research papers on business ethics

The effects of business ethics and corporate social responsibility on intellectual capital voluntary disclosure

Journal of Intellectual Capital

ISSN : 1469-1930

Article publication date: 9 March 2021

Issue publication date: 17 December 2021

This study aims to examine the potential effect that business ethics (BE) in general and corporate social responsibility (CSR) more specifically can exert on the voluntary disclosure (VD) of intellectual capital (IC) for the ethically most engaged firms in the world.

Design/methodology/approach

The research design is based on an inductive approach. As part of the global quantitative investigation, the authors have analyzed the impact of BE and CSR on the transparent communication of the IC. The data under analysis have been investigated using multiple linear regression.

Based on a sample of 83 enterprises emerging as the most ethical companies in the world, the results have revealed that the adoption of ethical and socially responsible approach is positively associated with the extent of VD about IC. This finding may help attenuating the asymmetry of information and the conflict of interest potentially arising with corporate partners. Hence, IC-VD may stand as an evidence of ethical and socially responsible behaviors.

Practical implications

Global and national regulators and policymakers can be involved by these results when setting social reporting standards because they suggest that institutional and/or cultural factors affect top management's social reporting behavior in the publication of the IC information.

Social implications

Direct and indirect stakeholders, if supported by ethical and socially responsible behaviors of the company, could assess more in detail the quality of the disclosed information concerning the IC.

Originality/value

Most of the studies that have been conducted in this field have examined the effect of BE and CSR on the firm's overall transparency, neglecting their potential effect on IC disclosure. This study is designed to fill in this gap through testing the impact of ethical and socially responsible approaches specifically on IC-VD.

• Business ethics
• Corporate social responsibility
• Voluntary disclosure
• Intellectual capital
• Transparency

Rossi, M. , Festa, G. , Chouaibi, S. , Fait, M. and Papa, A. (2021), "The effects of business ethics and corporate social responsibility on intellectual capital voluntary disclosure", Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2020-0287

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Matteo Rossi, Giuseppe Festa, Salim Chouaibi, Monica Fait and Armando Papa

Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

1. Introduction

Over the last few decades, firms have been generating value not only from securities and financials but also from other intangible elements, such as skills of employees (human capital), novelty in technology (structural capital), relationships with customers (direct relational capital) and reputation on the market (indirect relational capital or social capital), all forms of potential intellectual capital (IC), whose contribution, however, is probably riskier than industrial assets ( Su, 2014 ; Cruz-González et al. , 2014 ). In fact, the impact of IC on the business results is uncertain, and in addition, it is often more difficult to identify and measure its characteristics ( Murray et al. , 2016 ).

The uncertainty about its representation and measurement still poses issues related to accounting, evaluation and governance ( Hussi, 2004 ; Guthrie et al. , 2006 ; Hamed and Omri, 2014 ). To limit these problems, managers may choose voluntary disclosure (VD) to reduce the asymmetry of the information ( Branco and Rodrigues, 2008 ).

IC is a driving factor and creator of lasting value ( Lin et al. , 2015 ; Vaz et al. , 2019 ), and disclosure by applying ethical and social principles improves the trust of information and reduces the conflict of interest ( Alves et al. , 2012 ; Chung et al. , 2015 ; Al Maskati and Hamdan, 2017 ). These behaviors may exert a positive effect on the global quality of the IC-VD ( Melloni, 2015 ), and in this study, more specifically, VD of nonfinancial information about IC are assumed to be positively influenced by ethical and socially responsible behaviors of the company's decision-makers ( Corvino et al. , 2019 ).

In this respect, interest in the development of business ethics (BE) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in accounting, evaluation and management has gained increasing attention in the academic literature ( Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998 ), and the last 20 years (or even more) of empirical research on these issues have generated vast literature ( Gray et al. , 1995 ; Chen and Gavious, 2015 ; Singh and Gaur, 2020 ). Accordingly, the quality of the information published by companies about their IC has received an ever more peculiar interest in managerial research ( Ousama and Fatima, 2012 ; Muttakin et al. , 2015 ; Devalle et al. , 2016 ; Bellucci et al. , 2020 ), with specific concerns about the effect of BE and CSR on the quality of the disclosed information on voluntary or mandatory basis, also considering several financial scandals that have added doubts about relevance and reliability of some company data ( Lehnert et al. , 2016 ).

Subsequently, a critical question is the following: is it adequate, opportune and reliable to take into consideration only the accounting information that mandatorily concern IC, especially considering that this entity is so difficult to identify and measure? This issue seems deserving huge attention particularly in the current context, constantly and continuously marked by the rise of BE and CSR, with consequent effect also on the relevance of the quality of the disclosed information.

For example, the legitimacy theory provides some contributions regarding environmental reputation, and the related effect of VD on reputational capital ( Alvino et al. , 2020 ). In this respect, the reputation of the company is a social construct stemming from the process of legitimization ( Bond et al. , 2016 ).

However, empirical studies investigating the effect of BE and CSR on VD have proved mixed results, mostly because of the different meaning about ethics and responsibility in each institutional and cultural context ( Ting et al. , 2020 ). The current study aims to combat this diversity and its consequences in terms of value creation, analyzing more specifically the potential effect of BE and CSR on the VD of IC ( Giacosa et al. , 2017 ).

The perimeter of the research regards the companies that are ranked by the Ethisphere Institute – most probably the global leader in the world for defining and advancing the standards of ethical and social practices that fuel corporate character, market trust and business success – as the most ethical companies in the world. More precisely, the contribution of the study is in checking whether the companies' behavior about IC disclosure is influenced by BE and CSR, aspect that has been often neglected in other studies.

In this respect, a research concerning companies displaying high level of ethical and socially responsible commitment has been conducted, with two main ambitions. First, results should enable to explicitly identify the characteristics that are more likely to influence the diffusion of information about IC in the annual reports through adoption of BE and CSR; second, it should help exploring the contribution of the several company characteristics as assessed in terms of ethics-based scoring.

The empirical evidence emerging from the research has demonstrated that the adoption of approaches that are based on BE and CSR noticeably help in enhancing the disclosure extent of the IC information as figuring in annual reports. Thus, this study should serve to provide further recommendations to the companies intending to adopt codes of ethics, or to put forward CSR practices, encouraging these behaviors also from the point of view of the IC disclosure (and consequent accounting, evaluation and management).

The structure of this paper is organized as follows; Section 2 presents the basic theoretical background and the hypotheses that have been developed: in this section, the relationship between the potential effect of BE and CSR on the VD of IC has been analyzed. Section 3 displays the methodology that has been adopted, while the empirical results are exposed and discussed in Section 4 ; finally, the discussions of the findings, the concluding remarks and their implications are provided in Section 5 .

2. Theoretical background and hypotheses development

As aforementioned, the following investigation is about the effect of BE and CSR on IC-VD, also for clarifying the distinct influences that may arise from concepts that sometimes are considered in ambiguous connection ( Fassin et al. , 2011 ). Therefore, the first step of the research is about a general analysis of the studies focusing on the association between ethical as well as socially responsible behaviors and IC-VD as core aspect of a more global knowledge management approach that cutting-edge enterprises should adopt to succeed ( Serenko and Bontis, 2013 ).

2.1 Theoretical background

To present main reasons and usefulness of the VD of information about IC, the theory of planned behavior has been adopted as fundamental approach. In fact, although extensive research has focused on the variables that externally and internally may influence the managers' decision about disclosing information on IC, few studies have examined in this respect the psychological factors and have used a theoretical decision-making framework ( Coluccia et al. , 2017 ; McPhail, 2009 ).

The theory of planned behavior, largely used to explain the process of individual decision-making behavior ( Ajzen, 1991 ), can emerge as a theoretical framework for investigating the psychosocial factors stimulating the managers' decision to disclose IC information in a mandatory and/or voluntary way. In addition, this model has demonstrated its superiority over other theoretical approaches in many contexts of VD, including IC ( Zhang et al. , 2019 ).

This theory assumes that when individuals, considering altogether internal attitudes and external considerations, perceive a manageable activity as capable of providing business benefits, such as those that may arise from IC-VD, they receive intention, support and encouragement in adopting that specific behavior, also making assumptions about their ability to perform the task ( Passaro et al. , 2018 ; Mura et al. , 2012 ).

For example, Armitage and Conner (2001) examined 185 empirical studies that were conducted prior to 1997, finding that about 39 and 27% of the variance of intention and behavior, respectively, was caused by the theory of planned behavior. In fact, this theory is a rational decision-making model, which is mainly used to predict the potential behavioral intentions of the managers (in this specific case, adopting VD of IC).

Three key independent variables are at the basis of this framework: (1) the attitudes toward a particular behavior; (2) the perceptions of others' approval or disapproval of a particular behavior (subjective norms) and (3) the perceived behavioral control about easiness or difficulty in performing a particular behavior ( Ajzen, 1991 ). This configuration is adopted as methodological basis for the theoretical model in which assessing the following hypotheses.

2.2 Hypotheses development (H1) : BE and VD of IC

Transparent and reliable communication is essential to reflect the true image of a company ( Bhimani, 2008 ): with this regard, financial transparency is a necessary condition for a firm that is involved in the BE process. In the specific context of disclosure, several authors have recognized that BE rooted in organizational culture has a tremendous influence on the development of IC-VD ( Branco and Rodrigues, 2008 ).

For example, Jo et al. (2008) have analyzed the development of ethical standards in the business to improve the quality of the disclosed information, finding that entrepreneurs and managers that consider the promotion of ethical behaviors are urged to ensure permanent disclosure of the company's IC. Later, Navid et al. (2015) have found that unethical behaviors are at the basis of corporate financial scandals, workplace frauds and harassment or misleading financial reporting: such issues have raised awareness about the positive benefits of ethical behavior, also in improving VD (and then, also about IC), to limit the problems of the agency theory.

Mouritsen (2004) has found a significant gap between the market value and the book value resulting from the failure of the companies' hidden value in their annual reports: consequently, BE oriented to IC-VD would limit the problem of the business undervaluation (more specifically, VD of information about IC is positively influenced by the ethical behavior of the company's decision-makers).

On the other hand, the complexity and uncertainty of strategic decision-making require different combinations of data, information and knowledge. In this respect, some research has been conducted to examine the factors influencing disclosure of IC: Ferreira et al. (2012) have found that ownership concentration and firm size have a positive influence on the disclosure of IC, and ethical behaviors also positively influence this disclosure.

Several studies suggest that there are many benefits to acting ethically, such as improving the financial and nonfinancial performances as well as creating a sustainable competitive advantage ( Goel and Ramanathan, 2014 ; Khondkar et al. , 2016 ). In addition, in highly risky and uncertain contexts, policymakers are forced to select powerful tools over VD.

BE behaviors have positive impact on the extent of the IC-VD.

2.3 Hypotheses development (H2) : CSR and VD of IC

The economic value of the company is expressed not only by its means of production but also by the global impact that fundamentally derives from its IC ( Campanella et al. , 2014 ), activating human, structural and relational resources to generate shared value ( Porter and Kramer, 2011 ) at business, social and environmental level ( Elkington, 1998 ). As result, a new path on IC reporting sustains that all companies are increasingly required to be socially responsible and to better manage their environmental impact ( Aslam et al. , 2018 ).

In this vein, organizations have developed accounting and management systems and improved their disclosure practices according to social and environmental principles ( Khondkar et al. , 2016 ). In part, this has been due also to the fact that companies may have incentives for adopting globally responsible approaches and operating socially responsible initiatives ( Gangi et al. , 2019 ); however, a study by Türkel et al. (2016) on the European Union has provided evidence that CSR is a mean that companies may voluntarily decide to adopt to contribute to better society and cleaner environment.

From one side, Sun et al. (2010) have found that companies that need to pursue a strategy of VD of IC are brought to value CSR, and this should be positively interpreted by the various stakeholders. On the other side, regarding the potential asymmetry of information and conflict of interest that may exist, CSR should constitute a behavioral method that would have positive effect on the corporate behaviors, as it promotes transparency, also with regard to the potential VD of IC ( Beretta et al. , 2019 ).

Coherently to the dynamic resource capability perspective of (Bamel and Bamel, 2018) , Luthan et al. (2016) found that in an uncertain world, the adoption of a CSR approach could help reducing uncertainty, especially if the company discloses information about its IC. Similarly, some researchers argue that CSR is a very broad domain, and VD of IC should be considered as a social responsibility action ( Chan et al. , 2014 ).

Polo and Vázquez (2008) have described the relationship between CSR and the VD of information, to ensure the sustainability of the business in general and its operational goals more specifically. In other words, CSR is an asset for the company and the various stakeholders ( Fukukawa et al. , 2007 ) because of its direct contribution to IC (indirect relational capital, for example), with consequent influence on the relevance of the information provided by the company about its IC and knowledge properties more in general ( Rechberg and Syed, 2013 ).

Moreover, as aforementioned, Khondkar et al. (2016) have studied the effect of CSR on the quality of the information disclosed in companies' annual reports. They have found a positive relationship between the level of disclosure and the intensity of CSR, concluding that greater disclosure is a form of socially responsible behavior, thus directly and/or indirectly impacting IC ( Vrontis et al. , 2020 ).

CSR behaviors have positive impact on the extent of the IC-VD.

3. Research design

3.1 sample construction and data collection.

Being the main purpose of this study to explore the effect of BE and CSR on IC-VD, a sample of firms already involved in the process has been selected. In other words, the selectable companies have been detected among those with evident commitment and involvement in ethical and social behaviors.

Several statistical institutes are responsible for making an appropriate classification in this specific field: however, since 2007, the Ethisphere Institute ( Ethisphere.com ) has been analyzing the global market to identify, sector by sector, the most committed companies in the field of ethical behaviors, drawing up a list of the most ethical companies in the world and gaining at international level high reputation in the field ( BusinessWire.com ).

Then, the following investigation has been grounded on the Ethisphere Institute database, which considers more than 100 criteria; the most important are social responsibility, good governance, environmental impact, implementation of code of good behavior, commitment of the direction to questions of ethics and CSR, setting up of internal monitoring indicators, citizen investment and so on (it also considers negative criteria, such as the existence of disputes or infringements to sector regulations). This database provides a global overview, and the list of elected representatives reveals a real geographical diversity with several companies located outside the United States, such as the United Kingdom, Australia, Sweden, Germany, India, Guatemala, Poland, Switzerland, Saudi Arabia, Portugal and Belgium.

The data under investigation have been obtained from the Global-100 KPI 2015 database published by the independent Ethics Expert Group of the Ethisphere Institute (secondary, which have been then summarized into composite indexes, and not empirical data have been used to avoid any potential bias deriving from individual interviews concerning BE and CSR, most of all in the context of the planned behavior theory). Considered as one of the most authoritative indexes in the world due to its methodology and reliability, the Corporate Knights Global 100 designates each year the top 100 companies (out of several thousands) that are the most responsible in terms of ethical behavior.

The year 2015 has been chosen so that the data under analysis could be taken as definitively reliable, considering the time that sometimes is necessary to validate all the accounting information, most of all from a social and environmental point of view. Thus, the 2015 database, to the best of the authors' ability, is the latest publicly available for which it has been possible to collect all the necessary information for implementing the current investigation, but evidently the methodology can be replicated for any other year, when all necessary data would be available (for example, searching for the adequate data starting from WorldsMostEthicalCompanies.com ).

The initial population consisted of 4,353 companies (candidates); in a second step, 4,253 companies that did not meet the classification criteria for the first 100 companies were excluded. From the 100 best ranked companies, for the specific scope of the current research firms that are part of the financial sector, considering the very peculiar rules that govern this industry, have been excluded (i.e. 17 companies); thus, the final sample has included 83 firms, with Table 1 summarizing the sampling selection criteria.

Tables 2 and 3 describe the distributional profiles by country and by sector, respectively: the sample includes 18 developed countries belonging to 35 industries, according to the 48 industry group affiliations as figuring in Fama and French (1997) , with most firms that are based in the USA, the UK and France (these three countries make up 54.28% of the total sample).

The companies from the USA are at the top of the list, with 25% of the sample (20 firms out of 83, 24.09%): French and British companies are entitled of the second position in this ranking, respectively, represented with 10 companies on an equal basis. Then, Canada ranks fourth, since it is represented with eight firms, corresponding to 10% of the total sample (hence, these four countries account for almost 60% of the total sample).

In Table 3 , the most represented sectors are Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels (eight firms), Pharmaceuticals (seven firms) and Chemicals (four firms), respectively. Concerning other sectors, the number of companies is more limited (three or less).

3.2 The regression model

DISC_SCO: composite index about IC-VD, calculated as combination of several elements (cf. Table 4 ).

ETH_SCO: composite index about BE, calculated as combination of several elements reflecting ethical principles.

CSR_INDEX: composite index about CSR, calculated as combination of 40 indicators reflecting principles of individual and collective social responsibility.

INVT: the degree of innovation intensity is the ratio between research and development (R&D) costs and the turnover (concerning 2015).

TAX_PAID: the effective tax rate is the ratio between tax expenses and earnings before interest and taxes.

ETH_COUNTRY: the scores about this variable range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating a very low level of country ethics and 7 indicating a very high level of country ethics.

WOM_BOARD: this variable measures the proportion of women that are present in the boards of directors.

LEG_SYST: the legal system works as a binary variable, which numbers 1 if the company belongs to the Anglo-Saxon legal system (globally recognized as stricter), and 0 otherwise.

LEVE: the level of indebtedness is the ratio between long- and medium-term debts and total assets.

POL_SECTOR: the pollutant sector works as a binary variable, which numbers 1 if the company belongs to the polluting sectors (more regulated), and 0 otherwise.

3.3 Variables definition

To operationalize the hypotheses under test, all the variables that have been included in the empirical model are defined and commented as follows.

3.3.1 Dependent variable (“DISC_SCO”)

To measure this dimension, Li et al. (2008) have adopted a content analysis method, investigating the annual reports of selected companies to derive the qualitative, quantitative, financial as well as nonfinancial data relating to IC. In Table 4 the several components for human, structural and relational capital are reported.

In the current research, according to the measure used by Li et al. (2008) , cited also in Maaloul and Zeghal (2015) , the variable “DISC_SCO” has been adopted as a proxy of IC-VD, concerning published items about IC. Based on the examination of the annual reports, this dimension appraises the disclosed information on IC.

3.3.2 Independent variables

As aforementioned, several categories of explanatory variables have been selected to test their combined effects on the VD of IC. In the empirical model under analysis, to test H1 and H2 , two explanatory variables are naturally the most relevant, namely, BE and CSR.

3.3.2.1 BE (“ETH_SCO”)

The ethical measurement has been differently implemented in different contexts because this concept is highly complex and relates to several nonmeasurable dimensions. In addition, several studies have recently operationalized this measure by various means, originating from several international organizations.

In this research, the Ethisphere Quotient developed by the Ethisphere Institute has been adopted to measure the BE of the firms, as result of an investigation that consists of a series of multiple-choice questions that count the company's ethical performance. It is a composite index based on the combination of several items, reflecting each company's level of ethical principles.

3.3.2.2 CSR (“CSR_INDEX”)

In the current study, this measure has been derived from Dias et al. (2017) , who have constructed a list of indicators for measuring the CSR associated practices. The construct involves 40 CSR indicators categorized into three CSR dimensions (5 economic, 15 environmental and 20 social), as shown in Table 5 , thus providing a global view on the CSR of each firm.

The choice of the 40 indicators has been influenced by the most widely adopted standards on CSR disclosure (CSRD), i.e. the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Guidelines ( Bebbington et al. , 2008 ). Dias et al. (2017) have primarily focused on the GRI core indicators representing the well-established CSR indicators, and the selected items have been adapted to avoid penalizing companies that do not apply the GRI model.

CSR_INDEX = Level of CSR disclosure

e j  = Attributed analysis (1 if the disclosure item is found, and 0 otherwise)

e  = Maximum number of items a company can disclose (40).

3.3.3 The control variables: characteristics about the firm and the environment of the firm

BE and CSR are not the only factors that may influence the VD of IC. A control has been operated about other determinants of VD that have been documented in prior studies and that might explain the effects of financial and economic peculiarities of the firms on the scale and design of voluntary, and sometimes even mandatory, disclosure of IC ( Ribeiro Lucas and Costa Lourenço, 2014 ).

More specifically, control variables related to the characteristics of the firm are the following: the degree of innovation intensity (INVT), the effective tax rate (TAX_PAID), the percentage women on board of directors (WOM_BOARD), the leverage level (LEVE) and the pollutant sector (POL_SECTOR). Control variables related to the characteristics of the environment of the firm are the following: the level of country ethics (ETH_COUNTRY) and the legal system (LEG_SYST) because the sample includes several countries.

Generally, positive signs should be expected for INVT, WOM_BOARD, ETH_COUNTRY and LEG_SYST, whereas negative signs should be expected for LEVE, and POL_SECTOR, while no directional prediction is assumed for TAX_PAID. Finally, for an overall overview about the model variables composition, cf. Table 6 .

4. Empirical results and discussion

The current research, although engineered for testing specific hypotheses, has an explanatory purpose, aiming at identifying the potential determinants for the VD of the IC through ethical-and-social responsibility approach. As a result, a linear relationship could be established between the variable to be explained (IC-VD) and the potential explanatory variables (BE and CSR).

4.1 Descriptive analysis

Sections A and B, as figuring in Table 7 , provide the descriptive statistics characteristics concerning the continuous and dichotomous variables under investigation. Section A depicts mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum relevant to the continuous variables, whereas Section B provides the frequency of the dichotomous variables; globally speaking, the sample seems to be evenly distributed.

Starting with the analysis of Section A in Table 7 , the descriptive analysis provides evidence that the mean level of IC-VD (DISC_SCO) is 0.59; this score is high with respect to the Maaloul and Zeghal (2015) reached index (0.46), relevant to a sample of US companies in 2013. Moreover, the current sample encloses firms that should also tend to improve their informational capacity related to IC.

The BE score (ETH_SCO) has a mean value of 0.608. Most companies in the sample tend to be more involved in BE activities.

The CSR scores range from a minimum of 0.15 to a maximum of 0.95, with a mean of 0.698. A higher CSR score denotes that the company displays a better CSR performance ( Hassan and Guo, 2017 ).

As regards the control variables, the following considerations may arise. The intensity of innovation (INVT) displays an average of 0.068, with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 0.745; whereas the mean level of debt (LEVE) scores 33.3 (that seems an appreciable level of indebtedness), and the effective tax rate (TAX_PAID) exhibits an average of 0.166.

Regarding women's percentage on directors' boards (WOM_BOARD), it has been discovered that, on average, 0.223 of board members are female, with a minimum and a maximum value of 0.10 and 0.429, respectively. Consequently, there is predominance of men in the boards of directors.

As concerns the measure of the level of the country ethics (ETH_COUNTRY), Finland (6.4), Denmark (6.2) and Japan (6) rank as the most ethical, while Spain (3.8), Canada (3.51) and South Korea (0) exhibit the lowest ethical values. This finding is very relevant, affecting the potential influence of the countries' ethical approach on the adoption of IC-VD policies on behalf of enterprises.

From the analysis of Section B in Table 7 , highlighting the binary variables related frequencies, as regards the legal system (LEG_SYST) most of the companies in the sample turn out to pertain to the Anglo-Saxon rules (55%). Additionally, concerning the pollutant sector variable (POL_SECTOR), 51% of the companies in the sample appears to belong to nonpolluting sectors.

4.2 Correlations analysis

The Pearson coefficients were computed to examine the associations between the independent variables. According to Gujarati (2004) , if the pair-wise comparison between two independent variables is over 0.8, serious multicollinearity exists.

The maximum pair-wise value in the current investigation is 0.2649 (cf. Table 8 ); thus, multicollinearity should not be a concern for the regression analysis. Nonetheless, the null hypothesis of autocorrelation can be accepted because the explanatory variables are weakly correlated with each other, indicating that autocorrelation is not a problem. Table 8 presents all the correlation coefficients between the various explanatory variables that have been adopted in the empirical model.

The intercorrelations for all the explanatory variables have been examined by applying the variance inflation factors (VIF) analysis, which revealed no sign of multicollinearity. In fact, the VIF values corresponding to all the independent variables ranged from 1.05 to 1.47, very far below the acceptable upper bound of 10 ( Hair et al. , 2006 ).

The VIF values have been reported for each regression to demonstrate the model stability. Finally, both tests suggest that the regression estimations are not degraded by the presence of multicollinearity.

4.3 Regression analysis

The empirical results reveal that 32.5% of the variation for the level of IC-VD is explained by BE, CSR and control-related variables (cf. Table 9 ). As per Fisher's ( F ) statistics, equal to 2.8, the model's reliability is confirmed at a significant threshold lower than 0.01, and consequently, we tend to reject the null hypothesis, and assume that regression has significant potential to exist.

As expected, the empirical findings, even though with not definitive statistical values, in accordance with the exploratory nature of the research, show some evidence about supporting the research hypotheses ( H1 and H2 ), as further analyzed in detail. Thus, it can be concluded that the model is statistically significant and somehow fruitful for exploring the phenomenon under investigation.

4.3.1 Empirical evidence on BE impacting IC-VD ( H1 )

This hypothesis has been assumed to verify whether the ethical behavior of the companies under analysis positively influences the level of VD of IC: examination of the statistical tests (beta coefficient, t -test and p -value) shows that this variable has a positive and significant effect on the VD of IC. Indeed, the study of causal relationships shows that the coefficient associated with the link between BE and IC-VD is positive (0.485) and statistically significant (the value of the associated t is 1.99 with p  = 0.045), corroborating the hypothesis predictions ( H1 ).

It could be noted the existence of some similarity between these findings and those published by Wirth et al. (2016) . In addition, the results show that divergence of interests and information asymmetry are issues that hinder the success of the enterprise ( Rubinstein et al. , 2001 ); similarly, the rigidity of the corporate governance system could also prevent managers from disclosing information about IC.

The problems of moral hazard and adverse selection are obvious; nevertheless, the results found in this study show that the abovementioned risks are not constraints that prevent the company from disclosing information on IC. These results turn out to be in-line with those reported by Goel and Ramanathan (2014) .

As a further result, the company's commitment in the BE process is a trigger for improving VD of IC, corroborating the results found by Areal and Carvalho (2012) on a sample of the most ethical companies in the world, as these companies can have advantages over others because of three distinct effects, namely, culture, diversity and reputation. This attitude positively influences the level of IC-VD, suggesting for example that these companies may benefit from special protection in the event of a crisis.

4.3.2 Empirical evidence on CSR impacting IC-VD ( H2 )

This hypothesis has assumed that CSR has a positive influence on the level of VD of IC. The statistical tests analysis shows that this variable positively and statistically influences the VD of information.

The estimated coefficient of CSR_INDEX is positive and statistically significant (0.116, p  < 0.01), meaning that CSR influences the VD of the IC. This corroborates the hypothesis predictions ( H2 ).

These results turn out to be in-line with those reported by Branco and Rodrigues (2008) and Dias et al. (2017) . In this respect, CSR is positively interpreted by the various stakeholders via its effect on the decisions made by the company's organs and on the cognitive and mental patterns of the managers as well as on the legitimacy of the decisions ( Fontana et al. , 2019 ).

Likewise, these results align perfectly with the conclusions about the legitimacy of the company's managers ( Bond et al. , 2016 ). Thus, in some cases, and more specifically those based on the postulates of the agency theory, the manager who engages in specific activities related to CSR seems to reduce asymmetric information adopting these actions.

Indeed, the current findings support the view suggesting that VD of information about IC is sustained by CSR, in a mutual influence. Nevertheless, the commitment of the company in the activities of social responsibility, also when impacting IC-VD, is an asset that improves the confidence of investors in the business in the long run ( Saeidi et al. , 2015 ).

These results show the potential existence of a link between CSR and socially responsible disclosure and therefore, the transparency of information. Indeed, as shown by Su (2014) , engagement in social responsibility is a form of commitment to sustainable development and integration into VD that is needed for the most innovative companies.

In addition, as indicated by Garcia-Sanchez et al. (2016) , the company's commitment to social responsibility activities may affect the level of VD and promote financial transparency. Therefore, engagement in social responsibility activities could be dominated by a strategy of transparency and reliability, which may have significant impact on IC-VD.

4.3.3 Complementary considerations

Regarding the control variables, not all the related coefficients show the expected signs. The degree of innovation intensity (INVT) is positively and significantly associated ( p  < 0.1) with VD of IC: this finding suggests that the most innovative firms worldwide have adopted more VD practices about IC; in fact, innovative firms are often under greater pressure from the part of investors and financial analysts to disclose IC relating information.

In addition, the influence of pollutant sector (POL_SECTOR) turns out to be negatively and significantly correlated ( p  < 0.1) with the IC-VD, as expected. Similar confirmation can be found also as concerns the ethical level of the country (ETH_COUNTRY), positively associated with IC-VD.

However, the legal system relevant to each country (LEG_SYST) seems to be involved in controlling the corporate transparency, but this variable appears to be negatively correlated and statistically significant ( p  < 0.05) with IC-VD. Most probably, and differently from what expected, stricter legal system may stimulate in reinforcing potential conflicts of interest and information asymmetry.

Similarly, the percentage of women on boards of directors and the level of indebtedness present directions that are contrary to what expected. Globally speaking, these potential contradictions about the control variables estimations suggest caution and confirm the initial assumption about the exploratory nature of the research.

5. Theoretical and practical implications

The overall results of the research show some applicative potential. From a scientific point of view, essentially, the study helps highlighting the persistence of several connections associating corporate ethics and the extent of IC-VD, within a context characterized with a new tendency of the companies to be responsible in this respect. From a managerial point of view, furthermore, the current study can be useful to promote the implementation of BE and CSR-related strategies, enabling to protect majority or minority shareholders through an enhanced high-quality disclosure of IC.

Ethically, nevertheless, companies should allot greater engagement about the necessity and importance of transparent and reliable communication helping reflecting the firm's true image ( Mathuva et al. , 2017 ). In this respect, financial transparency constitutes a necessary condition for the effective promotion of a firm involved in ethical and socially responsible behaviors, and with this regard, several studies have acknowledged that global ethics, as engraved within the organizational culture, has a remarkable impact on the development of VD, and specifically on the various components of IC ( Luthan et al. , 2016 ).

For example, Rezaee et al. (2020) have stressed the promotion of ethical standards within the company to improve the quality of disclosed information. Indeed, it has been recently discovered that the companies envisaging to promote ethical behaviors are called upon to adopt a rather intensive disclosure policy regarding their IC characteristics: in other words, the quality of disclosed information about IC contributes to outline the social legitimacy ( Slack and Munz, 2016 ).

The quality of information disclosed about the company's IC as based on corporate ethics should necessarily help improving the confidence of the user of the information, while enhancing the firm's social legitimacy. In this context, Su (2014) has found that companies involved in stakeholders' ethical issues can gain a competitive advantage and higher performance attracting excellent employees, as concerns human capital, and enhancing the brand image, as concerns relational/social capital ( Pedrini, 2007 ).

The VD program is an organized process that abides by specific rules conforming to the company's social approach and the executive's behavior. In this respect, the agency theory helps only partially reflecting the reality of the company, as it outlooks other aspects of the business value, especially within the new context of the knowledge-based economy ( Long Kweh et al. , 2014 ).

More particularly, managers are representative agents that rationally respond to the firm's economic stakeholders and the control mechanisms/contractual motivations ( Bamber et al. , 2010 ). Yet, the enterprises' decision-makers are not interchangeable, and companies' actions are a reflection of the values, skills and cognitive competences of the human capital ( Rodriguez Perez and de Pablos, 2003 ); thus, as an organizational option, VD is rather potentially dependent on other considerations than on just the firm's environmental characteristics.

Moreover, the process of communication is complex, as it involves judgments and arbitrations that account for the various constraints relating to the environment of the company, and managers act on the basis of their personal interpretations of the strategic situations they encounter. These interpretations are therefore based also on the individual and organizational values that the manager enjoys ( López-González, 2019 ).

To this end, the theory of planned behavior has been considered as means whereby the disclosure decision about IC could be influenced by several attitudes about BE and CSR. Indeed, it helps understanding a certain behavior in individual's psychological processes, as subjected to various influences, particularly to ethical and social factors.

Like any other behavior, information disclosure about IC also rests on perceived opportunities as well as probable outcomes, as entirely based on managers' values and proper knowledge. Moreover, the generated and disseminated information highly depends on the capacity of the company's information systems not only in terms of quantity but also in terms of growth and ability to account for the needs issued by parties that are external to the company, along with other organisms' requests, ever more with respect to IC.

