Show that you understand the current state of research on your topic.
The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your work.
One trick to get started is to think of your proposal’s structure as a shorter version of your thesis or dissertation , only without the results , conclusion and discussion sections.
Download our research proposal template
Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We’ve included a few for you below.
Like your dissertation or thesis, the proposal will usually have a title page that includes:
The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.
Your introduction should:
To guide your introduction , include information about:
As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.
In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:
Following the literature review, restate your main objectives . This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.
? or ? , , or research design? | |
, )? ? | |
, , , )? | |
? |
To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasise again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.
For example, your results might have implications for:
Last but not least, your research proposal must include correct citations for every source you have used, compiled in a reference list . To create citations quickly and easily, you can use our free APA citation generator .
Some institutions or funders require a detailed timeline of the project, asking you to forecast what you will do at each stage and how long it may take. While not always required, be sure to check the requirements of your project.
Here’s an example schedule to help you get started. You can also download a template at the button below.
Download our research schedule template
Research phase | Objectives | Deadline |
---|---|---|
1. Background research and literature review | 20th January | |
2. Research design planning | and data analysis methods | 13th February |
3. Data collection and preparation | with selected participants and code interviews | 24th March |
4. Data analysis | of interview transcripts | 22nd April |
5. Writing | 17th June | |
6. Revision | final work | 28th July |
If you are applying for research funding, chances are you will have to include a detailed budget. This shows your estimates of how much each part of your project will cost.
Make sure to check what type of costs the funding body will agree to cover. For each item, include:
To determine your budget, think about:
Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement.
Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.
I will compare …
A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.
Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.
A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge.
A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector.
A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers.
All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career.
Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.
Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.
McCombes, S. & George, T. (2023, June 13). How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved 5 July 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/the-research-process/research-proposal-explained/
Other students also liked, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, what is a literature review | guide, template, & examples, how to write a results section | tips & examples.
Chris Drew (PhD)
Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]
Learn about our Editorial Process
A research proposal systematically and transparently outlines a proposed research project.
The purpose of a research proposal is to demonstrate a project’s viability and the researcher’s preparedness to conduct an academic study. It serves as a roadmap for the researcher.
The process holds value both externally (for accountability purposes and often as a requirement for a grant application) and intrinsic value (for helping the researcher to clarify the mechanics, purpose, and potential signficance of the study).
Key sections of a research proposal include: the title, abstract, introduction, literature review, research design and methods, timeline, budget, outcomes and implications, references, and appendix. Each is briefly explained below.
Watch my Guide: How to Write a Research Proposal
Get your Template for Writing your Research Proposal Here (With AI Prompts!)
Title: The title should present a concise and descriptive statement that clearly conveys the core idea of the research projects. Make it as specific as possible. The reader should immediately be able to grasp the core idea of the intended research project. Often, the title is left too vague and does not help give an understanding of what exactly the study looks at.
Abstract: Abstracts are usually around 250-300 words and provide an overview of what is to follow – including the research problem , objectives, methods, expected outcomes, and significance of the study. Use it as a roadmap and ensure that, if the abstract is the only thing someone reads, they’ll get a good fly-by of what will be discussed in the peice.
Introduction: Introductions are all about contextualization. They often set the background information with a statement of the problem. At the end of the introduction, the reader should understand what the rationale for the study truly is. I like to see the research questions or hypotheses included in the introduction and I like to get a good understanding of what the significance of the research will be. It’s often easiest to write the introduction last
Literature Review: The literature review dives deep into the existing literature on the topic, demosntrating your thorough understanding of the existing literature including themes, strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in the literature. It serves both to demonstrate your knowledge of the field and, to demonstrate how the proposed study will fit alongside the literature on the topic. A good literature review concludes by clearly demonstrating how your research will contribute something new and innovative to the conversation in the literature.
Research Design and Methods: This section needs to clearly demonstrate how the data will be gathered and analyzed in a systematic and academically sound manner. Here, you need to demonstrate that the conclusions of your research will be both valid and reliable. Common points discussed in the research design and methods section include highlighting the research paradigm, methodologies, intended population or sample to be studied, data collection techniques, and data analysis procedures . Toward the end of this section, you are encouraged to also address ethical considerations and limitations of the research process , but also to explain why you chose your research design and how you are mitigating the identified risks and limitations.
Timeline: Provide an outline of the anticipated timeline for the study. Break it down into its various stages (including data collection, data analysis, and report writing). The goal of this section is firstly to establish a reasonable breakdown of steps for you to follow and secondly to demonstrate to the assessors that your project is practicable and feasible.
Budget: Estimate the costs associated with the research project and include evidence for your estimations. Typical costs include staffing costs, equipment, travel, and data collection tools. When applying for a scholarship, the budget should demonstrate that you are being responsible with your expensive and that your funding application is reasonable.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: A discussion of the anticipated findings or results of the research, as well as the potential contributions to the existing knowledge, theory, or practice in the field. This section should also address the potential impact of the research on relevant stakeholders and any broader implications for policy or practice.
References: A complete list of all the sources cited in the research proposal, formatted according to the required citation style. This demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with the relevant literature and ensures proper attribution of ideas and information.
Appendices (if applicable): Any additional materials, such as questionnaires, interview guides, or consent forms, that provide further information or support for the research proposal. These materials should be included as appendices at the end of the document.
Research proposals often extend anywhere between 2,000 and 15,000 words in length. The following snippets are samples designed to briefly demonstrate what might be discussed in each section.
See some real sample pieces:
Consider this hypothetical education research proposal:
The Impact of Game-Based Learning on Student Engagement and Academic Performance in Middle School Mathematics
Abstract: The proposed study will explore multiplayer game-based learning techniques in middle school mathematics curricula and their effects on student engagement. The study aims to contribute to the current literature on game-based learning by examining the effects of multiplayer gaming in learning.
Introduction: Digital game-based learning has long been shunned within mathematics education for fears that it may distract students or lower the academic integrity of the classrooms. However, there is emerging evidence that digital games in math have emerging benefits not only for engagement but also academic skill development. Contributing to this discourse, this study seeks to explore the potential benefits of multiplayer digital game-based learning by examining its impact on middle school students’ engagement and academic performance in a mathematics class.
Literature Review: The literature review has identified gaps in the current knowledge, namely, while game-based learning has been extensively explored, the role of multiplayer games in supporting learning has not been studied.
Research Design and Methods: This study will employ a mixed-methods research design based upon action research in the classroom. A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group design will first be used to compare the academic performance and engagement of middle school students exposed to game-based learning techniques with those in a control group receiving instruction without the aid of technology. Students will also be observed and interviewed in regard to the effect of communication and collaboration during gameplay on their learning.
Timeline: The study will take place across the second term of the school year with a pre-test taking place on the first day of the term and the post-test taking place on Wednesday in Week 10.
Budget: The key budgetary requirements will be the technologies required, including the subscription cost for the identified games and computers.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: It is expected that the findings will contribute to the current literature on game-based learning and inform educational practices, providing educators and policymakers with insights into how to better support student achievement in mathematics.
See some real examples:
Consider this hypothetical psychology research proposal:
The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Stress Reduction in College Students
Abstract: This research proposal examines the impact of mindfulness-based interventions on stress reduction among college students, using a pre-test/post-test experimental design with both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods .
Introduction: College students face heightened stress levels during exam weeks. This can affect both mental health and test performance. This study explores the potential benefits of mindfulness-based interventions such as meditation as a way to mediate stress levels in the weeks leading up to exam time.
Literature Review: Existing research on mindfulness-based meditation has shown the ability for mindfulness to increase metacognition, decrease anxiety levels, and decrease stress. Existing literature has looked at workplace, high school and general college-level applications. This study will contribute to the corpus of literature by exploring the effects of mindfulness directly in the context of exam weeks.
Research Design and Methods: Participants ( n= 234 ) will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group, receiving 5 days per week of 10-minute mindfulness-based interventions, or a control group, receiving no intervention. Data will be collected through self-report questionnaires, measuring stress levels, semi-structured interviews exploring participants’ experiences, and students’ test scores.
Timeline: The study will begin three weeks before the students’ exam week and conclude after each student’s final exam. Data collection will occur at the beginning (pre-test of self-reported stress levels) and end (post-test) of the three weeks.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: The study aims to provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in reducing stress among college students in the lead up to exams, with potential implications for mental health support and stress management programs on college campuses.
Consider this hypothetical sociology research proposal:
The Impact of Social Media Usage on Interpersonal Relationships among Young Adults
Abstract: This research proposal investigates the effects of social media usage on interpersonal relationships among young adults, using a longitudinal mixed-methods approach with ongoing semi-structured interviews to collect qualitative data.
Introduction: Social media platforms have become a key medium for the development of interpersonal relationships, particularly for young adults. This study examines the potential positive and negative effects of social media usage on young adults’ relationships and development over time.
Literature Review: A preliminary review of relevant literature has demonstrated that social media usage is central to development of a personal identity and relationships with others with similar subcultural interests. However, it has also been accompanied by data on mental health deline and deteriorating off-screen relationships. The literature is to-date lacking important longitudinal data on these topics.
Research Design and Methods: Participants ( n = 454 ) will be young adults aged 18-24. Ongoing self-report surveys will assess participants’ social media usage, relationship satisfaction, and communication patterns. A subset of participants will be selected for longitudinal in-depth interviews starting at age 18 and continuing for 5 years.
Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of five years, including recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide insights into the complex relationship between social media usage and interpersonal relationships among young adults, potentially informing social policies and mental health support related to social media use.
Consider this hypothetical nursing research proposal:
The Influence of Nurse-Patient Communication on Patient Satisfaction and Health Outcomes following Emergency Cesarians
Abstract: This research will examines the impact of effective nurse-patient communication on patient satisfaction and health outcomes for women following c-sections, utilizing a mixed-methods approach with patient surveys and semi-structured interviews.
Introduction: It has long been known that effective communication between nurses and patients is crucial for quality care. However, additional complications arise following emergency c-sections due to the interaction between new mother’s changing roles and recovery from surgery.
Literature Review: A review of the literature demonstrates the importance of nurse-patient communication, its impact on patient satisfaction, and potential links to health outcomes. However, communication between nurses and new mothers is less examined, and the specific experiences of those who have given birth via emergency c-section are to date unexamined.
Research Design and Methods: Participants will be patients in a hospital setting who have recently had an emergency c-section. A self-report survey will assess their satisfaction with nurse-patient communication and perceived health outcomes. A subset of participants will be selected for in-depth interviews to explore their experiences and perceptions of the communication with their nurses.
Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of six months, including rolling recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing within the hospital.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide evidence for the significance of nurse-patient communication in supporting new mothers who have had an emergency c-section. Recommendations will be presented for supporting nurses and midwives in improving outcomes for new mothers who had complications during birth.
Consider this hypothetical social work research proposal:
The Role of a Family-Centered Intervention in Preventing Homelessness Among At-Risk Youthin a working-class town in Northern England
Abstract: This research proposal investigates the effectiveness of a family-centered intervention provided by a local council area in preventing homelessness among at-risk youth. This case study will use a mixed-methods approach with program evaluation data and semi-structured interviews to collect quantitative and qualitative data .
Introduction: Homelessness among youth remains a significant social issue. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of family-centered interventions in addressing this problem and identify factors that contribute to successful prevention strategies.
Literature Review: A review of the literature has demonstrated several key factors contributing to youth homelessness including lack of parental support, lack of social support, and low levels of family involvement. It also demonstrates the important role of family-centered interventions in addressing this issue. Drawing on current evidence, this study explores the effectiveness of one such intervention in preventing homelessness among at-risk youth in a working-class town in Northern England.
Research Design and Methods: The study will evaluate a new family-centered intervention program targeting at-risk youth and their families. Quantitative data on program outcomes, including housing stability and family functioning, will be collected through program records and evaluation reports. Semi-structured interviews with program staff, participants, and relevant stakeholders will provide qualitative insights into the factors contributing to program success or failure.
Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of six months, including recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing.
Budget: Expenses include access to program evaluation data, interview materials, data analysis software, and any related travel costs for in-person interviews.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide evidence for the effectiveness of family-centered interventions in preventing youth homelessness, potentially informing the expansion of or necessary changes to social work practices in Northern England.
Get your Detailed Template for Writing your Research Proposal Here (With AI Prompts!)
This is a template for a 2500-word research proposal. You may find it difficult to squeeze everything into this wordcount, but it’s a common wordcount for Honors and MA-level dissertations.
Section | Checklist |
---|---|
Title | – Ensure the single-sentence title clearly states the study’s focus |
Abstract (Words: 200) | – Briefly describe the research topicSummarize the research problem or question – Outline the research design and methods – Mention the expected outcomes and implications |
Introduction (Words: 300) | – Introduce the research topic and its significance – Clearly state the research problem or question – Explain the purpose and objectives of the study – Provide a brief overview of |
Literature Review (Words: 800) | – Gather the existing literature into themes and ket ideas – the themes and key ideas in the literature – Identify gaps or inconsistencies in the literature – Explain how the current study will contribute to the literature |
Research Design and Methods (Words; 800) | – Describe the research paradigm (generally: positivism and interpretivism) – Describe the research design (e.g., qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods) – Explain the data collection methods (e.g., surveys, interviews, observations) – Detail the sampling strategy and target population – Outline the data analysis techniques (e.g., statistical analysis, thematic analysis) – Outline your validity and reliability procedures – Outline your intended ethics procedures – Explain the study design’s limitations and justify your decisions |
Timeline (Single page table) | – Provide an overview of the research timeline – Break down the study into stages with specific timeframes (e.g., data collection, analysis, report writing) – Include any relevant deadlines or milestones |
Budget (200 words) | – Estimate the costs associated with the research project – Detail specific expenses (e.g., materials, participant incentives, travel costs) – Include any necessary justifications for the budget items – Mention any funding sources or grant applications |
Expected Outcomes and Implications (200 words) | – Summarize the anticipated findings or results of the study – Discuss the potential implications of the findings for theory, practice, or policy – Describe any possible limitations of the study |
Your research proposal is where you really get going with your study. I’d strongly recommend working closely with your teacher in developing a research proposal that’s consistent with the requirements and culture of your institution, as in my experience it varies considerably. The above template is from my own courses that walk students through research proposals in a British School of Education.
Very excellent research proposals
very helpful
Very helpful
Dear Sir, I need some help to write an educational research proposal. Thank you.
Hi Levi, use the site search bar to ask a question and I’ll likely have a guide already written for your specific question. Thanks for reading!
very good research proposal
Thank you so much sir! ❤️
Very helpful 👌
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
Published on September 7, 2022 by Tegan George and Shona McCombes. Revised on November 21, 2023.
The introduction is the first section of your thesis or dissertation , appearing right after the table of contents . Your introduction draws your reader in, setting the stage for your research with a clear focus, purpose, and direction on a relevant topic .
Your introduction should include:
Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes
How to start your introduction, topic and context, focus and scope, relevance and importance, questions and objectives, overview of the structure, thesis introduction example, introduction checklist, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about introductions.
Although your introduction kicks off your dissertation, it doesn’t have to be the first thing you write — in fact, it’s often one of the very last parts to be completed (just before your abstract ).
It’s a good idea to write a rough draft of your introduction as you begin your research, to help guide you. If you wrote a research proposal , consider using this as a template, as it contains many of the same elements. However, be sure to revise your introduction throughout the writing process, making sure it matches the content of your ensuing sections.
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
See an example
Begin by introducing your dissertation topic and giving any necessary background information. It’s important to contextualize your research and generate interest. Aim to show why your topic is timely or important. You may want to mention a relevant news item, academic debate, or practical problem.
After a brief introduction to your general area of interest, narrow your focus and define the scope of your research.
You can narrow this down in many ways, such as by:
It’s essential to share your motivation for doing this research, as well as how it relates to existing work on your topic. Further, you should also mention what new insights you expect it will contribute.
Start by giving a brief overview of the current state of research. You should definitely cite the most relevant literature, but remember that you will conduct a more in-depth survey of relevant sources in the literature review section, so there’s no need to go too in-depth in the introduction.
Depending on your field, the importance of your research might focus on its practical application (e.g., in policy or management) or on advancing scholarly understanding of the topic (e.g., by developing theories or adding new empirical data). In many cases, it will do both.
Ultimately, your introduction should explain how your thesis or dissertation:
Perhaps the most important part of your introduction is your questions and objectives, as it sets up the expectations for the rest of your thesis or dissertation. How you formulate your research questions and research objectives will depend on your discipline, topic, and focus, but you should always clearly state the central aim of your research.
If your research aims to test hypotheses , you can formulate them here. Your introduction is also a good place for a conceptual framework that suggests relationships between variables .
To help guide your reader, end your introduction with an outline of the structure of the thesis or dissertation to follow. Share a brief summary of each chapter, clearly showing how each contributes to your central aims. However, be careful to keep this overview concise: 1-2 sentences should be enough.
I. Introduction
Human language consists of a set of vowels and consonants which are combined to form words. During the speech production process, thoughts are converted into spoken utterances to convey a message. The appropriate words and their meanings are selected in the mental lexicon (Dell & Burger, 1997). This pre-verbal message is then grammatically coded, during which a syntactic representation of the utterance is built.
Speech, language, and voice disorders affect the vocal cords, nerves, muscles, and brain structures, which result in a distorted language reception or speech production (Sataloff & Hawkshaw, 2014). The symptoms vary from adding superfluous words and taking pauses to hoarseness of the voice, depending on the type of disorder (Dodd, 2005). However, distortions of the speech may also occur as a result of a disease that seems unrelated to speech, such as multiple sclerosis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
This study aims to determine which acoustic parameters are suitable for the automatic detection of exacerbations in patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by investigating which aspects of speech differ between COPD patients and healthy speakers and which aspects differ between COPD patients in exacerbation and stable COPD patients.
I have introduced my research topic in an engaging way.
I have provided necessary context to help the reader understand my topic.
I have clearly specified the focus of my research.
I have shown the relevance and importance of the dissertation topic .
I have clearly stated the problem or question that my research addresses.
I have outlined the specific objectives of the research .
I have provided an overview of the dissertation’s structure .
You've written a strong introduction for your thesis or dissertation. Use the other checklists to continue improving your dissertation.
If you want to know more about AI for academic writing, AI tools, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!
Research bias
(AI) Tools
The introduction of a research paper includes several key elements:
and your problem statement
Don’t feel that you have to write the introduction first. The introduction is often one of the last parts of the research paper you’ll write, along with the conclusion.
This is because it can be easier to introduce your paper once you’ve already written the body ; you may not have the clearest idea of your arguments until you’ve written them, and things can change during the writing process .
Research objectives describe what you intend your research project to accomplish.
They summarize the approach and purpose of the project and help to focus your research.
Your objectives should appear in the introduction of your research paper , at the end of your problem statement .
Scope of research is determined at the beginning of your research process , prior to the data collection stage. Sometimes called “scope of study,” your scope delineates what will and will not be covered in your project. It helps you focus your work and your time, ensuring that you’ll be able to achieve your goals and outcomes.
Defining a scope can be very useful in any research project, from a research proposal to a thesis or dissertation . A scope is needed for all types of research: quantitative , qualitative , and mixed methods .
To define your scope of research, consider the following:
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
George, T. & McCombes, S. (2023, November 21). How to Write a Thesis or Dissertation Introduction. Scribbr. Retrieved July 5, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/introduction-structure/
Other students also liked, how to choose a dissertation topic | 8 steps to follow, how to write an abstract | steps & examples, get unlimited documents corrected.
✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts
Home » How To Write A Proposal – Step By Step Guide [With Template]
Table of Contents
Writing a Proposal involves several key steps to effectively communicate your ideas and intentions to a target audience. Here’s a detailed breakdown of each step:
The format of a proposal can vary depending on the specific requirements of the organization or institution you are submitting it to. However, here is a general proposal format that you can follow:
1. Title Page:
2. Executive Summary:
3. Introduction:
4. Problem Statement:
5. Proposed Solution or Project Description:
6. Methodology:
7. Evaluation and Success Metrics:
9. Conclusion:
10. Appendices:
Here’s a basic proposal template that you can use as a starting point for creating your own proposal:
Dear [Recipient’s Name],
I am writing to submit a proposal for [briefly state the purpose of the proposal and its significance]. This proposal outlines a comprehensive solution to address [describe the problem or issue] and presents an actionable plan to achieve the desired objectives.
Thank you for considering this proposal. I believe that implementing this solution will significantly contribute to [organization’s or community’s goals]. I am available to discuss the proposal in more detail at your convenience. Please feel free to contact me at [your email address or phone number].
Yours sincerely,
Note: This template is a starting point and should be customized to meet the specific requirements and guidelines provided by the organization or institution to which you are submitting the proposal.
Here’s a sample proposal to give you an idea of how it could be structured and written:
Subject : Proposal for Implementation of Environmental Education Program
I am pleased to submit this proposal for your consideration, outlining a comprehensive plan for the implementation of an Environmental Education Program. This program aims to address the critical need for environmental awareness and education among the community, with the objective of fostering a sense of responsibility and sustainability.
Executive Summary: Our proposed Environmental Education Program is designed to provide engaging and interactive educational opportunities for individuals of all ages. By combining classroom learning, hands-on activities, and community engagement, we aim to create a long-lasting impact on environmental conservation practices and attitudes.
Introduction: The state of our environment is facing significant challenges, including climate change, habitat loss, and pollution. It is essential to equip individuals with the knowledge and skills to understand these issues and take action. This proposal seeks to bridge the gap in environmental education and inspire a sense of environmental stewardship among the community.
Problem Statement: The lack of environmental education programs has resulted in limited awareness and understanding of environmental issues. As a result, individuals are less likely to adopt sustainable practices or actively contribute to conservation efforts. Our program aims to address this gap and empower individuals to become environmentally conscious and responsible citizens.
Proposed Solution or Project Description: Our Environmental Education Program will comprise a range of activities, including workshops, field trips, and community initiatives. We will collaborate with local schools, community centers, and environmental organizations to ensure broad participation and maximum impact. By incorporating interactive learning experiences, such as nature walks, recycling drives, and eco-craft sessions, we aim to make environmental education engaging and enjoyable.
Methodology: Our program will be structured into modules that cover key environmental themes, such as biodiversity, climate change, waste management, and sustainable living. Each module will include a mix of classroom sessions, hands-on activities, and practical field experiences. We will also leverage technology, such as educational apps and online resources, to enhance learning outcomes.
Evaluation and Success Metrics: We will employ a combination of quantitative and qualitative measures to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. Pre- and post-assessments will gauge knowledge gain, while surveys and feedback forms will assess participant satisfaction and behavior change. We will also track the number of community engagement activities and the adoption of sustainable practices as indicators of success.
Budget: Please find attached a detailed budget breakdown for the implementation of the Environmental Education Program. The budget covers personnel costs, materials and supplies, transportation, and outreach expenses. We have ensured cost-effectiveness while maintaining the quality and impact of the program.
Conclusion: By implementing this Environmental Education Program, we have the opportunity to make a significant difference in our community’s environmental consciousness and practices. We are confident that this program will foster a generation of individuals who are passionate about protecting our environment and taking sustainable actions. We look forward to discussing the proposal further and working together to make a positive impact.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at [your email address or phone number].
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
Table of Contents
Every research proposal needs a well-written introduction. It serves as your first impression to potential readers and helps set the tone of the entire document. But learning how to write a proposal introduction that effectively conveys the main points of your research can be difficult. Don’t worry, though, because we’re here to help.
In this article, we’ll be sharing a step-by-step guide you can follow to start writing your introduction. We’ll also discuss the importance of this section in your paper and give tips to make it more effective.
If you’re ready to write an introduction that gets people interested in your research proposal , read on.
A research introduction is a vital part of any academic paper. It serves as an essential starting point for the reader, allowing them to understand the importance of the work and what it aims to solve.
The introduction of your proposal aims to achieve the following goals:
Research proposal introductions should be concise but also cover all the necessary points of your research. It can be a few paragraphs long. Don’t try to throw in all the information in one paragraph.
A good word count target would be around 500 to 1000 words . This is just a general figure. It’s still best to check the journal guidelines for the specific type of paper you’re writing.
The main job of an introduction is to let readers know what your topic is and why it’s interesting or important. This can usually be done with the help of a strong opening hook.
Your hook can be anything from an interesting fact, a trivial question, or a strong statement relevant to your topic. It needs to be something that will pique the reader’s interest.
After giving a general overview of the topic, provide additional context and explain why your proposed research is essential. Discuss relevant theories or prior studies on the topic and how they inform your work.
Clearly state what objectives or goals your research seeks to accomplish in relation to the problem you have established. Ensure these objectives are S.M.A.R.T., Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound.
How you frame your objectives can vary depending on the type of paper you’re writing. An argumentative paper, it’s usually in the form of a thesis statement. If you’re working on an empirical paper, you can generally pose the objective as a research question.
How will you go about conducting your research? Are there any special techniques or tools that you plan on using? Be as detailed as possible so that readers understand how the research process will be carried out.
Lastly, end your introduction with a summary statement that captures the main points of your proposal.
Ensure all the key elements discussed above (research question, background info, objectives, methods) are included in the conclusion. Keep it concise and focused while leaving room for further discussion in the body of the paper.
A well-written introduction is crucial for any research paper. It helps to set the stage and provide readers with an understanding of your work’s purpose and overall focus.
An effective research introduction not only introduces the topic at hand but helps to build credibility for the researcher’s point of view and argument. Follow these steps on how to write a proposal introduction , and you should have no problem getting started.
Abir is a data analyst and researcher. Among her interests are artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing. As a humanitarian and educator, she actively supports women in tech and promotes diversity.
Creative terms and conditions agreement in business proposal.
In business, proposals are essential for securing contracts and agreements with clients. However, a proposal is only complete with terms…
A statement of proposal is a document that outlines a proposed project or initiative in detail. It is typically used…
Training and development are essential to improve employees’ skills, knowledge, and productivity. A well-crafted training proposal can help an organization…
HR consulting is an essential service for businesses of all sizes. HR consultants provide expert guidance to organizations on various…
The rise of remote work has been a significant trend in the business world over the last few years. With…
E-commerce has become one of the most popular ways of doing business recently. With the increasing number of people using…
Reference.com
What's Your Question?
Research proposals are essential documents that outline the objectives, methodology, and significance of a research project. They serve as blueprints for researchers, guiding them through the process of conducting their investigations. While there are various formats and templates available, PDF examples of research proposals can be particularly beneficial in understanding the structure and content required for a successful proposal. In this article, we will explore some noteworthy PDF examples of research proposals and discuss what makes them effective.
The introduction section of a research proposal sets the stage for the study by providing background information on the topic and stating the research problem or question. A well-crafted introduction should capture the reader’s interest and clearly articulate the significance of the proposed research.
One example of an effective introduction in a research proposal is a study on climate change’s impact on coastal communities. The introduction outlines key statistics related to rising sea levels and emphasizes the vulnerability of coastal areas to environmental changes. It also highlights gaps in existing literature and explains how the proposed study aims to address these gaps.
The literature review section demonstrates that you have thoroughly researched existing studies related to your topic and have identified a gap that your research will fill. It showcases your ability to critically analyze previous work while highlighting its relevance to your own study.
An exemplary PDF example of a literature review within a research proposal is one that explores mental health interventions among college students. This section summarizes various studies on mental health issues faced by college students, including stress, anxiety, and depression. It then highlights gaps in current intervention strategies and proposes new approaches based on emerging evidence.
The methodology section describes how you will conduct your research, including details about data collection methods, sample selection criteria, and data analysis techniques. This section should demonstrate your ability to design a rigorous study that will yield reliable results.
A notable PDF example showcases a research proposal investigating the effects of a new teaching method on student performance in mathematics. The methodology section outlines the study’s design, including the selection of schools and participants, data collection through pre- and post-tests, and statistical analysis methods. It also discusses potential limitations and ethical considerations.
The significance and expected outcomes section explains the potential impact of your research and how it contributes to existing knowledge in the field. It should highlight the practical implications of your findings and explain how they can be applied to real-world situations.
An informative PDF example of this section could be a research proposal on renewable energy sources. It discusses the significance of transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy for environmental sustainability. The proposal outlines expected outcomes such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased energy efficiency, and long-term cost savings.
In conclusion, examining PDF examples of research proposals can provide valuable insights into crafting an effective proposal. By studying well-structured introductions, comprehensive literature reviews, detailed methodologies, and impactful significance sections, researchers can learn from successful proposals in their fields. These examples serve as guideposts for developing their own research proposals that are compelling, rigorous, and contribute meaningfully to their respective disciplines.
This text was generated using a large language model, and select text has been reviewed and moderated for purposes such as readability.
MORE FROM REFERENCE.COM
Ai generator.
Introduction in research serves as a critical component, setting the stage for the entire study. It provides context, explains the significance of the research, and outlines the objectives. For example, a self-introduction essay in the introduction can help personalize the research, making it relatable. This initial section is crucial for engaging readers and establishing the foundation for the subsequent analysis and discussion. Effective introductions ensure clarity and focus, guiding the reader through the research journey.
Introduction in research is the initial section that provides context, states the research problem, outlines objectives, and highlights the study’s significance. It engages readers, sets the stage for the research, and guides the direction of the entire study.
Research introductions across various fields.
Introduction in research proposal is crucial for setting the tone and direction of your study. A good introduction provides a clear context, highlights the significance, and outlines the research objectives. The introduction paragraph should engage readers, clearly state the research problem, and present the study’s goals. This foundational section is key to securing interest and support for your research, guiding readers through the rationale and planned approach. Crafting a compelling introduction ensures clarity and focus for the entire proposal.
Introduction in research paper serves as the gateway to your study, establishing the context and significance of your work. A well-crafted research paper introduction outlines the research problem, states the objectives, and provides a brief overview of the methodology. This initial section aims to engage readers, setting the stage for a comprehensive exploration of the topic. By clearly defining the scope and purpose, the introduction ensures that readers understand the relevance and direction of the research, laying a strong foundation for the subsequent sections.
Introduction in research defense is a pivotal part of presenting your study. This section provides an overview of the research problem, objectives, and significance. It sets the stage for the defense by summarizing key findings and methodologies. A strong introduction engages the audience, clarifies the purpose of the research, and highlights its contributions to the field. This initial part of the defense ensures that the audience understands the research context, laying the groundwork for a detailed discussion of the study’s results and implications.
Introduction in research is a critical component, as it sets the stage for the entire study. A well-crafted introduction paragraph provides essential context, clearly defines the research problem, and outlines the objectives. This section engages the reader, establishing the relevance and significance of the research. It guides the direction of the study, ensuring clarity and focus. By presenting a concise overview, the introduction helps readers understand the purpose and scope of the research, laying a strong foundation for the subsequent analysis and discussion.
It provides background information and sets the context for the study.
The introduction should include the research problem, objectives, and significance of the study.
It typically ranges from one to two pages, depending on the length of the paper.
It engages the reader and establishes the foundation for the research.
A research problem is the specific issue or question that the study aims to address.
The introduction outlines the hypothesis or research questions that will be tested or explored.
Yes, a brief review of relevant literature is often included to provide context.
Yes, it should give a brief overview of the methodology to be used.
The thesis statement summarizes the main point or argument of the research.
It introduces the topic and approach, setting expectations for the reader.
Text prompt
10 Examples of Public speaking
20 Examples of Gas lighting
Trials volume 25 , Article number: 437 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
92 Accesses
7 Altmetric
Metrics details
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, and at present, India has the highest burden of acute coronary syndrome and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI). A key reason for poor outcomes is non-adherence to medication.
The intervention is a 2 × 2 factorial design trial applying two interventions individually and in combination with 1:1 allocation ratio: (i) ASHA-led medication adherence initiative comprising of home visits and (ii) m-health intervention using reminders and self-reporting of medication use. This design will lead to four potential experimental conditions: (i) ASHA-led intervention, (ii) m-health intervention, (iii) ASHA and m-health intervention combination, (iv) standard of care. The cluster randomized trial has been chosen as it randomizes communities instead of individuals, avoiding contamination between participants. Subcenters are a natural subset of the health system, and they will be considered as the cluster/unit. The factorial cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) will also incorporate a nested health economic evaluation to assess the cost-effectiveness and return on investment (ROI) of the interventions on medication adherence among patients with CVDs. The sample size has been calculated to be 393 individuals per arm with 4–5 subcenters in each arm. A process evaluation to understand the effect of the intervention in terms of acceptability, adoption (uptake), appropriateness, costs, feasibility, fidelity, penetration (integration of a practice within a specific setting), and sustainability will be done.
The effect of different types of intervention alone and in combination will be assessed using a cluster randomized design involving 18 subcenter areas. The trial will explore local knowledge and perceptions and empower people by shifting the onus onto themselves for their medication adherence. The proposal is aligned to the WHO-NCD aims of improving the availability of the affordable basic technologies and essential medicines, training the health workforce and strengthening the capacity of at the primary care level, to address the control of NCDs. The proposal also helps expand the use of digital technologies to increase health service access and efficacy for NCD treatment and may help reduce cost of treatment.
The trial has been registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI), reference number CTRI/2023/10/059095.
Peer Review reports
Note: the numbers in curly brackets in this protocol refer to SPIRIT checklist item numbers. The order of the items has been modified to group similar items (see http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/spirit-2013-statement-defining-standard-protocol-items-for-clinical-trials/ ).
Title {1} | SPIRIT guidance: Descriptive title identifying the study design, population, interventions, and, if applicable, trial acronym.
|
Trial registration {2a and 2b}. | SPIRIT guidance: Trial identifier and registry name. If not yet registered, name of intended registry. Item 2b is met if the register used for registration collects all items from the World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set. |
Protocol version {3} | SPIRIT guidance: Date and version identifier. Version 3. 23 February 2024. |
Funding {4} | SPIRIT guidance: Sources and types of financial, material, and other support. Financial support from WHO, Geneva, Alliance for Health Policy and System research |
Author details {5a} | SPIRIT guidance: Affiliations of protocol contributors. Jaideep C Menon, Professor, Adult Cardiology, AIMS, Kochi Denny John, Adjunct Professor, Ramaiah University of applied Sciences Aswathy S, Professor, Community Medicine Chandrasekhar J, Professor, Public Health Dentistry Akshaya R, Senior Resident, Community Medicine Sumithra S, Senior Lecturer, St John’s research Institute Aravind MS, Research Associate, Public Health, AIMS, Kochi Mathews Numpeli, CHC MO, DHS, Govt of Kerala Bipin Gopal, State nodal Officer- NCDs, Kerala Renjini BA, MO, DHS, Govt of Kerala Sajeev PK, NHM Coordinator, Kalady Ravivarman L, WHO NCD officer, India Country Office Abhishek Kunwar, NPO NCD, WHO India |
Name and contact information for the trial sponsor {5b} | SPIRIT guidance: Name and contact information for the trial sponsor. Dr Sarah Rylance, Medical Officer for Chronic Respiratory Diseases, Focal point for NCD Research and Innovation World Health Organization HQ |
Role of sponsor {5c} | SPIRIT guidance: Role of study sponsor and funders, if any, in study design; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and the decision to submit the report for publication, including whether they will have ultimate authority over any of these activities. Study sponsor does not have any role in the study design, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data |
Background and rationale {6a}.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, and at present, India has the highest burden of acute coronary syndrome and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) [ 1 ]. A key reason for poor outcomes is non-adherence to medication. The WHO has reported that non-adherence to drugs in chronic conditions is as high as 50%, and 30% of re-admissions are related to non-compliance to medication. In its 2003 report [ 2 ], WHO states that “increasing the effectiveness of adherence interventions may have a far greater impact on the health of the population than any improvement in specific medical treatment.”
A systematic review published in 2015 on adherence to medication had eleven studies from India reporting adherence rates (using pills taken, prescribed doses taken, changes, etc.) using Morisky Medication Adherence Score (MMAS) in the range of 0–51.2% [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. The factors associated with non-adherence to medications were forgetfulness, difficulty in remembering, and stopping medication upon feeling better/worse.
Various interventions have been studied to increase medication adherence for cardiovascular disease in India. These include the use of combination therapy or polypill [ 9 , 10 , 11 ], use of community health workers (CHW) for simplified hypertension management with the aid of a smart-phone-based electronic decision support system [ 12 ], “task shifting” interventions to CHWs for CVD risk reduction through behavioral change [ 13 ], improving adherence to drugs, lifestyle changes, and clinical risk markers in patients of acute coronary syndromes [ 14 , 15 ] and use of CHWs and doctors in primary health center (PHC) to assess CVD risk with clinical decision support being provided through an m-health platform by doctors sitting remotely [ 16 ]. Studies have also identified the use of mobile technology by health workers in resource-limited settings for health delivery improvement [ 17 ]. The different studies mentioned have looked at m-health or CHWs alone to improve adherence to medication, lifestyle changes, or as a platform for treatment, with varied results.
We measured adherence in 2064 patients of coronary artery disease (CAD) the ENDIRA cohort using the MMAS-8 in the year 2019. Our results revealed poor adherence to chronic care medications in CAD patients. On an average, only 2.8 of the mandated 4 drugs (beta blocker, ACE Inhibitor /ARB, statin, and anti-platelet) were being taken by patients regularly [ 18 ]. The mean value of MMAS was 4 out of a possible 8, reflecting poor adherence [ 19 ]. A study on the feasibility of an m-health intervention in the same cohort for the prevention and management of CAD revealed that the use and ownership of mobiles was 88% (2015), 92% were willing to receive mobile health advice [ 19 ], 70% preferred voice calls over SMS, 85.9% would send self-recorded blood pressure, weight, and blood glucose to a doctor or community health worker [ 19 ]. Given that the results of our study revealed poor adherence and that use of m-health for CVD was both acceptable and feasible, the obvious next step would be in trying to improve adherence using these resources.
Primary objective.
To assess the effectiveness of using m-health and community health worker-led interventions for improving adherence to drugs in patients with cardiovascular disease using m-health and community health worker intervention individually and in combination in comparison to control group.
To assess the effects of using the interventions (m-health and community health worker-led interventions) for improving adherence to drugs among heart disease patients on implementation outcomes such as acceptability and adoption.
To assess the cardiometabolic risk factors among first degree relatives of patients with heart disease
It is a 2 × 2 factorial design trial applying two interventions individually and in combination with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Two interventions are applied individually and in combination: (i) ASHA-led medication adherence initiative comprising of home visits, and (ii) m-health intervention using reminders and self-reporting of medication use. This design will lead to four potential experimental conditions: (i) ASHA-led intervention, (ii) m-health intervention, (iii) ASHA and m-health intervention combination, (iv) standard of care.
Study setting {9}.
The study will be implemented in the ENDIRA (Epidemiology of Non-communicable Diseases in Rural Areas) cohort (n-114,064 individuals) which includes 2064 patients with heart disease in whom adherence to drugs for heart disease has already been assessed. The ENDIRA cohort is spread over 5 primary health centers consisting of 18 subcenters where the health details of all individuals have been recorded. In order to avoid contamination in the treatment allocation and its response, at least 10 km of distance among villages will be maintained and they will be clubbed into 4 groups.
The intervention will be implemented in Angamaly block consisting of five local self-government areas namely Mookkannoor, Kalady, Thuravoor, Karukutty, and Manjapra with a population of 18,638, 20,407, 20,475, 26,811, and 14,668 in Ernakulam district [ 20 ] in Kerala state, India, respectively.
The study samples will consist of adult community members with diagnosis of CAD, valvular disease, heart failure, and rhythm disorders in the target areas who provide informed consent.
Diagnosed case of CAD who have received treatment for MI/STEMI/UA or diagnosed using a coronary angiogram or CT coronary angiogram or have undergone revascularization and are on medications.
Other cardiovascular cases such as rhythm disorders, valve disorders, and heart failure identified as pumping disorders by the community will also be a part of the study. Male or female aged 18 years or more will be considered.
Resident of village during the baseline survey.
Has no plans to migrate in next 12 months from the date of initiation of intervention.
Persons who are bedridden and are unable to answer the questions.
Pregnant or lactating mothers
Individuals with cognitive impairment
Informed consent will be taken by the accredited social health activist of the area who will be collecting the data. The data collection will be through an application called SHRADDHA (which means care). The participant’s digital signature will be obtained on the tablet.
Blood samples will be collected to assess random blood sugar and HbA1c among cardiac patients with type 2 DM after obtaining consent. These samples will be tested using point-of-care devices and will not be stored. We will request consent for review of participants’ medical records, and for the collection of blood samples to assess random blood sugar and HbA1c among the cardiac patients with type 2 diabetes. But this trial does not involve collecting biological specimens for storage.
Explanation for the choice of comparators {6b}.
Results of our study revealed poor adherence and that use of m-health for CVD was both acceptable and feasible. Various interventions have been studied to increase medication adherence for cardiovascular disease in India such as use of combination therapy or polypill, use of community health workers (CHW) for simplified hypertension management with the aid of a smart phone-based electronic decision support system, so we decided to use factorial study design where study units would be assigned to ASHA and no ASHA group. Following this they would be assigned to m-health and no m-health group. Thus, there are four arms to the study: namely ASHA, ASHA and m-health, m-health, and standard of care.
The intervention content is prepared after discussion with the stakeholders such as ASHAs, Medical Officers, and patients. Qualitative data would be obtained from unstructured or semi-structured interviews exploring the individual’s understanding of the use of medicines, potential obstacles and incentives to adherence, useful strategies to improve adherence. Interview guide for In-Depth-Interviews and Key-Informant Interviews will be developed after a thorough literature search. In-Depth Interviews will be done with the participants and their relatives to identify individual’s understanding of the use of medicines, potential obstacles and incentives to adherence, useful strategies to improve adherence, and other questions spontaneously raised during the interview. For Key-Informant Interviews, Health care providers such as doctors, the multipurpose health worker, ASHAs, and pharmacists (about 10) will be interviewed till saturation Is reached. Focus group discussions (FGD) will be conducted among adherent CVD patients and nonadherent CVD patients. About 3-4 such FGD will be conducted till data saturation is reached. This will be repeated at endline.
Community health worker directed visits to the house of the patient, where they will explain the use of drugs and the various roles of the different classes of drugs along with taking a pill count and giving health advice and counselling with a PowerPoint on a tablet. The frequency of visits is twice a month for the first 3 months, and once a month for the next 3 (11 visits in all). A schedule of visits with the areas to be highlighted in each visit such as diet, physical activity, tobacco, and alcohol will be prepared and given.
Before the commencement of the intervention training, sessions for community health workers (ASHAs) in the intervention arm will be conducted. This will comprise of three sessions of 6 h each and would include curriculum-based training modules on CVD, HTN, diabetes, dyslipidemia; awareness of the role each of the 4 classes of drugs in AS-CVD plays in secondary prevention; sensitization to the role of adherence in preventing recurrence; sensitization to the side effects of the drugs and counselling skill training. Role of lifestyle changes such as diet, physical activity, tobacco, and alcohol will also be carried out.
The envisaged m-health platform is a two-way system through which messages or jingles (audio clips) could be passed back and forth between the care provider (ASHA, Research assistant, or doctor) and the recipient (patient). Individual patient details gathered and entered on a Tab PC get stored on a central server. The data is anonymized and coded individually, with a 12-digit UID. In clusters where the m-health intervention is planned, individual patients could download and activate an already developed App, which is a free download from the Google play store [Ente app (my app)]. The individual patient would be able to access his personal health record as entered, by way of the App. This App would serve as a two-way channel of communication between the patient and caregiver. In the other clusters, individual patients could download their personal data and the App, with the communication channel remaining blocked.
Bi-monthly reminders via text or audio messages and weekly reminders on taking medicines at the time of a scheduled dose by way of a beep or tune and health advice by way of messages are sent for the first 3 months, followed by monthly reminders of text messages the next 3 and weekly drug reminder tunes.
Health worker (ASHA)-directed visits to the house of the patient, where they will explain the use of drugs and the various roles of the different classes of drugs along with taking a pill count and giving health advice and counselling. The frequency of visits is twice a month for the first 3 months, and once a month for the next 3. In addition, bi-monthly reminders via text or audio messages and weekly reminders on taking medicines at the time of a scheduled dose by way of a beep or tune and health advice by way of messages are sent for the first 3 months, followed by monthly reminders of text messages the next 3 and weekly drug reminder tunes.
Standard of care (SoC) is patient-initiated physician visit with health advice and treatment as prescribed by the treating doctor.
In all the groups, the patients can visit the doctor in case of any need or emergency.
After completion of baseline survey in all clusters, intervention will be implemented in intervention clusters for 6 months. All the participants in the intervention and control arms will be permitted to use standard treatment for CVD. Community health worker-directed visits to the house of the patient, where they will explain the use of drugs and the various roles of the different classes of drugs along with taking a pill count and giving health advice and counselling. The frequency of visits is twice a month for the first 3 months, and once a month for the next 3 (9 visits in all). Table 1 shows the timepoint for the intervention implementation.
This is not applicable as the intervention is to improve medication adherence, so there will be no special criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated intervention.
The various interventions are for the improvement of adherence as measured by the Morisky Medication Adherence scale [ 21 ].
Relevant concomitant care is permitted.
This is a non-pharmacological intervention; therefore, there are no specific post trial care provisions.
Primary, secondary, and other outcomes.
The primary outcome is the adherence of patients as measured by Morisky adherence scale [ 21 ] at the beginning of the study, midterm, and at the end. The secondary outcomes include Quality of Life (EuroQOL) [ 22 ], blood pressure, random blood sugar, HbA1c among the cardiac patients with type 2 diabetes, mortality events, and other unintended outcomes will also be recorded. The analysis will include change from baseline. Adherence is chosen as the main outcome as the objective is to study the impact of the various interventions singly and in combination on adherence in comparison to standard of care. Various symptoms, such as dyspnea, fatigue, edema, difficulty sleeping, depression, and chest pain associated with CVD limits activities of daily life [ 23 ]. Therefore, it is important to measure the quality of life before and after the intervention. Metabolic control can result from better adherence to medication and a better awareness of the importance to adhering to medication. Therefore, meeting targets of blood pressure, blood sugar levels, and HbA1c will be considered as secondary outcomes.
Sample size {14}.
Based on the learnings from the previous study, the rate of missing data due to electronic data collection will be low.
The process of developing the intervention will start with the development of the initial concepts based on the available literature and interaction with healthcare professionals working in the rural areas.
Selection and training of team : The team will deliver the training to the selected project coordinator and the field staff. Field staff (part-time) will be recruited by the investigators on the advice of village head and/or NCD clinic in-charge. He/she should be a member of community preferably the accredited social health activist with an interest in health care and community, willingness to learn, and leadership qualities. A strong commitment to work in the community will be identified as an important criteria for the selection of all the team members. After a sensitization session of the data collectors/field staff, they will be asked to prepare a list of persons with cardiovascular disease including coronary artery disease, valvular disease, arrhythmias, and heart failure. Hands on sessions to download the App and collect data will be provided.
In Phase 2, baseline evaluation will be initiated in the study areas after obtaining the ethics committee approval. Written informed consent will be obtained from the study participants. Participants will receive a participant information sheet (PIS) outlining the rationale for the study, details on interventions, the steps, and protocols to be followed throughout the study, potential side effects and risks, benefits, a confidentiality statement, the option to withdraw from the study at any time, and the investigators’ contact information. The baseline survey performed by ASHAs will be done through a survey app called SHRADDHA. The variables collected would include (1) basic demographic information, including age, income, gender, marital status, religion, and occupation; (2) lifestyle-related factors such as physical activity, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption, dietary factors intake of fruits and vegetables, cooking oil and red meats; (3) disease details including for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, stroke and CAD, COPD, and surgeries; and (4) current medications. Questions will be explained to each participant to help them get familiar with the contents, instructions for filling them out will be given, and the responses will be recorded. On the home visit, the Field staff/ASHA will also record height and weight, measure sugars with a glucometer, and take a photo of the most recent prescription. All of this will be recorded in the app. Glycosylated hemoglobin will also be measured among the cardiac patients with diabetes using the point of care device called Lumira Dx.
Sample size : Sample size was estimated assuming an improvement of 10% in medication adherence at the end of a 6-month period in either m-health or community health worker-led intervention compared to control group. This 10% improvement will lead to an effect size of 0.4 units in medication adherence through m-health or community health worker-led intervention and an effect size of 0.8 units in combined intervention (m-health and community health worker-led intervention) compared to the control group. The 10% was an assumption considering that large differences are not possible in a community setting and was based on another community-based study which has also used 10% improvement of adherence score [ 24 ].
To observe a difference of 0.4 units in the medication adherence between study groups, with a standard deviation of 1.8, 5% level of significance (adjusted for multiple comparison) and 80% power, the sample size needed will be 238 participants in each of the study groups. After accounting for a design effect (cluster effect) and 10% attrition, the number of participants required per group will be 393, a total of 1572 participants.
Working through the public health system, keeping in mind the proximity of the ASHAs to the community, it is expected that adequate participant enrolment can be achieved. Monitoring and supervision by the project team will assist in timely completion. The time period of recruitment is from February to May, 2024. After the recruitment, the randomization will be done and intervention will be administered for 6 months. Expected to finish by November 2024 and endline assessment in December 2024.
Sequence generation {16a}.
Allocation of intervention and sequence generation will be as follows. Codes will be randomly assigned to the four interventions (ASHA, m-health, ASHA + m-health, and control groups) namely A, B, C, and D. In the next step, randomization list will be generated using RANDOM ALLOC software. Eighteen subcenters will be randomized into 4 study groups (A, B, C, and D) using different permutations of ABCD. Each subcenter will be allocated random numbers ranging from 1 to 18 using random number generators and random shuffling of this number. Interventions will be allocation to the subcenters in the sequence of random shuffled numbers as per the randomization list.
It will be an open-label trial as concealment is not possible. However, study site allocation will be done only after completing baseline assessment and agreements with sites to participate.
The allocation sequence will be generated by the Statistician, enrolment will be by the Field coordinator and the Field coordinator will assign subcenter as it is a cluster randomized trial.
Who will be blinded {17a}.
Data analysts will be blinded. The ASHA workers, patients, and outcome assessors are not blinded.
In this study, the ASHA workers, patients, and outcome assessors will not be blinded. Only the data analysts will be blinded. The data analyst will be unblinded if there are any outlier biochemical values which requires immediate action so that the patient can be intimated.
Plans for assessment and collection of outcomes {18a}.
The primary outcome adherence will be measured by Morisky 8-item adherence questionnaire which has been validated in various countries including India and in various disease conditions. The eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) is a structured self-report measure of medication-taking behavior that has been widely used in various cultures [ 25 , 26 , 27 ].It has a maximum score of 8.
The quality of life will be measured by the EuroQol five‐dimensions – 3‐level (EQ5D) which is a versatile quality of life (QOL) instrument with five dimensions (mobility, self‐care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a visual analog scale. The questionnaire has also been found to be valid and reliable in various disease conditions including cardiovascular and cancer in India and neighboring countries [ 28 , 29 ].Random blood sugar among the patient and family member will be measured by the ASHA as per standard methods using a glucometer. Blood pressure will also be measured using the electronic Blood pressure will be recorded with the OMRON HEM 7124 automatic blood pressure monitor (Shimogyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan) by measuring upper arm BP. A laboratory technician will measure Glycosylated Haemoglobin using the Lumira Dx point of care device.
Real-time data entry will be monitored, and wherever there are difficulties with using the app, support will be provided by the field coordinator.
All efforts will be made to retain all participants in the study. As they are also part of the earlier ENDIRA study, there is a good rapport with the study group, local self-government, and frontline health workers. Loss to follow-up may result from migration to their children’s places of living or death or for other reasons. The characteristics of the patients who drop out will be recorded and compared to those who are in the study.
As the data is collected through the SHRADDHA app, the data will be exported to excel and checked for completion each day. According to the data collected, feedback, and monitoring will be done to ensure correct and complete entries. Duplicate entries will be checked for and removed.
The data of the patients will be anonymized, and each patient will be assigned a unique id. From the app de-identified anonymized data will be stored in Excel. This will be stored confidentially before, during, and after the trial.
In this study, blood samples will be collected to assess random blood sugar and HbA1c. These tests are done using point-of-care devices. The blood samples will not be stored in the current trial.
Statistical methods for primary and secondary outcomes {20a}.
Several models will be run to test for the main outcomes, implementation outcomes, and related research questions. Mixed linear and logistic effects models as appropriate will be used to identify differences between the groups (ASHA, ASHA and m-health, m-health, control group), where random effects will be used for the clusters and fixed effects will be used for effects of ASHA workers and of m-health. The primary dependent variable in the models will be change in adherence measured by the Morisky scale. Models will also be fitted for the secondary outcomes such as change in blood pressure, random blood sugar, Hba1c levels, and quality of life. Subsequently, covariates such as age, sex, and co-morbidities will be added to the models to adjust for potential confounders.
In this study, the intervention is done to improve the medication adherence through health education by ASHA workers, m-health, or both. Since the risk due to the intervention is minimal or none, interim analysis, and stopping guidelines have not been prescribed by the ethical committee and therefore there will not be any stopping guidelines.
Subgroup analysis will not be carried out. However, for the primary and secondary outcome variables, covariates such as age, sex, and co-morbidities will be considered as potential confounders in the mixed effect model analysis.
Nonadherence will be managed by the intention to treat analysis and if there are too many missing data, imputations will be considered. Mixed method analysis will be considered for intention to treat analysis. Also depending on the percentage of data missingness and assumption for data missing in the study variables, appropriate missing data imputation technique will be used.
Full protocol can be given. Full dataset can be given with the permission of the Institution, WHO, and Government.
Composition of the coordinating center and trial steering committee {5d}.
There is only one site for the study; therefore, the coordinating and steering committee will be situated at the site. The coordinating center is the Community Health Centre (CHC). The ASHA’s work is coordinated through the CHC by the National Health mission coordinators. The trial steering committee (TSC) monitors recruitment, communicates, and provides conflict resolution and timely advice. They meet every 6 weeks. Local organization and implementation is taken care of by the NHM coordinators and a responsible person reporting to the Principal Investigator from the Project management group. Trainings and other group meetings are conducted by the project management group. Consent is obtained by the ASHA. Periodic meetings are conducted by the Project management group (investigators) team to monitor progress. The stakeholder groups are apprised of the progress of the trial, role of intervention, and its possible benefit.
