literature review software project management

Risk factors in software development projects: a systematic literature review

• Published: 07 November 2018
• Volume 27 , pages 1149–1174, ( 2019 )

Cite this article

• Júlio Menezes Jr   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2460-1148 1 ,
• Cristine Gusmão 2 &
• Hermano Moura 1  

3003 Accesses

25 Citations

Explore all metrics

Risks are an inherent part of any software project. The presence of risks in environments of software development projects requires the perception so that the associated factors do not lead projects to failure. The correct identification and monitoring of these factors can be decisive for the success of software development projects and software quality. However, in practice, risk management in software development projects is still often neglected and one of the reasons is due to the lack of knowledge of risk factors that promoted a low perception of them in the environment. This paper aims to identify and to map risk factors in environments of software development projects. We conducted a systematic literature review through a database search, as well as we performed an assessment of quality of the selected studies. All this process was conducted through a research protocol. We identified 41 studies. In these works, we extracted and classified risk factors according to the software development taxonomy developed by Software Engineering Institute (SEI). In total, 148 different risk factors were categorized. The found evidences suggest that risk factors relating to software requirements are the most recurrent and cited. In addition, we highlight that the most mentioned risk factors were the lack of technical skills by the staff. Therefore, the results converged to the need for more studies on these factors as fundamental items for reduction of failure level of a software development project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Effective Risk Management of Software Projects (ERM): An Exploratory Literature Review of IEEE and Scopus Online Databases

Risk Management During Software Development: Results of a Survey in Software Houses from Germany, Austria and Switzerland

Systematic Literature Review of the Risk Management Process Literature for the Public Sector

Alam, A. U., Khan, S. U., & Ali, I. (2012). Knowledge sharing management risks in outsourcing from various continents perspective: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 6 (21), 27–33.

Article   Google Scholar  

Bannerman, P. L. (2015). A reassessment of risk management in software projects. In: Handbook on Project Management and scheduling , vol. 2 (pp. 1119–1134). Springer International Publishing.

Biolchini, J., Mian, P. G., Natali, A. C. C., & Travassos, G. H. (2005). Systematic review in software engineering. In: System engineering and computer science department COPPE/UFRJ, Technical Report ES , vol 679(05) (p. 45).

Boehm, B. W. (1989). Software risk management . Piscataway: Software risk management.

Book   Google Scholar  

Boehm, B. W. (1991). Software risk management: principles and practices. IEEE Software, 8 (1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.62930 .

Brasiliano, A. (2009). Método Brasiliano avançado – Gestão e análise de risco corporativo . Sicurezza.

Carr, M. J., Konda, S. L., Monarch, I., Ulrich, F. C., & Walker, C. F. (1993). Taxonomy-based risk identification (No. CMU/SEI-93-TR-06) . Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh Pa Software Engineering Inst.

Charette, R. N. (1989). Software engineering risk analysis and management . New York: Intertext Publications.

Google Scholar  

Charette, R. N. (2005). Why software fails. IEEE Spectrum, 42 (9), 42–49.

De Bakker, K., Boonstra, A., & Wortmann, H. (2010). Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. International Journal of Project Management, 28 (5), 493–503.

De Marco, T. (1997). The deadline: a novel about project management . Dorset House.

DoD, U. S. (2006). Risk management guide for DoD acquisition . USA: Department of Defense.

Dorofee, A. J., Walker, J. A., Alberts, C. J., Higuera, R. P., & Murphy, R. L. (1996). Continuous risk management guidebook . Carnegie-Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh.

Fairley, R. (1994). Risk management for software projects. IEEE Software, 11 (3), 57–67.

Fan, C. F., & Yu, Y. C. (2004). BBN-based software project risk management. Journal of Systems and Software, 73 (2), 193–203.

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Fu, Y., Li, M., & Chen, F. (2012). Impact propagation and risk assessment of requirement changes for software development projects based on design structure matrix. International Journal of Project Management, 30 (3), 363–373.

Gerrard, P., & Thompson, N. (2002). Risk-based E-business testing . Artech House.

Goguen, A., Stoneburner, G., & Feringa, A. (2002). Risk management guide for information technology systems and underlying technical models for information technology security .

Google Scholar citations. (2017). https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/citations.html . Accessed May 2017.

Hall, E. M. (1998). Managing risk: methods for software systems development . Pearson Education.

Han, W. M., & Huang, S. J. (2007). An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 80 (1), 42–50.

Heldman, K. (2010). Project manager’s spotlight on risk management . John Wiley & Sons.

Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions . http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_6/6_4_4_sensitivity_versus_precision.htm . Accessed May 2017.

Hillson, D. (2002). The Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) as an aid to effective risk management. In: 5th European Project Management conference . Cannes, France (pp. 1–11).

Ivarsson, M., & Gorschek, T. (2011). A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations. Empirical Software Engineering, 16 (3), 365–395.

Jiang, J., & Klein, G. (2000). Software development risks to project effectiveness. The Journal of Systems and Software, 52 (1), 3–10.

Jiang, J., Klein, G., & Discenza, R. (2001). Information systems success as impacted by risks and development strategies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48 (1), 46–55.

Jorgensen, M. (1999). Software quality measurement. Advances in Engineering Software, 30 (12), 907–912.

Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling . Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Khan, A. A., Basri, S., & Dominic, P. D. D. (2014). Communication risks in GSD during RCM: results from SLR. In: Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

Kitchenham, B & Charters, S., 2007 . Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering . Technical report. EBSE.

Kontio, J. (2001). Software engineering risk management: a method, improvement framework, and empirical evaluation . Helsinki University of Technology.

López, C., & Salmeron, J. L. (2012). Risks response strategies for supporting practitioners decision-making in software projects. Procedia Technology, 5 , 437–444.

March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33 (11), 1404–1418.

Munir, H., Wnuk, K., & Runeson, P. (2016). Open innovation in software engineering: a systematic mapping study. Empirical Software Engineering, 21 (2), 684–723.

Neves, S. M., da Silva, C. E. S., Salomon, V. A. P., da Silva, A. F., & Sotomonte, B. E. P. (2014). Risk management in software projects through knowledge management techniques: cases in Brazilian incubated technology-based firms. International Journal of Project Management, 32 (1), 125–138.

Nurdiani, I., Jabangwe, R., Šmite, D., & Damian, D. (2011). Risk identification and risk mitigation instruments for global software development: systematic review and survey results. In: Global Software Engineering Workshop (ICGSEW), 2011 Sixth IEEE International Conference on (pp. 36–41). IEEE.

Oliveira, K. A., Gusmão, C. M., & de Barros Carvalho Filho, E. C. (2012). Mapeamento de Riscos em Projetos de Desenvolvimento Distribuído de Software. In: CONTECSI-international conference on information systems and technology management (vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3837–3866).

Pa, N. C., & Jnr, B. A. (2015). A review on decision making of risk mitigation for software management. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 76 (3).

Pfleeger, S. L., Hatton, L., & Howell, C. C. (2001). Solid software . Prentice Hall PTR.

Pressman, R. S. (2005). Software engineering: a practitioner’s approach . Palgrave Macmillan.

Qinghua, P. (2009). A model of risk assessment of software project based on grey theory. In: Computer Science & Education, 2009. ICCSE'09. 4th International Conference on (pp. 538–541). IEEE.

Raz, T., Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2002). Risk management, project success, and technological uncertainty. R&D Management, 32 (2), 101–109.

Reeves, J. D., Eveleigh, T., Holzer, T. H., & Sarkani, S. (2013). Identification biases and their impact to space system development project performance. Engineering Management Journal, 25 (2), 3–12.

Ren, F. (2016) Understanding Pareto’s principle - the 80-20 rule . https://www.thebalance.com/pareto-s-principle-the-80-20-rule-2275148 . Accessed May 2017.

Salmeron, J. L., & Lopez, C. (2012). Forecasting risk impact on ERP maintenance with augmented fuzzy cognitive maps. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 38 (2), 439–452.

Sarigiannidis, L., & Chatzoglou, P. D. (2014). Quality vs risk: an investigation of their relationship in software development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32 (6), 1073–1082.

Savolainen, P., Ahonen, J. J., & Richardson, I. (2012). Software development project success and failure from the supplier’s perspective: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 30 (4), 458–469.

Silva, S. (2011). Proposta de tratamento de fatores de riscos em desenvolvimento de software para uma organização no setor público . Federal University of Permambuco.

SJR. (2017). Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) . http://www.scimagojr.com/aboutus.php . Accessed May 2017.

Subramanian, G. H., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2007). Software quality and IS project performance improvements from software development process maturity and IS implementation strategies. Journal of Systems and Software, 80 (4), 616–627.

Tang, A. G., & Wang, R. L. (2010, June). Software project risk assessment model based on fuzzy theory. In: Computer and Communication Technologies in Agriculture Engineering (CCTAE), 2010 International Conference On (vol. 2, pp. 328–330). IEEE.

Trigo, T. R., Gusmão, C., & Lins, A. (2008). CBR risk – risk identification method using case based reasoning. In: International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management (vol. 5, No. 2008).

Van Loon, H. (2007). A management methodology to reduce risk and improve quality. IT Professional, 9 (6), 30–35.

Vasconcellos, F. J., Landre, G. B., Cunha, J. A. O., Oliveira, J. L., Ferreira, R. A., & Vincenzi, A. M. (2017). Approaches to strategic alignment of software process improvement: a systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 123 , 45–63.

Wallace, L., & Keil, M. (2004). Software project risks and their effect on outcomes. Communications of the ACM, 47 (4), 68–73.

Wallace, L., Keil, M., & Rai, A. (2004a). Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis. Information Management, 42 (1), 115–125.

Wallace, L., Keil, M., & Rai, A. (2004b). How software project risk affects project performance: an investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sciences, 35 (2), 289–321.

Wysocki, R. K. (2011). Effective project management: traditional, agile, extreme . John Wiley & Sons.

Zhang, H., Babar, M. A., & Tell, P. (2011). Identifying relevant studies in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 53 (6), 625–637.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Brazilian Ministry of Health for the support given to this work.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Center of Informatics (CIn), Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil

Júlio Menezes Jr & Hermano Moura

Department of Biomedical Engineering (DEBM) – Center of Technology and Geosciences (CTG), Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil

Cristine Gusmão

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Júlio Menezes Jr .

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Menezes, J., Gusmão, C. & Moura, H. Risk factors in software development projects: a systematic literature review. Software Qual J 27 , 1149–1174 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-018-9427-5

Download citation

Published : 07 November 2018

Issue Date : September 2019

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-018-9427-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Software risk management
• Risk factors
• Project management
• Systematic literature review
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Distiller SR: Literature Review Software

Smarter reviews: trusted evidence.

Securely automate every stage of your literature review to produce evidence-based research faster, more accurately, and more

transparently at scale.

Software Built for Every Stage of a Literature Review

DistillerSR automates the management of literature collection, screening, and assessment using AI and intelligent workflows. From a systematic literature review to a rapid review to a living review, DistillerSR makes any project simpler to manage and configure to produce transparent, audit-ready, and compliant results.

Broader, Automated Literature Searches

Search more efficiently with DistillerSR’s integrations with data providers, such as PubMed, automatic review updates, and AI-powered duplicate detection and removal.

PubMed Integration

Automatic review updates.

Automatically import newly published references, always keeping literature reviews up-to-date with DistillerSR LitConnect .

Duplicate Detection

Detect and remove duplicate citations preventing skew and bias caused by studies included more than once.

Faster, More Effective Reference Screening

Reduce your screening burden by 60% with DistillerSR. Start working on later stages of your review sooner by finding relevant references faster and addressing conflicts more easily.

AI-Powered Screening

Conflict resolution.

Automatically identifies conflicts and disagreements between literature reviewers for easy resolution.

AI Quality Check

Increase the thoroughness of your literature review by having AI double-check your exclusion decisions and validate your categorization of records with the help of DistillerSR AI Classifiers software module.

Cost-Effective Access  to Full-Text Documents

Ensure your literature review is always up-to-date with DistillerSR’s direct connections to full-text data sources, all the while lowering overall subscription costs.

Ensure your review is always up-to-date with DistillerSR’s direct connections to full-text data sources, all the while lowering overall subscription costs.

Open Access Integrations

Automatically search for and upload full-text documents from PMC , and link directly to source material through DOI.org .

Copyright Compliant Bulk Search

Retrieve full-text articles for the lowest possible cost through Article Galaxy .

Ad-Hoc Document Retrieval

Leverage existing RightFind and Article Galaxy subscriptions, the open access Unpaywall plugin, and internal libraries to access copyright compliant documents.

Simple Yet Powerful Data-Extraction

Simplify data extraction through templates and configurable forms. Extract data easily with in-form validations and calculations, and easily capture repeating, complex data sets.

Cross-Review, Data Reuse

Prevent duplication of effort across your organization and reduce data extraction times with DistillerSR CuratorCR by easily reusing data across literature reviews.

Capturing Complex Output

Easily capture complex data, such as a variable number of time points across multiple studies in an easy-to-understand and ready-to-analyze way.

Smart Forms

Cut down on literature review data cleaning, data conversions, and effective measure calculations with input validation and built-in form calculations.

Automatic and Configurable Reporting

Customizable Reporting Engine

Build reports and schedule automated email updates to stakeholders. Integrate your data with third-party reporting applications and databases with DistillerSR API .

Auto-Generated Reports

Comprehensive audit-trail.

Automatically keeps track of every entry and decision providing transparency and reproducibility in your literature review.

Easy-to-use Literature Review Project Management

Facilitate project management throughout the literature review process with real-time user and project metric monitoring, reusable configurations, and granular user permissions.

Facilitate project management throughout the review process with real-time user and project metric monitoring, reusable configurations, and granular user permissions.

Real-Time User and Project Metrics

Monitor teams and literature review progress in real-time, improving management and quality oversight into projects.

Repeatable, Configurable Processes

Secure literature reviews.

Single sign-on (SSO) and fully configurable user roles and permissions simplify the literature reviewer experience while also ensuring data integrity and security .

I can’t think of a way to do reviews faster than with DistillerSR. Being able to monitor progress and collaborate with team members, no matter where they are located makes my life a lot easier.

DistillerSR Case Studies

Maple Health Group

Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Distillersr frequently asked questions, what types of reviews can be done with distillersr systematic reviews, living reviews, rapid reviews, or clinical evaluation report (cer) literature reviews.

Literature reviews can be a very simple or highly complex process, and literature reviews can use a variety of methods for finding, assessing, and presenting evidence. We describe DistillerSR as a literature review software because it supports all types of reviews , from systematic reviews to rapid reviews, and from living reviews to CER literature reviews.

DistillerSR software is used by over 300 customers in many different industries to support their evidence generation initiatives, from guideline development to HEOR analysis to CERs to post-market surveillance (PMS) and pharmacovigilance.

What are some of DistillerSR’s capabilities that support conducting systematic reviews?

Systematic reviews are the gold standard of literature reviews that aim to identify and screen all evidence relating to a specific research question. DistillerSR facilitates systematic reviews through a configurable, transparent, reproducible process that makes it easy to view the provenance of every cell of data.

DistillerSR was originally designed to support systematic reviews. The software handles dual reviewer screening, conflict resolution, capturing exclusion reasons while you work, risk of bias assessments, duplicate detection, multiple database searches, and reporting templates such as PRISMA. DistillerSR can readily scale for systematic reviews of all sizes, supporting more than 700,000 references per project through a robust enterprise-grade technical architecture . Using software like DistillerSR makes conducting systematic reviews easier to manage and configure to produce transparent evidence-based research faster and more accurately.