At even more practical level, the reached findings appear to provide effects for global regulators and policymakers intending to install social reporting standards. They may provide ground that institutional and/or cultural factors affect top management's social reporting behavior or ethical/social values more in general, influencing the quality of published information about IC.

6. Research limitations and future avenues

The study shows several constraints, and two seem quite relevant. First, the research sample corresponds to firms without homogeneous characteristics, especially with regard to their pertinence to two different legal systems (the selected sample encloses several countries with two distinct legal system assumptions), probably affecting the companies' behaviors in terms of VD (mandatorily for sure); for this reason, it seems very desirable to control more thoroughly the legal system's effect, for example, subdividing further research samples into subsamples on the basis of the legal system pertinence. Furthermore, it could be useful to implement a comparison of the investigated model between companies pertaining to civil law or common law, since the legal system directly influences the accounting system, and then, the quality of the financial information.

Second, this finding appears to demonstrate that VD depends highly on corporate culture rather than the respective countries' accounting culture: this should also highlight that IC-VD stands as a form of socially responsible behavior, or an outcome of ethical behavior regarding the entirety of partners, more than mere legal constraint. Thus, further research on cross-cultural management influence could be useful, along with longitudinal analyses that could support major reliability of the global research.

7. Conclusion

This study has explored the impact of BE and CSR on the process of IC-VD, concerning a sample including 83 of the most ethical companies in 2015 in the world. Among the research motivations, it is to highlight that very few empirical studies appear to demonstrate the persistence of a relationship between ethical and social approaches and IC-VD: attempting to fill such a noticeable gap, the current study has been conducted to investigate, empirically, the relationship binding both variables.

Findings support arguments that companies with ethical behaviors and socially responsible practices appear to be highly committed to VD about their IC. It could follow, therefore, that IC-VD can also be considered as a form of ethical and socially responsible behavior.

The results achieved in this research afford empirical evidence as to the extent of external disclosure practices in the global context, also considering ever more frequent interfirm networks, providing useful means for investors seeking profitable investment opportunities and for financial report users, acting as operative orientations of knowledge management and IC strategy ( Del Giudice and Maggioni, 2014 ). In this respect, an ethical behavior (structural capital), influenced by personal values (human capital), affects IC-VD and then, practically, also the relational/social capital of the organization.

Sample selection process

Note(s) : *, ** and *** represent significance at 0.1, 0.05 and 0.01, respectively

Source(s) : Authors' calculation

Ajzen , I. ( 1991 ), “ The theory of planned behavior ”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , Vol. 50 No. 2 , pp. 179 - 211 .

Al Maskati , M.M. and Hamdan , A.M.M. ( 2017 ), “ Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Bahrain ”, International Journal of Economics and Accounting , Vol. 8 No. 1 , pp. 1 - 28 .

Alves , H. , Rodrigues , A.M. and Canadas , N. ( 2012 ), “ Factors influencing the different categories of voluntary disclosure in annual reports: an analysis for Iberian Peninsula listed companies ”, Tékhne , Vol. 10 No. 1 , pp. 15 - 26 .

Alvino , F. , Di Vaio , A. , Hassan , R. and Palladino , R. ( 2020 ), “ Intellectual capital and sustainable development: a systematic literature review ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 22 No. 1 , pp. 76 - 94 .

Areal , N. and Carvalho , A. ( 2012 ), “ The financial performance of the world's most ethical companies: advantage in times of crisis ”, Working Paper , University of Minho School of Economics and Management , Braga , pp. 1 - 48 , doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2186088 .

Armitage , C.J. and Conner , M. ( 2001 ), “ Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta, analytic review ”, British Journal of Social Psychology , Vol. 40 No. 4 , pp. 471 - 499 .

Aslam , S. , Ahmad , M. , Amin , S. , Usman , M. and Arif , S. ( 2018 ), “ The impact of corporate governance and intellectual capital on firm's performance and corporate social responsibility disclosure ”, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences , Vol. 12 No. 1 , pp. 283 - 308 .

Bamber , L.S. , Jiang , J.X. and Wang , I.Y. ( 2010 ), “ What's my style? The influence of top managers on voluntary corporate financial disclosure ”, The Accounting Review , Vol. 85 No. 4 , pp. 1131 - 1162 .

Bamel , U.K. and Bamel , N. ( 2018 ), “ Organizational resources, KM process capability and strategic flexibility: a dynamic resource-capability perspective ”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 22 No. 7 , pp. 1555 - 1572 .

Bebbington , J. , Larrinaga , C. and Moneva , J.M. ( 2008 ), “ Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management ”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal , Vol. 21 No. 3 , pp. 337 - 361 .

Bellucci , M. , Marzi , G. , Orlando , B. and Ciampi , F. ( 2020 ), “ Journal of Intellectual Capital: a review of emerging themes and future trends ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print , pp. 1 - 24 , doi: 10.1108/JIC-10-2019-0239 .

Beretta , V. , Demartini , C. and Trucco , S. ( 2019 ), “ Does environmental, social and governance performance influence intellectual capital disclosure tone in integrated reporting? ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 20 No. 1 , pp. 100 - 124 .

Bhimani , A. ( 2008 ), “ Making corporate governance count: the fusion of ethics and economic rationality ”, Journal of Management and Governance , Vol. 12 No. 2 , pp. 135 - 147 .

Bond , A. , Pope , J. , Morrison-Saunders , A. and Retief , F. ( 2016 ), “ A game theory perspective on environmental assessment: what games are played and what does this tell us about decision making rationality and legitimacy? ”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review , Vol. 57 No. 2016 , pp. 187 - 194 .

Branco , M.C. and Rodrigues , L.L. ( 2008 ), “ Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 83 No. 4 , pp. 685 - 701 .

Campanella , F. , Della Peruta , M.R. and Del Giudice , M. ( 2014 ), “ Creating conditions for innovative performance of science parks in Europe. How manage the intellectual capital for converting knowledge into organizational action ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 15 No. 4 , pp. 576 - 596 .

Chan , M.C. , Watson , J. and Woodliff , D. ( 2014 ), “ Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 125 No. 1 , pp. 59 - 73 .

Chen , E. and Gavious , I. ( 2015 ), “ Does CSR have different value implications for different shareholders? ”, Finance Research Letters , Vol. 14 , No. 2015 , pp. 29 - 35 .

Chung , H. , Judge , W.Q. and Li , Y.H. ( 2015 ), “ Voluntary disclosure, excess executive compensation, and firm value ”, Journal of Corporate Finance , Vol. 32 , No. 2015 , pp. 64 - 90 .

Coluccia , D. , D'Amico , E. , Fontana , S. and Solimene , S. ( 2017 ), “ A cross-cultural perspective of voluntary disclosure: Italian listed firms in the stakeholder global context ”, European Journal of International Management , Vol. 11 No. 4 , pp. 430 - 451 .

Corvino , A. , Caputo , F. , Pironti , M. , Doni , F. and Bianchi Martini , S. ( 2019 ), “ The moderating effect of firm size on relational capital and firm performance: evidence from Europe ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 20 No. 4 , pp. 510 - 532 .

Cruz-González , J. , López-Sáez , P. , Emilio Navas-López , J. and Delgado-Verde , M. ( 2014 ), “ Directions of external knowledge search: investigating their different impact on firm performance in high-technology industries ”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 18 No. 5 , pp. 847 - 866 .

Del Giudice , M. and Maggioni , V. ( 2014 ), “ Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks: a global view ”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 18 No. 5 , pp. 841 - 846 .

Devalle , A. , Rizzato , F. and Busso , D. ( 2016 ), “ Disclosure indexes and compliance with mandatory disclosure-The case of intangible assets in the Italian market ”, Advances in Accounting , Vol. 35 , No. 2016 , pp. 8 - 25 .

Dias , A. , Rodrigues , L.L. and Craig , R. ( 2017 ), “ Corporate governance effects on social responsibility disclosures ”, Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal , Vol. 11 No. 2 , pp. 3 - 22 .

Elkington , J. ( 1998 ), “ Accounting for the triple bottom line ”, Measuring Business Excellence , Vol. 2 No. 3 , pp. 18 - 22 .

Fama , E.F. and French , K.R. ( 1997 ), “ Industry costs of equity ”, Journal of Financial Economics , Vol. 43 No. 2 , pp. 153 - 193 .

Fassin , Y. , Van Rossem , A. and Buelens , M. ( 2011 ), “ Small-business owner-managers' perceptions of business ethics and CSR-related concepts ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 98 No. 3 , pp. 425 - 453 .

Ferreira , A.L. , Branco , M.C. and Moreira , J.A. ( 2012 ), “ Factors influencing intellectual capital disclosure by Portuguese companies ”, International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting , Vol. 2 No. 2 , p. 278 .

Fontana , S. , Coluccia , D. and Solimene , S. ( 2019 ), “ VAIC as a tool for measuring intangibles value in voluntary multi-stakeholder disclosure ”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy , Vol. 10 No. 4 , pp. 1679 - 1699 .

Fukukawa , K. , Balmer , J.M. and Gray , E.R. ( 2007 ), “ Mapping the interface between corporate identity, ethics and corporate social responsibility ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 76 No. 1 , pp. 1 - 5 .

Gangi , F. , Mustilli , M. and Varrone , N. ( 2019 ), “ The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) knowledge on corporate financial performance: evidence from the European banking industry ”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 23 No. 1 , pp. 110 - 134 .

Garcia-Sanchez , I.M. , Cuadrado-Ballesteros , B. and Frias-Aceituno , J.V. ( 2016 ), “ Impact of the institutional macro context on the voluntary disclosure of CSR information ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 49 No. 1 , pp. 15 - 35 .

Giacosa , E. , Ferraris , A. and Bresciani , S. ( 2017 ), “ Exploring voluntary external disclosure of intellectual capital in listed companies: an integrated intellectual capital disclosure conceptual model ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 18 No. 1 , pp. 149 - 169 .

Goel , M. and Ramanathan , M.P.E. ( 2014 ), “ Business ethics and corporate social responsibility–is there a dividing line? ”, Procedia Economics and Finance , Vol. 11 , No. 2014 , pp. 49 - 59 .

Gray , R. , Kouhy , R. and Lavers , S. ( 1995 ), “ Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure ”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal , Vol. 8 No. 2 , pp. 47 - 77 .

Gujarati , D.N. ( 2004 ), Basic Econometrics , McGraw-Hill , New York, NY .

Guthrie , J. , Petty , R. and Ricceri , F. ( 2006 ), “ The voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: comparing evidence from Hong Kong and Australia ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 7 No. 2 , pp. 254 - 271 .

Hair , J. , Black , W. , Babin , B. , Anderson , R. and Tatham , R. ( 2006 ), Multivariate Data Analysis , Pearson Prentice Hall , Upper Saddle River, NJ .

Hamed , M.S. and Omri , M.A. ( 2014 ), “ Voluntary disclosure about innovation and technological choices by Tunisian listed companies ”, International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting , Vol. 5 No. 4 , pp. 379 - 390 .

Haniffa , R.M. and Cooke , T.E. ( 2005 ), “ The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting ”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy , Vol. 24 No. 5 , pp. 391 - 430 .

Hassan , A. and Guo , X. ( 2017 ), “ The relationships between reporting format, environmental disclosure and environmental performance: an empirical study ”, Journal of Applied Accounting Research , Vol. 18 No. 4 , pp. 425 - 444 .

Hussi , T. ( 2004 ), “ Reconfiguring knowledge management – combining intellectual capital, intangible assets and knowledge creation ”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 8 No. 2 , pp. 36 - 52 .

Jo , J. , Park , J. and Cho , M. ( 2008 ), “ A study on the segment reporting of Korean firms ”, Korean Accounting Journal , Vol. 17 , No. 2008 , pp. 191 - 223 .

Khondkar , E.K. , Suh , S. and Tang , J. ( 2016 ), “ Do ethical firms create value? ”, Social Responsibility Journal , Vol. 12 No. 1 , pp. 54 - 68 .

Lehnert , K. , Craft , J. , Singh , N. and Park , Y.H. ( 2016 ), “ The human experience of ethics: a review of a decade of qualitative ethical decision making research ”, Business Ethics: A European Review , Vol. 25 No. 4 , pp. 498 - 537 .

Li , J. , Pike , R. and Haniffa , R. ( 2008 ), “ Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms ”, Accounting and Business Research , Vol. 38 No. 2 , pp. 137 - 159 .

Lin , C.S. , Chang , R.Y. and Dang , V.T. ( 2015 ), “ An integrated model to explain how corporate social responsibility affects corporate financial performance ”, Sustainability , Vol. 7 No. 7 , pp. 8292 - 8311 .

López-González , E. , Martínez-Ferrero , J. and García-Meca , E. ( 2019 ), “ Corporate social responsibility in family firms: a contingency approach ”, Journal of Cleaner Production , Vol. 211 , No. 2019 , pp. 1044 - 1064 .

Long Kweh , Q. , Lu , W.-M. and Wang , W.-K. ( 2014 ), “ Dynamic efficiency: intellectual capital in the Chinese non-life insurance firms ”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 18 No. 5 , pp. 937 - 951 .

Luthan , E. , Asniati and Yohana , D. ( 2016 ), “ A correlation of CSR and intellectual capital, its implication toward company's value creation ”, International Journal of Business and Management Invention , Vol. 5 No. 11 , pp. 88 - 94 .

Maaloul , A. and Zeghal , D. ( 2015 ), “ Financial statement informativeness and intellectual capital disclosure: an empirical analysis ”, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting , Vol. 13 No. 1 , pp. 66 - 90 .

Mathuva , D.M. , Mboya , J.K. and McFie , J.B. ( 2017 ), “ Achieving legitimacy through co-operative governance and social and environmental disclosure by credit unions in a developing country ”, Journal of Applied Accounting Research , Vol. 18 No. 2 , pp. 162 - 184 .

McPhail , K. ( 2009 ), “ Where is the ethical knowledge in the knowledge economy? Power and potential in the emergence of ethical knowledge as a component of intellectual capital ”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting , Vol. 20 No. 7 , pp. 804 - 822 .

Melloni , G. ( 2015 ), “ Intellectual capital disclosure in integrated reporting: an impression management analysis ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 16 No. 3 , pp. 661 - 680 .

Mouritsen , J. ( 2004 ), “ Measuring and intervening: how do we theorise intellectual capital management? ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 5 No. 2 , pp. 257 - 267 .

Mura , M. , Lettieri , E. , Spiller , N. and Radaelli , G. ( 2012 ), “ Intellectual capital and innovative work behaviour: opening the black box ”, International Journal of Engineering Business Management , Vol. 4 , No. 2012 , pp. 4 - 39 .

Murray , A. , Papa , A. , Cuozzo , B. and Russo , G. ( 2016 ), “ Evaluating the innovation of the internet of things ”, Business Process Management Journal , Vol. 22 No. 2 , pp. 1 - 21 .

Muttakin , M.B. , Khan , A. and Belal , A.R. ( 2015 ), “ Intellectual capital disclosures and corporate governance: an empirical examination ”, Advances in Accounting , Vol. 31 No. 2 , pp. 219 - 227 .

Nahapiet , J. and Ghoshal , S. ( 1998 ), “ Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage ”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 23 No. 2 , pp. 242 - 266 .

Navid , B.J. , Pourmazaheri , M. and Amiri , M. ( 2015 ), “ The investigate of relationships between intellectual capital, performance and corporate social responsibility evidence from Tehran stock exchange ”, International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research , Vol. 13 No. 6 , pp. 3983 - 3993 .

Ousama , A.A. and Fatima , A.H. ( 2012 ), “ Extent and trend of intellectual capital reporting in Malaysia: empirical evidence ”, International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting , Vol. 4 No. 2 , pp. 159 - 176 .

Passaro , R. , Quinto , I. and Thomas , A. ( 2018 ), “ The impact of higher education on entrepreneurial intention and human capital ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 19 No. 1 , pp. 135 - 156 .

Pedrini , M. ( 2007 ), “ Human capital convergences in intellectual capital and sustainability reports ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 8 No. 2 , pp. 346 - 366 .

Polo , F.C. and Vázquez , D.G. ( 2008 ), “ Social information within the intellectual capital report ”, Journal of International Management , Vol. 14 No. 4 , pp. 353 - 363 .

Porter , M.E. and Kramer , M.R. ( 2011 ), “ Creating shared value ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 89 Nos 1-2 , pp. 62 - 77 .

Rechberg , I. and Syed , J. ( 2013 ), “ Ethical issues in knowledge management: conflict of knowledge ownership ”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 17 No. 6 , pp. 828 - 847 .

Rezaee , Z. , Alipour , M. , Faraji , O. , Ghanbari , M. and Jamshidinavid , B. ( 2020 ), “ Environmental disclosure quality and risk: the moderating effect of corporate governance ”, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal , Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print , pp. 1 - 34 , doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2018-0269 .

Ribeiro Lucas , S.M. and Costa Lourenço , I. ( 2014 ), “ The effect of firm and country characteristics on mandatory disclosure compliance ”, International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting , Vol. 6 No. 2 , pp. 87 - 116 .

Rodriguez Perez , J. and Ordóñez de Pablos , P. ( 2003 ), “ Knowledge management and organizational competitiveness: a framework for human capital analysis ”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 7 No. 3 , pp. 82 - 91 .

Rubinstein , J.S. , Meyer , D.E. and Evans , J.E. ( 2001 ), “ Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching ”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , Vol. 27 No. 4 , pp. 763 - 797 .

Saeidi , S.P. , Sofian , S. , Saeidi , P. , Saeidi , S.P. and Saaeidi , S.A. ( 2015 ), “ How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol. 68 No. 2 , pp. 341 - 350 .

Serenko , A. and Bontis , N. ( 2013 ), “ The intellectual core and impact of the knowledge management academic discipline ”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 17 No. 1 , pp. 137 - 155 .

Singh , S.K. and Gaur , S.S. ( 2020 ), “ Corporate growth, sustainability and business ethics in twenty-first century ”, Journal of Management and Governance , Vol. 24 , No. 2020 , pp. 303 - 305 .

Slack , R. and Munz , M. ( 2016 ), “ Intellectual capital reporting, leadership and strategic change ”, Journal of Applied Accounting Research , Vol. 17 No. 1 , pp. 61 - 83 .

Su , H.Y. ( 2014 ), “ Business ethics and the development of intellectual capital ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 119 No. 1 , pp. 87 - 98 .

Sun , N. , Salama , A. , Hussainey , K. and Habbash , M. ( 2010 ), “ Corporate environmental disclosure, corporate governance and earnings management ”, Managerial Auditing Journal , Vol. 25 No. 7 , pp. 679 - 700 .

Ting , I.W.K. , Ren , C. , Chen , F.-C. and Kweh , Q.L. ( 2020 ), “ Interpreting the dynamic performance effect of intellectual capital through a value-added-based perspective ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 21 No. 3 , pp. 381 - 401 .

Türkel , S. , Uzunoğlu , E. , Kaplan , M.D. and Vural , B.A. ( 2016 ), “ A strategic approach to CSR communication: examining the impact of brand familiarity on consumer responses ”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , Vol. 23 No. 4 , pp. 228 - 242 .

Vaz , C.R. , Selig , P.M. and Viegas , C.V. ( 2019 ), “ A proposal of intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) evaluation ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 20 No. 2 , pp. 208 - 234 .

Vrontis , D. , Christofi , M. , Battisti , E. and Graziano , E.A. ( 2020 ), “ Intellectual capital, knowledge sharing and equity crowdfunding ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 22 No. 1 , pp. 95 - 121 .

Wirth , H. , Kulczycka , J. , Hausner , J. and Koński , M. ( 2016 ), “ Corporate Social Responsibility: communication about social and environmental disclosure by large and small copper mining companies ”, Resources Policy , Vol. 49 , No. 2016 , pp. 53 - 60 .

Zhang , Y. , Wang , T. and Hsu , C. ( 2019 ), “ The effects of voluntary GDPR adoption and the readability of privacy statements on customers' information disclosure intention and trust ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol. 21 No. 2 , pp. 145 - 163 .

businesswire.com .

ethisphere.com .

weforum.org .

worldbank.org .

worldsmostethicalcompanies.com .

Acknowledgements

The article is based on the study funded by the Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and by the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100”.

Corresponding author

About the authors.

Matteo Rossi is an Associate Professor of Corporate Finance at the University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy, where he received the PhD degree in Management. He is also an Adjunct Professor of Advanced Corporate Finance at LUISS, Rome, Italy. Dr Rossi is the Editor-in-Chief for the International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting and for the International Journal of Behavioral Accounting and Finance.

Giuseppe Festa is an Associate Professor of Management at the Department of Economics and Statistics of the University of Salerno, Italy, EU. He holds a PhD in Economics and Management of Public Organizations from the University of Salerno, where he is the Scientific Director of the Postgraduate course in Wine Business and the Vice-Director of the Second Level Master's in Management of Healthcare Organizations – Daosan. He is also the Chairman of the Euromed Research Interest Committee on Wine Business. His research interests focus mainly on wine business, information systems and healthcare management.

Salim Chouaibi is a PhD Student in Accounting at the Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management of the University of Sfax (Tunisia).

Monica Fait is an Assistant Professor of Management at the Department of Management Economics Mathematics and Statistics of the University of Salento, Lecce (Italy), where she teaches Business Economics and Management. Her research looks at the effects of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on company behavior, knowledge sharing and sustainability. She is the author of several scientific publications and papers on the Web 2.0 marketing strategies, and her studies have been published on international journals like Technological Forecasting and Social Change , Journal of Knowledge Management and British Food Journal . She also serves as reviewer for several international journals and is a speaker at national and international conferences and industry forums.

Armando Papa is an Associate Professor of Management at the Faculty of Communication Sciences of the University of Teramo (Italy) and at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) of Moscow (Russian Federation). He received the postgraduate master's degree in corporate finance from IPE (Naples, Italy) and the PhD degree in management from the “Federico II” University of Naples. He is an Associate Editor for the Journal of Knowledge Economy (Springer) and an Editorial Assistant for the Journal of Knowledge Management (Emerald).

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

• Help and information
• Business Ethics
• Business Strategy
• Business and Government
• Business and the Environment
• Corporate Governance
• Corporate Social Responsibility
• Employee Relations
• International Human Resource Management
• Strategic Human Resource Management
• International Business
• Knowledge Management
• Leadership and Motivation
• Brand Management
• International Marketing
• Marketing Research
• Strategic Marketing
• Operations Management
• Organizational Theory and Behaviour
• Strategic Management
• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Business Research Methods (Sixth Edition)

• Learning Features
• Acronyms and Abbreviations
• About the Authors
• About the Students and Supervisors
• Guide to Using this Book
• Resources for Lecturers
• About the Book
• Acknowledgments
• Editorial Advisory Panel
• Publisher Credits
• 1. The Nature and Process of Business Research
• 2. Business Research Strategies
• 3. Research Designs
• 4. Planning a Research Project and Developing Research Questions
• 5. Getting Started: Reviewing the Literature
• 6. Ethics in Business Research
• 7. Writing Up Business Research
• 8. The Nature of Quantitative Research
• 9. Sampling in Quantitative Research
• 10. Structured Interviewing
• 11. Self-Completion Questionnaires
• 12. Asking Questions
• 13. Quantitative Research using Naturally Occurring Data
• 14. Secondary Analysis and Official Statistics
• 15. Quantitative Data Analysis: Descriptive, Univariate, and Bivariate Statistics
• 16. Quantitative Data Analysis: Hypothesis Testing and Inferential Statistics
• 17. The Nature of Qualitative Research
• 18. Sampling in Qualitative Research
• 19. Ethnography and Participant Observation
• 20. Interviewing in Qualitative Research
• 21. Focus Groups
• 22. Language in Qualitative Research
• 23. Documentary Data
• 24. Visual Qualitative Research
• 25. Qualitative Data Analysis
• 26. Breaking Down the Quantitative/Qualitative Divide
• 27. Mixed Methods Research: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research
• Subject Index

6. p. 111 Ethics in Business Research

• Emma Bell , Emma Bell Professor of Organisation Studies, The Open University
• Alan Bryman Alan Bryman Professor of Management and Marketing, University of Melbourne
•  and  Bill Harley Bill Harley Professor of Organizational and Social Research, University of Leicester (formerly)
• https://doi.org/10.1093/hebz/9780198869443.003.0016
• Published in print: 30 March 2022
• Published online: 31 August 2023

This chapter examines the importance of ethics in business research. Since ethical issues can arise at any point in the research process, business researchers must be aware and prepared to address the issues to ensure the integrity of their study and the reputation of business research in general. The chapter then identifies the four ethical principles to which researchers are expected to adhere: avoidance of harm, informed consent, protection of privacy through confidentiality, and preventing deception. It also discusses the ethical consideration surrounding visual and online research. Meanwhile, the politicization of research has consequences for how research is done and how the type of knowledge is produced.

• business research
• politicization
• visual research
• online research
• confidentiality

You do not currently have access to this article

Please login to access the full content.

Access to the full content requires a subscription

Printed from Oxford Business Trove. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 02 April 2024

• Cookie Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility
• [66.249.64.20|45.133.227.243]
• 45.133.227.243

Character limit 500 /500

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection

Business Versus Ethics? Thoughts on the Future of Business Ethics

M. tina dacin.

1 Smith School of Business, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON Canada

Jeffrey S. Harrison

2 Robins School of Business, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA USA

3 Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA

Sheila Killian

4 Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

Julia Roloff

5 Department of Management and Organisation, Rennes School of Business, Rennes, France

To commemorate 40 years since the founding of the Journal of Business Ethics, the editors in chief of the journal have invited the editors to provide commentaries on the future of business ethics. This essay comprises a selection of commentaries aimed at creating dialogue around the theme Business versus Ethics? (inspired by the title of the commentary by Jeffrey Harrison). The authors of these commentaries seek to transcend the age-old separation fallacy (Freeman in Bus Ethics Q 4(4):409–421, 1994) that juxtaposes business and ethics/society, posing a forced choice or trade off. Providing a contemporary take on the classical question “if it’s legal is it ethical?”, David Hess explores the role of the law in promoting or hindering stakeholder-oriented purpose and governance structure. Jeffrey Harrison encourages scholars to move beyond the presupposition that businesses are either strategic or ethical and explore important questions at the intersection of strategy and ethics. The proposition that business models might be inherently ethical or inherently unethical in their design is developed by Sheila Killian, who examines business systems, their morality, and who they serve. However, the conundrum that entrepreneurs are either lauded for their self-belief and risk-taking, or loathed for their self-belief and risk-taking, is discussed by M. Tina Dacin and Julia Roloff using the metaphor of taboos and totems. These commentaries seek to explore positions that advocate multiplicity and tensions in which business ethics is not either/or but both.

The Intersection of Law and Business Ethics

Introduction.

The relationship between law and business ethics has been a core research area across the 40 years of the Journal of Business Ethics. Indeed, the very first issue of the journal asked the question of whether legally allowed bluffing in labor negotiations was ethical (Carson et al., 1982 ). More recent research has flipped that question of “if it’s legal, is it ethical?”, and used Uber’s rideshare expansion strategy—which involved directly violating laws regulating taxicab services—to ask if illegal actions are always unethical (Young, 2019 ). These are two simple illustrations of the numerous ways that law, public policy, and business ethics intersect.

The Journal of Business Ethics encourages researchers to consider how business ethics scholarship informs the goals of the laws that regulate business and our understanding of how to improve individual and organizational compliance with those laws. Due to the constant changes in society, the questions on the role of the law in encouraging ethical business behavior are continuously evolving. For example, technology advancements raise questions of whether and how to update laws that protect the privacy rights of employees and consumers. Likewise, the use of artificial intelligence in employment decisions and the operation of autonomous vehicles raises important issues related to employment law and products liability law, respectively. Societal changes leading to an increased attention to issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion, raises issues of the role of the law in increasing the numbers of those that identify as women, underrepresented minorities, or LBGTQ+, in management and corporate boardrooms.

Corporate Purpose, Environmental and Social Governance, and Business and Human Rights

The purpose of the corporation, which has been an important research issue for the journal, is another key area where law, public policy, and business ethics have intersected. Recently, the debate over corporate purpose has reached a new level of public attention due to the Business Roundtable—an organization made up of CEOs of leading corporations in a wide range of industries—revising its prior statement on corporate purpose to shift from a shareholder maximization view to the adoption of a stakeholder view (Loughran et al., 2022 ). Although this is an important development, skeptics question CEOs’ commitments to the Business Roundtable’s statement. This raises issues of how the law can be structured to hold corporations legally accountable for such commitments. For example, there are questions of whether legislators should adopt a new type of corporation—such as the benefit corporation—as an alternative to the existing shareholder value focused corporation. Likewise, business ethics scholars have considered changes to corporate governance, including stakeholder representatives on boards of directors and altering directors’ fiduciary duties.

Coinciding with the Business Roundtable’s statement, environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues have become a top priority for corporate boards. One survey found ESG was the top issue that shareholders sought to discuss with the board, ahead of both executive compensation and strategy oversight issues (PwC, 2021 ). As shareholders demand more and better information on corporations’ performance on sustainability matters, there are questions of whether there should be mandatory corporate disclosures on ESG matters. The European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) shows a movement away from voluntary reporting and toward compliance with mandatory standards. As those standards are disclosed and implemented, business ethics scholars must help guide such legislation by examining its effectiveness in changing corporate behavior and identifying necessary reforms. As seen from the existing work on nonfinancial disclosure in the Journal of Business Ethics, this legislative evaluation effort will benefit from the wide range of disciplinary perspectives represented by business ethics scholars.

One key aspect of the “social” factor in ESG is respecting human rights. The field of business and human rights (BHR) did not exist when the Journal of Business Ethics was founded in 1982. This field developed primarily with legal scholars and focused on mandatory obligations and holding corporations accountable for the harm they caused, as opposed to a corporate social responsibility perspective focused on business making voluntary, positive contributions to human rights (Ramasastry, 2015 ). Although there may be a gap between the fields of BHR and CSR, there are opportunities for connection (Ramasastry, 2015 ), especially for research related to the journal’s section on law, public policy, and business ethics.

In the last decade, BHR has rapidly moved from soft law to hard law. The 2011 United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) solidified support for business having a responsibility to respect human rights. This support—and perceived lack of corporate commitment to human rights—led to the adoption of legislation on BHR issues in various countries and the formation of a United Nations working group to develop a binding treaty. Included within this discussion of mandatory human rights obligations are considerations of how a “smart mix” of soft law and hard law mechanisms can help “reach beyond the limits of conventional public law” (Buhmann, 2016 , p. 710). In addition to regulatory actions, courts in some jurisdictions are starting to show a willingness to hold corporations liable for the acts of their subsidiaries or supply chain partners in foreign countries, which may further impact business practice (even when the litigation is unsuccessful) (Schrempf-Stirling & Wettstein, 2017 ). As the legal environment surrounding BHR continues to evolve, business ethics scholars can provide valuable guidance on the way forward. The remainder of this commentary will provide a brief overview of recent developments in the law on BHR and provide some illustrations where scholars at the crossroads of law, public policy, and business ethics have provided valuable contributions, which also shows the way for future contributions in this area.

Business Ethics and Business and Human Rights Legislation

Governments have approached BHR legislation in a variety of ways. The scope of the laws either focus on human rights generally or are targeted toward specific issues, such as conflict minerals, modern slavery, or child labor. There are also differences in obligations and potential liabilities; a law may be limited to disclosure requirements, may mandate the undertaking of human rights due diligence (HRDD)—which is a process for identifying, preventing, mitigating, and remediating negative human rights impacts—or may provide for legal liability to victims of human rights abuse. For example, targeted, disclosure only laws include the UK Modern Slavery Act and the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act (CTSCA). These laws only require corporations to disclose what actions, if any, they have undertaken to ensure that modern slavery is not present in their supply chains. The Netherlands’ Child Labor Due Diligence Act, on the other hand, requires corporations to conduct due diligence to determine whether there is a reasonable suspicion that child labor was used in the production of the company’s goods and services. If such a finding is made, then the corporation must develop a plan of action to address the issue. France’s Duty of Vigilance law mandates HRDD, disclosure of the vigilance plan, and opens the company up to potential civil liability if inadequate HRDD results in a human rights violation.