This study is measuring adherence which is a low-risk intervention; therefore, a data monitoring committee is not required. The project management group meets every 2 weeks. The Trial Steering Group and the independent Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee meet to review conduct throughout the trial period.
As this study is measuring adherence of an intervention, no adverse events or serious adverse events and harms from the intervention are anticipated. But if there are any, they will be reported to relevant regulatory bodies such as Project management group, Trial steering Committee, District Health Authority, and Ethics Committee. Trial deviations will be reported to the ethical committee.
The meetings of the Project management group, Trial Steering group, independent data monitoring, and Ethics Committee periodically will also serve to audit the trial.
Before the start and at the start, there have been some minor modifications which has been updated to the ethical committee and subsequently uploaded in the CTRI.
The results of the study will be published in standard journals. Social media and Stakeholder workshops will be used to disseminate the findings. A lay summary will be shared with all participants.
The present study will promote much needed research and innovation for increasing adherence among patients with cardiovascular disease. The effect of different types of intervention alone and in combination will be assessed using a cluster randomized design involving 18 subcenter areas. This factorial cluster randomized controlled trial will benefit by increasing the drug adherence for NCD using m-health platform and frontline health workers. The trial will explore local knowledge, perceptions and empower people by shifting the onus onto themselves for their medication adherence.
The proposal is aligned to the WHO-NCD aims of improving the availability of affordable basic technologies and essential medicines, improving adherence for non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It also aligns to WHO-NCD aim of training the health workforce and strengthening the capacity of health systems, particularly at the primary care level, to address the control of NCDs. The proposal also helps expand the use of digital technologies to increase health service access and efficacy for NCD treatment and may help reduce the cost of treatment.
The proposal helps implementation of WHO-PEN protocol for Self-Care guidelines including utilizing frontline health workers in improving self-care in patients of heart disease, counselling to improving adherence and self-care, considering patients’ beliefs and concerns about drugs and their effect. The research is also aligned to the WHO-HEARTS package, both by way of A&T of the HEARTS where A- consists of information on CVD medicine and technology procurement, quantification, distribution, management, and handling of supplies at facility level. T- consists of guidance and examples on team-based care and task shifting related to the care of CVD. The research is also aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) goal in relation to NCD of reducing by one third premature mortality from non-communicable diseases through prevention and treatment.
There are significant expected implementation challenges to note. First, the trial involves working with the primary clinics providing NCD screening and detection services, and building an effective partnership with the state government of Kerala where the project will be implemented will be crucial for its success. Second, medication nonadherence for patients with chronic diseases is extremely common with 40–50% of patients prescribed medications for management of diabetes and hypertension [ 30 ]. There exist treatment-related barriers, such as treatment complexity, side effects (or fear of side effects), inconvenience, cost, and time, and other barriers such as poor practitioner-patient relationship, aspects of which are beyond the scope of the intervention [ 30 ].
If successful, the medication adherence intervention, using m-health and ASHAs, has the potential to constitute evidence-based practice for improving medication adherence for CVD in India, and in similar developing countries.
The current protocol is version 3 dated 23–02-2024. The recruitment began on November 30, 2023 and is expected to be complete by May 30, 2024. The submission has been delayed due to unavoidable circumstances such as elections and heatwave.
The investigators will have access to the final data set. There are no contractual agreements which limit access to investigators. The investigators in the field collect the data and the data is with them. Any data required to support the protocol can be supplied on request.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme
Angiotensin II receptor blocker
Accredited social health activist
Community health workers
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Cluster randomized control trial
Computed tomography
Clinical Trials Registry—India
Cardiovascular diseases
Epidemiology of Non-Communicable Diseases in Rural Areas
Hypertension
Low-middle-income countries
Mobile Health
Myocardial infarction
Morisky Medication Adherence Score
Non-communicable diseases
Primary health center
Quality of Life
Return on investment
Sustainable Development Goals
Short Message Service
ST elevation myocardial infarction
Unstable angina
World Health Organization
Sreeniwas Kumar A, Sinha N. Cardiovascular disease in India: A 360 degree overview. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2020;76(1):1–3.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sabaté E, ed. Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
Baroletti S, Dell’Orfano H. Medication adherence in cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2010;121:1455–8.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Roy A. Cardiovascular disease in India, Current epidemiology and future directions. Circulation. 2016;133:1605–20.
Akeroyd JM, Chan WJ, Kamal AK, Palaniappan L, Virani SS. Adherence to cardiovascular medications in the South Asian population: A systematic review of current evidence and future directions. World J Cardiol. 2015;7(12):938–47.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fathima FN, Shanbhag DN, Hegde SKB, Sebastian B, Briguglio S. Cross Sectional Study of Adherence to Prescribed Medications among Individuals Registered at a High Risk Clinic in a Rural Area in Bangalore, India. Indian J Publ Health Research and Development. 2013;4(3):90–4.
Article Google Scholar
Venkatachalam J, Abrahm SB, Singh Z, Stalin P, Sathya GR. Determinants of Patient’s Adherence to Hypertension Medications in a Rural Population of Kancheepuram District inTamilNadu. SouthIndia Indian J Community Med. 2015;40:33–7.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kumar N, Unnikrishnan B, Thapar R, Mithra P, Kulkarni V, Holla R, Bhagawan D, Mehta I. Factors associated with adherence to antihypertensive treatment among patients attention atertiary care hospital in Mangalore. South India IJCRR. 2014;6:77–85.
Google Scholar
Bahl VK, Jadhav UM, Thacker HP. Management of hypertension with the fixed combination of perindopril and amlodipine in daily clinical practice: results from the STRONG prospective, observational, multicenter study. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2009;9:135–42.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Soliman EZ, Mendis S, Dissanayake WP, Somasundaram NP, Gunaratne PS, Jayasingne IK, Furberg CD. A Polypill for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a feasibility study of the World Health Organization. Trials. 2011;12:3.
Thom S, Poulter N, Field J, Patel A, Prabhakaran D, Stanton A, Grobbee DE, Bots ML, Reddy KS, Cidambi R, et al. Effects of a fixed-dose combination strategy on adherence and risk factors in patients with or at high risk of CVD:theUMPIRE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310:918–29.
Ajay VS, Tian M, Chen H, Wu Y, Li X, Dunzhu D, et al. A cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of a simplified cardiovascular management program in Tibet, China and Haryana, India: study design and rationale. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):924.
Jeemon P, Narayanan G, Kondal D, et al. Task shifting of frontline community health workers for cardiovascular risk reduction: design and rationale of a cluster randomised controlled trial (DISHAstudy) in India. BMC Public health. 2016;16:264.
Kamath DY, Xavier D, Gupta R, Devereaux PJ, Sigamani A, Hussain T, et al. Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial evaluating community health worker–based interventions for the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in India (SPREAD). Am Heart J. 2014;168(5):690–7.
Sharma KK, Gupta R, Mathur M, Natani V, Lodha S, Roy S, Xavier D. Non-physician health workers for improving adherence to medications and healthy lifestyle following acute coronary syndrome: 24-month follow-up study. Indian Heart J. 2016;68(6):832–40.
Peiris D, Praveen D, Kishor M, et al. SMART health India: A stepped-wedge, a cluster randomised controlled trial of a community health worker managed mobile health intervention for people assessed at high cardiovascular disease risk in rural India. PLOS One. 2019;14(3):e0213708.
Free C, Phillips G, Watson L, Galli L, Felix L, Edwards P, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1): e1001363.
Banerjee A, Menon JC, et al. A learning health system for secondary prevention in cardiovascular disease in Kerala using informatics and non-physician health workers (LHSCVD). Indian Heart J. 2018;70:S2.
Feinberg L, Menon JC, et al. Potential for mobile health (m-Health) prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Kerala: A population-based survey. Indian Heart J. 2017;69:182–99.
Angamaly Municipality City Population Census 2011-2024 | Kerala. [cited 2024 Jun 3]. Available from: https://www.census2011.co.in/data/town/803285-angamaly-kerala.html
Janežič A, Locatelli I, Kos M. Criterion validity of 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in patients with asthma. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0187835. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187835.PMID:29190693;PMCID:PMC5708647 .
EQ-5D-3LUserguide-23–07.pdf. [cited 2024 Jun 3]. Available from: https://euroqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/EQ-5D-3LUserguide-23-07.pdf
Heo S, Lennie TA, Okoli C, Moser DK. Quality of life in patients with heart failure: ask the patients. Heart Lung. 2009;38(2):100–8.
Xavier D, Gupta R, Kamath D, Sigamani A, Devereaux PJ, George N, et al. Community health worker-based intervention for adherence to drugs and lifestyle change after acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre, open, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(3):244–53.
Surekha A, Fathima FN, Agrawal T, Misquith D. Psychometric Properties of Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) in Known Diabetic and Hypertensive Patients in a Rural Population of Kolar District, Karnataka. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2016;7(2):250.
Grover A, Oberoi M. Self-reported Morisky eight item medication adherence scale is a reliable and valid measure of compliance to statins in hyperlipidemic patients in India. Indian Heart J. 2020;72(4):319–20.
Okello S, Nasasira B, Muiru ANW, Muyingo A. Validity and Reliability of a Self-Reported Measure of Antihypertensive Medication Adherence in Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0158499.
Mahesh PKB, Gunathunga MW, Jayasinghe S, Arnold SM, Senanayake S, Senanayake C, et al. Construct validity and reliability of EQ-5D-3L for stroke survivors in a lower middle-income setting. Ceylon Med J. 2019;64(2):52–8.
Tripathy S, Hansda U, Seth N, Rath S, Rao PB, Mishra TS, et al. Validation of the EuroQol Five-dimensions - Three-Level Quality of Life Instrument in a Classical Indian Language (Odia) and Its Use to Assess Quality of Life and Health Status of Cancer Patients in Eastern India. Indian J Palliat Care. 2015;21(3):282–8.
Kleinsinger F. The Unmet Challenge of Medication Nonadherence. Perm J. 2018;22:18–033. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/18-033 .
Download references
The authors acknowledge the Accredited Social Health Activists, Dr Naseema Najeeb CHC MO, Dr Sunil Kumar, and Mr Sunny V V.
Funded by WHO NCD Division and NCD Alliance, Geneva.
WHO Reference 2023/1376413–0.
The funding body does not have a role in the design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.
Authors and affiliations.
Adult Cardiology, AIMS, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, India
Jaideep C. Menon
Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, India
Community Medicine, AIMS, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, India
Aswathy Sreedevi & Akshaya R
Public Health Dentistry, Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, India
Chandrasekhar Janakiram
StJohn’s Research Institute, Bangalore, India
AIMS, Kochi, India
Aravind M S
MO, DHS, Govt of Kerala, Ernakulam, India
Mathews Numpeli & Renjini B A
NCD, DHS, Govt of Kerala, Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Bipin Gopal
CHC, Kalady, Kalady, India
India Country Office, New Delhi, India
Ravivarman Lakshmanaswamy
NPO NCD, WHO India, New Delhi, India
Abhishek Kunwar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
➙JCM is the Chief investigator, conceived the study, led the proposal and protocol development, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Review & Editing
➙DJ—Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Review & Editing
➙AS—Development of proposal, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Review & Editing
➙CJ—Development of proposal, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Project Administration, Formal Analysis, Writing – Review & Editing
➙AR—Analysis, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Review & Editing
➙SS—Analysis, Sample calculation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing—Review & Editing
➙AMS—Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Review & Editing
➙MN—Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing
➙BG—Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing
➙RBA—Project administration, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing,
➙RL—Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing
➙AK—Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing
➙All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Correspondence to Aswathy Sreedevi .
Ethics approval and consent to participate {24}.
Ethical Review Board of Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences had approved the study dated 23–02-2024 number ECASM-AIMS-2024–098. Written, informed consent to participate will be obtained from all participants. Ethical approval has been obtained.
Informed consent has been obtained and the model consent form can be made available. No identifying images or other personal or clinical details of participants are presented here or will be presented in reports of the trial results.
The authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Menon, J.C., John, D., Sreedevi, A. et al. Improving medication adherence among persons with cardiovascular disease through m-health and community health worker-led interventions in Kerala; protocol for a type II effectiveness-implementation research-(SHRADDHA-ENDIRA). Trials 25 , 437 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08244-0
Download citation
Received : 09 May 2024
Accepted : 11 June 2024
Published : 02 July 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08244-0
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1745-6215
COMMENTS
Research proposal examples. Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We've included a few for you below. Example research proposal #1: "A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management".
A well written introduction will help make a compelling case for your research proposal. To begin with, the introduction must set context for your research by mentioning what is known about the topic and what needs to be explored further. In the introduction, you can highlight how your research will contribute to the existing knowledge in your ...
Define your specific research problem and problem statement. Highlight the novelty and contributions of the study. Give an overview of the paper's structure. The research paper introduction can vary in size and structure depending on whether your paper presents the results of original empirical research or is a review paper.
Table of contents. Step 1: Introduce your topic. Step 2: Describe the background. Step 3: Establish your research problem. Step 4: Specify your objective (s) Step 5: Map out your paper. Research paper introduction examples. Frequently asked questions about the research paper introduction.
Research proposals, like all other kinds of academic writing, are written in a formal, objective tone. Keep in mind that being concise is a key component of academic writing; formal does not mean flowery. Adhere to the structure outlined above. Your reader knows how a research proposal is supposed to read and expects it to fit this template.
Research Proposal Sample. Title: The Impact of Online Education on Student Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Study. 1. Introduction. Online education has gained significant prominence in recent years, especially due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Learn step-by-step how to write a Research Proposal Introduction from the first sentence to the last paragraph.Struggling with developing ideas or a research...
Make sure you can ask the critical what, who, and how questions of your research before you put pen to paper. Your research proposal should include (at least) 5 essential components : Title - provides the first taste of your research, in broad terms. Introduction - explains what you'll be researching in more detail.
2. Introduction. The introduction is crucial to your research proposal as it is your first opportunity to hook the reader in.A good introduction section will introduce your project and its relevance to the field of study. You'll want to use this space to demonstrate that you have carefully thought about how to present your project as interesting, original, and important research.
Research paper introduction example. The following introduction is taken from a research paper exploring the potential uses of the peach palm. We've highlighted each step we mentioned above. Note that some of the steps may overlap a bit; the goal is to include all four components. In this example, the thesis statement appears in Step 4 rather ...
The purpose of the research proposal (its job, so to speak) is to convince your research supervisor, committee or university that your research is suitable (for the requirements of the degree program) and manageable (given the time and resource constraints you will face). The most important word here is "convince" - in other words, your ...
A dissertation or thesis research proposal may take on a variety of forms depending on the university, but most generally a research proposal will include the following elements: Titles or title pages that give a description of the research. Detailed explanation of the proposed research and its background. Outline of the research project.
Detailed Walkthrough + Free Proposal Template. If you're getting started crafting your research proposal and are looking for a few examples of research proposals, you've come to the right place. In this video, we walk you through two successful (approved) research proposals, one for a Master's-level project, and one for a PhD-level ...
II. Research Proposal Writing A. Introduction. A research proposal is commonly written by scholars seeking grant funding for a research project when enrolling for a research-based postgraduate degree. Graduate and post-graduate students also embark on a university dissertation to obtain a degree or get that Ph.D. Although it is just a course ...
The key thing is. to guide the reader into your topic and situate your ideas. Step 2: Describe the background. This part of the introduction differs depending on what approach your paper is ...
Writing a research proposal template in structured steps ensures a comprehensive and coherent presentation of your research project. Let's look at the explanation for each of the steps here: Step 1: Title and Abstract. Step 2: Introduction. Step 3: Research objectives. Step 4: Literature review.
INTRODUCTION. A clean, well-thought-out proposal forms the backbone for the research itself and hence becomes the most important step in the process of conduct of research.[] The objective of preparing a research proposal would be to obtain approvals from various committees including ethics committee [details under 'Research methodology II' section [Table 1] in this issue of IJA) and to ...
Research proposal examples. Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We've included a few for you below. Example research proposal #1: 'A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management'.
The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Stress Reduction in College Students. Abstract: This research proposal examines the impact of mindfulness-based interventions on stress reduction among college students, using a pre-test/post-test experimental design with both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. Introduction: College students face heightened stress levels ...
Introduction to Writing Research Proposals In this handout we will discuss some of the basics of how to write a Research Proposal. The main goal of a Research Proposal is to convince someone to give you money. To that end, you will have be an expert salesperson and convince your audience, usually a panel of experts in the eld or a closely ...
Overview of the structure. To help guide your reader, end your introduction with an outline of the structure of the thesis or dissertation to follow. Share a brief summary of each chapter, clearly showing how each contributes to your central aims. However, be careful to keep this overview concise: 1-2 sentences should be enough.
Develop an Outline. Create a clear and logical structure: Divide your proposal into sections or headings that will guide your readers through the content. Consider the typical structure of a proposal: Introduction: Provide a concise overview of the problem, its significance, and the proposed solution. Background/Context: Offer relevant ...
Hannah Skaggs. Hannah, a writer and editor since 2017, specializes in clear and concise academic and business writing. She has mentored countless scholars and companies in writing authoritative and engaging content. Write a research proposal with purpose and accuracy. Learn about the objective, parts, and key elements of a research proposal in ...
Lastly, end your introduction with a summary statement that captures the main points of your proposal. Ensure all the key elements discussed above (research question, background info, objectives, methods) are included in the conclusion. Keep it concise and focused while leaving room for further discussion in the body of the paper.
The introduction section of a research proposal sets the stage for the study by providing background information on the topic and stating the research problem or question. A well-crafted introduction should capture the reader's interest and clearly articulate the significance of the proposed research. ... A notable PDF example showcases a ...
What is Introduction in Research. Introduction in research is the initial section that provides context, states the research problem, outlines objectives, and highlights the study's significance. It engages readers, sets the stage for the research, and guides the direction of the entire study. Introduction in Research Format. Opening Sentence:
Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, and at present, India has the highest burden of acute coronary syndrome and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI). A key reason for poor outcomes is non-adherence to medication. Methods The intervention is a 2 × 2 factorial design trial applying two interventions individually and in combination with 1:1 ...