download research paper on data mining

Review Paper on Data Mining Techniques and Applications

International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science & Technology (IJIRCST), Volume-7, Issue-2, March 2019

5 Pages Posted: 2 Mar 2020

GVMGC Sonipat

Date Written: MARCH 31, 2019

Data mining is the process of extracting hidden and useful patterns and information from data. Data mining is a new technology that helps businesses to predict future trends and behaviors, allowing them to make proactive, knowledge driven decisions. The aim of this paper is to show the process of data mining and how it can help decision makers to make better decisions. Practically, data mining is really useful for any organization which has huge amount of data. Data mining help regular databases to perform faster. They also help to increase the profit, because of the correct decisions made with the help of data mining. This paper shows the various steps performed during the process of data mining and how it can be used by various industries to get better answers from huge amount of data.

Keywords: Data Mining, Regression, Time Series, Prediction, Association

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Anshu (Contact Author)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on ssrn, paper statistics, related ejournals, econometrics: econometric & statistical methods - special topics ejournal.

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Web Technology eJournal

Decision-making & management science ejournal, data science, data analytics & informatics ejournal.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• PeerJ Comput Sci

Adaptations of data mining methodologies: a systematic literature review

Associated data.

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

SLR Protocol (also shared via online repository), corpus with definitions and mappings are provided as a Supplemental File .

The use of end-to-end data mining methodologies such as CRISP-DM, KDD process, and SEMMA has grown substantially over the past decade. However, little is known as to how these methodologies are used in practice. In particular, the question of whether data mining methodologies are used ‘as-is’ or adapted for specific purposes, has not been thoroughly investigated. This article addresses this gap via a systematic literature review focused on the context in which data mining methodologies are used and the adaptations they undergo. The literature review covers 207 peer-reviewed and ‘grey’ publications. We find that data mining methodologies are primarily applied ‘as-is’. At the same time, we also identify various adaptations of data mining methodologies and we note that their number is growing rapidly. The dominant adaptations pattern is related to methodology adjustments at a granular level (modifications) followed by extensions of existing methodologies with additional elements. Further, we identify two recurrent purposes for adaptation: (1) adaptations to handle Big Data technologies, tools and environments (technological adaptations); and (2) adaptations for context-awareness and for integrating data mining solutions into business processes and IT systems (organizational adaptations). The study suggests that standard data mining methodologies do not pay sufficient attention to deployment issues, which play a prominent role when turning data mining models into software products that are integrated into the IT architectures and business processes of organizations. We conclude that refinements of existing methodologies aimed at combining data, technological, and organizational aspects, could help to mitigate these gaps.

Introduction

The availability of Big Data has stimulated widespread adoption of data mining and data analytics in research and in business settings ( Columbus, 2017 ). Over the years, a certain number of data mining methodologies have been proposed, and these are being used extensively in practice and in research. However, little is known about what and how data mining methodologies are applied, and it has not been neither widely researched nor discussed. Further, there is no consolidated view on what constitutes quality of methodological process in data mining and data analytics, how data mining and data analytics are applied/used in organization settings context, and how application practices relate to each other. That motivates the need for comprehensive survey in the field.

There have been surveys or quasi-surveys and summaries conducted in related fields. Notably, there have been two systematic systematic literature reviews; Systematic Literature Review, hereinafter, SLR is the most suitable and widely used research method for identifying, evaluating and interpreting research of particular research question, topic or phenomenon ( Kitchenham, Budgen & Brereton, 2015 ). These reviews concerned Big Data Analytics, but not general purpose data mining methodologies. Adrian et al. (2004) executed SLR with respect to implementation of Big Data Analytics (BDA), specifically, capability components necessary for BDA value discovery and realization. The authors identified BDA implementation studies, determined their main focus areas, and discussed in detail BDA applications and capability components. Saltz & Shamshurin (2016) have published SLR paper on Big Data Team Process Methodologies. Authors have identified lack of standard in regards to how Big Data projects are executed, highlighted growing research in this area and potential benefits of such process standard. Additionally, authors synthesized and produced list of 33 most important success factors for executing Big Data activities. Finally, there are studies that surveyed data mining techniques and applications across domains, yet, they focus on data mining process artifacts and outcomes ( Madni, Anwar & Shah, 2017 ; Liao, Chu & Hsiao, 2012 ), but not on end-to-end process methodology.

There have been number of surveys conducted in domain-specific settings such as hospitality, accounting, education, manufacturing, and banking fields. Mariani et al. (2018) focused on Business Intelligence (BI) and Big Data SLR in the hospitality and tourism environment context. Amani & Fadlalla (2017) explored application of data mining methods in accounting while Romero & Ventura (2013) investigated educational data mining. Similarly, Hassani, Huang & Silva (2018) addressed data mining application case studies in banking and explored them by three dimensions—topics, applied techniques and software. All studies were performed by the means of systematic literature reviews. Lastly, Bi & Cochran (2014) have undertaken standard literature review of Big Data Analytics and its applications in manufacturing.

Apart from domain-specific studies, there have been very few general purpose surveys with comprehensive overview of existing data mining methodologies, classifying and contextualizing them. Valuable synthesis was presented by Kurgan & Musilek (2006) as comparative study of the state-of-the art of data mining methodologies. The study was not SLR, and focused on comprehensive comparison of phases, processes, activities of data mining methodologies; application aspect was summarized briefly as application statistics by industries and citations. Three more comparative, non-SLR studies were undertaken by Marban, Mariscal & Segovia (2009) , Mariscal, Marbán & Fernández (2010) , and the most recent and closest one by Martnez-Plumed et al. (2017) . They followed the same pattern with systematization of existing data mining frameworks based on comparative analysis. There, the purpose and context of consolidation was even more practical—to support derivation and proposal of the new artifact, that is, novel data mining methodology. The majority of the given general type surveys in the field are more than a decade old, and have natural limitations due to being: (1) non-SLR studies, and (2) so far restricted to comparing methodologies in terms of phases, activities, and other elements.

The key common characteristic behind all the given studies is that data mining methodologies are treated as normative and standardized (‘one-size-fits-all’) processes. A complementary perspective, not considered in the above studies, is that data mining methodologies are not normative standardized processes, but instead, they are frameworks that need to be specialized to different industry domains, organizational contexts, and business objectives. In the last few years, a number of extensions and adaptations of data mining methodologies have emerged, which suggest that existing methodologies are not sufficient to cover the needs of all application domains. In particular, extensions of data mining methodologies have been proposed in the medical domain ( Niaksu, 2015 ), educational domain ( Tavares, Vieira & Pedro, 2017 ), the industrial engineering domain ( Huber et al., 2019 ; Solarte, 2002 ), and software engineering ( Marbán et al., 2007 , 2009 ). However, little attention has been given to studying how data mining methodologies are applied and used in industry settings, so far only non-scientific practitioners’ surveys provide such evidence.

Given this research gap, the central objective of this article is to investigate how data mining methodologies are applied by researchers and practitioners, both in their generic (standardized) form and in specialized settings. This is achieved by investigating if data mining methodologies are applied ‘as-is’ or adapted, and for what purposes such adaptations are implemented.

Guided by Systematic Literature Review method, initially we identified a corpus of primary studies covering both peer-reviewed and ‘grey’ literature from 1997 to 2018. An analysis of these studies led us to a taxonomy of uses of data mining methodologies, focusing on the distinction between ‘as is’ usage versus various types of methodology adaptations. By analyzing different types of methodology adaptations, this article identifies potential gaps in standard data mining methodologies both at the technological and at the organizational levels.

The rest of the article is organized as follows. The Background section provides an overview of key concepts of data mining and associated methodologies. Next, Research Design describes the research methodology. The Findings and Discussion section presents the study results and their associated interpretation. Finally, threats to validity are addressed in Threats to Validity while the Conclusion summarizes the findings and outlines directions for future work.

The section introduces main data mining concepts, provides overview of existing data mining methodologies, and their evolution.

Data mining is defined as a set of rules, processes, algorithms that are designed to generate actionable insights, extract patterns, and identify relationships from large datasets ( Morabito, 2016 ). Data mining incorporates automated data extraction, processing, and modeling by means of a range of methods and techniques. In contrast, data analytics refers to techniques used to analyze and acquire intelligence from data (including ‘big data’) ( Gandomi & Haider, 2015 ) and is positioned as a broader field, encompassing a wider spectrum of methods that includes both statistical and data mining ( Chen, Chiang & Storey, 2012 ). A number of algorithms has been developed in statistics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence domains to support and enable data mining. While statistical approaches precedes them, they inherently come with limitations, the most known being rigid data distribution conditions. Machine learning techniques gained popularity as they impose less restrictions while deriving understandable patterns from data ( Bose & Mahapatra, 2001 ).

Data mining projects commonly follow a structured process or methodology as exemplified by Mariscal, Marbán & Fernández (2010) , Marban, Mariscal & Segovia (2009) . A data mining methodology specifies tasks, inputs, outputs, and provides guidelines and instructions on how the tasks are to be executed ( Mariscal, Marbán & Fernández, 2010 ). Thus, data mining methodology provides a set of guidelines for executing a set of tasks to achieve the objectives of a data mining project ( Mariscal, Marbán & Fernández, 2010 ).

The foundations of structured data mining methodologies were first proposed by Fayyad, Piatetsky-Shapiro & Smyth (1996a , 1996b , 1996c) , and were initially related to Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD). KDD presents a conceptual process model of computational theories and tools that support information extraction (knowledge) with data ( Fayyad, Piatetsky-Shapiro & Smyth, 1996a ). In KDD, the overall approach to knowledge discovery includes data mining as a specific step. As such, KDD, with its nine main steps (exhibited in Fig. 1 ), has the advantage of considering data storage and access, algorithm scaling, interpretation and visualization of results, and human computer interaction ( Fayyad, Piatetsky-Shapiro & Smyth, 1996a , 1996c ). Introduction of KDD also formalized clearer distinction between data mining and data analytics, as for example formulated in Tsai et al. (2015) : “…by the data analytics, we mean the whole KDD process, while by the data analysis, we mean the part of data analytics that is aimed at finding the hidden information in the data, such as data mining”.

The main steps of KDD are as follows:

• Step 1: Learning application domain: In the first step, it is needed to develop an understanding of the application domain and relevant prior knowledge followed by identifying the goal of the KDD process from the customer’s viewpoint.
• Step 2: Dataset creation: Second step involves selecting a dataset, focusing on a subset of variables or data samples on which discovery is to be performed.
• Step 3: Data cleaning and processing: In the third step, basic operations to remove noise or outliers are performed. Collection of necessary information to model or account for noise, deciding on strategies for handling missing data fields, and accounting for data types, schema, and mapping of missing and unknown values are also considered.
• Step 4: Data reduction and projection: Here, the work of finding useful features to represent the data, depending on the goal of the task, application of transformation methods to find optimal features set for the data is conducted.
• Step 5: Choosing the function of data mining: In the fifth step, the target outcome (e.g., summarization, classification, regression, clustering) are defined.
• Step 6: Choosing data mining algorithm: Sixth step concerns selecting method(s) to search for patterns in the data, deciding which models and parameters are appropriate and matching a particular data mining method with the overall criteria of the KDD process.
• Step 7: Data mining: In the seventh step, the work of mining the data that is, searching for patterns of interest in a particular representational form or a set of such representations: classification rules or trees, regression, clustering is conducted.
• Step 8: Interpretation: In this step, the redundant and irrelevant patterns are filtered out, relevant patterns are interpreted and visualized in such way as to make the result understandable to the users.
• Step 9: Using discovered knowledge: In the last step, the results are incorporated with the performance system, documented and reported to stakeholders, and used as basis for decisions.

The KDD process became dominant in industrial and academic domains ( Kurgan & Musilek, 2006 ; Marban, Mariscal & Segovia, 2009 ). Also, as timeline-based evolution of data mining methodologies and process models shows ( Fig. 2 below), the original KDD data mining model served as basis for other methodologies and process models, which addressed various gaps and deficiencies of original KDD process. These approaches extended the initial KDD framework, yet, extension degree has varied ranging from process restructuring to complete change in focus. For example, Brachman & Anand (1996) and further Gertosio & Dussauchoy (2004) (in a form of case study) introduced practical adjustments to the process based on iterative nature of process as well as interactivity. The complete KDD process in their view was enhanced with supplementary tasks and the focus was changed to user’s point of view (human-centered approach), highlighting decisions that need to be made by the user in the course of data mining process. In contrast, Cabena et al. (1997) proposed different number of steps emphasizing and detailing data processing and discovery tasks. Similarly, in a series of works Anand & Büchner (1998) , Anand et al. (1998) , Buchner et al. (1999) presented additional data mining process steps by concentrating on adaptation of data mining process to practical settings. They focused on cross-sales (entire life-cycles of online customer), with further incorporation of internet data discovery process (web-based mining). Further, Two Crows data mining process model is consultancy originated framework that has defined the steps differently, but is still close to original KDD. Finally, SEMMA (Sample, Explore, Modify, Model and Assess) based on KDD, was developed by SAS institute in 2005 ( SAS Institute Inc., 2017 ). It is defined as a logical organization of the functional toolset of SAS Enterprise Miner for carrying out the core tasks of data mining. Compared to KDD, this is vendor-specific process model which limits its application in different environments. Also, it skips two steps of original KDD process (‘Learning Application Domain’ and ‘Using of Discovered Knowledge’) which are regarded as essential for success of data mining project ( Mariscal, Marbán & Fernández, 2010 ). In terms of adoption, new KDD-based proposals received limited attention across academia and industry ( Kurgan & Musilek, 2006 ; Marban, Mariscal & Segovia, 2009 ). Subsequently, most of these methodologies converged into the CRISP-DM methodology.

Additionally, there have only been two non-KDD based approaches proposed alongside extensions to KDD. The first one is 5A’s approach presented by De Pisón Ascacbar (2003) and used by SPSS vendor. The key contribution of this approach has been related to adding ‘Automate’ step while disadvantage was associated with omitting ‘Data Understanding’ step. The second approach was 6-Sigma which is industry originated method to improve quality and customer’s satisfaction ( Pyzdek & Keller, 2003 ). It has been successfully applied to data mining projects in conjunction with DMAIC performance improvement model (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control).

In 2000, as response to common issues and needs ( Marban, Mariscal & Segovia, 2009 ), an industry-driven methodology called Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) was introduced as an alternative to KDD. It also consolidated original KDD model and its various extensions. While CRISP-DM builds upon KDD, it consists of six phases that are executed in iterations ( Marban, Mariscal & Segovia, 2009 ). The iterative executions of CRISP-DM stand as the most distinguishing feature compared to initial KDD that assumes a sequential execution of its steps. CRISP-DM, much like KDD, aims at providing practitioners with guidelines to perform data mining on large datasets. However,CRISP-DM with its six main steps with a total of 24 tasks and outputs, is more refined as compared to KDD. The main steps of CRIPS-DM, as depicted in Fig. 3 below are as follows:

• Phase 1: Business understanding: The focus of the first step is to gain an understanding of the project objectives and requirements from a business perspective followed by converting these into data mining problem definitions. Presentation of a preliminary plan to achieve the objectives are also included in this first step.
• Phase 2: Data understanding: This step begins with an initial data collection and proceeds with activities in order to get familiar with the data, identify data quality issues, discover first insights into the data, and potentially detect and form hypotheses.
• Phase 3: Data preparation: The third step covers activities required to construct the final dataset from the initial raw data. Data preparation tasks are performed repeatedly.
• Phase 4: Modeling phase: In this step, various modeling techniques are selected and applied followed by calibrating their parameters. Typically, several techniques are used for the same data mining problem.
• Phase 5: Evaluation of the model(s): The fifth step begins with the quality perspective and then, before proceeding to final model deployment, ascertains that the model(s) achieves the business objectives. At the end of this phase, a decision should be reached on how to use data mining results.
• Phase 6: Deployment phase: In the final step, the models are deployed to enable end-customers to use the data as basis for decisions, or support in the business process. Even if the purpose of the model is to increase knowledge of the data, the knowledge gained will need to be organized, presented, distributed in a way that the end-user can use it. Depending on the requirements, the deployment phase can be as simple as generating a report or as complex as implementing a repeatable data mining process.

The development of CRISP-DM was led by industry consortium. It is designed to be domain-agnostic ( Mariscal, Marbán & Fernández, 2010 ) and as such, is now widely used by industry and research communities ( Marban, Mariscal & Segovia, 2009) . These distinctive characteristics have made CRISP-DM to be considered as ‘de-facto’ standard of data mining methodology and as a reference framework to which other methodologies are benchmarked ( Mariscal, Marbán & Fernández, 2010 ).

Similarly to KDD, a number of refinements and extensions of the CRISP-DM methodology have been proposed with the two main directions—extensions of the process model itself and adaptations, merger with the process models and methodologies in other domains. Extensions direction of process models could be exemplified by Cios & Kurgan (2005) who have proposed integrated Data Mining & Knowledge Discovery (DMKD) process model. It contains several explicit feedback mechanisms, modification of the last step to incorporate discovered knowledge and insights application as well as relies on technologies for results deployment. In the same vein, Moyle & Jorge (2001) , Blockeel & Moyle (2002) proposed Rapid Collaborative Data Mining System (RAMSYS) framework—this is both data mining methodology and system for remote collaborative data mining projects. The RAMSYS attempted to achieve the combination of a problem solving methodology, knowledge sharing, and ease of communication. It intended to allow the collaborative work of remotely placed data miners in a disciplined manner as regards information flow while allowing the free flow of ideas for problem solving ( Moyle & Jorge, 2001 ). CRISP-DM modifications and integrations with other specific domains were proposed in Industrial Engineering (Data Mining for Industrial Engineering by Solarte (2002) ), and Software Engineering by Marbán et al. (2007 , 2009) . Both approaches enhanced CRISP-DM and contributed with additional phases, activities and tasks typical for engineering processes, addressing on-going support ( Solarte, 2002 ), as well as project management, organizational and quality assurance tasks ( Marbán et al., 2009 ).

Finally, limited number of attempts to create independent or semi-dependent data mining frameworks was undertaken after CRISP-DM creation. These efforts were driven by industry players and comprised KDD Roadmap by Debuse et al. (2001) for proprietary predictive toolkit (Lanner Group), and recent effort by IBM with Analytics Solutions Unified Method for Data Mining (ASUM-DM) in 2015 ( IBM Corporation, 2016 : https://developer.ibm.com/technologies/artificial-intelligence/articles/architectural-thinking-in-the-wild-west-of-data-science/ ). Both frameworks contributed with additional tasks, for example, resourcing in KDD Roadmap, or hybrid approach assumed in ASUM, for example, combination of agile and traditional implementation principles.

The Table 1 above summarizes reviewed data mining process models and methodologies by their origin, basis and key concepts.

Research Design

The main research objective of this article is to study how data mining methodologies are applied by researchers and practitioners. To this end, we use systematic literature review (SLR) as scientific method for two reasons. Firstly, systematic review is based on trustworthy, rigorous, and auditable methodology. Secondly, SLR supports structured synthesis of existing evidence, identification of research gaps, and provides framework to position new research activities ( Kitchenham, Budgen & Brereton, 2015 ). For our SLR, we followed the guidelines proposed by Kitchenham, Budgen & Brereton (2015) . All SLR details have been documented in the separate, peer-reviewed SLR protocol (available at https://figshare.com/articles/Systematic-Literature-Review-Protocol/10315961 ).

Research questions

As suggested by Kitchenham, Budgen & Brereton (2015) , we have formulated research questions and motivate them as follows. In the preliminary phase of research we have discovered very limited number of studies investigating data mining methodologies application practices as such. Further, we have discovered number of surveys conducted in domain-specific settings, and very few general purpose surveys, but none of them considered application practices either. As contrasting trend, recent emergence of limited number of adaptation studies have clearly pinpointed the research gap existing in the area of application practices. Given this research gap, in-depth investigation of this phenomenon led us to ask: “How data mining methodologies are applied (‘as-is’ vs adapted) (RQ1)?” Further, as we intended to investigate in depth universe of adaptations scenarios, this naturally led us to RQ2: “How have existing data mining methodologies been adapted?” Finally, if adaptions are made, we wish to explore what the associated reasons and purposes are, which in turn led us to RQ3: “For what purposes are data mining methodologies adapted?”

Thus, for this review, there are three research questions defined:

• Research Question 1: How data mining methodologies are applied (‘as-is’ versus adapted)? This question aims to identify data mining methodologies application and usage patterns and trends.
• Research Question 2: How have existing data mining methodologies been adapted? This questions aims to identify and classify data mining methodologies adaptation patterns and scenarios.
• Research Question 3: For what purposes have existing data mining methodologies been adapted? This question aims to identify, explain, classify and produce insights on what are the reasons and what benefits are achieved by adaptations of existing data mining methodologies. Specifically, what gaps do these adaptations seek to fill and what have been the benefits of these adaptations. Such systematic evidence and insights will be valuable input to potentially new, refined data mining methodology. Insights will be of interest to practitioners and researchers.

Data collection strategy

Our data collection and search strategy followed the guidelines proposed by Kitchenham, Budgen & Brereton (2015) . It defined the scope of the search, selection of literature and electronic databases, search terms and strings as well as screening procedures.

Primary search

The primary search aimed to identify an initial set of papers. To this end, the search strings were derived from the research objective and research questions. The term ‘data mining’ was the key term, but we also included ‘data analytics’ to be consistent with observed research practices. The terms ‘methodology’ and ‘framework’ were also included. Thus, the following search strings were developed and validated in accordance with the guidelines suggested by Kitchenham, Budgen & Brereton (2015) :

(‘data mining methodology’) OR (‘data mining framework’) OR (‘data analytics methodology’) OR (‘data analytics framework’)

The search strings were applied to the indexed scientific databases Scopus, Web of Science (for ‘peer-reviewed’, academic literature) and to the non-indexed Google Scholar (for non-peer-reviewed, so-called ‘grey’ literature). The decision to cover ‘grey’ literature in this research was motivated as follows. As proposed in number of information systems and software engineering domain publications ( Garousi, Felderer & Mäntylä, 2019 ; Neto et al., 2019 ), SLR as stand-alone method may not provide sufficient insight into ‘state of practice’. It was also identified ( Garousi, Felderer & Mäntylä, 2016 ) that ‘grey’ literature can give substantial benefits in certain areas of software engineering, in particular, when the topic of research is related to industrial and practical settings. Taking into consideration the research objectives, which is investigating data mining methodologies application practices, we have opted for inclusion of elements of Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) 1 in our study. Also, Kitchenham, Budgen & Brereton (2015) recommends including ‘grey’ literature to minimize publication bias as positive results and research outcomes are more likely to be published than negative ones. Following MLR practices, we also designed inclusion criteria for types of ‘grey’ literature reported below.

The selection of databases is motivated as follows. In case of peer-reviewed literature sources we concentrated to avoid potential omission bias. The latter is discussed in IS research ( Levy & Ellis, 2006 ) in case research is concentrated in limited disciplinary data sources. Thus, broad selection of data sources including multidisciplinary-oriented (Scopus, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library) and domain-oriented (ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplorer Digital Library) scientific electronic databases was evaluated. Multidisciplinary databases have been selected due to wider domain coverage and it was validated and confirmed that they do include publications originating from domain-oriented databases, such as ACM and IEEE. From multi-disciplinary databases as such, Scopus was selected due to widest possible coverage (it is worlds largest database, covering app. 80% of all international peer-reviewed journals) while Web of Science was selected due to its longer temporal range. Thus, both databases complement each other. The selected non-indexed database source for ‘grey’ literature is Google Scholar, as it is comprehensive source of both academic and ‘grey’ literature publications and referred as such extensively ( Garousi, Felderer & Mäntylä, 2019 ; Neto et al., 2019 ).

Further, Garousi, Felderer & Mäntylä (2019) presented three-tier categorization framework for types of ‘grey literature’. In our study we restricted ourselves to the 1st tier ‘grey’ literature publications of the limited number of ‘grey’ literature producers. In particular, from the list of producers ( Neto et al., 2019 ) we have adopted and focused on government departments and agencies, non-profit economic, trade organizations (‘think-tanks’) and professional associations, academic and research institutions, businesses and corporations (consultancy companies and established private companies). The 1st tier ‘grey’ literature selected items include: (1) government, academic, and private sector consultancy reports 2 , (2) theses (not lower than Master level) and PhD Dissertations, (3) research reports, (4) working papers, (5) conference proceedings, preprints. With inclusion of the 1st tier ‘grey’ literature criteria we mitigate quality assessment challenge especially relevant and reported for it ( Garousi, Felderer & Mäntylä, 2019 ; Neto et al., 2019 ).

Scope and domains inclusion

As recommended by Kitchenham, Budgen & Brereton (2015) it is necessary to initially define research scope. To clarify the scope, we defined what is not included and is out of scope of this research. The following aspects are not included in the scope of our study:

• Context of technology and infrastructure for data mining/data analytics tasks and projects.
• Granular methods application in data mining process itself or their application for data mining tasks, for example, constructing business queries or applying regression or neural networks modeling techniques to solve classification problems. Studies with granular methods are included in primary texts corpus as long as method application is part of overall methodological approach.
• Technological aspects in data mining for example, data engineering, dataflows and workflows.
• Traditional statistical methods not associated with data mining directly including statistical control methods.

Similarly to Budgen et al. (2006) and Levy & Ellis (2006) , initial piloting revealed that search engines retrieved literature available for all major scientific domains including ones outside authors’ area of expertise (e.g., medicine). Even though such studies could be retrieved, it would be impossible for us to analyze and correctly interpret literature published outside the possessed area of expertise. The adjustments toward search strategy were undertaken by retaining domains closely associated with Information Systems, Software Engineering research. Thus, for Scopus database the final set of inclusive domains was limited to nine and included Computer Science, Engineering, Mathematics, Business, Management and Accounting, Decision Science, Economics, Econometrics and Finance, and Multidisciplinary as well as Undefined studies. Excluded domains covered 11.5% or 106 out of 925 publications; it was confirmed in validation process that they primarily focused on specific case studies in fundamental sciences and medicine 3 . The included domains from Scopus database were mapped to Web of Science to ensure consistent approach across databases and the correctness of mapping was validated.

Screening criteria and procedures

Based on the SLR practices (as in Kitchenham, Budgen & Brereton (2015) , Brereton et al. (2007) ) and defined SLR scope, we designed multi-step screening procedures (quality and relevancy) with associated set of Screening Criteria and Scoring System . The purpose of relevancy screening is to find relevant primary studies in an unbiased way ( Vanwersch et al., 2011 ). Quality screening, on the other hand, aims to assess primary relevant studies in terms of quality in unbiased way.

Screening Criteria consisted of two subsets— Exclusion Criteria applied for initial filtering and Relevance Criteria , also known as Inclusion Criteria .

Exclusion Criteria were initial threshold quality controls aiming at eliminating studies with limited or no scientific contribution. The exclusion criteria also address issues of understandability, accessability and availability. The Exclusion Criteria were as follows:

• Quality 1: The publication item is not in English (understandability).
• either the same document retrieved from two or all three databases.
• or different versions of the same publication are retrieved (i.e., the same study published in different sources)—based on best practices, decision rule is that the most recent paper is retained as well as the one with the highest score ( Kofod-Petersen, 2014 ).
• if a publication is published both as conference proceeding and as journal article with the same name and same authors or as an extended version of conference paper, the latter is selected.
• Quality 3: Length of the publication is less than 6 pages—short papers do not have the space to expand and discuss presented ideas in sufficient depth to examine for us.
• Quality 4: The paper is not accessible in full length online through the university subscription of databases and via Google Scholar—not full availability prevents us from assessing and analyzing the text.

The initially retrieved list of papers was filtered based on Exclusion Criteria . Only papers that passed all criteria were retained in the final studies corpus. Mapping of criteria towards screening steps is exhibited in Fig. 4 .

Relevance Criteria were designed to identify relevant publications and are presented in Table 2 below while mapping to respective process steps is presented in Fig. 4 . These criteria were applied iteratively.

As a final SLR step, the full texts quality assessment was performed with constructed Scoring Metrics (in line with Kitchenham & Charters (2007) ). It is presented in the Table 3 below.

Data extraction and screening process

The conducted data extraction and screening process is presented in Fig. 4 . In Step 1 initial publications list were retrieved from pre-defined databases—Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar. The lists were merged and duplicates eliminated in Step 2. Afterwards, texts being less than 6 pages were excluded (Step 3). Steps 1–3 were guided by Exclusion Criteria . In the next stage (Step 4), publications were screened by Title based on pre-defined Relevance Criteria . The ones which passed were evaluated by their availability (Step 5). As long as study was available, it was evaluated again by the same pre-defined Relevance Criteria applied to Abstract, Conclusion and if necessary Introduction (Step 6). The ones which passed this threshold formed primary publications corpus extracted from databases in full. These primary texts were evaluated again based on full text (Step 7) applying Relevance Criteria first and then Scoring Metrics .

Results and quantitative analysis

In Step 1, 1,715 publications were extracted from relevant databases with the following composition—Scopus (819), Web of Science (489), Google Scholar (407). In terms of scientific publication domains, Computer Science (42.4%), Engineering (20.6%), Mathematics (11.1%) accounted for app. 74% of Scopus originated texts. The same applies to Web of Science harvest. Exclusion Criteria application produced the following results. In Step 2, after eliminating duplicates, 1,186 texts were passed for minimum length evaluation, and 767 reached assessment by Relevancy Criteria .

As mentioned Relevance Criteria were applied iteratively (Step 4–6) and in conjunction with availability assessment. As a result, only 298 texts were retained for full evaluation with 241 originating from scientific databases while 57 were ‘grey’. These studies formed primary texts corpus which was extracted, read in full and evaluated by Relevance Criteria combined with Scoring Metrics . The decision rule was set as follows. Studies that scored “1” or “0” were rejected, while texts with “3” and “2” evaluation were admitted as final primary studies corpus. To this end, as an outcome of SLR-based, broad, cross-domain publications collection and screening we identified 207 relevant publications from peer-reviewed (156 texts) and ‘grey’ literature (51 texts). Figure 5 below exhibits yearly published research numbers with the breakdown by ‘peer-reviewed’ and ‘grey’ literature starting from 1997.

In terms of composition, ‘peer-reviewed’ studies corpus is well-balanced with 72 journal articles and 82 conference papers while book chapters account for 4 instances only. In contrast, in ‘grey’ literature subset, articles in moderated and non-peer reviewed journals are dominant ( n = 34) compared to overall number of conference papers ( n = 13), followed by small number of technical reports and pre-prints ( n = 4).

Temporal analysis of texts corpus (as per Fig. 5 below) resulted in two observations. Firstly, we note that stable and significant research interest (in terms of numbers) on data mining methodologies application has started around a decade ago—in 2007. Research efforts made prior to 2007 were relatively limited with number of publications below 10. Secondly, we note that research on data mining methodologies has grown substantially since 2007, an observation supported by the 3-year and 10-year constructed mean trendlines. In particular, the number of publications have roughly tripled over past decade hitting all time high with 24 texts released in 2017.

Further, there are also two distinct spike sub-periods in the years 2007–2009 and 2014–2017 followed by stable pattern with overall higher number of released publications on annual basis. This observation is in line with the trend of increased penetration of methodologies, tools, cross-industry applications and academic research of data mining.

Findings and Discussion

In this section, we address the research questions of the paper. Initially, as part of RQ1, we present overview of data mining methodologies ‘as-is’ and adaptation trends. In addressing RQ2, we further classify the adaptations identified. Then, as part of RQ3 subsection, each category identified under RQ2 is analyzed with particular focus on the goals of adaptations.

RQ1: How data mining methodologies are applied (‘as-is’ vs. adapted)?

The first research question examines the extent to which data mining methodologies are used ‘as-is’ versus adapted. Our review based on 207 publications identified two distinct paradigms on how data mining methodologies are applied. The first is ‘as-is’ where the data mining methodologies are applied as stipulated. The second is with ‘adaptations’; that is, methodologies are modified by introducing various changes to the standard process model when applied.

We have aggregated research by decades to differentiate application pattern between two time periods 1997–2007 with limited vs 2008–2018 with more intensive data mining application. The given cut has not only been guided by extracted publications corpus but also by earlier surveys. In particular, during the pre-2007 research, there where ten new methodologies proposed, but since then, only two new methodologies have been proposed. Thus, there is a distinct trend observed over the last decade of large number of extensions and adaptations proposed vs entirely new methodologies.

We note that during the first decade of our time scope (1997–2007), the ratio of data mining methodologies applied ‘as-is’ was 40% (as presented in Fig. 6A ). However, the same ratio for the following decade is 32% ( Fig. 6B ). Thus, in terms of relative shares we note a clear decrease in using data mining methodologies ‘as-is’ in favor of adapting them to cater to specific needs.The trend is even more pronounced when comparing numbers—adaptations more than tripled (from 30 to 106) while ‘as-is’ scenario has increased modestly (from 20 to 51). Given this finding, we continue with analyzing how data mining methodologies have been adapted under RQ2.

RQ2: How have existing data mining methodologies been adapted?

We identified that data mining methodologies have been adapted to cater to specific needs. In order to categorize adaptations scenarios, we applied a two-level dichotomy, specifically, by applying the following decision tree:

• Level 1 Decision: Has the methodology been combined with another methodology? If yes, the resulting methodology was classified in the ‘integration’ category. Otherwise, we posed the next question.
• Level 2 Decision: Are any new elements (phases, tasks, deliverables) added to the methodology? If yes, we designate the resulting methodology as an ‘extension’ of the original one. Otherwise, we classify the resulting methodology as a modification of the original one.

Thus, when adapted three distinct types of adaptation scenarios can be distinguished:

• Scenario ‘Modification’: introduces specialized sub-tasks and deliverables in order to address specific use cases or business problems. Modifications typically concentrate on granular adjustments to the methodology at the level of sub-phases, tasks or deliverables within the existing reference frameworks (e.g., CRISP-DM or KDD) stages. For example, Chernov et al. (2014) , in the study of mobile network domain, proposed automated decision-making enhancement in the deployment phase. In addition, the evaluation phase was modified by using both conventional and own-developed performance metrics. Further, in a study performed within the financial services domain, Yang et al. (2016) presents feature transformation and feature selection as sub-phases, thereby enhancing the data mining modeling stage.
• Scenario ‘Extension’: primarily proposes significant extensions to reference data mining methodologies. Such extensions result in either integrated data mining solutions, data mining frameworks serving as a component or tool for automated IS systems, or their transformations to fit specialized environments. The main purposes of extensions are to integrate fully-scaled data mining solutions into IS/IT systems and business processes and provide broader context with useful architectures, algorithms, etc. Adaptations, where extensions have been made, elicit and explicitly present various artifacts in the form of system and model architectures, process views, workflows, and implementation aspects. A number of soft goals are also achieved, providing holistic perspective on data mining process, and contextualizing with organizational needs. Also, there are extensions in this scenario where data mining process methodologies are substantially changed and extended in all key phases to enable execution of data mining life-cycle with the new (Big) Data technologies, tools and in new prototyping and deployment environments (e.g., Hadoop platforms or real-time customer interfaces). For example, Kisilevich, Keim & Rokach (2013) presented extensions to traditional CRISP-DM data mining outcomes with fully fledged Decision Support System (DSS) for hotel brokerage business. Authors ( Kisilevich, Keim & Rokach, 2013 ) have introduced spatial/non-spatial data management (extending data preparation), analytical and spatial modeling capabilities (extending modeling phase), provided spatial display and reporting capabilities (enhancing deployment phase). In the same work domain knowledge was introduced in all phases of data mining process, and usability and ease of use were also addressed.
• Scenario ‘Integration’: combines reference methodology, for example, CRISP-DM with: (1) data mining methodologies originated from other domains (e.g., Software engineering development methodologies), (2) organizational frameworks (Balanced Scorecard, Analytics Canvass, etc.), or (3) adjustments to accommodate Big Data technologies and tools. Also, adaptations in the form of ‘Integration’ typically introduce various types of ontologies and ontology-based tools, domain knowledge, software engineering, and BI-driven framework elements. Fundamental data mining process adjustments to new types of data, IS architectures (e.g., real time data, multi-layer IS) are also presented. Key gaps addressed with such adjustments are prescriptive nature and low degree of formalization in CRISP-DM, obsolete nature of CRISP-DM with respect to tools, and lack of CRISP-DM integration with other organizational frameworks. For example, Brisson & Collard (2008) developed KEOPS data mining methodology (CRIPS-DM based) centered on domain knowledge integration. Ontology-driven information system has been proposed with integration and enhancements to all steps of data mining process. Further, an integrated expert knowledge used in all data mining phases was proved to produce value in data mining process.

To examine how the application scenario of each data mining methodology usage has developed over time, we mapped peer-reviewed texts and ‘grey’ literature to respective adaptation scenarios, aggregated by decades (as presented in the Fig. 7 for peer-reviewed and Fig. 8 for ‘grey’).

For peer-reviewed research, such temporal analysis resulted in three observations. Firstly, research efforts in each adaptation scenario has been growing and number of publication more than quadrupled (128 vs. 28). Secondly, as noted above relative proportion of ‘as-is’ studies is diluted (from 39% to 33%) and primarily replaced with ‘Extension’ paradigm (from 25% to 30%). In contrast, in relative terms ‘Modification’ and ‘Integration’ paradigms gains are modest. Further, this finding is reinforced with other observation—most notable gaps in terms of modest number of publications remain in ‘Integration’ category where excluding 2008–2009 spike, research efforts are limited and number of texts is just 13. This is in stark contrast with prolific research in ‘Extension category’ though concentrated in the recent years. We can hypothesize that existing reference methodologies do not accommodate and support increasing complexity of data mining projects and IS/IT infrastructure, as well as certain domains specifics and as such need to be adapted.

In ‘grey’ literature, in contrast to peer-reviewed research, growth in number of publications is less profound—29 vs. 22 publications or 32% comparing across two decade (as per Fig. 8 ). The growth is solely driven by ‘Integration’ scenarios application (13 vs. 4 publications) while both ‘as-is’ and other adaptations scenarios are stagnating or in decline.

RQ3: For what purposes have existing data mining methodologies been adapted?

We address the third research question by analyzing what gaps the data mining methodology adaptations seek to fill and the benefits of such adaptations. We identified three adaptation scenarios, namely ‘Modification’, ‘Extension’, and ‘Integration’. Here, we analyze each of them.

Modification

Modifications of data mining methodologies are present in 30 peer-reviewed and 4 ‘grey’ literature studies. The analysis shows that modifications overwhelmingly consist of specific case studies. However, the major differentiating point compared to ‘as-is’ case studies is clear presence of specific adjustments towards standard data mining process methodologies. Yet, the proposed modifications and their purposes do not go beyond traditional data mining methodologies phases. They are granular, specialized and executed on tasks, sub-tasks, and at deliverables level. With modifications, authors describe potential business applications and deployment scenarios at a conceptual level, but typically do not report or present real implementations in the IS/IT systems and business processes.

Further, this research subcategory can be best classified based on domains where case studies were performed and data mining methodologies modification scenarios executed. We have identified four distinct domain-driven applications presented in the Fig. 9 .

IT, IS domain

The largest number of publications (14 or app. 40%), was performed on IT, IS security, software development, specific data mining and processing topics. Authors address intrusion detection problem in Hossain, Bridges & Vaughn (2003) , Fan, Ye & Chen (2016) , Lee, Stolfo & Mok (1999) , specialized algorithms for variety of data types processing in Yang & Shi (2010) , Chen et al. (2001) , Yi, Teng & Xu (2016) , Pouyanfar & Chen (2016) , effective and efficient computer and mobile networks management in Guan & Fu (2010) , Ertek, Chi & Zhang (2017) , Zaki & Sobh (2005) , Chernov, Petrov & Ristaniemi (2015) , Chernov et al. (2014) .

Manufacturing and engineering

The next most popular research area is manufacturing/engineering with 10 case studies. The central topic here is high-technology manufacturing, for example, semi-conductors associated—study of Chien, Diaz & Lan (2014) , and various complex prognostics case studies in rail, aerospace domains ( Létourneau et al., 2005 ; Zaluski et al., 2011 ) concentrated on failure predictions. These are complemented by studies on equipment fault and failure predictions and maintenance ( Kumar, Shankar & Thakur, 2018 ; Kang et al., 2017 ; Wang, 2017 ) as well as monitoring system ( García et al., 2017 ).

Sales and services, incl. financial industry

The third category is presented by seven business application papers concerning customer service, targeting and advertising ( Karimi-Majd & Mahootchi, 2015 ; Reutterer et al., 2017 ; Wang, 2017 ), financial services credit risk assessments ( Smith, Willis & Brooks, 2000 ), supply chain management ( Nohuddin et al., 2018 ), and property management ( Yu, Fung & Haghighat, 2013 ), and similar.

As a consequence of specialization, these studies concentrate on developing ‘state-of-the art’ solution to the respective domain-specific problem.

‘Extension’ scenario was identified in 46 peer-reviewed and 12 ‘grey’ publications. We noted that ‘Extension’ to existing data mining methodologies were executed with four major purposes:

• Purpose 1: To implement fully scaled, integrated data mining solution and regular, repeatable knowledge discovery process— address model, algorithm deployment, implementation design (including architecture, workflows and corresponding IS integration). Also, complementary goal is to tackle changes to business process to incorporate data mining into organization activities.
• Purpose 2: To implement complex, specifically designed systems and integrated business applications with data mining model/solution as component or tool. Typically, this adaptation is also oriented towards Big Data specifics, and is complemented by proposed artifacts such as Big Data architectures, system models, workflows, and data flows.
• Purpose 3: To implement data mining as part of integrated/combined specialized infrastructure, data environments and types (e.g., IoT, cloud, mobile networks) .
• Purpose 4: To incorporate context-awareness aspects.

The specific list of studies mapped to each of the given purposes presented in the Appendix ( Table A1 ). Main purposes of adaptations, associated gaps and/or benefits along with observations and artifacts are documented in the Fig. 10 below.

In ‘Extension’ category, studies executed with the Purpose 1 propose fully scaled, integrated data mining solutions of specific data mining models, associated frameworks and processes. The distinctive trait of this research subclass is that it ensures repeatability and reproducibility of delivered data mining solution in different organizational and industry settings. Both the results of data mining use case as well as deployment and integration into IS/IT systems and associated business process(es) are presented explicitly. Thus, ‘Extension’ subclass is geared towards specific solution design, tackling concrete business or industrial setting problem or addressing specific research gaps thus resembling comprehensive case study.

This direction can be well exemplified by expert finder system in research social network services proposed by Sun et al. (2015) , data mining solution for functional test content optimization by Wang (2015) and time-series mining framework to conduct estimation of unobservable time-series by Hu et al. (2010) . Similarly, Du et al. (2017) tackle online log anomalies detection, automated association rule mining is addressed by Çinicioğlu et al. (2011) , software effort estimation by Deng, Purvis & Purvis (2011) , network patterns visual discovery by Simoff & Galloway (2008) . Number of studies address solutions in IS security ( Shin & Jeong, 2005 ), manufacturing ( Güder et al., 2014 ; Chee, Baharudin & Karkonasasi, 2016 ), materials engineering domains ( Doreswamy, 2008 ), and business domains ( Xu & Qiu, 2008 ; Ding & Daniel, 2007 ).

In contrast, ‘Extension’ studies executed for the Purpose 2 concentrate on design of complex, multi-component information systems and architectures. These are holistic, complex systems and integrated business applications with data mining framework serving as component or tool. Moreover, data mining methodology in these studies is extended with systems integration phases.

For example, Mobasher (2007) presents data mining application in Web personalization system and associated process; here, data mining cycle is extended in all phases with utmost goal of leveraging multiple data sources and using discovered models and corresponding algorithms in an automatic personalization system. Authors comprehensively address data processing, algorithm, design adjustments and respective integration into automated system. Similarly, Haruechaiyasak, Shyu & Chen (2004) tackle improvement of Webpage recommender system by presenting extended data mining methodology including design and implementation of data mining model. Holistic view on web-mining with support of all data sources, data warehousing and data mining techniques integration, as well as multiple problem-oriented analytical outcomes with rich business application scenarios (personalization, adaptation, profiling, and recommendations) in e-commerce domain was proposed and discussed by Büchner & Mulvenna (1998) . Further, Singh et al. (2014) tackled scalable implementation of Network Threat Intrusion Detection System. In this study, data mining methodology and resulting model are extended, scaled and deployed as module of quasi-real-time system for capturing Peer-to-Peer Botnet attacks. Similar complex solution was presented in a series of publications by Lee et al. (2000 , 2001) who designed real-time data mining-based Intrusion Detection System (IDS). These works are complemented by comprehensive study of Barbará et al. (2001) who constructed experimental testbed for intrusion detection with data mining methods. Detection model combining data fusion and mining and respective components for Botnets identification was developed by Kiayias et al. (2009) too. Similar approach is presented in Alazab et al. (2011) who proposed and implemented zero-day malware detection system with associated machine-learning based framework. Finally, Ahmed, Rafique & Abulaish (2011) presented multi-layer framework for fuzzy attack in 3G cellular IP networks.

A number of authors have considered data mining methodologies in the context of Decision Support Systems and other systems that generate information for decision-making, across a variety of domains. For example, Kisilevich, Keim & Rokach (2013) executed significant extension of data mining methodology by designing and presenting integrated Decision Support System (DSS) with six components acting as supporting tool for hotel brokerage business to increase deal profitability. Similar approach is undertaken by Capozzoli et al. (2017) focusing on improving energy management of properties by provision of occupancy pattern information and reconfiguration framework. Kabir (2016) presented data mining information service providing improved sales forecasting that supported solution of under/over-stocking problem while Lau, Zhang & Xu (2018) addressed sales forecasting with sentiment analysis on Big Data. Kamrani, Rong & Gonzalez (2001) proposed GA-based Intelligent Diagnosis system for fault diagnostics in manufacturing domain. The latter was tackled further in Shahbaz et al. (2010) with complex, integrated data mining system for diagnosing and solving manufacturing problems in real time.

Lenz, Wuest & Westkämper (2018) propose a framework for capturing data analytics objectives and creating holistic, cross-departmental data mining systems in the manufacturing domain. This work is representative of a cohort of studies that aim at extending data mining methodologies in order to support the design and implementation of enterprise-wide data mining systems. In this same research cohort, we classify Luna, Castro & Romero (2017) , which presents a data mining toolset integrated into the Moodle learning management system, with the aim of supporting university-wide learning analytics.

One study addresses multi-agent based data mining concept. Khan, Mohamudally & Babajee (2013) have developed unified theoretical framework for data mining by formulating a unified data mining theory. The framework is tested by means of agent programing proposing integration into multi-agent system which is useful due to scalability, robustness and simplicity.

The subcategory of ‘Extension’ research executed with Purpose 3 is devoted to data mining methodologies and solutions in specialized IT/IS, data and process environments which emerged recently as consequence of Big Data associated technologies and tools development. Exemplary studies include IoT associated environment research, for example, Smart City application in IoT presented by Strohbach et al. (2015) . In the same domain, Bashir & Gill (2016) addressed IoT-enabled smart buildings with the additional challenge of large amount of high-speed real time data and requirements of real-time analytics. Authors proposed integrated IoT Big Data Analytics framework. This research is complemented by interdisciplinary study of Zhong et al. (2017) where IoT and wireless technologies are used to create RFID-enabled environment producing analysis of KPIs to improve logistics.

Significant number of studies addresses various mobile environments sometimes complemented by cloud-based environments or cloud-based environments as stand-alone. Gomes, Phua & Krishnaswamy (2013) addressed mobile data mining with execution on mobile device itself; the framework proposes innovative approach addressing extensions of all aspects of data mining including contextual data, end-user privacy preservation, data management and scalability. Yuan, Herbert & Emamian (2014) and Yuan & Herbert (2014) introduced cloud-based mobile data analytics framework with application case study for smart home based monitoring system. Cuzzocrea, Psaila & Toccu (2016) have presented innovative FollowMe suite which implements data mining framework for mobile social media analytics with several tools with respective architecture and functionalities. An interesting paper was presented by Torres et al. (2017) who addressed data mining methodology and its implementation for congestion prediction in mobile LTE networks tackling also feedback reaction with network reconfigurations trigger.

Further, Biliri et al. (2014) presented cloud-based Future Internet Enabler—automated social data analytics solution which also addresses Social Network Interoperability aspect supporting enterprises to interconnect and utilize social networks for collaboration. Real-time social media streamed data and resulting data mining methodology and application was extensively discussed by Zhang, Lau & Li (2014) . Authors proposed design of comprehensive ABIGDAD framework with seven main components implementing data mining based deceptive review identification. Interdisciplinary study tackling both these topics was developed by Puthal et al. (2016) who proposed integrated framework and architecture of disaster management system based on streamed data in cloud environment ensuring end-to-end security. Additionally, key extensions to data mining framework have been proposed merging variety of data sources and types, security verification and data flow access controls. Finally, cloud-based manufacturing was addressed in the context of fault diagnostics by Kumar et al. (2016) .

Also, Mahmood et al. (2013) tackled Wireless Sensor Networks and associated data mining framework required extensions. Interesting work is executed by Nestorov & Jukic (2003) addressing rare topic of data mining solutions integration within traditional data warehouses and active mining of data repositories themselves.

Supported by new generation of visualization technologies (including Virtual Reality environments), Wijayasekara, Linda & Manic (2011) proposed and implemented CAVE-SOM (3D visual data mining framework) which offers interactive, immersive visual data mining with multiple visualization modes supported by plethora of methods. Earlier version of visual data mining framework was successfully developed and presented by Ganesh et al. (1996) as early as in 1996.

Large-scale social media data is successfully tackled by Lemieux (2016) with comprehensive framework accompanied by set of data mining tools and interface. Real time data analytics was addressed by Shrivastava & Pal (2017) in the domain of enterprise service ecosystem. Images data was addressed in Huang et al. (2002) by proposing multimedia data mining framework and its implementation with user relevance feedback integration and instance learning. Further, exploded data diversity and associated need to extend standard data mining is addressed by Singh et al. (2016) in the study devoted to object detection in video surveillance systems supporting real time video analysis.

Finally, there is also limited number of studies which addresses context awareness (Purpose 4) and extends data mining methodology with context elements and adjustments. In comparison with ‘Integration’ category research, here, the studies are at lower abstraction level, capturing and presenting list of adjustments. Singh, Vajirkar & Lee (2003) generate taxonomy of context factors, develop extended data mining framework and propose deployment including detailed IS architecture. Context-awareness aspect is also addressed in the papers reviewed above, for example, Lenz, Wuest & Westkämper (2018) , Kisilevich, Keim & Rokach (2013) , Sun et al. (2015) , and other studies.

Integration

‘Integration’ of data mining methodologies scenario was identified in 27 ‘peer-reviewed’ and 17 ‘grey’ studies. Our analysis revealed that this adaptation scenario at a higher abstraction level is typically executed with the five key purposes:

• Purpose 1: to integrate/combine with various ontologies existing in organization .
• Purpose 2: to introduce context-awareness and incorporate domain knowledge .
• Purpose 3: to integrate/combine with other research or industry domains framework, process methodologies and concepts .
• Purpose 4: to integrate/combine with other well-known organizational governance frameworks, process methodologies and concepts .
• Purpose 5: to accommodate and/or leverage upon newly available Big Data technologies, tools and methods.

The specific list of studies mapped to each of the given purposes presented in Appendix ( Table A2 ). Main purposes of adaptations, associated gaps and/or benefits along with observations and artifacts are documented in Fig. 11 below.

As mentioned, number of studies concentrates on proposing ontology-based Integrated data mining frameworks accompanies by various types of ontologies (Purpose 1). For example, Sharma & Osei-Bryson (2008) focus on ontology-based organizational view with Actors, Goals and Objectives which supports execution of Business Understanding Phase. Brisson & Collard (2008) propose KEOPS framework which is CRISP-DM compliant and integrates a knowledge base and ontology with the purpose to build ontology-driven information system (OIS) for business and data understanding phases while knowledge base is used for post-processing step of model interpretation. Park et al. (2017) propose and design comprehensive ontology-based data analytics tool IRIS with the purpose to align analytics and business. IRIS is based on concept to connect dots, analytics methods or transforming insights into business value, and supports standardized process for applying ontology to match business problems and solutions.

Further, Ying et al. (2014) propose domain-specific data mining framework oriented to business problem of customer demand discovery. They construct ontology for customer demand and customer demand discovery task which allows to execute structured knowledge extraction in the form of knowledge patterns and rules. Here, the purpose is to facilitate business value realization and support actionability of extracted knowledge via marketing strategies and tactics. In the same vein, Cannataro & Comito (2003) presented ontology for the Data Mining domain which main goal is to simplify the development of distributed knowledge discovery applications. Authors offered to a domain expert a reference model for different kind of data mining tasks, methodologies, and software capable to solve the given business problem and find the most appropriate solution.

Apart from ontologies, Sharma & Osei-Bryson (2009) in another study propose IS inspired, driven by Input-Output model data mining methodology which supports formal implementation of Business Understanding Phase. This research exemplifies studies executed with Purpose 2. The goal of the paper is to tackle prescriptive nature of CRISP-DM and address how the entire process can be implemented. Cao, Schurmann & Zhang (2005) study is also exemplary in terms of aggregating and introducing several fundamental concepts into traditional CRISP-DM data mining cycle—context awareness, in-depth pattern mining, human–machine cooperative knowledge discovery (in essence, following human-centricity paradigm in data mining), loop-closed iterative refinement process (similar to Agile-based methodologies in Software Development). There are also several concepts, like data, domain, interestingness, rules which are proposed to tackle number of fundamental constrains identified in CRISP-DM. They have been discussed and further extended by Cao & Zhang (2007 , 2008) , Cao (2010) into integrated domain driven data mining concept resulting in fully fledged D3M (domain-driven) data mining framework. Interestingly, the same concepts, but on individual basis are investigated and presented by other authors, for example, context-aware data mining methodology is tackled by Xiang (2009a , 2009b) in the context of financial sector. Pournaras et al. (2016) attempted very crucial privacy-preservation topic in the context of achieving effective data analytics methodology. Authors introduced metrics and self-regulatory (reconfigurable) information sharing mechanism providing customers with controls for information disclosure.

A number of studies have proposed CRISP-DM adjustments based on existing frameworks, process models or concepts originating in other domains (Purpose 3), for example, software engineering ( Marbán et al., 2007 , 2009 ; Marban, Mariscal & Segovia, 2009 ) and industrial engineering ( Solarte, 2002 ; Zhao et al., 2005 ).

Meanwhile, Mariscal, Marbán & Fernández (2010) proposed a new refined data mining process based on a global comparative analysis of existing frameworks while Angelov (2014) outlined a data analytics framework based on statistical concepts. Following a similar approach, some researchers suggest explicit integration with other areas and organizational functions, for example, BI-driven Data Mining by Hang & Fong (2009) . Similarly, Chen, Kazman & Haziyev (2016) developed an architecture-centric agile Big Data analytics methodology, and an architecture-centric agile analytics and DevOps model. Alternatively, several authors tackled data mining methodology adaptations in other domains, for example, educational data mining by Tavares, Vieira & Pedro (2017) , decision support in learning management systems ( Murnion & Helfert, 2011 ), and in accounting systems ( Amani & Fadlalla, 2017 ).

Other studies are concerned with actionability of data mining and closer integration with business processes and organizational management frameworks (Purpose 4). In particular, there is a recurrent focus on embedding data mining solutions into knowledge-based decision making processes in organizations, and supporting fast and effective knowledge discovery ( Bohanec, Robnik-Sikonja & Borstnar, 2017 ).

Examples of adaptations made for this purpose include: (1) integration of CRISP-DM with the Balanced Scorecard framework used for strategic performance management in organizations ( Yun, Weihua & Yang, 2014 ); (2) integration with a strategic decision-making framework for revenue management Segarra et al. (2016) ; (3) integration with a strategic analytics methodology Van Rooyen & Simoff (2008) , and (4) integration with a so-called ‘Analytics Canvas’ for management of portfolios of data analytics projects Kühn et al. (2018) . Finally, Ahangama & Poo (2015) explored methodological attributes important for adoption of data mining methodology by novice users. This latter study uncovered factors that could support the reduction of resistance to the use of data mining methodologies. Conversely, Lawler & Joseph (2017) comprehensively evaluated factors that may increase the benefits of Big Data Analytics projects in an organization.

Lastly, a number of studies have proposed data mining frameworks (e.g., CRISP-DM) adaptations to cater for new technological architectures, new types of datasets and applications (Purpose 5). For example, Lu et al. (2017) proposed a data mining system based on a Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA), Zaghloul, Ali-Eldin & Salem (2013) developed a concept of self-service data analytics, Osman, Elragal & Bergvall-Kåreborn (2017) blended CRISP-DM into a Big Data Analytics framework for Smart Cities, and Niesen et al. (2016) proposed a data-driven risk management framework for Industry 4.0 applications.

Our analysis of RQ3, regarding the purposes of existing data mining methodologies adaptations, revealed the following key findings. Firstly, adaptations of type ‘Modification’ are predominantly targeted at addressing problems that are specific to a given case study. The majority of modifications were made within the domain of IS security, followed by case studies in the domains of manufacturing and financial services. This is in clear contrast with adaptations of type ‘Extension’, which are primarily aimed at customizing the methodology to take into account specialized development environments and deployment infrastructures, and to incorporate context-awareness aspects. Thirdly, a recurrent purpose of adaptations of type ‘Integration’ is to combine a data mining methodology with either existing ontologies in an organization or with other domain frameworks, methodologies, and concepts. ‘Integration’ is also used to instill context-awareness and domain knowledge into a data mining methodology, or to adapt it to specialized methods and tools, such as Big Data. The distinctive outcome and value (gaps filled in) of ‘Integrations’ stems from improved knowledge discovery, better actionability of results, improved combination with key organizational processes and domain-specific methodologies, and improved usage of Big Data technologies.

We discovered that the adaptations of existing data mining methodologies found in the literature can be classified into three categories: modification, extension, or integration.

We also noted that adaptations are executed either to address deficiencies and lack of important elements or aspects in the reference methodology (chiefly CRISP-DM). Furthermore, adaptations are also made to improve certain phases, deliverables or process outcomes.

In short, adaptations are made to:

• improve key reference data mining methodologies phases—for example, in case of CRISP-DM these are primarily business understanding and deployment phases.
• support knowledge discovery and actionability.
• introduce context-awareness and higher degree of formalization.
• integrate closer data mining solution with key organizational processes and frameworks.
• significantly update CRISP-DM with respect to Big Data technologies, tools, environments and infrastructure.
• incorporate broader, explicit context of architectures, algorithms and toolsets as integral deliverables or supporting tools to execute data mining process.
• expand and accommodate broader unified perspective for incorporating and implementing data mining solutions in organization, IT infrastructure and business processes.

Threats to Validity

Systematic literature reviews have inherent limitations that must be acknowledged. These threats to validity include subjective bias (internal validity) and incompleteness of search results (external validity).

The internal validity threat stems from the subjective screening and rating of studies, particularly when assessing the studies with respect to relevance and quality criteria. We have mitigated these effects by documenting the survey protocol (SLR Protocol), strictly adhering to the inclusion criteria, and performing significant validation procedures, as documented in the Protocol.

The external validity threat relates to the extent to which the findings of the SLR reflect the actual state of the art in the field of data mining methodologies, given that the SLR only considers published studies that can be retrieved using specific search strings and databases. We have addressed this threat to validity by conducting trial searches to validate our search strings in terms of their ability to identify relevant papers that we knew about beforehand. Also, the fact that the searches led to 1,700 hits overall suggests that a significant portion of the relevant literature has been covered.

In this study, we have examined the use of data mining methodologies by means of a systematic literature review covering both peer-reviewed and ‘grey’ literature. We have found that the use of data mining methodologies, as reported in the literature, has grown substantially since 2007 (four-fold increase relative to the previous decade). Also, we have observed that data mining methodologies were predominantly applied ‘as-is’ from 1997 to 2007. This trend was reversed from 2008 onward, when the use of adapted data mining methodologies gradually started to replace ‘as-is’ usage.

The most frequent adaptations have been in the ‘Extension’ category. This category refers to adaptations that imply significant changes to key phases of the reference methodology (chiefly CRISP-DM). These adaptations particularly target the business understanding, deployment and implementation phases of CRISP-DM (or other methodologies). Moreover, we have found that the most frequent purposes of adaptions are: (1) adaptations to handle Big Data technologies, tools and environments (technological adaptations); and (2) adaptations for context-awareness and for integrating data mining solutions into business processes and IT systems (organizational adaptations). A key finding is that standard data mining methodologies do not pay sufficient attention to deployment aspects required to scale and transform data mining models into software products integrated into large IT/IS systems and business processes.

Apart from the adaptations in the ‘Extension’ category, we have also identified an increasing number of studies focusing on the ‘Integration’ of data mining methodologies with other domain-specific and organizational methodologies, frameworks, and concepts. These adaptions are aimed at embedding the data mining methodology into broader organizational aspects.

Overall, the findings of the study highlight the need to develop refinements of existing data mining methodologies that would allow them to seamlessly interact with IT development platforms and processes (technological adaptation) and with organizational management frameworks (organizational adaptation). In other words, there is a need to frame existing data mining methodologies as being part of a broader ecosystem of methodologies, as opposed to the traditional view where data mining methodologies are defined in isolation from broader IT systems engineering and organizational management methodologies.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental information 1.

Unfortunately, we were not able to upload any graph (original png files). Based on Overleaf placed PeerJ template we constructed graphs files based on the template examples. Unfortunately, we were not able to understand why it did not fit, redoing to new formats will change all texts flow and generated pdf file. We submit graphs in archived file as part of supplementary material. We will do our best to redo the graphs further based on instructions from You.

Supplemental Information 2

File starts with Definitions page—it lists and explains all columns definitions as well as SLR scoring metrics. Second page contains"Peer reviewed" texts while next one "grey" literature corpus.

Funding Statement

The authors received no funding for this work.

Additional Information and Declarations

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Veronika Plotnikova conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, performed the computation work, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Marlon Dumas conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Fredrik Milani conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Primary Sources

IEEE Account

• Change Username/Password
• Update Address

Purchase Details

• Payment Options
• Order History
• View Purchased Documents

Profile Information

• Communications Preferences
• Profession and Education
• Technical Interests
• US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
• Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
• Contact & Support
• About IEEE Xplore
• Accessibility
• Terms of Use
• Nondiscrimination Policy
• Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. © Copyright 2024 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.

Accessibility Links

• Skip to content
• Skip to search IOPscience
• Skip to Journals list
• Accessibility help
• Accessibility Help

Click here to close this panel.

Purpose-led Publishing is a coalition of three not-for-profit publishers in the field of physical sciences: AIP Publishing, the American Physical Society and IOP Publishing.

Together, as publishers that will always put purpose above profit, we have defined a set of industry standards that underpin high-quality, ethical scholarly communications.

We are proudly declaring that science is our only shareholder.

Research on Application of Machine Learning in Data Mining

Xiuyi Teng 1,2 and Yuxia Gong 1,2

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering , Volume 392 , Issue 6 Citation Xiuyi Teng and Yuxia Gong 2018 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 392 062202 DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/392/6/062202

Article metrics

3895 Total downloads

Share this article

Author affiliations.

1 Economics and Management School, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin China, 300222

2 Financial engineering and risk management research Center, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin China, 300222.

Buy this article in print

Data mining has been widely used in the business field, and machine learning can perform data analysis and pattern discovery, thus playing a key role in data mining application. This paper expounds the definition, model, development stage, classification and commercial application of machine learning, and emphasizes the role of machine learning in data mining. Understanding the various machine learning techniques helps to choose the right method for a specific application. Therefore, this paper summarizes and analyzes machine learning technology, and discusses their advantages and disadvantages in data mining.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence . Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts

Data mining articles within Scientific Reports

Article 12 August 2024 | Open Access

Development, validation and use of custom software for the analysis of pain trajectories

• M. R. van Ittersum
• , A. de Zoete
•  &  P. McCarthy

Comprehensive analysis identifies ubiquitin ligase FBXO42 as a tumor-promoting factor in neuroblastoma

• Jianwu Zhou
•  &  Yifei Du

Article 10 August 2024 | Open Access

Aquaporin 1 aggravates lipopolysaccharide-induced macrophage polarization and pyroptosis

•  &  Abduxukur Ablimit

Article 07 August 2024 | Open Access

Bidirectional Mendelian randomization to explore the causal relationships between the gut microbiota and male reproductive diseases

• Xiaofang Han
•  &  Yuanyuan Ji

Article 06 August 2024 | Open Access

A comprehensive single-cell RNA transcriptomic analysis identifies a unique SPP1+ macrophages subgroup in aging skeletal muscle

• , Mengyue Yang
•  &  Weiming Guo

Article 01 August 2024 | Open Access

Association of GATA3 expression in triple-positive breast cancer with overall survival and immune cell infiltration

• Xiuwen Chen
• , Weilin Zhao
•  &  Qiong Yi

Article 31 July 2024 | Open Access

Advanced differential evolution for gender-aware English speech emotion recognition

•  &  Jiulong Zhu

Article 30 July 2024 | Open Access

Identification and immune landscape of sarcopenia-related molecular clusters in inflammatory bowel disease by machine learning and integrated bioinformatics

• Chongkang Yue
•  &  Huiping Xue

Article 26 July 2024 | Open Access

A data-centric machine learning approach to improve prediction of glioma grades using low-imbalance TCGA data

• Raquel Sánchez-Marqués
• , Vicente García
•  &  J. Salvador Sánchez

Article 24 July 2024 | Open Access

Development and validation of a predictive model based on β-Klotho for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

• XiangXiu Wang
• , HongWei Liu
•  &  Ying Cui

Article 15 July 2024 | Open Access

Detecting depression severity using weighted random forest and oxidative stress biomarkers

• Mariam Bader
• , Moustafa Abdelwanis
•  &  Herbert F. Jelinek

Article 06 July 2024 | Open Access

Scanpro is a tool for robust proportion analysis of single-cell resolution data

• Yousef Alayoubi
• , Mette Bentsen
•  &  Mario Looso

Article 02 July 2024 | Open Access

Impact of Bariatric Surgery on metabolic health in a Uruguayan cohort and the emerging predictive role of FSTL1

• Leonardo Santos
• , Mariana Patrone
•  &  Gustavo Bruno

Identification of a novel lactylation-related gene signature predicts the prognosis of multiple myeloma and experiment verification

• , Wanqiu Zhang
•  &  Wei Hu

Article 26 June 2024 | Open Access

Single-cell transcriptome profiling highlights the importance of telocyte, kallikrein genes, and alternative splicing in mouse testes aging

• , Ziyan Zhang
•  &  Gangcai Xie

Article 25 June 2024 | Open Access

Unifying aspect-based sentiment analysis BERT and multi-layered graph convolutional networks for comprehensive sentiment dissection

• Kamran Aziz
• , Donghong Ji
•  &  Rashid Abbasi

Article 18 June 2024 | Open Access

Expression characteristics of lipid metabolism-related genes and correlative immune infiltration landscape in acute myocardial infarction

• , Jingyi Luo
•  &  Xiaorong Hu

Article 17 June 2024 | Open Access

Multi role ChatGPT framework for transforming medical data analysis

• Haoran Chen
• , Shengxiao Zhang
•  &  Xuechun Lu

A tensor decomposition reveals ageing-induced differences in muscle and grip-load force couplings during object lifting

• , Seyed Saman Saboksayr
•  &  Ioannis Delis

Article 14 June 2024 | Open Access

Research on coal mine longwall face gas state analysis and safety warning strategy based on multi-sensor forecasting models

• Haoqian Chang
• , Xiangrui Meng
•  &  Zuxiang Hu

PDE1B, a potential biomarker associated with tumor microenvironment and clinical prognostic significance in osteosarcoma

• Qingzhong Chen
• , Chunmiao Xing
•  &  Zhongwei Qian

Article 13 June 2024 | Open Access

A real-world pharmacovigilance study on cardiovascular adverse events of tisagenlecleucel using machine learning approach

• Juhong Jung
• , Ju Hwan Kim
•  &  Ju-Young Shin

Article 12 June 2024 | Open Access

Alteration of circulating ACE2-network related microRNAs in patients with COVID-19

• Zofia Wicik
• , Ceren Eyileten
•  &  Marek Postula

DCRELM: dual correlation reduction network-based extreme learning machine for single-cell RNA-seq data clustering

• Qingyun Gao
•  &  Qing Ai

Article 10 June 2024 | Open Access

Multi-cohort analysis reveals immune subtypes and predictive biomarkers in tuberculosis

•  &  Hong Ding

Article 03 June 2024 | Open Access

Depression recognition using voice-based pre-training model

• Xiangsheng Huang
• , Fang Wang
•  &  Zhenrong Xu

Article 01 June 2024 | Open Access

Mitochondrial RNA modification-based signature to predict prognosis of lower grade glioma: a multi-omics exploration and verification study

• Xingwang Zhou
• , Yuanguo Ling
•  &  Liangzhao Chu

Article 31 May 2024 | Open Access

Decoding intelligence via symmetry and asymmetry

• Jianjing Fu
•  &  Ching-an Hsiao

Article 27 May 2024 | Open Access

Research on domain ontology construction based on the content features of online rumors

• Jianbo Zhao
• , Huailiang Liu
•  &  Ruiyu Ding

Exploring the pathways of drug repurposing and Panax ginseng treatment mechanisms in chronic heart failure: a disease module analysis perspective

• Chengzhi Xie
• , Ying Zhang
•  &  Na Lang

Article 22 May 2024 | Open Access

Comprehensive data mining reveals RTK/RAS signaling pathway as a promoter of prostate cancer lineage plasticity through transcription factors and CNV

• Guanyun Wei
•  &  Zao Dai

Article 21 May 2024 | Open Access

Anoikis-related gene signatures in colorectal cancer: implications for cell differentiation, immune infiltration, and prognostic prediction

• Taohui Ding
• , Zhao Shang
•  &  Bo Yi

Insights from modelling sixteen years of climatic and fumonisin patterns in maize in South Africa

• Sefater Gbashi
• , Oluwasola Abayomi Adelusi
•  &  Patrick Berka Njobeh

Article 17 May 2024 | Open Access

Identification of cancer risk groups through multi-omics integration using autoencoder and tensor analysis

• Ali Braytee
•  &  Ali Anaissi

Article 14 May 2024 | Open Access

Multi-omics integration of scRNA-seq time series data predicts new intervention points for Parkinson’s disease

• Katarina Mihajlović
• , Gaia Ceddia
•  &  Nataša Pržulj

Stellae-123 gene expression signature improved risk stratification in Taiwanese acute myeloid leukemia patients

• Yu-Hung Wang
• , Adrián Mosquera Orgueira
•  &  Hwei-Fang Tien

Article 06 May 2024 | Open Access

Joint extraction of wheat germplasm information entity relationship based on deep character and word fusion

• Xiaoxiao Jia
• , Guang Zheng
•  &  Lei Xi

Article 25 April 2024 | Open Access

Low ACADM expression predicts poor prognosis and suppressive tumor microenvironment in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

•  &  Huimin Long

Article 19 April 2024 | Open Access

Automatic inference of ICD-10 codes from German ophthalmologic physicians’ letters using natural language processing

• D. Böhringer
• , P. Angelova
•  &  T. Reinhard

Robust identification of interactions between heat-stress responsive genes in the chicken brain using Bayesian networks and augmented expression data

• E. A. Videla Rodriguez
• , John B. O. Mitchell
•  &  V. Anne Smith

Article 16 April 2024 | Open Access

Potential routes of plastics biotransformation involving novel plastizymes revealed by global multi-omic analysis of plastic associated microbes

• Rodney S. Ridley Jr
• , Roth E. Conrad
•  &  Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis

Article 13 April 2024 | Open Access

Identifying and overcoming COVID-19 vaccination impediments using Bayesian data mining techniques

• , Arvind Mahajan
•  &  Bani Mallick

Article 10 April 2024 | Open Access

A decision support system based on recurrent neural networks to predict medication dosage for patients with Parkinson's disease

• Atiye Riasi
• , Mehdi Delrobaei
•  &  Mehri Salari

Article 03 April 2024 | Open Access

A distributed feature selection pipeline for survival analysis using radiomics in non-small cell lung cancer patients

• Benedetta Gottardelli
• , Varsha Gouthamchand
•  &  Andrea Damiani

Article 02 April 2024 | Open Access

Characterization of a putative orexin receptor in Ciona intestinalis sheds light on the evolution of the orexin/hypocretin system in chordates

• Maiju K. Rinne
• , Lauri Urvas
•  &  Henri Xhaard

Multiomics analysis to explore blood metabolite biomarkers in an Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort

• , Yuki Matsuzawa
•  &  Balebail Ashok Raj

Article 01 April 2024 | Open Access

Information heterogeneity between progress notes by physicians and nurses for inpatients with digestive system diseases

• Yukinori Mashima
• , Masatoshi Tanigawa
•  &  Hideto Yokoi

Article 25 March 2024 | Open Access

Integrated image and location analysis for wound classification: a deep learning approach

• , Tirth Shah
•  &  Zeyun Yu

Article 19 March 2024 | Open Access

Persistence of collective memory of corporate bankruptcy events discussed on X (Twitter) is influenced by pre-bankruptcy public attention

• Kathleen M. Jagodnik
• , Sharon Dekel
•  &  Alon Bartal

Article 18 March 2024 | Open Access

Clustering analysis for the evolutionary relationships of SARS-CoV-2 strains

• Xiangzhong Chen
• , Mingzhao Wang
•  &  Juanying Xie

Browse broader subjects

• Computational biology and bioinformatics

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Data mining: concepts and techniques by Jiawei Han and Micheline Kamber

2002, Sigmod Record

Related Papers

Shubham Baranwal

Data mining is a concept which looks for valuable resources as exapmles from substantial measure of information i.e from a large amount of data. The thoery or the information in this paper examines few of the data mining procedures, calculations and a portion of the associations which have adjusted information mining innovation to enhance their organizations and discovered great outcomes.

International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science & Technology

Anshu Anshu

Vinoth Nagarajan

IJESRT Journal

Data mining, the extraction of hidden predictive information from large databases, invented as a powerful new technology with great potential to help companies and organizations to focus on the most important information in their data warehouses. Data mining uses machine learning, statistical and visualization techniques to discovery and present knowledge in a form which is easily comprehensible to humans. Various popular data mining tools and techniques are available today for supporting large amount of applications. Data mining tools predict future trends and behaviors, allowing it’s users to make proactive, knowledge-driven decisions. They scour databases for hidden patterns, finding predictive information that experts may miss because it lies outside their expectations. With these large amount of features and applications there are some challenging issues also which are not exclusive and are not ordered in any way. This paper presents an overview of the data mining technique, Some of its vital applications and issues needs to be addressed.

Dolly Sharma

Today Data Engineering assumes a crucial part in every parts of the human life. It is extremely vital to assemble information from diverse sources Lots of data mining tools are available in the market, but each tool has their own strengths and weaknesses. But Data mining means how to search relevant data from large database. And to solve this kind of broblem we use the concept of data mining It means by using various kind of data mining tools we easily find out the information from large data base.without wasting our time. In this paper we discuss various type of tools which help in data mining.there are certain measures which checked by organization before purchasing the mining tool .organisation only purchase that tool which meets the requirement of organization.because eevery organization has different requirements of mininig.this paper only give the description of various type of data mining tools. This paper examines the learning revelation process, information mining, differen...

yitayew solomon

—Data mining an non-trivial extraction of novel, implicit, and actionable knowledge from large data sets is an evolving technology which is a direct result of the increasing use of computer databases in order to store and retrieve information effectively .It is also known as Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) and enables data exploration, data analysis, and data visualization of huge databases at a high level of abstraction, without a specific hypothesis in mind. The working of data mining is understood by using a method called modeling with it to make predictions. Data mining techniques are results of long process of research and product development and include artificial neural networks, decision trees and genetic algorithms. This paper surveys the data mining technology, its definition, motivation, its process and architecture, kind of data mined, functionalities and classification of data mining, major issues, applications and directions for further research of data mining technology.

Journal of Computer Science IJCSIS , Majid Zaman

With progression in technology specifically in last three decades or so, an enormous magnitude of information has been transitioned into a digital form, which resulted in formation of enormous data repositories. With accrual of information in these repositories a challenge persisted as how to extract meaningful knowledge from it. Data mining as a tool was used to tackle the situation. Data mining considered as stepping stone to procedure of knowledge discovery in databases, this is a procedure of extracting hidden information from enormous sets of databases to excavate eloquent patterns and rules. Data mining has now become an indispensable component in almost every field of human life. The present article provides an analysis of the available literature on data mining. The concept of data mining as well as its various methodologies are summarized. Some applications, tasks and issues related to it have also been illustrated.

Kalpa Publications in Engineering

Neeraj Dahiya

Information mining is known as the extraction of concealed prescient data from expansive databases whose primary concentration is to enable organizations to concentrate on the most critical data to display in their information stockrooms. Data mining can in like manner be called as the examination of data and the use of the distinctive programming techniques for finding illustrations and regularities in the given courses of action of data. The articulation "Electronic exchange" (or web business) ordinarily implies the usage of an electronic medium to finish all the business trades. Numerous a times it alludes to the offer of items by means of Internet, however it likewise incorporates the acquiring of systems through Internet. This primary concentration of this paper is to give the fundamental presentation about the different information mining methods accessible and furthermore to break down these procedures based on their execution. The paper additionally characterizes t...

Anup Lahoti

Data mining is a process of using different algorithms to find useful patterns or models from data. It is a process of selecting, exploring and modeling large amount of data. Mostly used in technology and also used in different areas of real life like finance, marketing, business. It can also be used in different social science methodologies, such as psychology, cognitive science and human behavior etc. The ability to continually change and acquire new understanding is a driving force for the application of DM. This allows many new future applications of data mining (1) as in today's world the need of data in every field is growing very vast. So, for satisfying our need there should be proper Data Mining techniques available. In this paper we are presenting valuable information about data mining.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Interal Res journa Managt Sci Tech

Ramesh M. Mirajkar

Kabure Tirenga

International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)

IJRASET Publication

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication

MONIKA SONI

Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery in Real Life Applications

Chandrika Fernando

IJCST Eighth Sense Research Group

Information & Management

Hennie Daniels

SIGMOD Record

Nicolás Marín

International Journal of Research in Advent Technology

Sohaib Alvi

Sankar Keeral Koloth Vidyadharan

IJSART JOURNAL

International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT)

IJERT Journal

International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology IJSRCSEIT

International Journal IJRITCC

sathish kumar.s

prakash durai

Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence

Qiyang Chen

International Journal of Software & Hardware Research in Engineering

Santhana Megala CT

Opportunities, Limitations and Risks

Sally McClean

IJRCAR JOURNAL

uma senthilarasu , Kavitha S

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

A comprehensive survey of data mining

• Original Research
• Published: 06 February 2020
• Volume 12 , pages 1243–1257, ( 2020 )

Cite this article

• Manoj Kumar Gupta   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4481-8432 1 &
• Pravin Chandra 1  

4984 Accesses

59 Citations

Explore all metrics

Data mining plays an important role in various human activities because it extracts the unknown useful patterns (or knowledge). Due to its capabilities, data mining become an essential task in large number of application domains such as banking, retail, medical, insurance, bioinformatics, etc. To take a holistic view of the research trends in the area of data mining, a comprehensive survey is presented in this paper. This paper presents a systematic and comprehensive survey of various data mining tasks and techniques. Further, various real-life applications of data mining are presented in this paper. The challenges and issues in area of data mining research are also presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

A Review of the Development and Future Trends of Data Mining Tools

A Survey on Big Data, Mining: (Tools, Techniques, Applications and Notable Uses)

Data Mining—A Tool for Handling Huge Voluminous Data

Explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence

Fayadd U, Piatesky-Shapiro G, Smyth P (1996) From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ISBN 0–262 56097–6 Fayap

Fayadd U, Piatesky-Shapiro G, Smyth P (1996) Knowledge discovery and data mining: towards a unifying framework. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD), Portland, pp 82–88

Heikki M (1996) Data mining: machine learning, statistics, and databases. In: SSDBM ’96: proceedings of the eighth international conference on scientific and statistical database management, June 1996, pp 2–9

Arora RK, Gupta MK (2017) e-Governance using data warehousing and data mining. Int J Comput Appl 169(8):28–31

Google Scholar  

Morik K, Bhaduri K, Kargupta H (2011) Introduction to data mining for sustainability. Data Min Knowl Discov 24(2):311–324

Han J, Kamber M, Pei J (2012) Data mining concepts and techniques, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Netherlands

MATH   Google Scholar  

Friedman JH (1997) Data mining and statistics: What is the connection? in: Keynote Speech of the 29th Symposium on the Interface: Computing Science and Statistics, Houston, TX, 1997

Turban E, Aronson JE, Liang TP, Sharda R (2007) Decision support and business intelligence systems. 8 th edn, Pearson Education, UK

Gheware SD, Kejkar AS, Tondare SM (2014) Data mining: tasks, tools, techniques and applications. Int J Adv Res Comput Commun Eng 3(10):8095–8098

Kiranmai B, Damodaram A (2014) A review on evaluation measures for data mining tasks. Int J Eng Comput Sci 3(7):7217–7220

Sharma M (2014) Data mining: a literature survey. Int J Emerg Res Manag Technol 3(2):1–4

Venkatadri M, Reddy LC (2011) A review on data mining from past to the future. Int J Comput Appl 15(7):19–22

Chen M, Han J, Yu PS (1996) Data mining: an overview from a database perspective. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 8(6):866–883

Gupta MK, Chandra P (2019) A comparative study of clustering algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 13th INDIACom-2019; IEEE Conference ID: 461816; 6th International Conference on “Computing for Sustainable Global Development”

Ponniah P (2001) Data warehousing fundamentals. Wiley, USA

Chandra P, Gupta MK (2018) Comprehensive survey on data warehousing research. Int J Inform Technol 10(2):217–224

Weiss SH, Indurkhya N (1998) Predictive data mining: a practical guide. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco

Fu Y (1997) Data mining: tasks, techniques, and applications. IEEE Potentials 16(4):18–20

Abuaiadah D (2015) Using bisect k-means clustering technique in the analysis of arabic documents. ACM Trans Asian Low-Resour Lang Inf Process 15(3):1–17

Algergawy A, Mesiti M, Nayak R, Saake G (2011) XML data clustering: an overview. ACM Comput Surv 43(4):1–25

Angiulli F, Fassetti F (2013) Exploiting domain knowledge to detect outliers. Data Min Knowl Discov 28(2):519–568

MathSciNet   MATH   Google Scholar  

Angiulli F, Fassetti F (2016) Toward generalizing the unification with statistical outliers: the gradient outlier factor measure. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 10(3):1–26

Bhatnagar V, Ahuja S, Kaur S (2015) Discriminant analysis-based cluster ensemble. Int J Data Min Modell Manag 7(2):83–107

Bouguessa M (2013) Clustering categorical data in projected spaces. Data Min Knowl Discov 29(1):3–38

MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Campello RJGB, Moulavi D, Zimek A, Sander J (2015) Hierarchical density estimates for data clustering, visualization, and outlier detection. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 10(1):1–51

Carpineto C, Osinski S, Romano G, Weiss D (2009) A survey of web clustering engines. ACM Comput. Surv. 41(3):1–38

Ceglar A, Roddick JF (2006) Association mining. ACM Comput Surv 38(2):1–42

Chen YL, Weng CH (2009) Mining fuzzy association rules from questionnaire data. Knowl Based Syst 22(1):46–56

Fan Chin-Yuan, Fan Pei-Shu, Chan Te-Yi, Chang Shu-Hao (2012) Using hybrid data mining and machine learning clustering analysis to predict the turnover rate for technology professionals. Expert Syst Appl 39:8844–8851

Das R, Kalita J, Bhattacharya (2011) A pattern matching approach for clustering gene expression data. Int J Data Min Model Manag 3(2):130–149

Dincer E (2006) The k-means algorithm in data mining and an application in medicine. Kocaeli Univesity, Kocaeli

Geng L, Hamilton HJ (2006) Interestingness measures for data mining: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 38(3):1–32

Gupta MK, Chandra P (2019) P-k-means: k-means using partition based cluster initialization method. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advancements in computing and management (ICACM 2019), Elsevier SSRN, pp 567–573

Gupta MK, Chandra P (2019) An empirical evaluation of k-means clustering algorithm using different distance/similarity metrics. In: Proceedings of the international conference on emerging trends in information technology (ICETIT-2019), emerging trends in information technology, LNEE 605 pp 884–892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30577-2_79

Hea Z, Xua X, Huangb JZ, Denga S (2004) Mining class outliers: concepts, algorithms and applications in CRM. Expert Syst Appl 27(4):681e97

Hung LN, Thu TNT, Nguyen GC (2015) An efficient algorithm in mining frequent itemsets with weights over data stream using tree data structure. IJ Intell Syst Appl 12:23–31

Hung LN, Thu TNT (2016) Mining frequent itemsets with weights over data stream using inverted matrix. IJ Inf Technol Comput Sci 10:63–71

Jain AK, Murty MN, Flynn PJ (1999) Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput. Surv 31(3):1–60

Jin H, Wang S, Zhou Q, Li Y (2014) An improved method for density-based clustering. Int J Data Min Model Manag 6(4):347–368

Khandare A, Alvi AS (2017) Performance analysis of improved clustering algorithm on real and synthetic data. IJ Comput Netw Inf Secur 10:57–65

Koh YS, Ravana SD (2016) Unsupervised rare pattern mining: a survey. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 10(4):1–29

Kosina P, Gama J (2015) Very fast decision rules for classification in data streams. Data Min Knowl Discov 29(1):168–202

Kotsiantis SB (2007) Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques. Informatica 31:249–268

Kumar D, Bezdek JC, Rajasegarar S, Palaniswami M, Leckie C, Chan J, Gubbi J (2016) Adaptive cluster tendency visualization and anomaly detection for streaming data. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 11(2):1–24

Lee G, Yun U (2017) A new efficient approach for mining uncertain frequent patterns using minimum data structure without false positives. Future Gener Comput Syst 68:89–110

Li G, Zaki MJ (2015) Sampling frequent and minimal boolean patterns: theory and application in classification. Data Min Knowl Discov 30(1):181–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-015-0409-y

Article   MathSciNet   MATH   Google Scholar  

Liao TW, Triantaphyllou E (2007) Recent advances in data mining of enterprise data: algorithms and applications. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp 111–145

Mabroukeh NR, Ezeife CI (2010) A taxonomy of sequential pattern mining algorithms. ACM Comput Surv 43:1

Mampaey M, Vreeken J (2011) Summarizing categorical data by clustering attributes. Data Min Knowl Discov 26(1):130–173

Menardi G, Torelli N (2012) Training and assessing classification rules with imbalanced data. Data Min Knowl Discov 28(1):4–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-012-0295-5

Mukhopadhyay A, Maulik U, Bandyopadhyay S (2015) A survey of multiobjective evolutionary clustering. ACM Comput Surv 47(4):1–46

Pei Y, Fern XZ, Tjahja TV, Rosales R (2016) ‘Comparing clustering with pairwise and relative constraints: a unified framework. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 11:2

Rafalak M, Deja M, Wierzbicki A, Nielek R, Kakol M (2016) Web content classification using distributions of subjective quality evaluations. ACM Trans Web 10:4

Reddy D, Jana PK (2014) A new clustering algorithm based on Voronoi diagram. Int J Data Min Model Manag 6(1):49–64

Rustogi S, Sharma M, Morwal S (2017) Improved Parallel Apriori Algorithm for Multi-cores. IJ Inf Technol Comput Sci 4:18–23

Shah-Hosseini H (2013) Improving K-means clustering algorithm with the intelligent water drops (IWD) algorithm. Int J Data Min Model Manag 5(4):301–317

Silva JA, Faria ER, Barros RC, Hruschka ER, de Carvalho ACPLF, Gama J (2013) Data stream clustering: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 46(1):1–31

Silva A, Antunes C (2014) Multi-relational pattern mining over data streams. Data Min Knowl Discov 29(6):1783–1814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-014-0394-6

Sim K, Gopalkrishnan V, Zimek A, Cong G (2012) A survey on enhanced subspace clustering. Data Min Knowl Discov 26(2):332–397

Sohrabi MK, Roshani R (2017) Frequent itemset mining using cellular learning automata. Comput Hum Behav 68:244–253

Craw Susan, Wiratunga Nirmalie, Rowe Ray C (2006) Learning adaptation knowledge to improve case-based reasoning. Artif Intell 170:1175–1192

Tan KC, Teoh EJ, Yua Q, Goh KC (2009) A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for attribute selection in data mining. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):8616–8630

Tew C, Giraud-Carrier C, Tanner K, Burton S (2013) Behavior-based clustering and analysis of interestingness measures for association rule mining. Data Min Knowl Discov 28(4):1004–1045

Wang L, Dong M (2015) Exemplar-based low-rank matrix decomposition for data clustering. Data Min Knowl Discov 29:324–357

Wang F, Sun J (2014) Survey on distance metric learning and dimensionality reduction in data mining. Data Min Knowl Discov 29:534–564

Wang B, Rahal I, Dong A (2011) Parallel hierarchical clustering using weighted confidence affinity. Int J Data Min Model Manag 3(2):110–129

Zacharis NZ (2018) Classification and regression trees (CART) for predictive modeling in blended learning. IJ Intell Syst Appl 3:1–9

Zhang W, Li R, Feng D, Chernikov A, Chrisochoides N, Osgood C, Ji S (2015) Evolutionary soft co-clustering: formulations, algorithms, and applications. Data Min Knowl Discov 29:765–791

Han J, Fu Y (1996) Exploration of the power of attribute-oriented induction in data mining. Adv Knowl Discov Data Min. AAAI/MIT Press, pp 399-421

Gupta A, Mumick IS (1995) Maintenance of materialized views: problems, techniques, and applications. IEEE Data Eng Bull 18(2):3

Sawant V, Shah K (2013) A review of distributed data mining using agents. Int J Adv Technol Eng Res 3(5):27–33

Gupta MK, Chandra P (2019) An efficient approach for selection of initial cluster centroids for k-means clustering algorithm. In: Proceedings international conference on recent developments in science engineering and technology (REDSET-2019), November 15–16 2019

Gupta MK, Chandra P (2019) MP-K-means: modified partition based cluster initialization method for k-means algorithm. Int J Recent Technol Eng 8(4):1140–1148

Gupta MK, Chandra P (2019) HYBCIM: hypercube based cluster initialization method for k-means. IJ Innov Technol Explor Eng 8(10):3584–3587. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.j9774.0881019

Article   Google Scholar  

Enke David, Thawornwong Suraphan (2005) The use of data mining and neural networks for forecasting stock market returns. Expert Syst Appl 29:927–940

Mezyk Edward, Unold Olgierd (2011) Machine learning approach to model sport training. Comput Hum Behav 27:1499–1506

Esling P, Agon C (2012) Time-series data mining. ACM Comput Surv 45(1):1–34

Hüllermeier Eyke (2005) Fuzzy methods in machine learning and data mining: status and prospects. Fuzzy Sets Syst 156:387–406

Hullermeier Eyke (2011) Fuzzy sets in machine learning and data mining. Appl Soft Comput 11:1493–1505

Gengshen Du, Ruhe Guenther (2014) Two machine-learning techniques for mining solutions of the ReleasePlanner™ decision support system. Inf Sci 259:474–489

Smith Kate A, Gupta Jatinder ND (2000) Neural networks in business: techniques and applications for the operations researcher. Comput Oper Res 27:1023–1044

Huang Mu-Jung, Tsou Yee-Lin, Lee Show-Chin (2006) Integrating fuzzy data mining and fuzzy artificial neural networks for discovering implicit knowledge. Knowl Based Syst 19:396–403

Padhraic S (2000) Data mining: analysis on grand scale. Stat Method Med Res 9(4):309–327. https://doi.org/10.1191/096228000701555181

Article   MATH   Google Scholar  

Saeed S, Ali M (2012) Privacy-preserving back-propagation and extreme learning machine algorithms. Data Knowl Eng 79–80:40–61

Singh Y, Bhatia PK, Sangwan OP (2007) A review of studies on machine learning techniques. Int J Comput Sci Secur 1(1):70–84

Yahia ME, El-taher ME (2010) A new approach for evaluation of data mining techniques. Int J Comput Sci Issues 7(5):181–186

Jackson J (2002) Data mining: a conceptual overview. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 8:267–296

Heckerman D (1998) A tutorial on learning with Bayesian networks. Learning in graphical models. Springer, Netherlands, pp 301–354

Politano PM, Walton RO (2017) Statistics & research methodol. Lulu. com

Wetherill GB (1987) Regression analysis with application. Chapman & Hall Ltd, UK

Anderberg MR (2014) Cluster analysis for applications: probability and mathematical statistics: a series of monographs and textbooks, vol 19. Academic Press, USA

Mihoci A (2017) Modelling limit order book volume covariance structures. In: Hokimoto T (ed) Advances in statistical methodologies and their application to real problems. IntechOpen, Croatia. https://doi.org/10.5772/66152

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Thompson B (2004) Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (ISBN:1-59147-093-5)

Kuzey C, Uyar A, Delen (2014) The impact of multinationality on firm value: a comparative analysis of machine learning techniques. Decis Support Syst 59:127–142

Chan Philip K, Salvatore JS (1997) On the accuracy of meta-learning for scalable data mining. J Intell Inf Syst 8:5–28

Tsai Chih-Fong, Hsu Yu-Feng, Lin Chia-Ying, Lin Wei-Yang (2009) Intrusion detection by machine learning: a review. Expert Syst Appl 36:11994–12000

Liao SH, Chu PH, Hsiao PY (2012) Data mining techniques and applications—a decade review from 2000 to 2011. Expert Syst Appl 39:11303–11311

Kanevski M, Parkin R, Pozdnukhov A, Timonin V, Maignan M, Demyanov V, Canu S (2004) Environmental data mining and modelling based on machine learning algorithms and geostatistics. Environ Model Softw 19:845–855

Jain N, Srivastava V (2013) Data mining techniques: a survey paper. Int J Res Eng Technol 2(11):116–119

Baker RSJ (2010) Data mining for education. In: McGaw B, Peterson P, Baker E (eds) International encyclopedia of education, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, UK

Lew A, Mauch H (2006) Introduction to data mining and its applications. Springer, Berlin

Mukherjee S, Shaw R, Haldar N, Changdar S (2015) A survey of data mining applications and techniques. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol 6(5):4663–4666

Data mining examples: most common applications of data mining (2019). https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/data-mining-examples/ . Accessed 27 Dec 2019

Devi SVSG (2013) Applications and trends in data mining. Orient J Comput Sci Technol 6(4):413–419

Data mining—applications & trends. https://www.tutorialspoint.com/data_mining/dm_applications_trends.htm

Keleş MK (2017) An overview: the impact of data mining applications on various sectors. Tech J 11(3):128–132

Top 14 useful applications for data mining. https://bigdata-madesimple.com/14-useful-applications-of-data-mining/ . Accessed 20 Aug 2014

Yang Q, Wu X (2006) 10 challenging problems in data mining research. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 5(4):597–604

Padhy N, Mishra P, Panigrahi R (2012) A survey of data mining applications and future scope. Int J Comput Sci Eng Inf Technol 2(3):43–58

Gibert K, Sanchez-Marre M, Codina V (2010) Choosing the right data mining technique: classification of methods and intelligent recommendation. In: International Congress on Environment Modelling and Software Modelling for Environment’s Sake, Fifth Biennial Meeting, Ottawa, Canada

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University School of Information, Communication and Technology, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Sector-16C, Dwarka, Delhi, 110078, India

Manoj Kumar Gupta & Pravin Chandra

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoj Kumar Gupta .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Gupta, M.K., Chandra, P. A comprehensive survey of data mining. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 12 , 1243–1257 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-020-00427-7

Download citation

Received : 29 June 2019

Accepted : 20 January 2020

Published : 06 February 2020

Issue Date : December 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-020-00427-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Data mining techniques
• Data mining tasks
• Data mining applications
• Classification
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

An Overview of Data Mining -A Survey Paper

• February 2018

• Madras Christian College
• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Abstract and Figures

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• M. Vasumathy
• Ujjwal Agarwal
• G. Divyamrutha

• Delyana Dimova

• Micheline Kamber
• . K S Deepashri
• Ashwini Kamath
• R Tamilselvi
• S Kalaiselvi
• Sonali Gandhi
• Swetha Shetty
• Aarti Sharma
• Rahul Sharma
• Vishal Sharma
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up