Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Research paper
![](http://farmaciacoslada.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Writing a Research Paper Introduction | Step-by-Step Guide
Published on September 24, 2022 by Jack Caulfield . Revised on March 27, 2023.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary Writing a Research Paper Introduction](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Writing-a-research-paper-introduction-preview.webp)
The introduction to a research paper is where you set up your topic and approach for the reader. It has several key goals:
- Present your topic and get the reader interested
- Provide background or summarize existing research
- Position your own approach
- Detail your specific research problem and problem statement
- Give an overview of the paper’s structure
The introduction looks slightly different depending on whether your paper presents the results of original empirical research or constructs an argument by engaging with a variety of sources.
Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text
Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes
![how should you start a research project flocabulary upload-your-document-ai-proofreader](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/grammar-check.webp)
Table of contents
Step 1: introduce your topic, step 2: describe the background, step 3: establish your research problem, step 4: specify your objective(s), step 5: map out your paper, research paper introduction examples, frequently asked questions about the research paper introduction.
The first job of the introduction is to tell the reader what your topic is and why it’s interesting or important. This is generally accomplished with a strong opening hook.
The hook is a striking opening sentence that clearly conveys the relevance of your topic. Think of an interesting fact or statistic, a strong statement, a question, or a brief anecdote that will get the reader wondering about your topic.
For example, the following could be an effective hook for an argumentative paper about the environmental impact of cattle farming:
A more empirical paper investigating the relationship of Instagram use with body image issues in adolescent girls might use the following hook:
Don’t feel that your hook necessarily has to be deeply impressive or creative. Clarity and relevance are still more important than catchiness. The key thing is to guide the reader into your topic and situate your ideas.
Scribbr Citation Checker New
The AI-powered Citation Checker helps you avoid common mistakes such as:
- Missing commas and periods
- Incorrect usage of “et al.”
- Ampersands (&) in narrative citations
- Missing reference entries
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/citation-checker-issue-example-1.png)
This part of the introduction differs depending on what approach your paper is taking.
In a more argumentative paper, you’ll explore some general background here. In a more empirical paper, this is the place to review previous research and establish how yours fits in.
Argumentative paper: Background information
After you’ve caught your reader’s attention, specify a bit more, providing context and narrowing down your topic.
Provide only the most relevant background information. The introduction isn’t the place to get too in-depth; if more background is essential to your paper, it can appear in the body .
Empirical paper: Describing previous research
For a paper describing original research, you’ll instead provide an overview of the most relevant research that has already been conducted. This is a sort of miniature literature review —a sketch of the current state of research into your topic, boiled down to a few sentences.
This should be informed by genuine engagement with the literature. Your search can be less extensive than in a full literature review, but a clear sense of the relevant research is crucial to inform your own work.
Begin by establishing the kinds of research that have been done, and end with limitations or gaps in the research that you intend to respond to.
The next step is to clarify how your own research fits in and what problem it addresses.
Argumentative paper: Emphasize importance
In an argumentative research paper, you can simply state the problem you intend to discuss, and what is original or important about your argument.
Empirical paper: Relate to the literature
In an empirical research paper, try to lead into the problem on the basis of your discussion of the literature. Think in terms of these questions:
- What research gap is your work intended to fill?
- What limitations in previous work does it address?
- What contribution to knowledge does it make?
You can make the connection between your problem and the existing research using phrases like the following.
Although has been studied in detail, insufficient attention has been paid to . | You will address a previously overlooked aspect of your topic. |
The implications of study deserve to be explored further. | You will build on something suggested by a previous study, exploring it in greater depth. |
It is generally assumed that . However, this paper suggests that … | You will depart from the consensus on your topic, establishing a new position. |
Now you’ll get into the specifics of what you intend to find out or express in your research paper.
The way you frame your research objectives varies. An argumentative paper presents a thesis statement, while an empirical paper generally poses a research question (sometimes with a hypothesis as to the answer).
Argumentative paper: Thesis statement
The thesis statement expresses the position that the rest of the paper will present evidence and arguments for. It can be presented in one or two sentences, and should state your position clearly and directly, without providing specific arguments for it at this point.
Empirical paper: Research question and hypothesis
The research question is the question you want to answer in an empirical research paper.
Present your research question clearly and directly, with a minimum of discussion at this point. The rest of the paper will be taken up with discussing and investigating this question; here you just need to express it.
A research question can be framed either directly or indirectly.
- This study set out to answer the following question: What effects does daily use of Instagram have on the prevalence of body image issues among adolescent girls?
- We investigated the effects of daily Instagram use on the prevalence of body image issues among adolescent girls.
If your research involved testing hypotheses , these should be stated along with your research question. They are usually presented in the past tense, since the hypothesis will already have been tested by the time you are writing up your paper.
For example, the following hypothesis might respond to the research question above:
Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
- Academic style
- Vague sentences
- Style consistency
See an example
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/dissertation-proofreading-service.png)
The final part of the introduction is often dedicated to a brief overview of the rest of the paper.
In a paper structured using the standard scientific “introduction, methods, results, discussion” format, this isn’t always necessary. But if your paper is structured in a less predictable way, it’s important to describe the shape of it for the reader.
If included, the overview should be concise, direct, and written in the present tense.
- This paper will first discuss several examples of survey-based research into adolescent social media use, then will go on to …
- This paper first discusses several examples of survey-based research into adolescent social media use, then goes on to …
Full examples of research paper introductions are shown in the tabs below: one for an argumentative paper, the other for an empirical paper.
- Argumentative paper
- Empirical paper
Are cows responsible for climate change? A recent study (RIVM, 2019) shows that cattle farmers account for two thirds of agricultural nitrogen emissions in the Netherlands. These emissions result from nitrogen in manure, which can degrade into ammonia and enter the atmosphere. The study’s calculations show that agriculture is the main source of nitrogen pollution, accounting for 46% of the country’s total emissions. By comparison, road traffic and households are responsible for 6.1% each, the industrial sector for 1%. While efforts are being made to mitigate these emissions, policymakers are reluctant to reckon with the scale of the problem. The approach presented here is a radical one, but commensurate with the issue. This paper argues that the Dutch government must stimulate and subsidize livestock farmers, especially cattle farmers, to transition to sustainable vegetable farming. It first establishes the inadequacy of current mitigation measures, then discusses the various advantages of the results proposed, and finally addresses potential objections to the plan on economic grounds.
The rise of social media has been accompanied by a sharp increase in the prevalence of body image issues among women and girls. This correlation has received significant academic attention: Various empirical studies have been conducted into Facebook usage among adolescent girls (Tiggermann & Slater, 2013; Meier & Gray, 2014). These studies have consistently found that the visual and interactive aspects of the platform have the greatest influence on body image issues. Despite this, highly visual social media (HVSM) such as Instagram have yet to be robustly researched. This paper sets out to address this research gap. We investigated the effects of daily Instagram use on the prevalence of body image issues among adolescent girls. It was hypothesized that daily Instagram use would be associated with an increase in body image concerns and a decrease in self-esteem ratings.
The introduction of a research paper includes several key elements:
- A hook to catch the reader’s interest
- Relevant background on the topic
- Details of your research problem
and your problem statement
- A thesis statement or research question
- Sometimes an overview of the paper
Don’t feel that you have to write the introduction first. The introduction is often one of the last parts of the research paper you’ll write, along with the conclusion.
This is because it can be easier to introduce your paper once you’ve already written the body ; you may not have the clearest idea of your arguments until you’ve written them, and things can change during the writing process .
The way you present your research problem in your introduction varies depending on the nature of your research paper . A research paper that presents a sustained argument will usually encapsulate this argument in a thesis statement .
A research paper designed to present the results of empirical research tends to present a research question that it seeks to answer. It may also include a hypothesis —a prediction that will be confirmed or disproved by your research.
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Caulfield, J. (2023, March 27). Writing a Research Paper Introduction | Step-by-Step Guide. Scribbr. Retrieved July 30, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-paper/research-paper-introduction/
Is this article helpful?
![how should you start a research project flocabulary Jack Caulfield](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/jack-originalsquare-250-min.jpg)
Jack Caulfield
Other students also liked, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples, writing a research paper conclusion | step-by-step guide, research paper format | apa, mla, & chicago templates, get unlimited documents corrected.
✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://cdn.paperpal.com/assets/images/paperpal_editage_logo.webp)
How to Write a Research Proposal: (with Examples & Templates)
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how to write a research proposal](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/pexels-karolina-grabowska-8539429-1-1170x780.jpg)
Table of Contents
Before conducting a study, a research proposal should be created that outlines researchers’ plans and methodology and is submitted to the concerned evaluating organization or person. Creating a research proposal is an important step to ensure that researchers are on track and are moving forward as intended. A research proposal can be defined as a detailed plan or blueprint for the proposed research that you intend to undertake. It provides readers with a snapshot of your project by describing what you will investigate, why it is needed, and how you will conduct the research.
Your research proposal should aim to explain to the readers why your research is relevant and original, that you understand the context and current scenario in the field, have the appropriate resources to conduct the research, and that the research is feasible given the usual constraints.
This article will describe in detail the purpose and typical structure of a research proposal , along with examples and templates to help you ace this step in your research journey.
What is a Research Proposal ?
A research proposal¹ ,² can be defined as a formal report that describes your proposed research, its objectives, methodology, implications, and other important details. Research proposals are the framework of your research and are used to obtain approvals or grants to conduct the study from various committees or organizations. Consequently, research proposals should convince readers of your study’s credibility, accuracy, achievability, practicality, and reproducibility.
With research proposals , researchers usually aim to persuade the readers, funding agencies, educational institutions, and supervisors to approve the proposal. To achieve this, the report should be well structured with the objectives written in clear, understandable language devoid of jargon. A well-organized research proposal conveys to the readers or evaluators that the writer has thought out the research plan meticulously and has the resources to ensure timely completion.
Purpose of Research Proposals
A research proposal is a sales pitch and therefore should be detailed enough to convince your readers, who could be supervisors, ethics committees, universities, etc., that what you’re proposing has merit and is feasible . Research proposals can help students discuss their dissertation with their faculty or fulfill course requirements and also help researchers obtain funding. A well-structured proposal instills confidence among readers about your ability to conduct and complete the study as proposed.
Research proposals can be written for several reasons:³
- To describe the importance of research in the specific topic
- Address any potential challenges you may encounter
- Showcase knowledge in the field and your ability to conduct a study
- Apply for a role at a research institute
- Convince a research supervisor or university that your research can satisfy the requirements of a degree program
- Highlight the importance of your research to organizations that may sponsor your project
- Identify implications of your project and how it can benefit the audience
What Goes in a Research Proposal?
Research proposals should aim to answer the three basic questions—what, why, and how.
The What question should be answered by describing the specific subject being researched. It should typically include the objectives, the cohort details, and the location or setting.
The Why question should be answered by describing the existing scenario of the subject, listing unanswered questions, identifying gaps in the existing research, and describing how your study can address these gaps, along with the implications and significance.
The How question should be answered by describing the proposed research methodology, data analysis tools expected to be used, and other details to describe your proposed methodology.
Research Proposal Example
Here is a research proposal sample template (with examples) from the University of Rochester Medical Center. 4 The sections in all research proposals are essentially the same although different terminology and other specific sections may be used depending on the subject.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary Research Proposal Template](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Research-proposal-Template-1-2_page-00011-scaled.jpg)
Structure of a Research Proposal
If you want to know how to make a research proposal impactful, include the following components:¹
1. Introduction
This section provides a background of the study, including the research topic, what is already known about it and the gaps, and the significance of the proposed research.
2. Literature review
This section contains descriptions of all the previous relevant studies pertaining to the research topic. Every study cited should be described in a few sentences, starting with the general studies to the more specific ones. This section builds on the understanding gained by readers in the Introduction section and supports it by citing relevant prior literature, indicating to readers that you have thoroughly researched your subject.
3. Objectives
Once the background and gaps in the research topic have been established, authors must now state the aims of the research clearly. Hypotheses should be mentioned here. This section further helps readers understand what your study’s specific goals are.
4. Research design and methodology
Here, authors should clearly describe the methods they intend to use to achieve their proposed objectives. Important components of this section include the population and sample size, data collection and analysis methods and duration, statistical analysis software, measures to avoid bias (randomization, blinding), etc.
5. Ethical considerations
This refers to the protection of participants’ rights, such as the right to privacy, right to confidentiality, etc. Researchers need to obtain informed consent and institutional review approval by the required authorities and mention this clearly for transparency.
6. Budget/funding
Researchers should prepare their budget and include all expected expenditures. An additional allowance for contingencies such as delays should also be factored in.
7. Appendices
This section typically includes information that supports the research proposal and may include informed consent forms, questionnaires, participant information, measurement tools, etc.
8. Citations
![how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/blog-banner_extra.png)
Important Tips for Writing a Research Proposal
Writing a research proposal begins much before the actual task of writing. Planning the research proposal structure and content is an important stage, which if done efficiently, can help you seamlessly transition into the writing stage. 3,5
The Planning Stage
- Manage your time efficiently. Plan to have the draft version ready at least two weeks before your deadline and the final version at least two to three days before the deadline.
- What is the primary objective of your research?
- Will your research address any existing gap?
- What is the impact of your proposed research?
- Do people outside your field find your research applicable in other areas?
- If your research is unsuccessful, would there still be other useful research outcomes?
The Writing Stage
- Create an outline with main section headings that are typically used.
- Focus only on writing and getting your points across without worrying about the format of the research proposal , grammar, punctuation, etc. These can be fixed during the subsequent passes. Add details to each section heading you created in the beginning.
- Ensure your sentences are concise and use plain language. A research proposal usually contains about 2,000 to 4,000 words or four to seven pages.
- Don’t use too many technical terms and abbreviations assuming that the readers would know them. Define the abbreviations and technical terms.
- Ensure that the entire content is readable. Avoid using long paragraphs because they affect the continuity in reading. Break them into shorter paragraphs and introduce some white space for readability.
- Focus on only the major research issues and cite sources accordingly. Don’t include generic information or their sources in the literature review.
- Proofread your final document to ensure there are no grammatical errors so readers can enjoy a seamless, uninterrupted read.
- Use academic, scholarly language because it brings formality into a document.
- Ensure that your title is created using the keywords in the document and is neither too long and specific nor too short and general.
- Cite all sources appropriately to avoid plagiarism.
- Make sure that you follow guidelines, if provided. This includes rules as simple as using a specific font or a hyphen or en dash between numerical ranges.
- Ensure that you’ve answered all questions requested by the evaluating authority.
Key Takeaways
Here’s a summary of the main points about research proposals discussed in the previous sections:
- A research proposal is a document that outlines the details of a proposed study and is created by researchers to submit to evaluators who could be research institutions, universities, faculty, etc.
- Research proposals are usually about 2,000-4,000 words long, but this depends on the evaluating authority’s guidelines.
- A good research proposal ensures that you’ve done your background research and assessed the feasibility of the research.
- Research proposals have the following main sections—introduction, literature review, objectives, methodology, ethical considerations, and budget.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/AAP-Banner-3.png)
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. How is a research proposal evaluated?
A1. In general, most evaluators, including universities, broadly use the following criteria to evaluate research proposals . 6
- Significance —Does the research address any important subject or issue, which may or may not be specific to the evaluator or university?
- Content and design —Is the proposed methodology appropriate to answer the research question? Are the objectives clear and well aligned with the proposed methodology?
- Sample size and selection —Is the target population or cohort size clearly mentioned? Is the sampling process used to select participants randomized, appropriate, and free of bias?
- Timing —Are the proposed data collection dates mentioned clearly? Is the project feasible given the specified resources and timeline?
- Data management and dissemination —Who will have access to the data? What is the plan for data analysis?
Q2. What is the difference between the Introduction and Literature Review sections in a research proposal ?
A2. The Introduction or Background section in a research proposal sets the context of the study by describing the current scenario of the subject and identifying the gaps and need for the research. A Literature Review, on the other hand, provides references to all prior relevant literature to help corroborate the gaps identified and the research need.
Q3. How long should a research proposal be?
A3. Research proposal lengths vary with the evaluating authority like universities or committees and also the subject. Here’s a table that lists the typical research proposal lengths for a few universities.
Arts programs | 1,000-1,500 | |
University of Birmingham | Law School programs | 2,500 |
PhD | 2,500 | |
2,000 | ||
Research degrees | 2,000-3,500 |
Q4. What are the common mistakes to avoid in a research proposal ?
A4. Here are a few common mistakes that you must avoid while writing a research proposal . 7
- No clear objectives: Objectives should be clear, specific, and measurable for the easy understanding among readers.
- Incomplete or unconvincing background research: Background research usually includes a review of the current scenario of the particular industry and also a review of the previous literature on the subject. This helps readers understand your reasons for undertaking this research because you identified gaps in the existing research.
- Overlooking project feasibility: The project scope and estimates should be realistic considering the resources and time available.
- Neglecting the impact and significance of the study: In a research proposal , readers and evaluators look for the implications or significance of your research and how it contributes to the existing research. This information should always be included.
- Unstructured format of a research proposal : A well-structured document gives confidence to evaluators that you have read the guidelines carefully and are well organized in your approach, consequently affirming that you will be able to undertake the research as mentioned in your proposal.
- Ineffective writing style: The language used should be formal and grammatically correct. If required, editors could be consulted, including AI-based tools such as Paperpal , to refine the research proposal structure and language.
Thus, a research proposal is an essential document that can help you promote your research and secure funds and grants for conducting your research. Consequently, it should be well written in clear language and include all essential details to convince the evaluators of your ability to conduct the research as proposed.
This article has described all the important components of a research proposal and has also provided tips to improve your writing style. We hope all these tips will help you write a well-structured research proposal to ensure receipt of grants or any other purpose.
References
- Sudheesh K, Duggappa DR, Nethra SS. How to write a research proposal? Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(9):631-634. Accessed July 15, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037942/
- Writing research proposals. Harvard College Office of Undergraduate Research and Fellowships. Harvard University. Accessed July 14, 2024. https://uraf.harvard.edu/apply-opportunities/app-components/essays/research-proposals
- What is a research proposal? Plus how to write one. Indeed website. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/research-proposal
- Research proposal template. University of Rochester Medical Center. Accessed July 16, 2024. https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/MediaLibraries/URMCMedia/pediatrics/research/documents/Research-proposal-Template.pdf
- Tips for successful proposal writing. Johns Hopkins University. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://research.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Tips-for-Successful-Proposal-Writing.pdf
- Formal review of research proposals. Cornell University. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://irp.dpb.cornell.edu/surveys/survey-assessment-review-group/research-proposals
- 7 Mistakes you must avoid in your research proposal. Aveksana (via LinkedIn). Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/7-mistakes-you-must-avoid-your-research-proposal-aveksana-cmtwf/
Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.
Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.
Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!
Related Reads:
- How to Paraphrase Research Papers Effectively
- How to Cite Social Media Sources in Academic Writing?
- What is the Importance of a Concept Paper and How to Write It
APA format: Basic Guide for Researchers
You may also like, how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write a phd research proposal, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide), five things authors need to know when using..., 7 best referencing tools and citation management software..., maintaining academic integrity with paperpal’s generative ai writing..., research funding basics: what should a grant proposal..., how to write an abstract in research papers..., how to write dissertation acknowledgements.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- Clin Epidemiol
From ideas to studies: how to get ideas and sharpen them into research questions
Jan p vandenbroucke.
1 Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
2 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
3 Department of Medical Statistics and Centre for Global NCDs, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Neil Pearce
Where do new research questions come from? This is at best only partially taught in courses or textbooks about clinical or epidemiological research. Methods are taught under the assumption that a researcher already knows the research question and knows which methods will fit that question. Similarly, the real complexity of the thought processes that lead to a scientific undertaking is almost never described in published papers. In this paper, we first discuss how to get an idea that is worth researching. We describe sources of new ideas and how to foster a creative attitude by “cultivating your thoughts”. Only a few of these ideas will make it into a study. Next, we describe how to sharpen and focus a research question so that a study becomes feasible and a valid test of the underlying idea. To do this, the idea needs to be “pruned”. Pruning a research question means cutting away anything that is unnecessary, so that only the essence remains. This includes determining both the latent and the stated objectives, specific pruning questions, and the use of specific schemes to structure reasoning. After this, the following steps include preparation of a brief protocol, conduct of a pilot study, and writing a draft of the paper including draft tables. Then you are ready to carry out your research.
Introduction
How do you get an idea for a study? How do you turn your idea into a testable hypothesis, and turn this into an appropriate and feasible study design? This is usually at best only partially taught in epidemiology courses. Most courses and textbooks assume that you know your research question and the general methods that you will need to answer it. Somehow it is assumed that you can readily translate your idea into a specific framework, such as the PICO framework (Patient, Intervention, Control or Comparison, Outcome) 1 or the FINER framework (Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, and Relevant) 2 or that you can fit it into counterfactual reasoning. 3 However, before describing your project in one of these frameworks, you first need to have an idea for your study and think about it in general terms: why you might do a study and how you might do a study.
This paper considers the complex process of having ideas, keeping track of them, turning them into studies, trying them out in pilot studies, and writing a draft paper before you finally embark on your study.
The paper is intended for novice researchers in clinical or public health epidemiology. It is not intended to be a comprehensive literature review about creativity, nor a sociology or philosophical treatise about why scientists get particular ideas (and not other ideas). It is based on our personal experience of (a combined) 70+ epidemiologic research-years. We have worked on very different topics, mostly on opposite sides of the globe, yet found that our experiences are quite similar. The fact that these issues are rarely covered in epidemiology courses has provided motivation to reflect on our experience.
Getting new ideas
So how do you get an idea? How some juxtaposition of neural patterns in our brain suddenly creates a new idea is a process that we are far from understanding. According to Karl Popper, the origin of new ideas does not matter; the only thing of interest is to devise how to test them. 4 Over the past decades, the literature has been enriched with new ideas about “being creative” in science – as witnessed in the book Innovation Generation by Ness. 5
In the present paper, we will not cover the literature about creativity and discovery in depth, but we will discuss the issues that we consider relevant to epidemiologic research. We will first consider the more general principles.
The real complexity of the thought processes that lead to a scientific undertaking is almost never described in published papers. Immunologist Medawar claimed that in this respect almost all scientific papers may be a fraud – not in the sense that scientists deliberately produce misleading data, but in the sense that the real thought processes that lead to the data and conclusions are not mentioned. 6 Scientists tell us about their real thought processes in memoirs, inaugural, or valedictory lectures – which is why these are so much more interesting than “standard” papers or presentations.
What strikes our minds: regularities or anomalies?
All sciences study a particular “object of knowledge” (eg, “matter”, “life”). Ideas come from experience and previous knowledge or facts about this object of knowledge, although this knowledge is always filtered through the perspective of one or more theories. 7 Epidemiology studies the distribution and determinants of disease in human populations, 8 and epidemiological ideas arise from observing and thinking about populations. 9 These could be clinical populations (ie, clinical experience, sometimes involving just a few patients), exposure-based populations (eg, workers exposed to a particular chemical), or general populations (geographically defined or sociologically defined). Whatever the population we are interested in, ideas come from observing either regularities or anomalies.
The observation of regularities (“induction”) is a common origin of new ideas. 4 , 10 – 13 Philosopher David Hume described “Induction” as: regularly seeing two things happening in succession (like pushing a switch and a light going on) leads to suspicions of causality. As he pointed out, causality can never be proven by the mere observation of “constant conjunctions”, but observing regularities can start our train of thought. 12
An anomaly (or irregularity) strikes our mind, because it defies our expectations. The regularity that we expected was our “hypothesis” (even if it was not really explicitly formulated); the anomaly is a “refutation”. 4 , 13 It forces us to think about other explanations, and these lead to new hypotheses that we then try to test. Thus, scientists do not usually start from hypotheses that are nicely formulated “out of the blue”, but instead start from previous knowledge and experience; when they are challenged by anomalies, scientists seek new explanations. 14
An interesting way to discover anomalies is to enter a new field of research; since you have other background experience than the people already in the field, you see things that they take for granted but that strike you as odd – at the same time, you may also see new explanations for these anomalies. One of the pioneers of clinical epidemiology, Sackett, once wrote that scientists should “retire” from a field as soon as they become “experts”. 15 When you are too long in a field, you will no longer see the anomalies, and you may even obstruct newcomers with new explanations. Of course, there are differences between scientists: some roam across various fields and others stick to a problem area that they explore with increasing depth – then the increasing depth and the new techniques that one needs for advancing one’s thoughts will be like a “new field”.
Taxonomies of discovery
Few researchers have listed the different ways in which one can arrive at new ideas, that is, lists of ways of discovery. We will present two of them – which have very different origins but remarkable similarities. Several examples of studies corresponding to items on these two lists are given in Appendix Examples A1–A10 .
Sources for new ideas about health care evaluation were described by Crombie and Davies in the chapter “Developing the research question” of their book on Research in Health Care that reflects a UK public health experience. 16
- “Review existing practice […] the current organisation and delivery of health care is not as good as it could be […]”
- “Challenge accepted ideas […] much of health care is based on accepted practice rather than research evidence […]” ( Appendix Example A3 )
- “Look for conflicting views […] which indicate either that there is not enough evidence, or that some practitioners are misinformed”
- “Investigate geographical variation […] reflecting on the reasons [for geographical variation] can be a fruitful source of research questions […]” ( Appendix Example A6 )
- “Identify Cinderella topics […] important areas of health care are often overlooked […]”
- “Let loose the imagination […] look for wild or impossible ideas […] free the mind from the constraints of conventional wisdom […].”
A taxonomy for sources of clinical research questions about medical care and clinical problems was proposed by Hulley and Cummings, in the context of clinical research in the US: 2
- “Build on experience;” your own experience, that of close colleagues with whom you can freely discuss your research ideas, and that of a good mentor, because young researchers might not yet have much experience, “An essential strategy for a young investigator is to apprentice himself to an experienced senior scientist who has the time and interest to work with him regularly.”
- ○ By harvesting “the medical literature and attending journal clubs, national and international meetings, seeking informal conversations with other scientists and colleagues”
- ○ “A sceptical attitude about prevailing beliefs can stimulate good research questions”
- ○ Be alert to “careful observation of patients, which has historically been one of the major sources of descriptive studies” ( Appendix Examples A1 and A2 )
- ○ Your experiences in teaching; having to explain something may make you aware of gaps in your knowledge; questions by patients and colleagues may similarly identify things that we do not fully understand or ignore
- “Keep the imagination roaming […]” by a mixture of creativity and tenacity; “put an unresolved question clearly in view and turn on the mental switch that lets the mind run freely toward it”.
A special mention needs to be made about the last categories of both the lists: “Let loose the imagination” and “Keep the imagination roaming”. These are especially important to find innovative solutions. In many situations wherein you cannot do a perfect study and you run a grave danger of potential confounding or bias, it helps to “get deeply immersed”: to understand the problem biologically, clinically, socially, organizationally, and environmentally will help you to think about what is happening, why it is happening, and whether you can find situations in which the potential confounders or biases do not exist or exists in reverse. You should forget formal designs and think out of the box: you will find instances of studies that mutually reinforce each other and may even arrive at formulating new designs or analytic solutions (see Appendix Examples A7–A10 ).
Keeping track of your ideas
It is not only important to have good ideas but also important to develop them. Researchers who work in laboratories have the habit of keeping “lab logs”. They write down briefly the results of an experiment, note why they think it went wrong, and how they will perform the next experiment. This permits them to trace how they changed the experiments or even the content and the direction of their research. We should do the same in epidemiologic and clinical research, particularly in the stage of creating new ideas. Such notes about ideas can include not only hypotheses and views or results by others but also drawing directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) (see “Intermezzo: specific schemes to structure reasoning” section) to make the causal structures of ideas clear.
The greatest minds kept track of their thoughts. Charles Darwin’s notebooks document his ideas, his observations, his readings, and new theories and facts that struck him. 17 For example, Darwin noted a story that he heard from his father, a medical practitioner. His father recounted that he had been struck by one of his patients’ ways of expressing himself, because he had attended a parent of the patient who had had the same mannerisms – even though the parent had died when the patient was still an infant. Remarks like these still have relevance today when we think about the heredity and evolution of behavior.
The sociologist C Wright Mills carried the description of the process one step further in the appendix of his book on The Sociological Imagination . 18 He encourages young sociologists to set up a file of stacked cards to keep track of “[…] personal experience and professional activities, studies underway and studies planned […]” which “[…] encourages you to capture ‘fringe thoughts’: various ideas which may be by-products of everyday life, stretches of conversations […]”. These notes are continuously reshuffled, regrouped under new headings, and pondered. Mills denounced the habit of most (social) scientists who feel the need to write about their plans only when they are going to apply for a grant. He thought that scientists should continually work with their file of ideas and regularly take stock of how these have evolved.
Such strategies are still relevant today, even if our “logs” are kept in electronic form, particularly because grant writing has become more demanding, hectic, and time-consuming. From such files, new research projects are born: while your ideas gradually develop, you keep wondering what data you might need to prove a certain proposition, and how you might get those data in the easiest way possible. Often, ideas are reshuffled and regrouped under new headings. A new observation, a new piece of literature may make old ones fall into place, or there may suddenly be a new opportunity to work out an old idea.
A complementary advice recently came in a blog from a contemporary sociologist, Aldrich: his advice is to “Write as if you don’t have the data”, that is, to write “[…] the literature review and planning phase of a project, preferably before it has been locked into a specific research design”. 19
The role of emotions
Underlying the discovery process, there are often two emotions: “surprise” and “indignation”. Surprise is the intellectual emotion when we see something happening against expectation: a patient with an unusual exposure, unusual disease manifestation, sudden cure, or sudden ill-understood deterioration; a laboratory result that is an anomaly; and a sudden epidemic of disease in a population. Indignation is the moral emotion: a group of patients is not being treated well because we lack sufficient knowledge, or because we are blundering in organizing health care or in transmitting and applying public health knowledge. Some passion is useful to bring any undertaking to a good end, be it that the passion should be restrained and channeled into polite undertakings, like in a research protocol. While doing the research project, maintaining some of the original passion will help you to find ways to overcome the daily hassles of research, the misadventures, the difficulties of getting others to collaborate, and the difficulties of getting published ( Appendix Example A11 ).
Sharpening the research question: the pruning
Pruning a research question means cutting away anything that is unnecessary, so that only the essence remains.
The initial spark of an idea will usually lead to some rather general research question. Invariably, this is too ambitious, or so all-encompassing that it cannot be researched (at least not within the time frame of a single grant or PhD project). You have to refine your research question into something that is interesting, yet feasible. To do so, you have to know clearly where you are heading. The emphasis on a clear preconceived idea about what you want to attain by your research often comes as a surprise; some people object: “[…] isn’t research about discovery? How can you know in advance what you want to find?”
The social scientist Verschuren proposed the “wristwatch metaphor”. 20 A researcher is not like a beachcomber, who strolls along the beach to see whether anything valuable washed ashore. Rather, a researcher is like someone who has lost her wristwatch on the beach and returns to search for it. She knows what part of the beach to look, she can describe her wristwatch in detail, and once she has found it, she knows that this is the watch she was looking for. Some further background to these ideas can be found in Appendix B .
Charles Medawar wrote in his Advice to a Young Scientist (page 18) 21 that as much as politics is the ‘art of the possible’, research is the ‘art of the soluble’. A research question should be limited to a question that can be solved with the resources at hand. This does not mean that you should preferentially study “trivial” questions with easy solutions. It does mean that you should seek out your particular niche: something specific, something that was overlooked by others, or some new twist to a general question, so that you can make your own contribution.
The concept of “serendipity” is often invoked when thinking of “seeking novelty”: it means finding something that you were not looking for. For a full discussion of the more complex reality that shows how, in reality, “chance favors a prepared mind”, see Appendix C .
Proceed in the inverse order of the paper that you will write
From the aforementioned, we know that we need a precise aim and a soluble research question.
How can we achieve this? The best approach is to “begin at the end”, that is, the conclusion that you hope to support when you eventually publish your research findings, perhaps many years from now. 22 Most medical research papers have a fixed format: introduction, methods, results, discussion. Usually, the discussion has three parts: summary of the results, discussion of the strengths and limitations, and the importance and interpretation of the findings. There you start: you try to imagine what such last lines of the eventual paper might be – in particular what their intent, their message to the reader might be. Another useful strategy would be to imagine what might be written in the separate box “What this paper adds” that many journals nowadays ask to convey the message from the authors clearly and succinctly to the readers.
The “latent” versus the “stated” objective
The pioneer clinical epidemiologist Feinstein wrote that a good research consultant should be like a good clinician, who first wants to learn from the patient: “What is the chief complaint?”, that is, which is the problem that you want to study. Next, “What will you do with the answer?” 22 The latter question is not just about the potential conclusions of the research paper, but more importantly, their meaning. What is the intended effect (or impact) of the findings? He called this the “latent objective”: what do you want to achieve or change by your project; the “stated objective” is different, it is the type of result that the study will deliver. For example, the stated objective can be that you want to do a randomized trial to compare one intervention versus another and that you will look at recurrence of disease. The latent objective might be that you are concerned that one intervention may be harmful to patients, driven by special interests, and that if this is the case it should be abolished.
Rather analogously, the long-time editor of the Annals of Internal Medicine , Edward Huth, proposed in his book about medical publishing the “So-What” and the “Who-Cares” tests: “What may happen if the paper’s message is correct?”; may it change concepts and treatment or stimulate further exciting research? 23 In fact, many funders now require such an “impact statement” as part of the grant application process.
Experienced research consultants know that when trying to discover the latent objective, it is useful to brush aside the detailed protocol and to ask directly what the meaning of the research is. The meaning of the research is often not clearly stated in a formal study protocol that limits itself more or less to “stated aims”. 24 Like a patient who cannot articulate her/his complaints very well, would-be researchers lose themselves in trivial “side issues” or operational details of the protocol. Appendix Examples A2 and A11 explain the importance of elucidating the underlying frustration of the clinician-researcher to clearly guide a research effort.
After initial questions have set the scene and clarified the “latent objective” of a project, the next questions are more operational, translating the latent objective back into a “stated objective”. 22 The stated objective should be a feasible research project. According to Feinstein, one should ask: what maneuver is to be executed (what intervention, deliberate or not, and how is it administered), what groups are to be compared (and why those groups), and what is the outcome that we will study?
In these phases of discussion, one needs to immerse oneself into the problem: one has to understand it biologically and clinically, and how it is dealt with in the daily practice of health care in the setting in which you will do research. Getting deeply immersed in the problem is the only way of arriving at shrewd or new solutions for studies on vexing medical or public health problems ( Appendix Example A9 ). Mere discussion of technical or procedural aspects of a proposed design, data collection, or analysis will usually not lead to new insights.
Specific pruning questions, to ask yourself or others
In initial discussions, one goes back and forth between the general aim (the latent objective), the scientific questions that follow from it, and the possible research designs (with stated objectives). After feeling secure about the “latent” aim, proceed with more specific questions.
- Try to describe exactly the knowledge gap that you want to fill (ie, the watch that you lost at the beach). Is it about etiology, about pathogenesis, about prognosis? What should change for the benefit of a particular group of patients? Try to be as specific as possible. Do your colleagues see these problems and their solutions as you do? – and if not, why don’t they?
- Once you know the point you want to make, describe what table or figure you need to fill the gap in knowledge, that is, what would your results look like? This means drawing a simple table or graph. Are these the data you want? Will these tables convince your colleagues? What objections might they have? Keep in mind that if the research results go against ingrained beliefs, they will be scrutinized mercilessly, so the important aspects of your research should be able to withstand likely objections.
- Thereafter, the questions become more practical: what study design is needed to produce this table, this figure? Can we do this? Do we have the resources or can we find them?
Be self-critical
You should always remain self-critical about the aspects that threaten the validity of your study ( Appendix Example A12 ). 25 If the practical problems are too large, or the research question too unfeasibly grandiose, it might be wise to settle for a less ambitious aim ( Appendix Example A13 ).
Paraphrasing Miettinen, 26 the first decision is whether you should do the study at all. There might be several reasons to decide not to pursue a study. One might be that arriving at a satisfactory design will be impossible, because of biases that you are unable to solve. It serves no purpose to add another study that suffers from the same unsolved problems as previous studies. For example, it does not serve any purpose to do yet another study that shows lower mortality in vegetarians, if you cannot solve the problems of confounding that vegetarians are persons who have different lifestyles in comparison with others. 27 (If, however, you have found a solution – pursue it at all means!) Nevertheless, thinking about the potential problems and ultimate aims of a seemingly impossible question can foster the development of a new study design or a new method of analysis, ( Appendix Examples A2, A9, and A10 ). In the same vein, deciding that you cannot do a study yourself might make you look for collaboration with persons who have the type of data that you do not, for example, in a different population where it is believed that confounding is not so severe or may even be in the opposite direction.
All studies have imperfections, but you need to be aware which ones you can tolerate. 28 In the early stages of an enquiry, an “imperfect” study might still be worthwhile to see whether “there might be something in it”. For example, time trends or ecological comparisons are often seen as poor study designs to assess causality by themselves, but they can be very valuable in helping to develop ideas, as well as providing a “reality check” about the potential credibility of some hypothesis. 29
Conversely, it is pointless to add yet another study, however perfect, showing what is already known very well – unless you have to do it for “political” purposes, say, for convincing decision makers in your own country.
Finally, it is not a good use of your time to chase something completely improbable or futile. For example, at the present state of the debate, it serves no purpose to add another study about the presence or absence of clinical benefits or harms of homeopathy: no one will change his or her mind about the issue. 30 , 31 An exception might be something that is highly improbable, but that if true might lead to completely revolutionary insights – such an idea might be worth pursuing, even if the initial reaction of outsiders might remain incredulousness. Still, you should pursue unlikely hypotheses knowingly, that is, with the right amount of self-criticism – in particular, to make yourself aware when you are in a blind alley.
To keep yourself on the “straight and narrow”, it helps to form a group of people who cover different aspects of the problem you want to study: clinical, biochemical and physiological, and methodological – to discuss the project as equals. Such discussions can not only be tremendous fun but also will invariably lead to more profound and diverse research questions and will help to find solutions for practical as well as theoretical problems. In the right circumstances of a “machtsfreie Dialog” 32 (a communication in which all are equal and that is only based on rational arguments and not on power – which all scientific debates should be), such a circle of colleagues and friends will help you to be self-critical.
Finally, when pursuing one’s research interests, one should be prepared to learn new skills from other fields or collaborate with others from these fields. If one stays only with the techniques and skills that one knows, it might not lead to the desired answers. 33
What if the data already exist? And you are employed to do a particular analysis with an existing protocol?
Even in the circumstance that the data already exist, it greatly helps to not jump into an analysis, but to think for yourself what you would ideally like to do – if there were no constraints. As Aldrich mentioned, 19 also in that circumstance researchers should still
[…] begin their literature review and conceptual modeling as if they had the luxury of a blank slate […]. Writing without data constraints will, I believe, free their imaginations to range widely over the realm of possibilities, before they are brought to earth by practical necessities.
Moreover, this will make clear what compromises one will make by accepting the available data and the existing analysis protocol. Otherwise, one starts an analysis without being sufficiently aware of the limitations of a particular analysis on particular data.
The difference between explanatory and pragmatic research
A useful distinction is between explanatory and pragmatic research: the former is research that aims at discovery and explanation, whereas the latter is intended to evaluate interventions or diagnostic procedures. The first type of research consists of chasing explanations by pursuing different and evolving hypotheses; the second type of research aims at making decisions about actions in future patients. 27 The two opposites differ strongly in their thinking about the types of studies to pursue (eg, observational vs randomized), about the role of prior specification of a research hypothesis, about the need for “sticking to a prespecified protocol”, and about subgroup analyses and multiplicity of analyses. Some of these will be explained in the following subheadings.
The difference between explanatory and pragmatic trials is sometimes thought to mirror the difference between doing randomized trials versus observational research. However, even for randomized trials, a difference exists between “ pragmatic” and “explanatory” trials (coined first by Schwartz and Lellouch). 34 Because it is not always easy to delineate what aspects of a randomized trial are “pragmatic” or “explanatory”, instruments have been crafted to help researchers and evaluators. 35 , 36 Conversely, not all observational studies are explanatory: some are needed for pragmatic decisions (think about adverse effects of drugs and also about diagnostic evaluations where studies should influence practice guidelines) – while other studies aim at explaining how nature works.
Which iterations should you allow yourself? Anticipating the next project
Thinking about a research problem is a strongly iterative process. 2 , 33 , 37 One starts with a broad aim and then tries out several possible ideas about studies that might lead to better understanding or to better solutions.
Likewise, project proposals characteristically go through many iterations. In the early phases of the research, it is commonplace that the study design or even the research question is changed. Specific suggestions about common research problems and their potential solutions were given by Hulley and Cummings, 2 which we reproduce in Appendix D .
The revision of the aims of a project may be profound, in particular in explanatory research (see “The difference between explanatory and pragmatic research” section), in contrast to pragmatic research (see “Shouldn’t you stick to a predefined protocol?” section). The chemist Whitesides wrote: “Often the objectives of a paper when it is finished are different from those used to justify starting the work. Much of good science is opportunistic and revisionist”. 38 Along a similar line, Medawar proposed that to do justice to the real thought processes of a research undertaking, the discussion section of a paper should come at the beginning, since the thought processes of a scientist start with an expectation about particular results. The expectation determines which findings are of interest and why they will be interpreted in a particular way. 6 He added that in real scientific life, scientists get new ideas (ie, new expectations) while doing their research, but “[…] many of them apparently are ashamed to admit, that hypotheses appear in their mind along uncharted byways of thought”. 6
“Seeing something in the data” can be an important part of scientific discovery. This is often decried as “data dredging”, which it is not: one sees something because of one’s background knowledge and thereby there always is some “prior” that exists – even if that was not specified beforehand in the study protocol. 27 , 39 The word “exploratory” is often misused when it is used to characterize a study. True “exploratory” data analysis would only exists if it is mindlessly done, such as a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) analysis – but even GWAS analyses have specific aims, which becomes clear when results are interpreted and some findings are designated as “important” and others not. As stated by Rothman:
Hypotheses are not generated by data; they are proposed by scientists. The process by which scientists use their imagination to create hypotheses has no formal methodology […]. Any study, whether considered exploratory or not, can serve to refute a hypothesis. 40
Appendix Examples A5 and A7 show how projects changed mid-course because of a new discovery in the data or in the background knowledge about a research topic.
Generally, it is a good habit to think through what the next project might be, once you will have the result of the project you are currently thinking about, so as to know what direction your research might take. 33
Shouldn’t you stick to a predefined protocol?
Different research aims, in particular along the “explanatory” versus “pragmatic” continuum, may lead to different attitudes on the amount of change that protocols may endure while doing research. 27 , 39 For randomized trials, and also for pragmatic observational research, the research question is usually fixed: does a new therapy lead to better outcomes for a particular group of patients in a particular setting? Because findings from randomized trials or pragmatic observational research may lead to millions of patients to adopt or avoid a particular therapy (which means that their well-being or even life depends on the research) researchers are generally not at liberty to change their hypotheses at the last moment – for example, by suddenly declaring an interest in a particular subgroup. They should stick to the predefined protocol. If a change is needed for practical reasons, it should be clearly stated in the resulting publications. This makes thinking about research questions and doing pilot studies beforehand all the more important (see “Pilot Study” section).
In contrast, much epidemiologic and clinical research tries to explain how nature works. This gives greater leeway: exploration of data can lead to new insights. Thus, “sticking to the protocol” is a good rule for randomized trials and pragmatic observational research, but may be counterproductive for explanatory research. 39 , 41 Nevertheless, it is good to keep track of the changes in your thoughts and in the protocol, even if only for yourself. In practice, many situations are intermediate; in particular when using large available data sets, it often happens that one envisages in a protocol what one would do with the data, only to discover upon opening the data files that the data fall short or are more complex than imagined; this is another reason for doing pilot studies, even with large available data sets (see “Pilot Study” section).
How much literature should you read?
If you are setting up a new research project in a new area, do not start by reading too much. You will quickly drown in the ideas of others. Rather, read a few general reviews that identify unanswered problems. Only return to the literature after you have defined your research question and provisionally your study design. Now, the literature suddenly becomes extremely interesting, since you know what types of papers you need. You also know what the potential objections and shortcomings are of the different design options, because you thought about them yourself. The number of relevant papers usually greatly shrinks, see Appendix Example A4 .
Shouldn’t you do a systematic review first?
It is argued that before embarking on a new piece of research, one should first do a systematic review and/or meta-analysis, because this may help to define the gaps in knowledge more precisely, and guide new research – or may show that the question has been solved. This argument is somewhat circular. A systematic review is a piece of research in itself, intended for publication, and requires much time and effort. Like any piece of research, it requires a clear research question. As such it does not “identify gaps”: a systematic review is about a research question which is already specified, but for which more information is needed. Thus, the main function of the advice to first do a systematic review is to know whether the research question that one has in mind has not yet been solved by others. Perusing the literature in depth is absolutely needed, for example, before embarking on a randomized trial or on a major observational study. However, this is not the same as doing a formal systematic review. In-depth scoping of the literature will suffice. If it is found that potentially valuable studies already exist on the research question that one has in mind, then the new study that one is thinking about may be discarded, and a systematic review should be done instead.
Intermezzo: specific schemes to structure reasoning
Specific schemes have been proposed to guide our reasoning between the stage of delineation of the “gap in knowledge” and the stage of proposing the research design.
The acronym FINER (feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, and relevant) was coined by Hulley and Cummings 2 and denotes the different aspects that one should consider to judge a budding research proposal. These words are a good checklist for an in-depth self-scrutiny of your research. The central aspects are the feasibility and whether the possible answers are exciting (and/or much needed).
The PICO format (Patient, Intervention, Control or Comparison, Outcome) is advocated by the evidence-based medicine and Cochrane movements and is very useful for clinical therapeutic research, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs). 1 , 42 Questions about therapeutic interventions are highly specific, for example, a particular chemotherapeutic scheme (the intervention) is proposed to study survival (the outcome) among young women with a particular form of stage III breast cancer (the patients). This framework is less useful, and becomes a bit pointless, for etiologic research about generalizable questions such as: “Does smoking cause lung cancer?” which applies to all humans and to different types of smoking. Of course, all research will be done in particular population, with particular smoking habits, but this does not necessarily define the research question. Some of the first investigations about smoking and lung cancer were done in male doctors aged ≥35 years in the UK 43 – this was a very convenient group to research, but being a male doctor in the UK is not part of the research question.
The PICO format is thus most applicable for pragmatic research. A much more detailed and elaborate scheme for pragmatic research was proposed by the US Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) which has published Methodology Standards, including “Standards for Formulating Research Questions”. While we would not agree with all six standards, junior investigators may find the structure useful as they think through their options – especially for pragmatic research questions. 44
Counterfactual reasoning 3 emphasizes those aspects of the “ideal randomized trial” that should be mimicked by an observational study. A key question is whether your study is addressing a hypothesis that could in theory be studied in a randomized trial. For example, if the research question is “does smoking cause lung cancer?”, then this is a question that could in theory (but not in practice) be addressed by randomizing study participants to be smokers or nonsmokers. In this situation, it may be useful to design your observational study with the intention of obtaining the same answer that would have been obtained if you had been able to do a randomized trial.
However, the aims of explanatory observational research are different from those of randomized trials. 27 Explanatory research about disease etiology may involve “states” like being female, being old, being obese, having hypertension, having a high serum cholesterol, carrying the BrCa1 gene, and so on, as causes of disease. None of these causes are interventions. In contrast, RCTs focus on what to do to change particular causes: which interventions are feasible and work? For example, being female might expose a person to job discrimination; the intervention might be to have women on the appointment committee or to use some kind of positive discrimination. Likewise, the gene for phenylketonuria leads to disease, but the intervention is to change the diet. For carriers of BRCa1 genes, different strategies can be evaluated in RCTs to evaluate their effectiveness in preventing premature death due to breast cancer: frequent screening, prophylactic mastectomy, hormone treatment, and so on – which may have different effects. For obesity or hypertension or hypercholesterolemia, different types of interventions are possible – with potentially different effects and different adverse effects.
The interventionist outlook, that is, trying to mimic an RCT, can be very useful, for some type of observational studies, for example, about the adverse effects of drugs. It helps to make certain that one can mimic an “intervention” (ie, patients starting to use particular drugs) that is specific and consistent in groups of patients that are comparable (more technically, exchangeable – meaning that the results of the investigation would not change if the persons exposed and nonexposed were swapped). These conditions can be met in a credible way, if there are competing drugs for a similar indication, so that there is an active drug comparator: the interventions (use of different drugs in different patients) will be well defined, and the patients on the different drugs will tend to be comparable. This works particularly well if you are focusing on adverse drug effects that were unknown or unpredictable at the time of prescription. 45 , 46 For example, you may obtain more valid findings in a study that compares the adverse effects of two different beta agonists for asthma care (ie, two different drugs within the same class), than to design a study which compares patients who are prescribed beta agonists with patients who are prescribed other asthma medication, or no medication at all – because the latter might be a highly different group of patients. 47
As mentioned, there are some important studies about causes of diseases where a randomized trial is not feasible, even in theory. In particular, there are various “states” which are major causes of disease (obesity, cholesterol, hypertension, diabetes, etc). These states strongly affect the risks of disease and death, but cannot be randomized. For example, it is difficult to conceive of randomizing study participants to be obese or not obese; however, we could randomize them for the reduction of obesity, for example, through exercise, but such a study would assess the effects of a particular intervention, not of obesity itself. Still, it remains important to estimate the overall effects of obesity, that is, to answer the question “would this group of people have had different health status, on the average, if they had not been obese”. In this situation, the concept of “interventions” is not relevant to designing your study (at least in the way that the term “intervention” is commonly used). What is more relevant is simply to focus on the counterfactual contrast which is being assessed (eg, a body mass index [BMI] of 35 versus a BMI of 25), without specifying how this contrast came about.
A technique that has gone hand in hand with counterfactual reasoning in epidemiology is drawing DAGs; several introductions to DAG theory can be found in epidemiologic textbooks. 3 , 48 DAGs can be useful in the brainstorming phase of a study, after the general research question has been defined. At this stage, a general structure for the study is envisaged and the complexity of the causal processes needs clarification. A DAG can be extremely useful for illustrating the context in which a causal question is being asked, the assumptions that will be involved in the analyses (eg, whether a particular risk factor is a confounder, a mediator, or a col-lider), and help us question the validity of our reasoning. 49 Using DAGs helps us also decide which variables we need to collect information on and how they should be measured and defined. Given that DAGs root in causal thinking, their construction is, of necessity, subjective.
Preparation: pilot study, protocol, and advance writing
Doing a pilot study and collecting ancillary information about feasibility.
May I now start? is a question heard after lengthy deliberations about the research question and the potential studies that follow from it. Such deliberations almost invariably produce a lot of enthusiasm and exhilaration – because they are fun. The researcher wants to begin collecting data or start the analysis. However, Crombie and Davies, in their chapter about “Developing the research question” state emphatically: “Don’t rush into a study”. 16 Separate from doing a pilot study, which is about the procedures of your study, you may also need to collect ancillary information before actually starting your study.
Pilot study
Even if you think you are totally certain of what you want, you should first do a pilot study, based on a brief protocol. 2 , 22 That initial protocol should be easy to write. You have already discussed the aim and design of your study. Write them down. You expect a particular type of information that is essential and that will tell the essence of your message (a particular 2-by-2 or X-by-Y table, a particular graph), which you can describe.
Pilot studies are not done to know the likely direction of the results; instead, the aim is to see whether you will be able to perform the procedures of your study – and ultimately whether that really is the study you want to do. 50 The aim is to save yourself from embarrassment: data that very surprisingly do not turn out to be what you expected, questionnaires that are misunderstood or do not deliver the answers that you need or that are not returned, laboratories that do not produce, patients who do not show up, heads of other departments who block access to their patients or materials, or yourself who needs more time to manage the complexity of the undertaking.
We have never heard of someone who was sorry for having done a pilot. Conversely, we know many persons who found out at much personal embarrassment and institutional cost that their project was unfeasible. In intermediate cases, the pilot may show the need to change questionnaires or procedures before the study goes ahead.
In principle, a pilot study should be exactly like your final study and test out all your procedures on a small number of persons. Often, it is better to approach the task piecemeal and pilot different aspects of the research one by one.
A tough question is how to do pilot studies and pilot analyses when ethical or institutional review board approval is necessary for some of the actions in a pilot study. One solution might be to avoid piloting some procedures; for example, try parts of the procedure – for example, you may not be able to randomize in a pilot, but you may be able to try out data collection procedures and forms. There is a degree of circularity about piloting, also in obtaining funding, as one may need funding for the pilot. In practice, the best step might be to ask the ethics committee or review board of your institute which aspects of the research can be piloted and under what conditions.
In Appendix E , several questions that you might ask in pilot studies are listed. They may lead to profound reassessments of your research – particularly if you are piloting the collection of new data, but also if the research involves analyses of existing data.
Ancillary information
It may be necessary to collect additional information about event rates or standard deviations of measurements to calculate the statistical precision that might be obtained. Also, sometimes you need other ways of “testing the water” like procedures to streamlining data collection from different centers in order to know whether the study is feasible. Depending on the study size and importance, such activities may become studies in themselves and actually take a lot of time and money.
Advance writing of paper: before full data collection and/or analysis
Whitesides’ advice is:
The key to efficient use of your and my time is that we start exchanging outlines and proposals as early in a project as possible. Do not, under any circumstances, wait until the collection of data is ‘complete’ before starting to write an outline. 38
After the pilot study, you have a firm grasp of all elements that are necessary for a scientific paper: introduction, materials and methods, results, and discussion. In the introduction, you explain why you have done this research. Almost always, an introduction comprises three ideas: what is the general problem? what is the particular research question? what study will you perform to answer that question? This is followed by the materials and methods section. They have been extensively discussed and have been fine-tuned in the study protocol and the pilot study. Thereafter come the results sections. By now, you know what tables or figures you want and how you can obtain them, but not what the final numbers will look like. You will also have an idea about the auxiliary tables that you might need to explain your data to others (such as a table with the baseline characteristics or an additional table with a subgroup analysis). You can now draft the layouts of all these tables. Visualizing the presentation of your results in advance is the “bare minimum” of writing in advance.
Finally, the discussion section. Can you write a discussion before you know the final data? Of course you can; you even must think ahead. In principle, there are only three possible outcomes: the study can give the results that you hoped for; it can show the inverse; or something indeterminate in between. In all instances, you can imagine how you will react. One possibility is that you are disappointed by the results of your study, and you will tend to find excuses for why it did not produce the results you hoped for. What excuses might your produce? The other possibility is that it does show what you wanted; then you may have to imagine how others will react and what their objections might be. If the results are indeterminate, everybody might be disappointed, and you will need to explain the failure of your research to give clear-cut results. When you detect a specific weakness by imagining this situation, you may wish to change aspects of your study.
As we explain in Appendix F , there is no need to write a very extensive paper as a first draft – on the contrary, it might be more useful to write a short paper, which has the advantage that others will more readily read it and comment on it.
Never be afraid to discuss your study at all stages extensively with others, not only your immediate research colleagues but also semi-outsiders and also in this advance-writing stage. If you know, or are told by others, that a particular direction of your results might not be believed and therefore draw criticism because of some potential deficiency in your study, why not remedy it at this stage? Looking at what you have written, or by discussing potential results with others, you will be able to imagine more clearly what your readers and critical colleagues might object to.
Writing a paper beforehand is the ultimate test of whether the research project is what you wanted, whether your reasoning flows logically, or whether you forgot something. The initial draft will be a yardstick for yourself and for others – whatever happens during the course of your research. This will help you to surmount surprise happenings: you have written down where you started and why, and therefore you will also know very securely when and why you have to take a detour – or even a U-turn.
Writing is difficult and time-consuming. Writing a paper can easily take 5–10 revisions, which might span a full year (inclusive of the time it takes your supervisor or your colleagues to produce comments). During the writing, you will often be obliged to go back to the data and do additional or different analyses. Since your paper will need many revisions, and this will take such a long time, why not take a head-start at the beginning of your data collection? It will save frustration and lost time at the end of your project.
Many guidelines and advices exist about writing, both about the substance (how to use words and phrases) and about the process. All beginning researchers should have a look at some books and papers about writing, and seasoned researchers can still profit from rereading them. Several reporting guidelines exist for several types of studies (RCTs, observational, diagnostic research, etc). They are often very detailed, in describing what should be in title, abstract, and so on. Although they should not be mechanically adhered to, 28 they help writing. In Appendix F , we have collected some wisdom that we particularly liked; several books on writing are listed, as well as reporting guidelines that help researchers to craft papers that are readable and contain all the information that is necessary and useful to others.
Now you can start “your research”
After the piloting and after having written your paper, you are ready to start your data collection, your analysis, or whatever is needed to “do your research”.
The work that is needed before you can start to “do your research” will take a great deal of time and effort. What will you have achieved after setting up a piece of research following the lengthy and involved precepts of this paper? You will have specified a limited research question that you will solve. You will add one little shining stone to the large mosaic of science. At the time that you do the study, you may still be too close to see its effect on the overall picture. That will come over the years.
Further reading
Some texts that we mention in the paper might be especially worthwhile for further reading; see Appendix G .
Acknowledgments
We thank Miguel Hernán, Stuart Pocock, and Bianca De Stavola for their informative comments on an earlier draft manuscript, as well as two anonymous reviewers of Clinical Epidemiology . The Centre for Global NCDs is supported by the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund (097834/Z/11/B). This work was also supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013 / ERC grant agreement number 668954).
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
- For Parents
- For Educators
- Our Work and Impact
- About Digital Citizenship
- Digital Citizenship Curriculum
- Digital Citizenship (U.K.)
- Lesson Collections
- All Lesson Plans
- Digital Life Dilemmas
- SEL in Digital Life Resource Center
- Implementation Guide
- Toolkits by Topic
- Digital Citizenship Week
- Digital Connections (Grades 6–8)
- Digital Compass™ (Grades 6–8)
- Digital Passport™ (Grades 3–5)
- Social Media TestDrive (Grades 6–8)
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://www.commonsense.org/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_16_9_xsmall/public/menu-addons/2023-ai-literacy-lessons-collections-page-social-share-v2_1.jpg?itok=MXGHUpBR)
AI Literacy for Grades 6–12
- All Apps and Websites
- Curated Lists
- Best in Class
- Common Sense Selections
- About the Privacy Program
- Privacy Evaluations
- Privacy Articles
- Privacy Direct (Free download)
- AI Movies, Podcasts, & Books
- Learning Podcasts
- Movies to Support SEL
- Internet Safety
- Books for Digital Citizenship
- ChatGPT and Beyond
- Should Your School Have Cell Phone Ban?
- Digital Well-Being Discussions
- Supporting LGBTQ+ Students
- Offline Digital Citizenship
- Teaching with Tech
- Movies in the Classroom
- Social & Emotional Learning
- Digital Citizenship
- Tech & Learning
- News and Media Literacy
- Common Sense Recognized Educators
- Common Sense Education Ambassadors
- Browse Events and Training
- AI Foundations for Educators
- Digital Citizenship Teacher Training
- Modeling Digital Habits Teacher Training
- Student Privacy Teacher Training
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://www.commonsense.org/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_16_9_xsmall/public/menu-addons/ai-foundations.png?itok=efqmPoLD)
Training Course: AI Foundations for Educators
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://www.commonsense.org/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_16_9_xsmall/public/menu-addons/classroom%20teacher.jpg?itok=dM6kmXRb)
Earn your Common Sense Education badge today!
- Family Engagement Toolkit
- Digital Citizenship Resources for Families
![](http://farmaciacoslada.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Family Tech Planners
Family and community engagement program.
- Workshops for Families with Kids Age 0–8
- Workshops for Middle and High School Families
- Kids and Tech Video Series
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://www.commonsense.org/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_16_9_xsmall/public/menu-addons/family-tech-planners.jpeg?itok=Z43fgxyx)
- Get Our Newsletter
![how should you start a research project flocabulary A female elementary student wearing headphones smiles while working with her teacher on a classroom digital tablet.](https://www.commonsense.org/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_16_9_medium/public/cta/2023-08/edu-marketing-slider-v3.png?itok=syE1vSMM)
Subscribe to our newsletter!
Get weekly updates on the latest media and tech trends for educators.
Review by Marianne Rogowski , Common Sense Education | Updated July 2021
![how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://www.commonsense.org/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_1_1_small/public/jpeg/2022-08/flocabulary-logo.jpeg?itok=vjvAJ95z)
Flocabulary
Delightful hip-hop-based site connects literacy to every content area
Learning rating
Community rating, privacy rating, subjects & topics.
English Language Arts, Math, Science, Social Studies
Take a look inside 1 video | 9 images
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://www.commonsense.org/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_16_9_small/public/jpg/2018-10/flocabulary-in-30-thumbnail.jpg?itok=m-bg5G4o)
Pros : Smart, catchy videos feature diverse representation and a variety of teacher- and student-friendly activities.
Cons : Some videos contain language that some teachers will find inappropriate for younger viewers. The individual teacher version lacks easy differentiation and progress tracking.
Bottom Line : This site's content is savvy enough to keep students focused, and teachers will love the flexible options for deepening learning.
- How Can I Teach with This Tool?
- What Is It?
- Is It Good for Learning?
Whether you want to assign students a basic review lesson for homework or plan a fully integrated lesson, the Flocabulary platform is flexible enough to use a little or a lot without feeling routine. The lessons within the videos are relatable and fun enough to get concepts to sink in. Start a unit with a video that introduces the vocabulary that students need for a lesson in geometry, simple machines, student loans, or a Shakespearean sonnet. Play a video for the whole class, and then have the students group up and replay it in discussion mode, giving them the opportunity to explore ideas in more depth and learn from one another. Videos for older students are more dense, with nearly every rhyme containing some hard facts that they can review afterward through a variety of activities, including writing their own lyrics.
The Week in Rap video lessons help build background knowledge through the lens of current events, and their focus on equity and social justice will spark discussions and help students develop empathy. Teachers should put in some extra time to prepare since some of the topics may lead to in-depth conversations.
Flocabulary is a website with hundreds of educational hip-hop videos and supplemental activities for students in grades K–12. Flocabulary covers math, vocabulary, language arts, social studies, science, and SEL and offers a weekly news update, The Week in Rap, which is adjusted for age appropriateness. Lessons contain music videos and clickable lyrics that can be played at three different speeds. After viewing these as a class or independently, students can complete the accompanying games, quizzes, reading passages, and more, depending on the plan purchased.
The individual teacher subscription (which is required after a 30-day free trial) gives access to the videos, lessons, activities, and Common Core State Standards (CCSS) correlations, and the videos present content through a diverse, equitable, and inclusive lens. The full whole-school plan includes quite a bit more, including a teacher dashboard and assignable, automatically scored quizzes. Created by pros committed to education, all Flocabulary content is standards-based and even goes above and beyond traditional standards to incorporate current events and SEL content. There's also a pretty robust community of users and product ambassadors who share ideas and spark inspiration.
Disclosure: Common Sense Education has partnered with Flocabulary in the past; however, our initial review was completed before this partnership was established.
One of Flocabulary's best qualities is that the videos feel authentic, not awkward imitations that are obviously for educational purposes. The backing beats and samples are catchy and memorable, and videos contain a fun combo of stock footage, discussion points, original animation, and, for The Week in Rap, current news clips. The lyrics don't diminish topics; rather, they speak directly to a K–12 audience, providing an accessible and subtle way for students to learn content. Accompanying activities, done independently or as a whole class, help students learn key vocabulary and concepts, increase background knowledge, and review learning with access to quick feedback. Opportunities to create their own hip-hop lyrics empower students to be creative and allow teachers to assess how well their students are grasping larger concepts.
The downsides to Flocabulary are pretty limited. For one, the cost may be an issue. The Teacher Lite plan gives access to all of the lessons and some activities, but for full access, teachers and students will need to be on the school plan, which may be out of their price range. Also, lyrics are occasionally kind of stilted, but this happens in popular music, too. Finally, teachers should know that some videos contain light questionable language. While students probably won't bat an eye, it's something teachers should just check on beforehand. Turning on the Elementary Filter might be useful for K–6 teachers to ensure students don't have access to videos that contain violent or disturbing images.
Learning Rating
Overall rating.
Often irreverent and funny, these super-entertaining hip-hop videos will keep students' attention, and they'll have a blast forming and performing their own lyrics.
Videos are packed with educational info that hits all subject areas, including SEL skills. As students learn to listen for details, they can become more focused.
Flocabulary offers a solid support system. Videos and lyrics can be viewed at three speeds, and there's a beta immersive reader feature. Objective quizzes, games, and reading and writing activities challenge students at every level.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary J. H.](https://www.commonsense.org/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_1_1_xsmall/public/user/2023-09/social-auth-google-113718546327408331954.jpg?itok=cVOen0Gp)
Misleading Information and Inflated Prices
Their "lite" tier of the product is trash and not even worth making a free account, let alone paying money for it's use. You can't do ANY of the things a good teacher would want to do with an activity with their students. To make matters worse, they put pressure on you as the teacher to push your school site administration to purchase a license for the entire school. Why should it be MY job to advertise and solicit for your product? How dare they lock the most useful features behind a paywall that individual teachers can have NO control over whatsoever.
Privacy Rating
Data safety how safe is this product.
- Users can interact with trusted users.
- Users cannot interact with untrusted users, including strangers and/or adults.
- Profile information must be shared for social interactions.
Data Rights What rights do I have to the data?
- Users can create or upload content.
- Users retain ownership of their data.
- Processes to access or review user data are available.
Ads & Tracking Are there advertisements or tracking?
- Personal information is not shared for third-party marketing.
- Traditional or contextual advertisements are not displayed.
- Personalised advertising is not displayed.
Continue reading about this tool's privacy practices, including data collection, sharing, and security.
See complete evaluation
Learn more about our privacy ratings Pass Meets our minimum requirements for privacy and security practices. Warning Does not meet our recommendations for privacy and security practices. Fail Does not have a privacy policy and/or does not use encryption and should not be used. 100% Every privacy rating includes a score. A higher score (up to 100%) means the product provides more transparent privacy policies with better practices to protect user data. Privacy ratings are created by Common Sense expert evaluators and are independent from our "Common Sense says" age-based reviews. Read more about privacy ratings
Explore Our Favorite Tools
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://www.commonsense.org/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_16_9_small/public/png/2021-02/top-picks-3887111_1.png?itok=UmVflMIQ)
ELA Tools Aligned to Common Core Standards
Great tools targeted at the Common Core
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://www.commonsense.org/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_16_9_small/public/png/2022-04/top-picks-3946756_1.png?itok=q2h7l3m0)
Top Tech Tools for Formative Assessment
Assess and engage students in real time with these formative assessment apps.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://www.commonsense.org/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_16_9_small/public/png/2022-04/top-picks-3887168_1.png?itok=-uxM84fH)
Great Vocabulary Games, Apps, and Sites
Introduce students to new and relevant words.
Home » Teaching Resources » Flocabulary: The Hip-Hop Education Platform That’s Changing the Game
![how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://teachsimple.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Flocabulary-840x400.png)
Flocabulary: The Hip-Hop Education Platform That’s Changing the Game
Have you ever considered whether learning could be as engaging as your favorite playlist? Let us explore Flocabulary – an educational platform that is transforming the landscape. Envision a classroom where lessons are brought to life through hip-hop beats and compelling narratives. Intriguing, is it not? That encapsulates the essence of Flocabulary.
Table of Contents
History and background, core features, educational benefits, how it works, subject coverage, comparison with other educational tools, conclusion: the flocabulary experience, what exactly is flocabulary.
It is an instructional tool that utilizes hip-hop music, storytelling, and forging connections to help pupils learn various subjects. From mathematics and science to literacy, this platform provides a holistic educational experience.
Why is this significant?
In contemporary classrooms, sustaining student interest is an ongoing challenge. Conventional techniques often fall short, resulting in disengagement. Flocabulary confronts this dilemma directly by integrating academic rigor with a rhythmic approach, rendering learning both efficacious and engaging.
What can you anticipate in this article?
In the following sections, we will explore Flocabulary’s features, its advantages for students and teachers, and w2hy it represents a paradigm shift in modern education. So remain tuned for an illuminating examination of this innovative platform.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://teachsimple.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Screenshot-2023-09-23-at-6.22.17-AM-1024x488.jpg)
The Beginning of Flocabulary
Flocabulary started as an innovative idea to transform education. The founders recognized the huge potential of music, especially hip-hop, as a way to teach effectively and connect with students. Their goal was to build a platform that would not only educate but also engage learners on an emotional level.
Growth Over the Years
Over time, Flocabulary has evolved into a comprehensive learning tool. It has expanded its subjects and incorporated research-backed methods to ensure students learn successfully. The platform has also adopted new technologies, offering interactive features that further captivate students.
Major Milestones
While specific achievements are confidential, it’s clear Flocabulary has made a big impact on education. Its unique approach has earned attention and praise, making it a top choice for many teachers and schools.
Partnership with Nearpod
One significant milestone is Flocabulary’s collaboration with Nearpod, another edtech platform. This partnership enables flexible synchronous and asynchronous learning. Students can choose experiences that fit their needs, enriching their academic journey.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://teachsimple.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Screenshot-2023-09-23-at-6.21.30-AM-1024x428.jpg)
Flocabulary offers awesome tools to make learning fun and meaningful. Let’s check out what makes this platform so cool.
Music and Rap
One of Flocabulary’s best features is integrating hip-hop music into lessons. This not only engages students but also helps them remember concepts.
Learning Experiences
Challenging, purposeful lessons push students to think critically and creatively. Research-backed activities build higher-order thinking skills.
Vocabulary Building
The platform focuses on vocabulary growth . Students get targeted practice to expand their word knowledge and apply vocabulary in context to improve reading comprehension.
Multimedia Lessons
Cool multimedia lessons reflect youth culture, making learning stick. These lessons authentically connect with how students learn today.
Standards-Aligned
All Flocabulary lessons and activities align with educational standards . This ensures students build academic skills while having fun.
Research-Based
Flocabulary’s lessons use proven learning science to grow vocabulary and reading comprehension. This leads to better test scores and learning outcomes.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://teachsimple.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Screenshot-2023-09-23-at-6.21.39-AM-1024x378.jpg)
Flocabulary is more than just a catchy way to learn; it offers tangible educational benefits that set it apart from traditional learning methods. Here’s how:
Cognitive Benefits
- Memory Retention : The integration of music and rhythm in Flocabulary’s lessons aids in memory retention, making it easier for students to recall information.
- Critical Thinking : The platform’s research-backed lessons challenge students to think critically, fostering higher-order thinking skills.
Emotional Benefits
- Student Engagement : Flocabulary’s multimedia lessons are designed to authentically engage students, making learning both memorable and meaningful.
- Motivation : The platform’s unique approach to education increases student motivation , encouraging them to actively participate in the learning process.
Social Benefits
- Collaboration : Flocabulary promotes group activities and discussions, encouraging students to collaborate and learn from each other.
- Cultural Relevance : The platform’s lessons reflect youth culture, making it relatable and thereby fostering a sense of community among students.
Academic Outcomes
- Improved Test Scores : Flocabulary’s research-backed lessons lead to improved test scores, as stated by educators who have implemented the platform.
- Comprehensive Learning : The platform’s standards-aligned content ensures that students are not just engaged but also meeting educational benchmarks.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://teachsimple.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Screenshot-2023-09-23-at-6.22.27-AM-1024x493.jpg)
Understanding how Flocabulary operates gives us more insight into why it’s effective. Flocabulary operates as an online educational platform where lessons across various subjects are presented in the form of hip-hop music videos. Teachers can access these video lessons and integrate them into their classroom activities.
Each lesson follows a structured sequence that starts with the video, followed by interactive quizzes, vocabulary games, and group activities to reinforce the concepts taught.
The platform also offers features for teachers to track student progress. Additionally, Flocabulary provides the flexibility for students to access lessons both in real-time with their teachers (synchronous learning) and on their own time (asynchronous learning).
The content is research-backed and aligned with educational standards, ensuring that it meets academic benchmarks while engaging students.
Lesson Sequence
Flocabulary has a structured lesson flow that challenges students to think critically at each step. This ensures learning is rigorous and purposeful.
Research and Results
The platform uses proven learning science to build vocabulary and reading comprehension. This approach improves test scores and learning outcomes.
User Experience
- For Teachers: Flocabulary provides resources and support to help teachers use it successfully.
- For Students: The platform enables flexible learning – students can join lessons anytime, anywhere.
Customization with Nearpod
As part of Nearpod, educators can customize synchronous and asynchronous lessons. This adds more flexibility and personalization.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://teachsimple.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Screenshot-2023-09-23-at-6.21.50-AM-1024x327.jpg)
Flocabulary offers diverse subjects for a complete learning experience. Here’s a detailed overview:
Flocabulary Subjects and Sub-Subjects
Main Subject | Sub-Subjects |
---|---|
Language Arts | Reading & Writing, Grammar, Research & Study Skills, Literature |
Math | Addition & Subtraction, Multiplication & Division, Numbers & Operations, Expressions & Equations, Geometry & Measurement, Statistics & Probability, Ratios & Proportional Relationships |
Science | Life Science, Earth & Space Science, Physical Science, Technology & Engineering, Scientific Practices |
Social Studies | Ancient World History, Modern World History, U.S. History, Civics, Geography, Historical Figures, Holidays, Economics, Historical Practices, Issues in the News |
Life Skills | Racial & Social Justice, Social & Emotional Learning, Health & Wellness, Financial Literacy |
Vocabulary | Word Up Series for Grades K to 8, SAT Vocabulary for Grades 9 to 12 |
Current Events | The Week in Rap for Grades 6 to 12, The Week in Rap Junior for Grades 3 to 5 |
Language Arts
- Reading & Writing: Lessons to improve reading comprehension and writing skills to excel in language arts.
- Grammar: Covers everything from basic to complex grammar through engaging lessons.
- Research & Study Skills: Tools and lessons to help students become better researchers and learners.
- Literature: Make reading classic and modern literature more fun and educational.
- Addition & Subtraction: Lessons designed to help younger students learn these basics.
- Multiplication & Division: Makes learning these concepts engaging and enjoyable.
- Numbers & Operations: Covers the foundational math concepts students need.
- Expressions & Equations: Learn to solve math expressions and equations interactively.
- Geometry & Measurement: Explore shapes, sizes, and measurements through cool lessons.
- Statistics & Probability: Understand data, chance, and likelihood.
- Ratios & Proportional Relationships: Grasp the fundamentals of ratios and proportions.
- Life Science: Explore biology interactively – plants, animals, humans.
- Earth & Space Science: Learn about Earth, space, the environment.
- Physical Science: Lessons cover physics, chemistry, science principles.
- Technology & Engineering: Intro to technology and engineering.
- Scientific Practices: Learn about methods and practices scientists use.
Social Studies
- Ancient World History: Explore ancient civilizations and cultures.
- Modern World History: Learn about significant modern events and people.
- U.S. History: Understand the people and events that shaped the U.S.
- Civics: Learn about government, politics, civic duties.
- Geography: Explore continents, countries, cultures.
- Historical Figures: Learn about influential people in history.
- Holidays: Understand the history and significance of holidays.
- Economics: Get intro to economic principles and practices.
- Historical Practices: Learn about practices and traditions throughout history.
- Issues in the News: Understand current events in historical context.
Life Skills
- Racial & Social Justice: Promote understanding around these issues.
- Social & Emotional Learning: Build skills for emotional and social competence.
- Health & Wellness: Cover physical, mental, and overall wellness.
- Financial Literacy: Intro to money management and financial planning.
- Word Up Series: Enhance vocabulary for grades K-8.
- SAT Vocabulary: Prepare for SATs with focused vocabulary lessons.
Current Events
- The Week in Rap: Stay updated on news through rap videos.
- The Week in Rap Junior: Simplified news summary for younger grades.
How Flocabulary Compares to Traditional Educational Tools
- Engagement : Traditional educational tools often rely on textbooks and lectures, which may not be as engaging for students. Flocabulary, on the other hand, uses hip-hop music and interactive lessons to capture students’ attention.
- Flexibility : While traditional methods are often rigid and time-bound, Flocabulary offers the flexibility of asynchronous learning, allowing students to learn at their own pace.
- Innovation : Traditional tools may lack the innovative approaches to teaching that Flocabulary offers, such as using music and multimedia to enhance learning.
How Flocabulary Stands Against Other Tech-Based Educational Platforms
- Unique Approach : Flocabulary’s use of hip-hop to teach academic subjects sets it apart from other tech-based platforms that may use gamification or virtual classrooms.
- Comprehensive Coverage : While some tech-based platforms focus on specific subjects like coding or math, Flocabulary offers a wide range of subjects, making it a more comprehensive tool.
- Research-Backed : Unlike some platforms that may not have a strong educational foundation , Flocabulary’s lessons are research-backed, ensuring that they meet academic standards.
In a world where traditional educational methods often struggle to keep students engaged, Flocabulary emerges as a breath of fresh air. By fusing the power of hip-hop with rigorous, research-backed lessons, this innovative platform offers a unique approach to learning. Covering a wide array of subjects—from Language Arts and Math to Life Skills and Current Events—Flocabulary ensures a comprehensive educational experience for students in grades K-12.
While the platform’s effectiveness in improving test scores and educational outcomes is noted, the absence of specific user reviews leaves room for further exploration. Nonetheless, the platform’s commitment to making learning engaging, meaningful, and fun is evident.
So, whether you’re a teacher looking to spice up your classroom activities or a student eager to learn in a more interactive way, Flocabulary offers a compelling option. It’s not just about learning; it’s about experiencing education in a way that resonates with today’s youth.
Share Article:
Download unlimited teaching resources, join free today, teach simple.
The team behind Teach Simple is a small but dedicated group who are passionate about education and making a positive impact on the lives of teachers and students.
We have a lot of interesting articles and educational resources from a wide variety of authors and teaching professionals.
21 Unique & Inspiring Tree Bulletin Board
Tips for teachers on making calls to parents.
Last Updated on May 21, 2024 by Teach Simple
![how should you start a research project flocabulary logo](https://cf.quizizz.com/img/logos/Purple.webp)
Have an account?
Suggestions for you See more
![how should you start a research project flocabulary Quiz image](https://cf.quizizz.com/img/logos/new/logo_placeholder_sm.png)
Argumentative Writing
The writing process, 6th - 8th , facts, opinions, and opinion writing, 3rd - 5th , 11th - 12th , university - professional development , main idea & supporting details vocab.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary pencil-icon](https://cf.quizizz.com/image/pencil.png)
Flocabulary: The Research Process/Works ...
6th - 8th grade.
Flocabulary: The Research Process/Works Cited
16 questions
![how should you start a research project flocabulary Player avatar](https://cf.quizizz.com/img/logos/new/logo_placeholder_sm.png)
Introducing new Paper mode
No student devices needed. Know more
What's essential when you're deciding on a research topic?
that you like the topic
that there's a website on the topic
that there's a lot of videos on the topic
that no one has heard of the topic
You are doing research in a large library. What source would you not expect to find there?
an encyclopedia
the internet
old letters
journal articles
Which website would be considered the most credible?
one sponsored by a club
one sponsored by a college
one sponsored by a person
one sponsored by a store
Why is it important for you to take notes?
So you can decide if you want to pursue the topic.
So you can memorize facts.
So you can give credit for your own ideas.
So you can organize your paper.
What is an example of a primary source?
an academic journal
What is the purpose of the bibliography?
To define words the reader may not know.
To tell the reader where to find specific ideas in your paper.
To tell where your facts and quotes came from.
To give credit to your librarian for helping you.
Why would you do pre-search?
to evaluate possible research topics
to judge the credibility of sources
to provide a list of sources used
to organize your thoughts
When should you cite a source?
each time you write an idea that is your own
each time you write a fact or idea that's not your own
each time you write a word that a reader may not know
each time you include your own photo or drawing
How do you show that a sentence is a quote from another source?
underline it
put it in boldface
put it in italics
surround it with quotation marks
Which statement is true?
If you quote less than three lines from a book, you don't have to cite it.
If you quote information from the web site, you don't have to cite it.
If you quote information from a print or digital source, you must cite it.
If you cite your opinion in your research paper, you must cite it.
In a works cited, you list
every source that you mentioned in a paper.
only the sources that you found online.
only the books that you used to write a paper.
ideas that you came up with by yourself.
A works cited helps your readers by
explaining why you wrote the paper.
restating the thesis of your paper.
allowing them to use your sources to do their own research.
allowing them to plagiarize your sources in their own papers.
Which of the following should you put in a works cited page if you included them in a paper?
other author's opinions
all of the above
Shelby is citing a book with one author in her works cited. How should she format it?
Title . Author's last name, First name. Publisher, publication date.
Title . Publisher, publication date. Author's last name, First name.
Author's last name, First name. Title . Publisher, publication date.
Author's first name, Last name. Title . Publisher, publication date.
Below is a citation for an book with one author. Identify the publisher.
Naruto, Jaycee. The Moon at Noon. Cylinder, 2009.
The Moon at Noon
Below is a citation for a web article. Identify the name of the article.
Kirkman, Kim. "Revenge of the Spinach." Foodie, 18 Mar., 2014, foodiemage.com/revenge-of-spinach . Accessed 12 May 2016.
"Revenge of the Spinach."
Kirkman, Kim.
foodiemag.com/revenge-of-spinach
Explore all questions with a free account
![how should you start a research project flocabulary Google Logo](https://cf.quizizz.com/img/logos/google-logo-1.png)
Continue with email
Continue with phone
![how should you start a research project flocabulary The Flocabulary Blog](https://e2d4cc.p3cdn1.secureserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/nearpodflocab-logo-white.png)
Five Ways to Teach Literacy Across Content Areas with Flocabulary
- April 3, 2017
Karie Frauenhoffer
- Education Tips & Tricks , Flocabulary Community , Lessons and Ideas , Teacher Idea Exchange
This Flocabulary community post comes from Karie Frauenhoffer, a middle school ELA teacher and Flocabulary MC Educator from North Carolina.
When it comes to talking with school colleagues across content areas about literacy, I can’t even count the number of times I have heard, “Oh, I don’t have to worry about that, my ELA teammate has it covered!” I personally believe it is such a common misconception that literacy instruction is just an ELA skill. Has no one else ever heard the expression “ It takes a village!” ? Well, that village just got some reinforcements in the form of Flocabulary. Literacy can and should be incorporated across all content areas, and Flocabulary can help.
You might be asking yourself, “ How can Flocabulary help literacy? Isn’t it just raps?” Well, sit back, get comfy and get your popcorn ready, because this feature film on literacy starts NOW! Here are five ways you can use Flocabulary to support literacy instruction, no matter the subject.
1. Use Printable Lyrics as an Anticipation Guide
We are always on the hunt for a fun way to get our students interested in our content. Let’s be honest, it’s not all fun and games! I have helped increase student engagement and participation by printing out the complete lyrics of a Flocabulary rap I am going to utilize in class, like the the Author’s Purpose rap . I print off the lyrics and cut them into sections. Each section goes to a group. As a group, the students read over their lyrics section and synthesize their thoughts on their section. Then, we come together whole group and listen to the rap and see if they were right or wrong in their inferences! You could use this strategy for any Flocabulary unit across subject areas.
2. Train Students to Annotate as They Listen
An important literacy skill for students to acquire is the ability to talk to a text. Annotations are a great way to get students jotting down those thought bubbles that pop up as they read. You can print out the lyrics to have students jot down those thoughts as they come to mind. For example, I have used this strategy for the Five Elements of a Story rap . You can also use this method to pose questions to your students OR utilizing Flocabulary’s Discuss Mode feature and have your students answer those questions on the printed lyrics.
![how should you start a research project flocabulary](https://e2d4cc.p3cdn1.secureserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2018-10-16-at-8.37.52-AM.png?time=1722353251)
3. Take Some Time for Discussion Mode
One amazing feature that you can find on Flocabulary is “Discuss Mode. ” This is a fantastic feature to use for Socraticic seminars or whole class discussions. You simply slide the button next to the words “Discuss” at the bottom of the video, and press play! Flocabulary has included periodic stopping points with questions to help facilitate discussion and student collaboration. Make this a multi-literacy skill activity by having students listen and discuss in pairs, then use a writing prompt to bring the activity full circle.
Use Discuss Mode and Lyric Lab To Support Literacy
4. try a bit of app-smashing.
It isn’t a Friday if Flocabulary’s current events program, The Week in Rap , isn’t on! My students love it. Try app-smashing this tool with another popular edtech tool like Newsela. View The Week in Rap whole class and then challenge students to hop on Newsela and find corresponding articles to some of the news events discussed in The Week in Rap!
P.S. Don’t forget tip #2. You can print off The Week in Rap Lyrics and have students practice those annotation skills!
5. Have Students Write Raps to Summarize a Major Concept
A student FAVORITE Flocabulary feature is the amazing LYRIC LAB . Lyric Lab is great for the novice rapper AND the seasoned rap lyricist! With hip-hop music being such a popular genre today, you might as well jump on that train. I guarantee you, even your most reluctant participant will love the ease of use with Lyric Lab. Lyric Lab provides your students with key terms they should include, a whole bunch of beats to use and helps them with rhyming too.
Lyric Lab is a great support for literacy instruction as it not only gets students writing, (which, by the way, doesn’t have to be structured like a five-paragraph essay—it can be as simple as a rap) it also gets them speaking! Literacy encompasses several skills, and speaking is an important one. Lyric Lab is a great summative assessment for any lesson, and you can’t top the student engagement.
Karie Frauenhoffer is a middle school ELA teacher and Flocabulary MC Educator from North Carolina.
- Channeling Your Passions To Create an Amazing Classroom Culture: An Interview with Michael Bonner
- What the Research Shows: Social & Emotional Learning and Student Achievement
![](http://farmaciacoslada.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Discuss. This song introduces the research process, providing students with steps and suggestions for researching a paper. Review techniques for the research process with Flocabulary's educational rap song and lesson plan.
Flocabulary programs were designed with these insights in mind. Every unit begins with a high-interest song that introduces vocabulary or key concepts, and goes on to provide students with up to ten unique exposures to the content. To learn more about our effective methods of increasing literacy, read the full research base of The Word Up Project.
How Flocabulary's video-based lessons align with pedagogy & learning research. No matter the type, each video is carefully and intentionally designed to embrace evidence-based principles that improve learning. These lessons are rooted in robust pedagogical and learning research principles, ensuring their effectiveness in the classroom.
Step 1: Research. The lesson production process begins with our curriculum team. A curriculum writer reviews national and state standards, determines the proper grade range for a lesson, and identifies student learning objectives. ... Start exploring Flocabulary's lessons. At Flocabulary, we understand the value of creating content that is ...
Step 4: Create a research design. The research design is a practical framework for answering your research questions. It involves making decisions about the type of data you need, the methods you'll use to collect and analyze it, and the location and timescale of your research. There are often many possible paths you can take to answering ...
Use the favorite tool to mark ones you want to come back to in the future for lessons. Three strategies for instruction of vocabulary using Flocabulary for science, social studies, reading, writing, and math in the classroom. These teacher strategies support reading comprehension through vocabulary acquisition.
Table of contents. Step 1: Introduce your topic. Step 2: Describe the background. Step 3: Establish your research problem. Step 4: Specify your objective (s) Step 5: Map out your paper. Research paper introduction examples. Frequently asked questions about the research paper introduction.
print. something, like a newspaper or photographer, printed on paper. research. study done with the purpose of learning about a subject. source. a person or thing that gives information. topic. a subject of writing.
From the Flocabulary homepage, click on "My Classes" at the top of the page and. then click the blue "Create a Class" button. Give the class a name, grade level, and subject. Keep in mind your students will see the class name when they sign up. Click "Create a New Class" to finish. A Class Code will be generated.
Flocabulary is a learning program for all grades that uses educational hip-hop music to engage students and increase achievement across the curriculum. Teachers at 20,000 schools use Flocabulary's standards-based videos, instructional activities and student creativity tools to supplement instruction and develop core literacy skills.
Before conducting a study, a research proposal should be created that outlines researchers' plans and methodology and is submitted to the concerned evaluating organization or person. Creating a research proposal is an important step to ensure that researchers are on track and are moving forward as intended. A research proposal can be defined as a detailed plan or blueprint for the proposed ...
something, like a newspaper or photograph, printed on paper. research. study or examination done with the purpose of learning about a subject. source. a person or thing that gives information. topic. the subject of writing or speech. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like bibliography, cite, credible and more.
Next, we describe how to sharpen and focus a research question so that a study becomes feasible and a valid test of the underlying idea. To do this, the idea needs to be "pruned". Pruning a research question means cutting away anything that is unnecessary, so that only the essence remains.
Flocabulary in 30 Seconds. Pros: Smart, catchy videos feature diverse representation and a variety of teacher- and student-friendly activities. Cons: Some videos contain language that some teachers will find inappropriate for younger viewers. The individual teacher version lacks easy differentiation and progress tracking.
Flocabulary provides a variety of lesson content to cover a range of grade levels and subject areas. For all content, Flocabulary lessons expose students to Tier 2 and Tier 3 vocabulary words using a similar framework, with a video to introduce the vocabulary using hip-hop music and multiple activities where students can interact with the vocabulary words in different ways with increasing ...
In a world where traditional educational methods often struggle to keep students engaged, Flocabulary emerges as a breath of fresh air. By fusing the power of hip-hop with rigorous, research-backed lessons, this innovative platform offers a unique approach to learning. Covering a wide array of subjects—from Language Arts and Math to Life ...
Analyzing student data on the scale of schools and districts helps identify opportunities to drive high-quality instruction in every classroom and building. For example, you can make small group interventions more targeted and effective when driven by data insights. Student data is key to effective teaching and building supportive curricula ...
Flocabulary is a part of the Nearpod family. With Nearpod, you can customize synchronous and asynchronous learning experiences students can join anytime from anywhere. Read on. Lessons. Language Arts. Math. Science. Social Studies. Life Skills.
Accelerate learning with rigor and rhythm. Standards-aligned, high-quality videos, and activities that leverage hip-hop music, storytelling, and more. Authen...
The Flocabulary lesson sequence includes a full suite of features that help students master content, build vocabulary and engage in 21st-century skills. Teachers in grades 2-12 use the Week in Rap and The Week in Rap Jr. to help students become curious, global citizens who ask questions and think critically. Find answers to your questions ...
MSNBC host Joy Reid on Monday delivered a special report, "Project 2025 Exposed," breaking down the 900-page document piece by piece and how it would give Trump the power to put in place an ...
Research shows that project-based learning not only gives students a sense of purpose but also helps them better retain content. Students can form smaller groups to write raps together and present them as a team. Teachers can also host a poetry slam or create a whole-class rap to perform for other classes. ... Start using Flocabulary today ...
If you quote information from a print or digital source, you must cite it. If you cite your opinion in your research paper, you must cite it. allowing them to use your sources to do their own research. allowing them to plagiarize your sources in their own papers. Which of the following should you put in a works cited page if you included them ...
Flocabulary's instructional approach: Vocabulary word selection process. Flocabulary was built with vocabulary comprehension front of mind, as it is a key indicator for student success. This focus on vocabulary has proven to be essential in education. For instance, Malcolm X's experience vividly highlights the importance of a rich vocabulary.
Well, sit back, get comfy and get your popcorn ready, because this feature film on literacy starts NOW! Here are five ways you can use Flocabulary to support literacy instruction, no matter the subject. 1. Use Printable Lyrics as an Anticipation Guide. We are always on the hunt for a fun way to get our students interested in our content.