![phd defence process](https://www.researchvoyage.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/cropped-cropped-logo-1.jpeg)
Research Voyage
Research Tips and Infromation
![](http://farmaciacoslada.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
PhD Defence Process: A Comprehensive Guide
![PhD Defence Process: A Comprehensive Guide PhD Defence](https://www.researchvoyage.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/PhD-Defence-760x539.png)
Embarking on the journey toward a PhD is an intellectual odyssey marked by tireless research, countless hours of contemplation, and a fervent commitment to contributing to the body of knowledge in one’s field. As the culmination of this formidable journey, the PhD defence stands as the final frontier, the proverbial bridge between student and scholar.
In this comprehensive guide, we unravel the intricacies of the PhD defence—a momentous occasion that is both a celebration of scholarly achievement and a rigorous evaluation of academic prowess. Join us as we explore the nuances of the defence process, addressing questions about its duration, contemplating the possibility of failure, and delving into the subtle distinctions of language that surround it.
Beyond the formalities, we aim to shed light on the significance of this rite of passage, dispelling misconceptions about its nature. Moreover, we’ll consider the impact of one’s attire on this critical day and share personal experiences and practical tips from those who have successfully navigated the defence journey.
Whether you are on the precipice of your own defence or are simply curious about the process, this guide seeks to demystify the PhD defence, providing a roadmap for success and a nuanced understanding of the pivotal event that marks the transition from student to scholar.
Introduction
A. definition and purpose:, b. overview of the oral examination:, a. general duration of a typical defense, b. factors influencing the duration:, c. preparation and flexibility:, a. preparation and thorough understanding of the research:, b. handling questions effectively:, c. confidence and composure during the presentation:, d. posture of continuous improvement:, a. exploring the possibility of failure:, b. common reasons for failure:, c. steps to mitigate the risk of failure:, d. post-failure resilience:, a. addressing the language variation:, b. conforming to regional preferences:, c. consistency in usage:, d. flexibility and adaptability:, e. navigating language in a globalized academic landscape:, a. debunking myths around the formality of the defense:, b. significance in validating research contributions:, c. post-defense impact:, a. appropriate attire for different settings:, b. professionalism and the impact of appearance:, c. practical tips for dressing success:, b. practical tips for a successful defense:, c. post-defense reflections:, career options after phd.
Embarking on the doctoral journey is a formidable undertaking, where aspiring scholars immerse themselves in the pursuit of knowledge, contributing new insights to their respective fields. At the pinnacle of this academic odyssey lies the PhD defence—a culmination that transcends the boundaries of a mere formality, symbolizing the transformation from a student of a discipline to a recognized contributor to the academic tapestry.
The PhD defence, also known as the viva voce or oral examination, is a pivotal moment in the life of a doctoral candidate.
PhD defence is not merely a ritualistic ceremony; rather, it serves as a platform for scholars to present, defend, and elucidate the findings and implications of their research. The defence is the crucible where ideas are tested, hypotheses scrutinized, and the depth of scholarly understanding is laid bare.
The importance of the PhD defence reverberates throughout the academic landscape. It is not just a capstone event; it is the juncture where academic rigour meets real-world application. The defence is the litmus test of a researcher’s ability to articulate, defend, and contextualize their work—an evaluation that extends beyond the pages of a dissertation.
Beyond its evaluative nature, the defence serves as a rite of passage, validating the years of dedication, perseverance, and intellectual rigour invested in the research endeavour. Success in the defence is a testament to the candidate’s mastery of their subject matter and the originality and impact of their contributions to the academic community.
Furthermore, a successful defence paves the way for future contributions, positioning the scholar as a recognized authority in their field. The defence is not just an endpoint; it is a launchpad, propelling researchers into the next phase of their academic journey as they continue to shape and redefine the boundaries of knowledge.
In essence, the PhD defence is more than a ceremonial checkpoint—it is a transformative experience that validates the intellectual journey, underscores the significance of scholarly contributions, and sets the stage for a continued legacy of academic excellence. As we navigate the intricacies of this process, we invite you to explore the multifaceted dimensions that make the PhD defence an indispensable chapter in the narrative of academic achievement.
What is a PhD Defence?
At its core, a PhD defence is a rigorous and comprehensive examination that marks the culmination of a doctoral candidate’s research journey. It is an essential component of the doctoral process in which the candidate is required to defend their dissertation before a committee of experts in the field. The defence serves multiple purposes, acting as both a showcase of the candidate’s work and an evaluative measure of their understanding, critical thinking, and contributions to the academic domain.
The primary goals of a PhD defence include:
- Presentation of Research: The candidate presents the key findings, methodology, and significance of their research.
- Demonstration of Mastery: The defence assesses the candidate’s depth of understanding, mastery of the subject matter, and ability to engage in scholarly discourse.
- Critical Examination: Committee members rigorously question the candidate, challenging assumptions, testing methodologies, and probing the boundaries of the research.
- Validation of Originality: The defence validates the originality and contribution of the candidate’s work to the existing body of knowledge.
The PhD defence often takes the form of an oral examination, commonly referred to as the viva voce. This oral component adds a dynamic and interactive dimension to the evaluation process. Key elements of the oral examination include:
- Presentation: The candidate typically begins with a formal presentation, summarizing the dissertation’s main components, methodology, and findings. This presentation is an opportunity to showcase the significance and novelty of the research.
- Questioning and Discussion: Following the presentation, the candidate engages in a thorough questioning session with the examination committee. Committee members explore various aspects of the research, challenging the candidates to articulate their rationale, defend their conclusions, and respond to critiques.
- Defence of Methodology: The candidate is often required to defend the chosen research methodology, demonstrating its appropriateness, rigour, and contribution to the field.
- Evaluation of Contributions: Committee members assess the originality and impact of the candidate’s contributions to the academic discipline, seeking to understand how the research advances existing knowledge.
The oral examination is not a mere formality; it is a dynamic exchange that tests the candidate’s intellectual acumen, research skills, and capacity to contribute meaningfully to the scholarly community.
In essence, the PhD defence is a comprehensive and interactive evaluation that encapsulates the essence of a candidate’s research journey, demanding a synthesis of knowledge, clarity of expression, and the ability to navigate the complexities of academic inquiry. As we delve into the specifics of the defence process, we will unravel the layers of preparation and skill required to navigate this transformative academic milestone.
How Long is a PhD Defence?
The duration of a PhD defence can vary widely, but it typically ranges from two to three hours. This time frame encompasses the candidate’s presentation of their research, questioning and discussions with the examination committee, and any additional deliberations or decisions by the committee. However, it’s essential to note that this is a general guideline, and actual defence durations may vary based on numerous factors.
- Sciences and Engineering: Defenses in these fields might lean towards the shorter end of the spectrum, often around two hours. The focus is often on the methodology, results, and technical aspects.
- Humanities and Social Sciences: Given the theoretical and interpretive nature of research in these fields, defences might extend closer to three hours or more. Discussions may delve into philosophical underpinnings and nuanced interpretations.
- Simple vs. Complex Studies: The complexity of the research itself plays a role. Elaborate experiments, extensive datasets, or intricate theoretical frameworks may necessitate a more extended defence.
- Number of Committee Members: A larger committee or one with diverse expertise may lead to more extensive discussions and varied perspectives, potentially elongating the defence.
- Committee Engagement: The level of engagement and probing by committee members can influence the overall duration. In-depth discussions or debates may extend the defence time.
- Cultural Norms: In some countries, the oral defence might be more ceremonial, with less emphasis on intense questioning. In others, a rigorous and extended defence might be the norm.
- Evaluation Practices: Different academic systems have varying evaluation criteria, which can impact the duration of the defence.
- Institutional Guidelines: Some institutions may have specific guidelines on defence durations, influencing the overall time allotted for the process.
Candidates should be well-prepared for a defence of any duration. Adequate preparation not only involves a concise presentation of the research but also anticipates potential questions and engages in thoughtful discussions. Additionally, candidates should be flexible and responsive to the dynamics of the defense, adapting to the pace set by the committee.
Success Factors in a PhD Defence
- Successful defence begins with a deep and comprehensive understanding of the research. Candidates should be well-versed in every aspect of their study, from the theoretical framework to the methodology and findings.
- Thorough preparation involves anticipating potential questions from the examination committee. Candidates should consider the strengths and limitations of their research and be ready to address queries related to methodology, data analysis, and theoretical underpinnings.
- Conducting mock defences with peers or mentors can be invaluable. It helps refine the presentation, exposes potential areas of weakness, and provides an opportunity to practice responding to challenging questions.
- Actively listen to questions without interruption. Understanding the nuances of each question is crucial for providing precise and relevant responses.
- Responses should be clear, concise, and directly address the question. Avoid unnecessary jargon, and strive to convey complex concepts in a manner that is accessible to the entire committee.
- It’s acceptable not to have all the answers. If faced with a question that stumps you, acknowledge it honestly. Expressing a willingness to explore the topic further demonstrates intellectual humility.
- Use questions as opportunities to reinforce key messages from the research. Skillfully link responses back to the core contributions of the study, emphasizing its significance.
- Rehearse the presentation multiple times to build familiarity with the material. This enhances confidence, reduces nervousness, and ensures a smooth and engaging delivery.
- Maintain confident and open body language. Stand tall, make eye contact, and use gestures judiciously. A composed demeanour contributes to a positive impression.
- Acknowledge and manage nervousness. It’s natural to feel some anxiety, but channelling that energy into enthusiasm for presenting your research can turn nervousness into a positive force.
- Engage with the committee through a dynamic and interactive presentation. Invite questions during the presentation to create a more conversational atmosphere.
- Utilize visual aids effectively. Slides or other visual elements should complement the spoken presentation, reinforcing key points without overwhelming the audience.
- View the defence not only as an evaluation but also as an opportunity for continuous improvement. Feedback received during the defence can inform future research endeavours and scholarly pursuits.
In essence, success in a PhD defence hinges on meticulous preparation, adept handling of questions, and projecting confidence and composure during the presentation. A well-prepared and resilient candidate is better positioned to navigate the challenges of the defence, transforming it from a moment of evaluation into an affirmation of scholarly achievement.
Failure in PhD Defence
- While the prospect of failing a PhD defence is relatively rare, it’s essential for candidates to acknowledge that the possibility exists. Understanding this reality can motivate diligent preparation and a proactive approach to mitigate potential risks.
- Failure, if it occurs, should be seen as a learning opportunity rather than a definitive endpoint. It may highlight areas for improvement and offer insights into refining the research and presentation.
- Lack of thorough preparation, including a weak grasp of the research content, inadequate rehearsal, and failure to anticipate potential questions, can contribute to failure.
- Inability to effectively defend the chosen research methodology, including justifying its appropriateness and demonstrating its rigour, can be a critical factor.
- Failing to clearly articulate the original contributions of the research and its significance to the field may lead to a negative assessment.
- Responding defensively to questions, exhibiting a lack of openness to critique, or being unwilling to acknowledge limitations can impact the overall impression.
- Inability to address committee concerns or incorporate constructive feedback received during the defense may contribute to a negative outcome.
- Comprehensive preparation is the cornerstone of success. Candidates should dedicate ample time to understanding every facet of their research, conducting mock defences, and seeking feedback.
- Identify potential weaknesses in the research and address them proactively. Being aware of limitations and articulating plans for addressing them in future work demonstrates foresight.
- Engage with mentors, peers, or advisors before the defence. Solicit constructive feedback on both the content and delivery of the presentation to refine and strengthen the defence.
- Develop strategies to manage stress and nervousness. Techniques such as mindfulness, deep breathing, or visualization can be effective in maintaining composure during the defence.
- Conduct a pre-defense review of all materials, ensuring that the presentation aligns with the dissertation and that visual aids are clear and supportive.
- Approach the defence with an open and reflective attitude. Embrace critique as an opportunity for improvement rather than as a personal affront.
- Clarify expectations with the examination committee beforehand. Understanding the committee’s focus areas and preferences can guide preparation efforts.
- In the event of failure, candidates should approach the situation with resilience. Seek feedback from the committee, understand the reasons for the outcome, and use the experience as a springboard for improvement.
In summary, while the prospect of failing a PhD defence is uncommon, acknowledging its possibility and taking proactive steps to mitigate risks are crucial elements of a well-rounded defence strategy. By addressing common failure factors through thorough preparation, openness to critique, and a resilient attitude, candidates can increase their chances of a successful defence outcome.
PhD Defense or Defence?
- The choice between “defense” and “defence” is primarily a matter of British English versus American English spelling conventions. “Defense” is the preferred spelling in American English, while “defence” is the British English spelling.
- In the global academic community, both spellings are generally understood and accepted. However, the choice of spelling may be influenced by the academic institution’s language conventions or the preferences of individual scholars.
- Academic institutions may have specific guidelines regarding language conventions, and candidates are often expected to adhere to the institution’s preferred spelling.
- Candidates may also consider the preferences of their advisors or committee members. If there is a consistent spelling convention used within the academic department, it is advisable to align with those preferences.
- Consideration should be given to the spelling conventions of scholarly journals in the candidate’s field. If intending to publish research stemming from the dissertation, aligning with the conventions of target journals is prudent.
- If the defense presentation or dissertation will be shared with an international audience, using a more universally recognized spelling (such as “defense”) may be preferred to ensure clarity and accessibility.
- Regardless of the chosen spelling, it’s crucial to maintain consistency throughout the document. Mixing spellings can distract from the content and may be perceived as an oversight.
- In oral presentations and written correspondence related to the defence, including emails, it’s advisable to maintain consistency with the chosen spelling to present a professional and polished image.
- Recognizing that language conventions can vary, candidates should approach the choice of spelling with flexibility. Being adaptable to the preferences of the academic context and demonstrating an awareness of regional variations reflects a nuanced understanding of language usage.
- With the increasing globalization of academia, an awareness of language variations becomes essential. Scholars often collaborate across borders, and an inclusive approach to language conventions contributes to effective communication and collaboration.
In summary, the choice between “PhD defense” and “PhD defence” boils down to regional language conventions and institutional preferences. Maintaining consistency, being mindful of the target audience, and adapting to the expectations of the academic community contribute to a polished and professional presentation, whether in written documents or oral defences.
Is PhD Defense a Formality?
- While the PhD defence is a structured and ritualistic event, it is far from being a mere formality. It is a critical and substantive part of the doctoral journey, designed to rigorously evaluate the candidate’s research contributions, understanding of the field, and ability to engage in scholarly discourse.
- The defence is not a checkbox to be marked but rather a dynamic process where the candidate’s research is evaluated for its scholarly merit. The committee scrutinizes the originality, significance, and methodology of the research, aiming to ensure it meets the standards of advanced academic work.
- Far from a passive or purely ceremonial event, the defence involves active engagement between the candidate and the examination committee. Questions, discussions, and debates are integral components that enrich the scholarly exchange during the defence.
- The defence serves as a platform for the candidate to demonstrate the originality of their research. Committee members assess the novelty of the contributions, ensuring that the work adds value to the existing body of knowledge.
- Beyond the content, the defence evaluates the methodological rigour of the research. Committee members assess whether the chosen methodology is appropriate, well-executed, and contributes to the validity of the findings.
- Successful completion of the defence affirms the candidate’s ability to contribute meaningfully to the academic discourse in their field. It is an endorsement of the candidate’s position as a knowledgeable and respected scholar.
- The defence process acts as a quality assurance mechanism in academia. It ensures that individuals awarded a doctoral degree have undergone a thorough and rigorous evaluation, upholding the standards of excellence in research and scholarly inquiry.
- Institutions have specific criteria and standards for awarding a PhD. The defence process aligns with these institutional and academic standards, providing a consistent and transparent mechanism for evaluating candidates.
- Successful completion of the defence is a pivotal moment that marks the transition from a doctoral candidate to a recognized scholar. It opens doors to further contributions, collaborations, and opportunities within the academic community.
- Research presented during the defence often forms the basis for future publications. The validation received in the defence enhances the credibility of the research, facilitating its dissemination and impact within the academic community.
- Beyond the academic realm, a successfully defended PhD is a key credential for professional advancement. It enhances one’s standing in the broader professional landscape, opening doors to research positions, teaching opportunities, and leadership roles.
In essence, the PhD defence is a rigorous and meaningful process that goes beyond formalities, playing a crucial role in affirming the academic merit of a candidate’s research and marking the culmination of their journey toward scholarly recognition.
Dressing for Success: PhD Defense Outfit
- For Men: A well-fitted suit in neutral colours (black, navy, grey), a collared dress shirt, a tie, and formal dress shoes.
- For Women: A tailored suit, a blouse or button-down shirt, and closed-toe dress shoes.
- Dress codes can vary based on cultural expectations. It’s advisable to be aware of any cultural nuances within the academic institution and to adapt attire accordingly.
- With the rise of virtual defenses, considerations for attire remain relevant. Even in online settings, dressing professionally contributes to a polished and serious demeanor. Virtual attire can mirror what one would wear in-person, focusing on the upper body visible on camera.
- The attire chosen for a PhD defense contributes to the first impression that a candidate makes on the examination committee. A professional and polished appearance sets a positive tone for the defense.
- Dressing appropriately reflects respect for the gravity of the occasion. It acknowledges the significance of the defense as a formal evaluation of one’s scholarly contributions.
- Wearing professional attire can contribute to a boost in confidence. When individuals feel well-dressed and put-together, it can positively impact their mindset and overall presentation.
- The PhD defense is a serious academic event, and dressing professionally fosters an atmosphere of seriousness and commitment to the scholarly process. It aligns with the respect one accords to academic traditions.
- Institutional norms may influence dress expectations. Some academic institutions may have specific guidelines regarding attire for formal events, and candidates should be aware of and adhere to these norms.
- While adhering to the formality expected in academic settings, individuals can also express their personal style within the bounds of professionalism. It’s about finding a balance between institutional expectations and personal comfort.
- Select and prepare the outfit well in advance to avoid last-minute stress. Ensure that the attire is clean, well-ironed, and in good condition.
- Accessories such as ties, scarves, or jewelry should complement the outfit. However, it’s advisable to keep accessories subtle to maintain a professional appearance.
- While dressing professionally, prioritize comfort. PhD defenses can be mentally demanding, and comfortable attire can contribute to a more confident and composed demeanor.
- Pay attention to grooming, including personal hygiene and haircare. A well-groomed appearance contributes to an overall polished look.
- Start preparation well in advance of the defense date. Know your research inside out, anticipate potential questions, and be ready to discuss the nuances of your methodology, findings, and contributions.
- Conduct mock defenses with peers, mentors, or colleagues. Mock defenses provide an opportunity to receive constructive feedback, practice responses to potential questions, and refine your presentation.
- Strike a balance between confidence and humility. Confidence in presenting your research is essential, but being open to acknowledging limitations and areas for improvement demonstrates intellectual honesty.
- Actively engage with the examination committee during the defense. Listen carefully to questions, respond thoughtfully, and view the defense as a scholarly exchange rather than a mere formality.
- Understand the expertise and backgrounds of the committee members. Tailor your presentation and responses to align with the interests and expectations of your specific audience.
- Practice time management during your presentation. Ensure that you allocate sufficient time to cover key aspects of your research, leaving ample time for questions and discussions.
- It’s normal to feel nervous, but practicing mindfulness and staying calm under pressure is crucial. Take deep breaths, maintain eye contact, and focus on delivering a clear and composed presentation.
- Have a plan for post-defense activities. Whether it’s revisions to the dissertation, publications, or future research endeavors, having a roadmap for what comes next demonstrates foresight and commitment to ongoing scholarly contributions.
- After successfully defending, individuals often emphasize the importance of taking time to reflect on the entire doctoral journey. Acknowledge personal and academic growth, celebrate achievements, and use the experience to inform future scholarly pursuits.
In summary, learning from the experiences of others who have successfully defended offers a wealth of practical wisdom. These insights, combined with thoughtful preparation and a proactive approach, contribute to a successful and fulfilling defense experience.
You have plenty of career options after completing a PhD. For more details, visit my blog posts:
7 Essential Steps for Building a Robust Research Portfolio
Exciting Career Opportunities for PhD Researchers and Research Scholars
Freelance Writing or Editing Opportunities for Researchers A Comprehensive Guide
Research Consultancy: An Alternate Career for Researchers
The Insider’s Guide to Becoming a Patent Agent: Opportunities, Requirements, and Challenges
The journey from a curious researcher to a recognized scholar culminates in the PhD defence—an intellectual odyssey marked by dedication, resilience, and a relentless pursuit of knowledge. As we navigate the intricacies of this pivotal event, it becomes evident that the PhD defence is far more than a ceremonial rite; it is a substantive evaluation that validates the contributions of a researcher to the academic landscape.
Upcoming Events
- Visit the Upcoming International Conferences at Exotic Travel Destinations with Travel Plan
- Visit for Research Internships Worldwide
![phd defence process Dr. Vijay Rajpurohit](https://www.researchvoyage.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/vijay-e1674371705260-150x150.jpg)
Recent Posts
- 05 Quick Review, High Impact, Best Research Journals for Submissions for July 2024
- Top Mistakes to Avoid When Writing a Research Paper
- Average Stipend for Research/Academic Internships
- These Institutes Offer Remote Research/Academic Internships
- How to Include Your Journal in the UGC-CARE List? A Guide for Publishers
- All Blog Posts
- Research Career
- Research Conference
- Research Internship
- Research Journal
- Research Tools
- Uncategorized
- Research Conferences
- Research Journals
- Research Grants
- Internships
- Research Internships
- Email Templates
- Conferences
- Blog Partners
- Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024 Research Voyage
Design by ThemesDNA.com
![phd defence process close-link](https://www.researchvoyage.com/wp-content/plugins/convertplug-1/modules/modal/functions/config/img/cross.png)
![phd defence process Graduate Center | Home](https://gradcenter.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/UAGRAD_CENTER_LogoLockup_ALTERNATE_0.png)
Defending Your Dissertation: A Guide
![phd defence process A woman in front of a bookshelf speaking to a laptop](https://gradcenter.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/styles/az_large/public/field/image/adobestock_348801142.jpeg?itok=vJIJf_7f)
Written by Luke Wink-Moran | Photo by insta_photos
Dissertation defenses are daunting, and no wonder; it’s not a “dissertation discussion,” or a “dissertation dialogue.” The name alone implies that the dissertation you’ve spent the last x number of years working on is subject to attack. And if you don’t feel trepidation for semantic reasons, you might be nervous because you don’t know what to expect. Our imaginations are great at making The Unknown scarier than reality. The good news is that you’ll find in this newsletter article experts who can shed light on what dissertations defenses are really like, and what you can do to prepare for them.
The first thing you should know is that your defense has already begun. It started the minute you began working on your dissertation— maybe even in some of the classes you took beforehand that helped you formulate your ideas. This, according to Dr. Celeste Atkins, is why it’s so important to identify a good mentor early in graduate school.
“To me,” noted Dr. Atkins, who wrote her dissertation on how sociology faculty from traditionally marginalized backgrounds teach about privilege and inequality, “the most important part of the doctoral journey was finding an advisor who understood and supported what I wanted from my education and who was willing to challenge me and push me, while not delaying me. I would encourage future PhDs to really take the time to get to know the faculty before choosing an advisor and to make sure that the members of their committee work well together.”
Your advisor will be the one who helps you refine arguments and strengthen your work so that by the time it reaches your dissertation committee, it’s ready. Next comes the writing process, which many students have said was the hardest part of their PhD. I’ve included this section on the writing process because this is where you’ll create all the material you’ll present during your defense, so it’s important to navigate it successfully. The writing process is intellectually grueling, it eats time and energy, and it’s where many students find themselves paddling frantically to avoid languishing in the “All-But-Dissertation” doldrums. The writing process is also likely to encroach on other parts of your life. For instance, Dr. Cynthia Trejo wrote her dissertation on college preparation for Latin American students while caring for a twelve-year-old, two adult children, and her aging parents—in the middle of a pandemic. When I asked Dr. Trejo how she did this, she replied:
“I don’t take the privilege of education for granted. My son knew I got up at 4:00 a.m. every morning, even on weekends, even on holidays; and it’s a blessing that he’s seen that work ethic and that dedication and the end result.”
Importantly, Dr. Trejo also exercised regularly and joined several online writing groups at UArizona. She mobilized her support network— her partner, parents, and even friends from high school to help care for her son.
The challenges you face during the writing process can vary by discipline. Jessika Iwanski is an MD/PhD student who in 2022 defended her dissertation on genetic mutations in sarcomeric proteins that lead to severe, neonatal dilated cardiomyopathy. She described her writing experience as “an intricate process of balancing many things at once with a deadline (defense day) that seems to be creeping up faster and faster— finishing up experiments, drafting the dissertation, preparing your presentation, filling out all the necessary documents for your defense and also, for MD/PhD students, beginning to reintegrate into the clinical world (reviewing your clinical knowledge and skill sets)!”
But no matter what your unique challenges are, writing a dissertation can take a toll on your mental health. Almost every student I spoke with said they saw a therapist and found their sessions enormously helpful. They also looked to the people in their lives for support. Dr. Betsy Labiner, who wrote her dissertation on Interiority, Truth, and Violence in Early Modern Drama, recommended, “Keep your loved ones close! This is so hard – the dissertation lends itself to isolation, especially in the final stages. Plus, a huge number of your family and friends simply won’t understand what you’re going through. But they love you and want to help and are great for getting you out of your head and into a space where you can enjoy life even when you feel like your dissertation is a flaming heap of trash.”
While you might sometimes feel like your dissertation is a flaming heap of trash, remember: a) no it’s not, you brilliant scholar, and b) the best dissertations aren’t necessarily perfect dissertations. According to Dr. Trejo, “The best dissertation is a done dissertation.” So don’t get hung up on perfecting every detail of your work. Think of your dissertation as a long-form assignment that you need to finish in order to move onto the next stage of your career. Many students continue revising after graduation and submit their work for publication or other professional objectives.
When you do finish writing your dissertation, it’s time to schedule your defense and invite friends and family to the part of the exam that’s open to the public. When that moment comes, how do you prepare to present your work and field questions about it?
“I reread my dissertation in full in one sitting,” said Dr. Labiner. “During all my time writing it, I’d never read more than one complete chapter at a time! It was a huge confidence boost to read my work in full and realize that I had produced a compelling, engaging, original argument.”
There are many other ways to prepare: create presentation slides and practice presenting them to friends or alone; think of questions you might be asked and answer them; think about what you want to wear or where you might want to sit (if you’re presenting on Zoom) that might give you a confidence boost. Iwanksi practiced presenting with her mentor and reviewed current papers to anticipate what questions her committee might ask. If you want to really get in the zone, you can emulate Dr. Labiner and do a full dress rehearsal on Zoom the day before your defense.
But no matter what you do, you’ll still be nervous:
“I had a sense of the logistics, the timing, and so on, but I didn’t really have clear expectations outside of the structure. It was a sort of nebulous three hours in which I expected to be nauseatingly terrified,” recalled Dr. Labiner.
“I expected it to be terrifying, with lots of difficult questions and constructive criticism/comments given,” agreed Iwanski.
“I expected it to be very scary,” said Dr. Trejo.
“I expected it to be like I was on trial, and I’d have to defend myself and prove I deserved a PhD,” said Dr Atkins.
And, eventually, inexorably, it will be time to present.
“It was actually very enjoyable” said Iwanski. “It was more of a celebration of years of work put into this project—not only by me but by my mentor, colleagues, lab members and collaborators! I felt very supported by all my committee members and, rather than it being a rapid fire of questions, it was more of a scientific discussion amongst colleagues who are passionate about heart disease and muscle biology.”
“I was anxious right when I logged on to the Zoom call for it,” said Dr. Labiner, “but I was blown away by the number of family and friends that showed up to support me. I had invited a lot of people who I didn’t at all think would come, but every single person I invited was there! Having about 40 guests – many of them joining from different states and several from different countries! – made me feel so loved and celebrated that my nerves were steadied very quickly. It also helped me go into ‘teaching mode’ about my work, so it felt like getting to lead a seminar on my most favorite literature.”
“In reality, my dissertation defense was similar to presenting at an academic conference,” said Dr. Atkins. “I went over my research in a practiced and organized way, and I fielded questions from the audience.
“It was a celebration and an important benchmark for me,” said Dr. Trejo. “It was a pretty happy day. Like the punctuation at the end of your sentence: this sentence is done; this journey is done. You can start the next sentence.”
If you want to learn more about dissertations in your own discipline, don’t hesitate to reach out to graduates from your program and ask them about their experiences. If you’d like to avail yourself of some of the resources that helped students in this article while they wrote and defended their dissertations, check out these links:
The Graduate Writing Lab
https://thinktank.arizona.edu/writing-center/graduate-writing-lab
The Writing Skills Improvement Program
https://wsip.arizona.edu
Campus Health Counseling and Psych Services
https://caps.arizona.edu
https://www.scribbr.com/
Reference management. Clean and simple.
How to prepare an excellent thesis defense
![phd defence process Thesis defence](https://cdn.paperpile.com/guides/img/thesis-defence-400x400.png)
What is a thesis defense?
How long is a thesis defense, what happens at a thesis defense, your presentation, questions from the committee, 6 tips to help you prepare for your thesis defense, 1. anticipate questions and prepare for them, 2. dress for success, 3. ask for help, as needed, 4. have a backup plan, 5. prepare for the possibility that you might not know an answer, 6. de-stress before, during, and after, frequently asked questions about preparing an excellent thesis defense, related articles.
If you're about to complete, or have ever completed a graduate degree, you have most likely come across the term "thesis defense." In many countries, to finish a graduate degree, you have to write a thesis .
A thesis is a large paper, or multi-chapter work, based on a topic relating to your field of study.
Once you hand in your thesis, you will be assigned a date to defend your work. Your thesis defense meeting usually consists of you and a committee of two or more professors working in your program. It may also include other people, like professionals from other colleges or those who are working in your field.
During your thesis defense, you will be asked questions about your work. The main purpose of your thesis defense is for the committee to make sure that you actually understand your field and focus area.
The questions are usually open-ended and require the student to think critically about their work. By the time of your thesis defense, your paper has already been evaluated. The questions asked are not designed so that you actually have to aggressively "defend" your work; often, your thesis defense is more of a formality required so that you can get your degree.
- Check with your department about requirements and timing.
- Re-read your thesis.
- Anticipate questions and prepare for them.
- Create a back-up plan to deal with technology hiccups.
- Plan de-stressing activities both before, and after, your defense.
How long your oral thesis defense is depends largely on the institution and requirements of your degree. It is best to consult your department or institution about this. In general, a thesis defense may take only 20 minutes, but it may also take two hours or more. The length also depends on how much time is allocated to the presentation and questioning part.
Tip: Check with your department or institution as soon as possible to determine the approved length for a thesis defense.
First of all, be aware that a thesis defense varies from country to country. This is just a general overview, but a thesis defense can take many different formats. Some are closed, others are public defenses. Some take place with two committee members, some with more examiners.
The same goes for the length of your thesis defense, as mentioned above. The most important first step for you is to clarify with your department what the structure of your thesis defense will look like. In general, your thesis defense will include:
- your presentation of around 20-30 minutes
- questions from the committee
- questions from the audience (if the defense is public and the department allows it)
You might have to give a presentation, often with Powerpoint, Google slides, or Keynote slides. Make sure to prepare an appropriate amount of slides. A general rule is to use about 10 slides for a 20-minute presentation.
But that also depends on your specific topic and the way you present. The good news is that there will be plenty of time ahead of your thesis defense to prepare your slides and practice your presentation alone and in front of friends or family.
Tip: Practice delivering your thesis presentation in front of family, friends, or colleagues.
You can prepare your slides by using information from your thesis' first chapter (the overview of your thesis) as a framework or outline. Substantive information in your thesis should correspond with your slides.
Make sure your slides are of good quality— both in terms of the integrity of the information and the appearance. If you need more help with how to prepare your presentation slides, both the ASQ Higher Education Brief and James Hayton have good guidelines on the topic.
The committee will ask questions about your work after you finish your presentation. The questions will most likely be about the core content of your thesis, such as what you learned from the study you conducted. They may also ask you to summarize certain findings and to discuss how your work will contribute to the existing body of knowledge.
Tip: Read your entire thesis in preparation of the questions, so you have a refreshed perspective on your work.
While you are preparing, you can create a list of possible questions and try to answer them. You can foresee many of the questions you will get by simply spending some time rereading your thesis.
Here are a few tips on how to prepare for your thesis defense:
You can absolutely prepare for most of the questions you will be asked. Read through your thesis and while you're reading it, create a list of possible questions. In addition, since you will know who will be on the committee, look at the academic expertise of the committee members. In what areas would they most likely be focused?
If possible, sit at other thesis defenses with these committee members to get a feel for how they ask and what they ask. As a graduate student, you should generally be adept at anticipating test questions, so use this advantage to gather as much information as possible before your thesis defense meeting.
Your thesis defense is a formal event, often the entire department or university is invited to participate. It signals a critical rite of passage for graduate students and faculty who have supported them throughout a long and challenging process.
While most universities don't have specific rules on how to dress for that event, do regard it with dignity and respect. This one might be a no-brainer, but know that you should dress as if you were on a job interview or delivering a paper at a conference.
It might help you deal with your stress before your thesis defense to entrust someone with the smaller but important responsibilities of your defense well ahead of schedule. This trusted person could be responsible for:
- preparing the room of the day of defense
- setting up equipment for the presentation
- preparing and distributing handouts
Technology is unpredictable. Life is too. There are no guarantees that your Powerpoint presentation will work at all or look the way it is supposed to on the big screen. We've all been there. Make sure to have a plan B for these situations. Handouts can help when technology fails, and an additional clean shirt can save the day if you have a spill.
One of the scariest aspects of the defense is the possibility of being asked a question you can't answer. While you can prepare for some questions, you can never know exactly what the committee will ask.
There will always be gaps in your knowledge. But your thesis defense is not about being perfect and knowing everything, it's about how you deal with challenging situations. You are not expected to know everything.
James Hayton writes on his blog that examiners will sometimes even ask questions they don't know the answer to, out of curiosity, or because they want to see how you think. While it is ok sometimes to just say "I don't know", he advises to try something like "I don't know, but I would think [...] because of x and y, but you would need to do [...] in order to find out.” This shows that you have the ability to think as an academic.
You will be nervous. But your examiners will expect you to be nervous. Being well prepared can help minimize your stress, but do know that your examiners have seen this many times before and are willing to help, by repeating questions, for example. Dora Farkas at finishyourthesis.com notes that it’s a myth that thesis committees are out to get you.
Two common symptoms of being nervous are talking really fast and nervous laughs. Try to slow yourself down and take a deep breath. Remember what feels like hours to you are just a few seconds in real life.
- Try meditational breathing right before your defense.
- Get plenty of exercise and sleep in the weeks prior to your defense.
- Have your clothes or other items you need ready to go the night before.
- During your defense, allow yourself to process each question before answering.
- Go to dinner with friends and family, or to a fun activity like mini-golf, after your defense.
Allow yourself to process each question, respond to it, and stop talking once you have responded. While a smile can often help dissolve a difficult situation, remember that nervous laughs can be irritating for your audience.
We all make mistakes and your thesis defense will not be perfect. However, careful preparation, mindfulness, and confidence can help you feel less stressful both before, and during, your defense.
Finally, consider planning something fun that you can look forward to after your defense.
It is completely normal to be nervous. Being well prepared can help minimize your stress, but do know that your examiners have seen this many times before and are willing to help, by repeating questions for example if needed. Slow yourself down, and take a deep breath.
Your thesis defense is not about being perfect and knowing everything, it's about how you deal with challenging situations. James Hayton writes on his blog that it is ok sometimes to just say "I don't know", but he advises to try something like "I don't know, but I would think [...] because of x and y, you would need to do [...] in order to find out".
Your Powerpoint presentation can get stuck or not look the way it is supposed to do on the big screen. It can happen and your supervisors know it. In general, handouts can always save the day when technology fails.
- Dress for success.
- Ask for help setting up.
- Have a backup plan (in case technology fails you).
- Deal with your nerves.
![phd defence process](https://cdn.paperpile.com/guides/img/research-paper-illustr-400x400.png)
![phd defence process Enago Academy](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/enago-academy-sitelogo.png)
13 Tips to Prepare for Your PhD Dissertation Defense
![phd defence process ' src=](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Shrutika-profile-pic-170x150.jpg)
How well do you know your project? Years of experiments, analysis of results, and tons of literature study, leads you to how well you know your research study. And, PhD dissertation defense is a finale to your PhD years. Often, researchers question how to excel at their thesis defense and spend countless hours on it. Days, weeks, months, and probably years of practice to complete your doctorate, needs to surpass the dissertation defense hurdle.
In this article, we will discuss details of how to excel at PhD dissertation defense and list down some interesting tips to prepare for your thesis defense.
Table of Contents
What Is Dissertation Defense?
Dissertation defense or Thesis defense is an opportunity to defend your research study amidst the academic professionals who will evaluate of your academic work. While a thesis defense can sometimes be like a cross-examination session, but in reality you need not fear the thesis defense process and be well prepared.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/c/JamesHaytonPhDacademy
What are the expectations of committee members.
Choosing the dissertation committee is one of the most important decision for a research student. However, putting your dissertation committee becomes easier once you understand the expectations of committee members.
The basic function of your dissertation committee is to guide you through the process of proposing, writing, and revising your dissertation. Moreover, the committee members serve as mentors, giving constructive feedback on your writing and research, also guiding your revision efforts.
The dissertation committee is usually formed once the academic coursework is completed. Furthermore, by the time you begin your dissertation research, you get acquainted to the faculty members who will serve on your dissertation committee. Ultimately, who serves on your dissertation committee depends upon you.
Some universities allow an outside expert (a former professor or academic mentor) to serve on your committee. It is advisable to choose a faculty member who knows you and your research work.
How to Choose a Dissertation Committee Member?
- Avoid popular and eminent faculty member
- Choose the one you know very well and can approach whenever you need them
- A faculty member whom you can learn from is apt.
- Members of the committee can be your future mentors, co-authors, and research collaborators. Choose them keeping your future in mind.
How to Prepare for Dissertation Defense?
![phd defence process dissertation defense](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/TipsForDissertationDefense.jpg)
1. Start Your Preparations Early
Thesis defense is not a 3 or 6 months’ exercise. Don’t wait until you have completed all your research objectives. Start your preparation well in advance, and make sure you know all the intricacies of your thesis and reasons to all the research experiments you conducted.
2. Attend Presentations by Other Candidates
Look out for open dissertation presentations at your university. In fact, you can attend open dissertation presentations at other universities too. Firstly, this will help you realize how thesis defense is not a scary process. Secondly, you will get the tricks and hacks on how other researchers are defending their thesis. Finally, you will understand why dissertation defense is necessary for the university, as well as the scientific community.
3. Take Enough Time to Prepare the Slides
Dissertation defense process harder than submitting your thesis well before the deadline. Ideally, you could start preparing the slides after finalizing your thesis. Spend more time in preparing the slides. Make sure you got the right data on the slides and rephrase your inferences, to create a logical flow to your presentation.
4. Structure the Presentation
Do not be haphazard in designing your presentation. Take time to create a good structured presentation. Furthermore, create high-quality slides which impresses the committee members. Make slides that hold your audience’s attention. Keep the presentation thorough and accurate, and use smart art to create better slides.
5. Practice Breathing Techniques
Watch a few TED talk videos and you will notice that speakers and orators are very fluent at their speech. In fact, you will not notice them taking a breath or falling short of breath. The only reason behind such effortless oratory skill is practice — practice in breathing technique.
Moreover, every speaker knows how to control their breath. Long and steady breaths are crucial. Pay attention to your breathing and slow it down. All you need I some practice prior to this moment.
6. Create an Impactful Introduction
The audience expects a lot from you. So your opening statement should enthrall the audience. Furthermore, your thesis should create an impact on the members; they should be thrilled by your thesis and the way you expose it.
The introduction answers most important questions, and most important of all “Is this presentation worth the time?” Therefore, it is important to make a good first impression , because the first few minutes sets the tone for your entire presentation.
7. Maintain Your Own List of Questions
While preparing for the presentation, make a note of all the questions that you ask yourself. Try to approach all the questions from a reader’s point of view. You could pretend like you do not know the topic and think of questions that could help you know the topic much better.
The list of questions will prepare you for the questions the members may pose while trying to understand your research. Attending other candidates’ open discussion will also help you assume the dissertation defense questions.
8. Practice Speech and Body Language
After successfully preparing your slides and practicing, you could start focusing on how you look while presenting your thesis. This exercise is not for your appearance but to know your body language and relax if need be.
Pay attention to your body language. Stand with your back straight, but relax your shoulders. The correct posture will give you the feel of self-confidence. So, observe yourself in the mirror and pay attention to movements you make.
9. Give Mock Presentation
Giving a trial defense in advance is a good practice. The most important factor for the mock defense is its similarity to your real defense, so that you get the experience that prepares for the actual defense.
10. Learn How to Handle Mistakes
Everyone makes mistakes. However, it is important to carry on. Do not let the mistakes affect your thesis defense. Take a deep breath and move on to the next point.
11. Do Not Run Through the Presentation
If you are nervous, you would want to end the presentation as soon as possible. However, this situation will give rise to anxiety and you will speak too fast, skipping the essential details. Eventually, creating a fiasco of your dissertation defense .
12. Get Plenty of Rest
Out of the dissertation defense preparation points, this one is extremely important. Obviously, sleeping a day before your big event is hard, but you have to focus and go to bed early, with the clear intentions of getting the rest you deserve.
13. Visualize Yourself Defending Your Thesis
This simple exercise creates an immense impact on your self-confidence. All you have to do is visualize yourself giving a successful presentation each evening before going to sleep. Everyday till the day of your thesis defense, see yourself standing in front of the audience and going from one point to another.
This exercise takes a lot of commitment and persistence, but the results in the end are worth it. Visualization makes you see yourself doing the scary thing of defending your thesis.
If you have taken all these points into consideration, you are ready for your big day. You have worked relentlessly for your PhD degree , and you will definitely give your best in this final step.
Have you completed your thesis defense? How did you prepare for it and how was your experience throughout your dissertation defense ? Do write to us or comment below.
![phd defence process ' src=](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/ap_avatars/cfcd208495d565ef66e7dff9f98764da.jpg)
The tips are very useful.I will recomend it to our students.
Excellent. As a therapist trying to help a parent of a candidate, I am very impressed and thankful your concise, clear, action-oriented article. Thank you.
Thanks for your sharing. It is so good. I can learn a lot from your ideas. Hope that in my dissertation defense next time I can pass
The tips are effective. Will definitely apply them in my dissertation.
My dissertation defense is coming up in less than two weeks from now, I find this tips quite instructive, I’ll definitely apply them. Thank you so much.
Rate this article Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published.
![phd defence process phd defence process](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/800-X-210-1.jpg)
Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles
![phd defence process Content Analysis vs Thematic Analysis: What's the difference?](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/FeatureImages-16-210x136.png)
- Reporting Research
Choosing the Right Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis vs. content analysis for data interpretation
In research, choosing the right approach to understand data is crucial for deriving meaningful insights.…
![phd defence process Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Study Design](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/FeatureImages-14-210x136.png)
Comparing Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Studies: 5 steps for choosing the right approach
The process of choosing the right research design can put ourselves at the crossroads of…
![phd defence process Networking in Academic Conferences](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ethical-research-15-210x136.png)
- Career Corner
Unlocking the Power of Networking in Academic Conferences
Embarking on your first academic conference experience? Fear not, we got you covered! Academic conferences…
![phd defence process Research recommendation](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/910x340-3-210x136.png)
Research Recommendations – Guiding policy-makers for evidence-based decision making
Research recommendations play a crucial role in guiding scholars and researchers toward fruitful avenues of…
![phd defence process](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/910x340-Exploring-Responsible-AI-210x136.png)
- AI in Academia
Disclosing the Use of Generative AI: Best practices for authors in manuscript preparation
The rapid proliferation of generative and other AI-based tools in research writing has ignited an…
Setting Rationale in Research: Cracking the code for excelling at research
Mitigating Survivorship Bias in Scholarly Research: 10 tips to enhance data integrity
The Power of Proofreading: Taking your academic work to the next level
Facing Difficulty Writing an Academic Essay? — Here is your one-stop solution!
![phd defence process phd defence process](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/iwwa_dashboard.png)
Sign-up to read more
Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:
- 2000+ blog articles
- 50+ Webinars
- 10+ Expert podcasts
- 50+ Infographics
- 10+ Checklists
- Research Guides
We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.
- Industry News
- Publishing Research
- Promoting Research
- Diversity and Inclusion
- Infographics
- Expert Video Library
- Other Resources
- Enago Learn
- Upcoming & On-Demand Webinars
- Peer-Review Week 2023
- Open Access Week 2023
- Conference Videos
- Enago Report
- Journal Finder
- Enago Plagiarism & AI Grammar Check
- Editing Services
- Publication Support Services
- Research Impact
- Translation Services
- Publication solutions
- AI-Based Solutions
- Thought Leadership
- Call for Articles
- Call for Speakers
- Author Training
- Edit Profile
I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:
![phd defence process phd defence process](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ai-survey-sticky.jpg)
In your opinion, what is the most effective way to improve integrity in the peer review process?
- Link to facebook
- Link to linkedin
- Link to twitter
- Link to youtube
- Writing Tips
How to Prepare for Your Dissertation Defense
![phd defence process How to Prepare for Your Dissertation Defense](https://proofed.com/wp-content/webp-express/webp-images/uploads/2023/09/1-Graphic-How-to-Prepare-for-Your-Dissertation-Defence-628x492.png.webp)
4-minute read
- 1st August 2023
After years of research and study, you’ve finally reached the grand finale of your PhD years: your dissertation defense. Since defending your dissertation is the culmination of all your hard work, it’s essential to do everything you can to prepare for it.
In this post, we’ll take you through how to ready yourself for your dissertation defense so you can focus on your accomplishments and excel during this crucial professional moment.
What is a Dissertation Defense?
The dissertation defense is the crowning moment of years of research – the final examination before a PhD student is awarded their doctoral degree.
During a dissertation defense, the student presents their research, methodology, findings, and conclusions to a committee of faculty members and experts in their field. The committee then engages in a question-and-answer session to assess the student’s understanding of the subject matter, the quality of their research, and their ability to defend their work under scrutiny.
Many PhD students consider it to be the defining moment of their academic career and their chance to prove their expertise in their chosen research field.
If all this sounds overwhelming – don’t worry. If you’re a PhD student, you’ll have plenty of time and opportunity to adequately prepare for your dissertation defense. Below are some strategies to help you get ready for this significant occasion in your career.
1. Know the Requirements
Familiarize yourself with your institution’s guidelines and requirements for the defense process. Understanding the format, time limit, and expectations for the presentation will help you to prepare your material and anticipate any issues.
2. Review Your Dissertation
Even if you think you know it inside and out, review your dissertation from beginning to end. It may have been some time since you’ve last read and considered certain portions of your research and findings. Consider what your committee might ask about your research questions , data analysis, and conclusions.
Find this useful?
Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.
3. Work on Starting Strong
To begin your defense on a strong note, work on creating a clear and engaging introduction. You can start by briefly outlining the purpose of your study, research questions, and methodology . Try to stay on topic and don’t veer off track by discussing unrelated or unnecessary information.
4. Practice Presenting
Practice your presentation skills by rehearsing your defense multiple times. Focus on clarity and pacing and try to stay within the allotted time limit. It also helps to record yourself so that you can see yourself from your audience’s point of view.
5. Practice Q&A Sessions
To build your confidence, enlist friends and colleagues to conduct mock question-and-answer sessions. When practicing, remember to pause before answering questions you’re unsure of. It’s better to take your time delivering a response than it is to give an inaccurate or incorrect answer.
6. Seek Feedback
Find out if your institution offers mock defense sessions where peers or mentors play the role of the committee, ask you questions, and give feedback . You can also have colleagues, mentors, or advisors review your presentation and offer practical feedback.
7. Create Visual Aids
Think about any visual aids , such as slides, you may want to use to illustrate your defense and prepare them in advance. Be sure to check that your university allows visuals or images and that they enhance, rather than overwhelm, your presentation.
8. Stay Calm and Confident
It’s natural to feel nervous but try to stay calm and composed during your defense. Take deep breaths and remind yourself of the expertise you’ve gained through the experience of writing your dissertation.
Expert Proofreading Services
The best way to prepare for your dissertation defense is to have your dissertation professionally proofread. Our editing experts have extensive experience with a wide variety of academic subjects and topics and can help ensure your dissertation is ready for presentation. Send in a free sample of 500 words or less and get started today.
Share this article:
Post A New Comment
Got content that needs a quick turnaround? Let us polish your work. Explore our editorial business services.
6-minute read
How to Write a Nonprofit Grant Proposal
If you’re seeking funding to support your charitable endeavors as a nonprofit organization, you’ll need...
9-minute read
How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation
Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...
8-minute read
Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement
Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...
7-minute read
Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization
Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...
![](http://farmaciacoslada.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Five Creative Ways to Showcase Your Digital Portfolio
Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...
How to Ace Slack Messaging for Contractors and Freelancers
Effective professional communication is an important skill for contractors and freelancers navigating remote work environments....
![phd defence process Logo Harvard University](https://proofed.com/wp-content/webp-express/webp-images/uploads/2020/11/logo-harvard.png.webp)
Make sure your writing is the best it can be with our expert English proofreading and editing.
Defense and Dissertation Overview
Once a student’s box is checked, the BPH student should set up a one-on-one “Defense Packet Meeting” with the BPH Associate Director to review the Defense and Dissertation Process, which includes reviewing all required materials, logistics, timing, FAS/Harvard Griffin GSAS Form of the Dissertation, sample forms, and to answer student questions related to these processes.
![phd defence process](https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/biological-sciences/wp-content/uploads/sites/74/2014/10/IMG_8471-copy-300x203.jpg)
- Defense Committee Chair: One member of the student’s DAC, often the DAC chair, is required to chair the oral defense. This required holdover from the DAC serves the purpose of providing insight to the examiners regarding the path the student has taken in completing the dissertation research. Their primary role is to assess committee satisfaction with the written dissertation, administer the exam, arbitrate any problems that may arise, and make final recommendations for completion of necessary corrections and additions to the dissertation. No other DAC members can serve on the defense committee .
- At least one member must be a BPH faculty member, often from the same academic department.
- One member of the examination committee must be from outside of Harvard University.
- The fourth member may be from either BPH or another Harvard-affiliated program.
- Co-authors and collaborators cannot be members of the Defense committee
DEFENSE TIMING AND FORMAT
- Students should notify the BPH Program as far in advance as possible with the details of the exam.
- The student is required to notify the BPH office no later than 3 weeks in advance of the defense with the final dissertation title.
- At least two weeks before the date of exam, defense members should be sent copies of the dissertation for review. A copy of the dissertation should also be sent to the BPH program.
- If any defense committee member foresees problems with the exam, they should contact the chair of the defense committee in advance of the meeting. If major problems are found with the written document, the Committee can decide to postpone the oral defense until satisfactory changes are made. While rare in our program, these occasions can involve the insufficient or improper use of statistical methods, grossly overstated conclusions, insufficient background or discussion, or evidence of plagiarism.
- More details about the timing and format are provided in the “Defense Packet Meeting” held with each student.
STIPEND GUIDELINES
If a student successfully defends the dissertation before the 15th of the month, the stipend will be terminated at the end of that month. If the student successfully defends on or after the 15th, the next month’s stipend will be the final month the student is paid, at the discretion of their advisor.
Students are encouraged to speak to their advisors directly about how they should be paid as they complete their graduate work. If an advisor wishes to pay the student for one additional month, beyond what has been explained above, the advisor must notify the department’s financial administrator. For administrative reasons, a stipend cannot be issued to a student after their graduation/degree conferral date.
ORAL DEFENSE PROCEDURES
Part 1: Public Seminar As part of the exam, the PhD candidate will present a public seminar followed by a private oral examination. The public presentation lasts no longer than 1 hour, which includes time for the advisor’s introduction, the student’s oral presentation and acknowledgements, and time for audience questions and answers. The Defense Committee is required to attend the public seminar; however, it is customary for members of the defense committee to hold their questions until the private oral exam.
Part 2: Private Oral Examination A private oral examination follows the public seminar. Initially, the student will be asked to leave the room for several minutes, along with the dissertation advisor if the dissertation advisor has decided to remain for the private exam. During this time, the committee will discuss the merits of the dissertation, any issues with the dissertation, and areas they may want to focus on during the oral exam. The student (and advisor if present) is then asked back into the room for the exam.
Each member of the defense committee will direct questions to the candidate based on their review of the dissertation and presentation of the seminar. The Defense Chair will moderate the discussion between the panel and the student. The closed defense takes up to two hours and involves detailed technical questions as well as broader questions on the conclusions, impact, and limitations of the research. Dissertation advisors may be present, but they must not participate in the exam (e.g., answer questions posed by the committee).
At the end of the examination, the student (and advisor if present) is once again asked to step out of the room for several minutes. The Committee will discuss any revisions needed for the thesis and whether these revisions need to be reviewed and by whom. Once the committee determines the outcomes, the student will be asked back into the room and the Committee provides the student with any [minor] changes needed to the dissertation. While it is extremely rare for the student to fail at this stage, the committee will provide recommendations to the student on their research, communication skills, and development as a scientist, as well as delineating the required changes to the dissertation.
PREPARING FOR THE DEFENSE/WRITING THE DISSERTATION
Students preparing to write and defend their dissertation must review University requirements as outlined in “ Dissertations ” with guidelines published at the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.
Students are also welcome to visit the BPH Student Lounge (Building 2, Room 113) to look at copies of previous BPH bound dissertations.
Writing the Dissertation Each student must write a comprehensive PhD dissertation on their research topic and the original results of their research. There are a variety of ways a dissertation can be composed, but the core elements described below must be included. The dissertation must show original treatment of the subject, contain a scholarly review of the pertinent literature, provide evidence of independent research of publishable quality, and be clearly, logically, and carefully written. In addition to a compendium of the student’s research, including detailed methods and results, the dissertation must contain a thoughtful discussion of the conclusions, impact, and limitations of the research. The completed work should be critically reviewed by the dissertation advisor before being submitted to the Dissertation Defense Committee.
In some cases, the student has done all of the work in the dissertation; more often portions of the dissertation result from collaborative research. In all dissertations containing collaborative results, the dissertation should indicate concisely who contributed to the work and how. For example, a chapter containing multi-authored, published work must include a complete reference of the publication and a brief description of the candidate’s and the colleagues’ contributions. For work that is not published but which resulted from multiple researchers, the contributors must be named and respective attributions made clear. This policy allows stylistic flexibility; depending on the amount of collaborative work in the dissertation and the status of publication(s), the attributions can be, preferably, on or accompanying the cover page for each chapter or within an extended acknowledgements section at the end of each chapter. It is recommended that if figures or figure panels are included that are the work of others that the figure panels be clearly identified and the work properly attributed. It is permissible for more than one student to include work from the same collaboration or publication as long as the required attributions are clear, justified, and complete.
Individual chapters can be that of published articles as long as there are also comprehensive Introduction and Conclusion chapters written by the student. While the text can be the same, use of journal reprints as a chapter is not permissible. A word document of the published article must be used, and the pages in the dissertation must be consecutively numbered. Furthermore, the figures and accompanying figure legends must be integrated into the main body of each chapter, preferably following the first mention of the given figure, not clustered at the end of the chapter. Any dissertation that varies significantly from the Graduate School or FAS guidelines, or is not neat and readable, is subject to required stylistic revision before acceptance by the University. (For further information, please visit https://gsas.harvard.edu/academics/dissertations ).
DEFENSE FORMS AND PAPERWORK
Dissertation Acceptance Certificate Before the examination, the BPH Program Office will provide the Defense Committee Chair with a copy of the official Dissertation Acceptance Certificate. This certificate must be signed by all readers of the dissertation at the end of the examination and returned to the BPH Program Office. This certificate will be scanned and sent to the student so it can be inserted as page one of the dissertation prior to the online submission. The student must submit the one original, official copy to the Registrar’s in Cambridge by the appropriate deadline.
If extensive corrections are to be made, the BPH Program Office will hold the certificate until the Defense Committee Chair, and/or assigned reviewer(s) provide a written notification to the BPH Program to confirm that the corrected work has been reviewed and approved.
Dissertation Defense Exam Report The Dissertation Defense Exam Report is completed by the members of the Dissertation Defense Committee to provide a record of any comments or recommendations they may have. The report must be signed by all members immediately after the private exam. The completed report must be submitted to the BPH Program Office at the same time as the Dissertation Acceptance Certificate.
Sample Dissertation Title Page Please click here to see a sample BPH Dissertation Title Page. Again, please refer to the Dissertation website for guidelines about how to format your dissertation.
News from the School
![U.S. bird flu response builds on lessons learned from COVID U.S. bird flu response builds on lessons learned from COVID](https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/cropped-Cows_800x600.jpg)
U.S. bird flu response builds on lessons learned from COVID
![Experiencing gratitude associated with greater longevity among older adults Experiencing gratitude associated with greater longevity among older adults](https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/cropped-gratitude-1125x600-1.jpg)
Experiencing gratitude associated with greater longevity among older adults
![Insurance coverage disruptions, challenges accessing care common amid Medicaid unwinding Insurance coverage disruptions, challenges accessing care common amid Medicaid unwinding](https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/cropped-id-card-illustration-800x600-1.jpg)
Insurance coverage disruptions, challenges accessing care common amid Medicaid unwinding
![‘Linear urban forest’ project aims to mitigate heat, improve health in cities ‘Linear urban forest’ project aims to mitigate heat, improve health in cities](https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/cropped-Linear-urban-forest-800x600-1.jpg)
‘Linear urban forest’ project aims to mitigate heat, improve health in cities
![phd defence process Academia Insider](https://academiainsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/AI-logo-full-colour.png)
Tips for preparing your PhD defense [EASY dissertation defense]
Embarking on the final hurdle of your doctoral journey, the PhD dissertation defense, can feel daunting.
This significant event involves presenting and justifying years of research to a committee of field experts, showcasing your comprehension, originality, and critical thinking skills.
With various expectations from committee members, it’s crucial to know what makes a compelling thesis and how to adeptly defend your arguments. Preparation is key; from choosing well-suited examiners to meticulously preparing for potential questions, every step counts.
This article provides easy-to-follow tips for this process, from how to approach revisions to the actual defense duration, ensuring a smoother dissertation defense.
Top tips for your PhD defence process
- Understand Expectations : Understand what your examiners are looking for in your thesis. They expect it to be relevant to the field, have a clear title, a comprehensive abstract, engage with relevant literature, answer clear research questions, provide a consistent argument, and make a significant contribution to knowledge. They also value the ability to show connections between different parts of the thesis and a confident, positive attitude during the defense.
- Choose the Right Examiners : Make strategic decisions when selecting your examiners. They should be experts in your field, open-minded about cross-discipline work, cited in your work, have a constructive approach, align with your methodology, and respect critical viewpoints. Consider your supervisor’s advice, as they can help identify suitable examiners.
- Thorough Preparation : Understand your institute’s specific defense requirements and practice rigorously. Break down your thesis into sections, time your presentation, focus on key points, and prepare for potential questions. Consider setting up a mock defense to familiarize yourself with the process.
- Master Your Content : Understand your work inside out. Rather than cramming as much information as possible, focus on thoroughly comprehending your research. If faced with an unexpected question during the defense, take a moment to formulate an organized response.
- Manage Your Time : Be aware that dissertation defenses usually last between one to three hours, so ensure your presentation fits within this timeframe. Remember, the defense is an opportunity to showcase your hard work. Be confident and composed throughout the process.
What Is Dissertation Defense?
A PhD defense, also known as a viva , is a critical process that marks the completion of a doctoral degree. It varies from one institution to another and between different countries.
It could be a private examination by a panel of experts in the field or a public defense before an audience.
In this defense, you present and justify the research you have conducted over many years.
You’ll engage in a rigorous academic conversation about the different aspects of your research, answer questions, and explain your findings and their implications.
The defense is a chance for the panel to test your comprehension of your chosen subject area, your work’s originality, and its contribution to the field. It also tests your ability to think critically, to articulate your thoughts, and how effectively you can defend your arguments under pressure.
The essence of a PhD defense is not only to assess the validity of the thesis but also to assess the candidate’s proficiency in their subject.
What Are the Expectations of PhD Defence Examiners? Understand your dissertation committee.
Meeting the expectations of committee members in the context of a dissertation is essential for the successful completion of the research.
They will have read your thesis and will be looking for any mistakes or areas that they are unsure about to ask you during your PhD defence.
Here are what PhD defence examiners are looking for in your thesis and may have questions at your oral defence:
Item | Description |
---|---|
Relevance to Field | The thesis must be clearly relevant to the specific academic field. |
Clear Title | The thesis should have a clear, descriptive, and concise title. |
Clear Abstract | The abstract should provide a good overview of the research and its findings. |
Relevant Literature Review | The thesis should engage with the existing academic literature relevant to the research topic. |
Research Questions | Research questions should be clear, relevant, and answered in the course of the research. |
Consistent Argument | The thesis should contain a clear and consistent argument throughout. |
Conceptual Conclusions | The conclusions should not only summarize the research findings but also relate back to the literature review and conceptual issues raised. |
Contribution to Knowledge | The thesis should make a significant contribution to the field of knowledge. |
Ability to think interconnectedly | The ability to show connections between different parts of the thesis is important, as it demonstrates a higher level of thinking. |
Pleasurable Text | The text should be enjoyable to read, well-written, and explicit in terms of ideas and concepts. |
Positive Attitude | The candidate should demonstrate confidence, enjoyment, and a positive attitude during the Viva (oral examination), symbolized by smiling with the examiners, not at them. |
Display of interconnectedness | The thesis should clearly show how various parts are interconnected, ultimately achieving synergy. |
A dissertation committee typically consists of external experts (in a similar field) who will engage in robust discussion about your PhD and submitted thesis.
As committee members, their primary role is to actively engage with the dissertation research, offering constructive feedback and suggestions as well as deciding if you have satisfied the requirements of the university to be awarded a PhD
Here’s my video about the common questions you’ll likely encounter during your defence and how you can answer them:
How to Choose your PhD examiners and committee members
Choosing your PhD examiners requires strategic thinking and insightful conversations with your supervisor. It’s a very important decision and can make your PhD defence much smoother.
During my PhD, I chose examiners that I had cited and based my work on their preliminary investigations.
But there are more things to think about before you write down their names!
Here’s a table checklist for choosing your PhD examiners.
CHECKLIST | NOTES |
---|---|
Expert in relevant field | Your examiners should be well-acquainted with your research topic and be able to provide relevant and informed feedback. |
Interdisciplinary knowledge | If your thesis spans multiple disciplines, it would be helpful to have examiners who understand all the fields involved. |
Open-minded about cross-discipline work | Ensure your examiner is open-minded about works integrating different disciplines, as each field has unique ways of presenting findings. |
Cited in your work | Consider examiners who you have cited in your work, as they are familiar with the type of work you’re doing. |
Constructive Approach | Avoid examiners known for overly harsh or destructive feedback, you want someone who can critically analyze your work but also provide constructive comments. |
Alignment with your methodology | The examiner should understand and ideally endorse the methodology you used. This ensures that they can productively critique your work’s design and execution. |
Respect for critical viewpoints | If you’ve critiqued a particular scholar’s work in your thesis, ensure the scholar is professional enough to respect different viewpoints if considering them as an examiner. |
Supervisor’s advice | Pay heed to your supervisor’s advice as they have experience in identifying suitable and appropriate examiners. |
First, compile a list of potential examiners who you believe would be appropriate for reviewing your thesis. Discuss your choices with your supervisor, explaining why you consider them suitable.
If your thesis spans multiple disciplines, consider choosing examiners from each discipline; it ensures intricate knowledge of each field is utilized.
However, ensure these examiners are open-minded about cross-discipline work, as disciplines tend to have unique ways of presenting their findings.
Listen to your supervisor’s advice.
They have experience in these matters and know who would be best qualified to examine your work.
Even if a scholar is high-profile or an editor of a favored journal, they might not be suitable due to methodological differences or varying research approaches.
Choosing the right examiner is crucial, as an ill-suited examiner could result in undesired outcomes. The goal is to establish a thoughtful academic conversation about your work.
How to Prepare for Dissertation Defense?
To prepare for your dissertation defense, start by understanding the specific requirements of your institute, as the process can vary across countries.
This could include:
- a presentation,
- a conversation with examiners,
- or a combination of both.
Once you know what to expect, practice vigorously. This should not be your first time discussing your work with others – engage in academic conversation, seek feedback and address challenging questions prior to the defense.
Breakdown your thesis into sections and time yourself on each section to manage length. Focus on the key points and avoid irrelevant details.
Creating a mock defense will be helpful in managing time and getting familiar with the process.
Prepare for potential questions. It’s not about cramming as much information as possible, but about understanding your work inside out. Start by preparing answers to common defense questions. In case of an unexpected question, don’t rush to answer. Take a moment, write down key points, and formulate an organized response.
Remember that the defense is an opportunity to showcase years of hard work.
Be confident, and don’t forget to breathe!
How Long Do Dissertation Defenses Usually Last?
The length of a dissertation defense can vary depending on factors such as the specific requirements of the institution and the complexity of the research being presented.
On average, a dissertation defense usually lasts between one to three hours.
During this time, the candidate will present their research and findings to a panel of experts, often including faculty members and fellow researchers.
The defense typically begins with an introduction by the candidate, followed by a detailed presentation of the research methodology, results, and conclusions.
Panel members then have the opportunity to ask questions and engage in a discussion with the candidate.
It is not unusual for defenses to be quite intense and challenging, as the panel seeks to assess the depth of the candidate’s knowledge and understanding of their research. In some cases, the candidate may be asked to leave the room while the panel deliberates before ultimately reaching a decision on the acceptance or rejection of the dissertation.
Wrapping up
As the culmination of the doctoral journey, the PhD defense demands meticulous preparation and understanding of its unique rigors.
This entails knowing the expectations of your dissertation committee, choosing the right examiners who offer constructive feedback, and putting considerable time into preparing for your oral defense.
The defense process isn’t a mere formality; it’s a critical examination of the candidate’s comprehension, originality, and critical thinking skills.
It provides an opportunity to exhibit your research and its contribution to your field, defend your arguments, and validate your years of labor.
Thus, selecting well-qualified examiners, anticipating potential questions, and honing your presentation skills are vital for a successful defense.
Students must be registered for their PhD program and finalize their dissertation prior to the defense, which can last anywhere from one to three hours, depending on the institution and the complexity of the research.
Any corrections or major revisions suggested by the dissertation committee members must be completed and submitted weeks prior to the conferral date.
A PhD defense isn’t just a rite of passage for doctoral candidates—it’s the final, decisive step on the journey to earning a doctorate.
It requires the full commitment of the candidate, their dissertation advisor, the committee chair, and all members involved, ensuring that the graduate studies department’s requirements are met, and that the student is admitted to the next phase of their academic or professional journey.
![phd defence process phd defence process](https://academiainsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/DR-ANDREW-STAPPLETON-PORTRAIT-THE-HEADSHOT-CREATIVE-LO-RES-19931-1024x684.jpg)
Dr Andrew Stapleton has a Masters and PhD in Chemistry from the UK and Australia. He has many years of research experience and has worked as a Postdoctoral Fellow and Associate at a number of Universities. Although having secured funding for his own research, he left academia to help others with his YouTube channel all about the inner workings of academia and how to make it work for you.
Thank you for visiting Academia Insider.
We are here to help you navigate Academia as painlessly as possible. We are supported by our readers and by visiting you are helping us earn a small amount through ads and affiliate revenue - Thank you!
![phd defence process phd defence process](https://academiainsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/AI-full-logo-Black-1024x270.png)
2024 © Academia Insider
![phd defence process phd defence process](https://academiainsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/quora.png)
PhD thesis defence process
The PhD thesis oral defence is the last step in completing your PhD degree and is arranged by the Faculty of Environment Graduate Office. The PhD student and their supervisor(s) should reference the PhD thesis examination regulations and the Defence Backwards Planning Tool as the student reaches the final stages of their degree.
Format of the defence can be in-person, remote defence, or hybrid. The decision on the format of the defence will be agreed upon by the supervisor and student.
Learn more about the process: Stage 1: Prior to the defence | Stage 2: Day of the defence | Stage 3: After the defence
Process and duties
Stage 1: prior to the defence.
- Verify with your department graduate coordinator that all the courses and milestones required to graduate are completed.
- The department graduate coordinator can verify this and prepare the PhD Examining Committee Form (PDF) for the Faculty Graduate Studies committee.
- If the committee has changed since original approval, the Advisor must inform the graduate coordinator of that student's department of these changes. A revised committee approval form must be approved by the Faculty Graduate Studies Committee.
- Supervisor to conform up-to-date adjunct or cross-appointment status of any committee members with the department administrative manager.
- Please review the GSPA Preparation of the Thesis page to ensure the formatting standards established by the University of Waterloo are met.
- Please refer to the Graduate Studies Academic Calendar for important dates (e.g fall or spring convocation deadlines, the 100% and 50% refund deadlines, etc.)
- Five-six names (in consultation with the Committee), with accurate email addresses and telephone numbers, for the selection of the External Examiner. Along with the list, there should be a brief biographical sketch for each of the possible External Examiners. If the Supervisor is unavailable for consultation during the scheduling of the examination, they should delegate a committee member to act on their behalf. The Supervisor should not contact the persons on the potential external examiner list.
- A statement on any potential conflict of interest or an indication that there is no conflict of interest with any of the potential external examiners.
- A copy of the thesis abstract, including title, candidate's name, and (ideally) the names of all the committee members.
- The Associate Dean, Graduate Studies, will select the External Examiner from the list provided by the Supervisor and confirm the date/time of the defence based on the External Examiner's availability.
- Administrator, Graduate Studies, will submit a PhD Defence Chair request to GSPA.
- Apply to graduate for the next available Convocation after the defence date, using Quest.
Back to top
Stage 2: Day of defence
- For in-person or hybrid defences - Plan on arriving to the room booked for the defence 30-60 minutes before the scheduled defence to ensure the room is prepared and the equipment to be used are functional.
Stage 3: After the defence
- The Chair will send the results of the defence to the Administrator, Graduate Studies.
- Accepted: Thesis to be revised to the satisfaction of the Supervisor and submitted to UW Space within one month of the date of the defence.
- Accepted Conditionally: The PhD Thesis Examining Committee's report must include a brief outline of the nature of the changes required and must indicate the time by which the changes are to be completed. Changes must be completed to the Committee's satisfaction and submitted to the UWSpace within four months of the dare of the defence. At least two members of the Committee must confirm that required changes have been made.
- Any extension to the time limits for A or B must be requested in writing and approved by the Graduate Officer and Faculty Associate Dean, Graduate Studies.
- If there are any changes in the thesis title, please inform the Administrator, Graduate Studies as the thesis may be rejected from UW Space otherwise.
- Please refer to the PhD Thesis Examination Regulations page for more information and for next steps on Reexamination and Failed defence decision.
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
- View all journals
- Explore content
- About the journal
- Publish with us
- Sign up for alerts
- CAREER COLUMN
- 30 March 2020
How to defend a PhD remotely
- Alyssa Frederick 0
Alyssa Frederick is a postdoctoral scholar at the Bodega Marine Laboratory in Bodega Bay, California, part of the University of California, Davis.
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
In November 2019, I conducted my PhD defence using the videoconferencing software Zoom.
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
24,99 € / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
185,98 € per year
only 3,65 € per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00971-z
This is an article from the Nature Careers Community, a place for Nature readers to share their professional experiences and advice. Guest posts are encouraged .
Related Articles
![phd defence process phd defence process](https://media.nature.com/lw100/magazine-assets/d41586-020-00971-z/d41586-020-00971-z_16646258.jpg)
- Peer review
- Conferences and meetings
![phd defence process We are junior scientists from emerging economies — the world needs more researchers like us solving global problems](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02485-4/d41586-024-02485-4_27355860.jpg)
We are junior scientists from emerging economies — the world needs more researchers like us solving global problems
Career Column 26 JUL 24
![phd defence process Why you should perform a premortem on your research](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02344-2/d41586-024-02344-2_27303682.jpg)
Why you should perform a premortem on your research
Career Column 24 JUL 24
![phd defence process Science must protect thinking time in a world of instant communication](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02381-x/d41586-024-02381-x_27373784.jpg)
Science must protect thinking time in a world of instant communication
Editorial 24 JUL 24
![phd defence process Who will make AlphaFold3 open source? Scientists race to crack AI model](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-01555-x/d41586-024-01555-x_27123394.jpg)
Who will make AlphaFold3 open source? Scientists race to crack AI model
News 23 MAY 24
![phd defence process Pay researchers to spot errors in published papers](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-01465-y/d41586-024-01465-y_27083492.jpg)
Pay researchers to spot errors in published papers
World View 21 MAY 24
![phd defence process Plagiarism in peer-review reports could be the ‘tip of the iceberg’](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-01312-0/d41586-024-01312-0_27039232.jpg)
Plagiarism in peer-review reports could be the ‘tip of the iceberg’
Nature Index 01 MAY 24
![phd defence process What is it like to attend a predatory conference?](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02358-w/d41586-024-02358-w_27338272.jpg)
What is it like to attend a predatory conference?
Career Feature 18 JUL 24
![phd defence process How to network with the brightest minds in science](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-02086-1/d41586-024-02086-1_27225678.jpg)
How to network with the brightest minds in science
Career Feature 26 JUN 24
![phd defence process How I overcame my stage fright in the lab](https://images.nature.com/w140h79/magazine-assets/d41586-024-01616-1/d41586-024-01616-1_27042952.jpg)
How I overcame my stage fright in the lab
Career Column 30 MAY 24
Stadtman Investigator Search 2024-2025
Stadtman Investigator Search 2024-2025 Deadline: September 30, 2024 The National Institutes of Health, the U.S. government’s premier biomedical and...
Bethesda, Maryland
National Institute of Health- Office of Intramural Research
Research Manager, Open Access
The Research Manager is a great opportunity for someone with experience of policy and open access to join Springer Nature.
London, Berlin or New York (Hybrid Working)
Springer Nature Ltd
Postdoctoral Research Scientist
Computational Postdoctoral Research Scientist in Neurodegenerative Disease
New York City, New York (US)
Columbia University Department of Pathology
Associate or Senior Editor (Chemical Engineering), Nature Sustainability
Associate or Senior Editor (Chemical engineering), Nature Sustainability Locations: New York, Philadelphia, Berlin, or Heidelberg Closing date: Aug...
Postdoctoral Research Scientist - Mouse Model
The Stavros Niarchos Foundation Center for Precision Psychiatry & Mental Health is seeking a Postdoctoral Research Scientist for the Mouse Model.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center / Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
Quick links
- Explore articles by subject
- Guide to authors
- Editorial policies
How Do I Prepare for a Successful Defence?
Vivas and Presentations
- First Online: 19 October 2023
Cite this chapter
- Sue Reeves ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3017-0559 3 &
- Bartek Buczkowski ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4146-3664 4
500 Accesses
Once you have submitted your dissertation, you may be asked to do a defence of your dissertation. This could be in the form of an oral presentation, a poster presentation of your findings, or you could be invited to a viva voce. Vivas, as they are usually known, are particularly common for research degrees such as MPhils or PhDs and are essentially a verbal defence of your thesis that is conducted in an interview style format. At a minimum, the viva is a way of checking you authored the thesis yourself and understand the detail, but it is also an opportunity to discuss your research findings and interpretations in depth with experts. Preparation is key for defending your thesis in a viva or a presentation format. With a bit of groundwork, you could even enjoy the discussion, after all the thesis is the culmination of all your hard work, and no one knows it better than you.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Ratcliffe R (2015) How to survive a PhD viva: 17 top tips. https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2015/jan/08/how-to-survive-a-phd-viva-17-top-tips. Accessed 3 Mar 2023
Further Reading
Levin P, Topping G (2006) Perfect presentations. Open University Press
Google Scholar
Smith P (2014) The PhD viva: how to prepare for your oral examination. Macmillan, New York
Book Google Scholar
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
University of Roehampton, London, UK
Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
Bartek Buczkowski
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Reeves, S., Buczkowski, B. (2023). How Do I Prepare for a Successful Defence?. In: Mastering Your Dissertation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41911-9_14
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41911-9_14
Published : 19 October 2023
Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-031-41910-2
Online ISBN : 978-3-031-41911-9
eBook Packages : Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
PhD Completion Process
Congratulations!
As a PhD student, you have spent spend significant time at the University of Rochester taking courses, completing research in your field, completing milestones and are now ready to complete your degree.
The final requirement in earning a PhD degree is the completion and defense of the doctoral dissertation. Understanding the steps and associated deadlines in the dissertation submission and degree conferral process is necessary to establish a successful plan. For complete descriptions of the process, please review the Regulations and University Policies Concerning Graduate Students .
The page below is organized by before, during and post-oral defense. Please read the page in it’s entirety and email questions you have to [email protected]
Doctoral Qualifying Exam / Admission to Candidacy
All PhD programs must administer a qualifying examination as part of the PhD program requirements. The qualifying examination may be either written or oral or both, at the discretion of the department/program, and must be passed at least six months before the final examination may be taken.
The associate dean of a school certifies that a student has passed the qualifying examinations and is recommended for candidacy.
For more details, please review page 12 of the Regulations and University Policies Concerning Graduate Students .
Planning for the Final Oral Exam / Dissertation Defense
At least six months before you plan to defend your dissertation, you should contact the graduate coordinator of your program for details regarding the submitting the defense. During the months leading up to the anticipated defense, your graduate coordinator will walk you through the process and explain any department specific nuances.
Pay careful attention to the five PhD degree cycle deadlines. In each degree cycle, there is a deadline for the last day to complete your degree requirements. There are no exceptions to the deadlines. If a deadline is missed, your name cannot be approved by the Council on Graduate Education and presented to the Board of Trustees until the following degree date.
The oral exam/defense/dissertation is approved at multiple levels of the University. Starting with the program, oral exam/defense/dissertation committee, school graduate deans and the University Dean of Graduate Education. You will receive emails a few days before your defense confirming that the approvals for the defense have all been received.
PhD academic calendar
PhD students can reference their specific academic calendar in the drop-downs below.
To enable review by the Graduate Education Offices in the Schools and University Graduate Education, online dissertation committee and program director approvals must be completed the following number of working days before the defense:
- SMD and SON: At least 10 working days before the defense
- AS&E, Warner and Simon: At least 15 working days before the defense
- ESM: At least 20 working days before the defense
A minimum of five working days must elapse between the approval of the candidate’s School Dean to advance the record to University Graduate Education and the day of the defense. This time has been included in the schools’ lead times listed above.
Defenses may be held during regular business hours on any University working day with the exceptions listed below. See calendar below for additional non-working days.
Monday, May 27: The University is closed in observance of Memorial Day. This day cannot be counted as a working day.
Wednesday, June 19: The University is closed in observance of Juneteenth. This day cannot be counted as a working day.
Thursday, July 4: The University is closed in observance of Independence Day. This day cannot be counted as a working day.
Friday, August 23, 4 p.m.: Last day to submit final corrected dissertation to the ProQuest website to fulfill degree requirements for an August 2024 degree conferral.
Monday, August 26: Fall semester begins.
Saturday, August 31: August 2024 PhD date.
Monday, August 26 at 4 p.m.: Last day for students who have completed defenses to submit final corrected dissertation for October 2024 degree to the ProQuest website without having to register for Fall 2024. AFTER THIS DATE, SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS FOR DEGREE COMPLETION REQUIRES REGISTRATION FOR THE FALL SEMESTER.
Monday, September 2: The University is closed in observance of Labor Day. This day cannot be counted as a working day
Thursday, September 26, 4 p.m.: Last day to submit final corrected dissertation to the ProQuest website to fulfill degree requirements for an October 2024 degree. NOTE: Students must be registered for the Fall 2024 Semester if submitting documents after August 26.
Friday, October 4: October 2024 PhD conferral date.
Monday, September 2: The University is closed in observance of Labor Day. This day cannot be counted as a working day.
Wednesday, November 27 through Friday, November 29: The University is closed in observance of Thanksgiving. These three days cannot be counted as working days.
Monday, December 16 at 4 p.m.: Last day to submit final corrected dissertation to the ProQuest website to fulfill degree requirements for a December degree. NOTE: Students must be registered for the Fall 2024 Semester if submitting final documents after August 28.
Friday, December 13: Last day for dissertation defense registration approval by University Dean of Graduate Education for defenses scheduled January 2, 2025.
Thursday, December 19 through Friday, December 31: Due to recess and holidays, no dissertation registrations will be completed in the University Graduate Education office. No PhD defenses may be held during this time period.
December 31: December 2024 PhD conferral date.
Tuesday, February 28 at 4 p.m.: Last day to submit final corrected dissertation to the ProQuest website to fulfill degree requirements for a March degree.
March 7, 2025: March 2025 PhD conferral date.
Wednesday, April 30 at 4 p.m.: Last day to submit final corrected dissertation to the ProQuest website to fulfill degree requirements for a May 2025 degree.
Friday, May 16: University Doctoral Commencement
Additional Information about Planning for your Defense
Writing your dissertation.
The dissertation process webpage offers several writing resources to help you get started, meet your goals, and complete your thesis/dissertation on time.
You also will want to take full advantage of internal reviews of the dissertation before uploading the thesis for defense registration, in order to minimize the number of errors in the registration version.
Final Oral Examination Committee
Page 11 of the Regulations and University Policies Concerning Graduate Students (“Redbook”) goes into detail about the make-up of the committee.
PhD Committee Matrix
Approval Process for Non-Standard Committee Membership
Approval must be obtained in writing, based on a petition that includes a rationale for the request and a CV of the proposed nonstandard member.
Contact your Graduate Coordinator to start the petition process.
Page 12 of the Regulations and University Policies Concerning Graduate Students (“Redbook”) goes into detail.
Scheduling your Defense
Contact the graduate coordinator of your program for details regarding the scheduling the defense.
Click here to Download a checklist of information needed to schedule defense
Rubric for Oral Defense
Click here to download the Oral Defense Rubric.
After the final oral exam / defense
Submitting your final dissertation.
Approximately, 24 hours after oral exam, an email is sent that details out the next steps. Including uploading the final abstract and dissertation to ProQuest®, submitting a UR Research authorization form, and completing two required surveys.
UR Research Form
The libraries at University of Rochester, electronically store and publish the dissertations based on a students embargo restrictions.
You can access our database of dissertations on the UR Research page hosted by the library.
Survey Completion
There are two required survey’s for completion of the PhD Process. The University of Rochester PhD Survey and the national Survey of Earned Doctorates. The links to completing these surveys will be included in the completion memo sent post-defense.
We use a service called ProQuest to administer the electronic final thesis/dissertation (ETD) submission. ProQuest provides services that enable strategic acquisition, management and discovery of information collections. Once you have made any necessary revisions and the thesis/dissertation is final, you are ready to begin the submission process.
PhD Completion Confirmation
Once you have completed the steps above, you will receive an email the confirms that all of the requirements have been completed and will include a PhD Completion memo.
We offer both an electronic diploma and a paper copy diploma to students after their graduation date. Information on ordering replacement diplomas is located on the registrar’s webpage .
Commencement
The University holds one doctoral commencement ceremony each year in May. Eligibility to walk in the May ceremony includes students that graduated between August of the previous year through August of the current year. As an example, the May 2025 ceremony is for students who graduated August 2024, October 2024, December 2024, February 2025, May 2025 and August 2025. Doctoral students are only eligible to walk once.
You will receive information about the ceremony that your are eligible to walk in during the Spring semester.
Politics latest: Mel Stride joins Tory leadership race; chancellor expected to unveil £20bn black hole
Mel Stride has become the fourth Conservative MP to join the race for the party's leadership, joining ex-home secretary James Cleverly, former security minister Tom Tugendhat, and the last immigration minister Robert Jenrick.
Friday 26 July 2024 09:56, UK
- General Election 2024
- Mel Stride joins Tory leadership race
- Chancellor expected to unveil £20bn black hole
- Prime minister hits out at 'mess' left by Tories
- Jon Craig: Starting gun fired on Tory leadership race
- Politics at Jack and Sam's : Keir partners with the King
We'll be pausing our coverage for today but we'll be back soon with all the latest from Westminster.
Labour grandee Harriet Harmen is back on the podcast and joins Beth and Ruth to unpick Keir Starmer's first PMQs as Prime Minister.
The ladies look ahead to what chancellor Rachel Reeves is going to say about the state of the country’s finances after 14 years of Conservative rule, and Harriet gives her take on the seven Labour rebels on the two-child benefit cap.
Plus, what impact will Kamala Harris have on the Democrats' chances of beating Trump's Republicans?
Many will be wondering what Labour know now that they didn't know a month ago , political correspondent Rob Powell says.
He says the narrative we are hearing at the moment is "how bad everything is".
Rob says when it came to the expected £20bn black hole figure, we "needed to be a bit cautious" with that figure before we know what makes it up.
"It's likely a big chunk of that might be for instance public sector pay and that is a decision the government takes about where they put in public sector pay," he says.
"Whether they want to bring it in at 5.5% for NHS workers and teachers after inflation or whether they want to go lower."
Also, "many will be wondering what Labour know now that they didn't know a month ago during the election campaign", Rob adds.
Asked if he is in a weak position after retaining his seat by just 61 votes at the General Election, Mel Stride says: "I don't think so.
"I won my seat against the odds and I won it because I fought, and fought and fought really hard to preserve that.
"We've got to be focused on winning back the seats we lost.
"We've got to have much bigger aspirations than worrying about my seat and my small majority."
Mel Stride is currently speaking to Sky News after throwing his name into the Tory leadership race.
On his candidacy, he says he is "putting himself forward" because he thinks "we've got a huge job to do".
"I think I am the right person to put myself forward to do that " he says.
Mr Stride says during his time in parliament what he focused on was "winning for my party".
He says the Tories have a "huge amount of ground to make up" both in terms of "trust" with the British public and "competence" and he is the right person to do that.
"I am going to be a driver of chance," he adds.
Earlier, Wes Streeting used the phrase a "total work of fiction" when referring to some of the information he said the previous health minister had put out.
Asked if the Tories were selective with the truth on the finances in the last few months of their leadership, Mr Stride says: "Not at all.
"We were very clear about what was going on."
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to unveil a £20bn black hole that needs to be filled, Sky News understands.
Ms Reeves will on Monday set out the results of the spending audit she ordered Treasury officials to produce.
But the figure could still shift as each department's spending commitments are assessed before her Commons statement.
Any tax hikes to plug the shortfall in spending for essential public services are not expected before the autumn budget, the date of which Ms Reeves is also set to announce on Monday.
Labour has ruled out lifting income tax, VAT, national insurance and corporation tax, but changes to capital gains or inheritance levies may be on the table.
Asked about the black hole at a meeting of G20 finance ministers in Brazil, Ms Reeves said: "I'll give a statement to parliament on Monday, but I have always been honest about the scale of the challenge we face as an incoming government, and let me be crystal clear: we will fix the mess we have inherited."
A review into the Care Quality Commission (CQC) "represent a stunning failure" in the body, Wes Streeting has told Sky News.
The health secretary said the CQC was "meant to be able to give us a true and accurate reflection of care and patient safety".
"That's how serious this is and the reason I have chosen to publish the interim report today is because this is urgent," he said.
"I want to be honest with people as quickly as possible."
He said when it came to the future of the CQC the government needed to find the right leadership.
"We are going to be honest about the scale of the challenge," he added.
The minister said it was a "difficult challenge" but there was something that gave him confidence about the future.
Mr Streeting said: "When I said the NHS was broken but not beaten there was a sight of relief throughout the NHS.
"A lot of them have been living in these intolerable conditions and are relieved someone is being honest about the scale of the challenge.
"If you get the diagnosis right you are more likely to get the right prescription."
The health secretary said this was a "central test" for the government.
At 7.15am, we will be hearing from Health Secretary Wes Streeting.
Mr Streeting said yesterday that England's health and social care watchdog was "not fit for purpose" as he reacted to an independent review into the Care Quality Commission (CQC).
The report identified "significant internal failings" affecting its ability to identify poor performance at hospitals, care homes and GP practices.
Mr Streeting said he was "stunned by the extent of the failings" revealed in the report.
And then at 8.15am, Mel Stride will speak to Sky News about his decision to join the Tory leadership race.
Tom Tugendhat, James Cleverly and Robert Jenrick have also confirmed they are running for leader.
Mel Stride has become the fourth Conservative MP to join the race for the party's leadership.
The former work and pensions secretary has now officially joined ex-home secretary James Cleverly, former security minister Tom Tugendhat, and the last immigration minister Robert Jenrick in the contest to replace Rishi Sunak.
He announced his candidacy on BBC Breakfast, saying: "I'm fully nominated. I was nominated yesterday morning and my candidacy has gone forward."
Mr Stride, the MP for Central Devon, retained his seat by just 61 votes at the general election.
Shadow communities secretary Kemi Badenoch, the bookmakers' favourite to succeed Mr Sunak, and former home secretaries Suella Braverman and Dame Priti Patel are expected to put themselves forward before nominations close at 2.30pm on Monday.
Nominees must have 10 backers to submit their papers to enter the race.
The parliamentary party will narrow the field down to four candidates and they will then need to make their case at the Conservative Party Conference, which runs from 29 September to 2 October.
The final two, picked by the parliamentary party, will then go to a vote of party members in an online ballot that will close on 31 October, with the result announced on 2 November.
Welcome back to the Politics Hub.
The Tory leadership race is continuing to heat up, with Tom Tugendhat, James Cleverly and Robert Jenrick throwing their hats into the ring to replace Rishi Sunak.
Meanwhile, the Care Quality Commission has been found to have "significant internal failings".
And Harriet Harman has criticised the former Labour MPs who rebelled against the party over the two-child benefit cap.
Coming up this morning on the Politics Hub:
- We will hear about the independent review of the Care Quality Commission (CQC), with Wes Streeting due to speak on Sky News this morning;
- The PM will be in Paris for the Olympic opening ceremony;
- The chancellor will be in Rio de Janeiro for the G20
- The nominations for the Tory leadership race are under way.
Be the first to get Breaking News
Install the Sky News app for free
![phd defence process phd defence process](https://news.sky.com/assets/ui-graphics/ui-app-promo-apple-app-store.png)
![](http://farmaciacoslada.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
COMMENTS
In essence, the PhD defence is a comprehensive and interactive evaluation that encapsulates the essence of a candidate's research journey, demanding a synthesis of knowledge, clarity of expression, and the ability to navigate the complexities of academic inquiry. As we delve into the specifics of the defence process, we will unravel the ...
ram of study, there are several things that must be done before a thesis defense can occur. Most importantly, you must meet w. h your advisory committee to ensure that everyone agrees that the wo. is ready to defend. You will need to decide on a date by which the defense should occur. You should also infor.
A chair is appointed for each PhD oral defense to monitor and promote fairness and rigor in the conduct of the defense. To help eliminate pre-established judgments on the candidate's work, the chair should be from a different program/department than the student.
All PhD students should also ensure that they read the PhD thesis examination regulations and review the thesis preparation guidelines prior to their oral defence. If your thesis defence will be conducted remotely, you should also review the process for a remote thesis defence .
She described her writing experience as "an intricate process of balancing many things at once with a deadline (defense day) that seems to be creeping up faster and faster— finishing up experiments, drafting the dissertation, preparing your presentation, filling out all the necessary documents for your defense and also, for MD/PhD students ...
Here are a few tips on how to prepare for your thesis defense: 1. Anticipate questions and prepare for them. You can absolutely prepare for most of the questions you will be asked. Read through your thesis and while you're reading it, create a list of possible questions.
tips from former PhD stude nts and super visors, this book. unpacks the principles and unwritten rules underpinning. the defence. Addressing planning and preparing for the. doctoral defence, and ...
Answering a question properly is a three-step process. 1. Listen to the question carefully. Too often, Ph.D. candidates stop listening halfway through because they believe they know what the question is about, or they are so nervous they start preparing the answer in their heads while the question is still being asked.
1. Start Your Preparations Early. Thesis defense is not a 3 or 6 months' exercise. Don't wait until you have completed all your research objectives. Start your preparation well in advance, and make sure you know all the intricacies of your thesis and reasons to all the research experiments you conducted. 2.
3. Work on Starting Strong. To begin your defense on a strong note, work on creating a clear and engaging introduction. You can start by briefly outlining the purpose of your study, research questions, and methodology. Try to stay on topic and don't veer off track by discussing unrelated or unnecessary information. 4.
Once a student's box is checked, the BPH student should set up a one-on-one "Defense Packet Meeting" with the BPH Associate Director to review the Defense and Dissertation Process, which includes reviewing all required materials, logistics, timing, FAS/Harvard Griffin GSAS Form of the Dissertation, sample forms, and to answer student questions related to these processes.
What's the best way to prepare for your thesis defence? The tips below will help you in the final few weeks before the exam, but the real preparation begins as soon as you start your PhD. Talking to people and discussing your work regularly over a long period of time is the best preparation. Don't let your thesis defence be the first time you ...
PhD Proposal Defense. The PhD proposal is a pivotal step in a doctoral student's academic progression at Rutgers University. It lays out a comprehensive framework, aligning the student's research direction with the benchmarks of the ECE Graduate Program. The proposal typically comprises several chapters, some of which may naturally evolve ...
Top tips for your PhD defence process. Understand Expectations: Understand what your examiners are looking for in your thesis.They expect it to be relevant to the field, have a clear title, a comprehensive abstract, engage with relevant literature, answer clear research questions, provide a consistent argument, and make a significant contribution to knowledge.
The PhD thesis oral defence is the last step in completing your PhD degree and is arranged by the Faculty of Environment Graduate Office. The PhD student and their supervisor(s) should reference the PhD thesis examination regulations and the Defence Backwards Planning Tool as the student reaches the final stages of their degree. Format of the defence can be in-person, remote defence, or hybrid.
Set ground rules for your presentation from the very beginning. In a conventional defence, you might dive right into your talk. If you are presenting remotely, take a moment to explain how the ...
If you are doing a PhD or an MPhil then you will definitely need to do a viva, and this will be conducted by at least two examiners, usually one from inside the university and one external to the university who is an expert in the field. At BSc or MSc level you may be asked to do a viva, however you may be expected to do an oral or a poster ...
Attend other defences (if permitted) Know your subject matter. Process is initiated online in the Mosaic. Log into Student Centre and under 'Academics' select 'other academics': Select Thesis Intent -> Defend my Thesis: Select Degree and Program before selecting "Next" button: Review your Supervisory Committee (names, roles, emails).
The final requirement in earning a PhD degree is the completion and defense of the doctoral dissertation. Understanding the steps and associated deadlines in the dissertation submission and degree conferral process is necessary to establish a successful plan. For complete descriptions of the process, please review the Regulations and University ...
PhD Degree: Dissertation Procedures A doctoral dissertation is based upon original investigation and shows mature scholarship and critical judgment as well as familiarity with tools and methods of research. ... Defense Meeting The defense consists of a public presentation that is open to anyone, and a closed door meeting with the committee. The ...
course of the student's program of studies.1 PhD work is not pursued in a vacuum. The outcome of the \defense" is absolutely known before it is ever scheduled. If this is not the case then the program needs to carefully examine its mentor-ing process. Here it is worth reminding ourselves that we are not in the early 20th century when individ-
1. The general schedule. Obtaining a doctoral degree is the result of a process, whose main step is the defence, but which also includes a preparation phase and a finalisation phase. Each step includes measures to be taken, some within the time limits set by the regulations.
The PhD Program Handbook delineates the policies, and procedures for earning a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in International Relations at American University's School of International ... be informed of the follow-up process at the time of the defense. • Fail - the student will be informed of the specific deficiencies of the dissertation. ...
2. Attend other defences (if permitted) Know your subject matter. Process is initiated online in the Mosaic. Log into Student Centre and under 'Academics' select 'other academics': Select Thesis Intent -> Defend my Thesis: Select Degree and Program before selecting "Next" button: Review your Supervisory Committee (names, roles, emails).
The Department of Physics at Instituto Superior Técnico (IST) invites Expressions of Interest (EOI) from researchers across all branches of physics (theoretical and experimental) who aspire to build international research careers and establish dynamic research groups.
College Football 25 brings a two-click process. You need to get the moving line as close to the middle as possible for accuracy and then hold it as the power meter goes up.
Mel Stride has become the fourth Conservative MP to join the race for the party's leadership, joining ex-home secretary James Cleverly, former security minister Tom Tugendhat, and the last ...