research titles for stem students quantitative

200+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students In 2023

STEM means Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math, which is not the only stuff we learn in school. It is like a treasure chest of skills that help students become great problem solvers, ready to tackle the real world’s challenges.

In this blog, we are here to explore the world of Research Topics for STEM Students. We will break down what STEM really means and why it is so important for students. In addition, we will give you the lowdown on how to pick a fascinating research topic. We will explain a list of 200+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students.

And when it comes to writing a research title, we will guide you step by step. So, stay with us as we unlock the exciting world of STEM research – it is not just about grades; it is about growing smarter, more confident, and happier along the way.

What Is STEM?

Table of Contents

STEM is Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. It is a way of talking about things like learning, jobs, and activities related to these four important subjects. Science is about understanding the world around us, technology is about using tools and machines to solve problems, engineering is about designing and building things, and mathematics is about numbers and solving problems with them. STEM helps us explore, discover, and create cool stuff that makes our world better and more exciting.

Why STEM Research Is Important?

STEM research is important because it helps us learn new things about the world and solve problems. When scientists, engineers, and mathematicians study these subjects, they can discover cures for diseases, create new technology that makes life easier, and build things that help us live better. It is like a big puzzle where we put together pieces of knowledge to make our world safer, healthier, and more fun.

STEM research leads to new discoveries and solutions.
It helps find cures for diseases.
STEM technology makes life easier.
Engineers build things that improve our lives.
Mathematics helps us understand and solve complex problems.

How to Choose a Topic for STEM Research Paper

Here are some steps to choose a topic for STEM Research Paper:

Step 1: Identify Your Interests

Think about what you like and what excites you in science, technology, engineering, or math. It could be something you learned in school, saw in the news, or experienced in your daily life. Choosing a topic you’re passionate about makes the research process more enjoyable.

Step 2: Research Existing Topics

Look up different STEM research areas online, in books, or at your library. See what scientists and experts are studying. This can give you ideas and help you understand what’s already known in your chosen field.

Step 3: Consider Real-World Problems

Think about the problems you see around you. Are there issues in your community or the world that STEM can help solve? Choosing a topic that addresses a real-world problem can make your research impactful.

Step 4: Talk to Teachers and Mentors

Discuss your interests with your teachers, professors, or mentors. They can offer guidance and suggest topics that align with your skills and goals. They may also provide resources and support for your research.

Step 5: Narrow Down Your Topic

Once you have some ideas, narrow them down to a specific research question or project. Make sure it’s not too broad or too narrow. You want a topic that you can explore in depth within the scope of your research paper.

Here we will discuss 200+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students:

Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students:

Qualitative research focuses on exploring and understanding phenomena through non-numerical data and subjective experiences. Here are 10 qualitative research topics for STEM students:

Exploring the experiences of female STEM students in overcoming gender bias in academia.
Understanding the perceptions of teachers regarding the integration of technology in STEM education.
Investigating the motivations and challenges of STEM educators in underprivileged schools.
Exploring the attitudes and beliefs of parents towards STEM education for their children.
Analyzing the impact of collaborative learning on student engagement in STEM subjects.
Investigating the experiences of STEM professionals in bridging the gap between academia and industry.
Understanding the cultural factors influencing STEM career choices among minority students.
Exploring the role of mentorship in the career development of STEM graduates.
Analyzing the perceptions of students towards the ethics of emerging STEM technologies like AI and CRISPR.
Investigating the emotional well-being and stress levels of STEM students during their academic journey.

Easy Experimental Research Topics for STEM Students:

These experimental research topics are relatively straightforward and suitable for STEM students who are new to research:

Measuring the effect of different light wavelengths on plant growth.
Investigating the relationship between exercise and heart rate in various age groups.
Testing the effectiveness of different insulating materials in conserving heat.
Examining the impact of pH levels on the rate of chemical reactions.
Studying the behavior of magnets in different temperature conditions.
Investigating the effect of different concentrations of a substance on bacterial growth.
Testing the efficiency of various sunscreen brands in blocking UV radiation.
Measuring the impact of music genres on concentration and productivity.
Examining the correlation between the angle of a ramp and the speed of a rolling object.
Investigating the relationship between the number of blades on a wind turbine and energy output.

Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines:

These research topics are tailored for STEM students in the Philippines:

Assessing the impact of climate change on the biodiversity of coral reefs in the Philippines.
Studying the potential of indigenous plants in the Philippines for medicinal purposes.
Investigating the feasibility of harnessing renewable energy sources like solar and wind in rural Filipino communities.
Analyzing the water quality and pollution levels in major rivers and lakes in the Philippines.
Exploring sustainable agricultural practices for small-scale farmers in the Philippines.
Assessing the prevalence and impact of dengue fever outbreaks in urban areas of the Philippines.
Investigating the challenges and opportunities of STEM education in remote Filipino islands.
Studying the impact of typhoons and natural disasters on infrastructure resilience in the Philippines.
Analyzing the genetic diversity of endemic species in the Philippine rainforests.
Assessing the effectiveness of disaster preparedness programs in Philippine communities.

Frontend Project Ideas
Business Intelligence Projects For Beginners

Good Research Topics for STEM Students:

These research topics are considered good because they offer interesting avenues for investigation and learning:

Developing a low-cost and efficient water purification system for rural communities.
Investigating the potential use of CRISPR-Cas9 for gene therapy in genetic disorders.
Studying the applications of blockchain technology in securing medical records.
Analyzing the impact of 3D printing on customized prosthetics for amputees.
Exploring the use of artificial intelligence in predicting and preventing forest fires.
Investigating the effects of microplastic pollution on aquatic ecosystems.
Analyzing the use of drones in monitoring and managing agricultural crops.
Studying the potential of quantum computing in solving complex optimization problems.
Investigating the development of biodegradable materials for sustainable packaging.
Exploring the ethical implications of gene editing in humans.

Unique Research Topics for STEM Students:

Unique research topics can provide STEM students with the opportunity to explore unconventional and innovative ideas. Here are 10 unique research topics for STEM students:

Investigating the use of bioluminescent organisms for sustainable lighting solutions.
Studying the potential of using spider silk proteins for advanced materials in engineering.
Exploring the application of quantum entanglement for secure communication in the field of cryptography.
Analyzing the feasibility of harnessing geothermal energy from underwater volcanoes.
Investigating the use of CRISPR-Cas12 for rapid and cost-effective disease diagnostics.
Studying the interaction between artificial intelligence and human creativity in art and music generation.
Exploring the development of edible packaging materials to reduce plastic waste.
Investigating the impact of microgravity on cellular behavior and tissue regeneration in space.
Analyzing the potential of using sound waves to detect and combat invasive species in aquatic ecosystems.
Studying the use of biotechnology in reviving extinct species, such as the woolly mammoth.

Experimental Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines

Research topics for STEM students in the Philippines can address specific regional challenges and opportunities. Here are 10 experimental research topics for STEM students in the Philippines:

Assessing the effectiveness of locally sourced materials for disaster-resilient housing construction in typhoon-prone areas.
Investigating the utilization of indigenous plants for natural remedies in Filipino traditional medicine.
Studying the impact of volcanic soil on crop growth and agriculture in volcanic regions of the Philippines.
Analyzing the water quality and purification methods in remote island communities.
Exploring the feasibility of using bamboo as a sustainable construction material in the Philippines.
Investigating the potential of using solar stills for freshwater production in water-scarce regions.
Studying the effects of climate change on the migration patterns of bird species in the Philippines.
Analyzing the growth and sustainability of coral reefs in marine protected areas.
Investigating the utilization of coconut waste for biofuel production.
Studying the biodiversity and conservation efforts in the Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park.

Capstone Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines:

Capstone research projects are often more comprehensive and can address real-world issues. Here are 10 capstone research topics for STEM students in the Philippines:

Designing a low-cost and sustainable sanitation system for informal settlements in urban Manila.
Developing a mobile app for monitoring and reporting natural disasters in the Philippines.
Assessing the impact of climate change on the availability and quality of drinking water in Philippine cities.
Designing an efficient traffic management system to address congestion in major Filipino cities.
Analyzing the health implications of air pollution in densely populated urban areas of the Philippines.
Developing a renewable energy microgrid for off-grid communities in the archipelago.
Assessing the feasibility of using unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) for agricultural monitoring in rural Philippines.
Designing a low-cost and sustainable aquaponics system for urban agriculture.
Investigating the potential of vertical farming to address food security in densely populated urban areas.
Developing a disaster-resilient housing prototype suitable for typhoon-prone regions.

Experimental Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students:

Experimental quantitative research involves the collection and analysis of numerical data to conclude. Here are 10 Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students interested in experimental quantitative research:

Examining the impact of different fertilizers on crop yield in agriculture.
Investigating the relationship between exercise and heart rate among different age groups.
Analyzing the effect of varying light intensities on photosynthesis in plants.
Studying the efficiency of various insulation materials in reducing building heat loss.
Investigating the relationship between pH levels and the rate of corrosion in metals.
Analyzing the impact of different concentrations of pollutants on aquatic ecosystems.
Examining the effectiveness of different antibiotics on bacterial growth.
Trying to figure out how temperature affects how thick liquids are.
Finding out if there is a link between the amount of pollution in the air and lung illnesses in cities.
Analyzing the efficiency of solar panels in converting sunlight into electricity under varying conditions.

Descriptive Research Topics for STEM Students

Descriptive research aims to provide a detailed account or description of a phenomenon. Here are 10 topics for STEM students interested in descriptive research:

Describing the physical characteristics and behavior of a newly discovered species of marine life.
Documenting the geological features and formations of a particular region.
Creating a detailed inventory of plant species in a specific ecosystem.
Describing the properties and behavior of a new synthetic polymer.
Documenting the daily weather patterns and climate trends in a particular area.
Providing a comprehensive analysis of the energy consumption patterns in a city.
Describing the structural components and functions of a newly developed medical device.
Documenting the characteristics and usage of traditional construction materials in a region.
Providing a detailed account of the microbiome in a specific environmental niche.
Describing the life cycle and behavior of a rare insect species.

Research Topics for STEM Students in the Pandemic:

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised many research opportunities for STEM students. Here are 10 research topics related to pandemics:

Analyzing the effectiveness of various personal protective equipment (PPE) in preventing the spread of respiratory viruses.
Studying the impact of lockdown measures on air quality and pollution levels in urban areas.
Investigating the psychological effects of quarantine and social isolation on mental health.
Analyzing the genomic variation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its implications for vaccine development.
Studying the efficacy of different disinfection methods on various surfaces.
Investigating the role of contact tracing apps in tracking & controlling the spread of infectious diseases.
Analyzing the economic impact of the pandemic on different industries and sectors.
Studying the effectiveness of remote learning in STEM education during lockdowns.
Investigating the social disparities in healthcare access during a pandemic.
Analyzing the ethical considerations surrounding vaccine distribution and prioritization.

Research Topics for STEM Students Middle School

Research topics for middle school STEM students should be engaging and suitable for their age group. Here are 10 research topics:

Investigating the growth patterns of different types of mold on various food items.
Studying the negative effects of music on plant growth and development.
Analyzing the relationship between the shape of a paper airplane and its flight distance.
Investigating the properties of different materials in making effective insulators for hot and cold beverages.
Studying the effect of salt on the buoyancy of different objects in water.
Analyzing the behavior of magnets when exposed to different temperatures.
Investigating the factors that affect the rate of ice melting in different environments.
Studying the impact of color on the absorption of heat by various surfaces.
Analyzing the growth of crystals in different types of solutions.
Investigating the effectiveness of different natural repellents against common pests like mosquitoes.

Technology Research Topics for STEM Students

Technology is at the forefront of STEM fields. Here are 10 research topics for STEM students interested in technology:

Developing and optimizing algorithms for autonomous drone navigation in complex environments.
Exploring the use of blockchain technology for enhancing the security and transparency of supply chains.
Investigating the applications of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in medical training and surgery simulations.
Studying the potential of 3D printing for creating personalized prosthetics and orthopedic implants.
Analyzing the ethical and privacy implications of facial recognition technology in public spaces.
Investigating the development of quantum computing algorithms for solving complex optimization problems.
Explaining the use of machine learning and AI in predicting and mitigating the impact of natural disasters.
Studying the advancement of brain-computer interfaces for assisting individuals with
disabilities.
Analyzing the role of wearable technology in monitoring and improving personal health and wellness.
Investigating the use of robotics in disaster response and search and rescue operations.

Scientific Research Topics for STEM Students

Scientific research encompasses a wide range of topics. Here are 10 research topics for STEM students focusing on scientific exploration:

Investigating the behavior of subatomic particles in high-energy particle accelerators.
Studying the ecological impact of invasive species on native ecosystems.
Analyzing the genetics of antibiotic resistance in bacteria and its implications for healthcare.
Exploring the physics of gravitational waves and their detection through advanced interferometry.
Investigating the neurobiology of memory formation and retention in the human brain.
Studying the biodiversity and adaptation of extremophiles in harsh environments.
Analyzing the chemistry of deep-sea hydrothermal vents and their potential for life beyond Earth.
Exploring the properties of superconductors and their applications in technology.
Investigating the mechanisms of stem cell differentiation for regenerative medicine.
Studying the dynamics of climate change and its impact on global ecosystems.

Interesting Research Topics for STEM Students:

Engaging and intriguing research topics can foster a passion for STEM. Here are 10 interesting research topics for STEM students:

Exploring the science behind the formation of auroras and their cultural significance.
Investigating the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy in the universe.
Studying the psychology of decision-making in high-pressure situations, such as sports or
emergencies.
Analyzing the impact of social media on interpersonal relationships and mental health.
Exploring the potential for using genetic modification to create disease-resistant crops.
Investigating the cognitive processes involved in solving complex puzzles and riddles.
Studying the history and evolution of cryptography and encryption methods.
Analyzing the physics of time travel and its theoretical possibilities.
Exploring the role of Artificial Intelligence in creating art and music.
Investigating the science of happiness and well-being, including factors contributing to life satisfaction.

Practical Research Topics for STEM Students

Practical research often leads to real-world solutions. Here are 10 practical research topics for STEM students:

Developing an affordable and sustainable water purification system for rural communities.
Designing a low-cost, energy-efficient home heating and cooling system.
Investigating strategies for reducing food waste in the supply chain and households.
Studying the effectiveness of eco-friendly pest control methods in agriculture.
Analyzing the impact of renewable energy integration on the stability of power grids.
Developing a smartphone app for early detection of common medical conditions.
Investigating the feasibility of vertical farming for urban food production.
Designing a system for recycling and upcycling electronic waste.
Studying the environmental benefits of green roofs and their potential for urban heat island mitigation.
Analyzing the efficiency of alternative transportation methods in reducing carbon emissions.

Experimental Research Topics for STEM Students About Plants

Plants offer a rich field for experimental research. Here are 10 experimental research topics about plants for STEM students:

Investigating the effect of different light wavelengths on plant growth and photosynthesis.
Studying the impact of various fertilizers and nutrient solutions on crop yield.
Analyzing the response of plants to different types and concentrations of plant hormones.
Investigating the role of mycorrhizal in enhancing nutrient uptake in plants.
Studying the effects of drought stress and water scarcity on plant physiology and adaptation mechanisms.
Analyzing the influence of soil pH on plant nutrient availability and growth.
Investigating the chemical signaling and defense mechanisms of plants against herbivores.
Studying the impact of environmental pollutants on plant health and genetic diversity.
Analyzing the role of plant secondary metabolites in pharmaceutical and agricultural applications.
Investigating the interactions between plants and beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere.

Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines

Qualitative research in the Philippines can address local issues and cultural contexts. Here are 10 qualitative research topics for STEM students in the Philippines:

Exploring indigenous knowledge and practices in sustainable agriculture in Filipino communities.
Studying the perceptions and experiences of Filipino fishermen in coping with climate change impacts.
Analyzing the cultural significance and traditional uses of medicinal plants in indigenous Filipino communities.
Investigating the barriers and facilitators of STEM education access in remote Philippine islands.
Exploring the role of traditional Filipino architecture in natural disaster resilience.
Studying the impact of indigenous farming methods on soil conservation and fertility.
Analyzing the cultural and environmental significance of mangroves in coastal Filipino regions.
Investigating the knowledge and practices of Filipino healers in treating common ailments.
Exploring the cultural heritage and conservation efforts of the Ifugao rice terraces.
Studying the perceptions and practices of Filipino communities in preserving marine biodiversity.

Science Research Topics for STEM Students

Science offers a diverse range of research avenues. Here are 10 science research topics for STEM students:

Investigating the potential of gene editing techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 in curing genetic diseases.
Studying the ecological impacts of species reintroduction programs on local ecosystems.
Analyzing the effects of microplastic pollution on aquatic food webs and ecosystems.
Investigating the link between air pollution and respiratory health in urban populations.
Studying the role of epigenetics in the inheritance of acquired traits in organisms.
Analyzing the physiology and adaptations of extremophiles in extreme environments on Earth.
Investigating the genetics of longevity and factors influencing human lifespan.
Studying the behavioral ecology and communication strategies of social insects.
Analyzing the effects of deforestation on global climate patterns and biodiversity loss.
Investigating the potential of synthetic biology in creating bioengineered organisms for beneficial applications.

Correlational Research Topics for STEM Students

Correlational research focuses on relationships between variables. Here are 10 correlational research topics for STEM students:

Analyzing the correlation between dietary habits and the incidence of chronic diseases.
Studying the relationship between exercise frequency and mental health outcomes.
Investigating the correlation between socioeconomic status and access to quality healthcare.
Analyzing the link between social media usage and self-esteem in adolescents.
Studying the correlation between academic performance and sleep duration among students.
Investigating the relationship between environmental factors and the prevalence of allergies.
Analyzing the correlation between technology use and attention span in children.
Studying how environmental factors are related to the frequency of allergies.
Investigating the link between parental involvement in education and student achievement.
Analyzing the correlation between temperature fluctuations and wildlife migration patterns.

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines

Quantitative research in the Philippines can address specific regional issues. Here are 10 quantitative research topics for STEM students in the Philippines

Analyzing the impact of typhoons on coastal erosion rates in the Philippines.
Studying the quantitative effects of land use change on watershed hydrology in Filipino regions.
Investigating the quantitative relationship between deforestation and habitat loss for endangered species.
Analyzing the quantitative patterns of marine biodiversity in Philippine coral reef ecosystems.
Studying the quantitative assessment of water quality in major Philippine rivers and lakes.
Investigating the quantitative analysis of renewable energy potential in specific Philippine provinces.
Analyzing the quantitative impacts of agricultural practices on soil health and fertility.
Studying the quantitative effectiveness of mangrove restoration in coastal protection in the Philippines.
Investigating the quantitative evaluation of indigenous agricultural practices for sustainability.
Analyzing the quantitative patterns of air pollution and its health impacts in urban Filipino areas.

Things That Must Keep In Mind While Writing Quantitative Research Title

Here are few things that must be keep in mind while writing quantitative research tile:

1. Be Clear and Precise

Make sure your research title is clear and says exactly what your study is about. People should easily understand the topic and goals of your research by reading the title.

2. Use Important Words

Include words that are crucial to your research, like the main subjects, who you’re studying, and how you’re doing your research. This helps others find your work and understand what it’s about.

3. Avoid Confusing Words

Stay away from words that might confuse people. Your title should be easy to grasp, even if someone isn’t an expert in your field.

4. Show Your Research Approach

Tell readers what kind of research you did, like experiments or surveys. This gives them a hint about how you conducted your study.

5. Match Your Title with Your Research Questions

Make sure your title matches the questions you’re trying to answer in your research. It should give a sneak peek into what your study is all about and keep you on the right track as you work on it.

STEM students, addressing what STEM is and why research matters in this field. It offered an extensive list of research topics , including experimental, qualitative, and regional options, catering to various academic levels and interests. Whether you’re a middle school student or pursuing advanced studies, these topics offer a wealth of ideas. The key takeaway is to choose a topic that resonates with your passion and aligns with your goals, ensuring a successful journey in STEM research. Choose the best Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For Stem Students today!

Step by Step Guide on The Best Way to Finance Car

The Best Way on How to Get Fund For Business to Grow it Efficiently

Best 151+ Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

In today’s rapidly evolving world, STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields have gained immense significance. For STEM students, engaging in quantitative research is a pivotal aspect of their academic journey. Quantitative research involves the systematic collection and interpretation of numerical data to address research questions or test hypotheses. Choosing the right research topic is essential to ensure a successful and meaningful research endeavor.

In this blog, we will explore 151+ quantitative research topics for STEM students. Whether you are an aspiring scientist, engineer, or mathematician, this comprehensive list will inspire your research journey. But we understand that the journey through STEM education and research can be challenging at times. That’s why we’re here to support you every step of the way with our Engineering Assignment Help service.

What is Quantitative Research in STEM?

Table of Contents

Quantitative research is a scientific approach that relies on numerical data and statistical analysis to draw conclusions and make predictions. In STEM fields, quantitative research encompasses a wide range of methodologies, including experiments, surveys, and data analysis. The key characteristics of quantitative research in STEM include:

Data Collection: Systematic gathering of numerical data through experiments, observations, or surveys.
Statistical Analysis: Application of statistical techniques to analyze data and draw meaningful conclusions.
Hypothesis Testing: Testing hypotheses and theories using quantitative data.
Replicability: The ability to replicate experiments and obtain consistent results.
Generalizability: Drawing conclusions that can be applied to larger populations or phenomena.

Importance of Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Quantitative research plays a pivotal role in STEM education and research for several reasons:

1. Empirical Evidence

It provides empirical evidence to support or refute scientific theories and hypotheses.

2. Data-Driven Decision-Making

STEM professionals use quantitative research to make informed decisions, from designing experiments to developing new technologies.

3. Innovation

It fuels innovation by providing data-driven insights that lead to the creation of new products, processes, and technologies.

4. Problem Solving

STEM students learn critical problem-solving skills through quantitative research, which are invaluable in their future careers.

5. Interdisciplinary Applications

Quantitative research transcends STEM disciplines, facilitating collaboration and the tackling of complex, real-world problems.

Also Read: Google Scholar Research Topics

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Now, let’s explore important quantitative research topics for STEM students:

Biology and Life Sciences

Here are some quantitative research topics in biology and life science:

1. The impact of climate change on biodiversity.

2. Analyzing the genetic basis of disease susceptibility.

3. Studying the effectiveness of vaccines in preventing infectious diseases.

4. Investigating the ecological consequences of invasive species.

5. Examining the role of genetics in aging.

6. Analyzing the effects of pollution on aquatic ecosystems.

7. Studying the evolution of antibiotic resistance.

8. Investigating the relationship between diet and lifespan.

9. Analyzing the impact of deforestation on wildlife.

10. Studying the genetics of cancer development.

11. Investigating the effectiveness of various plant fertilizers.

12. Analyzing the impact of microplastics on marine life.

13. Studying the genetics of human behavior.

14. Investigating the effects of pollution on plant growth.

15. Analyzing the microbiome’s role in human health.

16. Studying the impact of climate change on crop yields.

17. Investigating the genetics of rare diseases.

Let’s get started with some quantitative research topics for stem students in chemistry:

1. Studying the properties of superconductors at different temperatures.

2. Analyzing the efficiency of various catalysts in chemical reactions.

3. Investigating the synthesis of novel polymers with unique properties.

4. Studying the kinetics of chemical reactions.

5. Analyzing the environmental impact of chemical waste disposal.

6. Investigating the properties of nanomaterials for drug delivery.

7. Studying the behavior of nanoparticles in different solvents.

8. Analyzing the use of renewable energy sources in chemical processes.

9. Investigating the chemistry of atmospheric pollutants.

10. Studying the properties of graphene for electronic applications.

11. Analyzing the use of enzymes in industrial processes.

12. Investigating the chemistry of alternative fuels.

13. Studying the synthesis of pharmaceutical compounds.

14. Analyzing the properties of materials for battery technology.

15. Investigating the chemistry of natural products for drug discovery.

16. Analyzing the effects of chemical additives on food preservation.

17. Investigating the chemistry of carbon capture and utilization technologies.

Here are some quantitative research topics in physics for stem students:

1. Investigating the behavior of subatomic particles in high-energy collisions.

2. Analyzing the properties of dark matter and dark energy.

3. Studying the quantum properties of entangled particles.

4. Investigating the dynamics of black holes and their gravitational effects.

5. Analyzing the behavior of light in different mediums.

6. Studying the properties of superfluids at low temperatures.

7. Investigating the physics of renewable energy sources like solar cells.

8. Analyzing the properties of materials at extreme temperatures and pressures.

9. Studying the behavior of electromagnetic waves in various applications.

10. Investigating the physics of quantum computing.

11. Analyzing the properties of magnetic materials for data storage.

12. Studying the behavior of particles in plasma for fusion energy research.

13. Investigating the physics of nanoscale materials and devices.

14. Analyzing the properties of materials for use in semiconductors.

15. Studying the principles of thermodynamics in energy efficiency.

16. Investigating the physics of gravitational waves.

17. Analyzing the properties of materials for use in quantum technologies.

Engineering

Let’s explore some quantitative research topics for stem students in engineering:

1. Investigating the efficiency of renewable energy systems in urban environments.

2. Analyzing the impact of 3D printing on manufacturing processes.

3. Studying the structural integrity of materials in aerospace engineering.

4. Investigating the use of artificial intelligence in autonomous vehicles.

5. Analyzing the efficiency of water treatment processes in civil engineering.

6. Studying the impact of robotics in healthcare.

7. Investigating the optimization of supply chain logistics using quantitative methods.

8. Analyzing the energy efficiency of smart buildings.

9. Studying the effects of vibration on structural engineering.

10. Investigating the use of drones in agricultural practices.

11. Analyzing the impact of machine learning in predictive maintenance.

12. Studying the optimization of transportation networks.

13. Investigating the use of nanomaterials in electronic devices.

14. Analyzing the efficiency of renewable energy storage systems.

15. Studying the impact of AI-driven design in architecture.

16. Investigating the optimization of manufacturing processes using Industry 4.0 technologies.

17. Analyzing the use of robotics in underwater exploration.

Environmental Science

Here are some top quantitative research topics in environmental science for students:

1. Investigating the effects of air pollution on respiratory health.

2. Analyzing the impact of deforestation on climate change.

3. Studying the biodiversity of coral reefs and their conservation.

4. Investigating the use of remote sensing in monitoring deforestation.

5. Analyzing the effects of plastic pollution on marine ecosystems.

6. Studying the impact of climate change on glacier retreat.

7. Investigating the use of wetlands for water quality improvement.

8. Analyzing the effects of urbanization on local microclimates.

9. Studying the impact of oil spills on aquatic ecosystems.

10. Investigating the use of renewable energy in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions.

11. Analyzing the effects of soil erosion on agricultural productivity.

12. Studying the impact of invasive species on native ecosystems.

13. Investigating the use of bioremediation for soil cleanup.

14. Analyzing the effects of climate change on migratory bird patterns.

15. Studying the impact of land use changes on water resources.

16. Investigating the use of green infrastructure for urban stormwater management.

17. Analyzing the effects of noise pollution on wildlife behavior.

Computer Science

Let’s get started with some simple quantitative research topics for stem students:

1. Investigating the efficiency of machine learning algorithms for image recognition.

2. Analyzing the security of blockchain technology in financial transactions.

3. Studying the impact of quantum computing on cryptography.

4. Investigating the use of natural language processing in chatbots and virtual assistants.

5. Analyzing the effectiveness of cybersecurity measures in protecting sensitive data.

6. Studying the impact of algorithmic trading in financial markets.

7. Investigating the use of deep learning in autonomous robotics.

8. Analyzing the efficiency of data compression algorithms for large datasets.

9. Studying the impact of virtual reality in medical simulations.

10. Investigating the use of artificial intelligence in personalized medicine.

11. Analyzing the effectiveness of recommendation systems in e-commerce.

12. Studying the impact of cloud computing on data storage and processing.

13. Investigating the use of neural networks in predicting disease outbreaks.

14. Analyzing the efficiency of data mining techniques in customer behavior analysis.

15. Studying the impact of social media algorithms on user behavior.

16. Investigating the use of machine learning in natural language translation.

17. Analyzing the effectiveness of sentiment analysis in social media monitoring.

Mathematics

Let’s explore the quantitative research topics in mathematics for students:

1. Investigating the properties of prime numbers and their distribution.

2. Analyzing the behavior of chaotic systems using differential equations.

3. Studying the optimization of algorithms for solving complex mathematical problems.

4. Investigating the use of graph theory in network analysis.

5. Analyzing the properties of fractals in natural phenomena.

6. Studying the application of probability theory in risk assessment.

7. Investigating the use of numerical methods in solving partial differential equations.

8. Analyzing the properties of mathematical models for population dynamics.

9. Studying the optimization of algorithms for data compression.

10. Investigating the use of topology in data analysis.

11. Analyzing the behavior of mathematical models in financial markets.

12. Studying the application of game theory in strategic decision-making.

13. Investigating the use of mathematical modeling in epidemiology.

14. Analyzing the properties of algebraic structures in coding theory.

15. Studying the optimization of algorithms for image processing.

16. Investigating the use of number theory in cryptography.

17. Analyzing the behavior of mathematical models in climate prediction.

Earth Sciences

Here are some quantitative research topics for stem students in earth science:

1. Investigating the impact of volcanic eruptions on climate patterns.

2. Analyzing the behavior of earthquakes along tectonic plate boundaries.

3. Studying the geomorphology of river systems and erosion.

4. Investigating the use of remote sensing in monitoring wildfires.

5. Analyzing the effects of glacier melt on sea-level rise.

6. Studying the impact of ocean currents on weather patterns.

7. Investigating the use of geothermal energy in renewable power generation.

8. Analyzing the behavior of tsunamis and their destructive potential.

9. Studying the impact of soil erosion on agricultural productivity.

10. Investigating the use of geological data in mineral resource exploration.

11. Analyzing the effects of climate change on coastal erosion.

12. Studying the geomagnetic field and its role in navigation.

13. Investigating the use of radar technology in weather forecasting.

14. Analyzing the behavior of landslides and their triggers.

15. Studying the impact of groundwater depletion on aquifer systems.

16. Investigating the use of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) in land-use planning.

17. Analyzing the effects of urbanization on heat island formation.

Health Sciences and Medicine

Here are some quantitative research topics for stem students in health science and medicine:

1. Investigating the effectiveness of telemedicine in improving healthcare access.

2. Analyzing the impact of personalized medicine in cancer treatment.

3. Studying the epidemiology of infectious diseases and their spread.

4. Investigating the use of wearable devices in monitoring patient health.

5. Analyzing the effects of nutrition and exercise on metabolic health.

6. Studying the impact of genetics in predicting disease susceptibility.

7. Investigating the use of artificial intelligence in medical diagnosis.

8. Analyzing the behavior of pharmaceutical drugs in clinical trials.

9. Studying the effectiveness of mental health interventions in schools.

10. Investigating the use of gene editing technologies in treating genetic disorders.

11. Analyzing the properties of medical imaging techniques for early disease detection.

12. Studying the impact of vaccination campaigns on public health.

13. Investigating the use of regenerative medicine in tissue repair.

14. Analyzing the behavior of pathogens in antimicrobial resistance.

15. Studying the epidemiology of chronic diseases like diabetes and heart disease.

16. Investigating the use of bioinformatics in genomics research.

17. Analyzing the effects of environmental factors on health outcomes.

Quantitative research is the backbone of STEM fields, providing the tools and methodologies needed to explore, understand, and innovate in the world of science and technology . As STEM students, embracing quantitative research not only enhances your analytical skills but also equips you to address complex real-world challenges. With the extensive list of 155+ quantitative research topics for stem students provided in this blog, you have a starting point for your own STEM research journey. Whether you’re interested in biology, chemistry, physics, engineering, or any other STEM discipline, there’s a wealth of quantitative research topics waiting to be explored. So, roll up your sleeves, grab your lab coat or laptop, and embark on your quest for knowledge and discovery in the exciting world of STEM.

I hope you enjoyed this blog post about quantitative research topics for stem students.

8 easiest programming language to learn for beginners.

There are so many programming languages you can learn. But if you’re looking to start with something easier. We bring to you a list of…

10 Online Tutoring Help Benefits

Do you need a computer science assignment help? Get the best quality assignment help from computer science tutors at affordable prices. They always presented to help…

189+ Good Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Quantitative research is an essential part of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields. It involves collecting and analyzing numerical data to answer research questions and test hypotheses.

In 2023, STEM students have a wealth of exciting research opportunities in various disciplines. Whether you’re an undergraduate or graduate student, here are quantitative research topics to consider for your next project.

If you are looking for the best list of quantitative research topics for stem students, then you can check the given list in each field. It offers STEM students numerous opportunities to explore and contribute to their respective fields in 2023 and beyond.

Whether you’re interested in astrophysics, biology, engineering, mathematics, or any other STEM field.

Also Read: Most Exciting Qualitative Research Topics For Students

What Is Quantitative Research

Table of Contents

Quantitative research is a type of research that focuses on the organized collection, analysis, and evaluation of numerical data to answer research questions, test theories, and find trends or connections between factors. It is an organized, objective way to do study that uses measurable data and scientific methods to come to results.

Quantitative research is often used in many areas, such as the natural sciences, social sciences, economics, psychology, education, and market research. It gives useful information about patterns, trends, cause-and-effect relationships, and how often things happen. Quantitative tools are used by researchers to answer questions like “How many?” and “How often?” “Is there a significant difference?” or “What is the relationship between the variables?”

In comparison to quantitative research, qualitative research uses non-numerical data like conversations, notes, and open-ended surveys to understand and explore the ideas, experiences, and points of view of people or groups. Researchers often choose between quantitative and qualitative methods based on their research goals, questions, and the type of thing they are studying.

How To Choose Quantitative Research Topics For STEM

Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to choose quantitative research topics for STEM:

Step 1:- Identify Your Interests and Passions

Start by reflecting on your personal interests within STEM. What areas or subjects in STEM excite you the most? Choosing a topic you’re passionate about will keep you motivated throughout the research process.

Step 2:- Review Coursework and Textbooks

Look through your coursework, textbooks, and class notes. Identify concepts, theories, or areas that you found particularly intriguing or challenging. These can be a source of potential research topics.

Step 3:- Consult with Professors and Advisors

Discuss your research interests with professors, academic advisors, or mentors. They can provide valuable insights, suggest relevant topics, and guide you toward areas with research opportunities.

Step 4:- Read Recent Literature

Explore recent research articles, journals, and publications in STEM fields. This will help you identify current trends, gaps in knowledge, and areas where further research is needed.

Step 5:- Narrow Down Your Focus

Once you have a broad area of interest, narrow it down to a specific research focus. Consider questions like:

What specific problem or phenomenon do you want to investigate?
Are there unanswered questions or controversies in this area?
What impact could your research have on the field or society?

Step 6:- Consider Resources and Access

Assess the resources available to you, including access to laboratories, equipment, databases, and funding. Ensure that your chosen topic aligns with the resources you have or can access.

Step 7:- Think About Practicality

Consider the feasibility of conducting research on your chosen topic. Are the data readily available, or will you need to collect data yourself? Can you complete the research within your available time frame?

Step 8:- Define Your Research Question

Formulate a clear and specific research question or hypothesis. Your research question should guide your entire study and provide a focus for your data collection and analysis.

Step 9:- Conduct a Literature Review

Dive deeper into the existing literature related to your chosen topic. This will help you understand the current state of research, identify gaps, and refine your research question.

Step 10:- Consider the Impact

Think about the potential impact of your research. How does your topic contribute to the advancement of knowledge in your field? Does it have practical applications or implications for society?

Step 11:- Brainstorm Research Methods

Determine the quantitative research methods and data collection techniques you plan to use. Consider whether you’ll conduct experiments, surveys, data analysis, simulations, or use existing datasets.

Step 12:- Seek Feedback

Share your research topic and ideas with peers, advisors, or mentors. They can provide valuable feedback and help you refine your research focus.

Step 13:- Assess Ethical Considerations

Consider ethical implications related to your research, especially if it involves human subjects, sensitive data, or potential environmental impacts. Ensure that your research adheres to ethical guidelines.

Step 14:- Finalize Your Research Topic

Once you’ve gone through these steps, finalize your research topic. Write a clear and concise research proposal that outlines your research question, objectives, methods, and expected outcomes.

Step 15:- Stay Open to Adjustments

Be open to adjusting your research topic as you progress. Sometimes, new insights or challenges may lead you to refine or adapt your research focus.

Following are the most interesting quantitative research topics for stem students. These are given below.

Quantitative Research Topics In Physics and Astronomy

Quantum Computing Algorithms : Investigate new algorithms for quantum computers and their potential applications.
Dark Matter Detection Methods : Explore innovative approaches to detect dark matter particles.
Quantum Teleportation : Study the principles and applications of quantum teleportation.
Exoplanet Characterization : Analyze data from telescopes to characterize exoplanets.
Nuclear Fusion Modeling : Create mathematical models for nuclear fusion reactions.
Superconductivity at High Temperatures : Research the properties and applications of high-temperature superconductors.
Gravitational Wave Analysis : Analyze gravitational wave data to study astrophysical phenomena.
Black Hole Thermodynamics : Investigate the thermodynamics of black holes and their entropy.

Quantitative Research Topics In Biology and Life Sciences

Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) : Conduct GWAS to identify genetic factors associated with diseases.
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics : Study drug interactions in the human body.
Ecological Modeling : Model ecosystems to understand population dynamics.
Protein Folding : Research the kinetics and thermodynamics of protein folding.
Cancer Epidemiology : Analyze cancer incidence and risk factors in specific populations.
Neuroimaging Analysis : Develop algorithms for analyzing brain imaging data.
Evolutionary Genetics : Investigate evolutionary patterns using genetic data.
Stem Cell Differentiation : Study the factors influencing stem cell differentiation.

Engineering and Technology Quantitative Research Topics

Renewable Energy Efficiency : Optimize the efficiency of solar panels or wind turbines.
Aerodynamics of Drones : Analyze the aerodynamics of drone designs.
Autonomous Vehicle Safety : Evaluate safety measures for autonomous vehicles.
Machine Learning in Robotics : Implement machine learning algorithms for robot control.
Blockchain Scalability : Research methods to scale blockchain technology.
Quantum Computing Hardware : Design and test quantum computing hardware components.
IoT Security : Develop security protocols for the Internet of Things (IoT).
3D Printing Materials Analysis : Study the mechanical properties of 3D-printed materials.

Quantitative Research Topics In Mathematics and Statistics

Following are the best Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students in mathematics and statistics.

Prime Number Distribution : Investigate the distribution of prime numbers.
Graph Theory Algorithms : Develop algorithms for solving graph theory problems.
Statistical Analysis of Financial Markets : Analyze financial data and market trends.
Number Theory Research : Explore unsolved problems in number theory.
Bayesian Machine Learning : Apply Bayesian methods to machine learning models.
Random Matrix Theory : Study the properties of random matrices in mathematics and physics.
Topological Data Analysis : Use topology to analyze complex data sets.
Quantum Algorithms for Optimization : Research quantum algorithms for optimization problems.

Experimental Quantitative Research Topics In Science and Earth Sciences

Climate Change Modeling : Develop climate models to predict future trends.
Biodiversity Conservation Analysis : Analyze data to support biodiversity conservation efforts.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) : Apply GIS techniques to solve environmental problems.
Oceanography and Remote Sensing : Use satellite data for oceanographic research.
Air Quality Monitoring : Develop sensors and models for air quality assessment.
Hydrological Modeling : Study the movement and distribution of water resources.
Volcanic Activity Prediction : Predict volcanic eruptions using quantitative methods.
Seismology Data Analysis : Analyze seismic data to understand earthquake patterns.

Chemistry and Materials Science Quantitative Research Topics

Nanomaterial Synthesis and Characterization : Research the synthesis and properties of nanomaterials.
Chemoinformatics : Analyze chemical data for drug discovery and materials science.
Quantum Chemistry Simulations : Perform quantum simulations of chemical reactions.
Materials for Renewable Energy : Investigate materials for energy storage and conversion.
Catalysis Kinetics : Study the kinetics of chemical reactions catalyzed by materials.
Polymer Chemistry : Research the properties and applications of polymers.
Analytical Chemistry Techniques : Develop new analytical techniques for chemical analysis.
Sustainable Chemistry : Explore green chemistry approaches for sustainable materials.

Computer Science and Information Technology Topics

Natural Language Processing (NLP) : Work on NLP algorithms for language understanding.
Cybersecurity Analytics : Analyze cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities.
Big Data Analytics : Apply quantitative methods to analyze large data sets.
Machine Learning Fairness : Investigate bias and fairness issues in machine learning models.
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) : Study user behavior and interaction patterns.
Software Performance Optimization : Optimize software applications for performance.
Distributed Systems Analysis : Analyze the performance of distributed computing systems.
Bioinformatics Data Mining : Develop algorithms for mining biological data.

Good Quantitative Research Topics Students In Medicine and Healthcare

Clinical Trial Data Analysis : Analyze clinical trial data to evaluate treatment effectiveness.
Epidemiological Modeling : Model disease spread and intervention strategies.
Healthcare Data Analytics : Analyze healthcare data for patient outcomes and cost reduction.
Medical Imaging Algorithms : Develop algorithms for medical image analysis.
Genomic Medicine : Apply genomics to personalized medicine approaches.
Telemedicine Effectiveness : Study the effectiveness of telemedicine in healthcare delivery.
Health Informatics : Analyze electronic health records for insights into patient care.

Agriculture and Food Sciences Topics

Precision Agriculture : Use quantitative methods for optimizing crop production.
Food Safety Analysis : Analyze food safety data and quality control.
Aquaculture Sustainability : Research sustainable practices in aquaculture.
Crop Disease Modeling : Model the spread of diseases in agricultural crops.
Climate-Resilient Agriculture : Develop strategies for agriculture in changing climates.
Food Supply Chain Optimization : Optimize food supply chain logistics.
Soil Health Assessment : Analyze soil data for sustainable land management.

Social Sciences with Quantitative Approaches

Educational Data Mining : Analyze educational data for improving learning outcomes.
Sociodemographic Surveys : Study social trends and demographics using surveys.
Psychometrics : Develop and validate psychological measurement instruments.
Political Polling Analysis : Analyze political polling data and election trends.
Economic Modeling : Develop economic models for policy analysis.
Urban Planning Analytics : Analyze data for urban planning and infrastructure.
Climate Policy Evaluation : Evaluate the impact of climate policies on society.

Environmental Engineering Quantitative Research Topics

Water Quality Assessment : Analyze water quality data for environmental monitoring.
Waste Management Optimization : Optimize waste collection and recycling programs.
Environmental Impact Assessments : Evaluate the environmental impact of projects.
Air Pollution Modeling : Model the dispersion of air pollutants in urban areas.
Sustainable Building Design : Apply quantitative methods to sustainable architecture.

Quantitative Research Topics Robotics and Automation

Robotic Swarm Behavior : Study the behavior of robot swarms in different tasks.
Autonomous Drone Navigation : Develop algorithms for autonomous drone navigation.
Humanoid Robot Control : Implement control algorithms for humanoid robots.
Robotic Grasping and Manipulation : Study robotic manipulation techniques.
Reinforcement Learning for Robotics : Apply reinforcement learning to robotic control.

Quantitative Research Topics Materials Engineering

Additive Manufacturing Process Optimization : Optimize 3D printing processes.
Smart Materials for Aerospace : Research smart materials for aerospace applications.
Nanostructured Materials for Energy Storage : Investigate energy storage materials.
Corrosion Prevention : Develop corrosion-resistant materials and coatings.

Nuclear Engineering Quantitative Research Topics

Nuclear Reactor Safety Analysis : Study safety aspects of nuclear reactor designs.
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Analysis : Analyze the nuclear fuel cycle for efficiency.
Radiation Shielding Materials : Research materials for radiation protection.

Quantitative Research Topics In Biomedical Engineering

Medical Device Design and Testing : Develop and test medical devices.
Biomechanics Analysis : Analyze biomechanics in sports or rehabilitation.
Biomaterials for Medical Implants : Investigate materials for medical implants.

Good Quantitative Research Topics Chemical Engineering

Chemical Process Optimization : Optimize chemical manufacturing processes.
Industrial Pollution Control : Develop strategies for pollution control in industries.
Chemical Reaction Kinetics : Study the kinetics of chemical reactions in industries.

Best Quantitative Research Topics In Renewable Energy

Energy Storage Systems : Research and optimize energy storage solutions.
Solar Cell Efficiency : Improve the efficiency of photovoltaic cells.
Wind Turbine Performance Analysis : Analyze and optimize wind turbine designs.

Brilliant Quantitative Research Topics In Astronomy and Space Sciences

Astrophysical Simulations : Simulate astrophysical phenomena using numerical methods.
Spacecraft Trajectory Optimization : Optimize spacecraft trajectories for missions.
Exoplanet Detection Algorithms : Develop algorithms for exoplanet detection.

Quantitative Research Topics In Psychology and Cognitive Science

Cognitive Psychology Experiments : Conduct quantitative experiments in cognitive psychology.
Emotion Recognition Algorithms : Develop algorithms for emotion recognition in AI.
Neuropsychological Assessments : Create quantitative assessments for brain function.

Geology and Geological Engineering Quantitative Research Topics

Geological Data Analysis : Analyze geological data for mineral exploration.
Geological Hazard Prediction : Predict geological hazards using quantitative models.

Great Quantitative Research Topics In Cybersecurity

Network Intrusion Detection : Develop quantitative methods for intrusion detection.
Cryptocurrency Analysis : Analyze blockchain data and cryptocurrency trends.

Mathematical Biology Quantitative Research Topics

Epidemiological Modeling : Model disease spread and control in populations.
Population Genetics : Analyze genetic data to understand population dynamics.

Quantitative Research Topics In Chemical Analysis

Analytical Chemistry Methods : Develop quantitative methods for chemical analysis.
Spectroscopy Analysis : Analyze spectroscopic data for chemical identification.

Mathematics Education Quantitative Research Topics

Mathematics Curriculum Analysis : Analyze curriculum effectiveness in mathematics education.
Mathematics Assessment Development : Develop quantitative assessments for mathematics skills.

Quantitative Research Topics In Social Research

Social Network Analysis : Analyze social network structures and dynamics.
Survey Research : Conduct quantitative surveys on social issues and trends.

Quantitative Research Topics In Computational Neuroscience

Neural Network Modeling : Model neural networks and brain functions computationally.
Brain Connectivity Analysis : Analyze functional and structural brain connectivity.

Best Topics In Transportation Engineering

Traffic Flow Modeling : Model and optimize traffic flow in urban areas.
Public Transportation Efficiency : Analyze the efficiency of public transportation systems.

Good Quantitative Research Topics In Energy Economics

Energy Policy Analysis : Evaluate the economic impact of energy policies.
Renewable Energy Cost-Benefit Analysis : Assess the economic viability of renewable energy projects.

Quantum Information Science

Quantum Cryptography Protocols : Develop and analyze quantum cryptography protocols.
Quantum Key Distribution : Study the security of quantum key distribution systems.

Human Genetics

Genome Editing Ethics : Investigate ethical issues in genome editing technologies.
Population Genomics : Analyze genomic data for population genetics research.

Marine Biology

Coral Reef Health Assessment : Quantitatively assess the health of coral reefs.
Marine Ecosystem Modeling : Model marine ecosystems and biodiversity.

Data Science and Machine Learning

Machine Learning Explainability : Develop methods for explaining machine learning models.
Data Privacy in Machine Learning : Study privacy issues in machine learning applications.
Deep Learning for Image Analysis : Develop deep learning models for image recognition.

Environmental Engineering

Robotics and automation, materials engineering, nuclear engineering, biomedical engineering, chemical engineering, renewable energy, astronomy and space sciences, psychology and cognitive science, geology and geological engineering, forensic science, cybersecurity, mathematical biology, chemical analysis, mathematics education, quantitative social research, computational neuroscience, quantitative research topics in transportation engineering, quantitative research topics in energy economics, topics in quantum information science, amazing quantitative research topics in human genetics, quantitative research topics in marine biology, what is a common goal of qualitative and quantitative research.

A common goal of both qualitative and quantitative research is to generate knowledge and gain a deeper understanding of a particular phenomenon or topic. However, they approach this goal in different ways:

1. Understanding a Phenomenon

Both types of research aim to understand and explain a specific phenomenon, whether it’s a social issue, a natural process, a human behavior, or a complex event.

2. Testing Hypotheses

Both qualitative and quantitative research can involve hypothesis testing. While qualitative research may not use statistical hypothesis tests in the same way as quantitative research, it often tests hypotheses or research questions by examining patterns and themes in the data.

3. Contributing to Knowledge

Researchers in both approaches seek to contribute to the body of knowledge in their respective fields. They aim to answer important questions, address gaps in existing knowledge, and provide insights that can inform theory, practice, or policy.

4. Informing Decision-Making

Research findings from both qualitative and quantitative studies can be used to inform decision-making in various domains, whether it’s in academia, government, industry, healthcare, or social services.

5. Enhancing Understanding

Both approaches strive to enhance our understanding of complex phenomena by systematically collecting and analyzing data. They aim to provide evidence-based explanations and insights.

6. Application

Research findings from both qualitative and quantitative studies can be applied to practical situations. For example, the results of a quantitative study on the effectiveness of a new drug can inform medical treatment decisions, while qualitative research on customer preferences can guide marketing strategies.

7. Contributing to Theory

In academia, both types of research contribute to the development and refinement of theories in various disciplines. Quantitative research may provide empirical evidence to support or challenge existing theories, while qualitative research may generate new theoretical frameworks or perspectives.

Conclusion – Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students

So, selecting a quantitative research topic for STEM students is a pivotal decision that can shape the trajectory of your academic and professional journey. The process involves a thoughtful exploration of your interests, a thorough review of the existing literature, consideration of available resources, and the formulation of a clear and specific research question.

Your chosen topic should resonate with your passions, align with your academic or career goals, and offer the potential to contribute to the body of knowledge in your STEM field. Whether you’re delving into physics, biology, engineering, mathematics, or any other STEM discipline, the right research topic can spark curiosity, drive innovation, and lead to valuable insights.

Moreover, quantitative research in STEM not only expands the boundaries of human knowledge but also has the power to address real-world challenges, improve technology, and enhance our understanding of the natural world. It is a journey that demands dedication, intellectual rigor, and an unwavering commitment to scientific inquiry.

What is quantitative research in STEM?

Quantitative research in this context is designed to improve our understanding of the science system’s workings, structural dependencies and dynamics.

What are good examples of quantitative research?

Surveys and questionnaires serve as common examples of quantitative research. They involve collecting data from many respondents and analyzing the results to identify trends, patterns

What are the 4 C’s in STEM?

They became known as the “Four Cs” — critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity.

13 Best Tips To Write An Assignment

Whenever the new semester starts, you will get a lot of assignment writing tasks. Now you enter the new academic…

How To Do Homework Fast – 11 Tips To Do Homework Fast

Homework is one of the most important parts that have to be done by students. It has been around for…

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

60+ Best Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students: Dive into Data

Embark on a captivating journey through the cosmos of knowledge with our curated guide on Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students. Explore innovative ideas in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, designed to ignite curiosity and shape the future.

Unleash the power of quantitative research and dive into uncharted territories that go beyond academics, fostering innovation and discovery.

Hey, you future scientists, tech wizards, engineering maestros, and math superheroes – gather ’round! We’re about to dive headfirst into the rad world of quantitative research topics, tailor-made for the rockstars of STEM.

In the crazy universe of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), quantitative research isn’t just a nerdy term—it’s your VIP pass to an interstellar adventure. Picture this: you’re strapping into a rocket ship, zooming through the cosmos, and decoding the universe’s coolest secrets, all while juggling numbers like a cosmic DJ.

But here’s the real scoop: finding the ultimate research topic is like picking the juiciest star in the galaxy. It’s about stumbling upon something so mind-blowing that you can’t resist plunging into the data. It’s about choosing questions that make your STEM-loving heart do the cha-cha.

In this guide, we’re not just your sidekicks; we’re your partners in crime through the vast jungle of quantitative research topics. Whether you’re a rookie gearing up for your first lab escapade or a seasoned explorer hunting for a new thrill, think of this article as your treasure map, guiding you to the coolest STEM discoveries.

From the teeny wonders of biology to the brain-bending puzzles of physics, the cutting-edge vibes of engineering, and the downright gorgeous dance of mathematics – we’ve got your back.

So, buckle up, fellow STEM enthusiasts! We’re setting sail on a cosmic adventure through the groovy galaxy of quantitative research topics. Get ready to unravel the secrets of science and tech, one sizzling digit at a time.

Stick around for a ride that’s part data, part disco, and all STEM swagger!

Table of Contents

Benefits of Choosing Quantitative Research

Embarking on the quantitative research journey is like stepping into a treasure trove of benefits across a spectrum of fields. Let’s dive into the exciting advantages that make choosing quantitative research a game-changer:

Numbers That Speak Louder

Quantitative research deals in cold, hard numbers. This means your data isn’t just informative; it’s objective, measurable, and has a voice of its own.

Statistical Swagger

Crunching numbers isn’t just for show. With quantitative research, statistical tools add a touch of pizzazz, boosting the validity of your findings and turning your study into a credible performance.

For the Masses

Quantitative research loves a crowd. Larger sample sizes mean your discoveries aren’t just for the lucky few – they’re for everyone. It’s the science of sharing the knowledge wealth.

Data Showdown

Ready for a duel between variables? Quantitative research sets the stage for epic battles, letting you compare, contrast, and uncover cause-and-effect relationships in the data arena.

Structured and Ready to Roll

Think of quantitative research like a well-organized party. It follows a structured plan, making replication a breeze. Because who doesn’t love a party that’s easy to recreate?

Data Efficiency Dance

Efficiency is the name of the game. Surveys, experiments, and structured observations make data collection a dance – choreographed, smooth, and oh-so-efficient.

Data Clarity FTW

No decoding needed here. Quantitative research delivers crystal-clear results. It’s like reading a good book without the need for interpretation – straightforward and to the point.

Spotting Trends Like a Pro

Ever wish you had a crystal ball for trends? Quantitative analysis is the next best thing. It’s like having a trend-spotting superpower, revealing patterns that might have otherwise stayed hidden.

Bias Be Gone

Quantitative research takes bias out of the equation. Systematic data collection and statistical wizardry reduce researcher bias, leaving you with results that are as unbiased as a judge at a talent show.

Key Components of a Quantitative Research Study

Launching into a quantitative research study is like embarking on a thrilling quest, and guess what? You’re the hero of this research adventure! Let’s unravel the exciting components that make your study a blockbuster:

Quest-Starter: Research Question or Hypothesis

It’s your “once upon a time.” Kick off your research journey with a bang by crafting a captivating research question or hypothesis. This is the spark that ignites your curiosity.

Backstory Bonanza: Literature Review

Think of it as your research Netflix binge. Dive into existing literature for the backstory. It’s not just research – it’s drama, plot twists, and the foundation for your epic tale.

Blueprint Brilliance: Research Design

Time to draw up the plans for your study castle. Choose your research design – is it a grand experiment or a cunning observational scheme? Your design is the architectural genius behind your research.

Casting Call: Population and Sample

Who’s in your star-studded lineup? Define your dream cast – your target population – and then handpick a sample that’s ready for the research red carpet.

Gear Up: Data Collection Methods

Choose your research tools wisely – surveys, experiments, or maybe a bit of detective work. Your methods are like the gadgets in a spy movie, helping you collect the data treasures.

The Numbers Game: Variables and Measures

What’s in the spotlight? Identify your main characters – independent and dependent variables. Then, sprinkle in some measures to add flair and precision to your study.

Magic Analysis Wand: Data Analysis Techniques

Enter the wizardry zone! Pick your magic wand – statistical methods, tests, or software – and watch as it unravels the mysteries hidden in your data.

Ethical Superhero Cape: Ethical Considerations

Every hero needs a moral compass. Clearly outline how you’ll be the ethical superhero of your study, protecting the well-being and secrets of your participants.

Grand Finale: Results and Findings

It’s showtime! Showcase your results like the grand finale of a fireworks display. Tables, charts, and statistical dazzle – let your findings steal the spotlight.

Wrap-Up Party: Conclusion and Implications

Bring out the confetti! Summarize your findings, discuss their VIP status in the research world, and hint at the afterparty – how your results shape the future.

Behind-the-Scenes Blooper Reel: Limitations and Future Research

No Hollywood film is perfect. Share the bloopers – the limitations of your study – and hint at the sequel with ideas for future research. It’s all part of the cinematic journey.

Roll Credits: References

Give a shout-out to the supporting cast! Cite your sources – it’s the credits that add credibility to your blockbuster.

Bonus Scene: Appendix

Think of it as the post-credits scene. Tuck in any extra goodies – surveys, questionnaires, or behind-the-scenes material – for those eager to dive deeper into your research universe.

By weaving these storylines together, your quantitative research study becomes a cinematic masterpiece, leaving a lasting impact on the grand stage of academia. Happy researching, hero!

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Check out the best quantitative research topics for STEM students:-

Investigating the Effects of Different Soil pH Levels on Plant Growth.
Analyzing the Impact of Pesticide Exposure on Bee Populations.
Studying the Genetic Variability in Endangered Species.
Quantifying the Relationship Between Temperature and Microbial Growth in Water.
Analyzing the Effects of Ocean Acidification on Coral Reefs.
Investigating the Correlation Between Pollinator Diversity and Crop Yield.
Studying the Role of Gut Microbiota in Human Health and Disease.
Quantifying the Impact of Antibiotics on Soil Microbial Communities.
Analyzing the Effects of Light Pollution on Nocturnal Animal Behavior.
Investigating the Relationship Between Altitude and Plant Adaptations in Mountain Ecosystems.
Measuring the Speed of Light Using Interferometry Techniques.
Investigating the Quantum Properties of Photons in Quantum Computing.
Analyzing the Factors Affecting Magnetic Field Strength in Electromagnets.
Studying the Behavior of Superfluids at Ultra-Low Temperatures.
Quantifying the Efficiency of Energy Transfer in Photovoltaic Cells.
Analyzing the Properties of Quantum Dots for Future Display Technologies.
Investigating the Behavior of Particles in High-Energy Particle Accelerators.
Studying the Effects of Gravitational Waves on Space-Time.
Quantifying the Frictional Forces on Objects at Different Surfaces.
Analyzing the Characteristics of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe.

Engineering

Optimizing the Design of Wind Turbine Blades for Maximum Efficiency.
Investigating the Use of Smart Materials in Structural Engineering.
Analyzing the Impact of 3D Printing on Prototyping in Product Design.
Studying the Behavior of Composite Materials Under Extreme Temperatures.
Evaluating the Efficiency of Water Treatment Plants in Removing Contaminants.
Investigating the Aerodynamics of Drones for Improved Flight Control.
Quantifying the Effects of Traffic Flow on Roadway Maintenance.
Analyzing the Impact of Vibration Damping in Building Structures.
Studying the Mechanical Properties of Biodegradable Polymers in Medical Devices.
Investigating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Autonomous Robotic Systems.

Mathematics

Exploring Chaos Theory and Its Applications in Nonlinear Systems.
Modeling the Spread of Infectious Diseases in Population Dynamics.
Analyzing Data Mining Techniques for Predictive Analytics in Business.
Studying the Mathematics of Cryptography Algorithms for Data Security.
Quantifying the Patterns in Stock Market Price Movements Using Time Series Analysis.
Investigating the Applications of Fractal Geometry in Computer Graphics.
Analyzing the Behavior of Differential Equations in Climate Modeling.
Studying the Optimization of Supply Chain Networks Using Linear Programming.
Investigating the Mathematical Concepts Behind Machine Learning Algorithms.
Quantifying the Patterns of Prime Numbers in Number Theory.
Investigating the Chemical Mechanisms Behind Enzyme Catalysis.
Analyzing the Thermodynamic Properties of Chemical Reactions.
Studying the Kinetics of Chemical Reactions in Different Solvents.
Quantifying the Concentration of Pollutants in Urban Air Quality.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Antioxidants in Food Preservation.
Investigating the Electrochemical Properties of Batteries for Energy Storage.
Studying the Behavior of Nanomaterials in Drug Delivery Systems.
Analyzing the Chemical Composition of Exoplanet Atmospheres Using Spectroscopy.
Quantifying Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil and Water Sources.
Investigating the Correlation Between Chemical Exposure and Human Health.

Computer Science

Analyzing Machine Learning Algorithms for Natural Language Processing.
Investigating Quantum Computing Algorithms for Cryptography Applications.
Studying the Efficiency of Data Compression Methods for Big Data Storage.
Quantifying Cybersecurity Threats and Vulnerabilities in IoT Devices.
Evaluating the Impact of Cloud Computing on Distributed Systems.
Investigating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Autonomous Vehicles.
Analyzing the Behavior of Neural Networks in Deep Learning Applications.
Studying the Performance of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management.
Quantifying User Behavior in Social Media Analytics.
Investigating Quantum Machine Learning for Enhanced Data Processing.

These additional project ideas provide a diverse range of opportunities for STEM students to engage in quantitative research and explore various aspects of their respective fields. Each project offers a unique avenue for discovery and contribution to the world of science and technology.

What is an example of a quantitative research?

Quantitative research is a powerful investigative approach, wielding numbers to shed light on intricate relationships and phenomena. Let’s dive into an example of quantitative research to understand its workings:

Research Question

What is the correlation between the time students devote to studying and their academic grades?

Students who invest more time in studying are likely to achieve higher grades.

Research Design

Imagine a researcher embarking on a journey within a high school. They distribute surveys to students, inquiring about their weekly study hours and their corresponding grades in core subjects.

Data Analysis

Equipped with statistical tools, our researcher scrutinizes the collected data. Lo and behold, a significant positive correlation emerges—students who dedicate more time to studying generally earn higher grades.

With data as their guide, the researcher concludes that indeed, a relationship exists between study time and academic grades. The more time students commit to their studies, the brighter their academic stars tend to shine.

This example merely scratches the surface of quantitative research’s potential. It can delve into an extensive array of subjects and investigate complex hypotheses. Here are a few more examples:

Assessing a New Drug’s Effectiveness: Quantifying the impact of a novel medication in treating a specific illness.
Socioeconomic Status and Crime Rates: Investigating the connection between economic conditions and criminal activity.
Analyzing the Influence of an Advertising Campaign on Sales: Measuring the effectiveness of a marketing blitz on product purchases.
Factors Shaping Customer Satisfaction: Using data to pinpoint the elements contributing to customer contentment.
Government Policies and Employment Rates: Evaluating the repercussions of new governmental regulations on job opportunities.

Quantitative research serves as a potent beacon, illuminating the complexities of our world through data-driven inquiry. Researchers harness its might to collect, analyze, and draw valuable conclusions about a vast spectrum of phenomena. It’s a vital tool for unraveling the intricacies of our universe.

As we bid adieu to our whirlwind tour of quantitative research topics tailor-made for the STEM dreamers, it’s time to soak in the vast horizons that science, technology, engineering, and mathematics paint for us.

We’ve danced through the intricate tango of poverty and crime, peeked into the transformative realm of cutting-edge technologies, and unraveled the captivating puzzles of quantitative research. But these aren’t just topics; they’re open invitations to dive headfirst into the uncharted seas of knowledge.

To you, the STEM trailblazers, these research ideas aren’t mere academic pursuits. They’re portals to curiosity, engines of innovation, and blueprints for shaping the future of our world. They’re the sparks that illuminate the trail leading to discovery.

As you set sail on your research odyssey, remember that quantitative research isn’t just about unlocking answers—it’s about nurturing that profound sense of wonder, igniting innovation, and weaving your unique thread into the fabric of human understanding.

Whether you’re stargazing, decoding the intricate language of genes, engineering marvels, or tackling global challenges head-on, realize that your STEM and quantitative research journey is a perpetual adventure.

May your questions be audacious, your data razor-sharp, and your discoveries earth-shattering. Keep that innate curiosity alive, keep exploring, and let the spirit of STEM be your North Star, guiding you towards a future that’s not just brighter but brilliantly enlightened.

And with that, fellow adventurers, go forth, embrace the unknown, and let your journey in STEM be the epic tale that reshapes the narrative of tomorrow!

Frequently Asked Questions

How can i ensure the ethical conduct of my quantitative research project.

To ensure ethical conduct, obtain informed consent from participants, maintain data confidentiality, and adhere to ethical guidelines established by your institution and professional associations.

Are there any software tools recommended for data analysis in STEM research?

Yes, there are several widely used software tools for data analysis in STEM research, including R, Python, MATLAB, and SPSS. The choice of software depends on your specific research needs and familiarity with the tools.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Best 101 Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Are you a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) student looking for exciting research topics? Well, you’ve come to the right place! Quantitative research can be both challenging and rewarding, but finding the right topic is the first step to success. In this blog, we’ve gathered 101 quantitative research topics in the easiest language possible to help you kickstart your research journey.

101 Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Biology research topics.

Effect of Temperature on Enzyme Activity: Investigate how different temperatures affect the efficiency of enzymes in biological reactions.
The Impact of Pollution on Aquatic Ecosystems: Analyze the correlation between pollution levels and the health of aquatic ecosystems.
Genetic Variability in Human Populations: Study the genetic diversity within different human populations and its implications.
Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics: Examine how bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics and potential solutions.
Photosynthesis Efficiency in Different Light Conditions: Measure photosynthesis rates in various light conditions to understand plant adaptation.
Effect of pH Levels on Seed Germination: Investigate how different pH levels affect the germination of seeds.
Diversity of Insect Species in Urban vs. Rural Areas: Compare insect species diversity in urban and rural environments.
The Impact of Exercise on Heart Rate: Study how exercise affects heart rate and overall cardiovascular health.
Plant Growth in Response to Different Fertilizers: Analyze the growth of plants using different types of fertilizers.
Genetic Basis of Inherited Diseases: Explore the genetic mutations responsible for inherited diseases.

Chemistry Research Topics

Chemical Analysis of Water Sources: Investigate the composition of water from different sources and its suitability for consumption.
Stoichiometry of Chemical Reactions: Study the relationships between reactants and products in chemical reactions.
Kinetics of Chemical Reactions: Examine the speed and mechanisms of various chemical reactions.
The Impact of Temperature on Chemical Equilibrium: Analyze how temperature influences chemical equilibrium in reversible reactions.
Quantifying Air Pollution Levels: Measure air pollution components and their effects on human health.
Analysis of Food Additives: Investigate the safety and effects of common food additives.
Chemical Composition of Different Soils: Study the chemical properties of soils from different regions.
Electrochemical Cell Efficiency: Examine the efficiency of electrochemical cells in energy storage.
Quantitative Analysis of Drugs in Pharmaceuticals: Develop methods to quantify drug concentrations in pharmaceutical products.
Chemical Analysis of Renewable Energy Sources: Investigate the chemical composition of renewable energy sources like biofuels and solar cells.

Physics Research Topics

Quantum Mechanics and Entanglement: Explore the mysterious world of quantum entanglement and its applications.
The Physics of Black Holes: Study the properties and behavior of black holes in the universe.
Analysis of Superconductors: Investigate the phenomenon of superconductivity and its practical applications.
The Doppler Effect and its Applications: Explore the Doppler effect in various contexts, such as in astronomy and medicine.
Nanotechnology and Its Future: Analyze the potential of nanotechnology in various scientific fields.
The Behavior of Light Waves: Study the properties and behaviors of light waves, including diffraction and interference.
Quantifying Friction in Mechanical Systems: Measure and analyze friction in mechanical systems for engineering applications.
The Physics of Renewable Energy: Investigate the physics behind renewable energy sources like wind turbines and solar panels.
Particle Accelerators and High-Energy Physics: Explore the world of particle physics and particle accelerators.
Astrophysics and Dark Matter: Analyze the mysteries of dark matter and its role in the universe.

Mathematics Research Topics

Prime Number Distribution Patterns: Study the distribution of prime numbers and look for patterns.
Graph Theory and Network Analysis: Analyze real-world networks using graph theory techniques.
Optimization of Algorithms: Optimize algorithms for faster computation and efficiency.
Statistical Analysis of Economic Data: Apply statistical methods to analyze economic trends and data.
Mathematical Modeling of Disease Spread: Model the spread of diseases using mathematical equations.
Game Theory and Decision Making: Explore decision-making processes in strategic games.
Cryptographic Algorithms and Security: Study cryptographic algorithms and their role in data security.
Machine Learning and Predictive Analytics: Apply machine learning techniques to predict future events.
Number Theory and Cryptography: Investigate the mathematical foundations of cryptography.
Mathematics in Art and Design: Explore the intersection of mathematics and art through patterns and fractals.

Engineering Research Topics

Structural Analysis of Bridges: Evaluate the structural integrity of different types of bridges.
Renewable Energy Integration in Smart Grids: Study the integration of renewable energy sources in smart grid systems.
Materials Science and Composite Materials: Analyze the properties and applications of composite materials.
Robotics and Automation in Manufacturing: Explore the role of robotics in modern manufacturing processes.
Aerodynamics of Aircraft Design: Investigate the aerodynamics principles behind aircraft design.
Traffic Flow Analysis: Analyze traffic patterns and propose solutions for congestion.
Environmental Impact of Transportation: Study the environmental effects of various transportation methods.
Civil Engineering and Urban Planning: Explore solutions for urban development and infrastructure planning.
Biomechanics and Prosthetics: Study the mechanics of the human body and design prosthetic devices.
Environmental Engineering and Water Treatment: Investigate methods for efficient water treatment and pollution control.

Computer Science Research Topics

Machine Learning for Image Recognition: Develop algorithms for image recognition using machine learning.
Cybersecurity and Intrusion Detection: Study methods to detect and prevent cyber intrusions.
Natural Language Processing for Sentiment Analysis: Analyze sentiment in text data using natural language processing techniques.
Big Data Analytics and Predictive Modeling: Apply big data analytics to predict trends and make data-driven decisions.
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Explore the applications of AI in diagnosing diseases and patient care.
Computer Vision and Autonomous Vehicles: Study computer vision techniques for autonomous vehicle navigation.
Quantum Computing and Cryptography: Investigate the potential of quantum computing in breaking current cryptographic systems.
Social Media Data Analysis: Analyze social media data to understand trends and user behavior.
Software Development for Accessibility: Develop software solutions for individuals with disabilities.
Virtual Reality and Simulation: Explore the use of virtual reality in simulations and training.

Environmental Science Research Topics

Climate Change and Sea-Level Rise: Study the effects of climate change on sea-level rise in coastal areas.
Ecosystem Restoration and Biodiversity: Explore methods to restore and conserve ecosystems and biodiversity.
Air Quality Monitoring in Urban Areas: Analyze air quality in urban environments and its health implications.
Sustainable Agriculture and Crop Yield: Investigate sustainable farming practices for improved crop yield.
Water Resource Management: Study methods for efficient water resource management and conservation.
Waste Management and Recycling: Analyze waste management strategies and recycling programs.
Natural Disaster Prediction and Mitigation: Develop models for predicting and mitigating natural disasters.
Renewable Energy and Environmental Impact: Investigate the environmental impact of renewable energy sources.
Climate Modeling and Predictions: Study climate models and make predictions about future climate changes.
Pollution Control and Remediation Techniques: Explore methods to control and remediate various types of pollution.

Psychology Research Topics

Effects of Social Media on Mental Health: Analyze the relationship between social media usage and mental health.
Cognitive Development in Children: Study cognitive development in children and its factors.
The Impact of Stress on Academic Performance: Analyze how stress affects academic performance.
Gender Differences in Decision-Making: Investigate gender-related variations in decision-making processes.
Psychological Factors in Addiction: Study the psychological factors contributing to addiction.
Perception and Memory in Aging: Explore changes in perception and memory as people age.
Cross-Cultural Psychological Studies: Compare psychological phenomena across different cultures.
Positive Psychology and Well-Being: Investigate factors contributing to overall well-being and happiness.
Emotional Intelligence and Leadership: Study the relationship between emotional intelligence and effective leadership.
Psychological Effects of Virtual Reality: Analyze the psychological impact of immersive virtual reality experiences.

Earth Science Research Topics

Volcanic Activity and Predictions: Study volcanic eruptions and develop prediction models.
Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes: Analyze the movement of tectonic plates and earthquake patterns.
Geomorphology and Landscape Evolution: Investigate the processes shaping Earth’s surface.
Glacial Retreat and Climate Change: Study the retreat of glaciers and its connection to climate change.
Mineral Exploration and Resource Management: Explore methods for mineral resource exploration and sustainable management.
Meteorology and Weather Forecasting: Analyze weather patterns and improve weather forecasting accuracy.
Oceanography and Marine Life: Study marine ecosystems, ocean currents, and their impact on marine life.
Soil Erosion and Conservation: Investigate soil erosion processes and conservation techniques.
Remote Sensing and Earth Observation: Use remote sensing technology to monitor Earth’s surface changes.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Applications: Apply GIS technology for various geographical analyses.

Materials Science Research Topics

Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery: Investigate the use of nanomaterials for targeted drug delivery.
Superconducting Materials and Energy Efficiency: Study materials with superconducting properties for energy applications.
Advanced Composite Materials for Aerospace: Analyze advanced composites for lightweight aerospace applications.
Solar Cell Efficiency Improvement: Investigate materials for more efficient solar cell technology .
Biomaterials and Medical Implants: Explore materials used in medical implants and their biocompatibility.
Smart Materials for Electronics: Study materials that can change their properties in response to external stimuli.
Materials for Energy Storage: Analyze materials for improved energy storage solutions.
Quantum Dots in Display Technology: Investigate the use of quantum dots in display technology.
Materials for 3D Printing: Explore materials suitable for 3D printing in various industries.
Materials for Water Purification: Study materials used in water purification processes.
Data Analysis of Social Media Trends: Explore the quantitative analysis of social media trends to understand their impact on society and marketing strategies.

There you have it—101 quantitative research topics for STEM students! Remember that the key to a successful research project is choosing a topic that genuinely interests you. Whether you’re passionate about biology, chemistry, physics, mathematics, engineering, computer science, environmental science, psychology, or earth science, there’s a quantitative research topic waiting for you to explore. So, roll up your sleeves, gather your data, and embark on your research journey with enthusiasm.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Open access
Published: 10 March 2020

Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications

Yeping Li 1 ,
Ke Wang 2 ,
Yu Xiao 1 &
Jeffrey E. Froyd 3

International Journal of STEM Education volume 7 , Article number: 11 ( 2020 ) Cite this article

172k Accesses

169 Citations

5 Altmetric

Metrics details

With the rapid increase in the number of scholarly publications on STEM education in recent years, reviews of the status and trends in STEM education research internationally support the development of the field. For this review, we conducted a systematic analysis of 798 articles in STEM education published between 2000 and the end of 2018 in 36 journals to get an overview about developments in STEM education scholarship. We examined those selected journal publications both quantitatively and qualitatively, including the number of articles published, journals in which the articles were published, authorship nationality, and research topic and methods over the years. The results show that research in STEM education is increasing in importance internationally and that the identity of STEM education journals is becoming clearer over time.

Introduction

A recent review of 144 publications in the International Journal of STEM Education ( IJ - STEM ) showed how scholarship in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education developed between August 2014 and the end of 2018 through the lens of one journal (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). The review of articles published in only one journal over a short period of time prompted the need to review the status and trends in STEM education research internationally by analyzing articles published in a wider range of journals over a longer period of time.

With global recognition of the growing importance of STEM education, we have witnessed the urgent need to support research and scholarship in STEM education (Li, 2014 , 2018a ). Researchers and educators have responded to this on-going call and published their scholarly work through many different publication outlets including journals, books, and conference proceedings. A simple Google search with the term “STEM,” “STEM education,” or “STEM education research” all returned more than 450,000,000 items. Such voluminous information shows the rapidly evolving and vibrant field of STEM education and sheds light on the volume of STEM education research. In any field, it is important to know and understand the status and trends in scholarship for the field to develop and be appropriately supported. This applies to STEM education.

Conducting systematic reviews to explore the status and trends in specific disciplines is common in educational research. For example, researchers surveyed the historical development of research in mathematics education (Kilpatrick, 1992 ) and studied patterns in technology usage in mathematics education (Bray & Tangney, 2017 ; Sokolowski, Li, & Willson, 2015 ). In science education, Tsai and his colleagues have conducted a sequence of reviews of journal articles to synthesize research trends in every 5 years since 1998 (i.e., 1998–2002, 2003–2007, 2008–2012, and 2013–2017), based on publications in three main science education journals including, Science Education , the International Journal of Science Education , and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching (e.g., Lin, Lin, Potvin, & Tsai, 2019 ; Tsai & Wen, 2005 ). Erduran, Ozdem, and Park ( 2015 ) reviewed argumentation in science education research from 1998 to 2014 and Minner, Levy, and Century ( 2010 ) reviewed inquiry-based science instruction between 1984 and 2002. There are also many literature reviews and syntheses in engineering and technology education (e.g., Borrego, Foster, & Froyd, 2015 ; Xu, Williams, Gu, & Zhang, 2019 ). All of these reviews have been well received in different fields of traditional disciplinary education as they critically appraise and summarize the state-of-art of relevant research in a field in general or with a specific focus. Both types of reviews have been conducted with different methods for identifying, collecting, and analyzing relevant publications, and they differ in terms of review aim and topic scope, time period, and ways of literature selection. In this review, we systematically analyze journal publications in STEM education research to overview STEM education scholarship development broadly and globally.

The complexity and ambiguity of examining the status and trends in STEM education research

A review of research development in a field is relatively straight forward, when the field is mature and its scope can be well defined. Unlike discipline-based education research (DBER, National Research Council, 2012 ), STEM education is not a well-defined field. Conducting a comprehensive literature review of STEM education research require careful thought and clearly specified scope to tackle the complexity naturally associated with STEM education. In the following sub-sections, we provide some further discussion.

Diverse perspectives about STEM and STEM education

STEM education as explicated by the term does not have a long history. The interest in helping students learn across STEM fields can be traced back to the 1990s when the US National Science Foundation (NSF) formally included engineering and technology with science and mathematics in undergraduate and K-12 school education (e.g., National Science Foundation, 1998 ). It coined the acronym SMET (science, mathematics, engineering, and technology) that was subsequently used by other agencies including the US Congress (e.g., United States Congress House Committee on Science, 1998 ). NSF also coined the acronym STEM to replace SMET (e.g., Christenson, 2011 ; Chute, 2009 ) and it has become the acronym of choice. However, a consensus has not been reached on the disciplines included within STEM.

To clarify its intent, NSF published a list of approved fields it considered under the umbrella of STEM (see http://bit.ly/2Bk1Yp5 ). The list not only includes disciplines widely considered under the STEM tent (called “core” disciplines, such as physics, chemistry, and materials research), but also includes disciplines in psychology and social sciences (e.g., political science, economics). However, NSF’s list of STEM fields is inconsistent with other federal agencies. Gonzalez and Kuenzi ( 2012 ) noted that at least two US agencies, the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, use a narrower definition that excludes social sciences. Researchers also view integration across different disciplines of STEM differently using various terms such as, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary (Vasquez, Sneider, & Comer, 2013 ). These are only two examples of the ambiguity and complexity in describing and specifying what constitutes STEM.

Multiple perspectives about the meaning of STEM education adds further complexity to determining the extent to which scholarly activity can be categorized as STEM education. For example, STEM education can be viewed with a broad and inclusive perspective to include education in the individual disciplines of STEM, i.e., science education, technology education, engineering education, and mathematics education, as well as interdisciplinary or cross-disciplinary combinations of the individual STEM disciplines (English, 2016 ; Li, 2014 ). On the other hand, STEM education can be viewed by others as referring only to interdisciplinary or cross-disciplinary combinations of the individual STEM disciplines (Honey, Pearson, & Schweingruber, 2014 ; Johnson, Peters-Burton, & Moore, 2015 ; Kelley & Knowles, 2016 ; Li, 2018a ). These multiple perspectives allow scholars to publish articles in a vast array and diverse journals, as long as journals are willing to take the position as connected with STEM education. At the same time, however, the situation presents considerable challenges for researchers intending to locate, identify, and classify publications as STEM education research. To tackle such challenges, we tried to find out what we can learn from prior reviews related to STEM education.

Guidance from prior reviews related to STEM education

A search for reviews of STEM education research found multiple reviews that could suggest approaches for identifying publications (e.g., Brown, 2012 ; Henderson, Beach, & Finkelstein, 2011 ; Kim, Sinatra, & Seyranian, 2018 ; Margot & Kettler, 2019 ; Minichiello, Hood, & Harkness, 2018 ; Mizell & Brown, 2016 ; Thibaut et al., 2018 ; Wu & Rau, 2019 ). The review conducted by Brown ( 2012 ) examined the research base of STEM education. He addressed the complexity and ambiguity by confining the review with publications in eight journals, two in each individual discipline, one academic research journal (e.g., the Journal of Research in Science Teaching ) and one practitioner journal (e.g., Science Teacher ). Journals were selected based on suggestions from some faculty members and K-12 teachers. Out of 1100 articles published in these eight journals from January 1, 2007, to October 1, 2010, Brown located 60 articles that authors self-identified as connected to STEM education. He found that the vast majority of these 60 articles focused on issues beyond an individual discipline and there was a research base forming for STEM education. In a follow-up study, Mizell and Brown ( 2016 ) reviewed articles published from January 2013 to October 2015 in the same eight journals plus two additional journals. Mizell and Brown used the same criteria to identify and include articles that authors self-identified as connected to STEM education, i.e., if the authors included STEM in the title or author-supplied keywords. In comparison to Brown’s findings, they found that many more STEM articles were published in a shorter time period and by scholars from many more different academic institutions. Taking together, both Brown ( 2012 ) and Mizell and Brown ( 2016 ) tended to suggest that STEM education mainly consists of interdisciplinary or cross-disciplinary combinations of the individual STEM disciplines, but their approach consisted of selecting a limited number of individual discipline-based journals and then selecting articles that authors self-identified as connected to STEM education.

In contrast to reviews on STEM education, in general, other reviews focused on specific issues in STEM education (e.g., Henderson et al., 2011 ; Kim et al., 2018 ; Margot & Kettler, 2019 ; Minichiello et al., 2018 ; Schreffler, Vasquez III, Chini, & James, 2019 ; Thibaut et al., 2018 ; Wu & Rau, 2019 ). For example, the review by Henderson et al. ( 2011 ) focused on instructional change in undergraduate STEM courses based on 191 conceptual and empirical journal articles published between 1995 and 2008. Margot and Kettler ( 2019 ) focused on what is known about teachers’ values, beliefs, perceived barriers, and needed support related to STEM education based on 25 empirical journal articles published between 2000 and 2016. The focus of these reviews allowed the researchers to limit the number of articles considered, and they typically used keyword searches of selected databases to identify articles on STEM education. Some researchers used this approach to identify publications from journals only (e.g., Henderson et al., 2011 ; Margot & Kettler, 2019 ; Schreffler et al., 2019 ), and others selected and reviewed publications beyond journals (e.g., Minichiello et al., 2018 ; Thibaut et al., 2018 ; Wu & Rau, 2019 ).

The discussion in this section suggests possible reasons contributing to the absence of a general literature review of STEM education research and development: (1) diverse perspectives in existence about STEM and STEM education that contribute to the difficulty of specifying a scope of literature review, (2) its short but rapid development history in comparison to other discipline-based education (e.g., science education), and (3) difficulties in deciding how to establish the scope of the literature review. With respect to the third reason, prior reviews have used one of two approaches to identify and select articles: (a) identifying specific journals first and then searching and selecting specific articles from these journals (e.g., Brown, 2012 ; Erduran et al., 2015 ; Mizell & Brown, 2016 ) and (b) conducting selected database searches with keywords based on a specific focus (e.g., Margot & Kettler, 2019 ; Thibaut et al., 2018 ). However, neither the first approach of selecting a limited number of individual discipline-based journals nor the second approach of selecting a specific focus for the review leads to an approach that provides a general overview of STEM education scholarship development based on existing journal publications.

Current review

Two issues were identified in setting the scope for this review.

What time period should be considered?

What publications will be selected for review?

Time period

We start with the easy one first. As discussed above, the acronym STEM did exist until the early 2000s. Although the existence of the acronym does not generate scholarship on student learning in STEM disciplines, it is symbolic and helps focus attention to efforts in STEM education. Since we want to examine the status and trends in STEM education, it is reasonable to start with the year 2000. Then, we can use the acronym of STEM as an identifier in locating specific research articles in a way as done by others (e.g., Brown, 2012 ; Mizell & Brown, 2016 ). We chose the end of 2018 as the end of the time period for our review that began during 2019.

Focusing on publications beyond individual discipline-based journals

As mentioned before, scholars responded to the call for scholarship development in STEM education with publications that appeared in various outlets and diverse languages, including journals, books, and conference proceedings. However, journal publications are typically credited and valued as one of the most important outlets for research exchange (e.g., Erduran et al., 2015 ; Henderson et al., 2011 ; Lin et al., 2019 ; Xu et al., 2019 ). Thus, in this review, we will also focus on articles published in journals in English.

The discourse above on the complexity and ambiguity regarding STEM education suggests that scholars may publish their research in a wide range of journals beyond individual discipline-based journals. To search and select articles from a wide range of journals, we thought about the approach of searching selected databases with keywords as other scholars used in reviewing STEM education with a specific focus. However, existing journals in STEM education do not have a long history. In fact, IJ-STEM is the first journal in STEM education that has just been accepted into the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) (Li, 2019a ). Publications in many STEM education journals are practically not available in several important and popular databases, such as the Web of Science and Scopus. Moreover, some journals in STEM education were not normalized due to a journal’s name change or irregular publication schedule. For example, the Journal of STEM Education was named as Journal of SMET Education when it started in 2000 in a print format, and the journal’s name was not changed until 2003, Vol 4 (3 and 4), and also went fully on-line starting 2004 (Raju & Sankar, 2003 ). A simple Google Scholar search with keywords will not be able to provide accurate information, unless you visit the journal’s website to check all publications over the years. Those added complexities prevented us from taking the database search as a viable approach. Thus, we decided to identify journals first and then search and select articles from these journals. Further details about the approach are provided in the “ Method ” section.

Research questions

Given a broader range of journals and a longer period of time to be covered in this review, we can examine some of the same questions as the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ), but we do not have access to data on readership, articles accessed, or articles cited for the other journals selected for this review. Specifically, we are interested in addressing the following six research questions:

What were the status and trends in STEM education research from 2000 to the end of 2018 based on journal publications?

What were the patterns of publications in STEM education research across different journals?

Which countries or regions, based on the countries or regions in which authors were located, contributed to journal publications in STEM education?

What were the patterns of single-author and multiple-author publications in STEM education?

What main topics had emerged in STEM education research based on the journal publications?

What research methods did authors tend to use in conducting STEM education research?

Based on the above discussion, we developed the methods for this literature review to follow careful sequential steps to identify journals first and then identify and select STEM education research articles published in these journals from January 2000 to the end of 2018. The methods should allow us to obtain a comprehensive overview about the status and trends of STEM education research based on a systematic analysis of related publications from a broad range of journals and over a longer period of time.

Identifying journals

We used the following three steps to search and identify journals for inclusion:

We assumed articles on research in STEM education have been published in journals that involve more than one traditional discipline. Thus, we used Google to search and identify all education journals with their titles containing either two, three, or all four disciplines of STEM. For example, we did Google search of all the different combinations of three areas of science, mathematics, technology Footnote 1 , and engineering as contained in a journal’s title. In addition, we also searched possible journals containing the word STEAM in the title.

Since STEM education may be viewed as encompassing discipline-based education research, articles on STEM education research may have been published in traditional discipline-based education journals, such as the Journal of Research in Science Teaching . However, there are too many such journals. Yale’s Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning has listed 16 journals that publish articles spanning across undergraduate STEM education disciplines (see https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/FacultyResources/STEMjournals ). Thus, we selected from the list some individual discipline-based education research journals, and also added a few more common ones such as the Journal of Engineering Education .

Since articles on research in STEM education have appeared in some general education research journals, especially those well-established ones. Thus, we identified and selected a few of those journals that we noticed some publications in STEM education research.

Following the above three steps, we identified 45 journals (see Table 1 ).

Identifying articles

In this review, we will not discuss or define the meaning of STEM education. We used the acronym STEM (or STEAM, or written as the phrase of “science, technology, engineering, and mathematics”) as a term in our search of publication titles and/or abstracts. To identify and select articles for review, we searched all items published in those 45 journals and selected only those articles that author(s) self-identified with the acronym STEM (or STEAM, or written as the phrase of “science, technology, engineering, and mathematics”) in the title and/or abstract. We excluded publications in the sections of practices, letters to editors, corrections, and (guest) editorials. Our search found 798 publications that authors self-identified as in STEM education, identified from 36 journals. The remaining 9 journals either did not have publications that met our search terms or published in another language other than English (see the two separate lists in Table 1 ).

Data analysis

To address research question 3, we analyzed authorship to examine which countries/regions contributed to STEM education research over the years. Because each publication may have either one or multiple authors, we used two different methods to analyze authorship nationality that have been recognized as valuable from our review of IJ-STEM publications (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). The first method considers only the corresponding author’s (or the first author, if no specific indication is given about the corresponding author) nationality and his/her first institution affiliation, if multiple institution affiliations are listed. Method 2 considers every author of a publication, using the following formula (Howard, Cole, & Maxwell, 1987 ) to quantitatively assign and estimate each author’s contribution to a publication (and thus associated institution’s productivity), when multiple authors are included in a publication. As an example, each publication is given one credit point. For the publication co-authored by two, the first author would be given 0.6 and the second author 0.4 credit point. For an article contributed jointly by three authors, the three authors would be credited with scores of 0.47, 0.32, and 0.21, respectively.

After calculating all the scores for each author of each paper, we added all the credit scores together in terms of each author’s country/region. For brevity, we present only the top 10 countries/regions in terms of their total credit scores calculated using these two different methods, respectively.

To address research question 5, we used the same seven topic categories identified and used in our review of IJ-STEM publications (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). We tested coding 100 articles first to ensure the feasibility. Through test-coding and discussions, we found seven topic categories could be used to examine and classify all 798 items.

K-12 teaching, teacher, and teacher education in STEM (including both pre-service and in-service teacher education)

Post-secondary teacher and teaching in STEM (including faculty development, etc.)

K-12 STEM learner, learning, and learning environment

Post-secondary STEM learner, learning, and learning environments (excluding pre-service teacher education)

Policy, curriculum, evaluation, and assessment in STEM (including literature review about a field in general)

Culture and social and gender issues in STEM education

History, epistemology, and perspectives about STEM and STEM education

To address research question 6, we coded all 798 publications in terms of (1) qualitative methods, (2) quantitative methods, (3) mixed methods, and (4) non-empirical studies (including theoretical or conceptual papers, and literature reviews). We assigned each publication to only one research topic and one method, following the process used in the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). When there was more than one topic or method that could have been used for a publication, a decision was made in choosing and assigning a topic or a method. The agreement between two coders for all 798 publications was 89.5%. When topic and method coding discrepancies occurred, a final decision was reached after discussion.

Results and discussion

In the following sections, we report findings as corresponding to each of the six research questions.

The status and trends of journal publications in STEM education research from 2000 to 2018

Figure 1 shows the number of publications per year. As Fig. 1 shows, the number of publications increased each year beginning in 2010. There are noticeable jumps from 2015 to 2016 and from 2017 to 2018. The result shows that research in STEM education had grown significantly since 2010, and the most recent large number of STEM education publications also suggests that STEM education research gained its own recognition by many different journals for publication as a hot and important topic area.

The distribution of STEM education publications over the years

Among the 798 articles, there were 549 articles with the word “STEM” (or STEAM, or written with the phrase of “science, technology, engineering, and mathematics”) included in the article’s title or both title and abstract and 249 articles without such identifiers included in the title but abstract only. The results suggest that many scholars tended to include STEM in the publications’ titles to highlight their research in or about STEM education. Figure 2 shows the number of publications per year where publications are distinguished depending on whether they used the term STEM in the title or only in the abstract. The number of publications in both categories had significant increases since 2010. Use of the acronym STEM in the title was growing at a faster rate than using the acronym only in the abstract.

The trends of STEM education publications with vs. without STEM included in the title

Not all the publications that used the acronym STEM in the title and/or abstract reported on a study involving all four STEM areas. For each publication, we further examined the number of the four areas involved in the reported study.

Figure 3 presents the number of publications categorized by the number of the four areas involved in the study, breaking down the distribution of these 798 publications in terms of the content scope being focused on. Studies involving all four STEM areas are the most numerous with 488 (61.2%) publications, followed by involving one area (141, 17.7%), then studies involving both STEM and non-STEM (84, 10.5%), and finally studies involving two or three areas of STEM (72, 9%; 13, 1.6%; respectively). Publications that used the acronym STEAM in either the title or abstract were classified as involving both STEM and non-STEM. For example, both of the following publications were included in this category.

Dika and D’Amico ( 2016 ). “Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first-generation college students in STEM and non-STEM majors.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 53 (3), 368–383. (Note: this article focused on early experience in both STEM and Non-STEM majors.)

Sochacka, Guyotte, and Walther ( 2016 ). “Learning together: A collaborative autoethnographic exploration of STEAM (STEM+ the Arts) education.” Journal of Engineering Education , 105 (1), 15–42. (Note: this article focused on STEAM (both STEM and Arts).)

Publication distribution in terms of content scope being focused on. (Note: 1=single subject of STEM, 2=two subjects of STEM, 3=three subjects of STEM, 4=four subjects of STEM, 5=topics related to both STEM and non-STEM)

Figure 4 presents the number of publications per year in each of the five categories described earlier (category 1, one area of STEM; category 2, two areas of STEM; category 3, three areas of STEM; category 4, four areas of STEM; category 5, STEM and non-STEM). The category that had grown most rapidly since 2010 is the one involving all four areas. Recent growth in the number of publications in category 1 likely reflected growing interest of traditional individual disciplinary based educators in developing and sharing multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship in STEM education, as what was noted recently by Li and Schoenfeld ( 2019 ) with publications in IJ-STEM.

Publication distribution in terms of content scope being focused on over the years

Patterns of publications across different journals

Among the 36 journals that published STEM education articles, two are general education research journals (referred to as “subject-0”), 12 with their titles containing one discipline of STEM (“subject-1”), eight with journal’s titles covering two disciplines of STEM (“subject-2”), six covering three disciplines of STEM (“subject-3”), seven containing the word STEM (“subject-4”), and one in STEAM education (“subject-5”).

Table 2 shows that both subject-0 and subject-1 journals were usually mature journals with a long history, and they were all traditional subscription-based journals, except the Journal of Pre - College Engineering Education Research , a subject-1 journal established in 2011 that provided open access (OA). In comparison to subject-0 and subject-1 journals, subject-2 and subject-3 journals were relatively newer but still had quite many years of history on average. There are also some more journals in these two categories that provided OA. Subject-4 and subject-5 journals had a short history, and most provided OA. The results show that well-established journals had tended to focus on individual disciplines or education research in general. Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary education journals were started some years later, followed by the recent establishment of several STEM or STEAM journals.

Table 2 also shows that subject-1, subject-2, and subject-4 journals published approximately a quarter each of the publications. The number of publications in subject-1 journals is interested, because we selected a relatively limited number of journals in this category. There are many other journals in the subject-1 category (as well as subject-0 journals) that we did not select, and thus it is very likely that we did not include some STEM education articles published in subject-0 or subject-1 journals that we did not include in our study.

Figure 5 shows the number of publications per year in each of the five categories described earlier (subject-0 through subject-5). The number of publications per year in subject-5 and subject-0 journals did not change much over the time period of the study. On the other hand, the number of publications per year in subject-4 (all 4 areas), subject-1 (single area), and subject-2 journals were all over 40 by the end of the study period. The number of publications per year in subject-3 journals increased but remained less than 30. At first sight, it may be a bit surprising that the number of publications in STEM education per year in subject-1 journals increased much faster than those in subject-2 journals over the past few years. However, as Table 2 indicates these journals had long been established with great reputations, and scholars would like to publish their research in such journals. In contrast to the trend in subject-1 journals, the trend in subject-4 journals suggests that STEM education journals collectively started to gain its own identity for publishing and sharing STEM education research.

STEM education publication distribution across different journal categories over the years. (Note: 0=subject-0; 1=subject-1; 2=subject-2; 3=subject-3; 4=subject-4; 5=subject-5)

Figure 6 shows the number of STEM education publications in each journal where the bars are color-coded (yellow, subject-0; light blue, subject-1; green, subject-2; purple, subject-3; dark blue, subject-4; and black, subject-5). There is no clear pattern shown in terms of the overall number of STEM education publications across categories or journals, but very much individual journal-based performance. The result indicates that the number of STEM education publications might heavily rely on the individual journal’s willingness and capability of attracting STEM education research work and thus suggests the potential value of examining individual journal’s performance.

Publication distribution across all 36 individual journals across different categories with the same color-coded for journals in the same subject category

The top five journals in terms of the number of STEM education publications are Journal of Science Education and Technology (80 publications, journal number 25 in Fig. 6 ), Journal of STEM Education (65 publications, journal number 26), International Journal of STEM Education (64 publications, journal number 17), International Journal of Engineering Education (54 publications, journal number 12), and School Science and Mathematics (41 publications, journal number 31). Among these five journals, two journals are specifically on STEM education (J26, J17), two on two subjects of STEM (J25, J31), and one on one subject of STEM (J12).

Figure 7 shows the number of STEM education publications per year in each of these top five journals. As expected, based on earlier trends, the number of publications per year increased over the study period. The largest increase was in the International Journal of STEM Education (J17) that was established in 2014. As the other four journals were all established in or before 2000, J17’s short history further suggests its outstanding performance in attracting and publishing STEM education articles since 2014 (Li, 2018b ; Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). The increase was consistent with the journal’s recognition as the first STEM education journal for inclusion in SSCI starting in 2019 (Li, 2019a ).

Publication distribution of selected five journals over the years. (Note: J12: International Journal of Engineering Education; J17: International Journal of STEM Education; J25: Journal of Science Education and Technology; J26: Journal of STEM Education; J31: School Science and Mathematics)

Top 10 countries/regions where scholars contributed journal publications in STEM education

Table 3 shows top countries/regions in terms of the number of publications, where the country/region was established by the authorship using the two different methods presented above. About 75% (depending on the method) of contributions were made by authors from the USA, followed by Australia, Canada, Taiwan, and UK. Only Africa as a continent was not represented among the top 10 countries/regions. The results are relatively consistent with patterns reported in the IJ-STEM study (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 )

Further examination of Table 3 reveals that the two methods provide not only fairly consistent results but also yield some differences. For example, Israel and Germany had more publication credit if only the corresponding author was considered, but South Korea and Turkey had more publication credit when co-authors were considered. The results in Table 3 show that each method has value when analyzing and comparing publications by country/region or institution based on authorship.

Recognizing that, as shown in Fig. 1 , the number of publications per year increased rapidly since 2010, Table 4 shows the number of publications by country/region over a 10-year period (2009–2018) and Table 5 shows the number of publications by country/region over a 5-year period (2014–2018). The ranks in Tables 3 , 4 , and 5 are fairly consistent, but that would be expected since the larger numbers of publications in STEM education had occurred in recent years. At the same time, it is interesting to note in Table 5 some changes over the recent several years with Malaysia, but not Israel, entering the top 10 list when either method was used to calculate author's credit.

Patterns of single-author and multiple-author publications in STEM education

Since STEM education differs from traditional individual disciplinary education, we are interested in determining how common joint co-authorship with collaborations was in STEM education articles. Figure 8 shows that joint co-authorship was very common among these 798 STEM education publications, with 83.7% publications with two or more co-authors. Publications with two, three, or at least five co-authors were highest, with 204, 181, and 157 publications, respectively.

Number of publications with single or different joint authorship. (Note: 1=single author; 2=two co-authors; 3=three co-authors; 4=four co-authors; 5=five or more co-authors)

Figure 9 shows the number of publications per year using the joint authorship categories in Fig. 8 . Each category shows an increase consistent with the increase shown in Fig. 1 for all 798 publications. By the end of the time period, the number of publications with two, three, or at least five co-authors was the largest, which might suggest an increase in collaborations in STEM education research.

Publication distribution with single or different joint authorship over the years. (Note: 1=single author; 2=two co-authors; 3=three co-authors; 4=four co-authors; 5=five or more co-authors)

Co-authors can be from the same or different countries/regions. Figure 10 shows the number of publications per year by single authors (no collaboration), co-authors from the same country (collaboration in a country/region), and co-authors from different countries (collaboration across countries/regions). Each year the largest number of publications was by co-authors from the same country, and the number increased dramatically during the period of the study. Although the number of publications in the other two categories increased, the numbers of publications were noticeably fewer than the number of publications by co-authors from the same country.

Publication distribution in authorship across different categories in terms of collaboration over the years

Published articles by research topics

Figure 11 shows the number of publications in each of the seven topic categories. The topic category of goals, policy, curriculum, evaluation, and assessment had almost half of publications (375, 47%). Literature reviews were included in this topic category, as providing an overview assessment of education and research development in a topic area or a field. Sample publications included in this category are listed as follows:

DeCoito ( 2016 ). “STEM education in Canada: A knowledge synthesis.” Canadian Journal of Science , Mathematics and Technology Education , 16 (2), 114–128. (Note: this article provides a national overview of STEM initiatives and programs, including success, criteria for effective programs and current research in STEM education.)

Ring-Whalen, Dare, Roehrig, Titu, and Crotty ( 2018 ). “From conception to curricula: The role of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in integrated STEM units.” International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology , 6 (4), 343–362. (Note: this article investigates the conceptions of integrated STEM education held by in-service science teachers through the use of photo-elicitation interviews and examines how those conceptions were reflected in teacher-created integrated STEM curricula.)

Schwab et al. ( 2018 ). “A summer STEM outreach program run by graduate students: Successes, challenges, and recommendations for implementation.” Journal of Research in STEM Education , 4 (2), 117–129. (Note: the article details the organization and scope of the Foundation in Science and Mathematics Program and evaluates this program.)

Frequencies of publications’ research topic distributions. (Note: 1=K-12 teaching, teacher and teacher education; 2=Post-secondary teacher and teaching; 3=K-12 STEM learner, learning, and learning environment; 4=Post-secondary STEM learner, learning, and learning environments; 5=Goals and policy, curriculum, evaluation, and assessment (including literature review); 6=Culture, social, and gender issues; 7=History, philosophy, Epistemology, and nature of STEM and STEM education)

The topic with the second most publications was “K-12 teaching, teacher and teacher education” (103, 12.9%), followed closely by “K-12 learner, learning, and learning environment” (97, 12.2%). The results likely suggest the research community had a broad interest in both teaching and learning in K-12 STEM education. The top three topics were the same in the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ).

Figure 11 also shows there was a virtual tie between two topics with the fourth most cumulative publications, “post-secondary STEM learner & learning” (76, 9.5%) and “culture, social, and gender issues in STEM” (78, 9.8%), such as STEM identity, students’ career choices in STEM, and inclusion. This result is different from the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ), where “post-secondary STEM teacher & teaching” and “post-secondary STEM learner & learning” were tied as the fourth most common topics. This difference is likely due to the scope of journals and the length of the time period being reviewed.

Figure 12 shows the number of publications per year in each topic category. As expected from the results in Fig. 11 the number of publications in topic category 5 (goals, policy, curriculum, evaluation, and assessment) was the largest each year. The numbers of publications in topic category 3 (K-12 learner, learning, and learning environment), 1 (K-12 teaching, teacher, and teacher education), 6 (culture, social, and gender issues in STEM), and 4 (post-secondary STEM learner and learning) were also increasing. Although Fig. 11 shows the number of publications in topic category 1 was slightly more than the number of publications in topic category 3 (see Fig. 11 ), the number of publications in topic category 3 was increasing more rapidly in recent years than its counterpart in topic category 1. This may suggest a more rapidly growing interest in K-12 STEM learner, learning, and learning environment. The numbers of publications in topic categories 2 and 7 were not increasing, but the number of publications in IJ-STEM in topic category 2 was notable (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). It will be interesting to follow trends in the seven topic categories in the future.

Publication distributions in terms of research topics over the years

Published articles by research methods

Figure 13 shows the number of publications per year by research methods in empirical studies. Publications with non-empirical studies are shown in a separate category. Although the number of publications in each of the four categories increased during the study period, there were many more publications presenting empirical studies than those without. For those with empirical studies, the number of publications using quantitative methods increased most rapidly in recent years, followed by qualitative and then mixed methods. Although there were quite many publications with non-empirical studies (e.g., theoretical or conceptual papers, literature reviews) during the study period, the increase of the number of publications in this category was noticeably less than empirical studies.

Publication distributions in terms of research methods over the years. (Note: 1=qualitative, 2=quantitative, 3=mixed, 4=Non-empirical)

Concluding remarks

The systematic analysis of publications that were considered to be in STEM education in 36 selected journals shows tremendous growth in scholarship in this field from 2000 to 2018, especially over the past 10 years. Our analysis indicates that STEM education research has been increasingly recognized as an important topic area and studies were being published across many different journals. Scholars still hold diverse perspectives about how research is designated as STEM education; however, authors have been increasingly distinguishing their articles with STEM, STEAM, or related words in the titles, abstracts, and lists of keywords during the past 10 years. Moreover, our systematic analysis shows a dramatic increase in the number of publications in STEM education journals in recent years, which indicates that these journals have been collectively developing their own professional identity. In addition, the International Journal of STEM Education has become the first STEM education journal to be accepted in SSCI in 2019 (Li, 2019a ). The achievement may mark an important milestone as STEM education journals develop their own identity for publishing and sharing STEM education research.

Consistent with our previous reviews (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ; Li, Wang, & Xiao, 2019 ), the vast majority of publications in STEM education research were contributed by authors from the USA, where STEM and STEAM education originated, followed by Australia, Canada, and Taiwan. At the same time, authors in some countries/regions in Asia were becoming very active in the field over the past several years. This trend is consistent with findings from the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). We certainly hope that STEM education scholarship continues its development across all five continents to support educational initiatives and programs in STEM worldwide.

Our analysis has shown that collaboration, as indicated by publications with multiple authors, has been very common among STEM education scholars, as that is often how STEM education distinguishes itself from the traditional individual disciplinary based education. Currently, most collaborations occurred among authors from the same country/region, although collaborations across cross-countries/regions were slowly increasing.

With the rapid changes in STEM education internationally (Li, 2019b ), it is often difficult for researchers to get an overall sense about possible hot topics in STEM education especially when STEM education publications appeared in a vast array of journals across different fields. Our systematic analysis of publications has shown that studies in the topic category of goals, policy, curriculum, evaluation, and assessment have been the most prevalent, by far. Our analysis also suggests that the research community had a broad interest in both teaching and learning in K-12 STEM education. These top three topic categories are the same as in the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). Work in STEM education will continue to evolve and it will be interesting to review the trends in another 5 years.

Encouraged by our recent IJ-STEM review, we began this review with an ambitious goal to provide an overview of the status and trends of STEM education research. In a way, this systematic review allowed us to achieve our initial goal with a larger scope of journal selection over a much longer period of publication time. At the same time, there are still limitations, such as the decision to limit the number of journals from which we would identify publications for analysis. We understand that there are many publications on STEM education research that were not included in our review. Also, we only identified publications in journals. Although this is one of the most important outlets for scholars to share their research work, future reviews could examine publications on STEM education research in other venues such as books, conference proceedings, and grant proposals.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials used and analyzed for the report are publicly available at the various journal websites.

Journals containing the word "computers" or "ICT" appeared automatically when searching with the word "technology". Thus, the word of "computers" or "ICT" was taken as equivalent to "technology" if appeared in a journal's name.

Abbreviations

Information and Communications Technology

International Journal of STEM Education

Kindergarten–Grade 12

Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology

Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics

Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2015). What is the state of the art of systematic review in engineering education? Journal of Engineering Education, 104 (2), 212–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20069 .

Article Google Scholar

Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research – a systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114 , 255–273.

Brown, J. (2012). The current status of STEM education research. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 13 (5), 7–11.

Google Scholar

Christenson, J. (2011). Ramaley coined STEM term now used nationwide . Winona Daily News Retrieved from http://www.winonadailynews.com/news/local/article_457afe3e-0db3-11e1-abe0-001cc4c03286.html Accessed on 16 Jan 2018.

Chute, E. (2009). STEM education is branching out . Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Feb 9, 2009. https://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2009/02/10/STEM-education-is-branching-out/stories/200902100165 Accessed on 2 Jan 2020.

DeCoito, I. (2016). STEM education in Canada: A knowledge synthesis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16 (2), 114–128.

Dika, S. L., & D'Amico, M. M. (2016). Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first-generation college students in STEM and non-STEM majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53 (3), 368–383.

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3 , 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s4059%204-016-0036-1 .

Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J.-Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2 , 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1 .

Gonzalez, H. B. & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. CRS report for congress, R42642, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42642.pdf Accessed on 2 Jan 2020.

Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 (8), 952–984.

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research . Washington: National Academies Press.

Howard, G. S., Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (1987). Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 42 (11), 975–986.

Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (2015). STEM roadmap: A framework for integration . London: Taylor & Francis.

Book Google Scholar

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3 , 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z .

Kilpatrick, J. (1992). A history of research in mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3–38). New York: Macmillan.

Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88 (4), 589–625.

Li, Y. (2014). International journal of STEM education – a platform to promote STEM education and research worldwide. International Journal of STEM Education, 1 , 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-7822-1-1 .

Li, Y. (2018a). Journal for STEM education research – promoting the development of interdisciplinary research in STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1 (1–2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0009-z .

Li, Y. (2018b). Four years of development as a gathering place for international researchers and readers in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 5 , 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0153-0 .

Li, Y. (2019a). Five years of development in pursuing excellence in quality and global impact to become the first journal in STEM education covered in SSCI. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0198-8 .

Li, Y. (2019b). STEM education research and development as a rapidly evolving and international field. 数学教育学报(Journal of Mathematics Education), 28 (3), 42–44.

Li, Y., Froyd, J. E., & Wang, K. (2019). Learning about research and readership development in STEM education: A systematic analysis of the journal’s publications from 2014 to 2018. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0176-1 .

Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as ‘given’ in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9 .

Li, Y., Wang, K., & Xiao, Y. (2019). Exploring the status and development trends of STEM education research: A review of research articles in selected journals published between 2000 and 2018. 数学教育学报(Journal of Mathematics Education), 28 (3), 45–52.

Lin, T.-J., Lin, T.-C., Potvin, P., & Tsai, C.-C. (2019). Research trends in science education from 2013 to 2017: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 41 (3), 367–387.

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2 .

Minichiello, A., Hood, J. R., & Harkness, D. S. (2018). Bring user experience design to bear on STEM education: A narrative literature review. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1 (1–2), 7–33.

Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction – what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (4), 474–496.

Mizell, S., & Brown, S. (2016). The current status of STEM education research 2013-2015. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 17 (4), 52–56.

National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering . Washington DC: National Academies Press.

National Science Foundation (1998). Information technology: Its impact on undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. (NSF 98–82), April 18–20, 1996. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf9882 Accessed 16 Jan 2018.

Raju, P. K., & Sankar, C. S. (2003). Editorial. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 4 (3&4), 2.

Ring-Whalen, E., Dare, E., Roehrig, G., Titu, P., & Crotty, E. (2018). From conception to curricula: The role of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in integrated STEM units. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6 (4), 343–362.

Schreffler, J., Vasquez III, E., Chini, J., & James, W. (2019). Universal design for learning in postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0161-8 .

Schwab, D. B., Cole, L. W., Desai, K. M., Hemann, J., Hummels, K. R., & Maltese, A. V. (2018). A summer STEM outreach program run by graduate students: Successes, challenges, and recommendations for implementation. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 4 (2), 117–129.

Sochacka, N. W., Guyotte, K. W., & Walther, J. (2016). Learning together: A collaborative autoethnographic exploration of STEAM (STEM+ the Arts) education. Journal of Engineering Education, 105 (1), 15–42.

Sokolowski, A., Li, Y., & Willson, V. (2015). The effects of using exploratory computerized environments in grades 1 to 8 mathematics: A meta-analysis of research. International Journal of STEM Education, 2 , 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0022-z .

Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Pauw, J. B., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3 (1), 2.

Tsai, C. C., & Wen, L. M. C. (2005). Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: A content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (1), 3–14.

United States Congress House Committee on Science. (1998). The state of science, math, engineering, and technology (SMET) education in America, parts I-IV, including the results of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): hearings before the Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, first session, July 23, September 24, October 8 and 29, 1997. Washington: U.S. G.P.O.

Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Wu, S. P. W., & Rau, M. A. (2019). How students learn content in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) through drawing activities. Educational Psychology Review . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09467-3 .

Xu, M., Williams, P. J., Gu, J., & Zhang, H. (2019). Hotspots and trends of technology education in the International Journal of Technology and Design Education: 2000-2018. International Journal of Technology and Design Education . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09508-6 .

Download references

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4232, USA

Yeping Li & Yu Xiao

Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, LA, 70310, USA

Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

Jeffrey E. Froyd

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YL conceptualized the study and drafted the manuscript. KW and YX contributed with data collection, coding, and analyses. JEF reviewed drafts and contributed to manuscript revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeping Li .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y. et al. Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. IJ STEM Ed 7 , 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6

Download citation

Received : 10 February 2020

Accepted : 12 February 2020

Published : 10 March 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Journal publication
Literature review
STEM education research

research titles for stem students quantitative

Write my thesis
Thesis writers
Buy thesis papers
Bachelor thesis
Master's thesis
Thesis editing services
Thesis proofreading services
Buy a thesis online
Write my dissertation
Dissertation proposal help
Pay for dissertation
Custom dissertation
Dissertation help online
Buy dissertation online
Cheap dissertation
Dissertation editing services
Write my research paper
Buy research paper online
Pay for research paper
Research paper help
Order research paper
Custom research paper
Cheap research paper
Research papers for sale
Thesis subjects
How It Works

100+ Quantitative Research Topics For Students

Quantitative research is a research strategy focusing on quantified data collection and analysis processes. This research strategy emphasizes testing theories on various subjects. It also includes collecting and analyzing non-numerical data.

Quantitative research is a common approach in the natural and social sciences , like marketing, business, sociology, chemistry, biology, economics, and psychology. So, if you are fond of statistics and figures, a quantitative research title would be an excellent option for your research proposal or project.

How to Get a Title of Quantitative Research

How to make quantitative research title, what is the best title for quantitative research, amazing quantitative research topics for students, creative quantitative research topics, perfect quantitative research title examples, unique quantitative research titles, outstanding quantitative research title examples for students, creative example title of quantitative research samples, outstanding quantitative research problems examples, fantastic quantitative research topic examples, the best quantitative research topics, grade 12 quantitative research title for students, list of quantitative research titles for high school, easy quantitative research topics for students, trending topics for quantitative research, quantitative research proposal topics, samples of quantitative research titles, research title about business quantitative.

Finding a great title is the key to writing a great quantitative research proposal or paper. A title for quantitative research prepares you for success, failure, or mediocre grades. This post features examples of quantitative research titles for all students.

Putting together a research title and quantitative research design is not as easy as some students assume. So, an example topic of quantitative research can help you craft your own. However, even with the examples, you may need some guidelines for personalizing your research project or proposal topics.

So, here are some tips for getting a title for quantitative research:

Consider your area of studies
Look out for relevant subjects in the area
Expert advice may come in handy
Check out some sample quantitative research titles

Making a quantitative research title is easy if you know the qualities of a good title in quantitative research. Reading about how to make a quantitative research title may not help as much as looking at some samples. Looking at a quantitative research example title will give you an idea of where to start.

However, let’s look at some tips for how to make a quantitative research title:

The title should seem interesting to readers
Ensure that the title represents the content of the research paper
Reflect on the tone of the writing in the title
The title should contain important keywords in your chosen subject to help readers find your paper
The title should not be too lengthy
It should be grammatically correct and creative
It must generate curiosity

An excellent quantitative title should be clear, which implies that it should effectively explain the paper and what readers can expect. A research title for quantitative research is the gateway to your article or proposal. So, it should be well thought out. Additionally, it should give you room for extensive topic research.

A sample of quantitative research titles will give you an idea of what a good title for quantitative research looks like. Here are some examples:

What is the correlation between inflation rates and unemployment rates?
Has climate adaptation influenced the mitigation of funds allocation?
Job satisfaction and employee turnover: What is the link?
A look at the relationship between poor households and the development of entrepreneurship skills
Urbanization and economic growth: What is the link between these elements?
Does education achievement influence people’s economic status?
What is the impact of solar electricity on the wholesale energy market?
Debt accumulation and retirement: What is the relationship between these concepts?
Can people with psychiatric disorders develop independent living skills?
Children’s nutrition and its impact on cognitive development

Quantitative research applies to various subjects in the natural and social sciences. Therefore, depending on your intended subject, you have numerous options. Below are some good quantitative research topics for students:

The difference between the colorific intake of men and women in your country
Top strategies used to measure customer satisfaction and how they work
Black Friday sales: are they profitable?
The correlation between estimated target market and practical competitive risk assignment
Are smartphones making us brighter or dumber?
Nuclear families Vs. Joint families: Is there a difference?
What will society look like in the absence of organized religion?
A comparison between carbohydrate weight loss benefits and high carbohydrate diets?
How does emotional stability influence your overall well-being?
The extent of the impact of technology in the communications sector

Creativity is the key to creating a good research topic in quantitative research. Find a good quantitative research topic below:

How much exercise is good for lasting physical well-being?
A comparison of the nutritional therapy uses and contemporary medical approaches
Does sugar intake have a direct impact on diabetes diagnosis?
Education attainment: Does it influence crime rates in society?
Is there an actual link between obesity and cancer rates?
Do kids with siblings have better social skills than those without?
Computer games and their impact on the young generation
Has social media marketing taken over conventional marketing strategies?
The impact of technology development on human relationships and communication
What is the link between drug addiction and age?

Need more quantitative research title examples to inspire you? Here are some quantitative research title examples to look at:

Habitation fragmentation and biodiversity loss: What is the link?
Radiation has affected biodiversity: Assessing its effects
An assessment of the impact of the CORONA virus on global population growth
Is the pandemic truly over, or have human bodies built resistance against the virus?
The ozone hole and its impact on the environment
The greenhouse gas effect: What is it and how has it impacted the atmosphere
GMO crops: are they good or bad for your health?
Is there a direct link between education quality and job attainment?
How have education systems changed from traditional to modern times?
The good and bad impacts of technology on education qualities

Your examiner will give you excellent grades if you come up with a unique title and outstanding content. Here are some quantitative research examples titles.

Online classes: are they helpful or not?
What changes has the global CORONA pandemic had on the population growth curve?
Daily habits influenced by the global pandemic
An analysis of the impact of culture on people’s personalities
How has feminism influenced the education system’s approach to the girl child’s education?
Academic competition: what are its benefits and downsides for students?
Is there a link between education and student integrity?
An analysis of how the education sector can influence a country’s economy
An overview of the link between crime rates and concern for crime
Is there a link between education and obesity?

Research title example quantitative topics when well-thought guarantees a paper that is a good read. Look at the examples below to get started.

What are the impacts of online games on students?
Sex education in schools: how important is it?
Should schools be teaching about safe sex in their sex education classes?
The correlation between extreme parent interference on student academic performance
Is there a real link between academic marks and intelligence?
Teacher feedback: How necessary is it, and how does it help students?
An analysis of modern education systems and their impact on student performance
An overview of the link between academic performance/marks and intelligence
Are grading systems helpful or harmful to students?
What was the impact of the pandemic on students?

Irrespective of the course you take, here are some titles that can fit diverse subjects pretty well. Here are some creative quantitative research title ideas:

A look at the pre-corona and post-corona economy
How are conventional retail businesses fairing against eCommerce sites like Amazon and Shopify?
An evaluation of mortality rates of heart attacks
Effective treatments for cardiovascular issues and their prevention
A comparison of the effectiveness of home care and nursing home care
Strategies for managing effective dissemination of information to modern students
How does educational discrimination influence students’ futures?
The impacts of unfavorable classroom environment and bullying on students and teachers
An overview of the implementation of STEM education to K-12 students
How effective is digital learning?

If your paper addresses a problem, you must present facts that solve the question or tell more about the question. Here are examples of quantitative research titles that will inspire you.

An elaborate study of the influence of telemedicine in healthcare practices
How has scientific innovation influenced the defense or military system?
The link between technology and people’s mental health
Has social media helped create awareness or worsened people’s mental health?
How do engineers promote green technology?
How can engineers raise sustainability in building and structural infrastructures?
An analysis of how decision-making is dependent on someone’s sub-conscious
A comprehensive study of ADHD and its impact on students’ capabilities
The impact of racism on people’s mental health and overall wellbeing
How has the current surge in social activism helped shape people’s relationships?

Are you looking for an example of a quantitative research title? These ten examples below will get you started.

The prevalence of nonverbal communication in social control and people’s interactions
The impacts of stress on people’s behavior in society
A study of the connection between capital structures and corporate strategies
How do changes in credit ratings impact equality returns?
A quantitative analysis of the effect of bond rating changes on stock prices
The impact of semantics on web technology
An analysis of persuasion, propaganda, and marketing impact on individuals
The dominant-firm model: what is it, and how does it apply to your country’s retail sector?
The role of income inequality in economy growth
An examination of juvenile delinquents’ treatment in your country

Excellent Topics For Quantitative Research

Here are some titles for quantitative research you should consider:

Does studying mathematics help implement data safety for businesses
How are art-related subjects interdependent with mathematics?
How do eco-friendly practices in the hospitality industry influence tourism rates?
A deep insight into how people view eco-tourisms
Religion vs. hospitality: Details on their correlation
Has your country’s tourist sector revived after the pandemic?
How effective is non-verbal communication in conveying emotions?
Are there similarities between the English and French vocabulary?
How do politicians use persuasive language in political speeches?
The correlation between popular culture and translation

Here are some quantitative research titles examples for your consideration:

How do world leaders use language to change the emotional climate in their nations?
Extensive research on how linguistics cultivate political buzzwords
The impact of globalization on the global tourism sector
An analysis of the effects of the pandemic on the worldwide hospitality sector
The influence of social media platforms on people’s choice of tourism destinations
Educational tourism: What is it and what you should know about it
Why do college students experience math anxiety?
Is math anxiety a phenomenon?
A guide on effective ways to fight cultural bias in modern society
Creative ways to solve the overpopulation issue

An example of quantitative research topics for 12 th -grade students will come in handy if you want to score a good grade. Here are some of the best ones:

The link between global warming and climate change
What is the greenhouse gas impact on biodiversity and the atmosphere
Has the internet successfully influenced literacy rates in society
The value and downsides of competition for students
A comparison of the education system in first-world and third-world countries
The impact of alcohol addiction on the younger generation
How has social media influenced human relationships?
Has education helped boost feminism among men and women?
Are computers in classrooms beneficial or detrimental to students?
How has social media improved bullying rates among teenagers?

High school students can apply research titles on social issues or other elements, depending on the subject. Let’s look at some quantitative topics for students:

What is the right age to introduce sex education for students
Can extreme punishment help reduce alcohol consumption among teenagers?
Should the government increase the age of sexual consent?
The link between globalization and the local economy collapses
How are global companies influencing local economies?

There are numerous possible quantitative research topics you can write about. Here are some great quantitative research topics examples:

The correlation between video games and crime rates
Do college studies impact future job satisfaction?
What can the education sector do to encourage more college enrollment?
The impact of education on self-esteem
The relationship between income and occupation

You can find inspiration for your research topic from trending affairs on social media or in the news. Such topics will make your research enticing. Find a trending topic for quantitative research example from the list below:

How the country’s economy is fairing after the pandemic
An analysis of the riots by women in Iran and what the women gain to achieve
Is the current US government living up to the voter’s expectations?
How is the war in Ukraine affecting the global economy?
Can social media riots affect political decisions?

A proposal is a paper you write proposing the subject you would like to cover for your research and the research techniques you will apply. If the proposal is approved, it turns to your research topic. Here are some quantitative titles you should consider for your research proposal:

Military support and economic development: What is the impact in developing nations?
How does gun ownership influence crime rates in developed countries?
How can the US government reduce gun violence without influencing people’s rights?
What is the link between school prestige and academic standards?
Is there a scientific link between abortion and the definition of viability?

You can never have too many sample titles. The samples allow you to find a unique title you’re your research or proposal. Find a sample quantitative research title here:

Does weight loss indicate good or poor health?
Should schools do away with grading systems?
The impact of culture on student interactions and personalities
How can parents successfully protect their kids from the dangers of the internet?
Is the US education system better or worse than Europe’s?

If you’re a business major, then you must choose a research title quantitative about business. Let’s look at some research title examples quantitative in business:

Creating shareholder value in business: How important is it?
The changes in credit ratings and their impact on equity returns
The importance of data privacy laws in business operations
How do businesses benefit from e-waste and carbon footprint reduction?
Organizational culture in business: what is its importance?

We Are A Call Away

Interesting, creative, unique, and easy quantitative research topics allow you to explain your paper and make research easy. Therefore, you should not take choosing a research paper or proposal topic lightly. With your topic ready, reach out to us today for excellent research paper writing services .

199+ Engaging Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

quantitative research topics for stem students (2)

Discover engaging quantitative research topics for STEM students, spanning energy solutions, medical advancements, and cutting-edge technology. Explore hands-on ideas to sharpen skills and make a tangible impact on the future.

Hey STEM buddy! Ready for some awesome research ideas? We’ve handpicked cool topics just for you.

Inside, you’ll find stuff from new energy solutions to medical breakthroughs. They’re chosen to let you shine with your skills in numbers, problems, and creativity.

You’ll get better at stats, experiments, and telling a great story with your results.

Best part? These ideas make a real impact. Whether it’s saving the environment or inventing something new, let’s dive in and shape the future together!

Why Choose Quantitative Research for STEM Students?

Here’s why quantitative research rocks for STEM students:

Boosts Core Skills

Crunching Numbers: It helps you analyze big data, spot trends, and draw solid conclusions, super important in any STEM gig.
Problem-Solving with Math: You’ll ace making research questions that need number answers, a must-have skill in physics, engineering, and computer science.
Smart Thinking: By sussing out good data and drawing logical conclusions, you’ll become a pro problem-solver in STEM.

Preps You for More

Grad School Ready: Quantitative research sets you up for success in advanced STEM studies.
R&D Pros: Get ready to contribute big time to scientific breakthroughs and cool research projects.

Keeps It Real

Less Bias, More Facts: Quantitative research sticks to the facts, making your findings solid and reliable.
Tangible Results: You’ll get real numbers and clear outcomes, making your research super easy to understand and compare.

Works in All Kinds of STEM

Engineering: Perfect for testing designs and improving processes.
Computer Science: From writing code to analyzing networks, you’ll need those numbers.
Life Sciences: It’s vital for everything from drug trials to understanding how living things work.

So while qualitative research is cool, focusing on numbers sets you up with the skills you need to rock STEM like a pro!

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Check out quantiative research topics for STEM students:-

Impact of environment on bacteria growth.
Effects of fertilizers on plant growth.
Genetic mutations and disease prevalence.
Strategies for biodiversity preservation.
Temperature’s influence on enzyme activity.
Ecological footprint of a species.
Spread of infectious diseases.
Pollution’s effects on aquatic ecosystems.
Diet’s correlation with lifespan.
Climate change’s impact on bird migration.
Catalyst efficiency in reactions.
Chemical reaction kinetics.
Nanoparticle properties in drug delivery.
pH levels and metal corrosion.
Pollution analysis in air and water.
Water purification methods.
Polymer behavior under conditions.
Thermodynamics of chemical compounds.
Additives’ impact on food stability.
Solar cell efficiency.
Superconductor properties at temperatures.
Mass-acceleration relationship.
Energy transfer in collisions.
Material behavior under pressure.
Projectile trajectory modeling.
Renewable energy source efficiency.
Aerodynamics of wing designs.
Electromagnetic wave properties.
Doppler effect in astronomy.
Temperature’s effect on conductivity.

Mathematics

Resource allocation algorithms.
Prime number distribution analysis.
Fractals in mathematical modeling.
Numerical equation-solving methods.
Geometry-topology relationship.
Chaotic system modeling.
Convergence properties of methods.
Graph theory in networks.
Financial market risk analysis.
Population growth prediction models.

Engineering

Structural material performance.
Heat exchanger efficiency.
Stability of bridges and buildings.
Vehicle propulsion system efficiency.
Fluid behavior in hydraulic systems.
Vibration effects on mechanics.
Electrical circuit reliability.
Manufacturing process energy efficiency.
Traffic flow optimization.

Environmental Science

Deforestation’s impact on climate.
Soil erosion rate quantification.
Conservation strategy effectiveness.
Air pollution’s effects on health.
Ocean acidification’s impact.
Waste management technique analysis.
Carbon footprint analysis.
Urbanization’s effect on water quality.
Renewable energy policy effectiveness.
Species distribution analysis.

Computer Science

Image recognition algorithm development.
Sorting algorithm efficiency.
Machine learning model performance.
Scalability of distributed systems.
Encryption method vulnerability.
Network behavior under cyber-attacks.
Routing protocol efficiency.
Social media user behavior analysis.
Data compression technique performance.
Algorithmic bias impact analysis.

Agricultural Science

Irrigation method impact on crop yield.
Climate change effects on productivity.
Pest control method efficiency.
Crop nutritional content analysis.
Plant disease spread modeling.
Soil composition and crop growth.
Water usage in farming systems.
Genetically modified crop efficacy.
Land use change biodiversity impact.
Organic farming economic viability.

Material Science

Graphene-based material mechanical properties.
Ceramic thermal conductivity.
Metal alloy corrosion resistance.
Semiconductor electrical properties.
Composite material behavior modeling.
Nanomaterial optical property analysis.
Material hardness quantification.
Polymer biocompatibility assessment.
Material self-healing property study.
Manufacturing process environmental impact.

Health Sciences

Exercise impact on cardiovascular health.
Diet’s correlation with obesity.
Air quality’s effects on respiratory health.
Genetic predisposition to diseases.
Infectious disease spread modeling.
Rehabilitation technique effectiveness.
Psychological factors in substance abuse.
Treatment efficacy for mental disorders.
Sleep patterns’ effect on cognition.
Telemedicine’s healthcare access impact.

Neuroscience

Neural mechanisms of learning and memory.
Neurotransmitter effects on brain function.
Neuroplasticity’s brain injury recovery impact.
Brain structure’s cognitive ability correlation.
Decision-making neural network modeling.
Stress effects on brain development.
Brain activity analysis with EEG or fMRI.
Intervention efficacy for neurodegenerative diseases.
Neural basis of addiction.
Aging’s effect on brain health.
Dark matter distribution analysis.
Exoplanet properties using transit photometry.
Galaxy cluster dynamics.
Star formation and evolution.
Celestial body gravitational interaction modeling.
Asteroid and comet composition analysis.
Stellar spectra analysis.
Pulsating star variability study.
Black hole properties analysis.
Cosmic microwave background radiation analysis.

Earth Science

Tectonic activity and seismicity relationship.
Climate change’s glacier retreat impact.
Tornadoes and hurricanes formation factors.
Ocean currents’ climate effect.
Groundwater system behavior modeling.
Deforestation’s local climate impact.
Soil erosion rate analysis.
Landslide risk assessment.
Volcanic eruption impact on atmosphere.
Historical climate data analysis.

Social Sciences

Socioeconomic status and education correlation.
Early childhood intervention impact.
Social media’s mental health effect.
Voter behavior influencing factors.
Misinformation spread modeling.
Crime rate intervention effectiveness.
Urban area income inequality analysis.
Immigration’s labor market impact.
Social support’s health outcome impact.
Residential segregation patterns analysis.
Teaching method impact on learning.
Class size’s academic achievement impact.
Student retention and graduation analysis.
Parental involvement and student success correlation.
Socioeconomic status’ educational attainment impact.
Educational technology effectiveness analysis.
Gender gap in STEM fields analysis.
Early childhood education program effectiveness.
Standardized testing’s educational equity impact.
Teacher training’s student achievement impact.

Business and Economics

Consumer behavior influencing factors.
Advertising’s product sales impact.
Pricing strategy effectiveness analysis.
Inflation’s economic growth correlation.
Financial market dynamics modeling.
Government policy economic impact analysis.
Income inequality’s economic stability impact.
International trade agreement impact analysis.
Entrepreneurship program economic growth impact.
Corporate governance’s firm performance correlation.

Linguistics

Bilingual children’s language acquisition patterns.
Linguistic diversity’s communication impact.
Language structure and cognitive process correlation.
Language evolution modeling.
Cultural trait spread modeling.
Colonialism’s impact on indigenous languages.
Phonological variation analysis.
Technology’s language impact.
Language processing neural basis study.
Language’s cultural identity shaping role.
Decision-making in social dilemmas analysis.
Stress impact on cognitive performance.
Personality traits’ academic achievement impact.
Emotion regulation neural mechanism study.
Attachment style development modeling.
Sleep deprivation’s mood and behavior impact.
Psychotherapy intervention effectiveness analysis.
Social support’s mental health outcome impact.
Social media’s self-esteem impact.
Online community behavior analysis.

Anthropology

Cultural transmission patterns in indigenous communities.
Globalization’s impact on traditional cultures.
Kinship structures and social organization relationship.
Cooperative behavior evolution in societies.
Cultural trait diffusion modeling.
Colonialism’s impact on indigenous populations.
Material culture’s social identity implications.
Migration’s cultural diversity impact.
Rituals and ceremonies’ social cohesion role.
Cultural contact’s language evolution impact.

Political Science

Voter turnout influencing factors analysis.
Gerrymandering’s political representation impact.
Media bias and public opinion correlation.
Campaign finance law electoral outcome impact.
Political polarization modeling.
International diplomacy’s conflict resolution effectiveness.
Government policy income distribution impact.
Electoral system political stability impact.
Identity politics’ political movement impact.
Political participation and activism patterns analysis.

These simplified points should provide a clear overview of research topics in each category for STEM students.

What is quantitative research related to stem students?

Quantitative research is like a secret weapon for STEM students. It helps them explore science using numbers and stats, making their findings solid and reliable. Here’s why:-

It’s Objective: Numbers don’t lie, so it keeps things fair and unbiased.
Testing Ideas: Got a hunch? Quantitative research helps you test your theories properly.
Big Picture: With lots of data, you can make conclusions that matter to more than just your study group.

Now, here are some cool areas where STEM students can get into it:

Environmental Science: Measure climate change impacts or track biodiversity loss.
Public Health: Look at how diets affect diseases or see if vaccines really work.
Engineering: Figure out which materials make things stronger or find the best renewable energy sources.

And a few tips for STEM students diving into quantitative research:

Find the Data: Check out government databases or online sources for info on your topic.
Think Beyond Science: Consider how your research might affect society or the environment.
Get Advice: Talk to your professors for guidance on your project.

With quantitative research, STEM students can unlock new discoveries and make a real impact on the world.

What are the best topics for quantitative research for STEM?

Selecting the “best” topic hinges on your specific STEM interests, but here are some general paths to guide your quantitative research:

Considering Your STEM Field

Data Trends: Explore existing data to uncover patterns. For instance, analyze how different fertilizers impact crop yield or the relationship between exercise and heart rate across demographics.

Efficiency Evaluation: Assess effectiveness through quantitative methods. Research topics could include comparing insulation materials or evaluating algorithm performance for specific tasks.

Design Optimization: Enhance designs by studying material properties’ impact on structural integrity or how design features influence aerodynamic efficiency.

Phenomena Modeling: Use mathematical models to understand real-world scenarios. Investigate disease spread models or analyze financial markets through time series analysis.

General Tips for Strong Quantitative Research:

Data Accessibility: Ensure you can access necessary data, whether from existing sources or through your own experiments.
Real-World Relevance: Address pertinent issues with your research.
Feasibility: Consider time and resource constraints.

Finding Inspiration

Current Events: Stay informed about recent breakthroughs or technological advancements.
Personal Interests: Blend academic pursuits with personal hobbies for added motivation.
Review Papers: Explore current challenges researchers are tackling in your field.

Additional Tips

Focus on Specificity: Craft a precise research question for targeted data collection and analysis.
Consider Study Design: Choose between correlational or experimental approaches to suit your research goals.

Remember, the ideal topic should spark your enthusiasm and enable you to contribute meaningfully to your field.

How can you apply quantitative research in STEM?

Quantitative research is like the engine driving progress in STEM fields. Here’s how it works:

Understanding Phenomena

Modeling and Prediction: We use math to create models of complex systems, making better predictions about real-world behavior. For example, epidemiological models forecast disease spread.
Spotting Relationships: Crunching numbers helps us find connections between things. In ecology, we might study how ocean temperatures affect fish populations.

Testing and Evaluating

Experimenting: We design experiments with controlled variables to discover new stuff. Quantitative research ensures our tests are fair and help us pinpoint what works, like developing new technologies or drugs.
Performance Boost: Engineers use numbers to make things better, like testing different car designs to improve fuel efficiency.

Making Smart Choices

Data-Driven Decisions: From building roads to treating illnesses, STEM fields rely on data to make smart decisions. For instance, traffic data helps plan efficient road networks, while clinical trial results inform medical treatments.
Spotting Trends: Big datasets reveal hidden patterns, helping us predict future events or manage resources. Quantitative weather analysis, for instance, helps forecast climate patterns.

In a nutshell, quantitative research gives us the tools to test ideas, analyze data, and make informed decisions in STEM, driving innovation and understanding in our world.

How do you choose a research topic in STEM?

Choosing an exciting STEM research topic is like embarking on a thrilling quest, blending your passions, feasibility, and potential impact. Here’s your guide:

Ignite Your Passion

Follow What Interests You: Dive into what excites you most in STEM. Whether it’s the mysteries of the human body, the elegance of math, or the potential of renewable energy, let your interests guide your journey.
Stay Current: Keep an eye on the latest breakthroughs in AI or pressing environmental issues. Researching these hot topics can give your project relevance and timeliness.
Classroom Insights: Reflect on standout moments from your STEM classes. Did a concept or experiment leave you eager to explore further? Use that as a starting point for your research.

Refine Your Focus

From Broad to Specific: Begin with a broad STEM area of interest, then zoom into specific subtopics that intrigue you. Whether it’s a particular gene’s role or the ethical dilemmas of AI, sharpen your focus.
Background Check: Dive into preliminary research to understand what’s already known in your chosen subtopic. Look for gaps or unanswered questions that your research can tackle.

Consider Feasibility

Data Access: Can you get your hands on the data you need? Explore existing datasets or plan to gather your own. Also, consider the resources available, like lab equipment or software.
Time and Resources: Be realistic about what’s achievable with your available time and resources. Some topics might demand more effort and advanced tools than others.

Sharpen Your Focus

Craft Your Question: Develop a clear and focused research question. It should guide your data collection and analysis, specific enough to answer but broad enough to intrigue.
Design Decision: Decide on your research approach—correlational or experimental. Choose the one that best fits your question and goals.
Seek Guidance: Discuss your ideas with professors or researchers. They can offer insights to refine your topic and ensure its feasibility.
Find Your Fit: Your ideal topic should excite you, allow for meaningful contribution, and align with your academic goals and resources.

By following these steps, you’ll uncover a captivating STEM research topic that not only ignites your curiosity but also propels you toward making a valuable scientific contribution. Let the adventure begin!

Absolutely, selecting research topics for STEM scholars resembles navigating a vast ocean of opportunities.

From unraveling the mysteries of the cosmos to devising solutions for mundane hurdles, an entire realm awaits exploration.

Simply pursue your passions, maintain a pragmatic approach, and embrace collaboration when needed.

Whether you’re crunching numbers, conducting experiments, or dissecting data, always keep in mind the essence: unearthing novel insights and effecting tangible change.

Therefore, plunge into the depths, relish the journey, and allow your inquisitiveness to chart the course!

189+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Are you looking for incredible experimental quantitative research topics for STEM students? Then you are in the right place. Here, we’ll explore the fantastic experimental research topics for STEM students and others you want to learn. That will help you to increase your knowledge in your field.

Experimental quantitative research plays a pivotal role in STEM. These students explore a broad range of multidisciplinary experimental quantitative research subjects. STEM students take on challenges that push the boundaries of knowledge, whether by studying the complexities of ecological systems, creating novel technologies, delving into the workings of the human brain, or investigating the subtleties of subatomic particles.

Before jumping to our main topic, experimental quantitative research topics for STEM students. Let’s learn about what STEM is.

What Is STEM?

STEM is an acronym that stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. It is an interdisciplinary approach to learning and problem-solving that combines these four main areas. Scientists, technicians, engineers, and mathematicians collaborate to address challenging real-world challenges and generate novel solutions in the STEM fields.

Let’s know about how to do experimental research. Before starting the experimental quantitative research topics for STEM students.

How To Do Experimental Research

Here are 8 key points on how to do experimental research effectively.

1. Clear Research Focus

Begin by defining a clear and focused research question. A well-defined question provides a purpose and direction for your experiment, guiding your choices in variables and methodology.

2. Thorough Literature Review

Conduct a comprehensive literature review to understand the existing knowledge in your field. This step helps you identify gaps in research and ensures your experiment contributes meaningfully to the scientific community.

3. Precise Variable Definition

Carefully define the variables you will manipulate (independent variable) and measure (dependent variable). Precise definitions are crucial for the validity of your experiment, ensuring you measure what you intend to study.

Also read: 199+ Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students to Try Now

4. Randomization and Control

Use randomization to assign participants randomly to experimental and control groups. Control all other variables that might influence the outcome, creating a controlled environment. This minimizes biases and enhances the reliability of your results.

5. Standardized Procedures

Develop standardized procedures for conducting the experiment. Consistency in methods across participants and groups is essential to ensure that any observed effects are due to the manipulated variables and not external factors.

6. Accurate Data Collection

Employ accurate and reliable methods to collect data. Be meticulous in recording observations and measurements. Utilize appropriate tools and technologies to minimize errors and enhance the precision of your data.

7. Thorough Data Analysis

Use appropriate statistical techniques to analyze the collected data. Statistical analysis helps you identify patterns, relationships, and significant differences between groups. Proper analysis is key to drawing valid conclusions from your experiment.

8. Clear Communication of Results

Effectively communicate your research findings through clear and concise writing. Present your results, methods, and conclusions in a structured manner, adhering to the standards of scientific reporting. Transparent communication ensures that others can understand, evaluate, and build upon your research.

By following these 8 points, you can conduct experimental research in a systematic, reliable, and impactful manner, leading to valuable contributions to your field of study. Now, let’s move to the main topic, experimental quantitative research topics for STEM students.

Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Certainly, there are more than 189+ experimental quantitative research topics for STEM students, categorized into different fields:

Biology and Life Sciences

Effects of Different Fertilizers on Plant Growth
Impact of Light Intensity on Photosynthesis
Influence of Temperature on Enzyme Activity
Relationship Between Diet and Animal Behavior
Efficacy of Antibiotics on Bacterial Cultures
Effects of Microplastics on Aquatic Ecosystems
Impact of pH Levels on Microbial Growth
The Role of Genetics in Disease Susceptibility
Influence of Pollution on Soil Microbes
The Effect of Radiation on Cellular DNA

Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

Kinetics of Chemical Reactions at Various Temperatures
Efficiency of Various Catalysts in Chemical Processes
Influence of pH on Chemical Equilibrium
Study of Electrochemical Cells and Voltage
Impact of Different Solvents on Reaction Rates
Properties of Various Polymers in Material Science
Effects of Different Oxidizing Agents on Reactions
The Relationship Between Pressure and Gas Behavior
The Influence of Concentration on Reaction Rate
The Efficacy of Water Purification Methods

Physics and Engineering

The Impact of Different Materials on Magnet Strength
Efficiency of Wind Turbines at Different Wind Speeds
Influence of Friction on Motion and Speed
Relationship Between Light Wavelengths and Energy
Effects of Different Insulation Materials on Heat Transfer
Impact of Material Properties on Bridge Strength
Efficiency of Solar Panels in Different Light Conditions
Influence of Temperature on Electrical Conductivity
Study of Fluid Dynamics in Various Geometries
The Role of Geometric Shapes in Sound Resonance

Environmental Science

Effects of Land Use on Local Climate Patterns
Influence of Air Pollution on Plant Health
Impact of Climate Change on Ocean Acidification
The Relationship Between Soil Erosion and Agricultural Productivity
Efficacy of Biodegradable Materials in Reducing Plastic Pollution
Study of Water Quality Parameters in Urban vs. Rural Areas
Effects of Renewable Energy Sources on Carbon Footprint
Influence of Pesticides on Honeybee Population Decline
Impact of Soil Contaminants on Groundwater Quality
The Role of Algae in Wastewater Treatment

Computer Science and Technology

Effects of Algorithm Complexity on Execution Time
Influence of Data Structures on Software Performance
Impact of Different Programming Languages on Code Efficiency
The Relationship Between Internet Speed and User Experience
Efficacy of Different Machine Learning Models in Data Analysis
Effects of Cybersecurity Measures on Network Vulnerabilities
Influence of Mobile App Features on User Engagement
Impact of Virtual Reality in Education on Learning Outcomes
The Use of Nanomaterials in Data Storage Devices
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Natural Language Processing

Mathematics and Statistics

Effects of Teaching Methods on Math Skill Acquisition
Influence of Classroom Size on Student Performance
Impact of Tutoring Programs on Math Proficiency
The Relationship Between Homework and Test Scores
Efficacy of Different Teaching Strategies in Probability Education
Effects of Math Anxiety on Test Performance
Influence of Gender on Mathematical Problem-Solving
Impact of Early Math Education on Later Achievement
The Role of Game-Based Learning in Mathematics
The Use of Data Visualization in Statistical Analysis

Medicine and Healthcare

Effects of Medication on Heart Rate Variability
Influence of Different Therapies on Pain Management
Impact of Sleep Duration on Cognitive Performance
The Relationship Between Diet and Weight Loss
Efficacy of Telemedicine in Remote Healthcare Delivery
Effects of Telehealth on Patient Engagement
Influence of Lifestyle on Blood Pressure
Impact of Exercise on Stress Reduction
The Role of Telemedicine in Mental Health Support
The Use of Wearable Health Devices in Disease Monitoring

Materials Science and Nanotechnology

Effects of Nanomaterials on Solar Cell Efficiency
Influence of Nanoparticles on Drug Delivery
Impact of Nanotechnology on Water Filtration
The Relationship Between Nanomaterial Size and Strength
Efficacy of Nanoparticles in Targeted Cancer Therapy
Effects of Nanotechnology on Wearable Electronics
Influence of Nanomaterials in Energy Storage
Impact of Nanomaterials on Sensor Technologies
The Role of Nanomaterials in Environmental Remediation
The Use of Nanotechnology in Biomedical Imaging

Astronomy and Space Science

Effects of Stellar Types on Planetary Formation
Influence of Dark Matter on Galactic Dynamics
Impact of Solar Activity on Earth’s Climate
The Relationship Between Asteroids and Space Weather
Efficacy of Space Telescopes in Exoplanet Discovery
Effects of Cosmic Radiation on Space Travelers
Influence of Gravitational Waves on Black Hole Research
Impact of Satellite Data on Weather Prediction
The Role of Telescopes in Exoplanet Characterization
The Use of Space Probes in Solar System Exploration

Geology and Earth Sciences

Effects of Plate Tectonics on Earthquakes
Influence of Rock Types on Coastal Erosion
Impact of Soil Composition on Landslide Risk
The Relationship Between Geothermal Activity and Volcanic Eruptions
Efficacy of Geological Maps in Hazard Prediction
Effects of Climate Change on Glacier Movement
Influence of Seismic Waves on Building Resilience
Impact of Mineral Properties on Geological Exploration
The Role of Ground-Penetrating Radar in Archaeological Surveys
The Use of LiDAR in Topographic Mapping

Social Sciences

Effects of Social Media Use on Mental Health
Influence of Parenting Styles on Child Behavior
Impact of Education Levels on Income Disparities
The Relationship Between Income and Job Satisfaction
Efficacy of Diversity Training in Workplace Inclusion
Effects of Media Violence on Aggressive Behavior
Influence of Music on Stress Reduction
Impact of Family Structure on Child Development
The Role of Gender Stereotypes in Career Choices
The Use of Virtual Reality in Empathy Training

Economics and Finance

Effects of Fiscal Policy Changes on Economic Growth
Influence of Interest Rates on Investment Decisions
Impact of Inflation on Consumer Spending
The Relationship Between Stock Market Volatility and Investor Behavior
Efficacy of Financial Education on Saving Habits
Effects of Tax Policies on Small Business Growth
Influence of Exchange Rates on International Trade
Impact of Government Regulation on Industry Profitability
The Role of Behavioral Economics in Decision-Making
The Use of Cryptocurrencies in Global Transactions

Environmental Engineering

Effects of Wetland Restoration on Water Quality
Influence of Green Building Techniques on Energy Efficiency
Impact of Renewable Energy Integration on Grid Stability
The Relationship Between Land Use Planning and Flood Resilience
Efficacy of Environmental Impact Assessments in Construction
Effects of Water Treatment Methods on Contaminant Removal
Influence of Erosion Control Measures on Coastal Preservation
Impact of Watershed Management on Aquatic Ecosystem Health
The Role of Stormwater Management in Urban Sustainability
The Use of Biodegradable Materials in Waste Reduction

Also read: 139+ Creative SK Projects Ideas: Your Key to Creative Achievement

Robotics and Automation

Effects of Different Algorithms on Robot Navigation
Influence of Sensor Technologies on Autonomous Vehicles
Impact of Machine Learning on Robotic Object Recognition
The Relationship Between Human-Robot Interaction and User Satisfaction
Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Medical Procedures
Effects of Robotics on Disaster Response and Recovery
Influence of Automation on Manufacturing Efficiency
Impact of AI in Autonomous Drones for Environmental Monitoring
The Role of Robotics in Space Exploration
The Use of AI in Predictive Maintenance for Industrial Equipment

Agricultural Sciences

Effects of Crop Rotation on Soil Nutrient Levels
Influence of Pest Control Methods on Crop Yields
Impact of Irrigation Techniques on Water Conservation
The Relationship Between Genetic Modification and Crop Resilience
Efficacy of Precision Agriculture in Resource Optimization
Effects of Soil Microbes on Plant Health
Influence of Organic Farming on Soil Biodiversity
Impact of Sustainable Practices on Farming Profitability
The Role of Drought-Resistant Crops in Food Security
The Use of Drones in Precision Farming

Energy Engineering

Effects of Different Energy Storage Systems on Grid Reliability
Influence of Renewable Energy Integration on Energy Independence
Impact of Building Insulation on Energy Efficiency
The Relationship Between Energy-Efficient Appliances and Household Savings
Efficacy of Smart Grid Technologies in Energy Management
Effects of Solar Thermal Systems on Water Heating
Influence of Geothermal Heat Pumps on HVAC Efficiency
Impact of Hydropower on Renewable Energy Portfolios
The Role of Energy-Efficient Lighting in Green Building
The Use of Biofuels in Reducing Carbon Emissions

Telecommunications and Networking

Effects of Network Topologies on Data Transmission Speed
Influence of Encryption Protocols on Data Security
Impact of 5G Technology on Mobile Network Performance
The Relationship Between Network Load and Bandwidth Allocation
Efficacy of Network Redundancy in Data Backup
Effects of Internet Traffic on Quality of Service
Influence of Routing Algorithms on Packet Delivery
Impact of Firewall Configurations on Network Protection
The Role of Network Virtualization in Scalability
The Use of IoT Devices in Smart Home Connectivity

Materials Engineering

Effects of Heat Treatment on Material Strength
Influence of Alloy Composition on Metal Durability
Impact of Coating Materials on Corrosion Resistance
The Relationship Between Material Properties and Wear Resistance
Efficacy of Composite Materials in Structural Applications
Effects of Surface Treatments on Material Hardness
Influence of Polymers in Biodegradable Packaging
Impact of Nanomaterials on Lightweight Materials
The Role of Smart Materials in Shape Memory Applications
The Use of Superconductors in Energy Transmission

Renewable Energy Technologies

Effects of Wind Turbine Blade Design on Energy Efficiency
Influence of Solar Panel Orientation on Energy Output
Impact of Biofuel Feedstock on Bioenergy Production
The Relationship Between Geothermal Heat Extraction and Sustainability
Efficacy of Tidal Energy Systems in Marine Environments
Effects of Concentrated Solar Power on Thermal Storage
Influence of Energy-Efficient Lighting in Building Sustainability
Impact of Biomass Gasification on Bioenergy Generation
The Role of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion in Renewable Energy
The Use of Piezoelectric Materials in Energy Harvesting

Urban Planning and Architecture

Effects of Urban Green Spaces on Air Quality
Influence of Building Design on Indoor Air Quality
Impact of Transportation Systems on Urban Accessibility
The Relationship Between Noise Pollution and Building Acoustics
Efficacy of Low-Impact Development in Urban Stormwater Management
Effects of Smart Cities Technologies on Energy Efficiency
Influence of Green Building Materials on Sustainable Construction
Impact of Walkability in Urban Planning and Health
The Role of Urban Farms in Food Security
The Use of Building Automation Systems in Energy Management

Psychology and Behavioral Science

Effects of Stress Management Techniques on Well-Being
Influence of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Anxiety Reduction
Impact of Behavioral Interventions on Autism Spectrum Disorder
The Relationship Between Color Psychology and Retail Sales
Efficacy of Mindfulness Meditation in Stress Reduction
Effects of Music Therapy on Dementia Patients’ Behavior
Influence of Social Media Use on Self-Esteem
Impact of Positive Psychology on Employee Well-Being
The Impact of Video Games on Cognitive Skills

Here, we discussed the list of incredible experimental quantitative research topics for STEM students.

Some Experimental Research Topics For High School Students

Above, we discussed the list of experimental quantitative research topics for STEM students. Now, let’s discuss some experimental research topics suitable for high school students.

Exploring Alternative Energy Sources
Investigating the Effects of Climate Change on Local Ecosystems
Testing the Impact of Different Fertilizers on Plant Growth
Studying the Genetics of Inherited Traits
Measuring the Impact of Music on Concentration and Productivity
Examining the Relationship Between Exercise and Academic Performance
Investigating the Effects of Different Cooking Methods on Food Nutrient Levels
Testing the Efficiency of Water Filtration Methods
Studying the Behavior of Insects in Various Environments
Exploring the Chemistry of Food Preservation
Investigating the Physics of Simple Machines
Testing the Effect of Light on Plant Growth
Studying the Impact of Color on Human Mood and Perception
Measuring the Effect of Different Cleaning Products on Bacterial Growth
Investigating the Physics of Projectile Motion

These research topics cover a wide range of disciplines, allowing high school students to engage in exciting and educational experiments while nurturing their scientific curiosity and passion.

6 Mistakes To Avoid While Choosing an Experimental Research Topic

Selecting the right experimental research topic is an essential step to scoring in academic life. However, some common mistakes can hinder your research progress. Let’s explore six pitfalls to avoid:

1. Lack of Personal Interest

Choosing a topic solely based on its popularity or perceived prestige can lead to a lack of personal connection—your emotional investment matters. Select a subject that genuinely intrigues and excites you, as your enthusiasm will be your driving force throughout the research journey.

2. Overambitious Goals

Setting unrealistic expectations can lead to frustration and burnout. Remember, you’re not expected to solve the world’s most complex problems with a single experiment. Start with manageable, well-defined objectives that align with your resources and timeframe.

3. Ignoring Your Skill Level

Overestimating your skills can be disheartening. Choose a topic that matches your current knowledge and expertise. Gradual growth is emotionally rewarding, and as you gain proficiency, you can tackle more complex challenges.

4. Neglecting Resources

Research can be emotionally draining if you lack the necessary resources, be it equipment, materials, or mentorship. Before diving in, ensure you have access to the tools and guidance required for your chosen topic.

5. Failure to Consider the Bigger Picture

Focusing solely on your topic’s microcosm may lead to a lack of context. Remember to examine how your research fits into the larger scientific landscape. This perspective can be emotionally fulfilling, knowing that your work contributes to a broader understanding.

Also read: 21+ Best Paying Jobs In Computer Software Prepackaged Software

6. Ignoring Ethical and Emotional Implications

Some topics may have ethical considerations or evoke emotional responses. Be aware of the potential emotional toll and moral dilemmas that your research may entail. Ensure that you’re emotionally prepared to address these issues responsibly.

Here, we discussed the mistakes to avoid while choosing the experimental research topics.

In this blog, we discussed the experimental quantitative research topics for STEM students, how to do research, what is STEM, some research topics for high school, and mistakes that should be avoided while choosing the experimental research topics.

In conclusion, an experimental research topic is valuable for STEM students to increase their practical knowledge. Each research topic we choose in this blog will definitely help you to achieve your academic goals. Experimental quantitative research gives STEM students concrete insights to deepen their scientific understanding.

STEM students, addressing what STEM is and why research matters in this field. The key takeaway is to choose a topic that resonates with your passion and aligns with your goals, ensuring a successful journey in STEM research. Choose the best Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM students today!

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. why is experimental quantitative research important for stem students .

It is important because it fosters critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and hands-on learning. It allows STEM students to explore real-world questions, make evidence-based discoveries, and contribute to advancements in their chosen fields.

Q2. What Skills Will I Develop Through Experimental Research?

STEM students will develop skills in critical thinking, data analysis, problem-solving, project management, and effective communication. These skills are valuable in both academia and the workplace.

Q3. What are the Key Elements of a Good Research Question?

A good research question should be specific, clear, measurable, and relevant. It should also be focused on testing a hypothesis or addressing a knowledge gap in your field.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Home » 500+ Quantitative Research Titles and Topics

500+ Quantitative Research Titles and Topics

Table of Contents

Quantitative research involves collecting and analyzing numerical data to identify patterns, trends, and relationships among variables. This method is widely used in social sciences, psychology , economics , and other fields where researchers aim to understand human behavior and phenomena through statistical analysis. If you are looking for a quantitative research topic, there are numerous areas to explore, from analyzing data on a specific population to studying the effects of a particular intervention or treatment. In this post, we will provide some ideas for quantitative research topics that may inspire you and help you narrow down your interests.

Quantitative Research Titles

Quantitative Research Titles are as follows:

Business and Economics

“Statistical Analysis of Supply Chain Disruptions on Retail Sales”
“Quantitative Examination of Consumer Loyalty Programs in the Fast Food Industry”
“Predicting Stock Market Trends Using Machine Learning Algorithms”
“Influence of Workplace Environment on Employee Productivity: A Quantitative Study”
“Impact of Economic Policies on Small Businesses: A Regression Analysis”
“Customer Satisfaction and Profit Margins: A Quantitative Correlation Study”
“Analyzing the Role of Marketing in Brand Recognition: A Statistical Overview”
“Quantitative Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Trust”
“Price Elasticity of Demand for Luxury Goods: A Case Study”
“The Relationship Between Fiscal Policy and Inflation Rates: A Time-Series Analysis”
“Factors Influencing E-commerce Conversion Rates: A Quantitative Exploration”
“Examining the Correlation Between Interest Rates and Consumer Spending”
“Standardized Testing and Academic Performance: A Quantitative Evaluation”
“Teaching Strategies and Student Learning Outcomes in Secondary Schools: A Quantitative Study”
“The Relationship Between Extracurricular Activities and Academic Success”
“Influence of Parental Involvement on Children’s Educational Achievements”
“Digital Literacy in Primary Schools: A Quantitative Assessment”
“Learning Outcomes in Blended vs. Traditional Classrooms: A Comparative Analysis”
“Correlation Between Teacher Experience and Student Success Rates”
“Analyzing the Impact of Classroom Technology on Reading Comprehension”
“Gender Differences in STEM Fields: A Quantitative Analysis of Enrollment Data”
“The Relationship Between Homework Load and Academic Burnout”
“Assessment of Special Education Programs in Public Schools”
“Role of Peer Tutoring in Improving Academic Performance: A Quantitative Study”

Medicine and Health Sciences

“The Impact of Sleep Duration on Cardiovascular Health: A Cross-sectional Study”
“Analyzing the Efficacy of Various Antidepressants: A Meta-Analysis”
“Patient Satisfaction in Telehealth Services: A Quantitative Assessment”
“Dietary Habits and Incidence of Heart Disease: A Quantitative Review”
“Correlations Between Stress Levels and Immune System Functioning”
“Smoking and Lung Function: A Quantitative Analysis”
“Influence of Physical Activity on Mental Health in Older Adults”
“Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Community Hospitals: A Quantitative Study”
“The Efficacy of Vaccination Programs in Controlling Disease Spread: A Time-Series Analysis”
“Role of Social Determinants in Health Outcomes: A Quantitative Exploration”
“Impact of Hospital Design on Patient Recovery Rates”
“Quantitative Analysis of Dietary Choices and Obesity Rates in Children”

Social Sciences

“Examining Social Inequality through Wage Distribution: A Quantitative Study”
“Impact of Parental Divorce on Child Development: A Longitudinal Study”
“Social Media and its Effect on Political Polarization: A Quantitative Analysis”
“The Relationship Between Religion and Social Attitudes: A Statistical Overview”
“Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Educational Achievement”
“Quantifying the Effects of Community Programs on Crime Reduction”
“Public Opinion and Immigration Policies: A Quantitative Exploration”
“Analyzing the Gender Representation in Political Offices: A Quantitative Study”
“Impact of Mass Media on Public Opinion: A Regression Analysis”
“Influence of Urban Design on Social Interactions in Communities”
“The Role of Social Support in Mental Health Outcomes: A Quantitative Analysis”
“Examining the Relationship Between Substance Abuse and Employment Status”

Engineering and Technology

“Performance Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in Autonomous Vehicles”
“Material Science: A Quantitative Analysis of Stress-Strain Properties in Various Alloys”
“Impacts of Data Center Cooling Solutions on Energy Consumption”
“Analyzing the Reliability of Renewable Energy Sources in Grid Management”
“Optimization of 5G Network Performance: A Quantitative Assessment”
“Quantifying the Effects of Aerodynamics on Fuel Efficiency in Commercial Airplanes”
“The Relationship Between Software Complexity and Bug Frequency”
“Machine Learning in Predictive Maintenance: A Quantitative Analysis”
“Wearable Technologies and their Impact on Healthcare Monitoring”
“Quantitative Assessment of Cybersecurity Measures in Financial Institutions”
“Analysis of Noise Pollution from Urban Transportation Systems”
“The Influence of Architectural Design on Energy Efficiency in Buildings”

Quantitative Research Topics

Quantitative Research Topics are as follows:

The effects of social media on self-esteem among teenagers.
A comparative study of academic achievement among students of single-sex and co-educational schools.
The impact of gender on leadership styles in the workplace.
The correlation between parental involvement and academic performance of students.
The effect of mindfulness meditation on stress levels in college students.
The relationship between employee motivation and job satisfaction.
The effectiveness of online learning compared to traditional classroom learning.
The correlation between sleep duration and academic performance among college students.
The impact of exercise on mental health among adults.
The relationship between social support and psychological well-being among cancer patients.
The effect of caffeine consumption on sleep quality.
A comparative study of the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy in treating depression.
The relationship between physical attractiveness and job opportunities.
The correlation between smartphone addiction and academic performance among high school students.
The impact of music on memory recall among adults.
The effectiveness of parental control software in limiting children’s online activity.
The relationship between social media use and body image dissatisfaction among young adults.
The correlation between academic achievement and parental involvement among minority students.
The impact of early childhood education on academic performance in later years.
The effectiveness of employee training and development programs in improving organizational performance.
The relationship between socioeconomic status and access to healthcare services.
The correlation between social support and academic achievement among college students.
The impact of technology on communication skills among children.
The effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction programs in reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression.
The relationship between employee turnover and organizational culture.
The correlation between job satisfaction and employee engagement.
The impact of video game violence on aggressive behavior among children.
The effectiveness of nutritional education in promoting healthy eating habits among adolescents.
The relationship between bullying and academic performance among middle school students.
The correlation between teacher expectations and student achievement.
The impact of gender stereotypes on career choices among high school students.
The effectiveness of anger management programs in reducing violent behavior.
The relationship between social support and recovery from substance abuse.
The correlation between parent-child communication and adolescent drug use.
The impact of technology on family relationships.
The effectiveness of smoking cessation programs in promoting long-term abstinence.
The relationship between personality traits and academic achievement.
The correlation between stress and job performance among healthcare professionals.
The impact of online privacy concerns on social media use.
The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy in treating anxiety disorders.
The relationship between teacher feedback and student motivation.
The correlation between physical activity and academic performance among elementary school students.
The impact of parental divorce on academic achievement among children.
The effectiveness of diversity training in improving workplace relationships.
The relationship between childhood trauma and adult mental health.
The correlation between parental involvement and substance abuse among adolescents.
The impact of social media use on romantic relationships among young adults.
The effectiveness of assertiveness training in improving communication skills.
The relationship between parental expectations and academic achievement among high school students.
The correlation between sleep quality and mood among adults.
The impact of video game addiction on academic performance among college students.
The effectiveness of group therapy in treating eating disorders.
The relationship between job stress and job performance among teachers.
The correlation between mindfulness and emotional regulation.
The impact of social media use on self-esteem among college students.
The effectiveness of parent-teacher communication in promoting academic achievement among elementary school students.
The impact of renewable energy policies on carbon emissions
The relationship between employee motivation and job performance
The effectiveness of psychotherapy in treating eating disorders
The correlation between physical activity and cognitive function in older adults
The effect of childhood poverty on adult health outcomes
The impact of urbanization on biodiversity conservation
The relationship between work-life balance and employee job satisfaction
The effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) in treating trauma
The correlation between parenting styles and child behavior
The effect of social media on political polarization
The impact of foreign aid on economic development
The relationship between workplace diversity and organizational performance
The effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy in treating borderline personality disorder
The correlation between childhood abuse and adult mental health outcomes
The effect of sleep deprivation on cognitive function
The impact of trade policies on international trade and economic growth
The relationship between employee engagement and organizational commitment
The effectiveness of cognitive therapy in treating postpartum depression
The correlation between family meals and child obesity rates
The effect of parental involvement in sports on child athletic performance
The impact of social entrepreneurship on sustainable development
The relationship between emotional labor and job burnout
The effectiveness of art therapy in treating dementia
The correlation between social media use and academic procrastination
The effect of poverty on childhood educational attainment
The impact of urban green spaces on mental health
The relationship between job insecurity and employee well-being
The effectiveness of virtual reality exposure therapy in treating anxiety disorders
The correlation between childhood trauma and substance abuse
The effect of screen time on children’s social skills
The impact of trade unions on employee job satisfaction
The relationship between cultural intelligence and cross-cultural communication
The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in treating chronic pain
The correlation between childhood obesity and adult health outcomes
The effect of gender diversity on corporate performance
The impact of environmental regulations on industry competitiveness.
The impact of renewable energy policies on greenhouse gas emissions
The relationship between workplace diversity and team performance
The effectiveness of group therapy in treating substance abuse
The correlation between parental involvement and social skills in early childhood
The effect of technology use on sleep patterns
The impact of government regulations on small business growth
The relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover
The effectiveness of virtual reality therapy in treating anxiety disorders
The correlation between parental involvement and academic motivation in adolescents
The effect of social media on political engagement
The impact of urbanization on mental health
The relationship between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust
The correlation between early childhood education and social-emotional development
The effect of screen time on cognitive development in young children
The impact of trade policies on global economic growth
The relationship between workplace diversity and innovation
The effectiveness of family therapy in treating eating disorders
The correlation between parental involvement and college persistence
The effect of social media on body image and self-esteem
The impact of environmental regulations on business competitiveness
The relationship between job autonomy and job satisfaction
The effectiveness of virtual reality therapy in treating phobias
The correlation between parental involvement and academic achievement in college
The effect of social media on sleep quality
The impact of immigration policies on social integration
The relationship between workplace diversity and employee well-being
The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy in treating personality disorders
The correlation between early childhood education and executive function skills
The effect of parental involvement on STEM education outcomes
The impact of trade policies on domestic employment rates
The relationship between job insecurity and mental health
The effectiveness of exposure therapy in treating PTSD
The correlation between parental involvement and social mobility
The effect of social media on intergroup relations
The impact of urbanization on air pollution and respiratory health.
The relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership effectiveness
The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy in treating depression
The correlation between early childhood education and language development
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in STEM fields
The impact of trade policies on income inequality
The relationship between workplace diversity and customer satisfaction
The effectiveness of mindfulness-based therapy in treating anxiety disorders
The correlation between parental involvement and civic engagement in adolescents
The effect of social media on mental health among teenagers
The impact of public transportation policies on traffic congestion
The relationship between job stress and job performance
The effectiveness of group therapy in treating depression
The correlation between early childhood education and cognitive development
The effect of parental involvement on academic motivation in college
The impact of environmental regulations on energy consumption
The relationship between workplace diversity and employee engagement
The effectiveness of art therapy in treating PTSD
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in vocational education
The effect of social media on academic achievement in college
The impact of tax policies on economic growth
The relationship between job flexibility and work-life balance
The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in treating anxiety disorders
The correlation between early childhood education and social competence
The effect of parental involvement on career readiness in high school
The impact of immigration policies on crime rates
The relationship between workplace diversity and employee retention
The effectiveness of play therapy in treating trauma
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in online learning
The effect of social media on body dissatisfaction among women
The impact of urbanization on public health infrastructure
The relationship between job satisfaction and job performance
The effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy in treating PTSD
The correlation between early childhood education and social skills in adolescence
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in the arts
The impact of trade policies on foreign investment
The relationship between workplace diversity and decision-making
The effectiveness of exposure and response prevention therapy in treating OCD
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in special education
The impact of zoning laws on affordable housing
The relationship between job design and employee motivation
The effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation therapy in treating traumatic brain injury
The correlation between early childhood education and social-emotional learning
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in foreign language learning
The impact of trade policies on the environment
The relationship between workplace diversity and creativity
The effectiveness of emotion-focused therapy in treating relationship problems
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in music education
The effect of social media on interpersonal communication skills
The impact of public health campaigns on health behaviors
The relationship between job resources and job stress
The effectiveness of equine therapy in treating substance abuse
The correlation between early childhood education and self-regulation
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in physical education
The impact of immigration policies on cultural assimilation
The relationship between workplace diversity and conflict resolution
The effectiveness of schema therapy in treating personality disorders
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in career and technical education
The effect of social media on trust in government institutions
The impact of urbanization on public transportation systems
The relationship between job demands and job stress
The correlation between early childhood education and executive functioning
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in computer science
The effectiveness of cognitive processing therapy in treating PTSD
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in homeschooling
The effect of social media on cyberbullying behavior
The impact of urbanization on air quality
The effectiveness of dance therapy in treating anxiety disorders
The correlation between early childhood education and math achievement
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in health education
The impact of global warming on agriculture
The effectiveness of narrative therapy in treating depression
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in character education
The effect of social media on political participation
The impact of technology on job displacement
The relationship between job resources and job satisfaction
The effectiveness of art therapy in treating addiction
The correlation between early childhood education and reading comprehension
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in environmental education
The impact of income inequality on social mobility
The relationship between workplace diversity and organizational culture
The effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy in treating anxiety disorders
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in physical therapy education
The effect of social media on misinformation
The impact of green energy policies on economic growth
The relationship between job demands and employee well-being
The correlation between early childhood education and science achievement
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in religious education
The impact of gender diversity on corporate governance
The relationship between workplace diversity and ethical decision-making
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in dental hygiene education
The effect of social media on self-esteem among adolescents
The impact of renewable energy policies on energy security
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in social studies
The impact of trade policies on job growth
The relationship between workplace diversity and leadership styles
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in online vocational training
The effect of social media on self-esteem among men
The impact of urbanization on air pollution levels
The effectiveness of music therapy in treating depression
The correlation between early childhood education and math skills
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in language arts
The impact of immigration policies on labor market outcomes
The effectiveness of hypnotherapy in treating phobias
The effect of social media on political engagement among young adults
The impact of urbanization on access to green spaces
The relationship between job crafting and job satisfaction
The effectiveness of exposure therapy in treating specific phobias
The correlation between early childhood education and spatial reasoning
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in business education
The impact of trade policies on economic inequality
The effectiveness of narrative therapy in treating PTSD
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in nursing education
The effect of social media on sleep quality among adolescents
The impact of urbanization on crime rates
The relationship between job insecurity and turnover intentions
The effectiveness of pet therapy in treating anxiety disorders
The correlation between early childhood education and STEM skills
The effect of parental involvement on academic achievement in culinary education
The impact of immigration policies on housing affordability
The relationship between workplace diversity and employee satisfaction
The effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction in treating chronic pain
The correlation between parental involvement and academic success in art education
The effect of social media on academic procrastination among college students
The impact of urbanization on public safety services.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

500+ Climate Change Research Topics

500+ Physics Research Topics

300+ Communication Research Topics

500+ Business Research Topics

500+ Environmental Research Topics

500+ Computer Science Research Topics

2023 AERA in the News
2022 AERA in the News
2021 AERA In the News
2020 AERA In the News
2019 AERA In the News
2018 AERA In the News
2017 AERA In the News
2016 AERA In the News
2015 AERA In the News
2014 AERA In the News
2013 AERA In the News
AERA Speaking Out on Major Issues
2023 AERA News Releases
2022 AERA News Releases
2021 AERA News Releases
2020 AERA News Releases
2019 AERA News Releases
2018 AERA News Releases
2017 AERA News Releases
2016 AERA News Releases
2015 AERA News Releases
2014 AERA News Releases
2013 AERA News Releases
2012 AERA News Releases
2011 News Releases
2010 News Releases
2009 News Releases
2008 News Releases
2007 News Releases
2006 News Releases
2005 News Releases
2004 News Releases
AERA Research Archive
Trending Topic Research Files
Communication Resources for Researchers
AERA Highlights Archival Issues
AERA Video Gallery

STEM

Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) is one of the most talked about topics in education, emphasizing research, problem solving, critical thinking, and creativity.

The following compendium of open-access articles are inclusive of all substantive AERA journal content regarding STEM published since 1969. This page will be updated as new articles are published.

Jason Jabbari, Yung Chun, Wenrui Huang, Stephen Roll
October 2023
Researchers found that program acceptance was significantly associated with increased earnings and probabilities of working in a science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) profession.

Robert R. Martinez, Jr., James M. Ellis
September 2023
Researchers found that STEM-CR involves four related yet distinct dimensions of Think, Know, Act, and Go. Results also demonstrated soundness of these STEM-CR dimensions by race and gender (key learning skills and techniques/Act).

Rosemary J. Perez, Rudisang Motshubi, Sarah L. Rodriguez
April 2023
Researchers found that because participants did not attend to how racism and White supremacy fostered negative climate, their strategies (e.g., increased recruitment, committees, workshops) left systemic racism intact and (un)intentionally amplified labor for racially minoritized graduate students and faculty champions who often led change efforts with little support.

Kathleen Lynch, Lily An, Zid Mancenido
, July 2022
Researchers found an average weighted impact estimate of +0.10 standard deviations on mathematics achievement outcomes.

Luis A. Leyva, R. Taylor McNeill, B R. Balmer, Brittany L. Marshall, V. Elizabeth King, Zander D. Alley
, May 2022
Researchers address this research gap by exploring four Black queer students’ experiences of oppression and agency in navigating invisibility as STEM majors.

Angela Starrett, Matthew J. Irvin, Christine Lotter, Jan A. Yow
, May 2022
Researchers found that the more place-based workforce development adolescents reported, the higher their expectancy beliefs, STEM career interest, and rural community aspirations.

Matthew H. Rafalow, Cassidy Puckett
May 2022
Researchers found that educational resources, like digital technologies, are also sorted by schools.

Pamela Burnard, Laura Colucci-Gray, Carolyn Cooke
April 2022
This article makes a case for repositioning STEAM education as democratized enactments of transdisciplinary education, where arts and sciences are not separate or even separable endeavors.

Salome Wörner, Jochen Kuhn, Katharina Scheiter
, April 2022
Researchers conclude that for combining real and virtual experiments, apart from the individual affordances and the learning objectives of the different experiment types, especially their specific function for the learning task must be considered.

Seung-hyun Han, Eunjung Grace Oh, Sun “Pil” Kang
April 2022
Researchers found that the knowledge sharing mechanism and student learning outcomes can be explained in terms of their social capital within social networks.

Barbara Schneider, Joseph Krajcik, Jari Lavonen, Katariina Salmela-Aro, Christopher Klager, Lydia Bradford, I-Chien Chen, Quinton Baker, Israel Touitou, Deborah Peek-Brown, Rachel Marias Dezendorf, Sarah Maestrales, Kayla Bartz
March 2022
Researchers found that improving secondary school science learning is achievable with a coherent system comprising teacher and student learning experiences, professional learning, and formative unit assessments that support students in “doing” science.

Paulo Tan, Alexis Padilla, Rachel Lambert
, March 2022
Researchers found that studies continue to avoid meaningful intersectional considerations of race and disability.

Ta-yang Hsieh, Sandra D. Simpkins
March 2022
Researchers found patterns with overall high/low beliefs, patterns with varying levels of motivational beliefs, and patterns characterized by domain differentiation.

Jonté A. Myers, Bradley S. Witzel, Sarah R. Powell, Hongli Li, Terri D. Pigott, Yan Ping Xin, Elizabeth M. Hughes
, February 2022
Findings of meta-regression analyses showed several moderators, such as sample composition, group size, intervention dosage, group assignment approach, interventionist, year of publication, and dependent measure type, significantly explained heterogeneity in effects across studies.

Grace A. Chen, Ilana S. Horn
, January 2022
The findings from this review highlight the interconnectedness of structures and individual lives, of the material and ideological elements of marginalization, of intersectionality and within-group heterogeneity, and of histories and institutions.

Victor R. Lee, Michelle Hoda Wilkerson, Kathryn Lanouette
December 2021
Researchers offer an interdisciplinary framework based on literature from multiple bodies of educational research to inform design, teaching and research for more effective, responsible, and inclusive student learning experiences with and about data.

Ido Davidesco, Camillia Matuk, Dana Bevilacqua, David Poeppel, Suzanne Dikker
December 2021
This essay critically evaluates the value added by portable brain technologies in education research and outlines a proposed research agenda, centered around questions related to student engagement, cognitive load, and self-regulation.

Guan K. Saw, Charlotte A. Agger
December 2021
Researchers found that during high school rural and small-town students shifted away from STEM fields and that geographic disparities in postsecondary STEM participation were largely explained by students’ demographics and precollege STEM career aspirations and academic preparation.

Kyle M. Whitcomb, Sonja Cwik, Chandralekha Singh
November 2021
Researchers found that on average across all years of study, underrepresented minority (URM) students experience a larger penalty to their mean overall and STEM GPA than even the most disadvantaged non-URM students.

Lana M. Minshew, Amanda A. Olsen, Jacqueline E. McLaughlin
, October 2021
Researchers found that the CA framework is a useful and effective model for supporting faculty in cultivating rich learning opportunities for STEM graduate students.

Xin Lin, Sarah R. Powell
, October 2021
Findings suggested fluency in both mathematics and reading, as well as working memory, yielded greater impacts on subsequent mathematics performance.

Christine L. Bae, Daphne C. Mills, Fa Zhang, Martinique Sealy, Lauren Cabrera, Marquita Sea
, September 2021
This systematic literature review is guided by a complex systems framework to organize and synthesize empirical studies of science talk in urban classrooms across individual (student or teacher), collective (interpersonal), and contextual (sociocultural, historical) planes.

Toya Jones Frank, Marvin G. Powell, Jenice L. View, Christina Lee, Jay A. Bradley, Asia Williams
August/September 2021
Researchers found that teachers’ experiences of microaggressions accounted for most of the variance in our modeling of teachers’ thoughts of leaving the profession.

Ebony McGee, Yuan Fang, Yibin (Amanda) Ni, Thema Monroe-White
August 2021
Researchers found that 40.7% of the respondents reported that their career plans have been affected by Trump’s antiscience policies, 54.5% by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Martha Cecilia Bottia, Roslyn Arlin Mickelson, Cayce Jamil, Kyleigh Moniz, Leanne Barry
, May 2021
Consistent with cumulative disadvantage and critical race theories, findings reveal that the disproportionality of racially minoritized students in STEM is related to their inferior secondary school preparation; the presence of racialized lower quality educational contexts; reduced levels of psychosocial factors associated with STEM success; less exposure to inclusive and appealing curricula and instruction; lower levels of family social, cultural, and financial capital that foster academic outcomes; and fewer prospects for supplemental STEM learning opportunities. Policy implications of findings are discussed.

Iris Daruwala, Shani Bretas, Douglas D. Ready
April 2021
Researchers describe how teachers, school leaders, and program staff navigated institutional pressures to improve state grade-level standardized test scores while implementing tasks and technologies designed to personalize student learning.

Michael A. Gottfried, Jay Plasman, Jennifer A. Freeman, Shaun Dougherty
March 2021
Researchers found that students with learning disabilities were more likely to earn more units in CTE courses compared with students without disabilities.

Ebony Omotola McGee
December 2020
This manuscript also discusses how universities institutionalize diversity mentoring programs designed mostly to fix (read “assimilate”) underrepresented students of color while ignoring or minimizing the role of the STEM departments in creating racially hostile work and educational spaces.

Miray Tekkumru-Kisa, Mary Kay Stein, Walter Doyle
November 2020
The purpose of this article is to revisit theory and research on tasks, a construct introduced by Walter Doyle nearly 40 years ago.

Elizabeth S. Park, Federick Ngo
November 2020
Researchers found that lower math placement may have supported women, and to a lesser extent URM students, in completing transferable STEM credits.

Karisma Morton, Catherine Riegle-Crumb
August/September 2020
Results of regression analyses reveal that, net of school, teacher, and student characteristics, the time that teachers report spending on algebra and more advanced content in eighth grade algebra classes is significantly lower in schools that are predominantly Black compared to those that are not predominantly minority. Implications for future research are discussed.

Qi Zhang, Jessaca Spybrook, Fatih Unlu
, July 2020
Researchers consider strategies to maximize the efficiency of the study design when both student and teacher effects are of primary interest.

Jennifer Lin Russell, Richard Correnti, Mary Kay Stein, Ally Thomas, Victoria Bill, Laurie Speranzo
, July 20, 2020
Analysis of videotaped coaching conversations and teaching events suggests that model-trained coaches improved their capacity to use a high-leverage coaching practice—deep and specific prelesson planning conversations—and that growth in this practice predicted teaching improvement, specifically increased opportunities for students to engage in conceptual thinking.

Maithreyi Gopalan, Kelly Rosinger, Jee Bin Ahn
, April 21, 2020
The overarching purpose of this chapter is to explore and document the growth, applicability, promise, and limitations of quasi-experimental research designs in education research.

Thomas M. Philip, Ayush Gupta
, April 21, 2020
By bringing this collection of articles together, this chapter provides collective epistemic and empirical weight to claims of power and learning as co-constituted and co-constructed through interactional, microgenetic, and structural dynamics.

Steve Graham, Sharlene A. Kiuhara, Meade MacKay
, March 19, 2020
This meta-analysis examined if students writing about content material in science, social studies, and mathematics facilitated learning.

Janina Roloff, Uta Klusmann, Oliver Lüdtke, Ulrich Trautwein
, January 2020
Multilevel regression analyses revealed that agreeableness, high school GPA, and the second state examination grade predicted teachers’ instructional quality.

: Contemporary Views on STEM Subjects and Language With English Learners
Okhee Lee, Amy Stephens
, 2020
With the release of the consensus report , the authors highlight foundational constructs and perspectives associated with STEM subjects and language with English learners that frame the report.

Angela Calabrese Barton and Edna Tan
, 2020
This essay presents a rightful presence framework to guide the study of teaching and learning in justice-oriented ways.

Day Greenberg, Angela Calabrese Barton, Carmen Turner, Kelly Hardy, Akeya Roper, Candace Williams, Leslie Rupert Herrenkohl, Elizabeth A. Davis, Tammy Tasker
, 2020
Researchers report on how one community builds capacity for disrupting injustice and supporting each other during the COVID-19 crisis.

Tatiana Melguizo, Federick Ngo
, 2020
This study explores the extent to which “college-ready” students, by high school standards, are assigned to remedial courses in college.

Karisma Morton and Catherine Riegle-Crumb
, 2020
Results of regression analyses reveal that, net of school, teacher, and student characteristics, the time that teachers report spending on algebra and more advanced content in eighth grade algebra classes is significantly lower in schools that are predominantly Black compared to those that are not predominantly minority. Implications for future research are discussed.

Jonathan D. Schweig, Julia H. Kaufman, and V. Darleen Opfer
, 2020
Researchers found that there are both substantial fluctuations in students’ engagement in these practices and reported cognitive demand from day to day, as well as large differences across teachers.

David Blazar and Casey Archer
, 2020
Researchers found that exposure to “ambitious” mathematics practices is more strongly associated with test score gains of English language learners compared to those of their peers in general education classrooms.

Megan Hopkins, Hayley Weddle, Maxie Gluckman, Leslie Gautsch
, December 2019
Researchers show how both researchers and practitioners facilitated research use.

Adrianna Kezar, Samantha Bernstein-Sierra
, October 2019
Findings suggest that Association of American Universities’ influence was a powerful motivator for institutions to alter deeply ingrained perceptions and behaviors.

Denis Dumas, Daniel McNeish, Julie Sarama, Douglas Clements
, October 2019
While students who receive a short-term intervention in preschool may not differ from a control group in terms of their long-term mathematics outcomes at the end of elementary school, they do exhibit significantly steeper growth curves as they approach their eventual skill level.

Jessica Thompson, Jennifer Richards, Soo-Yean Shim, Karin Lohwasser, Kerry Soo Von Esch, Christine Chew, Bethany Sjoberg, Ann Morris
, September 2019
Researchers used data from professional learning communities to analyze pathways into improvement work and reflective data to understand practitioners’ perspectives.

Ross E. O’Hara, Betsy Sparrow
, September 2019
Results indicate that interventions that target psychosocial barriers experienced by community college STEM students can increase retention and should be considered alongside broader reforms.

Ran Liu, Andrea Alvarado-Urbina, Emily Hannum
, September 2019
Findings reveal disparate national patterns in gender gaps across the performance distribution.

Adam Kirk Edgerton
, September 2019
Through an analysis of 52 interviews with state, regional, and district officials in California, Texas, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts, the author investigates the decline in the popularity of K–12 standards-based reform.

Amy Noelle Parks
, September 2019
The study suggests that more research needs to represent mathematics lessons from the perspectives of children and youth, particularly those students who engage with teachers infrequently or in atypical ways.

Rajeev Darolia, Cory Koedel, Joyce B. Main, J. Felix Ndashimye, Junpeng Yan
, September 30, 2019
Researchers found that differential access to high school courses does not affect postsecondary STEM enrollment or degree attainment.

Laura A. Davis, Gregory C. Wolniak, Casey E. George, Glen R. Nelson
, August 2019
The findings point to variation in informational quality across dimensions ranging from clarity of language use and terminology, to consistency and coherence of visual displays, which accompany navigational challenges stemming from information fragmentation and discontinuity across pages.

Juan E. Saavedra, Emma Näslund-Hadley, Mariana Alfonso
, August 12, 2019
Researchers present results from the first randomized experiment of a remedial inquiry-based science education program for low-performing elementary students in a developing country.

F. Chris Curran, James Kitchin
, July 2019
Researchers found suggestive evidence in some models (student fixed effects and regression with observable controls) that time on science instruction is related to science achievement but little evidence that the number of science topics/skills covered are related to greater science achievement.

Kathleen Lynch, Heather C. Hill, Kathryn E. Gonzalez, Cynthia Pollard
, June 2019
Programs saw stronger outcomes when they helped teachers learn to use curriculum materials; focused on improving teachers’ content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and/or understanding of how students learn; incorporated summer workshops; and included teacher meetings to troubleshoot and discuss classroom implementation. We discuss implications for policy and practice.

Elizabeth Stearns, Martha Cecilia Bottia, Jason Giersch, Roslyn Arlin Mickelson, Stephanie Moller, Nandan Jha, Melissa Dancy
, June 2019
Researchers found that relative advantages in college academic performance in STEM versus non-STEM subjects do not contribute to the gender gap in STEM major declaration.

Nicole Shechtman, Jeremy Roschelle, Mingyu Feng, Corinne Singleton
, May 2019
As educational leaders throughout the United States adopt digital mathematics curricula and adaptive, blended approaches, the findings provide a relevant caution.

Colleen M. Ganley, Robert C. Schoen, Mark LaVenia, Amanda M. Tazaz
, March 2019
Factor analyses support a distinction between components of general math anxiety and anxiety about teaching math.

Felicia Moore Mensah
, February 2019
The implications for practice in both teacher education and science education show that educational and emotional support for teachers of color throughout their educational and professional journey is imperative to increasing and sustaining Black teachers.

Herbert W. Marsh, Brooke Van Zanden, Philip D. Parker, Jiesi Guo, James Conigrave, Marjorie Seaton
, February 2019
Researchers evaluated STEM coursework selection by women and men in senior high school and university, controlling achievement and expectancy-value variables.

Yasemin Copur-Gencturk, Debra Plowman, Haiyan Bai
, January 2019
The results showed that a focus on curricular content knowledge and examining students’ work were significantly related to teachers’ learning.

Rebecca Colina Neri, Maritza Lozano, Louis M. Gomez
, 2019
Researchers found that teacher resistance to CRE as a multilevel learning problem stems from (a) limited understanding and belief in the efficacy of CRE and (b) a lack of know-how needed to execute it.

Russell T. Warne, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip M. Sadler
, 2019
Researchers investigated the relationship between participation in AP mathematics courses (AP Calculus and AP Statistics) and student career interest in STEM.

Catherine Riegle-Crumb, Barbara King, and Yasmiyn Irizarry
, 2019
Results reveal evidence of persistent racial/ethnic inequality in STEM degree attainment not found in other fields.

Eben B. Witherspoon, Paulette Vincent-Ruz, and Christian D. Schunn
, 2019
Researchers found that high-performing women often graduate with lower paying, lower status degrees.

Bruce Fuller, Yoonjeon Kim, Claudia Galindo, Shruti Bathia, Margaret Bridges, Greg J. Duncan, and Isabel García Valdivia
, 2019
This article details the growing share of Latino children from low-income families populating schools, 1998 to 2010.

Rebekka Darner
, 2019
Drawing from motivated reasoning and self-determination theories, this essay builds a theoretical model of how negative emotions, thwarting of basic psychological needs, and the backfire effect interact to undermine critical evaluation of evidence, leading to science denial.

Okhee Lee
, 2019
As the fast-growing population of English learners (ELs) is expected to meet college- and career-ready content standards, the purpose of this article is to highlight key issues in aligning ELP standards with content standards.

Mark C. Long, Dylan Conger, and Raymond McGhee, Jr.
, 2019
The authors offer the first model of the components inherent in a well-implemented AP science course and the first evaluation of AP implementation with a focus on public schools newly offering the inquiry-based version of AP Biology and Chemistry courses.

Yasemin Copur-Gencturk, Joseph R. Cimpian, Sarah Theule Lubienski, and Ian Thacker
, 2019
Results indicate that teachers are not free of bias, and that teachers from marginalized groups may be susceptible to bias that favors stereotype-advantaged groups.

Geoffrey B. Saxe and Joshua Sussman
, 2019
Multilevel analysis of longitudinal data on a specialized integers and fractions assessment, as well as a California state mathematics assessment, revealed that the ELs in LMR classrooms showed greater gains than comparison ELs and gained at similar rates to their EP peers in LMR classrooms.

Jordan Rickles, Jessica B. Heppen, Elaine Allensworth, Nicholas Sorensen, and Kirk Walters
, 2019
The authors discuss whether it would have been appropriate to test for nominally equivalent outcomes, given that the study was initially conceived and designed to test for significant differences, and that the conclusion of no difference was not solely based on a null hypothesis test.

Soobin Kim, Gregory Wallsworth, Ran Xu, Barbara Schneider, Kenneth Frank, Brian Jacob, Susan Dynarski
, 2019
Using detailed Michigan high school transcript data, this article examines the effect of the MMC on various students’ course-taking and achievement outcomes.

Dario Sansone
, December 2018
Researchers found that students were less likely to believe that men were better than women in math or science when assigned to female teachers or to teachers who valued and listened to ideas from their students.

Ebony McGee
, December 2018
The authors argues that both racial groups endure emotional distress because each group responds to its marginalization with an unrelenting motivation to succeed that imposes significant costs.

Barbara Means, Haiwen Wang, Xin Wei, Emi Iwatani, Vanessa Peters
, November 2018
Students overall and from under-represented groups who had attended inclusive STEM high schools were significantly more likely to be in a STEM bachelor’s degree program two years after high school graduation.

Paulo Tan, Kathleen King Thorius
, November 2018
Results indicate identity and power tensions that worked against equitable practices.

Caesar R. Jackson
, November 2018
This study investigated the validity and reliability of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for minority students enrolled in STEM courses at a historically black college/university (HBCU).

Tuan D. Nguyen, Christopher Redding
, September 2018
The results highlight the importance of recruiting qualified STEM teachers to work in high-poverty schools and providing supports to help them thrive and remain in the classroom.

Joseph A. Taylor, Susan M. Kowalski, Joshua R. Polanin, Karen Askinas, Molly A. M. Stuhlsatz, Christopher D. Wilson, Elizabeth Tipton, Sandra Jo Wilson
, August 2018
The meta-analysis examines the relationship between science education intervention effect sizes and a host of study characteristics, allowing primary researchers to access better estimates of effect sizes for a priori power analyses. The results of this meta-analysis also support programmatic decisions by setting realistic expectations about the typical magnitude of impacts for science education interventions.

Brian A. Burt, Krystal L. Williams, Gordon J. M. Palmer
, August 2018
Three factors are identified as helping them persist from year to year, and in many cases through completion of the doctorate: the role of family, spirituality and faith-based community, and undergraduate mentors.

Anna-Lena Rottweiler, Jamie L. Taxer, Ulrike E. Nett
, June 2018
Suppression improved mood in exam-related anxiety, while distraction improved mood only in non-exam-related anxiety.

Gabriel Estrella, Jacky Au, Susanne M. Jaeggi, Penelope Collins
, April 2018
Although an analysis of 26 articles confirmed that inquiry instruction produced significantly greater impacts on measures of science achievement for ELLs compared to direct instruction, there was still a differential learning effect suggesting greater efficacy for non-ELLs compared to ELLs.

Heather C. Hill, Mark Chin
, April 2018
In this article, evidence from 284 teachers suggests that accuracy can be adequately measured and relates to instruction and student outcomes.

Darrell M. Hull, Krystal M. Hinerman, Sarah L. Ferguson, Qi Chen, Emma I. Näslund-Hadley
, April 20, 2018
Both quantitative and qualitative evidence suggest students within this culture respond well to this relatively simple and inexpensive intervention that departs from traditional, expository math instruction in many developing countries.

Erika C. Bullock
, April 2018
The author reviews CME studies that employ intersectionality as a way of analyzing the complexities of oppression.

Angela Calabrese Barton, Edna Tan
, March 2018
Building a conceptual argument for an equity-oriented culture of making, the authors discuss the ways in which making with and in community opened opportunities for youth to project their communities’ rich culture knowledge and wisdom onto their making while also troubling and negotiating the historicized injustices they experience.

Sabrina M. Solanki, Di Xu
, March 2018
Researchers found that having a female instructor narrows the gender gap in terms of engagement and interest; further, both female and male students tend to respond to instructor gender.

Susanne M. Jaeggi, Priti Shah
, February 2018
These articles provide excellent examples for how neuroscientific approaches can complement behavioral work, and they demonstrate how understanding the neural level can help researchers develop richer models of learning and development.

Danyelle T. Ireland, Kimberley Edelin Freeman, Cynthia E. Winston-Proctor, Kendra D. DeLaine, Stacey McDonald Lowe, Kamilah M. Woodson
, 2018
Researchers found that (1) identity; (2) STEM interest, confidence, and persistence; (3) achievement, ability perceptions, and attributions; and (4) socializers and support systems are key themes within the experiences of Black women and girls in STEM education.

Ann Y. Kim, Gale M. Sinatra, Viviane Seyranian
, 2018
Findings indicate that young women experience challenges to their participation and inclusion when they are in STEM settings.

Guan Saw, Chi-Ning Chang, and Hsun-Yu Chan
, 2018
Results indicated that female, Black, Hispanic, and low SES students were less likely to show, maintain, and develop an interest in STEM careers during high school years.

Di Xu, Sabrina Solanki, Peter McPartlan, and Brian Sato
, 2018
This paper estimates the causal effects of a first-year STEM learning communities program on both cognitive and noncognitive outcomes at a large public 4-year institution.

Christina S. Chhin, Katherine A. Taylor, and Wendy S. Wei
, 2018
Data showed that IES has not funded any direct replications that duplicate all aspects of the original study, but almost half of the funded grant applications can be considered conceptual replications that vary one or more dimensions of a prior study.

Okhee Lee
, 2018
As federal legislation requires that English language proficiency (ELP) standards are aligned with content standards, this article addresses issues and concerns in aligning ELP standards with content standards in English language arts, mathematics, and science.

Jordan Rickles, Jessica B. Heppen, Elaine Allensworth, Nicholas Sorensen, and Kirk Walters
, 2018
Researchers found no statistically significant differences in longer term outcomes between students in the online and face-to-face courses. Implications of these null findings are discussed.

Colleen M. Ganley, Casey E. George, Joseph R. Cimpian, Martha B. Makowski
, December 2017
Researchers found that perceived gender bias against women emerges as the dominant predictor of the gender balance in college majors.

James P. Spillane, Megan Hopkins, Tracy M. Sweet
, December 2017
This article examines the relationship between teachers’ instructional ties and their beliefs about mathematics instruction in one school district working to transform its approach to elementary mathematics education.

Susan A. Yoon, Sao-Ee Goh, Miyoung Park
, December 6, 2017
Results revealed needs in five areas of research: a need to diversify the knowledge domains within which research is conducted, more research on learning about system states, agreement on the essential features of complex systems content, greater focus on contextual factors that support learning including teacher learning, and a need for more comparative research.

Candace Walkington, Virginia Clinton, Pooja Shivraj
, November 2017
Textual features that make problems more difficult to process appear to differentially negatively impact struggling students, while features that make language easier to process appear to differentially positively impact struggling students.

Rebecca L. Matz, Benjamin P. Koester, Stefano Fiorini, Galina Grom, Linda Shepard, Charles G. Stangor, Brad Weiner, Timothy A. McKay
, November 2017
Biology, chemistry, physics, accounting, and economics lecture courses regularly exhibit gendered performance differences that are statistically and materially significant, whereas lab courses in the same subjects do not.

Adam V. Maltese, Christina S. Cooper
, August 2017
The results reveal that although there is no singular pathway into STEM fields, self-driven interest is a large factor in persistence, especially for males, and females rely more heavily on support from others.

Brian R. Belland, Andrew E. Walker, Nam Ju Kim
, August 2017
Scaffolding has a consistently strong effect across student populations, STEM disciplines, and assessment levels, and a strong effect when used with most problem-centered instructional and educational levels.

Di Xu, Shanna Smith Jaggars
, July 2017
The findings indicate a robust negative impact of online course taking for both subjects.

Maisie L. Gholson, Charles E. Wilkes
, June 2017
This chapter reviews two strands of identity-based research in mathematics education related to Black children, exemplified by Martin (2000) and Nasir (2002).

Sarah Theule Lubienski, Emily K. Miller, and Evthokia Stephanie Saclarides
, November 2017
Using data from a survey of doctoral students at one large institution, this study finds that men submitted and published more scholarly works than women across many fields, with differences largest in natural/biological sciences and engineering.

David Blazar, Cynthia Pollard
, October 2017
Drawing on classroom observations and teacher surveys, researchers find that test preparation activities predict lower quality and less ambitious mathematics instruction in upper-elementary classrooms.

Nicole M. Joseph, Meseret Hailu, Denise Boston
, June 2017
This integrative review used critical race theory (CRT) and Black feminism as interpretive frames to explore factors that contribute to Black women’s and girls’ persistence in the mathematics pipeline and the role these factors play in shaping their academic outcomes.

Benjamin L. Wiggins, Sarah L. Eddy, Daniel Z. Grunspan, Alison J. Crowe
, May 2017
Researchers describe the results of a quasi-experimental study to test the apex of the ICAP framework (interactive, constructive, active, and passive) in this ecological classroom environment.

Sean Gehrke, Adrianna Kezar
, May 2017
This study examines how involvement in four cross-institutional STEM faculty communities of practice is associated with local departmental and institutional change for faculty members belonging to these communities.

Lawrence Ingvarson, Glenn Rowley
, May 2017
This study investigated the relationship between policies related to the recruitment, selection, preparation, and certification of new teachers and (a) the quality of future teachers as measured by their mathematics content and pedagogy content knowledge and (b) student achievement in mathematics at the national level.

Will Tyson, Josipa Roksa
, April 2017
This study examines how course grades and course rigor are associated with math attainment among students with similar eighth-grade standardized math test scores.

Anne K. Morris, James Hiebert
, March 2017
Researchers investigated whether the content pre-service teachers studied in elementary teacher preparation mathematics courses was related to their performance on a mathematics lesson planning task 2 and 3 years after graduation.

Laura M. Desimone, Kirsten Lee Hill
, March 2017
Researchers use data from a randomized controlled trial of a middle school science intervention to explore the causal mechanisms by which the intervention produced previously documented gains in student achievement.

Okhee Lee
, March 2017
This article focuses on how the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) treat “argument,” especially in Grades K–5, and the extent to which each set of standards is grounded in research literature, as claimed.

Cory Koedel, Diyi Li, Morgan S. Polikoff, Tenice Hardaway, Stephani L. Wrabel
, February 2017
Researchers estimate relative achievement effects of the four most commonly adopted elementary mathematics textbooks in the fall of 2008 and fall of 2009 in California.

Mary Kay Stein, Richard Correnti, Debra Moore, Jennifer Lin Russell, Katelynn Kelly
, January 2017
Researchers argue that large-scale, standards-based improvements in the teaching and learning of mathematics necessitate advances in theories regarding how teaching affects student learning and progress in how to measure instruction.

Alan H. Schoenfeld
, December 2016
The author begins by tracing the growth and change in research in mathematics education and its interdependence with research in education in general over much of the 20th century, with an emphasis on changes in research perspectives and methods and the philosophical/empirical/disciplinary approaches that underpin them.

Marcia C. Linn, Libby Gerard, Camillia Matuk, Kevin W. McElhaney
, December 2016
This chapter focuses on how investigators from varied fields of inquiry who initially worked separately began to interact, eventually formed partnerships, and recently integrated their perspectives to strengthen science education.

: Are Teachers’ Implicit Cognitions Another Piece of the Puzzle?
Almut E. Thomas
, December 2016
Drawing on expectancy-value theory, this study investigated whether teachers’ implicit science-is-male stereotypes predict between-teacher variation in males’ and females’ motivational beliefs regarding physical science.

: A By-Product of STEM College Culture?
Ebony O. McGee
, December 2016
The researcher found that the 38 high-achieving Black and Latino/a STEM study participants, who attended institutions with racially hostile academic spaces, deployed an arsenal of strategies (e.g., stereotype management) to deflect stereotyping and other racial assaults (e.g., racial microaggressions), which are particularly prevalent in STEM fields.

James Cowan, Dan Goldhaber, Kyle Hayes, Roddy Theobald
, November 2016
Researchers discuss public policies that contribute to teacher shortages in specific subjects (e.g., STEM and special education) and specific types of schools (e.g., disadvantaged) as well as potential solutions.

: A Sociological Analysis of Multimethod Data From Young Women Aged 10–16 to Explore Gendered Patterns of Post-16 Participation
Louise Archer, Julie Moote, Becky Francis, Jennifer DeWitt, Lucy Yeomans
, November 2016
Researchers draw on survey data from more than 13,000 year 11 (age 15/16) students and interviews with 70 students (who had been tracked from age 10 to 16), focusing in particular on seven girls who aspired to continue with physics post-16, discussing how the cultural arbitrary of physics requires these girls to be highly “exceptional,” undertaking considerable identity work and deployment of capital in order to “possibilize” a physics identity—an endeavor in which some girls are better positioned to be successful than others.

Jeremy Roschelle, Mingyu Feng, Robert F. Murphy, Craig A. Mason
, October 2016
In a randomized field trial with 2,850 seventh-grade mathematics students, researchers evaluated whether an educational technology intervention increased mathematics learning.

: Making Research Participation Instructionally Effective
Sherry A. Southerland, Ellen M. Granger, Roxanne Hughes, Patrick Enderle, Fengfeng Ke, Katrina Roseler, Yavuz Saka, Miray Tekkumru-Kisa
, October 2016
As current reform efforts in science place a premium on student sense making and participation in the practices of science, researchers use a close examination of 106 science teachers participating in Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) to identify, through structural equation modeling, the essential features in supporting teacher learning from these experiences.

Brian R. Belland, Andrew E. Walker, Nam Ju Kim, Mason Lefler
, October 2016
This review addresses the need for a comprehensive meta-analysis of research on scaffolding in STEM education by synthesizing the results of 144 experimental studies (333 outcomes) on the effects of computer-based scaffolding designed to assist the full range of STEM learners (primary through adult education) as they navigated ill-structured, problem-centered curricula.

Vaughan Prain, Brian Hand
, October 2016
Researchers claim that there are strong evidence-based reasons for viewing writing as a central but not sole resource for learning, drawing on both past and current research on writing as an epistemological tool and on their professional background in science education research, acknowledging its distinctive take on the use of writing for learning.

June Ahn, Austin Beck, John Rice, Michelle Foster
, September 2016
Researchers present analyses from a researcher-practitioner partnership in the District of Columbia Public Schools, where the researchers are exploring the impact of educational software on students’ academic achievement.

Barbara King
, September 2016
This study uses nationally representative data from a recent cohort of college students to investigate thoroughly gender differences in STEM persistence.

Ryan C. Svoboda, Christopher S. Rozek, Janet S. Hyde, Judith M. Harackiewicz, Mesmin Destin
, August 2016
This longitudinal study draws on identity-based and expectancy-value theories of motivation to explain the socioeconomic status (SES) and mathematics and science course-taking relationship.

Mathematics Course Placements in California Middle Schools, 2003–2013
Thurston Domina, Paul Hanselman, NaYoung Hwang, Andrew McEachin
, July 2016
Researchers consider the organizational processes that accompanied the curricular intensification of the proportion of California eighth graders enrolled in algebra or a more advanced course nearly doubling to 65% between 2003 and 2013.

Lina Shanley
, July 2016
Using a nationally representative longitudinal data set, this study compared various models of mathematics achievement growth on the basis of both practical utility and optimal statistical fit and explored relationships within and between early and later mathematics growth parameters.

Mimi Engel, Amy Claessens, Tyler Watts, George Farkas
, June 2016
Analyzing data from two nationally representative kindergarten cohorts, researchers examine the mathematics content teachers cover in kindergarten.

F. Chris Curran, Ann T. Kellogg
, June 2016
Researchers present findings from the recently released Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010–2011 that demonstrate significant gaps in science achievement in kindergarten and first grade by race/ethnicity.

Rachel Garrett, Guanglei Hong
, June 2016
Analyzing the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study–Kindergarten cohort data, researchers find that heterogeneous grouping or a combination of heterogeneous and homogeneous grouping under relatively adequate time allocation is optimal for enhancing teacher ratings of language minority kindergartners’ math performance, while using homogeneous grouping only is detrimental.

Jennifer Gnagey, Stéphane Lavertu
, May 2016
This study is one of the first to estimate the impact of “inclusive” science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) high schools using student-level data.

Hanna Gaspard, Anna-Lena Dicke, Barbara Flunger, Isabelle Häfner, Brigitte M. Brisson, Ulrich Trautwein, Benjamin Nagengast
, May 2016
Through data from a cluster-randomized study in which a value intervention was successfully implemented in 82 ninth-grade math classrooms, researchers address how interventions on students’ STEM motivation in school affect motivation in subjects not targeted by the intervention.

Rebecca M. Callahan, Melissa H. Humphries
, April 2016
Researchers employ multivariate methods to investigate immigrant college going by linguistic status using the Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002.

Federick Ngo, Tatiana Melguizo
, March 2016
Researchers take advantage of heterogeneous placement policy in a large urban community college district in California to compare the effects of math remediation under different policy contexts.

: An Analysis of German Fourth- and Sixth-Grade Classrooms
Steffen Tröbst, Thilo Kleickmann, Kim Lange-Schubert, Anne Rothkopf, Kornelia Möller
, February 2016
Researchers examined if changes in instructional practices accounted for differences in situational interest in science instruction and enduring individual interest in science between elementary and secondary school classrooms.

: A Mixed-Methods Study
David F. Feldon, Michelle A. Maher, Josipa Roksa, James Peugh
, February 2016
Researchers offer evidence of a similar phenomenon to cumulative advantage, accounting for differential patterns of research skill development in graduate students over an academic year and explore differences in socialization that accompany diverging developmental trajectories.

: The Influence of Time, Peers, and Place
Luke Dauter, Bruce Fuller
, February 2016
Researchers hypothesize that pupil mobility stems from the (a) student’s time in school and grade; (b) student’s race, class, and achievement relative to peers; (c) quality of schooling relative to nearby alternatives; and (4) proximity, abundance, and diversity of local school options.

: How Workload and Curricular Affordances Shape STEM Faculty Decisions About Teaching and Learning
Matthew T. Hora
, January 2016
In this study the idea of the “problem space” from cognitive science is used to examine how faculty construct mental representations for the task of planning undergraduate courses.

Jessaca Spybrook, Carl D. Westine, Joseph A. Taylor
, January 2016
This article provides empirical estimates of design parameters necessary for planning adequately powered cluster randomized trials (CRTs) focused on science achievement.

Paul L. Morgan, George Farkas, Marianne M. Hillemeier, Steve Maczuga
, January 2016
Researchers examined the age of onset, over-time dynamics, and mechanisms underlying science achievement gaps in U.S. elementary and middle schools.

: Opportunity Structures and Outcomes in Inclusive STEM-Focused High Schools
Lois Weis, Margaret Eisenhart, Kristin Cipollone, Amy E. Stich, Andrea B. Nikischer, Jarrod Hanson, Sarah Ohle Leibrandt, Carrie D. Allen, Rachel Dominguez
, December 2015
Researchers present findings from a three-year comparative longitudinal and ethnographic study of how schools in two cities, Buffalo and Denver, have taken up STEM education reform, including the idea of “inclusive STEM-focused schools,” to address weaknesses in urban high schools with majority low-income and minority students.

: How Do They Interact in Promoting Science Understanding?
Jasmin Decristan, Eckhard Klieme, Mareike Kunter, Jan Hochweber, Gerhard Büttner, Benjamin Fauth, A. Lena Hondrich, Svenja Rieser, Silke Hertel, Ilonca Hardy
, December 2015
Researchers examine the interplay between curriculum-embedded formative assessment—a well-known teaching practice—and general features of classroom process quality (i.e., cognitive activation, supportive climate, classroom management) and their combined effect on elementary school students’ understanding of the scientific concepts of floating and sinking.

: An International Perspective
William H. Schmidt, Nathan A. Burroughs, Pablo Zoido, Richard T. Houang
, October 2015
In this paper, student-level indicators of opportunity to learn (OTL) included in the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment are used to explore the joint relationship of OTL and socioeconomic status (SES) to student mathematics literacy.

Xueli Wang
, September 2015
This study examines the effect of beginning at a community college on baccalaureate success in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields.

: Trends and Predictors
David M. Quinn, North Cooc
, August 2015
With research on science achievement disparities by gender and race/ethnicity often neglecting the beginning of the pipeline in the early grades, researchers address this limitation using nationally representative data following students from Grades 3 to 8.

Shaun M. Dougherty, Joshua S. Goodman, Darryl V. Hill, Erica G. Litke, Lindsay C. Page
, May 2015
Researchers highlight a collaboration to investigate one district’s effort to increase middle school algebra course-taking.

David F. Feldon, Michelle A. Maher, Melissa Hurst, Briana Timmerman
, April 2015
This mixed-method study investigates agreement between student mentees’ and their faculty mentors’ perceptions of the students’ developing research knowledge and skills in STEM.

: Reviving Science Education for Civic Ends
John L. Rudolph
, December 2014
This article revisits John Dewey’s now-well-known address “Science as Subject-Matter and as Method” and examines the development of science education in the United States in the years since that address.

Dermot F. Donnelly, Marcia C. Linn Sten Ludvigsen
, December 2014
The National Science Foundation–sponsored report Fostering Learning in the Networked World called for “a common, open platform to support communities of developers and learners in ways that enable both to take advantage of advances in the learning sciences”; we review research on science inquiry learning environments (ILEs) to characterize current platforms.

: A Longitudinal Case Study of America’s Chemistry Teachers
Gregory T. Rushton, Herman E. Ray, Brett A. Criswell, Samuel J. Polizzi, Clyde J. Bearss, Nicholas Levelsmier, Himanshu Chhita, Mary Kirchhoff
, November 2014
Researchers perform a longitudinal case study of U.S. public school chemistry teachers to illustrate a diffusion of responsibility within the STEM community regarding who is responsible for the teacher workforce.

: Relations Between Early Mathematics Knowledge and High School Achievement
Tyler W. Watts, Greg J. Duncan, Robert S. Siegler, Pamela E. Davis-Kean
, October 2014
Researchers find that preschool mathematics ability predicts mathematics achievement through age 15, even after accounting for early reading, cognitive skills, and family and child characteristics.

T. Jared Robinson, Lane Fischer, David Wiley, John Hilton, III
, October 2014
The purpose of this quantitative study is to analyze whether the adoption of open science textbooks significantly affects science learning outcomes for secondary students in earth systems, chemistry, and physics.

: 1968–2009
Robert N. Ronau, Christopher R. Rakes, Sarah B. Bush, Shannon O. Driskell, Margaret L. Niess, David K. Pugalee
, October 2014
We examined 480 dissertations on the use of technology in mathematics education and developed a Quality Framework (QF) that provided structure to consistently define and measure quality.

Andrew D. Plunk, William F. Tate, Laura J. Bierut, Richard A. Grucza
, June 2014
Using logistic regression with Census and American Community Survey (ACS) data ( = 2,892,444), researchers modeled mathematics and science course graduation requirement (CGR) exposure on (a) high school dropout, (b) beginning college, and (c) obtaining any college degree.

Corey Drake, Tonia J. Land, Andrew M. Tyminski
, April 2014
Building on the work of Ball and Cohen and that of Davis and Krajcik, as well as more recent research related to teacher learning from and about curriculum materials, researchers seek to answer the question, How can prospective teachers (PTs) learn to read and use educative curriculum materials in ways that support them in acquiring the knowledge needed for teaching?

Lorraine M. McDonnell, M. Stephen Weatherford
, December 2013
This article draws on theories of political and policy learning and interviews with major participants to examine the role that the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) supporters have played in developing and implementing the standards, supporters’ reasons for mobilizing, and the counterarguments and strategies of recently emerging opposition groups.

: Motivation, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support
Xueli Wang
, October 2013
This study draws upon social cognitive career theory and higher education literature to test a conceptual framework for understanding the entrance into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors by recent high school graduates attending 4-year institutions.

Philip M. Sadler, Gerhard Sonnert, Harold P. Coyle, Nancy Cook-Smith, Jaimie L. Miller
, October 2013
This study examines the relationship between teacher knowledge and student learning for 9,556 students of 181 middle school physical science teachers.

: Teaching Critical Mathematics in a Remedial Secondary Classroom
Andrew Brantlinger
, October 2013
The researcher presents results from a practitioner research study of his own teaching of critical mathematics (CM) to low-income students of color in a U.S. context.

Jason G. Hill, Ben Dalton
, October 2013
This study investigates the distribution of math teachers with a major or certification in math using data from the National Center for Education Statistics’ High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09).

Kristin F. Butcher, Mary G. Visher
, September 2013
This study uses random assignment to investigate the impact of a “light-touch” intervention, where an individual visited math classes a few times during the semester, for a few minutes each time, to inform students about available services.

Janet M. Dubinsky, Gillian Roehrig, Sashank Varma
, August 2013
Researchers argue that the neurobiology of learning, and in particular the core concept of , have the potential to directly transform teacher preparation and professional development, and ultimately to affect how students think about their own learning.

: The Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs
M. Kevin Eagan, Jr., Sylvia Hurtado, Mitchell J. Chang, Gina A. Garcia, Felisha A. Herrera, Juan C. Garibay
, August 2013
Researchers’ findings indicate that participation in an undergraduate research program significantly improved students’ probability of indicating plans to enroll in a STEM graduate program.

Okhee Lee, Helen Quinn, Guadalupe Valdés
, May 2013
This article addresses language demands and opportunities that are embedded in the science and engineering practices delineated in “A Framework for K–12 Science Education,” released by the National Research Council (2011).

Liliana M. Garces
, April 2013
This study examines the effects of affirmative action bans in four states (California, Florida, Texas, and Washington) on the enrollment of underrepresented students of color within six different graduate fields of study: the natural sciences, engineering, social sciences, business, education, and humanities.

: Learning Lessons From Research on Diversity in STEM Fields
Shirley M. Malcom, Lindsey E. Malcom-Piqueux
, April 2013
Researchers argue that social scientists ought to look to the vast STEM education research literature to begin the task of empirically investigating the questions raised in the case.

Roslyn Arlin Mickelson, Martha Cecilia Bottia, Richard Lambert
, March 2013
This metaregression analysis reviewed the social science literature published in the past 20 years on the relationship between mathematics outcomes and the racial composition of the K–12 schools students attend.

Jeffrey Grigg, Kimberle A. Kelly, Adam Gamoran, Geoffrey D. Borman
, March 2013
Researchers examine classroom observations from a 3-year large-scale randomized trial in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) to investigate the extent to which a professional development initiative in inquiry science influenced teaching practices in in 4th and 5th grade classrooms in 73 schools.

:
Angela Calabrese Barton, Hosun Kang, Edna Tan, Tara B. O’Neill, Juanita Bautista-Guerra, Caitlin Brecklin
, February 2013
This longitudinal ethnographic study traces the identity work that girls from nondominant backgrounds do as they engage in science-related activities across school, club, and home during the middle school years.

: A Review of the State of the Field
Shuchi Grover, Roy Pea
, January 2013
This article frames the current state of discourse on computational thinking in K–12 education by examining mostly recently published academic literature that uses Jeannette Wing’s article as a springboard, identifies gaps in research, and articulates priorities for future inquiries.

Catherine Riegle-Crumb, Barbara King, Eric Grodsky, Chandra Muller
, December 2012
This article investigates the empirical basis for often-repeated arguments that gender differences in entrance into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors are largely explained by disparities in prior achievement.

Richard M. Ingersoll, Henry May
, December 2012
This study examines the magnitude, destinations, and determinants of mathematics and science teacher turnover.

: How Families Shape Children’s Engagement and Identification With Science
Louise Archer, Jennifer DeWitt, Jonathan Osborne, Justin Dillon, Beatrice Willis, Billy Wong
, October 2012
Drawing on the conceptual framework of Bourdieu, this article explores how the interplay of family habitus and capital can make science aspirations more “thinkable” for some (notably middle-class) children than others.

Erin Marie Furtak, Tina Seidel, Heidi Iverson, Derek C. Briggs
, September 2012
This meta-analysis introduces a framework for inquiry-based teaching that distinguishes between cognitive features of the activity and degree of guidance given to students.

Jaekyung Lee, Todd Reeves
, June 2012
This study examines the impact of high-stakes school accountability, capacity, and resources under NCLB on reading and math achievement outcomes through comparative interrupted time-series analyses of 1990–2009 NAEP state assessment data.

: Toward a Theory of Teaching
Paola Sztajn, Jere Confrey, P. Holt Wilson, Cynthia Edgington
, June 2012
Researchers propose a theoretical connection between research on learning and research on teaching through recent research on students’ learning trajectories (LTs).

: The Perspectives of Exemplary African American Teachers
Jianzhong Xu, Linda T. Coats, Mary L. Davidson
, February 2012
Researchers argue both the urgency and the promise of establishing a constructive conversation among different bodies of research, including science interest, sociocultural studies in science education, and culturally relevant teaching.

Rebecca M. Schneider, Kellie Plasman
, December 2011
This review examines the research on science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in order to refine ideas about science teacher learning progressions and how to support them.

Brian A. Nosek, Frederick L. Smyth
, October 2011
Researchers examined implicit math attitudes and stereotypes among a heterogeneous sample of 5,139 participants.

Libby F. Gerard, Keisha Varma, Stephanie B. Corliss, Marcia C. Linn
, September 2011
Researchers’ findings suggest that professional development programs that engaged teachers in a comprehensive, constructivist-oriented learning process and were sustained beyond 1 year significantly improved students’ inquiry learning experiences in K–12 science classrooms.

: Teaching and Learning Impacts of Reading Apprenticeship Professional Development
Cynthia L. Greenleaf, Cindy Litman, Thomas L. Hanson, Rachel Rosen, Christy K. Boscardin, Joan Herman, Steven A. Schneider, Sarah Madden, Barbara Jones
, June 2011
This study examined the effects of professional development integrating academic literacy and biology instruction on science teachers’ instructional practices and students’ achievement in science and literacy.

Paul Cobb, Kara Jackson
, May 2011
The authors comment on Porter, McMaken, Hwang, and Yang’s recent analysis of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics by critiquing their measures of the focus of the standards and the absence of an assessment of coherence.

P. Wesley Schultz, Paul R. Hernandez, Anna Woodcock, Mica Estrada, Randie C. Chance, Maria Aguilar, Richard T. Serpe
, March 2011
This study reports results from a longitudinal study of students supported by a national National Institutes of Health–funded minority training program, and a propensity score matched control.

: Three Large-Scale Studies
Jeremy Roschelle, Nicole Shechtman, Deborah Tatar, Stephen Hegedus, Bill Hopkins, Susan Empson, Jennifer Knudsen, Lawrence P. Gallagher
, December 2010
The authors present three studies (two randomized controlled experiments and one embedded quasi-experiment) designed to evaluate the impact of replacement units targeting student learning of advanced middle school mathematics.

: Examining Disparities in College Major by Gender and Race/Ethnicity
Catherine Riegle-Crumb, Barbara King
, December 2010
The authors analyze national data on recent college matriculants to investigate gender and racial/ethnic disparities in STEM fields, with an eye toward the role of academic preparation and attitudes in shaping such disparities.

Mary Kay Stein, Julia H. Kaufman
, September 2010
This article begins to unravel the question, “What curricular materials work best under what kinds of conditions?” The authors address this question from the point of view of teachers and their ability to implement mathematics curricula that place varying demands and provide varying levels of support for their learning.

Andy R. Cavagnetto
, September 2010
This study of 54 articles from the research literature examines how argument interventions promote scientific literacy.

Victoria M. Hand
, March 2010
The researcher examined how the teacher and students in a low-track mathematics classroom jointly constructed opposition through their classroom interactions.

Terrence E. Murphy, Monica Gaughan, Robert Hume, S. Gordon Moore, Jr.
, March 2010
Researchers evaluate the association of a summer bridge program with the graduation rate of underrepresented minority (URM) students at a selective technical university.

23+ Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students In The Philippines

Post author By Ankit
February 6, 2024

“Did you know only 28% of college graduates in the Philippines get degrees in STEM fields? Finding good research topics is vital to getting more Filipino students curious about quantitative studies.

With limited research money and resources, it can be hard for STEM students to find quantitative projects that are possible, new, and impactful. Often, researchers end up feeling apart from local issues and communities.

This blog post offers a unique collection of quantitative research topics for STEM students in the Philippines. Thus, drawing from current events, social issues, and the country’s needs, these project ideas will feel relevant and help students do research that creates positive change.

Philippines students can find inspiration for quantitative studies that make a difference at home through many examples across science, technology, engineering, and math.

Read Our Blog: 120+ Best Quantitative Research Topics for Nursing Students (2024 Edition)

Table of Contents

30 Great Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students in The Philippines

Here are the top quantitative research topics for STEM students in the Philippines in 2024

1. Impact of Climate Change on Farming

Analyze how changing weather affects the growth of crops like rice and corn in different parts of the Philippines. Use numbers to find ways and suggest ways farmers can adapt.

2. Using Drones to Watch Nature

See how well drones with special sensors can watch over forests and coasts in the Philippines. Look at the data they gather to figure out how to save these places.

3. Making Solar Panels Work Better

Experiment with various ways to make more power with solar panels in sunny, humid places like the Philippines. Utilize math to guess how well they’ll work.

4. Checking How Pollution Hurts Coral Reefs

Count how much damage pollution does to coral reefs in the Philippines. Try to predict how bad it’ll get if we don’t stop polluting.

5. Watching Traffic to Fix Roads

Look at how cars move in big cities like Manila. Use math to figure out how to make traffic flow better and help people get around faster.

6. at Air and Sick People

Measure how clean the air is in various parts of the Philippines and see if it affects how many people get sick. Find out which areas need help to stay healthy.

7. Guessing When Earthquakes Might Happen

Look at data from sensors all over the Philippines to see if we can tell when earthquakes might come. Try to guess where they’ll occur next.

8. Making Water Pipes Better

Use math tricks to design cheap pipes that bring clean water to small towns in the Philippines. Think about things like hills and how many people need water.

9. Checking If Planting Trees Helps

Measure if planting trees helps stop the shore from washing away during storms. Use photos from far away and math to see if it’s working.

10. Teaching Computers to Find Sickness

Teach computers to look at pictures and records from hospitals to see if people are sick. Check if they’re good at spotting problems in the Philippines.

11. Finding Better Bags That Break Down

Test different materials like banana leaves to see which ones can be made into bags that don’t hurt the environment. Compare them to regular plastic bags.

12. Making Gardens in the City

See if we can grow vegetables in tall buildings in big cities like Manila. Use numbers to figure out if it’s a good idea.

13. Checking If Bugs Spread Easily in Crowded Places

Use computers to see if diseases spread fast in busy places in the Philippines. Look at how people move around to stop diseases from spreading.

14. Storing Energy for Islands Without Power

Think about ways to save power for small islands without electricity. Try out different ways to save energy and see which one works best.

15. Seeing How Much Storms Hurt Farms

Calculate how much damage storms do to farms in the Philippines. Use numbers to see how much money farmers lose.

16. Testing Ways to Stop Dirt from Washing Away

Try out different ways to stop dirt from being washed away when it rains. Use math to see which way works best on hills in the Philippines.

17. Checking How Healthy Local Food Is

Look at the vitamins and minerals in local foods like sweet potatoes and moringa leaves. See if eating them is good for people in the Philippines.

18. Making Cheap Water Cleaners

Build simple machines that clean dirty water in small towns. Notice if they work better than expensive ones.

19. Seeing How Hot Cities Get

Use satellites to see how hot cities like Manila get compared to places with more trees. Think about how this affects people.

20. Thinking About Trash in Cities

Look at how much trash cities in the Philippines make and find ways to deal with it. Consider what people can do to make less trash.

21. Checking If We Can Use Hot Rocks for Power

Look at rocks under the ground to see if we can get power from them. Consider whether it is beneficial for the environment.

22. Counting Animals in the Forest

Use cameras to count how many animals are in forests in the Philippines. Notice which places need the most help to keep animals safe.

23. Making Fishing Fair

Look at how many fish are caught in the Philippines and see if it’s fair. Think about ways to make sure there will always be enough fish to catch.

24. Making Power Lines Smarter

Design power lines that can change how much power they use. Try to make sure power goes where it’s needed most.

25. Looking at Dirty Water

Find out if chopping down trees and building things by rivers makes the water dirty. Think about what this means for people and animals.

26. Thinking About Big Waves

Use computers to see if big waves could hit the Philippines and what might happen. Think about how to keep people safe.

27. Seeing If Parks Help Cities

Ask people if they like having parks in their city and see what animals live there. Think about if parks make cities better.

28. Making Houses That Don’t Break in Storms

Make houses that don’t fall when there are big storms. Try to make them cheap so more people can have them.

29. Stopping Food from Going Bad

Look at how food gets from farms to people’s houses and see if we can stop it from going bad. Think about how to make sure people have enough to eat.

30. Seeing How Hot Cities Get

Put machines around cities to see how hot they get. Consider how this affects people and what we can do to help.

These topics will help you to make a good project that assists you in getting better scores.

Importance Of Quantitative Research For STEM Students

Read why quantitative research matters to Filipino students.

Helps us understand problems more clearly by revealing trends, patterns, and connections in the data
Provides an accurate picture by removing personal biases and opinions
Allows quantitative comparison of results if studies use the same methods
Enables testing hypotheses and theories through experiments that can prove/disprove predictions
Allows replication and verification as other researchers can redo experiments and study methods
Numbers give a more precise, factual understanding compared to qualitative data.
Removes subjectivity through quantitative data rather than opinions
A key part of the scientific process is that data helps confirm or reject proposed explanations.
Overall, collecting and analyzing quantitative data is crucial for gaining insights, testing ideas, ensuring consistency, and reducing bias

It’s time to see what challenges students face with their quantitative research.

Challenge Philippines Students Face With Their Quantitative Research

Here are the common challenges that students face with their quantitative research topics:

Lack of resources and funding

Doing quantitative research needs access to equipment, software , datasets etc, which can be costly. Many students lack funding and access to these resources.

Lack of background in mathematics and statistics

Quantitative research relies heavily on math and statistical skills. However, many students haven’t developed strong enough skills in these areas yet.

Difficulty accessing scholarly databases

Students need access to academic journals and databases for literature reviews. However, these can be costly for people to access.

Language barriers

Many of the academic literature is in English. This can make reading and learning complex statistical concepts more difficult.

Lack of mentorship

Having an experienced mentor to provide guidance is invaluable. However, not all students have access to mentorship in quantitative research.

Managing large datasets

Collecting, cleaning and analyzing large datasets requires advanced technical skills. Students may struggle without proper guidance.

Presenting results clearly

Learning how to visualize and communicate statistical findings effectively is an important skill that takes practice.

Ethical challenges

Ensuring quantitative studies are designed ethically can be difficult for novice researchers.

Writing scientifically

Adopting the formal, precise writing style required in quantitative research is challenging initially.

Maintaining motivation

Quantitative research is complex and time-consuming. Students may lose motivation without a strong support network.

While quantitative research presents many challenges, Philippines STEM students can overcome these through access to proper resources and support. With hard work, mentorship and collaborative opportunities, students can build essential skills and contribute to the quantitative research landscape.

Tips For Conducting Quantitative Research In The Philippines

When conducting research in a new cultural context like the Philippines, it is vital to take time to understand local norms and build trust. Approaching research openly and collaboratively will lead to more meaningful insights.

1. Get Required Approvals

Be sure to get any necessary ethics reviews or approvals from local governing boards before conducting the analysis. It is wise to follow proper protocols and permissions.

2. Hire Local Assistants

Hire local research helpers to help navigate logistics, translation, and cultural sensitivities. This provides jobs and insider insights.

3. Use Multiple Research Methods

Triangulate findings using interviews, focus groups, surveys, participant observation, etc. Multiple methods provide more potent and well-rounded results.

4. Verify Information

Politely verify information collected from interviews before publication. Follow up to ensure accurate representation and context.

5. Share Results

Report back to participants and communities on research findings and next steps. This shows respect and accountability for their contributions.

6. Acknowledge Limitations

Openly acknowledge the limitations of perspective and methods as an outside researcher. Remain humble and keep improving approaches.

Keep in mind, when entering a new community to conduct research, taking an open, patient, and collaborative approach leads to more ethical and meaningful results. Thus, making the effort to understand and work within cultural norms demonstrates respect.

STEM students in the Philippines have many possible research topics using numbers. They could look at renewable energy, sustainability, pollution, environment, disease prevention, farming improvements, preparing for natural disasters, building projects, transportation, and technology access.

By carefully analyzing statistics and creating mathematical models, young Filipino researchers can provide key ideas to guide future policies and programs. Quantitative research allows real observations and suggestions based on evidence to make the country better now and later.

Number-based methods help young researchers in the Philippines give tangible recommendations to improve their communities.

How can I limit my choices and pick the right research topic?

Think about what you enjoy and what you’re skilled at. Consider if your topic is meaningful and if you have the resources to study it. Get advice from teachers or friends to help you decide.

What are some common problems in doing math research in science, technology, engineering, and math?

Problems might include: 1. Finding data. 2. Make sure your measurements are correct. 3. Following rules about ethics. 4. Handling big sets of data.

How can I make sure my research is done well?

Plan your study carefully, use the correct methods and tools, write down everything you do, and think about the strengths and weaknesses of your work.

Tags Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students In The Philippines
australia (2)
duolingo (13)
Education (283)
General (78)
How To (17)
IELTS (127)
Latest Updates (162)
Malta Visa (6)
Permanent residency (1)
Programming (31)
Scholarship (1)
Sponsored (4)
Study Abroad (187)
Technology (12)
work permit (8)

Research Trends in STEM Clubs: A Content Analysis

Open access
Published: 25 June 2024

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Rabia Nur Öndeş ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9787-4382 1

320 Accesses

Explore all metrics

To identify the research trends in studies related to STEM Clubs, 56 publications that met the inclusion and extraction criteria were identified from the online databases ERIC and WoS in this study. These studies were analysed by using the descriptive content analysis research method based on the Paper Classification Form (PCF), which includes publishing years, keywords, research methods, sample levels and sizes, data collection tools, data analysis methods, durations, purposes, and findings. The findings showed that, the keywords in the studies were used under six different categories: disciplines, technological concepts, academic community, learning experiences, core elements of education, and psychosocial factors (variables). Case studies were frequently employed, with middle school students serving as the main participants in sample groups ranging from 11–15, 16–20, and 201–250. Surveys, questionnaires, and observations were the primary methods of data collection, and descriptive analysis was commonly used for data analysis. STEM Clubs had sessions ranging from 2 to 16 weeks, with each session commonly lasting 60 to 120 min. The study purposes mainly focused on four themes: the impact of participation on various aspects such as attitudes towards STEM disciplines, career paths, STEM major selection, and academic achievement; the development and implementation of a sample STEM Club program, including challenges and limitations; the examination of students' experiences, perceptions, and factors influencing their involvement and choice of STEM majors; the identification of some aspects such as attitudinal effects and non-academic skills; and the comparison of STEM experiences between in-school and out-of-school settings. The study results mainly focused on three themes: the increase in various aspects such as academic achievement, STEM major choice, engagement in STEM clubs, identity, interest in STEM, collaboration-communication skills; the design of STEM Clubs, including sample implementations, design principles, challenges, and factors affecting their success and sustainability; and the identification of factors influencing participation, motivation, and barriers. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of STEM Clubs, leading the way for more targeted and informed future research endeavours.

Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement

'Qualitative' and 'quantitative' methods and approaches across subject fields: implications for research values, assumptions, and practices

A Medical Science Educator’s Guide to Selecting a Research Paradigm: Building a Basis for Better Research

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

Worldwide, STEM education, which integrates the disciplines of science, technology, engineering, and math, is gaining popularity in K-12 settings due to its capacity to enhance 21st-century skills such as adaptability, problem-solving, and creative thinking (National Research Council [NRC], 2015 ). In STEM lessons, students are frequently guided by the engineering design process, which involves identifying problems or technical challenges and creating and developing solutions. Furthermore, higher achievement in STEM education has been linked to increased enrolment in post-secondary STEM fields, offering students greater opportunities to pursue careers in these domains (Merrill & Daugherty, 2010 ). However, STEM activities require dedicated time and the restructuring of integrated curricula, necessitating careful organization of lessons. Recognizing the complexity of developing 21st-century STEM proficiency, schools are not expected to tackle this challenge alone. In addition to regular STEM classes, there exists a diverse range of extended education programs, activities, and out-of-school learning environments (Baran et al., 2016 ; Kalkan & Eroglu, 2017 ; Schweingruber et al., 2014 ). In this paper, out-of-school learning environments, informal learning environments, extended education, and afterschool programs were used synonymously. It is worth noting that the literature lacks a universally accepted definition for out-of-school learning environments, leading to the use of various interchangeable terms (Donnelly et al., 2019 ). Some of these terms include informal learning environments, extended education, afterschool programs, all-day school, extracurricular activities, out-of-school time learning, extended schools, expanded learning, and leisure-time activities. These terms refer to optional programs and clubs offered by schools that exist outside of the standard academic curriculum (Baran et al., 2016 ; Cooper, 2011 ; Kalkan & Eroglu, 2017 ; Schweingruber et al., 2014 ).

Out-of-school learning, in contrast to traditional in-school learning, offers greater flexibility in terms of time and space, as it is not bound by the constraints of the school schedule, national or state standards, and standardized tests (Cooper, 2011 ). Out-of-school learning experiences typically involve collaborative engagement, the use of tools, and immersion in authentic environments, while school environments often emphasize individual performance, independent thinking, symbolic representations, and the acquisition of generalized skills and knowledge (Resnick, 1987 ). They encompass everyday activities such as family discussions, pursuing hobbies, and engaging in daily conversations, as well as designed environments like museums, science centres, and afterschool programs (Civil, 2007 ; Hein, 2009 ). On the other hand, extended education refers to intentionally structured learning and development programs and activities that are not part of regular classes. These programs are typically offered before and after school, as well as at locations outside the school (Bae, 2018 ). As a result, out-of-school learning environments encompass a wide range of experiences, including social, cultural, and technical excursions around the school, field studies at museums, zoos, nature centres, aquariums, and planetariums, project-based learning, sports activities, nature training, and club activities (Civil, 2007 ; Donnelly et al., 2019 ; Hein, 2009 ). At this point, STEM clubs are a specialized type of extracurricular activity that engage students in hands-on projects, experiments, and learning experiences related to scientific, technological, engineering, and mathematical disciplines. STEM Clubs, described as flexible learning environments unconstrained by time or location, offer an effective approach to conducting STEM studies outside of school (Blanchard et al., 2017 ; Cooper, 2011 ; Dabney et al., 2012 ).

Out-of-school learning environments, extended education or afterschool programs, hold tremendous potential for enhancing student learning and providing them with a diverse and enriching educational experience (Robelen, 2011 ). Extensive research supports the notion that these alternative educational programs not only contribute to students' academic growth but also foster their social, emotional, and intellectual development (NRC, 2015 ). Studies have consistently shown that after-school programs play a vital role in boosting students' achievement levels (Casing & Casing, 2024 ; Pastchal-Temple, 2012 ; Shernoff & Vandell, 2007 ), and contributing to positive emotional development, including improved self-esteem, positive attitudes, and enhanced social behaviour (Afterschool Alliance, 2015 ; Durlak & Weissberg, 2007 ; Lauer et al., 2006 ; Little et al., 2008 ). Moreover, engaging in various activities within these programs allows students to develop meaningful connections, expand their social networks, enhance leadership skills (Lipscomb et al., 2017 ), and cultivate cooperation, effective communication, and innovative problem-solving abilities (Mahoney et al., 2007 ).

Implementing STEM activities in out-of-school learning environments not only supports students in making career choices and fostering meaningful learning and interest in science, but also facilitates deep learning experiences (Bybee, 2001 ; Dabney et al., 2012 ; Sahin et al., 2018 ). Furthermore, STEM Clubs enhance students' emotional skills, such as a sense of belonging and peer-to-peer communication, while also fostering 21st-century skills, facilitating the acquisition of current content, and promoting career awareness and interest in STEM professions (Blanchard et al., 2017 ). In summary, engaging in STEM activities through social club activities not only addresses time constraints but also complements formal education and contributes to students' overall development. Hence, STEM Clubs, which are part of extended education, can be defined as dynamic and flexible learning environments that provide an effective approach to conducting STEM studies beyond traditional classroom settings. These clubs offer flexibility in terms of time and location, with intentionally structured programs and activities that take place outside of regular classes. They provide students with unique opportunities to explore and deepen their understanding of STEM subjects through collaborative engagement, hands-on use of tools, and immersive experiences in authentic environments (Bae, 2018 ; Blanchard, et al., 2017 ; Bybee, 2001 ; Cooper, 2011 ; Dabney et al., 2012 ). STEM Clubs have gained immense popularity worldwide, providing students with invaluable opportunities to explore and cultivate their interests and knowledge in these crucial fields (Adams et al., 2014 ; Bell et al., 2009 ). According to America After 3PM, nearly 75% of afterschool program participants, around 5,740,836 children, have access to STEM learning opportunities (Afterschool Alliance, 2015 ).

STEM Clubs as after-school programs come in various forms and provide diverse tutoring and instructional opportunities. For instance, the Boys and Girls Club of America (BGCA) operates in numerous cities across the United States, annually serving 4.73 million students (Boys and Girls Club of America, 2019 ). This program offers students the chance to engage in activities like sports, art, dance, field trips, and addresses the underrepresentation of African Americans in STEM. Another example is the Science Club for Girls (SCFG), established by concerned parents in Cambridge to address gender inequity in math, science, and technology courses and careers. SCFG brings together girls from grades K–7 through free after-school or weekend clubs, science explorations during vacations, and community science fairs, with approximately 800 to 1,000 students participating each year. The primary goal of these clubs is to increase STEM literacy and self-confidence among K–12 girls from underrepresented groups in these fields. More examples can be found in the literature, such as the St. Jude STEM Club (SJSC), where students conducted a 10-week paediatric cancer research project using accurate data (Ayers et al., 2020 ), and After School Matters, based in Chicago, offers project-based learning that enhances students' soft skills and culminates in producing a final project based on their activities (Hirsch, 2011 ).

The Purpose of The Study

The literature on STEM Clubs indicates a diverse range of such clubs located worldwide, catering to different student groups, operating on varying schedules, implementing diverse activities, and employing various strategies, methodologies, experiments, and assessments (Ayers et al., 2020 ; Blanchard et al., 2017 ; Boys and Girls Club of America, 2019 ; Hirsch, 2011 ; Sahin et al., 2018 ). However, it was previously unknown which specific sample groups were most commonly studied, which analytical methods were used frequently, and which results were primarily reported, even though the overall topic of STEM Clubs has gained significant attention. Therefore, organizing and categorizing this expansive body of literature is necessary to gain deeper insights into the current state of knowledge and practices in STEM Clubs. By systematically reviewing and synthesizing the diverse range of studies on this topic, we can develop a clearer understanding of the focus areas, methodologies, and key findings that have emerged from the existing research (Fraenkel et al., 2012 ). At this point, using a content analysis method is appropriate for this purpose because this method is particularly useful for examining trends and patterns in documents (Stemler, 2000 ). Similarly, some previous research on STEM education has conducted content analyses to examine existing studies and construct holistic patterns to understand trends (Bozkurt et al., 2019 ; Chomphuphra et al., 2019 ; Irwanto et al., 2022 ; Li et al., 2020 ; Lin et al., 2019 ; Martín-Páez et al., 2019 ; Noris et al., 2023 ). However, there is a lack of content analysis specifically focused on studies of STEM Clubs in the literature and showing the trends in this topic. Analysing research trends in STEM Clubs can help build upon existing knowledge, identify gaps, explore emerging topics, and highlight successful methodologies and strategies (Fraenkel et al., 2012 ; Noris et al., 2023 ; Stemler, 2000 ). This information can be valuable for researchers, educators, and policymakers to stay up-to-date and make informed decisions regarding curriculum design (Bozkurt et al., 2019 ; Chomphuphra et al., 2019 ; Irwanto et al., 2022 ; Li et al., 2020 ; Lin et al., 2019 ; Martín-Páez et al., 2019 ; Noris et al., 2023 ), the development of effective STEM Club programs, resource allocation, and policy formulation (Blanchard et al., 2017 ; Cooper, 2011 ; Dabney et al., 2012 ). Therefore, the identification of research trends in STEM Clubs was the aim of this study.

To identify research trends, studies commonly analysed documents by considering the dimensions of articles such as keywords, publishing years, research designs, purposes, sample levels, sample sizes, data collection tools, data analysis methods, and findings (Bozkurt et al., 2019 ; Chomphuphra et al., 2019 ; Irwanto et al., 2022 ; Li et al., 2020 ; Sozbilir et al., 2012 ). Using these dimensions as a framework is a useful and common approach in content analysis because this framework allows researchers to systematically examine the key aspects of existing studies and uncover patterns, relationships, and trends within the research data (Sozbilir et al., 2012 ). Hence, since the aim of this study is to identify and analyse research trends in STEM Clubs, it focused on publishing years, keywords, research designs, purposes, sample levels, sample sizes, data collection tools, data analysis methods, and findings of the studies on STEM Clubs.

As a conclusion, the main problem of this study is “What are the characteristics of the studies on STEM Clubs?”. The following sub-questions are addressed in this study:

What is the distribution of studies on STEM Clubs by year?

What are the frequently used keywords in studies on STEM Clubs?

What are the commonly employed research designs in studies on STEM Clubs?

What are the typical purposes explored in studies on STEM Clubs?

What are the commonly observed sample levels in studies on STEM Clubs?

What are the commonly observed sample sizes in studies on STEM Clubs?

What are the commonly utilized data collection tools in studies on STEM Clubs?

What are the commonly utilized data analysis methods in studies on STEM Clubs?

What are the typical durations reported in studies on STEM Clubs?

What are the commonly reported findings in studies on STEM Clubs?

In this study, the descriptive content analysis research method was employed, which allows for a systematic and objective examination of the content within articles, and description of the general trends and research results in a particular subject matter (Lin et al., 2014 ; Suri & Clarke, 2009 ; Sozbilir et al., 2012 ; Stemler, 2000 ). Given the aim of examining research trends in STEM Clubs, the utilization of this method was appropriate, as it provides a structured approach to identify patterns and trends (Gay et al., 2012 ). To implement the content analysis method, this study followed the three main phases proposed by Elo and Kyngäs ( 2008 ): preparation, organizing, and reporting. In the preparation phase, the unit of analysis, such as a word or theme, is selected as the starting point. So, in this study, the topic of STEM Clubs was carefully selected. During the organizing process, the researcher strives to make sense of the data and to learn "what is going on" and obtain a sense of the whole. So, in this study, during the analysis process, the content analysis framework (sample levels, sample sizes, data collection tools, research designs, etc.) was used to question the collected studies. Finally, in the reporting phase, the analyses are presented in a meaningful and coherent manner. So, the analyses were presented meaningfully with visual representations such as tables, graphs, etc. By adopting the content analysis research method and following the suggested phases, this study aimed to gain insights into research trends in STEM Clubs, identify recurring themes, and provide a comprehensive analysis of the collected data.

Search and Selection Process

The online databases ERIC and Web of Science were searched using keywords derived from a database thesaurus. These databases were chosen because of their widespread recognition and respect in the fields of education and academic research, and they offer a substantial amount of high-quality, peer-reviewed literature. The search process involved several steps. Firstly, titles, abstracts, and keywords were searched using Boolean operators for the keywords "STEM Clubs," "STEAM Clubs," "science-technology-engineering-mathematics clubs," "after school STEM program" and "extracurricular STEM activities" in the databases (criterion-1). Secondly, studies were collected beginning from November to the end of December 2023. So, the studies published until the end of December 2023 were included in the search, without a specific starting date restriction (criterion-2). Thirdly, the search was limited to scientific journal articles, book chapters, proceedings, and theses, excluding publications such as practices, letters to editors, corrections, and (guest) editorials (criterion-3). Fourthly, studies published in languages other than English were excluded, focusing exclusively on English language publications (criterion-4). Fifthly, duplicate articles found in both databases were identified and removed. Next, the author read the contents of all the studies, including those without full articles, with a particular focus on the abstract sections. After that, studies related to after school program and extracurricular activities that did not specifically involve the terms STEM or clubs were excluded, even though “extracurricular STEM activities” and “after school STEM program” were used in the search process, and there were studies related to after school program or extracurricular activities but not STEM (criterion-5). Additionally, studies conducted in formal and informal settings within STEM clubs were included, while studies conducted in settings such as museums or trips were excluded (criterion-6). Because STEM Clubs are a subset of informal STEM education settings, which also include museums and field trips, the main focus of this study is to show the trends specifically related to STEM Clubs. Moreover, studies focusing solely on technology without incorporating other STEM components were also excluded (criterion-7). Finally, 56 publications that met the inclusion and extraction criteria were identified. These publications comprised two dissertations, seven proceedings, and 47 articles from 36 different journals. By applying these criteria, the search process aimed to ensure the inclusion of relevant studies while excluding those that did not meet the specified criteria as shown in Fig. 1 .

Flowchart of article process selection

Data Analysing Process

Two different approaches were followed in the content analysis process of this study. In the first part, deductive content analysis was used, and a priori coding was conducted as the categories were established prior to the analysis. The categorization matrix was created based on the Paper Classification Form (PCF) developed by Sozbilir et al. ( 2012 ). The coding scheme devised consisted of eight classification groups for the sections of publication years, keywords, research designs, sample levels, sample sizes, data collection tools, data analysis methods, and durations, with sub-categories for each section. For example, under the research designs section, the sub-categories included qualitative and quantitative methods, case study, design-case study, comparative-case study, ethnographic study, phenomenological study, survey study, experimental study, mixed and longitudinal study, and literature review study. These sub-categories were identified prior to the analysis. Coding was then applied to the data using spreadsheets in the Excel program, based on the categorization matrix. Frequencies for the codes and categories created were calculated and presented in the findings section with tables. Line charts were used for the publication years section, while word clouds, which visually represent word frequency, were used for the keywords section. Word clouds display the most frequently used words in different sizes and colours based on their frequencies (DePaolo & Wilkinson, 2014 ). So, in this part, the analysis was certain since the studies mostly provided related information in their contents.

In the second part, open coding and the creation of categories and abstraction phases were followed for the purposes and findings sections. Firstly, the stated purposes and findings of the studies were written as text. The written text was then carefully reviewed, and any necessary terms were written down in the margins to describe all aspects of the content. Following this open coding, the lists of categories were grouped under higher order headings, taking into consideration their similarities or dissimilarities. Each category was named using content-characteristic words. The abstraction process was repeated to the extent that was reasonable and possible. In this coding process, two individuals independently reviewed ten studies, considering the coding scheme for the first part and conducting open coding for the second part. They then compared their notes and resolved any differences that emerged during their initial checklists. Inter-rater reliability was calculated as 0.84 using Cohen's kappa analysis. Once coding reliability was ensured, the remaining articles were independently coded by the author. After completing the coding process, consensus was reached through discussions regarding any disagreements among the researchers regarding the codes, as well as the codes and categories constructed for the purpose and findings sections. At this point, there were mostly agreements in the coding process since the studies had already clearly stated their key characteristics, such as research design, sample size, sample level, and data collection tools. Additionally, when coding the studies' stated purposes and results, the researchers closely referred to the original sentences in the studies, which led to a high level of consistency in the coded content between the two raters.

Studies related to the STEM Clubs were initially conducted in 2009 (Fig. 2 ). The noticeable increase in the number of studies conducted each year is remarkable. It can be seen that the majority of the 47 articles that were examined (56 articles) were published after 2015, despite a decrease in the year 2018. Additionally, it was observed that the articles were most frequently published (8) in the years 2019 and 2022, least frequently (1) in the years 2009, 2010, and 2014, and there were no publications in 2012.

Number of articles by years

Word clouds were utilized to present the most frequently used keywords in the articles, as shown in Fig. 3 . However, due to the lack of reported keywords in the ERIC database, only 30 articles were included for these analyses. The keywords that exist in these studies were represented in a word cloud in Fig. 3 . The most frequently appearing keywords, such as "STEM," "education" and "learning" were identified. Additionally, by using a content analysis method, these keywords were categorized into six different groups: disciplines, technological concepts, academic community, learning experiences, core elements of education, and psychosocial factors (variables) in Table 1 .

Word cloud of the keywords used in articles

The purposes of the identified studies identified were classified into six main themes: “effects of participation in STEM Clubs on” (25), “evolution of a sample program for STEM Clubs and its implementation” (25), “examination of” (11), “identification of” (3), “comparison of in-school and out-school STEM experiences” (2) and “others” (6). Table 2 presents the distribution of the articles’ purposes based on the classification regarding these themes. Therefore, it can be seen that purposes of “effects of participation in STEM Clubs on,” and “evolution of a sample program for STEM Clubs and its implementation” were given the highest and equal consideration, while the purposes related to "identification of" (3) and "comparison of in-school and out-of-school STEM experiences" (2) were given the least consideration among them.

Within the theme of "effects of participation in STEM Clubs on" there are 11 categories. The aims of the studies in this section are to examine the effect of participation in STEM Clubs on various aspects such as attitudes towards STEM disciplines or career paths, STEM major choice/career aspiration, achievement in math, science, STEM disciplines, or content knowledge, perception of scientists, strategies used, value of clubs, STEM career paths, enjoyment of physics, use of complex and scientific language, interest in STEM, creativity, critical thinking about STEM texts, images of mathematics, or climate-change beliefs/literacy. It is evident that the majority of research in this section focuses on the effects of participation in STEM Clubs on STEM major choice/career aspiration (5), achievement (4), perception of something (4), and interest in STEM (3).

Within the theme of "evolution of a sample program for STEM Clubs and its implementation" there are three categories: development of program/curriculum/activity (14), identification of program's challenges and limitations (3), and implementation of program/activity (8). The studies in this section aim to develop a sample program for STEM Clubs and describe its implementation. It can be seen that the most preferred purpose among them is the development of program/curriculum/activity (14), while the least preferred purpose is the identification of program's challenges and limitations (3). In addition, studies that focus on the development of the program, curriculum, or activity were classified under the "general" category (10). Sub-categories were created for studies specifically expressing the development of the program with a focus on a particular area, such as the maker movement or Arduino-assisted robotics and coding. Similarly, studies that explicitly mentioned the development of the program based on presented ideas and experiences formed another sub-category. Furthermore, the category related to the implementation of program/activity was divided into eight sub-categories, each indicating the specific centre of implementation, such as problem-based learning-centred and representation of blacks-centred.

The theme of "examination of" refers to studies that aim to examine certain aspects, such as the experiences and perceptions of students (7) and the factors influencing specific subjects (4). Studies focusing on examining the experiences and perceptions of students were labelled as "general" (4), while studies exploring their experiences and perceptions regarding specific content, such as influences and challenges to participation in STEM clubs (2) and assessment (1), were labelled accordingly. Additionally, studies that focused on examining factors affecting the choice of STEM majors (2), participation in STEM clubs (1), and motivation to develop interest in STEM (1) were categorized in line with their respective focuses. As shown in Table 2 , it is evident that studies focusing on examining the experiences and perceptions of students (7) were more frequently conducted compared to studies focusing on examining the factors affecting specific subjects (4).

The theme of "identification of" refers to studies that aim to identify certain aspects, such as the types of attitudinal effects (1), types of changes in affect toward engineering (1), and non-academic skills (1). Additionally, the theme of "comparison of in-school and out-of-school STEM experiences" (2) refers to studies that aim to compare STEM experiences within school and outside of school. Lastly, studies that did not fit into the aforementioned categories were included in the "others" theme (6) as no clear connection could be identified among them.

Research Designs

The research designs employed in the examined articles were identified as follows: qualitative methods (36), including case study (20), design-case study (6), comparative-case study (4), ethnographic study (2), phenomenological study (2), and survey study (2); quantitative methods (7), including survey study (4) and experimental study (3); mixed methods and longitudinal studies (10); and literature review (3), as illustrated in Table 3 . It can be observed that among these methods, case study was the most commonly utilized. Furthermore, it is evident that quantitative methods (7) and literature reviews (3) were employed less frequently compared to qualitative (36) and mixed methods (10). Additionally, survey studies were utilized in both quantitative and qualitative studies.

Sample Levels

The frequencies and percentages of sample levels in the examined articles are presented in Table 4 . The studies involved participants at different educational levels, including elementary school (8), middle school (23), high school (14), pre-service teachers or undergraduate students (6), teachers (4), parents (3), and others (1). It is apparent that middle school students (23) were the most commonly utilized sample among them, while high school students (14) were more frequently chosen compared to elementary school students (8). It should be noted that while grade levels were specified for both elementary and middle school students, separate grade levels were not identified for high school students in these studies. Additionally, studies that involved mixed groups were labelled as 3-5th and 6-8th grades. However, when the mixed groups included participants from different educational levels such as elementary, middle, or high school, teachers, parents, etc., they were counted as separate levels. Furthermore, the studies conducted with participants such as pre-service teachers, undergraduates, teachers, and parents were less frequently employed compared to K-12 students.

Sample Sizes

The frequencies of sample sizes in the examined articles are presented in Table 5 . It was observed that in 15 studies, the number of sample sizes was not provided. The intervals for the sample size were not equally separated; instead, they were arranged with intervals of 5, 10, 50, and 100. This choice was made to allow for a more detailed analysis of smaller samples, as smaller intervals can provide a more granular examination of data instead of cumulative amounts. The analysis reveals that the studies primarily prioritized sample groups with 11–15 (f:8) participants, followed by groups of 16–20 (f:4) and 201–250 (f:4). Additionally, it is evident that sample sizes of 6–10, 21–25, 41–50, 50–100, and more than 2000 (f:1) were the least commonly studied.

Data Collection Tools

The frequencies and percentages of data collection tools in the examined articles are presented in Table 6 . The analysis reveals that the studies primarily employed survey or questionnaires (31.6%) and observations (30.5%) as data collection methods, followed by interviews (15.8%), documents (13.7%), tests (4.2%), and field notes (4.2%). Regarding survey/questionnaires, Likert-type scales (f:23) were more commonly employed compared to open-ended questions (f:7). Tests were predominantly used as achievement tests (f:2) and assessments (f:2), representing the least preferred data collection tools. Furthermore, the table illustrates that multiple data collection tools were frequently employed, as the total number of tools (95) is nearly twice the number of studies (56).

Data Analysing Methods

The frequencies and percentages of data analysing methods in the examined articles are presented in Table 7 . The table reveals that the studies predominantly employed descriptive analysis (f:33, 41.25%), followed by inferential statistics (f:16, 20%), descriptive statistics (f:15, 18.75%), content analysis (f:14, 17.5%), and the constant-comparative method (f:2, 2.5%). It is notable that qualitative methods (f:49, 61.25%) were preferred more frequently than quantitative methods (f:31, 38.75%) in the examined studies related to STEM Clubs. Within the qualitative methods, descriptive analysis (f:33) was utilized nearly twice as often as content analysis (f:14), while within the quantitative methods, descriptive statistics (f:15) and inferential statistics (f:16), including t-tests, ANOVA, regression, and other methods, were used with comparable frequency.

The durations of STEM Clubs in the examined studies are presented in Table 8 . Based on the analysis, there are more studies (f:37) that do not state the duration of STEM Clubs than studies (f:19) that do provide information on the durations. Additionally, among the studies that do state the durations, there is no common period of time for STEM Clubs, as they were implemented for varying numbers of weeks and sessions, with session durations ranging from several minutes. Therefore, it can be observed that STEM Clubs were conducted over the course of 3 semesters (academic year and summer), 5 months, 2 to 16 weeks, with session durations ranging from 60 to 120 min. Furthermore, the durations of "3 semesters," "10 weeks with 90-min sessions per week," and "unknown weeks with 60-min sessions per week" were used more than once in the studies.

The content analysis of the findings of the identified examined articles are presented by their frequencies in Table 9 . Although the studies cover a diverse range of topics, the analysis indicates that the results can be broadly classified into three themes, namely, the "development of or increase in certain aspects" (f:68), "design of STEM Clubs" (f:17), and "identification of various aspects" (f:16). Based on the analysis, the findings in the studies are associated with the development of certain aspects such as skills or the increase in specific outcomes like academic achievement. Furthermore, the studies explore the design of STEM Clubs through the description of specific cases, such as sample implementations and challenges. Additionally, the studies focus on the identification of various aspects, such as factors and perceptions.

It is evident from the findings that the studies predominantly yield results related to the development of or increase in certain aspects (f:68). Within this theme, the most commonly observed result is the development of STEM or academic achievement or STEM competency (f:11). This is followed by an increase in STEM major choice or career aspiration (f:9), an increase in engagement or participation in STEM clubs (f:5), the development of identity including STEM, science, engineering, under-representative groups (f:5), the development of interest in STEM (f:4), an increase in enjoyment (f:4), and the development of collaboration, leadership, or communication skills (f:4). Furthermore, it can be observed that there are some results, such as the development of critical thinking, perseverance and the teachers’ profession, that were yielded less frequently (f:1). The results of 16 studies were found with a frequency of 1.

Within the design of STEM Clubs, the sample implementation or design model for different purposes such as the usage of robotic program or students with disabilities (f:7), design principles or ideas for STEM clubs, activities or curriculum (f:4), challenges or factors effecting STEM Clubs success and sustainability (f:3) were presented as a result. Additionally, the comparison was made between in-school and out-of-school learning environments (f:3), highlighting the contradictions of STEM clubs and science classes, as well as the differences in STEM activities and continues-discontinues learning experiences in mathematics. Within the identification of various aspects, the most commonly gathered result was the identification of factors affecting participation or motivation to STEM clubs (f:5). This was followed by the identification of barriers to participation (f:2). The identification of other aspects, such as parents' roles and perspectives on STEM, was comparatively less frequent.

Considering the wide variety of STEM Clubs found in different regions around the world, this study aimed to investigate the current state of research on STEM Clubs. It is not surprising to observe an increase in the number of studies conducted on STEM Clubs over the years. This can be attributed to the overall growth in research on STEM education (Zhan et al., 2022 ), as STEM education often includes activities and after-school programs as integral components (Blanchard et al., 2017 ). Identifying relevant keywords and incorporating them into a search strategy is crucial for conducting a comprehensive and rigorous systematic review (Corrin et al., 2022 ). To gain a broader understanding of keyword usage in the context of STEM Clubs, a word cloud analysis was performed (McNaught & Lam, 2010 ). Additionally, based on the content analysis method, six different categories for keywords were immerged: disciplines, technological concepts, academic community, learning experiences, core elements of education, and psychosocial factors (variables). The analysis revealed that the keyword "STEM" was used most frequently in the studies examined. This may be because authors want their studies to be easily found and widely searchable by others, so they use "STEM" as a general term for their studies (Corrin et al., 2022 ). Similarly, the frequent use of keywords like "education" and "learning" from the "core elements of education" category could be attributed to authors' desire to use broad, searchable terms to make their studies more discoverable (Corrin et al., 2022 ). Additionally, it was observed that from the STEM components, only "science" and "engineering" were used as keywords, while "mathematics" and "technology" were not present. This finding aligns with claims in the literature that mathematics is often underemphasized in STEM integration (Fitzallen, 2015 ; Maass et al., 2019 ; Stohlmann, 2018 ). Although the specific term "technology" did not appear in the word cloud, technology-related keywords such as "arduino," "robots," "coding," and "innovative" were present. Furthermore, the analysis revealed that authors preferred to use keywords related to their sample populations, such as "middle (school students)," "elementary (students)," "high school students," or "teachers." Additionally, keywords describing learning experiences, such as "extracurricular," "informal," "afterschool," "out-of-school," "social," "clubs," and "practice" were commonly used. This preference may stem from the fact that STEM clubs are often part of informal learning environments, out-of-school programs, or afterschool activities, and these concepts are closely related to each other (Baran et al., 2016 ; Cooper, 2011 ; Kalkan & Eroglu, 2017 ; Schweingruber et al., 2014 ). Moreover, the analysis showed that keywords related to psychosocial factors (variables), such as "disabilities," "skills," "interest," "attainment," "enactment," "expectancy-value," "self-efficacy," "engagement," "motivation," "career," "gender," "cognitive," and "identity" were also prevalent. This suggests that the articles investigated the effects of STEM club practices on these psychosocial variables. To sum up, by using these keywords, researchers can gain valuable insights and effectively search for relevant articles related to STEM clubs, enabling them to locate appropriate resources for their research (Corrin et al., 2022 ).

The popularity of case studies as a research design, based on the analysis, can be attributed to the fact that studies on STEM Clubs were conducted in diverse learning environments, highlighting sample implementation designs (Adams et al., 2014 ; Bell et al., 2009 ; Robelen, 2011 ). At this point, case studies offer the opportunity to present practical applications and real-world examples (Hamilton & Corbett-Whittier, 2012 ), which is highly valuable in the context of STEM Clubs. Additionally, the observation that quantitative methods were not as commonly utilized as qualitative methods in studies related to STEM Clubs contrasts with the predominant reliance on quantitative methods in STEM education research (Aslam et al., 2022 ; Irwanto et al., 2022 ; Lin et al., 2019 ). This suggests a lack of quantitative studies specifically focused on STEM Clubs, indicating a need for more research in this area employing quantitative approaches. Therefore, it is important to prioritize and conduct additional quantitative studies to further enhance our understanding of STEM Clubs and their impact. In studies on STEM Club, there is a higher frequency of research involving K-12 students, particularly middle school students, parallel to some studies on literature (Aslam et al., 2022 ), compared to other groups such as pre-service teachers, undergraduate students, teachers, and parents. This can be attributed to the fact that STEM Clubs are designed for K-12 students, and middle school is a crucial period for introducing them to STEM concepts and careers. Middle school students are developmentally ready for hands-on and inquiry-based learning, commonly used in STEM education. Additionally, time constraints, especially for high school students preparing for university, may limit their involvement in extensive STEM activities. Furthermore, STEM Clubs were primarily employed with sample groups ranging from 11–15, 16–20, and 201–250 participants. The preference for 11–20 participants, rather than less than 10, may be attributed to the collaborative nature of STEM activities, which often require a larger team for effective teamwork and group dynamics (Magaji et al., 2022 ). Utilizing small groups as samples can result in the case study research design being the most frequently employed approach due to its compatibility with smaller sample sizes. On the other hand, the inclusion of larger groups (201–250) is suitable for survey studies, as this number can represent the total student population attending STEM Clubs throughout a semester with multiple sessions (Boys & Girls Club of America, 2019 ).

According to studies on STEM Clubs, surveys or questionnaires and observations were predominantly used as data collection methods. This preference can be attributed to the fact that surveys or questionnaires allow researchers to gather data on diverse aspects, including students' attitudes, perceptions, and experiences related to STEM Clubs, facilitating generalization and comparison (McLafferty, 2016 ). Furthermore, observations were frequently employed because they can offer a deeper understanding of the lived experiences and actual practices within STEM Clubs (Baker, 2006 ). Along with data collection tools, descriptive analysis was predominantly utilized in studies on STEM Clubs, with quantitative methods including descriptive statistics and inferential statistics being used to a similar extent. The preference for descriptive analysis may arise from its effectiveness in describing activities, experiences, and practices within STEM Clubs. Given the predominance of case study research in the analysed studies, it is not surprising to observe a high frequency of descriptive statistics in the findings. On the other hand, the extensive use of quantitative analysing methods can be attributed to the need for statistical analysis of surveys and questionnaires (Young, 2015 ). Consequently, future studies on STEM Clubs could benefit from considering the use of tests and field notes as additional data collection tools, along with surveys, observations and interviews. Additionally, the development of tests specifically designed to assess aspects related to STEM could provide valuable insights (Capraro & Corlu, 2013 ; Grangeat et al., 2021 ). Moreover, increasing the utilization of content analysis and constant comparative analysis methods could further enhance the depth and richness of data analysis in STEM Club research (White & Marsh, 2006 ). In the studies on STEM Clubs, the duration and scheduling of the clubs varied considerably. While there was no common period of time for STEM Clubs, they were implemented for different numbers of weeks and sessions, with session durations ranging from several minutes to 60 to 120 min. However, it was observed that STEM Clubs were predominantly conducted over the course of three semesters, including the academic year and summer, or for durations of 2 to 16 weeks. This scheduling pattern can be attributed to the fact that STEM Clubs were often implemented as after-school programs, and they were designed to align with the academic semesters and summer school periods to effectively reach students. Additionally, the number of weeks in these studies may have been arranged according to the duration of academic semesters, although some studies were conducted for less than a semester (Gutierrez, 2016 ). The most common use of multiple sessions with a time range of 60 to 120 min can be attributed to the nature of the activities involved in STEM Clubs. These activities often require more time than regular class hours, and splitting them into separate sessions allows students to effectively concentrate on their work and engage in more in-depth learning experiences (Vennix et al., 2017 ).

The purposes of the studies on STEM Clubs were mostly related to effects of participation in STEM Clubs on various aspects such as attitudes towards STEM disciplines or career paths, STEM major choice/career aspiration, achievement etc., evolution of a sample program for STEM Clubs and its implementation including the development of program/activity, identification of program's challenges and limitations, and implementation of it, followed by the examination of certain aspects such as the experiences and perceptions of students and the factors influencing specific subjects, identification of such as the types of attitudinal effects and non-academic skills, and comparison of in-school and out-school STEM experiences. Therefore, the results of the studies parallel to the purposes were mostly related to development of or increase in certain aspects such as STEM or academic achievement or STEM competency STEM major choice or career aspiration engagement or participation in STEM Clubs, identity, interest in STEM, enjoyment, collaboration, communication skills, critical thinking, the design of STEM Clubs including the sample implementation or design model for different purposes such as the usage of robotic program or students with disabilities, design principles or ideas for STEM clubs or activities, challenges or factors effecting STEM Clubs success and sustainability, and the comparison between in-school and out-of-school learning environments. Also, they are related to the identification of various aspects such as factors affecting participation or motivation to STEM clubs, barriers to participation. At this point, it is evident that these identified categories align with the findings of studies in the literature. These studies claim that after-school programs, such as STEM Clubs, have positive impacts on students' achievement levels (NRC, 2015 ; Kazu & Kurtoglu Yalcin, 2021 ; Shernoff & Vandell, 2007 ), communication, and innovative problem-solving abilities (Mahoney et al., 2007 ), leadership skills (Lipscomb et al., 2017 ), career decision-making (Bybee, 2001 ; Dabney et al., 2012 ; Sahin et al., 2018 ; Tai et al., 2006 ), creativity (Wan et al., 2023 ), 21st-century skills (Hirsch, 2011 ; Zeng et al., 2018 ), interest in STEM professions (Blanchard et al., 2017 ; Chittum et al., 2017 ; Wang et al., 2011 ), and knowledge in STEM fields (Adams et al., 2014 ; Bell et al., 2009 ). Furthermore, it can be inferred that the studies on STEM Clubs paid significant attention to the design descriptions of programs or activities (Nation et al., 2019 ). This may be because there is a need for studies that focus on designing program models for different cases (Calabrese Barton & Tan, 2018 ; Estrada et al., 2016 ). These studies can serve as examples and provide guidance for the development of STEM clubs in various settings. By creating sample models, researchers can contribute to the improvement and expansion of STEM clubs across different environments (Cakir & Guven, 2019 ; Estrada et al., 2016 ).

In conclusion, as the studies on the trends in STEM education (Bozkurt et al., 2019 ; Chomphuphra et al., 2019 ; Irwanto et al., 2022 ; Li et al., 2020 ; Lin et al., 2019 ; Martín-Páez et al., 2019 ; Noris et al., 2023 ), the analysis of prevailing research trends specifically in STEM Clubs, which are implemented in diverse environments with varying methods and purposes, can provide a comprehensive understanding of these clubs as a whole.

It can also serve as a valuable resource for guiding future investigations in this field. By identifying common approaches and identifying gaps in methods and results, a holistic perspective on STEM Clubs can be achieved, leading to a more informed and targeted direction for future research endeavours.

Recommendations

Future research on STEM Clubs should consider the trends identified in the study and address methodological gaps. For instance, there is a lack of research in this area that employs quantitative approaches. Therefore, it is important for future studies to incorporate quantitative methods to enhance the understanding of STEM Clubs and their impact. This includes exploring underrepresented populations, investigating the long-term impacts of STEM Clubs, and examining the effectiveness of specific pedagogical approaches or interventions within these clubs. Researchers should conduct an analysis to identify common approaches used in STEM Clubs across different settings. This analysis can help uncover effective strategies, best practices, and successful models that can be replicated or adapted in various contexts. By undertaking these efforts, researchers can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of STEM Clubs, leading to advancements in the field of STEM education.

Limitations

It is important to consider the limitations of the study when interpreting its findings. The study's findings are based on the literature selected from two databases, which may introduce biases and limitations. Additionally, the study's findings are constrained by the timeframe of the literature review, and new studies may have emerged since the cut-off date, potentially impacting the representation and generalizability of the research trends identified. Another limitation lies in the construction of categories during the coding process. The coding scheme used may not have fully captured or represented all relevant terms or concepts. Some relevant terms may have been inadequately represented or identified using different words or phrases, potentially introducing limitations to the analysis. While efforts were made to ensure validity and reliability, there is still a possibility of unintended biases or inconsistencies in the categorization process.

Data Availability

The datasets (documents, excel analysis) utilized in this article are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Adams, J. D., Gupta, P., & Cotumaccio, A. (2014). A museum program enhances girls’ STEM interest, motivation and persistence. Afterschool Matters, 12 , 14–20.

Google Scholar

Afterschool Alliance (2015). Full STEM ahead: Afterschool programs step up as key partners in STEM education . Retrieved November 2023 from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/AA3PM/

Aslam, S., Saleem, A., Kennedy, T. J., Kumar, T., Parveen, K., Akram, H., & Zhang, B. (2022). Identifying the research and trends in STEM education in Pakistan: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 12 (3), 21582440221118544.

Article Google Scholar

Ayers, K. A., Wade-Jaimes, K., Wang, L., Pennella, R. A., & Pounds, S. B. (2020). The St. Jude STEM clubs: An after-school STEM club for upper elementary school students in Memphis, TN. Journal of STEM Outreach, 3 (1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v3i1.13

Bae, S. H. (2018). Concepts, models, and research of extended education. International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 6 (2), 153–165.

Baker, L. (2006). Observation: A complex research method. Library Trends, 55 (1), 171–189.

Baran, E., Bilici, S. C., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2016). Moving STEM beyond schools: Students’ perceptions about an out-of-school STEM education program. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4 (1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.71338

Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits . National Research Council of the National Academies.

Blanchard, M. R., Hoyle, K. S., & Gutierrez, K. S. (2017). How to start a STEM club. Science Scope, 41 (3), 88–94.

Boys and Girls Club of America (2019). Annual report . Retrieved November 2023 from https://www.bgca.org/about-us/annual-report

Bozkurt, A., Ucar, H., Durak, G., & Idin, S. (2019). The current state of the art in STEM research: A systematic review study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 14 (3), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v14i3.3447

Bybee, R. W. (2001). Achieving scientific literacy: Strategies for ensuring that free choice science education complements national formal science education efforts. In J. H. Falk (Ed.), Free choice education: How we learn science outside of school (pp. 44–63). Teachers College Press.

Cakir, N. K., & Guven, G. (2019). Arduino-assisted robotic and coding applications in science teaching: Pulsimeter activity in compliance with the 5E learning model. Science Activities, 56 (2), 42–51.

Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2018). A longitudinal study of equity-oriented STEM-rich making among youth from historically marginalized communities. American Educational Research Journal, 55 (4), 761–800.

Capraro, R. M., & Corlu, M. S. (2013). Changing views on assessment for STEM project-based learning. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. R. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project-based learning (pp. 109–118). Brill.

Chapter Google Scholar

Casing, P. I., & Casing, L. M. R. (2024). Fostering students’ mathematics achievement through after-school program in the 21st century. Online Submission, 12 (3), 118–122.

Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., Akalin, S., & Schram, A. B. (2017). The effects of an afterschool STEM program on students’ motivation and engagement. International Journal of STEM Education, 4 , 1–16.

Chomphuphra, P., Chaipidech, P., & Yuenyong, C. (2019). Trends and research issues of STEM education: A review of academic publications from 2007 to 2017. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340 (1), 012069.

Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105–117). Teachers College.

Cooper, S. (2011). An exploration of the potential for mathematical experiences in informal learning environments. Visitor Studies, 14 (1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2011.557628

Corrin, L., Thompson, K., Hwang, G. J., & Lodge, J. M. (2022). The importance of choosing the right keywords for educational technology publications. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (2), 1–8.

Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with a career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2 (1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.629455

DePaolo, C. A., & Wilkinson, K. (2014). Get your head into the clouds: Using word clouds for analyzing qualitative assessment data. TechTrends, 58 , 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0750-9

Donnelly, M., ažetić, P., Sandoval-Hernandez, A., Kumar, K., & Whewall, S. (2019). An unequal playing field-extra-curricular activities, soft skills and social mobility . Social Mobility Commission.

Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). Retrieved from www.casel.org

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62 (1), 107–115.

Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Okpodu, C. M, Robinson, T. J., Summers, M. F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education , 15 (3), es5.

Fitzallen, N. (2015). STEM Education: What does mathematics have to offer? In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics education in the margins. Proceedings of The 38th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 237–244). MERGA.

Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson.

Grangeat, M., Harrison, C., & Dolin, J. (2021). Exploring assessment in STEM inquiry learning classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 43 (3), 345–361.

Gutierrez, K. S. (2016). Investigating the climate change beliefs, knowledge, behaviors, and cultural worldviews of rural middle school students and their families during an out-of-school intervention: A mixed-methods study (Publication No. 11320) [Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University]. NC State University Libraries.

Hamilton, L., & Corbett-Whittier, C. (2012). Using case study in education research . Sage.

Hein, G. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Museums & Social Issues, 4 (1), 113–124.

Hirsch, B. (2011). Learning and development in after-school programs. Phi Delta Kappan, 92 (5), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F003172171109200516

Irwanto, I., Saputro, A. D., Widiyanti, W., Ramadhan, M. F., & Lukman, I. R. (2022). Research trends in STEM education from 2011 to 2020: A systematic review of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 16 (5), 19–32.

Kalkan, C., & Eroglu, S. (2017). Designing sample activities based on STEM materials for gifted/talented students in support education rooms. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity , 4 (2), 36–46. Retrieved November 2023 from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jgedc/issue/38702/449432

Kazu, I. Y., & Kurtoglu Yalcin, C. (2021). The effect of STEM education on academic performance: A meta-analysis study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20 (4), 101–116.

Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-of-school-time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk students. Review of Educa- Tional Research, 76 (2), 275–313.

Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7 (1), 1–16.

Lin, T. C., Lin, T. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Research trends in science education from 2008 to 2012: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 36 (8), 1346–1372.

Lin, T. J., Lin, T. C., Potvin, P., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Research trends in science education from 2013 to 2017: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 41 (3), 367–387.

Lipscomb, S., Haimson, J., Liu, A. Y., Burghardt, J., Johnson, D. R., & Thurlow, M. L. (2017). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 2: Comparisons across disability groups: Full report (Report No. NCEE 2017–4018). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Little, P., Wimer, C., & Weiss, H. B. (2008). After school programs in the 21st century: Their poten- tial and what it takes to achieve it. Issues and Opportunities in out-of-School Time Evaluation, 10 , 1–12.

Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM, 51 , 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5

Magaji, A., Ade-Ojo, G., & Bijlhout, D. (2022). The impact of after school science club on the learning progress and attainment of students. International Journal of Instruction, 15 (3), 171–190.

Mahoney, J. L., Parente, M. E., & Lord, H. (2007). After-school program engagement: Links to child competence and program quality and content. The Elementary School Journal, 107 (4), 385–404.

Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez-González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A Review of Literature. Science Education, 103 (4), 799–822.

McLafferty, S. (2016). Conducting questionnaire surveys. Key Methods in Geography, 3 , 129–142.

McNaught, C., & Lam, P. (2010). Using Wordle as a supplementary research tool. Qualitative Report, 15 (3), 630–643.

Merrill, C., & Daugherty, J. (2010). STEM education and leadership: A mathematics and science partnership approach. Journal of Technology Education, 21 (2), 21–34.

Nation, J. M., Harlow, D., Arya, D. J., & Longtin, M. (2019). Being and becoming scientists: Design-based STEM programming for girls. Afterschool Matters, 29 , 36–44.

National Research Council, Division of Behavioral, Board on Science Education, & Committee on Successful Out-of-School STEM Learning (2015). Identifying and supporting productive STEM programs in out-of-school settings . National Academies Press.

Noris, M., Saputro, S., & Ulimaz, A. (2023). STEM research trends from 2013 to 2022: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 6 (2), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.390

Pastchal-Temple, A. S. (2012). The effect of regular participation in an after-school program on student achievement, attendance, and behavior (Publication No. 4368) [Doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University]. Mississippi State University Libraries.

Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think . National Academy Press.

Robelen, E. (2011). New STEM schools target underrepresented groups. Education Week, 31 (1), 18–19.

Sahin, A., Ekmekci, A., & Waxman, H. C. (2018). Collective effects of individual, behavioral, and contextual factors on high school students’ future STEM career plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16 , 69–89.

Schweingruber, H., Pearson, G., & Honey, M. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research . National Academies Press.

Shernoff, D. J., & Vandell, D. L. (2007). Engagement in after school program activities: Quality of experience from the perspective of participants. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 36 , 891–903.

Stemler, S. (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7 (17), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34

Stohlmann, M. (2018). A vision for future work to focus on the “m” in integrated STEM. School Science and Mathematics, 118 (7), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12301

Sozbilir, M., Kutu, H., & Yasar, M. D. (2012). Science education research in Turkey: A content analysis of selected features of papers published. In J. Dillon & D. Jorde (Eds.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in Europe (pp. 1–35). Sense publishers.

Suri, H., & Clarke, D. (2009). Advancements in research systhesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79 (1), 395–430.

Tai, R. H., Qi Liu, C., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312 (5777), 1143–1144.

Vennix, J., Den Brok, P., & Taconis, R. (2017). Perceptions of STEM-based outreach learning activities in secondary education. Learning Environments Research, 20 , 21–46.

Wan, Z. H., So, W. M. W., & Zhan, Y. (2023). Investigating the effects of design-based STEM learning on primary students’ STEM creativity and epistemic beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21 (Suppl. 1), 87–108.

Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1 (2), 1–13.

White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55 (1), 22–45.

Young, T. J. (2015). Questionnaires and surveys. In Z. Hua (Ed.), Research methods in intercultural communication: A practical guide (pp. 163–180). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166283.ch11

Zeng, Z., Yao, J., Gu, H., & Przybylski, R. (2018). A meta-analysis on the effects of STEM education on students’ abilities. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 1 (1), 3–16.

Zhan, Z., Shen, W., Xu, Z., Niu, S., & You, G. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the global landscape on STEM education (2004–2021): Towards global distribution, subject integration, and research trends. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16 (2), 171–203.

Download references

Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK). There was no external funding received for the research conducted in this article.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey

Rabia Nur Öndeş

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabia Nur Öndeş .

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent.

This is a review study and no ethical approval is required.

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Öndeş, R.N. Research Trends in STEM Clubs: A Content Analysis. Int J of Sci and Math Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10477-z

Download citation

Received : 19 January 2024

Accepted : 10 June 2024

Published : 25 June 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10477-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Research Trends
Content Analysis
After-school Program
Extracurricular Activities
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

>> MS-Econ future students

Master’s in economics academics

The STEM-designated Master of Science in Economics (MS-Econ) degree incorporates applied learning experiences, flexible elective options, and career coaching to prepare graduates for immediate success in dynamic roles across industries, including government, technology, consulting, and more.

Professional Preparation

Designed to be completed in as little as 9 months, the master’s in economics is a full-time in-person program that requires 30 total credit hours. The MS-Econ degree includes core economics courses and electives where you will learn to apply theory and use data analysis tools.

Math bootcamp

The MS-Econ degree welcomes students from various stages of life and career, with a variety of academic and professional backgrounds. The optional math bootcamp ahead of the program ensures all students have the opportunity to be fully prepared to succeed.

Core courses

For the first half of the program, you’ll take core courses in microeconomics, macroeconomics, and data science and econometrics, taught by leading economists with an extensive research record on these topics.

This course is the first of two that provide students with a solid background in microeconomic theory. It focuses on consumer theory, production and cost, perfect competition, games with complete information, and oligopoly. You will obtain the requisite knowledge for understanding applications and as a foundation for empirical analysis.

Continue to build upon your foundation in microeconomic theory. This course focuses on general equilibrium, games with incomplete information, and topics in information economics, with special emphasis in detailed applications to actual markets and organizations.

Gain the language and tools necessary to understand and analyze macroeconomic phenomena in the domestic and global economy. This course places emphasis on the careful interpretation of economic data. You will emerge with the tools to produce analyses of how current events can be expected to affect macroeconomic outcomes.

Introducing students to concepts and tools needed to understand the global economy, this course emphasizes the interaction between countries in the trade of goods and services and the exchange of financial assets. We will study how exchange rates are determined, how assets flow across countries, why trade deficits occur, and more.

Understand basic econometric theory, methods, and applications. This course emphasizes research designs that support causal inference. Topics include fundamentals of OLS estimation and statistical inference, bias, consistency, Monte Carlo simulation, and instrumental variables. Students learn how to estimate these econometric models in STATA.

Develop practical knowledge of modern econometric research designs that support causal inference. Topics include regression discontinuity designs, difference-in-differences, fixed effects, panel data with instrumental variables, clustering, and bootstrap methods for calculating standard error. Students learn how to estimate these econometric models in STATA.

A variety of interdisciplinary electives allow you to make the MS-Econ degree your own.

Market Design
Macroeconomic Policy
Topics in Data Science and Econometrics
Game Theory and Economic Analysis
Industrial Organization
Environmental Economics
Public Economics
Labor Economics
Categorical Data Analysis
International Finance
Investment Strategies
Environmental and Resource Economics
Global Business Environment

Applied project

Your experience culminates with a collaborative project, where you’ll apply your newly developed knowledge to solve a real-world problem. Partner with a corporation with a local presence or the L. William Seidman Research Institute , which acts as an economic research and consulting resource for a variety of public and private clients.

Professional preparation

With growing public and private demand for quantitative economics and data science and econometrics expertise, there is plenty of space and opportunity to start and sustain a high-impact career.

STEM designation

Our record of excellence and impact attracts motivated, diverse scholars from all over the world: over 100 countries are represented in the W. P. Carey student body alone. As a STEM-designated program, eligible MS-Econ graduates on student visas have access to an Optional Practical Training (OPT) extension for up to 36 months. This longer work authorization term may help international students gain additional skills and experience in the U.S.

Career coaching

Experienced career coaches in the W. P. Carey Career Services Center will help you build critical skills and your personal brand, working with you every step of the way — and even after you graduate.

Enroll in a career course as part of your MS-Econ degree
Consultations and guidance from dedicated career professionals
Library of on-demand content and resources to help advance your career
Continued access to career coaching and support for alumni

Accelerated program (4+1)

Earn your ASU bachelor’s degree and an ASU master’s in economics in as few as five years. Students who enter the MS-Econ program from an ASU undergraduate degree can receive unique benefits and apply for scholarships through W. P. Carey Forward . These students may also have the ability to take fewer credit hours — contact a recruiter to learn more.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Financial literacy to develop complex thinking skills: quantitative measurement in mexican women entrepreneurs.

$\r\nKarla Bayly-Castaneda&#x;$

1 School of Business, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
2 EGADE Business School, and Institute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
3 Actuary Program, FES Acatlán, Nacional Autonomus University of Mexico, Estado de Mexico, Mexico
4 Hub Europe (Spain), Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico

The objective of the study was to validate the construction of a financial literacy measurement instrument aligned with complex thinking competencies in Mexican women entrepreneurs. By means of the construct validation method, the content was validated by expert judgment, validation by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, as well as internal consistency by means of a pilot test applied to a sample of 189 participants. A highly valid and reliable version was obtained, organized in four dimensions with a total of 23 items. This study examines and estimates the determinants of financial literacy for the first time under the light of complex reasoning.

Introduction

Entrepreneurship, as the mainstay of the economy in a complex and constantly changing environment, deserves to be studied not only about the threats it faces or the identification of opportunities and their viability analysis, but also about the characteristics and decision-making skills of those who undertake them, especially women, one of the economically vulnerable sectors of the population. Financial literacy is an essential skill in modern life in both developed and emerging economies ( García-Mata, 2021b ) because, with the increasing complexity of the financial world, the ability to understand and properly manage money has become a pressing need directly related to the success of female entrepreneurship ( Baporikar and Akino, 2020 ). Through the acquisition of knowledge, skills and positive attitudes regarding money management, the female entrepreneur will be better prepared to face recurrent economic crises that threaten the survival of her business ( Niwaha et al., 2016 ; Rachapaettayakom et al., 2020 ). However, few efforts are directed at addressing the need for financial literacy of adult women who are on the path of entrepreneurship.

Beyond theoretical knowledge about financial instruments and services, women entrepreneurs require support for the development of competencies aimed at putting this knowledge into practice in contexts such as scenario analysis, risk assessment, the search for solutions, as well as informed decision making. The promotion of financial literacy initiatives under the scheme of complex thinking can give the entrepreneur the ability to improve her decision-making process for an effective, innovative and efficient management of her business resources ( Dzwigol et al., 2020 ; Ramos et al., 2021 ). The objective of this research is the design and validation of the construction of an instrument to measure the complex thinking sub-competencies of Mexican women entrepreneurs aligned to their level of financial literacy, presenting an original approach as it is the first of its kind. The result has demonstrated that it is possible to evaluate the level of financial literacy of women entrepreneurs in the context of complex thinking, so that future initiatives in this field can be developed.

Financial literacy

Financial literacy, as a discipline of study, awakened interest only at the beginning of the 21st century as a result of the financial crises that have characterized it up to now, resulting in questions about the influence of attitudes, behaviors and knowledge on individuals' decision making with respect to the management of their money and the impact of these decisions on their general wellbeing. Starting with the work of Lusardi (2001) , who was a pioneer in questioning the reasons for the factors underlying the lack of a savings culture and its impact on long-term financial planning, and the subsequent posing of a first set of questions aimed at measuring financial literacy ( Lusardi, 2008 , 2011 ; Lusardi and Mitchell, 2009 ), as well as the work of different governments and institutions, among which the effort of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in the development of measurement instruments such as the PISA test (Programme for International Student Assessment), which includes the measurement of basic knowledge on money management among young people ( OECD, 2018 ), stands out, it was in 2012 when the Mexican Government launched a first measurement initiative, the National Survey on Financial Inclusion (ENIF) ( CNBV, 2012 ). The results of these measurements consistently point to the existence of a significant gender gap where women not only show lower rates of financial literacy but also of access to useful and affordable financial products and services ( UNESCO, 2020 ; UN Women, 2021 ). Now, beyond the impact that financial literacy has on women's individual wellbeing, it is time to focus on the influence of this level of financial literacy on the success of female entrepreneurship, especially in micro and small businesses where planning, management and financing decisions are usually made by a single person.

A first approach to the object of study is to establish what is understood as financial literacy, both individually and in the management of the enterprise or business. Although there is diverse literature on the subject, the definition of the construct is heterogeneous and there is no agreement ( Anshika and Mallik, 2021 ). This represents an important challenge when trying to propose a model for its measurement. According to the OECD, financial literacy is defined as the process by which financial consumers improve their understanding of financial products, related concepts, as well as the underlying risks and, through information, instruction and/or objective advice, develop the skills and confidence to become more aware of financial risks and opportunities, make informed decisions, know where to go for help and take any effective action to improve their economic wellbeing ( Raccanello and Guzmán, 2014 ). Another more technical approach establishes the financial literacy of the entrepreneur as the ability to understand the functioning of the business in terms of possessing knowledge about recording income and expenses, separation between personal and business money, as well as financial planning ( Ali et al., 2018 ). Given the above, we can add that, in a business context, this definition can be complemented with the execution of actions aimed at the stable growth and financial viability of the business over time. It is important to note the importance of the ability to make timely and informed decisions according to individual circumstances.

Women and entrepreneurship

Globally, there is an unequal race for business survival. In Latin America, and especially in the case of Mexico, this inequality is extremely marked by the proportion distributed between large and small companies. According to the 2019 Economic Censuses, 99.8% of the country's establishments are micro, small or medium-sized ( INEGI, 2020 ). These micro and small enterprises (MSMEs) are the pillar of economic growth for developing countries in addition to allowing the generation of employment and self-employment for women, one of the vulnerable groups recognized by both the OECD and UNESCO, which in the framework of the 2030 Agenda points out the need for the integration of women not only in productive processes, but also in social and economic ones ( UNESCO, 2017 ), inequality in terms of financial inclusion in Mexico prevents women from accessing savings and investment mechanisms to ensure a decent standard of living in retirement ( INEGI, 2021 ; INMUJERES, 2022 ). Entrepreneurship allows women not only to contribute to the economic wellbeing of the country, but also to guarantee the generation of income for their personal and family wellbeing while facilitating compatibility with care and household tasks.

Despite this, this sector faces enormous barriers in accessing funding and financing sources, as well as financial products and services through formal institutions, in addition to the lack of ability of entrepreneurs for financial management and long-term business planning. Without the understanding of basic financial concepts, people lack the equipment to make decisions related to the management of their resources ( Vanegas et al., 2020 ; Anshika and Mallik, 2021 ) which is reflected in low performance rates and a high mortality rate of MSMEs in Mexico, which until before the COVID-19 pandemic, resulted in an average life time for this sector of 7.8 years ( INEGI, 2020 ). Empowering women entrepreneurs by developing competencies to improve financial decision-making through innovative financial literacy initiatives can translate, over time, into a determining factor for an improvement in the population's wellbeing indexes.

Complex thinking

Decision making is a reflective process that involves analyzing and discerning between different alternatives, a decision implies knowledge, understanding and analysis of a problem in order to generate the right decision. Some authors suggest that correct decision making is linked to greater cognitive capacity, and this is a requirement for financial literacy, also establishing that the greater the cognitive capacity, the greater the gender gap in financial inclusion ( Muñoz-Murillo et al., 2020 ). In addition to the above, studies have shown that financial literacy is neither stable nor constant, nor can it be assumed that once acquired it will affect people's decision making, since it changes according to time and circumstances, being related to the experiences, contexts and skills of the individual or the social situations that surround him/her ( Bay and Catasús, 2014 ). It becomes, then, a personal process in which the individual needs to take responsibility for his or her self-training in order to prepare him or herself for changing economic environments ( Vanegas et al., 2020 ). Technological evolution and the speed with which large volumes of information are transferred have evolved the business world, demanding from its managers the ability to make decisions quickly, to be self-taught, capable of interpreting reality, systematizing their decisions and learning from their own mistakes ( Pacheco-Velázquez et al., 2023 ). In other words, the entrepreneur must not only acquire knowledge related so far to financial literacy, but simultaneously requires the development of complex thinking skills.

Unlike simple reasoning, which focuses on solving problems with a single correct answer, complex reasoning involves the consideration of multiple perspectives and the integration of multiple sources of information to find effective solutions. Complex thinking is defined as the competence acquired by individuals that allows them to develop a holistic view of the world, enabling them to carry out cognitive activities, analysis and synthesis to face challenges and solve problems ( Vázquez-Parra et al., 2022a , b ). According to the complex thinking competency it integrates four sub-competencies:

a) Systemic: allows the identification of the elements and interconnections that make up an environmental problem or situation.

b) Critical: analyzes and evaluates the reasoning considering its validity and its differentiation with existing knowledge and structures.

c) Scientific: provides methodologies that allow the construction of objective reasoning to make decisions.

d) Innovative: provides creative and novel elements to evaluate the environment and the problems faced by the individual.

These sub-competencies are related to financial literacy in that they frame the knowledge of theoretical concepts and the skills to generate behaviors and attitudes for their application based on the experience and understanding of the environment as a consequence of business activities ( Manzanera-Román and Brändle, 2016 ; García-González et al., 2020 ; Oggero et al., 2020 ; Cruz-Sandoval et al., 2023 ). From the literature review it is clear that, although there are measurement instruments regarding the application of financial literacy aimed at micro and small business management, there is no evidence of the existence of measurement instruments that relate the field of financial literacy in the female sector to the subcompetencies of complex thinking. Table 1 summarizes some studies on financial literacy in entrepreneurs that have addressed the operationalization of financial literacy related to entrepreneurship, which have served as the basis for the development of the instrument that we present in the framework of this research.

Table 1 . Previous studies.

The method of the study was the construct validation through the convergent and discriminant validity of a measurement instrument by means of a three-stage process. In the first stage, a literature review was carried out in order to construct the operationalization of variables based on previous research on financial literacy and its relationship with complex thinking competencies. Derived from the review, and given the non-existence of instruments that addressed both constructs, it was decided to proceed with the adaptation of the instrument: “OECD/INFE Survey Instrument to Measure the Financial Literacy of MSMEs” ( Escobar-Pérez and Martínez, 2008 ; OECD, 2019 ) by reformulating items based on four sub-competencies of complex thinking: critical thinking, systems thinking, innovative thinking and scientific thinking according to the framework proposed by Vázquez-Parra et al. (2023) , as well as translation and cultural adaptation ensuring the use of language oriented to favor women's financial inclusion ( Agnew et al., 2018 ; Whitehouse, 2018 ; Osei-Tutu and Weill, 2021 ; Bertrand and Osei-Tutu, 2022 ). Next, a content validation process was carried out by expert judgment followed by the application of Aiken's V concordance test and a qualitative review of observations made by the experts. Finally, once the corrections derived from the previous process were attended to, progress was made toward the piloting of the instrument and its validation by means of exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and, finally, the internal consistency test by calculating Cronbach's Alpha coefficient.

Content validity through expert judgment

A group of seven expert judges was formed with proven experience in the field of financial literacy, as well as professional experience in direct contact with women entrepreneurs. As part of the experience of this group of experts we can highlight that three of them are authors of two or more books of international circulation on the subject of personal finance, three occupy management positions in financial institutions where they actively participate in the development of financial products and training aimed at women, and finally, one expert directs, at a national level, an initiative dedicated to the area of support for entrepreneurs in the post-acceleration stage of their business. The average number of years of experience in the area of personal finance and/or female entrepreneurship in this group is 11.3 years.

This group received the first version of the questionnaire with 40 items grouped into five domains of interest: Attitude, Behavior, Knowledge, correct financial management decision and Training, and four subdomains corresponding to the sub-competencies of Complex Thinking: systemic, innovative, critical and scientific. The experts received the questionnaire via the Google Forms tool, and were asked to evaluate each item based on clarity (the item is understood, correctly worded), coherence (the item is related to the dimension it measures), relevance (the item is important and should be included) and sufficiency (items belonging to the same dimension and sufficient to measure it) ( Matsumoto-Royo et al., 2021 ; Ramírez-Montoya et al., 2022 ; OECD, (n/d)) using a Likert-type polytomous scale from 1 to 5, as well as the inclusion of qualitative comments on the items. The criterion for the acceptance of items as valid was defined as those with a concordance index >0.71 according to the estimate using Alkien's V coefficient test ( Escurra, 1988 ; Penfield and Giacobbi, 2004 ), as well as the content analysis of the comments made by the group of experts.

Construct validity

Participants.

The questionnaire received responses during February and March 2023 using a convenience sampling of women entrepreneurs between 18 and 69 years of age ( n = 189). From the total number of observations, those where the participant stated that she was not directly involved in the financial decisions of the business or did not own the business (88) were eliminated, thus reducing the sample to 101 women entrepreneurs distributed as follows: 18–19 years ( n = 9), 20–29 years ( n = 37), 30–39 years ( n = 13), 40–49 years ( n = 20), 50–59 years ( n = 14), and 60–69 years ( n = 8), with businesses employing one person ( n = 42) and employing between 2 and 50 people ( n = 59). All of them agreed to participate in the sample collection by expressing their consent for data collection ( Valenzuela and Flores Fahara, 2013 ), declaring to be involved in making both investment and financing decisions for their business.

Once the results obtained during the validation process by expert judgment were integrated, a new version of the questionnaire was integrated with 23 items grouped into four dimensions associated with the sub-competences of complex thinking: (1) Scientific Thinking (SCT) with items R-01, R-02, R-05 and R-10, (2) Critical Thinking (CRT) with items R-06, R-12, R-13 and R15, (3) Innovative Thinking (INT) with items R-09, R-14, R-16, R-17, R-19 and R-23, and finally (4) Systematic Thinking (SYT) with items R-03, R-04, R-07, R-08, R-11, R-18, R-20, R-21 and R-22.

The questionnaire was applied online using the Google Forms tool. The results validation process consisted of performing an exploratory factor analysis in order to identify the relationships between the variables of interest and group them into latent factors or underlying constructs, as well as confirmatory factor analysis to confirm the underlying structure identified in a previous exploratory factor analysis ( García and Caro, 2009 ; García-González et al., 2020 ). This statistical technique was performed using the SSPS tool in order to validate the dimensionality of the data set and its latent factors. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test was also performed as a measure of sampling adequacy used as a prior evaluation of data in terms of their adequacy to perform a factor analysis with an expected value between 0 and 1. The reliability of the instrument was calculated using Cronbach's alpha as a measure of reliability or internal consistency of the set of items included in the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha ranges from 0 to 1, with values >0.7 being considered acceptable for most research purposes ( González and Pazmiño, 2015 ). The data collection and analysis process took care of ethical aspects such as the confidentiality of the participants, their individual responses and the care of the personal data provided. The methodological quality, data management and interpretations of the results were taken care of throughout the research process.

Content validity

Through the calculation of Aiken's V coefficient ( Aiken, 1985 ), the relevance of the items with respect to a content domain was quantified based on the evaluations of the seven expert judges, with a result of total agreement among the judges for 39 of the 40 items evaluated, that is, they obtained a score higher than 0.71 in terms of clarity, relevance, coherence and correspondence. The content analysis of the qualitative observations made by the expert judges was also carried out, finding that all the observations corresponded to the Clarity dimension in nine of the items. In this sense, the observations were grouped in terms of suggestions for modification or elimination. As a result of this analysis, a second version of the questionnaire was constructed with the 23 items best evaluated by the group of expert judges, the results of which are shown in Table 2 , which summarizes the value of Aiken's V coefficient calculated for each item and moves toward the reliability validity stage by piloting the instrument.

Table 2 . Result of the calculation of the Aiken V coefficient.

The suitability of the data for factor analysis was verified by obtaining a KMO value equal to 0.928, whose reading indicates having an excellent sample to perform the factor analysis of the data. The results obtained from Bartlett's test of sphericity indicate that the value of the chi-square test statistic is 2,129.689 with 253 degrees of freedom and a significance level of <0.001, which allows rejecting the null hypothesis that the observed correlation matrix is equal to the expected correlation matrix for independent and uncorrelated variables and indicates that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variables are correlated. These statistical indicators reinforce that the sample size is adequate for the methodological objective of the study, in addition to what MacCallum et al. (1999) establish as a recommendation to ensure the validity and reliability of the results obtained, where sample sizes of between 100 and 200 participants are considered adequate for factor analyses in instrument validation studies.

In the next stage of the factor analysis, the principal components table was analyzed with Kaiser normalization rotation and Varimax rotation, which seeks to maximize the variance explained by each component and minimize the variance shared among the components. Table 3 shows that it is possible to group four common factors that explain 74.076% of the accumulated variance.

Table 3 . Total variance explained.

The extraction of four principal components shows in Table 4 the variables that are significantly associated with each of them when having loadings ≥0.3.

Table 4 . Rotated component matrix.

With respect to the data obtained during the piloting of the instrument, descriptive statistics were calculated for each item. Table 5 shows that the highest mean was 3.754 for item R-02, while the lowest mean was 2.257 for R-11.

Table 5 . Descriptive statistics of the pilot test.

The confirmatory factor analysis establishes a model of relationships that empirically confirms the modeled structure of the instrument after the reclassification of the items as a result of the rotated component matrix analysis. The model fit indices are as follows:

• Comparative Fit Index (CFI): CFI value is 0.839. A CFI >0.90 generally indicates a good model fit, while values >0.80 can be considered acceptable.

• Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI): The TLI value is 0.818. Similar to CFI, a TLI >0.90 is indicative of a good model fit, while values >0.80 may be considered acceptable.

• Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA): The RMSEA value is 0.122. An RMSEA ≤ 0.05 indicates a good model fit, while values between 0.05 and 0.08 indicate an acceptable fit. In this case, the RMSEA value suggests an acceptable model fit.

• Chi-square by degrees of freedom ( X 2 /df): The X 2 value is 558.472 and there are 224 degrees of freedom, resulting in an X 2 /df of ~2.49. An X 2 /df value close to 2 or less indicates a good model fit.

In summary, the fit indices suggest an acceptable overall model fit. Figure 1 presents the model generated, while Table 6 shows the reclassification of the items for the development of the final version of the measurement instrument.

Figure 1 . Results of the confirmatory factor analysis after item reclassification. Source: Own elaboration using SPSS Amos.

Table 6 . Reclassified reagents.

Finally, to measure the reliability of the instrument, the internal consistency of the instrument was estimated through the calculation of Cronbach's Alpha coefficient, obtaining a measurement precision of 0.966. According to the scale established for this measurement, the result is considered excellent.

Discussion and conclusions

The final version of the instrument allows measuring the level of financial literacy of women entrepreneurs in terms of attitudes, knowledge, behaviors and decision making aligned to the sub-competencies of complex thinking according to the results of the confirmatory factor analysis as shown in Figure 1 , given the need to promote female entrepreneurship not only as a form of self-support but also as a source of employment generation and economic growth ( UNESCO, 2017 , 2020 ; INEGI, 2020 ; UN Women, 2021 ) through financial inclusion initiatives that offer an increase in financial literacy levels allowing women entrepreneurs to face and weather the ups and downs of the economy ( Raccanello and Guzmán, 2014 ; Ali et al., 2018 ; Oggero et al., 2020 ; García-Mata, 2021a ) but also help them to enable complex reasoning competencies needed in a constantly evolving business environment ( Bay and Catasús, 2014 ; Dzwigol et al., 2020 ; Vanegas et al., 2020 ; Ramos et al., 2021 ). Knowing the level of financial literacy aligned to complex thinking competencies through the designed instrument allows the design and generation of effective financial literacy programs.

Content validity through expert judgment, as shown in Table 2 , allowed establishing the relevance of the items designed ( Escurra, 1988 ; Padilla García and Benítez, 2014 ; Sireci and Padilla, 2014 ; Matsumoto-Royo et al., 2021 ), while the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis established the construct validity and its high relationship with the dimension assigned to them, as well as the reliability and internal consistency of the data validated by calculating Cronbach's Alpha ( García and Caro, 2009 ; González and Pazmiño, 2015 ; García-González et al., 2020 ). The information collected through the instrument can be used in financial literacy programs with emphasis on complex thinking sub-competencies for financial decision making in business.

The analyses carried out show that the instrument designed is a valid and reliable measure of financial literacy aligned with complex thinking competencies in Mexican women entrepreneurs. In conclusion, this study has generated an innovative instrument that can be used to measure the mastery not only of attitudes, knowledge, behaviors and financial decision-making of women entrepreneurs in Mexico, but also their interrelation with the sub-competencies of complex thinking that are necessary in the daily practice of entrepreneurship in the country.

A possible limitation of this study is related to the participants, since it was applied to women with some initiative to support entrepreneurship and who also have access to the internet through a mobile device, which leaves out those with lower socioeconomic status and/or limited use of electronic devices or digital media or who do not belong to any network to promote entrepreneurship. The validation of this instrument through its application to a population sample that includes women entrepreneurs who do not have the support of business development initiatives and in areas with limited access to internet or mobile devices is recommended to cover this limitation. Another future line of research is the design of longitudinal research to measure the effects over time of a personalized financial literacy initiative and its impact not only on the lengthening of the life of the business but also on its growth and performance levels, on the other hand, the possibility of studying in depth the impact of the empowerment in complex thinking skills for the empowerment of female entrepreneurship is generated.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the study involving human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent to participate in this study was not required from the participants in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

KB-C: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MR-M: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. AE-R: Writing – review & editing. MM-B: Writing – review & editing.

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors acknowledge the financial support of Tecnologico de Monterrey through the “Challenge-Based Research Funding Program 2022”. Project ID # I005 - IFE001 - C2-T3 - T also academic support from Writing Lab, Institute for the Future of Education.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Agnew, S., Maras, P., and Moon, A. (2018). Gender differences in financial socialization in the home-an exploratory study. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 42, 275–282. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12415

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 45, 131–142. doi: 10.1177/0013164485451012

Ali, H., Omar, E. N., and Nasir, H. A. (2018). “Financial literacy of entrepreneurs in the small and medium enterprises,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Advances in Business Research International Conference , eds. F. Noordin, A. K. Othman, and E. S. Kassim (New York, NY: Springer), 31–38. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-6053-3_4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Anshika and Singla, A.. (2022). Financial literacy of entrepreneurs: a systematic review. Manag. Financ. 48, 1352–1371. doi: 10.1108/MF-06-2021-0260

Anshika, Singla, A., and Mallik, G. (2021). Determinants of financial literacy: empirical evidence from micro and small enterprises in India. Asia Pac. Manag. Rev. 26, 248–255. doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.03.001

Baporikar, N., and Akino, S. (2020). Financial literacy imperative for success of women entrepreneurship. Int. J. Innov. Digit. Econ. 11, 1–21. doi: 10.4018/IJIDE.2020070101

Barte, R. (2012). Financial Literacy in MicroEnterprises: The Case of Cebu Fish Vendors. Philippine Management Review. Available online at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Financial-Literacy-in-Micro%C2%ADEnterprises%3A-The-Case-Barte/30d8488d3afac1532fb69377e5e00990e2c0527e (accesed November 4, 2023).

Google Scholar

Bay, C., and Catasús, B. (2014). Situating financial literacy. Crit. Perspect. Account. 25, 36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2012.11.011

Bertrand, J., and Osei-Tutu, F. (2022). Language gender-marking and borrower discouragement. Econ. Lett. 212:110298. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110298

CNBV, I. (2012). National Financial Inclusion Survey (ENIF). Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores, 85. Available onlie at: https://www.cnbv.gob.mx/Inclusi%C3%B3n/Paginas/Encuestas.aspx (accesed November 4, 2023).

Cruz-Sandoval, M., Vázquez-Parra, J. C., and Carlos-Arroyo, M. (2023). Complex thinking and social entrepreneurship. an approach from the methodology of compositional data analysis. Heliyon 9:e13415. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13415

Dzwigol, H., Dzwigol-Barosz, M., Miśkiewicz, R., and Kwilinski, A. (2020). Manager competency assessment model in the conditions of industry 4.0. Entrep. Sustain. Iss. 7, 2630–2644. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(5)

Eniola, A. A., and Entebang, H. (2017). SME managers and financial literacy. Glob. Bus. Rev. 18, 559–576. doi: 10.1177/0972150917692063

Escobar-Pérez, J., and Martínez, A. (2008). Content validity and expert judgment: an approach to their use. Av. Medición 6, 27–36. doi: 10.32870/ap.v9n2.993

Escurra, L. M. (1988). Quantification of content validity by criterion judges. J. Psychol. 6, 103–111.

García, J. A. M., and Caro, L. M. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis and the validity of scales in causal models. Ann. Psychol. 25:2. doi: 10.6018/analesps

García-González, A., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., and León, G. D. (2020). Social entrepreneurship as a transversal competence: construction and validation of an assessment instrument in the university context. REVESCO J. Coop. Stud. 136:e71862. doi: 10.5209/reve.71862

García-Mata, O. (2021a). The effect of financial literacy and gender on retirement planning among young adults. Int. J. Bank Market. 39, 1068–1090. doi: 10.1108/IJBM-10-2020-0518

García-Mata, O. (2021b). Financial literacy among millennials in Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Estud. Gerenciales 37, 399–412. doi: 10.18046/j.estger.2021.160.4021

González, J. A., and Pazmiño, M. R. (2015). Calculation and interpretation of Cronbach's Alpha for the case of validation of the internal consistency of a questionnaire, with two possible Likert-type scales. Rev. Publ. 2, 62–77. Available online at: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-423821

Guliman, S. D. (2015). An evaluation of financial literacy of micro and small enterprise owners in Iligan city: knowledge and skills. J. Glob. Bus . 4, 17−23.

INEGI (2020). Economic Censuses 2019. Available online at: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ce/2019/ (accesed November 4, 2023).

INEGI (2021). Encuesta Nacional de Inclusión Financiera (ENIF) 2021 ( p. 30). Available online at: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enif/2021/#Documentacion (accesed November 4, 2023).

INMUJERES (2022). Inequality in figures (Bulletin No. 5). National Institute of Women, 2. Available online at: http://estadistica-sig.inmujeres.gob.mx/formas/temas.php (accesed November 4, 2023).

Lusardi, A. (2001). Explaining Why so Many People Do Not Save (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 285978) . Rochester, NY. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.285978

Lusardi, A. (2008). Planning and financial literacy: how do women fare? American Econ. Rev. 98, 413–417. doi: 10.1257/aer.98.2.413

Lusardi, A. (2011). Financial literacy around the world: an overview. J. Pension Econ. Finan. 10, 497–508. doi: 10.1017/S1474747211000448

Lusardi, A., and Mitchell, O. (2009). How Ordinary Consumers Make Complex Economic Decisions: Financial Literacy and Retirement Readiness (No. w15350; p. w15350). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi: 10.3386/w15350

MacCallum, R., Widaman, K., Zhang, S., and Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol. Methods 4, 84–99. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84

Manzanera-Román, S., and Brändle, G. (2016). Abilities and skills as factors explaining the differences in women entrepreneurship. Suma Neg . 7, 38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.sumneg.2016.02.001

Matsumoto-Royo, K., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., and Conget, P. (2021). Design and validation of a questionnaire to assess opportunities for pedagogical practice, metacognition and lifelong learning provided by initial teacher education programs. Stud. Educ. 41, 131–161.

Muñoz-Murillo, M., Álvarez-Franco, P. B., and Restrepo-Tobón, D. A. (2020). The role of cognitive abilities on financial literacy: new experimental evidence. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 84:101482. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2019.101482

Niwaha, M., Tibihikirra, P., and Tumuramye, P. (2016). Entrepreneurship and financial literacy: an insight into financial practices of rural small and micro business owners in the Rwenzori region.

OECD (2018). Pisa results (Volume IV): Are students smart about money? Available online at: https://www.oecd.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-iv-48ebd1ba-en.htm (accesed November 4, 2023).

OECD (2019). OECD/INFE survey instrument to measure the financial literacy of MSMEs , 42. Available online at: https://www.oecd.org/financial/education/2020-survey-to-measure-msme-financial-literacy.pdf (accesed November 4, 2023).

OECD (n/d). Financial Literacy test-PISA . Available online at: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/test/financialliteracytest/ (accessed March 12 2023).

Oggero, N., Rossi, M. C., and Ughetto, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial spirits in women and men. The role of financial literacy and digital skills. Small Bus. Econ. 55, 313–327. doi: 10.1007/s11187-019-00299-7

Osei-Tutu, F., and Weill, L. (2021). Sex, language and financial inclusion * . Econ. Trans. Inst. Change 29, 369–403. doi: 10.1111/ecot.12262

Pacheco-Velázquez, E. A., Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Cruz-Sandoval, M., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., and Carlos-Arroyo, M. (2023). Business decision-making and complex thinking: a bibliometric study. MDPI 13:80. doi: 10.3390/admsci13030080

Padilla García, J. L., and Benítez, I. (2014). Validity Evidence Based on Response Processes. Granada.

Penfield, R. D., and Giacobbi, P. R. Jr. (2004). Applying a score confidence interval to aiken's item content-relevance index. Meas. Phys. Educ. Exerc. Sci. 8, 213–225. doi: 10.1207/s15327841mpee0804_3

Raccanello, K., and Guzmán, E. H. (2014). Education and financial inclusion. Rev. Latinoam. Estud. Educativos 44:2. doi: 10.48102/rlee.2014.44.2.250

Rachapaettayakom, P., Wiriyapinit, M., Cooharojananone, N., Tanthanongsakkun, S., and Charoenruk, N. (2020). The need for financial knowledge acquisition tools and technology by small business entrepreneurs. J. Innov. Entrep. 9. doi: 10.1186/s13731-020-00136-2

Rahim, S., and Binod, R. B. (2021). Financial literacy: the impact on the profitability of the SMEs in kuching. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 21, 1172–1191. doi: 10.33736/ijbs.3333.2020

Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Sanabria-Zepeda, J., and Miranda, J. (2022). Complex thinking in the framework of education 4.0 and open innovation: a systematic literature review. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 8. doi: 10.3390/joitmc8010004

Ramos, E. V. R., Otero, C. A., and Heredia, F. D. (2021). Competency-based training of the management professional: from a contingency approach. Rev. Cienc. Soc. 451–466. doi: 10.31876/rcs.v27i2.35933

Sireci, S., and Padilla, J. L. (2014). Validating assessments: introduction to the special section. Psicothema 26, 97–99. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.255

UN Women (2021). Win-Win: Gender Equality is Good Business . UN Women. Available online at: https://lac.unwomen.org/es/digiteca/publicaciones/2021/09/ganar-ganar-la-igualdad-de-genero-es-un-buen-negocio (accesed November 4, 2023).

UNESCO (2017). UNESCO Moves Forward. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development . United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Available online at: https://es.unesco.org/creativity/files/unesco-avanza-agenda-2030-para-desarrollo-sostenible (accesed November 4, 2023).

UNESCO (2020). Summary of the Global Education Monitoring Report, 2020: Inclusion and Education: All without Exception . Available online at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373721_spa (accesed November 4, 2023).

Valenzuela, J. R., and Flores Fahara, J. R. (2013). Fundamentos de Investigación Educativa , Vol. 2, 1st Edn. Monterrey: Editorial Digital Tecnológico de Monterrey.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Vanegas, J. G., Mesa, M. A. A., and Gómez-Betancur, L. (2020). Financial education in women: a study in the López de Mesa neighborhood of Medellín1. Rev. Fac. Cienc. Econ. 28, 121–141. doi: 10.18359/rfce.4929

Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Castillo-Martínez, I. M., and Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022a). Development of the perception of achievement of complex thinking: a disciplinary approach in a Latin American student population. Educ. Sci. 12:5. doi: 10.3390/educsci12050289

Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., and Amézquita-Zamora, J. A. (2023). Gender gap in the perceived mastery of reasoning-for-complexity competency: an approach in Latin America. J. Appl. Res. High. Educ . 12. doi: 10.1108/JARHE-11-2022-0355

Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Cruz-Sandoval, M., and Carlos-Arroyo, M. (2022b). Social Entrepreneurship and complex thinking: a bibliometric study. Sustainability 14:20. doi: 10.3390/su142013187

Whitehouse, M. (2018). The language of numbers. transdisciplinary action research and financial communication. AILA Rev. 31, 81–112. doi: 10.1075/aila.00014.whi

Keywords: financial literacy, complex thinking, measurement instrument, higher education, educational innovation

Citation: Bayly-Castaneda K, Ramírez-Montoya MS, Erdély-Ruiz A and Montoya-Bayardo MA (2024) Financial literacy to develop complex thinking skills: quantitative measurement in Mexican women entrepreneurs. Front. Educ. 9:1331866. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1331866

Received: 01 November 2023; Accepted: 29 May 2024; Published: 03 July 2024.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2024 Bayly-Castaneda, Ramírez-Montoya, Erdély-Ruiz and Montoya-Bayardo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, solramirez@tec.mx

† ORCID: Karla Bayly-Castaneda orcid.org/0000-0002-4170-6072 María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-706X Arturo Erdély-Ruiz orcid.org/0000-0003-1653-8342 Miguel Angel Montoya-Bayardo orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-6334

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Get the Reddit app

For students from the Philippines, by students from the Philippines. For strand, course, and admission questions, please post on r/CollegeAdmissionsPH

Any good experimental quantitative research topic for STEM students?

Need help please, I made 5 proposals for the past weeks but all got rejected dahil either not STEM related or just not feasible at all according to our research teacher. I seriously need your help guys, lutang na lutang na isip ko kakaisip ng research topic and worse, haggang Friday nalang since computan na ng grades for 1st quarter :((

IMAGES

Quantitative Research Titles for STEM Students
Proposed Research Titles of Grade 12 Stem Students
Quantitative-Research-Proposal-Topics-list.pdf
😂 Quantitative research title. Format for a quantitative research
Research Titles for STEM Strand Student
10 Examples Of Quantitative Research Titles And Their Research Design

VIDEO

Practical Research 2 Lesson 11 Quantitative Research Designs- STEM 12
SAMPLE QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH TITLES
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH TITLES FOR STEM STUDENTS #researchtitle #qualitativeresearch #stem
Sample Qualitative and Quantitative Research Titles
Developing Research Titles: Single and Double Topics
How to Develop Quantitative Research Titles: Means and Ends

COMMENTS

200+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For Stem Students
Here are 10 practical research topics for STEM students: Developing an affordable and sustainable water purification system for rural communities. Designing a low-cost, energy-efficient home heating and cooling system. Investigating strategies for reducing food waste in the supply chain and households.
Top 200 Quantitative Research Title for Stem Students
Quantitative research involves gathering numerical data to answer specific questions, and it's a fundamental part of STEM fields. To help you get started on your research journey, we've compiled a list of 200 quantitative research title for stem students. These titles span various STEM disciplines, from biology to computer science.
Best 151+ Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students
Chemistry. Let's get started with some quantitative research topics for stem students in chemistry: 1. Studying the properties of superconductors at different temperatures. 2. Analyzing the efficiency of various catalysts in chemical reactions. 3. Investigating the synthesis of novel polymers with unique properties. 4.
189+ Good Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students
Following are the best Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students in mathematics and statistics. Prime Number Distribution: Investigate the distribution of prime numbers. Graph Theory Algorithms: Develop algorithms for solving graph theory problems. Statistical Analysis of Financial Markets: Analyze financial data and market trends.
60+ Best Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students: Dive into Data
Embark on a captivating journey through the cosmos of knowledge with our curated guide on Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students. Explore innovative ideas in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, designed to ignite curiosity and shape the future. Unleash the power of quantitative research and dive into uncharted territories ...
Best 101 Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students
101 Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students Biology Research Topics. Effect of Temperature on Enzyme Activity: Investigate how different temperatures affect the efficiency of enzymes in biological reactions. The Impact of Pollution on Aquatic Ecosystems: Analyze the correlation between pollution levels and the health of aquatic ecosystems. Genetic Variability in Human Populations: Study ...
55 Brilliant Research Topics For STEM Students
There are several science research topics for STEM students. Below are some possible quantitative research topics for STEM students. A study of protease inhibitor and how it operates. A study of how men's exercise impacts DNA traits passed to children. A study of the future of commercial space flight.
PDF List Of 125+ Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students
environmental science. These research endeavors contribute to theoretical frameworks and practical applications, technological innovations, and evidence-based decision-making. Here is a list of 200 quantitative research topics for STEM students. Keep in mind that. these topics cover a broad range of disciplines within STEM The impact of ...
210 Best Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students
Here are the key characteristics of quantitative research topics for STEM Students: Measurable Data: Quantitative topics examine things that can be measured and quantified with numbers, allowing statistical analysis of the data. Statistical Analysis: Quantitative topics use mathematical statistics to analyze numerical data and spot patterns ...
Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal
With the rapid increase in the number of scholarly publications on STEM education in recent years, reviews of the status and trends in STEM education research internationally support the development of the field. For this review, we conducted a systematic analysis of 798 articles in STEM education published between 2000 and the end of 2018 in 36 journals to get an overview about developments ...
100+ Best Quantitative Research Topics For Students In 2023
An example of quantitative research topics for 12 th -grade students will come in handy if you want to score a good grade. Here are some of the best ones: The link between global warming and climate change. What is the greenhouse gas impact on biodiversity and the atmosphere.
199+ Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students to Try Now
Discover engaging Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students - Explore the world of science, tech, engineering, and math with simplified, fascinating ideas.
199+ Engaging Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students
199+ Engaging Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students. March 20, 2024 by Rupam. Discover engaging quantitative research topics for STEM students, spanning energy solutions, medical advancements, and cutting-edge technology. Explore hands-on ideas to sharpen skills and make a tangible impact on the future. Hey STEM buddy!
11 STEM Research Topics for High School Students
Scholar Launch has compiled a list of 11 compelling research ideas tailored for STEM students: . Topic 1: Artificial Intelligence (AI) AI stands at the forefront of technological innovation. Students can engage in research on AI applications in various sectors and the ethical implications of AI. This field is suitable for students with ...
189+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students
Here are 8 key points on how to do experimental research effectively. 1. Clear Research Focus. Begin by defining a clear and focused research question. A well-defined question provides a purpose and direction for your experiment, guiding your choices in variables and methodology. 2.
500+ Quantitative Research Titles and Topics
Quantitative research involves collecting and analyzing numerical data to identify patterns, trends, and relationships among variables. This method is widely used in social sciences, psychology, economics, and other fields where researchers aim to understand human behavior and phenomena through statistical analysis.
Trends and Hot Topics of STEM and STEM Education: a Co-word ...
This study explored research trends in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Descriptive analysis and co-word analysis were used to examine articles published in Social Science Citation Index journals from 2011 to 2020. From a search of the Web of Science database, a total of 761 articles were selected as target samples for analysis. A growing number of STEM ...
Trending Topic Research: STEM
Trending Topic Research File. Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) is one of the most talked about topics in education, emphasizing research, problem solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The following compendium of open-access articles are inclusive of all substantive AERA journal content regarding STEM published since ...
23+ Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students In ...
Here are the top quantitative research topics for STEM students in the Philippines in 2024. 1. Impact of Climate Change on Farming. Analyze how changing weather affects the growth of crops like rice and corn in different parts of the Philippines. Use numbers to find ways and suggest ways farmers can adapt. 2.
Research Trends in STEM Clubs: A Content Analysis
Worldwide, STEM education, which integrates the disciplines of science, technology, engineering, and math, is gaining popularity in K-12 settings due to its capacity to enhance 21st-century skills such as adaptability, problem-solving, and creative thinking (National Research Council [NRC], 2015).In STEM lessons, students are frequently guided by the engineering design process, which involves ...
Quantitative research title suggestions : r/studentsph
Combination of Statistics and Biology? It will be easier if you already have specific parameters e.g. Correlational Analysis on the Efficiency of [METHOD] Teaching for Grade 12 Students in 2nd Semestral [STEM SUBJ] Final Grade Reports. In this way, possible topics for your research will come naturally and will be more appropriate depending on ...
Can someone help us pick our research topic for Stem which ...
We were having trouble picking out our quantitative research topics that must be related to stem. Some of our old title proposals were rejected because it was hard to quantify and required a diploma to do. We would like to do research that is a bit unique and doable for us students. Here are some of the title drafts we've thought of:
Research Topics for STEM Quantitative : r/studentsph
Currently I have these topics but my teacher suggested that we won't use "Academic Performance" because its too common. -stress levels of grade 12 students in online education -level of preparedness in making research of grade 12 students -The Effects of Online Learning on Senior High School Grade-12 STEM Student's Academic Performance ...
MS Economics Academics
The optional math bootcamp ahead of the program ensures all students have the opportunity to be fully prepared to succeed. Core courses. For the first half of the program, you'll take core courses in microeconomics, macroeconomics, and data science and econometrics, taught by leading economists with an extensive research record on these topics.
Financial literacy to develop complex thinking skills: quantitative
This article is part of the Research Topic Building the Future of Education Together: Innovation, Complexity, Sustainability, Interdisciplinary Research and Open Science View all 14 articles Financial literacy to develop complex thinking skills: quantitative measurement in Mexican women entrepreneurs
Any good experimental quantitative research topic for STEM students
Since you are a STEM student (like me but Im already College), most experimental quanti researches I've read so far are alternatives of this and that (eg. Alternative for Cell Staining)... so take time to go to library and read existing research. Need help please, I made 5 proposals for the past weeks but all got rejected dahil either not STEM ...
Study Reveals How Risk Preferences Shape Online Trading Outcomes
A study co-authored by a researcher at Tulane University's A. B. Freeman School of Business has uncovered important insights into how individual investors' risk preferences influence their online trading behaviors and performance.. Yang Pan, assistant professor of management science, analyzed data from over 7,000 investor accounts at a major Chinese brokerage firm over a 44-month period from ...

200+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students In 2023

What Is STEM?

Why STEM Research Is Important?

How to Choose a Topic for STEM Research Paper

Step 1: Identify Your Interests

Step 2: Research Existing Topics

Step 3: Consider Real-World Problems

Step 4: Talk to Teachers and Mentors

Step 5: Narrow Down Your Topic

Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students:

Easy Experimental Research Topics for STEM Students:

Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines:

Read More

Good Research Topics for STEM Students:

Unique Research Topics for STEM Students:

Experimental Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines

Capstone Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines:

Experimental Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students:

Descriptive Research Topics for STEM Students

Research Topics for STEM Students in the Pandemic:

Research Topics for STEM Students Middle School

Technology Research Topics for STEM Students

Scientific Research Topics for STEM Students

Interesting Research Topics for STEM Students:

Practical Research Topics for STEM Students

Experimental Research Topics for STEM Students About Plants

Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines

Science Research Topics for STEM Students

Correlational Research Topics for STEM Students

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines

Things That Must Keep In Mind While Writing Quantitative Research Title

1. Be Clear and Precise

2. Use Important Words

3. Avoid Confusing Words

4. Show Your Research Approach

5. Match Your Title with Your Research Questions

Related Posts

Step by Step Guide on The Best Way to Finance Car

The Best Way on How to Get Fund For Business to Grow it Efficiently

Best 151+ Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

What is Quantitative Research in STEM?

Importance of Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

1. Empirical Evidence

2. Data-Driven Decision-Making

3. Innovation

4. Problem Solving

5. Interdisciplinary Applications

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Biology and Life Sciences

Engineering

Environmental Science

Computer Science

Mathematics

Earth Sciences

Health Sciences and Medicine

Related Posts

10 Online Tutoring Help Benefits

189+ Good Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students

What Is Quantitative Research

How To Choose Quantitative Research Topics For STEM

Step 1:- Identify Your Interests and Passions

Step 2:- Review Coursework and Textbooks

Step 3:- Consult with Professors and Advisors

Step 4:- Read Recent Literature

Step 5:- Narrow Down Your Focus

Step 6:- Consider Resources and Access

Step 7:- Think About Practicality

Step 8:- Define Your Research Question

Step 9:- Conduct a Literature Review

Step 10:- Consider the Impact

Step 11:- Brainstorm Research Methods

Step 12:- Seek Feedback

Step 13:- Assess Ethical Considerations

Step 14:- Finalize Your Research Topic

Step 15:- Stay Open to Adjustments

Quantitative Research Topics In Physics and Astronomy

Quantitative Research Topics In Biology and Life Sciences

Engineering and Technology Quantitative Research Topics

Quantitative Research Topics In Mathematics and Statistics

Experimental Quantitative Research Topics In Science and Earth Sciences