Business ethics scholars have already started to examine these laws and propose reforms. The few examples of scholarship discussed here provide inspiration for future research possibilities. For targeted disclosure laws, Birkey et al. ( 2018 ) examined corporations’ public reports under the CTSCA and found that companies comply with the law through mostly symbolic disclosures. Interestingly, although there is much discussion of investors pushing for increased disclosure of ESG information, this study raises the question of whether symbolic compliance is due, in part, to the fact that many investors “interpret increased disclosure as potentially costly in terms of firm value” (Birkey et al., 2018 , p. 837).

Beyond market participants, a disclosure regime relies on non-market actors, such as NGOs, to utilize disclosed information to influence change in corporate behavior. Thus, Islam and Van Staden ( 2022 ) analyzed the effectiveness of modern slavery disclosure laws by interviewing key stakeholders, including anti-slavery NGOs. This research provides insights into the tensions between the ability of such laws to work toward long-term change and their limitations due to regulatory capture by interest groups focused primarily on reducing business risk. In addition, this study, along with others such as Pinnington et al. ( 2022 ), use normativity theory to provide insights into the perceived legitimacy of these disclosure-based regulatory regimes, which calls for additional research into how to enhance their legitimacy. Pinnington et al. ( 2022 ) also open new possible avenues for improving disclosure regimes by examining corporations’ disclosures on their discovery efforts, including corporations’ discussion of the “known unknowns” in their supply chains and how they plan to fill that information gap. Business ethics scholars are also well-positioned to explore how government can improve the regime through “guidance, leadership, training and scrutiny” and not simply the use of coercive power (Pinnington et al., 2022 ). For example, public procurement practices, which focus on the government providing positive incentives, as opposed to using coercive power, are a potentially valuable tool in need of further research (Martin-Ortega, 2018 ).

Turning to HRDD practices, research has examined how firms respond to external pressures, such as regulatory pressures. For example, in the area of conflict minerals, Hoffman et al. ( 2018 , p. 132) find that firms may respond to legislative requirements with a simple risk management approach that avoids addressing the root causes of the problem and does “not tackle major problems related to their business model.” This raises issues of how legislation can encourage and incentivize meaningful corporate responses to mandates. For instance, if corporate liability is based on a corporation failing to adopt adequate HRDD, then regulators or the court system must be able to distinguish adequate from inadequate HRDD. Otherwise, we face the problem of corporations being “focused primarily on documenting a due diligence process to protect itself from blame, while not being primarily concerned that the corporation’s decisions effectively curb business-related human rights abuse...” (Fasterling & Demuijnck, 2013 , p. 807).

In the context of their study, Hoffman et al. ( 2018 , p. 116) stated that “the topic of conflict minerals becomes one of supply chain management rather than of individual companies’ legal or compliance divisions alone.” This comment applies to all research on the problem of human rights violations in supply chains. Future research in business ethics can help bring together legal mandates and management practice to improve the impact of our regulatory regimes. We need an understanding of how organizational members understand human rights responsibilities and are encouraged to comply with relevant company policies.

Many corporations struggle with understanding what it means to respect human rights in their situation. The UNGPs, and some mandatory HRDD laws, cover all internationally recognized human rights. Due to the significant number of recognized human rights that could be impacted by business, businesses struggle with determining their responsibilities. McVey et al. ( 2022 ) examined how managers within the corporation understood human rights and sought to persuade their colleagues to adopt a rights-based perspective. In some cases, this involved discussing human rights in terms of the financial impact to the company or otherwise reframing the topic in a manner that tones down the communication of the human rights abuse. As the authors argue, “the process of making human rights understandable and manageable can change their form and content.”

HRDD laws must specify the scope of a corporation’s responsibility for human rights violations. Researchers have considered the concepts of “spheres of influence” (Macdonald, 2011 ) and the different forms of complicity (Wettstein, 2010 ) in their examination of soft law guidance on this issue. The UNGPs developed new terms—“cause,” “contribute,” and “directly linked”—to determine a corporation’s connection to a negative human rights impact, which then determines the required response. These terms may find their way into mandatory HRDD legislation and they appear in the current draft of the UN BHR treaty. Unfortunately, the UNGPs do not provide clear definitions of those terms. Business ethics scholars can help contribute a real world understanding of the meaning of those terms or suggest alternative approaches.

Finally, as states mandate HRDD through legislation, lawyers will become involved in the compliance process. Business ethics research can help provide an understanding of how that impacts corporate responses. For example, in line with Fasterling and Demuijnck’s ( 2013 ) concerns above, some believe that lawyers will push HRDD in the direction of risk management and a tick-box exercise. Thus, the internal governance of HRDD is important. Past research on compliance and ethics programs, and the governance of corporate sustainability efforts generally, provide a useful starting point (Hess, 2021 ). For example, Radu and Smaili ( 2021 ) have examined the impact of corporate governance measures, such as having a board committee focused on CSR and linking CEO compensation to CSR metrics, on improving the company’s social performance.

The primary goal of this commentary was to use recent developments in the law on business and human rights to show the importance of the integration of law, public policy, and business ethics. Rather than provide an exhaustive look at the issues, it simply used several examples to illustrate how business ethics scholars can provide valuable contributions to understanding the effectiveness of the recent developments in BHR law and propose reforms. Moreover, the hope is to encourage business ethics scholars from any disciplinary background to use their perspectives to help inform law and public policy in their area of interest, including privacy; diversity, equity, and inclusion; artificial intelligence; or any other ethical issue of importance to business.

Strategy Vs. Ethics?

Ethics in strategy.

Businesses create a lot of value for stakeholders and society. They provide goods and services, wages for workers, income for investors, and taxes that help to support community infrastructures and a wide variety of government programs and services. Many firms give generously to charities and provide employees time to engage in community programs. This is a short and incomplete list of sources of value provided by businesses. However, in spite of the value they provide, many people have a negative view of businesses and their leaders, believing that they are inherently corrupt and destructive. This perspective is fuelled by widely disseminated information about corporate misdeeds associated with pollution, greed, discrimination, exploitation of workers, bribery, and so forth. In the age of high-speed internet, an abundance of news sources, and social media, businesses are scrutinized more than they have ever been.

These conflicting perspectives about business create a ready forum for ethical debate regarding business strategies. A business strategy is a discernible pattern of actions through which a firm attempts to achieve its business objectives or, as strategy pioneer Henry Mintzberg ( 1978 ) put it, “a pattern in a stream of decisions” (p. 934). All business strategies have ethical implications because they influence the well-being of stakeholders and society. From a strategy perspective, then, business ethics takes on a practical dimension, exploring the principles and rules through which strategies are formulated and implemented, as well as the outcomes from those strategies on the welfare of a firm’s stakeholders and society at large (Freeman et al., 2010 ).

Hopefully, a business strategy results in the creation of value for most of a firm’s stakeholders. In the optimal situation, some or all stakeholders receive incremental value from the implementation of a new strategy without reducing value for any stakeholder, a situation known as pareto optimality (Jones et al., 2016 ). This should be the primary objective of strategic decision makers. However, strategies can also lead to negative outcomes for some stakeholders or for society, a consequence that should not be ignored. Also, the means through which strategies are implemented may violate widely held ethical rules or moral codes associated with values such as honesty, fairness, equality, responsibility, justice, or freedom. Firms and their managers should “do what is right.” The fact that there may be disagreement about what this means makes studying strategy from an ethical perspective a fascinating subject. Ethical dilemmas, when managers must choose among options with conflicting benefits and costs, or when the values or moral codes of various parties collide, provide fertile ground for studying business strategy formulation and implementation.

Papers that are submitted to the Strategy and Ethics section, whether conceptual or empirical, should be deliberate in how they fit into the business ethics literature. They should not assume that readers will make the connection. One way to link strategic dimensions to ethical dimensions is to use an ethical theory or framework to build the arguments. Applying utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, social justice, social contracts theory, or a religious philosophy can provide an obvious ethical dimension to a paper. Also, conflicting theories like agency theory vs. stewardship theory or shareholder primacy vs. stakeholder theory can enhance arguments about business strategies, although the latter debate has already received so much attention that it might be difficult to make a meaningful incremental contribution to the business ethics literature. Another way to make the connection between strategy and ethics is to draw heavily from the existing business ethics literature, as found in journals such as this one. Simply using a variable that measures corporate social responsibility (CSR) or stakeholder management is not sufficient grounds for inclusion in this section of the journal. An ethics foundation is necessary.

Stakeholder theory has a well-developed connection with strategy formulation and implementation (Bosse & Sutton, 2019 ; Freeman et al., 2010 ), and many submissions attempt to use it to give their papers an ethics flavor. However, simply citing Freeman ( 1984 ), Jones ( 1995 ), or Mitchell et al. ( 1997 ) in support of a particular point is not the same as diving into the intricacies of the theory to create well-constructed arguments (Freeman et al., 2010 ; Harrison et al., 2019 ). A paper that is built on a stakeholder theory foundation should, at a minimum, describe the actual, potential, or intended consequences for stakeholders and/or society beyond simply demonstrating that a firm is able to make more money. Alternatively, a paper that adopts a stakeholder perspective combined with another ethical perspective is even stronger than a paper that relies solely on stakeholder theory. Remember that stakeholder theory qualifies as an ethics-based theory because it is built on normative concepts associated with relationships between firms and stakeholders such as trust, fairness, integrity, and respect. Purely instrumental arguments that the primary purpose of treating stakeholders well is to make more money are not particularly valuable to business ethics scholarship.

The same ideas apply to corporate social responsibility (CSR). A paper that demonstrates how much money a firm can make if it is a responsible corporate citizen (perhaps with a few moderators thrown into the models) is only going to be attractive if it also explores the ethical ramifications of whatever definition of CSR the author is using. This also means that it is vitally important to clearly define the CSR construct and then, if it is an empirical paper, make sure that whatever measures of CSR are used are consistent with that definition. There are far too many papers in the literature already that make use of a comprehensive measure of CSR that is based on a measure created from data provided by a firm that gathers the data for investors and not for business ethics researchers. In many cases, the construct validity of one of these CSR measures has not been established in the academic research literature. Also, many of these measures are based on hundreds of variables that are processed by the data providers in what amounts to a “black box,” and researchers have to assume that the methods used by the data collection firm are valid.

In papers submitted to the section, examples of moral as well as potentially immoral strategies and actions are welcome. Consequently, also of interest is research on the way corruption, greed, deceit, coercion, and the desire for power influence firm strategies, outcomes, and stakeholder responses. In the next section I will highlight some of the papers that have been published in the journal that fit nicely within the strategy and ethics domain.

Examples of Published Articles at the Intersection of Strategy and Ethics

Authors who are submitting a paper to the Journal of Business Ethics decide which section seems to be the best fit for their submission. In most cases, their preference is granted. Selecting a section may sometimes be difficult because a lot of topics can fit into multiple sections. For example, strategy has potential conceptual overlaps with corporate governance, corporate responsibility, corporate sustainability, global issues, leadership, technology and marketing. This being said, I went through Volume 175 of the journal and found six articles that fit within the intersection of strategy and ethics. Three are highlighted here.

One of the most interesting of the six articles is “Stakeholder Engagement, Knowledge Problems, and Ethical Challenges,” by Mitchell et al. ( 2022 ). Stakeholder engagement strategies are of great interest to strategic management scholars and these authors already have well-established reputations in the strategy area. However, the paper is also very strong on the ethics dimension. The authors address several ethical challenges head on in the context of the development and application of genetic modification technologies. Specifically, they examine factors that influence the level to which managers and stakeholders are likely to share a common understanding of either the premises or likely consequences of an action taken by the firm. They not only describe these factors, but they explain how stakeholder engagement can help to overcome problems associated with a lack of common understanding.

Another excellent example is “Losing More than Money: Organizations’ Prosocial Actions Appear Less Authentic When Their Resources are Declining,” by Jago et al. ( 2022 ). This article deals with organizational authenticity in the context of prosocial actions. Prosocial behaviors fit nicely into the definition of strategy as a pattern of decisions made by the firm. Furthermore, authenticity is an important ethical dimension related to honesty and trust.

Finally, a third example of a paper that is interesting to both strategy and business ethics scholars is “Competing Logics in the Islamic Funds Industry: A Market Logic Versus a Religious Logic” by Alotaibi et al. ( 2022 ). Obviously, this paper fits well within the Finance and Business Ethics section, but because it is about the strategies of investment fund managers, it is appealing also to Strategy and Ethics. Strategic Management scholars are very interested in investment funds and the links between those funds and the investors that support them. The paper qualifies in the ethics area because the strategies are screened against religious philosophy found in Islamic scripture and teachings. Also, the paper explores the influence of Islamic teachings on diversification in these funds. Diversification is an important concept in both finance and strategy.

For the benefit of those interested in the other three articles I identified at the intersection of strategy and ethics, they are: “Building Projects on the Local Communities’ Planet, Studying Organizations’ Care-Giving Approaches,” by Derakhshan ( 2022 ); “When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Backfire in Acquisitions? Signal Incongruence and Acquirer Returns,” by Zhang et al. ( 2022 ); and “Effect of CSR and Ethical Practices on Sustainable Competitive Performance: A Case of Emerging Markets from Stakeholder Theory Perspective,” by Waheed and Zhang ( 2022 ). The range of topics found in these articles, and their unique approaches, reflect the breadth of ideas that can contribute to the intersection of strategy and ethics, and to the broader business ethics literature. Examples of some of the topics and research questions that have a lot of potential to move the strategy and ethics topic forward will now be discussed.

Future Research on Strategy and Ethics

This is an exciting time to study the intersection of strategy and ethics. So much is happening in the world that has implications for this intersection. Firms need to develop strategies for dealing with changes in the world stemming from new technologies, social movements and upheavals, global health challenges, supply chain issues, and a wealth of other problems that have gained prominence since the start of the new century. As managers deal with these changes, they will need to be sensitive to the ethical ramifications—that is, how their strategies influence stakeholders and society, as well as how they are likely to influence public opinion and, ultimately, their firms’ reputations. In this light, here are a few research questions that seem important to strategy and ethics:

• How have firm strategies changed in light of social movements associated with diversity and inclusion, and which of these strategies have been the most successful in creating value for firms, their stakeholders, and society? In other words, who are the innovators in this space, and how are their strategies working?
• How have firms dealt with supply chain shortages, and how have these coping strategies influenced the welfare of employees, customers, suppliers, and communities in which they operate? Have their strategies led to unfair advantages or disadvantages to any particular group? Have supply chain challenges led to unethical behavior?
• As firms develop or adopt new technologies associated with artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, big data, alternative energy sources, or global value chains, what are the ethical issues that need to be addressed? How are firms dealing with these issues, and which strategies are more or less successful in terms of protecting stakeholder rights and welfare while also enhancing firm performance?
• What are the strategies that firms use to deal with shocks such as a pandemic or a supply chain disruption caused by a natural disaster (e.g., earthquake, tsunami)? To what extent do these strategies lead to more or less harm to stakeholders and society? Do such shocks lead firms to engage in unethical behaviors or practices? Covid-19 has provided a ready workshop for studying these types of issues.
• How do institutional, political, and/or societal forces influence the strategies that firms use to deal with shocks such as a pandemic or supply chain disruptions? How do these forces vary globally, and how have different international contexts led to different strategies? To what extent do these forces lead to more or less harm to stakeholders and society, or promote unethical behaviors?

In addition to these types of challenges, the way firms are organizing has changed dramatically in recent years. Global value chains are common in many industries, as are platform organizations (businesses that facilitate transactions across a large number of participants, such as eBay), business groups (i.e., Tata Group), and megacorporations (i.e., Apple, Toyota, and Shell). The increasing popularity of these types of organization have come with a whole range of ethical issues associated with responsibility, fairness, trust, privacy and transparency.

From a strategic perspective, there is already a well-developed literature on the extent to which a firm is responsible for the actions of other actors in its global supply chain (i.e., sweatshops and child labor), and also on how firms cope with cultural differences that promote behaviors such as bribery or lying in their international operations. More research is needed on how a firm’s global value chain strategies influence the welfare of its stakeholders, and whether particular strategies are more prone to ethical dilemmas than others (and how to overcome them without stifling performance). How can firms devise strategies to deal effectively with resistance to globalization (i.e., tariffs, social movements) and how can firms use their strategies to help reduce economic inequality in the nations in which they operate?

Platform organizations and business groups, because their control structures are at least somewhat distributed, offer excellent potential for studying business ethics. The ethical issues associated with these types of structures need to be clearly identified, along with how firms deal with these issues effectively in their policies and strategies. It would be helpful to find out what has worked and what has not, in terms of improving the welfare of and/or harming particular stakeholders. Of course, megacorporations continue to be the subject of ethical debate, and there is still much to do on this topic.

In addition to these research questions that pertain to some of the most important global trends, there are some nagging problems in the strategy and ethics area that have not been adequately addressed:

• Measurement is a big problem, at least in the CSR and stakeholder areas. For example, Choi and Wang ( 2009 ) measured stakeholder relations by drawing data from what is called the KLD database, using variables for employee relations, diversity, community relations, the environment, and product dimensions. Then Wang and Choi ( 2013 ) used these exact same variables from the same database to measure corporate social performance . This is not a criticism of the authors, but rather an example of a huge problem in the field—both of these papers passed through a rigorous review process at a top management journal. Moving forward, we need to make sure that, once we have clearly defined our constructs, we also make sure that there is consistency between the construct and the way it is measured. This principle applies not only to the CSR subject area, but to other topics in business ethics.
• Beyond the big commercial databases whose primary source of income is investors, there is very little publicly available data that researchers can use to examine the value firms create or destroy for stakeholders (e.g., stakeholder welfare). Given that so many of the interesting topics in strategy and ethics pertain to this type of welfare, creation of new databases or even a consistent set of data collection tools would be very beneficial in advancing knowledge in the field.
• The most common dependent variable in empirical studies in strategic management is financial return in the form of profit, shareholder returns or something similar. While profits are important to the ability of a firm to achieve its objectives, including the creation of value for stakeholders, there are infinite possibilities for new studies in this section if researchers spend more of their efforts examining other dependent variables. CSR is sometimes used as a dependent variable, and this is a good step (as long as the construct definition and measures are consistent). Other dependent variables could include community welfare, employee welfare, supplier welfare or customer welfare, just for a start. Some of the big databases that are already in use contain data that may be useful in creating these types of measures. Qualitative methodologies and methods can also be very helpful. The key is to think about the stakeholder and societal value that is created or destroyed as firms implement their strategies (Harrison & Wicks, 2021 ).
• Finally, new theory is sorely needed. Among the most used theories at the intersection of strategy and ethics are stakeholder theory, agency theory, stewardship theory, or salience theory. Scholars also borrow theory from other disciplines to support their arguments, which is good, but where are the new theories that are specific to strategy and ethics?

In summary, the intersection of strategy and ethics offers many opportunities to address some of the problems associated with global changes and challenges. In addition, there are research opportunities for advancing the field through cleaning up some of the remaining conceptual and methodological problems that have impeded research in the area for many years. Of course, the overarching aim of the journal is to develop more of an awareness of ethical issues in business and ways that businesses can become more ethical, and do more good in the world, thus reducing the propensity for people to look at business as clashing with ethical principles—ethical businesses strategies instead of “strategy vs. ethics.”

Toward a Framework to Explore Unethical Business Models

This essay proposes a framework for research that critiques not only the ethical implications of business practice, but also of business models. If there are embedded ethics, there can also be embedded unethicality. If there are social enterprises, surely there are also antisocial ones (a categorization as yet undefined), who by their very business model, promote unsustainability or exacerbate inequality. Beyond the idea of bad apples or even bad barrels, which has been well explored in this journal (the latter implying a flaw in a barrel designed to be “good”) there are business structures hiding in plain sight which by their very design embody and reify unethical practice.

The negative impact of some businesses is clear, particularly if the model is one that operates outside the law. With the proviso that laws vary more widely by jurisdiction than ethics do, and may be subject to political influence, or other cultural factors, illegal activities are often, although by no means always, unethical. The sale of heroin, for instance, and armed robbery are both for-profit enterprises which exist outside the boundaries of legality and therefore of respectability. This makes research on the ethics inherent in their models appear redundant, a waste of scholars’ energy and resources. It appears obvious that these models are unethical because we first see them as illegal. But in fact it is the other way around. The reason that these things are illegal, the trigger for their being sanctioned by law, is that they have been deemed at a particular place and time to be unethical and harmful. Correspondingly, the legalization of formerly criminalized activities reflects a changing understanding of how society should operate. Law is a response to societal understandings of ethics. Therefore, while it offers one option to reveal the kinds of models we, as scholars, might address, it does so at a delay, lagging societal awareness.

Consider activities that have recently been banned. The sale and deployment of cluster bombs, for example, was outlawed in 2010 by the Convention on Cluster Munitions (Oslo Convention) due to their indiscriminate and harmful nature. Prior to that date, they were still harmful, but the law would not have acted as a flag to this effect. Right now, their illegality points toward their unethicality. It is our role as researchers in this field to question business models that are legal, but which have built-in unethicality which may 1 day be banned, or which might deserve such sanction even if it is politically untenable. At the time of writing in early 2022, proposals are under consideration in New Zealand which will effectively, over time, outlaw the sale of cigarettes. Why is the New Zealand government taking this position? Because tobacco is inherently harmful, killing half of its users, according to the World Health Organization. Unlike alcohol, that is harmful with over-consumption, the World Health Organization observes that “there is no safe level of exposure to tobacco” (WHO, 2021 ). The business model for supply of tobacco depends on knowingly selling a product that will harm consumers. It is not that some, or even many, tobacco companies practice unethical behavior. It is the model, the design, that is inherently unethical.

Like tobacco, we know there are other industries, sectors and companies with business models which are (currently) legal yet ripe for analysis, containing elements that are inherently, almost by design, damaging or unsustainable. Can we frame this in terms of ethics, and what would such an approach tell us about business ethics itself? By default, scholars approach ethics in relation to decisions, and when we apply this to business, our perspective can tend toward a micro rather than a macro view. As well as looking at bad practice, bad apples, and bad barrels, the ethicality of business models would be an interesting topic to explore further in this journal.

A desire to do so, as a community of scholars, begs the next question: how do we identify such businesses? Harrison and Wicks ( 2021 ) have written on this topic in the context of stakeholder theory, providing a basis for identifying strategies that might be considered unethical by stakeholders and exploring the response of firms. A complementary approach would be to develop a framework. What we are seeking to identify is not unethical practice on an individual firm basis, or even unethical practice that is widespread but avoidable within particular industries, such as low wages in hospitality, but business models that depend on specific unethical elements. It is common, for instance, for food delivery workers to be poorly paid, but, arguably, the business model does not depend on those low wages. A delivery service could exist which charged more and paid well. However, other business models depend clearly on some harmful or unethical dimension. An example might be the tobacco industry, as noted above, or the provision of essay-cheating services to students. The purpose of this commentary is to explore a framework to identify and examine these.

Toward a Framework of Unethical Business Models

An approach to the question of how to identify unethical business models can be made either deductively or inductively. We might, for instance, locate a pre-existing code that can be used to classify them, or we could inductively explore businesses with significant ethical issues, and attempt to isolate the specific elements on which they rely. Using a code, the law, as we have seen, is somewhat useful ex-post, but overall it is inadequate to the task, being slow to respond, subjective in some ways, insufficient and geographically inconsistent. Another potentially useful rubric might be the criteria applied by ethical investment funds. The ethics of ethical investing have long been scrutinized in this journal, 1 and as the field transitions into ESG metrics and socially responsible investment factors, major issues that emerge are a lack of transparency, and a lack of convergence across the field on how and which criteria should be applied (Widyawati, 2020 ). For these and other reasons, this essay adopts the second of the two possible approaches flagged above, and explores in an inductive way business models that appear fundamentally harmful or unethical, aiming to synthesize a tentative framework for evaluation. Note that the dimensions explored may not, on an individual basis, brand a business model as unethical. In aggregate, however, they may provide a frame by which such business categories could be considered.

The tobacco industry may be seen as an example of a business that causes inherent harm, in its case primarily to the human health of consumers. Even where the tobacco is grown organically and sold on a fair trade basis, with well-remunerated workers and a supply chain free of exploitation, the sale of the product itself is always, even at low levels of consumption, damaging. Inherent harm, as a dimension of unethical business models, could also apply beyond consumers. Some forms of mineral exploration, for instance, may cause irreparable harm to the environment. A business that requires such approaches, especially if the exploration is not strictly necessary, may be given a high score on the dimension of harm.

Another dimension may be dependence. Some for-profit models are built on the foundation of locking consumers or suppliers in to future purchases. For example, newer Apple products which do not have a standard headphone port require users to either buy an adaptor, or to depend on the company to supply such accessories. A related element is built-in redundancy, or a lack of backwards compatibility. In gaming, for instance, some new games require upgrading of the hardware needed to play them, and in some cases the newer consoles will not support older games. Another example is phone batteries designed to degrade after a certain length of time, or digital cameras which become redundant even while functional when there is no longer software available to link to newer computer operating systems. Practices of creating dependency create moral hazard for the design of entire business models built on this behavior.

Another element is facilitating or encouraging unethical behavior on the part of others. Essay-writing services for students are an example, or those parts of the dark web that depend on platforming racist groups. A fourth dimension might be appropriation: privatization or theft of common resources like water supplies, radical overfishing, the patenting of genetic material, or, spectacularly, the February 2020 call by the Adam Smith Institute for the privatization of the moon. Deception is also a clearly unethical practice, and some businesses, notably in the field of natural medicine, beauty or diet products, promise far beyond what they can or do deliver. A congruent idea is that of an industry creating a problem for which they are the only solution, as in the case of some “smart food products” or much of the beauty industry.

Another dimension, not unconnected but distinct, is that of predation, or predatory behavior. An example is the selling to vulnerable groups of payday loans which only become profitable if the borrower does not pay on time. The loans are marketed in a disingenuous way, based on early repayment, but the business model depends on default. More indirectly, predation might include the sale of products that promote unrealistic beauty standards to young women in particular.

Exploitation is intrinsic to business models ranging from the use of near-forced labor to parts of the gig economy, or creative outlets that do not pay performers a living wage. Even the language used in the creative industry is revealing: artistic work is now routinely called content, relegating it to something that serves the distribution channels, rather than the other way around.

A Stylized Framework

These seven dimensions, harm, dependence, facilitation, appropriation, deception, predation and exploitation, may act in overlapping ways to support a business model with an unethical core. Such a simple framework would allow researchers to map the dependence of any given business model on each of these dimensions, perhaps with results as shown graphically as in Fig.  1 , below, for four stylized, pro-forma business models labeled A to D.

Framework mapping the ethicality of business models

This initial framework requires refinement in three key ways, and research is invited to explore correlations and redundancies, to add missing elements and dimensions, and, critically, to devise a means of scoring, perhaps based on large datasets.

The Means of Distribution

In applying the framework to business, it may be important to once again step back from examining products and services, to focus on elements of distribution. A central tenet of Marxism, eloquently expressed in W. E. B. DuBois’s posthumous autobiography ( 1968 ) was: “for working people to be free, they must seize control of the means of production .” He was thinking of slavery and forced labor in the cotton fields of the US South, where the invention of the cotton gin had made free labor in plantation fields extremely profitable for the few, but back-breaking and imprisoning for the many. In that pre-globalization context, he correctly saw the planation system as a generator of inequality, and a perpetuator of poverty and slavery. If the people were to be free, control of this means of production needed to be in wider hands. Production was the controlling element of its time. If you looked and asked: “Who are the wealthy? And what have they that the poor do not?” the answer would be factories, mills, mines, farms.

Our current system of financial accounting developed in the service of this old model of capitalism, accounting to the providers of capital on how their investment has been deployed in order to produce something. We assess companies—“account” for their activity in a literal sense—by evaluating the cost of the goods they produce and the revenue they obtain by selling them. Financial accounting developed to account for a commodity-based business—sales, cost of goods sold. Services are accounted for using the same structure, and thus are seen, in a way, as a special class of goods. Through a financial accounting lens, a service company is seen as selling something that is ultimately consumed in the same way as, say, a sandwich, or a widget. Profit is accounted for by taking the revenue from “selling” the service, and subtracting in some sense the cost of this sale. This fundamental idea—that the value generated within companies is linked to what they produce— has shaped our thinking about how business works. It colors how we theorize on how invested capital will be concentrated or distributed or generate value within or outside an organization. It forms the basis of financial accounting and delineates how we think about business ethics and about power, capital, production, value, and inequality. But is there a new element to consider?

Consider The Evergiven . In March of 2021, the unfortunate captain of the container ship, The Evergiven ran aground near the village of Manshiyet Rugola, blocking the Suez Canal. For a week, the world watched efforts to free it on nightly news broadcasts, daily newspapers, and in real time on social media. It was just one ship, run aground in a place most people had never heard of. But it mattered, somehow, to us all. Factories in countries dominated by production open and close all the time, and those of us in the privileged countries dominated by consumption barely notice. But let a ship block up the Suez Canal for a week, and we sit up, our fingers poised over the “Buy Now” button, wondering how this disruption to shipping might affect us, how it might affect our spending.

We now live in a globalized age of networked capitalism and consumerism, where rising inequality and its associated societal damage is driven not just by a few individuals controlling the means of production of valuable goods or services, but by distribution. Amazon destroys millions of items of unsold stock every year. Consider the business model that makes this more profitable for Amazon than selling the items cheaply. They have found a way to make money from the offer of distribution, even if no goods are sold or consumed. When billionaire artists like Beyoncé and JayZ set up Tidal in competition with Spotify, it was clear that, even for superstar producers of music, the money lies in distribution.

More generally, on a basic level, failures of distribution impact disproportionately on the poor. Wealthier people can stockpile a little, or time their spending. Those without a financial buffer are more reliant on getting that fill of fuel when they need and can afford it—they can’t afford to wait. For a starker example, consider the distribution of vaccines in the Covid-19 pandemic, booster vaccines were rolled out widely in countries with good health infrastructure, while many in the global South were still waiting for their first dose, putting their health and their lives at risk.

Perhaps our system of financial accounting, which developed to provide an account to the providers of capital about their commodity-based businesses, is no longer appropriate to this new era. Perhaps it even serves to occlude the means by which an elite can generate private profits without producing any goods. Perhaps we need to reconsider what it means to run a successful business, what it means to be productive in a real sense. Amazon does not need to provide a commodity the world needs, and price it accordingly, to be profitable. It gives us something else we appear to desperately want: instant consumption of everything, 24 h a day, delivered to our homes “for free.” Their model does not need to know or care about the utility of the goods. It simply needs us to want to buy something, anything at all, as the control the channels for an ever-widening range of goods. What they are selling us is consumption itself. The only desire they need to awaken is the desire to purchase. Once that is established, profits accrue to them, the distributor, regardless of whether they accrue to the producers. To an extent, then, they may be facilitating this harmful practice of over-consumption; their model may be predatory in relation to smaller, local suppliers; it may be designed to create dependency—not absolutely, but to some extent that could be scored using the framework above. Applying the framework with a distribution as well as a production lens could therefore be useful.

Of course, there are still production-based problems. Sweatshops persist. The ILO ( 2022 ) estimates about 40 million people are trapped in forced labor, a quarter of whom are children. 2 Neither is it a choice between the merits of production or distribution. Modern modes of production are themselves complex and networked, dependent on interwoven pathways of materials and processes that span the globe. Distribution underpins production. And if we stand and look around, as W. E. B. Dubois may have done, and ask: “Who are the wealthy? What do they have that the poor do not?” we will find ourselves looking not at the finery of plantation-owners, but at billionaires taking daytrips to space whose wealth is founded not on production, but on the distribution of goods, and the curation and channeling of our ideas and even of our relationships, thereby creating a lasting dependency.

This proposed framework, while imperfect, can be progressed to help identify unethical business models. Having done so, many aspects of the business would merit examination: design and packaging of the product or service; marketing strategies; price points and availability; the CSR strategies of companies operating this business model; social impact accounting. Researchers could explore the ethics of people who work in, patronize or invest in such businesses, with due regard to issues of power, choice and voice. The framework could also be applied to aspects of otherwise benign industries, such as education or healthcare. Closer to home, for example, it could be applied to the model of academic publishing, considering how young scholars need to corral their ideas into narrow channels that will reach publication in the few outlets that will be recognized by their employers. There are design issues to be explored in terms of the cost of open access, the dominance of English language, the pressure placed on our future scholars by tight and demanding tenure tracks, the role of encouragers and gatekeepers, the motivations created by our promotion and recruitment systems.

Overall, this approach could complement work that seeks out examples of good or bad business ethics, by examining business systems, their morality and who they serve.

Taboo and Totems in the Study of Social Ventures, Entrepreneurship, and Small Businesses

M. Tina Dacin and Julia Roloff

Descriptions of entrepreneurial activities range from glorifying entrepreneurs for their willingness to take risks, hard work, and innovativeness to raising general suspicion that entrepreneurs cut corners to get their business going and are motivated by self-serving goals. The literature on social enterprises, family businesses, start-ups, and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often belongs to one extreme or the other: either entrepreneurs or their ventures are studied as exemplars for outstanding achievement and contributions to society (e.g., Fowler et al., 2019 ), or they are studied for their deviance. Studies that present small businesses, family firms, and social ventures as places where well-intentioned people struggle to walk the talk about responsible and sustainable business practices are rare. However, without research that captures both the good and the bad, we fail to create management theory and recommendations that are relevant to business practice.

We observe contributions to the literature on social entrepreneurship and small business in which successful business ventures and their leaders are revered in a way that reminds us of totems. These examples are adverted to as proof that socially and environmentally responsible business ventures can also be financially successful. This idea is essentially so precious that criticizing these ventures, their operations or their leaders essentially becomes taboo. We explore the notions of totem and taboo and how they dominate our thinking and push for a move toward a more nuanced and balanced approach to research in this domain.

The terms totem and taboo have a long history in anthropology and anthropologists have described practices of totemism among ethnic groups from various continents. For example, Frazer (1887, p. 1) wrote: “A totem is a class of material objects which a savage regards with superstitious respect, believing that there exists between him and every member of the class an intimate and altogether special relation.” A wide range of cultural practices is described in connection with totemism, ranging from worshipping the totem to identification with it. Totemism comes with taboos, such as the taboo against killing or eating any individual of the totem species since this would be considered cannibalism. Freud ( 2013 /1913) claims in his book “Totem and Taboo” that this identification with a totem is the social institution that laid the ground for an incest taboo, as two people who identify with the same totem will not “consume” each other sexually. According to Freud ( 2013 /1913), the origin of taboos is unclear, as he believes them to be older than religious and moral prohibitions and they come with no clear explanation. He borrowed largely from the work of writers such as Van Gennep ( 1904 ), who referred to a taboo largely as a prohibition that could be grounded in religious, moral, or even social foundations. While taboos and their associated prohibitions can be behavioral, they can also be conversational—neither talked about nor publicly debated and discussed (Sabri et al., 2010 ).

We assert that some contributions to the business ethics literature show signs of totemism and of taboos that lack justification. Sabri et al. ( 2010 ) suggest that taboos are “cultural productions” that are crafted and embedded in social and historical contexts. The accelerated evolution of social ventures as a panacea for society’s ailing aid and impact sector has imposed enormous pressure to present only the good while downplaying the bad sides of these ventures. We see case studies that do not dare criticize any aspect of a social venture, or those that present claims of successful leaders as gospel without critical distancing or considering the possibility that an exemplary venture may also be fraught with weaknesses. Here, social ventures are approached as totems. Taboos play a role when entrepreneurs are studied for their deviant behavior, such as their propensity to lie, distort and/or misrepresent information in order to gain support from investors and clients, but there is neglection of discussion of those who do not resort to such behaviors (e.g., Ji et al., 2019 ): in this case, the idea that entrepreneurs forego a business opportunity because of their individual or organizational values is the taboo. This tendency of researchers to revere totems and observe taboos has led to a number of problematic outcomes that limit our ability to meaningfully unpack this literature. We encourage researchers to consider how their theoretical framing and methodological approaches can introduce or remove bias in their research.

Bias Introduced by Theoretical Framing

First, for the most part, the social venture and small business literature tends to focus on hybrid forms of organizing, where it is assumed at the outset that there are tensions across the logics (most often social and commercial) which are blended to guide and govern the enterprise. The assumption is that the logics driving social ventures compete and are largely incompatible. However, this assumption may be unfounded and ignores the fact that firms generally operate in pluralistic institutional spheres that involve the simultaneous juggling of multiple logics. An example is a family firm, which has to balance the needs of the business, the family and those of the firm’s stakeholders (Signori & Fassin, 2021 ). We do not want to discount the rise of conflicts or tensions because of multiple logics. However, an implicit assumption that there is incompatibility from the outset is largely misguided.

Second, there is a romanticized narrative that often accompanies small, entrepreneurial enterprises and family businesses, and especially in the discourse around social ventures. Indeed, most of the narratives describe the work of social entrepreneurs in a positive light. Social entrepreneurs are heroic totems who seek and gather accolades at a variety of field-configuring events led by various foundations and luminaries. At these events, entrepreneurs are highly celebrated, reinforcing a cycle of pointing out the positive in an extreme form of hero worship. These same heroes go on to enjoy a cycle of success receiving awards from one event to the next. As they continue their momentum of success, these heroic social entrepreneurs are rarely scrutinized, and in fact their stories are careful curations of their origin, work, and impact. In so doing, we know of little to nothing in published scholarly work about the darker side of these actors and their ventures, although recent examples in the news media shed light on some controversial activities (Waldie, 2020 ).

Third, by focusing on totems and ignoring more mid-range dialogue about the positive and darker sides of entrepreneurial activity, we privilege the role of individual actors and ignore the collective side of entrepreneuring (Montgomery et al., 2012 ). In fact, many social ventures involve groups of individuals. Collective sets of actors such as key stakeholders, including partners, funders, and community actors, should not be discounted nor ignored. In fact, in community settings, much good comes from the efforts of collective social innovation (Dacin & Dacin, 2019 ).

Taboos can influence researchers when they develop their theoretical frameworks. For example, two recent studies investigating how entrepreneurs describe their ventures on crowdfunding platforms exemplify this problem. Defazio et al. ( 2021 ) study the impact of prosocial framing in these descriptions, while Calic et al. ( 2021 ) investigate whether using Machiavellian rhetoric makes projects more or less successful in receiving financial backing. Both studies address the same research question on how project descriptions influence funding success and failure, but they approach this question from diametrically opposed positions, assuming that investors are either drawn to socially impactful projects or manipulated by ingratiation and stories of betrayal. Together, these two studies provide a more complex understanding of venture presentations on crowdsourcing websites. However, it is often feasible to design studies that capture a wide range of motivations and actions and therefore allow exploration of both the good and the bad in the same study.

In particular, research on social ventures has been limited by the tendency and practice to establish totems and to avoid taboos. To what extent can we be confident that the literature to date has rendered valuable knowledge and insight about whether social ventures have produced lasting, systemic, and structural change in the range of complex, inter-related problems, such as homelessness and poverty? By assuming that social ventures are inherently good, there is a tendency to avoid comparison to other forms of doing good, take impact as given, and often inspection is seen as harsh and also is often unwanted. The mythical status attributed to social ventures being “inherently good” means we tend to overlook potentially viable alternative approaches such as public, private, and charitable organizations, cross-sector partnerships and corporate philanthropy (Dacin et al., 2011 ). In fact, in the last two decades other pathways for good may have been subjugated to the allure of the social enterprise over other alternatives.

Bias Introduced by the Methodological Approach

We want to encourage researchers to be mindful of tendencies toward glorification and vilification in the research of social ventures, entrepreneurship, and small businesses. There are examples for studies that are designed to identify virtuous as well as problematic patterns.

Such research can be motivated by unexpected observations such as the study by Dorado et al. ( 2022 ) of a successful social bank that struggles with employee retention. Dorado et al. investigate the reasons why this value-driven social enterprise sees so many of its employees leaving after a few years of service. A similar inquiry—but based on large population samples—is conducted by Brieger et al. ( 2021 ), who study how social value creation, meaningful work and burnout are related. This research helps us to understand the price people pay when working for a social venture as they perceive pressure to set private needs and goals aside.

On the other hand, keeping a business on the right path is challenging to do. For example, Sendlhofer ( 2020 ) describes how employees of a SME that is recognized as a corporate social responsibly (CSR) pioneer started decoupling from the firm’s praised practices. Moreover, they procrastinated when it came to creating new socially responsible practices because their past success made them confident that their firm would continue to excel anyway. Similar observations of mission drift are made in the microfinance sector when over time lenders tend to prefer more capable clients over more needy ones (Beisland et al., 2019 ). These studies help us to understand the messy nature of business ventures aimed at creating valuable outcomes for society and highlight that these organizations can hardly be categorized as good or bad, but that they are operating between high aspiration and very real human and organizational limitations. Limitations and aspirations are best studied with research questions that are interested in a wide range of observations.

Other examples of studies avoiding bias can be found in the research on what motivates entrepreneurs that capture responses ranging from egoistic to altruistic motivations. For example, a study on indigenous entrepreneurs demonstrates that emancipation through entrepreneurship can take on many meanings, as some entrepreneurs work toward making themselves autonomous while others want to instigate change in their community (Pergelova et al., 2021 ). If the researchers had only asked questions on how indigenous entrepreneurs seek to help their community, we would have learned less about their need for individual autonomy. Another study avoiding taboos investigated the role of SME in peacekeeping was able to capture dynamics that promote peace and others which foster conflict (Joseph et al., 2021 ): this study highlights that creating income and employment in a conflict-ridden community is not sufficient to promote peace—in order to make a contribution, firms needed to reduce inter-group conflict between Lebanese citizens and Syrian refugees within the firm. If the researchers had only been interested in observing how firms contribute to peacekeeping, they might have failed to observe that in some firms conflictual beliefs are perpetuated. Such findings are feasible since the studies were designed to capture motivations, beliefs, and behaviors along a continuum between virtuous and beneficial, on one side, and deviant and harmful, on the other. Thus, we can learn more about the struggles people experience when they are trying to do the right thing, create ventures that produce more than financial value and work toward keeping these ventures on the right path in changing environments.

These studies link observations on the individual, organizational and societal level, such as exhaustion and decoupling among employees and unintended problematic consequences of entrepreneurial activities at organizational and community level. By conducting research that sheds light on the gray zones of entrepreneurship and managing small ventures, we can create theories that address problems that entrepreneurs and their teams experience every day. A focus on only one end of the continuum between virtuosity and deviance blinds us to the nuances and complexity of entrepreneurial activities and the difficulties that people experience when they are trying to “walk the talk” and not to lose their path as they continue walking.

The Path Forward

To reduce our focus on totems and taboos from research on social ventures, family businesses, start-ups, and SMEs, we need to be open to observing the good and the bad in any empirical context, and we need to find ways to describe and explain a complex and embedded social system, in which people with good intentions fail to deliver desired outcomes and people with questionable intentions create value for others. Only by designing studies that can capture the complexity of doing business in a dynamic environment can we create theory that provides an accurate description of our messy reality and permits us to develop solutions that work under given constraints.

We invite efforts for more systematic research on the motivation and rationale as to why some businesses work toward more responsible and sustainable business practices and others neglect to do the same. Future research ought to inquire whether good, moderate, and poor practices can be explained by factors influencing enterprises at a societal or cultural level, such as institutional and legislative pressures, market demands, or the absence of such factors. Do inadequate organizational resources, capabilities, or resistance to change explain why businesses fail to do better? Are individual factors such as motivation, values, and beliefs the reason why entrepreneurs, managers, and employees engage with or decouple from such goals? What is the role of stakeholders and partners in encouraging or discouraging responsible business practices? How can we better understand the unintended negative consequences of doing good?

Moreover, we are also interested in a critical analysis of our research traditions. To what extent do the totems we perpetuate maintain the façade or serve as a mask for material or ideological interests? Where does the dark side reside? Is it hidden, just below the surface, or more deeply embedded in the core of entrepreneurial activity? Moving forward, what can we learn about social impact creation by focussing more on how ventures capture value instead on how they create it (Bacq & Eddleston, 2018 )? How do various pathways to social impact compare? Are social ventures more effective than other forms of impact such as cross-sector partnerships (Vurro et al., 2010 )?

We are looking forward to a discourse on social ventures, family businesses, start-ups, and SMEs that is ready to question old assumptions and ready to capture the potential but also the limitations of individuals and collectives to create socially beneficial ventures.

1 See, for instance, Schwartz ( 2003 ) and the considerable body of work citing that paper, or, more recently, Widyawati ( 2020 ).

2 See https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/forced-labour/lang--en/index.htm for estimates of the level of forced and child labor worldwide.

Please note that authors are listed by alphabetical order and not based on author contribution. Each commentary in this essay was written by different authors.

This article has been changed to open access. The setting in Jflux have been amended regarding copyright holder name, grants and licence

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

• Alotaibi KO, Helliar C, Tantisantiwong N. Competing logics in the Islamic funds industry: A market logic versus a religious logic. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022; 175 (1):207–230. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04653-8. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bacq S, Eddleston KA. A resource-based view of social entrepreneurship: How stewardship culture benefits scale of social impact. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018; 152 (5):589–611. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Beisland LA, D’Espallier B, Mersland R. The commercialization of the microfinance industry: Is there a ‘personal mission drift’ among credit officers? Journal of Business Ethics. 2019; 158 (1):119–134. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3710-4. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Birkey RN, Guidry RP, Islam MA, Patten DM. Mandated social disclosure: An analysis of the response to the California transparency in supply chains act of 2010. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018; 152 (3):827–841. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3364-7. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bosse DA, Sutton T. The stakeholder perspective in strategic management. In: Harrison JS, Barney JB, Freeman RE, Phillips RA, editors. Cambridge handbook of stakeholder theory. Cambridge University Press; 2019. pp. 189–210. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brieger SA, De Clercq D, Meynhardt T. Doing good, feeling good? Entrepreneurs’ social value creation beliefs and work-related well-being. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021; 172 (4):707–725. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04512-6. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Buhmann K. Public regulators and CSR: The ‘Social Licence to Operate’ in recent United Nations instruments on business and human rights and the juridification of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016; 136 (4):699–714. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2869-9. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Calic G, Arseneault R, Ghasemaghaei M. The dark side of Machiavellian rhetoric: Signaling in reward-based crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04984-0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Carton TL, Wokutch RE, Murrmann KF. Bluffing in labor negotiations: Legal and ethical Issues. Journal of Business Ethics. 1982; 1 (1):13–22. doi: 10.1007/BF00382801. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Choi J, Wang H. Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal. 2009; 30 (8):895–907. doi: 10.1002/smj.759. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dacin MT, Dacin PA. Collective social innovation: leveraging custodianship, tradition and place on Fogo Island. In: George G, Baker T, Tracey P, Joshi H, editors. Handbook of inclusive innovation: The role of organizations, markets and communities in social innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd; 2019. pp. 167–185. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dacin MT, Dacin PA, Tracey P. Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science. 2011; 22 (5):1203–1213. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0620. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Defazio D, Franzoni C, Rossi-Lamastra C. How pro-social framing affects the success of crowdfunding projects: The role of emphasis and information crowdedness. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021; 171 (2):357–378. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04428-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Derakhshan R. Building projects on the local communities’ planet: Studying organizations’ care-giving approaches. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022; 175 (4):721–740. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04636-9. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dorado S, Chen Y, Prado AM, Simon V. Attuned HRM systems for social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022; 178 (3):1–20. doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04821-4. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Du Bois WEB. A soliloquy on viewing my life from the last decade of its first century. Oxford University Press; 1968. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fasterling B, Demuijnck G. Human rights in the void? Due diligence in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Journal of Business Ethics. 2013; 116 (4):799–814. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1822-z. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fowler EA, Coffey BS, Dixon-Fowler HR. Transforming good intentions into social impact: A case on the creation and evolution of a social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics. 2019; 159 (3):665–678. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3754-5. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Freeman RE. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman; 1984. [ Google Scholar ]
• Freeman RE. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly. 1994; 4 (4):409–421. doi: 10.2307/3857340. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar B, de Colle S. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press; 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Freud, S. (2013/1913). Totem and taboo: Some points of agreement between the mental lives of savages and neurotics. Routledge.
• Harrison JS, Barney JB, Freeman RE, Phillips RA, editors. Cambridge handbook of stakeholder theory. Cambridge University Press; 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Harrison JS, Wicks AC. Harmful stakeholder strategies. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021; 169 (3):405–419. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04310-9. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hess D. The management and oversight of human rights due diligence. American Business Law Journal. 2021; 58 (4):751–798. doi: 10.1111/ablj.12197. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hofmann H, Schleper MC, Blome C. Conflict minerals and supply chain due diligence: An exploratory study of multi-tier supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018; 147 (1):115–141. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2963-z. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• ILO. (2022). ILO Topics. Forced labour, modern slavery and human trafficking: facts and figures . International Labour Organisation. Retrieved May 18, 2022, from https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/forced-labour/lang--en/index.htm .
• Islam MA, Van Staden CJ. Modern slavery disclosure regulation and global supply chains: Insights from stakeholder narratives on the UK Modern Slavery Act. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04878-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jago AS, Fast N, Pfeffer J. Losing more than money: Organizations’ prosocial actions appear less authentic when their resources are declining. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022; 175 (2):413–425. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04645-8. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ji J, Dimitratos P, Huang Q, Su T. Everyday-life business deviance among Chinese SME owners. Journal of Business Ethics. 2019; 155 (4):1179–1194. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3542-2. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jones TM. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review. 1995; 20 (2):404–437. doi: 10.2307/258852. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jones TM, Donaldson T, Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Leana CR, Mahoney JT, Pearce JL. Management theory and social welfare: Contributions and challenges. Academy of Management Review. 2016; 41 (2):216–228. doi: 10.5465/amr.2016.0012. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Joseph J, Katsos JE, Daher M. Local business, local peace? Intergroup and economic dynamics. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021; 173 (4):835–854. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04515-3. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Loughran T, McDonald B, Otteson JR. How have corporate codes of ethics responded to an era of increased scrutiny? Journal of Business Ethics. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05104-2. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Macdonald K. Re-thinking ‘Spheres of responsibility’: Business responsibility for indirect harm. Journal of Business Ethics. 2011; 99 (4):549–563. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0668-x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Martin-Ortega O. Public procurement as a tool for the protection and promotion of human rights: A study of collaboration, due diligence and leverage in the electronics industry. Business and Human Rights Journal. 2018; 3 (1):75–95. doi: 10.1017/bhj.2017.35. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• McVey M, Ferguson J, Puyou F-R. “Traduttore, traditore?” Translating human rights into the corporate context. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-05028-3. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Michell JR, Mitchell RK, Hunt RA, Townsend DM, Lee JH. Stakeholder engagement, knowledge problems and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022; 175 (1):75–94. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04550-0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mintzberg H. Patterns in strategy formulation. Management Science. 1978; 24 (9):934–948. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principles of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review. 1997; 22 (4):853–886. doi: 10.2307/259247. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Montgomery AW, Dacin PA, Dacin MT. Collective social entrepreneurship: Collaboratively shaping social good. Journal of Business Ethics. 2012; 111 (3):375–388. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1501-5. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pergelova A, Angulo-Ruiz F, Dana LP. The entrepreneurial quest for emancipation: Trade-offs, practices and outcomes in an indigenous context. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04894-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pinnington B, Benstead A, Meehan J. Transparency in supply chains (TISC): Assessing and Improving the quality of modern slavery statements. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05037-w. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• PwC [PricewaterhouseCoopers]. (2021). PwC’s 2021 annual corporate director survey. The director’s new playbook: Taking on change . Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/governance-insights-center/assets/pwc-2021-annual-corporate-directors-survey.pdf .
• Radu C, Smaili N. Alignment versus monitoring: An examination of the effect of the CSR committee and CSR-linked executive compensation on CSR performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04904-2. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ramasastry A. Corporate social responsibility versus business and human rights: Bridging the gap between responsibility and accountability. Journal of Human Rights. 2015; 14 (2):237–259. doi: 10.1080/14754835.2015.1037953. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sabri O, Manceau D, Pras B. Taboo: An underexplored concept in marketing. Recherche Et Applications En Marketing. 2010; 25 (1):59–85. doi: 10.1177/076737011002500103. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Schrempf-Stirling J, Wettstein F. Beyond guilty verdicts: Human rights litigation and its impact on corporations’ human rights policies. Journal of Business Ethics. 2017; 145 (3):545–562. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2889-5. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Schwartz MS. The "ethics" of ethical investing. Journal of Business Ethics. 2003; 43 (3):195–213. doi: 10.1023/A:1022933912939. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sendlhofer T. Decoupling from moral responsibility for CSR: Employees' visionary procrastination at a SME. Journal of Business Ethics. 2020; 167 (2):361–378. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04174-z. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Signori S, Fassin Y. Family members’ salience in family business: An identity-based stakeholder approach. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04998-8. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Gennep, A. (1904). Tabou et totémisme à Madagascar: étude descriptive et théorique (Vol. 17). Pипoл Клaccик [Ripol Classic].
• Vurro C, Dacin MT, Perrini F. Institutional antecedents of partnering for social change: How institutional logics shape cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics. 2010; 94 (1):39–53. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0778-0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Waheed A, Zhang Q. Effect of CSR and ethical practices on sustainable competitive performance: A case of emerging markets from stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022; 175 (4):837–855. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04679-y. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Waldie, P. (2020). WE Charity’s fall from grace: The Kielburger brothers’ philanthropic empire is struggling to survive. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved May 4, 2022.
• Wang H, Choi J. A new look at the corporate social-financial performance relationship: The moderating roles of temporal and interdomain consistency in corporate social performance. Journal of Management. 2013; 39 (2):416–441. doi: 10.1177/0149206310375850. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wettstein F. The duty to protect: Corporate complicity, political responsibility, and human rights advocacy. Journal of Business Ethics. 2010; 96 (1):33–47. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0447-8. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Widyawati L. A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020; 29 (2):619–637. doi: 10.1002/bse.2393. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• World Health Organisation. (2021). Fact sheet: Tobacco . 26 July, 2021. Retrieved February 2022, from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco .
• Young C. Putting the law in its place: Business ethics and the assumption that illegal implies unethical. Journal of Business Ethics. 2019; 160 (1):35–51. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3904-4. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhang T, Zhang Z, Yang J. When does corporate social responsibility backfire in acquisitions? Signal incongruence and acquirer returns. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022; 175 (1):45–58. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04583-5. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

• How it works

Useful Links

How much will your dissertation cost?

Have an expert academic write your dissertation paper!

Dissertation Services

Get unlimited topic ideas and a dissertation plan for just £45.00

Order topics and plan

Get 1 free topic in your area of study with aim and justification

Yes I want the free topic

Business Ethics Dissertation Topics

Published by Owen Ingram at December 29th, 2022 , Revised On October 10, 2023

Many students find it difficult to choose an appropriate topic for their business ethics dissertation paper because the field is complex and contains interesting and contentious issues. Furthermore, the current issues keep evolving as more and more people get involved in different enterprises.

What we know for certain is that a business cannot be conducted without ethics. In order to maintain their integrity and dependability, companies must follow an ethical code of conduct.

The purpose of a dissertation or a research paper is to assess the student’s understanding of the various issues of business ethics and propose appropriate solutions through research and writing.

Students should choose compelling and intriguing business ethics dissertation topics to ensure good grades. For those who do not know where to begin, here are some business ethics research topics to consider.

Important & Related Resource: Dissertation Topics Database , Dissertation Writing Services .

• Is overly high pricing and levies imposed by businesses related to corporate social responsibility (CSR)?
• How ethical behaviour among business managers contributes to a company’s success.
• The effect of deceptive advertising techniques on consumer trust.
• The impact of discrimination and gender bias on worker performance inside a business.
• How higher education institutions use ethics in their hiring procedures.
• Difficulties in implementing ethical business practices, which are necessary for the growth of sustainable tourism.
• Should businesses that benefit from other people’s risk be permitted to continue operating? A case study of unhealthy items sold by cigarette and alcohol manufacturers on the American market.
• Case study on business ethics; a quick analysis of Facebook’s privacy and surveillance violations.
• Examine child labour as an unethical practice and a source of cheap labour.
• Women face discrimination at work and are frequently seen as sex symbols.
• Describe how you, as a business manager, could stop this.
• Examine the concept of honesty in business ethics.
• Examine privacy violations on social media as a breach of company ethics.
• How does a company’s inadequate environmental management affects consumer loyalty and trust?
• A study on the conflict between publication incentives and business research.
• How does an organisation’s profit incentive affect the quality of its products?
• The effects of worker exploitation on the industrial market
• The usefulness of academic theories of business ethics in real-world corporate settings.
• Approach to publishing industry ethics in author sponsorship deals.
• Using ethics to guide decision-making in the context of internet commerce.
• A comparison of how business ethics are taught in rich and developing countries higher education institutions.
• Apply business ethics to determine how much a corporation must invest in health, maternity, and other benefits when moving to a foreign nation.
• Is it morally acceptable for businesses to be completely upfront with their target market?
• Is it moral for employers to use birth control to prevent workplace pregnancies?
• A thorough analysis of the impact on society and the economy of illicit activities like corruption, bribery, nepotism, and overpricing of contracts.
• An analysis of a case study including sexual harassment and other unethical behaviour in commercial companies.
• The several moral conundrums that contemporary corporate firms must choose between.
• Components of a shared ethical responsibility culture between a company and employees.
• How do corporate ethics affect employees’ mental health?
• Corporate crime and white-collar crime characteristics in modern business.
• Teaching personnel from various ethnic origins a shared code of conduct.
• Things that multinational corporations should take into account while creating their environmental policies in various nations.
• The need for ethics in good corporate governance, item number.
• Personal and professional conduct in connection to work ethics, moral conduct, and workplace crisis management.
• The importance of ethics in the management and prevention of disputes in the workplace
• Businesses in the industrial and production sectors have made major contributions to pollution and global warming.
• Explain the many breaches and ethical violations such firms have committed from the business ethics perspective in the paragraph.
• What does corporate social responsibility (CSR) entail? Describe the numerous ways that businesses can implement CSR.
• The connection between pharmaceutical corporations’ gift-giving practices and corporate ethics.

Get Dissertation Help

Orders completed by our expert writers are

• Formally drafted in an academic style
• Free Amendments and 100% Plagiarism Free – or your money back!
• 100% Confidential and Timely Delivery!
• Free anti-plagiarism report
• Appreciated by thousands of clients. Check client reviews

The field of business ethics entails establishing the moral rules that govern an organisation’s conduct or administration. Changing business practices are eroding ethical principles over time. Academics must study business ethics to determine its causes, benefits, and effects.

Our assistance in finding good thesis topics will require you to choose an original topic that deals with ethically contentious issues. Our dissertation writing experts can assist you in navigating the moral dilemmas of today in the form of a dissertation paper. We will provide appealing business ethics dissertation topics to help you achieve the highest possible grade.

Frequently Asked Questions

List down the 5 best business ethics dissertation topics.

Certainly! Here are 5 great Business Ethics Dissertation Topics: 1. Ethical Decision-Making in Corporate Governance 2. Sustainability and Social Responsibility in Business 3. Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Business 4. Whistleblowing and Ethical Accountability in Organizations 5. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalized World.

You May Also Like

Are you looking for unique and intriguing branding dissertation topics, ideas and topic examples? If yes, continue reading this article because it provides several branding dissertation topic suggestions for your consideration. 

Pick from any of our top 55 dissertation topic ideas on neuroscience and neurobiology available for your help with neuroscience dissertation and research.

Fintech, short for financial technology, is a rapidly growing industry that focuses on using technology to improve the efficiency of traditional banking and financial services.

USEFUL LINKS

LEARNING RESOURCES

COMPANY DETAILS

• How It Works

• Write my thesis
• Thesis writers
• Buy thesis papers
• Bachelor thesis
• Master's thesis
• Thesis editing services
• Thesis proofreading services
• Buy a thesis online
• Write my dissertation
• Dissertation proposal help
• Pay for dissertation
• Custom dissertation
• Dissertation help online
• Buy dissertation online
• Cheap dissertation
• Dissertation editing services
• Write my research paper
• Buy research paper online
• Pay for research paper
• Research paper help
• Order research paper
• Custom research paper
• Cheap research paper
• Research papers for sale
• Thesis subjects
• How It Works

80 World’s Finest Business Ethics Topics For Research Paper

What is business ethics?  MBA students in college or university need top business ethics research paper topics for their course. Any business cannot exist without ethics. It is a vital aspect that companies in numerous countries uphold to ensure their reliability and credibility.

Building a consensus between the moral aspects and the economic setting is what lecturers aim to see in students with such a paper. You will know how to write more topics on your own painstakingly with our top business ethics paper topic ideas in a moment.

Topics in Accounting: Business Ethics Research Paper

• The perception of tax evasion ethics
• Acceptable ethical behavior in the accounting workplace
• The history of ethics in accounting
• How governments handle accounting ethics
• A case study of philosophers who contributed to the ethics of accounting
• Cultural and political situations leading to accounting ethics
• The concepts behind accounting ethics precepts and their applications
• Different educational approaches in teaching accounting ethics

Corporate Culture Business Ethics Paper Topics

• What role does corporate culture play in business ethics?
• The place of organizational culture in improving performance
• Business ethics in the management of mergers
• Lessons from corporate scandals and organizational crises
• Conducting a corporate cultural “audit.”
• Factors determining the behavior of people in a corporate environment
• How management impacts organizational culture
• Methods used to incorporate ethics into the corporate culture.

Technology Business Ethics Research Topics

• Encoding company values to stop destructive technologies
• How to build a more robust data foundation to enhance security
• Stakeholder privacy in the dissemination of information
• Cultivating trust in destructive technologies
• Demonstrating transparency using technology in business
• Is data surveillance ethical?
• Deploying the technology “power of all.”
• Training business technologists to eliminate product bias
• Advising employees on how technology may affect their jobs in the future

Business Ethics Paper Topics For Advertising

• Is the use of misleading advertising unethical?
• Why do companies use women in product advertising?
• Is it ethical to use minors for business adverts?
• Should alcohol companies advertise before the watershed period?
• Is it ethical to advertise the sale of guns on TV?
• What should happen to agencies with scam adverts?
• Discuss why it is unethical for boxing companies to use provocatively dressed ladies
• The impact of misleading headlines in advertisements
• Is it ethical to use vague and obscene language in advertising?
• Why should cigarette adverts have a warning for excessive use?
• Compare and contrast men versus women adverts. Which ones sell?

Ethical Research Paper Topics in Business during Pandemics

• Is it ethical to hike prices during pandemics
• Should companies lay off their staff during the coronavirus period
• Should small income businesses pay tax during adverse conditions
• Why do enterprises hide commodities in times of crises
• Is it ethical for real-estate agencies to continue charging rent?
• Should governments supply subsidized products to stop competition?
• Why pandemics may increase internal control risks
• Is slashing more than 50% of salaries ethical?
• Should employers grant their employees mandatory unpaid leaves?

Ethics Research Paper Topics for Managers

• Why managers should have a Corporate Conscience
• How good ethics translates to profit: A guide for managers
• A critical approach to the integrity of managers
• The social nature of morality in managerial positions
• Is shrewd bargaining ethical for managers?
• How can managers effectively resolve ethical problems
• How unethical management can affect a company’s bottom line
• Moral management is suitable for both the law and the market
• Ethical managers save companies legal compulsion
• How does good ethics result in excellence for managers?

Interesting Legal Business Ethics Topics

• Why lawyers should not pursue their interests in the representation of a client
• Are law schools teaching legal ethics effectively?
• How should lawyers behave towards each other?
• Should lawyers be compelled to honor their obligation?
• How law and morality conflict
• Can a promise be used in place of a contract?
• How far should companies stand behind their products?
• Is it ethical to use mentally insane people in adverts?
• Claiming a product is better than others in ads.
• Employment discrimination law ethics

Social Media Business Ethical Issues Topics for Papers

• Should employers monitor employee behavior?
• How social media leads to a breach of confidentiality
• Social media and improper business practices and activities
• Have blogs toned-down business ethics?
• Use of social media by employees for their personal, non-company use
• Discuss how employees use social media for the company’s business objectives
• How to ethical answer questions on social media
• Healthy employee social media policies
• How applicable is the Kantian Ethics to the use of social media in business?
• Proper ethical standards for social media use
• Should companies turn off comments on social media?
• Trust and brands management in social media
• How to improve ethics using social media
• Corporate social media policy for companies
• Tips for posting on social media

The list of business ethics topics above should inspire you to get a paper and begin your essay or create more of them.

Our team of eminent writers is on standby to offer you all the writing help you need for your papers on business ethics and much more! All you need to do is to tap that “Place Order” button.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply