Sample Essay #1
(Using 3 points arguing that zoos are useful and 1 point arguing that zoos are cruel; Conclusion: conditionally agree with the opinion that zoos are useful)
Visit to a zoo is part of fond childhood memories of almost everyone. Yet, it has become a contentious subject in recent years whether zoos serve an overall positive purpose. Since there seem to be valid supporting arguments for both perspectives, this essay will discuss them and reach a logical conclusion based on the presented line of reasoning.
Firstly, these establishments provide a safe place for wild animals from poachers and other risks. This is especially crucial for rare and endangered species. For example, tigers and pandas are kept in different zoos across the globe because of which their numbers have grown manifold over the years. Secondly, these zoological parks are needed by researchers and scientists to study animals. Lastly, menageries, such as zoos, are an ideal location for edutainment. That is to say, these establishments are not only an ideal source of entertainment for people of all age groups but they are also a way to impart education to children regarding animals. As a result of visit to such places, children may feel an affinity towards animals. What is more, zoos are a brilliant means of creating awareness about environmental issues.
On the other hand, those who oppose zoos and want them to be closed assert that animals are not treated well in zoos. These animals are caged in confined spaces. The cages and enclosures are tiny compared to the natural habitat of these animals. For instance, a tiger which is one of the fastest animals is sometimes kept in small cages. Similarly, monkeys which can jump from one tree to another in seconds are at times confined to a small area with just 2-3 trees.
In conclusion, my opinion is that zoos have many benefits which have been proven over the years and they should certainly not be closed. We should, however, ensure that the animals in zoos have larger spaces where they can move about.
Sample Essay #2
(Using 3 points arguing that zoos are useful and 3 points arguing that zoos are cruel; Conclusion: zoos are cruel)
(first two paragraphs are almost the same as the previous essay)
Firstly, these establishments provide a safe place for wild animals from poachers and other risks. This is especially crucial for rare and endangered species. For example, tigers and pandas are kept in different zoos across the globe because of which their numbers have grown manifold over the years. Secondly, these zoological parks are needed by researchers and scientists to study animals. Lastly, menageries, such as zoos, are an ideal location for edutainment. That is to say, these establishments are not only an ideal source of entertainment for people of all age groups but they are also a way to impart education to children regarding animals. As a result of visits to such places, children may feel an affinity towards animals. What is more, zoos are a brilliant means of creating awareness about environmental issues.
On the other hand, it is necessary to accept that no creature should be treated as if it is for the entertainment of humankind. Hence, the treatment of wild animals in zoos has to be considered as brutal as their freedom is hampered. What is worse, the animals bred in captivity are incapable of adapting to the wild environment and thus can never be released into the wild. For instance, if a chimpanzee is born in a zoo environment, it would never be able to live in a forest. This chimpanzee would not know how to live with other wild animals or find food for itself.
In conclusion, although it seems that there are quite a few positives of zoos, I strongly believe they are an atrocity and closing is the only ethical recourse.
Sample Essay #3
(Using 3 points arguing that zoos are useful and 3 points arguing that zoos are cruel; Conclusion: zoos are cruel + alternatives to benefits of zoos)
(first three paragraphs are almost the same as the previous essay)
In conclusion, although it seems that there are quite a few positives of zoos, I strongly believe they are an atrocity and closing them is the only ethical recourse. As far as education is concerned, we now have a wide range of audio-visual media for this purpose. A practical example of this is the fact that no child has ever seen a dinosaur but through movies, documentaries, animations, and museums, they are very familiar with these extinct creatures. Similarly, for research and conservation purposes, wildlife sanctuaries and national parks should be encouraged where the focus is the well-being of the animals and not the amusement of human visitors.
Different ways of writing the first paragraph for this essay
Different ways of writing the topic sentence (first sentence of second paragraph) for this essay
Different ways of writing the conclusion for this essay
Step 1: Read & understand the question
Step 2: Plan the answer (points for both views)
Step 3: Think about the vocabulary
Step 4: Write
Step 5: Revise
Basic format/template:
Paragraph 1 : Introduction
• General statement (optional)
• Paraphrasing of the question
• This essay will discuss both the opinions before reaching a conclusion based on the arguments presented.
Paragraph 2 (body paragraph 1): Discuss one viewpoint
• Topic sentence (E.g., There are a number of reasons to support this opinion)
• Beginning phrases (Firstly/To begin with); Supporting points (Secondly/Thirdly; Moreover/Furthermore)
Paragraph 3 (body paragraph 2): Discuss the other viewpoint
• Topic sentence (E.g., On the other hand, the opposing viewpoint can also have valid supporting arguments)
• Supporting points
Paragraph 4 : Conclusion
Vocabulary planning (step 3 of essay writing) (Screenshot from the YouTube video--link in the beginning of this post) |
Copyright © www.Guide2IELTS.com 2022. All rights reserved.
Popular posts from this blog, consumerism (part 3--ielts speaking), letters--writing task 1 ielts general training (templates), morning/evening; different times of the day (part 1--ielts speaking).
Ielts reading passage – essay on animal rights and its condition.
Human beings are the most developed social animals as per the evolution theories state. Animal rights are the reservations made for the animals for their existence on earth and the virtue of no molestation.
Moving forward, there have been various acts enacted to address animal rights supporters and actually emphasize the condition of animals and upgrade them well.
As a whole, animal welfare has reached a recognized status where using animals for experimental methods, and replacing the living bodies with non-animal techniques are implemented to safeguard the safety of animals. Thus, the effort of animal welfare activities recognised some of the major issues like animal testing, wildlife conservation, living status, and treatment but the world is yet to achieve guaranteed animal rights. “Animal rights movements” are ongoing not only in the United States but in various countries but the universal declaration is not guaranteed for animal rights.
The best way to keep up to date with posts like this is to like us on Facebook , then follow us on Instagram and Pinterest . If you need help preparing for the IELTS Test, join the IELTS Achieve Academy and see how we can assist you to achieve your desired band score. We offer an essay correction service, mock exams and online courses.
Sending money home ielts reading question and answer, islands that float reading questions and answers.
IELTS General Training
A hub for IELTS GT test takers to help them reach their goal.
Gt writing task 2 / essay sample # 270.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1:
Whether it is brutal and inhuman to raise animals for our consumption is a hotly debated issue nowadays. In this case, the writer strongly disagrees with the claim because it is a natural process and part of human history and culture.
There is no brutality in eating meat. From time immemorial, animals have been eating other animals for meat to survive. Eagles kill and eat snakes, and snakes eat the mouse, and it is a natural process. Human is also part of the animal kingdom when it comes to the food pyramid. Moreover, meat is an important source of nutrients for the human being. For instance, ruminants such as cows, sheep, and goats, convert indigestible plant parts into a form the human body can absorb. That is to say that our digestive system cannot break down cellulose, which is an elementary component of fibre. They consume high-fibre plants like grasses and translate them into valuable protein for humans. The food chain is an essential part of ecosystem service, so to claim that rearing livestock for meat is inhumane is unnatural.
