bwff 2033 financial management assignment

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

Comprehensive Financial Management You Can Trust

Focus on your life and goals—we’ll handle the rest.

Full-Service Financial Management

We provide comprehensive services, including financial planning, investing, and taxes. With Northstar, you have a dedicated team managing the critical aspects of your financial life.  

Fee-Only Fiduciary

We act in your best interest, and not just because it’s legally required. Our compensation comes only from our clients, ensuring our advice is unbiased and focused solely on your needs.

Independent & Client-Focused

 Our highest responsibility is to serve your best interests. We’re independently owned and answer only to you, not brokers, banks, insurance companies, or a corporate “head office”.

Diverse Expertise

Our team brings a broad and deep range of education, experience, and expertise. You can trust that your money is managed by experts with deep knowledge and diverse wisdom.

Your future is safe in our hands. Find financial peace of mind with our trusted, holistic financial management.

Common problems we solve.

Major Life Transitions

"I’m going through a transition (divorce, spouse’s death, career change, new baby) and need expert financial advice to navigate it."

"I’ve been saving for retirement but don’t know if I’m saving enough or if it’s invested in the best way."

Saving & Investment Strategies

"I received an inheritance and need help deciding what to do with it.”

“I want to pass on my wealth without compromising my kids’ future."

Inheritance & Wealth Transfer

Financial Goal Funding

"Can I afford to retire early, buy a house, or pay for my children’s education?"

"I know I should be planning for retirement but I don’t know where to start." Or “When can I retire?”

Retirement Planning Uncertainty

"I know what I should be doing to invest my money, but I’m too busy to do it."

Busy Lifestyle

"I have big goals for my life and lifestyle—how do I fund them?"

Why Choose Northstar

Trustworthy & unbiased advice.

We get it; it’s hard to know who to trust. There are under-qualified professionals and a few bad actors out there using the title of “financial advisor.” Some get commissions to sell you financial products you don’t need. As a fee-only fiduciary, our advice is unbiased, with no hidden agendas. We are solely focused on your needs and financial well-being.

Transparent & Client-Centered

We prioritize transparency and integrity in all our dealings. No commissions, no hidden fees. We offer personalized advice tailored to your unique situation, ensuring you always understand your financial options. We’re your expert teachers and guides, not sales people.

Holistic Approach

From financial planning and investment management to tax, we handle it all  seamlessly, providing you with comprehensive solutions for all your financial needs. We happily coordinate with other experts in areas we don’t cover (like your lawyer) to serve you holistically.

We Believe In A Better Way

You have big goals; at Northstar, we have the roadmap to achieve them. We are legally required to advance your interests instead of our own and we are singularly focused on understanding and advising you on your unique situation, goals and needs. We are not chasing sales commissions, aren’t trying to sell you insurance, and aren’t beholden to a parent company. Let us help you navigate the complexities of your financial journey with trusted, personalized advice.

Working with traditional advisors

Conflicted interests and low trust.

Hidden fees and sales commissions for products you don’t need.

Generic advice and confusing industry jargon.

Beholden to bankers, brokers, or insurance companies. 

“You’ll need to talk to your tax professional about that”

Working with Northstar

We believe in advancing your interests, not our own, and are legally obligated to do so.

No hidden fees and no sales tactics.

Transparent advice catered to your unique situation and goals.

Beholden only to you, our client.

We advise you on the tax implications of investing and prepare your annual tax return

Stay on Track

Sign up for our mailing list to receive our newsletter of valuable information on investing, financial planning, and tax.

Thanks for submitting!

Enter the characters you see below

Sorry, we just need to make sure you're not a robot. For best results, please make sure your browser is accepting cookies.

Type the characters you see in this image:

This is a site about the books and other writing by James Rodgers, author of Assignment Moscow: Reporting on Russia From Lenin to Putin ( new edition 2023 ; first published July 2020); Headlines from the Holy Land (2015 and 2017); No Road Home: Fighting for Land and Faith in Gaza (2013); Reporting Conflict (2012). My work looks at how stories of international affairs, especially armed conflict, are told to the world.

I am an author and journalist. During two decades of covering international news, I reported on the end of the Soviet Union; the wars in Chechnya; the coming to power of Vladimir Putin; 9/11; the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; the 2003 war in Iraq; Russia’s war with Georgia in 2008. I completed correspondent postings for the BBC in Moscow, Brussels, and Gaza. I now teach in the Journalism Department at City, University of London.

Assignment Moscow: Russia’s Story From Lenin To Putin

I outlined some of my ideas from Assignment Moscow: Reporting on Russia from Lenin to Putin in a recent piece for The Conversation . I am republishing it here .

WHAT A CONTRAST IT WAS . In early May 2000, Vladimir Putin strode through the Kremlin’s gilded corridors, his progress relayed on live TV across the world’s largest country, and beyond. I was reporting from Moscow for the BBC. Putin looked purposeful, slim and sober as he swore to uphold the constitution of the Russian Federation.

During the 1990s, the international press corps in Moscow had become used to the president of Russia as an unpredictable character: impulsive, sometimes even drunk in public. But Boris Yeltsin resigned suddenly on the last day of 1999. As the constitution required, his acting successor – Vladimir Putin, a prime minister who had built his reputation by taking the fight to separatists in Chechnya – had to stand for election to be confirmed in his post. He was duly elected.

Two decades later, Putin’s critics argue that he has upended that constitution – introducing changes, by means of a recent national vote, that mean he  could stay in power  until he is 83.

None of the correspondents in Moscow in May 2000 stopped to think that Putin might be in power so long. He probably did not foresee it himself. At the time, his arrival appeared to be a necessary corrective to the chaos that had gone before.

We correspondents had certainly seen plenty of that: for the few winners of Russia’s new bandit capitalism, there had been unimaginable wealth; for many more, uncertainty and unpaid wages. From the years of political and economic chaos that had followed the collapse of communism, another kind of leader now emerged – one who was very much a product of the Soviet system in which he had grown up.

Because relatively few westerners or other foreigners have visited Russia, those correspondents who have ventured there have had a disproportionate influence on forming outside opinion of the country. At various times, Russia has welcomed them, expelled them – or banned them altogether.

Theirs is the story I tell in my  new book , Assignment Moscow: Reporting on Russia From Lenin to Putin. In short, Russia’s treatment of international correspondents tells the story of its relations with the rest of the world.

‘A Window On The Country’

I first visited the Soviet Union as a language student in 1987. Four years later, I returned as a TV news producer. It was my first foreign assignment. It was also the year when the Soviet Union ceased to exist. Major change had been underway for some years. That era of reform – started in the 1980s by the last Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev – was also a golden age for international correspondents.

Fred Weir – whom I interviewed for the book – first went to Moscow in 1986 as correspondent for a Communist newspaper, the Canadian Tribune. He has reported for many other English-language publications since, and still does. He remembers that “a window on the country”, opened for foreign journalists as the Gorbachev era got underway. Travel restrictions remained, but were eased. Yet while it was not clear which direction the Soviet Union would take, few foresaw such a complete and sudden collapse of the system.

The brightest correspondents who have covered Russia have always tried to understand the country, its language, history and culture. Their insight has often enabled them to guess what was coming.

Journalism is designed to capture the sense of a moment, of a day. The greater understanding and interpretation is left for historians, who often benefit from a wider range of sources, and the power of hindsight. Yet the work of the best reporters from Russia – even as far back as the revolutions of 1917 – is still worth reading today.

Sympathies In The Struggle

For weeks after Vladimir Lenin and his Bolshevik followers seized power in November 1917, conservative newspapers gleefully predicted their downfall. Arthur Ransome – better known today as an author of children’s books, including the childhood idyll Swallows and Amazons – and Morgan Philips Price of the Manchester Guardian both stand out as two who correctly predicted that the Bolshevik regime would endure.

They were curious, both spoke good Russian, and had extensive contacts in political circles. Reporters could speak to revolutionaries, workers and peasants. Diplomats did not have the same freedoms, so they were slower to appreciate that the Tsar’s dynasty was doomed.

Philips Price and Ransome were not unbiased observers. Nor was John Reed, the charismatic young author of  Ten Days that Shook the World , which was about the revolution. He admitted as much when he wrote: “My sympathies in the struggle were not neutral.”

Correspondence in the Guardian’s archives shows the length to which the paper later went to distance itself from Philips Price. A pamphlet which he wrote was deemed so inspiring by the Bolsheviks that they used it as propaganda to dissuade British troops who had entered Russia to reverse the revolution. As for Ransome, he clearly admired Lenin, and later married Leon Trotsky’s secretary.

Correspondents who were so impressed by Lenin found their counterparts in later admirers of Joseph Stalin, Nikita Khrushchev and Mikhail Gorbachev. In the 1930s, the king of Moscow correspondents was Walter Duranty of the New York Times. His 1990s biographer, SJ Taylor, declared him  Stalin’s apologist .

The recent film  Mr Jones  remembers Duranty’s refusal to report the famine in Ukraine in the 1930s. His playing down of the mass starvation kept him in favour with Stalin’s regime, and he later took credit for the US’s diplomatic recognition of the Soviet Union.

Another pioneering correspondent could not believe what seemed to be astonishing luck as she crossed into Russia at its border with Poland without the right papers and was still able to make her way to Moscow. Marguerite Harrison, hailed by the New York Times as a “brilliant news writer”, called her 1936 autobiography  Born For Trouble .

One trouble in her case was that she was not just a great reporter. She was also an American spy. In her defence, Harrison’s gender had prevented her from getting the journalistic assignment, so she agreed to work for US military intelligence too. She ended up in a Moscow prison cell, but her luck held out long enough for her to get an interview with Trotsky. Her excellent access was later explained by the fact that the Soviets knew what she was up to, and wanted to keep an eye on her.

‘Hostile actors’

The sense of press freedom – the “window on the country” that Weir remembers – endured through the first chaotic decade of post-Soviet Russia. It no longer does. Western correspondents “are seen more as hostile actors”, Matthew Chance, who has reported from Russia for CNN since the late 1990s, told me. In an age when Russia’s relations with the west – especially the UK – are worse than at any time since the cold war, correspondents face great challenges. Access “is negligible”, Chance argues.

Journalism itself is in crisis: criticized not only by leaders in countries where the media has rarely been free, but also ignored and chastised by governments in the west. Russia’s media policy in recent years shows a shift towards wanting to tell its own story, through RT and its other international media platforms, rather than engaging with western media. Still, recent  verbal assaults  and veiled threats to the Financial Times and New York Times over their reporting of coronavirus statistics shows that international coverage can still sting.

The brightest correspondents who have covered Russia have always tried to understand the country, its language, history and culture. Their insight has sometimes – as in the case of Ransome and Philips Price – enabled them to guess what was coming.

My generation of correspondents may have witnessed, and understood, the factors that delivered Putin’s initial popularity: his tough line on fighting separatists in Chechnya and his determination to bring Russia’s new tycoons – the oligarchs – under the Kremlin’s control.

I see now that I did not realise fully what I was witnessing that day in May 2000. Looking back two decades later, it feels like the start of yet another revolutionary period in Russia’s history. What seemed then like a peaceful transition of power was the beginning of a new system – the Putin system – that endures to this day, and may last yet longer: giving Moscow correspondents plenty more to write about.

Share this: