what is academic writing in higher education

Student Writing in Higher Education

• Reference work entry
• First Online: 10 October 2019
• Cite this reference work entry

• Sue Starfield 2  

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

5542 Accesses

Academic writing is a vast and ever-expanding field of study. In higher education in particular with the growth of English medium instruction on a global level, writing for a multitude of academic purposes has become a high-stakes activity. Recently, academic literacies approaches in which writing is no longer viewed as a generic skill to be taught as a set of static rules but rather as shaped by complex interactions of social, institutional, and historical forces in contexts of unequal power have been influential, leading to discussions of the interactions between academic literacies approaches, English for academic purposes (EAP) approaches, and genre approaches. Key themes discussed in this chapter are approaches to researching and teaching academic writing, genre in academic writing, understandings of plagiarism and intertextuality, and the role of identity in academic writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Introduction: Understanding Academic Writing in the Context of Central and Eastern European Higher Education

Demistyfying Academic Writing

Abasi A, Akbari N (2008) Are we encouraging patchwriting? Reconsidering the role of the pedagogical context in ESL student writers’ transgressive intertextuality. Engl Specif Purp 27:267–284

Article   Google Scholar  

Angélil-Carter S (2000) Stolen language. Longman, London

Google Scholar  

Angelova M, Riazantseva A (1999) If you don’t tell me, how can I know ? Writ Commun 16:491–525

Atkinson D (2001) Reflections and refractions on the JSLW special issue on voice. J Second Lang Writ 10:107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00035-2

Bakhtin M (1981) The dialogic imagination. University of Texas Press, Austin

Bakhtin M (1986) Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press, Austin

Ballard B, Clanchy J (1988) Literacy in the university: an anthropological approach. In: Taylor G, Ballard B, Beasley V, Bock H, Clanchy J, Nightingale P (eds) Literacy by degrees. Society for Research in Higher Education/Open University Press, Milton Keynes, pp 7–23

Bangeni B, Kapp R (2006) I want to write about the Dalai Lama …’: literacies in transition. In: Thesen L, van Pletzen E (eds) Academic literacy and the languages of change. Continuum, London, pp 67–83

Bawarshi AS, Reiff MJ (2010) Genre: an introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. Parlor Press, West Layfette

Belcher D, Braine G (1995) Introduction. In: Belcher D, Braine G (eds) Academic writing in a second language: essays on research and pedagogy. Ablex, Norwood, pp xiv–xxxi

Benesch S (1988) Ending remediation: linking ESL and content in higher education. TESOL, Washington, DC

Benesch S (2001) Critical English for academic purposes. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

Book   Google Scholar  

Benesch S (2009) Theorizing and practicing critical English for academic purposes. J Engl Acad Purp 8(2):81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.09.002

Bourdieu P (1977) The economics of linguistic exchanges. Soc Sci Informat 16(6):645–668

Bourdieu P (1991) Language and symbolic power. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK

Bourdieu P (1994) Academic discourse. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK

Bunton D (1999) The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D theses. Engl Specif Purp 18(Supplement 1):S41–S56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2

Cadman K (1997) Thesis writing for international students: a question of identity? Engl Specif Purp 16(1):3–14

Canagarajah S (1996) From critical research practice to critical research reporting. TESOL Q 30:321–330. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588146

Candlin C, Hyland K (1999) Introduction: integrating approaches to the study of writing. In: Candlin C, Hyland K (eds) Writing: texts, processes and practices. Longman, London, pp 1–17

Candlin C, Plum G (1999) Engaging with challenges of interdiscursivity in academic writing: researchers, students and tutors. In: Candlin C, Hyland K (eds) Writing: texts, processes and practices. Longman, London, pp 193–217

Casanave C (1995) Local interactions: constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In: Belcher D, Braine G (eds) Academic writing in a second language: essays on research and pedagogy. Ablex, Norwood, pp 83–110

Casanave C (2010) Taking risks?: A case study of three doctoral students writing qualitative dissertations at an American university in Japan. J Second Lang Writ 19:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.12.002

Chandrasoma R, Thompson C, Pennycook A (2004) Beyond plagiarism: transgressive and nontransgressive intertextuality. J Lang Identity Educ 3(3):171–193. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0303_1

Chang Y, Swales J (1999) Informal elements in English academic writing: threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers? In: Candlin C, Hyland K (eds) Writing: texts, processes and practices. Longman, London, pp 145–167

Chase G (1988) Accommodation, resistance and the politics of student writing. Coll Compos Commun 39(1):13–22

Cheng A (2006) Understanding learners and learning in ESP genre-based writing instruction. Engl Specif Purp 25:76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.07.002

Cheng A (2007) Transferring generic features and recontextualizing genre awareness: understanding writing performance in the ESP genre – based literacy framework. Engl Specif Purp 26:287–307

Cheng A (2008) Analyzing genre exemplars in preparation for writing: the case of an L2 graduate student in the ESP genre-based instructional framework of academic literacy. Appl Linguis 29:50–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm021

Cheng A (2015) Genre analysis as a pre-instructional, instructional, and teacher development framework. J Engl Acad Purp 19:125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.04.004

Cherry R (1988) Ethos versus persona: self-representation in written discourse. Writ Commun 5(3):251–276

Chiseri-Strater E (1991) Academic literacies: the public and private discourse of university students. Boynton-Cook, Portsmouth

Clark R (1992) Principles and practice of CLA in the classroom. In: Fairclough N (ed) Critical language awareness. Longman, London, pp 117–140

Clark R, Ivanič R (1997) The politics of writing. Routledge, London

Coffin C, Donohue J (2012) English for academic purposes: contributions from systemic functional linguistics and academic literacies. J Engl Acad Purp 11:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.008

Cope B, Kalantzis M (eds) (1993) The powers of literacy: a genre approach to teaching writing. Falmer Press, London

Cummins J (1996) Negotiating identities: education for empowerment in a diverse society. CABE, Ontario

Currie P (1998) Staying out of trouble: apparent plagiarism and academic survival. J Second Lang Writ 7(1):1–18

Delpit L (1988) The silenced dialogue: power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harv Educ Rev 58(3):280–298

DePalma M-J, Ringer JM (2011) Toward a theory of adaptive transfer: expanding disciplinary discussions of “transfer” in second-language writing and composition studies. J Second Lang Writ 20:134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.003

Fairclough N (1992) Discourse and text: linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse Soc 3(2):193–217

Flowerdew J (2016) English for specific academic purposes (ESAP) writing: making the case. Writ Pedagog 8(1):5–32. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v8i1.30051

Flowerdew J, Li Y (2007) Language re-use among Chinese apprentice scientists writing for publication. Appl Linguist 28:440–465

Gee JP (1990) Social linguistics and literacies: ideology in discourses. The Falmer Press, London

Geertz C (1975) The interpretation of cultures. Hutchinson, London

Halliday MAK, Matthiessen CMIM (2014) Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. Routledge, London

Harris J (1989) The idea of community in the study of writing. Coll Compos Commun 40(1):11–22

Hathaway J (2015) Developing that voice: locating academic writing tuition in the mainstream of higher education. Teach High Educ 20:506–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1026891

Hewlett L (1996) How can you discuss alone?: Academic literacy in a South African context. In: Baker D, Clay J, Fox C (eds) Challenging ways of knowing: in English, Mathematics and Science. Falmer Press, London, pp 89–100

Hirvela A, Belcher D (2001) Coming back to voice: the multiple voices and identities of mature multilingual writers. J Second Lang Writ 10:83–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00038-2

Hirvela A, Du Q (2013) ‘Why am I paraphrasing?’: Undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. J Engl Acad Purp 12:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.005

Howard R (1995) Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. Coll Engl 57:788–806

Hull G, Rose M (1989) Rethinking remediation: towards a social-cognitive understanding of problematic reading and writing. Writ Commun 6:139–154

