![research hypothesis about modular distance learning U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- Behav Sci (Basel)
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning Logo of behavsci](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/pmc/pmcgifs/logo-behavsci.png)
![](http://farmaciacoslada.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Assessing Cognitive Factors of Modular Distance Learning of K-12 Students Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic towards Academic Achievements and Satisfaction
Yung-tsan jou.
1 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan; wt.ude.ucyc@uojty (Y.-T.J.); moc.oohay@enimrahcrolfas (C.S.S.)
Klint Allen Mariñas
2 School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapua University, Manila 1002, Philippines
3 Department of Industrial Engineering, Occidental Mindoro State College, San Jose 5100, Philippines
Charmine Sheena Saflor
Associated data.
Not applicable.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought extraordinary challenges to K-12 students in using modular distance learning. According to Transactional Distance Theory (TDT), which is defined as understanding the effects of distance learning in the cognitive domain, the current study constructs a theoretical framework to measure student satisfaction and Bloom’s Taxonomy Theory (BTT) to measure students’ academic achievements. This study aims to evaluate and identify the possible cognitive capacity influencing K-12 students’ academic achievements and satisfaction with modular distance learning during this new phenomenon. A survey questionnaire was completed through an online form by 252 K-12 students from the different institutions of Occidental Mindoro. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the researcher analyses the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The model used in this research illustrates cognitive factors associated with adopting modular distance learning based on students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. The study revealed that students’ background, experience, behavior, and instructor interaction positively affected their satisfaction. While the effects of the students’ performance, understanding, and perceived effectiveness were wholly aligned with their academic achievements. The findings of the model with solid support of the integrative association between TDT and BTT theories could guide decision-makers in institutions to implement, evaluate, and utilize modular distance learning in their education systems.
1. Introduction
The 2019 coronavirus is the latest infectious disease to develop rapidly worldwide [ 1 ], affecting economic stability, global health, and education. Most countries have suspended thee-to-face classes in order to curb the spread of the virus and reduce infections [ 2 ]. One of the sectors impacted has been education, resulting in the suspension of face-to-face classes to avoid spreading the virus. The Department of Education (DepEd) has introduced modular distance learning for K-12 students to ensure continuity of learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to Malipot (2020), modular learning is one of the most popular sorts of distance learning alternatives to traditional face-to-face learning [ 3 ]. As per DepEd’s Learner Enrolment and Survey Forms, 7.2 million enrollees preferred “modular” remote learning, TV and radio-based practice, and other modalities, while two million enrollees preferred online learning. It is a method of learning that is currently being used based on the preferred distance learning mode of the students and parents through the survey conducted by the Department of Education (DepEd); this learning method is mainly done through the use of printed and digital modules [ 4 ]. It also concerns first-year students in rural areas; the place net is no longer available for online learning. Supporting the findings of Ambayon (2020), modular teaching within the teach-learn method is more practical than traditional educational methods because students learn at their own pace during this modular approach. This educational platform allows K-12 students to interact in self-paced textual matter or digital copy modules. With these COVID-19 outbreaks, some issues concerned students’ academic, and the factors associated with students’ psychological status during the COVID-19 lockdown [ 5 ].
Additionally, this new learning platform, modular distance learning, seems to have impacted students’ ability to discover and challenged their learning skills. Scholars have also paid close attention to learner satisfaction and academic achievement when it involves distance learning studies and have used a spread of theoretical frameworks to assess learner satisfaction and educational outcomes [ 6 , 7 ]. Because this study aimed to boost academic achievement and satisfaction in K-12 students, the researcher thoroughly applied transactional distance theory (TDT) to understand the consequences of distance in relationships in education. The TDT was utilized since it has the capability to establish the psychological and communication factors between the learners and the instructors in distance education that could eventually help researchers in identifying the variables that might affect students’ academic achievement and satisfaction [ 8 ]. In this view, distance learning is primarily determined by the number of dialogues between student and teacher and the degree of structuring of the course design. It contributes to the core objective of the degree to boost students’ modular learning experiences in terms of satisfaction. On the other hand, Bloom’s Taxonomy Theory (BTT) was applied to investigate the students’ academic achievements through modular distance learning [ 6 ]. Bloom’s theory was employed in addition to TDT during this study to enhance students’ modular educational experiences. Moreover, TDT was utilized to check students’ modular learning experiences in conjuction with enhacing students’ achievements.
This study aimed to detect the impact of modular distance learning on K-12 students during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the cognitive factors affecting academic achievement and student satisfaction. Despite the challenging status of the COVID-19 outbreak, the researcher anticipated a relevant result of modular distance learning and pedagogical changes in students, including the cognitive factors identified during this paper as latent variables as possible predictors for the utilization of K-12 student academic achievements and satisfaction.
1.1. Theoretical Research Framework
This study used TDT to assess student satisfaction and Bloom’s theory to quantify academic achievement. It aimed to assess the impact of modular distance learning on academic achievement and student satisfaction among K-12 students. The Transactional Distance Theory (TDT) was selected for this study since it refers to student-instructor distance learning. TDT Moore (1993) states that distance education is “the universe of teacher-learner connections when learners and teachers are separated by place and time.” Moore’s (1990) concept of ”Transactional Distance” adopts the distance that occurs in all linkages in education, according to TDT Moore (1993). Transactional distance theory is theoretically critical because it states that the most important distance is transactional in distance education, rather than geographical or temporal [ 9 , 10 ]. According to Garrison (2000), transactional distance theory is essential in directing the complicated experience of a cognitive process such as distance teaching and learning. TDT evaluates the role of each of these factors (student perception, discourse, and class organization), which can help with student satisfaction research [ 11 ]. Bloom’s Taxonomy is a theoretical framework for learning created by Benjamin Bloom that distinguishes three learning domains: Cognitive domain skills center on knowledge, comprehension, and critical thinking on a particular subject. Bloom recognized three components of educational activities: cognitive knowledge (or mental abilities), affective attitude (or emotions), and psychomotor skills (or physical skills), all of which can be used to assess K-12 students’ academic achievement. According to Jung (2001), “Transactional distance theory provides a significant conceptual framework for defining and comprehending distance education in general and a source of research hypotheses in particular,” shown in Figure 1 [ 12 ].
![Click on image to zoom An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is behavsci-12-00200-g001.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9312230/bin/behavsci-12-00200-g001.jpg)
Theoretical Research Framework.
1.2. Hypothesis Developments and Literature Review
This section will discuss the study hypothesis and relate each hypothesis to its related studies from the literature.
There is a significant relationship between students’ background and students’ behavior .
The teacher’s guidance is essential for students’ preparedness and readiness to adapt to a new educational environment. Most students opt for the Department of Education’s “modular” distance learning options [ 3 ]. Analyzing students’ study time is critical for behavioral engagement because it establishes if academic performance is the product of student choice or historical factors [ 13 ].
There is a significant relationship between students’ background and students’ experience .
Modules provide goals, experiences, and educational activities that assist students in gaining self-sufficiency at their speed. It also boosts brain activity, encourages motivation, consolidates self-satisfaction, and enables students to remember what they have learned [ 14 ]. Despite its success, many families face difficulties due to their parents’ lack of skills and time [ 15 ].
There is a significant relationship between students’ behavior and students’ instructor interaction .
Students’ capacity to answer problems reflects their overall information awareness [ 5 ]. Learning outcomes can either cause or result in students and instructors behavior. Students’ reading issues are due to the success of online courses [ 16 ].
There is a significant relationship between students’ experience and students’ instructor interaction .
The words “student experience” relate to classroom participation. They establish a connection between students and their school, teachers, classmates, curriculum, and teaching methods [ 17 ]. The three types of student engagement are behavioral, emotional, and cognitive. Behavioral engagement refers to a student’s enthusiasm for academic and extracurricular activities. On the other hand, emotional participation is linked to how children react to their peers, teachers, and school. Motivational engagement refers to a learner’s desire to learn new abilities [ 18 ].
There is a significant relationship between students’ behavior and students’ understanding .
Individualized learning connections, outstanding training, and learning culture are all priorities at the Institute [ 19 , 20 ]. The modular technique of online learning offers additional flexibility. The use of modules allows students to investigate alternatives to the professor’s session [ 21 ].
There is a significant relationship between students’ experience and students’ performance .
Student conduct is also vital in academic accomplishment since it may affect a student’s capacity to study as well as the learning environment for other students. Students are self-assured because they understand what is expected [ 22 ]. They are more aware of their actions and take greater responsibility for their learning.
There is a significant relationship between students’ instructor interaction and students’ understanding .
Modular learning benefits students by enabling them to absorb and study material independently and on different courses. Students are more likely to give favorable reviews to courses and instructors if they believe their professors communicated effectively and facilitated or supported their learning [ 23 ].
There is a significant relationship between students’ instructor interaction and students’ performance.
Students are more engaged and active in their studies when they feel in command and protected in the classroom. Teachers play an essential role in influencing student academic motivation, school commitment, and disengagement. In studies on K-12 education, teacher-student relationships have been identified [ 24 ]. Positive teacher-student connections improve both teacher attitudes and academic performance.
There is a significant relationship between students’ understanding and students’ satisfaction .
Instructors must create well-structured courses, regularly present in their classes, and encourage student participation. When learning objectives are completed, students better understand the course’s success and learning expectations. “Constructing meaning from verbal, written, and graphic signals by interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining” is how understanding is characterized [ 25 ].
There is a significant relationship between students’ performance and student’s academic achievement .
Academic emotions are linked to students’ performance, academic success, personality, and classroom background [ 26 ]. Understanding the elements that may influence student performance has long been a goal for educational institutions, students, and teachers.
There is a significant relationship between students’ understanding and students’ academic achievement .
Modular education views each student as an individual with distinct abilities and interests. To provide an excellent education, a teacher must adapt and individualize the educational curriculum for each student. Individual learning may aid in developing a variety of exceptional and self-reliant attributes [ 27 ]. Academic achievement is the current level of learning in the Philippines [ 28 ].
There is a significant relationship between students’ performance and students’ satisfaction .
Academic success is defined as a student’s intellectual development, including formative and summative assessment data, coursework, teacher observations, student interaction, and time on a task [ 29 ]. Students were happier with course technology, the promptness with which content was shared with the teacher, and their overall wellbeing [ 30 ].
There is a significant relationship between students’ academic achievement and students’ perceived effectiveness .
Student satisfaction is a short-term mindset based on assessing students’ educational experiences [ 29 ]. The link between student satisfaction and academic achievement is crucial in today’s higher education: we discovered that student satisfaction with course technical components was linked to a higher relative performance level [ 31 ].
There is a significant relationship between students’ satisfaction and students’ perceived effectiveness.
There is a strong link between student satisfaction and their overall perception of learning. A satisfied student is a direct effect of a positive learning experience. Perceived learning results had a favorable impact on student satisfaction in the classroom [ 32 ].
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. participants.
The principal area under study was San Jose, Occidental Mindoro, although other locations were also accepted. The survey took place between February and March 2022, with the target population of K-12 students in Junior and Senior High Schools from grades 7 to 12, aged 12 to 20, who are now implementing the Modular Approach in their studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. A 45-item questionnaire was created and circulated online to collect the information. A total of 300 online surveys was sent out and 252 online forms were received, a total of 84% response rate [ 33 ]. According to several experts, the sample size for Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) should be between 200 and 500 [ 34 ].
2.2. Questionnaire
The theoretical framework developed a self-administered test. The researcher created the questionnaire to examine and discover the probable cognitive capacity influencing K-12 students’ academic achievement in different parts of Occidental Mindoro during this pandemic as well as their satisfaction with modular distance learning. The questionnaire was designed through Google drive as people’s interactions are limited due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. The questionnaire’s link was sent via email, Facebook, and other popular social media platforms.
The respondents had to complete two sections of the questionnaire. The first is their demographic information, including their age, gender, and grade level. The second is about their perceptions of modular learning. The questionnaire is divided into 12 variables: (1) Student’s Background, (2) Student’s Experience, (3) Student’s Behavior, (4) Student’s Instructor Interaction, (5) Student’s Performance, (6) Student’s Understanding, (7) Student’s Satisfaction, (8) Student’s Academic Achievement, and (9) Student’s Perceived Effectiveness. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess all latent components contained in the SEM shown in Table 1 .
The construct and measurement items.
Construct | Items | Measures | Supporting Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Students’ Background (SB) | SB1 | Are you having difficulty with Modular Distance Learning. | Pe Dangle, Y.R. (2020) [ ] |
SB2 | I prefer Modular Distance Learning Rather than traditional face-to-face training, I prefer the Modular Distance Learning Approach. | Aksan, J.A. (2021) [ ] | |
SB3 | Modular learning aids students in increasing their productivity in education and learning while promoting flexibility in terms of content, time, and space. | Shuja, A. et al. (2019) [ ] | |
SB4 | I have a lot of time to answer the activities with a modular teaching technique. | Aksan, J.A. (2021) [ ] | |
SB5 | I acquire the same amount of learning from using the module as I do from learning in a face-to-face or classroom situation. | Natividad, E. (2021) [ ] | |
Students’ Behavior (SBE) | SBE1 | I feel confident in studying and performing well in the modular class. | Delfino, A.P. (2019) [ ] |
SBE2 | I employed rehearsing techniques like reviewing my notes over and over again. | Lowerison et al. (2006) [ ] | |
SBE3 | I can recall my understanding from the past and help me to understand words. | Santillan, S.C. et al. (2021) [ ] | |
SBE4 | I retain a critical mindset throughout my studies, considering before accepting or rejecting. | Bordeos (2021) [ ] | |
SBE5 | Usually I plan my weekly module work in advance. | Karababa et al. (2010) [ ] | |
Students’ Experience (SE) | SE1 | The way the module materials were presented helped to maintain my interest. | Allen et al. (2020) [ ] |
SE2 | I do not experience any problems during modular distance learning | Amir al (2020) [ ] | |
SE3 | The instructions for completing the assessed tasks were simple to understand. | Santillan et al. (2021) [ ] | |
SE4 | During distance learning, I am not stressed. | Amir et al. (2020) [ ] | |
SE5 | The study workload on this module fitted with my personal circumstances. | Allen et al. (2020) [ ] | |
Students’ Instructor Interaction (SI) | SI1 | The instructor updated me on my progress in the course regularly. | Gray & DiLoreto (2020) [ ] |
SI2 | On this subject, I was satisfied with my teacher’s assistance. | Allen et al. (2020) [ ] | |
SI3 | I kept in touch with the course’s instructor regularly. | Gray & DiLoreto (2020) [ ] | |
SI4 | The instructor was concerned about my performance in this class. | Gray & DiLoreto (2020) [ ] | |
SI5 | My teacher feedback on assessed tasks helped me prepare for the next assessment. | Allen et al. (2020) [ ] | |
Students’ Understanding (SAU) | SAU1 | Modular Distance Learning allows me to take my time to understand my school works. | Abuhassna et al. (2020) [ ] |
SAU2 | The distance learning program met my expectations in terms of quality. | Woolf et al. (2020) [ ] | |
SAU3 | Modular Distance Learning helps me to improve my understanding and skills and also helps to gather new knowledge. | Bordeos (2021) [ ] | |
SAU4 | Modular Distance Learning is a helpful tool to get so focused on activities in my classes. | Abuhassna et al. (2020) [ ] | |
SAU5 | Modular Distance Learning motivates me to study more about the course objectives. | Abuhassna et al. (2020) [ ] | |
Students’ Performance (SP) | SP1 | I can effectively manage my study time and complete assignments on schedule. | Richardson and Swan (2003) [ ] |
SP2 | When completing projects or participating in class discussions, combine ideas or concepts from several courses. | Delfino, A.P. (2019) [ ] | |
SP3 | I employed elaboration techniques like summarizing the material and relating it to previous knowledge. | Lowerison et al. (2006) [ ] | |
SP4 | In my studies, I am self-disciplined and find it easy to schedule reading and homework time. | Richardson and Swan (2003) [ ] | |
SP5 | I was confident in my capacity to learn and do well in class. | Delfino, A.P. (2019) [ ] | |
Student’s Academic Achievement (SAA) | SAA1 | I have more opportunities to reflect on what I’ve learned in modular classes. | Dziuban et al. (2015) [ ] |
SAA2 | I am committed to completing my homework (readings, assignments) on time and engaging fully in class discussions. | Mt. San Antonio College (2012) [ ] | |
SAA3 | My modular learning experience has increased my opportunity to access and use information. | Dziuban et al. (2015) [ ] | |
SAA4 | I employed assessment, evaluation, and criticizing procedures for assessing, evaluating, and critiquing the material. | Lowerison et al. (2006) [ ] | |
SAA5 | I am skilled at juggling many responsibilities while working under time constraints. | Estelami (2013) [ ] | |
Students’ Satisfaction (SS) | SS1 | I am always interested in learning about new things. | Abuhassna et al. (2020) [ ] |
SS2 | I study more efficiently with distance learning. | Amir (2020) [ ] | |
SS3 | Modular learning suits me better than face-to-face classes. | Abuhassna et al. (2020) [ ] | |
SS4 | I prefer distance learning to classroom learning. | Amir et al. (2020) [ ] | |
SS5 | Overall, I am pleased with the module’s quality. | Santillan, S.C. et al. (2021) [ ] | |
Students’ Perceived Effectiveness (SPE) | SPE1 | I made use of learning possibilities and resources in this modular distance learning. | Lowerison et al. (2006) [ ] |
SPE2 | I would recommend modular distance learning study to other students. | Abuhassna et al. (2020) [ ] | |
SPE3 | These classes also challenge me to conduct more independent research and not rely on a single source of information. | Mt. San Antonio College (2012) [ ] | |
SPE4 | Overall, this modular distance learning has been a good platform for studying during the pandemic. | Lowerison et al., 2006) [ ] | |
SPE5 | Overall, I am satisfied with this modular distance learning course. | Aman (2009) [ ] |
2.3. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
All the variables have been adapted from a variety of research in the literature. The observable factors were scored on a Likert scale of 1–5, with one indicating “strongly disagree” and five indicating “strongly agree”, and the data were analyzed using AMOS software. Theoretical model data were confirmed by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). SEM is more suitable for testing the hypothesis than other methods [ 53 ]. There are many fit indices in the literature, of which the most commonly used are: CMIN/DF, Comparative Fit Index (CFI), AGFI, GFI, and Root Mean Square Error (RMSEA). Table 2 demonstrates the Good Fit Values and Acceptable Fit Values of the fit indices, respectively. AGFI and GFI are based on residuals; when sample size increases, the value of the AGFI also increase. It takes a value between 0 and 1. The fit is good if the value is more significant than 0.80. GFI is a model index that spans from 0 to 1, with values above 0.80 deemed acceptable. An RMSEA of 0.08 or less suggests a good fit [ 54 ], and a value of 0.05 to 0.08 indicates an adequate fit [ 55 ].
Acceptable Fit Values.
Fit Indices | Acceptable Range | Reference |
---|---|---|
CMIN/DF | <3.00 | Norberg et al., 2007 [ ]; Li et al., 2013 [ ] |
GFI | ≥0.80 | Doloi et al., 2012 [ ] |
CFI | >0.70 | Norberg et al., 2007 [ ]; Chen et al., 2012 [ ] |
RMSEA | ≤0.08 | Doloi et al., 2012 [ ] |
AGFI | >0.08 | Jaccard and Wan (1996) [ ] |
TLI | >0.08 | Jafari et al., 2021 [ ] |
IFI | >0.08 | Lee et al., 2015 [ ] |
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 2 demonstrates the initial SEM for the cognitive factors of Modular Distance learning towards academic achievements and satisfaction of K-12 students during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the figure below, three hypotheses were not significant: Students’ Behavior to Students’ Instructor Interaction (Hypothesis 3), Students’ Understanding of Students’ Academic Achievement (Hypothesis 11), and Students’ Performance to Students’ Satisfaction (Hypothesis 12). Therefore, a revised SEM was derived by removing this hypothesis in Figure 3 . We modified some indices to enhance the model fit based on previous studies using the SEM approach [ 47 ]. Figure 3 demonstrates the final SEM for evaluating cognitive factors affecting academic achievements and satisfaction and the perceived effectiveness of K-12 students’ response to Modular Learning during COVID-19, shown in Table 3 . Moreover, Table 4 demonstrates the descriptive statistical results of each indicator.
![Click on image to zoom An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is behavsci-12-00200-g002.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9312230/bin/behavsci-12-00200-g002.jpg)
Initial SEM with indicators for evaluating the cognitive factors of modular distance learning towards academic achievements and satisfaction of K-12 students during COVID-19 pandemic.
![Click on image to zoom An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is behavsci-12-00200-g003.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9312230/bin/behavsci-12-00200-g003.jpg)
Revised SEM with indicators for evaluating the cognitive factors of modular distance learning towards academic achievements and satisfaction of K-12 students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Summary of the Results.
Hypothesis | -Value | Interpretation | |
---|---|---|---|
H1 | There is a significant relationship between Students’ Background and Students’ Behavior | 0.001 | Significant |
H2 | There is a significant relationship between Students’ Background and Students’ Experiences. | 0.001 | Significant |
H3 | There is a significant relationship between Students’ Behavior and Students’ instructor Interaction. | 0.155 | Not Significant |
H4 | There is a significant relationship between Students’ experience and Students—Interaction | 0.020 | Significant |
H5 | There is a significant relationship between Students’ Behavior and Students’ Understanding | 0.212 | Not Significant |
H6 | There is a significant relationship between Students’ experience and Students’ Performance | 0.001 | Significant |
H7 | There is a significant relationship between Students’ instructor Interaction and Students’ Understanding | 0.008 | Significant |
H8 | There is a significant relationship between Students’ Instructor—Interaction and students’ Performance | 0.018 | Significant |
H9 | There is a significant relationship between students’ Understanding and Students’ Satisfaction | 0.001 | Significant |
H10 | There is a significant relationship between students’ Performance and Students’ Academic Achievement | 0.001 | Significant |
H11 | There is a significant relationship between students’ understanding and Students’ Academic Achievement | 0.001 | Significant |
H12 | There is a significant relationship between students’ Performance and Students Satisfaction | 0.602 | Not Significant |
H13 | There is a significant relationship between Students’ Academic Achievement and students’ Perceived Effectiveness | 0.001 | Significant |
H14 | There is a significant relationship between students’ Satisfaction and Students’ Perceived Effectiveness | 0.001 | Significant |
Descriptive statistic results.
Factor | Item | Mean | SD | Factor Loading | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial Model | Final Model | ||||
Students’ Background | SB1 | 3.437 | 0.9147 | 0.052 | - |
SB2 | 3.000 | 1.1707 | 0.480 | 0.562 | |
SB3 | 3.663 | 0.8042 | 0.551 | 0.551 | |
SB4 | 3.742 | 0.8797 | 0.381 | - | |
SB5 | 3.024 | 1.0746 | 0.557 | 0.629 | |
Students’ Behavior | SBE1 | 3.667 | 0.8468 | 0.551 | - |
SBE2 | 3.829 | 0.8075 | 0.463 | - | |
SBE3 | 3.873 | 0.7305 | 0.507 | - | |
SBE4 | 3.833 | 0.8157 | 0.437 | - | |
SBE 5 | 3.849 | 0.8188 | 0.585 | - | |
Students’ Experience | SE1 | 3.853 | 0.8458 | 0.669 | 0.686 |
SE2 | 2.825 | 1.0643 | 0.572 | 0.525 | |
SE3 | 3.591 | 0.9035 | 0.630 | 0.634 | |
SE4 | 2.758 | 1.1260 | 0.639 | 0.611 | |
SE5 | 3.615 | 0.8693 | 0.552 | 0.551 | |
Students’ Instructor Interaction | SI1 | 3.754 | 0.7698 | 0.689 | - |
SI2 | 3.817 | 0.9095 | 0.655 | 0.541 | |
SI3 | 3.730 | 0.9269 | 0.731 | 0.645 | |
SI4 | 3.929 | 0.7487 | 0.685 | 0.568 | |
SI5 | 3.909 | 0.7805 | 0.669 | 0.597 | |
Students’ Understanding | SAU1 | 4.028 | 0.8152 | 0.647 | 0.652 |
SAU2 | 3.464 | 0.8390 | 0.691 | 0.704 | |
SAU3 | 3.873 | 0.8325 | 0.658 | 0.620 | |
SAU4 | 3.750 | 0.8775 | 0.731 | 0.741 | |
SAU5 | 3.794 | 0.8591 | 0.740 | 0.717 | |
Students’ Performance | SP1 | 3.762 | 0.8602 | 0.640 | - |
SP2 | 3.881 | 0.7995 | 0.708 | 0.655 | |
SP3 | 3.778 | 0.8781 | 0.582 | 0.606 | |
SP4 | 3.905 | 0.7927 | 0.647 | 0.585 | |
SP5 | 3.976 | 0.8275 | 0.630 | 0.673 | |
Student’s Academic Achievement | SAA1 | 3.885 | 0.7976 | 0.696 | 0.713 |
SAA2 | 3.929 | 0.7749 | 0.653 | 0.658 | |
SAA3 | 3.762 | 0.8319 | 0.632 | 0.615 | |
SAA4 | 3.837 | 0.7790 | 0.612 | 0.597 | |
SAA5 | 3.694 | 0.8959 | 0.559 | - | |
Students’ Satisfaction | SS1 | 4.087 | 0.7835 | 0.189 | - |
SS2 | 3.361 | 0.9943 | 0.657 | 0.669 | |
SS3 | 2.960 | 1.1390 | 0.779 | 0.659 | |
SS4 | 2.889 | 1.1516 | 0.759 | 0.677 | |
SS5 | 3.377 | 1.0918 | 0.802 | 0.803 | |
Students’ Perceived Effectiveness | SPE1 | 3.829 | 0.7875 | 0.580 | 0.558 |
SPE2 | 3.405 | 1.0153 | 0.730 | 0.750 | |
PE3 | 3.790 | 0.8178 | 0.490 | - | |
PE4 | 3.813 | 0.9367 | 0.614 | - | |
PE5 | 3.492 | 1.0000 | 0.696 | 0.690 |
The current study was improved by Moore’s transactional distance theory (TDT) and Bloom’s taxonomy theory (BTT) to evaluate cognitive factors affecting academic achievements and satisfaction and the perceived effectiveness of K-12 students’ response toward modular learning during COVID-19. SEM was utilized to analyze the correlation between Student Background (SB), Student Experience (SE), Student Behavior (SBE), Student Instructor Interaction (SI), Student Performance (SP), Student Understanding (SAU), Student Satisfaction (SS), Student’s Academic achievement (SAA), and Student’s Perceived effectiveness (SPE). A total of 252 data samples were acquired through an online questionnaire.
According to the findings of the SEM, the students’ background in modular learning had a favorable and significant direct effect on SE (β: 0.848, p = 0.009). K-12 students should have a background and knowledge in modular systems to better experience this new education platform. Putting the students through such an experience would support them in overcoming all difficulties that arise due to the limitations of the modular platforms. Furthermore, SEM revealed that SE had a significant adverse impact on SI (β: 0.843, p = 0.009). The study shows that students who had previous experience with modular education had more positive perceptions of modular platforms. Additionally, students’ experience with modular distance learning offers various benefits to them and their instructors to enhance students’ learning experiences, particularly for isolated learners.
Regarding the Students’ Interaction—Instructor, it positively impacts SAU (β: 0.873, p = 0.007). Communication helps students experience positive emotions such as comfort, satisfaction, and excitement, which aim to enhance their understanding and help them attain their educational goals [ 62 ]. The results revealed that SP substantially impacted SI (β: 0.765; p = 0.005). A student becomes more academically motivated and engaged by creating and maintaining strong teacher-student connections, which leads to successful academic performance.
Regarding the Students’ Understanding Response, the results revealed that SAA (β: 0.307; p = 0.052) and SS (β: 0.699; p = 0.008) had a substantial impact on SAU. Modular teaching is concerned with each student as an individual and with their specific capability and interest to assist each K-12 student in learning and provide quality education by allowing individuality to each learner. According to the Department of Education, academic achievement is the new level for student learning [ 63 ]. Meanwhile, SAA was significantly affected by the Students’ Performance Response (β: 0.754; p = 0.014). It implies that a positive performance can give positive results in student’s academic achievement, and that a negative performance can also give negative results [ 64 ]. Pekrun et al. (2010) discovered that students’ academic emotions are linked to their performance, academic achievement, personality, and classroom circumstances [ 26 ].
Results showed that students’ academic achievement significantly positively affects SPE (β: 0.237; p = 0.024). Prior knowledge has had an indirect effect on academic accomplishment. It influences the amount and type of current learning system where students must obtain a high degree of mastery [ 65 ]. According to the student’s opinion, modular distance learning is an alternative solution for providing adequate education for all learners and at all levels in the current scenario under the new education policy [ 66 ]. However, the SEM revealed that SS significantly affected SPE (β: 0.868; p = 0.009). Students’ perceptions of learning and satisfaction, when combined, can provide a better knowledge of learning achievement [ 44 ]. Students’ perceptions of learning outcomes are an excellent predictor of student satisfaction.
Since p -values and the indicators in Students’ Behavior are below 0.5, therefore two paths connecting SBE to students’ interaction—instructor (0.155) and students’ understanding (0.212) are not significant; thus, the latent variable Students’ Behavior has no effect on the latent variable Students’ Satisfaction and academic achievement as well as perceived effectiveness on modular distance learning of K12 students. This result is supported by Samsen-Bronsveld et al. (2022), who revealed that the environment has no direct influence on the student’s satisfaction, behavior engagement, and motivation to study [ 67 ]. On the other hand, the results also showed no significant relationship between Students’ Performance and Students’ Satisfaction (0.602) because the correlation p -values are greater than 0.5. Interestingly, this result opposed the other related studies. According to Bossman & Agyei (2022), satisfaction significantly affects performance or learning outcomes [ 68 ]. In addition, it was discovered that the main drivers of the students’ performance are the students’ satisfaction [ 64 , 69 ].
The result of the study implies that the students’ satisfaction serves as the mediator between the students’ performance and the student-instructor interaction in modular distance learning for K-12 students [ 70 ].
Table 5 The reliabilities of the scales used, i.e., Cronbach’s alphas, ranged from 0.568 to 0.745, which were in line with those found in other studies [ 71 ]. As presented in Table 6 , the IFI, TLI, and CFI values were greater than the suggested cutoff of 0.80, indicating that the specified model’s hypothesized construct accurately represented the observed data. In addition, the GFI and AGFI values were 0.828 and 0.801, respectively, indicating that the model was also good. The RMSEA value was 0.074, lower than the recommended value. Finally, the direct, indirect, and total effects are presented in Table 7 .
Construct Validity Model.
Factor | Number of Items | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|
Students’ Background | 3 | 0.598 |
Students’ Behavior | 5 | 0.682 |
Students’ Experience | 5 | 0.761 |
Students’ Instructor Interaction | 5 | 0.817 |
Students’ Understanding | 5 | 0.825 |
Students’ Performance | 5 | 0.768 |
Students’ Academic Achievement | 5 | 0.770 |
Students’ Satisfaction | 5 | 0.777 |
Students’ Perceived Effectiveness | 5 | 0.772 |
Total | 0.752 |
Goodness of Fit Measures of SEM | Parameter Estimates | Minimum Cut-Off | Interpretation |
---|---|---|---|
CMIN/DF | 2.375 | <3.0 | Acceptable |
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) | 0.830 | >0.8 | Acceptable |
Incremental Fit Index (IFI) | 0.832 | >0.8 | Acceptable |
Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) | 0.812 | >0.8 | Acceptable |
Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) | 0.812 | >0.8 | Acceptable |
Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) | 0.803 | >0.8 | Acceptable |
Root Mean Square Error (RMSEA) | 0.074 | <0.08 | Acceptable |
Direct effect, indirect effect, and total effect.
No. | Variable | Direct Effects | -Value | Indirect Effects | -Value | Total Effects | -Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SB–SE | 0.848 | 0.009 | - | - | 0.848 | 0.009 |
2 | SB–SI | - | - | 0.715 | 0.006 | 0.715 | 0.006 |
3 | SB–SAU | - | - | 0.624 | 0.006 | 0.624 | 0.006 |
4 | SB–SP | - | - | 0.547 | 0.004 | 0.547 | 0.004 |
5 | SB–SAA | - | - | 0.604 | 0.006 | 0.604 | 0.006 |
6 | SB–SS | - | - | 0.436 | 0.006 | 0.436 | 0.006 |
7 | SB–SPE | - | - | 0.522 | 0.007 | 0.522 | 0.006 |
8 | SE–SI | 0.843 | 0.009 | - | - | 0.843 | 0.009 |
9 | SE–SAU | - | - | 0.736 | 0.010 | 0.736 | 0.010 |
10 | SE–SP | - | - | 0.645 | 0.005 | 0.645 | 0.005 |
11 | SE–SAA | - | - | 0.713 | 0.006 | 0.713 | 0.006 |
12 | SE–SS | - | - | 0.514 | 0.006 | 0.514 | 0.006 |
13 | SE–SPE | - | - | 0.615 | 0.006 | 0.615 | 0.006 |
14 | SI–SAU | 0.873 | 0.007 | - | - | 0.873 | 0.007 |
15 | SI–SP | 0.765 | 0.005 | - | - | 0.765 | 0.005 |
16 | SI–SAA | - | - | 0.845 | 0.004 | 0.845 | 0.004 |
17 | SI–SS | - | - | 0.610 | 0.004 | 0.610 | 0.004 |
18 | SI–SPE | - | - | 0.730 | 0.007 | 0.730 | 0.007 |
19 | SAU–SP | - | - | - | - | - | - |
20 | SAU–SAA | 0.307 | 0.052 | - | - | 0.307 | 0.052 |
21 | SAU–SS | 0.699 | 0.008 | - | - | 0.699 | 0.008 |
22 | SAU–SPE | - | - | 0.680 | 0.011 | 0.680 | 0.011 |
23 | SP–SAA | 0.754 | 0.014 | - | - | 0.754 | 0.014 |
24 | SP–SS | - | - | - | - | - | - |
25 | SP–SPE | - | - | 0.179 | 0.018 | 0.179 | 0.018 |
26 | SAA–SS | - | - | - | - | - | - |
27 | SAA–SPE | 0.237 | 0.024 | - | - | 0.237 | 0.024 |
28 | SS–SPE | 0.868 | 0.009 | - | - | 0.868 | 0.009 |
Table 6 shows that the five parameters, namely the Incremental Fit Index, Tucker Lewis Index, the Comparative Fit Index, Goodness of Fit Index, and Adjusted Goodness Fit Index, are all acceptable with parameter estimates greater than 0.8, whereas mean square error is excellent with parameter estimates less than 0.08.
4. Conclusions
The education system has been affected by the 2019 coronavirus disease; face-to-face classes are suspended to control and reduce the spread of the virus and infections [ 2 ]. The suspension of face-to-face classes results in the application of modular distance learning for K-12 students according to continuity of learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. With the outbreak of COVID-19, some issues concerning students’ academic Performance and factors associated with students’ psychological status are starting to emerge, which impacted the students’ ability to learn. This study aimed to perceive the impact of Modular Distance learning on the K-12 students amid the COVID-19 pandemic and assess cognitive factors affecting students’ academic achievement and satisfaction.
This study applied Transactional Distance Theory (TDT) and Bloom Taxonomy Theory (BTT) to evaluate cognitive factors affecting students’ academic achievements and satisfaction and evaluate the perceived effectiveness of K-12 students in response to modular learning. This study applied Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test hypotheses. The application of SEM analyzed the correlation among students’ background, experience, behavior, instructor interaction, performance, understanding, satisfaction, academic achievement, and student perceived effectiveness.
A total of 252 data samples were gathered through an online questionnaire. Based on findings, this study concludes that students’ background in modular distance learning affects their behavior and experience. Students’ experiences had significant effects on the performance and understanding of students in modular distance learning. Student instructor interaction had a substantial impact on performance and learning; it explains how vital interaction with the instructor is. The student interacting with the instructor shows that the student may receive feedback and guidance from the instructor. Understanding has a significant influence on students’ satisfaction and academic achievement. Student performance has a substantial impact on students’ academic achievement and satisfaction. Perceived effectiveness was significantly influenced by students’ academic achievement and student satisfaction. However, students’ behavior had no considerable effect on students’ instructor interaction, and students’ understanding while student performance equally had no significant impact on student satisfaction. From this study, students are likely to manifest good performance, behavior, and cognition when they have prior knowledge with regard to modular distance learning. This study will help the government, teachers, and students take the necessary steps to improve and enhance modular distance learning that will benefit students for effective learning.
The modular learning system has been in place since its inception. One of its founding metaphoric pillars is student satisfaction with modular learning. The organization demonstrated its dedication to the student’s voice as a component of understanding effective teaching and learning. Student satisfaction research has been transformed by modular learning. It has caused the education research community to rethink long-held assumptions that learning occurs primarily within a metaphorical container known as a “course.” When reviewing studies on student satisfaction from a factor analytic perspective, one thing becomes clear: this is a complex system with little consensus. Even the most recent factor analytical studies have done little to address the lack of understanding of the dimensions underlying satisfaction with modular learning. Items about student satisfaction with modular distance learning correspond to forming a psychological contract in factor analytic studies. The survey responses are reconfigured into a smaller number of latent (non-observable) dimensions that the students never really articulate but are fully expected to satisfy. Of course, instructors have contracts with their students. Studies such as this one identify the student’s psychological contact after the fact, rather than before the class. The most important aspect is the rapid adoption of this teaching and learning mode in Senior High School. Another balancing factor is the growing sense of student agency in the educational process. Students can express their opinions about their educational experiences in formats ranging from end-of-course evaluation protocols to various social networks, making their voices more critical.
Furthermore, they all agreed with latent trait theory, which holds that the critical dimensions that students differentiate when expressing their opinions about modular learning are formed by the combination of the original items that cannot be directly observed—which underpins student satisfaction. As stated in the literature, the relationship between student satisfaction and the characteristic of a psychological contract is illustrated. Each element is translated into how it might be expressed in the student’s voice, and then a contract feature and an assessment strategy are added. The most significant contributor to the factor pattern, engaged learning, indicates that students expect instructors to play a facilitative role in their teaching. This dimension corresponds to the relational contract, in which the learning environment is stable and well organized, with a clear path to success.
5. Limitations and Future Work
This study was focused on the cognitive capacity of modular distance learning towards academic achievements and satisfaction of K-12 students during the COVID-19 pandemic. The sample size in this study was small, at only 252. If this study is repeated with a larger sample size, it will improve the results. The study’s restriction was to the province of Occidental Mindoro; Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to measure all the variables. Thus, this will give an adequate solution to the problem in the study.
The current study underlines that combining TDT and BTT can positively impact the research outcome. The contribution the current study might make to the field of modular distance learning has been discussed and explained. Based on this research model, the nine (9) factors could broadly clarify the students’ adoption of new learning environment platform features. Thus, the current research suggests that more investigation be carried out to examine relationships among the complexity of modular distance learning.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Author Contributions
Data collection, methodology, writing and editing, K.A.M.; data collection, writing—review and editing, Y.-T.J. and C.S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed consent statement.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Insights into students’ experiences and perceptions of remote learning methods: from the covid-19 pandemic to best practice for the future.
- 1 Minerva Schools at Keck Graduate Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States
- 2 Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship, Montclair, NJ, United States
- 3 Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
This spring, students across the globe transitioned from in-person classes to remote learning as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. This unprecedented change to undergraduate education saw institutions adopting multiple online teaching modalities and instructional platforms. We sought to understand students’ experiences with and perspectives on those methods of remote instruction in order to inform pedagogical decisions during the current pandemic and in future development of online courses and virtual learning experiences. Our survey gathered quantitative and qualitative data regarding students’ experiences with synchronous and asynchronous methods of remote learning and specific pedagogical techniques associated with each. A total of 4,789 undergraduate participants representing institutions across 95 countries were recruited via Instagram. We find that most students prefer synchronous online classes, and students whose primary mode of remote instruction has been synchronous report being more engaged and motivated. Our qualitative data show that students miss the social aspects of learning on campus, and it is possible that synchronous learning helps to mitigate some feelings of isolation. Students whose synchronous classes include active-learning techniques (which are inherently more social) report significantly higher levels of engagement, motivation, enjoyment, and satisfaction with instruction. Respondents’ recommendations for changes emphasize increased engagement, interaction, and student participation. We conclude that active-learning methods, which are known to increase motivation, engagement, and learning in traditional classrooms, also have a positive impact in the remote-learning environment. Integrating these elements into online courses will improve the student experience.
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically changed the demographics of online students. Previously, almost all students engaged in online learning elected the online format, starting with individual online courses in the mid-1990s through today’s robust online degree and certificate programs. These students prioritize convenience, flexibility and ability to work while studying and are older than traditional college age students ( Harris and Martin, 2012 ; Levitz, 2016 ). These students also find asynchronous elements of a course are more useful than synchronous elements ( Gillingham and Molinari, 2012 ). In contrast, students who chose to take courses in-person prioritize face-to-face instruction and connection with others and skew considerably younger ( Harris and Martin, 2012 ). This leaves open the question of whether students who prefer to learn in-person but are forced to learn remotely will prefer synchronous or asynchronous methods. One study of student preferences following a switch to remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic indicates that students enjoy synchronous over asynchronous course elements and find them more effective ( Gillis and Krull, 2020 ). Now that millions of traditional in-person courses have transitioned online, our survey expands the data on student preferences and explores if those preferences align with pedagogical best practices.
An extensive body of research has explored what instructional methods improve student learning outcomes (Fink. 2013). Considerable evidence indicates that active-learning or student-centered approaches result in better learning outcomes than passive-learning or instructor-centered approaches, both in-person and online ( Freeman et al., 2014 ; Chen et al., 2018 ; Davis et al., 2018 ). Active-learning approaches include student activities or discussion in class, whereas passive-learning approaches emphasize extensive exposition by the instructor ( Freeman et al., 2014 ). Constructivist learning theories argue that students must be active participants in creating their own learning, and that listening to expert explanations is seldom sufficient to trigger the neurological changes necessary for learning ( Bostock, 1998 ; Zull, 2002 ). Some studies conclude that, while students learn more via active learning, they may report greater perceptions of their learning and greater enjoyment when passive approaches are used ( Deslauriers et al., 2019 ). We examine student perceptions of remote learning experiences in light of these previous findings.
In this study, we administered a survey focused on student perceptions of remote learning in late May 2020 through the social media account of @unjadedjade to a global population of English speaking undergraduate students representing institutions across 95 countries. We aim to explore how students were being taught, the relationship between pedagogical methods and student perceptions of their experience, and the reasons behind those perceptions. Here we present an initial analysis of the results and share our data set for further inquiry. We find that positive student perceptions correlate with synchronous courses that employ a variety of interactive pedagogical techniques, and that students overwhelmingly suggest behavioral and pedagogical changes that increase social engagement and interaction. We argue that these results support the importance of active learning in an online environment.
Materials and Methods
Participant pool.
Students were recruited through the Instagram account @unjadedjade. This social media platform, run by influencer Jade Bowler, focuses on education, effective study tips, ethical lifestyle, and promotes a positive mindset. For this reason, the audience is presumably academically inclined, and interested in self-improvement. The survey was posted to her account and received 10,563 responses within the first 36 h. Here we analyze the 4,789 of those responses that came from undergraduates. While we did not collect demographic or identifying information, we suspect that women are overrepresented in these data as followers of @unjadedjade are 80% women. A large minority of respondents were from the United Kingdom as Jade Bowler is a British influencer. Specifically, 43.3% of participants attend United Kingdom institutions, followed by 6.7% attending university in the Netherlands, 6.1% in Germany, 5.8% in the United States and 4.2% in Australia. Ninety additional countries are represented in these data (see Supplementary Figure 1 ).
Survey Design
The purpose of this survey is to learn about students’ instructional experiences following the transition to remote learning in the spring of 2020.
This survey was initially created for a student assignment for the undergraduate course Empirical Analysis at Minerva Schools at KGI. That version served as a robust pre-test and allowed for identification of the primary online platforms used, and the four primary modes of learning: synchronous (live) classes, recorded lectures and videos, uploaded or emailed materials, and chat-based communication. We did not adapt any open-ended questions based on the pre-test survey to avoid biasing the results and only corrected language in questions for clarity. We used these data along with an analysis of common practices in online learning to revise the survey. Our revised survey asked students to identify the synchronous and asynchronous pedagogical methods and platforms that they were using for remote learning. Pedagogical methods were drawn from literature assessing active and passive teaching strategies in North American institutions ( Fink, 2013 ; Chen et al., 2018 ; Davis et al., 2018 ). Open-ended questions asked students to describe why they preferred certain modes of learning and how they could improve their learning experience. Students also reported on their affective response to learning and participation using a Likert scale.
The revised survey also asked whether students had responded to the earlier survey. No significant differences were found between responses of those answering for the first and second times (data not shown). See Supplementary Appendix 1 for survey questions. Survey data was collected from 5/21/20 to 5/23/20.
Qualitative Coding
We applied a qualitative coding framework adapted from Gale et al. (2013) to analyze student responses to open-ended questions. Four researchers read several hundred responses and noted themes that surfaced. We then developed a list of themes inductively from the survey data and deductively from the literature on pedagogical practice ( Garrison et al., 1999 ; Zull, 2002 ; Fink, 2013 ; Freeman et al., 2014 ). The initial codebook was revised collaboratively based on feedback from researchers after coding 20–80 qualitative comments each. Before coding their assigned questions, alignment was examined through coding of 20 additional responses. Researchers aligned in identifying the same major themes. Discrepancies in terms identified were resolved through discussion. Researchers continued to meet weekly to discuss progress and alignment. The majority of responses were coded by a single researcher using the final codebook ( Supplementary Table 1 ). All responses to questions 3 (4,318 responses) and 8 (4,704 responses), and 2,512 of 4,776 responses to question 12 were analyzed. Valence was also indicated where necessary (i.e., positive or negative discussion of terms). This paper focuses on the most prevalent themes from our initial analysis of the qualitative responses. The corresponding author reviewed codes to ensure consistency and accuracy of reported data.
Statistical Analysis
The survey included two sets of Likert-scale questions, one consisting of a set of six statements about students’ perceptions of their experiences following the transition to remote learning ( Table 1 ). For each statement, students indicated their level of agreement with the statement on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (“Strongly Disagree”) to 5 (“Strongly Agree”). The second set asked the students to respond to the same set of statements, but about their retroactive perceptions of their experiences with in-person instruction before the transition to remote learning. This set was not the subject of our analysis but is present in the published survey results. To explore correlations among student responses, we used CrossCat analysis to calculate the probability of dependence between Likert-scale responses ( Mansinghka et al., 2016 ).
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/647986/feduc-06-647986-HTML-r1/image_m/feduc-06-647986-t001.jpg)
Table 1. Likert-scale questions.
Mean values are calculated based on the numerical scores associated with each response. Measures of statistical significance for comparisons between different subgroups of respondents were calculated using a two-sided Mann-Whitney U -test, and p -values reported here are based on this test statistic. We report effect sizes in pairwise comparisons using the common-language effect size, f , which is the probability that the response from a random sample from subgroup 1 is greater than the response from a random sample from subgroup 2. We also examined the effects of different modes of remote learning and technological platforms using ordinal logistic regression. With the exception of the mean values, all of these analyses treat Likert-scale responses as ordinal-scale, rather than interval-scale data.
Students Prefer Synchronous Class Sessions
Students were asked to identify their primary mode of learning given four categories of remote course design that emerged from the pilot survey and across literature on online teaching: live (synchronous) classes, recorded lectures and videos, emailed or uploaded materials, and chats and discussion forums. While 42.7% ( n = 2,045) students identified live classes as their primary mode of learning, 54.6% ( n = 2613) students preferred this mode ( Figure 1 ). Both recorded lectures and live classes were preferred over uploaded materials (6.22%, n = 298) and chat (3.36%, n = 161).
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/647986/feduc-06-647986-HTML-r1/image_m/feduc-06-647986-g001.jpg)
Figure 1. Actual (A) and preferred (B) primary modes of learning.
In addition to a preference for live classes, students whose primary mode was synchronous were more likely to enjoy the class, feel motivated and engaged, be satisfied with instruction and report higher levels of participation ( Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2 ). Regardless of primary mode, over two-thirds of students reported they are often distracted during remote courses.
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/647986/feduc-06-647986-HTML-r1/image_m/feduc-06-647986-t002.jpg)
Table 2. The effect of synchronous vs. asynchronous primary modes of learning on student perceptions.
Variation in Pedagogical Techniques for Synchronous Classes Results in More Positive Perceptions of the Student Learning Experience
To survey the use of passive vs. active instructional methods, students reported the pedagogical techniques used in their live classes. Among the synchronous methods, we identify three different categories ( National Research Council, 2000 ; Freeman et al., 2014 ). Passive methods (P) include lectures, presentations, and explanation using diagrams, white boards and/or other media. These methods all rely on instructor delivery rather than student participation. Our next category represents active learning through primarily one-on-one interactions (A). The methods in this group are in-class assessment, question-and-answer (Q&A), and classroom chat. Group interactions (F) included classroom discussions and small-group activities. Given these categories, Mann-Whitney U pairwise comparisons between the 7 possible combinations and Likert scale responses about student experience showed that the use of a variety of methods resulted in higher ratings of experience vs. the use of a single method whether or not that single method was active or passive ( Table 3 ). Indeed, students whose classes used methods from each category (PAF) had higher ratings of enjoyment, motivation, and satisfaction with instruction than those who only chose any single method ( p < 0.0001) and also rated higher rates of participation and engagement compared to students whose only method was passive (P) or active through one-on-one interactions (A) ( p < 0.00001). Student ratings of distraction were not significantly different for any comparison. Given that sets of Likert responses often appeared significant together in these comparisons, we ran a CrossCat analysis to look at the probability of dependence across Likert responses. Responses have a high probability of dependence on each other, limiting what we can claim about any discrete response ( Supplementary Figure 3 ).
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/647986/feduc-06-647986-HTML-r1/image_m/feduc-06-647986-t003.jpg)
Table 3. Comparison of combinations of synchronous methods on student perceptions. Effect size (f).
Mann-Whitney U pairwise comparisons were also used to check if improvement in student experience was associated with the number of methods used vs. the variety of types of methods. For every comparison, we found that more methods resulted in higher scores on all Likert measures except distraction ( Table 4 ). Even comparison between four or fewer methods and greater than four methods resulted in a 59% chance that the latter enjoyed the courses more ( p < 0.00001) and 60% chance that they felt more motivated to learn ( p < 0.00001). Students who selected more than four methods ( n = 417) were also 65.1% ( p < 0.00001), 62.9% ( p < 0.00001) and 64.3% ( p < 0.00001) more satisfied with instruction, engaged, and actively participating, respectfully. Therefore, there was an overlap between how the number and variety of methods influenced students’ experiences. Since the number of techniques per category is 2–3, we cannot fully disentangle the effect of number vs. variety. Pairwise comparisons to look at subsets of data with 2–3 methods from a single group vs. 2–3 methods across groups controlled for this but had low sample numbers in most groups and resulted in no significant findings (data not shown). Therefore, from the data we have in our survey, there seems to be an interdependence between number and variety of methods on students’ learning experiences.
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/647986/feduc-06-647986-HTML-r1/image_m/feduc-06-647986-t004.jpg)
Table 4. Comparison of the number of synchronous methods on student perceptions. Effect size (f).
Variation in Asynchronous Pedagogical Techniques Results in More Positive Perceptions of the Student Learning Experience
Along with synchronous pedagogical methods, students reported the asynchronous methods that were used for their classes. We divided these methods into three main categories and conducted pairwise comparisons. Learning methods include video lectures, video content, and posted study materials. Interacting methods include discussion/chat forums, live office hours, and email Q&A with professors. Testing methods include assignments and exams. Our results again show the importance of variety in students’ perceptions ( Table 5 ). For example, compared to providing learning materials only, providing learning materials, interaction, and testing improved enjoyment ( f = 0.546, p < 0.001), motivation ( f = 0.553, p < 0.0001), satisfaction with instruction ( f = 0.596, p < 0.00001), engagement ( f = 0.572, p < 0.00001) and active participation ( f = 0.563, p < 0.00001) (row 6). Similarly, compared to just being interactive with conversations, the combination of all three methods improved five out of six indicators, except for distraction in class (row 11).
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/647986/feduc-06-647986-HTML-r1/image_m/feduc-06-647986-t005.jpg)
Table 5. Comparison of combinations of asynchronous methods on student perceptions. Effect size (f).
Ordinal logistic regression was used to assess the likelihood that the platforms students used predicted student perceptions ( Supplementary Table 2 ). Platform choices were based on the answers to open-ended questions in the pre-test survey. The synchronous and asynchronous methods used were consistently more predictive of Likert responses than the specific platforms. Likewise, distraction continued to be our outlier with no differences across methods or platforms.
Students Prefer In-Person and Synchronous Online Learning Largely Due to Social-Emotional Reasoning
As expected, 86.1% (4,123) of survey participants report a preference for in-person courses, while 13.9% (666) prefer online courses. When asked to explain the reasons for their preference, students who prefer in-person courses most often mention the importance of social interaction (693 mentions), engagement (639 mentions), and motivation (440 mentions). These students are also more likely to mention a preference for a fixed schedule (185 mentions) vs. a flexible schedule (2 mentions).
In addition to identifying social reasons for their preference for in-person learning, students’ suggestions for improvements in online learning focus primarily on increasing interaction and engagement, with 845 mentions of live classes, 685 mentions of interaction, 126 calls for increased participation and calls for changes related to these topics such as, “Smaller teaching groups for live sessions so that everyone is encouraged to talk as some people don’t say anything and don’t participate in group work,” and “Make it less of the professor reading the pdf that was given to us and more interaction.”
Students who prefer online learning primarily identify independence and flexibility (214 mentions) and reasons related to anxiety and discomfort in in-person settings (41 mentions). Anxiety was only mentioned 12 times in the much larger group that prefers in-person learning.
The preference for synchronous vs. asynchronous modes of learning follows similar trends ( Table 6 ). Students who prefer live classes mention engagement and interaction most often while those who prefer recorded lectures mention flexibility.
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/647986/feduc-06-647986-HTML-r1/image_m/feduc-06-647986-t006.jpg)
Table 6. Most prevalent themes for students based on their preferred mode of remote learning.
Student Perceptions Align With Research on Active Learning
The first, and most robust, conclusion is that incorporation of active-learning methods correlates with more positive student perceptions of affect and engagement. We can see this clearly in the substantial differences on a number of measures, where students whose classes used only passive-learning techniques reported lower levels of engagement, satisfaction, participation, and motivation when compared with students whose classes incorporated at least some active-learning elements. This result is consistent with prior research on the value of active learning ( Freeman et al., 2014 ).
Though research shows that student learning improves in active learning classes, on campus, student perceptions of their learning, enjoyment, and satisfaction with instruction are often lower in active-learning courses ( Deslauriers et al., 2019 ). Our finding that students rate enjoyment and satisfaction with instruction higher for active learning online suggests that the preference for passive lectures on campus relies on elements outside of the lecture itself. That might include the lecture hall environment, the social physical presence of peers, or normalization of passive lectures as the expected mode for on-campus classes. This implies that there may be more buy-in for active learning online vs. in-person.
A second result from our survey is that student perceptions of affect and engagement are associated with students experiencing a greater diversity of learning modalities. We see this in two different results. First, in addition to the fact that classes that include active learning outperform classes that rely solely on passive methods, we find that on all measures besides distraction, the highest student ratings are associated with a combination of active and passive methods. Second, we find that these higher scores are associated with classes that make use of a larger number of different methods.
This second result suggests that students benefit from classes that make use of multiple different techniques, possibly invoking a combination of passive and active methods. However, it is unclear from our data whether this effect is associated specifically with combining active and passive methods, or if it is associated simply with the use of multiple different methods, irrespective of whether those methods are active, passive, or some combination. The problem is that the number of methods used is confounded with the diversity of methods (e.g., it is impossible for a classroom using only one method to use both active and passive methods). In an attempt to address this question, we looked separately at the effect of number and diversity of methods while holding the other constant. Across a large number of such comparisons, we found few statistically significant differences, which may be a consequence of the fact that each comparison focused on a small subset of the data.
Thus, our data suggests that using a greater diversity of learning methods in the classroom may lead to better student outcomes. This is supported by research on student attention span which suggests varying delivery after 10–15 min to retain student’s attention ( Bradbury, 2016 ). It is likely that this is more relevant for online learning where students report high levels of distraction across methods, modalities, and platforms. Given that number and variety are key, and there are few passive learning methods, we can assume that some combination of methods that includes active learning improves student experience. However, it is not clear whether we should predict that this benefit would come simply from increasing the number of different methods used, or if there are benefits specific to combining particular methods. Disentangling these effects would be an interesting avenue for future research.
Students Value Social Presence in Remote Learning
Student responses across our open-ended survey questions show a striking difference in reasons for their preferences compared with traditional online learners who prefer flexibility ( Harris and Martin, 2012 ; Levitz, 2016 ). Students reasons for preferring in-person classes and synchronous remote classes emphasize the desire for social interaction and echo the research on the importance of social presence for learning in online courses.
Short et al. (1976) outlined Social Presence Theory in depicting students’ perceptions of each other as real in different means of telecommunications. These ideas translate directly to questions surrounding online education and pedagogy in regards to educational design in networked learning where connection across learners and instructors improves learning outcomes especially with “Human-Human interaction” ( Goodyear, 2002 , 2005 ; Tu, 2002 ). These ideas play heavily into asynchronous vs. synchronous learning, where Tu reports students having positive responses to both synchronous “real-time discussion in pleasantness, responsiveness and comfort with familiar topics” and real-time discussions edging out asynchronous computer-mediated communications in immediate replies and responsiveness. Tu’s research indicates that students perceive more interaction with synchronous mediums such as discussions because of immediacy which enhances social presence and support the use of active learning techniques ( Gunawardena, 1995 ; Tu, 2002 ). Thus, verbal immediacy and communities with face-to-face interactions, such as those in synchronous learning classrooms, lessen the psychological distance of communicators online and can simultaneously improve instructional satisfaction and reported learning ( Gunawardena and Zittle, 1997 ; Richardson and Swan, 2019 ; Shea et al., 2019 ). While synchronous learning may not be ideal for traditional online students and a subset of our participants, this research suggests that non-traditional online learners are more likely to appreciate the value of social presence.
Social presence also connects to the importance of social connections in learning. Too often, current systems of education emphasize course content in narrow ways that fail to embrace the full humanity of students and instructors ( Gay, 2000 ). With the COVID-19 pandemic leading to further social isolation for many students, the importance of social presence in courses, including live interactions that build social connections with classmates and with instructors, may be increased.
Limitations of These Data
Our undergraduate data consisted of 4,789 responses from 95 different countries, an unprecedented global scale for research on online learning. However, since respondents were followers of @unjadedjade who focuses on learning and wellness, these respondents may not represent the average student. Biases in survey responses are often limited by their recruitment techniques and our bias likely resulted in more robust and thoughtful responses to free-response questions and may have influenced the preference for synchronous classes. It is unlikely that it changed students reporting on remote learning pedagogical methods since those are out of student control.
Though we surveyed a global population, our design was rooted in literature assessing pedagogy in North American institutions. Therefore, our survey may not represent a global array of teaching practices.
This survey was sent out during the initial phase of emergency remote learning for most countries. This has two important implications. First, perceptions of remote learning may be clouded by complications of the pandemic which has increased social, mental, and financial stresses globally. Future research could disaggregate the impact of the pandemic from students’ learning experiences with a more detailed and holistic analysis of the impact of the pandemic on students.
Second, instructors, students and institutions were not able to fully prepare for effective remote education in terms of infrastructure, mentality, curriculum building, and pedagogy. Therefore, student experiences reflect this emergency transition. Single-modality courses may correlate with instructors who lacked the resources or time to learn or integrate more than one modality. Regardless, the main insights of this research align well with the science of teaching and learning and can be used to inform both education during future emergencies and course development for online programs that wish to attract traditional college students.
Global Student Voices Improve Our Understanding of the Experience of Emergency Remote Learning
Our survey shows that global student perspectives on remote learning agree with pedagogical best practices, breaking with the often-found negative reactions of students to these practices in traditional classrooms ( Shekhar et al., 2020 ). Our analysis of open-ended questions and preferences show that a majority of students prefer pedagogical approaches that promote both active learning and social interaction. These results can serve as a guide to instructors as they design online classes, especially for students whose first choice may be in-person learning. Indeed, with the near ubiquitous adoption of remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, remote learning may be the default for colleges during temporary emergencies. This has already been used at the K-12 level as snow days become virtual learning days ( Aspergren, 2020 ).
In addition to informing pedagogical decisions, the results of this survey can be used to inform future research. Although we survey a global population, our recruitment method selected for students who are English speakers, likely majority female, and have an interest in self-improvement. Repeating this study with a more diverse and representative sample of university students could improve the generalizability of our findings. While the use of a variety of pedagogical methods is better than a single method, more research is needed to determine what the optimal combinations and implementations are for courses in different disciplines. Though we identified social presence as the major trend in student responses, the over 12,000 open-ended responses from students could be analyzed in greater detail to gain a more nuanced understanding of student preferences and suggestions for improvement. Likewise, outliers could shed light on the diversity of student perspectives that we may encounter in our own classrooms. Beyond this, our findings can inform research that collects demographic data and/or measures learning outcomes to understand the impact of remote learning on different populations.
Importantly, this paper focuses on a subset of responses from the full data set which includes 10,563 students from secondary school, undergraduate, graduate, or professional school and additional questions about in-person learning. Our full data set is available here for anyone to download for continued exploration: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId= doi: 10.7910/DVN/2TGOPH .
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
![](http://farmaciacoslada.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Author Contributions
GS: project lead, survey design, qualitative coding, writing, review, and editing. TN: data analysis, writing, review, and editing. CN and PB: qualitative coding. JW: data analysis, writing, and editing. CS: writing, review, and editing. EV and KL: original survey design and qualitative coding. PP: data analysis. JB: original survey design and survey distribution. HH: data analysis. MP: writing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We want to thank Minerva Schools at KGI for providing funding for summer undergraduate research internships. We also want to thank Josh Fost and Christopher V. H.-H. Chen for discussion that helped shape this project.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.647986/full#supplementary-material
Aspergren, E. (2020). Snow Days Canceled Because of COVID-19 Online School? Not in These School Districts.sec. Education. USA Today. Available online at: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2020/12/15/covid-school-canceled-snow-day-online-learning/3905780001/ (accessed December 15, 2020).
Google Scholar
Bostock, S. J. (1998). Constructivism in mass higher education: a case study. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 29, 225–240. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00066
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Bradbury, N. A. (2016). Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more? Adv. Physiol. Educ. 40, 509–513. doi: 10.1152/advan.00109.2016
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Chen, B., Bastedo, K., and Howard, W. (2018). Exploring best practices for online STEM courses: active learning, interaction & assessment design. Online Learn. 22, 59–75. doi: 10.24059/olj.v22i2.1369
Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., and Houben, G.-J. (2018). Activating learning at scale: a review of innovations in online learning strategies. Comput. Educ. 125, 327–344. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., and Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 19251–19257. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Somerset, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 8410–8415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., and Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 2, 87–105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gay, G. (2000). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. Multicultural Education Series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gillingham, and Molinari, C. (2012). Online courses: student preferences survey. Internet Learn. 1, 36–45. doi: 10.18278/il.1.1.4
Gillis, A., and Krull, L. M. (2020). COVID-19 remote learning transition in spring 2020: class structures, student perceptions, and inequality in college courses. Teach. Sociol. 48, 283–299. doi: 10.1177/0092055X20954263
Goodyear, P. (2002). “Psychological foundations for networked learning,” in Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. Computer Supported Cooperative Work , eds C. Steeples and C. Jones (London: Springer), 49–75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0181-9_4
Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 21, 82–101. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1344
Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. Int. J. Educ. Telecommun. 1, 147–166.
Gunawardena, C. N., and Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. Am. J. Distance Educ. 11, 8–26. doi: 10.1080/08923649709526970
Harris, H. S., and Martin, E. (2012). Student motivations for choosing online classes. Int. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. 6, 1–8. doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060211
Levitz, R. N. (2016). 2015-16 National Online Learners Satisfaction and Priorities Report. Cedar Rapids: Ruffalo Noel Levitz, 12.
Mansinghka, V., Shafto, P., Jonas, E., Petschulat, C., Gasner, M., and Tenenbaum, J. B. (2016). CrossCat: a fully Bayesian nonparametric method for analyzing heterogeneous, high dimensional data. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 17, 1–49. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-69765-9_7
National Research Council (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, doi: 10.17226/9853
Richardson, J. C., and Swan, K. (2019). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Online Learn. 7, 68–88. doi: 10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864
Shea, P., Pickett, A. M., and Pelz, W. E. (2019). A Follow-up investigation of ‘teaching presence’ in the suny learning network. Online Learn. 7, 73–75. doi: 10.24059/olj.v7i2.1856
Shekhar, P., Borrego, M., DeMonbrun, M., Finelli, C., Crockett, C., and Nguyen, K. (2020). Negative student response to active learning in STEM classrooms: a systematic review of underlying reasons. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 49, 45–54.
Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Tu, C.-H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. Int. J. E Learn. 1, 34–45. doi: 10.17471/2499-4324/421
Zull, J. E. (2002). The Art of Changing the Brain: Enriching Teaching by Exploring the Biology of Learning , 1st Edn. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Keywords : online learning, COVID-19, active learning, higher education, pedagogy, survey, international
Citation: Nguyen T, Netto CLM, Wilkins JF, Bröker P, Vargas EE, Sealfon CD, Puthipiroj P, Li KS, Bowler JE, Hinson HR, Pujar M and Stein GM (2021) Insights Into Students’ Experiences and Perceptions of Remote Learning Methods: From the COVID-19 Pandemic to Best Practice for the Future. Front. Educ. 6:647986. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.647986
Received: 30 December 2020; Accepted: 09 March 2021; Published: 09 April 2021.
Reviewed by:
Copyright © 2021 Nguyen, Netto, Wilkins, Bröker, Vargas, Sealfon, Puthipiroj, Li, Bowler, Hinson, Pujar and Stein. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Geneva M. Stein, [email protected]
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning research hypothesis about modular distance learning](https://himjournals.com/media/journal_thumbnails/HJEL_y5i3tCe.png)
- All Archives
- Special Issue
- Aim and Scope
- Editorial Board
- Journal Insights
- Abstracting and Indexing
- Announcements
- For Authors
- For Reviewers
- Ethics and Policies
- Open Access Policies
- Plagiarism Policies
- Research Ethics Policy
- Authorship and Contributorship
- Informed Consent Policy
- Conflict of Interest
- Content Licensing
- Corrections and Retractions
- Complaints and Appeals
- Article Submission
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning research hypothesis about modular distance learning](https://himjournals.com/static/images/icons/quote.png)
Download PDF
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning Chat on WhatsApp](https://himjournals.com/static/images/icons/whatsapp.png)
- DOI: 10.37275/OAIJSS.V4I2.57
- Corpus ID: 236226804
Comparative Analysis Of Students’ Perceptions In Modular Distance Learning Approach Versus Face-To-Face Learning Approach Of Mindanao State University – Sulu
- Altamir Salamuddin
- Published in Open Access Indonesia Journal… 15 June 2021
Ask This Paper
By using this feature, you agree to AI2's terms and conditions and that you will not submit any sensitive or confidential info.
AI2 may include your prompts and inputs in a public dataset for future AI research and development. Please check the box to opt-out.
Ask a question about " "
Supporting statements, tables from this paper.
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning table 1](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/af2ac628c00b47743db05cd2a36c8093d7793a81/9-Table1-1.png)
9 Citations
Undergraduate students’ modular experiences in learning mathematics in the new normal education, experiences and challenges of struggling readers in the framework of modular distance learning, perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of mathematics teachers in the implementation of limited face-to-face classes, international journal of evaluation and research in education (ijere), a psycholinguistic analysis of the students’ perceptions used google classroom as online learning media during pandemic.
- Highly Influenced
START (Struggling Today, A Reader Tomorrow) Through Our Eyes: A Phenomenology
Impact of pre-service teachers’ self-regulation and self-efficacy on their mathematics performance in blended learning, world journal on educational technology: current issues effects of smartphone utilization on junior high school students ’ mathematics performance, evaluation of school learning continuity plan (lcp) utilizing context, input, process, and product (cipp) model, 40 references, effectiveness of modular approach in teaching at university level, students' learning styles in two classes: online distance learning and equivalent on-campus, does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning, effects of modular and traditional approaches on students' general, group processes online: teaching collaboration through collaborative processes, modular instruction in higher education: a review, incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: a new blended learning approach., faculties’ perception and responses to academic dishonesty of undergraduate students in education, business and economics, learning from higher education, assessment of the implementation of continuous assessment: the case of mettu university., related papers.
Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning research hypothesis about modular distance learning](https://eprajournals.com//template/ecom/assets/img/logo.png)
EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR)
- Vol. 7 Issue. 7 (July-2021) EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR)
THE CHALLENGES AND STATUS OF MODULAR LEARNING: ITS EFFECT TO STUDENTS' ACADEMIC BEHAVIOR AND PERFORMANCE
Monica anna ladan agarin.
: | 7 | |
: | 7 | |
: | July | |
: | 2021 |
ABOUT EPRA JOURNALS
Quick links.
- Submit Your Paper
- Track Your Paper Status
- Certificate Download
FOR AUTHORS
- Impact Factor
- Plagiarism Policy
- Retraction Policy
- Publication Policy
- Terms & Conditions
- Refund Policy
- Privacy Policy
- Cancellation Policy
- Shipping Policy
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
- My Bibliography
- Collections
- Citation manager
Save citation to file
Email citation, add to collections.
- Create a new collection
- Add to an existing collection
Add to My Bibliography
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
- Search in PubMed
- Search in NLM Catalog
- Add to Search
Assessing Cognitive Factors of Modular Distance Learning of K-12 Students Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic towards Academic Achievements and Satisfaction
Affiliations.
- 1 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan.
- 2 School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapua University, Manila 1002, Philippines.
- 3 Department of Industrial Engineering, Occidental Mindoro State College, San Jose 5100, Philippines.
- PMID: 35877270
- PMCID: PMC9312230
- DOI: 10.3390/bs12070200
The COVID-19 pandemic brought extraordinary challenges to K-12 students in using modular distance learning. According to Transactional Distance Theory (TDT), which is defined as understanding the effects of distance learning in the cognitive domain, the current study constructs a theoretical framework to measure student satisfaction and Bloom's Taxonomy Theory (BTT) to measure students' academic achievements. This study aims to evaluate and identify the possible cognitive capacity influencing K-12 students' academic achievements and satisfaction with modular distance learning during this new phenomenon. A survey questionnaire was completed through an online form by 252 K-12 students from the different institutions of Occidental Mindoro. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the researcher analyses the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The model used in this research illustrates cognitive factors associated with adopting modular distance learning based on students' academic achievements and satisfaction. The study revealed that students' background, experience, behavior, and instructor interaction positively affected their satisfaction. While the effects of the students' performance, understanding, and perceived effectiveness were wholly aligned with their academic achievements. The findings of the model with solid support of the integrative association between TDT and BTT theories could guide decision-makers in institutions to implement, evaluate, and utilize modular distance learning in their education systems.
Keywords: COVID-19; K-12; SEM; cognitive capacity; modular distance learning.
PubMed Disclaimer
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Theoretical Research Framework.
Initial SEM with indicators for…
Initial SEM with indicators for evaluating the cognitive factors of modular distance learning…
Revised SEM with indicators for…
Revised SEM with indicators for evaluating the cognitive factors of modular distance learning…
Similar articles
- Dental Students' Satisfaction With Web-Based Learning During the Initial Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Study. Lee M, An SY, Ihm J. Lee M, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 8;26:e50278. doi: 10.2196/50278. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 38457808 Free PMC article.
- COVID-19, students satisfaction about e-learning and academic achievement: Mediating analysis of online influencing factors. Younas M, Noor U, Zhou X, Menhas R, Qingyu X. Younas M, et al. Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 22;13:948061. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948061. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36081717 Free PMC article.
- Online Learning Satisfaction During COVID-19 Pandemic Among Chinese University Students: The Serial Mediation Model. She L, Ma L, Jan A, Sharif Nia H, Rahmatpour P. She L, et al. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 5;12:743936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743936. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34675851 Free PMC article.
- Transactional Distance and College Students' Learning Engagement in Online Learning: The Chain Mediating Role of Social Presence and Autonomous Motivation. Chen L. Chen L. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jun 7;16:2085-2101. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S409294. eCollection 2023. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023. PMID: 37309511 Free PMC article.
- Distance learning in physiotherapy education during the COVID-19 pandemic: students' satisfaction, perceived quality, and potential predictors of satisfaction. Etoom M, Aldaher KN, Abdelhaq AA, Alawneh A, Alghwiri AA. Etoom M, et al. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Jul 3;39(7):1513-1518. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2042438. Epub 2022 Feb 23. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023. PMID: 35196952
- Influence of online collaborative learning on social network and academic performance of medical students: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Zhou Y, Xu X, Schönrock-Adema J, Brouwer J, Bos NA, Diemers AD. Zhou Y, et al. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 9;10:1242638. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1242638. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37621461 Free PMC article.
- Investigating Latent Interactions between Students' Affective Cognition and Learning Performance: Meta-Analysis of Affective and Cognitive Factors. Li J, Xue E, Li C, He Y. Li J, et al. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 4;13(7):555. doi: 10.3390/bs13070555. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37504002 Free PMC article.
- Factors Affecting Perceived Effectiveness of Government Response towards COVID-19 Vaccination in Occidental Mindoro, Philippines. Jou YT, Mariñas KA, Saflor CS, Young MN, Prasetyo YT, Persada SF. Jou YT, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 7;10(8):1483. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081483. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36011139 Free PMC article.
- Spagnuolo G., De Vito D., Rengo S., Tatullo M. COVID-19 outbreak: An overview on dentistry. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:2094. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062094. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
- Tria J.Z. The COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of Education in the Philippines: The New Normal. ResearchGate; Gatersleben, Germany: 2020.
- Hernando-Malipot M. DepEd: Most Students Prefer ‘Modular’ Learning over Online. Manila Bulletin. 2021. [(accessed on 1 February 2022)]. Available online: https://mb.com.ph/2020/07/03/deped-most-students-prefer-modular-learning...
- Bernardo J. Modular Learning Most Preferred Parents: DepEd. ABS-CBN News. Jul 30, 2020. [(accessed on 1 February 2022)]. Available online: https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/07/30/20/modular-learning-most-preferred-b... .
- Ambayon M. Modular-Based Approach and Students “Achievement in Literature”. 2020. [(accessed on 1 February 2022)]. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3723644 .
Related information
Grants and funding, linkout - more resources, full text sources.
- Europe PubMed Central
- PubMed Central
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning full text provider logo](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/query/egifs/https:--res.mdpi.com-data-pubmed-linkout.png)
- Citation Manager
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning paper cover thumbnail](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/81572947/mini_magick20220302-3306-kuagew.png?1646231195)
Modular Distance Learning: Its Effect in the Academic Performance of Learners in the New Normal
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning Profile image of Michelle Dimas](https://0.academia-photos.com/118487852/29665657/27577467/s65_michelle.dimas.jpg)
JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning)
Due to Covid-19 pandemic, schools, particularly in the rural areas employed Modular Distance Learning (MDL) to ensure education continuity. This study seeks to investigate the effects of MDL in the academic performance of learners whether there is a significant difference in their performance before and after the implementation of MDL. Mixed method was applied in this study; Quantitative using T-Test to compare the GWA of learners and Qualitative through the use of semi-structured interview to find out the perceived effect of MDL to 15 parents, 10 learners, and 7 teachers and their recommendations. The study revealed that the 2.25% decrease in the GWA of learners after the implementation of MDL denotes a significant difference in their academic performance. MDL strengthens family bonding, independent learning, and is cost-effective. However, it is an additional workload to working parents, there is limited teacher-learner interaction, learners lack socialization with other children ...
Related Papers
Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal
Psychology and Education , ROMEL LAGRIO
The education sector was greatly affected by the global health crisis of COVID-19, resulting in massive changes in our education setup , which contributed to various problems and challenges encountered during the implementation of the modular distance learning modality. This study aimed to determine the strategies and challenges encountered by teachers in implementing modular distance learning and its impact on students' academic performance. A descriptive research design was employed. The researchers utilized an online survey method for data gathering. A total of 60 teachers and 187 selected Grade 7 learners were the study's respondents utilizing total enumeration for teachers and stratified random sampling for learners.The study's findings show that teachers could employ strategies such as setting a submission schedule and creating a group chat with the learners. Moreover, establish the appropriate health and safety protocols and safety nets for learners against violence and abuse at home and in the community, and train school personnel for the Learning Delivery Modality (LMD).On the other hand, teachers professed that printing modules were time-consuming, the distance of the learner's home from the school hindered the teachers in providing technical assistance, and learners needed help following instructions. Parents answered the modules of the learners. The need for printing materials was a significant challenge.Most of the student's grades during the first quarter were within the range of 80-84, which was considered a satisfactory academic performance. Moreover, the results signified a negligible negative correlation between teachers' strategies in implementing modular distance learning and students' academic performance. The study suggests revisiting the school's plans for implementing modular distance learning and strengthening the partnership of the school, parents, and stakeholders.
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning research hypothesis about modular distance learning](https://a.academia-assets.com/images/loswp/related-pdf-icon.png)
IJMRAP Editor
During this pandemic, several schools opted for modular remote education. One of the elementary schools that selected Modular Distance Learning (MDL) as their primary mode of instruction for various reasons is Antipuluan Elementary School, a public elementary school in the Municipality of Narra, Palawan, the Philippines. However, the usage of this modality, which is unknown to many, has presented difficulties for everyone-including school staff, students, and their parents. Hence the conduct of this study. This quantitative research employed a Descriptive-Correlational Approach and involved 15 elementary teachers, 141 pupils, and 141 parents as the main data sources. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data, which was then analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and Pearson product-moment correlation. The study found that the extent of Modular Distance Learning modality implementation was High, teachers', pupils', and parents' degrees of acceptance of the MDL implementation were High, and there was a strong relationship between the teachers' degree of acceptance of MDL implementation and the degree of its implementation. The perceived effects of MDL implementation have a direct relationship with the degree of their acceptance by teachers and parents.
Psychology and Education
This study investigated the limitations experienced by students, parents, and teachers in the implementation of Modular Distance Learning in Lagundi-CCL National High School during the school year 2021-2022. The researcher utilized the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods of research. An online research questionnaire utilizing Google Form was used to gather necessary information from the eighty (80) students, eighty (80) parents, and thirty-one (31) teachers who served as the respondents of this paper. Based on the results, the three major limitations experienced by students were: 1) insufficient knowledge of parents/ family members; 2) unavailability of gadgets; and 3) too many activities. In addition, parents' three major limitations were: 1) insufficient knowledge about the lessons; 2) difficulties in schedule of distribution and retrieval of modules; and 3) working parents. Furthermore, the identified limitations of teachers were: 1) too many additional tasks for teachers; 2) unavailability of self-learning modules; and 3) students who were lagging behind. From these limitations the respondents had given their suggestions. The students suggested that: 1) lessen the activities that are given to them; 2) conduct an online class even once a week; and 3) give additional time to answer the learning tasks. Meanwhile, parents' suggestions were: 1) enough information and examples in the modules should be given; 2) lessen the learning tasks; and 3) guide the parents on how to assist their children. Lastly, teachers' suggestions include: 1) proper dissemination of program, projects, and activities related to modular distance learning; 2) capacitate parents and students on MDL; and 3) distribution and retrieval should be done every other two weeks. The researchers crafted a process framework which may serve as basis in the modification of the implementation of modular distance learning which included seven (7) strategic dimensions.
International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences
Gerald Malabarbas
Face-to-face classes were temporarily suspended and shifted to modular print learning modality due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aimed to determine if there significant difference and relationship between parents’ involvement in modular distance learning and the academic performance of the Grade 6 learners in a public elementary school. The results revealed that parents’ involvement in their child's MDL varies substantially according to their educational attainment and family monthly income. Similarly, the educational attainment of parents and their family's monthly income are predictors of their children's academic achievement. Furthermore, it was disclosed that fathers were more likely than mothers to be involved in the learners' MDL. The findings also revealed that there was a correlation between parents' involvement in modular learning and their children's academic performance. Furthermore, the study supports prior results that parental involvement ...
Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review
Leomarich Casinillo
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, schools, particularly in rural areas, employed Modular Distance Learning (MDL) to ensure educational continuity. Modular distance learning is the current learning modality of primary education, where parents serve as parent-teachers to their children. This study seeks to evaluate the experiences of students and teachers of Elementary School, on modular distance learning during the pandemic. This study used the qualitative method of interviewing nine students and six teachers to learn about their MDL experiences. Data process involves combining related concepts and themes to produce a more structured and organized picture of the data. MDL strengthens family bonding, promotes independent learning, and economizes money and time. However, it is an additional workload for working parents; there needs to be more teacher-student interaction, preventing pupils from socializing and gadget distractions. The article revealed that MDL has positive and negative experiences for teachers and students. Therefore, the impact may vary depending on individual circumstances and adaptability. The study suggests that suitable strategies should address any challenges during implementation and evaluation. Furthermore, teachers must undergo training related to MDL to address existing problems in delivering their lessons.
AJHSSR Journal
The general purpose of this study was to find out the level of extent on the parental involvement in the implementation of modular distance learning approach in Botolan District, Division of Zambales, Philippines during school year 2020-2021. The study revealed that the parent-respondent is a typical female in her early adulthood, married, high school graduate with part-time work and meagre income whose children are at primary grade level. The academic performance of the parent-respondents' children was assessed-Very Satisfactory‖. Perceived-Highly Involved‖ on Parent as a Teacher and Acceptance of the Self-Learning Module while-Involved‖ on Submission of the Self-Learning Module. There is significant difference when grouped according to highest educational attainment towards Parent as a Teacher, Acceptance and Submission of the Self-learning module respectively; significant when grouped according to family income towards Parent as Teacher and Acceptance of the Self-Learning Module; while significant on number of children studying in the elementary level towards Parent as Teacher and Submission of the Self-Learning Module respectively. There is significant difference on the perception towards dimensions on the level ofextent on the parental involvement in the implementation of modular distance learning approach. There is negatively weak or little relationship between the level of academic performance and the level ofextent on the parental involvement in the implementation of modular distance learning approach. Based on the summary of the investigations conducted and the conclusions arrived at, the researcher recommended that the parents are encouraged to be given orientation to heighten awareness on their respective limited roles in the implementation of the self-learning modular approach; that parents are encouraged to help children developed with high levels of self-directed learning, to have strong for learning.\
COVID-19 Pandemics have an impact on many aspects of life, including education. The Department of Education developed the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan in response to the outbreak. This plan outlines learning delivery techniques such as blended learning, which is a combination of face-to-face, modular distance learning, and TV/radio-based education based on the learners' context. As a result, the DepEd permits schools to select a learning mode depending on available resources and student requirements. Thus, this study investigates the primary teachers' readiness, parental support towards modular distance learning, and its effects to the learners' performance. Based on the findings drawn from the study, the following conclusion drawn: The levels of Teachers readiness were very much ready. While in the level of parental support were much supportive. Lastly, the learner's performance was satisfactory. Moreover, it is concluded that teacher's readiness and leaners performance had no bearing with the way learners performed in class while the parental challenges and learners performance were associated with the way learners performed in class.
Psychology and Education , Maritis Magallanes Cagas , Myra A. Ambalong
Parents' engagement played an important role in parent-teacher partnership in educating the children to have a harmonious collaboration in motivating the children's learning. Due to this pandemic, parents were appreciated as facilitators in the learning process of the learners since children were not allowed to go to school for face-to-face interaction with the teacher. Modular Distance learning modalities were implemented most of the schools especially Dalamas Integrated School wherein internet connection was not available in the said area. This study aimed to assess the parents' engagement in modular distance learning and the learners' academic performance in the school year 2021-2022. The study utilized the descriptive-correlational research design. Findings revealed that the respondents' engagement in modular distance learning helped them realize that education was very important to their children and that they encouraged their children to do their homework. However, the data revealed that engagement of parents in modular distance learning did not necessarily affect the academic performance of the learners and that their engagement was not differentiated based on their socio-demographic profile.
Psychology and Education , Ehlz Marie N. Sacnanas , Shanice Marie B. Ferolino
As educational system was hit by a global catastrophe, the introduction of modular distance learning outspread to sustain the quality of education towards the learners. To make this work, parents forced to embrace the new system of learning. With this, the parents were having a hard time on scheduling between their work and children's learning, and on facilitating the learning from home scheme. This study dug into the parents' involvement and attitude towards the modular distance learning system. The data were evaluated by interpretation and the method used in gathering data is qualitative. Content analysis allows researchers identify and analyze the correct words, topics, or concepts. The researchers conducted interviews to six parents from Badian, Cebu. The parents' involvement in this study were determined by purposive sampling technique. From the responses of the parents, the researchers developed three essential themes: (1) The Challenges, (2) The Time, (3) The Rating, (4) The Improvement, and (5) The Advantages and Disadvantages. These themes emphasized the lived experiences and battles of the parents in the distance learning system during the pandemic. The researchers were able to extract problems and meaning of consequences for parents' lived experience of MDL. Parents' talent in shaping their children's learning is not an easy job, rather it was found to be difficult. But additional colors were added to help shape it and made the children's future more worthwhile.
EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)
Emma Trovela
This research investigated the parents and learners’ perceptions on modular distance learning that they are experiencing during this time of pandemic as part contemporary new normal education setup. The main purpose of this study was to understand parents’ and learners’ perceptions on modular distance learning as contemporary teaching strategy and how they coped with the experiences and challenges of the new normal education settings. The participants of this study where five (5) senior high school learners and five (5) parents/guardians of senior high school learners of Sta. Catalina Integrated National High School. The research was conducted in Majayjay District from School Year 2020-2021. This study used Qualitative Research through Descriptive research where in-depth interviewing and storytelling was done to gather the narratives or accounts of the research participants. Using an interview protocol and with a strong collaboration with the participants, the researcher will manage...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
RELATED PAPERS
International Journal of Arts and Social Science
JOEL D POTANE , Keziah CanEte
Behavioral Sciences
Charmine Sheena Saflor
International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research
Norvin De Ocampo
CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo
Alcher Arpilleda
Trans Stellar Journals
TJPRC Publication , FITZGERALD KINTANAR
Psychology and Education , Sammy Boy B. Guzman
Psychology and Education , Mayline Atienza
JPAIR Institutional Research
MARINO PAMOGAS
Challenges and Barriers Encountered by G10-Agoncillo Learners in the Implementation of Modular Distance Learning at Taal National High School
Waylie Niña De Claro
European Journal of Education Studies
Romel C . Mutya , Christine Cudillo
Psychology and Education , Harlyn L. Palmes , Harry Palmes
International Journal of Research Studies in Education
Baby Miranda
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Lucilyn Luis
Environment and Social Psychology
jason V chavez
Tazanna Sevilla
International Journal of Scientific & Research
Regie Bangoy
Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
Jimmy Rey Cabardo
Instabright International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
Michael L . Bordeos
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2024
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning research hypothesis about modular distance learning](https://journals.sapienzaeditorial.com/public/journals/1/pageHeaderLogoImage_en_US.png)
Challenges and mechanisms of teachers in the implementation of modular distance learning in the Philippines: a phenomenological study
- Jimmy Rey O. Cabardo Hagonoy National High School, Guihing, Hagonoy, Davao del Sur https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1219-0580
- Cristy Jean O. Cabardo Sacub National High School, Sacub, Hagonoy, Davao del Sur
- Sheila Jean O. Cabardo-Mabida Lapulabao National High School, Lapulabao, Hagonoy, Davao del Sur
COVID-19 pandemic brought so many changes in the state of education after school’s temporary closure. Educational institutions transitioned to modular distance learning from the usual face-to-face teaching which put both teachers and students less prepared, if not totally unprepared. This qualitative phenomenological study explored the challenges and mechanisms of teachers in the implementation of modular distance learning in the Philippines amidst COVID-19 pandemic. Data were gathered through in-depth interview to twelve (12) teachers, six (6) were teaching in the elementary, and the other six (6) teaching in the secondary level. Recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the following steps: data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. Ethical issues were considered in the conduct of the study. Results revealed that the challenges of teachers in modular distance learning includes time-consuming, incomplete and unanswered modules, inadequate parental support, and insufficient trainings to teachers. The mechanisms utilized by teachers to overcome the challenges includes time management, regular communication to parents and students, reskilling and upskilling of teachers, and utilization of blended learning. With this, it is recommended that DepEd should continue to undertake monitoring and evaluation on the implemented modular distance learning to assess its quality and relevance on the current status of education in the country.
Author Biographies
Jimmy rey o. cabardo, hagonoy national high school, guihing, hagonoy, davao del sur.
Hagonoy National High School, Guihing, Hagonoy, Davao del Sur
Cristy Jean O. Cabardo, Sacub National High School, Sacub, Hagonoy, Davao del Sur
Sacub National High School, Sacub, Hagonoy, Davao del Sur
Sheila Jean O. Cabardo-Mabida, Lapulabao National High School, Lapulabao, Hagonoy, Davao del Sur
Lapulabao National High School, Lapulabao, Hagonoy, Davao del Sur
Abuhassna, H. & Yahaya, N. (2018). Students’ Utilization of Distance Learning through an Interventional Online Module Based on Moore Transactional Distance Theory. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 3043-3052. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91606 .
Almeida, A.B., Gaerlan, A.A. & Manly, N.E. (2016). Research Fundamentals from Concept to Output: A Guide for Researchers & Thesis Writers. Quezon City: Adriana Publishing Corporation, Incorporated.
Baloran, E.T. (2020). Knowledge, Attitudes, Anxiety, and Coping Strategies of Students during COVID-19 Pandemic, Journal of Loss and Trauma, Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 635-642, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1769300 .
Barrios, J.M., & Hochberg, Y. (2020). Risk Perception Through the Lens of Politics in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27008 .
Becker, C. (1992). Living and relating: An introduction to phenomenology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2017). Qualitative research methods for social sciences (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Ltd.
Borup, J., & Evmenova, A. S. (2019). The effectiveness of professional development in overcoming obstacles to effective online instruction in a college of education. Online Learning, 23(2), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1468 .
Boyd, C.O. (2001). Phenomenology the Method. In P.L. Munhall (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative Perspective (3rd. ed., pp. 93-122). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Barlett.
Castroverde, F. & Acala, M. (2021). Modular distance learning modality: Challenges of teachers in teaching amid the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, Vol. 10, No. 15, pp. 7 – 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2021.602 .
Chinazzi, M., Davis, J. T., Ajelli, M., Gioannini, C., Litvinova, M., Merler, S., … Vespignani, A. (2020). The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak. Science, 368(6489), 395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aba9757 .
Creswell, J.W. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions (6th Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
DepEd. (2020a). School Effectiveness Toolkit for the Implementation of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan in Light of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. DepEd Complex, Meralco Ave., Pasig City.
DepEd. (2020b). Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020-2021 in Light of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. In DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2020. DepEd Complex, Meralco Ave., Pasig City.
DepEd. (2020c). Readiness Assessment Checklist for Learning Delivery Modalities in the Learning Continuity Plan of Private Schools. In DepEd Order No. 013, s. 2020. DepEd Complex, Meralco Ave., Pasig City.
Enitan, S.S., Ibeh, I.N., Oluremi, A.S., Olayanju, A.O., & Itodo, G.E. (2020). The 2019 Novel Coronavirus Outbreak: Current Crises, Controversies and Global Strategies to Prevent a Pandemic. International Journal for Pathogen Research, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/IJPR/2020/v4i130099 .
Fernandes, N. (2020). Economic Effects of Coronavirus Outbreak (COVID-19) on the World Economy. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3557504 .
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E. & Hyun, H.H. (2013). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th Edition). New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Education.
Groenewald, T. (2004). A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300104 .
Habibi, R., Burci, G.L., De Campos, T.C., Chirwa, D., Cina, M., Dagron, S., … Hoffman, S. (2020). Do not violate the International Health Regulations during the COVID-19 Outbreak. The Lancet, 395 (10225). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30373-1 .
Hammersley, M. (2003). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: Methods or Paradigms? Discourse & Society, 14(6), 751-781. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030146004 .
Hanson, D., Maushak, N.J., Schlosser, C.A., Anderson, M.L., Sorenson, C., & Simonson, M. (1997). Distance Education: Review of the Literature (2nd Ed.). Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Hashemi, A. & Sina, K. (2020). The Effects of Using Blended Learning in Teaching and Learning English: A Review of Literature. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), Vol. 18, pp. 173-179. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED614699.pdf .
Heath, S., & Shine, B. (2021). Teaching Techniques to Facilitate Time Management in Remote and Online Teaching. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(1). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jotlt/article/view/31370 .
Henaku, E.A. (2020). COVID-19: Online Learning Experience of College Students: The Case of Ghana. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Advanced Technology, Vol. 1, Special Issue No. 2, pp. 54 – 62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342586709 .
Jones, J. (2019). The Implications of Blended Learning in Today’s Classroom: A Look into the History, Views, Impacts, and Research. Master's Theses & Capstone Projects, Northwestern College, Iowa. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3Kp4goa .
Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method. Harlow, Pearson Prentice Hall.
Lee, J. & Lin, L. (2009) Chapter V, Applying Constructivism to Online Learning: A New Instructional Design Map. In, C. Payne (ed.), Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks, pp. 58-73. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Moore, M.G. (1983). The Individual Adult Learner. In M. Tight (Ed.), Adult Learning and Education. London: Croom Helm.
Morrissey, G. & Higgs, J. (2006). Phenomenological Research and Adolescent Female Sexuality: Discoveries and Applications. The Qualitative Report, Vol. 11, No. 1. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/38VbJt1 .
Rasmitadila, Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The Perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388
Reimers, F., Schleicher, A., Saavedra, J. & Tuominen, S. (2020). Supporting the continuation of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Annotated resources for online learning. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://www.oecd.org/education/Supporting-the-continuation-of-teaching-and-learning-during-the-COVID-19-pandemic.pdf
San Jose, A., Concepcion, M.G.R. & San Jose, B.R. (2021). Mothers as Teachers: The New Role of Mothers in the New Normal. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3926482 .
Toquero, C.M. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Philippine Context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947 .
Tria, J.Z. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of Education in the Philippines: The New Normal. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), ep2001. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8311 .
United Nations. (2020). Policy Brief: The Impact of COVID-19 on Children. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/policy_brief_on_covid_impact_on_children_16_april_2020.pdf .
Viner, R.M., Russell, S.J., Croker, H., Packer, J., Ward, J., Stansfield, C., … Booy, R. (2020). School Closure and Management Practices during Coronavirus Outbreaks including COVID-19: A Rapid Systematic Review. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(5), 397-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30095-X .
Weaver, J.L. & Swank, J.M. (2021). Parents’ Lived Experiences With the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, Vol. 29(2) 136-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480720969194 .
WHO. (2020a). R & D Blueprint and COVID-19. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/374Aa7C .
WHO. (2020b). Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 51. World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3oGJ2GS .
Yarovaya, O., Yarovaya, L. & Bogatskaya, E. (2020). Distance learning during coronavirus: problems and solutions. E3S Web of Conferences 210, 18051. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021018051
Yüksel, P. & Yıldırım, S. (2015). Theoretical Frameworks, Methods, and Procedures for Conducting Phenomenological Studies in Educational Settings. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6 (1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.59813 .
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning research hypothesis about modular distance learning](https://journals.sapienzaeditorial.com/public/journals/1/cover_issue_6_pt_BR.png)
How to Cite
- Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
Copyright (c) 2022 Jimmy Rey O. Cabardo, Cristy Jean O. Cabardo, Sheila Jean O. Cabardo-Mabida
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning Creative Commons License](https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .
Make a Submission
Digital preservation.
PRESERVATION:
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning Locks](https://journals.sapienzaeditorial.com/public/site/images/Editor-chefe/locks.png)
I4OA Member
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning](https://journals.sapienzaeditorial.com/public/site/images/Editor-chefe/i4oa.png)
Signatory of BOAI
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning research hypothesis about modular distance learning](https://journals.sapienzaeditorial.com/public/site/images/Editor-chefe/mceclip0-a9e219510001f0ef08ac4bae5b847076.png)
SIJIS is present in SCOPUS
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning](https://journals.sapienzaeditorial.com/public/site/images/Editor-chefe/index-by-scopus.png)
Current Issue
Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies (SIJIS), e-ISSN: 2675-9780 publications are licensed with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional.
SIJIS also supports initiatives such as the DORA ( Declaration on Research Assessment) declaration, BOAI (Budapest Open Access Initiative), and the I4OA (Initiative for Open Abstracts), reaffirming our commitment to open science.
Starting 2023, we have embraced the ReviewerCredits platform to increase transparency and reliability in our peer review process, while also providing greater recognition for the invaluable contributions of our reviewers
Responsible Publisher:
Sapienza Grupo Editorial
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning More information about the publishing system, Platform and Workflow by OJS/PKP.](https://journals.sapienzaeditorial.com/templates/images/ojs_brand.png)
![research hypothesis about modular distance learning chrome icon](https://typeset.io/vs/chrome-icon.png)
The challenges and status of modular learning: its effect to students’ academic behavior and performance
Chat with Paper
An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of living with colorectal cancer as a chronic illness.
The importance of students' motivation for their academic achievement - replicating and extending previous findings., a predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs, blended learning in saudi universities: challenges and perspectives, motivation: a predictor of pisa's mathematical competence beyond intelligence and prior test achievement, related papers (5), sustainability analysis of the e-learning education system during pandemic period—covid-19 in romania, assessing learning needs clinical teachers and educational supervisors work with a range of students and trainees on different programmes. learners from diverse backgrounds have different learning needs which can be difficult to assess. teachers who pay attention to individual learners' needs will help learners get the most from their training. this can be enhanced through the use of tools such as professional development plans and formal assessments., towards a better efl learners’ management of their independent english language learning at university level, exploring goal–setting strategies of prospective physical education teachers to maintain academic performance, co-opting learners: addressing their learning support needs through a learning support needs questionnaire. part one: the rationale and basis of the learning support needs questionnaire, trending questions (3).
Modular learning significantly affects academic performance by influencing students' academic behavior and performance, rejecting the null hypothesis of no effect on learners' academic behavior and performance.
Not addressed in the paper.
The challenges and status of modular learning during the pandemic have a significant negative effect on students' academic behavior and performance.
![](http://farmaciacoslada.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Future researchers who will conduct research related to Modular Distance Learning may also consider the findings of this study in drafting their related concepts. Normal Distribution Curve of the Data
The COVID-19 pandemic brought extraordinary challenges to K-12 students in using modular distance learning. According to Transactional Distance Theory (TDT), which is defined as understanding the effects of distance learning in the cognitive domain, the current study constructs a theoretical framework to measure student satisfaction and Bloom's Taxonomy Theory (BTT) to measure students ...
Therefore, we can reject the null hypothesis that the true effect sizes are consistent across studies. The variance of true effect sizes was T 2 = 0.021, ... Implications and future research. Distance learning had a significant small effect over face-to-face learning overall and specifically for cognitive outcomes. This shows that distance ...
The mean of the four (4) quarters before the MDL implementation is 88.25% while after the Modular Distance Learning the mean is 86%. This implies that there is a 2.25% difference between the mean ...
This result is consistent with prior research on the value of active learning (Freeman et al., 2014). Though research shows that student learning improves in active learning classes, on campus, student perceptions of their learning, enjoyment, and satisfaction with instruction are often lower in active-learning courses (Deslauriers et al., 2019 ...
which is composed of the following descriptors: "Modular Distance Learning" or "Distance Learning", and "Distance Education". The descriptors were applied in the searching engine of both databases in order to filter them further. In order to do so, a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria was set up to limit the study sample ...
This research study aims to identify the challenges and effectiveness of the modular distance learning approach on the academic performance of Grade 12 Humanities and Social Sciences students at ...
The Covid-19 pandemic has caused a historical disturbance in the delivery of education in the Philippines. The major purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of modular distance learning modality to the Academic Performance of Students on its more than a year implementation.
Modular Distance Learning. Distance learning, often known as correspondence education or home study, is a type of education in which students and teachers have little or no face-to-face interaction.[6]. It also refers to the process of teaching and learning that takes place outside the traditional classroom.
Modular distance learning approach helps to explore myself 3.06 Agree in different activities. 5. It is flexible than other learning approaches. 2.77 Agree 6. I am more comfortable to answer the different activities on 3.05 Agree my own using modules. 7. I prefer modular distance learning approach in learning. 2.88 Agree 8.
ABSTRACT. The purpose of this descriptive paper was to explore and synthesize literature related to understanding modular learning and how it can be implemented effectively so faculty members embrace its use. An in-depth review of literature addressed topics including, Educational Theories supporting modular learning, the development of modular ...
The different learning modalities for distance learning include modular (printed), modular (digitized), online, educational TV, radio-based instruction, home-schooling, and blended learning [5 ...
Teaching approach gives significant to the teaching-learning process for both teachers and students. Thus, the students' learning depends on what the school's application of most effective and attainable teaching approach especially in the time of covid-19 pandemic. With the implementation of the new normal education, the difficulties encountered among stakeholders because of an ...
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development www.allsubjectjournal.com Online ISSN: 2349-4182, Print ISSN: 2349-5979 ... Volume 8, Issue 9, 2021, Page No. 117-119 Learners' needs and challenges in modular distance learning approach Joan T PO Guimaras State College, Graduate School, Guimaras, Philippines Abstract
Amidst of the COVID-19 crisis, the education don’t stop, it must continue whether with or without physically going to school. Face-to-face learning modality is out, modular distance learning is in. At the present moment of situation; Department of Education made an urgent response to ensure the safety of learners and the teachers. On the other hand, they also ensure the continuity of ...
The COVID-19 pandemic brought extraordinary challenges to K-12 students in using modular distance learning. According to Transactional Distance Theory (TDT), which is defined as understanding the effects of distance learning in the cognitive domain, the current study constructs a theoretical framework to measure student satisfaction and Bloom's Taxonomy Theory (BTT) to measure students ...
The descriptive correlational method and quantitative research were chosen for the reason that it was correlational in nature since it was determined the significant relationship between the stressors and coping strategies. ... Modular Distance Learning (MDL) is a way of learning in the Philippines' basic education that allows students to ...
Modular Distance learning modalities were implemented most of the schools especially Dalamas Integrated School wherein internet connection was not available in the said area. This study aimed to assess the parents' engagement in modular distance learning and the learners' academic performance in the school year 2021-2022.
This mode of learning have been used by the learners and teachers during the conduct of Modular Distance Learning [3], [4]. This will attempt to increase their performances of the in the school. ...
COVID-19 pandemic brought so many changes in the state of education after school's temporary closure. Educational institutions transitioned to modular distance learning from the usual face-to-face teaching which put both teachers and students less prepared, if not totally unprepared. This qualitative phenomenological study explored the challenges and mechanisms of teachers in the ...
The key purpose of this descriptive qualitative phenomenological study is to explore the personal stories of students in the modular distance learning first experiences in SY 2020-2021. Insights, opinions, and ideas were sought from six (6) low performing students through Key Informant Interview. Considering the lockdown problems, data were ...
The education sector experienced changes during the pandemic, leading to the exploration and adoption of various distance learning modalities to address unprecedented challenges.
Amidst of the COVID-19 crisis, the education don't stop, it must continue whether with or without physically going to school. Face-to-face learning modality is out, modular distance learning is in. At the present moment of situation; Department of Education made an urgent response to ensure the safety of learners and the teachers. On the other hand, they also ensure the continuity of quality ...
The study investigated the level of academic performances of the students in the existence of COVID-19 pandemic. Implementation of online learning and modular distance education was one of the ...