Figure 1
Survey Respondents by Position
Out of 53 skills and knowledge areas, 10 were ranked as core by 50 percent or more of academic librarians: knowledge of professional ethics; evaluating and selecting information sources; cultural competence; reflective practice grounded in diversity and inclusion; interpersonal communication; writing; customer service; search skills; interacting with diverse communities; and teamwork. Figure 2 shows the percentage of academic librarians who ranked each of these skills as core.
Figure 2 |
KSAs Ranked Core by 50%+ Academic Librarians |
Skills not ranked as core were not necessarily considered unimportant or irrelevant. Many of the remaining 53 KSAs were ranked as very important or important, indicating that most academic librarians would need some familiarity with those skills and concepts, but they are not considered a necessary grounding for all academic librarians across positions. In fact, none of the 53 KSAs were ranked as “not important” by more than a handful of people. Further, only four KSAs of 53 were identified as specialized by 50 percent or more of participants, meaning those participants believe that only professionals in specialized positions are likely to need those skills or that knowledge. Those four areas included preservation of digital sources (50%), preservation of nondigital sources (61%), management of archival records and manuscripts (73%), and managing network systems (65%). Figures 3–7 show the rankings of all 53 KSAs, broken down by the survey categories of General, Communications, User Services, Management, and Technology.
Figure 3 |
General Skills Ranked |
Figure 4 |
Communications Skills Ranked |
Figure 5 |
User Services Skills Ranked |
Figure 6 |
User Services Skills Ranked |
Figure 7 |
Technology Skills Ranked |
One aim of this study was to compare core KSAs as identified by academic librarians to those ranked core by all other information professionals. After eliminating the 830 academic librarians from the responses, there were 1,624 respondents representing public, special, school, and corporate libraries, various archives, and some nontraditional settings such as database vendors. Looking just at the nonacademic librarian responses, 11 KSAs were ranked as core by 50 percent or more of participants. These included the 10 selected by the academic librarians, as well as reference interview skills, which were identified as core by 53 percent of nonacademic librarian respondents. Only 45 percent of academic librarians ranked the reference interview as a core skill. While academic and nonacademic respondents ranked nearly all the same KSAs as core, they often did so at somewhat different rates. In fact, chi-square tests revealed that seven of the 11 skills showed a statistically significant difference in the rate at which each group ranked the KSAs as core. Table 1 shows the top 11 KSAs along with the percentage of academic and nonacademic librarians ranking each as core and whether there was a statistically significant difference in the ranking.
Table 1 | ||||
Top Ten Skills Ranked by Academic and Non-Academic Respondents | ||||
KSA | Percentage of Academic Librarians Ranking KSA as Core | Percentage of All Other Information Professionals Ranking KSA as Core | p-value | Significance |
Interpersonal communication | 89% | 86% | .0256 | Significant |
Knowledge of professional ethics | 81% | 82% | .65 | NOT Significant |
Writing | 80% | 77% | .00085 | Significant |
Search skills | 76% | 81% | .0057 | Significant |
Teamwork | 76% | 76% | .7507 | NOT Significant |
Evaluating and selecting information resources | 72% | 80% | .00005 | Significant |
Cultural competence | 66% | 65% | .703 | NOT Significant |
Customer service skills | 66% | 75% | .00001 | Significant |
Interacting with diverse communities | 65% | 60% | .0442 | Significant |
Reflective practice grounded in diversity & inclusion | 55% | 51% | .053 | NOT Significant |
Reference interview/question negotiation | 45% | 53% | .00001 | Significant |
Chi-square tests revealed there were statistically significant differences in how academic and nonacademic respondents rated many of the other skills, in addition to these 11 “core” KSAs. In fact, there were statistically significant differences in rankings for 24 of the remaining 42 skills. Table 2 lists those 42 skills along with the percentage of academic and nonacademic librarians ranking each as core, telling whether there was a statistically significant difference in the ranking.
Table 2 | ||||
Significance in Skills Ranking between Academic and Non-Academic Respondents | ||||
Skill | Percentage of Academic Librarians Ranking KSA as Core | Percentage of All Other Information Professionals Ranking KSA as Core | p-value | Significance |
General | ||||
Describing information resources | 39% | 49% | 0.000015 | Significant |
Legal issues (copyright, etc.) | 37% | 44% | 0.00151 | Significant |
Knowledge management | 22% | 27% | 0.0065 | Significant |
Research data management | 17% | 27% | 0 | Significant |
Taxonomy/classification development | 8% | 13% | 0.000089 | Significant |
Metadata creation | 7% | 10% | 0.01571 | Significant |
Metadata management | 7% | 10% | 0.0082 | Significant |
Preservation of digital resources | 5% | 9% | 0.0001 | Significant |
Preservation of non-digital resources | 3% | 7% | 0.0004 | Significant |
Knowledge of user information behaviors | 43% | 43% | 0.817 | NOT significant |
Information literacy standards | 36% | 40% | 0.0875 | NOT significant |
Grounding in history of library and information practices and professions | 34% | 30% | 0.0677 | NOT significant |
Evaluation research (collecting and analyzing data for purposes of improvement) | 33% | 31% | 0.302 | NOT significant |
Reporting basic descriptive statistics | 32% | 30% | 0.2858 | NOT significant |
Basic data collection methods (surveys, focus groups, etc.) | 32% | 29% | 0.2327 | NOT significant |
Grounding in social justice | 29% | 30% | 0.8042 | NOT significant |
Design thinking (approach or strategy for innovation) | 19% | 21% | 0.1666 | NOT significant |
Management of archival records and manuscripts | 2% | 3% | 0.3566 | NOT significant |
Communication | ||||
Advocacy (representing organizational interests to stakeholders) | 38% | 45% | 0.00042 | Significant |
Marketing/outreach | 23% | 32% | 0.000001 | Significant |
Making effective visual presentations | 33% | 32% | 0.6567 | NOT significant |
Public speaking | 33% | 31% | 0.4674 | NOT significant |
User Services | ||||
Community/user needs assessment | 30% | 38% | 0.0002 | Significant |
Reader's advisory | 4% | 23% | 0 | Significant |
Instruction/teaching (f2f & online) | 28% | 31% | 0.27 | NOT significant |
Management | ||||
Fundamentals of management | 36% | 44% | 0.00018 | Significant |
Leadership | 33% | 43% | 0.000004 | Significant |
Budgeting | 17% | 31% | 0 | Significant |
Grant writing | 11% | 18% | 0.000003 | Significant |
HR/personnel management | 10% | 15% | 0.00047 | Significant |
Facilities management | 4% | 11% | 0 | Significant |
Project management | 43% | 43% | 0.9126 | NOT significant |
Change management | 34% | 37% | 0.1471 | NOT significant |
Data-driven decision-making | 32% | 31% | 0.5781 | NOT significant |
Technology | ||||
Knowledge of online security issues | 33% | 37% | 0.0476 | Significant |
Usability testing for improvement | 16% | 11% | 0.00041 | Significant |
Troubleshooting hardware | 15% | 22% | 0.00002 | Significant |
Social networking application in information settings | 13% | 22% | 0 | Significant |
Managing network systems | 2% | 5% | 0.0095 | Significant |
Troubleshooting software | 24% | 27% | 0.0776 | NOT significant |
Website design | 9% | 8% | 1.622 | NOT significant |
Coding/programming | 4% | 5% | 0.4103 | NOT significant |
Participants in this survey identified 10 KSAs as core to academic librarianship. Seven of the 10 core KSAs are what might be considered “soft” or personal skills. Specifically, these seven KSAs include interpersonal communication, writing, teamwork, customer service skills, cultural competence, interacting with diverse communities, and reflective practice grounded in diversity and inclusion. The three remaining KSAs—knowledge of professional ethics, evaluating and selecting resources, and search skills—are more firmly rooted in the domain knowledge of the field of librarianship. Broadly speaking, those KSAs seem to align with previous research and reports on core competencies and critical areas.