Hyland K (2004) Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

Hyland K (2005) Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Stud 7(2):173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland K (2007) Genre pedagogy: language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. J Second Lang Writ 16:148–164

Hyland K (2017) English in the disciplines: arguments or specificity. ESP Today 1:5–23. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2017.5.1.1

Hyland K, Hamp-Lyons L (2002) EAP: issues and directions. J Engl Acad Purp 1:1–2

Ivanič R (1994) I is for interpersonal: discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. Linguist Educ 6:3–15

Ivanič R (1998) Writing and identity. John Benjamns, Amsterdam

Ivanič R, Camps D (2001) I am how I sound: voice as self-representation in L2 writing. J Second Lang Writ 10(3):3–33

Ivanič R, Simpson J (1992) Who’s who in academic writing? In: Fairclough N (ed) Critical language awareness. Longman, London, pp 141–173

Johns A (1992) L1 composition theories: implications for developing theories of L2 composition. In: Kroll B (ed) Second language writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 24–36

Johns A (1997) Text, role, and context: developing academic literacies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Jones J, Gollin S, Drury H, Economou D (1989) Systemic-functional linguistics and its application to the TESOL curriculum. In: Hasan R, Martin JR (eds) Language development: learning language, learning culture. Ablex, New Jersey, pp 257–328

Keck C (2014) Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: a re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. J Second Lang Writ 25:4–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005

Kress G (1993) Learning to write. Routledge, London

Kubota R (1999) Japanese culture constructed by discourses: implications for applied linguistics research and ELT. TESOL Q 33(1):9–35

Lea M (1999) Academic literacies and learning in higher education. In: Jones C, Turner J, Street B (eds) Students writing in the university. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 103–124

Lea M (2004) Academic literacies: a pedagogy for course design. Stud High Educ 29(6):739–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287230

Lea M, Street B (1998) Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Stud High Educ 23(2):157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364

Lillis T (1997) New voices in academia? The regulative nature of academic writing conventions. Lang Educ 11:182–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789708666727

Lillis T (2012) English medium writing for academic purposes: foundational categories, certainty and contingency. In: Tang R (ed) Academic writing in a second or foreign language. Continuum, London, pp 235–247

Lillis T, Scott M (2007) Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. J Appl Linguist 4:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5

Lillis T, Tuck J (2016) Academic literacies. In: Hyland K, Shaw P (eds) Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. Routledge, London, pp 30–43

Liu D (2005) Plagiarism in ESOL students: is cultural conditioning truly the major culprit? ELT J 59:234–241

Luke A (1996) Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In: Hasan R, Williams G (eds) Literacy in society. Longman, London, pp 308–338

McCarthy LP (1987) A stranger in strange lands: a college student writing across the curriculum. Res Teach Engl 21(3):233–265

Mochizuki N (2016) Oral interactions in a writing group as mediating artefacts: the case of a multilingual student’s motives, scaffolding and response. Aust Rev Appl Linguist 39(2):181–200. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.39.2.05moc

Mochizuki N (2017) Contingent needs analysis for task implementation: an activity systems analysis of group writing conferences. TESOL Q 51(3):607–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.391

Mochizuki N (2019) The lived experience of thesis writers in group writing conferences: the quest for ‘perfect’ and ‘critical’. J Second Lang Writ. 43:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.02.001

Morgan B, Ramanathan V (2005) Critical literacies and language education: global and local perspectives. Annu Rev Appl Linguist 25:151–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000085

Negretti R, Kuteeva M (2011) Fostering metacognitive genre awareness in L2 academic reading and writing: a case study of pre-service English teachers. J Second Lang Writ 20:95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.002

Nesi H, Gardner S (2012) Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Ong V (2017) Facilitating non-native English speaker students’ transition to writing for the disciplines: a study of learning transfer. In: Spelman-Miller K, Stevenson M (eds) Transitions in writing. Brill, The Netherlands, pp 104–141

Paltridge B (2017) Context and teaching of academic writing. In: Bitchener J, Storch N, Wette R (eds) Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students. Routledge, New York, pp 9–23

Paltridge B, Starfield S (2007) Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language. Routledge, London

Paltridge B, Woodrow L (2012) Thesis and dissertation writing: moving beyond the text. In: Tang R (ed) Academic writing in a second or foreign language. Continuum, London, pp 88–104

Paltridge B, Starfield S, Ravelli LJ, Tuckwell K (2012) Change and stability: examining the macrostructures of doctoral theses in the visual and performing arts. J Engl Acad Purp 11:332–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.08.003

Paltridge B, Starfield S, Tardy C (2016) Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Paxton M (2013) Genre: a pigeonhole or a pigeon? Case studies of the dilemmas posed by the writing of research proposals. In: Thesen L, Cooper L (eds) Risk in academic writing: postgraduate students, their teachers and the making of knowledge. Channel View Publications, Clevedon, pp 148–165

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Paxton M, Firth V (2014) Implications of academic literacies research for knowledge making and curriculum design. High Educ 67:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9675-z

Pecorari D (2008) Academic writing and plagiarism. Continuum, London

Pecorari D (2015) Plagiarism in second language writing: is it time to close the case? J Second Lang Writ 30:94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.003

Pennycook A (1996) Borrowing others’ words: text, ownership, memory and plagiarism. TESOL Q 30(2):201–230

Phan LH (2006) Plagiarism and overseas students: stereotypes again? ELT J 61:76–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci085

Porter R (1986) Intertextuality and the discourse community. Rhetor Rev 5(1):34–47

Prior P (1991) Contextualising writing and response in a graduate seminar. Writ Commun 8(3):267–310

Prior P (1994) Response, revision, disciplinarity: a microhistory of a dissertation prospectus in sociology. Writ Commun 11(4):483–533

Prior P (1995) Redefining the task: an ethnographic examination of writing and response in graduate seminars. In: Belcher D, Braine G (eds) Academic writing in a second language: essays on research and pedagogy. Ablex, Norwood, pp 47–81

Prior P (2001) Voices in text, mind, and society: Sociohistoric accounts of discourse, acquisition and use. J Second Lang Writ 10(3):55–81

Prior P (2003) Are communities of practice really an alternative to discourse communities? Paper presented at the 2003 American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Conference, Accessed 4 October 2017 https://www.academia.edu/14039729/Are_communities_of_practice_really_an_alternative_to_discourse_communities

Prior P, Bilbro R (2012) Academic enculturation: developing literate practices and disciplinary identities. In: Castello M, Donahue C (eds) University writing: selves and texts in academic societies. Emerald, Bingley, pp 19–31

Ramanathan V, Atkinson D (1999) Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. J Second Lang Writ 8(1):45–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80112-X

Ramanathan V, Kaplan R (1996) Audience and voice in current L1 composition texts: some implications for ESL student writers. J Second Lang Writ 5(1):21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90013-2

Sheeran Y, Barnes D (1991) School writing. Open University Press, Milton Keynes

Shen F (1989) The classroom and the wider culture: identity as a key to learning English composition. Coll Compos Commun 40(4):459–466

Shi L (2004) Textual borrowing in second language writing. Writ Commun 21:171–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303262846

Soler-Monreal C, Carbonell-Olivares M, Gil-Salom L (2011) A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. Engl Specif Purp 30:4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.005

Spack R (1997a) The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: a longitudinal case study. Writ Commun 14:3–62

Spack R (1997b) The rhetorical construction of multilingual students. TESOL Q 31(4):765–774

Starfield S (2001) ‘I’ll go with the group’: rethinking ‘discourse community’ in EAP. In: Flowerdew J, Peacock M (eds) Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 132–147

Starfield S (2002) ‘I’m as second–language English speaker’: negotiating writer identity and authority in sociology one. J Lang Identity Educ 1(2):121–140. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0102_02

Starfield S (2004a) Word power: negotiating success in a first-year sociology course. In: Ravelli L, Ellis R (eds) Analysing academic writing: contextualised frameworks. Continuum, London, pp 66–83

Starfield S (2004b) ‘Why does this feel empowering ?’: Thesis writing, concordancing, and the ‘ corporatising ’ university. In: Norton B, Toohey K (eds) Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 138–157

Starfield S (2011) Doing critical ethnographic research into academic writing: the theory of the methodology. In: Belcher D, Johns AM, Paltridge B (eds) New directions for ESP research. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 174–196

Starfield S (2013) Critical perspectives on ESP. In: Paltridge B, Starfield S (eds) Handbook of English for specific purposes. Wiley Blackwell, Malden, pp 461–479

Starfield S (2015) First person singular: negotiating identity in academic writing in English. In: Djenar D, Mahboob A, Cruickshank K (eds) Language and identity across modes of communication. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, pp 249–262

Starfield S, Ravelli LJ (2006) ‘The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist’: self and structure in new humanities research theses. J Engl Acad Purp 5:222–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.07.004

Swales J (1990) Genre analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Swales JM (1998) Textography: toward a contextualization of written academic discourse. Res Lang Soc Interact 31:109–112. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3101_7

Swales JM (2004) Research genres: explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

Tang R (2012) The issues and challenges facing academic writers from ESL/EFL contexts: an overview. In: Tang R (ed) Academic writing in a second or foreign language. Continuum, London, pp 1–18

Tang R, John S (1999) The ‘I’ in identity: exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. Engl Specif Purp 18:S23–S39

Tardy C (2009) Building genre knowledge. Parlor Press, West Lafayette

Thesen L (1997) Voices, discourses and transition: in search of new categories in EAP. TESOL Q 31(3):487–511. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587835

Thompson C, Morton J, Storch N (2013) Where from, who, why and how? A study of the use of sources by first year L2 university students. J Engl Acad Purp 12:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.004

Turner J (2012) Academic literacies: providing a space for the socio-political dynamics of EAP. J Engl Acad Purp 11:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.007

Turner J (2018) On writtenness. Bloomsbury Academic, London, UK

Wette R (2010) Evaluating student learning in a university-level EAP unit on writing using sources. J Second Lang Writ 19:158–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.06.002

Wingate U, Tribble C (2012) The best of both worlds? Towards an English for academic purposes/academic literacies writing pedagogy. Stud High Educ 37:481–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.525630

Woodward-Kron R (2004) ‘Discourse communities’ and ‘writing apprenticeship’: an investigation of these concepts in undergraduate education students’ writing. J Engl Acad Purp 3:139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.09.001

Zamel V (1993) Questioning academic discourse. Coll ESL 3(1):28–39

Zamel V, Spack R (1998) Negotiating academic literacies: teaching and learning across languages and cultures. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Education, University of New South Wales, SY, Australia

Sue Starfield

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue Starfield .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Xuesong Gao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Starfield, S. (2019). Student Writing in Higher Education. In: Gao, X. (eds) Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_45

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_45

Published : 10 October 2019

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-02897-8

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-02899-2

eBook Packages : Education Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Education

Share this entry

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• Academic Writing Style
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

Academic writing refers to a style of expression that researchers use to define the intellectual boundaries of their disciplines and specific areas of expertise. Characteristics of academic writing include a formal tone, use of the third-person rather than first-person perspective (usually), a clear focus on the research problem under investigation, and precise word choice. Like specialist languages adopted in other professions, such as, law or medicine, academic writing is designed to convey agreed meaning about complex ideas or concepts within a community of scholarly experts and practitioners.

Academic Writing. Writing Center. Colorado Technical College; Hartley, James. Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Guide . New York: Routledge, 2008; Ezza, El-Sadig Y. and Touria Drid. T eaching Academic Writing as a Discipline-Specific Skill in Higher Education . Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2020.

Importance of Good Academic Writing

The accepted form of academic writing in the social sciences can vary considerable depending on the methodological framework and the intended audience. However, most college-level research papers require careful attention to the following stylistic elements:

I.  The Big Picture Unlike creative or journalistic writing, the overall structure of academic writing is formal and logical. It must be cohesive and possess a logically organized flow of ideas; this means that the various parts are connected to form a unified whole. There should be narrative links between sentences and paragraphs so that the reader is able to follow your argument. The introduction should include a description of how the rest of the paper is organized and all sources are properly cited throughout the paper.

II.  Tone The overall tone refers to the attitude conveyed in a piece of writing. Throughout your paper, it is important that you present the arguments of others fairly and with an appropriate narrative tone. When presenting a position or argument that you disagree with, describe this argument accurately and without loaded or biased language. In academic writing, the author is expected to investigate the research problem from an authoritative point of view. You should, therefore, state the strengths of your arguments confidently, using language that is neutral, not confrontational or dismissive.

III.  Diction Diction refers to the choice of words you use. Awareness of the words you use is important because words that have almost the same denotation [dictionary definition] can have very different connotations [implied meanings]. This is particularly true in academic writing because words and terminology can evolve a nuanced meaning that describes a particular idea, concept, or phenomenon derived from the epistemological culture of that discipline [e.g., the concept of rational choice in political science]. Therefore, use concrete words [not general] that convey a specific meaning. If this cannot be done without confusing the reader, then you need to explain what you mean within the context of how that word or phrase is used within a discipline.

IV.  Language The investigation of research problems in the social sciences is often complex and multi- dimensional . Therefore, it is important that you use unambiguous language. Well-structured paragraphs and clear topic sentences enable a reader to follow your line of thinking without difficulty. Your language should be concise, formal, and express precisely what you want it to mean. Do not use vague expressions that are not specific or precise enough for the reader to derive exact meaning ["they," "we," "people," "the organization," etc.], abbreviations like 'i.e.'  ["in other words"], 'e.g.' ["for example"], or 'a.k.a.' ["also known as"], and the use of unspecific determinate words ["super," "very," "incredible," "huge," etc.].

V.  Punctuation Scholars rely on precise words and language to establish the narrative tone of their work and, therefore, punctuation marks are used very deliberately. For example, exclamation points are rarely used to express a heightened tone because it can come across as unsophisticated or over-excited. Dashes should be limited to the insertion of an explanatory comment in a sentence, while hyphens should be limited to connecting prefixes to words [e.g., multi-disciplinary] or when forming compound phrases [e.g., commander-in-chief]. Finally, understand that semi-colons represent a pause that is longer than a comma, but shorter than a period in a sentence. In general, there are four grammatical uses of semi-colons: when a second clause expands or explains the first clause; to describe a sequence of actions or different aspects of the same topic; placed before clauses which begin with "nevertheless", "therefore", "even so," and "for instance”; and, to mark off a series of phrases or clauses which contain commas. If you are not confident about when to use semi-colons [and most of the time, they are not required for proper punctuation], rewrite using shorter sentences or revise the paragraph.

VI.  Academic Conventions Among the most important rules and principles of academic engagement of a writing is citing sources in the body of your paper and providing a list of references as either footnotes or endnotes. The academic convention of citing sources facilitates processes of intellectual discovery, critical thinking, and applying a deliberate method of navigating through the scholarly landscape by tracking how cited works are propagated by scholars over time . Aside from citing sources, other academic conventions to follow include the appropriate use of headings and subheadings, properly spelling out acronyms when first used in the text, avoiding slang or colloquial language, avoiding emotive language or unsupported declarative statements, avoiding contractions [e.g., isn't], and using first person and second person pronouns only when necessary.

VII.  Evidence-Based Reasoning Assignments often ask you to express your own point of view about the research problem. However, what is valued in academic writing is that statements are based on evidence-based reasoning. This refers to possessing a clear understanding of the pertinent body of knowledge and academic debates that exist within, and often external to, your discipline concerning the topic. You need to support your arguments with evidence from scholarly [i.e., academic or peer-reviewed] sources. It should be an objective stance presented as a logical argument; the quality of the evidence you cite will determine the strength of your argument. The objective is to convince the reader of the validity of your thoughts through a well-documented, coherent, and logically structured piece of writing. This is particularly important when proposing solutions to problems or delineating recommended courses of action.

VIII.  Thesis-Driven Academic writing is “thesis-driven,” meaning that the starting point is a particular perspective, idea, or position applied to the chosen topic of investigation, such as, establishing, proving, or disproving solutions to the questions applied to investigating the research problem. Note that a problem statement without the research questions does not qualify as academic writing because simply identifying the research problem does not establish for the reader how you will contribute to solving the problem, what aspects you believe are most critical, or suggest a method for gathering information or data to better understand the problem.

IX.  Complexity and Higher-Order Thinking Academic writing addresses complex issues that require higher-order thinking skills applied to understanding the research problem [e.g., critical, reflective, logical, and creative thinking as opposed to, for example, descriptive or prescriptive thinking]. Higher-order thinking skills include cognitive processes that are used to comprehend, solve problems, and express concepts or that describe abstract ideas that cannot be easily acted out, pointed to, or shown with images. Think of your writing this way: One of the most important attributes of a good teacher is the ability to explain complexity in a way that is understandable and relatable to the topic being presented during class. This is also one of the main functions of academic writing--examining and explaining the significance of complex ideas as clearly as possible.  As a writer, you must adopt the role of a good teacher by summarizing complex information into a well-organized synthesis of ideas, concepts, and recommendations that contribute to a better understanding of the research problem.

Academic Writing. Writing Center. Colorado Technical College; Hartley, James. Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Guide . New York: Routledge, 2008; Murray, Rowena  and Sarah Moore. The Handbook of Academic Writing: A Fresh Approach . New York: Open University Press, 2006; Johnson, Roy. Improve Your Writing Skills . Manchester, UK: Clifton Press, 1995; Nygaard, Lynn P. Writing for Scholars: A Practical Guide to Making Sense and Being Heard . Second edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2015; Silvia, Paul J. How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2007; Style, Diction, Tone, and Voice. Writing Center, Wheaton College; Sword, Helen. Stylish Academic Writing . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.

Strategies for...

Understanding Academic Writing and Its Jargon

The very definition of research jargon is language specific to a particular community of practitioner-researchers . Therefore, in modern university life, jargon represents the specific language and meaning assigned to words and phrases specific to a discipline or area of study. For example, the idea of being rational may hold the same general meaning in both political science and psychology, but its application to understanding and explaining phenomena within the research domain of a each discipline may have subtle differences based upon how scholars in that discipline apply the concept to the theories and practice of their work.

Given this, it is important that specialist terminology [i.e., jargon] must be used accurately and applied under the appropriate conditions . Subject-specific dictionaries are the best places to confirm the meaning of terms within the context of a specific discipline. These can be found by either searching in the USC Libraries catalog by entering the disciplinary and the word dictionary [e.g., sociology and dictionary] or using a database such as Credo Reference [a curated collection of subject encyclopedias, dictionaries, handbooks, guides from highly regarded publishers] . It is appropriate for you to use specialist language within your field of study, but you should avoid using such language when writing for non-academic or general audiences.

Problems with Opaque Writing

A common criticism of scholars is that they can utilize needlessly complex syntax or overly expansive vocabulary that is impenetrable or not well-defined. When writing, avoid problems associated with opaque writing by keeping in mind the following:

1.   Excessive use of specialized terminology . Yes, it is appropriate for you to use specialist language and a formal style of expression in academic writing, but it does not mean using "big words" just for the sake of doing so. Overuse of complex or obscure words or writing complicated sentence constructions gives readers the impression that your paper is more about style than substance; it leads the reader to question if you really know what you are talking about. Focus on creating clear, concise, and elegant prose that minimizes reliance on specialized terminology.

2.   Inappropriate use of specialized terminology . Because you are dealing with concepts, research, and data within your discipline, you need to use the technical language appropriate to that area of study. However, nothing will undermine the validity of your study quicker than the inappropriate application of a term or concept. Avoid using terms whose meaning you are unsure of--do not just guess or assume! Consult the meaning of terms in specialized, discipline-specific dictionaries by searching the USC Libraries catalog or the Credo Reference database [see above].

Additional Problems to Avoid

In addition to understanding the use of specialized language, there are other aspects of academic writing in the social sciences that you should be aware of. These problems include:

• Personal nouns . Excessive use of personal nouns [e.g., I, me, you, us] may lead the reader to believe the study was overly subjective. These words can be interpreted as being used only to avoid presenting empirical evidence about the research problem. Limit the use of personal nouns to descriptions of things you actually did [e.g., "I interviewed ten teachers about classroom management techniques..."]. Note that personal nouns are generally found in the discussion section of a paper because this is where you as the author/researcher interpret and describe your work.
• Directives . Avoid directives that demand the reader to "do this" or "do that." Directives should be framed as evidence-based recommendations or goals leading to specific outcomes. Note that an exception to this can be found in various forms of action research that involve evidence-based advocacy for social justice or transformative change. Within this area of the social sciences, authors may offer directives for action in a declarative tone of urgency.
• Informal, conversational tone using slang and idioms . Academic writing relies on excellent grammar and precise word structure. Your narrative should not include regional dialects or slang terms because they can be open to interpretation. Your writing should be direct and concise using standard English.
• Wordiness. Focus on being concise, straightforward, and developing a narrative that does not have confusing language . By doing so, you  help eliminate the possibility of the reader misinterpreting the design and purpose of your study.
• Vague expressions (e.g., "they," "we," "people," "the company," "that area," etc.). Being concise in your writing also includes avoiding vague references to persons, places, or things. While proofreading your paper, be sure to look for and edit any vague or imprecise statements that lack context or specificity.
• Numbered lists and bulleted items . The use of bulleted items or lists should be used only if the narrative dictates a need for clarity. For example, it is fine to state, "The four main problems with hedge funds are:" and then list them as 1, 2, 3, 4. However, in academic writing, this must then be followed by detailed explanation and analysis of each item. Given this, the question you should ask yourself while proofreading is: why begin with a list in the first place rather than just starting with systematic analysis of each item arranged in separate paragraphs? Also, be careful using numbers because they can imply a ranked order of priority or importance. If none exists, use bullets and avoid checkmarks or other symbols.
• Descriptive writing . Describing a research problem is an important means of contextualizing a study. In fact, some description or background information may be needed because you can not assume the reader knows the key aspects of the topic. However, the content of your paper should focus on methodology, the analysis and interpretation of findings, and their implications as they apply to the research problem rather than background information and descriptions of tangential issues.
• Personal experience. Drawing upon personal experience [e.g., traveling abroad; caring for someone with Alzheimer's disease] can be an effective way of introducing the research problem or engaging your readers in understanding its significance. Use personal experience only as an example, though, because academic writing relies on evidence-based research. To do otherwise is simply story-telling.

NOTE:   Rules concerning excellent grammar and precise word structure do not apply when quoting someone.  A quote should be inserted in the text of your paper exactly as it was stated. If the quote is especially vague or hard to understand, consider paraphrasing it or using a different quote to convey the same meaning. Consider inserting the term "sic" in brackets after the quoted text to indicate that the quotation has been transcribed exactly as found in the original source, but the source had grammar, spelling, or other errors. The adverb sic informs the reader that the errors are not yours.

Academic Writing. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Academic Writing Style. First-Year Seminar Handbook. Mercer University; Bem, Daryl J. Writing the Empirical Journal Article. Cornell University; College Writing. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Murray, Rowena  and Sarah Moore. The Handbook of Academic Writing: A Fresh Approach . New York: Open University Press, 2006; Johnson, Eileen S. “Action Research.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education . Edited by George W. Noblit and Joseph R. Neikirk. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020); Oppenheimer, Daniel M. "Consequences of Erudite Vernacular Utilized Irrespective of Necessity: Problems with Using Long Words Needlessly." Applied Cognitive Psychology 20 (2006): 139-156; Ezza, El-Sadig Y. and Touria Drid. T eaching Academic Writing as a Discipline-Specific Skill in Higher Education . Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2020; Pernawan, Ari. Common Flaws in Students' Research Proposals. English Education Department. Yogyakarta State University; Style. College Writing. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Invention: Five Qualities of Good Writing. The Reading/Writing Center. Hunter College; Sword, Helen. Stylish Academic Writing . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012; What Is an Academic Paper? Institute for Writing Rhetoric. Dartmouth College.

Structure and Writing Style

I. Improving Academic Writing

To improve your academic writing skills, you should focus your efforts on three key areas: 1.   Clear Writing . The act of thinking about precedes the process of writing about. Good writers spend sufficient time distilling information and reviewing major points from the literature they have reviewed before creating their work. Writing detailed outlines can help you clearly organize your thoughts. Effective academic writing begins with solid planning, so manage your time carefully. 2.  Excellent Grammar . Needless to say, English grammar can be difficult and complex; even the best scholars take many years before they have a command of the major points of good grammar. Take the time to learn the major and minor points of good grammar. Spend time practicing writing and seek detailed feedback from professors. Take advantage of the Writing Center on campus if you need help. Proper punctuation and good proofreading skills can significantly improve academic writing [see sub-tab for proofreading you paper ].

Refer to these three basic resources to help your grammar and writing skills:

• A good writing reference book, such as, Strunk and White’s book, The Elements of Style or the St. Martin's Handbook ;
• A college-level dictionary, such as, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary ;
• The latest edition of Roget's Thesaurus in Dictionary Form .

3.  Consistent Stylistic Approach . Whether your professor expresses a preference to use MLA, APA or the Chicago Manual of Style or not, choose one style manual and stick to it. Each of these style manuals provide rules on how to write out numbers, references, citations, footnotes, and lists. Consistent adherence to a style of writing helps with the narrative flow of your paper and improves its readability. Note that some disciplines require a particular style [e.g., education uses APA] so as you write more papers within your major, your familiarity with it will improve.

II. Evaluating Quality of Writing

A useful approach for evaluating the quality of your academic writing is to consider the following issues from the perspective of the reader. While proofreading your final draft, critically assess the following elements in your writing.

• It is shaped around one clear research problem, and it explains what that problem is from the outset.
• Your paper tells the reader why the problem is important and why people should know about it.
• You have accurately and thoroughly informed the reader what has already been published about this problem or others related to it and noted important gaps in the research.
• You have provided evidence to support your argument that the reader finds convincing.
• The paper includes a description of how and why particular evidence was collected and analyzed, and why specific theoretical arguments or concepts were used.
• The paper is made up of paragraphs, each containing only one controlling idea.
• You indicate how each section of the paper addresses the research problem.
• You have considered counter-arguments or counter-examples where they are relevant.
• Arguments, evidence, and their significance have been presented in the conclusion.
• Limitations of your research have been explained as evidence of the potential need for further study.
• The narrative flows in a clear, accurate, and well-organized way.

Boscoloa, Pietro, Barbara Arféb, and Mara Quarisaa. “Improving the Quality of Students' Academic Writing: An Intervention Study.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (August 2007): 419-438; Academic Writing. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Academic Writing Style. First-Year Seminar Handbook. Mercer University; Bem, Daryl J. Writing the Empirical Journal Article. Cornell University; Candlin, Christopher. Academic Writing Step-By-Step: A Research-based Approach . Bristol, CT: Equinox Publishing Ltd., 2016; College Writing. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Style . College Writing. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Invention: Five Qualities of Good Writing. The Reading/Writing Center. Hunter College; Sword, Helen. Stylish Academic Writing . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012; What Is an Academic Paper? Institute for Writing Rhetoric. Dartmouth College.

Writing Tip

Considering the Passive Voice in Academic Writing

In the English language, we are able to construct sentences in the following way: 1.  "The policies of Congress caused the economic crisis." 2.  "The economic crisis was caused by the policies of Congress."

The decision about which sentence to use is governed by whether you want to focus on “Congress” and what they did, or on “the economic crisis” and what caused it. This choice in focus is achieved with the use of either the active or the passive voice. When you want your readers to focus on the "doer" of an action, you can make the "doer"' the subject of the sentence and use the active form of the verb. When you want readers to focus on the person, place, or thing affected by the action, or the action itself, you can make the effect or the action the subject of the sentence by using the passive form of the verb.

Often in academic writing, scholars don't want to focus on who is doing an action, but on who is receiving or experiencing the consequences of that action. The passive voice is useful in academic writing because it allows writers to highlight the most important participants or events within sentences by placing them at the beginning of the sentence.

Use the passive voice when:

• You want to focus on the person, place, or thing affected by the action, or the action itself;
• It is not important who or what did the action;
• You want to be impersonal or more formal.

Form the passive voice by:

• Turning the object of the active sentence into the subject of the passive sentence.
• Changing the verb to a passive form by adding the appropriate form of the verb "to be" and the past participle of the main verb.

NOTE: Consult with your professor about using the passive voice before submitting your research paper. Some strongly discourage its use!

Active and Passive Voice. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Diefenbach, Paul. Future of Digital Media Syllabus. Drexel University; Passive Voice. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina.  

• << Previous: 2. Preparing to Write
• Next: Applying Critical Thinking >>
• Last Updated: May 22, 2024 12:03 PM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

Teaching & Learning

• Education Excellence
• Professional development
• Case studies
• Teaching toolkits
• MicroCPD-UCL
• Assessment resources
• Student partnership
• Generative AI Hub
• Community Engaged Learning
• UCL Student Success

Academic writing

Academic writing is an essential skill for your students to master. Find out how you can support them to develop these skills. 

1 August 2019

In most subjects, academic writing is the biggest factor determining a student’s degree classification. Nothing affects a student’s academic prospects more than their ability to write well.

Higher education subjects are defined through academic texts. If a student is to fully grasp their subject they need to understand how it’s written.

Many students know this but feel that successful academic writing is a mystery.

As teachers, we can help students improve their academic writing by:

• offering them opportunities to practice
• encouraging them to share their work
• giving them individual, face-to-face feedback
• pointing them towards practical resources.

What academic writing means

Academic writing underpins all aspects of teaching and learning. It describes a wide range of activities, such as:

• note-making
• researching
• structuring
• referencing

Putting it into practice

Set clear expectations for writing standards.

Helping students improve their academic writing should be a continual part of teaching, but making time and space in the curriculum for it can be challenging.

At the start of a programme or module, review the course assessment criteria with students. This will help start a conversation about what you expect students to achieve in their writing.

You’ll also need to ensure that you give students the means to reach those standards.

Some aspects of good academic writing will be procedural, for example the format for including citations. Be clear about which system you expect students to use.

Other aspects will be more subjective, such as good sentence construction.

Spending time in the first few weeks can ensure that students are moving in the right direction straight away, rather than waiting until a piece of assessed written work is due.

• Academic integrity: staff guide to UCL’s online course for students : how to support your students to recognise and avoid plagiarism and other academic misconduct.

What makes good academic writing

Get students to think about:

• language fundamentals such as grammar, punctuation and spelling
• writing clear introductions, statements of purpose and conclusions
• writing in plain English
• revising their work, always reading it back to check it makes sense.

Get students to write frequently

The best way to help students improve their academic writing is to get them to do short and varied writing activities throughout their course. If this isn’t done, students may only be expected to produce one or two pieces of assessed written work per module.

Short tasks done in class are especially effective. They also keep students engaged with the subject (see the Active learning toolkit ).

• Thinking Writing by Queen Mary University of London, contains lots of great ideas for short writing tasks.

The wider the range of writing genres that students practise, the better.

Get students to critique their own and others’ writing

1. reviewing published works .

In class, look at a piece of published work relevant to your subject and discuss with students what makes it good. Better still, do this with your own work and talk about the stages of writing.

Choose something short: for example the introduction to a book, or a journal article.

• why the author has written it
• how the author has formulated the argument
• how easy it is to understand
• which aspects of the author’s writing style help or hinder the reader.

2. Reviewing coursework from a previous year group

Look at coursework from a previous year group and discuss its strengths and weaknesses.

Compare it with the marking guide and ask students to say what they would have given it. Then you can reveal what mark it actually got.

Make sure any work you show is anonymised. If you are using students’ work from recent years, ideally you should get their permission first. If in doubt, check with your teaching lead.

To maximise time in the classroom, share the written work with students beforehand via Moodle.

Example case study:  It's a trap! How I got students to engage with assessment: the power of guided marking

3. Getting students to critique their own and others’ writing

Get students to write something for five minutes. Then ask them to read one another’s work in groups of three and compare views.

As a teacher, you don’t have to read everything your students write. Encouraging students to show their written work to others (apart from you) can help them become better at self-assessment and peer assessment . 

It can also make them think more carefully about what they write. Showing work to others can help to foster a better culture of learning and sharing among students. It also gives students a sense of how they are contributing to the body of work that makes up an academic subject. 

Offer individual tuition to students

Ask your teaching lead about the individual support on a programme for students to improve their writing.

Ask your students if they’ve ever been invited to sit down with someone to go through their writing. If they haven’t, give them that opportunity.

Sit down for 15 minutes with a student. Look at a short piece of their writing with them and explain how they could improve it.

If you have too many students (say over 25), you could offer part of your weekly office time on a first-come-first-served basis.

Particularly in their first two years of study, offer your personal tutees the chance to use a tutorial to talk about academic writing.

UCL writing resources

Use these resources for more practical examples of things to try when teaching large groups.  

• UCL Academic Communication Centre  shows what support is available to students in each faculty.
• UCL Centre for Languages & International Education (CLIE) offers taught courses for students who are non-native speakers of English and resources for staff to help students with their English.
• UCL Academic Writing Centre at the IOE, UCL's Faculty of Education and Society, provides short courses, tutorials, forums and online resources to IOE postgraduate students.
• Writing and Language Support Programme (WALS) : peer-to-peer support for non-native speakers of English through UCL Union.
• UCL’s Survey of English Usage produces apps on academic writing (free), spelling and punctuation (free) and grammar (various costs).
• UCL Student Disability Services has produced some excellent guides on reading, note-taking, essay writing, revision technique and time management.

Academic integrity: staff guide to UCL’s online course for students

UCL also has a licence for Linkedin Learning (formerly Lynda.com), the online video training provider. Linkedin Learning has several short courses on writing, such as writing in plain English.

External writing resources

• Guide to writing essays , the Royal Literary Fund
• Guide to writing dissertations , the Royal Literary Fund
• Andrew Northedge, The Good Study Guide, 2nd ed. , The Open University, 2005. Book available on Amazon
• William Strunk and E.B. White, The Elements of Style, 4th ed. , New York, 2000. Book available on Amazon
• How to write in Plain English, the Plain English Campaign (pdf)

This guide has been produced by the UCL Arena Centre for Research-based Education . You are welcome to use this guide if you are from another educational facility, but you must credit the UCL Arena Centre. 

Further information

More teaching toolkits  - back to the toolkits menu

Personal tutoring at UCL

[email protected] : contact the UCL Arena Centre 

UCL Education Strategy 2016–21  

Download a printable copy of this guide

Case studies : browse related stories from UCL staff and students.

Sign up to the monthly UCL education e-newsletter  to get the latest teaching news, events & resources.  

Education events

Funnelback feed: https://search2.ucl.ac.uk/s/search.json?collection=drupal-teaching-learn... Double click the feed URL above to edit

Essential Rules for Academic Writing: A Beginner’s Guide

Unlock the key rules for academic writing: from structure to citations. Master scholarly communication with expert insights.

Mastering the art of academic writing is a fundamental skill that empowers students and researchers to express their ideas, convey complex concepts, and contribute meaningfully to their respective fields. However, for beginners venturing into the realm of scholarly writing, navigating the intricacies of this formal discourse can be a daunting task.

“Essential Rules for Academic Writing: A Beginner’s Guide” serves as a beacon of guidance, illuminating the path for aspiring scholars as they embark on their academic journey. This comprehensive article offers invaluable insights into the fundamental principles and key rules that underpin successful academic writing, providing a strong foundation for those new to the craft.

What Is Academic Writing?

Academic writing refers to a formal style of writing that is prevalent in academic settings such as universities, research institutions, and scholarly publications. It is a mode of communication used by students, researchers, and scholars to convey their ideas, present research findings, and engage in intellectual discourse within their respective fields of study.

Related article: 11 Best Grammar Checker Tools For Academic Writing

Unlike other forms of writing, academic writing adheres to specific conventions and standards that prioritize clarity, precision, objectivity, and critical thinking. It is characterized by a rigorous approach to presenting arguments, supporting claims with evidence, and adhering to the principles of logic and reasoning.

Academic writing encompasses a wide range of genres, including essays, research papers, literature reviews, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and journal articles. Regardless of the specific genre, academic writing typically follows a structured format, includes proper citation and referencing, and adheres to established academic style guides such as APA (American Psychological Association) or MLA (Modern Language Association).

Types Of Academic Writing

Here’s a table summarizing the different types of academic writing, along with their definitions, purposes and typical structures:

Also read: Words To Use In Essays: Amplifying Your Academic Writing

General Rules For Academic Writing

Here are some general rules for academic writing: by adhering to these general guidelines, you can enhance the clarity, effectiveness, and professionalism of your academic writing, ensuring that your ideas are communicated with precision and impact.

Clarity and Precision

Academic writing demands clarity and precision in the expression of ideas. Use clear and concise language to communicate your thoughts effectively. Avoid ambiguous or vague statements, and strive for a logical flow of ideas within your writing.

Audience Awareness

Consider your intended audience when writing academically. Be aware of their background knowledge and familiarity with the topic. Adapt your writing style and level of technicality accordingly, ensuring that your content is accessible and understandable to your readers.

Use Formal Language

Academic writing requires a formal tone and language. Avoid colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions. Instead, employ a vocabulary appropriate to the academic context, using specialized terms when necessary.

Structure and Organization

Structure your writing in a logical and coherent manner. Use clear headings, subheadings, and paragraphs to guide the reader through your work. Ensure that your ideas are well-organized and presented in a cohesive manner, with each paragraph or section contributing to the overall argument or discussion.

Evidence-Based Reasoning

Support your arguments and claims with credible evidence. Reference authoritative sources and cite them appropriately to establish the foundation for your ideas. Use empirical data, scholarly research, and reputable references to strengthen the validity and reliability of your work.

Critical Thinking

Academic writing encourages critical thinking and analysis. Engage with the existing literature, identify strengths and weaknesses in the arguments, and develop your own well-reasoned perspective. Challenge assumptions, evaluate alternative viewpoints, and provide well-supported arguments.

Proper Referencing and Citation

Maintain academic integrity by properly referencing and citing all sources used in your writing. Follow the specific citation style required by your academic institution or field, such as APA , MLA , or Chicago style . Accurate referencing gives credit to the original authors, allows readers to verify your sources, and demonstrates your commitment to scholarly integrity.

Revision and Proofreading

Academic writing involves a process of revision and proofreading. Review your work for clarity, coherence, grammar, and spelling errors. Ensure that your writing is free from typographical mistakes and inconsistencies. Seek feedback from peers, instructors, or writing centers to enhance the quality of your work.

Also read: What Is Proofreading And How To Harness Its Benefits?

How To Improve The Academic Writing

To enhance your academic writing skills, it is crucial to engage in regular practice and give careful consideration to various aspects. Here are some essential focal points to pay attention to in order to improve your academic writing:

Punctuation

• Proper use of commas, periods, question marks, and exclamation marks to enhance clarity and meaning in sentences.
• Effective use of semicolons and colons to join related independent clauses and introduce lists or explanations.
• Understanding the role of dashes and hyphens to indicate interruptions or join words in compound adjectives.

Capitalization

• Capitalize proper nouns, including names of people, places, institutions, and specific titles or terms.
• Follow capitalization rules for titles, capitalizing the first and last words, as well as major words within the title.
• Ensure consistency in capitalization within headings and subheadings.

Grammar and Sentence Structure

• Ensure subject-verb agreement, ensuring that the subject and verb agree in number and person.
• Use proper tenses and maintain consistency in verb tense usage within a paragraph or section.
• Write clear and unambiguous sentences, avoiding run-on sentences, fragments, or unclear pronoun references.

Academic Conventions

• Apply appropriate formatting and font style as per the guidelines of the specific academic institution or style guide.
• Use headings and subheadings correctly, following a consistent hierarchy and formatting style.
• Use abbreviations appropriately and consistently, following the accepted conventions in the field.
• Adhere to specific guidelines for tables, figures, and graphs, including proper numbering, labeling, and citation.

Infographic Templates Made By Scientists

Mind the Graph revolutionizes scientific communication by offering scientists a user-friendly platform with scientifically-themed infographic templates. Publication-ready exporting ensures seamless integration into scientific papers and presentations. Mind the Graph empowers scientists to make their research more accessible and engaging through visually appealing infographics. Start your free trial now!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Exclusive high quality content about effective visual communication in science.

Unlock Your Creativity

Create infographics, presentations and other scientifically-accurate designs without hassle — absolutely free for 7 days!

About Jessica Abbadia

Jessica Abbadia is a lawyer that has been working in Digital Marketing since 2020, improving organic performance for apps and websites in various regions through ASO and SEO. Currently developing scientific and intellectual knowledge for the community's benefit. Jessica is an animal rights activist who enjoys reading and drinking strong coffee.

Content tags

• 301 Academic Skills Centre
• Study skills online

Academic writing

Strategies and advice on how to communicate your ideas using an appropriate academic register

Introduction to academic writing

Producing written work as part of a university exam, essay, dissertation or another form of assignment requires an approach to organisation, structure, voice and use of language that differs from other forms of writing and communication.

Academic writing is a language that no one is born speaking. Understanding more about the conventions of your discipline and the specific features and conventions of academic writing can help you develop confidence and make improvements to your written work.

Academic writing is part of a complex process of finding, analysing and evaluating information, planning, structuring, editing and proofreading your work, and reflecting on feedback that underpins written assessment at university.

Here we focus on the key principles of academic writing as a way to communicate your ideas using appropriate language, structure and organisation. 

301 Recommends:

Our Academic Writing Essentials workshop will explore the challenges of writing in an academic register and provide a range of strategies that can be used to develop your academic voice. The workshop will cover the use of language, structuring your writing and critical writing to take a holistic view of the writing process from a blank page through to a completed piece of work.

Try out our Academic Writing Interactive Digital Workshop  to explore the key principles of good academic writing.

Our Paraphrasing workshop will explore the roles of paraphrasing, quoting and 'para-quoting' and provide strategies for formulating and referencing paraphrases.

Join our 301 Writing Club sessions which include three 25-minute blocks of silent writing time, plus time to share your writing goals and progress with others. This is not a workshop, please bring an piece of academic writing to work on.

Academic language

Academic writing is defined by conventions rather than rules. This means that they are flexible and adaptable at least some of the time.

The point is not for you and your peers to produce identical pieces of work, but to provide a shared framework of communication that allows specialists within a field to access information, ideas and concepts quickly and easily.

It goes without saying that academic writing uses a more formal register than everyday communication. The following are four important conventions to follow that will help you to hit the right level of formality in your writing:

Use formal language

Academic writing tends to adopt formal language derived from Latinate, rather than Anglo-Saxon roots. This distinction is particularly evident in the use of verbs in academic language.

In general, phrasal verbs are used when speaking (eg in presentations), whilst Latinate verbs are used in academic writing (eg essays). Phrasal language is more informal, whilst Latinate verbs sound 'posher' and more formal.

Phrasal verbs tend to come in two parts: they use a  verb  together with an  adverb  or preposition.

There is often a one-word equivalent, which usually comes from Latin root, reflecting the origins of formal English among educated Romans and the Church.

Examples include: 

Carry out = perform

Talk about = discuss

Look up to = respect

Why is this useful? Latinate verbs use fewer words, so can help you develop a more concise writing style.

Latinate verbs can also be more specific than their phrasal equivalents, for example, the phrasal verb 'set up' has several Latinate equivalents: 

Set up a room: I’m going to  arrange  the room for the meeting.

Set up an experiment: The experiment was  prepared.

Set up an organisation: The NSPCC was  established  in 1884.

You may wish to use a mixture of phrasal and Latinate verbs in your writing, and to tailor it to your assignment. For example, if writing a more informal blog post, you may want to use more phrasal language.

Some common examples of academic verb use include:

Carry out: Perform "The experiment was carried out/performed..."

Find out:   Investigate "The aim of this project is to find out/investigate…"

Leave out: Omit "Therefore this was left out of/omitted from the analysis..."

Awareness of how and when to use different registers of language can help to improve the level of formality of your writing. 

Avoid contractions and abbreviations

Academic writing tends to avoid the types of contractions and abbreviated language that you might use in other forms of communication.

In some cases, this is obvious, but in other cases, where abbreviations have become commonly used forms of words, it can be more difficult to spot.

For example:

Are not/is not: Aren't/isn't

Quotation: Quote

UK: United Kingdom

However, some commonly used abbreviations or acronyms relating to the discipline will often need to be used to enhance the clarity of your writing and reduce the word count.

In these cases, it is important to use the full form of the abbreviated name or phrase in the first instance, including the abbreviation in parentheses.

A key role has always been played by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)...

World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations state...

The use of an Electrocardiogram (ECG) is recommended...

Certain extremely commonly used acronyms have become part of common usage and do not require further explanation within a text. For example, AIDS, laser, radar, scuba. 

Write objectively

Academic writing tends to strive for an appearance of objectivity.

Although you will no doubt have an informed opinion or theory that you are trying to get across in your writing, it is important to build a compelling objective case for your ideas using evidence and data.

Secondary sources should be used to build a foundation of background thinking, ideas and theories to support your approach.

All secondary sources (books, journals, webpages, conference presentations, films, audio recordings, etc.) should be referenced using the standard system recommended by your department.

A bibliography of all referenced works should be included at the end of your assignment, ordered alphabetically and formatted using the recommended standard system. 

Visit the  library referencing pages  for more information, examples and tutorials.

Primary sources include any information or data that you have found, collected or generated to illustrate your arguments or explore your hypotheses. Primary sources may include texts that you are analysing, survey responses, experimental data, artefacts and much more.

When writing about primary and secondary sources, it is usually better to avoid using the first person ('I' or 'we' forms), as your focus should be on an objective interpretation of that evidence. 

The first person is most commonly used to indicate where you are going beyond an objective analysis to put forward your own informed opinions, for example as part of a discussion section or conclusion. 

Some principles of using the first person include:

Avoid overusing the first person (I) and use passive forms where possible: "the experiment was conducted..."; "evidence suggests..."; "a sample was taken..."

Watch out for adjectives that imply a value judgement: fantastic, brilliant, rubbish, interesting, good, etc.

Avoid using cliched phrases: "a hot topic..."; "the other side of the coin..."; "at the end of the day..."; "the fact of the matter..."; "in the current climate..."

Avoid overstatement. Make cautious use or avoid the following altogether: extremely, very, really, always, never, a lot, the most, the least

Note: always check department guidelines   on the use of first-person forms in your writing.

301 Recommends: Manchester University Academic Phrasebank

The Academic Phrasebank is a repository of the most commonly-used phrases in published academic work, organised according to purpose and function. Explore the Phrasebank for ideas on how to express yourself using established academic language.

Paragraphs and flow

Paragraphs are the building blocks of your written work, and a good essay or assignment will organise the content clearly at a paragraph level.

However, in a piece of academic writing paragraphs can be tricky to structure due to the complexity of ideas that you are likely to be working with.

The following structure is not the only way to write a paragraph, but it is a common model that is used in academic writing to build sources and evidence into your writing in a critical and analytical way. 

Writing good paragraphs: structure

Most paragraphs of academic writing tend to follow a similar organisational structure:

The topic sentence:  States the main idea or area to be covered by the paragraph.

Explanation or definitions (optional):  Can be used to clarify any difficult or uncertain terminology introduced in the topic sentence.

Evidence and examples:  One or more sentences introducing key ideas, sources, quotes, case studies, evidence or data.

Comment:  Explores what the evidence means, how it can be summarised or whether it needs to be challenged.

Concluding sentence:  Relates the paragraph to your overall argument and links forward to the next paragraph.

The final sentence is often the most important part of a paragraph as it clarifies your interpretation of the topic area and identifies how it contributes to your overall argument.

Watch this short  study skills hacks video  for more information. 

Writing good paragraphs: unity

A paragraph will usually discuss only one idea as outlined in the first sentence, the  topic sentence . If you find a paragraph drifting away from this controlling idea, it is time to split it into more than one paragraph:

The opening sentence of paragraph should outline the main idea (topic sentence).

Every supporting sentence should directly explain, refer back to, or build on the main idea using specific evidence and examples where possible.

Use the final sentence(s) to refer back to the topic sentence and lead into the following paragraph.

Writing good paragraphs: flow 

The skill of structuring your writing and building effective connections between paragraphs is one that will allow you to develop and sustain a compelling argument in your written work.

By setting out your ideas and evidence with a natural flow, you will make your work much more readable.

This important technique will help you work towards higher levels of attainment in assignments and help to improve the quality of your everyday writing.

Paraphrasing and quoting

When you are producing a piece of writing at university, you will often want to talk about what someone else has written about the topic.

There are four distinct ways of doing this.

Quoting:  directly including in your work the published words or other data you have found in a source

Paraphrasing:  expressing in your own words the ideas, arguments, words or other material you have found published elsewhere

Para-quoting:  paraphrasing an idea or area but retaining one or more important words and phrases from the original in quotation marks

Summarising:  providing a top-level overview of a single larger area of work or multiple sources

There are many reasons for quoting or paraphrasing in your own work, but essentially these techniques allow you to show your understanding of current knowledge about the topic you are studying and respond to that knowledge in your work.

Remember that you will need to cite and reference all of the sources that have informed your work.

It is a complex linguistic skill to incorporate others’ work smoothly and efficiently into your own by quoting or paraphrasing.

Skilful use of sources and selective quoting and paraphrasing are important elements of the critical writing process, which is in greater detail on the critical thinking pages – see  Legitimation Code Theory  for more ideas.

It is also a key skill of academic writing that will help to ensure that your work does not include elements of plagiarism.

For more information on unfair means and plagiarism, including suggestions on how to avoid it, see the following  resource .

As with other aspects of working with sources, it is important to  follow your department's specific guidelines about these skills.

When to quote and when to paraphrase

You should direct quote

if you are referring to a formal definition in which the specific language is important

if you are quoting an opinion (with which you do not necessarily agree)

if you are reporting direct speech, eg the reactions or experience of someone actually involved

if you wish to highlight specific features of the author's writing style

 You should paraphrase

to elaborate on or explain a concept or definition to your reader

to engage critically with an opinion or source and demonstrate that you understand it fully

to summarise the reactions or experience of one or more individual

if the general concept is more important than the specific language used

Writing to a word count

If you find you often go over the word count on an assignment, there are several possible causes and solutions.

In this online resource, we will think about the purpose of the word count, the reasons why we might go over it, and strategies to tackle it.

Why is there a word count?

Word counts are part of the challenge of academic writing for several reasons:

To suggest a level of detail: with one topic, you could write a 100-word summary, 1,000-word essay, 10,000-word dissertation, or a 100,000 word PhD thesis. The word count gives an indication of the level of depth you are expected to go into

To ensure fairness: each student has the same number of words to show the marker what they know. 

To test your communication skills: being able to keep within a word count requires a concise writing style and excellent communication skills – it helps you get straight to the point.

To demonstrate your critical thinking skills: to stay within word counts, you need to focus on what is most important and select the best examples and case studies. It puts critical thinking into practice

As a matter of practicality: markers only have a finite amount of time to mark work.

Why do we go over the word count?

First of all, it is important to remember that being over the word count is better than having a blank page. The ideas are down on the page but might need refining. There are several reasons why you might have exceeded the word count: 

Still developing an effective structure: Do you have a clear plan and have you stuck to it? If not, can you map out an overall structure for your essay and identify areas where you have departed from it?

Fear of missing out on something important: try to be selective with examples and arguments. What is your mission statement or key argument, and how does each section help you make it?

Waffling (using 200 words when 100 will do): work on developing a concise academic writing style. Even if you’re not over the word count, this leaves you more words for your critical analysis and discussion

Writing to a word count involves careful planning and organisation to make sure that you get your main points across. The following points might help you to stay within the parameters that you are aiming for:

• Plan what your key points are, and what percentage of your word count to spend on each. Are any sections disproportionately long?
• Avoid repeating arguments – try reading your work backwards (paragraph by paragraph, not word by word). This can make it easier to spot ideas that are repeated, as you are viewing each paragraph individually rather than your argument as a whole
• Use topic sentences at the start of each paragraph. This can help you (and the marker) to identify what key point you are trying to make. Are there any paragraphs that are making the same point? Can you link them?
• It might be tempting to show all of the reading you have done, but select the most important case studies, and explain why you have chosen them. This can be evidence of critical thinking (eg whilst many studies have examined X, a key paper is Y because…)
• Are you using 200 words where 100 will do? One way of testing this is to calculate your  Fog Index  to find out how clear and concise your writing is.

Remember: Having a more concise academic writing style gives you more words to use on things that are important, eg critical analysis and discussion. It’s not just about cutting the odd word here and there to get you under the word count.

The following are some simple tips to make sure you stay within your word count:

Find out what counts towards your word count (for references, footnotes, abstract, captions, tables, text boxes…)

Consider combining related sections or cutting irrelevant sections.

Focus on condensing your key arguments.

Use a concise academic writing style, eg avoid excessive hedging, remove redundant adjectives.

Lie about your word count.

Cut sections just to meet the word count.

Focus on removing individual words – this will be extremely time consuming and will make little impact on your overall count.

Use contractions to meet the word count (eg isn't, doesn't, shouldn't) – this is not academic.

Useful resources

Internal resources.

University of Sheffield Library –  R esearch and Critical Thinking Resources

Digital Learning - Using Turnitin  (login required)

English Language Teaching Centre (ELTC) –   P araphrasing

External Resources

Manchester University –  Academic phrasebank

UCL Institute of English –  Word count

Gunning Fog Index Calculator –  Online tool

Purdue Online Writing Lab –  Quoting, paraphrasing and summarising

Wisconsin Writing Centre –  Paraphrasing vs. quoting

Using English for academic purposes –  Writing paragraphs

Related information

Academic Skills Certificate

Dissertation planning

Scientific writing and lab reports

Essay Structure and Planning

Be the first to hear about our new and upcoming workshops!

The 301 Academic Skills Centre newsletter is a fortnightly email for study skills, mathematics and statistics.

Be the first to find out about our:

• new and upcoming workshops,
• special events and programmes, and
• new and relevant online materials and resources.

Sheffield is a research university with a global reputation for excellence. We're a member of the Russell Group: one of the 24 leading UK universities for research and teaching.