fashion and modernity essay

Essay on Modern Fashion

Students are often asked to write an essay on Modern Fashion in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Modern Fashion

Introduction.

Modern fashion is a dynamic world that reflects the spirit of the times. It’s not just about clothing, but also about expressing one’s personality and values.

Fashion has evolved significantly over time. It has moved from being a privilege of the elite to being accessible to everyone, thanks to technological advancements.

Fashion is influenced by various factors like culture, media, celebrities, and even politics. It’s a way for people to communicate their identity and beliefs.

In conclusion, modern fashion is more than just clothes. It’s a form of self-expression and a mirror of society’s changes and trends.

250 Words Essay on Modern Fashion

Introduction to modern fashion.

Modern fashion, a dynamic and ever-evolving field, reflects societal changes and individual identities. As a form of self-expression, it serves as a mirror to the cultural, economic, and political shifts occurring globally.

Fashion as a Form of Self-Expression

In the modern era, fashion has become an avenue for personal storytelling. It’s no longer merely about following trends set by high-end designers. Instead, individuals curate their style, blending vintage and contemporary pieces, high-end and affordable items, to create a unique aesthetic that reflects their personality and values.

The Influence of Social Media

The advent of social media has greatly democratized fashion. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok allow users to showcase their style, influencing trends on a global scale. As a result, the power to dictate fashion has shifted from designers and models to everyday individuals and influencers.

Sustainability in Modern Fashion

In response to growing concerns about environmental and ethical issues, sustainable fashion is gaining prominence. This movement encourages the use of eco-friendly materials, ethical production processes, and a shift towards slow fashion – buying fewer, higher quality items that last longer.

Modern fashion is a complex blend of personal expression, social media influence, and growing sustainability consciousness. As we move forward, the industry will continue to evolve, reflecting the changing times and the diverse identities of those who engage with it. With its dynamic nature, fashion remains an exciting and influential aspect of modern culture.

500 Words Essay on Modern Fashion

Fashion is an ever-evolving phenomenon, a reflection of societal changes and individual expression. Modern fashion is a complex blend of aesthetics, functionality, and cultural influences, marking a departure from traditional norms and embracing diversity on a global scale.

The Evolution of Modern Fashion

The evolution of modern fashion is marked by a shift from conformity to individuality. In the early 20th century, fashion was largely dictated by social class and occasion. Today, however, fashion is more about personal style and comfort. The advent of fast fashion, while controversial, has democratized style, making it accessible to people of all socio-economic backgrounds.

Global Influences and Cultural Fusion

Modern fashion is a melting pot of global influences. Designers are increasingly drawing inspiration from different cultures, leading to a fusion of styles. This cultural exchange is not just about aesthetics, but also about fostering understanding and respect for diverse cultures. However, it’s crucial to navigate this space with sensitivity to avoid cultural appropriation.

Technology and Fashion

Technology has revolutionized modern fashion in numerous ways. From digital sketches and 3D printing to smart fabrics and wearable tech, the marriage of fashion and technology is reshaping the industry. Online shopping and social media have also transformed the way we discover and purchase fashion, making it a more interactive and personalized experience.

With growing awareness about environmental issues, sustainability has become a significant aspect of modern fashion. The industry is grappling with its environmental footprint, leading to a rise in ethical fashion brands and sustainable practices. Concepts like slow fashion and circular fashion are gaining traction, promoting longevity, recycling, and responsible consumption.

Representation and Inclusivity

Modern fashion is also marked by a push for greater representation and inclusivity. Body positivity and diversity are now front and center, challenging traditional beauty standards. Fashion brands are recognizing the need for designs that cater to all body types, ages, and races, signaling a shift towards a more inclusive industry.

Conclusion: The Future of Modern Fashion

As we move forward, the future of modern fashion lies in its ability to adapt and innovate. With challenges like climate change and social inequality, the industry needs to evolve sustainably and inclusively. Modern fashion is not just about what we wear, but also about the values we embody. As consumers, we have the power to shape these values and drive change, making fashion a powerful tool for social and environmental progress.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

• Essay on Mizoram
• Essay on Mirror
• Essay on Migration

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Fashion And Modernity Phenomenon

“Fashion is dress in which the key feature is rapid and continual changing of styles”. Wilson, E. 1985 Adorned in Dreams: Fashion and Modernity” London: Virago p. 3 How to ‘identity’ and ‘obsolescence’ contribute to this continual change? Illustrate your argument with reference to specific examples. Fashion today is one of the predominant cultural aspects of the Modern Society. We are consistently informed about its latest changes in the quality newspapers, on TV and even in films. Yet it is becoming more of a norm and not, as most of us think, creative.

Fashion nowadays is not one established trend; it’s the multitude of trends.

This has replaced the trend which until a few decades ago was the style introduced every fashion season. Therefore, fashion includes a broad range of possibilities now than it did in the first 6 or 7 decades of the last century or any of the past centuries. Whoever wants to be stylish abides by fashion. This causes continuous change.

Fashion represents distinctiveness and ephemera. The fact of the ephemera itself is fascinating. Fashion, by description, changes constantly. Since the 1980s and the growth of the global economy, there has been massive growth in the world fashion.

The biggest effect of globalization is on fashion, and the changing fashion trends are proof to the fact that the effect of globalization has significantly affected the fashion trends in the whole world. “Americanisation” is the nucleus of the global consumer society. It has become synonymous with commodification, the rationalising and material power of modernity and Westernisation.

Proficient in: Clothing

“ Thank you so much for accepting my assignment the night before it was due. I look forward to working with you moving forward ”

The influence of the United States of America on the cultures of other countries of the world is far more negative than positive. Consumers are constantly being manipulated by the foreign influence, which results in the loss of one’s own individuality.

History of Fashion

For centuries societies have used dress as a form of unspoken communication to show occupation, status and personality. What we wear and how and when we wear it provides others with information of a social situation as well. Even those who reject fashion are connected to it through their refusal. They refer to the current trends in order to break away from it. This is one example of conflicting nature of fashion with its constant changes of styles. These changes indicate reaction against what went before; although they may be self-contradictory too.

A Twenties flapper might wear a masculine sweater as to undermine the femininity of her bell-shaped skirt or in the 70s young women wore feminine lace blouse and unisex jeans. Sometimes this paradox appeared pointless. Ever changing, fashion produces only orthodoxy, as the sensation of the never-before-seen adapts to the moralistic principles of the society. “The nineteenth-century urban bourgeois, anxious to preserve their distance from the omnipresent gaze in the strangely inquisitive anonymity of the crowd where ‘anyone’ might see you, developed a discreet style of dress as a protection” (E.

wilson, 1985 p. 137) Fashion is a modern European occurrence, which is inseparable from capitalism in Europe. It is the progress of the bourgeois 19th century and the industrial revolution. Fashion can only flourish and become a mass event in an industrialized society with developed technology, sound aesthetic taste and uniqueness, as well as wealth. Because fashion is the opulence one must be able to pay for. ‘ Both haute couture and mass-production fashion were quick to adapt the youth cult to mainstream fashion. ‘ (E. wilson, 1985 p. 174).

Although today, in a time of mass production of cheap fashion for all, fashion becomes democratic. But this idea is misleading; even though everyone can be fashionable, fashion still plays the role of social distinction. But the decisive factor is not very emphasized; it shifted from the complete shape to details in preference in fabric and manufacturing. There are also factors such as the way of speaking and personal behavior that reflect social belonging. When dress was the only sign of status these factors weren’t as primary. Before fashion there was a traditional costume, or simply clothing. Clothing is the more broad term.

It stresses the functional roles, such as protection from cold, heat and other environmental factors. But costume did not only protect the human body, it decorated it too, which proves that the core role of fashion has always been to adorn human body. But the difference between fashion and clothing is that the clothing has a sound function. Whereas with fashion it is not enough; we need it to express ourselves to the visually obsessed society through the way we wear clothes, jewellery and body art. We need fashion because others approve it and we always change it because it becomes dull and stops to serve its purpose of being unique.

Cite this page

Fashion And Modernity Phenomenon. (2019, Dec 05). Retrieved from https://paperap.com/paper-on-fashion-and-modernity/

"Fashion And Modernity Phenomenon." PaperAp.com , 5 Dec 2019, https://paperap.com/paper-on-fashion-and-modernity/

PaperAp.com. (2019). Fashion And Modernity Phenomenon . [Online]. Available at: https://paperap.com/paper-on-fashion-and-modernity/ [Accessed: 3 Apr. 2024]

"Fashion And Modernity Phenomenon." PaperAp.com, Dec 05, 2019. Accessed April 3, 2024. https://paperap.com/paper-on-fashion-and-modernity/

"Fashion And Modernity Phenomenon," PaperAp.com , 05-Dec-2019. [Online]. Available: https://paperap.com/paper-on-fashion-and-modernity/. [Accessed: 3-Apr-2024]

PaperAp.com. (2019). Fashion And Modernity Phenomenon . [Online]. Available at: https://paperap.com/paper-on-fashion-and-modernity/ [Accessed: 3-Apr-2024]

• Scopic Regime Meaning and Modernity Pages: 5 (1478 words)
• Niccolò Machiavelli and His Concept of Modernity Pages: 8 (2107 words)
• Fashion It is Everywhere A Constantly Changing Art Form Fashion Pages: 4 (956 words)
• An Analysis of the Fake News Phenomenon and Why It Spreads So Quickly Pages: 3 (622 words)
• The Phenomenon Of Social Networks And Its Protagonist Pages: 2 (523 words)
• Reaction Paper About Social Phenomenon Pages: 2 (454 words)
• Is Globalisation A New Phenomenon Pages: 5 (1209 words)
• Statement of the Phenomenon of Interest Pages: 7 (1843 words)
• Rape Is a Very Common Phenomenon in India Pages: 7 (2037 words)
• The Pulfrich phenomenon Pages: 9 (2564 words)

Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History Essays

Impressionism: art and modernity.

Garden at Sainte-Adresse

Claude Monet

Porte de la Reine at Aigues-Mortes

Jean-Frédéric Bazille

La Grenouillère

The Bridge at Villeneuve-la-Garenne

Alfred Sisley

Edouard Manet

Madame Georges Charpentier (Marguérite-Louise Lemonnier, 1848–1904) and Her Children, Georgette-Berthe (1872–1945) and Paul-Émile-Charles (1875–1895)

Auguste Renoir

The Monet Family in Their Garden at Argenteuil

The Dance Class

Edgar Degas

Mademoiselle Bécat at the Café des Ambassadeurs, Paris

Côte des Grouettes, near Pontoise

Camille Pissarro

Mary Cassatt at the Louvre: The Etruscan Gallery

Allée of Chestnut Trees

Young Woman Seated on a Sofa

Berthe Morisot

Two Young Girls at the Piano

Dancers in the Rehearsal Room with a Double Bass

Young Girl Bathing

Young Woman Knitting

The Garden of the Tuileries on a Spring Morning

Margaret Samu Institute of Fine Arts, New York University

October 2004

In 1874, a group of artists called the Anonymous Society of Painters, Sculptors, Printmakers, etc. organized an exhibition in Paris that launched the movement called Impressionism. Its founding members included Claude Monet , Edgar Degas , and Camille Pissarro, among others. The group was unified only by its independence from the official annual Salon , for which a jury of artists from the Académie des Beaux-Arts selected artworks and awarded medals. The independent artists, despite their diverse approaches to painting, appeared to contemporaries as a group. While conservative critics panned their work for its unfinished, sketchlike appearance, more progressive writers praised it for its depiction of modern life. Edmond Duranty, for example, in his 1876 essay La Nouvelle Peinture (The New Painting), wrote of their depiction of contemporary subject matter in a suitably innovative style as a revolution in painting. The exhibiting collective avoided choosing a title that would imply a unified movement or school, although some of them subsequently adopted the name by which they would eventually be known, the Impressionists. Their work is recognized today for its modernity, embodied in its rejection of established styles, its incorporation of new technology and ideas, and its depiction of modern life.

Claude Monet’s Impression, Sunrise (Musée Marmottan Monet, Paris) exhibited in 1874, gave the Impressionist movement its name when the critic Louis Leroy accused it of being a sketch or “impression,” not a finished painting. It demonstrates the techniques many of the independent artists adopted: short, broken brushstrokes that barely convey forms, pure unblended colors, and an emphasis on the effects of light. Rather than neutral white, grays, and blacks, Impressionists often rendered shadows and highlights in color. The artists’ loose brushwork gives an effect of spontaneity and effortlessness that masks their often carefully constructed compositions, such as in Alfred Sisley’s 1878 Allée of Chestnut Trees ( 1975.1.211 ). This seemingly casual style became widely accepted, even in the official Salon, as the new language with which to depict modern life.

In addition to their radical technique, the bright colors of Impressionist canvases were shocking for eyes accustomed to the more sober colors of academic painting. Many of the independent artists chose not to apply the thick golden varnish that painters customarily used to tone down their works. The paints themselves were more vivid as well. The nineteenth century saw the development of synthetic pigments for artists’ paints, providing vibrant shades of blue, green, and yellow that painters had never used before. Édouard Manet’s 1874 Boating ( 29.100.115 ), for example, features an expanse of the new cerulean blue and synthetic ultramarine. Depicted in a radically cropped, Japanese-inspired composition , the fashionable boater and his companion embody modernity in their form, their subject matter, and the very materials used to paint them.

Such images of suburban and rural leisure outside of Paris were a popular subject for the Impressionists, notably Monet and Auguste Renoir . Several of them lived in the country for part or all of the year. New railway lines radiating out from the city made travel so convenient that Parisians virtually flooded into the countryside every weekend. While some of the Impressionists, such as Pissarro, focused on the daily life of local villagers in Pontoise, most preferred to depict the vacationers’ rural pastimes. The boating and bathing establishments that flourished in these regions became favorite motifs. In his 1869 La Grenouillère ( 29.100.112 ), for example, Monet’s characteristically loose painting style complements the leisure activities he portrays. Landscapes , which figure prominently in Impressionist art, were also brought up to date with innovative compositions, light effects, and use of color. Monet in particular emphasized the modernization of the landscape by including railways and factories, signs of encroaching industrialization that would have seemed inappropriate to the Barbizon artists of the previous generation.

Perhaps the prime site of modernity in the late nineteenth century was the city of Paris itself, renovated between 1853 and 1870 under Emperor Napoleon III. His prefect, Baron Haussmann, laid the plans, tearing down old buildings to create more open space for a cleaner, safer city. Also contributing to its new look was the Siege of Paris during the Franco-Prussian War (1870–71), which required reconstructing the parts of the city that had been destroyed. Impressionists such as Pissarro and Gustave Caillebotte enthusiastically painted the renovated city, employing their new style to depict its wide boulevards, public gardens, and grand buildings. While some focused on the cityscapes, others turned their sights to the city’s inhabitants. The Paris population explosion after the Franco-Prussian War gave them a tremendous amount of material for their scenes of urban life. Characteristic of these scenes was the mixing of social classes that took place in public settings. Degas and Caillebotte focused on working people, including singers and dancers , as well as workmen. Others, including Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt , depicted the privileged classes. The Impressionists also painted new forms of leisure, including theatrical entertainment (such as Cassatt’s 1878 In the Loge [Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]), cafés, popular concerts, and dances. Taking an approach similar to Naturalist writers such as Émile Zola, the painters of urban scenes depicted fleeting yet typical moments in the lives of characters they observed. Caillebotte’s 1877 Paris Street, Rainy Day (Art Institute, Chicago) exemplifies how these artists abandoned sentimental depictions and explicit narratives, adopting instead a detached, objective view that merely suggests what is going on.

The independent collective had a fluid membership over the course of the eight exhibitions it organized between 1874 and 1886, with the number of participating artists ranging from nine to thirty. Pissarro, the eldest, was the only artist who exhibited in all eight shows, while Morisot participated in seven. Ideas for an independent exhibition had been discussed as early as 1867, but the Franco-Prussian War intervened. The painter Frédéric Bazille, who had been leading the efforts, was killed in the war. Subsequent exhibitions were headed by different artists. Philosophical and political differences among the artists led to heated disputes and fractures, causing fluctuations in the contributors. The exhibitions even included the works of more conservative artists who simply refused to submit their work to the Salon jury. Also participating in the independent exhibitions were Paul Cézanne and Paul Gauguin , whose later styles grew out of their early work with the Impressionists.

The last of the independent exhibitions in 1886 also saw the beginning of a new phase in avant-garde painting. By this time, few of the participants were working in a recognizably Impressionist manner. Most of the core members were developing new, individual styles that caused ruptures in the group’s tenuous unity. Pissarro promoted the participation of Georges Seurat and Paul Signac, in addition to adopting their new technique based on points of pure color, known as Neo-Impressionism . The young Gauguin was making forays into Primitivism. The nascent Symbolist Odilon Redon also contributed, though his style was unlike that of any other participant. Because of the group’s stylistic and philosophical fragmentation, and because of the need for assured income, some of the core members such as Monet and Renoir exhibited in venues where their works were more likely to sell.

Its many facets and varied participants make the Impressionist movement difficult to define. Indeed, its life seems as fleeting as the light effects it sought to capture. Even so, Impressionism was a movement of enduring consequence, as its embrace of modernity made it the springboard for later avant-garde art in Europe.

Samu, Margaret. “Impressionism: Art and Modernity.” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History . New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/imml/hd_imml.htm (October 2004)

Further Reading

Bomford, David, et al. Art in the Making: Impressionism . Exhibition catalogue.. New Haven and London: National Gallery, 1990.

Herbert, Robert L. Impressionism: Art, Leisure, and Parisian Society . New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.

House, John. Monet: Nature into Art . New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.

Moffett, Charles S., et al. The New Painting: Impressionism 1874–1886 . San Francisco: Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, 1986.

Nochlin, Linda, ed. Impressionism and Post-Impressionism, 1874–1904: Sources and Documents . Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1966.

Rewald, John. The History of Impressionism . Rev. and enl. ed. . New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1961.

Tinterow, Gary, and Henri Loyrette. Origins of Impressionism . Exhibition catalogue.. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1994. See on MetPublications

Related Essays

• Claude Monet (1840–1926)
• Edgar Degas (1834–1917): Painting and Drawing
• Édouard Manet (1832–1883)
• Mary Stevenson Cassatt (1844–1926)
• African Influences in Modern Art
• American Impressionism
• American Scenes of Everyday Life, 1840–1910
• Americans in Paris, 1860–1900
• Auguste Renoir (1841–1919)
• Auguste Rodin (1840–1917)
• Edgar Degas (1834–1917): Bronze Sculpture
• Georges Seurat (1859–1891) and Neo-Impressionism
• Henri Matisse (1869–1954)
• Nineteenth-Century French Realism
• Orientalism in Nineteenth-Century Art
• Paul Gauguin (1848–1903)
• France, 1800–1900 A.D.
• Great Britain and Ireland, 1800–1900 A.D.
• The United States and Canada, 1800–1900 A.D.
• 19th Century A.D.
• Academic Painting
• Arboreal Landscape
• Architecture
• Barbizon School
• French Literature / Poetry
• Great Britain and Ireland
• Impressionism
• Literature / Poetry
• Neo-Impressionism
• Oil on Canvas
• Post-Impressionism
• Primitivism
• Women Artists

Artist or Maker

• Bazille, Jean-Frédéric
• Cassatt, Mary
• Cézanne, Paul
• Degas, Edgar
• Gauguin, Paul
• Manet, Édouard
• Monet, Claude
• Morisot, Berthe
• Pissarro, Camille
• Redon, Odilon
• Renoir, Auguste
• Sisley, Alfred
• Sorolla y Bastida, Joaquin

Online Features

• The Artist Project: “George Condo on Claude Monet’s The Path through the Irises “

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Modern Fashion Traditions: Introduction

2016, Modern Fashion Traditions

The aim of this volume, Modern Fashion Traditions, is to disrupt a persistent euro- and ethnocentricity in fashion discourse by bringing together research by authors who are engaged in creative and critical thinking concerning fashion, in a wide scope of geographical areas, from a wide variety of disciplines, and from a cross-cultural perspective. The key premise is that fashion in a non-Western context is not a mere adoption of a European phenomenon or a recent outcome of globalization. Non-Western fashion has its own historical and socio-cultural relevance. To this end, the objectives of this volume are: * to disrupt persistent euro- and ethnocentric academic practice in fashion studies by challenging simple, linear, oppositional, and essentialist thinking, resulting in false dichotomies like tradition versus modernity, dress versus fashion, West versus Non-West, local versus global, etc. * to contest the idea that fashion outside of Europe and North America is a recent phenomenon and/or a result of globalization. * to acknowledge that different fashion systems have been, and are, located all around the world, and that these have been developing in conjunction, competition, collaboration, and independently from the European fashion system. * to not only dispute misassumptions concerning non-European fashion as being static, authentic and symbolic, but also concerning European fashion as being arbitrary, innovative, and, most importantly, detached from its cultural context. * to provide a platform for developing alternative, inclusive theoretical frameworks to analyze fashion from a global perspective, and to establish new terminology that surpasses current Eurocentric discourse in relation to fashion.

Related Papers

Maria Angela Jansen

The emerging sub-discipline of fashion anthropology is far from established despite its significant potential to contribute to rectifying some of the most obstinate misunderstandings in current fashion scholarship as a result of ethno- and euro- centric academic practice. One important potential, for example, lays in its ability to contest some prevailing false assumptions concerning both traditional and fashionable dress associated respectively with the non-West and West. It not only disputes misassumptions concerning so-called traditional dress as being merely static, authentic and symbolic rather than aesthetic, but also concerning fashion as being purely dynamic, innovative, aesthetic rather than symbolic, cosmopolitan and, most importantly, detached from its cultural heritage. This false dichotomy is predominantly the result of a disciplinary divide between the anthropology of dress and fashion studies, which has led to obsolete interpretations of key concepts like tradition, modernity, local, global, western and non-western. By combining the core principles and research techniques of anthropology with the key scholarship of fashion studies, fashion anthropology has the potential to rectify the misconception that fashion is a European/western invention and phenomenon. By emphasizing a true global perspective through cross-cultural comparisons based on extensive field research, it can contribute significantly to a new, all-inclusive, definition of fashion that acknowledges a wide scope of fashion systems across the globe. Contrary to fashion studies, which are based on European costume history, fashion anthropology has a central role to play in rectifying the misunderstanding that fashion was solemnly introduced in the so-called non-West by European encounter, denying local fashion histories altogether. On the contrary, fashion anthropology focuses on fashion as highly linked to context-specific cultural, historical, economic, political and religious developments in all parts of the world rather than a mere cultural appropriation from the West through recent processes of globalization. Because fashion anthropology is a developing sub-discipline, little is know about it and therefore the principal aim of this paper is to identify the core aspects of fashion anthropology, its principal methodology as well as the high potentials it entails for both dress and fashion studies.

International Journal of Fashion Studies

Nazli Alimen

Jennifer Craik

şakir özüdoğru

Even though in classical texts of fashion theory written by Simmel, Veblen, Flügel, and Laver, fashion had been defined as a phenomenon occurred in Europe by virtue of Western expansionism and capitalism and separated to the rest of the world from there; a branch of fashion scholars including Eicher, Craik, Kaiser, and Jansen has started to interrogate Eurocentric fashion view since the 1990s. The definition of fashion as the site of newness started to investigate these questions: how was the fashionable/traditional dress dichotomy created? Is there other fashion system separated from Europe? What do we mean with terms ‘fashion’, ‘dress’, and ‘costume’? Moreover, in such a globalized world, is it possible to persist western dominance on fashion system/s? In this study, my aim is to introduce prominent ideas of fashion scholars that focus on interrogating Eurocentric fashion view and to handle the fashion phenomenon in our days under the frame of globalization and hybridization.

There continues to prevail a false dichotomy in current fashion scholarship between so-called static traditional dress associated with the non-West and dynamic modern fashion associated with the West. This dichotomy is especially the result of a largely artificial disciplinary separation between the anthropology of dress and fashion theory on the one hand and a Eurocentric hegemonic fashion discourse on the other hand, that aims to preserve the boundary between the West/Rest and as such, to both protect its position of power and ensure the maintenance of a conceptual Other on which to rely for self-definitional purposes (Niessen 2003). This paper is part of an ongoing cross-regional interdisciplinary comparative research project that aims to contest this dichotomy through comparing western with non-western case-studies from a dynamic non-Eurocentric point of view, focussing rather on similarities and intersectionalities than oppositions, using a combination of anthropology of dress, fashion theory and cultural studies discourses. The research’s main hypothesis is that cultural anxiety, as a main stimulator for an endless and repetitive cycle of change (Davis 1992, Kaiser 2012), is the principal common constituent of both traditional and fashionable dress. The research argues that both clothing styles are equally used in a continuous invention and construction of national narratives that inevitably and constantly relate to global issues of identity, production and consumption (Paulicilli and Clark 2009). It argues that national fashion identities have more to do with categorical thinking—the drive to classify and compare in order to develop a sense of identity–—than with distinguishable cultures or characteristics (Kaiser 2012). In the same way that cultures have become brands and cities have become logos, national fashion identities have become ideologies, e.g. conscious or unconscious beliefs, attitudes, habits, feelings and assumptions (Kawamura 2004).

Markets, Globalization & Development Review

zeynep ertekin

Epistemology and Transformation of Knowledge in Global Age

Anna-Mari Almila

This chapter addresses the increasingly complex question of the nature of fashion in a globalized world. While it is strikingly obvious that fashion is a global and globalized phenomenon, its specific character, and indeed geographical locations and origins, remain contested. Drawing inspiration from the Greek historian Polybius, and his ideas of ecumenical analytical approach to studying world-wide phenomena, we discuss the current state of fashion studies in what we consider an ecumenical moment, holding many opportunities for the field. In order to lay out the roots of current debates on such matters, we review the history of fashion studies from the mid‐19th century through to today, drawing attention to both the ontological assumptions and the epistemological and methodological dilemmas that have shaped the field, and that in some ways continue to do so today. We finish with some suggestions as to what the future may hold for the field if the ecumenical promise of global fashion research is truly realized.

Zone Moda Journal

Wessie Ling

Ling, Wessie, Lorusso, Mariella, Segre Reinach, Simona (2019) Critical Studies in Global Fashion, in eds. Wessie Ling, Mariella Lorusso, Simona Segre Reinach, Global Fashion, Zone Moda Journal, 9(2), pp. V-XVI.

Michaela Malíčková

In accordance with Gilles Lipovetsky (2002), this paper explores fashion, its current form and functions, as a consequence of the development of the modern Western world. Although the author points out different possibilities for the discursive reading of fashion in the cultural space, emphasis is put on the discourse led by the rise of an individualized subject, which is a symptom of modern democratic societies. Within this frame, fashion is a proof of individualistic tendencies and autonomous subjectivity, which enable it to function as an important tool of self-expression for both the individual and diverse social communities. In this context, fashion clothes – functioning as a costume – claim authenticity as well as other qualities that strengthen the differentiating possibilities as well as capabilities on the axis me/us, he/you, own/ other. Moreover, the language of fashion has been influenced by globalization in recent decades, which encourages the emergence of culturally lay...

Sarah Cheang

RELATED PAPERS

Tommaso Borgogelli

International Journal of …

zakiya hujan

Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis

Bahtiar Effendi

Angelica Gomez Cruz

Molecular BioSystems

Tania Fiaschi

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Hari Setiadi

Journal of Renal Endocrinology

Altayyeb Yousef

Takashi Suzuki

The Journal of Nutrition

Cirugía Española

Rafael Calpena Rico

Julio Przybylski

Fabio Bandini

Laszlo Csetenyi

Journal of Palliative Medicine

leslie martinez

Md.sakinul Islam

Crop Science

Ricardo Ruiz

Investigação Qualitativa em Saúde: Avanços e Desafios | Investigación Cualitativa en Salud: Avances y Desafíos

Carmen Lúcia Albuquerque de Santana

Molecular Simulation

Christina Chan

Media Kesehatan Gigi : Politeknik Kesehatan Makassar

Muhammad Saleh

American review of mathematics and statistics

Franco Fineschi

THOURAYA TURKI

Journal of surgery and medicine

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Muhammad Saqib ul haq

Helen Gonçalves

Case reports in oncology

Cori McMahon

See More Documents Like This

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Essay on Fashion for Students and Children

500+ words essay on fashion.

Fashion refers to anything that becomes a rage among the masses. Fashion is a popular aesthetic expression. Most Noteworthy, it is something that is in vogue. Fashion appears in clothing, footwear, accessories, makeup, hairstyles, lifestyle, and body proportions. Furthermore, Fashion is an industry-supported expression. In the contemporary world, people take fashion very seriously. Fashion is something that has permeated every aspect of human culture.

History of Fashion

The origin of Fashion is from the year 1826. Probably everyone believes Charles Frederick to be the first fashion designer of the world. He also established the first Fashion house in Paris. Consequently, he began the tradition of Fashion houses. Furthermore, he gave advice to customers on what clothing would suit them. He was prominent form 1826 to 1895.

During this period, many design houses hired artists. Furthermore, the job of these artists was to develop innovative designs for garments. The clients would examine many different patterns. Then they would pick the one they like. Consequently, a tradition began of presenting patterns to customers and then stitching them.

At the beginning of the 20th century, new developments in Fashion took place. These developments certainly began in Paris first. Then they spread in other parts of the world. Consequently, new designs first came into existence in France. From Paris, they went to other parts of the world. Hence, Paris became the Fashion capital of the world. Also, Fashion in this era was ‘haute couture’. This Fashion design was exclusively for individuals.

In the mid-20th century, a change took place. Now Fashion garments underwent mass production. There was a significant increase in the rate of production of Fashion garments. As a result, more and more people became involved with Fashion garments. By the end of the 20th century, a sense of Fashion awareness was very strong. Now people began to choose clothes based on their own style preference. Hence, people began to create their own trends instead of relying on existing trends.

Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas

Fashion Trend

Political influences certainly play a major role in influencing Fashion. Many politicians become fashion symbols. Notable examples are First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy and Princess Diana. Also, political revolutions make a huge impact on the Fashion trend. For example, in 1960’s America, liberal clothing styles became popular among the younger generation. This was due to the Liberal revolution.

Another significant factor which influences Fashion trend is technology. There certainly has been a rapid growth of technology in the Fashion industry. For example, wearable technology has become a popular Fashion trend. Furthermore, 3D printing technology and the internet have also made an impact on Fashion.

Social influences are probably the strongest influences on the Fashion trend. Many music stars strongly influence Fashion choice. For example, wearing hoodies became famous due to rap musicians. Furthermore, movie and television actors create a big impact on Fashion. Many youngsters love to emulate the Fashion sense of their favourite celebrity.

To sum it up, Fashion certainly has become a part and parcel of human life. It certainly is a force that is here to stay. Most noteworthy, Fashion has immersed every place on Earth.

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

• Travelling Essay
• Picnic Essay
• Our Country Essay
• My Parents Essay
• Essay on Favourite Personality
• Essay on Memorable Day of My Life
• Essay on Knowledge is Power
• Essay on Gurpurab
• Essay on My Favourite Season
• Essay on Types of Sports

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download the App

Advertisement

Supported by

What ‘KateGate’ Says About Royalty, Celebrity and Internet Culture

Many Americans used to view the Windsors with excitement, even admiration, beyond that shown to other public figures. Are they basically Kardashians now?

• Share full article

By Elizabeth Paton

Reporting from London

Once upon a time, the British monarchy exerted a unique hold over the imaginations of millions of Americans, an interest that elevated its crown-bearing figureheads above the average A-lister or Hollywood elite.

Lately, however, a succession of births, deaths and marriages in the royal family, and several high-profile scandals, have collided with the rise of an internet culture evermore obsessed with celebrity . The monthslong frenzy over the whereabouts of Catherine, Princess of Wales — culminating in a televised statement on Friday in which she revealed she was battling cancer — reflects a fundamental shift in the sentiment of a growing faction of the public: that the Windsors are like any other celebrity family in the public eye, and that they deserve to be treated as such.

The online maelstrom that fueled KateGate came largely from outside Britain — and especially from across the Atlantic. It exploded thanks to a 24-hour news cycle, a boom in conspiracy theories and rabid social media punditry, as millions of users sought clicks and a boost in followers with increasingly provocative posts.

“Everyone is watching a different thread on their phone, following a different theory or even becoming an armchair expert or sleuth broadcasting about the royals from their living room,” Wendy Naugle, the editor in chief of People magazine, said last week.

These days, many of Ms. Naugle’s American readers follow every update about the British royals as they would other celebrities — “for the outfits and family drama,” she said. And while millions of people wanted only to offer well wishes to the princess, the criticism, mockery and expectation that interested parties should be given boundless information about her reached levels rarely seen before.

Matters were not helped by an edited photo released by Kensington Palace on Mother’s Day that fed speculation that Princess Catherine was missing, dying, using a body double or seeking a divorce. TMZ footage of the princess in a car with her mother, Carole Middleton, was published widely in the United States. Thousands of posts and reposts asked whether, given the angle of her face, it was even her.

“The moment grew far beyond the corners of social media into the mainstream media and the national conversation in America,” Elizabeth Holmes, a journalist and royal expert in Los Angeles, said last week, before Catherine’s statement was aired. New ground was broken by outlets and individuals with audiences of millions in terms of what they said publicly about royals. Certainly any expectation that a family in the public eye could maintain three months of silence was shown to be unrealistic.

A more brazen and derisive tone toward the royal family, which echoes a similar shift in attitude toward establishment positions like the American presidency, extended to the well-oiled cogs of the United States entertainment machine. On “ The Late Show With Stephen Colbert ,” Mr. Colbert suggested that Princess Catherine’s “disappearance” was linked to Prince William’s alleged extramarital affairs, to hoots from the audience. A constellation of celebrities, including Kim Kardashian and Blake Lively, posted jokes on Instagram about her absence from public life. (Ms. Lively apologized after her cancer diagnosis came to light.) The British tabloid press, notorious for hounding royals and celebrities but who have shown restraint in recent weeks, have openly accused the United States and its media of intensifying the frenzied rumor mill.

The Windsors have long held an outsize role in the imaginations and interests of Americans. A war may have been fought to escape British rule, but Queen Elizabeth II , Princess Diana and, more recently, Princess Catherine were by and large adored. The centuries-old pageantry, palaces and traditions associated with the House of Windsor may be tinged with tyranny and imperialism, but they remain a subject of enduring fixation across the Atlantic, as shown by the 33 million Americans who watched Princess Diana’s funeral in 1997 and the 29 million who woke up at the crack of dawn to watch Meghan Markle marry Prince Harry 21 years later.

“People of all ages and backgrounds still take the British royal family very seriously,” Sally Bedell Smith, the journalist and serial royal biographer, said of its American fan base, dismissing any suggestion that they are seen as a British version of a reality television family like, say, the Kardashians. “They are interested in their lives and their history and they respect their work.”

But there has always been detachment in the American attitude toward the British royals, which holds fascination and curiosity but has evolved for some to include resentment and even ridicule. The Windsors are not funded by American taxpayer dollars. Nor are they deeply woven into the fabric of American society as they are in Britain, where in recent weeks public consensus on the royals, which resists easy interpretation and remains tied up with centuries of tradition, was to leave the princess alone.

American interest in the royals waned after the death of Queen Elizabeth II, especially among older generations. King Charles III, who recently underwent cancer treatment , has yet to inspire the same degree of affection. But the marriage of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex created a younger fan base in the United States, many of whom began to feel negatively toward the royal family following the fracturing of relations between the Sussexes and the palace . The couple’s subsequent relocation to California, Prince Harry’s autobiography and a tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey have married the conventions of a royal title with the business of modern celebrity with products to sell and a more commercialized relationship with fans.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex wished Catherine “health and healing” in a statement on Friday. But many of the Sussexes’ followers continue to be vocal contributors to online conversation around the Princess of Wales, comparing the treatment of the Duchess of Sussex and the Princess of Wales by the faceless “palace,” as well as what modern royalty should look like.

“Queen Elizabeth was famously private and people accepted that for a woman of her generation,” Ms. Naugle said. “Now Meghan and Harry have prompted some people in younger generations to question the true costs of the monarchy. They want transparency and expect authenticity.”

The same could be said of Hollywood celebrities and reality television stars, though many of them arguably have more control over the information they share about their lives. Or they employ experienced communications handlers with a strong sense of how to navigate the sometimes savage cycles and spirals of 21st-century media. But royals, crucially, aren’t supposed to disappear from sight. As Queen Elizabeth II is rumored to have said, she and her family had to be seen to be believed. That means providing a steady stream of photos for public consumption , be it in moments of celebration — or profound crisis.

Since Catherine’s statement on Friday, there has been a global outpouring of well wishes — and contrition — and backlash toward those showing contrition. But the more outlandish theories have continued, with some social media users believing her latest video was either fake or generated by A.I. On Monday, The Telegraph reported another factor amplifying certain conspiracy theories: disinformation spread by hostile states like China, Russia and Iran.

Others continue to rail against what they perceive as a botched communications job by palace executives and say that her cancer diagnosis should have been unveiled sooner. Few choose to believe Catherine has had any authority or agency in the handling of the matter as she and her family processed her news, even though this is what she stated from a garden of daffodils as she asked for privacy while she underwent chemotherapy.

“People fill silence with their own noise,” Ms. Holmes said last week.

Elizabeth Paton reports on the global fashion industry for The Times, a topic she has covered for more than a decade. She is based in London. More about Elizabeth Paton

Shop theFashionSpot's Top Picks From Christian Dior's Spring 2024 Collection

W elcome back to theFashionSpot’s shopping series, where we shine a spotlight upon our top picks from the Spring 2024 collections of just about every major fashion house.

You’ve already shopped our selections from Louis Vuitton , Versace , Saint Laurent , Prada and we’ve got Christian Dior up next. Unveiled during Paris Fashion Week back in September 2023, Maria Grazia Chiuri’s latest Dior collection packed a feminist punch. Models walked the bold and graphic set as an immersive video installation by Italian artist Elena Bellantoni adorned the walls of the show space, roaming the set and donning a mostly-black collection in which Wednesday Adams would simply adore.

From an ultra-chic short-sleeved jacket in black and white houndstooth (and matching skirt) to a pair of timeless slingback pumps and a large Dior Toujour bag fully embroidered with black textured tweed to a must-have belt in black smooth calfskin – scroll further for theFashionSpot’s top picks from Christian Dior’s Spring 2024 collection:

#1 Mini Dior Jolie Top Handle Bag:

The Dior Jolie Top Handle bag presents an elegant and functional design. It is crafted in black calfskin with Cannage stitching and features a double flap enhanced by a CD signature embellished with a white resin pearl, as well as three compartments and a zip pocket to accommodate all the essentials, day or evening. The removable top handle is completed by a detachable chain strap with a leather insert and CD signature links embellished with white resin pearls, allowing the miniature bag to be comfortably carried by hand, worn over the shoulder or crossbody ( $4900.00 ).

#2 Short-Sleeved Jacket:

The jacket is adorned with a timeless white and black houndstooth motif. Crafted in a technical knit, it offers a regular fit and cropped silhouette embellished with the Christian Dior signature on the back. The short-sleeved jacket can be paired with the matching skirt to complete the look ( $2900.00 ).

#3 Miniskirt:

The miniskirt features a timeless white and black houndstooth motif. Crafted in technical knit, it has a slightly flared silhouette embellished by a Christian Dior signature on the back ( $2300.00 ).

#4 Adiorable Pump:

The Adiorable pump is modern and elegant. The black fringed grosgrain upper showcases an unstructured bow on the front embellished with a CD signature white resin pearl. Completed by an 8-cm (3) heel and pointed toe, the pump will lend a refined touch to any of the season’s looks ( $1090.00 ).

#5 30 Montaigne Jolie Belt:

The 30 Montaigne Jolie belt is a refined and delicate creation. Made from black smooth calfskin, it features a CD buckle in shiny gold-finish metal adorned with a white resin pearl at the center. The modern yet timeless belt will add a touch of elegance to a Bar Jacket, dress or jeans ( $650.00 ).

#6 Medium Dior Tribales New Look Earrings:

Unveiled during the Spring 2024 show, the Dior Tribales New Look earrings add to the iconic line with a bold and modern design. The graphic, gold-finish metal hoop is engraved with the CD signature on both sides and displays the emblematic white resin pearls on the bottom. The medium earrings will lend a couture touch to any look and can be coordinated with other creations from the Dior Tribales New Look line ( $540.00 ).

#7 Marinière Sweater with Sailor Collar & Bow:

The Dior Marinière sweater is at once timeless and contemporary. Crafted in navy blue and white cotton knit, it is enhanced by a contrasting sailor collar with a bow, further embellished with a Christian Dior signature band. Gold-tone anchor buttons adorn the cuffs, and ribbed detailing on the hem and cuffs complete the design. The sweater can be coordinated with one of the season’s mid-length skirts for a hallmark silhouette ( $1800.00 ).

#8 Flared Denim Miniskirt:

The miniskirt is a modern and laidback design with practical front and back pockets. Crafted in blue cotton denim with a stonewashed effect, it features a slightly flared silhouette, embellished with a Christian Dior signature jacron label. The miniskirt can be paired with a blouse from the collection to complete the look ( $1150.00 ).

#9 Diorstar Hobo Bag with Chain:

The Diorstar hobo bag with chain has a practical, modern look. Crafted in blue Dior Oblique jacquard, it features a supple silhouette and spacious compartment. Its design is enhanced by a zip closure embellished with a medallion engraved with the Christian Dior Paris signature and a star, the House’s flagship symbol, while discreet CD studs adorn the sides. The interior is lined with suede calfskin and includes card slots. A leather insert on the adjustable CD chain link shoulder strap allows the bag to be worn comfortably over the shoulder ( $2450.00 ).

#10 30Montaigne B5U Sunglasses:

The 30Montaigne B5U sunglasses enhance the line with a sleek low butterfly shape and urban elegance. The black acetate frame is embellished with a functional CD hinge in gold-finish metal. Completed by gray lenses, the style will lend a couture touch to any look ( $560.00 ).

#11 Macrocannage Jacket:

Combining modernity and elegance, the jacket features the signature Macrocannage motif. Crafted in black and white technical cotton tweed with a textured effect, it features a cropped, straight silhouette that is distinguished by black CD signature buttons and patch pockets at the waist. The jacket will pair well with the matching skirt to complete the look ( $3400.00 ).

#12 Macrocannage Flared Miniskirt:

The Macrocannage miniskirt revisits a signature House motif. Crafted in black and white technical cotton knit with a textured effect, its flared silhouette combines elegance and modernity. The refined skirt can be paired with an asymmetric shirt for a couture look ( $1550.00 ).

#13 J’Adior Slingback Pump:

The J’Adior slingback pump is a prime example of Dior’s savoir-faire and is elegantly crafted in timeless black and white houndstooth tweed. The two-tone J’Adior signature on the embroidered cotton ribbon, bow and 6.5-cm (2.5) comma heel complete the refined and sophisticated design ( $1150.00 ).

#14 Medium Lady Dior Bag:

The Lady Dior bag embodies Dior’s vision of elegance and beauty. The refined, timeless style is made in black crinkled calfskin with Cannage stitching, creating an instantly recognizable quilted texture. Ultra-matte metal D.I.O.R. charms offer a modern touch. Featuring a thin, removable leather shoulder strap, the medium Lady Dior bag can be carried by hand or worn crossbody ( $6500.00 ).

#15 Dior Marinière Twinset:

The Dior Marinière twinset is at once timeless and contemporary. Crafted in white and navy blue cotton knit, it consists of a long-sleeved cardigan fastened with anchor buttons, and a sleeveless round neck top. Both pieces are embellished with hand-fringed detailing on the cuffs and hem. The twinset can be paired with a pencil skirt from the collection for a signature look ( $2150.00 ).

#16 Dior 8 Flared Jeans, D04:

The denim pants are from the Dior 8 capsule collection and are distinguished by an elegant flared silhouette with patch pockets. Crafted in blue stonewashed cotton denim, they feature a Christian Dior jacron label on the back that is enhanced by two horizontal bands and the style number, D04. The jeans will complete any casual look ( $1650.00 ).

#17 Dior Ballet Flat:

The Dior Ballet flat revisits a timeless pattern with elements of House couture. Crafted in white quilted calfskin with the Cannage motif, it is distinguished by a delicate grosgrain bow on the front adorned with a white CD resin pearl inspired by the iconic Dior Tribales earrings. Featuring a padded leather insole, the supple, comfortable ballet flat will add the finishing touch to all of the season’s looks ( $980.00 ).

#18 Macrocannage Short Dress:

The short dress revisits the signature Macrocannage motif in a modern and feminine design. Crafted in technical cotton tweed with a black and white textured effect, it features a trapeze silhouette and grosgrain shoulder straps. The dress can be paired with other Macrocannage creations to complete the look ( $3200.00 ).

#19 Dior Tribales Earrings:

The Dior Tribales earrings offer an elegant and sophisticated take on the iconic House style. Hallmark white resin pearls are embellished with the gold-finish metal CD signature displaying a white resin pearl at its center. Modern yet timeless, the earrings can be styled with creations from the 30 Montaigne Jolie line ( $580.00 ).

#20 Large Dior Toujours Bag:

The Dior Toujours bag is distinguished by a casual and practical design. Fully embroidered with black textured tweed, it is accented by a blend of threads displaying the Cannage motif. It showcases a spacious interior compartment with a matching pouch to organize the essentials, while a leather strap closure keeps items secure and the D of the CD Lock clasp twists to adjust the sides and enhance the bag’s silhouette. The leather handles can be adjusted using the small notches in order to be able to carry the large bag by hand or wear it over the shoulder ( $4200.00 ).

The post Shop theFashionSpot’s Top Picks From Christian Dior’s Spring 2024 Collection appeared first on theFashionSpot .

This article may contain affiliate links that Microsoft and/or the publisher may receive a commission from if you buy a product or service through those links.