For example, several previous studies have identified soft skills as among the most important for librarians and as the top priorities of hiring managers when reviewing applicants. 34 Further, these soft skills underpin many of the other domain-specific skills and knowledge areas that, while not identified as core, still ranked as very important for academic librarians. For instance, interpersonal communication, customer service skills, cultural competence, and the ability to interact with diverse communities are all necessary to providing front-line, public-facing user services jobs such as reference and instruction. Many of these skills also align with student learning outcome areas defined in ALA’s Standards for Accreditation . For example, cultural competence and interacting with diverse communities directly align with ALA standard I.2.6, which states that all graduates of ALA-accredited master’s programs should understand “The role of library and information services in a diverse global society, including the role of serving the needs of underserved groups.” 35 Nevertheless, it is interesting that three-quarters of the core skills of academic librarians are essentially generic soft skills. As discussed in more detail below, these results raise questions about education and training for a specialization in academic libraries, as well as questions about the extent to which certain soft skills, such as interpersonal skills, can be taught and assessed.
Three of the 10 core skills are more solidly situated within the specific domain of library and information science: knowledge of professional ethics, evaluating and selecting information resources, and search skills. Again, these results seem to align with previous research identifying core skills or areas. For example, even as academic libraries look to diversify their roles and use of space, a review of strategic plans found that collections are still a top priority for academic libraries, appearing as a strategic goal area in 100 percent of those plans. 36 In addition, the library’s role of procuring and making available resources is one of the areas most highly valued by faculty, especially in the sciences. 37 Similarly, reference positions, often with instruction responsibilities, continue to remain steady in academic libraries, 38 and previous studies have confirmed the importance of search skills to reference positions. 39 As noted above, information literacy and instruction are currently considered one of the most important areas for academic librarians. Librarians in these positions indicate that teaching users to locate and access information is one of their primary areas of responsibility, as well as an area on which they spend much of their instruction time. 40 Thus, it makes sense that selection and evaluation of resources and search skills would be considered core areas.
While the 10 skills identified as core KSAs are perhaps not surprising in and of themselves, one striking aspect of the results is that not a single technology skill was identified as core by at least 50 percent of respondents. In fact, the top-ranked technology skill, knowledge of online security, was only ranked as core by one-third of respondents, followed by trouble-shooting hardware at just under 25 percent. All other technology skills were identified as core by fewer than one-quarter of respondents. This lack of attention to technology skills might seem surprising at first, given the impact of technology on the field and the fact that nearly every aspect of librarians’ jobs involve interaction with, understanding of, and instruction in various technologies. However, even these findings seem to align with previous research. For instance, in a series of focus groups on library competencies, researchers in Australia noted “participants observed that library 2.0 should not be tied to specific technological tools (e.g., blogs or wiki), as this may impede scope for libraries and their services to continue to evolve. The focus needs to be on change and how to meet the changing needs of users.” 41 Likewise, Saunders found that, though hiring managers in United States focus groups often mentioned technology as a necessary skill, there was little agreement about which technologies, specifically, were in demand. 42 Participants in both studies seemed to agree that, when discussing librarianship broadly rather than specific technology skills, emerging professionals had to achieve a certain level of comfort with technology generally, which included learning how to learn and being willing to continuously upgrade their skills. Specific software and hardware or other technical knowledge would be dependent on the setting and position. The results of this study suggest a similar pattern. It is worth noting, too, that this survey was asking respondents to identify skills that are core, or necessary for all emerging professionals regardless of role or job function. This survey suggests that technology skills are not unimportant, but they are more likely to vary by position and over time. Thus, academic librarians generally need to have strong technology skills and a general facility with technology and willingness to learn, but the specific programs, skills, and technologies will depend on the specific job.
In a similar way, the fact that KSAs associated with trend areas, such as data management, evaluation research, or design thinking, were not identified as core skills does not necessarily mean that they are unimportant. As noted above, many of the skills not ranked as core were still rated as highly important. For example, while only 16 percent of academic library respondents rated data research management as core, an additional 66 percent said it is very important or important. Likewise, only one-third of respondents said that the ability to carry out evaluation research is core, but another 60 percent ranked it as very important or important. There are two possible implications of these findings. The first is that not every emerging academic librarian needs to be grounded in these particular KSAs, but many librarians will need to be familiar with them. As with technology, the suggestion is that the extent of knowledge or ability necessary is more dependent on job function.
Another possibility is that some of these areas are still emerging themselves. For example, many academic libraries are only beginning to offer data management services to their faculty, and others are still exploring the possibility but have not implemented such a service. Thus, some of these trending areas might still be too new to be considered core. Over time, however, they might begin to take on a more central role within academic libraries. Further, some of these emerging areas entail traditional skills as well. Data research management, for instance, can include acquiring, organizing, and providing access to data sets, as well as offering instruction in the location, evaluation, and use of these sets. Thus, data research management incorporates KSAs such as evaluating and selecting information sources, describing information resources, search skills, and providing instruction, some of which have been identified as core.
Finally, it is worth noting that there were a number of statistically significant differences between academic librarians and other information professionals across the KSAs, both core and not. These findings suggest that there are some fundamental differences in terms of the skills and qualifications for information professionals preparing to work in academic libraries compared to other settings. In all cases but one, academic librarians identified the KSA in question as core in lower proportions than the broader group. The only exception to this finding was for usability testing for improvement, where 16 percent of academic librarians ranked the skill as core, compared to 11 percent of the broader population. This suggests that some skills, such as describing information sources, metadata creation and management, and knowledge management are more likely to be considered core skills in settings other than academic libraries.
The findings of this study suggest a number of implications both for current and emerging academic library professionals as well as for LIS faculty in charge of program curriculum. Perhaps one of the most striking aspects of the study results is that, of the top 10 skills considered to be core by academic librarians, all but three are what might be considered “soft” or personal skills. Areas like writing, interpersonal skills, and teamwork, while certainly important, are not specific to the field of librarianship or to the domain knowledge that defines the field. As noted above, these findings beg the question, raised in other studies with similar findings, of whether and how LIS programs can teach soft skills, as well as how employers balance soft skills against domain-specific knowledge and abilities when hiring. As Saunders speculated in earlier research, the importance of soft skills to library employers signals a need for LIS faculty to directly teach and assess those skills in the classroom. 43
One might imagine that writing skills are incorporated across any graduate curriculum, including LIS, but to what extent are interpersonal, customer service, cultural competence, or reflective practice taught and assessed? The findings of this study suggest that LIS faculty need to find clear and specific ways to integrate these topics directly into the curriculum to ensure that emerging professionals are adequately prepared in these areas. Certainly, these KSAs can likely be integrated into existing courses in many cases. It seems likely that many user services–oriented courses, like reference and instruction, probably incorporate attention to customer service and interpersonal skills. For instance, instructors likely discuss the importance of active listening, open-ended questioning, approachability, interest, and reservation of judgment as part of the reference interview process. Courses on user instruction might integrate content on reflective teaching practice. Group assignments could be a way to introduce and foster teamwork. As noted in the literature review, Jaeger et al. discuss how LIS faculty can integrate more attention to issues of diversity and inclusion in their courses. 44
An additional question, however, is whether these topics are merely addressed through lectures and readings or whether students are engaged in hands-on practice and are assessed on performance in these areas. For these KSAs to be fully addressed as learning outcomes of an MSLIS program, faculty should provide direct instruction and opportunities for students to demonstrate and be assessed on their abilities. For example, students in a reference course might engage in a practice reference interview in which they would be assessed not just on their ability to correctly and completely answer the question posed but also on their adherence to behavioral aspects of the interview such as active listening and approachability. Likewise, instructors cannot necessarily assume that simply assigning group projects will result in an understanding of and ability to work in teams. Rather, instructors should provide direct instruction on team building, including assessing strengths and assigning roles. Team members might reflect on their own and their teammates’ performance throughout the assignment as well as providing a summative assessment at the end. LIS students and emerging professionals will want to consider how to build and showcase experience in these areas. This might mean choosing courses that integrate attention to soft skills as well as highlighting relevant transferable skills from other work experience or extracurricular activities.
This study also compared the relative importance of various KSAs in academic libraries to the broader professions. The results showed that in a number of cases there are significant differences between skills expected of academic librarians compared to the broader information professions, which might initially suggest particular career preparation for academic librarians. At the same time, however, the findings revealed that, while there are a number of KSAs that academic librarians consider to be very important or important, there are only a very few domain-specific skills that they consider to be core for all academic librarians. Rather, the results seem to suggest that the specific skills and knowledge necessary might have more to do with one’s role or job function within an academic library setting, rather than being dependent on the setting itself.
Once again, these findings have particular implications for the professional preparation of academic librarians and for LIS faculty designing library curricula. It is not uncommon for MSLIS programs to offer formal or informal paths to specialization within the degree program. For example, Simmons University School of Library and Information Science outlines recommended courses for students interested in user services, youth services, organization of information, and management and leadership. Similarly, Syracuse’s iSchool offers specializations in areas such as instructional librarianship, data librarianship, and management. Within its program of library and information studies, the University of Rhode Island offers tracks in organization of digital media and libraries, leadership, and transforming communities.
Such tracks and specializations can be very helpful to students, especially in programs with few required courses and many electives. Tracks and specializations help students focus their programs and select courses that will provide them with the depth they need to pursue specific career paths within the information professions. However, given the limited scope of domain-knowledge ranked as core for academic librarians, this study suggests that, when organizing curricula and choosing courses, MSLIS instructors and their students might do better to focus on job roles and functions rather than on the academic library setting as an area of specialization. In other words, while LIS students might well be interested in working in an academic library, they might need to consider what types of positions they hope to gain within that setting and plan their courses and programs around those job functions. In other words, a student interested in user services might take courses focused on information literacy, library instruction, reference, and collection development, while a student interested in data sciences might take courses on data management, information visualization, and statistics. Likewise, iSchools might continue to organize advising and tracks around these functions rather than on information settings.
Q1 The purpose of this survey is to identify foundational skills and knowledge areas for LIS professionals. Please rate the importance of the skills and content areas along the following scale
Core (ALL MSLIS graduates should have a strong foundation regardless of area of concentration/career path) (1) | Very Important (most professionals will need to know/be able to do this) (2) | Important (many professionals will need to be familiar with this skill/content) (3) | Specialized (only professionals in specialized positions are likely to need this skill/knowledge) (4) | Not Important (5) | |
Evaluating and selecting information resources (1) | |||||
Describing information resources (2) | |||||
Taxonomy/classification development (3) | |||||
Knowledge management (4) | |||||
Research data management (collecting, organizing, and making data accessible) (5) | |||||
Evaluation research (collecting and analyzing data for purposes of improvement) (6) | |||||
Management of archival records and manuscripts (7) | |||||
Basic data collection methods (surveys, focus groups, etc) (8) | |||||
Reflective practice grounded in diversity & inclusion (9) | |||||
Knowledge of professional ethics (10) | |||||
Metadata creation (11) | |||||
Metadata management (12) | |||||
Knowledge of user information behaviors (13) | |||||
Legal issues (copyright, etc.) (14) | |||||
Information literacy standards (15) | |||||
Design thinking (approach or strategy for innovation) (16) | |||||
Cultural competence (ability to work effectively in cross-cultural situations/with people of various cultural backgrounds) (17) | |||||
Reporting basic descriptive statistics (18) | |||||
Preservation of non-digital resources (19) | |||||
Preservation of digital resources (20) | |||||
Grounding in social justice (21) | |||||
Grounding in history of library and information practices and professions (22) |
Q2 Communication
Core (ALL MSLIS graduates should have a strong foundation regardless of area of concentration/career path)(1) | Very Important (most professionals will need to know/be able to do this) (2) | Important (many professionals will need to be familiar with this skill/content) (3) | Specialized (only professionals in specialized positions are likely to need this skill/knowledge) (4) | Not Important (5) | |
Writing (1) | |||||
Interpersonal communication (2) | |||||
Customer service skills (3) | |||||
Public speaking (4) | |||||
Advocacy (representing organizational interests to stakeholders) (5) | |||||
Marketing/outreach (6) | |||||
Making effective visual presentations (7) |
Q4 User Services
Core (ALL MSLIS graduates should have a strong foundation regardless of area of concentration/career path) (1) | Very Important (most professionals will need to know/be able to do this) (2) | Important (many professionals will need to be familiar with this skill/content) (3) | Specialized (only professionals in specialized positions are likely to need this skill/knowledge) (4) | Not Important (5) | |
Instruction/teaching (face to face and online) (1) | |||||
Reference interview/ question negotiation (2) | |||||
Interacting with diverse communities (3) | |||||
Reader’s advisory (4) | |||||
Search skills (ability to search databases, internet resources, and catalogs efficiently and effectively) (5) | |||||
Community/user needs assessment (6) |
Q5 Management
Core (ALL MSLIS graduates should have a strong foundation regardless of area of concentration/career path) (1) | Very Important (most professionals will need to know/be able to do this) (2) | Important (many professionals will need to be familiar with this skill/content) (3) | Specialized (only professionals in specialized positions are likely to need this skill/knowledge) (4) | Not Important (5) | |
Fundamentals of management (1) | |||||
Project management (2) | |||||
Budgeting (3) | |||||
Grant writing (4) | |||||
HR/personnel management (5) | |||||
Facilities management (6) | |||||
Data-driven decision-making (7) | |||||
Leadership (8) | |||||
Change management (9) | |||||
Teamwork (10) |
Q6 Technology
Core (ALL MSLIS graduates should have a strong foundation regardless of area of concentration/career path) (1) | Very Important (most professionals will need to know/be able to do this) (2) | Important (many professionals will need to be familiar with this skill/content) (3) | Specialized (only professionals in specialized positions are likely to need this skill/knowledge) (4) | Not Important (5) | |
Coding/programming (1) | |||||
Troubleshooting software (2) | |||||
Troubleshooting hardware (3) | |||||
Knowledge of online security issues (4) | |||||
Web site design (5) | |||||
Social networking application in information settings (6) | |||||
Usability testing for improvement (7) | |||||
Managing network systems (8) |
Q7 Are there any additional skills or content areas that you believe should be covered in the MSLIS curriculum?
Q8 Do you have an MSLIS degree
Q9 Which of the following best describes your current position?
Q10 Which of the following best describes your place of employment?
Q11 Please tell us which organization invited you to take this survey?
1. “ALA’s Core Competences of Librarianship,” American Library Association (last modified Jan. 27, 2009), available online at www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/careers/corecomp/corecompetences/finalcorecompstat09.pdf [accessed 16 January 2020].
2. “Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Libraries and Information Studies,” American Library Association (last modified Feb. 2, 2015), available online at www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/standards/Standards_2015_adopted_02-02-15.pdf [accessed 16 January 2020].
3. “ACRL Proficiencies for Assessment Librarians and Coordinators,” Association of College & Research Libraries (last modified Jan. 2017), available online at www.ala.org/acrl/standards/assessment_proficiencies [accessed 16 January 2020].
4. “Roles and Strengths of Teaching Librarians,” Association of College & Research Libraries (last modified Apr. 28, 2017), available online at www.ala.org/acrl/standards/teachinglibrarians [accessed 16 January 2020].
5. “Diversity Standards: Cultural Competency for Academic Librarians,” Association of College & Research Libraries (last modified 2012), available online at www.ala.org/acrl/standards/diversity [accessed 16 January 2020].
6. “Standards for Distance Learning Library Services,” Association of College & Research Libraries (last modified June 2016), available online at www.ala.org/acrl/standards/guidelinesdistancelearning [accessed 16 January 2020].
7. ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee, “2016 Top Trends in Academic Libraries,” College & Research Libraries 77, no. 6 (2016), available online at https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/9505/10798 [accessed 26 October 2018]; ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee, “2018 Top Trends in Academic Libraries,” College & Research Libraries 79, no. 6 (2018), available online at https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/17001/18750 [accessed 26 October 2018].
8. Lisa Federer, “Defining Data Librarianship: A Survey of Competencies, Skills, and Training ,” Journal of the Medical Library Association 106, no. 3 (2018), dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.306 .
9. Jingfeng Xia and Minglu Wang, “Competencies and Responsibilities of Social Science Data Librarians: An Analysis of Job Descriptions,” College & Research Libraries 75, no. 3 (2014), available online at https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16367 [accessed 27 October 2018].
10. Hsin-liang Chen and Yin Zhang, “Educating Data Management Professionals: A Content Analysis of Job Descriptions,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 43, no. 1 (2017): 18–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.11.002 .
11. ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee, “2018 Top Trends in Academic Libraries.”
12. ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee, “2016 Top Trends in Academic Libraries.”
13. “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education,” Association of College and Research Libraries (last updated Jan. 11, 2016), available online at www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework [accessed 16 January 2020].
14. Deanna Marcum and Roger C. Schonfeld, “Universities Are Changing and So Are Their Libraries,” Ithaka S+R (last updated Oct. 18, 2018), available online at https://sr.ithaka.org/blog/universities-are-changing-and-so-are-their-libraries/ [accessed 16 January 2020].
15. Christine Wolf, “Ithaka S+R US Library Report,” Ithaka S+R (Apr. 3, 2017), available online at https://sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/SR_Report_Library_Survey_2016_04032017.pdf [accessed 16 January 2020].
16. Hanrong Wang, Yingqi Tang, and Carley Knight, “Contemporary Development of Academic Reference Librarianship in the United States: A 44-year Content Analysis,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 36, no. 6 (2010): 484–94.
17. Robert Detmering and Claudene Sproles, “Forget the Desk Job: Current Roles and Responsibilities in Entry-Level Reference Job Advertisements,” College & Research Libraries 73, no. 6 (2012), available online at https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16265 [accessed 16 January 2020].
18. Russell A. Hall, “Beyond the Job Ad: Employers and Library Instruction,” College & Research Libraries 74, no. 1 (2014) (retrieved Oct. 27, 2018), available online at https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16276/0 [accessed 16 January 2020].
19. Kristen Radsliff Rebmann, Simone Molitor, and Bonnie Rainey, “Distance Learning Skills and Responsibilities: A Content Analysis of Job Announcements 1996–2010,” Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning 6, no. 2 (2012): 100–16; Yingqi Tang, “Distance Education Librarians in the United States: A Study of Job Announcements,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 39, no. 6 (2013): 500–05, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.012 .
20. Janie M. Mathews and Harold Pardue, “The Presence of IT Skill Sets in Librarian Position Announcements,” College & Research Libraries 70, no. 3 (2009): 255, available online at https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16009/17455 [accessed 27 October 2018].
21. Jaya Raju, “Information Professional or IT Professional? The Knowledge and Skills Required by Academic Librarians in the Digital Library Environment,” portal: Libraries and the Academy 17, no. 4 (2017): 163–70.
22. Helen Partridge, Julie Lee, and Carrie Munro, “Becoming Librarian 2.0: The Skills, Knowledge, and Attributes Required by Library and Information Science Professionals in a Web 2.0 World (and Beyond),” Library Trends 59, no. 1/2 (2010): 315–36.
23. Laura Saunders, “Employer Perspectives on Library and Information Science Education,” Library Quarterly 85, no. 4 (2015): 427–53.
24. See, for example, Anne Goulding, Graham Walton, and Derek Stephens, “The Importance of Political and Strategic Skills for UK Library Leaders,” Australian Library Journal 61, no. 2 (2012): 105–18; Colleen S. Harris-Keith, “What Academic Library Leadership Lacks: Leadership Skills Directors Are Least Likely to Develop, and Which Positions Offer Development Opportunity,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 42, no. 4 (2016): 313–18.
25. See, for example, Denice Adkins, Christina Verdin, and Charles Yier, “Learning about Diversity: The Roles of LIS Education, LIS Associations, and Lived Experience,” Library Quarterly 85, no. 2 (2015): 139–49; Paul T. Jaeger et al., “The Virtuous Circle Revisited: Injecting Diversity, Inclusion, Rights, Justice, and Equity into LIS from Education to Advocacy,” Library Quarterly 85, no. 2 (2015): 150–71.
26. Karen Okamoto and Mark Aaron Polger, “Off to Market We Go,” Library Leadership & Management 26, no. 1 (2012): 1–20.
27. Mark D. Winston and Lisa Dunkley, “Leadership Competencies for Academic Librarians: The Importance of Development and Fundraising,” College & Research Libraries 63, no 2 (2002): 171–82, available online at https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/15515/0 [accessed 27 October 2018].
28. See, for example, Dick Kawooya, Amber Veverka, and Thomas Lipinski, “The Copyright Librarian: A Study of Advertising Trends for the Period 2006–2013,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 41, no. 3 (2015): 341–49; Deborah H. Charbonneau and Michael Priehs, “Copyright Awareness, Partnerships, and Training in Academic Libraries,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 40, no. 3/4 (2014): 228–33.
29. Rachel Applegate, “Educating Assessors: Preparing Librarians with Micro and Macro Skills,” Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice 11, no. 2 (2016): 74–86, https://doi.org/10.18438/B89D0P .
30. Sarah Passoneau and Susan Erickson, “Core Competencies for Assessment in Libraries,” Library Leadership & Management , 28, no. 4 (2014): 1–19.
31. Li Zhang, “Foreign Language Skills and Academic Library Job Announcements: A Survey and Trends Analysis 1966–2006,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 34, no. 4 (2008): 322–31.
32. Jennifer Ferguson, “Additional Degree Required? Advanced Subject Knowledge and Academic Librarianship,” portal: Libraries and the Academy 16, no. 4 (2016): 721–36.
33. See, for example, Partridge, Lee, and Munro, “Becoming Librarian 2.0”; Saunders, “Employer Perspectives on Library and Information Science Education.”
34. See, for example, Partridge, Lee, and Munro, “Becoming Librarian 2.0”; Saunders, “Employer Perspectives on Library and Information Science Education.”
35. American Library Association, “Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Libraries and Information Studies.”
36. Laura Saunders, “Academic Libraries’ Strategic Plans: Top Priorities and Under-Recognized Areas,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 41, no. 3 (2015): 285–91.
37. Ross Housewright, Roger C. Shonfeld, and Kate Wulfson, “Ithaka S+R US: Faculty Survey 2012,” Ithaka S+R , available online at https://sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Ithaka_SR_US_Faculty_Survey_2012_FINAL.pdf [accessed 3 November 2018].
38. Wang, Tang, and Knight, “Contemporary Development of Academic Reference Librarianship in the United States.”
39. Laura Saunders, “Identifying Core Reference Competencies from an Employers’ Perspective: Implications for Instruction,” College & Research Libraries 73, no. 4 (2012): 390–404, available online at https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16244/17690 [accessed 16 January 2020].
40. Heidi Julien, Melissa Gross, and Don Latham, “Survey of Information Literacy Instructional Practices in U.S. Academic Libraries,” College & Research Libraries 79, no. 2 (2018): 179–99, available online at https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16606 [accessed 16 January 2020].
41. Helen Partridge et al., “The Contemporary Librarian: Skills, Knowledge and Attributes Required in a World of Emerging Technologies,” Library and Information Science Research in Australia 32, no. 4 (2010): 271.
42. Saunders, “Employer Perspectives on Library and Information Science Education.”
43. Saunders, “Employer Perspectives on Library and Information Science Education.”
44. Jaeger et al., “The Virtuous Circle Revisited.”
* Laura Saunders is Associate Professor in the School of Library and Information Science at Simmons University; email: [email protected] . ©2020 Laura Saunders, Attribution-NonCommercial ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ) CC BY-NC.
Contact ACRL for article usage statistics from 2010-April 2017.
2024 |
January: 289 |
February: 229 |
March: 248 |
April: 249 |
May: 244 |
June: 136 |
2023 |
January: 100 |
February: 180 |
March: 171 |
April: 194 |
May: 160 |
June: 145 |
July: 151 |
August: 98 |
September: 235 |
October: 185 |
November: 142 |
December: 121 |
2022 |
January: 149 |
February: 241 |
March: 189 |
April: 178 |
May: 203 |
June: 129 |
July: 110 |
August: 112 |
September: 161 |
October: 182 |
November: 211 |
December: 135 |
2021 |
January: 351 |
February: 232 |
March: 448 |
April: 216 |
May: 167 |
June: 156 |
July: 180 |
August: 157 |
September: 276 |
October: 241 |
November: 223 |
December: 128 |
2020 |
January: 0 |
February: 2 |
March: 2747 |
April: 450 |
May: 238 |
June: 158 |
July: 196 |
August: 134 |
September: 138 |
October: 132 |
November: 147 |
December: 140 |
© 2024 Association of College and Research Libraries , a division of the American Library Association
Print ISSN: 0010-0870 | Online ISSN: 2150-6701
ALA Privacy Policy
ISSN: 2150-6701
More information, sources for topics, finding a topic, more databases.
An argument essay is one which explores a controversial topic and takes a particular standpoint. It is important to pick a topic which has two conflicting points of view and one which you are passionate about. Read background information about the topic and find enough information for and against the topic in order to make sound arguments about your position.
How is an argumentative essay different from an expository essay? An expository essay merely describes the topic and provides information. An argument essay examines the pros and cons of a debatable issue and provides sound evidence to support your claim. So it is necessary that the information you gather is current, detailed, and accurate.
Your initial paragraph should give a brief description of the topic, state why the topic is important, and must present your thesis statement. The body of the essay should discuss the pros and cons with supporting evidence for each. The conclusion must restate your claim and say why you think your standpoint is correct based on the evidence you have gathered.
Fore more information on the argument essay consult Purdue's Online Writing Lab
Please see the Controversial Issues/Argument Essay guide for more information.
The first step in the research process is to identify a topic.
A topic is the subject you will be writing about. You may be assigned a topic by the instructor, or you may be given a list of topics to choose from, or you may be asked to write an essay on a topic of your choice. The last choice is often the most difficult for students. If you are stumped and don't know what to write about, the sources on the left may help you choose a topic.
Guidelines for choosing a topic:
Ask yourself questions about the topic to arrive at a reasonable thesis statement about your stand on the topic. Sometimes asking the questions how, when, what, where, and why might help you narrow your topic. If you choose to write about social networks, here are some questions to ponder: Are social network sites good or bad? Does social networking improve the quality of our lives? What are the psychological and sociological effects of social networking? Is social networking affecting the labor market?
Search Terms
Once you decide on your topic, write down as many related words and ideas that come to mind such as "social networking" "online networking", "social tools", "online communication tools" or you could search by specific social networking tools such as Facebook, Tinder, Twitter, Bebo, Linkedin, etc.
For more help on choosing a topic, consult Purdue's Online Writing Lab site:
To find journal, magazine or newspaper articles, you must search a database. The library subscribes to several databases. Some are general and some are subject specific. Opposing Viewpoints in Context is a great database for the hottest controversial issue topics in all subjects and provides topic overviews, magazine and journal articles, news, primary sources, statistics, websites, podcasts, and videos. You can search Opposing Viewpoints by entering your search terms in the search box below.
To access any database that the library subscribes to, go to the library home page and select "More Databases" from the left panel under "Popular Databases". On the databases page, click on the down arrow next to Choose a Subject, select the subject that you want and click on Go. A list of relevant subject databases for that discipline will appear and you can search the ones you want.
Alternatively, select the relevant database from the A-Z list of databases. To search Opposing Viewpoints, click on the letter O and then select Opposing Viewpoints from the list of O databases.
Below are links to some additional databases that are good for research on controversial issues:
Skills@Library supports taught students to develop academic skills, within the curriculum and through online resources, workshops, 1-2-1 consultations and drop-in sessions.
Take your learning to the next level with Skills@Library. We help taught students to develop academic skills online and in person.
Academic writing, critical thinking, digital capabilities, employability, maths and statistics, note making, referencing, revision and exams, searching for information, time management, assignments.
Struggling to write that essay? Not sure on how to write a report? Skills@Library can help you to complete your assignments.
Dissertations, essay writing, planning your assignments, presentations: oral, presentations: posters, reflective writing, report writing, editing and proofreading, skills development at university.
Whatever stage you’re at in your University journey, Skills@Library can help you to identify, develop and refine the academic skills you need.
Get off to a Flying Start! Find out about the skills you need at university and how it differs from what you’ve done before.
Step up to second year. Build on the skills you developed at first year and get to grips with the study techniques for second year success.
Tackle your final year project or dissertation. Our comprehensive guide takes you through all the stages of your Final Chapter at university.
Step up to Masters and equip yourself with the academic skills you need to progress to postgraduate level.
Enhance your skills by exploring strategies and tools tailored to the mature student experience.
Thinking about applying to study for a postgraduate research degree? This resource aims to help you decide.
Skills@Library provide tailored sessions within the curriculum to support particular programmes of study. Find out what resources are available for you to use within lectures, online and in the virtual learning environment to support your students.
Approaching deadline season.
on May 15, 2024
on May 1, 2024
The Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment prevents the government from unduly abridging the freedom of speech. 1 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote U.S. Const. amend. I ( Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech . . . . ). The Supreme Court has held that some restrictions on speech are permissible. See Amdt1.7.5.1 Overview of Categorical Approach to Restricting Speech ; see also Amdt1.7.3.1 Overview of Content-Based and Content-Neutral Regulation of Speech . Though the Clause refers to Congress and making law, its prohibition extends beyond legislative acts to all branches and offices of government. 2 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote See Miami Herald Pub’g Co. v. To rnillo , 418 U.S. 241 (1974) (observing that the Free Speech Clause applies to any government agency—local, state, or federal ) (quoting Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Comm’n on Hum. Rels. , 413 U.S. 376, 400 (1973) (Stewart, J., dissenting)). In particular, individuals may initiate legal proceedings against federal or state officials for violating their right to free speech. 3 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote An action brought against a federal official for violating constitutional right s is known as a Bivens action, after the Supreme Court case that established the right to file such an action. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents , 403 U.S 388 (1971) . An individual may bring an action against a state official for violating constitutional right s under a federal civil right s statute known as Section 1983. 42 United States Code, Section 1983. For more information on these actions, see ArtIII.S2.C1.13.4 Suits Against the United States and Sovereign Immunity . One basis for such a claim may be that an official to ok adverse action against the individual in response to the individual engaging in protected speech.
The Supreme Court has held that a plaintiff claiming to have suffered retaliation in violation of the Free Speech Clause must first demonstrate that the plaintiff engaged in constitutionally protected speech and such speech was a motivating fac to r behind the official’s adverse action. 4 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Mt. Healthy City Sch. Dist. Bd. Of Educ. v. Doyle , 429 U.S. 274, 287 (1977) . If the plaintiff demonstrates this, the official must show that it would have taken the same action absent the protected speech. 5 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Id. The Supreme Court has held that a plaintiff alleging retalia to ry prosecution—that is, being charged with a crime in retaliation for speech—must also prove that their prosecution was not supported by probable cause, as required by the Fourth Amendment. 6 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Hartman v. Moore , 547 U.S. 250, 265–66 (2006) ; U.S. Const. amend. IV ( The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause . . . . ). In Nieves v. Bartlett , the Court recognized an exception to the probable cause rule, holding that a plaintiff alleging retalia to ry arrest need not show a lack of probable cause if the plaintiff presents objective evidence that he was arrested when otherwise similarly situated individuals not engaged in the same sort of protected speech had not been. 7 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Nieves v. Bartlett , 587 U.S. 391, 406 (2019) .
In Gonzalez v. Trevino , the Court was asked to weigh in on the scope and application of the probable cause exception articulated in Nieves . Sylvia Gonzalez, a former city council member, organized a petition while in office to oust the city manager. 8 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Gonzalez v. City of Castle Hills , No. 5:20-CV-1151-DAE, 2021 WL 4046758, at *1 (W.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2021) , rev’d sub nom. Gonzalez v. Trevino , 42 F.4th 487 (5th Cir. 2022) , cert. granted , 144 S. Ct. 325 (2023) ; see Joint App. at JA-2, Gonzalez v. Trevino , No. 22-1025 (U.S. Dec. 11, 2023) . Later, Gonzalez was arrested on charges that she violated a government records law after placing the petition in her personal binder at the conclusion of a city council meeting. 9 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote See Petition for a Writ of Certiorari at 6–7, Gonzalez v. Trevino , No. 22-1025 (U.S. Apr. 20, 2023) ; Brief in Opposition at 2–3, Gonzalez v. Trevino , No. 22-1025 (U.S. June 8, 2023) . The charges against Gonzalez were later dismissed by the district at to rney. 10 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Gonzalez , 2021 WL 4046758,at *2 . Gonzalez brought a federal civil action against three city officials alleging that her arrest was retalia to ry in violation of the First Amendment. 11 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Id. Gonzalez provided data taken from county records indicating that, of the past indictments, prosecu to rs did not apply the law to situations resembling her circumstances. 12 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Id. at *6 .
A federal district court held that Gonzalez’s evidence of general charging data was sufficient to invoke the Nieves exception and she therefore did not need to demonstrate a lack of probable cause for her arrest. 13 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Id. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed. 14 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Gonzalez , 42 F.4th 487 . The Fifth Circuit observed that the language of Nieves speaks of comparative evidence . . . of otherwise similarly situated individuals who engage in the same conduct. 15 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Id. at 492 (quoting Nieves v. Bartlett , 587 U.S. 391, 406 (2019) ). The court concluded that general data that the charge had never been used in similar circumstances did not meet this standard. 16 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Id. Gonzalez appealed to the Supreme Court. In addition to arguing that objective evidence, including charging data, may satisfy the Nieves exception, Gonzalez argued more broadly that the lack of probable cause requirement applicable in retalia to ry arrest cases should not apply to her case, because the requirement applies only when the claims are based on split-second decisions to arrest. 17 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, supra note 9, at 25–26.
On June 20, 2024, the Supreme Court reversed in a per curiam opinion, holding that the Fifth Circuit misapplied the principles of Nieves . 18 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Gonzalez v. Trevino , No. 22-1025, slip op. (U.S. June 20, 2024) . The Court explained that the Nieves exception does not require evidence of virtually identical and identifiable compara to rs. 19 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Id . at 4 . Instead, the Court recognized that evidence that no one has ever been arrested for engaging in a certain kind of conduct—especially when the criminal prohibition is longstanding and the conduct at issue is not novel, — is sufficient to invoke Nieves . 20 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Id . at 5. The Court declined to address Gonzalez’s second argument that Nieves did not apply to her case, having resolved the case on the basis of Gonzalez’s first argument. 21 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Id .
Whether the Nieves probable cause exception can be satisfied by objective evidence other than specific examples of arrests that never happened.
Whether the Nieves probable cause rule is limited to individual claims against arresting officers for split-second arrests. 22 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Supreme Court of the United States Granted & Noted List , Oc to ber Term 2023 Cases for Argument, No. 22-1025 , https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/qp/22-01025qp.pdf .
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION IMPLICATED: First Amendment, Free Speech Clause
CONSTITUTIONAL TO PIC: Freedom of Speech
SUPREME COURT DOCKET NUMBERS: 22-1025 23 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Docket for 22-1025 , U.S. Supreme Court , https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-1025.html .
APPEAL FROM: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 21-50276
DECISION BELOW: 42 F.4th 487
ORAL ARGUMENT: March 20, 2024 24 to oltip-text footnotes aside" aria-hidden="true" hidden> Footnote Oral Argument Transcript, Gonzalez v. Trevino , No. 22-1025 (U.S. Mar. 20, 2024) , https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2023/22-1025_8m58.pdf .
FINAL DECISION: June 20, 2024
Justice Ali to concurring
Justice Kavanaugh concurring
Justice Jackson (joined by Justice So to mayor) concurring
Justice Thomas dissenting
Top of page
June 20, 2024
Posted by: Julie Miller
This is a guest blog by Barbara Bair, historian of Literature, Culture, and the Arts in the Manuscript Division
In honor of Pride Month, the recently acquired personal papers of best-selling Pulitzer Prize-winning poet, essayist, literary critic, and teacher Mary Oliver (1935-2019) are now open to researchers in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division. The Mary Oliver Papers include some 40,000 items in more than 118 containers, dating primarily from 1934 to 2019. The collection documents Oliver’s creative life, friendships, and professional writing and academic careers. It includes correspondence, prose writings, poetry, notebooks, teaching materials, drafts, photographs, interviews, and speeches representative of Oliver’s love of nature, birds, and the seaside.
The Mary Oliver Papers were received by the Library in December 2023 as a generous gift of Amalie Moses Reichblum and Bill Reichblum, NW Orchard LLC. The Reichblums, who are members of the Library’s James Madison Council, were close friends of Oliver and executors of her estate. In addition to the archival collection, they established the Mary Oliver Memorial Event Fund for Emerging Poets at the Library, in keeping with wishes expressed by Oliver. A public inaugural poetry reading and interview sponsored by the fund was facilitated by U.S. Poet Laureate Ada Limón at the Library in April. The Mary Oliver Papers were processed in the Manuscript Division in spring 2024 by archivist Elizabeth Livesey with the assistance of archives technicians Shandra Morehouse and Tammi Taylor.
Prominent in this newly available collection are materials pertaining to Oliver’s creative process and the publication of her work. Also represented is her life in the artist and LGBTQ+ communities of Provincetown, Massachusetts, on Cape Cod, and her personal and professional relationship with her longtime partner, the photographer and bookstore owner Molly Malone Cook (1925-2005). Cook served as manager of Oliver’s literary career and public appearances. As a member of the Provincetown community, she promoted photography as a fine art and maintained a friendship network that included filmmaker John Waters and other local writers, artists, and photographers. Oliver praised Cook as her best and most discerning reader. She dedicated her book Long Life (2004) to Cook, and their book, Our World, features photographs by Cook and text by Oliver.
Photographs of Oliver by Cook taken in Provincetown, as well as snapshots of their life together, including their dogs and home, are available in the collection, as is a 1995 issue of Provincetown Arts featuring a photograph of Oliver on the cover taken by her friend Barbara Savage Cheresh. That issue of the magazine includes a few Oliver poems and an article on her importance as a nature poet by fellow poet and Walt Whitman aficionado Mark Doty.
Oliver’s papers reveal her to be a witty and expressive letter writer. Correspondence with friends, such as dancer and potter Paulus Berensohn (1933-2017) demonstrate her closeness to those who shared her love of walking in nature, and her feelings about meadows, marshes, woodlands, and waterways, and the herons, hawks, insects, and animals who inhabited them. Like Walt Whitman , whose personal papers are also held in the Manuscript Division, and whom Oliver memorialized along with Wordsworth and Emerson as key influences in her essays, Oliver carried small pocket notebooks with her as she went about her days. She used them to jot down trial lines of poetry and descriptions of the world around her. In one notebook, created during her time teaching at Sweet Briar College in Virginia in 1991, she described the sight of brown bats flying over the quad at night. In her poem “The Morning Walk,” published in Long Life , she writes of thankfulness expressed in the peewee’s whistle, the twisting of the snake, or by the beaver who slaps his tail on the water of a pond—or by a person (such as herself) who may reach out to embrace the oak tree, or take out a notebook to record what was being observed.
An application for a Guggenheim fellowship, meanwhile, reveals Oliver’s uneasiness at being pegged only as a nature poet, when in fact she was interested in many things, including democracy in the United States and the regional variety of its people. When awarded the fellowship, she used it to work on her poetry collection, American Primitive, for which she was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Poetry in 1984.
Spirituality and eco-consciousness are also important parts of Oliver’s orientation to living reflected in the collection. She kept a copy of the poems of the Persian poet Rumi on her writing desk. An Anglican, she also kept a Book of Common Prayer nearby and pasted times for daily prayer on her typewriter. She emblazoned the typewriter with a bold message to her writer-self, positioned just above the keyboard, that read simply “COURAGE.” In trial lines jotted in her notebooks and in her published poems, she posited that every tree, every bush, and every flower is a reason to expound, and that the gladness she felt in response to the natural world is its own form of prayer. She continued to support the importance of environmental sustainability and stewardship after moving to Florida late in her life.
On June 14, 2024, United States Poet Laureate Ada Limón dedicated a tribute to a Mary Oliver poem titled “Can You Imagine” at the Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts. The event inaugurated her “You are Here: Poetry in the Parks” site-specific poetry installation initiative focused on poetry of the natural world, cosponsored by the National Park Service and the Poetry Society of America.
As Mark Doty observed in his Provincetown Arts article, Mary Oliver teaches us that “the created world is something to cherish” and the central part of her “art is … to return us to wonder.”
Do you want more stories like this? Then subscribe to Unfolding History – it’s free!
“The created world,” Mark Doty, “Natural Science: In Praise of Mary Oliver,” Provincetown Arts 11 (1995), 27.
I am thrilled that Mary Oliver’s collection will be available at the Library. Many, many thanks to the Reichblums and to everyone at the Library who helped make it possible — Barbara Bair not least among them.
See All Comments
This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy .
Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.
Papers of Talk Show Host and Sex Therapist Ruth Westheimer Open for Research at Library of Congress Papers and Correspondence of “Dr. Ruth” Acquired in 2022, Now Open for Research
The papers of talk show host and sex therapist Ruth Westheimer have been acquired by the Library of Congress and are now opening for research in the Library’s Manuscript Division.
Westheimer became a household name as “Dr. Ruth” in the 1980s, filling radio airwaves, television screens, and bookshelves with advice on sex and relationships. Westheimer was a pioneering voice in sex education, speaking openly about sex and the male and female anatomy at a time when such topics were publicly taboo.
The collection contains thousands of letters sent by listeners of her radio program, viewers of her television show, and readers of her books, providing insight into the sexual questions and concerns of her audience. There are also some of Westheimer’s written responses to those letters. The papers also document the dynamic rise in popularity of “Dr. Ruth.” There are publicity packets, production files and show notes related to Westheimer’s shows.
“I am delighted that the many letters I received requesting sexual advice will now be available to the research community,” Westheimer said. “I hope it helps us better understand the issues people struggled with then and also serves to promote better awareness today.”
Westheimer first went on the air in 1980 on WYNY-FM, broadcasting in New York City. Only radio listeners with antennae strong enough to pick up New York’s 97.1 FM station could hear her German-accented voice until 1984, when NBC Radio nationally syndicated her program, “Sexually Speaking.” Her audience grew with the premiere of “Good Sex! with Dr. Ruth Westheimer” on Lifetime Television in 1984. Both listeners and viewers sent in questions, comments, and requests for information or the occasional autograph.
Researchers may contact the Manuscript Reading Room for more information about this collection. The collection finding aid will be posted online next month. Researchers consulting the collection will be required to sign a form promising not to disclose personally identifiable information found in letters sent by the public to Westheimer.
The Library of Congress is the world’s largest library, offering access to the creative record of the United States — and extensive materials from around the world — both on-site and online. It is the main research arm of the U.S. Congress and the home of the U.S. Copyright Office. Explore collections, reference services and other programs and plan a visit at loc.gov ; access the official site for U.S. federal legislative information at congress.gov ; and register creative works of authorship at copyright.gov .
Media Contacts: Brett Zongker, [email protected] , Elaina Finkelstein, [email protected] PR 24-054 06/21/2024 ISSN 0731-3527
Today's print edition
Home Delivery
English learners may improve their writing skills in the language if they focus on making good arguments rather than mastering complex grammar and vocabulary, according to new Japanese research.
In 2023, Yasuda conducted an experiment in which she had 102 students at a public secondary school in Japan write an argumentative essay on an assigned topic in English. She then let two writing experts — who did not know the purpose of the experiment — grade their essays.
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
500 Words Essay on Library and Its Uses. A library is a place where books and sources of information are stored. They make it easier for people to get access to them for various purposes. ... When we read more, our social skills and academic performance improves. Most importantly, libraries are a great platform for making progress. When we get ...
200 Words Essay on Library. A library is a storehouse of books. It offers a variety of sources to read on the premises or borrow to take home.Library's collection includes books, manuscripts, journals, magazines and videos, audio, DVD, and various other formats of information. A wide variety of books are stored in the library and arranged in ...
200-250 Words Essay on Library. The library is the place where people come together to learn and gain knowledge. Books are arranged on large bookshelves. Books belonging to similar genres are arranged on the same shelf by the librarian. The librarian is in charge of the library. Some libraries have digital software to keep track of books issued ...
Libraries expose students to different genres of books, enhancing their reading skills and broadening their perspectives. Development of Life Skills. Libraries foster discipline, patience and respect for rules. ... 250 Words Essay on Uses of Library The Heart of Knowledge: Libraries. Libraries, often considered the treasure troves of knowledge ...
Basic in the phrase "basic skills of all librarians" can mean either 1) a basic set of skills that all librarians should have, or 2) a set of skills that all librarians should have at a basic level. I might disagree with either interpretation, although I agree with Lane Wilkinson's argument in response to my last post that there are ...
Short Essay on Importance of Library in 200 Words. A library is a place that maintains a collection of all forms of literature and important journals. The importance of a library in the lives of both readers and learners cannot be overstated. Many people go there once a week, while book enthusiasts go there every day.
500 Words Essay on Importance of Library Introduction. A library is a sanctuary of knowledge, housing a diverse collection of information resources. It is a hub for learning, intellectual growth, and social development. ... and synthesize information effectively. These skills are vital in the academic sphere and beyond, in professional and ...
Essay on Library: A library is an excellent place for kids to expand their knowledge. To understand the roles and benefits of libraries, refer to BYJU'S short essay on library. ... They can learn new skills and interests with the help of many different library resources. They can also go to libraries to borrow books they cannot afford.
Students are often asked to write an essay on Library in their schools and colleges. And if you're also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic. ... and cultivate critical thinking skills. Libraries also foster lifelong learning, encouraging curiosity and intellectual growth beyond formal ...
Enhance your reading, note-taking and library skills to help you to research your assignment topics in a quicker, more effective, way.ContentMaking effective use of libraries at OxfordDeveloping your IT skillsReading Skills: using different sources Getting started with your readingFocusing reading on your essay questionAccessing reading materials onlineMaking effective use of
This paper draws attention towards skill development that is required for librarians to set the pace in the changing information world. Further, it focuses on how librarians can acquire skills ...
Harness Librarians' Expertise in Academic Reading. There are three aspects to raising literacy levels: first, teaching children how to read; second, supporting those students who need extra help through interventions; and finally, helping students to read academically—the skill that school librarians have the expertise to support.
Librarian Skills: Definitions, Examples and Tips. Librarians handle the everyday functions, organization and customer interactions of public and private libraries. To help the library run efficiently and better serve the library's patrons, librarians rely on certain skills. If you are interested in joining the library field or would like to ...
Library Skills Toolkit. Librarians at academic institutions around the world have created hundreds of hours of content intended to help students develop and strengthen basic library and research skills. This toolkit is a carefully-curated collection of interactive tutorials and instructional videos that faculty may use as in-class activities or ...
Learning Library Skills is Still Important. By Starr Sackstein — May 12, 2016 3 min read. Starr Sackstein. Starr Sackstein is a secondary educator and school leader in New York. She is the ...
Introduction: The world we live in today demands continuous learning and adaptability, both professionally and personally. Lifelong learning has transcended the confines of formal education, becoming a fundamental principle for personal growth, career advancement, and societal development.At the core of this transformative paradigm is an age-old institution that has stood the test of time- the ...
The first step for conducting solid library research is to set concrete objectives. Also, the student must understand what the skill is that they are implementing in an assignment. For example, the student might be learning how to write citations in a bibliography or how to research databases. However, if the assignment makes assumptions that ...
2. On a large sheet of paper, start a drawing of a map and give the students a point of reference such as the front door. Now give each student their own map drawing supplies (paper and markers) and have them start with the front door as a visualization point. 3. Have the students label each section of the library map. (More capable students….
Assignments. When you start working on academic assignments, you will need to look for information beyond your reading lists. Our Assignments pages help you develop your library and information skills so you feel confident in finding, evaluating, referencing and managing the sources you use to inform your academic work. Library skills essentials.
Librarianship refers to the field of working in a library in various ways. Whether in a basic librarian position or as an administrator, there are numerous positions within the field and numerous types of libraries that one may find employment in. However, while anyone can earn a degree and enter this field, there are certain people who are more well-suited to the job based on their overall ...
30. Sarah Passoneau and Susan Erickson, "Core Competencies for Assessment in Libraries," Library Leadership & Management, 28, no. 4 (2014): 1-19. 31. Li Zhang, "Foreign Language Skills and Academic Library Job Announcements: A Survey and Trends Analysis 1966-2006," Journal of Academic Librarianship 34, no. 4 (2008): 322-31. 32.
Library Skills for Students of English Composition This is a basic library guide for students on how to find books, journal articles and other resources in Buley library for assignments and research papers.
Academic skills. Skills@Library supports taught students to develop academic skills, within the curriculum and through online resources, workshops, 1-2-1 consultations and drop-in sessions. Library. Study and research support. Academic skills.
Jump to essay-3 An action brought against a federal official for violating constitutional right s is known as a Bivens action, after the Supreme Court case that established the right to file such an action. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S 388 (1971).
This is a guest blog by Barbara Bair, historian of Literature, Culture, and the Arts in the Manuscript Division. In honor of Pride Month, the recently acquired personal papers of best-selling Pulitzer Prize-winning poet, essayist, literary critic, and teacher Mary Oliver (1935-2019) are now open to researchers in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division.
These skills are particularly important for JIY, who often come from historically disenfranchised communities. This population encounters many challenges as they transition from juvenile correctional facilities to their respective communities. To have the greatest impact, these skills should likely be taught prior to the transition.
The papers of talk show host and sex therapist Ruth Westheimer have been acquired by the Library of Congress and are now opening for research in the Library's Manuscript Division. Westheimer became a household name as "Dr. Ruth" in the 1980s, filling radio airwaves, television screens, and bookshelves with advice on sex and relationships.
English learners may improve their writing skills in the language if they focus on making good arguments rather than mastering complex grammar and vocabulary, according to new Japanese research.
1 INTRODUCTION. Assessing infectious disease risk areas is critical for effective prevention and control strategy development (Carlson et al., 2019).In disease ecology, species distribution models (SDMs) are the dominant method for predicting vectors, reservoirs, and transmission risks of infectious zoonoses and vector-borne diseases (Carlson, 2020; Liu et al., 2019; Messina et al., 2016), as ...