Aside from this, farmers breed ruminants, feed these animals, and protect these animals. These animals are domesticated so as to earn their bread. If rearing livestock for human consumption ceased, then the impulse of raising livestock would be gone. Farmers would no longer be there for looking after these animals, this, in turn, would endanger their existence. On top of that, these animals have survived over the generations due to their importance to humans. Besides, animal agriculture is a substantial part of human culture as well as history. Farmers and ranchers deem livestock rearing as more than a job. It is a lifestyle that is deeply ingrained in their existence and objectives here on earth. Thus, there is no brutality in rearing livestock for human consumption.
In conclusion, raising ruminants for human consumption is not cruelty to animals, but rather a natural process. However, we can introduce regulations so that farmers or corporations deter themselves from malpractice in raising and slaughtering animals.
Model Answer 2:
Whether people should abstain from consuming meat due to the perceived cruelty involved in raising animals for human consumption has ignited a heated debate. While some argue vehemently for the complete avoidance of meat, I respectfully disagree with this viewpoint. In my opinion, the decision to consume meat should be approached with mindfulness and consideration for ethical and sustainable practices.
First and foremost, it is essential to acknowledge that the mistreatment of animals in industrial farming practices is a genuine concern. The intensive farming methods employed to meet the growing demand for meat often involve cramped living conditions, inhumane treatment, and the use of growth hormones and antibiotics. These practices contradict the principles of compassion and respect for animal welfare.
However, it is important to note that not all meat production follows these unethical practices. There are alternative approaches, such as organic farming and free-range systems, that prioritize the well-being of animals, providing them with a more natural environment and access to pasture.
Furthermore, humans have evolved as omnivores, with meat being an integral part of our dietary history. Meat consumption, when practised responsibly, can provide essential nutrients that contribute to a balanced diet. It is worth noting that certain nutrients, such as vitamin B12, iron, and high-quality protein, are predominantly found in animal products. For individuals, particularly those with specific dietary requirements or cultural traditions, complete abstinence from meat may pose challenges in meeting their nutritional needs.
In conclusion, while the mistreatment of animals in industrial farming is a legitimate concern, I believe that a blanket statement advocating for the complete avoidance of meat oversimplifies a complex issue. Responsible meat consumption, encompassing ethical and sustainable practices, can coexist with animal welfare considerations. By supporting organic, free-range, and sustainably sourced meat, individuals can make informed choices that strike a balance between personal health, ethical considerations, and environmental sustainability.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
by Dave | Real Past Tests | 5 Comments
Here is my newest IELTS essay on the topic of animals! Specifically, if humans should protect all wild animals or just some specific ones.
Be sure to check out my Ebooks here .
Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while others think that it is important to protect some, not all of them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some have suggested that protection of wild animals should be selective. In my opinion, humanity has responsibility for all wild animals, though it is occasionally justified to divert resources towards more valuable species.
Those in favor of safeguarding certain wild animals argue the circumstantial factors. These factors can range from the threat the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. For instance, tigers are an endangered wild animal and require intensive conservation efforts compared with animals such as rats and pigeons, which have adapted skillfully to urban environments. Most would admit that there is little logic in providing equal support to species in different circumstances. A more extreme critic could add that some animals are more deserving of preservation. The tiger, to continue the previous example, is greatly valued for its elegance. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their usefulness to humanity.
However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the catalyst for their endangerment. Before the rapid industrialization and surging populations of the last several hundred years, humans and animals lived on relatively equal terms and shared the Earth. Since human development has outpaced nature and now threatens the habitats of countless species, it is a duty for mankind to enact safeguards for all animals. Without such forward-looking protections, there is likely to be a “domino effect” as species die out and impair fragile ecosystems globally. Therefore even if an animal is not on the verge of extinction, it might be important to maintain their population levels so as to not start a cycle of irreversible harms.
In conclusion, humans should endeavor to protect as many animals as possible although there are exceptional cases where some species may be prioritized. Governments and individuals should collaborate to ensure wild animals are not unduly threatened by human progress.
1. Some have suggested that protection of wild animals should be selective. 2. In my opinion, humanity has responsibility for all wild animals, though it is occasionally justified to divert resources towards more valuable species.
1. Those in favor of safeguarding certain wild animals argue the circumstantial factors. 2. These factors can range from the threat the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. 3. For instance, tigers are an endangered wild animal and require intensive conservation efforts compared with animals such as rats and pigeons, which have adapted skillfully to urban environments. 4. Most would admit that there is little logic in providing equal support to species in different circumstances. 5. A more extreme critic could add that some animals are more deserving of preservation. 6. The tiger, to continue the previous example, is greatly valued for its elegance. 7. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their usefulness to humanity.
1. However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the catalyst for their endangerment. 2. Before the rapid industrialization and surging populations of the last several hundred years, humans and animals lived on relatively equal terms and shared the Earth. 3. Since human development has outpaced nature and now threatens the habitats of countless species, it is a duty for mankind to enact safeguards for all animals. 4. Without such forward-looking protections, there is likely to be a “domino effect” as species die out and impair fragile ecosystems globally. 5. Therefore even if an animal is not on the verge of extinction, it might be important to maintain their population levels so as to not start a cycle of irreversible harms.
1. In conclusion, humans should endeavor to protect as many animals as possible although there are exceptional cases where some species may be prioritized. 2. Governments and individuals should collaborate to ensure wild animals are not unduly threatened by human progress.
What do the words in bold below mean? Make some notes on paper to aid memory and then check below.
Some have suggested that protection of wild animals should be selective . In my opinion, humanity has responsibility for all wild animals, though it is occasionally justified to divert resources towards more valuable species .
Those in favor of safeguarding certain wild animals argue the circumstantial factors . These factors can range from the threat the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. For instance , tigers are an endangered wild animal and require intensive conservation efforts compared with animals such as rats and pigeons, which have adapted skillfully to urban environments . Most would admit that there is little logic in providing equal support to species in different circumstances . A more extreme critic could add that some animals are more deserving of preservation . The tiger, to continue the previous example , is greatly valued for its elegance. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their usefulness to humanity.
However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the catalyst for their endangerment . Before the rapid industrialization and surging populations of the last several hundred years , humans and animals lived on relatively equal terms and shared the Earth. Since human development has outpaced nature and now threatens the habitats of countless species, it is a duty for mankind to enact safeguards for all animals. Without such forward-looking protections , there is likely to be a “domino effect” as species die out and impair fragile ecosystems globally . Therefore even if an animal is not on the verge of extinction , it might be important to maintain their population levels so as to not start a cycle of irreversible harms .
In conclusion, humans should endeavor to protect as many animals as possible although there are exceptional cases where some species may be prioritized . Governments and individuals should collaborate to ensure wild animals are not unduly threatened by human progress .
For extra practice, write an antonym (opposite word) on a piece of paper to help you remember the new vocabulary:
suggested advised
protection keeping safe
selective chosen
humanity mankind
responsibility duty
occasionally justified sometimes supported
divert resources towards sent in another direction at
valuable species important kind of animal
those in favor of people who support
safeguarding keeping safe
certain definite
argue point out
circumstantial factors contextual elements
range from include
threat risk
For instance for example
endangered near extinction
require intensive conservation efforts need lots of help
compared with relative to
adapted skillfully changed masterfully
urban environments cities
Most would admit that many would concede
little logic not much reason
providing equal support giving the same amount of help
different circumstances changing situations
extreme critic people strongly against
deserving should get
preservation staying alive and protected
previous example instance mentioned before
greatly valued considered important
usefulness utility
catalyst spark, cause
endangerment putting in danger
rapid industrialization becoming more and more developed
surging populations more and more people
last several hundred years since the 1800s or so
lived on continue to be alive
relatively equal terms almost living like equals
shared both using it
outpaced got a lot faster than
habitats places where animals live
countless limitless
duty responsibility
enact safeguards create protection
forward-looking protections progressive safeguards
“domino effect” will cause ramifications
die out go extinct
impair fragile ecosystems hurt a chain of animals
globally all around the world
not on the verge of extinction not about to die out completely
maintain keep the same
population levels how many are alive
cycle chain
irreversible harms can’t be fixed
endeavor try hard
exceptional cases extreme examples
prioritized considered most important
collaborate work together
ensure make sure
unduly unjustifiably
human progress mankind advancing
Practice saying the vocabulary below and use this tip about Google voice search :
səˈʤɛstɪd prəˈtɛkʃən sɪˈlɛktɪv hju(ː)ˈmænɪti rɪsˌpɒnsəˈbɪlɪti əˈkeɪʒnəli ˈʤʌstɪfaɪd daɪˈvɜːt rɪˈsɔːsɪz təˈwɔːdz ˈvæljʊəbl ˈspiːʃiːz ðəʊz ɪn ˈfeɪvər ɒv ˈseɪfgɑːdɪŋ ˈsɜːtn ˈɑːgjuː ˌsɜːkəmˈstænʃəl ˈfæktəz reɪnʤ frɒm θrɛt fɔːr ˈɪnstəns ɪnˈdeɪnʤəd rɪˈkwaɪər ɪnˈtɛnsɪv ˌkɒnsə(ː)ˈveɪʃən ˈɛfəts kəmˈpeəd wɪð əˈdæptɪd ˈskɪlf(ə)li ˈɜːbən ɪnˈvaɪərənmənts məʊst wʊd ədˈmɪt ðæt ˈlɪtl ˈlɒʤɪk prəˈvaɪdɪŋ ˈiːkwəl səˈpɔːt ˈdɪfrənt ˈsɜːkəmstənsɪz ɪksˈtriːm ˈkrɪtɪk dɪˈzɜːvɪŋ ˌprɛzə(ː)ˈveɪʃən ˈpriːviəs ɪgˈzɑːmpl , ˈgreɪtli ˈvæljuːd ˈjuːsfʊlnəs ˈkætəlɪst ɪnˈdeɪnʤəmənt ˈræpɪd ɪnˌdʌstrɪəlaɪˈzeɪʃən ˈsɜːʤɪŋ ˌpɒpjʊˈleɪʃənz lɑːst ˈsɛvrəl ˈhʌndrəd jɪəz lɪvd ɒn ˈrɛlətɪvli ˈiːkwəl tɜːmz ʃeəd aʊtˈpeɪst ˈhæbɪtæts ˈkaʊntlɪs ˈdjuːti ɪˈnækt ˈseɪfgɑːdz ˈfɔːwədˈlʊkɪŋ prəˈtɛkʃənz “ ˈdɒmɪnəʊ ɪˈfɛkt “ daɪ aʊt ɪmˈpeə ˈfræʤaɪl ˈiːkəʊˌsɪstəmz ˈgləʊbəli nɒt ɒn ðə vɜːʤ ɒv ɪksˈtɪŋkʃən meɪnˈteɪn ˌpɒpjʊˈleɪʃən ˈlɛvlz ˈsaɪkl ˌɪrɪˈvɜːsəbl hɑːmz ɪnˈdɛvə ɪkˈsɛpʃənl ˈkeɪsɪz praɪˈɒrɪˌtaɪzd kəˈlæbəreɪt ɪnˈʃʊə ʌnˈdjuːli ˈhjuːmən ˈprəʊgrəs
I recommend getting a pencil and piece of paper because that aids memory. Then write down the missing vocabulary from my sample answer in your notebook:
Some have s____________d that p______________n of wild animals should be s_______________e . In my opinion, h_______________y has r__________________y for all wild animals, though it is o______________________d to d______________________s more v___________________s .
T________________________________________________n wild animals a_______e the c___________________________s . These factors can r_____________m the t_________t the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. F______________e , tigers are an e______________d wild animal and r_________________________________s c_____________________h animals such as rats and pigeons, which have a_____________________y to u____________________s . M_____________________t there is l_________________c in p_______________________t to species in d___________________________s . A more e__________________c could add that some animals are more d______________g of p_______________n . The tiger, to continue the p___________________e , is g__________________d for its elegance. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their u______________s to humanity.
However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the c_________t for their e________________t . Before the r_______________________________n and s______________________s of the l________________________________s , humans and animals l______________________________s and s_______d the Earth. Since human development has o___________d nature and now threatens the h_________s of c__________s species, it is a d____y for mankind to e______________s for all animals. Without such f_______________________s , there is likely to be a “d_______________t” as species die out and i___________________________y . Therefore even if an animal is n____________________________n , it might be important to m__________n their p___________________s so as to not start a c________e of i__________________s .
In conclusion, humans should e______________r to protect as many animals as possible although there are e_ ______________ s where some species may be p________________d . Governments and individuals should c________________e to e________e wild animals are not u__________y threatened by h________________s .
Learn more about this topic by watching videos from The New York Times YouTube channel below and practice with these activities :
Practice with the following speaking questions from the real IELTS speaking exam :
Practice with the related IELTS essay topic below:
It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.
Do you agree or disagree?
IELTS Essay: Extinction
by Dave | Sample Answers | 147 Comments
These are the most recent/latest IELTS Writing Task 1 Task topics and questions starting in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and continuing into 2024. ...
by Dave | Sample Answers | 342 Comments
Read here all the newest IELTS questions and topics from 2024 and previous years with sample answers/essays. Be sure to check out my ...
by Dave | IELTS FAQ | 18 Comments
by Dave | Real Past Tests | 2 Comments
This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on the topic of celebrating family events from the real IELTS general training exam. ...
This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on the topic of clothes, culture, and character from the real IELTS exam. ...
by Dave | Understanding Task 2 Writing | 7 Comments
Here are some band 7 IELTS essays for writing task 2 that I have marked and corrected for past students. *I update this ...
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Sir, can we use the phrase a ‘postcode lottery’ in writing T2 to explain the disparity of public services in different areas.
I’m not familiar with that term… – if you explain it and use quotes that would be fine!
Thanks, Sir. I saw this term in a few BBC news articles. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41346237 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-59211183
I think, to be on the safe side, I’d rather not use it.
Every year a significant number of wild creatures are in danger of extinction. For that some individuals argue that all wild animals should be saved while others believe that only certain animals should be preserved. In this essay I will be discussing both views and why in my opinion all animals live matter.
To begin with , people who are in favour of the opinion that only some types of animals should be saved argue that there are some animals that are dangerous predators and their existence are a threat to human kind. Moreover , it will take a lot of money to conserve and save them and they believe this money could be invested in other areas such as education or infrastructure.
On the other hand, the predominant reason why we should protect animals is to maintain a healthy ecosystem. Moreover , some wild animals could be used for medicinal purposes. For instance, snake venom is used as a medical tool. Furthermore , because of human habitation and overuse of natural resources those creatures are in danger of extinction so at least we could make some effort to conserve them all without any exception.
In conclusion, we should save all wild animals that are still present in the world , selecting some of them is an idea why we should discard since it will bring more devastating outcomes.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Safeguarding wild lives is a topical issue globally. While it is considered by some that all wild animals should be taken care of, other believed that a selected few should benefit from this arrangement. In this essay I will discuss both views and make a conclusion.
One the one hand, the proponent of an holistic animal preservation believed that all wild animals are facing enormous dangers in the woods . For instance many beasts are devastated by green house effects thus dying at a tender age therefore they need to be nurtured to prevent them from extinction The resultant effect of this will foster ecosystem diversification and balance Additionally, keeping all wild lives will be a welcome development for the advocates of animal right. It is a common view that no animal is more important than another so if the wild lives will benefit from human intervention, it has to be all encompassing.
On the other hand, however, the critics of the above opinion believed that it is not financially sustainable. They argue that money meant for other essential services such as civil service, infrastructural development and human development will be channelled into building parks, zoos, provision of food and drugs to tend animals at the expense of man.
Furthermore, overpopulation of games in manmade habitats can bring a handful of issues. Animal becomes more aggressive posing danger to their carers and in the extreme of cases escapes and cause serious threats to mankind. An Australian magazine reported of a family of five who was killed by a lion that escaped zoos. This kind of disaster won’t have happened if wild animal that can’t be tamed easily is left in the forest.
To conclude, all wild animals deserve some protection but this should be limited to selected few in order to limit harm to the people and prevent economic catastrophe.
Sign up for patreon.
Don't miss out!
"The highest quality materials anywhere on the internet! Dave improved my writing and vocabulary so much. Really affordable options you don't want to miss out on!"
Minh, Vietnam
Hi, I’m Dave! Welcome to my IELTS exclusive resources! Before you commit I want to explain very clearly why there’s no one better to help you learn about IELTS and improve your English at the same time... Read more
Patreon Exclusive Ebooks Available Now!
Download Your Free Book (pdf)
Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner
Download IELTS eBooks , get everything you need to achieve a high band score
Deforestation, urbanization, and illegal hunting have relentlessly pushed numerous animal species towards endangerment and even extinction. This essay contends that safeguarding these species is not merely important but imperative. It will examine both the ecological impacts of extinction and the ethical responsibilities towards biodiversity conservation.
Firstly, the ecological ramifications of species loss are profound and far-reaching. Every species plays a unique role in its ecosystem, contributing to a complex web of interdependencies known as biodiversity. For instance, the extinction of a single pollinator species can lead to the collapse of plant populations that rely exclusively on that pollinator, which in turn affects species that depend on those plants for food and shelter. This domino effect can lead to ecological collapse, disrupting services ecosystems provide, like clean air, water purification, and climate regulation. The reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone National Park, USA, which helped stabilize other animal populations and rejuvenate the park’s ecosystem, exemplifies the positive impact of preserving biodiversity.
Secondly, there exists an ethical imperative to protect animal species. Beyond ecological benefits, humans have a moral duty to ensure the survival of other species with whom we share the planet. This duty arises from the recognition that animals possess intrinsic value and rights, independent of their utility to humans. Moreover, many of the threats to wildlife—such as habitat destruction and overhunting—are the direct result of human activities. Thus, it is incumbent upon us to rectify the harm we have caused. Initiatives like the establishment of wildlife corridors in India, which allow safe passage for tigers and other species between isolated reserves, demonstrate effective measures for mitigating human impact on wildlife.
In conclusion, the protection of endangered species is both an ecological necessity and a moral obligation. Through actions such as ecosystem restoration and the creation of wildlife corridors, we can address the adverse effects of human activity on wildlife, thereby preserving the natural heritage for future generations.
Deforestation, urban sprawl, and illegal poaching are increasingly threatening the survival of many animal species, propelling them towards extinction. This essay argues that animal protection is essential and will discuss the benefits of biodiversity and the effectiveness of conservation laws.
The first point to consider is the inherent value of biodiversity, which offers significant environmental and economic benefits. Diverse ecosystems are more resilient; they recover from disruptions such as natural disasters more quickly and are better at regulating disease, which benefits agricultural communities by ensuring healthy pollination and pest control. These ecological services are indispensable as they help maintain environmental balance and ensure sustainability of food sources. Economically, biodiversity is pivotal for sectors like ecotourism and pharmaceuticals, which rely on a variety of species to attract tourists and discover new medicines, respectively. For example, Costa Rica has harnessed its rich biodiversity to become one of the world's leading ecotourism destinations, significantly boosting its economy and providing jobs to local communities, thereby promoting a sustainable economic model that other nations can emulate.
Moreover, implementing strict conservation laws has proven to be an effective strategy for wildlife protection. Countries that have enforced comprehensive anti-poaching regulations and established protected areas have seen significant recoveries in wildlife populations. This approach not only prevents the immediate threats like poaching and habitat loss but also reinforces the ecological balance and biodiversity. Nepal, for instance, celebrated zero rhino poachings in several years due to stringent laws and community conservation efforts. These laws not only curb immediate threats but also foster a culture of wildlife value and conservation, ensuring long-term commitment to animal protection. The involvement of local communities in these efforts has been crucial, as it empowers them and provides economic benefits, further solidifying the support for wildlife conservation initiatives. This community engagement, combined with legal frameworks, forms a robust defense against the extinction of endangered species.
In conclusion, safeguarding endangered species through biodiversity preservation and rigorous legal frameworks is crucial. These strategies not only protect wildlife but also sustain ecological balance and foster economic growth.
Studying At University or College Is The Best Route to A Successful Career - IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Essay
Newspapers Are The Best Way To Learn about Current Events - IELTS Band 9 Sample Essay
Friendships That Take Place Online Are Not As Meaningful As Real-Life Friendship - IELTS Sample Essay
Talk to our experts
1800-120-456-456
Our planet Earth is a very beautiful place. Here, all the living organisms are dependent on each other and live together. We, humans, are considered as the most intelligent species on Earth. But, we sometimes become very insensitive to the creatures who cannot express themselves, especially the animals. We harm them just to fulfill our needs. We have an essay here on cruelty towards animals which will cover the questions like - write an article on cruelty towards animals, cruelty towards animals paragraph, paragraph on stop cruelty towards animals, article on cruelty towards animals class 9 and so on.
Animals, just like human beings, deserve a peaceful life. Animals are an important part of our ecosystem and are very useful to us. But, we sometimes forget that they are also living creatures. We keep on harassing them and these poor creatures can't even express their feelings and grief. Cruelty towards animals have become an international matter of concern. This needs to be addressed as soon as possible and should be eliminated for ever.
We become cruel towards animals for two reasons - one to fulfill our needs and other for fun. We use animals for their fur, their skin, their meat, their teeth and horns too. Sometimes, we apply colours on them which harm their skin, we also burn crackers without thinking about them. Sometimes , the tea-shop keeper pours the hot water on the street dogs, which is a great example of cruel behaviour towards the animals.
The animal skins are used in textile industries. Their skin and body hairs are used to make exotic fabrics for us to use. Animal’s teeth, horns, skin and fur are used to make home decor items which we beautifully use to decorate our homes without thinking how much pain animals go through for giving us these luxuries.
Another industry that contributes in cruelty to animals is the cosmetic industry. Whenever we buy any cosmetic products, we always make sure that the product is safe on our skin. But, we hardly realise that these products are tested on animals before it reaches us. The chemicals are often injected in animal’s bodies or applied on their skin. Sometimes, these are tested on their eyes too. And if the test fails, it sometimes leads to the animal's death also. These tests cause itching and burning too. But,we the human beings, keep on torturing the animals for our own purposes.
Our progressing medical science also has a big role in harassing the animals and showing our cruelty towards them. For the trials of medicines, animals are selected. They are then injected with the trial medicines without thinking about their pain. They are often kept in freezing temperatures for the experiments. We also ill treat the animals at zoos and circuses. The place where they are kept is not cleaned often. Also, the feeding methods are not too hygienic. These result in various diseases and often to their death.
Many animals and birds, in the name of pets, are being sold everyday. These animals are kept in cages or are kept tied with a chain. Most often, they are beaten up. The street dogs are often beaten up by the shopkeepers if they are found roaming around. Many cows are found roaming around the garbage heaps finding food. Many times many animals are hit by the fast moving traffic. These all are the examples of cruelty towards animals.
But now it's enough! We, the human beings, who are considered as the most intelligent creatures on Earth have to stop playing with these poor creatures' lives. We have to raise our voice and stop being cruel to the animals. We have to bring new strong laws to protect the animals. Every school should teach students how to respect and protect our fellow creatures - animals. Parents themselves should treat the animals with respect and love and should teach their wards the same.
We should always keep one thing in mind that we cannot survive without animals. Everything on Earth has its own purpose. The animals help in balancing our ecosystem. We have to take a call and save our environment, our mother Earth and our animals.
Cruelty means a behaviour that harms others physically or mentally. But it's a matter of shame that we only consider human beings when it comes to cruelty. We forget that animals are also living creatures and we should not be cruel to them. Just because these creatures can not express themselves as we do, we forget that what we are doing to them if someone does to us, we will die.
Human industries that contribute to this cruelty are - Textile, Cosmetics, Home Decor and many more. Animal skins and furs are used in textile industries, animal skin, fur, horns and teeths are used to make home decor items. Many animals are killed for their meat also. Animals are ill-treated in laboratories where they are used for testing and experiments. They are often kept in freezing conditions or in boiling conditions.
It is high time now that we stop abusing these poor animals. They are also living beings and are very very important to us as without them the whole ecosystem will disbalance. We should raise awareness and stop these cruelties against animals.
Cruelty to animals has become a nationwide problem nowadays. The government has already imposed a few laws and a few more are needed. Along with that, social awareness is also required. Students should learn how to treat animals in schools. Parents should also treat their pets well and teach their children. Our planet Earth is a very beautiful place. Here, all the living organisms are dependent on each other and live together. We, humans, are considered the most intelligent species on Earth. But, we sometimes become very insensitive to the creatures who cannot express themselves, especially the animals. We harm them just to fulfil our needs.
We have an essay here on cruelty towards animals which will cover the questions like - write an article on cruelty towards animals, cruelty towards animals paragraph, paragraph on stop cruelty towards animals, article on cruelty towards animals class 9 and so on.
To access these study materials, students will just have to complete this simple process:
Click on the download link provided on Vedantu's website for these study materials
Sign in with Gmail Id
Download the study material and start reaping the utmost benefits of it.
Students can also use Vedantu's mobile application. This mobile application is created by Vedantu to cater to students' needs of convenience and a better user experience. The mobile app is created by top-level app developers. Students who are using this app will not experience any inconvenience. All of these study materials are available on the app for free. Students can also find Vedantu's higher-level study materials like one to one coaching, video lectures, etc.
This essay on cruelty to animals is created by experts working with Vedantu. These experts have a ton of experience in their particular fields. That's why these experts are hired by Vedantu to provide students with the highest quality of study materials. The experts who wrote this essay on cruelty to animals have a lot of experience and background in this topic. They have taken their time and written this and many other essays for students to use any time and access from anywhere. Just because these essays are created by experts, the chance of these essays scoring full marks in any test or examination is pretty high.
Students can read this essay right now and can get ready for any tests or exams on it with confidence.
1. List Some Animal Protection Laws.
Here are a few laws and acts to prevent animals:
2. How do we Use Animal Teeth and Horns?
We use animal teeth and horns to make decorative pieces with which we decorate our home and offices. These decorative items are truly expensive for nature and its habitats. The most common example of animal cruelty is hunting. Animals are hunted for their meat, bones, leather or any other precious body parts. This can cause the species to be endangered or even go extinct. Another example of animal cruelty is enslaving them for entertainment or hard work. There are a lot of examples of animals being cruelty trained in circuses, kept as prisoners in zoos, or used as labourers to get the hardest jobs done.
3. What is meant by cruelty to animals?
Animal cruelty is defined as harming animals by either subjecting them to slavery, product-testing, or hunting. Killing endangered species for their meat, bones, or leather also comes under animal cruelty and is a punishable offence. The government of India has passed a lot of laws that prevent cruelty to animals from happening on a large scale. But still, in some neglected places like undeveloped villages, slums, or forests, these activities are followed illegally. And the government and some big governing bodies like PETA are working hard towards eradicating any kind of animal cruelty.
4. How does cruelty affect animals?
Cruelty towards animals can be dangerous for their overall species. There are a lot of examples like dodos, sabre tooth tigers, etc that have gone extinct because of excessive hunting. It is also morally incorrect to torture any living thing to die for the sake of an experiment. That's why animal testing is also banned. Animal testing is another example of animal cruelty and can hurt animals and even cruelly kill them. Animal cruelty should be banned completely.
5. How can we prevent animal cruelty?
There are very clear action steps to take to prevent animal cruelty. We can be responsible pet owners and start showing love and affection towards the animals at our home. We can adopt or at least hand over the abandoned baby animals we find on the streets to animal care centres. We can prohibit the use of animal-tested cosmetics or any products. We can even file a complaint against anyone who is abusing stray animals or harming them.
In this IELTS Zoo Essay you have to discuss whether you think zoos are cruel and should be shut down or whether they are useful as they protect some wild animals.
Essays on zoos have appeared in the IELTS test before and this was a question that was recently in the test.
Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.
Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
You must always read the question carefully and note if there is anything restricting the topic.
You have to discuss both sides of the argument and with this zoo essay question it would be very easy to read it and then simply write about the benefits and drawbacks of zoos.
But look at this bit carefully:
One of the arguments is specifically about protecting animals. So when you discuss the second argument you must be careful not to just write generally about the advantage of zoos.
You have to focus on how they may protect wild animals . So when you brainstorm your ideas for the zoo essay, you should be thinking about:
And in your other body paragraph you would need to explain why they are also seen as cruel.
And of course you must remember to give your own opinion. In this essay, the author makes it clear at the beginning that they support the closing down of zoos.
The opinion you decide on though is of course your choice.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.
Zoos remain popular places for people to visit for entertainment and to learn about wild animals. Although some people are of the opinion that zoos can provide a sanctuary for endangered animals and so should be kept open, I believe that the cruelty that animals suffer outweighs this benefit, and that they should be shut down.
These days, animals are under threat from humans in many ways, seen for example in the way that their habitats are being destroyed through the cutting down of rain forests, or through poaching. Following on from this, the argument is that zoos can protect some of these animals that are under threat. The reason is that they are in a safe environment managed by trained staff who can ensure the animals are looked after and can produce offspring. There are examples of successes in this respect, such as with Pandas, which have been endangered for many years but have been protected.
However, there are more convincing arguments for why zoos should be shut down. Firstly, even though some species are under threat, there are lots of animals which do not fall into this category and who are there just for the entertainment of visitors. While it may be fun and educational to see them, animals are not meant to be caged, and their distress can often be seen in the way many of them pace back and forwards all day. Not only this, if the prime reason of zoos is to protect animals, this could be done in other environments such as wild life parks where the animals have more freedom.
In conclusion, animals should be protected but this does not have to be in zoos. Zoos are cruel to animals, not similar enough to their natural habitat, and they should be closed down.
(299 Words)
Band scores are given for task response, coherence and cohesion, lexis (vocabulary) and grammatical range and accuracy.
This zoo essay would get a good score for task response as it fully answers the question by discussing both opinions and giving a personal opinion. Ideas are also well explained, extended and supported.
It would get a good score for coherence and cohesion as it is organised coherently and logically and is easy to follow. The introduction introduces the topic then there is a thesis statement.
One body paragraph discusses one side of the argument, and the other discusses the other side. The second body paragraph is also the writers opinion, and this is summarised again in the conclusion
.There is some interesting vocabulary and phrases. For example:
There are also some good complex grammatical constructions and the grammar is precise. For example, the red words show that some of these are adverbial clauses , noun clauses and relative clauses :
<<< Back
Next >>>
Donating Money to Charity Essay: IELTS model answer to an essay on the topic of giving locally or to national and international charities.
Child Development Essay for IELTS. The essay is about the factors that affect the way that children develop. It provides you with a model answer and comments on the response to help you know how to improve your band score.
Diet and Health Essay for IELTS: This model examines the extent to which individuals or governments should be responsible for health. Read a model answer and useful comments about the essay which will help you to improve your IELTS Score.
IELTS essays online with comments by an IELTS instructor - A writing sample on the topic of reducing crime.
This IELTS essay discussed whether people are becoming more independent than they were in the past. This is a question that has come up a few times in the test. This is discussion type essay as you have to discuss both sides of an argument and come to a conclusion.
Influence of Scientists or Politicians Essay- Model answer for IELTS. Who has had the most influence on our world? In this essay you have to discuss both sides.
This formal and informal education essay is about whether it is best for children to begin their formal education at school when they are 7 rather than much younger.
Animal Rights Essay for IELTS: Learn how to write an essay where you have to discuss two opinions. People who believe in animal rights think that they should not be treated cruelly, for example in experiments or for sport.
This extraterrestrial life essay is an IELTS opinion essay where you have to discuss both sides of an issue then give your own opinion.
Childcare Essay: In the essay you have to discuss two sides of an argument. The first is that it is better if pre-school children are looked after at home with relatives such as grandparents. The second opinion is that children should be looked after at childcare centres.
This sources for stories essay asks for your opinion on the best way for children to get stories. Is it from parents reading to them or other ways?
IELTS writing example essays. This is an essay on the aims of university education. In this essay, two opposing opinions need to be discussed. It is important to understand how to answer this type of question in the IELTS exam.
Any comments or questions about this page or about IELTS? Post them here. Your email will not be published or shared.
"I think these eBooks are FANTASTIC!!! I know that's not academic language, but it's the truth!"
Linda, from Italy, Scored Band 7.5
All 4 Writing eBooks for just $25.86 Find out more >>
Other resources:.
Jul 23, 24 01:27 PM
Jul 16, 24 04:06 PM
Jul 13, 24 07:48 AM
IELTS Writing IELTS Speaking IELTS Listening IELTS Reading All Lessons Vocabulary Academic Task 1 Academic Task 2 Practice Tests
30% discount - just $25.86 for all 4 writing ebooks.
Copyright © 2022- IELTSbuddy All Rights Reserved
IELTS is a registered trademark of University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia.
Home » IELTS BAND 9 ESSAYS » Animal testing IELTS essay
IELTS animal testing essay: Some people think that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefits of human beings, while other people argue that it is wrong.
Over centuries humans have experimented with many different chemicals, products, and processes, with the final aim of bettering our conditions. Testing products on animals most likely dates back centuries, however, in modern society it is a controversial point. Below is an outline of circumstances when it could be considered acceptable and unacceptable.
Firstly, it is clear that major advances in fighting disease, viruses and illnesses would not have been made without testing products on animals. This is because it is inhumane to test the products on healthy human beings, likewise using computer modelling to predict reactions is only a recent possibility and still not as reliable as testing on animals. Therefore without experiments on animals, breakthroughs in medicine would have been impossible, and most would agree the price paid has been worth it.
Conversely, it could be argued that medical research carried out for mere cosmetic ends is undoubtedly not worth the lives of innocent animals. This is largely for two reasons, firstly a large body of research is said to have been built up previously from past experiments, and secondly there are alternatives such as dermatological testing or using natural ingredients.
For example, retail chains such as Lush and The Body Shop have both made fortunes by positioning themselves as natural solutions against animal testing. Therefore due to the end rationale for testing on animals, and the alternatives available, it is clear it is completely unjustifiable in this situation.
To conclude animal welfare can be side-stepped when the situation is threatening humans and computer alternatives are simply too premature. Nevertheless, when the research has rather fickle motives and viable alternatives do exist, in these cases the loss of animal's lives in inexcusable.
For a FREE ebook of our top 10 sample task 2 essays, click here!
For more help with your task 2 preparation, take a look at our tutorials:
Company addresses: HK Office: BW ENGLISH SERVICES HK Ltd, Unit 2512, 25/F, Langham Place Office Tower, 8 Argyle Street, Mongkok, Hong Kong UK Office: BW ENGLISH SERVICES, 120 High Road, East Finchley, N29ED, London, England, United Kingdom +44 20 3951 8271 ($1/min).
Seriously, will someone please take this woman's cat away.
For years, I have considered The Cut ’s enragingly fact-averse defense of “repressed memories” ( read this if you read that) to be the absolute worst thing they have ever published. In fact, I’ll actually stand by that. It’s a very, very bad article. But a close second, for sure, is this week’s “Why Did I Stop Loving My Cat When I Had a Baby?”
The subheadline of the essay reads My postpartum loathing of Lucky made me wonder whether I might be a late-onset psychopath . And, you know, when I saw that, I assumed I was going to read an article about someone who was just being really hard on herself over feelings she probably could not help due to postpartum depression.
I did not. And she wasn’t.
Loving this post? Not a free or paid subscriber yet? Let’s fix that!
The anonymous author starts out by identifying with a woman who has just told her dog to “fuck off” and veers into a weird supposed-to-be-sympathetic story about a woman who wanted to put her dog down rather than pay for its surgery — the purpose of this essay being an attempt to show that what she felt and did to her cat was normal:
“It’s so bad,” Camilla, who has two children, told me. “The dog needed surgery on her leg at the beginning of June, and I asked the vet if I could put her down instead. He looked at me like I was a monster. I shelled out $5,000 we don’t have on the fucking dog instead of the millions of other things we needed it for.”
So, there are multiple options beyond literally killing the dog — which, no, a vet is not going to do just because you ask for it. There are animal welfare organizations that can help, payment plans and, sure, worst case scenario, rehoming or taking the dog to a shelter. You don’t just kill a dog.
Well, unless you’re Kristi Noem.
The author begins her own story by saying that, from the beginning, her cat Lucky “was only intermittently tolerant” of her, instead of loving as she had hoped. Despite this, she says, “all of my disposable income went toward fancy cat food and wholesome toys.” (As opposed to what? Tiny dicks stuffed with catnip?)
But the honeymoon, it did not last.
When I got married at 30, Lucky took an active and territorial dislike to my husband. It was unpleasant but manageable for everyone. A few years later, we had a baby, and my postpartum loathing of Lucky made me wonder whether I might be a late-onset psychopath. In the months following the baby’s arrival, any redirection of attention sparked fury. If Lucky nuzzled me as I nursed in bed, I shoved her away. When she barfed on a nursing bra, I threw the soiled garment at her head (and missed). When she threaded through my legs in figure eights during diaper changes, I could barely suppress the urge to — not kick but firmly scoot her away with a foot. (I didn’t, I didn’t.)
Now, you may be thinking “that’s not great, but it’s not like she actually went through with kicking the cat.” I assure you, it gets worse.
Basic needs went unmet. I often forgot to feed Lucky, which caused her to eat houseplants in desperation and puke them up. She shat and urinated on the floor in protest of her overflowing litter box. A few weeks in, I abandoned the effort of wet food altogether and placed a trough of dry food in a corner; Lucky binged and gained a statistically significant amount of weight, which made it impossible for her to self-groom, leaving her greasy and coated in dandruff. She lost at least one tooth. (No idea where it went.) I forgot to fill her water bowl, which I didn’t realize until I saw paw prints all over the toilet seat — her hydration source of last resort. The toilet paw prints broke my heart a little bit. If I treated a human the way I treated my cat, I would be in prison for years.
So … that is actually animal abuse. That’s not “having messed up thoughts because of postpartum depression” or not loving your cat enough, that is straight up animal abuse.
By the time the baby was 2 months old, I hated Lucky so much I began to leave our windows open in the vague hope that she would take the initiative and leap out of one — not directly to her death (we live on the ground floor, so a level of plausible deniability factored into my calculations) but, realistically, to her death. Call it voluntary catslaughter.
This certainly seems like a weird moment for wordplay, no?
Anonymous Cat Hater then veers back into talking about other women she claims experienced the same thing as her. That they realized later their pets had been “practice babies” and that they stopped caring about them after their children were born — not that they purchased them for that reason to begin with.
But let’s grant that it happens. You had a pet who was your baby, and now you have a baby who is your baby. Does that mean the pet is sentenced to irrelevance? The answer from most of my polling group was “Yes, but it’s not a life sentence.” More like one to five years with time off for good behavior.
Um. Did her “polling group” know that she was depriving her cat of food and water? Because the other women said things like, once their baby came, they no longer had time for “hourlong walks and photo shoots” with their pets, and that is just a little bit different from “I left the window open hoping that my cat would die.”
Wait it out, they implored me. “Don’t trust your feelings right now,” said Cynthia. She promised my affection for Lucky would return once the baby started noticing and interacting with her.
Yeah, I don’t think that she should do that. Cynthia does not know what she speaks of, as the author makes evident when she describes an incident in which Lucky took an interest in a stuffed dragon her sister had bought for the baby.
Having jumped onto the bed under false pretenses, Lucky froze. Her overgrown nails dug into the duvet cover. She stared at the dragon, the baby, me. Then back at the baby, who wobbled his head in the cat’s direction. Lucky moved closer. For six or seven seconds, the two creatures stared at each other. A hint of the affection Cynthia predicted flared up in my chest. As did a flicker of irritation because now the cat had to be fed or watered or whatever.
Oh, how rude of the cat to not want to starve to death? Jesus.
Just as an aside, I’d like to know what the husband was doing in all of this? Like, he couldn’t be bothered to put some food and water out for Lucky either?
Then I remembered something that Natasha, a mother of two kids and one dog, had told me: “Being irritable and not having enough love are two different things.” At that moment, on the bed, both happened to be true — I did not have enough love for the cat, and I was irritable. But that didn’t mean one followed from the other. In fact, a mountain of evidence pointed to the opposite: Every person and animal I’d ever loved had caused me vexation, and I knew myself to be a periodic or chronic irritant in the lives of my entire family, all my friends, my partner, and my colleagues — yet none of them ever invited me to self-destruct. I haven’t fallen back in love with Lucky, but it could still happen. I’ll shut the windows until then.
NO! No, you absolute lunatic — REHOME THE CAT. Find someone who will not abuse or starve the cat to take it from you. Take it to an animal welfare agency or rescue or a shelter.
Donate Just Once!
It’s unfortunate, but people do give up pets all of the time due to major life changes, including having children. We’d all prefer that not be the case, but it is infinitely preferable to killing them or otherwise torturing them. That being said, a pet is a commitment and one should not get one in the first place if they think they might not want them after they have kids or stop caring for it for any other reason!
As for the big questions this essay asks — Is this normal? Am I a psychopath? — I think the answer is fairly obvious.
Thank you for reading Wonkette. This post is public so feel free to share it with everyone you love (or hate).
NO SHIT — you're psychotic! That poor cat and I honestly I worry a bit for the baby in this situation too. What happens if they have a second child? Will the first one be left to starve?
|
|
Ready for more?
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Many think that governments should fund programs in search of life on other planets. however, others believe governments should focus on unresolved issues of the planet. provide your opinion and discuss both views., environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little. to what extent do you agree or disagree, the internet is a great course of information and has opened up opportunities for people to learn all over the world. is all information reliable on the internet what could be done to control information online, the government should give each citizen a basic income, so they have enough money to live on, even if they are unemployed to what extent do you agree or disagree.
Advertisement
Supported by
Nicholas Kristof
By Nicholas Kristof
Opinion Columnist
Over the past couple of decades, dogs have evolved into humans.
Well, at least that’s how we think of them now. Some 97 percent of U.S. pet owners consider dogs (or other pets) part of their families. A majority of dog owners celebrate canine birthdays, and nearly two-thirds report that they take more photos of their dogs than of family members.
If you’re dating someone with a dog, bring a biscuit: A majority of dog owners say they would consider ending a relationship if the pet disapproved of the partner.
America now has more dogs than children, and households are spending lavishly on pets. Warning that dogs may suffer storm anxiety, one company offers canine noise-canceling headphones for $200. Dog people spend thousands of dollars on oil paintings of Rover, not to mention large sums on dog spas, dog restaurants, dog bakeries and dog fashion.
“When your pooch is wearing clothes from Dog & Co., you know they’re going to be part of the most fashionable pack in town,” one site explains.
Then there are high-end dog foods and sophisticated health services and, if the chemotherapy doesn’t succeed, pet cemeteries. Because people don’t want to be separated from their pets, the Hartsdale Pet Cemetery outside New York City says that it has accommodated more than 800 people who asked to be buried with their pets.
I understand all this. Our last dog, Katie Kuvasz Kristof, was a saint (but not to squirrels), and if Pope Francis is right about dogs going to heaven , Katie is now barking in paradise. There are a few statues of heroic dogs around the world — in Tokyo , in New York City , in Scotland — and in the United States I would love to see more. Perhaps we could replace some statues of Confederate generals with ones of dogs who represented a higher standard of, er, humanity?
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Animal Rights Essay for IELTS: Learn how to write an essay where you have to discuss two opinions. People who believe in animal rights think that they should not be treated cruelly, for example in experiments or for sport.
Animal Cruelty Essays by Ashish garg (Delhi) Could u please tell me that how much would I get for this essay? A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your ...
However, this group believes that animals should not be endangered by humans, while some others point that human needs are more important and people should be allowed to use animals for their different purposes. Therefore, this essay has tried to cover both of mentioned views and would suggest a good way to solve the issue.
In conclusion, the argument against meat consumption on the grounds of animal cruelty is compelling and valid. The industrialized methods of raising animals for human consumption have led to inhumane treatment, neglect of basic welfare needs, and the excessive use of chemicals and hormones.
The Importance of Animal Rights: An IELTS Writing Guide The topic of animal rights frequently surfaces in IELTS Writing Task 2, prompting test-takers to consider the ethical treatment of animals in modern society. This essay will delve into the significance of animal rights, provide a sample answer to a related IELTS question, and offer valuable tips on crafting a high-scoring response.
Sample Essay #1. (Using 3 points arguing that zoos are useful and 1 point arguing that zoos are cruel; Conclusion: conditionally agree with the opinion that zoos are useful) Visit to a zoo is part of fond childhood memories of almost everyone. Yet, it has become a contentious subject in recent years whether zoos serve an overall positive ...
The Importance of Animal Rights in Modern Society: An IELTS Essay Guide Animal rights have become an increasingly prominent issue in modern society, prompting discussions and debates around the ethical treatment of animals. This topic frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2, requiring test-takers to express their opinions on various aspects of animal welfare.
IELTS Reading passage - Essay on Animal rights and its condition Essay on Animal rights and its condition Human beings are the most developed social animals as per the evolution theories state. Animal rights are the reservations made for the animals for their existence on earth and the virtue of no molestation.
This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on whether zoos are cruel and exploitive or helpful for rare animals from the real IELTS exam.
50 Latest Animals IELTS Topics. Get a band score and detailed report instantly. Check your IELTS essays right now! Some people say that it is necessary to use animals for testing the medicines intended for human beings, others however think it is cruel and unnecessary. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
essay, both viewpoints will be outlined before reaching a conclusion. At the outset, it is undeniable that keeping creatures in. zoos. is wrong and one of the most significant reasons is cruelty. To elaborate. further. , animals in these places will lose their instinct and behaviours. such. as hunting, feeding, etc.
In conclusion, raising ruminants for human consumption is not cruelty to animals, but rather a natural process. However, we can introduce regulations so that farmers or corporations deter themselves from malpractice in raising and slaughtering animals.
Animal testing essay: In this essay, you are asked to discuss the arguments for and against animal testing, and then give your own conclusions on the issue. This means you must look at both sides of the issue and you must also be sure you give your opinion too.
Here is my newest IELTS essay on the topic of animals! Specifically, if humans should protect all wild animals or just some specific ones.
Task 2 Essays. Task 2 Band 9 Essay - This essay will scrutinize both sides of the argument before positing that the act of taking animals out of their natural habitats and exposing them to substandard care and support in zoos is, in reality, a form of inhumanity. Although some contend that zoos have a crucial role to play in safeguarding ...
Keeping animals in captivity is cruel. There is no reason for zoos to exist in the 21st century. How far do you agree or disagree with this opinion? # animals # captivity # reason # zoos # st # century Around the world, people have differing opinions about zoos . Some people believe that keeping animals in captivity is wrong, while others contend that it is necessary , and that we need zoos ...
Band 4: Due to increased cruelty towards animals some demand zoos to be closed, while others think they are needed to protect rare species. Discuss both views and give your own opinion (User-Written IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay)
Sample Essay 2 Deforestation, urban sprawl, and illegal poaching are increasingly threatening the survival of many animal species, propelling them towards extinction. This essay argues that animal protection is essential and will discuss the benefits of biodiversity and the effectiveness of conservation laws.
Learn about speech on Cruelty to Animals Essay topic of english in details explained by subject experts on vedantu.com. Register free for online tutoring session to clear your doubts.
In this IELTS Zoo Essay you have to discuss whether you think zoos are cruel and should be shut down or whether they are useful as they protect some wild animals. Essays on zoos have appeared in the IELTS test before and this was a question that was recently in the test. Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down.
Throughout this ,essay I will agree with this point of view and give reasons for why I agree on this matter. 4. band. Some people say that t is necessary to use animals for testing medicines intended for human use. Others, however, think it is cruel and uncessary. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
IELTS animal testing essay: Some people think that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefits of human beings, while other people argue that it is wrong. Over centuries humans have experimented with many different chemicals, products, and processes, with the final aim of bettering our conditions.
The subheadline of the essay reads My postpartum loathing of Lucky made me wonder whether I might be a late-onset psychopath. And, you know, when I saw that, I assumed I was going to read an article about someone who was just being really hard on herself over feelings she probably could not help due to postpartum depression.
Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Some people argue that zoos help to preserve wild creatures, while others say that they are inhumane and should be abolished.
Over the past couple of decades, dogs have evolved into humans. Well, at least that's how we think of them now. Some 97 percent of U.S. pet owners consider dogs (or other pets) part of their ...