critical thinking disposition inventory 2001

Filter Instruments by Category

• Student Well-Being (138)
• Academic Knowledge and Skills (92)
• Schooling (78)
• Home and Community (25)

Sub-Category

• Social-Emotional Competence (109)
• Teaching (52)
• English Language Arts (40)
• School Climate (26)
• Parenting (25)
• College Readiness (22)
• Belonging (14)
• Mental Health (7)
• Neurodiversity (7)
• Child Development (6)
• < 3 Years (17)
• Pre-Kindergarten (45)
• Kindergarten (116)
• 1st Grade (126)
• 2nd Grade (129)
• 3rd Grade (145)
• 4th Grade (145)
• 5th Grade (152)
• 6th Grade (177)
• 7th Grade (179)
• 8th Grade (188)
• 9th Grade (187)
• 10th Grade (188)
• 11th Grade (192)
• 12th Grade (193)
• Post secondary (102)

California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI)

The CCTDI (P. A. Facione & N. C. Facione, 1992) was developed, validated, and used to assess students’ disposition toward critical thinking (CT). It consisted of 75 statements, divided into seven subscales: Truth-seeking, Open-mindedness, Analyticity, Systematicity, Self-confidence, Inquisitiveness, and Maturity. Responses were made on a 6-point Likert-type scale. The CCTDI reports a total score, which is the sum of its seven subscales, ranging from 70 to 420. A total score more than 280 indicates a positive overall disposition toward CT. The development and validation process is described in P. A. Facione and N. C. Facione (1992).

Curiosity, Systemicity, Analyticity, Integrity, Confidence, Critical Thinking

Administration Information

For reasons of test security and to protect the testing programs of our institutional and industry clients, we restrict purchase of certain of our testing products to qualified professionals and researchers as indicated on our website.

Access and Use

Price quotes available (*can be purchased with CCTST)

California Academic Press Insight Assessment 650-697-5628 1735 N 1st Street, Suite 306 San Jose, CA 95112-4511 USA

Facione, P. A., Sanchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking.  The Journal of General Education ,  44 (1), 1-25.  https://www.jstor.org/stable/27797240

Laird, T. F. N. (2005). College students’ experiences with diversity and their effects on academic self-confidence, social agency, and disposition toward critical thinking.  Research in Higher Education ,  46 (4), 365-387.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-2966-1

Ordem, E. (2017). Developing critical-thinking dispositions in a listening/speaking class.  English Language Teaching ,  10 (1), 50-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n1p50

Unlu, Z. K., & Dokme, I. (2017). Science teacher candidates' epistemological beliefs and critical thinking disposition.  Eurasian Journal of Educational Research ,  72 , 203-220. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejer/issue/42492/511913

Psychometrics

Bondy, K. N., Koenigseder, L. A., Ishee, J. H., & Williams, B. G. (2001). Psychometric properties of the California critical thinking tests.  Journal of Nursing Measurement ,  9 (3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.9.3.309

Facione, N. C., Facione, P. A., & Sanchez, C. A. (1994). Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory.  Journal of Nursing Education ,  33 (8), 345-350.  https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19941001-05

Kakai, H. (2003). Re-examining the factor structure of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory.  Perceptual and motor skills ,  96 (2), 435-438.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.96.2.435

Walsh, C. M. & Hardy, R. C. (1997). Factor structure stability of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory across sex and various students’ majors.  Perceptual & Motor Skills ,  85 (3), 1211–1228.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.85.3f.1211

Yeh, M. L. (2002). Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory.  International Journal of Nursing Studies ,  39 (2), 123-132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(01)00019-0  

Psychometric Considerations

Psychometrics is the science of psychological assessment. A primary goal of EdInstruments is to provide information on crucial psychometric topics including Validity and Reliability – essential concepts of evaluation, which indicate how well an instrument measures a construct - as well as additional properties that are worthy of consideration when selecting an instrument of measurement.

 Learn more

You are using an outdated browser.

• About Wabash
• Majors & More
• Admissions & Aid
• Student Life
• Give to Wabash
• Event Calendar
• Directories
• Wabash Employment
• Alumni & Friends
• Parents & Families

by Thomas F. Nelson Laird, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research

Summer 2005

Highlights of the CCTDI:

• Straightforward 75-question survey; relatively inexpensive to administer; takes about 20 minutes to complete; questionnaire can be completed by paper and pencil or online.
• Survey addresses the "dispositional" dimension of critical thinking—as opposed to the "skills" dimension, which is evaluated in the Critical Thinking Skills Test ( CCTST ). Survey assesses how students feel they approach these seven qualities: truth-seeking, open-mindedness, analytical tendencies, systematic tendencies, critical thinking self-confidence, inquisitiveness, and cognitive maturity.

Uses of the CCTDI:

• As a one-time test to gain understanding of how students view themselves as critical thinkers. Students’ strengths toward critical thinking are noted and areas for improvement identified.  
• As a pre- and post-test of a particular curricular or co-curricular experience in order to study how a student’s attitude toward critical thinking develops in relation to that experience.  
• Can be combined with demographic surveys to examine the relationship between student attitudes toward critical thinking and student characteristics (such as socioeconomic status or major).

Jill Cellars Rogers Center of Inquiry in the Liberal Arts at Wabash College

Introduction

The ideal critical thinker is habitually inquisitive, well-informed, trustful of reason, open-minded, flexible, fair-minded in evaluation, honest in facing personal biases, prudent in making judgments, willing to reconsider, clear about issues, orderly in complex matters, diligent in seeking relevant information, reasonable in the selection of criteria, focused in inquiry, and persistent in seeking results that are as precise as the subject and the circumstances of inquiry permit.                                           – American Philosophical Association, The Delphi Report [1]

Experts from several fields agree that a critical thinker must possess both a set of thinking skills and the habits of mind necessary to use those skills. The California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory ( CCTDI ) is a survey instrument designed to measure whether a person habitually exhibits the mindset of an ideal critical thinker. (A companion survey, the California Critical Thinking Skills Test, measures actual critical thinking skills.) The CCTDI, a 75-item questionnaire designed by Peter and Noreen Facione, is available through Insight Assessment (formerly the California Academic Press). The survey is designed for use with students in postsecondary settings (undergraduate, graduate, and professional) and with adults outside of educational environments. The CCTDI is used for student assessment as well as program evaluation, professional development, and training.

The following review provides a summary of several aspects of the CCTDI, including how it is used, how much it costs, what it measures, how it can be used for the purposes of student assessment, and why someone would use it when assessing liberal arts education.  

Administration and Cost

The CCTDI must be ordered from Insight Assessment. It is a tool that can be used with groups of any size (a class, a department, or an entire campus). It is available in paper form or as a web-based survey. Either version takes 20 minutes or less to complete. A "specimen kit" containing a manual, a copy of the instrument, and a copy of the fill-in answer form is available for purchase ($60). For those seriously considering using the CCTDI, it is advisable to obtain the specimen kit prior to ordering the surveys and answer sheets. The manual describes the survey’s history and properties as well as procedures for its administration.

Paper Version

The paper version of test/tool booklets (six-page documents that contain directions and the 75 statements about which students will rate their level of agreement/disagreement) and answer forms (scannable forms on which students fill in bubbles corresponding to their responses) must be ordered. At this writing, answer forms can be ordered in bundles of 25 ($150), 50 ($275), or 100 ($485). Because the booklets are separate from the answer forms, they can be used more than once. For this reason, answer forms can also be ordered on their own in packets of 25 ($110), 50 ($190), and 100 ($335).

Booklets and answer forms are shipped to the purchaser, who determines to whom and how the CCTDI will be administered (e.g., in class, by mail, at orientation). A student filling out the paper form will receive a test/tool booklet and an answer form. Answer forms are then collected from the students and shipped back to Insight Assessment, where they are scanned and scored using a system called CapScore. Insight Assessment then sends the investigator a data file and a report summarizing the survey results.

Online Version

To use the online version, an order needs to be placed with Insight Assessment. The cost is $6 per student. The software application is made available to the administrator by Insight Assessment and needs to be set up on a computer or group of computers. (For specifics on the application or for a demo version contact Insight Assessment.) The software application administers the CCTDI and compiles students’ responses. The data and reporting of the results are available instantly. The system can also be set up to give each student a critical thinking "dispositions profile" immediately upon completion of the instrument. A computer lab is an ideal setting for administering the online version.

About the CCTDI

In 1990, with sponsorship from the American Philosophical Association, a group of scholars from several disciplines developed a definition of critical thinking that had a skills dimension and a dispositional (i.e., affective and attitudinal) dimension. Building on the scholars' definition regarding the habits of mind of an ideal critical thinker, Peter and Noreen Facione developed and tested the CCTDI as a measure of the dispositional side of critical thinking. In its final form, the CCTDI has 75 items. Each respondent can choose from six responses, ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." Since 1990, the CCTDI have been developed in several languages, including English, Spanish, and Chinese. The instrument uses seven sub-scales to capture different aspects of the disposition to think critically: truth-seeking, open-mindedness, critical thinking self-confidence, inquisitiveness, cognitive maturity, and the inclination to analyze and systematize. (For a brief definition of each, visit Insight Assessment.) Examples of survey items are listed below, under the corresponding sub-scale.

Example Items for Each CCTDI Sub-scale

The CCTDI total score is the sum of the scores for each of the seven sub-scales. The total score indicates whether a person is generally disposed to think critically—whether the individual habitually exhibits the characteristics of an ideal critical thinker. The total score ranges from 70 to 420. Students who score less than 210 are defined as negatively disposed toward critical thinking, students with scores between 210 and 280 are defined as ambivalently disposed, and students with scores above 280 are defined as positively disposed. [4,6]  The score range for each of the seven sub-scales is from 10–40, and students can be considered negatively (scores less than 30), ambivalently (scores between 30 and 40), or positively (scores greater than 40) disposed to each of the characteristics.

The CCTDI has been tested by its developers and by several independent researchers. [2, 4, 6, 7, 9] Among those who have examined the instrument, there is general agreement that the survey validly and reliably measures the disposition toward critical thinking and is therefore appropriate for inclusion in research and assessment. In contrast to some of the findings of the survey developers, several researchers have identified concerns about the appropriate number of sub-scales and some of the statistical properties of particular sub-scales. [2, 7, 9]  Further work is needed to review these concerns, though the issues raised do not appear to be serious, and using the seven sub-scales defined by the instrument’s authors still appears to be appropriate.

How the CCTDI Can Be Used in Assessment

The CCTDI can be used at a single point in time to gain an understanding of how students view themselves as critical thinkers. This information can be useful in determining whether individual students or groups of students have the dispositions deemed necessary for a class, at the end of a program, or for entry into a particular professional setting. For example, in the field of nursing, which has recommended CCTDI scores [3] , it may be useful to know a student's disposition toward critical thinking upon entry into a program or prior to his or her entry into a clinical setting. Scores can be used to identify strengths and areas for improvement. (A person's predisposition and motivation to think critically is interrelated with actual critical thinking ability; both work together to create a critical thinker. Therefore, institutions interested in assessing critical thinking characteristics of their students might choose to consider using both the CCTDI for attitude and the CCTST for ability.)

In addition, the instrument can be used to test how an experience or set of experiences influence students’ dispositions toward critical thinking. Positive changes in individual predisposition to critical thinking linked to curricular programs have been demonstrated. Students can be tested in their first year of college and again at the end of their senior year to determine how the entire collegiate experience affected their dispositions to think critically. [6] One can also test the effects of specific collegiate programs, courses, or experiences. For this purpose, it is important to measure carefully different student characteristics and differences in what students have done at college in addition to the experiences under study. In one of my own studies [8] , I looked at the effects of students’ experiences with diversity on several outcomes, including the disposition toward critical thinking, as measured by the CCTDI.

The CCTDI is useful because it is a relatively short survey that captures a meaningful concept (the disposition to think critically) with clear connections to valued educational outcomes. It is adaptable to different settings and can be administered to any size group. For these reasons, it can play a valuable role in the assessment of a liberal arts education. However, because it measures a single outcome, the CCTDI is most helpful when combined with information gathered from other instruments and methods. It is a valuable tool to keep in one’s assessment "toolkit."

References  

• American Philosophical Association. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report Executive Summary: Research findings and recommendations prepared for the committee on pre-college philosophy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED315423)
• Bondy, K. N., Koenigseder, L. A., Ishee, J. H., & Williams, B. G. (2001). Psychometric properties of the California critical thinking tests. Journal of Nursing Measurement , 9, 309–328.
• Facione, N. C. & Facione, P. A. (1997). Critical thinking assessment in nursing education programs: An aggregate data analysis . Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.
• Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. (1998). The California critical thinking disposition inventory test manual (Revised) . Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.
• Facione, P. A., Sánchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 44 , 1–25.
• Giancarlo, C. A. & Facione, P. A. (2001). A look across four years at the disposition toward critical thinking among undergraduate students. The Journal of General Education , 50 , 29–55.
• Kakai, H. (2003). Re-examining the factor structure of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 96 , 435–438.
• Nelson Laird, T. F. (2005). College students’ experiences with diversity and their effects on academic self-confidence, social agency, and disposition toward critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 46 , 365–387.
• Walsh, C. M. & Hardy, R. C. (1997). Factor structure stability of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory across sex and various students’ majors. Perceptual & Motor Skills , 85 , 1211–1228.  
• The Bachelor
• Audio Podcasts
• ‘Wabash is home’: Fathers and Sons return for Big Bash
• Big Bash 2024!
• 2024 Trustee Election Results Announced
• Phillips Scholarship Draws Southwest Students to Wabash
• Stephenson Institute for Classical Liberalism Dedicated

News Archives

Wabash College Communications and Marketing

Video player.

•   UMB Digital Archive
• School, Graduate
• Theses and Dissertations All Schools

Translation and validation of the California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory

Description, identifier to cite or link to this item, collections.

entitlement

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: the development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory

Affiliation.

• 1 Department of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, UCSF 94143.
• PMID: 7799093
• DOI: 10.3928/0148-4834-19941001-05

Assessing critical thinking skills and disposition is crucial in nursing education and research. The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI) uses the Delphi Report's consensus definition of critical thinking as the theoretical basis to measure critical thinking disposition. Item analysis and factor analysis techniques were used to create seven disposition scales, which grouped the Delphi dispositional descriptions into larger, more unified constructs: open-mindedness, analyticity, cognitive maturity, truth-seeking, systematicity, inquisitiveness, and self-confidence. Cronbach's alpha for the overall instrument, the disposition toward critical thinking, is .92. The 75-item instrument was administered to an additional sample of college students (N = 1019). The alpha levels in the second sample remained relatively stable, ranging from .60 to .78 on the subscales and .90 overall. The instrument has subsequently been used to assess critical thinking disposition in high school through the graduate level but is targeted primarily for the college undergraduates. Administration time is 20 minutes. Correlation with its companion instrument, the California Critical Thinking Skills Test, also based on the Delphi critical thinking construct, was measured at .66 and .67 in two pilot sample groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Development and validation of the critical thinking disposition inventory for Chinese medical college students (CTDI-M). Wang X, Sun X, Huang T, He R, Hao W, Zhang L. Wang X, et al. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1593-z. BMC Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 31196183 Free PMC article.
• The effectiveness of concept mapping on development of critical thinking in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Yue M, Zhang M, Zhang C, Jin C. Yue M, et al. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 May;52:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Nurse Educ Today. 2017. PMID: 28273528 Review.
• A prospective study on the development of critical thinking skills for student prosthetists and orthotists in Hong Kong. Wong MS. Wong MS. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007 Jun;31(2):138-46. doi: 10.1080/03093640600983931. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007. PMID: 17520491
• Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Yeh ML. Yeh ML. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002 Feb;39(2):123-32. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(01)00019-0. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002. PMID: 11755443
• A critical thinking model for nursing judgment. Kataoka-Yahiro M, Saylor C. Kataoka-Yahiro M, et al. J Nurs Educ. 1994 Oct;33(8):351-6. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19941001-06. J Nurs Educ. 1994. PMID: 7799094 Review.
• Optimizing Intent to Transfer: Engagement and Community College English Learners. Hartman C, Callahan R, Yu H. Hartman C, et al. Res High Educ. 2021 Sep;62(6):789-828. doi: 10.1007/s11162-020-09619-3. Epub 2021 Jan 1. Res High Educ. 2021. PMID: 38283943 Free PMC article.
• Insight from the association between critical thinking and English argumentative writing: catering to English learners' writing ability. Hu Y, Saleem A. Hu Y, et al. PeerJ. 2023 Nov 20;11:e16435. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16435. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 38025684 Free PMC article.
• Critical thinking disposition of medical students in Anhui Province, China: a cross-sectional investigation. Zhai J, Zhang H. Zhai J, et al. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 8;23(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04646-x. BMC Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 37684599 Free PMC article.
• Exploring rumor behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic through an information processing perspective: The moderating role of critical thinking. Liu J, Liu X, Lai KH, Zhang X, Ma X. Liu J, et al. Comput Human Behav. 2023 Oct;147:107842. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107842. Epub 2023 Jun 18. Comput Human Behav. 2023. PMID: 37359713 Free PMC article.
• Building consensus on critical thinking assessment tool for undergraduate nursing students in a socialist low-middle income country: A delphi study. Hashimoto M, Horiuch S, Sisoulath A, Phanpaseuth S. Hashimoto M, et al. Heliyon. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):e15086. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15086. eCollection 2023 Apr. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37089344 Free PMC article.
• Search in MeSH

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Ovid Technologies, Inc.

• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

• DOI: 10.1177/07342829211048962
• Corpus ID: 246526932

California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory: Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis

• Published in Journal of Psychoeducational… 1 February 2022

Figures and Tables from this paper

6 Citations

Moderated mediating effects of gender among the components of critical thinking disposition in undergraduate students., a critical issue: assessing the critical thinking skills and dispositions of undergraduate health science students, effects of critical thinking disposition on foreign language proficiency in foreign language learning: evidence from china, impact of team-based learning on the development of critical thinking disposition in entry-level master's nursing students., gender differences in critical thinking and strategy use in english writing from sources among chinese efl undergraduates, trait emotional intelligence questionnaire short form (teique-sf): reliability generalization meta-analysis, 50 references, the inventory of callous unemotional traits: a reliability generalization meta-analysis., california critical thinking disposition inventory: further factor analytic examination.

• Highly Influential

Psychometric Properties of the California Critical Thinking Tests

Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: the development of the california critical thinking disposition inventory..

• 12 Excerpts

Factor Structure Stability of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory across Sex and Various Students' Majors

Reliability generalization as a seal of quality of substantive meta-analyses: the case of the via inventory of strengths (via-is) and their relationships to life satisfaction, reliability generalization of the meaning in life questionnaire subscales, the relationship of critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students., re-examining the factor structure of the california critical thinking disposition inventory, reliability generalization: exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers