quantitative research thematic analysis

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• How to Do Thematic Analysis | Guide & Examples

How to Do Thematic Analysis | Guide & Examples

Published on 5 May 2022 by Jack Caulfield .

Thematic analysis is a method of analysing qualitative data . It is usually applied to a set of texts, such as an interview or transcripts . The researcher closely examines the data to identify common themes, topics, ideas and patterns of meaning that come up repeatedly.

There are various approaches to conducting thematic analysis, but the most common form follows a six-step process:

• Familiarisation
• Generating themes
• Reviewing themes
• Defining and naming themes

This process was originally developed for psychology research by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke . However, thematic analysis is a flexible method that can be adapted to many different kinds of research.

Table of contents

When to use thematic analysis, different approaches to thematic analysis, step 1: familiarisation, step 2: coding, step 3: generating themes, step 4: reviewing themes, step 5: defining and naming themes, step 6: writing up.

Thematic analysis is a good approach to research where you’re trying to find out something about people’s views, opinions, knowledge, experiences, or values from a set of qualitative data – for example, interview transcripts , social media profiles, or survey responses .

Some types of research questions you might use thematic analysis to answer:

• How do patients perceive doctors in a hospital setting?
• What are young women’s experiences on dating sites?
• What are non-experts’ ideas and opinions about climate change?
• How is gender constructed in secondary school history teaching?

To answer any of these questions, you would collect data from a group of relevant participants and then analyse it. Thematic analysis allows you a lot of flexibility in interpreting the data, and allows you to approach large datasets more easily by sorting them into broad themes.

However, it also involves the risk of missing nuances in the data. Thematic analysis is often quite subjective and relies on the researcher’s judgement, so you have to reflect carefully on your own choices and interpretations.

Pay close attention to the data to ensure that you’re not picking up on things that are not there – or obscuring things that are.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Once you’ve decided to use thematic analysis, there are different approaches to consider.

There’s the distinction between inductive and deductive approaches:

• An inductive approach involves allowing the data to determine your themes.
• A deductive approach involves coming to the data with some preconceived themes you expect to find reflected there, based on theory or existing knowledge.

There’s also the distinction between a semantic and a latent approach:

• A semantic approach involves analysing the explicit content of the data.
• A latent approach involves reading into the subtext and assumptions underlying the data.

After you’ve decided thematic analysis is the right method for analysing your data, and you’ve thought about the approach you’re going to take, you can follow the six steps developed by Braun and Clarke .

The first step is to get to know our data. It’s important to get a thorough overview of all the data we collected before we start analysing individual items.

This might involve transcribing audio , reading through the text and taking initial notes, and generally looking through the data to get familiar with it.

Next up, we need to code the data. Coding means highlighting sections of our text – usually phrases or sentences – and coming up with shorthand labels or ‘codes’ to describe their content.

Let’s take a short example text. Say we’re researching perceptions of climate change among conservative voters aged 50 and up, and we have collected data through a series of interviews. An extract from one interview looks like this:

In this extract, we’ve highlighted various phrases in different colours corresponding to different codes. Each code describes the idea or feeling expressed in that part of the text.

At this stage, we want to be thorough: we go through the transcript of every interview and highlight everything that jumps out as relevant or potentially interesting. As well as highlighting all the phrases and sentences that match these codes, we can keep adding new codes as we go through the text.

After we’ve been through the text, we collate together all the data into groups identified by code. These codes allow us to gain a condensed overview of the main points and common meanings that recur throughout the data.

Next, we look over the codes we’ve created, identify patterns among them, and start coming up with themes.

Themes are generally broader than codes. Most of the time, you’ll combine several codes into a single theme. In our example, we might start combining codes into themes like this:

At this stage, we might decide that some of our codes are too vague or not relevant enough (for example, because they don’t appear very often in the data), so they can be discarded.

Other codes might become themes in their own right. In our example, we decided that the code ‘uncertainty’ made sense as a theme, with some other codes incorporated into it.

Again, what we decide will vary according to what we’re trying to find out. We want to create potential themes that tell us something helpful about the data for our purposes.

Now we have to make sure that our themes are useful and accurate representations of the data. Here, we return to the dataset and compare our themes against it. Are we missing anything? Are these themes really present in the data? What can we change to make our themes work better?

If we encounter problems with our themes, we might split them up, combine them, discard them, or create new ones: whatever makes them more useful and accurate.

For example, we might decide upon looking through the data that ‘changing terminology’ fits better under the ‘uncertainty’ theme than under ‘distrust of experts’, since the data labelled with this code involves confusion, not necessarily distrust.

Now that you have a final list of themes, it’s time to name and define each of them.

Defining themes involves formulating exactly what we mean by each theme and figuring out how it helps us understand the data.

Naming themes involves coming up with a succinct and easily understandable name for each theme.

For example, we might look at ‘distrust of experts’ and determine exactly who we mean by ‘experts’ in this theme. We might decide that a better name for the theme is ‘distrust of authority’ or ‘conspiracy thinking’.

Finally, we’ll write up our analysis of the data. Like all academic texts, writing up a thematic analysis requires an introduction to establish our research question, aims, and approach.

We should also include a methodology section, describing how we collected the data (e.g., through semi-structured interviews or open-ended survey questions ) and explaining how we conducted the thematic analysis itself.

The results or findings section usually addresses each theme in turn. We describe how often the themes come up and what they mean, including examples from the data as evidence. Finally, our conclusion explains the main takeaways and shows how the analysis has answered our research question.

In our example, we might argue that conspiracy thinking about climate change is widespread among older conservative voters, point out the uncertainty with which many voters view the issue, and discuss the role of misinformation in respondents’ perceptions.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Caulfield, J. (2022, May 05). How to Do Thematic Analysis | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 22 April 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/thematic-analysis-explained/

Is this article helpful?

Jack Caulfield

Other students also liked, qualitative vs quantitative research | examples & methods, inductive reasoning | types, examples, explanation, what is deductive reasoning | explanation & examples.

• - Google Chrome

Intended for healthcare professionals

• Access provided by Google Indexer
• My email alerts
• BMA member login
• Username * Password * Forgot your log in details? Need to activate BMA Member Log In Log in via OpenAthens Log in via your institution

Search form

• Advanced search
• Search responses
• Search blogs
• Practical thematic...

Practical thematic analysis: a guide for multidisciplinary health services research teams engaging in qualitative analysis

• Related content
• Peer review
• Catherine H Saunders , scientist and assistant professor 1 2 ,
• Ailyn Sierpe , research project coordinator 2 ,
• Christian von Plessen , senior physician 3 ,
• Alice M Kennedy , research project manager 2 4 ,
• Laura C Leviton , senior adviser 5 ,
• Steven L Bernstein , chief research officer 1 ,
• Jenaya Goldwag , resident physician 1 ,
• Joel R King , research assistant 2 ,
• Christine M Marx , patient associate 6 ,
• Jacqueline A Pogue , research project manager 2 ,
• Richard K Saunders , staff physician 1 ,
• Aricca Van Citters , senior research scientist 2 ,
• Renata W Yen , doctoral student 2 ,
• Glyn Elwyn , professor 2 ,
• JoAnna K Leyenaar , associate professor 1 2
• on behalf of the Coproduction Laboratory
• 1 Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, USA
• 2 Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
• 3 Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Lausanne, Switzerland
• 4 Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
• 5 Highland Park, NJ, USA
• 6 Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
• Correspondence to: C H Saunders catherine.hylas.saunders{at}dartmouth.edu
• Accepted 26 April 2023

Qualitative research methods explore and provide deep contextual understanding of real world issues, including people’s beliefs, perspectives, and experiences. Whether through analysis of interviews, focus groups, structured observation, or multimedia data, qualitative methods offer unique insights in applied health services research that other approaches cannot deliver. However, many clinicians and researchers hesitate to use these methods, or might not use them effectively, which can leave relevant areas of inquiry inadequately explored. Thematic analysis is one of the most common and flexible methods to examine qualitative data collected in health services research. This article offers practical thematic analysis as a step-by-step approach to qualitative analysis for health services researchers, with a focus on accessibility for patients, care partners, clinicians, and others new to thematic analysis. Along with detailed instructions covering three steps of reading, coding, and theming, the article includes additional novel and practical guidance on how to draft effective codes, conduct a thematic analysis session, and develop meaningful themes. This approach aims to improve consistency and rigor in thematic analysis, while also making this method more accessible for multidisciplinary research teams.

Through qualitative methods, researchers can provide deep contextual understanding of real world issues, and generate new knowledge to inform hypotheses, theories, research, and clinical care. Approaches to data collection are varied, including interviews, focus groups, structured observation, and analysis of multimedia data, with qualitative research questions aimed at understanding the how and why of human experience. 1 2 Qualitative methods produce unique insights in applied health services research that other approaches cannot deliver. In particular, researchers acknowledge that thematic analysis is a flexible and powerful method of systematically generating robust qualitative research findings by identifying, analysing, and reporting patterns (themes) within data. 3 4 5 6 Although qualitative methods are increasingly valued for answering clinical research questions, many researchers are unsure how to apply them or consider them too time consuming to be useful in responding to practical challenges 7 or pressing situations such as public health emergencies. 8 Consequently, researchers might hesitate to use them, or use them improperly. 9 10 11

Although much has been written about how to perform thematic analysis, practical guidance for non-specialists is sparse. 3 5 6 12 13 In the multidisciplinary field of health services research, qualitative data analysis can confound experienced researchers and novices alike, which can stoke concerns about rigor, particularly for those more familiar with quantitative approaches. 14 Since qualitative methods are an area of specialisation, support from experts is beneficial. However, because non-specialist perspectives can enhance data interpretation and enrich findings, there is a case for making thematic analysis easier, more rapid, and more efficient, 8 particularly for patients, care partners, clinicians, and other stakeholders. A practical guide to thematic analysis might encourage those on the ground to use these methods in their work, unearthing insights that would otherwise remain undiscovered.

Given the need for more accessible qualitative analysis approaches, we present a simple, rigorous, and efficient three step guide for practical thematic analysis. We include new guidance on the mechanics of thematic analysis, including developing codes, constructing meaningful themes, and hosting a thematic analysis session. We also discuss common pitfalls in thematic analysis and how to avoid them.

Summary points

Qualitative methods are increasingly valued in applied health services research, but multidisciplinary research teams often lack accessible step-by-step guidance and might struggle to use these approaches

A newly developed approach, practical thematic analysis, uses three simple steps: reading, coding, and theming

Based on Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis, our streamlined yet rigorous approach is designed for multidisciplinary health services research teams, including patients, care partners, and clinicians

This article also provides companion materials including a slide presentation for teaching practical thematic analysis to research teams, a sample thematic analysis session agenda, a theme coproduction template for use during the session, and guidance on using standardised reporting criteria for qualitative research

In their seminal work, Braun and Clarke developed a six phase approach to reflexive thematic analysis. 4 12 We built on their method to develop practical thematic analysis ( box 1 , fig 1 ), which is a simplified and instructive approach that retains the substantive elements of their six phases. Braun and Clarke’s phase 1 (familiarising yourself with the dataset) is represented in our first step of reading. Phase 2 (coding) remains as our second step of coding. Phases 3 (generating initial themes), 4 (developing and reviewing themes), and 5 (refining, defining, and naming themes) are represented in our third step of theming. Phase 6 (writing up) also occurs during this third step of theming, but after a thematic analysis session. 4 12

Key features and applications of practical thematic analysis

Step 1: reading.

All manuscript authors read the data

All manuscript authors write summary memos

Step 2: Coding

Coders perform both data management and early data analysis

Codes are complete thoughts or sentences, not categories

Step 3: Theming

Researchers host a thematic analysis session and share different perspectives

Themes are complete thoughts or sentences, not categories

Applications

For use by practicing clinicians, patients and care partners, students, interdisciplinary teams, and those new to qualitative research

When important insights from healthcare professionals are inaccessible because they do not have qualitative methods training

When time and resources are limited

Steps in practical thematic analysis

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

We present linear steps, but as qualitative research is usually iterative, so too is thematic analysis. 15 Qualitative researchers circle back to earlier work to check whether their interpretations still make sense in the light of additional insights, adapting as necessary. While we focus here on the practical application of thematic analysis in health services research, we recognise our approach exists in the context of the broader literature on thematic analysis and the theoretical underpinnings of qualitative methods as a whole. For a more detailed discussion of these theoretical points, as well as other methods widely used in health services research, we recommend reviewing the sources outlined in supplemental material 1. A strong and nuanced understanding of the context and underlying principles of thematic analysis will allow for higher quality research. 16

Practical thematic analysis is a highly flexible approach that can draw out valuable findings and generate new hypotheses, including in cases with a lack of previous research to build on. The approach can also be used with a variety of data, such as transcripts from interviews or focus groups, patient encounter transcripts, professional publications, observational field notes, and online activity logs. Importantly, successful practical thematic analysis is predicated on having high quality data collected with rigorous methods. We do not describe qualitative research design or data collection here. 11 17

In supplemental material 1, we summarise the foundational methods, concepts, and terminology in qualitative research. Along with our guide below, we include a companion slide presentation for teaching practical thematic analysis to research teams in supplemental material 2. We provide a theme coproduction template for teams to use during thematic analysis sessions in supplemental material 3. Our method aligns with the major qualitative reporting frameworks, including the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). 18 We indicate the corresponding step in practical thematic analysis for each COREQ item in supplemental material 4.

Familiarisation and memoing

We encourage all manuscript authors to review the full dataset (eg, interview transcripts) to familiarise themselves with it. This task is most critical for those who will later be engaged in the coding and theming steps. Although time consuming, it is the best way to involve team members in the intellectual work of data interpretation, so that they can contribute to the analysis and contextualise the results. If this task is not feasible given time limitations or large quantities of data, the data can be divided across team members. In this case, each piece of data should be read by at least two individuals who ideally represent different professional roles or perspectives.

We recommend that researchers reflect on the data and independently write memos, defined as brief notes on thoughts and questions that arise during reading, and a summary of their impressions of the dataset. 2 19 Memoing is an opportunity to gain insights from varying perspectives, particularly from patients, care partners, clinicians, and others. It also gives researchers the opportunity to begin to scope which elements of and concepts in the dataset are relevant to the research question.

Data saturation

The concept of data saturation ( box 2 ) is a foundation of qualitative research. It is defined as the point in analysis at which new data tend to be redundant of data already collected. 21 Qualitative researchers are expected to report their approach to data saturation. 18 Because thematic analysis is iterative, the team should discuss saturation throughout the entire process, beginning with data collection and continuing through all steps of the analysis. 22 During step 1 (reading), team members might discuss data saturation in the context of summary memos. Conversations about saturation continue during step 2 (coding), with confirmation that saturation has been achieved during step 3 (theming). As a rule of thumb, researchers can often achieve saturation in 9-17 interviews or 4-8 focus groups, but this will vary depending on the specific characteristics of the study. 23

Data saturation in context

Braun and Clarke discourage the use of data saturation to determine sample size (eg, number of interviews), because it assumes that there is an objective truth to be captured in the data (sometimes known as a positivist perspective). 20 Qualitative researchers often try to avoid positivist approaches, arguing that there is no one true way of seeing the world, and will instead aim to gather multiple perspectives. 5 Although this theoretical debate with qualitative methods is important, we recognise that a priori estimates of saturation are often needed, particularly for investigators newer to qualitative research who might want a more pragmatic and applied approach. In addition, saturation based, sample size estimation can be particularly helpful in grant proposals. However, researchers should still follow a priori sample size estimation with a discussion to confirm saturation has been achieved.

Definition of coding

We describe codes as labels for concepts in the data that are directly relevant to the study objective. Historically, the purpose of coding was to distil the large amount of data collected into conceptually similar buckets so that researchers could review it in aggregate and identify key themes. 5 24 We advocate for a more analytical approach than is typical with thematic analysis. With our method, coding is both the foundation for and the beginning of thematic analysis—that is, early data analysis, management, and reduction occur simultaneously rather than as different steps. This approach moves the team more efficiently towards being able to describe themes.

Building the coding team

Coders are the research team members who directly assign codes to the data, reading all material and systematically labelling relevant data with appropriate codes. Ideally, at least two researchers would code every discrete data document, such as one interview transcript. 25 If this task is not possible, individual coders can each code a subset of the data that is carefully selected for key characteristics (sometimes known as purposive selection). 26 When using this approach, we recommend that at least 10% of data be coded by two or more coders to ensure consistency in codebook application. We also recommend coding teams of no more than four to five people, for practical reasons concerning maintaining consistency.

Clinicians, patients, and care partners bring unique perspectives to coding and enrich the analytical process. 27 Therefore, we recommend choosing coders with a mix of relevant experiences so that they can challenge and contextualise each other’s interpretations based on their own perspectives and opinions ( box 3 ). We recommend including both coders who collected the data and those who are naive to it, if possible, given their different perspectives. We also recommend all coders review the summary memos from the reading step so that key concepts identified by those not involved in coding can be integrated into the analytical process. In practice, this review means coding the memos themselves and discussing them during the code development process. This approach ensures that the team considers a diversity of perspectives.

Coding teams in context

The recommendation to use multiple coders is a departure from Braun and Clarke. 28 29 When the views, experiences, and training of each coder (sometimes known as positionality) 30 are carefully considered, having multiple coders can enhance interpretation and enrich findings. When these perspectives are combined in a team setting, researchers can create shared meaning from the data. Along with the practical consideration of distributing the workload, 31 inclusion of these multiple perspectives increases the overall quality of the analysis by mitigating the impact of any one coder’s perspective. 30

Coding tools

Qualitative analysis software facilitates coding and managing large datasets but does not perform the analytical work. The researchers must perform the analysis themselves. Most programs support queries and collaborative coding by multiple users. 32 Important factors to consider when choosing software can include accessibility, cost, interoperability, the look and feel of code reports, and the ease of colour coding and merging codes. Coders can also use low tech solutions, including highlighters, word processors, or spreadsheets.

Drafting effective codes

To draft effective codes, we recommend that the coders review each document line by line. 33 As they progress, they can assign codes to segments of data representing passages of interest. 34 Coders can also assign multiple codes to the same passage. Consensus among coders on what constitutes a minimum or maximum amount of text for assigning a code is helpful. As a general rule, meaningful segments of text for coding are shorter than one paragraph, but longer than a few words. Coders should keep the study objective in mind when determining which data are relevant ( box 4 ).

Code types in context

Similar to Braun and Clarke’s approach, practical thematic analysis does not specify whether codes are based on what is evident from the data (sometimes known as semantic) or whether they are based on what can be inferred at a deeper level from the data (sometimes known as latent). 4 12 35 It also does not specify whether they are derived from the data (sometimes known as inductive) or determined ahead of time (sometimes known as deductive). 11 35 Instead, it should be noted that health services researchers conducting qualitative studies often adopt all these approaches to coding (sometimes known as hybrid analysis). 3

In practical thematic analysis, codes should be more descriptive than general categorical labels that simply group data with shared characteristics. At a minimum, codes should form a complete (or full) thought. An easy way to conceptualise full thought codes is as complete sentences with subjects and verbs ( table 1 ), although full sentence coding is not always necessary. With full thought codes, researchers think about the data more deeply and capture this insight in the codes. This coding facilitates the entire analytical process and is especially valuable when moving from codes to broader themes. Experienced qualitative researchers often intuitively use full thought or sentence codes, but this practice has not been explicitly articulated as a path to higher quality coding elsewhere in the literature. 6

Example transcript with codes used in practical thematic analysis 36

• View inline

Depending on the nature of the data, codes might either fall into flat categories or be arranged hierarchically. Flat categories are most common when the data deal with topics on the same conceptual level. In other words, one topic is not a subset of another topic. By contrast, hierarchical codes are more appropriate for concepts that naturally fall above or below each other. Hierarchical coding can also be a useful form of data management and might be necessary when working with a large or complex dataset. 5 Codes grouped into these categories can also make it easier to naturally transition into generating themes from the initial codes. 5 These decisions between flat versus hierarchical coding are part of the work of the coding team. In both cases, coders should ensure that their code structures are guided by their research questions.

Developing the codebook

A codebook is a shared document that lists code labels and comprehensive descriptions for each code, as well as examples observed within the data. Good code descriptions are precise and specific so that coders can consistently assign the same codes to relevant data or articulate why another coder would do so. Codebook development is iterative and involves input from the entire coding team. However, as those closest to the data, coders must resist undue influence, real or perceived, from other team members with conflicting opinions—it is important to mitigate the risk that more senior researchers, like principal investigators, exert undue influence on the coders’ perspectives.

In practical thematic analysis, coders begin codebook development by independently coding a small portion of the data, such as two to three transcripts or other units of analysis. Coders then individually produce their initial codebooks. This task will require them to reflect on, organise, and clarify codes. The coders then meet to reconcile the draft codebooks, which can often be difficult, as some coders tend to lump several concepts together while others will split them into more specific codes. Discussing disagreements and negotiating consensus are necessary parts of early data analysis. Once the codebook is relatively stable, we recommend soliciting input on the codes from all manuscript authors. Yet, coders must ultimately be empowered to finalise the details so that they are comfortable working with the codebook across a large quantity of data.

Assigning codes to the data

After developing the codebook, coders will use it to assign codes to the remaining data. While the codebook’s overall structure should remain constant, coders might continue to add codes corresponding to any new concepts observed in the data. If new codes are added, coders should review the data they have already coded and determine whether the new codes apply. Qualitative data analysis software can be useful for editing or merging codes.

We recommend that coders periodically compare their code occurrences ( box 5 ), with more frequent check-ins if substantial disagreements occur. In the event of large discrepancies in the codes assigned, coders should revise the codebook to ensure that code descriptions are sufficiently clear and comprehensive to support coding alignment going forward. Because coding is an iterative process, the team can adjust the codebook as needed. 5 28 29

Quantitative coding in context

Researchers should generally avoid reporting code counts in thematic analysis. However, counts can be a useful proxy in maintaining alignment between coders on key concepts. 26 In practice, therefore, researchers should make sure that all coders working on the same piece of data assign the same codes with a similar pattern and that their memoing and overall assessment of the data are aligned. 37 However, the frequency of a code alone is not an indicator of its importance. It is more important that coders agree on the most salient points in the data; reviewing and discussing summary memos can be helpful here. 5

Researchers might disagree on whether or not to calculate and report inter-rater reliability. We note that quantitative tests for agreement, such as kappa statistics or intraclass correlation coefficients, can be distracting and might not provide meaningful results in qualitative analyses. Similarly, Braun and Clarke argue that expecting perfect alignment on coding is inconsistent with the goal of co-constructing meaning. 28 29 Overall consensus on codes’ salience and contributions to themes is the most important factor.

Definition of themes

Themes are meta-constructs that rise above codes and unite the dataset ( box 6 , fig 2 ). They should be clearly evident, repeated throughout the dataset, and relevant to the research questions. 38 While codes are often explicit descriptions of the content in the dataset, themes are usually more conceptual and knit the codes together. 39 Some researchers hypothesise that theme development is loosely described in the literature because qualitative researchers simply intuit themes during the analytical process. 39 In practical thematic analysis, we offer a concrete process that should make developing meaningful themes straightforward.

Themes in context

According to Braun and Clarke, a theme “captures something important about the data in relation to the research question and represents some level of patterned response or meaning within the data set.” 4 Similarly, Braun and Clarke advise against themes as domain summaries. While different approaches can draw out themes from codes, the process begins by identifying patterns. 28 35 Like Braun and Clarke and others, we recommend that researchers consider the salience of certain themes, their prevalence in the dataset, and their keyness (ie, how relevant the themes are to the overarching research questions). 4 12 34

Use of themes in practical thematic analysis

Constructing meaningful themes

After coding all the data, each coder should independently reflect on the team’s summary memos (step 1), the codebook (step 2), and the coded data itself to develop draft themes (step 3). It can be illuminating for coders to review all excerpts associated with each code, so that they derive themes directly from the data. Researchers should remain focused on the research question during this step, so that themes have a clear relation with the overall project aim. Use of qualitative analysis software will make it easy to view each segment of data tagged with each code. Themes might neatly correspond to groups of codes. Or—more likely—they will unite codes and data in unexpected ways. A whiteboard or presentation slides might be helpful to organise, craft, and revise themes. We also provide a template for coproducing themes (supplemental material 3). As with codebook justification, team members will ideally produce individual drafts of the themes that they have identified in the data. They can then discuss these with the group and reach alignment or consensus on the final themes.

The team should ensure that all themes are salient, meaning that they are: supported by the data, relevant to the study objectives, and important. Similar to codes, themes are framed as complete thoughts or sentences, not categories. While codes and themes might appear to be similar to each other, the key distinction is that the themes represent a broader concept. Table 2 shows examples of codes and their corresponding themes from a previously published project that used practical thematic analysis. 36 Identifying three to four key themes that comprise a broader overarching theme is a useful approach. Themes can also have subthemes, if appropriate. 40 41 42 43 44

Example codes with themes in practical thematic analysis 36

Thematic analysis session

After each coder has independently produced draft themes, a carefully selected subset of the manuscript team meets for a thematic analysis session ( table 3 ). The purpose of this session is to discuss and reach alignment or consensus on the final themes. We recommend a session of three to five hours, either in-person or virtually.

Example agenda of thematic analysis session

The composition of the thematic analysis session team is important, as each person’s perspectives will shape the results. This group is usually a small subset of the broader research team, with three to seven individuals. We recommend that primary and senior authors work together to include people with diverse experiences related to the research topic. They should aim for a range of personalities and professional identities, particularly those of clinicians, trainees, patients, and care partners. At a minimum, all coders and primary and senior authors should participate in the thematic analysis session.

The session begins with each coder presenting their draft themes with supporting quotes from the data. 5 Through respectful and collaborative deliberation, the group will develop a shared set of final themes.

One team member facilitates the session. A firm, confident, and consistent facilitation style with good listening skills is critical. For practical reasons, this person is not usually one of the primary coders. Hierarchies in teams cannot be entirely flattened, but acknowledging them and appointing an external facilitator can reduce their impact. The facilitator can ensure that all voices are heard. For example, they might ask for perspectives from patient partners or more junior researchers, and follow up on comments from senior researchers to say, “We have heard your perspective and it is important; we want to make sure all perspectives in the room are equally considered.” Or, “I hear [senior person] is offering [x] idea, I’d like to hear other perspectives in the room.” The role of the facilitator is critical in the thematic analysis session. The facilitator might also privately discuss with more senior researchers, such as principal investigators and senior authors, the importance of being aware of their influence over others and respecting and eliciting the perspectives of more junior researchers, such as patients, care partners, and students.

To our knowledge, this discrete thematic analysis session is a novel contribution of practical thematic analysis. It helps efficiently incorporate diverse perspectives using the session agenda and theme coproduction template (supplemental material 3) and makes the process of constructing themes transparent to the entire research team.

Writing the report

We recommend beginning the results narrative with a summary of all relevant themes emerging from the analysis, followed by a subheading for each theme. Each subsection begins with a brief description of the theme and is illustrated with relevant quotes, which are contextualised and explained. The write-up should not simply be a list, but should contain meaningful analysis and insight from the researchers, including descriptions of how different stakeholders might have experienced a particular situation differently or unexpectedly.

In addition to weaving quotes into the results narrative, quotes can be presented in a table. This strategy is a particularly helpful when submitting to clinical journals with tight word count limitations. Quote tables might also be effective in illustrating areas of agreement and disagreement across stakeholder groups, with columns representing different groups and rows representing each theme or subtheme. Quotes should include an anonymous label for each participant and any relevant characteristics, such as role or gender. The aim is to produce rich descriptions. 5 We recommend against repeating quotations across multiple themes in the report, so as to avoid confusion. The template for coproducing themes (supplemental material 3) allows documentation of quotes supporting each theme, which might also be useful during report writing.

Visual illustrations such as a thematic map or figure of the findings can help communicate themes efficiently. 4 36 42 44 If a figure is not possible, a simple list can suffice. 36 Both must clearly present the main themes with subthemes. Thematic figures can facilitate confirmation that the researchers’ interpretations reflect the study populations’ perspectives (sometimes known as member checking), because authors can invite discussions about the figure and descriptions of findings and supporting quotes. 46 This process can enhance the validity of the results. 46

In supplemental material 4, we provide additional guidance on reporting thematic analysis consistent with COREQ. 18 Commonly used in health services research, COREQ outlines a standardised list of items to be included in qualitative research reports ( box 7 ).

Reporting in context

We note that use of COREQ or any other reporting guidelines does not in itself produce high quality work and should not be used as a substitute for general methodological rigor. Rather, researchers must consider rigor throughout the entire research process. As the issue of how to conceptualise and achieve rigorous qualitative research continues to be debated, 47 48 we encourage researchers to explicitly discuss how they have looked at methodological rigor in their reports. Specifically, we point researchers to Braun and Clarke’s 2021 tool for evaluating thematic analysis manuscripts for publication (“Twenty questions to guide assessment of TA [thematic analysis] research quality”). 16

Avoiding common pitfalls

Awareness of common mistakes can help researchers avoid improper use of qualitative methods. Improper use can, for example, prevent researchers from developing meaningful themes and can risk drawing inappropriate conclusions from the data. Braun and Clarke also warn of poor quality in qualitative research, noting that “coherence and integrity of published research does not always hold.” 16

Weak themes

An important distinction between high and low quality themes is that high quality themes are descriptive and complete thoughts. As such, they often contain subjects and verbs, and can be expressed as full sentences ( table 2 ). Themes that are simply descriptive categories or topics could fail to impart meaningful knowledge beyond categorisation. 16 49 50

Researchers will often move from coding directly to writing up themes, without performing the work of theming or hosting a thematic analysis session. Skipping concerted theming often results in themes that look more like categories than unifying threads across the data.

Unfocused analysis

Because data collection for qualitative research is often semi-structured (eg, interviews, focus groups), not all data will be directly relevant to the research question at hand. To avoid unfocused analysis and a correspondingly unfocused manuscript, we recommend that all team members keep the research objective in front of them at every stage, from reading to coding to theming. During the thematic analysis session, we recommend that the research question be written on a whiteboard so that all team members can refer back to it, and so that the facilitator can ensure that conversations about themes occur in the context of this question. Consistently focusing on the research question can help to ensure that the final report directly answers it, as opposed to the many other interesting insights that might emerge during the qualitative research process. Such insights can be picked up in a secondary analysis if desired.

Inappropriate quantification

Presenting findings quantitatively (eg, “We found 18 instances of participants mentioning safety concerns about the vaccines”) is generally undesirable in practical thematic analysis reporting. 51 Descriptive terms are more appropriate (eg, “participants had substantial concerns about the vaccines,” or “several participants were concerned about this”). This descriptive presentation is critical because qualitative data might not be consistently elicited across participants, meaning that some individuals might share certain information while others do not, simply based on how conversations evolve. Additionally, qualitative research does not aim to draw inferences outside its specific sample. Emphasising numbers in thematic analysis can lead to readers incorrectly generalising the findings. Although peer reviewers unfamiliar with thematic analysis often request this type of quantification, practitioners of practical thematic analysis can confidently defend their decision to avoid it. If quantification is methodologically important, we recommend simultaneously conducting a survey or incorporating standardised interview techniques into the interview guide. 11

Neglecting group dynamics

Researchers should concertedly consider group dynamics in the research team. Particular attention should be paid to power relations and the personality of team members, which can include aspects such as who most often speaks, who defines concepts, and who resolves disagreements that might arise within the group. 52

The perspectives of patient and care partners are particularly important to cultivate. Ideally, patient partners are meaningfully embedded in studies from start to finish, not just for practical thematic analysis. 53 Meaningful engagement can build trust, which makes it easier for patient partners to ask questions, request clarification, and share their perspectives. Professional team members should actively encourage patient partners by emphasising that their expertise is critically important and valued. Noting when a patient partner might be best positioned to offer their perspective can be particularly powerful.

Insufficient time allocation

Researchers must allocate enough time to complete thematic analysis. Working with qualitative data takes time, especially because it is often not a linear process. As the strength of thematic analysis lies in its ability to make use of the rich details and complexities of the data, we recommend careful planning for the time required to read and code each document.

Estimating the necessary time can be challenging. For step 1 (reading), researchers can roughly calculate the time required based on the time needed to read and reflect on one piece of data. For step 2 (coding), the total amount of time needed can be extrapolated from the time needed to code one document during codebook development. We also recommend three to five hours for the thematic analysis session itself, although coders will need to independently develop their draft themes beforehand. Although the time required for practical thematic analysis is variable, teams should be able to estimate their own required effort with these guidelines.

Practical thematic analysis builds on the foundational work of Braun and Clarke. 4 16 We have reframed their six phase process into three condensed steps of reading, coding, and theming. While we have maintained important elements of Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis, we believe that practical thematic analysis is conceptually simpler and easier to teach to less experienced researchers and non-researcher stakeholders. For teams with different levels of familiarity with qualitative methods, this approach presents a clear roadmap to the reading, coding, and theming of qualitative data. Our practical thematic analysis approach promotes efficient learning by doing—experiential learning. 12 29 Practical thematic analysis avoids the risk of relying on complex descriptions of methods and theory and places more emphasis on obtaining meaningful insights from those close to real world clinical environments. Although practical thematic analysis can be used to perform intensive theory based analyses, it lends itself more readily to accelerated, pragmatic approaches.

Strengths and limitations

Our approach is designed to smooth the qualitative analysis process and yield high quality themes. Yet, researchers should note that poorly performed analyses will still produce low quality results. Practical thematic analysis is a qualitative analytical approach; it does not look at study design, data collection, or other important elements of qualitative research. It also might not be the right choice for every qualitative research project. We recommend it for applied health services research questions, where diverse perspectives and simplicity might be valuable.

We also urge researchers to improve internal validity through triangulation methods, such as member checking (supplemental material 1). 46 Member checking could include soliciting input on high level themes, theme definitions, and quotations from participants. This approach might increase rigor.

Implications

We hope that by providing clear and simple instructions for practical thematic analysis, a broader range of researchers will be more inclined to use these methods. Increased transparency and familiarity with qualitative approaches can enhance researchers’ ability to both interpret qualitative studies and offer up new findings themselves. In addition, it can have usefulness in training and reporting. A major strength of this approach is to facilitate meaningful inclusion of patient and care partner perspectives, because their lived experiences can be particularly valuable in data interpretation and the resulting findings. 11 30 As clinicians are especially pressed for time, they might also appreciate a practical set of instructions that can be immediately used to leverage their insights and access to patients and clinical settings, and increase the impact of qualitative research through timely results. 8

Practical thematic analysis is a simplified approach to performing thematic analysis in health services research, a field where the experiences of patients, care partners, and clinicians are of inherent interest. We hope that it will be accessible to those individuals new to qualitative methods, including patients, care partners, clinicians, and other health services researchers. We intend to empower multidisciplinary research teams to explore unanswered questions and make new, important, and rigorous contributions to our understanding of important clinical and health systems research.

Acknowledgments

All members of the Coproduction Laboratory provided input that shaped this manuscript during laboratory meetings. We acknowledge advice from Elizabeth Carpenter-Song, an expert in qualitative methods.

Coproduction Laboratory group contributors: Stephanie C Acquilano ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-5531 ), Julie Doherty ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-6536 ), Rachel C Forcino ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9938-4830 ), Tina Foster ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-4031 ), Megan Holthoff, Christopher R Jacobs ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-8657 ), Lisa C Johnson ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7448-4931 ), Elaine T Kiriakopoulos, Kathryn Kirkland ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9851-926X ), Meredith A MacMartin ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6091 ), Emily A Morgan, Eugene Nelson, Elizabeth O’Donnell, Brant Oliver ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7399-622X ), Danielle Schubbe ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9858-1805 ), Gabrielle Stevens ( http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9001-178X ), Rachael P Thomeer ( http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5974-3840 ).

Contributors: Practical thematic analysis, an approach designed for multidisciplinary health services teams new to qualitative research, was based on CHS’s experiences teaching thematic analysis to clinical teams and students. We have drawn heavily from qualitative methods literature. CHS is the guarantor of the article. CHS, AS, CvP, AMK, JRK, and JAP contributed to drafting the manuscript. AS, JG, CMM, JAP, and RWY provided feedback on their experiences using practical thematic analysis. CvP, LCL, SLB, AVC, GE, and JKL advised on qualitative methods in health services research, given extensive experience. All authors meaningfully edited the manuscript content, including AVC and RKS. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

Funding: This manuscript did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at https://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

• Ziebland S ,
• ↵ A Hybrid Approach to Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Research: Using a Practical Example. 2018. https://methods.sagepub.com/case/hybrid-approach-thematic-analysis-qualitative-research-a-practical-example .
• Maguire M ,
• Vindrola-Padros C ,
• Vindrola-Padros B
• ↵ Vindrola-Padros C. Rapid Ethnographies: A Practical Guide . Cambridge University Press 2021. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=n80HEAAAQBAJ
• Schroter S ,
• Merino JG ,
• Barbeau A ,
• ↵ Padgett DK. Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Public Health . SAGE Publications 2011. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=LcYgAQAAQBAJ
• Scharp KM ,
• Korstjens I
• Barnett-Page E ,
• ↵ Guest G, Namey EE, Mitchell ML. Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research . SAGE 2013. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=-3rmWYKtloC
• Sainsbury P ,
• Emerson RM ,
• Saunders B ,
• Kingstone T ,
• Hennink MM ,
• Kaiser BN ,
• Hennink M ,
• O’Connor C ,
• ↵ Yen RW, Schubbe D, Walling L, et al. Patient engagement in the What Matters Most trial: experiences and future implications for research. Poster presented at International Shared Decision Making conference, Quebec City, Canada. July 2019.
• ↵ Got questions about Thematic Analysis? We have prepared some answers to common ones. https://www.thematicanalysis.net/faqs/ (accessed 9 Nov 2022).
• ↵ Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic Analysis. SAGE Publications. 2022. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481 .
• Kalpokas N ,
• Radivojevic I
• Campbell KA ,
• Durepos P ,
• ↵ Understanding Thematic Analysis. https://www.thematicanalysis.net/understanding-ta/ .
• Saunders CH ,
• Stevens G ,
• CONFIDENT Study Long-Term Care Partners
• MacQueen K ,
• Vaismoradi M ,
• Turunen H ,
• Schott SL ,
• Berkowitz J ,
• Carpenter-Song EA ,
• Goldwag JL ,
• Durand MA ,
• Goldwag J ,
• Saunders C ,
• Mishra MK ,
• Rodriguez HP ,
• Shortell SM ,
• Verdinelli S ,
• Scagnoli NI
• Campbell C ,
• Sparkes AC ,
• McGannon KR
• Sandelowski M ,
• Connelly LM ,
• O’Malley AJ ,

What (Exactly) Is Thematic Analysis?

Plain-Language Explanation & Definition (With Examples)

By: Jenna Crosley (PhD). Expert Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | April 2021

Thematic analysis is one of the most popular qualitative analysis techniques we see students opting for at Grad Coach – and for good reason. Despite its relative simplicity, thematic analysis can be a very powerful analysis technique when used correctly. In this post, we’ll unpack thematic analysis using plain language (and loads of examples) so that you can conquer your analysis with confidence.

Thematic Analysis 101

• Basic terminology relating to thematic analysis
• What is thematic analysis
• When to use thematic analysis
• The main approaches to thematic analysis
• The three types of thematic analysis
• How to “do” thematic analysis (the process)
• Tips and suggestions

First, the lingo…

Before we begin, let’s first lay down some terminology. When undertaking thematic analysis, you’ll make use of codes . A code is a label assigned to a piece of text, and the aim of using a code is to identify and summarise important concepts within a set of data, such as an interview transcript.

For example, if you had the sentence, “My rabbit ate my shoes”, you could use the codes “rabbit” or “shoes” to highlight these two concepts. The process of assigning codes is called coding. If this is a new concept to you, be sure to check out our detailed post about qualitative coding .

Codes are vital as they lay a foundation for themes . But what exactly is a theme? Simply put, a theme is a pattern that can be identified within a data set. In other words, it’s a topic or concept that pops up repeatedly throughout your data. Grouping your codes into themes serves as a way of summarising sections of your data in a useful way that helps you answer your research question(s) and achieve your research aim(s).

Alright – with that out of the way, let’s jump into the wonderful world of thematic analysis…

What is thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is the study of patterns to uncover meaning . In other words, it’s about analysing the patterns and themes within your data set to identify the underlying meaning. Importantly, this process is driven by your research aims and questions , so it’s not necessary to identify every possible theme in the data, but rather to focus on the key aspects that relate to your research questions .

Although the research questions are a driving force in thematic analysis (and pretty much all analysis methods), it’s important to remember that these questions are not necessarily fixed . As thematic analysis tends to be a bit of an exploratory process, research questions can evolve as you progress with your coding and theme identification.

When should you use thematic analysis?

There are many potential qualitative analysis methods that you can use to analyse a dataset. For example, content analysis , discourse analysis , and narrative analysis are popular choices. So why use thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is highly beneficial when working with large bodies of data ,  as it allows you to divide and categorise large amounts of data in a way that makes it easier to digest. Thematic analysis is particularly useful when looking for subjective information , such as a participant’s experiences, views, and opinions. For this reason, thematic analysis is often conducted on data derived from interviews , conversations, open-ended survey responses , and social media posts.

Your research questions can also give you an idea of whether you should use thematic analysis or not. For example, if your research questions were to be along the lines of:

• How do dog walkers perceive rules and regulations on dog-friendly beaches?
• What are students’ experiences with the shift to online learning?
• What opinions do health professionals hold about the Hippocratic code?
• How is gender constructed in a high school classroom setting?

These examples are all research questions centering on the subjective experiences of participants and aim to assess experiences, views, and opinions. Therefore, thematic analysis presents a possible approach.

In short, thematic analysis is a good choice when you are wanting to categorise large bodies of data (although the data doesn’t necessarily have to be large), particularly when you are interested in subjective experiences .

What are the main approaches?

Broadly speaking, there are two overarching approaches to thematic analysis: inductive and deductive . The approach you take will depend on what is most suitable in light of your research aims and questions. Let’s have a look at the options.

The inductive approach

The inductive approach involves deriving meaning and creating themes from data without any preconceptions . In other words, you’d dive into your analysis without any idea of what codes and themes will emerge, and thus allow these to emerge from the data.

For example, if you’re investigating typical lunchtime conversational topics in a university faculty, you’d enter the research without any preconceived codes, themes or expected outcomes. Of course, you may have thoughts about what might be discussed (e.g., academic matters because it’s an academic setting), but the objective is to not let these preconceptions inform your analysis.

The inductive approach is best suited to research aims and questions that are exploratory in nature , and cases where there is little existing research on the topic of interest.

The deductive approach

In contrast to the inductive approach, a deductive approach involves jumping into your analysis with a pre-determined set of codes . Usually, this approach is informed by prior knowledge and/or existing theory or empirical research (which you’d cover in your literature review ).

For example, a researcher examining the impact of a specific psychological intervention on mental health outcomes may draw on an existing theoretical framework that includes concepts such as coping strategies, social support, and self-efficacy, using these as a basis for a set of pre-determined codes.

The deductive approach is best suited to research aims and questions that are confirmatory in nature , and cases where there is a lot of existing research on the topic of interest.

Regardless of whether you take the inductive or deductive approach, you’ll also need to decide what level of content your analysis will focus on – specifically, the semantic level or the latent level.

A semantic-level focus ignores the underlying meaning of data , and identifies themes based only on what is explicitly or overtly stated or written – in other words, things are taken at face value.

In contrast, a latent-level focus concentrates on the underlying meanings and looks at the reasons for semantic content. Furthermore, in contrast to the semantic approach, a latent approach involves an element of interpretation , where data is not just taken at face value, but meanings are also theorised.

“But how do I know when to use what approach?”, I hear you ask.

Well, this all depends on the type of data you’re analysing and what you’re trying to achieve with your analysis. For example, if you’re aiming to analyse explicit opinions expressed in interviews and you know what you’re looking for ahead of time (based on a collection of prior studies), you may choose to take a deductive approach with a semantic-level focus.

On the other hand, if you’re looking to explore the underlying meaning expressed by participants in a focus group, and you don’t have any preconceptions about what to expect, you’ll likely opt for an inductive approach with a latent-level focus.

Simply put, the nature and focus of your research, especially your research aims , objectives and questions will  inform the approach you take to thematic analysis.

What are the types of thematic analysis?

Now that you’ve got an understanding of the overarching approaches to thematic analysis, it’s time to have a look at the different types of thematic analysis you can conduct. Broadly speaking, there are three “types” of thematic analysis:

• Reflexive thematic analysis
• Codebook thematic analysis
• Coding reliability thematic analysis

Let’s have a look at each of these:

Reflexive thematic analysis takes an inductive approach, letting the codes and themes emerge from that data. This type of thematic analysis is very flexible, as it allows researchers to change, remove, and add codes as they work through the data. As the name suggests, reflexive thematic analysis emphasizes the active engagement of the researcher in critically reflecting on their assumptions, biases, and interpretations, and how these may shape the analysis.

Reflexive thematic analysis typically involves iterative and reflexive cycles of coding, interpreting, and reflecting on data, with the aim of producing nuanced and contextually sensitive insights into the research topic, while at the same time recognising and addressing the subjective nature of the research process.

Codebook thematic analysis , on the other hand, lays on the opposite end of the spectrum. Taking a deductive approach, this type of thematic analysis makes use of structured codebooks containing clearly defined, predetermined codes. These codes are typically drawn from a combination of existing theoretical theories, empirical studies and prior knowledge of the situation.

Codebook thematic analysis aims to produce reliable and consistent findings. Therefore, it’s often used in studies where a clear and predefined coding framework is desired to ensure rigour and consistency in data analysis.

Coding reliability thematic analysis necessitates the work of multiple coders, and the design is specifically intended for research teams. With this type of analysis, codebooks are typically fixed and are rarely altered.

The benefit of this form of analysis is that it brings an element of intercoder reliability where coders need to agree upon the codes used, which means that the outcome is more rigorous as the element of subjectivity is reduced. In other words, multiple coders discuss which codes should be used and which shouldn’t, and this consensus reduces the bias of having one individual coder decide upon themes.

Quick Recap: Thematic analysis approaches and types

To recap, the two main approaches to thematic analysis are inductive , and deductive . Then we have the three types of thematic analysis: reflexive, codebook and coding reliability . Which type of thematic analysis you opt for will need to be informed by factors such as:

• The approach you are taking. For example, if you opt for an inductive approach, you’ll likely utilise reflexive thematic analysis.
• Whether you’re working alone or in a group . It’s likely that, if you’re doing research as part of your postgraduate studies, you’ll be working alone. This means that you’ll need to choose between reflexive and codebook thematic analysis.

Now that we’ve covered the “what” in terms of thematic analysis approaches and types, it’s time to look at the “how” of thematic analysis.

Need a helping hand?

How to “do” thematic analysis

At this point, you’re ready to get going with your analysis, so let’s dive right into the thematic analysis process. Keep in mind that what we’ll cover here is a generic process, and the relevant steps will vary depending on the approach and type of thematic analysis you opt for.

Step 1: Get familiar with the data

The first step in your thematic analysis involves getting a feel for your data and seeing what general themes pop up. If you’re working with audio data, this is where you’ll do the transcription , converting audio to text.

At this stage, you’ll want to come up with preliminary thoughts about what you’ll code , what codes you’ll use for them, and what codes will accurately describe your content. It’s a good idea to revisit your research topic , and your aims and objectives at this stage. For example, if you’re looking at what people feel about different types of dogs, you can code according to when different breeds are mentioned (e.g., border collie, Labrador, corgi) and when certain feelings/emotions are brought up.

As a general tip, it’s a good idea to keep a reflexivity journal . This is where you’ll write down how you coded your data, why you coded your data in that particular way, and what the outcomes of this data coding are. Using a reflexive journal from the start will benefit you greatly in the final stages of your analysis because you can reflect on the coding process and assess whether you have coded in a manner that is reliable and whether your codes and themes support your findings.

As you can imagine, a reflexivity journal helps to increase reliability as it allows you to analyse your data systematically and consistently. If you choose to make use of a reflexivity journal, this is the stage where you’ll want to take notes about your initial codes and list them in your journal so that you’ll have an idea of what exactly is being reflected in your data. At a later stage in the analysis, this data can be more thoroughly coded, or the identified codes can be divided into more specific ones.

Step 2: Search for patterns or themes in the codes

Step 2! You’re going strong. In this step, you’ll want to look out for patterns or themes in your codes. Moving from codes to themes is not necessarily a smooth or linear process. As you become more and more familiar with the data, you may find that you need to assign different codes or themes according to new elements you find. For example, if you were analysing a text talking about wildlife, you may come across the codes, “pigeon”, “canary” and “budgerigar” which can fall under the theme of birds.

As you work through the data, you may start to identify subthemes , which are subdivisions of themes that focus specifically on an aspect within the theme that is significant or relevant to your research question. For example, if your theme is a university, your subthemes could be faculties or departments at that university.

In this stage of the analysis, your reflexivity journal entries need to reflect how codes were interpreted and combined to form themes.

Step 3: Review themes

By now you’ll have a good idea of your codes, themes, and potentially subthemes. Now it’s time to review all the themes you’ve identified . In this step, you’ll want to check that everything you’ve categorised as a theme actually fits the data, whether the themes do indeed exist in the data, whether there are any themes missing , and whether you can move on to the next step knowing that you’ve coded all your themes accurately and comprehensively . If you find that your themes have become too broad and there is far too much information under one theme, it may be useful to split this into more themes so that you’re able to be more specific with your analysis.

In your reflexivity journal, you’ll want to write about how you understood the themes and how they are supported by evidence, as well as how the themes fit in with your codes. At this point, you’ll also want to revisit your research questions and make sure that the data and themes you’ve identified are directly relevant to these questions .

Step 4: Finalise Themes

By this point, your analysis will really start to take shape. In the previous step, you reviewed and refined your themes, and now it’s time to label and finalise them . It’s important to note here that, just because you’ve moved onto the next step, it doesn’t mean that you can’t go back and revise or rework your themes. In contrast to the previous step, finalising your themes means spelling out what exactly the themes consist of, and describe them in detail . If you struggle with this, you may want to return to your data to make sure that your data and coding do represent the themes, and if you need to divide your themes into more themes (i.e., return to step 3).

When you name your themes, make sure that you select labels that accurately encapsulate the properties of the theme . For example, a theme name such as “enthusiasm in professionals” leaves the question of “who are the professionals?”, so you’d want to be more specific and label the theme as something along the lines of “enthusiasm in healthcare professionals”.

It is very important at this stage that you make sure that your themes align with your research aims and questions . When you’re finalising your themes, you’re also nearing the end of your analysis and need to keep in mind that your final report (discussed in the next step) will need to fit in with the aims and objectives of your research.

In your reflexivity journal, you’ll want to write down a few sentences describing your themes and how you decided on these. Here, you’ll also want to mention how the theme will contribute to the outcomes of your research, and also what it means in relation to your research questions and focus of your research.

By the end of this stage, you’ll be done with your themes – meaning it’s time to write up your findings and produce a report.

Step 5: Produce your report

You’re nearly done! Now that you’ve analysed your data, it’s time to report on your findings. A typical thematic analysis report consists of:

• An introduction
• A methodology section
• Your results and findings
• A conclusion

When writing your report, make sure that you provide enough information for a reader to be able to evaluate the rigour of your analysis. In other words, the reader needs to know the exact process you followed when analysing your data and why. The questions of “what”, “how”, “why”, “who”, and “when” may be useful in this section.

So, what did you investigate? How did you investigate it? Why did you choose this particular method? Who does your research focus on, and who are your participants? When did you conduct your research, when did you collect your data, and when was the data produced? Your reflexivity journal will come in handy here as within it you’ve already labelled, described, and supported your themes.

If you’re undertaking a thematic analysis as part of a dissertation or thesis, this discussion will be split across your methodology, results and discussion chapters . For more information about those chapters, check out our detailed post about dissertation structure .

It’s absolutely vital that, when writing up your results, you back up every single one of your findings with quotations . The reader needs to be able to see that what you’re reporting actually exists within the results. Also make sure that, when reporting your findings, you tie them back to your research questions . You don’t want your reader to be looking through your findings and asking, “So what?”, so make sure that every finding you represent is relevant to your research topic and questions.

Quick Recap: How to “do” thematic analysis

Getting familiar with your data: Here you’ll read through your data and get a general overview of what you’re working with. At this stage, you may identify a few general codes and themes that you’ll make use of in the next step.

Search for patterns or themes in your codes : Here you’ll dive into your data and pick out the themes and codes relevant to your research question(s).

Review themes : In this step, you’ll revisit your codes and themes to make sure that they are all truly representative of the data, and that you can use them in your final report.

Finalise themes : Here’s where you “solidify” your analysis and make it report-ready by describing and defining your themes.

Produce your report : This is the final step of your thematic analysis process, where you put everything you’ve found together and report on your findings.

Tips & Suggestions

In the video below, we share 6 time-saving tips and tricks to help you approach your thematic analysis as effectively and efficiently as possible.

Wrapping Up

In this article, we’ve covered the basics of thematic analysis – what it is, when to use it, the different approaches and types of thematic analysis, and how to perform a thematic analysis.

If you have any questions about thematic analysis, drop a comment below and we’ll do our best to assist. If you’d like 1-on-1 support with your thematic analysis, be sure to check out our research coaching services here .

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

You Might Also Like:

21 Comments

I really appreciate the help

Hello Sir, how many levels of coding can be done in thematic analysis? We generate codes from the transcripts, then subthemes from the codes and themes from subthemes, isn’t it? Should these themes be again grouped together? how many themes can be derived?can you please share an example of coding through thematic analysis in a tabular format?

I’ve found the article very educative and useful

Excellent. Very helpful and easy to understand.

This article so far has been most helpful in understanding how to write an analysis chapter. Thank you.

My research topic is the challenges face by the school principal on the process of procurement . Thematic analysis is it sutable fir data analysis ?

It is a great help. Thanks.

Best advice. Worth reading. Thank you.

Where can I find an example of a template analysis table ?

Finally I got the best article . I wish they also have every psychology topics.

Hello, Sir/Maam

I am actually finding difficulty in doing qualitative analysis of my data and how to triangulate this with quantitative data. I encountered your web by accident in the process of searching for a much simplified way of explaining about thematic analysis such as coding, thematic analysis, write up. When your query if I need help popped up, I was hesitant to answer. Because I think this is for fee and I cannot afford. So May I just ask permission to copy for me to read and guide me to study so I can apply it myself for my gathered qualitative data for my graduate study.

Thank you very much! this is very helpful to me in my Graduate research qualitative data analysis.

Thank you very much. I find your guidance here helpful. Kindly let help me understand how to write findings and discussions.

i am having troubles with the concept of framework analysis which i did not find here and i have been an assignment on framework analysis

I was discouraged and felt insecure because after more than a year of writing my thesis, my work seemed lost its direction after being checked. But, I am truly grateful because through the comments, corrections, and guidance of the wisdom of my director, I can already see the bright light because of thematic analysis. I am working with Biblical Texts. And thematic analysis will be my method. Thank you.

lovely and helpful. thanks

very informative information.

thank you very much!, this is very helpful in my report, God bless……..

Thank you for the insight. I am really relieved as you have provided a super guide for my thesis.

Thanks a lot, really enlightening

excellent! very helpful thank a lot for your great efforts

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

• How it works

Thematic Analysis – A Guide with Examples

Published by Alvin Nicolas at August 16th, 2021 , Revised On August 29, 2023

Thematic analysis is one of the most important types of analysis used for qualitative data . When researchers have to analyse audio or video transcripts, they give preference to thematic analysis. A researcher needs to look keenly at the content to identify the context and the message conveyed by the speaker.

Moreover, with the help of this analysis, data can be simplified.  

Importance of Thematic Analysis

Thematic analysis has so many unique and dynamic features, some of which are given below:

Thematic analysis is used because:

• It is flexible.
• It is best for complex data sets.
• It is applied to qualitative data sets.
• It takes less complexity compared to other theories of analysis.

Intellectuals and researchers give preference to thematic analysis due to its effectiveness in the research.

How to Conduct a Thematic Analysis?

While doing any research , if your data and procedure are clear, it will be easier for your reader to understand how you concluded the results . This will add much clarity to your research.

Understand the Data

This is the first step of your thematic analysis. At this stage, you have to understand the data set. You need to read the entire data instead of reading the small portion. If you do not have the data in the textual form, you have to transcribe it.

Example: If you are visiting an adult dating website, you have to make a data corpus. You should read and re-read the data and consider several profiles. It will give you an idea of how adults represent themselves on dating sites. You may get the following results:

I am a tall, single(widowed), easy-going, honest, good listener with a good sense of humor. Being a handyperson, I keep busy working around the house, and I also like to follow my favourite hockey team on TV or spoil my two granddaughters when I get the chance!! Enjoy most music except Rap! I keep fit by jogging, walking, and bicycling (at least three times a week). I have travelled to many places and RVD the South-West U.S., but I would now like to find that special travel partner to do more travel to warm and interesting countries. I now feel it’s time to meet a nice, kind, honest woman who has some of the same interests as I do; to share the happy times, quiet times, and adventures together

I enjoy photography, lapidary & seeking collectibles in the form of classic movies & 33 1/3, 45 & 78 RPM recordings from the 1920s, ’30s & ’40s. I am retired & looking forward to travelling to Canada, the USA, the UK & Europe, China. I am unique since I do not judge a book by its cover. I accept people for who they are. I will not demand or request perfection from anyone until I am perfect, so I guess that means everyone is safe. My musical tastes range from Classical, big band era, early jazz, classic ’50s & 60’s rock & roll & country since its inception.

Development of Initial Coding:

At this stage, you have to do coding. It’s the essential step of your research . Here you have two options for coding. Either you can do the coding manually or take the help of any tool. A software named the NOVIC is considered the best tool for doing automatic coding.

For manual coding, you can follow the steps given below:

• Please write down the data in a proper format so that it can be easier to proceed.
• Use a highlighter to highlight all the essential points from data.
• Make as many points as possible.
• Take notes very carefully at this stage.
• Apply themes as much possible.
• Now check out the themes of the same pattern or concept.
• Turn all the same themes into the single one.

Example: For better understanding, the previously explained example of Step 1 is continued here. You can observe the coded profiles below:

Make Themes

At this stage, you have to make the themes. These themes should be categorised based on the codes. All the codes which have previously been generated should be turned into themes. Moreover, with the help of the codes, some themes and sub-themes can also be created. This process is usually done with the help of visuals so that a reader can take an in-depth look at first glance itself.

Extracted Data Review

Now you have to take an in-depth look at all the awarded themes again. You have to check whether all the given themes are organised properly or not. It would help if you were careful and focused because you have to note down the symmetry here. If you find that all the themes are not coherent, you can revise them. You can also reshape the data so that there will be symmetry between the themes and dataset here.

For better understanding, a mind-mapping example is given here:

Reviewing all the Themes Again

You need to review the themes after coding them. At this stage, you are allowed to play with your themes in a more detailed manner. You have to convert the bigger themes into smaller themes here. If you want to combine some similar themes into a single theme, then you can do it. This step involves two steps for better fragmentation. 

You need to observe the coded data separately so that you can have a precise view. If you find that the themes which are given are following the dataset, it’s okay. Otherwise, you may have to rearrange the data again to coherence in the coded data.

Corpus Data

Here you have to take into consideration all the corpus data again. It would help if you found how themes are arranged here. It would help if you used the visuals to check out the relationship between them. Suppose all the things are not done accordingly, so you should check out the previous steps for a refined process. Otherwise, you can move to the next step. However, make sure that all the themes are satisfactory and you are not confused.

When all the two steps are completed, you need to make a more précised mind map. An example following the previous cases has been given below:

Define all the Themes here

Now you have to define all the themes which you have given to your data set. You can recheck them carefully if you feel that some of them can fit into one concept, you can keep them, and eliminate the other irrelevant themes. Because it should be precise and clear, there should not be any ambiguity. Now you have to think about the main idea and check out that all the given themes are parallel to your main idea or not. This can change the concept for you.

The given names should be so that it can give any reader a clear idea about your findings. However, it should not oppose your thematic analysis; rather, everything should be organised accurately.

Does your Research Methodology Have the Following?

• Great Research/Sources
• Perfect Language
• Accurate Sources

If not, we can help. Our panel of experts makes sure to keep the 3 pillars of Research Methodology strong.

Also, read about discourse analysis , content analysis and survey conducting . we have provided comprehensive guides.

Make a Report

You need to make the final report of all the findings you have done at this stage. You should include the dataset, findings, and every aspect of your analysis in it.

While making the final report , do not forget to consider your audience. For instance, you are writing for the Newsletter, Journal, Public awareness, etc., your report should be according to your audience. It should be concise and have some logic; it should not be repetitive. You can use the references of other relevant sources as evidence to support your discussion.  

Frequently Asked Questions

What is meant by thematic analysis.

Thematic Analysis is a qualitative research method that involves identifying, analyzing, and interpreting recurring themes or patterns in data. It aims to uncover underlying meanings, ideas, and concepts within the dataset, providing insights into participants’ perspectives and experiences.

You May Also Like

You can transcribe an interview by converting a conversation into a written format including question-answer recording sessions between two or more people.

A case study is a detailed analysis of a situation concerning organizations, industries, and markets. The case study generally aims at identifying the weak areas.

Discourse analysis is an essential aspect of studying a language. It is used in various disciplines of social science and humanities such as linguistic, sociolinguistics, and psycholinguistic.

USEFUL LINKS

LEARNING RESOURCES

COMPANY DETAILS

• How It Works

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• v.21(12); 2021 Dec

General-purpose thematic analysis: a useful qualitative method for anaesthesia research

1 Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

2 Department of Anaesthesia, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

Learning objectives

By reading this article, you should be able to:

• • Explain when to use thematic analysis.
• • Describe the steps in thematic analysis of interview data.
• • Critique the quality of a study that uses the method of thematic analysis.
• • Thematic analysis is a popular method for systematically analysing qualitative data, such as interview and focus group transcripts.
• • It is one of a cluster of methods that focus on identifying patterns of meaning, or themes, across a data set.
• • It is relevant to many questions in perioperative medicine and a good starting point for those new to qualitative research.
• • Systematic approaches to thematically analysing data exist, with key components to demonstrate rigour, accountability, confirmability and reliability.
• • In one study, a useful six-step approach to analysing data is offered.

Anaesthesia research commonly uses quantitative methods, such as surveys, RCTs or observational studies. Such methods are often concerned with answering what questions and how many questions. Qualitative research is more concerned with why questions that enable us to understand social complexities. ‘Qualitative studies in the anaesthetic setting’, write Shelton and colleagues, ‘have been used to define excellence in anaesthesia, explore the reasons behind drug errors, investigate the acquisition of expertise and examine incentives for hand hygiene in the operating theatre’. 1

General-purpose thematic analysis (termed thematic analysis hereafter) is a qualitative research method commonly used with interview and focus group data to understand people's experiences, ideas and perceptions about a given topic. Thematic analysis is a good starting point for those new to qualitative research and is relevant to many questions in the perioperative context. It can be used to understand the experiences of healthcare professionals and patients and their families. Box 1 gives examples of questions amenable to thematic analysis in anaesthesia research.

Examples of questions amenable to thematic analysis.

• (i) How do operating theatre staff feel about speaking up with their concerns?
• (ii) What are trainee's conceptions of the balance between service and learning?
• (iii) What are patients' experiences of preoperative neurocognitive screening?

Alt-text: Box 1

Thematic analysis involves a process of assigning data to a number of codes, grouping codes into themes and then identifying patterns and interconnections between these themes. 2 Thematic analysis allows for a nuanced understanding of what people say and do within their particular social contexts. Of note, thematic analysis can be used with interviews and focus groups and other sources of data, such as documents or images.

Thematic analysis is not the same as content analysis. Content analysis involves counting the frequency with which words or phrases appear in data. Content analysis is a method used to code and categorise textual information systematically to determine trends, frequency and patterns of words used. 3 Conversely, thematic analysis focuses on the relative importance of ideas and how ideas connect and govern practices. Thematic analysis does not rely on frequency counts to indicate the importance of coded data. Content analysis can be coupled with thematic analysis, where both themes and frequencies of particular statements or words are reported.

Thematic analysis is a research method, not a methodology. A methodology is a method with a philosophical underpinning. If researchers report only on what they did, this is the method. If, in addition, they report on the philosophy that governed what they did, this is methodology. Common methodologies in qualitative research include phenomenology, grounded theory, hermeneutics, narrative enquiry and ethnography. 4 Each of these methodologies has associated methods for data analysis. Thematic analysis can be combined with many different qualitative methodologies.

There are also different types of thematic analysis, such as inductive (including general purpose), applied, deductive or semantic thematic analysis. Inductive analysis involves approaching the data with an open mind, inductively looking for patterns and themes and interpreting these for meaning. 2 , 4 Of note, researchers can never have a truly open mind on their topic of interest, so the process will be influenced by their particular perspectives, which need to be declared. In applied and deductive thematic analysis, the researcher will have a pre-existing framework (which may be informed by theory or philosophy) against which they will attempt to categorise the data. 4 , 5 , 6 For semantic thematic analysis, the data are coded on explicit content, and tend to be descriptive rather than interpretative. 6

In this review, we outline what thematic analysis entails and when to use it. We also list some markers to look for to appraise the quality of a published study.

Designing the data collection

Before embarking on qualitative research, as with quantitative research, it is important to seek ethical review of the proposed study. Ethical considerations include such issues as consent, data security and confidentiality, permission to use quotes, potential for identifying individuals or institutions, risk of psychological harm to participants with studies on sensitive issues (e.g. suicide or sexual harassment), power relationships between interviewer and interviewee or intrusion on other activities (such as teaching time or work commitments). 7

Qualitative research often involves asking people questions during interviews or focus groups. Merriam and Tisdell stated that, ‘The most common form of interview is the person-to-person encounter in which one person elicits information from the other’. 8 Information is elicited through careful and purposeful questioning and listening. 9 Research interviews in anaesthesia are generally purposeful conversations with a structure that allows the researcher to gather information about a participant's ideas, perceptions and experiences concerning a given topic.

A structured interview is when the researcher has already decided on a set of questions to ask. 9 If the researcher will ask a set of questions, but has flexibility to follow up responses with further questions, this is called a semi-structured interview. Semi-structured interviews are commonly used in research involving thematic analysis. The researcher can also use other forms of questioning, such as single-question interview. Semi-structured interviews are commonly used in anaesthesia, such as the studies from our own research group. 10 , 11 , 12

Interviews are usually recorded in audio form and then transcribed. For each interview or focus group, a single transcript is created. The transcripts become the written form of data and the collection of transcripts from the research participants becomes the data set.

Designing productive interview questions

The design of interview questions significantly shapes a participant's response. Interview questions should be designed using ‘sensitising concepts’ to encourage participants to share information that will increase a researcher's understanding of the participants' experiences, views, beliefs and behaviours. 13 ‘Sensitising concepts’ describe words in questions that bring the participants' attention to a concept of research interest. Examples of sensitising concepts include speaking up, teamwork and theoretical concepts (such as Kolb's experiential learning cycle or Foucauldian power theory in relation to trainee learning and operating theatre culture). 14 , 15 Specifically, the questions should be framed in such a way as to encourage participants to make sense of their own experience and in their own words. The researcher should try to minimise the influences of their own biases when they design questions. Using open-ended questions will increase the richness of data. Box 2 gives examples of question design.

How to design an interview question.

Alt-text: Box 2

Bias, positionality and reflexivity

Bias is an inclination or prejudice for or against someone or something, whereas positionality is a person's position in society or their stance towards someone or something. For example, Tanisha once had an inexperienced anaesthetist accidentally rupture one of her veins whilst they were siting an i.v. cannula in an emergency situation. Now, Tanisha has a bias against inexperienced anaesthetists. Tanisha's positionality —a medical anthropologist with no anaesthesia training, but working with many anaesthesia colleagues, including her director—may also inform that bias or the way that Tanisha interacts with anaesthetists. Reflexivity is a process whereby people/researchers proactively reflect on their biases and positionality. Biases shape positionality (i.e. the stance of the researcher in relation to the social, historical and political contexts of the study). In practical research terms, biases and positionality inform the way researchers design and undertake research, and the way they interpret data. It is important in qualitative research to both identify biases and positionality, and to take steps to minimise the impact of these on the research.

Some ways to minimise the influence of bias and positionality on findings include:

(i) Raise awareness amongst the research team of bias and positionality.

(ii) Design research/interview questions that minimise potential for these to distort which data are collected or how they are collected.

(iii) Researchers ask reflexive questions during data analysis, such as, ‘Is my bias about xxx informing my view of these data?’

(iv) Two or more researchers are involved in the analysis process.

(v) Data analysis member check (e.g. checking back with participants if the interpretation of their data is consistent with their experience and with what they said).

Before embarking on the study, researchers should consider their own experiences, knowledge and views; how this influences their own position in relation to the study question; and how this position could potentially introduce bias in how they collect and analyse the data. Taking time to reflect on the impact of the researchers' position is an important step towards being reflective and transparent throughout the research process. When writing up the study, researchers should include statements on bias and positionality. In quantitative research, we aim to eliminate bias. In qualitative research, we acknowledge that bias is inevitable (and sometimes even unconscious), and we take steps to make it explicit and to minimise its effect on study design and data interpretation.

Sampling and saturation

Qualitative research typically uses systematic, non-probability sampling. Unlike quantitative research, the goal of sampling is not to randomly select a representative sample from a population. Instead, researchers identify and select individuals or groups relevant to the research question. Commonly used sampling techniques in anaesthesia qualitative research are homogeneous (group) sampling and maximum variation sampling. In the former, researchers may be concerned with the experiences of participants from a distinct group or who share a certain characteristic (e.g. female anaesthesia trainees), so they recruit selectively from within the group with this shared characteristic to gain a rich, in-depth understanding of their experiences. Conversely, the aim with maximum variation sampling is to recruit participants with diverse characteristics to obtain a broad understanding of the question being studied (e.g. members of different professional groups within operating theatre teams, who have diverse ages, gender and ethnicities).

As with quantitative research, the purpose of sampling is to recruit sufficient numbers of participants to enable identification of patterns or richness in what they say or do to understand or explain the phenomenon of interest, and where collecting more data is unlikely to change this understanding.

In qualitative research, data collection and analysis often occur concurrently. This is because data collection is an iterative process both in recruitment and in questioning. The researchers may identify that more data are needed from a particular demographic group or on a particular theme to reach data saturation, so the next participants may be selected from a particular demographic, or be asked slightly different questions or probes to draw out that theme. Sample size is considered adequate when little or no new information emerges from interviews or focus groups; this is generally termed ‘data saturation’, although some qualitative researchers use the term ‘data sufficiency’. This could also be explained in terms of data reliability (i.e. the researcher is satisfied that collecting more data will not substantially change the results). Data saturation typically occurs with between 12 and 17 participants in a relatively homogeneous sampling, but larger numbers may be required, where the interviewees are from distinct groups or cultures. 16 , 17

Data management

For data sets that involve 10 or more transcripts or lengthy interviews (e.g. 90 min or more), researchers often use software to help them collate and manage the data. The most commonly used qualitative software packages are QSR NVivo, Atlas and Dedoose. 18 , 19 , 20 Many researchers use Microsoft Excel instead, or for small data sets the analysis can be done by hand, with pen, paper and scissors (i.e. researchers cut up printed transcripts and reorder the information according to code and theme). 21 NVivo and Atlas are simply repositories, in which you can input the transcripts and, using your coding scheme, sort the text into codes. They facilitate the task of analysis, rather than doing the analysis for you. Some advantages over coding by hand are that text can be allocated to more than one code, and you can easily identify the source of the segment of text you have coded.

Data analysis

Qualitative data analysis is ‘the classification and interpretation of linguistic (or visual) material to make statements about implicit and explicit dimensions and structures of meaning-making in the material and what is represented in it’. 22

Several social scientists have described this analytical process in depth. 2 , 6 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 For inductive studies, we recommend researchers follow Braun and Clarke's practical six-phase approach to thematic analysis. 26 The phases are (i) familiarising the researcher with the data, (ii) generating initial codes, (iii) searching for themes, (iv) reviewing themes, (v) defining and naming themes and (vi) producing the report. These six phases are described next.

Phase 1: familiarising the researcher with the data

In this step, the researchers read the transcripts to become familiar with them and take notes on potential recurring ideas or potential themes. They share and discuss their ideas and, in conjunction with any sensitising concepts, they start thinking about possible codes or themes.

Phase 2: generating initial codes

The first step in Phase 2 is ‘assigning some sort of short-hand designation to various aspects of your data so that you can easily retrieve specific pieces of the data’. 2 The designation might be a word or a short phrase that summarises or captures the essence of a particular piece of text. Coding makes it easier to summarise and compare, which is important because qualitative research is primarily about synthesis and comparison of data. 2 , 25 As the researcher reads through the data, they assign codes. If they are coding a transcript, they might highlight some words, for example, and attach to them a single word that summarises their meaning.

Researchers undertaking thematic analysis should iteratively develop a ‘coding scheme’, which is essentially a list of the codes they create as they read the data, and definitions for each code. 25 , 26 Code definitions are important, as they help the researcher make decisions on whether to assign this code or another one to a segment of data. In Table 1 , we have provided an example of text data in Column 1. TJ analysed these data. To do so, she asked, ‘What are these data about? How does it answer the research question? What is the essence of this statement?’ She underlined keywords and created codes and definitions (Columns 2 and 3). Then, TJ searched the remaining data to see if any more data met each code definition, and if so, coded that (see Table 1 ). As demonstrated in Table 1 , data can be coded to multiple codes.

Table 1

How to code qualitative data: an example

In thematic analysis of interview data, we recommend that code definitions begin with something objective, such as ‘participant describes’. This keeps the researcher's focus on what participants said rather than what the researcher thought or said.

There is no set rule for how many codes to create. 25 However, in our experience, effective manageable coding schemes tend to have between 15 and 50 codes. The coding scheme is iterative. This means that the coding scheme is developed over time, with new codes being created as more data are coded. For example, after a close reading of the first transcript, the researcher might create, say, 10 codes that convey the key points. Then, the researcher reads and codes the next transcript and may, for instance, create additional four codes. As additional transcripts are read and coded, more codes may be created. Not all codes are relevant to all transcripts. The researcher will notice patterns as they code more transcripts. Some codes may be too broad and will need to be refined into two or three smaller codes (and vice versa ). Once the coding scheme is deemed complete and all transcripts have been coded, the researcher should go back to the beginning and recode the first few transcripts to ensure coding rigour.

The second step in Phase 2, once the coding is complete, is to collate all the data relevant to each of these codes.

Phase 3: searching for themes

In this phase, the researchers look across the codes to identify connections between them, with the intention of collating the codes into possible themes. Once these possible themes have been identified, all the data relevant to each possible theme are pulled together under that theme.

Phase 4: reviewing the themes

After the initial collation of the data into themes, the researchers undertake a rigorous process of checking the integrity of these themes, through reading and re-reading their data. This process includes checking to see if the themes ‘fit’ in relation to the coded excerpts (i.e. Do all the data collected under that theme fit within that theme?). Next is checking if the themes fit in relation to the whole data set (i.e. Do the themes adequately reflect the data?) This step may result in the search for additional themes. As a final step in this phase, the researchers create a thematic ‘map’ of the analysis.

When viewed together, the themes should answer the research question and should summarise participant experiences, views or behaviours.

Phase 5: naming the themes

Once researchers have checked the themes and included any additional emerging themes they name the final set of themes identified. Each theme and any subthemes should be listed in turn.

Phase 6: producing the report

The report should summarise the themes and illustrate them by choosing vivid or persuasive extracts from the data. For data arising from interviews, extracts will be quotes from participants. In some studies, researchers also report strong associations between themes, or divide a theme into sub-themes.

Tight word limits on many academic journals can make it difficult to include multiple quotes in the text. 27 One way around a word limit is to provide quotes in a table or a supplementary file, although quotes within the text tend to make for more interesting and compelling reading.

Who should analyse the data?

Ideally, each researcher in the team should be involved in the data analysis. Contrasting researcher viewpoints on the same study subject enhance data quality and validity, and minimise research bias. Independent analysis is time and resource intensive. In clinical research, close independent analysis by each member of the research team may be impractical, and one or two members may undertake the analysis while the rest of the research team read sections of data (e.g. reading two or three transcripts rather than closely analysing the whole data set), thus contributing to Phase 1 and Phase 2 of Braun and Clarke's method. 2

The research team should regularly meet to discuss the analytical process, as described earlier, to workshop and reach agreement on the coding and emergent themes (Phase 4 and Phase 5). The research team members compare their perspectives on the data, analyse divergences and coincidences and reach agreement on codes and emerging themes. Contrasting researcher viewpoints on the same study subject enhance data quality and validity, and minimise research bias.

Judging the quality and rigour of published studies involving thematic analysis

There are a number of indicators of quality when reading and appraising studies. 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 In essence, the authors should clearly state their method of analysis (e.g. thematic analysis) and should reference the literature relevant to their qualitative method, for example Braun and Clarke. 2 This is to indicate that they are following established steps in thematic analysis. The authors should include in the methods a description of the research team, their biases and experience and the efforts made to ensure analytical rigour. Verbatim quotes should be included in the findings to provide evidence to support the themes.

A number of guides have been published to assist readers, researchers and reviewers to evaluate the quality of a qualitative study. 30 , 31 The Joanna Briggs Institute guide to critical appraisal of qualitative studies is a good start. 30 This guide includes a set of 10 criteria, which can be used to rate the study. The criteria are summarised in Box 3 . Within these criteria lie rigorous methodological approaches to how data are collected, analysed and interpreted.

Ten quality appraisal criteria for qualitative literature.31

• (i) Alignment between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology
• (ii) Alignment between the research methodology and the research question or objectives
• (iii) Alignment between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data
• (iv) Alignment between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data
• (v) Alignment between the research methodology and the interpretation of results
• (vi) A statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically (positionality and bias)
• (vii) The influence of the researcher on the research, and vice versa
• (viii) Adequate representation of participants and their voices
• (ix) Ethical research conduct and evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body
• (x) Conclusions flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data

Alt-text: Box 3

Another approach to quality appraisal comes from Lincoln and Guba, who have published widely on the topic of judging qualitative quality. 28 They look for quality in terms of credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability and authenticity. There are many qualitative checklists readily accessible online, such as the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist or the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist, which researchers can include in their work to demonstrate quality in these areas.

Conclusions

As with quantitative research, qualitative research has requirements for rigour and trustworthiness. Thematic analysis is an accessible qualitative method that can offer researchers insight into the shared experiences, views and behaviours of research participants.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

The associated MCQs (to support CME/CPD activity) will be accessible at www.bjaed.org/cme/home by subscribers to BJA Education .

Biographies

Tanisha Jowsey PhD BA (Hons) MA PhD is a senior lecturer in the Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, School of Medicine, University of Auckland. She has a background in medical anthropology and has expertise as a qualitative researcher.

Carolyn Deng MPH FANZCA is a specialist anaesthetist at Auckland City Hospital. She has a Master of Public Health degree. She is embarking on qualitative research in perioperative medicine and hopes to use it as a tool to complement quantitative research findings in the future.

Jennifer Weller MD MClinEd FANZCA FRCA is head of the Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education at the University of Auckland. Professor Weller is a specialist anaesthetist at Auckland City Hospital and often uses qualitative methods in her research in clinical education, teamwork and patients' safety.

Matrix codes: 1A01, 2A01, 3A01

How to do thematic analysis

Last updated

8 February 2023

Reviewed by

Miroslav Damyanov

Uncovering themes in data requires a systematic approach. Thematic analysis organizes data so you can easily recognize the context.

• What is thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is   a method for analyzing qualitative data that involves reading through a data set and looking for patterns to derive themes . The researcher's subjective experience plays a central role in finding meaning within the data.

Streamline your thematic analysis

Find patterns and themes across all your qualitative data when you analyze it in Dovetail

• What are the main approaches to thematic analysis?

Inductive thematic analysis approach

Inductive thematic analysis entails   deriving meaning and identifying themes from data with no preconceptions.  You analyze the data without any expected outcomes.

Deductive thematic analysis approach

In the deductive approach, you analyze data with a set of expected themes. Prior knowledge, research, or existing theory informs this approach.

Semantic thematic analysis approach

With the semantic approach, you ignore the underlying meaning of data. You take identifying themes at face value based on what is written or explicitly stated.

Latent thematic analysis approach

Unlike the semantic approach, the latent approach focuses on underlying meanings in data and looks at the reasons for semantic content. It involves an element of interpretation where you theorize meanings and don’t just take data at face value.

• When should thematic analysis be used?

Thematic analysis is beneficial when you’re working with large bodies of data. It allows you to divide and categorize huge quantities of data in a way that makes it far easier to digest.  

The following scenarios warrant the use of thematic analysis:

You’re new to qualitative analysis

You need to identify patterns in data

You want to involve participants in the process

Thematic analysis is particularly useful when you’re looking for subjective information such as experiences and opinions in surveys , interviews, conversations, or social media posts. 

• What are the advantages and disadvantages of thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is a highly flexible approach to qualitative data analysis that you can modify to meet the needs of many studies. It enables you to generate new insights and concepts from data. 

Beginner researchers who are just learning how to analyze data will find thematic analysis very accessible. It’s easy for most people to grasp and can be relatively quick to learn.

The flexibility of thematic analysis can also be a disadvantage. It can feel intimidating to decide what’s important to emphasize, as there are many ways to interpret meaning from a data set.

• What is the step-by-step process for thematic analysis?

The basic thematic analysis process requires recognizing codes and themes within a data set. A code is a label assigned to a piece of data that you use to identify and summarize important concepts within a data set. A theme is a pattern that you identify within the data. Relevant steps may vary based on the approach and type of thematic analysis, but these are the general steps you’d take:

1. Familiarize yourself with the data(pre-coding work)

Before you can successfully work with data, you need to understand it. Get a feel for the data to see what general themes pop up. Transcribe audio files and observe any meanings and patterns across the data set. Read through the transcript, and jot down notes about potential codes to create. 

2. Create the initial codes (open code work)

Create a set of initial codes to represent the patterns and meanings in the data. Make a codebook to keep track of the codes. Read through the data again to identify interesting excerpts and apply the appropriate codes. You should use the same code to represent excerpts with the same meaning. 

3. Collate codes with supporting data (clustering of initial code)

Now it's time to group all excerpts associated with a particular code. If you’re doing this manually, cut out codes and put them together. Thematic analysis software will automatically collate them.

4. Group codes into themes (clustering of selective codes)

Once you’ve finalized the codes, you can sort them into potential themes. Themes reflect trends and patterns in data. You can combine some codes to create sub-themes.

5. Review, revise, and finalize the themes (final revision)

Now you’ve decided upon the initial themes, you can review and adjust them as needed. Each theme should be distinct, with enough data to support it. You can merge similar themes and remove those lacking sufficient supportive data. Begin formulating themes into a narrative. 

6. Write the report

The final step of telling the story of a set of data is writing the report. You should fully consider the themes to communicate the validity of your analysis.

A typical thematic analysis report contains the following:

An introduction

A methodology section

Results and findings

A conclusion

Your narrative must be coherent, and it should include vivid quotes that can back up points. It should also include an interpretive analysis and argument for your claims. In addition, consider reporting your findings in a flowchart or tree diagram, which can be independent of or part of your report.  

In conclusion, a thematic analysis is a method of analyzing qualitative data. By following the six steps, you will identify common themes from a large set of texts. This method can help you find rich and useful insights about people’s experiences, behaviors, and nuanced opinions.

• How to analyze qualitative data

Qualitative data analysis is the process of organizing, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical and subjective data . The goal is to capture themes and patterns, answer questions, and identify the best actions to take based on that data. 

Researchers can use qualitative data to understand people’s thoughts, feelings, and attitudes. For example, qualitative researchers can help business owners draw reliable conclusions about customers’ opinions and discover areas that need improvement. 

In addition to thematic analysis, you can analyze qualitative data using the following:

Content analysis

Content analysis examines and counts the presence of certain words, subjects, and contexts in documents and communication artifacts, such as: 

Text in various formats

This method transforms qualitative input into quantitative data. You can do it manually or with electronic tools that recognize patterns to make connections between concepts.  

Narrative analysis

Narrative analysis interprets research participants' stories from testimonials, case studies, interviews, and other text or visual data. It provides valuable insights into the complexity of people's feelings, beliefs, and behaviors.

Discourse analysis

In discourse analysis , you analyze the underlying meaning of qualitative data in a particular context, including: 

Historical 

This approach allows us to study how people use language in text, audio, and video to unravel social issues, power dynamics, or inequalities. 

For example, you can look at how people communicate with their coworkers versus their bosses. Discourse analysis goes beyond the literal meaning of words to examine social reality.

Grounded theory analysis

In grounded theory analysis, you develop theories by examining real-world data. The process involves creating hypotheses and theories by systematically collecting and evaluating this data. While this approach is helpful for studying lesser-known phenomena, it might be overwhelming for a novice researcher. 

• Challenges with analyzing qualitative data

While qualitative data can answer questions that quantitative data can't, it still comes with challenges.

If done manually, qualitative data analysis is very time-consuming.

It can be hard to choose a method. 

Avoiding bias is difficult.

Human error affects accuracy and consistency.

To overcome these challenges, you should fine-tune your methods by using the appropriate tools in collaboration with teammates.

Learn more about thematic analysis software

What is thematic analysis in qualitative research.

Thematic analysis is a method of analyzing qualitative data. It is applied to texts, such as interviews or transcripts. The researcher closely examines the data to identify common patterns and themes.

Can thematic analysis be done manually?

You can do thematic analysis manually, but it is very time-consuming without the help of software.

What are the two types of thematic analysis?

The two main types of thematic analysis include codebook thematic analysis and reflexive thematic analysis.

Codebook thematic analysis uses predetermined codes and structured codebooks to analyze from a deductive perspective. You draw codes from a review of the data or an initial analysis to produce the codebooks.

Reflexive thematic analysis is more flexible and does not use a codebook. Researchers can change, remove, and add codes as they work through the data. 

What makes a good thematic analysis?

The goal of thematic analysis is more than simply summarizing data; it's about identifying important themes. Good thematic analysis interprets, makes sense of data, and explains it. It produces trustworthy and insightful findings that are easy to understand and apply. 

What are examples of themes in thematic analysis?

Grouping codes into themes summarize sections of data in a useful way to answer research questions and achieve objectives. A theme identifies an area of data and tells the reader something about it. A good theme can sit alone without requiring descriptive text beneath it.

For example, if you were analyzing data on wildlife, codes might be owls, hawks, and falcons. These codes might fall beneath the theme of birds of prey. If your data were about the latest trends for teenage girls, codes such as mini skirts, leggings, and distressed jeans would fall under fashion.  

Thematic analysis is straightforward and intuitive enough that most people have no trouble applying it.

Get started today

Go from raw data to valuable insights with a flexible research platform

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 21 December 2023

Last updated: 16 December 2023

Last updated: 6 October 2023

Last updated: 5 March 2024

Last updated: 25 November 2023

Last updated: 15 February 2024

Last updated: 11 March 2024

Last updated: 12 December 2023

Last updated: 6 March 2024

Last updated: 10 April 2023

Last updated: 20 December 2023

Latest articles

Related topics, log in or sign up.

Get started for free

What is Thematic Analysis and How to Do It Step-By-Step?

Appinio Research · 03.11.2023 · 33min read

Have you ever wondered how researchers make sense of the rich tapestry of qualitative data they gather from interviews, surveys, or textual sources? Thematic analysis serves as their guiding compass in unraveling the intricate stories within the data.

In this guide, we dive deep into thematic analysis, exploring its definition, purpose, applications, and step-by-step methodologies. Whether you're a seasoned researcher seeking to refine your qualitative analysis skills or a novice embarking on your research journey, this guide will equip you with the knowledge and tools needed to unlock the hidden meanings and patterns within your data.

What is Thematic Analysis?

Thematic analysis is a qualitative research method that involves systematically identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns or themes within qualitative data. Its primary purpose is to uncover the underlying meanings and concepts embedded in textual, visual, or audio data.

Thematic analysis aims to provide a structured and comprehensive understanding of the content, enabling researchers to explore complex phenomena and answer research questions effectively.

Purpose of Thematic Analysis

• Data Exploration: Thematic analysis allows researchers to explore rich and unstructured qualitative data, such as interviews, focus group discussions, surveys, or written narratives. It helps reveal hidden insights that may not be apparent at first glance.
• Pattern Identification: The method is designed to identify patterns, recurring ideas, and common threads within the data. By categorizing data into themes, researchers can make sense of complex information.
• Contextual Understanding: Thematic analysis places a strong emphasis on understanding the context surrounding the data. It seeks to uncover the contextual factors that influence the emergence of specific themes.
• Interpretation and Explanation: It enables researchers to interpret and explain the meaning of the identified themes. Thematic analysis provides a deeper understanding of the phenomena under investigation.
• Theory Development: Thematic analysis can contribute to theory development by generating new concepts or refining existing theories. It helps researchers make theoretical connections based on empirical evidence.
• Practical Applications: Thematic analysis findings can have practical applications in various fields, such as healthcare, social sciences, business, and education. It informs decision-making, policy development, product improvement, and more.

In summary, the purpose of thematic analysis is to distill qualitative data into meaningful themes, providing researchers with a structured, interpretable, and contextually grounded understanding of the subject of study.

Importance of Thematic Analysis in Research

Thematic analysis holds significant importance in the field of research for several key reasons:

• Data Reduction and Organization: Qualitative data can be voluminous and unstructured. Thematic analysis acts as a powerful tool to reduce this complexity by organizing data into manageable themes and patterns. This reduction in data size makes it easier to extract meaningful insights.
• In-Depth Exploration: Thematic analysis enables researchers to conduct in-depth exploration of qualitative data. By identifying and examining themes, researchers can uncover nuances, contradictions, and intricacies within the data that may go unnoticed through other methods.
• Flexibility and Adaptability: Thematic analysis is highly flexible and adaptable to various research contexts and data types. It can be applied to textual data, visual data, audio data, and combinations thereof. Researchers can tailor the analysis to suit their specific research questions and objectives.
• Contextual Understanding: Thematic analysis places a strong emphasis on understanding the context in which data is generated. This contextual understanding is essential for accurate interpretation and meaningful insights.
• Theory Development and Testing: Thematic analysis can contribute to theory development by identifying patterns and concepts that inform or extend existing theories. It also allows researchers to test the applicability of theoretical frameworks in real-world settings.
• Practical Applications: The findings of thematic analysis have practical applications in diverse fields. They inform decision-making, guide policy development, drive product improvements, and provide valuable insights for addressing real-world challenges.
• Interdisciplinary Relevance: Thematic analysis transcends disciplinary boundaries, making it applicable in fields such as psychology, sociology, anthropology, education, healthcare , marketing, and more. Its interdisciplinary relevance enhances its utility in research.

In summary, thematic analysis plays a pivotal role in research by facilitating the systematic exploration and interpretation of qualitative data, leading to a deeper understanding of complex phenomena and informing decision-making and theory development across various domains.

How to Prepare for Thematic Analysis?

Before you embark on your thematic analysis journey, thorough preparation is vital. We'll delve into the main steps involved in getting your qualitative data ready for analysis.

1. Data Collection and Selection

Data collection is the foundation of any qualitative research project. You need to carefully plan, gather, and select your data to ensure it aligns with your research objectives.

• Research Goals: Clearly define your research questions or objectives. Your data should directly relate to what you want to explore or understand.
• Data Sources: Identify the sources of your qualitative data. Common sources include interviews , focus groups , surveys , field notes, or even existing documents and texts.
• Sampling: Decide on your sampling strategy. Will you use purposive sampling to select specific participants or content, or will you opt for more random sampling methods?
• Data Richness: Ensure your data is rich and comprehensive enough to answer your research questions. Collect enough data to reach data saturation, where new information or themes stop emerging.

2. Data Cleaning and Organization

Once you have your qualitative data in hand, the next step is data cleaning and organization. This process ensures that your data is in a usable format and is structured for efficient analysis.

• Transcription: If your data is in the form of interviews or recorded conversations, you may need to transcribe them. Accurate transcription is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the data.
• Data Format: Standardize the format of your data. This includes ensuring consistent date and time formats, naming conventions, and file organization.
• Data Validation: Check for data accuracy and consistency. Address any discrepancies or errors that may have arisen during data collection.
• Data Management: Organize your data systematically. Create a clear file structure, labeling, and version control to prevent data mix-ups or loss.

3. Choose the Right Software Tools

The choice of software tools for your thematic analysis can significantly impact the efficiency and effectiveness of your analysis process. Here's what you need to consider:

• Analysis Goals: Determine your specific analysis goals. Different software options may be better suited for certain types of projects or research questions.
• Ease of Use: Evaluate the user-friendliness of the software. Consider your team's familiarity with the tool and the learning curve involved.
• Collaboration Features: If you're working with a team, look for software that supports collaboration, allowing multiple researchers to work on the same project simultaneously.
• Data Import and Export: Ensure that the software can handle the data formats you are working with and provides robust import and export capabilities.
• Support and Training: Consider the availability of support resources, such as tutorials, user forums, and customer support, to assist you in case you encounter issues during analysis.

Some popular software options for thematic analysis include NVivo, ATLAS.ti, MAXQDA, and Dedoose. Each has its own strengths and features, so it's essential to choose the one that best fits your project's needs.

By carefully preparing your data, cleaning and organizing it effectively, and selecting the right software tools, you'll set a solid foundation for a successful thematic analysis. These steps ensure that you have high-quality data that can be analyzed efficiently and accurately, leading to meaningful insights for your research.

How to Do Thematic Analysis?

Thematic analysis involves a systematic process of identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns or themes within qualitative data. In this section, we'll explore each step in detail, guiding you through the process of conducting thematic analysis effectively.

1. Familiarize Yourself with the Data

The initial step in thematic analysis is to become intimately acquainted with your qualitative data. This process, known as familiarization with data, allows you to gain a deep understanding of the content and context.

• Multiple Readings: Begin by reading through your data numerous times. This repeated exposure helps you become familiar with the nuances and intricacies of the material.
• Note-Taking: Take notes as you read. Document your initial thoughts, observations, and any patterns or ideas that emerge during this phase.
• Maintain an Open Mind: Avoid preconceived notions or biases. Approach the data with an open mind to allow for unbiased exploration.
• Identify Interesting Features: Look for exciting features, such as recurrent phrases, significant events, or notable trends within the data.

Familiarization sets the stage for the subsequent steps, as it enables you to approach the data with a fresh perspective and a foundation of knowledge.

2. Generate Initial Codes

Once you're familiar with the data, the next step is generating initial codes. Codes are labels or tags assigned to specific portions of text that capture the essence of what's being expressed.

• Start Small: Begin by coding smaller sections of data, such as sentences or paragraphs. Focus on breaking down the data into manageable units.
• Use In-Vivo Codes: Whenever possible, use in-vivo codes, which are codes that use the participants' own words. This helps maintain the authenticity of the data.
• Stay Close to the Data: Keep your codes closely tied to the content of the data. Avoid overly abstract or generalized labels.
• Constant Comparison: Continuously compare new data segments with existing codes to ensure consistency and relevance.
• Document Your Codebook: Create a codebook or list that outlines the codes you've generated and their definitions. This document will serve as a reference throughout your analysis.

Generating initial codes is a fundamental step that involves systematically dissecting the data into meaningful elements, setting the stage for subsequent theme development.

3. Search for Themes

With a set of initial codes in hand, it's time to move on to searching for themes. Themes are overarching patterns or recurring ideas that emerge from the coded data.

• Pattern Recognition: Look for patterns in the codes. Identify codes that appear frequently or codes that seem conceptually related.
• Grouping Codes: Start grouping codes together based on their similarities or connections. This process forms the basis for theme development.
• Stay Open to New Themes: Be open to the possibility of new themes emerging as you continue your analysis. Themes may evolve or shift as you delve deeper into the data.
• Subthemes: Recognize that themes can have subthemes, providing a hierarchical structure to your analysis.

Searching for themes is a dynamic process that involves organizing and categorizing codes to uncover the underlying patterns and meanings within the data.

4. Review and Define Themes

Once you've identified potential themes, the next step is to review and define themes more rigorously. This phase ensures that your themes accurately represent the patterns in your data.

• Refinement: Refine and clarify your themes. Review them to ensure they align with the data and accurately capture the essence of the content.
• Definition: Provide clear definitions for each theme. What does each theme represent, and how does it relate to the data?
• Validation: Seek validation from colleagues or peers. Discuss your themes with others to ensure they are robust and well-defined.
• Naming Themes: Give each theme a concise and descriptive name that encapsulates its meaning.

Reviewing and defining themes is a crucial step in the thematic analysis process, as it ensures the accuracy and validity of your findings.

5. Write and Describe Themes

With well-defined themes in hand, it's time to write and describe themes in greater detail. This step involves fleshing out the themes with supporting evidence from your data.

• Quote Integration: Include quotes or excerpts from the data that exemplify each theme. These quotes serve as concrete examples of the theme in action.
• Narrative Development: Develop a narrative around each theme. Explain its significance and relevance within the context of your research.
• Contextual Understanding: Consider the broader context in which each theme exists. How do these themes contribute to the overall understanding of your research questions?
• Illustrative Examples: Provide multiple examples within each theme to demonstrate its consistency and depth.

Writing and describing themes is where the richness of your analysis comes to life, allowing readers to grasp the significance of the patterns you've uncovered.

6. Report Results

The final step in thematic analysis is reporting results. This involves presenting your findings in a clear and structured manner.

• Structure Your Report: Organize your report according to your research objectives, themes, and supporting evidence.
• Narrative Flow: Create a narrative flow that guides the reader through your analysis process, from data familiarization to theme development.
• Visual Aids: Consider using visual aids such as tables, charts, or graphs to enhance the presentation of your themes and findings.
• Discussion: Discuss the implications of your themes in the context of your research questions or objectives. What do these themes reveal, and how do they contribute to the broader understanding of your topic?
• Conclusion: Summarize your findings and their significance. Offer suggestions for future research or practical applications if applicable.

Reporting results effectively ensures that your thematic analysis is not only comprehensive but also accessible to your target audience, whether it's fellow researchers, stakeholders, or the broader community.

Thematic Analysis Approaches

Thematic analysis is a flexible method that can be approached in different ways based on your research goals and the nature of your data. In this section, we'll explore three primary approaches to thematic analysis: inductive thematic analysis, deductive thematic analysis , and reflexive thematic analysis. Each approach has its own unique characteristics and applications.

Inductive Thematic Analysis

Inductive thematic analysis is characterized by its bottom-up, data-driven approach. In this approach, you start without predefined themes or theories. Instead, you allow themes to emerge organically from your data.

• Data Familiarization: Begin by immersing yourself in the data, reading and re-reading it multiple times to develop a deep understanding.
• Open Coding: Start coding the data without any preconceived ideas. Codes emerge directly from the data, capturing concepts and patterns as they appear.
• Code Grouping: Group similar codes together, gradually forming initial themes. These themes are derived solely from the data and may evolve as you progress.
• Theme Definition: Define and refine the emerging themes. Ensure they accurately represent the patterns and concepts within your data.
• Review and Validation: Continuously review and validate the themes with colleagues or peer researchers. This iterative process enhances the trustworthiness of the analysis.

Example: Imagine conducting interviews with employees about their experiences in the workplace. Through inductive thematic analysis, you may find that themes like "Work-Life Balance Challenges" and "Employee Empowerment" emerge from the interviews, even though you had no preconceived notions about these topics.

Deductive Thematic Analysis

Deductive thematic analysis, in contrast, begins with predefined themes or theories based on existing research or theoretical frameworks. This approach is particularly useful when you want to test specific hypotheses or apply existing concepts to your data.

• Theory or Framework Selection: Start by selecting a theoretical framework or pre-existing themes that align with your research objectives.
• Data Collection: Gather data with these predefined themes or theories in mind. Your data collection process is guided by the established concepts.
• Initial Coding: Code your data according to the predefined themes. This involves assigning data segments to specific categories based on the chosen framework.
• Theme Refinement: Refine and adapt the predefined themes as you analyze the data. You may discover nuances or subthemes that were not initially accounted for.
• Validation: Seek validation from peers or experts to ensure the adapted themes accurately represent the data.

Example: Suppose you're studying customer feedback on a new product launch. You begin with predefined themes like "Product Usability" and " Customer Satisfaction " based on established criteria for evaluating products. As you analyze the data, you refine these themes and add subthemes like "User Interface Design" and "Product Performance."

Reflexive Thematic Analysis

Reflexive thematic analysis emphasizes the researcher's active role in shaping the analysis. It is often used in interpretive and intuitive research paradigms, acknowledging that the researcher's subjectivity plays a significant role in the analysis process.

• Engage Reflexively: Acknowledge your own perspectives, biases, and preconceptions. Be aware of how your background and experiences influence the analysis.
• Data Immersion: Immerse yourself in the data while considering your own positionality. How do your personal experiences and beliefs intersect with the data?
• Coding with Reflexivity: Code the data while reflecting on your own interpretive lens. How does your perspective shape the codes and themes you identify?
• Constant Reflexivity: Continuously engage in reflexivity throughout the analysis process. Be open to adjusting your interpretations based on ongoing self-awareness.
• Interpretation: Interpret the themes within the context of both the data and your reflexive insights. Recognize the co-construction of meaning between you as the researcher and the data.

Example: In a study on cultural perceptions of healthcare, you, as the researcher, openly acknowledge your cultural background and experiences. This reflexivity prompts you to recognize nuances in the data related to cultural sensitivities that might have been overlooked otherwise. Themes related to "Cultural Health Practices" and "Healthcare Access Barriers" are informed by both the data and your reflexive insights.

These three approaches to thematic analysis offer flexibility in how you approach your data. Your choice of approach should align with your research objectives, the nature of your data, and your epistemological stance as a researcher. Whether you start with a blank slate (inductive), apply existing theories (deductive), or embrace reflexivity, thematic analysis can be tailored to suit your research needs.

Data Analysis Techniques

Thematic analysis can be conducted using various data analysis techniques, each with its advantages and considerations. In this section, we'll delve into the three primary data analysis techniques for thematic analysis: manual coding, using qualitative data analysis software, and comparison with quantitative analysis.

Manual Coding

Manual coding involves the process of reviewing your qualitative data and assigning codes to segments of text that represent specific concepts or themes. While it may be more time-consuming than using software tools, manual coding offers a deep and intimate understanding of your data.

• Data Familiarization : Begin by thoroughly immersing yourself in the data. Read through it multiple times to gain a comprehensive understanding of the content.
• Code Generation : Start identifying meaningful segments in the data and assign relevant codes to them. Codes should capture the essence of what is being expressed.
• Codebook Development: Create a codebook that documents all the codes you've generated along with their definitions. This serves as a reference throughout the analysis.
• Code Sorting and Grouping: Organize and group codes into potential themes based on similarities or connections between codes.
• Theme Development : Review and refine the themes that emerge from the grouped codes. Ensure they accurately represent the patterns in your data.
• Validation : Seek validation from colleagues or peer researchers to enhance the trustworthiness of the analysis.

Manual coding allows for a meticulous examination of the data, ensuring a deep and nuanced understanding of the content. It's especially valuable when you have a smaller dataset or want to maintain a high level of researcher involvement in the analysis.

Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software

Qualitative data analysis software provides tools and features to streamline the coding and analysis process, making it more efficient and collaborative.

Some of the top tools used for thematic analysis include:

• Appinio : A real-time market research platform that excels in providing fast access to consumer insights. With a focus on user experience and the ability to define precise target groups, Appinio helps you make data-driven decisions seamlessly and quickly, making it an exciting and intuitive choice for thematic analysis.
• NVivo:  is a widely used software tool that offers a range of features for qualitative analysis, including coding, data visualization, and collaboration.
• ATLAS.ti: is known for its user-friendly interface and robust coding and analysis capabilities. It allows for the systematic organization of codes and themes.
• MAXQDA:  provides a comprehensive suite of tools for qualitative analysis, including advanced text coding, multimedia analysis, and robust reporting options.
• Dedoose: is a web-based application designed for qualitative and mixed-methods research. It offers real-time collaboration features and intuitive coding.

To get started with these tools, all you have to do is:

• Data Import: Import your qualitative data into the software. This can include text, audio, video, or other forms of qualitative data.
• Coding: Use the software's coding features to assign codes to segments of your data. You can create a coding structure, code hierarchy, and attach memos.
• Theme Development: Organize and analyze your codes to identify themes. Many software tools offer tools for visualizing themes and subthemes.
• Data Querying: Use the software to search for specific codes or themes within your data. This can help you identify patterns and relationships.
• Collaboration: If working with a team, collaborate in real-time within the software, making it easier to manage and validate codes and themes.

Using qualitative data analysis software can significantly speed up the coding and analysis process, especially with larger datasets. It also enhances the organization and management of your data, making it easier to revisit and revise your analysis.

Thematic Analysis vs Quantitative Analysis

Thematic analysis is a qualitative research method, but it can be valuable when used in conjunction with quantitative analysis. Here's how thematic analysis compares to quantitative analysis.

Thematic Analysis

• Qualitative method
• Focuses on exploring meanings, patterns, and themes in qualitative data.
• Involves coding, categorizing, and interpreting textual or visual data.
• Emphasizes rich, context-specific insights.
• Typically involves smaller sample sizes.
• Subjective and context-dependent.

Quantitative Analysis

• Quantitative method
• Focuses on numerical data, statistics, and generalizability.
• Involves structured surveys, experiments, or data collection instruments.
• Emphasizes statistical relationships and patterns.
• Typically involves larger sample sizes.
• Objective and aims for generalizability.

Thematic vs Quantitative Analysis Comparison

• Complementarity: Thematic analysis and quantitative analysis can complement each other. Qualitative analysis provides depth and context, while quantitative analysis offers breadth and statistical significance.
• Mixed-Methods Research: Researchers often employ mixed-methods research, combining both qualitative and quantitative approaches to gain a comprehensive understanding of a research question.
• Sequential or Concurrent: Researchers may choose to conduct thematic analysis before or after quantitative analysis, depending on the research design and objectives.

For example, in a healthcare study, qualitative thematic analysis may be used to understand patients' experiences and preferences (qualitative), while quantitative analysis can assess the effectiveness of a new treatment based on numerical outcomes (quantitative). These approaches together provide a holistic view of the research question.

How to Ensure Thematic Analysis Quality?

Ensuring the quality and rigor of your thematic analysis is essential to maintain the validity and trustworthiness of your findings. In this section, we'll explore three key aspects of quality assurance in thematic analysis: trustworthiness and credibility, inter-coder reliability , and addressing bias and reflexivity.

Trustworthiness and Credibility

Trustworthiness and credibility refer to the extent to which your thematic analysis can be considered reliable and valid. Establishing trustworthiness and credibility is crucial to ensure that your findings accurately represent the data and can withstand scrutiny.

To ensure trustworthiness and credibility:

• Member Checking: Seek feedback from participants to ensure that your analysis aligns with their perspectives and experiences.
• Peer Debriefing: Engage with colleagues or experts in the field to discuss your analysis process and findings. Their insights can help identify any potential biases or oversights.
• Audit Trail: Maintain a detailed record of your analysis process, including coding decisions, codebook development, and theme generation. This audit trail serves as a transparent documentation of your work.
• Triangulation: Use multiple sources of data or methods to validate your findings. Triangulation can involve comparing data from interviews, observations, and documents to identify converging themes.
• Peer Review: Submit your analysis and findings for peer review in academic or professional settings. Peer reviewers can provide valuable feedback and validation.
• Clear Reporting: Ensure that your research report or article clearly and transparently documents your analysis process, including the steps taken to establish trustworthiness.

By implementing these methods, you enhance the trustworthiness and credibility of your thematic analysis, increasing its validity and reliability.

Inter-Coder Reliability

Inter-coder reliability is the degree of agreement between different coders or researchers when coding the same data. It is a measure of consistency and ensures that your analysis is not overly influenced by individual subjectivity.

To establish inter-coder reliability:

• Coding Training: Train coders or researchers in the coding process, ensuring they understand the codebook and coding guidelines.
• Coding Samples: Have multiple coders independently code a sample of your data. This sample should represent the diversity of your dataset.
• Calculate Agreement: Calculate inter-coder agreement using a statistical measure such as Cohen's Kappa or percentage agreement. This measures the level of agreement between coders.
• Discuss Discrepancies: When discrepancies arise, convene coder meetings to discuss and resolve differences. This may involve refining code definitions or guidelines.
• Repeat Coding: After resolving discrepancies, have coders recode the data to assess improved inter-coder reliability.
• Ongoing Monitoring: Maintain constant communication and monitoring among coders to ensure consistency throughout the analysis process.

Establishing inter-coder reliability is crucial when working with a team of coders or researchers. It minimizes the risk of individual biases and subjectivity affecting the analysis.

Addressing Bias and Reflexivity

Bias and reflexivity acknowledgment and management are integral parts of maintaining the quality and rigor of thematic analysis.

Researchers bring their own perspectives, beliefs, and experiences to the analysis process, which can introduce bias into the interpretation of data. To address bias:

• Engage in reflexivity by regularly reflecting on your own positionality and potential biases.
• Maintain transparency by documenting your reflexive insights and how they may influence your analysis.
• Seek feedback from peers or colleagues to identify and mitigate bias in your analysis.

Reflexivity

Reflexivity involves recognizing and acknowledging the role of the researcher in shaping the analysis process and findings. Researchers should:

• Be aware of their assumptions and preconceptions and how these may impact their interpretation.
• Consider how their background, experiences, and cultural context influence their understanding of the data.
• Use reflexivity to enhance the depth and validity of their analysis by recognizing and addressing their subjectivity.

By addressing bias and embracing reflexivity, researchers can conduct a more transparent and rigorous thematic analysis, leading to more credible and valid findings.

Thematic Analysis Challenges

Thematic analysis, like any research method, comes with its own set of challenges. We'll explore three common challenges researchers may encounter during thematic analysis: data overload, maintaining consistency, and subjectivity and interpretation.

Data Overload

Data overload occurs when you have a large volume of qualitative data to analyze, making it challenging to manage and extract meaningful patterns. To address data overload:

• Chunking Data: Break the data into manageable chunks or segments for analysis. This helps prevent feeling overwhelmed.
• Prioritization: Focus on the most relevant or central data that directly relates to your research questions or objectives.
• Use of Software: Consider using qualitative data analysis software to assist with data organization and coding efficiency.

Maintaining Consistency

Maintaining consistency throughout the analysis process is crucial to ensure that codes and themes are applied consistently across the dataset. To maintain consistency:

• Develop a clear codebook with well-defined code definitions and examples.
• Regularly check in with coding team members to address any inconsistencies or questions.
• Use regular team meetings or discussions to clarify interpretations and ensure a shared understanding.

Subjectivity and Interpretation

Subjectivity and interpretation are inherent to thematic analysis, as researchers actively engage in interpreting data. To address subjectivity:

• Engage in reflexivity to acknowledge and manage your subjectivity and biases.
• Seek external validation or peer input to challenge or confirm your interpretations.
• Use transparency in reporting to clarify your interpretive stance and decision-making process.

By recognizing and addressing these common challenges, researchers can navigate the complexities of thematic analysis more effectively and produce robust, high-quality results.

Thematic Analysis Applications

Thematic analysis is a versatile qualitative research method widely applied in various fields and contexts. Its flexibility makes it suitable for exploring a wide range of research questions and topics.

Healthcare Research

Thematic analysis is frequently used in healthcare research to explore patients' experiences, healthcare provider perspectives, and healthcare policy analysis. Researchers in this field use thematic analysis to uncover themes related to patient satisfaction, healthcare disparities, the impact of treatments, and more. For example, a study might employ thematic analysis to understand the emotional challenges faced by cancer patients during their treatment journey, leading to the identification of themes like "Emotional Resilience" and "Support Systems."

Social Sciences

In the social sciences, thematic analysis helps researchers examine complex social phenomena and human behaviors. It is employed in studies related to sociology, psychology, anthropology, and education. Researchers use thematic analysis to explore themes in narratives, interviews, focus groups, and surveys. For instance, in educational research, thematic analysis can reveal themes in teacher-student interactions, leading to insights into classroom dynamics and pedagogical approaches.

Market Research

Thematic analysis is valuable in market research to extract insights from consumer feedback , product reviews, and focus group discussions. Researchers analyze themes in customer opinions to inform product development , marketing strategies, and customer experience improvements. For example, in analyzing online product reviews, thematic analysis can uncover themes like "Product Reliability" and "Customer Service Satisfaction," guiding companies in enhancing their offerings.

Psychology and Counseling

In psychology and counseling, thematic analysis is utilized to explore qualitative data from interviews, therapy sessions, or written narratives. It aids in understanding psychological processes, coping mechanisms, and therapeutic outcomes. Researchers might use thematic analysis to identify themes related to mental health stigma reduction or recovery narratives in individuals with mental health challenges.

Policy Analysis

Thematic analysis plays a critical role in policy analysis by extracting key themes from policy documents, legislative texts, or public opinion. Researchers can use thematic analysis to uncover themes related to policy effectiveness, public perception, and policy impact assessment. For instance, in analyzing environmental policies, themes like "Sustainability Goals" and "Community Engagement" may emerge, informing policymakers about areas of focus.

Examples of Thematic Analysis in Research

To gain a more comprehensive understanding of how thematic analysis is applied in research, let's explore several detailed examples across different fields and research contexts.

Example 1: Exploring Mental Health Stigma

Research Question: What are the key themes in narratives of individuals who have experienced mental health stigma?

Data: In-depth interviews with individuals who have faced mental health stigma.

Thematic Analysis Process:

• Data Familiarization: Researchers immerse themselves in interview transcripts, noting significant statements related to mental health stigma.
• Initial Coding: Initial codes are generated, including "Negative Stereotypes," "Experiences of Discrimination," and "Coping Strategies."
• Theme Development: Codes are grouped into broader themes, leading to the emergence of themes like "Internalization of Stigma" and "Empowerment through Advocacy."
• Refinement and Definition: Each theme is refined and defined with illustrative quotes to capture the nuances of participants' experiences.
• Interpretation: Researchers interpret the findings, highlighting the impact of stigma on mental health and the importance of support systems.

This thematic analysis sheds light on the multifaceted nature of mental health stigma and offers insights into the coping mechanisms individuals employ to navigate these challenges.

Example 2: Evaluating Customer Feedback for a Tech Product

Research Question: What themes emerge from an analysis of customer feedback for a new smartphone model?

Data: Analysis of online customer reviews and feedback for a recently launched smartphone.

• Data Collection: Collect customer reviews and comments from online platforms, aggregating a substantial dataset.
• Data Cleaning: Remove duplicates and irrelevant data to streamline the analysis process.
• Coding: Codes are generated for common sentiments and topics found in the reviews, such as "Camera Quality," "Battery Life," and "User-Friendly Interface."
• Theme Development: Codes are organized into overarching themes, revealing key themes like "Performance and Speed," "Durability Concerns," and "User Experience."
• Visualization: Visual aids such as word clouds and frequency distributions are used to present the prevalence of themes in customer feedback.
• Implications: The analysis highlights areas for product improvement and informs marketing strategies based on customer perceptions.

This thematic analysis of customer feedback provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the smartphone model, guiding product development and marketing efforts.

Example 3: Analyzing Qualitative Data in Educational Research

Research Question: What themes emerge from open-ended survey responses regarding the challenges of remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic?

• Data Organization: Survey responses are organized for systematic analysis.
• Initial Coding: Codes are generated for recurring issues, such as "Technology Challenges," "Lack of Social Interaction," and "Time Management."
• Theme Development: Codes are grouped into overarching themes, resulting in themes like "Digital Divide" and "Adaptive Teaching Strategies."
• Subtheme Identification: Subthemes may emerge within larger themes, providing a more detailed understanding of specific issues.
• Contextual Analysis: The analysis considers the broader context of the pandemic's impact on education, including policy implications and pedagogical adaptations.

This thematic analysis of survey responses offers insights into the unique challenges faced by students and educators during the pandemic, informing educational policies and strategies.

These examples showcase the adaptability and effectiveness of thematic analysis in uncovering meaningful patterns and themes across diverse research contexts. Whether exploring personal experiences, customer feedback, or educational challenges, thematic analysis serves as a versatile qualitative research method that provides valuable insights and informs decision-making.

Conclusion for Thematic Analysis

Thematic analysis is a versatile and powerful method that helps researchers uncover patterns and themes within qualitative data. By following the steps outlined in this guide, you can embark on your journey of discovery and gain deeper insights into the world of qualitative research.

Remember, whether you're studying people's experiences, analyzing customer feedback, or exploring social phenomena, thematic analysis offers a structured approach to make sense of complex data. It's a valuable tool for researchers across diverse fields, providing a clear path to understanding, interpretation, and meaningful insights. So, as you venture into the realm of thematic analysis, embrace the richness of your data and let it tell its story. Your research journey has just begun, and the possibilities are boundless.

How to Conduct Thematic Analysis in Minutes?

In the world of thematic analysis, Appinio shines as a real-time market research platform, revolutionizing the way you gain consumer insights. Say goodbye to long, tedious research processes and embrace the exciting and intuitive world of real-time data-driven decisions.

Here's why Appinio is your go-to partner for thematic analysis:

• Lightning-Fast Insights: From formulating questions to obtaining actionable insights, Appinio delivers results in minutes. When you need answers pronto, we've got you covered.
• User-Friendly Excellence: No need for a Ph.D. in research. Our platform is designed to be so intuitive that anyone can navigate it with ease, empowering you to take control of your market research.
• Global Reach, Local Precision: With access to over 90 countries and the ability to define your target group from 1200+ characteristics, Appinio ensures that your thematic analysis is not only insightful but also globally relevant.

Get free access to the platform!

Join the loop 💌

Be the first to hear about new updates, product news, and data insights. We'll send it all straight to your inbox.

Get the latest market research news straight to your inbox! 💌

Wait, there's more

17.04.2024 | 25min read

Quota Sampling: Definition, Types, Methods, Examples

15.04.2024 | 34min read

What is Market Share? Definition, Formula, Examples

11.04.2024 | 34min read

What is Data Analysis? Definition, Tools, Examples

A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis

• Open access
• Published: 26 June 2021
• Volume 56 , pages 1391–1412, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• David Byrne   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0587-4677 1  

453k Accesses

535 Citations

117 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Since the publication of their inaugural paper on the topic in 2006, Braun and Clarke’s approach has arguably become one of the most thoroughly delineated methods of conducting thematic analysis (TA). However, confusion persists as to how to implement this specific approach to TA appropriately. The authors themselves have identified that many researchers who purport to adhere to this approach—and who reference their work as such—fail to adhere fully to the principles of ‘reflexive thematic analysis’ (RTA). Over the course of numerous publications, Braun and Clarke have elaborated significantly upon the constitution of RTA and attempted to clarify numerous misconceptions that they have found in the literature. This paper will offer a worked example of Braun and Clarke’s contemporary approach to reflexive thematic analysis with the aim of helping to dispel some of the confusion regarding the position of RTA among the numerous existing typologies of TA. While the data used in the worked example has been garnered from health and wellbeing education research and was examined to ascertain educators’ attitudes regarding such, the example offered of how to implement the RTA would be easily transferable to many other contexts and research topics.

Similar content being viewed by others

Thematic Analysis

Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development

Kate Roberts, Anthony Dowell & Jing-Bao Nie

Doing Reflexive Thematic Analysis

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

Although the lineage of thematic analysis (TA) can be traced back as far as the early twentieth century (Joffe 2012 ), it has up until recently been a relatively poorly demarcated and poorly understood method of qualitative analysis. Much of the credit for the recent enlightenment and subsequent increase in interest in TA can arguably be afforded to Braun and Clarke’s ( 2006 ) inaugural publication on the topic of thematic analysis in the field of psychology. These authors have since published several articles and book chapters, as well as their own book, all of which make considerable contributions to further delineating their approach to TA (see, for example, Braun and Clarke 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2019 , 2020 ; Braun et al. 2016 ; Terry et al. 2017 ). However, on numerous occasions Braun and Clarke have identified a tendency for scholars to cite their 2006 article, but fail to fully adhere to their contemporary approach to RTA (see Braun and Clarke 2013 , 2019 , 2020 ). Commendably, they have acknowledged that their 2006 paper left several aspect of their approach incompletely defined and open to interpretation. Indeed, the term ‘reflexive thematic analysis’ only recently came about in response to these misconceptions (Braun and Clarke 2019 ). Much of their subsequent body of literature in this area addresses these issues and attempts to correct some of the misconceptions in the wider literature regarding their approach. Braun and Clarke have repeatedly iterated that researchers who chose to adopt their approach should interrogate their relevant publications beyond their 2006 article and adhere to their contemporary approach (Braun and Clarke 2019 , 2020 ). The purpose of this paper is to contribute to dispelling some of the confusion and misconceptions regarding Braun and Clarke’s approach by providing a worked example of their contemporary approach to reflexive thematic analysis. The worked example will be presented in relation to the author’s own research, which examined the attitudes of post-primary educators’ regarding the promotion of student wellbeing. This paper is intended to be a supplementary resource for any prospective proponents of RTA, but may be of particular interest to scholars conducting attitudinal studies in an educational context. While this paper is aimed at all scholars regardless of research experience, it may be most useful to research students and their supervisors. Ultimately, the provided example of how to implement the six-phase analysis is easily transferable to many contexts and research topics.

2 What is reflexive thematic analysis?

Reflexive thematic analysis is an easily accessible and theoretically flexible interpretative approach to qualitative data analysis that facilitates the identification and analysis of patterns or themes in a given data set (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). RTA sits among a number of varied approaches to conducting thematic analysis. Braun and Clarke have noted that very often, researchers who purport to have adopted RTA have failed to fully delineate their implementation of RTA, of have confused RTA with other approaches to thematic analysis. The over-riding tendency in this regard is for scholars to mislabel their analysis as RTA, or to draw from a number of different approaches to TA, some of which may not be compatible with each other (Braun and Clarke 2012 , 2013 , 2019 ; Terry et al. 2017 ). In an attempt to resolve this confusion, Braun and Clarke have demarcated the position of RTA among the other forms of thematic analysis by differentiating between three principal approaches to TA: (1) coding reliability TA; (2) codebook approaches to TA, and; (3) the reflexive approach to TA (Braun et al. 2019 ).

Coding reliability approaches, such as those espoused by Boyatzis ( 1998 ) and Joffe ( 2012 ), accentuate the measurement of accuracy or reliability when coding data, often involving the use of a structured codebook. The researcher would also seek a degree of consensus among multiple coders, which can be measured using Cohen’s Kappa (Braun and Clarke 2013 ). When adopting a coding reliability approach, themes tend to be developed very early in the analytical process. Themes can be hypothesised based on theory prior to data collection, with evidence to support these hypotheses then gathered from the data in the form of codes. Alternatively, themes can be hypothesised following a degree of familiarisation with the data (Terry et al. 2017 ). Themes are typically understood to constitute ‘domain summaries’, or “summaries of what participants said in relation to a particular topic or data collection question” (Braun et al. 2019 , p. 5), and are likely to be discussed as residing within the data in a positivistic sense.

Codebook approaches, such as framework analysis (Smith and Firth 2011 ) or template analysis (King and Brooks 2017 ), can be understood to be something of a mid-point between coding reliability approaches and the reflexive approach. Like coding reliability approaches, codebook approaches adopt the use of a structured codebook and share the conceptualisation of themes as domain summaries. However, codebook approaches are more akin to the reflexive approach in terms of the prioritisation of a qualitative philosophy with regard to coding. Proponents of codebook approaches would typically forgo positivistic conceptions of coding reliability, instead recognising the interpretive nature of data coding (Braun et al. 2019 ).

The reflexive approach to TA highlights the researcher’s active role in knowledge production (Braun and Clarke 2019 ). Codes are understood to represent the researcher’s interpretations of patterns of meaning across the dataset. Reflexive thematic analysis is considered a reflection of the researcher’s interpretive analysis of the data conducted at the intersection of: (1) the dataset; (2) the theoretical assumptions of the analysis, and; (3) the analytical skills/resources of the researcher (Braun and Clarke 2019 ). It is fully appreciated—even expected—that no two researchers will intersect this tripartite of criteria in the same way. As such, there should be no expectation that codes or themes interpreted by one researcher may be reproduced by another (although, this is of course possible). Prospective proponents of RTA are discouraged from attempting to provide accounts of ‘accurate’ or ‘reliable’ coding, or pursuing consensus among multiple coders or using Cohen’s Kappa values. Rather, RTA is about “the researcher’s reflective and thoughtful engagement with their data and their reflexive and thoughtful engagement with the analytic process” (Braun and Clarke 2019 , p. 594). Multiple coders may, however, be beneficial in a reflexive manner (e.g. to sense-check ideas, or to explore multiple assumptions or interpretations of the data). If analysis does involve more than one researcher, the approach should be collaborative and reflexive, aiming to achieve richer interpretations of meaning, rather than attempting to achieve consensus of meaning. Indeed, in this sense it would be beneficial for proponents of RTA to remain cognisant that qualitative analysis as a whole does not contend to provide a single or ‘correct’ answer (Braun and Clarke 2013 ).

The process of coding (and theme development) is flexible and organic, and very often will evolve throughout the analytical process (Braun et al. 2019 ). Progression through the analysis will tend to facilitate further familiarity with the data, which may in turn result in the interpretation of new patterns of meaning. This is converse to the use of codebooks, which can often predefine themes before coding. Through the reflexive approach, themes are not predefined in order to ‘find’ codes. Rather, themes are produced by organising codes around a relative core commonality, or ‘central organising concept’, that the researcher interprets from the data (Braun and Clarke 2019 ).

In their 2006 paper, Braun and Clarke ( 2006 ) originally conceptualised RTA as a paradigmatically flexible analytical method, suitable for use within a wide range of ontological and epistemological considerations. In recent publications, the authors have moved away from this view, instead defining RTA as a purely qualitative approach. This pushes the use RTA into exclusivity under appropriate qualitative paradigms (e.g. constructionism) (Braun and Clarke 2019 , 2020 ). As opposed to other forms of qualitative analysis such as content analysis (Vaismoradi et al. 2013 ), and even other forms of TA such as Boyatzis’ ( 1998 ) approach, RTA eschews any positivistic notions of data interpretation. Braun and Clarke ( 2019 ) encourage the researcher to embrace reflexivity, subjectivity and creativity as assets in knowledge production, where they argue some scholars, such as Boyatzis ( 1998 ), may otherwise construe these assets as threats.

3 A worked example of reflexive thematic analysis

The data used in the following example is taken from the qualitative phase of a mixed methods study I conducted, which examined mental health in an educational context. This study set out to understand the attitudes and opinions of Irish post-primary educators with regard to the promotion of students’ social and emotional wellbeing, with the intention to feed this information back to key governmental and non-governmental stakeholders such as the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment and the Department of Education. The research questions for this study aimed to examine educators’ general attitudes toward the promotion of student wellbeing and towards a set of ‘wellbeing guidelines’ that had recently been introduced in Irish post-primary schools. I also wanted to identify any potential barriers to wellbeing promotion and to solicit educators’ opinions as to what might constitute apposite remedial measures in this regard.

The qualitative phase of this study, from which the data for this example is garnered, involved eleven semi-structured interviews, which lasted approximately 25–30 min each. Participants consisted of core-curriculum teachers, wellbeing curriculum teachers, pastoral care team-members and senior management members. Participants were questioned on their attitudes regarding the promotion of student wellbeing, the wellbeing curriculum, the wellbeing guidelines and their perceptions of their own wellbeing. When conducting these interviews, I loosely adhered to an interview agenda to ensure each of these four key topics were addressed. However, discussions were typically guided by what I interpreted to be meaningful to the interviewee, and would often weave in and out of these different topics.

The research questions for this study were addressed within a paradigmatic framework of interpretivism and constructivism. A key principle I adopted for this study was to reflect educators’ own accounts of their attitudes, opinions and experiences as faithfully as was possible, while also accounting for the reflexive influence of my own interpretations as the researcher. I felt RTA was highly appropriate in the context of the underlying theoretical and paradigmatic assumptions of my study and would allow me to ensure qualitative data was collected and analysed in a manner that respected and expressed the subjectivity of participants’ accounts of their attitudes, while also acknowledging and embracing the reflexive influence of my interpretations as the researcher.

In the next section, I will outline the theoretical assumptions of the RTA conducted in my original study in more detail. It should be noted that outlining these theoretical assumptions is not a task specific to reflexive thematic analysis. Rather, these assumptions should be addressed prior to implementing any form of thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke 2012 , 2019 , 2020 ; Braun et al. 2016 ). The six-phase process for conducting reflexive thematic analysis will then be appropriately detailed and punctuated with examples from my study.

3.1 Addressing underlying theoretical assumptions

Across several publications, Braun and Clarke ( 2012 , 2014 , 2020 ) have identified a number of theoretical assumptions that should be addressed when conducting RTA, or indeed any form of thematic analysis. These assumptions are conceptualised as a series of continua as follows: essentialist versus constructionist epistemologies; experiential versus critical orientation to data; inductive versus deductive analyses, and; semantic versus latent coding of data. The aim is not just for the researcher to identify where their analysis is situated on each of these continua, but why the analysis is situated as it is and why this conceptualisation is appropriate to answering the research question(s).

3.1.1 Essentialist versus constructionist epistemologies

Ontological and epistemological considerations would usually be determined when a study is first being conceptualised. However, these considerations may become salient again when data analysis becomes the research focus, particularly with regard to mixed methods. The purpose of addressing this continuum is to conceptualise theoretically how the researcher understands their data and the way in which the reader should interpret the findings (Braun and Clarke 2013 , 2014 ). By adhering to essentialism, the researcher adopts a unidirectional understanding of the relationship between language and communicated experience, in that it is assumed that language is a simple reflection of our articulated meanings and experiences (Widdicombe and Wooffiitt 1995 ). The meanings and systems inherent in constructing these meanings are largely uninterrogated, with the interpretive potential of TA largely unutilised (Braun et al. 2016 ).

Conversely, researchers of a constructionist persuasion would tend to adopt a bidirectional understanding of the language/experience relationship, viewing language as implicit in the social production and reproduction of both meaning and experience (Burr 1995 ; Schwandt 1998 ). A constructionist epistemology has particular implications with regard to thematic analysis, namely that in addition to the recurrence of perceptibly important information, meaningfulness is highly influential in the development and interpretation of codes and themes. The criteria for a theme to be considered noteworthy via recurrence is simply that the theme should present repeatedly within the data. However, what is common is not necessarily meaningful or important to the analysis. Braun and Clarke ( 2012 , p. 37) offer this example:

…in researching white-collar workers’ experiences of sociality at work, a researcher might interview people about their work environment and start with questions about their typical workday. If most or all reported that they started work at around 9:00 a.m., this would be a pattern in the data, but it would not necessarily be a meaningful or important one.

Furthermore, there may be varying degrees of conviction in respondents’ expression when addressing different issues that may facilitate in identifying the salience of a prospective theme. Therefore, meaningfulness can be conceptualised, firstly on the part of the researcher, with regard to the necessity to identify themes that are relevant to answering the research questions, and secondly on the part of the respondent, as the expression of varying degrees of importance with regard to the issues being addressed. By adopting a constructionist epistemology, the researcher acknowledges the importance of recurrence, but appreciates meaning and meaningfulness as the central criteria in the coding process.

In keeping with the qualitative philosophy of RTA, epistemological consideration regarding the example data were constructionist. As such, meaning and experience was interpreted to be socially produced and reproduced via an interplay of subjective and inter-subjective construction. Footnote 1

3.1.2 Experiential versus critical orientation

An experiential orientation to understanding data typically prioritises the examination of how a given phenomenon may be experienced by the participant. This involves investigating the meaning ascribed to the phenomenon by the respondent, as well as the meaningfulness of the phenomenon to the respondent. However, although these thoughts, feelings and experiences are subjectively and inter-subjectively (re)produced, the researcher would cede to the meaning and meaningfulness ascribed by the participant (Braun and Clarke 2014 ). Adopting an experiential orientation requires an appreciation that the thoughts, feelings and experiences of participants are a reflection of personal states held internally by the participant. Conversely, a critical orientation appreciates and analyses discourse as if it were constitutive, rather than reflective, of respondents’ personal states (Braun and Clarke 2014 ). As such, a critical perspective seeks to interrogate patterns and themes of meaning with a theoretical understanding that language can create, rather than merely reflect, a given social reality (Terry et al. 2017 ). A critical perspective can examine the mechanisms that inform the construction of systems of meaning, and therefore offer interpretations of meaning further to those explicitly communicated by participants. It is then also possible to examine how the wider social context may facilitate or impugn these systems of meaning (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). In short, the researcher uses this continuum to clarify their intention to reflect the experience of a social reality (experiential orientation) or examine the constitution of a social reality (critical orientation).

In the present example, an experiential orientation to data interpretation was adopted in order to emphasise meaning and meaningfulness as ascribed by participants. Adopting this approach meant that this analysis did not seek to make claims about the social construction of the research topic (which would more so necessitate a critical perspective), but rather acknowledged the socially constructed nature of the research topic when examining the subjective ‘personal states’ of participants. An experiential orientation was most appropriate as the aim of the study was to prioritise educators’ own accounts of their attitudes, opinions. More importantly, the research questions aimed to examine educators’ attitudes regarding their experience of promoting student wellbeing—or the ‘meanings made’—and not, for example, the socio-cultural factors that may underlie the development of these attitudes—or the ‘meaning making’.

3.1.3 Inductive versus deductive analysis

A researcher who adopts a deductive or ‘theory-driven’ approach may wish to produce codes relative to a pre-specified conceptual framework or codebook. In this case, the analysis would tend to be ‘analyst-driven’, predicated on the theoretically informed interpretation of the researcher. Conversely, a researcher who adopts an inductive or ‘data-driven’ approach may wish to produce codes that are solely reflective of the content of the data, free from any pre-conceived theory or conceptual framework. In this case, data are not coded to fit a pre-existing coding frame, but instead ‘open-coded’ in order to best represent meaning as communicated by the participants (Braun and Clarke 2013 ). Data analysed and coded deductively can often provide a less rich description of the overall dataset, instead focusing on providing a detailed analysis of a particular aspect of the dataset interpreted through a particular theoretical lens (Braun and Clarke 2020 ). Deductive analysis has typically been associated with positivistic/essentialist approaches (e.g. Boyatzis 1998 ), while inductive analysis tends to be aligned with constructivist approaches (e.g. Frith and Gleeson 2004 ). That being said, inductive/deductive approaches to analysis are by no means exclusively or intrinsically linked to a particular epistemology.

Coding and analysis rarely fall cleanly into one of these approaches and, more often than not, use a combination of both (Braun and Clarke 2013 , 2019 , 2020 ). It is arguably not possible to conduct an exclusively deductive analysis, as an appreciation for the relationship between different items of information in the data set is necessary in order to identify recurring commonalities with regard to a pre-specified theory or conceptual framework. Equally, it is arguably not possible to conduct an exclusively inductive analysis, as the researcher would require some form of criteria to identify whether or not a piece of information may be conducive to addressing the research question(s), and therefore worth coding. When addressing this issue, Braun and Clarke ( 2012 ) clarify that one approach does tend to predominate over the other, and that the predominance of the deductive or inductive approach can indicate an overall orientation towards prioritising either researcher/theory-based meaning or respondent/data-based meaning, respectively.

A predominantly inductive approach was adopted in this example, meaning data was open-coded and respondent/data-based meanings were emphasised. A degree of deductive analysis was, however, employed to ensure that the open-coding contributed to producing themes that were meaningful to the research questions, and to ensure that the respondent/data-based meanings that were emphasised were relevant to the research questions.

3.1.4 Semantic versus latent coding

Semantic codes are identified through the explicit or surface meanings of the data. The researcher does not examine beyond what a respondent has said or written. The production of semantic codes can be described as a descriptive analysis of the data, aimed solely at presenting the content of the data as communicated by the respondent. Latent coding goes beyond the descriptive level of the data and attempts to identify hidden meanings or underlying assumptions, ideas, or ideologies that may shape or inform the descriptive or semantic content of the data. When coding is latent, the analysis becomes much more interpretive, requiring a more creative and active role on the part of the researcher. Indeed, Braun and Clarke ( 2012 , 2013 , 2020 ) have repeatedly presented the argument that codes and themes do not ‘emerge’ from the data or that they may be residing in the data, waiting to be found. Rather, the researcher plays an active role in interpreting codes and themes, and identifying which are relevant to the research question(s). Analyses that use latent coding can often overlap with aspects of thematic discourse analysis in that the language used by the respondent can be used to interpret deeper levels of meaning and meaningfulness (Braun and Clarke 2006 ).

In this example, both semantic and latent coding were utilised. No attempt was made to prioritise semantic coding over latent coding or vice-versa. Rather, semantic codes were produced when meaningful semantic information was interpreted, and latent codes were produced when meaningful latent information was interpreted. As such, any item of information could be double-coded in accordance with the semantic meaning communicated by the respondent, and the latent meaning interpreted by the researcher (Patton 1990 ). This was reflective of the underlying theoretical assumptions of the analysis, as the constructive and interpretive epistemology and ontology were addressed by affording due consideration to both the meaning constructed and communicated by the participant and my interpretation of this meaning as the researcher.

3.2 The six-phase analytical process

Braun and Clarke ( 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2020 ) have proposed a six-phase process, which can facilitate the analysis and help the researcher identify and attend to the important aspects of a thematic analysis. In this sense, Braun and Clarke ( 2012 ) have identified the six-phase process as an approach to doing TA, as well as learning how to do TA. While the six phases are organised in a logical sequential order, the researcher should be cognisant that the analysis is not a linear process of moving forward through the phases. Rather, the analysis is recursive and iterative, requiring the researcher to move back and forth through the phases as necessary (Braun and Clarke 2020 ). TA is a time consuming process that evolves as the researcher navigates the different phases. This can lead to new interpretations of the data, which may in turn require further iterations of earlier phases. As such, it is important to appreciate the six-phase process as a set of guidelines, rather than rules, that should be applied in a flexible manner to fit the data and the research question(s) (Braun and Clarke 2013 , 2020 ).

3.2.1 Phase one: familiarisation with the data

The ‘familiarisation’ phase is prevalent in many forms of qualitative analysis. Familiarisation entails the reading and re-reading of the entire dataset in order to become intimately familiar with the data. This is necessary to be able to identify appropriate information that may be relevant to the research question(s). Manual transcription of data can be a very useful activity for the researcher in this regard, and can greatly facilitate a deep immersion into the data. Data should be transcribed orthographically, noting inflections, breaks, pauses, tones, etc. on the part of both the interviewer and the participant (Braun and Clarke 2013 ). Often times, data may not have been gathered or transcribed by the researcher, in which case, it would be beneficial for the researcher to watch/listen to video or audio recordings to achieve a greater contextual understanding of the data. This phase can be quite time consuming and requires a degree of patience. However, it is important to afford equal consideration across the entire depth and breadth of the dataset, and to avoid the temptation of being selective of what to read, or even ‘skipping over’ this phase completely (Braun and Clarke 2006 ).

At this phase, I set about familiarising myself with the data by firstly listening to each interview recording once before transcribing that particular recording. This first playback of each interview recording required ‘active listening’ and, as such, I did not take any notes at this point. I performed this active-listen in order to develop an understanding of the primary areas addressed in each interview prior to transcription. This also provided me an opportunity, unburdened by tasks such as note taking, to recall gestures and mannerisms that may or may not have been documented in interview notes. I manually transcribed each interview immediately after the active-listen playback. When transcription of all interviews was complete, I read each transcripts numerous times. At this point, I took note of casual observations of initial trends in the data and potentially interesting passages in the transcripts. I also documented my thoughts and feelings regarding both the data and the analytical process (in terms of transparency, it would be beneficial to adhere to this practice throughout the entire analysis). Some preliminary notes made during the early iterations of familiarisation with the data can be seen in Box 1. It will be seen later that some of these notes would go on to inform the interpretation of the finalised thematic framework.

Example of preliminary notes taken during phase one

3.2.2 Phase two: generating initial codes

Codes are the fundamental building blocks of what will later become themes. The process of coding is undertaken to produce succinct, shorthand descriptive or interpretive labels for pieces of information that may be of relevance to the research question(s). It is recommended that the researcher work systematically through the entire dataset, attending to each data item with equal consideration, and identifying aspects of data items that are interesting and may be informative in developing themes. Codes should be brief, but offer sufficient detail to be able to stand alone and inform of the underlying commonality among constituent data items in relation to the subject of the research (Braun and Clarke 2012 ; Braun et al. 2016 ).

A brief excerpt of the preliminary coding process of one participant’s interview transcript is presented in Box 2. The preliminary iteration of coding was conducted using the ‘comments’ function in Microsoft Word (2016). This allowed codes to be noted in the side margin, while also highlighting the area of text assigned to each respective code. This is a relatively straightforward example with no double-codes or overlap in data informing different codes, as new codes begin where previous codes end. The code C5 offers an exemplar of the provision of sufficient detail to explain what I interpreted from the related data item. A poor example of this code would be to say “the wellbeing guidelines are not relatable” or “not relatable for students”. Each of these examples lack context. Understanding codes written in this way would be contingent upon knowledge of the underlying data extract. The code C8 exemplifies this issue. It is unclear if the positivity mentioned relates to the particular participant, their colleagues, or their students. This code was subsequently redefined in later iterations of coding. It can also be seen in this short example that the same code has been produced for both C4 and C9. This code was prevalent throughout the entire dataset and would subsequently be informative in the development of a theme.

Extract of preliminary coding

Any item of data that might be useful in addressing the research question(s) should be coded. Through repeated iterations of coding and further familiarisation, the researcher can identify which codes are conducive to interpreting themes and which can be discarded. I would recommend that the researcher document their progression through iterations of coding to track the evolution of codes and indeed prospective themes. RTA is a recursive process and it is rare that a researcher would follow a linear path through the six phases (Braun and Clarke 2014 ). It is very common for the researcher to follow a particular train of thought when coding, only to encounter an impasse where several different interpretations of the data come to light. It may be necessary to explore each of these prospective options to identify the most appropriate path to follow. Tracking the evolution of codes will not only aid transparency, but will afford the researcher signposts and waypoints to which they may return should a particular approach to coding prove unfruitful. I tracked the evolution of my coding process in a spreadsheet, with data items documented in the first column and iterations of codes in each successive column. I found it useful to highlight which codes were changed in each successive iteration. Table 1 provides an excerpt of a Microsoft Excel (2016) spreadsheet that was established to track iterations of coding and document the overall analytical process. All codes developed during the first iteration of coding were transferred into this spreadsheet along with a label identifying the respective participant. Subsequent iterations of coding were documented in this spreadsheet. The original transcripts were still regularly consulted to assess existing codes and examine for the interpretation of new codes as further familiarity with the data developed. Column one presents a reference number for the data item that was coded, while column two indicates the participant who provided each data item. Column three presents the data item that was coded. Columns four and five indicate the iteration of the coding process to be the third and fourth iteration, respectively. Codes revised between iterations three and four are highlighted.

With regard to data item one, I initially considered that a narrative might develop exploring a potential discrepancy in levels of training received by wellbeing educators and non-wellbeing educators. In early iterations of coding, I adopted a convention of coding training-related information with reference to the wellbeing or non-wellbeing status of the participant. While this discrepancy in levels of training remained evident throughout the dataset, I eventually deemed it unnecessary to pursue interpretation of the data in this way. This coding convention was abandoned at iteration four in favour of the pre-existing generalised code “insufficient training in wellbeing curriculum”. With data item three, I realised that the code was descriptive at a semantic level, but not very informative. Upon re-evaluating this data item, I found the pre-existing code “lack of clarity in assessing student wellbeing” to be much more appropriate and representative of what the participant seemed to be communicating. Finally, I realised that the code for data item five was too specific to this particular data item. No other data item shared this code, which would preclude this code (and data item) from consideration when construction themes. I decided that this item would be subsumed under the pre-existing code “more training is needed for wellbeing promotion”.

The process of generating codes is non-prescriptive regarding how data is segmented and itemised for coding, and how many codes or what type of codes (semantic or latent) are interpreted from an item of data. The same data item can be coded both semantically and latently if deemed necessary. For example, when discussing how able they felt to attend to their students’ wellbeing needs, one participant stated “…if someone’s struggling a bit with their schoolwork and it’s getting them down a bit, it’s common sense that determines what we say to them or how we approach them. And it might help to talk, but I don’t know that it has a lasting effect” [2B]. Here, I understood that the participant was explicitly sharing the way in which they address their students’ wellbeing concerns, but also that the participant was implying that this commonsense approach might not be sufficient. As such, this data item was coded both semantically as “educators rely on common sense when attending to wellbeing issues”, and latently as “common sense inadequate for wellbeing promotion”. Both codes were revised later in the analysis. However, this example illustrates the way in which any data item can be coded in multiple ways and for multiple meanings. There is also no upper or lower limit regarding how many codes should be interpreted. What is important is that, when the dataset is fully coded and codes are collated, sufficient depth exists to examine the patterns within the data and the diversity of the positions held by participants. It is, however, necessary to ensure that codes pertain to more than one data item (Braun and Clarke 2012 ).

3.2.3 Phase three: generating themes

This phase begins when all relevant data items have been coded. The focus shifts from the interpretation of individual data items within the dataset, to the interpretation of aggregated meaning and meaningfulness across the dataset. The coded data is reviewed and analysed as to how different codes may be combined according to shared meanings so that they may form themes or sub-themes. This will often involve collapsing multiple codes that share a similar underlying concept or feature of the data into one single code. Equally, one particular code may turn out to be representative of an over-arching narrative within the data and be promoted as a sub-theme or even a theme (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). It is important to re-emphasise that themes do not reside in the data waiting to be found. Rather, the researcher must actively construe the relationship among the different codes and examine how this relationship may inform the narrative of a given theme. Construing the importance or salience of a theme is not contingent upon the number of codes or data items that inform a particular theme. What is important is that the pattern of codes and data items communicates something meaningful that helps answer the research question(s) (Braun and Clarke 2013 ).

Themes should be distinctive and may even be contradictory to other themes, but should tie together to produce a coherent and lucid picture of the dataset. The researcher must be able and willing to let go of codes or prospective themes that may not fit within the overall analysis. It may be beneficial to construct a miscellaneous theme (or category) to contain all the codes that do not appear to fit in among any prospective themes. This miscellaneous theme may end up becoming a theme in its own right, or may simple be removed from the analysis during a later phase (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). Much the same as with codes, there is no correct amount of themes. However, with too many themes the analysis may become unwieldy and incoherent, whereas too few themes can result in the analysis failing to explore fully the depth and breadth of the data. At the end of this stage, the researcher should be able to produce a thematic map (e.g. a mind map or affinity map) or table that collates codes and data items relative to their respective themes (Braun and Clarke 2012 , 2020 ).

At this point in the analysis, I assembled codes into initial candidate themes. A thematic map of the initial candidate themes can be seen in Fig.  1 . The theme “best practice in wellbeing promotion” was clearly definable, with constituent coded data presenting two concurrent narratives. These narratives were constructed as two separate sub-themes, which emphasised the involvement of the entire school staff and the active pursuit of practical measures in promoting student wellbeing, respectively. The theme “recognising student wellbeing” was similarly clear. Again, I interpreted a dichotomy of narratives. However, in this case, the two narratives seemed to be even more synergetic. The two sub-themes for “best practice…” highlighted two independently informative factors in best practice. Here, the sub-themes are much more closely related, with one sub-theme identifying factors that may inhibit the development of student wellbeing, while the second sub-theme discusses factors that may improve student wellbeing. At this early stage in the analysis, I was considering that this sub-theme structure might also be used to delineate the theme “recognising educator wellbeing”. Finally, the theme “factors influencing wellbeing promotion” collated coded data items that addressed inhibitive factors with regard to wellbeing promotion. These factors were conceptualised as four separate sub-themes reflecting a lack of training, a lack of time, a lack of appropriate value for wellbeing promotion, and a lack of knowledge of supporting wellbeing-related documents. While it was useful to bring all of this information together under one theme, even at this early stage it was evident that this particular theme was very dense and unwieldy, and would likely require further revision.

Initial thematic map indicating four candidate themes

3.2.4 Phase four: reviewing potential themes

This phase requires the researcher to conduct a recursive review of the candidate themes in relation to the coded data items and the entire dataset (Braun and Clarke 2012 , 2020 ). At this phase, it is not uncommon to find that some candidate themes may not function well as meaningful interpretations of the data, or may not provide information that addresses the research question(s). It may also come to light that some of the constituent codes and/or data items that inform these themes may be incongruent and require revision. Braun and Clarke ( 2012 , p. 65) proposed a series of key questions that the researcher should address when reviewing potential themes. They are:

Is this a theme (it could be just a code)?

If it is a theme, what is the quality of this theme (does it tell me something useful about the data set and my research question)?

What are the boundaries of this theme (what does it include and exclude)?

Are there enough (meaningful) data to support this theme (is the theme thin or thick)?

Are the data too diverse and wide ranging (does the theme lack coherence)?

The analysis conducted at this phase involves two levels of review. Level one is a review of the relationships among the data items and codes that inform each theme and sub-theme. If the items/codes form a coherent pattern, it can be assumed that the candidate theme/sub-theme makes a logical argument and may contribute to the overall narrative of the data. At level two, the candidate themes are reviewed in relation to the data set. Themes are assessed as to how well they provide the most apt interpretation of the data in relation to the research question(s). Braun and Clarke have proposed that, when addressing these key questions, it may be useful to observe Patton’s ( 1990 ) ‘dual criteria for judging categories’ (i.e. internal homogeneity and external heterogeneity). The aim of Patton’s dual criteria would be to observe internal homogeneity within themes at the level one review, while observing external heterogeneity among themes at the level two review. Essentially, these two levels of review function to demonstrate that items and codes are appropriate to inform a theme, and that a theme is appropriate to inform the interpretation of the dataset (Braun and Clarke 2006 ). The outcome of this dual-level review is often that some sub-themes or themes may need to be restructured by adding or removing codes, or indeed adding or removing themes/sub-themes. The finalised thematic framework that resulted from the review of the candidate themes can be seen in Fig.  2 .

Finalised thematic map demonstrating five themes

During the level one review, inspection of the prospective sub-theme “sources of negative affect” in relation to the theme “recognising educator wellbeing” resulted in a new interpretation of the constituent coded data items. Participants communicated numerous pre-existing work-related factors that they felt had a negative impact upon their wellbeing. However, it was also evident that participants felt the introduction of the new wellbeing curriculum and the newly mandated task of formally attending to student wellbeing had compounded these pre-existing issues. While pre-existing issues and wellbeing-related issues were both informative of educators’ negative affect, the new interpretation of this data informed the realisation of two concurrent narratives, with wellbeing-related issues being a compounding factor in relation to pre-existing issues. This resulted in the “sources of negative affect” sub-theme being split into two new sub-themes; “work-related negative affect” and “the influence of wellbeing promotion”. The “actions to improve educator wellbeing” sub-theme was folded into these sub-themes, with remedial measures for each issue being discussed in respective sub-themes.

During the level two review, my concerns regarding the theme “factors inhibiting wellbeing promotion” were addressed. With regard to Braun and Clarke’s key questions, it was quite difficult to identify the boundaries of this theme. It was also particularly dense (or too thick) and somewhat incoherent. At this point, I concluded that this theme did not constitute an appropriate representation of the data. Earlier phases of the analysis were reiterated and new interpretations of the data were developed. This candidate theme was subsequently broken down into three separate themes. While the sub-themes of this candidate theme were, to a degree, informative in the development of the new themes, the way in which the constituent data was understood was fundamentally reconceptualised. The new theme, entitled “the influence of time”, moves past merely describing time constraints as an inhibitive factor in wellbeing promotion. A more thorough account of the bi-directional nature of time constraints was realised, which acknowledged that previously existing time constraints affected wellbeing promotion, while wellbeing promotion compounded previously existing time constraints. This added an analysis of the way in which the introduction of wellbeing promotion also produced time constraints in relation to core curricular activities.

The candidate sub-themes “lack of training” and “knowledge of necessary documents” were re-evaluated and considered to be topical rather than thematic aspects of the data. Upon further inspection, I felt that the constituent coded data items of these two sub-themes were informative of a single narrative of participants attending to their students’ wellbeing in an atheoretical manner. As such, these two candidate sub-themes were folded into each other to produce the theme “incompletely theorised agreements”. Finally, the level two review led me to the conclusion that the full potential of the data that informed the candidate sub-theme “lack of value of wellbeing promotion” was not realised. I found that a much richer understanding of this data was possible, which was obscured by the initial, relatively simplistic, descriptive account offered. An important distinction was made, in that participants held differing perceptions of the value attributed to wellbeing promotion by educators and by students. Further, I realised that educators’ perceptions of wellbeing promotion were not necessarily negative and should not be exclusively presented as an inhibitive factor in wellbeing promotion. A new theme, named “the axiology of wellbeing” and informed by the sub-themes “students’ valuation of wellbeing promotion” and “educators’ valuation of wellbeing promotion”, was developed to delineate this multifaceted understanding of participants’ accounts of the value of wellbeing promotion.

It is quite typical at this phase that codes, as well as themes, may be revised or removed to facilitate the most meaningful interpretation of the data. As such, it may be necessary to reiterate some of the activities undertaken during phases two and three of the analysis. It may be necessary to recode some data items, collapse some codes into one, remove some codes, or promote some codes as sub-themes or themes. For example, when re-examining the data items that informed the narrative of the value ascribed to wellbeing promotion, I observed that participants offered very different perceptions of the value ascribed by educators and by students. To pursue this line of analysis, numerous codes were reconceptualised to reflect the two different perspectives. Codes such as “positivity regarding the wellbeing curriculum” were split into the more specified codes “student positivity regarding the wellbeing curriculum” and “educator positivity regarding the wellbeing curriculum”. Amending codes in this way ultimately contributed to the reinterpretation of the data and the development of the finalised thematic map.

As with all other phases, it is very important to track and document all of these changes. With regard to some of the more significant changes (removing a theme, for example), I would recommend making notes on why it might be necessary to take this action. The aim of this phase is to produce a revised thematic map or table that captures the most important elements of the data in relation to the research question(s).

3.2.5 Phase five: defining and naming theme

At this phase, the researcher is tasked with presenting a detailed analysis of the thematic framework. Each individual theme and sub-theme is to be expressed in relation to both the dataset and the research question(s). As per Patton’s ( 1990 ) dual criteria, each theme should provide a coherent and internally consistent account of the data that cannot be told by the other themes. However, all themes should come together to create a lucid narrative that is consistent with the content of the dataset and informative in relation to the research question(s). The names of the themes are also subject to a final revision (if necessary) at this point.

Defining themes requires a deep analysis of the underlying data items. There will likely be many data items underlying each theme. It is at this point that the researcher is required to identify which data items to use as extracts when writing up the results of the analysis. The chosen extracts should provide a vivid and compelling account of the arguments being made by a respective theme. Multiple extracts should be used from the entire pool of data items that inform a theme in order to convey the diversity of expressions of meaning across these data items, and to demonstrate the cohesion of the theme’s constituent data items. Furthermore, each of the reported data extracts should be subject to a deep analysis, going beyond merely reporting what a participant may have said. Each extract should be interpreted in relation to its constitutive theme, as well as the broader context of the research question(s), creating an analytic narrative that informs the reader what is interesting about this extract and why (Braun and Clarke 2012 ).

Data extracts can be presented either illustratively, providing a surface-level description of what participants said, or analytically, interrogating what has been interpreted to be important about what participants said and contextualising this interpretation in relation to the available literature. If the researcher were aiming to produce a more illustrative write-up of the analysis, relating the results to the available literature would tend to be held until the ‘discussion’ section of the report. If the researcher were aiming to produce an analytical write-up, extracts would tend to be contextualised in relation to the literature as and when they are reported in the ‘results’ section (Braun and Clarke 2013 ; Terry et al. 2017 ). While an illustrative write-up of RTA results is completely acceptable, the researcher should remain cognisant that the narrative of the write-up should communicate the complexities of the data, while remaining “embedded in the scholarly field” (Braun and Clarke 2012 , p. 69). RTA is an interpretive approach to analysis and, as such, the overall report should go beyond describing the data, providing theoretically informed arguments as to how the data addresses the research question(s). To this end, a relatively straightforward test can reveal a researcher’s potential proclivity towards one particular reporting convention: If an extract can be removed and the write-up still makes sense, the reporting style is illustrative; if an extract is removed and the write-up no longer makes sense, the reporting style is analytical (Terry et al. 2017 ).

The example in Box 3 contains a brief excerpt from the sub-theme “the whole-school approach”, which demonstrates the way in which a data extract may be reported in an illustrative manner. Here, the narrative discussed the necessity of having an ‘appropriate educator’ deliver the different aspects of the wellbeing curriculum. One participant provided a particularly useful real-world example of the potential negative implications of having ‘the wrong person’ for this job in relation to physical education (one of the aspects of the wellbeing curriculum). This data extract very much informed the narrative and illustrated participants’ arguments regarding the importance of choosing an appropriate educator for the job.

Example of data extract reported illustratively

In Box 4, an example is offered of how a data extract may be reported in an analytical manner. This excerpt is also taken from the sub-theme “the whole-school approach”, and also informs the ‘appropriate educator for the job’ narrative. Here, however, sufficient evidence has already been established to illustrate the perspectives of the participants. The report turns to a deeper analysis of what has been said and how it has been said. Specifically, the way in which participants seemed to construe an ‘appropriate educator’ was examined and related to existing literature. The analytical interpretation of this data extract (and others) proposes interesting implications regarding the way in which participants constructed their schema of an ‘appropriate educator’.

Example of data extract reported analytically

The names of themes are also subject to a final review (if necessary) at this point. Naming themes may seem trivial and might subsequently receive less attention than it actually requires. However, naming themes is a very important task. Theme names are the first indication to the reader of what has been captured from the data. Names should be concise, informative, and memorable. The overriding tendency may be to create names that are descriptors of the theme. Braun and Clarke ( 2013 , 2014 , 2020 ) encourage creativity and advocate the use of catchy names that may more immediately capture the attention of the reader, while also communicating an important aspect of the theme. To this end, they suggest that it may be useful to examine data items for a short extract that could be used to punctuate the theme name.

3.2.6 Phase six: producing the report

The separation between phases five and six can often be blurry. Further, this ‘final’ phase would rarely only occur at the end of the analysis. As opposed to practices typical of quantitative research that would see the researcher conduct and then write up the analysis, the write-up of qualitative research is very much interwoven into the entire process of the analysis (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). Again, as with previous phases, this will likely require a recursive approach to report writing. As codes and themes change and evolve over the course of the analysis, so too can the write-up. Changes should be well documented by this phase and reflected in informal notes and memos, as well as a research journal that should be kept over the entire course of the research. Phase six then, can be seen as the completion and final inspection of the report that the researcher would most likely have begun writing before even undertaking their thematic analysis (e.g. a journal article or thesis/dissertation).

A useful task to address at this point would be to establish the order in which themes are reported. Themes should connect in a logical and meaningful manner, building a cogent narrative of the data. Where relevant, themes should build upon previously reported themes, while remaining internally consistent and capable of communicating their own individual narrative if isolated from other themes (Braun and Clarke 2012 ). I reported the theme “best practice in wellbeing promotion” first, as I felt it established the positivity that seemed to underlie the accounts provided by all of my participants. This theme was also strongly influence by semantic codes, with participants being very capable of describing what they felt would constitute ‘best practice’. I saw this as an easily digestible first theme to ease the reader into the wider analysis. It made sense to report “the axiology of wellbeing promotion” next. This theme introduced the reality that, despite an underlying degree of positivity, participants did indeed have numerous concerns regarding wellbeing promotion, and that participants’ attitudes were generally positive with a significant ‘but’. This theme provided good sign-posting for the next two themes that would be reported, which were “the influence of time” and “incompletely theorised agreements”, respectively. I reported “the influence of time” first, as this theme established how time constraints could negatively affect educator training, contributing to a context in which educators were inadvertently pushed towards adopting incompletely theorised agreements when promoting student wellbeing. The last theme to be reported was “recognising educator wellbeing”. As the purpose of the analysis was to ascertain the attitudes of educators regarding wellbeing promotion, it felt appropriate to offer the closing commentary of the analysis to educators’ accounts of their own wellbeing. This became particularly pertinent when the sub-themes were revised to reflect the influence of pre-existing work-related issues and the subsequent influence of wellbeing promotion.

An issue proponents of RTA may realise when writing up their analysis is the potential for incongruence between traditional conventions for report writing and the appropriate style for reporting RTA—particularly when adopting an analytical approach to reporting on data. The document structure for academic journal articles and Masters or PhD theses typically subscribe to the convention of reporting results of analyses in a ‘results’ section and then synthesising and contextualising the results of analyses in a ‘discussion’ section. Conversely, Braun and Clarke recommend synthesising and contextualising data as and when they are reported in the ‘results’ section (Braun and Clarke 2013 ; Terry et al. 2017 ). This is a significant departure from the traditional reporting convention, which researchers—particularly post-graduate students—may find difficult to reconcile. While Braun and Clarke do not explicitly address this potential issue, it is implicitly evident that they would advocate that researchers prioritise the appropriate reporting style for RTA and not cede to the traditional reporting convention.

4 Conclusion

Although Braun and Clarke are widely published on the topic of reflexive thematic analysis, confusion persists in the wider literature regarding the appropriate implementation of this approach. The aim of this paper has been to contribute to dispelling some of this confusion by provide a worked example of Braun and Clarke’s contemporary approach to reflexive thematic analysis. To this end, this paper provided instruction in how to address the theoretical underpinnings of RTA by operationalising the theoretical assumptions of the example data in relation to the study from which the data was taken. Clear instruction was also provided in how to conduct a reflexive thematic analysis. This was achieved by providing a detailed step-by-step guide to Braun and Clarke’s six-phase process, and by providing numerous examples of the implementation of each phase based on my own research. Braun and Clarke have made (and continue to make) an extremely valuable contribution to the discourse regarding qualitative analysis. I strongly recommended that any prospective proponents of RTA who may read this paper thoroughly examine Braun and Clarke’s full body of literature in this area, and aim to achieve an understanding of RTA’s nuanced position among the numerous different approaches to thematic analysis.

While the reconceptualisation of RTA as falling within the remit of a purely qualitative paradigm precipitates that the research fall on the constructionist end of this continuum, it is nevertheless good practice to explicate this theoretical position.

Boyatzis, R.E.: Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)

Google Scholar  

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3 (2), 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Article   Google Scholar  

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Thematic analysis. In: Cooper, H., Camic, P.M., Long, D.L., Panter, A.T., Rindskopf, D., Sher, K.J. (eds.) APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Research Designs, vol. 2, pp. 57–71. American Psychological Association, Washington (2012)

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2013)

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Thematic analysis. In: Teo, T. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology, pp. 1947–1952. Springer, New York (2014)

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health 11 (4), 589–597 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual. Res. Psychol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Weate, P.: Using Thematic Analysis in sport and exercise research. In: Smith, B., Sparkes, A.C. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, pp. 191–205. Routledge, London (2016)

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Terry, G., Hayfield, N.: Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong, P. (ed.) Handbook of Research Methods in Health and Social Sciences, pp. 843–860. Springer, Singapore (2018)

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Terry, G.: Answers to frequently asked questions about thematic analysis (2019). Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our-research/documents/Answers%20to%20frequently%20asked%20questions%20about%20thematic%20analysis%20April%202019.pdf

Burr, V.: An Introduction to Social Constructionism. Routledge, London, UK (1995)

Book   Google Scholar  

Clarke, V., Braun, V.: Thematic Analysis. In: Lyons, E., Coyle, A. (eds.) Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology, 2nd edn., pp. 84–103. Sage Publications, London (2016)

Frith, H., Gleeson, K.: Clothing and embodiment: men managing body image and appearance. Psychol. Men Mascul. 5 (1), 40–48 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.5.1.40

Joffe, H.: Thematic analysis. In: Harper, D., Thompson, A.R. (eds.) Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners, pp. 209–223. Wiley, Chichester (2012)

King, N., Brooks, J.M.: Template analysis for business and management students. Sage Publications, London, UK (2017)

Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1990)

Schwandt, T.A.: Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues, pp. 221–259. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)

Smith, J., Firth, J.: Qualitative data analysis: The framework approach. Nurse Res. 18 (2), 52–62 (2011). https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284

Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Thematic analysis. In: Willig, C., Rogers, W.S. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, pp. 17–37. Sage Publications, London (2017)

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., Bondas, T.: Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs. Health Sci. 15 (3), 398–405 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

Widdicombe, S., Wooffitt, R.: The Language of Youth Subcultures: Social Identity in Action. Harvester, Hemel Hempstead (1995)

Download references

Open Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium. This study was funded by Technological University Dublin Research Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Technological University Dublin – Blanchardstown Campus, Dublin, Ireland

David Byrne

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Byrne .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The author declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Byrne, D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant 56 , 1391–1412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Download citation

Accepted : 06 June 2021

Published : 26 June 2021

Issue Date : June 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Thematic analysis
• Qualitative
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Qualitative vs Quantitative Research Methods & Data Analysis

Saul Mcleod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul Mcleod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

What is the difference between quantitative and qualitative?

The main difference between quantitative and qualitative research is the type of data they collect and analyze.

Quantitative research collects numerical data and analyzes it using statistical methods. The aim is to produce objective, empirical data that can be measured and expressed in numerical terms. Quantitative research is often used to test hypotheses, identify patterns, and make predictions.

Qualitative research , on the other hand, collects non-numerical data such as words, images, and sounds. The focus is on exploring subjective experiences, opinions, and attitudes, often through observation and interviews.

Qualitative research aims to produce rich and detailed descriptions of the phenomenon being studied, and to uncover new insights and meanings.

Quantitative data is information about quantities, and therefore numbers, and qualitative data is descriptive, and regards phenomenon which can be observed but not measured, such as language.

What Is Qualitative Research?

Qualitative research is the process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical data, such as language. Qualitative research can be used to understand how an individual subjectively perceives and gives meaning to their social reality.

Qualitative data is non-numerical data, such as text, video, photographs, or audio recordings. This type of data can be collected using diary accounts or in-depth interviews and analyzed using grounded theory or thematic analysis.

Qualitative research is multimethod in focus, involving an interpretive, naturalistic approach to its subject matter. This means that qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or interpret, phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them. Denzin and Lincoln (1994, p. 2)

Interest in qualitative data came about as the result of the dissatisfaction of some psychologists (e.g., Carl Rogers) with the scientific study of psychologists such as behaviorists (e.g., Skinner ).

Since psychologists study people, the traditional approach to science is not seen as an appropriate way of carrying out research since it fails to capture the totality of human experience and the essence of being human.  Exploring participants’ experiences is known as a phenomenological approach (re: Humanism ).

Qualitative research is primarily concerned with meaning, subjectivity, and lived experience. The goal is to understand the quality and texture of people’s experiences, how they make sense of them, and the implications for their lives.

Qualitative research aims to understand the social reality of individuals, groups, and cultures as nearly as possible as participants feel or live it. Thus, people and groups are studied in their natural setting.

Some examples of qualitative research questions are provided, such as what an experience feels like, how people talk about something, how they make sense of an experience, and how events unfold for people.

Research following a qualitative approach is exploratory and seeks to explain ‘how’ and ‘why’ a particular phenomenon, or behavior, operates as it does in a particular context. It can be used to generate hypotheses and theories from the data.

Qualitative Methods

There are different types of qualitative research methods, including diary accounts, in-depth interviews , documents, focus groups , case study research , and ethnography.

The results of qualitative methods provide a deep understanding of how people perceive their social realities and in consequence, how they act within the social world.

The researcher has several methods for collecting empirical materials, ranging from the interview to direct observation, to the analysis of artifacts, documents, and cultural records, to the use of visual materials or personal experience. Denzin and Lincoln (1994, p. 14)

Here are some examples of qualitative data:

Interview transcripts : Verbatim records of what participants said during an interview or focus group. They allow researchers to identify common themes and patterns, and draw conclusions based on the data. Interview transcripts can also be useful in providing direct quotes and examples to support research findings.

Observations : The researcher typically takes detailed notes on what they observe, including any contextual information, nonverbal cues, or other relevant details. The resulting observational data can be analyzed to gain insights into social phenomena, such as human behavior, social interactions, and cultural practices.

Unstructured interviews : generate qualitative data through the use of open questions.  This allows the respondent to talk in some depth, choosing their own words.  This helps the researcher develop a real sense of a person’s understanding of a situation.

Diaries or journals : Written accounts of personal experiences or reflections.

Notice that qualitative data could be much more than just words or text. Photographs, videos, sound recordings, and so on, can be considered qualitative data. Visual data can be used to understand behaviors, environments, and social interactions.

Qualitative Data Analysis

Qualitative research is endlessly creative and interpretive. The researcher does not just leave the field with mountains of empirical data and then easily write up his or her findings.

Qualitative interpretations are constructed, and various techniques can be used to make sense of the data, such as content analysis, grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967), thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006), or discourse analysis.

For example, thematic analysis is a qualitative approach that involves identifying implicit or explicit ideas within the data. Themes will often emerge once the data has been coded.

Key Features

• Events can be understood adequately only if they are seen in context. Therefore, a qualitative researcher immerses her/himself in the field, in natural surroundings. The contexts of inquiry are not contrived; they are natural. Nothing is predefined or taken for granted.
• Qualitative researchers want those who are studied to speak for themselves, to provide their perspectives in words and other actions. Therefore, qualitative research is an interactive process in which the persons studied teach the researcher about their lives.
• The qualitative researcher is an integral part of the data; without the active participation of the researcher, no data exists.
• The study’s design evolves during the research and can be adjusted or changed as it progresses. For the qualitative researcher, there is no single reality. It is subjective and exists only in reference to the observer.
• The theory is data-driven and emerges as part of the research process, evolving from the data as they are collected.

Limitations of Qualitative Research

• Because of the time and costs involved, qualitative designs do not generally draw samples from large-scale data sets.
• The problem of adequate validity or reliability is a major criticism. Because of the subjective nature of qualitative data and its origin in single contexts, it is difficult to apply conventional standards of reliability and validity. For example, because of the central role played by the researcher in the generation of data, it is not possible to replicate qualitative studies.
• Also, contexts, situations, events, conditions, and interactions cannot be replicated to any extent, nor can generalizations be made to a wider context than the one studied with confidence.
• The time required for data collection, analysis, and interpretation is lengthy. Analysis of qualitative data is difficult, and expert knowledge of an area is necessary to interpret qualitative data. Great care must be taken when doing so, for example, looking for mental illness symptoms.

Advantages of Qualitative Research

• Because of close researcher involvement, the researcher gains an insider’s view of the field. This allows the researcher to find issues that are often missed (such as subtleties and complexities) by the scientific, more positivistic inquiries.
• Qualitative descriptions can be important in suggesting possible relationships, causes, effects, and dynamic processes.
• Qualitative analysis allows for ambiguities/contradictions in the data, which reflect social reality (Denscombe, 2010).
• Qualitative research uses a descriptive, narrative style; this research might be of particular benefit to the practitioner as she or he could turn to qualitative reports to examine forms of knowledge that might otherwise be unavailable, thereby gaining new insight.

What Is Quantitative Research?

Quantitative research involves the process of objectively collecting and analyzing numerical data to describe, predict, or control variables of interest.

The goals of quantitative research are to test causal relationships between variables , make predictions, and generalize results to wider populations.

Quantitative researchers aim to establish general laws of behavior and phenomenon across different settings/contexts. Research is used to test a theory and ultimately support or reject it.

Quantitative Methods

Experiments typically yield quantitative data, as they are concerned with measuring things.  However, other research methods, such as controlled observations and questionnaires , can produce both quantitative information.

For example, a rating scale or closed questions on a questionnaire would generate quantitative data as these produce either numerical data or data that can be put into categories (e.g., “yes,” “no” answers).

Experimental methods limit how research participants react to and express appropriate social behavior.

Findings are, therefore, likely to be context-bound and simply a reflection of the assumptions that the researcher brings to the investigation.

There are numerous examples of quantitative data in psychological research, including mental health. Here are a few examples:

Another example is the Experience in Close Relationships Scale (ECR), a self-report questionnaire widely used to assess adult attachment styles .

The ECR provides quantitative data that can be used to assess attachment styles and predict relationship outcomes.

Neuroimaging data : Neuroimaging techniques, such as MRI and fMRI, provide quantitative data on brain structure and function.

This data can be analyzed to identify brain regions involved in specific mental processes or disorders.

For example, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a clinician-administered questionnaire widely used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms in individuals.

The BDI consists of 21 questions, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. 

Quantitative Data Analysis

Statistics help us turn quantitative data into useful information to help with decision-making. We can use statistics to summarize our data, describing patterns, relationships, and connections. Statistics can be descriptive or inferential.

Descriptive statistics help us to summarize our data. In contrast, inferential statistics are used to identify statistically significant differences between groups of data (such as intervention and control groups in a randomized control study).

• Quantitative researchers try to control extraneous variables by conducting their studies in the lab.
• The research aims for objectivity (i.e., without bias) and is separated from the data.
• The design of the study is determined before it begins.
• For the quantitative researcher, the reality is objective, exists separately from the researcher, and can be seen by anyone.
• Research is used to test a theory and ultimately support or reject it.

Limitations of Quantitative Research

• Context: Quantitative experiments do not take place in natural settings. In addition, they do not allow participants to explain their choices or the meaning of the questions they may have for those participants (Carr, 1994).
• Researcher expertise: Poor knowledge of the application of statistical analysis may negatively affect analysis and subsequent interpretation (Black, 1999).
• Variability of data quantity: Large sample sizes are needed for more accurate analysis. Small-scale quantitative studies may be less reliable because of the low quantity of data (Denscombe, 2010). This also affects the ability to generalize study findings to wider populations.
• Confirmation bias: The researcher might miss observing phenomena because of focus on theory or hypothesis testing rather than on the theory of hypothesis generation.

Advantages of Quantitative Research

• Scientific objectivity: Quantitative data can be interpreted with statistical analysis, and since statistics are based on the principles of mathematics, the quantitative approach is viewed as scientifically objective and rational (Carr, 1994; Denscombe, 2010).
• Useful for testing and validating already constructed theories.
• Rapid analysis: Sophisticated software removes much of the need for prolonged data analysis, especially with large volumes of data involved (Antonius, 2003).
• Replication: Quantitative data is based on measured values and can be checked by others because numerical data is less open to ambiguities of interpretation.
• Hypotheses can also be tested because of statistical analysis (Antonius, 2003).

Antonius, R. (2003). Interpreting quantitative data with SPSS . Sage.

Black, T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An integrated approach to research design, measurement and statistics . Sage.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology . Qualitative Research in Psychology , 3, 77–101.

Carr, L. T. (1994). The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research : what method for nursing? Journal of advanced nursing, 20(4) , 716-721.

Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research. McGraw Hill.

Denzin, N., & Lincoln. Y. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications Inc.

Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing research, 17(4) , 364.

Minichiello, V. (1990). In-Depth Interviewing: Researching People. Longman Cheshire.

Punch, K. (1998). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage

Further Information

• Designing qualitative research
• Methods of data collection and analysis
• Introduction to quantitative and qualitative research
• Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
• Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data
• Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach
• Using the framework method for the analysis of
• Qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
• Content Analysis
• Grounded Theory
• Thematic Analysis

The Ultimate Guide to Qualitative Research - Part 2: Handling Qualitative Data

• Handling qualitative data
• Transcripts
• Field notes
• Survey data and responses
• Visual and audio data
• Data organization
• Data coding
• Coding frame
• Auto and smart coding
• Organizing codes
• Qualitative data analysis

Content analysis

• Introduction

What is meant by thematic analysis?

The thematic analysis process, thematic analysis in other research methods, using atlas.ti for qualitative analysis, considerations for thematic analysis.

• Thematic analysis vs. content analysis
• Narrative research
• Phenomenological research

Discourse analysis

Grounded theory.

• Deductive reasoning
• Inductive reasoning
• Inductive vs. deductive reasoning
• Qualitative data interpretation
• Qualitative analysis software

Thematic analysis

One of the most straightforward forms of qualitative data analysis involves the identification of themes and patterns that appear in otherwise unstructured qualitative data . Thematic analysis is an integral component of qualitative research because it provides an entry point into analyzing qualitative data.

Let's look at thematic analysis, its role in qualitative research methods , and how ATLAS.ti can help you form themes from raw data to generate a theoretical framework .

The main objective of research is to order data into meaningful patterns and generate new knowledge arising from theories about that data. Quantitative data is analyzed to measure a phenomenon's quantifiable aspects (e.g., an element's melting point, the effective income tax rate in the suburbs). The advantage of quantitative research is that data is often already structured, or at least easily structured, to quickly draw insights from numerical values.

On the other hand, some phenomena cannot be easily quantified, or they require conceptual development before they can be quantified. For example, what do people mean when they think of a movie or TV show as "good"? In the everyday world, people in a casual discussion may judge the quality of entertainment as a matter of personal preference, something that cannot be defined, let alone universally understood.

As a result, researchers analyze qualitative data for identifying themes or phenomena that occur often or in telling patterns. In the case of TV shows, a collection of reviews of TV shows may frequently mention the acting, the script writing, and the production values, among other things. If these aspects are mentioned the most often, researchers can think of these as the themes determining the quality of a given TV show.

A useful metaphor for thematic analysis

Even if this is an easy concept to grasp, realizing this concept in qualitative research is a significant challenge. The biggest consideration for thematic analysis is that qualitative data is often unstructured and requires some organization to make it relevant to researchers and their audience.

Imagine that you have a bag of marbles. Each marble has one of a set of different colors. If you were to sort the marbles by color, you could determine how many colors are in the bag and which colors are the most common.

The thematic analysis process is similar to sorting different-colored marbles. Instead of sorting colors, you are sorting themes in a data set to determine which themes appear the most often or to identify patterns among these themes.

After your initial analysis, you can take this one step further and separate "dark" colors from "light" colors or "warm" colors from "cool" colors. Blue and green are distinctly different colors, but you can group them under the "cool" category of colors to form a more overarching theme.

Turn raw data into broader insights with ATLAS.ti

Our powerful data analysis software is available with a free trial.

A simple example of thematic analysis

Imagine a simple research question : how do teachers determine if a student's essay is good? Suppose you have a set of transcripts of interviews with teachers discussing writing classes and students' essays. In this case, the objective of thematic analysis is to determine the main factors teachers use to determine the quality of a piece of writing.

As you read the transcripts, you might find that teachers share some common answers. Of course, you might have an intuition that correct grammar and spelling are important, which will likely be confirmed by the teachers in their interviews. However, other considerations might surface in the data.

The next question in this casual thematic analysis is, what considerations appear most often? A few teachers may occasionally mention the size and typeface of the text as deciding factors, but more often they might say that the flow and organization of students' writing are more important. Analyzing the occurrences and patterns among themes across your transcripts can help you develop an answer to your research question.

The subjectivity of themes

One challenge is that themes in qualitative analysis, as with determining the themes of good writing, are not as visible to the naked eye as colors on a marble. The color "red" is relatively easy to see, but the fields in which thematic analysis is often applied do not deal with concepts that can necessarily be seen "objectively." It is up to the researcher to derive themes from the data from an inductive approach. Researchers can also utilize deductive approaches if they want to analyze their data according to themes that have been previously identified in other research.

Think about the picture up above. To the naked eye, these children are holding hands. But themes that can be interpreted from this picture may include "friendship," "happiness," or even "family." The thematic analysis of pictures like this one often depends on a researcher's theoretical commitments, knowledge base, and cultural perspective.

This also means that you are responsible for explaining how you arrived at the themes arising from your data set. While colors are intuitively easy to distinguish, you are often required to explain more subjective codes and themes like "resilience" or "entitlement" so that you and your research audience have a common understanding of your data analysis .

This explanation should account for who you are as a researcher and how you see the data (since, after all, a word like "resilience" can mean different things to different people). A fully reflexive thematic analysis documents and presents where the researcher is relative to their data and to their research audience.

Applications for thematic analysis

Many disciplines within qualitative research employ thematic analysis to make sense of social phenomena. For instances, these fields might be:

• psychotherapy research
• qualitative psychology
• cultural anthropology

In a nutshell, any research discipline that relies on the understanding of social phenomena or insights that may not easily be quantifiable will attract researchers engaged in thematic analysis. Moreover, any exploratory research design lends itself easily to the identification of previously unknown themes that can later be used in a qualitative, quantitative, or confirmatory research project.

Common forms of data collection

Thematic analysis can involve any number of qualitative research methods to collect data, including:

• focus groups
• observations
• literature reviews

Any unstructured data set, particularly any data set that captures social phenomena, can benefit from thematic analysis. The main consideration in ensuring rigor in data collection for thematic analysis is ensuring that your data is representative of the population or phenomenon you are trying to capture.

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke are the key researchers involved in making thematic analysis a commonly utilized approach in qualitative research . A quick search for their scholarship will tell you the basic steps involved in thematic analysis:

• Become familiar with the data
• Generate codes from the data
• Generate themes based on the codes
• Review the potential themes
• Define the themes for the final reporting

In a nutshell, thematic analysis requires the researcher to look at their data, summarize their data with codes, and develop those codes to the extent that they can contribute a broader understanding of the context from which the data is collected.

While these are the key points in a robust and rigorous thematic analysis, there are understated parts of the qualitative research process that can often be taken for granted but must never be overlooked to ensure that researchers can analyze their data quickly and with as few challenges as possible.

The process in greater detail

Thematic analysis relies on research questions that are exploratory in nature, thus requiring an inductive approach to examining the data. While you might rely on an existing theoretical framework to decide your research questions and collect all the data for your project, thematic analysis primarily looks at your data inductively for what it says and what it says most often.

After data collection, you need to organize the data in some way to make the data analysis process easier (or, at minimum, possible). A data set in qualitative research is often akin to a crowd of people where individuals move in any direction without any sense of organization. This is a challenge if your research question involves understanding the crowd's age, gender, ethnicity, or style of clothing.

The role of qualitative researchers at this stage is to sort out the crowd. In this example, perhaps this means having the crowd split into different groups according to those demographic identifiers to see which groups are the largest. Reorganizing the crowd from what was previously a group of wandering individuals can offer a better sense of who is in the room.

Qualitative data is often similarly unstructured and in need of reorganization. When dealing with thematic analysis, you need to reorganize the information so that the themes become more apparent to you and your research audience. In most cases, this means reducing the entire data set, as large as it might be, into a more concise form that allows for a more feasible analysis .

Codes and themes are forms of data reduction that address this need. In a thematic analysis involving qualitative data analysis software , researchers code their data by applying short but descriptive phrases to larger data segments to summarize them for later analysis. Later stages of thematic analysis reorganize these codes into larger categories and then themes, where ultimately the themes support contribution to meaningful insights and existing theory.

As you progress in the coding process, you should start to notice that distinct codes may be related to each other. In a sense, codes provide researchers with visual data that they can examine to generate useful themes. ATLAS.ti, for example, lets you examine your codes in the margin to give you a sense of which codes and themes frequently appear in your data. As you code your data, you can apply colors to your codes. This is a flexible method that allows you to create preliminary categories that you can examine visually for their abundance and patterns.

Later on, your codes can be organized into more formal categories or nested in hierarchies to contribute to a more robust thematic analysis.

Especially in qualitative research , discrete analytical approaches overlap with each other, meaning that a sufficiently thorough analysis of your data can eventually yield themes useful to your research. Let's examine a few of the more prominent approaches in qualitative research and their relation to thematic analysis.

Using grounded theory involves developing analysis iteratively through an inductive approach . While there is a great deal of overlap with thematic analysis approaches, grounded theory relies on incorporating more data to support the analysis in previous iterations of the research.

Nonetheless, the analytic process is largely the same for both approaches as they rely on seeking out phenomena that occur in abundance or distinct patterns. As you analyze qualitative data in either orientation, your main consideration is to observe which patterns emerge that can help contribute to a more universal understanding of the population or phenomenon under observation.

Narrative analysis

Understanding narratives is often less about taking large samples of data and more about unpacking the meaning that is produced in the data that is collected. In narrative research analysis , the data set is merely the narrative to be examined for its meaning, intent, and effect on its audience.

Searching for abundant or patterned themes is still a common objective when examining narratives. However, specific questions guide a narrative analysis, such as what the narrator is trying to say, how they say it, and how their audience receives the narrator's message.

Analyzing discourse is similar to analyzing narratives in that there is an examination of the subtext informing the use of words in communication. Research questions under both of these approaches focus specifically on language and communication, while thematic analysis can apply to all forms of data.

The scope of analysis is also different among approaches. Thematic analysis seeks to identify patterns in abundance. In contrast, discourse analysis can look at individual instances in discursive practices to more fully understand why people use language in a particular way.

However, the data resulting from an analysis of discursive practices can also be examined thematically. Discursive patterns within culturally-defined groups and cultural practices can be determined with a thematic analysis when utterances or interactional turns and patterns among them can be identified.

Among all the approaches in this section, content analysis is arguably the most quantitative. Strictly speaking, the words or phrases that appear most often in a body of textual data can tell something useful about the data as a whole. For example, imagine how we feel when a public speaker says "um" or "uh" an excessive number of times compared to another speaker who doesn't use these utterances at all. In another case, what can we say about the confidence of a person who frequently writes, "I don't know, but..."?

Content analysis seeks to determine the frequencies of aspects of language to understand a body of data. Unlike discourse analysis, however, content analysis looks strictly at what is said or written, with analysis primarily stemming from a statistical understanding of the data.

Oftentimes, content analysis is deductive in that it might apply previous theory to new data, unlike thematic analysis, which is primarily inductive in nature. That said, the findings from a content analysis can be used to determine themes, particularly if your research question can be addressed by directly looking at the textual data.

For thematic analysis, software is especially useful for identifying themes within large data sets. After all, thematically analyzing data by hand can be time-consuming, and a researcher might miss nuanced data without software to help them look at all the data thoroughly.

Coding qualitative data

For qualitative researchers, the coding process is one of the key tools for structuring qualitative data to facilitate any data analysis . In ATLAS.ti, data is broken down into quotations or segments of data that can be reduced to a set of codes that can be analyzed later.

The codes and quotations appear in the margin next to a document in ATLAS.ti. This visualization is useful in showing how much of your data is coded and what concise meaning can be inferred from the data. In terms of thematic analysis, however, the codes can be assigned different colors based on what the researcher perceives as categories emerging from their project, as seen in the example above.

As you code the data iteratively, reviewing themes as they emerge, you can organize discrete codes within larger categories. ATLAS.ti provides spaces in your project called code groups and code categories where sets of codes in tandem represent broader, more theoretically developed themes. This approach to data organization , rather than merging codes together as broader units, allows for a more particular analysis of individual codes as your research questions evolve and develop over the course of your project.

ATLAS.ti tools for thematic analysis

As discussed above, analyzing qualitative data for themes can often be a matter of determining which codes and which categories of codes appear across the data and patterns among them. Indeed, any analysis software can assist you with this coding process for thematic analysis. The tools in ATLAS.ti, however, can help to make the process easier and more insightful. Let's look at a few of the many important features that are invaluable to conducting thematic analysis.

Code Manager

The Code Manager is ATLAS.ti's central space where researchers can organize and analyze their codes independent of the raw data . Researchers can perform numerous tasks in the Code Manager depending on their research questions and objectives, including looking just at the data that is associated with a particular code, organizing codes into hierarchies through code categories and nested sub-codes, and determining the frequencies and level of theoretical development for each code.

Co-Occurrence Analysis

Combinations of codes that overlap with each other can also illuminate themes in your data, perhaps more ably than discrete codes. This is different from understanding codes as groups, as an analysis for codes that frequently occur together in the data can give a sense of the relationships between different aspects of a phenomenon.

The Co-Occurrence Analysis tool helps researchers determine co-occurrence between different codes by placing them in a table, a bar chart, a Sankey diagram, or a force-directed graph. These visualizations can illustrate the strength of relationships between codes to you and your research audience. The relationships themselves can also be useful in generating themes useful for your analysis.

Word Frequencies

Qualitative content analysis depends on the frequencies of words, phrases, and other important aspects found in textual data. These frequencies can also help you in generating themes, particularly if your research questions are focused on the textual data itself.

The Word Frequencies tool in ATLAS.ti can facilitate a content analysis leading to a thematic analysis by giving you statistical data about what words appear most often in your project. Suppose these words can contribute to the development of themes. In that case, you can click on these words to find relevant quotations that you can code for thematic analysis. In addition, you can use ATLAS.ti’s Text Search tool to search for data segments that contain your word(s) of interest and automatically code them .

You can also use themes to refine the scope of the Word Frequencies tool. By default, Word Frequencies looks at documents, but the tool also allows researchers to filter the data by selecting the codes relevant to their query. That way, you can look at the most relevant data quotations that match your desired codes for a richer thematic analysis.

Patterns and themes may also emerge from combinations of codes, in which case the Query Tool can help you construct smart codes. Smart codes are more versatile than nested sub-codes or code groups as they allow you to set multiple criteria based on true/false conditions as well as proximity. For example, while a code group simply aggregates distinct codes together to show you quotations with any of the included codes, you can define a set of rules to filter the data and find the most relevant quotations for your thematic analysis.

A systematic and rigorous approach to thematic analysis involves showing your research audience how you arrived at your codes and themes. In qualitative research , visualizations offer clarity about the data in your project, which is a critical skill when explaining the broader meaning derived from otherwise unstructured data .

A TreeMap of codes is a representation of the application of codes relative to each other. In other words, codes that have been applied the most often in your data occupy the largest portions of the TreeMap, while less frequently used codes appear smaller in your visualization. This can give you a sense of the prevalence of certain codes over other codes. Moreover, when you assign colors to codes along the lines of themes and categories, you can quickly get a visual understanding of the themes that appear most often in your project.

As a result, the TreeMap for codes can help provide a visual, thematic map that you can export as an image for use in explaining key themes in your research reports .

In qualitative research , thematic analysis is a useful means for generating a theoretical framework for qualitative concepts and phenomena. As always, though, theoretical development is best supported by thorough research. A theory that emerges from thematic analysis can be affirmed by additional inquiries, whether through a qualitative, quantitative , or mixed methods study .

Further research is always recommended for qualitative research, such as those that employ a thematic analysis, for the very reason that themes in qualitative concepts are socially constructed by the researcher. In turn, future research building on thematic analysis depends on a research design that is transparent and clearly defined so that other researchers can understand how the themes were generated in the first place. This requires a detailed accounting of the data and the analysis through comprehensive detail and visualizations in the final report.

To that end, ATLAS.ti's various tools are specifically designed to allow researchers to share and report their data to their research audiences through data reports and visualizations. Especially where qualitative research and thematic analysis are involved, researchers can benefit from transparently showing their analysis through data excerpts, visualizations , and descriptions of their methodology.

Analyze and visualize all your data in ATLAS.ti

Identify patterns and potential themes from your data with ATLAS.ti. Download a free trial today.

Can Thematic Analysis Be Used In Quantitative Research?

• Success Team
• January 20, 2023

Top-Rated AI Meeting Assistant With Incredible ChatGPT & Qualitative Data Analysis Capabilities

Join 150,000+ individuals and teams who rely on speak ai to capture and analyze unstructured language data for valuable insights. streamline your workflows, unlock new revenue streams and keep doing what you love..

Get a 7-day fully-featured trial!

Quantitative research is a data-driven approach to understanding phenomena, typically through the collection of numerical data. Qualitative research, on the other hand, relies on the collection of non-numerical data, such as words and phrases, to gain insights. Thematic analysis is a qualitative data analysis method used to identify, analyze, and interpret patterns (themes) in data. It is increasingly being used by researchers to analyze quantitative data as well.

What is Thematic Analysis?

Thematic analysis is a process of analyzing qualitative data to identify patterns (themes) within the data. It involves breaking down the data into smaller components and analyzing the components to find commonalities and differences. This type of analysis is often used to uncover the underlying structure of a data set. Thematic analysis can be used to draw conclusions about the data, as well as to identify relationships between the data and other variables.

Can Thematic Analysis Be Used in Quantitative Research?

Yes, thematic analysis can be used in quantitative research. Thematic analysis can be used to analyze quantitative data sets in order to identify patterns and themes. This type of analysis can be particularly useful when the data is complex or when the researcher is looking to uncover relationships between the data and other variables.

For example, a researcher may use thematic analysis to analyze a survey data set in order to identify themes in the responses. The researcher could look for relationships between the responses and other variables, such as age, gender, or education level. This can help the researcher to better understand the data and draw more meaningful conclusions.

Benefits of Using Thematic Analysis in Quantitative Research

There are several benefits to using thematic analysis in quantitative research. First, it can help researchers to identify relationships between the data and other variables. This can be particularly useful when the data is complex or when the researcher is looking to uncover relationships between the data and other variables.

Second, thematic analysis can be used to identify patterns in the data that could not be identified through other methods. This can be helpful when the data does not fit into a traditional quantitative research model. For example, if the data is qualitative in nature, such as survey responses, thematic analysis can be used to identify patterns in the data.

Finally, thematic analysis can provide insight into the data that may not be otherwise apparent. This can be especially useful when the researcher is looking for relationships between the data and other variables.

Thematic analysis is a powerful tool that can be used in quantitative research. It can be used to identify relationships between the data and other variables, identify patterns in the data, and provide insight into the data that may not be otherwise apparent. Thematic analysis is an important tool for researchers to consider when conducting quantitative research.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Top-Rated AI Meeting Assistant With Incredible ChatGPT & Qualitative Data Analysis Capabilities​

Save 99% of your time and costs!

Use Speak's powerful AI to transcribe, analyze, automate and produce incredible insights for you and your team.

Can You Do Thematic Analysis In Quantitative Research?

We argue that thematic analysis is a qualitative research method that can be widely used across a range of epistemologies and research questions. It is a method for identifying, analyzing, organizing, describing, and reporting themes found within a data set (Braun & Clarke, 2006).

Can qualitative and quantitative research be used together?

In practice, most researchers agree that combining quantitative and qualitative techniques (sometimes called “ mixed method” research ) produces a richer and more comprehensive understanding of a research area. … This kind of in-depth understanding is well suited to qualitative approaches.

Are codes in thematic analysis quantitative or qualitative?

Thematic coding, also called thematic analysis, is a type of qualitative data analysis that finds themes in text by analyzing the meaning of words and sentence structure.

Is thematic analysis qualitative?

Thematic analysis is a method for analyzing qualitative data that entails searching across a data set to identify, analyze, and report repeated patterns (Braun and Clarke 2006). It is a method for describing data, but it also involves interpretation in the processes of selecting codes and constructing themes.

What type of qualitative research is thematic analysis?

Thematic analysis is a method of analyzing qualitative data . It is usually applied to a set of texts, such as interview transcripts. The researcher closely examines the data to identify common themes – topics, ideas and patterns of meaning that come up repeatedly.

Can research be done using both qualitative and quantitative data Why or why not?

Given that both qualitative and quantitative market research provide vital ingredients of the understanding you are looking for (the Why and the What), combining them should deliver significant benefits, enabling you to compare and contrast results and gain much deeper insights.

Can qualitative and quantitative variables be used to describe both samples and populations?

Samples and populations can both be represented by a qualitative variable and/ or a quantitative variable, because the definition of sample and population does not include anything about the type of variables that can be used within it.

How both quantitative and qualitative data is collected and Analysed?

When collecting and analyzing data, quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics , while qualitative research deals with words and meanings. … Common qualitative methods include interviews with open-ended questions, observations described in words, and literature reviews that explore concepts and theories.

Can you use thematic analysis in systematic review?

Thematic analysis is a method that is often used to analyse data in primary qualitative research . This paper reports on the use of this type of analysis in systematic reviews to bring together and integrate the findings of multiple qualitative studies.

What is the difference between thematic analysis and content analysis?

Thematic analysis helps researchers understand those aspects of a phenomenon that participants talk about frequently or in depth, and the ways in which those aspects of a phenomenon may be connected. Content analysis, on the other hand, can be used as a quantitative or qualitative method of data analysis.

What is the difference between thematic analysis and framework analysis?

All replies (7) I’m not sure that there is a large difference , but thematic analysis is much more widely used (the original Braun & Clarke article has over 40,000 citations). … Framework analysis involves a systematic analysis of content summaries of participants views/experiences in the latter stage.

Can I use thematic analysis in case study?

Thematic analysis is not particular to any one research method but is used by scholars across many fields and disciplines. … It is not a research method in itself but rather an analytic approach and synthesizing strategy used as part of the meaning-making process of many methods, including case study research.

How do you do thematic analysis of qualitative data?

Steps in a Thematic Analysis

• Familiarize yourself with your data.
• Assign preliminary codes to your data in order to describe the content.
• Search for patterns or themes in your codes across the different interviews.
• Review themes.
• Define and name themes.
• Produce your report.

Can thematic analysis be used in literature review?

A thematic analysis is used in qualitative research to focus on examining themes within a topic by identifying , analysing and reporting patterns (themes) within the research topic. It is similar to a literature review, which is a critical survey and assessment of the existing research on your particular topic.

What qualitative and quantitative data have in common with one and another?

Both quantitative and qualitative data has an order or scale to it . That is while ordinal data is sometimes classified under quantitative data. Qualitative data do not, however, have a standardised scale. Quantitative and qualitative data are both used for research and statistical analysis.

What is the similarities between qualitative and quantitative variables?

Qualitative variables are nominal and ordinal. Quantitative variables are interval and ratio . Both types can be used to get a full picture with samples and populations because the data can be gathered from the same data unit based on whether the variable of interest if categorical or numerical.

What is the difference and similarity between qualitative and quantitative research?

Qualitative research seeks to understand why people react and how they feel about a specific situation. Quantitative research measures numerical results to help predict possible outcomes.

Can a dissertation be both qualitative and quantitative?

Mixed methods dissertations combine qualitative and quantitative approaches to research . Whilst they are increasingly used and have gained greater legitimacy, much less has been written about their components parts.

What are the benefits of using both qualitative and quantitative research?

Given that both qualitative and quantitative market research provides vital ingredients of the understanding you are looking for (the Why and the What), combining them should deliver significant benefits, enabling you to compare and contrast results and gain much deeper insights .

Which of the following is both qualitative and quantitative?

​Hence, it could be concluded that evaluation is both quantitative and qualitative.

What are the 2 types of thematic analysis?

What are the types of thematic analysis?

• Coding reliability thematic analysis.
• Codebook thematic analysis.
• Reflexive thematic analysis.

What is the difference between thematic analysis and IPA?

What’s the difference between thematic analysis and IPA? … The fact that IPA is better thought of as a methodology (a theoretically informed framework for how you do research) rather than a method (a technique for collecting/analysing data), whereas TA is just a method.

How do you identify a theme in quantitative research?

In this technique, researchers identify key words and then systematically search the corpus of text to find all instances of the word or phrase. Each time they find a word, they make a copy of it and its immediate context. Themes get identified by physically sorting the examples into piles of similar meaning .

Related Q&A:

© 2022 - 2024 Times Mojo - All Rights Reserved Home | About | Contact | Copyright | Report Content | Privacy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions | Sitemap