How does DistillerSR support clinical evaluation reports (CERs) and performance evaluation reports (PERs) program management?

The new European Union Medical Device Regulation (EU-MDR) and In-Vitro Device Regulation (EU-IVDR) require medical device manufacturers to increase the frequency, traceability, and overall documentation for CERs in the MDR program or PERs in the IVDR counterpart. Literature review software is an ideal tool to help you comply with these regulations.

DistillerSR automates literature reviews to enable a more transparent, repeatable, and auditable process , enabling manufacturers to create and implement a standard framework for literature reviews. This framework for conducting literature reviews can then be incorporated into all CER and PER program management plans consistently across every product, division, and research group.

How can DistillerSR help rapid reviews?

DistillerSR AI is ideal to speed up the rapid review process without compromising on quality. The AI-powered screening enables you to find references faster by continuously reordering relevant references, resulting in accelerated screening. The AI can also double-check your exclusion decisions to ensure relevant references are not left out of the rapid review.

DistillerSR title screening functionality enables you to quickly perform title screening on large numbers of references.

Does DistillerSR support living reviews?

The short answer is yes. DistillerSR has multiple capabilities that automate living systematic reviews , such as automatically importing newly published references into your projects and notifying reviewers that there’s screening to do. You can also put reports on an automated schedule so you’re never caught off guard when important new data is collected.   These capabilities help ensure the latest research is included in your living systematic review and that your review is up-to-date. 

How can DistillerSR help ensure the accuracy of Literature and Systematic reviews?

The quality of systematic reviews is foundational to evidence-based research. However, quality may be compromised because systematic reviews – by their very nature – are often tedious and repetitive, and prone to human error. Tracking all review activity in systematic review software, like DistillerSR, and making it easy to trace the provenance of every cell of data, delivers total transparency and auditability into the systematic review process. DistillerSR enables reviewers to work on the same project simultaneously without the risk of duplicating work or overwriting each other’s results. Configurable workflow filters ensure that the right references are automatically assigned to the right reviewers, and DistillerSR’s cross-project dashboard allows reviewers to monitor to-do lists for all projects from one place.

Why should I add DistillerSR to my Literature and Systematic Review Toolbox and retire my current spreadsheet solution?

It’s estimated that 90% of spreadsheets contain formula errors and approximately 50% have material defects. These errors, coupled with the time and resources necessary to fix them, adversely impact the management of the systematic review process. DistillerSR software was specifically designed to address the challenges faced by systematic review authors, namely the ever-increasing volume of research to screen and extract, review bottlenecks, and regulatory requirements for auditability and transparency, as well as a tool for managing a remote global workforce. Efficiency, consistency, better collaboration, and quality control are just a few of the benefits you’ll get when you choose DistillerSR’s systematic review process over a manual spreadsheet tool for your reviews.

What is the role of AI in your systematic review process?

DistillerSR AI enables the automation of the logistic-heavy tasks involved in conducting a systematic literature review, such as finding references faster using AI to continuously reorder references based on relevance. Continuous AI Reprioritization uses machine learning to learn from the references you are including and excluding and automatically reorder the ones you have left to screen, putting the most pertinent references in front of you first. This means that you find included references much more quickly during the screening process. DistillerSR also uses classifiers , which use NLP to classify and process information in the systematic review.  DistillerSR can also increase the thoroughness of your systematic review by having AI double-check your exclusion decisions.

What about the security and scalability of systematic literature reviews done on DistillerSR?

DistillerSR builds security, scalability, and availability into everything we do, so you can focus on producing evidence-based research faster, more accurately, and more securely with our  systematic review software. We undergo an annual independent third-party audit and certify our products using the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants SOC 2 framework. In terms of scalability, systematic review projects in DistillerSR can easily handle a large number of references; some of our customers have over 700,000 references in their projects.

Do you offer any commitments on the frequency of new product and capability launches?

We pride ourselves on listening to and working with our customers to regularly introduce new capabilities that improve DistillerSR and the systematic review process. We plan on offering two major releases a year in addition to two minor feature enhancements. We notify customers in advance about upcoming releases, host webinars, develop tools and training to introduce the new capabilities, and provide extensive release notes for our reviewers.

I have a unique literature review protocol. Is your software configurable with my literature review data and process?

Configurability is one of the key foundations of DistillerSR software. In fact, with over 300 customers in many different industries, we have yet to see a literature review protocol that our software couldn’t handle. DistillerSR is a professional B2B SaaS company with an exceptional customer success team that will work with you to understand your unique requirements and systematic review process to get you started quickly. Our global support team is available 24/7 to help you.

Still unsure if DistillerSR will meet your systematic literature review requirements?

Adopting a new software is about more than just money. New software is also about commitment and trusting that the new platform will match your systematic review and scalability needs. We have resources to help you in your analysis and decision: check out the systematic review software checklist or the literature review software checklist .

Learn More About DistillerSR

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Software Engineering

Title: data management challenges in agile software projects: a systematic literature review.

Abstract: Agile software development follows an adaptive and iterative approach. However, the management of data (e.g., development data or product data) can pose significant challenges for projects and agile teams. We aim to identify and characterize key challenges faced in data management within agile projects and to examine potential solutions proposed in the literature. We used a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to collect and analyse relevant studies. We identified 45 studies related to data management in agile software development. We then manually analysed and mapped data from these studies to categorise different data management aspects and identify challenges and solutions as identified in those studies. Our findings reveal major challenges such as data integration and quality assurance. We found implications of challenges on team members and the product delivery process. We found that teams frequently struggle to integrate heterogeneous data sources, ensuring data reliability and real-time analytics. Additionally, fragmented data collection and a lack of standardized practices can impede team collaboration and project transparency. The studies have also proposed various solutions to address those challenges, including the use of ontologies, diverse data management strategies, automated tools, and the adoption of quality-focused development methods. Solutions also include training to enhance data quality and analysis. This SLR provides in-depth insights and recommendations for practitioners, emphasizing the importance of robust data management strategies. It suggests integrating advanced data management techniques into agile frameworks to enhance decision-making and improve software project outcomes. The study highlights the need for a more focused approach to data management in agile environments, advocating tailored solutions to meet the unique demands of agile software development.

Submission history

Access paper:.

• Other Formats

References & Citations

• Google Scholar
• Semantic Scholar

BibTeX formatted citation

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, data and media associated with this article, recommenders and search tools.

• Institution

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Accelerate your research with the best systematic literature review tools

The ideal literature review tool helps you make sense of the most important insights in your research field. ATLAS.ti empowers researchers to perform powerful and collaborative analysis using the leading software for literature review.

Finalize your literature review faster with comfort

ATLAS.ti makes it easy to manage, organize, and analyze articles, PDFs, excerpts, and more for your projects. Conduct a deep systematic literature review and get the insights you need with a comprehensive toolset built specifically for your research projects.

Figure out the "why" behind your participant's motivations

Understand the behaviors and emotions that are driving your focus group participants. With ATLAS.ti, you can transform your raw data and turn it into qualitative insights you can learn from. Easily determine user intent in the same spot you're deciphering your overall focus group data.

Visualize your research findings like never before

We make it simple to present your analysis results with meaningful charts, networks, and diagrams. Instead of figuring out how to communicate the insights you just unlocked, we enable you to leverage easy-to-use visualizations that support your goals.

Everything you need to elevate your literature review

Import and organize literature data.

Import and analyze any type of text content – ATLAS.ti supports all standard text and transcription files such as Word and PDF.

Analyze with ease and speed

Utilize easy-to-learn workflows that save valuable time, such as auto coding, sentiment analysis, team collaboration, and more.

Leverage AI-driven tools

Make efficiency a priority and let ATLAS.ti do your work with AI-powered research tools and features for faster results.

Visualize and present findings

With just a few clicks, you can create meaningful visualizations like charts, word clouds, tables, networks, among others for your literature data.

The faster way to make sense of your literature review. Try it for free, today.

A literature review analyzes the most current research within a research area. A literature review consists of published studies from many sources:

• Peer-reviewed academic publications
• Full-length books
• University bulletins
• Conference proceedings
• Dissertations and theses

Literature reviews allow researchers to:

• Summarize the state of the research
• Identify unexplored research inquiries
• Recommend practical applications
• Critique currently published research

Literature reviews are either standalone publications or part of a paper as background for an original research project. A literature review, as a section of a more extensive research article, summarizes the current state of the research to justify the primary research described in the paper.

For example, a researcher may have reviewed the literature on a new supplement's health benefits and concluded that more research needs to be conducted on those with a particular condition. This research gap warrants a study examining how this understudied population reacted to the supplement. Researchers need to establish this research gap through a literature review to persuade journal editors and reviewers of the value of their research.

Consider a literature review as a typical research publication presenting a study, its results, and the salient points scholars can infer from the study. The only significant difference with a literature review treats existing literature as the research data to collect and analyze. From that analysis, a literature review can suggest new inquiries to pursue.

Identify a focus

Similar to a typical study, a literature review should have a research question or questions that analysis can answer. This sort of inquiry typically targets a particular phenomenon, population, or even research method to examine how different studies have looked at the same thing differently. A literature review, then, should center the literature collection around that focus.

Collect and analyze the literature

With a focus in mind, a researcher can collect studies that provide relevant information for that focus. They can then analyze the collected studies by finding and identifying patterns or themes that occur frequently. This analysis allows the researcher to point out what the field has frequently explored or, on the other hand, overlooked.

Suggest implications

The literature review allows the researcher to argue a particular point through the evidence provided by the analysis. For example, suppose the analysis makes it apparent that the published research on people's sleep patterns has not adequately explored the connection between sleep and a particular factor (e.g., television-watching habits, indoor air quality). In that case, the researcher can argue that further study can address this research gap.

External requirements aside (e.g., many academic journals have a word limit of 6,000-8,000 words), a literature review as a standalone publication is as long as necessary to allow readers to understand the current state of the field. Even if it is just a section in a larger paper, a literature review is long enough to allow the researcher to justify the study that is the paper's focus.

Note that a literature review needs only to incorporate a representative number of studies relevant to the research inquiry. For term papers in university courses, 10 to 20 references might be appropriate for demonstrating analytical skills. Published literature reviews in peer-reviewed journals might have 40 to 50 references. One of the essential goals of a literature review is to persuade readers that you have analyzed a representative segment of the research you are reviewing.

Researchers can find published research from various online sources:

• Journal websites
• Research databases
• Search engines (Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar)
• Research repositories
• Social networking sites (Academia, ResearchGate)

Many journals make articles freely available under the term "open access," meaning that there are no restrictions to viewing and downloading such articles. Otherwise, collecting research articles from restricted journals usually requires access from an institution such as a university or a library.

Evidence of a rigorous literature review is more important than the word count or the number of articles that undergo data analysis. Especially when writing for a peer-reviewed journal, it is essential to consider how to demonstrate research rigor in your literature review to persuade reviewers of its scholarly value.

Select field-specific journals

The most significant research relevant to your field focuses on a narrow set of journals similar in aims and scope. Consider who the most prominent scholars in your field are and determine which journals publish their research or have them as editors or reviewers. Journals tend to look favorably on systematic reviews that include articles they have published.

Incorporate recent research

Recently published studies have greater value in determining the gaps in the current state of research. Older research is likely to have encountered challenges and critiques that may render their findings outdated or refuted. What counts as recent differs by field; start by looking for research published within the last three years and gradually expand to older research when you need to collect more articles for your review.

Consider the quality of the research

Literature reviews are only as strong as the quality of the studies that the researcher collects. You can judge any particular study by many factors, including:

• the quality of the article's journal
• the article's research rigor
• the timeliness of the research

The critical point here is that you should consider more than just a study's findings or research outputs when including research in your literature review.

Narrow your research focus

Ideally, the articles you collect for your literature review have something in common, such as a research method or research context. For example, if you are conducting a literature review about teaching practices in high school contexts, it is best to narrow your literature search to studies focusing on high school. You should consider expanding your search to junior high school and university contexts only when there are not enough studies that match your focus.

You can create a project in ATLAS.ti for keeping track of your collected literature. ATLAS.ti allows you to view and analyze full text articles and PDF files in a single project. Within projects, you can use document groups to separate studies into different categories for easier and faster analysis.

For example, a researcher with a literature review that examines studies across different countries can create document groups labeled "United Kingdom," "Germany," and "United States," among others. A researcher can also use ATLAS.ti's global filters to narrow analysis to a particular set of studies and gain insights about a smaller set of literature.

ATLAS.ti allows you to search, code, and analyze text documents and PDF files. You can treat a set of research articles like other forms of qualitative data. The codes you apply to your literature collection allow for analysis through many powerful tools in ATLAS.ti:

• Code Co-Occurrence Explorer
• Code Co-Occurrence Table
• Code-Document Table

Other tools in ATLAS.ti employ machine learning to facilitate parts of the coding process for you. Some of our software tools that are effective for analyzing literature include:

• Named Entity Recognition
• Opinion Mining
• Sentiment Analysis

As long as your documents are text documents or text-enable PDF files, ATLAS.ti's automated tools can provide essential assistance in the data analysis process.

Something went wrong when searching for seed articles. Please try again soon.

No articles were found for that search term.

Author, year The title of the article goes here

LITERATURE REVIEW SOFTWARE FOR BETTER RESEARCH

“This tool really helped me to create good bibtex references for my research papers”

Ali Mohammed-Djafari

Director of Research at LSS-CNRS, France

“Any researcher could use it! The paper recommendations are great for anyone and everyone”

Swansea University, Wales

“As a student just venturing into the world of lit reviews, this is a tool that is outstanding and helping me find deeper results for my work.”

Franklin Jeffers

South Oregon University, USA

“One of the 3 most promising tools that (1) do not solely rely on keywords, (2) does nice visualizations, (3) is easy to use”

Singapore Management University

“Incredibly useful tool to get to know more literature, and to gain insight in existing research”

KU Leuven, Belgium

“Seeing my literature list as a network enhances my thinking process!”

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

“I can’t live without you anymore! I also recommend you to my students.”

Professor at The Chinese University of Hong Kong

“This has helped me so much in researching the literature. Currently, I am beginning to investigate new fields and this has helped me hugely”

Aran Warren

Canterbury University, NZ

“It's nice to get a quick overview of related literature. Really easy to use, and it helps getting on top of the often complicated structures of referencing”

Christoph Ludwig

Technische Universität Dresden, Germany

“Litmaps is extremely helpful with my research. It helps me organize each one of my projects and see how they relate to each other, as well as to keep up to date on publications done in my field”

Daniel Fuller

Clarkson University, USA

“Litmaps is a game changer for finding novel literature... it has been invaluable for my productivity.... I also got my PhD student to use it and they also found it invaluable, finding several gaps they missed”

Varun Venkatesh

Austin Health, Australia

Our Course: Learn and Teach with Litmaps

• Resources Home 🏠
• Try SciSpace Copilot
• Search research papers
• Add Copilot Extension
• Try AI Detector
• Try Paraphraser
• Try Citation Generator
• April Papers
• June Papers
• July Papers

5 literature review tools to ace your research (+2 bonus tools)

Table of Contents

Your literature review is the lore behind your research paper . It comes in two forms, systematic and scoping , both serving the purpose of rounding up previously published works in your research area that led you to write and finish your own.

A literature review is vital as it provides the reader with a critical overview of the existing body of knowledge, your methodology, and an opportunity for research applications.

Some steps to follow while writing your review:

• Pick an accessible topic for your paper
• Do thorough research and gather evidence surrounding your topic
• Read and take notes diligently
• Create a rough structure for your review
• Synthesis your notes and write the first draft
• Edit and proofread your literature review

To make your workload a little lighter, there are many literature review AI tools. These tools can help you find academic articles through AI and answer questions about a research paper.  

Best literature review tools to improve research workflow

A literature review is one of the most critical yet tedious stages in composing a research paper. Many students find it an uphill task since it requires extensive reading and careful organization .

Using some of the best literature review tools listed here, you can make your life easier by overcoming some of the existing challenges in literature reviews. From collecting and classifying to analyzing and publishing research outputs, these tools help you with your literature review and improve your productivity without additional effort or expenses.

1. SciSpace

SciSpace is an AI for academic research that will help find research papers and answer questions about a research paper. You can discover, read, and understand research papers with SciSpace making it an excellent platform for literature review. Featuring a repository with over 270 million research papers, it comes with your AI research assistant called Copilot that offers explanations, summaries , and answers as you read.

Get started now:

Find academic articles through AI

SciSpace has a dedicated literature review tool that finds scientific articles when you search for a question. Based on semantic search, it shows all the research papers relevant for your subject. You can then gather quick insights for all the papers displayed in your search results like methodology, dataset, etc., and figure out all the papers relevant for your research.

Identify relevant articles faster

Abstracts are not always enough to determine whether a paper is relevant to your research question. For starters, you can ask questions to your AI research assistant, SciSpace Copilot to explore the content and better understand the article. Additionally, use the summarize feature to quickly review the methodology and results of a paper and decide if it is worth reading in detail.

Learn in your preferred language

A big barrier non-native English speakers face while conducting a literature review is that a significant portion of scientific literature is published in English. But with SciSpace Copilot, you can review, interact, and learn from research papers in any language you prefer — presently, it supports 75+ languages. The AI will answer questions about a research paper in your mother tongue.

Integrates with Zotero

Many researchers use Zotero to create a library and manage research papers. SciSpace lets you import your scientific articles directly from Zotero into your SciSpace library and use Copilot to comprehend your research papers. You can also highlight key sections, add notes to the PDF as you read, and even turn helpful explanations and answers from Copilot into notes for future review.

Understand math and complex concepts quickly

Come across complex mathematical equations or difficult concepts? Simply highlight the text or select the formula or table, and Copilot will provide an explanation or breakdown of the same in an easy-to-understand manner. You can ask follow-up questions if you need further clarification.

Discover new papers to read without leaving

Highlight phrases or sentences in your research paper to get suggestions for related papers in the field and save time on literature reviews. You can also use the 'Trace' feature to move across and discover connected papers, authors, topics, and more.

SciSpace Copilot is now available as a Chrome extension , allowing you to access its features directly while you browse scientific literature anywhere across the web.

Get citation-backed answers

When you're conducting a literature review, you want credible information with proper references.  Copilot ensures that every piece of information provided by SciSpace Copilot is backed by a direct reference, boosting transparency, accuracy, and trustworthiness.

Ask a question related to the paper you're delving into. Every response from Copilot comes with a clickable citation. This citation leads you straight to the section of the PDF from which the answer was extracted.

By seamlessly integrating answers with citations, SciSpace Copilot assures you of the authenticity and relevance of the information you receive.

2. Mendeley

Mendeley Citation Manager is a free web and desktop application. It helps simplify your citation management workflow significantly. Here are some ways you can speed up your referencing game with Mendeley.

Generate citations and bibliographies

Easily add references from your Mendeley library to your Word document, change your citation style, and create a bibliography, all without leaving your document.

Retrieve references

It allows you to access your references quickly. Search for a term, and it will return results by referencing the year, author, or source.

Add sources to your Mendeley library by dragging PDF to Mendeley Reference Manager. Mendeley will automatically remove the PDF(s) metadata and create a library entry.‌

Read and annotate documents

It helps you highlight and comment across multiple PDFs while keep them all in one place using Mendeley Notebook . Notebook pages are not tied to a reference and let you quote from many PDFs.

A big part of many literature review workflows, Zotero is a free, open-source tool for managing citations that works as a plug-in on your browser. It helps you gather the information you need, cite your sources, lets you attach PDFs, notes, and images to your citations, and create bibliographies.

Import research articles to your database

Search for research articles on a keyword, and add relevant results to your database. Then, select the articles you are most interested in, and import them into Zotero.

Add bibliography in a variety of formats

With Zotero, you don’t have to scramble for different bibliography formats. Simply use the Zotero-Word plug-in to insert in-text citations and generate a bibliography.

Share your research

You can save a paper and sync it with an online library to easily share your research for group projects. Zotero can be used to create your database and decrease the time you spend formatting citations.

Sysrev is an AI too for article review that facilitates screening, collaboration, and data extraction from academic publications, abstracts, and PDF documents using machine learning. The platform is free and supports public and Open Access projects only.

Some of the features of Sysrev include:

Group labels

Group labels can be a powerful concept for creating database tables from documents. When exported and re-imported, each group label creates a new table. To make labels for a project, go into the manage -> labels section of the project.

Group labels enable project managers to pull table information from documents. It makes it easier to communicate review results for specific articles.

Track reviewer performance

Sysrev's label counting tool provides filtering and visualization options for keeping track of the distribution of labels throughout the project's progress. Project managers can check their projects at any point to track progress and the reviewer's performance.

Tool for concordance

The Sysrev tool for concordance allows project administrators and reviewers to perform analysis on their labels. Concordance is measured by calculating the number of times users agree on the labels they have extracted.

Colandr is a free, open-source, internet-based analysis and screening software used as an AI for academic research. It was designed to ease collaboration across various stages of the systematic review procedure. The tool can be a little complex to use. So, here are the steps involved in working with Colandr.

Create a review

The first step to using Colandr is setting up an organized review project. This is helpful to librarians who are assisting researchers with systematic reviews.

The planning stage is setting the review's objectives along with research queries. Any reviewer can review the details of the planning stage. However, they can only be modified by the author for the review.

Citation screening/import

In this phase, users can upload their results from database searches. Colandr also offers an automated deduplication system.

Full-text screening

The system in Colandr will discover the combination of terms and expressions that are most useful for the reader. If an article is selected, it will be moved to the final step.

Data extraction/export

Colandr data extraction is more efficient than the manual method. It creates the form fields for data extraction during the planning stage of the review procedure. Users can decide to revisit or modify the form for data extraction after completing the initial screening.

Bonus literature review tools

SRDR+ is a web-based tool for extracting and managing systematic review or meta-analysis data. It is open and has a searchable archive of systematic reviews and their data.

7. Plot Digitizer

Plot Digitizer is an efficient tool for extracting information from graphs and images, equipped with many features that facilitate data extraction. The program comes with a free online application, which is adequate to extract data quickly.

Final thoughts

Writing a literature review is not easy. It’s a time-consuming process, which can become tiring at times. The literature review tools mentioned in this blog do an excellent job of maximizing your efforts and helping you write literature reviews much more efficiently. With them, you can breathe a sigh of relief and give more time to your research.

As you dive into your literature review, don’t forget to use SciSpace ResearchGPT to streamline the process. It facilitates your research and helps you explore key findings, summary, and other components of the paper easily.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. what is rrl in research.

RRL stands for Review of Related Literature and sometimes interchanged with ‘Literature Review.’ RRL is a body of studies relevant to the topic being researched. These studies may be in the form of journal articles, books, reports, and other similar documents. Review of related literature is used to support an argument or theory being made by the researcher, as well as to provide information on how others have approached the same topic.

2. What are few softwares and tools available for literature review?

• SciSpace Discover

• Mendeley

• Zotero

• Sysrev

• Colandr

• SRDR+

3. How to generate an online literature review?

The Scispace Discover tool, which offers an excellent repository of millions of peer-reviewed articles and resources, will help you generate or create a literature review easily. You may find relevant information by utilizing the filter option, checking its credibility, tracing related topics and articles, and citing in widely accepted formats with a single click.

4. What does it mean to synthesize literature?

To synthesize literature is to take the main points and ideas from a number of sources and present them in a new way. The goal is to create a new piece of writing that pulls together the most important elements of all the sources you read. Make recommendations based on them, and connect them to the research.

5. Should we write abstract for literature review?

Abstracts, particularly for the literature review section, are not required. However, an abstract for the research paper, on the whole, is useful for summarizing the paper and letting readers know what to expect from it. It can also be used to summarize the main points of the paper so that readers have a better understanding of the paper's content before they read it.

6. How do you evaluate the quality of a literature review?

• Whether it is clear and well-written.

• Whether Information is current and up to date.

• Does it cover all of the relevant sources on the topic.

• Does it provide enough evidence to support its conclusions.

7. Is literature review mandatory?

Yes. Literature review is a mandatory part of any research project. It is a critical step in the process that allows you to establish the scope of your research and provide a background for the rest of your work.

8. What are the sources for a literature review?

• Reports

• Theses

• Conference proceedings

• Company reports

• Some government publications

• Journals

• Books

• Newspapers

• Articles by professional associations

• Indexes

• Databases

• Catalogues

• Encyclopaedias

• Dictionaries

• Bibliographies

• Citation indexes

• Statistical data from government websites

9. What is the difference between a systematic review and a literature review?

A systematic review is a form of research that uses a rigorous method to generate knowledge from both published and unpublished data. A literature review, on the other hand, is a critical summary of an area of research within the context of what has already been published.

Suggested reads!

Types of essays in academic writing Citation Machine Alternatives — A comparison of top citation tools 2023

QuillBot vs SciSpace: Choose the best AI-paraphrasing tool

ChatPDF vs. SciSpace Copilot: Unveiling the best tool for your research

You might also like

Consensus GPT vs. SciSpace GPT: Choose the Best GPT for Research

Literature Review and Theoretical Framework: Understanding the Differences

Types of Essays in Academic Writing - Quick Guide (2024)

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

SUCCESS FACTORS IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT. LITERATURE REVIEW

Projects are widely recognized nowadays by organizations. They are part of the activities of both education providers and companies. Project management has been applied in organizations since the 1960's. However, despite garnering experience and improving on available methods, a significant number of projects (including educational ones) still fail. According to the Gartner Group's worldwide research, the percentage of unsuccessful projects (failed and challenged) as of the year 2012 was 61%. Therefore, the question, " what drives the success of the project? " , remains a fresh issue. Researchers thus undertake to continuously narrow this knowledge gap. However, as the issue is a complex one, many ideas, concepts and pieces of advice are given. In the article, based on the literature review, different approaches to projects' success are presented, discussed and systemized. The factors influencing the success of projects are identified and presented in the following areas: (1) applied methods, (2) people in projects, (3) and organizational context. Method-related issues are about utilizing tools and techniques in project management. Moreover, they cover the application of global standards while managing the projects. The discussion on the influence of the people involved in the project is not limited to human resources only. Widely recognized and fresh ideas of the Stakeholder Management concept are discussed as well. Last, but not least, the issue of the organizational context in which the projects are executed is emphasized. This matter is of high importance nowadays as the complexity and the number of managed projects has increased significantly within the last twenty years. Furthermore, the author outlines some characteristics related to the different types of projects and their associated success factors. Some advice for practitioners is given on what kind of action should be undertaken to increase the success of projects. The findings of this article can be of special interest to managers of any type of projects, including international ones where Stakeholder Management and organizational issues tend to play an important role in project success.

Related Papers

ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering

Tanmay Bhosale

This research paper comprises three different case studies taken under consideration and involves a step-by-step analysis of all three. The analysis of these case studies is based on the fundamentals of Project Management Techniques and the way it was implemented by the Project Managers during the different phases of the project to achieve success. The purpose of this research is to study the projects which avoided failure even at the toughest times and proved any project can be successful if managed and executed with proper project management techniques. The methodology used for conducting this research was Interview methodology aligned with the Case study approach. Project Managers of the mentioned projects were interviewed to accumulate accurate and authentic information to analyze, discuss and reach conclusion. Overall, the reason behind the study is to demonstrate that under appropriate guidance by project managers and the use of relevant project management techniques, factors ...

Mahmoud Rajablu , Marthandan Govindan , Wan Fadzilah Wan Yusoff

Muath Abu Arqoub

Interdisciplinary Management Research

Emil Crisan

The high frequency of using projects in all fields determined the increasing importance of adequate project management. Considering the direct relationship between reaching projects’ objectives and the long term development of an organization, aspects regarding projects’ success and the success factors of projects are topics of great interest in project management literature. Reaching projects’ objectives in compliance with constraints of cost, time and performance is usually not sufficient to determine whether the project was successful or not. While literature provides different perspectives regarding this topic, in practice things get sometimes even more complicated, project success being often vaguely defined. This article aims to present an overview on the topic of project success and identify main success factors when dealing with projects using a quantitative research.

Baker alkhlaifat

hamid aladpoosh

Industrial Engineering & Management

abdulbaset frefer

Project Management Journal

This article presents a new model encompassing all the important critical attributes needed to measure project success across different stakeholder groups. The study investigates the possibility that project failure is a result of the interpretations of the criteria and factors used for success by multiple stakeholder groups. Unique projects must have their outcome parameters monitored and controlled to minimize the chances of failure and the likely major financial and managerial ramifications for the organization. Early testing of the model supports its use to increase the shared, multiple stakeholder perception of project success, leading to more informed decision making and motivation of employees.

Sustainability

Javier Vilchez Romero

From the reports of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) Office of Evaluation and Oversight (OVE), a limited analysis of the factors affecting the execution of development cooperation projects was identified. Thanks to the review of scientific articles by renowned authors, effectiveness, relevance, competencies and motivation, sustainability, risk management, and additionality were evaluated using the analysis of relationships between variables and causality using IBM SPSS and fsQCA 3.0 software, respectively. As a result, a model was obtained that relates the components, factors, and roles that make up the stakeholder matrix. It was concluded that the effectiveness factor has a significant relationship with the success of a project; however, this could not be possible without a good development of sustainability and risk management, the latter being a necessary and sufficient condition for success in this type of projects. Currently, risk management has not only become a neces...

Project & Program Management eJournal

Project Management in Guinea is growing rapidly such as in many developing countries. It’s heavily used now in diverse area such as in agriculture, construction, manufacturing, telecoms, IT, education, and so on. This high prevalence of making projects in various sectors determined the increasing importance of effective project management. Managing project rightly at a right time with multiple constraints (human and technical aspect) remains the main challenge for project managers. The relationship concerning successful project and the project success factors are topics of great interest in project management. The paper highlights the most Critical Success Factors (CSFs) through project planning, project top management support and stakeholder involvement in project implementation in Guinea.

RELATED PAPERS

Mieke van Driel

Michael A. Gass

Neuropsychologia

Alexandra Economou

Journal of Agriculture and Applied Biology

Dr. Hari Kumar Shrestha

Bushra saba

Journal of Wildlife Diseases

Claudio Martinez

Geomorphology

Andy Bruckner

IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion

Jose Manuel

Mafalda Laranjo

IEEE Transactions on Communications

Faramarz Fekri

Annals of West University of Timisoara - Mathematics

Ismet Ozdemir

Physical Review Letters

Deepak Dhar

Current Psychiatry Reports

Shishuka Malhotra

Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme

Hubert Marotte

Ilija Lalošević

Computational Linguistics

Roberto Basili

International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Rajkumar Bidlan

BMC Public Health

Fahmida Khatun , Mohammad Shomik

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

Oscar Barawid

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Arthur Slutsky

Journal of Governance, Taxation and Auditing

deny larasdiputra

International Journal of Smart Grid - ijSmartGrid

Habib BENBOUHENNI

Chemosphere

Suziane Premoli

Behrouz Hajiloo

Droit et société

Puccio-Den Deborah

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

College & Research Libraries ( C&RL ) is the official, bi-monthly, online-only scholarly research journal of the Association of College & Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association.

C&RL is now on Instragram! Follow us today.

Jane Kinkus is Mathematical Sciences Librarian and Associate Professor of Library Science in the Purdue University Library; e-mail:[email protected].

C&RL News

ALA JobLIST

Advertising Information

• Research is an Activity and a Subject of Study: A Proposed Metaconcept and Its Practical Application (72410 views)
• Information Code-Switching: A Study of Language Preferences in Academic Libraries (38800 views)
• Three Perspectives on Information Literacy in Academia: Talking to Librarians, Faculty, and Students (27319 views)

Project Management Skills: A Literature Review and Content Analysis of Librarian Position Announcements

Project management is pervasive in the literature and practice of many industries, including finance, IT, engineering, and biotechnology. The recent rapid proliferation of complex library services such as virtual reference and digital repositories suggests that the role of librarians is becoming increasingly project-oriented. This article presents an overview of professional project management and a literature review from the library science and management literatures. A content analysis of librarian position announcements was conducted, and indicates that project management skills are in demand for librarians. However, it is unclear whether current library science literature and education adequately address project management skills or other traditionally “extra-librarian” leadership qualities now needed to effectively manage project based initiatives in libraries.

Article Views (Last 12 Months)

Contact ACRL for article usage statistics from 2010-April 2017.

Article Views (By Year/Month)

© 2024 Association of College and Research Libraries , a division of the American Library Association

Print ISSN: 0010-0870 | Online ISSN: 2150-6701

ALA Privacy Policy

ISSN: 2150-6701

10 Best Literature Review Tools for Researchers

This post may contain affiliate links that allow us to earn a commission at no expense to you. Learn more

Boost your research game with these Best Literature Review Tools for Researchers! Uncover hidden gems, organize your findings, and ace your next research paper!

Conducting literature reviews poses challenges for researchers due to the overwhelming volume of information available and the lack of efficient methods to manage and analyze it.

Researchers struggle to identify key sources, extract relevant information, and maintain accuracy while manually conducting literature reviews. This leads to inefficiency, errors, and difficulty in identifying gaps or trends in existing literature.

Advancements in technology have resulted in a variety of literature review tools. These tools streamline the process, offering features like automated searching, filtering, citation management, and research data extraction. They save time, improve accuracy, and provide valuable insights for researchers. 

In this article, we present a curated list of the 10 best literature review tools, empowering researchers to make informed choices and revolutionize their systematic literature review process.

Table of Contents

Top 10 Literature Review Tools for Researchers: In A Nutshell (2023)

#1. semantic scholar – a free, ai-powered research tool for scientific literature.

Semantic Scholar is a cutting-edge literature review tool that researchers rely on for its comprehensive access to academic publications. With its advanced AI algorithms and extensive database, it simplifies the discovery of relevant research papers. 

By employing semantic analysis, users can explore scholarly articles based on context and meaning, making it a go-to resource for scholars across disciplines. 

Additionally, Semantic Scholar offers personalized recommendations and alerts, ensuring researchers stay updated with the latest developments. However, users should be cautious of potential limitations. 

Not all scholarly content may be indexed, and occasional false positives or inaccurate associations can occur. Furthermore, the tool primarily focuses on computer science and related fields, potentially limiting coverage in other disciplines. 

Researchers should be mindful of these considerations and supplement Semantic Scholar with other reputable resources for a comprehensive literature review. Despite these caveats, Semantic Scholar remains a valuable tool for streamlining research and staying informed.

#2. Elicit – Research assistant using language models like GPT-3

Elicit is a game-changing literature review tool that has gained popularity among researchers worldwide. With its user-friendly interface and extensive database of scholarly articles, it streamlines the research process, saving time and effort. 

The tool employs advanced algorithms to provide personalized recommendations, ensuring researchers discover the most relevant studies for their field. Elicit also promotes collaboration by enabling users to create shared folders and annotate articles.

However, users should be cautious when using Elicit. It is important to verify the credibility and accuracy of the sources found through the tool, as the database encompasses a wide range of publications. 

Additionally, occasional glitches in the search function have been reported, leading to incomplete or inaccurate results. While Elicit offers tremendous benefits, researchers should remain vigilant and cross-reference information to ensure a comprehensive literature review.

#3. Scite.Ai – Your personal research assistant

Scite.Ai is a popular literature review tool that revolutionizes the research process for scholars. With its innovative citation analysis feature, researchers can evaluate the credibility and impact of scientific articles, making informed decisions about their inclusion in their own work. 

By assessing the context in which citations are used, Scite.Ai ensures that the sources selected are reliable and of high quality, enabling researchers to establish a strong foundation for their research.

However, while Scite.Ai offers numerous advantages, there are a few aspects to be cautious about. As with any data-driven tool, occasional errors or inaccuracies may arise, necessitating researchers to cross-reference and verify results with other reputable sources. 

Moreover, Scite.Ai’s coverage may be limited in certain subject areas and languages, with a possibility of missing relevant studies, especially in niche fields or non-English publications. 

Therefore, researchers should supplement the use of Scite.Ai with additional resources to ensure comprehensive literature coverage and avoid any potential gaps in their research.

Rayyan offers the following paid plans:

• Monthly Plan: $20
• Yearly Plan: $12

#4. DistillerSR – Literature Review Software

DistillerSR is a powerful literature review tool trusted by researchers for its user-friendly interface and robust features. With its advanced search capabilities, researchers can quickly find relevant studies from multiple databases, saving time and effort. 

The tool offers comprehensive screening and data extraction functionalities, streamlining the review process and improving the reliability of findings. Real-time collaboration features also facilitate seamless teamwork among researchers.

While DistillerSR offers numerous advantages, there are a few considerations. Users should invest time in understanding the tool’s features and functionalities to maximize its potential. Additionally, the pricing structure may be a factor for individual researchers or small teams with limited budgets.

Despite occasional technical glitches reported by some users, the developers actively address these issues through updates and improvements, ensuring a better user experience. 

Overall, DistillerSR empowers researchers to navigate the vast sea of information, enhancing the quality and efficiency of literature reviews while fostering collaboration among research teams .

#5. Rayyan – AI Powered Tool for Systematic Literature Reviews

Rayyan is a powerful literature review tool that simplifies the research process for scholars and academics. With its user-friendly interface and efficient management features, Rayyan is highly regarded by researchers worldwide. 

It allows users to import and organize large volumes of scholarly articles, making it easier to identify relevant studies for their research projects. The tool also facilitates seamless collaboration among team members, enhancing productivity and streamlining the research workflow. 

However, it’s important to be aware of a few aspects. The free version of Rayyan has limitations, and upgrading to a premium subscription may be necessary for additional functionalities. 

Users should also be mindful of occasional technical glitches and compatibility issues, promptly reporting any problems. Despite these considerations, Rayyan remains a valuable asset for researchers, providing an effective solution for literature review tasks.

Rayyan offers both free and paid plans:

• Professional: $8.25/month
• Student: $4/month
• Pro Team: $8.25/month
• Team+: $24.99/month

#6. Consensus – Use AI to find you answers in scientific research

Consensus is a cutting-edge literature review tool that has become a go-to choice for researchers worldwide. Its intuitive interface and powerful capabilities make it a preferred tool for navigating and analyzing scholarly articles. 

With Consensus, researchers can save significant time by efficiently organizing and accessing relevant research material.People consider Consensus for several reasons. 

Its advanced search algorithms and filters help researchers sift through vast amounts of information, ensuring they focus on the most relevant articles. By streamlining the literature review process, Consensus allows researchers to extract valuable insights and accelerate their research progress.

However, there are a few factors to watch out for when using Consensus. As with any automated tool, researchers should exercise caution and independently verify the accuracy and relevance of the generated results. Complex or niche topics may present challenges, resulting in limited search results. Researchers should also supplement Consensus with manual searches to ensure comprehensive coverage of the literature.

Overall, Consensus is a valuable resource for researchers seeking to optimize their literature review process. By leveraging its features alongside critical thinking and manual searches, researchers can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of their work, advancing their research endeavors to new heights.

Consensus offers both free and paid plans:

• Premium: $9.99/month
• Enterprise: Custom

#7. RAx – AI-powered reading assistant

Consensus is a revolutionary literature review tool that has transformed the research process for scholars worldwide. With its user-friendly interface and advanced features, it offers a vast database of academic publications across various disciplines, providing access to relevant and up-to-date literature. 

Using advanced algorithms and machine learning, Consensus delivers personalized recommendations, saving researchers time and effort in their literature search. 

However, researchers should be cautious of potential biases in the recommendation system and supplement their search with manual verification to ensure a comprehensive review. 

Additionally, occasional inaccuracies in metadata have been reported, making it essential for users to cross-reference information with reliable sources. Despite these considerations, Consensus remains an invaluable tool for enhancing the efficiency and quality of literature reviews.

RAx offers both free and paid plans. Currently offering 50% discounts as of July 2023:

• Premium: $6/month $3/month
• Premium with Copilot: $8/month $4/month

#8. Lateral – Advance your research with AI

“Lateral” is a revolutionary literature review tool trusted by researchers worldwide. With its user-friendly interface and powerful search capabilities, it simplifies the process of gathering and analyzing scholarly articles. 

By leveraging advanced algorithms and machine learning, Lateral saves researchers precious time by retrieving relevant articles and uncovering new connections between them, fostering interdisciplinary exploration.

While Lateral provides numerous benefits, users should exercise caution. It is advisable to cross-reference its findings with other sources to ensure a comprehensive review. 

Additionally, researchers must be mindful of potential biases introduced by the tool’s algorithms and should critically evaluate and interpret the results. 

Despite these considerations, Lateral remains an indispensable resource, empowering researchers to delve deeper into their fields of study and make valuable contributions to the academic community.

RAx offers both free and paid plans:

• Premium: $10.98
• Pro: $27.46

#9. Iris AI – Introducing the researcher workspace

Iris AI is an innovative literature review tool that has transformed the research process for academics and scholars. With its advanced artificial intelligence capabilities, Iris AI offers a seamless and efficient way to navigate through a vast array of academic papers and publications. 

Researchers are drawn to this tool because it saves valuable time by automating the tedious task of literature review and provides comprehensive coverage across multiple disciplines. 

Its intelligent recommendation system suggests related articles, enabling researchers to discover hidden connections and broaden their knowledge base. However, caution should be exercised while using Iris AI. 

While the tool excels at surfacing relevant papers, researchers should independently evaluate the quality and validity of the sources to ensure the reliability of their work. 

It’s important to note that Iris AI may occasionally miss niche or lesser-known publications, necessitating a supplementary search using traditional methods. 

Additionally, being an algorithm-based tool, there is a possibility of false positives or missed relevant articles due to the inherent limitations of automated text analysis. Nevertheless, Iris AI remains an invaluable asset for researchers, enhancing the quality and efficiency of their research endeavors.

Iris AI offers different pricing plans to cater to various user needs:

• Basic: Free
• Premium: Monthly ($82.41), Quarterly ($222.49), and Annual ($791.07)

#10. Scholarcy – Summarize your literature through AI

Scholarcy is a powerful literature review tool that helps researchers streamline their work. By employing advanced algorithms and natural language processing, it efficiently analyzes and summarizes academic papers, saving researchers valuable time. 

Scholarcy’s ability to extract key information and generate concise summaries makes it an attractive option for scholars looking to quickly grasp the main concepts and findings of multiple papers.

However, it is important to exercise caution when relying solely on Scholarcy. While it provides a useful starting point, engaging with the original research papers is crucial to ensure a comprehensive understanding. 

Scholarcy’s automated summarization may not capture the nuanced interpretations or contextual information presented in the full text. 

Researchers should also be aware that certain types of documents, particularly those with heavy mathematical or technical content, may pose challenges for the tool. 

Despite these considerations, Scholarcy remains a valuable resource for researchers seeking to enhance their literature review process and improve overall efficiency.

Scholarcy offer the following pricing plans:

• Browser Extension and Flashcards: Free 
• Personal Library: $9.99
• Academic Institution License: $8K+

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, conducting a comprehensive literature review is a crucial aspect of any research project, and the availability of reliable and efficient tools can greatly facilitate this process for researchers. This article has explored the top 10 literature review tools that have gained popularity among researchers.

Moreover, the rise of AI-powered tools like Iris.ai and Sci.ai promises to revolutionize the literature review process by automating various tasks and enhancing research efficiency. 

Ultimately, the choice of literature review tool depends on individual preferences and research needs, but the tools presented in this article serve as valuable resources to enhance the quality and productivity of research endeavors. 

Researchers are encouraged to explore and utilize these tools to stay at the forefront of knowledge in their respective fields and contribute to the advancement of science and academia.

Q1. What are literature review tools for researchers?

Literature review tools for researchers are software or online platforms designed to assist researchers in efficiently conducting literature reviews. These tools help researchers find, organize, analyze, and synthesize relevant academic papers and other sources of information.

Q2. What criteria should researchers consider when choosing literature review tools?

When choosing literature review tools, researchers should consider factors such as the tool’s search capabilities, database coverage, user interface, collaboration features, citation management, annotation and highlighting options, integration with reference management software, and data extraction capabilities. 

It’s also essential to consider the tool’s accessibility, cost, and technical support.

Q3. Are there any literature review tools specifically designed for systematic reviews or meta-analyses?

Yes, there are literature review tools that cater specifically to systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which involve a rigorous and structured approach to reviewing existing literature. These tools often provide features tailored to the specific needs of these methodologies, such as:

Screening and eligibility assessment: Systematic review tools typically offer functionalities for screening and assessing the eligibility of studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. This streamlines the process of selecting relevant studies for analysis.

Data extraction and quality assessment: These tools often include templates and forms to facilitate data extraction from selected studies. Additionally, they may provide features for assessing the quality and risk of bias in individual studies.

Meta-analysis support: Some literature review tools include statistical analysis features that assist in conducting meta-analyses. These features can help calculate effect sizes, perform statistical tests, and generate forest plots or other visual representations of the meta-analytic results.

Reporting assistance: Many tools provide templates or frameworks for generating systematic review reports, ensuring compliance with established guidelines such as PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses).

Q4. Can literature review tools help with organizing and annotating collected references?

Yes, literature review tools often come equipped with features to help researchers organize and annotate collected references. Some common functionalities include:

Reference management: These tools enable researchers to import references from various sources, such as databases or PDF files, and store them in a central library. They typically allow you to create folders or tags to organize references based on themes or categories.

Annotation capabilities: Many tools provide options for adding annotations, comments, or tags to individual references or specific sections of research articles. This helps researchers keep track of important information, highlight key findings, or note potential connections between different sources.

Full-text search: Literature review tools often offer full-text search functionality, allowing you to search within the content of imported articles or documents. This can be particularly useful when you need to locate specific information or keywords across multiple references.

Integration with citation managers: Some literature review tools integrate with popular citation managers like Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote, allowing seamless transfer of references and annotations between platforms.

By leveraging these features, researchers can streamline the organization and annotation of their collected references, making it easier to retrieve relevant information during the literature review process.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

We maintain and update science journals and scientific metrics. Scientific metrics data are aggregated from publicly available sources. Please note that we do NOT publish research papers on this platform. We do NOT accept any manuscript.

2012-2024 © scijournal.org