globalization cons essay

An economist explains the pros and cons of globalization

Piling up: Global trade has increased, but has it been a positive or negative force? Image:  REUTERS/Tyrone Siu

.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo{-webkit-transition:all 0.15s ease-out;transition:all 0.15s ease-out;cursor:pointer;-webkit-text-decoration:none;text-decoration:none;outline:none;color:inherit;}.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo:hover,.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo[data-hover]{-webkit-text-decoration:underline;text-decoration:underline;}.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo:focus,.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo[data-focus]{box-shadow:0 0 0 3px rgba(168,203,251,0.5);} Gita Gopinath

Ceri parker.

.chakra .wef-9dduvl{margin-top:16px;margin-bottom:16px;line-height:1.388;font-size:1.25rem;}@media screen and (min-width:56.5rem){.chakra .wef-9dduvl{font-size:1.125rem;}} Explore and monitor how .chakra .wef-15eoq1r{margin-top:16px;margin-bottom:16px;line-height:1.388;font-size:1.25rem;color:#F7DB5E;}@media screen and (min-width:56.5rem){.chakra .wef-15eoq1r{font-size:1.125rem;}} Global Governance is affecting economies, industries and global issues

.chakra .wef-1nk5u5d{margin-top:16px;margin-bottom:16px;line-height:1.388;color:#2846F8;font-size:1.25rem;}@media screen and (min-width:56.5rem){.chakra .wef-1nk5u5d{font-size:1.125rem;}} Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale

Stay up to date:, global governance.

Every industrial revolution has driven a wave of globalization. The first wave was driven by innovations such as the steam engine and the industrial weaving machine; the second by the assembly line, the car and the plane; and the third by the digital revolution.

As we enter the fourth wave of globalization, driven by the digital revolution, there is renewed debate over whether it is a beneficial force: powering economic growth, and allowing the spread of ideas to improve people’s lives; or whether it erodes communities, and widens the gap between the elites and the rest of the world.

Globalization results in increased trade and lower prices. It heightens competition within domestic product, capital, and labour markets, as well as among countries adopting different trade and investment strategies.

But how do these impacts net out? What are the positive and negative effects of globalization? The below is an edited transcript of a conversation with Gita Gopinath, Chief Economist of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Overall, what are the advantages of globalization?

The advantages of globalization are actually much like the advantages of technological improvement. They have very similar effects: they raise output in countries, raise productivity, create more jobs, raise wages, and lower prices of products in the world economy.

What might be the advantages of globalization that someone would feel in their day-to-day life?

I think something that's not sufficiently appreciated about, for instance, international trade is that it reduces the prices of goods that they consume. So if you look at day-to-day things that you purchase, in terms of washing machines, or cars, or even clothing, because of international trade we've had a decline in prices of these goods, so they have become far more affordable for a lot of people in the world.

How have the benefits played out in advanced economies versus poorer ones over the last three decades?

Both advanced economies and developing economies have benefited overall in terms of having higher productivity, more job creation, and higher wages. As we've always known, and this is true again with technology, there are always some winners and losers. So there are communities and there are workers who lose out when there is more trade integration. That is what we're seeing right now in terms of discontent with international trade.

Who have been the biggest losers?

The biggest losers from international trade are always those whose skills have a cheaper competitor in a different market. So, in the case of the US, it's been those who work in the manufacturing sector because jobs in the manufacturing sector have been outsourced to countries where labour is far cheaper.

On the other hand, in developing countries, more capital-intensive goods get imported more cheaply from the outside. So if you're a manufacturer of a capital-intensive good in a developing country you tend to lose because of that competition.

This is how it is with international trade: production goes to wherever it is most efficient to produce. So, when people in any country are exposed to this kind of competition, some win and some lose.

Is it possible as an economist to come up with a verdict? Has this wave of globalized trade been a net positive or a net negative?

If you say, I'm going to look at it from a measure of overall effect on a country's income, on its purchasing power, on the prices that its people pay, overall I think the evidence that we have all points to it being a net positive.

Now, if you frame the question as, has international trade been good for the manufacturing worker in the US? Then the answer to that would be “not fully”; it's been very costly in terms of jobs and wages for them.

How optimistic are you that this next wave of globalization offers a better future?

I would make a couple of points. First, the previous waves of globalization have been quite successful in lifting a large number of people out of poverty and so we should appreciate that.

The second thing is that any form of globalization will generate winners and losers. So even if you have the perfect, most optimal international trade agreements, there will always be those who lose out because of competition, in the exact same way that people lose out whenever there's a new technology being developed.

And so if we want to make sure that the next wave of globalization is even more successful, it has to be complemented with good, sound domestic policies that help those who are getting left out.

How optimistic are you that the trade war between the US and China will be swiftly resolved?

It's absolutely essential that it be resolved, and it gets resolved in a way that's long lasting. The world economy has lived with the uncertainty about trade tensions for a while now and if there is any solution and there is a sense that the solution is only transitory and something can again get triggered in the future, I think that's very costly.

I'd say I'm mildly optimistic because I think leaders in the world are recognizing that these trade tensions are having a negative effect on their economies and so it would make sense to sit down and resolve it.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:

The agenda .chakra .wef-n7bacu{margin-top:16px;margin-bottom:16px;line-height:1.388;font-weight:400;} weekly.

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

.chakra .wef-1dtnjt5{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;} More on Global Governance .chakra .wef-17xejub{-webkit-flex:1;-ms-flex:1;flex:1;justify-self:stretch;-webkit-align-self:stretch;-ms-flex-item-align:stretch;align-self:stretch;} .chakra .wef-nr1rr4{display:-webkit-inline-box;display:-webkit-inline-flex;display:-ms-inline-flexbox;display:inline-flex;white-space:normal;vertical-align:middle;text-transform:uppercase;font-size:0.75rem;border-radius:0.25rem;font-weight:700;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;line-height:1.2;-webkit-letter-spacing:1.25px;-moz-letter-spacing:1.25px;-ms-letter-spacing:1.25px;letter-spacing:1.25px;background:none;padding:0px;color:#B3B3B3;-webkit-box-decoration-break:clone;box-decoration-break:clone;-webkit-box-decoration-break:clone;}@media screen and (min-width:37.5rem){.chakra .wef-nr1rr4{font-size:0.875rem;}}@media screen and (min-width:56.5rem){.chakra .wef-nr1rr4{font-size:1rem;}} See all

This is why the number of refugees could double in the next decade, according to the head of UNHCR

Liam Coleman

March 7, 2024

AI: Will governance catch up with the tech in 2024?

David Elliott

March 1, 2024

The World Economic Forum: A Swiss success story

Selina Hänni and Micol Lucchi

January 17, 2024

Workers' rights are vital to revitalizing democracy. Here's why

Luc Triangle

January 15, 2024

How to thrive when uncertainty becomes the new norm for governance

January 11, 2024

How to build business resilience in an era of risk turbulence

Carolina Klint

January 10, 2024

• Business Essentials
• Leadership & Management
• Credential of Leadership, Impact, and Management in Business (CLIMB)
• Entrepreneurship & Innovation
• *New* Digital Transformation
• Finance & Accounting
• Business in Society
• For Organizations
• Support Portal
• Media Coverage
• Founding Donors
• Leadership Team

• Harvard Business School →
• HBS Online →
• Business Insights →

Business Insights

Harvard Business School Online's Business Insights Blog provides the career insights you need to achieve your goals and gain confidence in your business skills.

• Career Development
• Communication
• Decision-Making
• Earning Your MBA
• Negotiation
• News & Events
• Productivity
• Staff Spotlight
• Student Profiles
• Work-Life Balance
• Alternative Investments
• Business Analytics
• Business Strategy
• Business and Climate Change
• Design Thinking and Innovation
• Digital Marketing Strategy
• Disruptive Strategy
• Economics for Managers
• Entrepreneurship Essentials
• Financial Accounting
• Global Business
• Launching Tech Ventures
• Leadership Principles
• Leadership, Ethics, and Corporate Accountability
• Leading with Finance
• Management Essentials
• Negotiation Mastery
• Organizational Leadership
• Power and Influence for Positive Impact
• Strategy Execution
• Sustainable Business Strategy
• Sustainable Investing
• Winning with Digital Platforms

6 Pros and Cons of Globalization in Business to Consider

• 01 Apr 2021

Throughout history, commerce and business have been limited by certain geographic constraints. In its earliest days, trade happened between neighboring tribes and city-states. As humans domesticated the horse and other animals, the distances they could travel to trade increased. These distances increased further with the development of seafaring capabilities.

Although humans have been using ships for centuries to transport goods, cargo, people, and ideas around the world, it wasn’t until the development of the airplane that the blueprint of a “globalized economy” was laid. This was for a simple reason: You can travel greater distances faster than ever before.

The development of the internet accelerated this process even more, making it easier to communicate and collaborate with others. Today, your international co-worker, business partner, customer, or friend is only a few taps or clicks away.

Globalization has had numerous effects—both positive and negative—on business and society at large. Here’s an overview of the pros and cons of globalization in business.

Access your free e-book today.

What Is Globalization?

Globalization is the increased flow of goods, services, capital, people, and ideas across international boundaries according to the online course Global Business , taught by Harvard Business School Professor Forest Reinhardt.

“We live in an age of globalization,” Reinhardt says in Global Business . “That is, national economies are even more tightly connected with one another than ever before.”

How Globalization Affects Daily Life

Globalization has had a significant impact on various aspects of daily life.

For example, it’s changed the way consumers shop for products and services. Today, 70 percent of Americans shop online. In 2022, there were 268 million digital buyers in the US and by 2025, this number is predicted to reach 285 million.

In addition, the globalized economy has opened up new job markets by making it more feasible to hire overseas workers. This has created a wide range of career opportunities for both job seekers and employers.

The emergence of remote work post-pandemic was also made possible by globalization. According to a survey from WFH Research , only seven percent of paid workdays in the US were remote in 2019. However, this number climbed to 29 percent by January 2024.

Check out the video below to learn more about globalization, and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more explainer content!

Advantages of Globalization

1. economic growth.

It’s widely believed that one of the benefits of globalization is greater economic growth for all parties. There are several reasons why this might be the case, including:

• Access to labor: Globalization gives all nations access to a wider labor pool. Developing nations with a shortage of knowledge workers might, for example, “import” labor to kickstart industry. Wealthier nations, on the other hand, might outsource low-skill work to developing nations with a lower cost of living to reduce the cost of goods sold and pass those savings on to the customer.
• Access to jobs: This point is directly related to labor. Through globalization, developing nations often gain access to jobs in the form of work that’s been outsourced by wealthier nations. While there are potential pitfalls to this (see “Disproportionate Growth” below), this work can significantly contribute to the local economy.
• Access to resources: One of the primary reasons nations trade is to gain access to resources they otherwise wouldn’t have. Without this flow of resources across borders, many modern luxuries would be impossible to manufacture or produce. Smartphones, for example, are dependent on rare earth metals found in limited areas around the world.
• The ability for nations to “specialize”: Global and regional cooperation allow nations to heavily lean into their economic strengths, knowing they can trade products for other resources. An example is a tropical nation that specializes in exporting a certain fruit. It’s been shown that when nations specialize in the production of goods or services in which they have an advantage, trade benefits both parties.

2. Increased Global Cooperation

For a globalized economy to exist, nations must be willing to put their differences aside and work together. Therefore, increased globalization has been linked to a reduction—though not an elimination—of conflict.

“Of course, as long as there have been nations, they've been connected with each other through the exchange of lethal force—through war and conquest—and this threat has never gone away,” Reinhardt says in Global Business . “The conventional wisdom has been that the increased intensity of these other flows—goods, services, capital, people, and so on—have reduced the probability that the world's nations will fall back into the catastrophe of war.”

3. Increased Cross-Border Investment

According to the course Global Business , globalization has led to an increase in cross-border investment. At the macroeconomic level, this international investment has been shown to enhance welfare on both sides of the equation.

The country that’s the source of the capital benefits because it can often earn a higher return abroad than domestically. The country that receives the inflow of capital benefits because that capital contributes to investment and, therefore, to productivity. Foreign investment also often comes with, or in the form of, technology, know-how, or access to distribution channels that can help the recipient nation.

Disadvantages of Globalization

1. increased competition.

When viewed as a whole, global free trade is beneficial to the entire system. Individual companies, organizations, and workers can be disadvantaged, however, by global competition. This is similar to how these parties might be disadvantaged by domestic competition: The pool has simply widened.

With this in mind, some firms, industries, and citizens may elect governments to pursue protectionist policies designed to buffer domestic firms or workers from foreign competition. Protectionism often takes the form of tariffs, quotas, or non-tariff barriers, such as quality or sanitation requirements that make it more difficult for a competing nation or business to justify doing business in the country. These efforts can often be detrimental to the overall economic performance of both parties.

“Although we live in an age of globalization, we also seem to be living in an age of anti-globalization,” Reinhardt says in Global Business . “Dissatisfaction with the results of freer trade, concern about foreign investment, and polarized views about immigration all seem to be playing important roles in rich-country politics in the United States and Europe. The threats in Western democracy to the post-war globalist consensus have never been stronger.”

2. Disproportionate Growth

Another issue of globalization is that it can introduce disproportionate growth both between and within nations. These effects must be carefully managed economically and morally.

Within countries, globalization often has the effect of increasing immigration. Macroeconomically, immigration increases gross domestic product (GDP), which can be an economic boon to the recipient nation. Immigration may, however, reduce GDP per capita in the short run if immigrants’ income is lower than the average income of those already living in the country.

Additionally, as with competition, immigration can benefit the country as a whole while imposing costs on people who may want their government to restrict immigration to protect them from those costs. These sentiments are often tied to and motivated—at least in part—by racism and xenophobia.

“Meanwhile, outside the rich world, hundreds of millions of people remain mired in poverty,” Reinhardt says in Global Business. “We don't seem to be able to agree about whether this is because of too much globalization or not enough.”

3. Environmental Concerns

Increased globalization has been linked to various environmental challenges, many of which are serious, including:

• Deforestation and loss of biodiversity caused by economic specialization and infrastructure development
• Greenhouse gas emissions and other forms of pollution caused by increased transportation of goods
• The introduction of potentially invasive species into new environments

While such issues are governed by existing or proposed laws and regulations, businesses have made climate change concerns and sustainability a priority by, for example, embracing the tenets of the triple bottom line and the idea of corporate social responsibility .

Managing the Risks of Globalization

The world is never going to abandon globalization. While it’s true that individual countries and regions put policies and practices in place that limit globalization, such as tariffs, it’s here to stay. The good news is that businesses and professionals willing to prepare for globalization’s challenges by developing strong social impact skills have the potential to benefit immensely.

Whether you’re a business owner, member of executive leadership, or an employee, understanding the impacts of globalization and how to identify its opportunities and risks can help you become more effective in your role and drive value for your organization.

Taking a course like Global Business is one path toward developing international business skills and gaining an understanding of the macroeconomic, political , and social conditions that continue to impact globalization.

Are you interested in breaking into a global market? Sharpen your knowledge of the international business world with Global Business , one of our online business in society courses . If you aren't sure which course is the right fit, download our free course flowchart .

This post was updated on February 26, 2024. It was originally published on April 15, 2021.

About the Author

Globalization: What Globalization Is and Its Impact Essay

Primary source data, secondary source data, comparative analysis.

Bibliography

Globalization is a complex phenomenon that has a big influence on various fields of human life, including economics, society, and culture. Even though trade between countries has existed since time immemorial, in the 21st-century, globalization has become an integral part of the world’s development. While businesses try to expand on a global scale, and countries’ economies are intertwined in the international network, several outcomes occur out of this process. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and evaluate the impact of globalization on the world economy, whether it is good or bad. To achieve this goal, a comprehensive review of the relevant literature will be conducted. The information will be extracted from both primary and secondary sources. The primary sources will include an interview and a chart, while the secondary sources will consist of scholarly articles and books published from the year 2015 forward. The main argument of this research is that even though globalization offers endless business opportunities, it has a number of effects that negatively influence the resources and the economy.

First of all, in order to understand this phenomenon, it is important to define the term “globalization.” Several researchers have conducted a thorough study of this subject. For example, Martell describes globalization as “the intensification of worldwide social relations which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings are shaped by events occurring many miles away” 1 . It is a complex and multidimensional mechanism that allows a local business subdivision to integrate into the global economic system. The biggest companies of the 21st century are no longer limited to one country; they have become more multinational: businesses from several countries exchange resources, money, data, and employees. Nowadays, international relations are becoming more intense not only in politics but in the economy as well. Moreover, globalization has a significant influence on the distribution of not only skilled and unskilled labor but of capital and labor as well, both locally and globally. The tendencies of this process were analyzed by experts, for example, in the research by Chandy and Seidel, where they presented globalization trends in the form of a chart (Figure 1).

The chart above demonstrates how the GDP of the U.S. was changing while the global population was also growing. The diagram includes the analysis of foreign capital stock, merchandise exports, and migrant stock. According to it, it becomes evident that even though the world GDP was high during the 1910s, the global economy is more integrated in the 21st century. However, the researchers also point out that the economy of the U.S. is a relatively closed economy, which is surprising. Nevertheless, the study states that “it accounts for only 11 percent of global trade volumes, which is far below its 24 percent share of global GDP” 2 . In addition, despite the attempts to find evidence of the recession of globalization, Chandy and Seidel did not manage to present any. It means that the trend keeps developing as money, goods, and people continue to move around the world.

It is evident that one cannot talk about globalization without mentioning international companies. Global corporations are defined by the fact that they execute business in at least two countries 3 . They conduct various types of economic activities, for example, foreign investment, managing plants in different countries to avoid transaction costs. An example of an international firm that obtains cost advantages through foreign investments in international plants is Apple Inc.

To understand how companies conduct business internationally, several types of multinational corporations must be indicated: economists usually divide them into four categories. The first type of firm is determined by the fact that it has a strong presence in its home country. Another category is characterized by acquiring cost advantage through the means of buying cheaper resources in other countries, despite being controlled by one central office. The third type is a company that is based on the Research and Development of the parent corporation. The fourth and final category is a transnational business, which includes all features that are peculiar to the corporations that were mentioned above 3 . Since global companies generally combine different approaches to business, sometimes it can be hard to distinguish between these four categories. Nestle S.A. may serve as an example of a big transnational corporation that conducts its financial operations in many countries outside of the headquarters.

Since globalization is a complicated phenomenon, many analysts and businessmen have different views on its impact. For instance, the former Director-General of the World Trade Organization, Pascal Lamy, expressed his point of view in the interview, “Can Europe Civilize Globalization?”. Despite the fact that the concerns about European civilization may recede due to this process, he states that he does not see globalization as a threat. Instead, he sees it as a reality that has to be dealt with in a professional way. Lamy explains his opinion by pointing out the fact that some European countries have managed to gain more benefits than others by means of global trade 4 . As examples, he presents Sweden and Germany, which, during the last decades of the 20th century, conducted structural reforms that allowed them to get profit from international trade.

Moreover, Lamy notes that globalization presents new challenges for businesses. They include promoting “more actively global norms in the environmental and job protection, health protection, than the reduction of trade barriers that have been now largely operated worldwide”4. In other words, the ex-director of WTO believes that this process can have a positive impact on Europe’s economy as it provides opportunities for countries to develop and grow their benefits.

As for other researchers, Burlacu, Gutu, and Matei overview both sides of globalization, pointing out positive and negative impacts. For example, the advantages include reducing the economic isolation of poor countries as they are given the opportunity to sell their goods on the global market and participate in the trade 5 . Moreover, as the economy expands, the information does it as well. It means that access to education becomes more easy and available, which increases the number of professionals who are capable of expanding and developing the business even further. In addition, according to the study, globalization “enhances the speed of commercial, financial, and technological operations”5. It can be seen even nowadays as new products and devices continue to appear on the market every year. Furthermore, globalization ensures the efficiency of the entire economic activity on a global scale.

Other researchers have also pointed out several positive aspects of this process. For example, Parente et al. talk about the sharing economy, which is a new phenomenon. Their study indicated that due to internet globalization, some companies managed to perform business online, which helped them to expand around the world and raise funds 6 . Therefore, globalization allowed firms to achieve worldwide success at an unprecedented pace. Furthermore, Martell et al. elaborated on reasons for how exactly the internalization changed economic activities. The reasons included “the speeding up of global interactions and processes as a result of the development of transport and communications”1. In other words, the spread of resources, ideas, capital, and products accelerated, which allowed businesses to develop quicker.

However, aside from positive results that can come from globalization, researchers also indicate some negative aspects to it. For instance, Burlacu et al. Note that harmful effects include an international security deficit and an increased amount of illegal migrations5. Globalization opened borders for a large number of people to move to other countries illegally. Moreover, it allowed corrupt businessmen to employ these migrants and make them work for a lesser wage, which is a violation of human rights. Moreover, economists believe that nowadays, the export of human resources has risen, which means that some countries have lost intellectual potential5. The other downsides include the deterioration of the environment, which is caused by the rapid growth of the economy.

While rethinking the effects of globalization, Broner and Ventura elaborated on the negative consequences that it can bring to domestic markets. The researchers gathered data from other scholars and concluded that “financial globalization, in addition to providing a new, cheaper source of funding for emerging markets, can have indirect effects by affecting the workings of domestic financial markets” 7 . For example, according to them, with the rise of globalization, the incidence of domestic financial crises also grows. In addition, Mamedov et al. discusses the impact on traditional economies, which, according to the study, will reach a new level of their development 8 . It is difficult to say whether such changes are positive or not since some people may be reluctant to abandon the old economic structures.

As it can be observed, primary sources and secondary sources seem to express various opinions about globalization. First and foremost, most of them seem to agree that this phenomenon is relatively new and only recently began to spread. However, then the standpoints start to differ among experts. While the interview with Lamy demonstrates that the former leader of the World Trade Organization seems optimistic about it, such secondary sources as scholarly articles and books differentiate in positions.

Some researchers identify the internalization of the economy as a beneficial process that can create new opportunities for countries to develop and expand their businesses. However, other studies make a link between globalization and several other problems, such as environmental deterioration, security issues, and the increasing number of domestic crises. The last factor is especially interesting since it contradicts the general assumption that increased international trade opportunities can improve the country’s welfare.

Moreover, the recent events that were caused by the outbreak of coronavirus exposed vulnerabilities in the current globalized economy. Since traveling is restricted, the transportation of resources has become difficult. While big international corporations managed to stay afloat, some local firms were forced to shut down, and the suspension of one company factory can lead to a closing of another. Experts argue that such an intertwined international economic relationship is what caused changes in a global supply chain, and overall, stock declines 9 . The current situation provided proof that globalization may not be that good for the world economy.

While the system offers opportunities for businesses to grow, it also has some loopholes and weak points that seriously damage the economy of not only one country but of the whole world. Moreover, the situation with the pandemic supports the argument made by Broner and Ventura. The outbreak caused domestic market crises in Asian countries, and then in Europe and America, which significantly affected the global economy. Even the help of Widespread Disease Emergency Financing Facility 10 would not be enough to restore all financial damage. As the recession of the international market became apparent, businesses in other countries have also suffered.

In addition, the environmental aspect of globalization is also important since it affects the increasing deficiency of natural resources. While companies are trying to expand their business everywhere, new factories and new plants are built around the world. While new products and new technology continue to appear on the market and the demand grows, more damage is inflicted upon the environment by the constant production.

Moreover, the higher need for transportation means that more fossil fuels are used, causing harm to the climate. There is no doubt that such issues can be resolved with the creation of new technology. However, the process of development is complicated and expensive, which can lead to additional expenditures. It can cause more federal budget deficits and increased government debt; therefore, the economy is also negatively affected by environmental issues of globalization.

For this reason, it can be said that despite all the positive aspects of globalization, it definitely has several downsides. Internationalization brought not only different cultures but the economies of various countries together, allowing businesses to grow and reach financial benefits. Furthermore, it opened opportunities for people to find jobs and expand their profit. Nevertheless, the current system is vulnerable during difficult situations, and if there is a crisis in one country, it tends to spread to others like dominoes, because the economies are deeply connected. Moreover, globalization also causes harm to other fields of human life, which are can also negatively influence not only the financial state of a particular country but the economy of the world as well.

It is evident that more research needs to be conducted as the process of globalization is complex and ongoing. There are several topics that can be further explored while studying the impact of globalization on the world’s economy. For example, one can investigate the methods that can be implemented to minimize the negative consequences of globalization that were described earlier in this paper. In order to obtain the information, one can look through the suggestions of other researchers, analyze them, and select the ones that seem the most effective.

Moreover, as the current situation with the outbreak has a major impact on the international economy, it would be interesting to study the experts’ opinions on how it will affect globalization. A huge amount of relevant information can be gathered from recent interviews, news, and scholarly articles. In conclusion, it would appear that the topic of globalization and its influence is broad and can provide a good starting point for further discussion and analysis.

Chandy, Laurence, and Brina Seidel. “Donald Trump and the future of globalization.” The Brookings Institution , 2016. Web.

Broner, Fernando, and Jaume Ventura. “Rethinking the Effects of Financial Globalization.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131, no. 3 (2016): 1497-1542.

Burlacu, Sorin, Corneliu Gutu, and Florin Octavian Matei. “Globalization – Pros and Cons.” Calitatea 19, no. S1 (2018): 122-125.

Lamy, Pascal. “Interview. Can Europe Civilize Globalization?”, The Federalist Debate 28, no. 1 (2015): 60-63.

Mamedov, Oktay, Irina Movchan, Oksana Ishchenko-Padukova, and Monika Grabowska. “Traditional Economy: Innovations, Efficiency and Globalization.” Economics & Sociology 9, no. 2 (2016): 61.

Martell, Luke. The Sociology of Globalization . John Wiley & Sons, 2016.

Parente, Ronaldo C., José-Mauricio G. Geleilate, and Ke Rong. “The Sharing Economy Globalization Phenomenon: A Research Agenda.” Journal of International Management 24, no. 1 (2018): 52-64.

• Sułkowski, Łukasz. “Covid-19 Pandemic; Recession, Virtual Revolution Leading to De-globalization?”, Journal of Intercultural Management 12, no. 1 (2020): 1-11.
• Luke Martell. The Sociology of Globalization (John Wiley & Sons, 2016), 10.
• Laurence Chandy and Brina Seidel. “Donald Trump and the future of globalization.” The Brookings Institution , 2016.
• Lecture on Multinational Corporation (MNC)
• Pascal Lamy. “Interview. Can Europe Civilize Globalization?”, The Federalist Debate 28, no. 1 (2015): 60.
• Burlacu, Sorin, Corneliu Gutu, and Florin Octavian Matei. “Globalization – Pros and Cons.” Calitatea 19, no. S1 (2018): 124.
• Parente, Ronaldo C., José-Mauricio G. Geleilate, and Ke Rong. “The Sharing Economy Globalization Phenomenon: A Research Agenda.” Journal of International Management 24, no. 1 (2018): 53.
• Broner, Fernando, and Jaume Ventura. “Rethinking the Effects of Financial Globalization.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131, no. 3 (2016): 1533.
• Mamedov, Oktay, Irina Movchan, Oksana Ishchenko-Padukova, and Monika Grabowska. “Traditional Economy: Innovations, Efficiency, and Globalization.” Economics & Sociology 9, no. 2 (2016): 61.
• Lecture on the World Bank
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2022, February 16). Globalization: What Globalization Is and Its Impact. https://ivypanda.com/essays/globalization-what-globalization-is-and-its-impact/

"Globalization: What Globalization Is and Its Impact." IvyPanda , 16 Feb. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/globalization-what-globalization-is-and-its-impact/.

IvyPanda . (2022) 'Globalization: What Globalization Is and Its Impact'. 16 February.

IvyPanda . 2022. "Globalization: What Globalization Is and Its Impact." February 16, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/globalization-what-globalization-is-and-its-impact/.

1. IvyPanda . "Globalization: What Globalization Is and Its Impact." February 16, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/globalization-what-globalization-is-and-its-impact/.

IvyPanda . "Globalization: What Globalization Is and Its Impact." February 16, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/globalization-what-globalization-is-and-its-impact/.

• Humanizing Globalization’ Professional Analysis of Speech
• Protectionism as a Way to Protect Home Industries From Overseas Competition
• The $ 787 Billion Economic Stimulus Bill
• Globalization and its influences
• Globalization: An Economic Perspective
• Globalization Positive and Negative Impacts
• Globalization is not a Peaceful Process
• Positive and Negative Impacts of Globalization in Britain
• The Effects of Globalization on the World
• Is Globalization the Main Culprit for the 2008 Global Financial Crisis?
• Guanxi in Chinese Business and Global Economy
• Cross-Cultural Negotiation Analysis
• Intercultural Competencies: Environmental Scan and Analysis
• Uncertainty and Risks Regarding Multinational Corporations’ Functioning
• Multicultural Problems in Organizations

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

To log in and use all the features of Khan Academy, please enable JavaScript in your browser.

World History Project - Origins to the Present

Course: world history project - origins to the present   >   unit 7, read: introduction to globalization.

• READ: International Institutions
• READ: Rise of China
• BEFORE YOU WATCH: Eradicating Smallpox
• WATCH: Eradicating Smallpox
• BEFORE YOU WATCH: Global China into the 21st Century
• WATCH: Global China into the 21st Century
• READ: Goods Across the World
• BEFORE YOU WATCH: Globalization I - The Upside
• WATCH: Globalization I - The Upside
• BEFORE YOU WATCH: Nonviolence and Peace Movements
• WATCH: Nonviolence and Peace Movements
• READ: Population and Environmental Trends, 1880 to the Present
• READ: Is the World Flat or Spiky?
• Global Interactions and Institutions

First read: preview and skimming for gist

Second read: key ideas and understanding content.

• What late twentieth-century trends, according to the author, led people to create the term “globalization”?
• What are some historical trends that accelerated globalization before the late twentieth century?
• What are some impacts of globalization in terms of migration and economics?
• What are some positive impacts of globalization, according to the author?
• What are some negative impacts of globalization, according to the author?

Third read: evaluating and corroborating

• What does globalization look like from your perspective? How does it affect your family and community? Do you think it has been a good thing for you? Why or why not?
• Globalization looks very differently studied through each of the three course frames. Pick one of the three course frames and describe the effects of globalization on your home town or neighborhood using only that frame narrative. How would your results have been different if you had chosen a different frame?

Introduction to Globalization

What is globalization, globalization’s effect on communities and economies, the pros and cons of globalization, want to join the conversation.

• Upvote Button navigates to signup page
• Downvote Button navigates to signup page
• Flag Button navigates to signup page

Home — Essay Samples — Sociology — Globalization — Is Globalization Good or Bad: Evaluating the Pros and Cons

Is Globalization Good Or Bad: Evaluating The Pros and Cons

• Categories: Globalization

About this sample

Words: 904 |

Published: Sep 5, 2023

Words: 904 | Pages: 2 | 5 min read

Table of contents

The advantages of globalization, the disadvantages of globalization, striking a balance.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Sociology

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

4 pages / 1665 words

2 pages / 1095 words

3 pages / 1478 words

3 pages / 1314 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Globalization

Globalization is one of the critical factors that has led to a change in the world economy. In the past, people used to do better trade and they needed to travel long distances so that they can exchange their goods and services. [...]

Globalization, the process of increased interconnectedness and interdependence among nations and cultures, has had a profound impact on virtually every aspect of human life. Religion, as a fundamental element of culture and [...]

Globalization, the process of increased interconnectedness and interdependence among nations and cultures, has had a profound impact on various aspects of human society, including religion. This essay explores the intricate [...]

The phenomenon of globalization has exerted a profound influence on countries around the world, and China stands as a prime example of a nation that has been significantly impacted by this global trend. Globalization in China [...]

In the Philippines, globalization has brought many job probabilities to all Filipino people. The government encourages distant places firms to establish industrial business companies and open many jobs on Filipino workers even [...]

Before I give my answer to the questions given to us, I want to share what I already know about Globalization, State, and Nation. Globalization implies the speedup of developments and trades (of human creatures, products, [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

• Writing Correction
• Online Prep Platform
• Online Course
• Speaking Assessment
• Ace The IELTS
• Target Band 7
• Practice Tests Downloads
• IELTS Success Formula
• Essays Band 9 IELTS Writing Task 2 samples – IELTS Band 9 essays
• Essays Band 8 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 8
• Essays Band 7 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 7
• Essays Band 6 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 6
• Essays Band 5 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS essays of Band 5
• Reports Band 9 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS reports of Band 9 (Academic Writing Task 1)
• Reports Band 8 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS reports of Band 8
• Reports Band 7 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS reports of Band 7
• Letters Band 9 IELTS Writing Task 1 – samples of IELTS letters of Band 9
• Letters Band 8 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS letters of Band 8
• Letters Band 7 IELTS Writing – samples of IELTS letters of Band 7
• Speaking Samples
• Tests Samples
• 2023, 2024 IELTS questions
• 2022 IELTS questions
• 2021 IELTS questions
• 2020 IELTS questions
• High Scorer’s Advice IELTS high achievers share their secrets
• IELTS Results Competition
• IELTS-Blog App

IELTS Essay, topic: The advantages and disadvantages of globalization

• IELTS Essays - Band 8

Even though globalization affects the world’s economies in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss.

Globalization is such a commonly used term in the century. It simply means that the world has become integrated economically, socially, politically and culturally through the advances of technology, transportation and communication. It is undeniable that globalization has resulted in both positive and negative effects which must be addressed accordingly.

Secondly, several companies from the more developed countries have already ventured to establish foreign operations or branches to take advantage of the low cost of labor in the poorer countries. This kind of business activity will provide more influx of cash or investment funds into the less developed countries.

However, one cannot deny the negative effects which derived from globalization. One crucial social aspect is the risk and danger of epidemic diseases which can easily be spread as the transportation becomes easier and faster in today’s advanced society. This is evidenced in the recent birds flu disease which has infected most Asian countries over a short period of time.

As large corporations invest or take over many offshore businesses, a modern form of colonization will also evolve which may pose certain power pressure on the local governments of the less developed countries. Unemployment rates in the more developed regions such as Europe may also escalate as corporations choose to outsource to the cheaper work force from Asian countries.

In conclusion. to reiterate that globalization is inevitable and we must urge individuals, companies and governments to use a more balanced approach by taking the appropriate steps to deal with matters relating to the financial or economical gains verses the social, political or ecological concerns of the world.

This essay is too long, 318 words instead of 250-265. Otherwise (except for some minor grammatical errors) it is a very nice work. It covers the task, has the right structure, the paragraphs are coherent and are logically connected by elegantly used linking words, the structure of sentences is fine and so is your vocabulary. Seems worthy of Band 7.5 or 8.

Click here to see more IELTS essays of band 8

Related posts:

• IELTS essay, topic: Some say that new homes should be constructed in existing cities while others argue that new towns should be built (advantages/disadvantages) Many countries are experiencing population growth and need to build...
• IELTS essay, topic: The advantages and disadvantages of high-rise apartment living This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...
• IELTS Band 9 essay, topic: Some schools insist that students have laptops in class (advantages / disadvantages) This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...
• IELTS Essay, topic: In some countries private cars are now banned from city centres (advantages / disadvantages) This is a model response to a Writing Task 2...
• IELTS essay, topic: Many university students nowadays live away from home and their parents (advantages/disadvantages) This essay topic was seen in a recent IELTS test...

8 thoughts on “IELTS Essay, topic: The advantages and disadvantages of globalization”

Pingback:  IELTS Essay Samples of Band 8 | IELTS-Blog

Can i send my essay for review?

Hi Sawraj, yes of course, you’re welcome to send us your essays for review. Please visit this page to learn how to do it.

This is awesome effort.

Hlo may I snd my essay for review Plzz

Hi Harpreet, to send you essay for correction please visit this page , make a payment and we will send you some easy instructions how to send your task to our teachers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

More From Forbes

The pros and cons of globalization.

• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to Linkedin

A story in the Washington Post said “20 years ago globalization was pitched as a strategy that would raise all boats in poor and rich countries alike. In the U.S. and Europe consumers would have their pick of inexpensive items made by people thousands of miles away whose pay was much lower than theirs. And in time trade barriers would drop to support even more multinationals expansion and economic gains while geo political cooperation would flourish.”

There is no question that globalization has been a good thing for many developing countries who now have access to our markets and can export cheap goods. Globalization has also been good for Multi-national corporations and Wall Street. But globalization has not been good for working people (blue or white collar) and has led to the continuing deindustrialization of America.

Globalization is a complicated issue. It is necessary to evaluate the pros and cons before drawing any conclusions.

Supporters of globalization argue that it has the potential to make this world a better place to live in and solve some of the deep-seated problems like unemployment and poverty.

1. Free trade is supposed to reduce barriers such as tariffs, value added taxes, subsidies, and other barriers between nations. This is not true. There are still many barriers to free trade. The Washington Post story says “the problem is that the big G20 countries added more than 1,200 restrictive export and import measures since 2008

2. The proponents say globalization represents free trade which promotes global economic growth; creates jobs, makes companies more competitive, and lowers prices for consumers.

3. Competition between countries is supposed to drive prices down. In many cases this is not working because countries manipulate their currency to get a price advantage.

4. It also provides poor countries, through infusions of foreign capital and technology, with the chance to develop economically and by spreading prosperity, creates the conditions in which democracy and respect for human rights may flourish. This is an ethereal goal which hasn’t been achieved in most countries

5. According to supporters globalization and democracy should go hand in hand. It should be pure business with no colonialist designs.

6. There is now a worldwide market for companies and consumers who have access to products of different countries. True

7. Gradually there is a world power that is being created instead of compartmentalized power sectors. Politics is merging and decisions that are being taken are actually beneficial for people all over the world. This is simply a romanticized view of what is actually happening. True

8. There is more influx of information between two countries, which do not have anything in common between them. True

9. There is cultural intermingling and each country is learning more about other cultures. True

10. Since we share financial interests, corporations and governments are trying to sort out ecological problems for each other. – True, they are talking more than trying.

11. Socially we have become more open and tolerant towards each other and people who live in the other part of the world are not considered aliens. True in many cases.

12. Most people see speedy travel, mass communications and quick dissemination of information through the Internet as benefits of globalization. True

13. Labor can move from country to country to market their skills. True, but this can cause problems with the existing labor and downward pressure on wages.

14. Sharing technology with developing nations will help them progress. True for small countries but stealing our technologies and IP have become a big problem with our larger competitors like China.

15. Transnational companies investing in installing plants in other countries provide employment for the people in those countries often getting them out of poverty. True

16. Globalization has given countries the ability to agree to free trade agreements like NAFTA, South Korea Korus, and The TPP. True but these agreements have cost the U.S. many jobs and always increase our trade deficit

• The general complaint about globalization is that it has made the rich richer while making the non-rich poorer. “It is wonderful for managers, owners and investors, but hell on workers and nature.”

• Globalization is supposed to be about free trade where all barriers are eliminated but there are still many barriers. For instance161 countries have value added taxes (VATs) on imports which are as high as 21.6% in Europe. The U.S. does not have VAT.

• The biggest problem for developed countries is that jobs are lost and transferred to lower cost countries.” According to conservative estimates by Robert Scott of the Economic Policy Institute, granting China most favored nation status drained away 3.2 million jobs, including 2.4 million manufacturing jobs. He pegs the net losses due to our trade deficit with Japan ($78.3 billion in 2013) at 896,000 jobs, as well as an additional 682,900 jobs from the Mexico –U.S. trade-deficit run-up from 1994 through 2010.”

• Workers in developed countries like the US face pay-cut demands from employers who threaten to export jobs. This has created a culture of fear for many middle class workers who have little leverage in this global game

• Large multi-national corporations have the ability to exploit tax havens in other countries to avoid paying taxes.

• Multinational corporations are accused of social injustice, unfair working conditions (including slave labor wages, living and working conditions), as well as lack of concern for environment, mismanagement of natural resources, and ecological damage.

• Multinational corporations, which were previously restricted to commercial activities, are increasingly influencing political decisions. Many think there is a threat of corporations ruling the world because they are gaining power, due to globalization.

• Building products overseas in countries like China puts our technologies at risk of being copied or stolen, which is in fact happening rapidly

• The anti-globalists also claim that globalization is not working for the majority of the world. “During the most recent period of rapid growth in global trade and investment, 1960 to 1998, inequality worsened both internationally and within countries. The UN Development Program reports that the richest 20 percent of the world's population consume 86 percent of the world's resources while the poorest 80 percent consume just 14 percent. “

• Some experts think that globalization is also leading to the incursion of communicable diseases. Deadly diseases like HIV/AIDS are being spread by travelers to the remotest corners of the globe.

• Globalization has led to exploitation of labor. Prisoners and child workers are used to work in inhumane conditions. Safety standards are ignored to produce cheap goods. There is also an increase in human trafficking.

• Social welfare schemes or “safety nets” are under great pressure in developed countries because of deficits, job losses, and other economic ramifications of globalization.

Globalization is an economic tsunami that is sweeping the planet. We can’t stop it but there are many things we can do to slow it down and make it more equitable.

What is missing?

Leadership – We need politicians who are willing to confront the cheaters. One of our biggest problems is that 7 of our trading partners manipulate their currencies to gain unfair price advantage which increases their exports and decreases their imports. This is illegal under WTO rules so there is a sound legal basis to put some kind of tax on their exports until they quit cheating.

Balanced Trade – Most of our trading partners can balance their trade budgets and even run a surplus. We have not made any effort to balance our trade budget and have run a deficit for more than 30 years resulting in an $11 trillion deficit. The trade deficit is the single biggest job killer in our economy, particularly manufacturing jobs. We need the government to develop a plan to begin to balance our trade deficit even though this is not a political priority in either party.

Trade Agreements – Both the NAFTA and the South Korean Korus trade agreements might have been good for Wall Street and the multi-national corporations but they eliminated jobs in America and expanded our trade deficit. The upcoming Trans Pacific Trade Agreement will do the same thing and Congress should not fast track this bad agreement for a dozen reasons.

Enforcing the rules – China ignores trade rules and WTO laws with reckless abandon. Besides currency manipulation they subsidize their state owned companies to target our markets, and provide funding to their state owned companies that dump their products in America. They also steal our technologies, sell counterfeit versions of our products, and impose tariffs and other barriers anytime they want - as we do nothing to stop them. China does not deserve to be on our most favored nation list and we need to tax their exports to us until they stop these illegal activities.

What is good for third world countries, like Kenya, or countries with tremendous growth, like China, has not been good for American workers. Globalization is deindustrializing America as we continue to outsource both manufacturing blue collar and white collar jobs. Supporters of globalization have made the case that it is good because it has brought low priced imported goods, but they have not matched the decline of wages in the middle class and will not offset the loss of many family wage jobs

Globalization is like being overwhelmed by a snow avalanche. You can’t stop it – you can only swim in the snow and hope to stay on top. I would like to make the argument that the US should try a lot harder to swim in the snow and stay on top. We can’t stop globalization but there are many policies and strategies we can use to make it more equitable. We can enforce the trade laws, force the competition to play by the same rules, and stop giving our competitors the tools (technology and R& D) to ultimately win the global war.

Mike Collins is the author of Saving American Manufacturing. His website is www.mpcmgt.com.

• Editorial Standards
• Reprints & Permissions

• Current Affairs
• Pakistan Affairs
• World In Focus
• ESSAYS: CSS/PMS/PCS
• English (Precis & Composition)
• Pakistan Affairs MCQS
• Islamic Studies MCQS
• General Science & Ability MCQS
• Mathematics
• Everyday Science
• Scholarships
• Etimes Urdu
• Our Services

Pros and Cons of Globalization CSS ESSAY 2021

Table of Contents

Thesis Statement

Globalization has brought numerous advantages and disadvantages to the world, impacting various aspects of society, economy, and culture. In this This essay we will explore the pros and cons of globalization, highlighting its benefits in terms of economic growth, technological advancements, and cultural exchange, while also discussing its challenges related to inequality, cultural homogenization, and environmental concerns.

Introduction

Globalization has become a defining feature of the modern world, shaping various aspects of society, economy, and culture. As nations have become more interconnected and interdependent, it is important to examine the pros and cons of this phenomenon. While globalization has brought numerous benefits such as economic growth, technological advancements, and cultural exchange, it has also presented challenges including inequality, cultural homogenization, and environmental concerns. This essay will explore these pros and cons, shedding light on the complexities of globalization.

Exposition: Understanding Globalization

Globalization can be defined as the increasing interconnectedness and interdependence of nations in various aspects, including trade, communication, and technology. It has its roots in historical developments such as the expansion of trade routes and colonialism. However, it has gained momentum in recent decades due to advancements in transportation, communication, and the liberalization of trade policies. Globalization has enabled the flow of goods, services, capital, and information across borders, leading to increased global integration.

Pros of Globalization

Economic growth and development.

One of the key advantages of globalization is the potential for economic growth and development. Increased trade and investment opportunities have opened up new markets and expanded access to consumers worldwide. Businesses can now reach customers in different countries, leading to job creation, enhanced productivity, and overall economic prosperity. Globalization has also facilitated the transfer of technology and knowledge, fueling innovation and economic progress.

Technological Advancements

Globalization has accelerated the dissemination of information and knowledge through advancements in technology. The rapid exchange of ideas and expertise has led to breakthroughs in various fields, driving technological advancements. Innovations in areas such as communication, transportation, and medicine have transformed industries and improved the quality of life. Global collaboration and knowledge sharing have become easier, fostering scientific and technological progress.

Cultural Exchange and Diversity

The interconnectedness brought about by globalization has facilitated cultural exchange and diversity. People have greater exposure to diverse cultures, ideas, and perspectives from around the world. This exposure enriches societies by promoting cross-cultural understanding, tolerance, and appreciation. The exchange of artistic, literary, and culinary traditions has broadened cultural horizons, fostering a global tapestry of diversity and creativity.

Cons of Globalization

Economic inequality.

Despite the potential for economic growth, globalization has also led to increased economic inequality. The benefits of globalization are not evenly distributed, and wealth and resources tend to concentrate in the hands of a few. Developing countries often face challenges in competing with more developed nations, leading to disparities in wealth and living standards. Additionally, the exploitation of cheap labor in some parts of the world has raised concerns about fair trade practices and workers’ rights.

Cultural Homogenization

The dominance of Western cultural values and consumerism is a significant challenge posed by globalization. As global markets expand, there is a tendency for cultural homogenization, where local traditions and identities are marginalized or eroded. The influence of Western media, fashion, and entertainment can overshadow indigenous cultures, leading to the loss of cultural diversity. Preserving and promoting local traditions and languages becomes crucial in maintaining cultural richness and identity.

Environmental Concerns

Globalization has also raised environmental concerns. The increased movement of goods and people has resulted in higher carbon emissions and an ecological footprint. The overexploitation of natural resources to meet global demand poses threats to biodiversity and ecosystems. Environmental challenges, such as climate change and deforestation, require international cooperation and sustainable practices to mitigate their impact.

Addressing the Challenges

To manage the challenges of globalization, various strategies can be employed.

Economic Reforms and Redistribution

Implementing fair trade practices, ensuring workers’ rights, and promoting inclusive economic policies are essential in reducing economic inequality. Progressive taxation can help redistribute wealth and address disparities in income distribution.

Preserving Cultural Diversity

Supporting local arts, traditions, and languages is crucial in preserving cultural diversity. Governments and communities can take measures to protect and promote their cultural heritage, fostering intercultural dialogue and understanding.

Sustainable Development and Environmental Stewardship

Investing in renewable energy, adopting sustainable production and consumption practices, and strengthening international agreements on climate change and environmental protection are necessary steps in addressing environmental concerns. Global cooperation is vital in tackling shared environmental challenges.

Case Studies and Examples

Numerous case studies demonstrate both the positive impacts and negative consequences of globalization. For instance, countries like China and India have experienced remarkable economic growth and poverty reduction as a result of globalization. On the other hand, social unrest and environmental degradation have been observed in some regions due to unsustainable development practices.

Globalization is a multifaceted phenomenon with both benefits and challenges. While it has contributed to economic growth, technological advancements, and cultural exchange, it has also raised concerns regarding inequality, cultural homogenization, and environmental sustainability. Addressing these challenges requires a balanced approach that maximizes the benefits of globalization while mitigating its negative impacts. By promoting inclusive economic policies, preserving cultural diversity, and embracing sustainable practices, societies can navigate the complexities of globalization and create a more equitable and sustainable world.

RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR

Boys will be boys css essay 2022, is pakistan ready for the digital revolution css essay 2020, i do not agree with what you have to say, but i’ll defend to the death your right to say it. css essay 2020, leave a reply cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Privacy Policy

Globalization Essay: Pros And Cons

About 10 or 20 years ago not so many people heard about globalization, and only few knew what it means. Today globalization issue is discussed by almost everyone. A lot of journalists, writers, and just ordinary people have already written numerous globalization essays, in which they highlight different aspects of this phenomenon. Contingently all the essays on globalization can be divided into 2 groups: the first group supports globalization and tells about its advantages, the second one is against it and emphasizes its weak points. In this essay on globalization we try to remain neutral and to show you both pros and cons.

The concept of “globalization” is very multifaceted. In simple words globalization is a process of the world transformation into a unified system. In the end of the last century globalization became actual topic for thinking; discussions about it did not stop but strengthened instead. Globalization implies the integration of the economic, cultural, political and religious spheres, however, the most sensational is globalization of the economy.

Combining of space in one zone and unlimited movement in it of information resources, funds, labor, goods and services, the free expression of ideas, the development, strengthening and interaction of social institutions – all these form the world economic globalization.

Sources of globalization

1. Scientific and technical progress, in particular the development of the Internet, by means of which the distance between countries is erased. Today we have the possibility to get news from any place of the world, as soon as they occur, watch images and video from satellites in real time. It has also become available distance learning in educational institutions of any country.

2. World trade, which has become much freer as a result of liberal measures. Thanks to the taken measures tariffs on trade in goods and services from abroad reduced.

3. Transnationalization, which in essence is an exchange between the countries of the goods, which in one country are in abundance, and in another there is a lack of those goods. Multinational companies today captured financial and information market. The economies of all countries are becoming a global.

4. The transition to a market relations, which is more or less occurred in Europe and the former Soviet Union, and thus supported the economic views of the United States.

5. Union of the cultural traditions. The media are becoming homogeneous and globalized. English has become the international language, as in former times Russian was main for the countries of the USSR.

1. Globalization has created an international competition. Competition, in its turn, is a stimulator of the production, as much it is harder as much the level of production is higher. After all, every manufacturer tries to occupy a favorable place in international trade field, so he tries to do everything so that his goods look more attractive than the competitors’.

2. Globalization has provoked economy of industrial scale, which contributed to avoiding shocks in the economy and to lower prices.

3. International trade is beneficial to all the subjects of market relations; creation of trade unions only accelerates the process of globalization.

4. The introduction of modern technology improves productivity.

5. Countries in the development stage can catch up with the advanced state, globalization gives them a head start to improve their economic situation and take strong foothold on the world stage.

1. Benefits of globalization can not be equally distributed across the world. Some industrial sectors from international trade make huge profits, the inflow of skilled labor force from abroad, the financing, while others are losing competitiveness, become unnecessary. Forgotten industries need time and money to reconstruct, to adjust to the new conditions of life. Often they do not manage to do it, so the owners lose their money, people lose their work. These changes greatly hurt the national economy of each country, make changes in the economic structure, and the unemployment rate increases.

2. The de-industrialization of the economy. The manufacturing sector loses its ground, while its place takes the thriving service industry. People have to train for a new profession to find their place in this global changing system.

3. Competition creates a large gap between qualified and no qualified personnel. Salary of the first ones increases significantly, while the second receive a penny or even lose their source of income. This again raises the unemployment, which undermines globalization. But at the same time it is also a good incentive for people to train, develop and acquire a qualification.

4. Globalization has a significant impact on the ecosystem of the world. Conflicts over the use of natural resources can not be avoided. The world is already on the verge of tremendous discord caused by deforestation, pollution of the oceans and seas, and the irrational use of the goods of the Earth.

All this can cause irreparable harm to humanity and the planet as a whole.

Globalization is a fact of modern life; it is an irreversible process, inescapable fate of world development. Globalization can not be good or bad.

So let’s sum up everything we have already mentioned. Globalization is a world phenomenon; it is a process that affects every country of the world, their economies and the lives. On the one hand it unites the whole world, on the other hand globalization makes the line between developed and backward countries more apparent. The competition, which affects really all areas of production, is the main globalization engine on the world market. Only those companies that are able to compete can survive. The biggest globalization disadvantage is that backward countries will suffer the most, as they will not be able to take their place on the global market.

Now having read this essay about globalization you are able to form your own valid view on this issue. We have other essays for you on various topics. Visit our website and you will find everything you need. Also our qualified team can help you any time. On Bigessaywriter.com you are always welcome!

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy

Cultural Globalization (Examples, Pros, Cons) – AP Human Geo

Cultural globalization is the spread of the culture, customs, or ideas of a place or a people to the rest of the world.

The cultural globalization hypothesis argues that a global culture leads to the homogenization of the human experience. In other words, the con of cultural globalization is that there may develop one world culture (an Americanized world) rather than cultural diversity.

Cultural globalization theorists believe that globalization has picked up pace only over the last century. This is a result of unprecedented technological changes such as the internet and cheap international travel.

Peter L. Berger and Samuel P. Huntington have been among the most important theorists of cultural globalization. 

Pros of Cultural Globalization

1. standardization of time and space.

Cultural globalization has allowed for uniformity of standards in measuring time and space.

For instance, historically, different cultures had different calendars based on different determinants (solar, lunar, etc.). Once, the very sense of time differed across cultures, but now we all follow the same time norms and calendars.

Similarly, different units used to be used for measuring distance, mass, volume, etc.

Today, the Gregorian calendar and its months are followed in most of the world, while the metric system is used for measuring the space the world over. 

This has allowed not just for ease of communication, but for greater scientific progress. It led to freeing up human resources from the cumbersome task of always having to convert from one system to another.

The British geographer David Harvey called this phenomenon, which is characteristic of postmodernity, a “compression of time-space” (Harvey, 1989).

2. It is a Catalyst for Positive Social Change

Cultural globalization allows for the spread of positive political and social values such as democracy .

This happens both through the use of mass communication as well as the physical movement of people across boundaries and the exchanges between diasporas and their homelands. 

For instance, the spread of ideas such as freedom, democracy, secularism, feminism etc. has led to political movements in many parts of the world demanding greater rights for their people.

Twenty-first-century revolutionary movements such as the Arab spring, the orange revolution, etc. were fuelled by ideas born out of a culture of globalization that allowed liberal values to be widely disseminated and accepted in societies with traditionally autocratic political structures. However, these ideas spread sporadically through cultures, and there is clear evidence of cultural lag .

However, in recent years, the rise of nationalism and China’s defiance of democracy makes us wonder if this ‘pro’ is really happening at all.

3. Economic Growth

Cultural globalization creates greater opportunities for wealth creation as it allows businesses and people to move and operate across different geographies with greater ease.

For instance, the widespread use of the English language and American corporate culture in much of the world allows businesses to expand to virtually any geography without having to worry about linguistic and cultural barriers. 

Similarly, familiarity with the English language allows people from poor third-world countries such as India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Egypt, etc. to migrate to rich, first-world Anglo-Saxon nations such as the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc. and afford a better standard of living. 

4. Broadening the Human Perspective

Cultural globalization allows humans living in one part of the world to learn how other people experience life.

For instance, American culture has spread to much of the world, allowing people in China or Japan to experience the American way of life.

Similarly, the spread of Chinese cuisine or Latino music to America allows Americans to experience the way of life of other cultures.

All of this allows for a broadening of perspective of the people who come into contact with other cultures.

Cons of Cultural Globalization

1. erosion of local cultures.

Cultural globalization, while bringing people together, can also pose a threat to local cultures, languages, and traditions and replacing them with a transnational culture .

For instance, the widespread use of the English language is good for creating economic opportunities for people in the Third World. But, it also threatens their indigenous languages. The teaching of English in school is fast replacing local languages as the medium of instruction, thereby hampering the development of local languages. (Mikanowski, 2018)

Another example of the erosion of local cultures is the disappearance of ancient cultures and customs due to technological changes brought by globalization .

For instance, camels were once an integral part of the cultures of people in the arid and semi-arid parts of South and West Asia, India, Pakistan, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Camels were used not just for transport but also for milk, making clothes, and even musical instruments using camel hair.

However, the advent of modern transport has made the camel virtually obsolete in modern life even in arid regions.

Unlike horses, camels have little value in sport, ceremony, or showmanship. This has led to not just a steep decline in camel numbers, but also a disappearance of cultures and peoples associated with camels (Sunder, 2021).

2. Widening of Inequalities

Cultural globalization allows for greater opportunities for wealth creation. But, it has been argued that it also makes some people wealthier and leaves others behind.

For instance, while cultural globalization allows businesses to offer more opportunities to English speakers in the third world, such opportunities are limited only to those who can afford to invest in acquiring expensive English language skills.

Similarly, in much of the third world, legal immigration to a first-world country is an option available only to the relatively well-off because of the high costs involved in getting visas and the entry barriers (such as education or skill level) imposed by the destination countries. 

3. Clash of Civilizations

Clash of Civilizations is a concept popularized by the American historian and political scientist Samuel P. Huntington (1927-2008).

Huntington argued that where cultural globalization on the one hand is bringing the world and its people together, this proximity can also generate friction as different cultures struggle to maintain their individual identities.

This can result in a conflict of values, and, occasionally, violence (Huntington, 1996).

4. Ecological Impact

Cultural globalization can also have an adverse impact on the environment.

Cultural practices particular to one region may spread to others, irrespective of whether or not they may be suited to the ecology of the region. 

For instance, in many parts of the world, food was traditionally consumed in organic, locally sourced containers such as those made from tree leaves, wood, or bamboo.

But the spread of fast foods and packaging has also meant the spread of plastics.

Another example are the feral camels of Australia that were first brought to the Australian continent by British colonialists from Asia.

While camels are becoming extinct in South and West Asia, threatening millennia-old cultural traditions, their population has exploded in Australia, causing severe environmental degradation (Traill, 2017).

Table Summary: Pros and Cons of Cultural Globalization

Examples of cultural globalization, 1. mcdonaldization.

McDonaldization is a term coined by the American sociologist George Ritzer to describe increasing cultural conformity.

Like a Mcdonald’s outlet that offers the same hamburger in identical-looking restaurants served by identically dressed employees all over the world, several products of cultural globalization are characterized by uniformity, efficiency, and predictability or what Max Weber called rationalization of the modern world . (Ritzer, 1993)

Related Concept: McDonaldization Examples

2. Spread of Evangelical Protestantism

Peter L. Berger described evangelical Protestantism as another example of cultural globalization.

Berger compared it to Islamic resurgence, which was restricted to the Muslim world or among the Muslim diaspora.

By contrast, evangelical Protestantism brought the protestant ethic to regions where it had never before existed, such as sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America.

Rooted in an American ethic, evangelical Protestantism brings to the societies it spreads to a culture heavily tinged by American, protestant ethos. For instance, American gospel songs are sung by Mayan evangelicals in Mexico and Guatemala (Berger, 1997).

3. Spread of Foods and Dishes

Our grandparents likely remember a time when they didn’t eat a variety of different dishes from around the world.

But today, recipes and spices from around the world are commonplace in multicultural societies. We can eat Chinese, Indian, Japanese, and American foods from a range of restaurants in most world cities.

However, remember that food is just one part of culture. The deeper elements of cultures are the values and beliefs that cultural groups hold.

4. Spread of Fashion

In many nations, younger people are enjoying pop culture and fast fashion that comes from overseas.

This means you may go somewhere like Morocco and see a lot less of the traditional clothing as younger people are out and about wearing westernized fashions.

Similarly, French fashion has historically spread around the world quickly as people were influenced by big Parisian fashion designers.

5. Spread of Political Ideologies

Cultural globalization leads to the spread of ideologies and beliefs. Examples of ideologies include capitalism and democracy.

The best example of this is this is the 2011 Arab Spring, which was an example of the spread of democratic movements around the world. Some succeeded, while others were suppressed by dictatorships.

Similarly, in the early 2020s, there was a rise in authoritarianism in the United States and Eastern Europe. It’s likely that these cultural movements influenced one another thanks to technological globalization .

6. Davos Culture

Davos culture is a term used to describe the global business and political elites that attend the World Economic Forum summits at Davos in Switzerland.

The term “Davos Man” was coined by the American political scientist Samuel P. Huntington (Zanin, 2009).

The Davos Culture view of the world is one centered on the benefits of a globalized world, characterized by a preference for open markets and lower trade barriers, a positive view of competition, a healthy role for global finance, and so on. 

Davos Culture is a classic manifestation of cultural globalization, in that the attendees at such global conferences, irrespective of their national, religious, linguistic, or ethnic origins, share a similar outlook on political, economic, and social affairs, born out of their embeddedness in a globalized culture. 

Table Summary: Examples of Cultural Globalization

Globalization has several interlinked aspects  – including economic, political, and cultural.

While cultural exchanges have been occurring for millennia, cultural globalization refers specifically to the unprecedented acceleration of the transmission of cultural norms sparked off by technological changes such as the internet and cheap air travel. Cultural globalization can be a force for the good, as when it creates opportunities for economic growth and brings about positive change in societies. However, it can also have a darker side when it erodes cultures and creates deep income inequalities. 

Related Globalization and Culture Articles

• 8 Types of Globalization
• Political Globalization
• Economic Globalziation
• The 5 Scapes of Globalization
• 18 Elements of Culture
• 19 Examples of Culture
• Neolocalism
• Types of Cultural Diffusion
• Examples of Ethnocentrism
• Contagious Diffusion Examples
• Examples of Countercultures
• Examples of Relocation Diffusion
• Examples of Hierarchical Diffusion

Berger, P. L. (1997). Four faces of global culture. The National Interest , 49 , 23–29. 

Harvey, D. (1989) The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change . Blackwell.

Huntington, S.P. (1996) The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order Simon & Schuster.

Mikanowski, J. (2018) Behemoth, bully, thief: how the English language is taking over the planet The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/jul/27/english-language-global-dominance  

Ritzer, G. (1993) The McDonaldization of society . London: Sage.

Sunder, K. (2021) Camels are disappearing in India, threatening a centuries-old nomadic culture National Geographic https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/camels-disappearing-in-india-threatens-a-centuries-old-nomadic-culture  

Traill, B. (2017) Voracious and plentiful, feral camels remain a major threat to Australian Outback Pew https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2017/02/21/voracious-and-plentiful-feral-camels-remain-a-major-threat-to-australian-outback  

Zanin, T. (2009). Samuel P. Huntington and the Ambiguities of American Power. International Journal , 64(4), 1109–1116.

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 5 Top Tips for Succeeding at University
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 50 Durable Goods Examples
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 100 Consumer Goods Examples
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 30 Globalization Pros and Cons

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

25,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today

Meet top uk universities from the comfort of your home, here’s your new year gift, one app for all your, study abroad needs, start your journey, track your progress, grow with the community and so much more.

Verification Code

An OTP has been sent to your registered mobile no. Please verify

Thanks for your comment !

Our team will review it before it's shown to our readers.

• School Education /

✍️Essay on Globalisation: Samples in 100, 150 and 200 Words

• Updated on  
• Oct 25, 2023

Globalisation means the combination of economies and societies with the help of information, ideas, technology, finance, goods, services, and people. It is a process where multinational companies work on their international standing and conduct operations internationally or overseas. Over the years, Globalisation has had a profound impact on various aspects of society. Today we will be discussing what globalisation is and how it came into existence with the essay on globalisation listed below.

This Blog Includes:

How globalisation came into existence, essay on globalisation in 100 words, essay on globalisation in 150 words, essay on globalisation in 200 words.

For all those unaware, the concepts of globalisation first emerged in the 20th century. Here are some of the key events which led to the development of globalisation in today’s digital world.

• The ancient Silk Route as well as the maritime routes led to the exchange of goods, ideas and culture in several countries. Although these were just trade routes, but later became important centres for cultural exchange.
• Other than this, the European colonial expansion which took place from the 15th to the 20th century led to the setting up of global markets where both knowledge and people were transferred to several developing countries. 
• The evolution and exchange of mass media, cinema and the internet further led to the widespread dissemination of cultures and ideas.

Also Read: Essay on the Importance of the English Language for Students

Globalization, the interconnectedness of nations through trade, technology, and cultural exchange, has reshaped the world. It has enabled the free flow of goods and information, fostering economic growth and cultural diversity. However, it also raises challenges such as income inequality and cultural homogenization. 

In a globalized world, businesses expand internationally, but local industries can suffer. Moreover, while globalization promotes shared knowledge, it can erode local traditions. Striking a balance between the benefits and drawbacks of globalization is essential to ensure a more equitable and culturally diverse global community, where economies thrive without leaving anyone behind.

Also Read: Essay on Save Environment: Samples in 100, 200, 300 Words

Globalization is the process of increasing interconnectedness and interdependence among countries, economies, and cultures. It has transformed the world in various ways.

Economically, globalization has facilitated the flow of goods, services, and capital across borders. This has boosted economic growth and reduced poverty in many developing nations. However, it has also led to income inequality and job displacement in some regions.

Culturally, globalization has resulted in the spread of ideas, values, and cultural products worldwide. While this fosters cultural exchange and diversity, it also raises concerns about cultural homogenization.

Technologically, globalization has been driven by advances in communication and transportation. The internet and smartphones have connected people across the globe, allowing for rapid information dissemination and collaboration.

In conclusion, globalization is a complex phenomenon with both benefits and challenges. It has reshaped the world, bringing people closer together, but also highlighting the need for responsible governance and policies to address its downsides.

Also Read: Essay on Unity in Diversity in 100 to 200 Words

Globalization, a multifaceted phenomenon, has reshaped the world over the past few decades. It involves the interconnectedness of economies, cultures, and societies across the globe. In this essay, we will briefly discuss its key aspects and impacts.

Economically, globalization has led to increased international trade and investment. It has allowed companies to expand operations globally, leading to economic growth in many countries. However, it has also resulted in income inequality and job displacement in some regions.

Culturally, globalization has facilitated the exchange of ideas, values, and traditions. This has led to a more diverse and interconnected world where cultures blend, but it can also challenge local traditions and languages.

Socially, globalization has improved access to information and technology. It has connected people across borders, enabling global activism and awareness of worldwide issues. Nonetheless, it has also created challenges like cybercrime and privacy concerns.

In conclusion, globalization is a double-edged sword. It offers economic opportunities, cultural exchange, and global connectivity, but it also brings about disparities, cultural tensions, and new global challenges. To navigate this complex landscape, the world must strive for responsible globalization that balances the interests of all stakeholders and promotes inclusivity and sustainability.

Related Articles

The movement of goods, technologies, information, and jobs between countries is referred to as globalisation. 

Globalization as a phenomenon began with the earliest human migratory routes, or with Genghis Khan’s invasions, or travel across the Silk Road.

Globalisation allows wealthy nations to access cheaper labour and resources, while also providing opportunity for developing and underdeveloped nations with the jobs and investment capital they require.

For more information on such interesting topics, visit our essay-writing page and follow Leverage Edu ! 

Malvika Chawla

Malvika is a content writer cum news freak who comes with a strong background in Journalism and has worked with renowned news websites such as News 9 and The Financial Express to name a few. When not writing, she can be found bringing life to the canvasses by painting on them.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Contact no. *

Connect With Us

25,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today.

Resend OTP in

Need help with?

Study abroad.

UK, Canada, US & More

IELTS, GRE, GMAT & More

Scholarship, Loans & Forex

Country Preference

New Zealand

Which English test are you planning to take?

Which academic test are you planning to take.

Not Sure yet

When are you planning to take the exam?

Already booked my exam slot

Within 2 Months

Want to learn about the test

Which Degree do you wish to pursue?

When do you want to start studying abroad.

January 2024

September 2024

What is your budget to study abroad?

How would you describe this article ?

Please rate this article

We would like to hear more.

Have something on your mind?

Make your study abroad dream a reality in January 2022 with

India's Biggest Virtual University Fair

Essex Direct Admission Day

Why attend .

Don't Miss Out

Essay on Globalization for Students and Children

500+ words essay on globalization.

Globalization refers to integration between people, companies, and governments. Most noteworthy, this integration occurs on a global scale. Furthermore, it is the process of expanding the business all over the world. In Globalization, many businesses expand globally and assume an international image. Consequently, there is a requirement for huge investment to develop international companies.

How Globalization Came into Existence?

First of all, people have been trading goods since civilization began. In the 1st century BC, there was the transportation of goods from China to Europe. The goods transportation took place along the Silk Road. The Silk Road route was very long in distance. This was a remarkable development in the history of Globalization. This is because, for the first time ever, goods were sold across continents.

Globalization kept on growing gradually since 1st BC. Another significant development took place in the 7th century AD. This was the time when the religion of Islam spread. Most noteworthy, Arab merchants led to a rapid expansion of international trade . By the 9th century, there was the domination of Muslim traders on international trade. Furthermore, the focus of trade at this time was spices.

True Global trade began in the Age of Discovery in the 15th century. The Eastern and Western continents were connected by European merchants. There was the discovery of America in this period. Consequently, global trade reached America from Europe.

From the 19th century, there was a domination of Great Britain all over the world. There was a rapid spread of international trade. The British developed powerful ships and trains. Consequently, the speed of transportation greatly increased. The rate of production of goods also significantly increased. Communication also got faster which was better for Global trade .

Finally, in 20th and 21st -Century Globalization took its ultimate form. Above all, the development of technology and the internet took place. This was a massive aid for Globalization. Hence, E-commerce plays a huge role in Globalization.

Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas

Impact of Globalization

First of all, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) increases at a great rate. This certainly is a huge contribution of Globalization. Due to FDI, there is industrial development. Furthermore, there is the growth of global companies. Also, many third world countries would also benefit from FDI.

Technological Innovation is another notable contribution of Globalization. Most noteworthy, there is a huge emphasis on technology development in Globalization. Furthermore, there is also technology transfer due to Globalization. The technology would certainly benefit the common people.

The quality of products improves due to Globalization. This is because manufacturers try to make products of high-quality. This is due to the pressure of intense competition. If the product is inferior, people can easily switch to another high-quality product.

To sum it up, Globalization is a very visible phenomenon currently. Most noteworthy, it is continuously increasing. Above all, it is a great blessing to trade. This is because it brings a lot of economic and social benefits to it.

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

• Travelling Essay
• Picnic Essay
• Our Country Essay
• My Parents Essay
• Essay on Favourite Personality
• Essay on Memorable Day of My Life
• Essay on Knowledge is Power
• Essay on Gurpurab
• Essay on My Favourite Season
• Essay on Types of Sports

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download the App

Essay: The World’s Biggest Crisis Is the End of Scarcity

Create an FP account to save articles to read later and in the FP mobile app.

ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

• World Brief
• Editors’ Picks
• Africa Brief
• China Brief
• Latin America Brief
• South Asia Brief
• Situation Report
• Flash Points
• War in Ukraine
• Israel and Hamas
• U.S.-China competition
• Biden's foreign policy
• Trade and economics
• Artificial intelligence
• Asia & the Pacific
• Middle East & Africa

Ones and Tooze

Foreign policy live.

Winter 2024 Issue

Print Archive

FP Analytics

• In-depth Special Reports
• Issue Briefs
• Power Maps and Interactive Microsites
• FP Simulations & PeaceGames
• Graphics Database

Promise Over Peril: Part Six

Her power 2024, fp global health forum 2024, fp @ unga79.

By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.

Your guide to the most important world stories of the day

Essential analysis of the stories shaping geopolitics on the continent

The latest news, analysis, and data from the country each week

Weekly update on what’s driving U.S. national security policy

Evening roundup with our editors’ favorite stories of the day

One-stop digest of politics, economics, and culture

Weekly update on developments in India and its neighbors

A curated selection of our very best long reads

The World’s Biggest Crisis Is the End of Scarcity

How our era of plenty has created the global problems that plague us today..

• United States

Imagine an alien observer, sent undercover to Earth every half-century, to account for the status of human life on the planet. What would she convey to her extraterrestrial colleagues about 2024?

This article is adapted from The Taming of Scarcity and the Problems of Plenty: Rethinking International Relations and American Grand Strategy in a New Era , Francis J. Gavin, Routledge, 106 pp., $16.95, March 2024.

Before taking her trip, she would peruse her previous reports, noting a few things. In 1974, the world’s leading democratic power, the United States, was in geopolitical retreat and domestic disarray, while the authoritarian Soviet Union appeared increasingly powerful. The most populated state in the world, a Mao Zedong-led China, possessed an economy barely above subsistence level, while the second most populous nation, India, was scarcely better. The global economy suffered from both inflation and slow growth, marked by a chaotic international monetary and financial system. Wars or the threat of wars, both civil and interstate, were ever present in every part of the globe. Nuclear Armageddon hung like a sword of Damocles over the planet.

1974’s report, however, was absolutely Pollyannaish compared to 1924’s. One horrific world war had concluded while laying the seeds for another even more murderous. Imperialism shaped the international order, as a significant percentage of the world’s population was ruled or exploited by European capitals thousands of miles away. A steep economic depression had just ended but was only a precursor to a far deeper, more devastating financial collapse a few years later. Racism, misogyny, and intolerance were the norm. This, however, was paradise compared to the previous chronicle. 1874’s report pointed out that global life expectancy was only 30 and that few living people had not, at some point in their life, been visited by personal and communal violence, deadly disease, misrule and misgovernance, and the threat of famine and disaster. Each preceding half-century report was, in fact, more dire than the last.

The soup line in New York City, circa 1929. Bettman Archives/via Getty Images

Seen from this historical perspective, the alien could send a positively glowing report back home. In 2024, famine and illiteracy have been dramatically reduced, and life expectancy has more than doubled over the past century. Unimaginable volumes of wealth are generated; staggering amounts of information are available to ordinary people, instantaneously; and transformative new labor and lifesaving technologies are created every day. Genocide is rare; tolerance, not prejudice, is increasingly a shared norm; formal colonialism has been thrown on the dustbin of history; and economic recessions are unlikely to turn into crippling depressions.

Most importantly, the incentives for states to fully mobilize their societies to pursue total wars of conquest—perhaps the most pervasive and frightening aspect of world politics in her past chronicles—have all but disappeared. Indeed, states are now expected to protect and provide benefits to their citizens, instead of simply using them as military fodder to vanquish foes and seize land. Ideas and innovation, not territory, are the sources of power in this new world.

In short, the world has made unimaginable progress in taming the steep challenges of scarcity that had plagued humanity for millennia and had been one of the core drivers of total wars for plunder, empire, and conquest. But the success in creating a more prosperous, informed, and secure world for humanity has, unexpectedly, generated a whole new set of planetary challenges that, if not resolved, threatens disaster, if not human extinction.

The remarkable progress in generating unimaginable levels of wealth, information, and security has created the new, more vexing, and arguably more dangerous problems of plenty—unexpected and potentially catastrophic challenges that were created, ironically, by humanity’s impressive efforts to tame scarcity.

Drone to Yacht, an exclusive delivery service, drops a bag of food to boats near Ibiza on Aug. 24, 2021. Jaime Reina/AFP via Getty Images

Five revolutionary shifts were key in creating our present era of plenty. First, an unexpected and voluntary demographic compression unfolded in the developed world, with birth rates falling precipitously while life expectancy markedly expanded; as median ages increased and population growth slowed, the need to conquer additional territory abated. Second, an economic-technological revolution emerged that massively improved agricultural yields and the availability of food, dramatically boosted industrial productivity, and transformed finance capitalism, while improving transportation, housing, and health, and making accessible, affordable fuel bountiful. Third, an information revolution took place, whereby increased literacy and technological change significantly expanded the amount of access to knowledge about the world. Fourth, leaders of the developed world created domestic and international governing institutions and practices, which, among other benefits, generated far greater domestic stability and socio-economic well-being, eliminated great depressions, and provided increased personal as well as collective security, creating a political order that prized order, sovereignty, and, in time, human rights. Finally, ground-breaking new military capabilities, especially thermonuclear weapons, prohibitively increased the costs and risks of great-power wars of conquest.

These revolutions combined to reduce the shadow of famine, disease, and misery that had long fallen upon the human experience, massively increasing total wealth and information while weakening core drivers of territorial expansion, immeasurably improving the quality of life in the developed world. Populations stabilized and aged; food, resources, and markets became more abundant; and disintermediated flows of information exploded.

So what exactly are the problems of plenty? The current world order produces great material output, generated by increasing global exchange, but distributing it fairly among and between populations is contentious. This enormous prosperity generated by the burgeoning trade and industrial prowess has spawned grave risks of climate, ecological, migratory, and public-health catastrophes. The emergence of new technologies, developed largely in the private sector, has solved innumerable problems, while also creating frightening new ones. Surprisingly, an unlimited amount of data and information, no longer intermediated by legacy institutions, generates different though equally fraught dangers as scarce information controlled by religious institutions or the state.

The Relentless Growth of Degrowth Economics

Europe’s push to abandon capitalism is motivated by optimism about politics—and pessimism about everything else.

The Hidden History of the World’s Top Offshore Cryptocurrency Tax Haven

The Bahamas represents how global capitalism can go very right, and very wrong, at exactly the same time.

The 1970s Weren’t What You Think

Yes, fiscal and monetary policy seemed stuck for too long in expansionary mode. But the era also saw the rebalancing of the world economy.

As Jonathan S. Blake and Nils Gilman point out in their forthcoming book, Children of a Modest Star , the list of threats to human welfare, life, and the planet itself generated by plenty is daunting: “climate change, pandemic diseases, stratospheric ozone depletion, atmospheric aerosol loading, space junk, growing antibiotic resistance, biodiversity loss, anthropogenic genetic disruptions, declining soil health, upended nitrogen and phosphorus cycles, freshwater depletion, ocean acidification, oceanic plastics—and maybe even emerging technologies with terraforming potential, like bioengineering and artificial intelligence.”

A key feature of the age of plenty is the extraordinary ability to move massive quantities of ideas, money, goods, and especially people around the world quickly, irrespective of borders and territory. But this revolution in transmission does not simply enable good citizens and products to move around the world: unwanted agents—from pathogens to terrorists to bad ideas—can also move far more quickly and effortlessly, often with devastating consequences. Expectations have also been dramatically raised while left unmet. While the age of abundance has promoted tolerance and radical individuality, it has also undermined social cohesion and weakened the sense of common purpose needed to confront these challenges. Governing norms and institutions developed to successfully tame scarcity have been exposed as ill-suited to confront contemporary challenges, generating a crisis of political legitimacy and stoking polarization.

Families arrive to board a train at Kramatorsk central station as they flee Kramatorsk, in the Donbas region of Ukraine on April 4, 2022. Fadel Senna/AFP via Getty Images

In an era of plenty where empire, plunder, and conquest make little sense, how should we understand the current turmoil in world politics, marked by atrocities in the Middle East, Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine, and the deepening tensions between the world’s two most powerful states, China and the United States? Why are the leading powers seemingly focused on issues that resonated in the world of scarcity, particularly great-power rivalry and war, while offering inadequate responses to the pressing issues generated by a world of plenty? There are many reasons, but three stand out.

First, Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine is the exception that proves the rule, revealing the dangers of strategic decisions based on outdated assumptions about conquest. From a narrow national-interest perspective, a desire to control the Donbas made some sense in 1900, when its abundant coal, wheat, defense in depth, and pliant population added to Russia’s power in a world shaped by scarcity and where empire and conquest were the norm. Today, in an age when food and fuel are historically cheap and abundant, land less valuable, conquered territories much more difficult to subdue, alternative grand strategies far more promising, and the world both aghast by and willing to punish Russia for its violations of the norms of sovereignty and human rights, even a successful conquest of Ukraine was unlikely to make Russia much more powerful in the long run. There are many important differences between America’s disastrous post-9/11 wars in the greater Middle East and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Both, however, reflect poor grand-strategic decisions based on profound misreadings of the nature of power and the incentives of the contemporary international system, misunderstanding the increased difficulty and decreased payoff for using force to conquer territories or subdue uncooperative populations in the age of plenty.

Second, it is important to recognize that there are many causes of war and conflict beyond plunder and imperial conquest. In particular, we must distinguish between the imperial conquest of the past—or an expansive, often unlimited impulse to add territory and colonies—and irredentism, or the finite desire of a state to reclaim territory it believes it has unfairly lost. The most dangerous places in the world—Kashmir, the Korean Peninsula, the Middle East, and the Taiwan Strait—are often where states are willing to fight, at great cost, to regain territory they believe is naturally and historically their own. While they may seem similar, imperial conquest and irredentism are driven by significantly different factors and forces, are shaped by different cost-benefit calculations, and demand different grand-strategic responses.

Whether China’s ambitions to take Taiwan is an example of irredentism or the desire for global domination is a critical question. Regardless of China’s ultimate goal, however, the changing circumstances wrought by the age of plenty make the return of an imperial, ever-expanding Eurasian empire similar to Napoleonic France, Nazi Germany, imperial Japan, or Stalin’s Soviet Union very unlikely. Unlike states and empires during the age of scarcity, China has no reason to fear being conquered, nor, even if it wanted to, could it easily invade, occupy, and take over neighbors like India, Japan, and Southeast Asian states, especially if a future successful takeover of Taiwan generated widespread military balancing and nuclear proliferation in the region. In the age of plenty, China might soon discover that the cost-benefit ratio of conquest has been completely inverted over the past century. Even if Beijing wished to pursue imperial conquest, it is hard to imagine how it could succeed, and, if it tried, it would risk its own defeat and collapse.

Finally, it often takes some time—sometimes decades—for people, institutions, and states to understand when their environment and circumstances have changed and to update their assumptions, conceptual lenses, and policy practices accordingly. Millenia of conquest, empire, and violent revolutions—and governing institutions built to deal with those crises—have left deep scars and unchallenged assumptions, and states, leaders, and populations have been slow to recognize the profound changes in demographics, technology, economics, and socio-cultural realities that have done much to tame scarcity while abetting the problems of plenty.

This myopia can come at a steep cost. Today’s leaders may share the characteristics of their tragic predecessors on the eve of World War I. Faced with a rapidly changing world and global phenomena they do not understand, they fall back on their long-held, unspoken, and often unexamined beliefs about how the world should work, as opposed to trying to better understand how the world does work. As terrifying as the problems of scarcity and the geopolitical behaviors they unleash can be, at least they are familiar. Leading powers and their leaders and institutions understand how to play the great-power political game that dominated the past. The problems of plenty, and the solutions required, are unfamiliar, disorienting, and vexing. Yet a melting planet, mass migrations, another even more lethal pandemic, destabilizing new technologies, and the cancers of inequality, deep polarization, and sociocultural fragmentation and alienation threaten the United States and the planet far more than the kind of expanding industrial, mobilized Eurasian hegemon that plagued the first half of the 20th century.

An IBM computer center that processes agricultural data to produce projected figures for farming, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, circa 1973. Alan Band/ Getty Images Archive

How would our alien friend end her report? She would point out that the institutions, practices, theories, and policies that successfully tamed scarcity—and that dominated current debates—were woefully ill-suited to meet the problems of plenty. The costs of failing to update core, often unspoken assumptions about how the world works and what matters would be highlighted, and that by preparing for the last war, Earth might tragically and unnecessarily get it. Her report would chide the thinkers and statesmen of 2024 for obsessing over the return of great-power competition and regurgitating the works of geopolitical thinkers like Mahan and Mackinder in order to control oceans and land that, if the problems of plenty are not confronted, may be dying and uninhabitable before long.

Visiting the planet every half-century has made her, unlike her Earth friends, an optimist. Humankind never goes the easy way around, and given the stakes, they could easily mess up—by starting World War III or being unprepared for a more lethal pandemic than COVID-19, unrestrained artificial intelligence, or the deadly consequences of the climate crisis. She reminds herself, and wishes the citizens of the planet could remember, that few living in 1974, 1924, or 1874 could have imagined the extraordinary progress earthlings have made since. Which, perhaps against her better judgment, gives her hope that she will get to visit in 2074 and be impressed once again.

Francis J. Gavin is the Giovanni Agnelli distinguished professor and the director of the Henry A. Kissinger Center for Global Affairs at SAIS-Johns Hopkins University. This essay is adapted from his most recent book, The Taming of Scarcity and the Problems of Plenty: Rethinking International Relations and American Grand Strategy in a New Era .

Join the Conversation

Commenting on this and other recent articles is just one benefit of a Foreign Policy subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log In .

Subscribe Subscribe

View Comments

Join the conversation on this and other recent Foreign Policy articles when you subscribe now.

Not your account? Log out

Please follow our comment guidelines , stay on topic, and be civil, courteous, and respectful of others’ beliefs.

Change your username:

I agree to abide by FP’s comment guidelines . (Required)

Confirm your username to get started.

The default username below has been generated using the first name and last initial on your FP subscriber account. Usernames may be updated at any time and must not contain inappropriate or offensive language.

More from Foreign Policy

Russia’s military is already preparing for its next war .

Moscow is rebuilding its military in anticipation of a conflict with NATO in the next decade, Estonian officials warn.

The History Crisis Is a National Security Problem

As universities shed scholars, key learning disappears.

It’s Not Too Late for Restrained U.S. Foreign Policy

The calls for renewed U.S. global leadership are getting louder. They’re as mistaken as they ever were.

Princess Catherine, BBC Dad, and the New Picture Perfect

What the reception to two viral moments reveals about our evolving global culture of authenticity.

The Islamic State Has a New Target: Russia

Israel is a strategic liability for the united states, ukraine’s war is killing another country, what the latest u.n. cease-fire vote means, can ukraine escape the curse of nonexistence, al qaeda is back—and thriving—in afghanistan, the rise of the all-inclusive resort, indian opposition leader arvind kejriwal arrested on graft charges, what in the world.

Sign up for World Brief

FP’s flagship evening newsletter guiding you through the most important world stories of the day, written by Alexandra Sharp . Delivered weekdays.

Pros and Cons of Globalization for Pakistan

• March 26, 2022
• CSS , Css Essays , CSS Solved Essays , PMS , PMS Essays
• 38142 Views

CSS, PMS Essays | Pros and Cons of Globalization for Pakistan | Best for CSS, PMS Current Affairs, Pakistan Affairs, and Essay Papers

The essay is attempted by Iqra Ali on the given pattern, which Sir Syed Kazim Ali  teaches to his students, who have consistently been qualifying their CSS, PMS essays. Sir Syed Kazim Ali has been Pakistan’s top English writing and CSS, PMS essay and precis coach with the highest success rate of his students. The essay is uploaded to help other competitive aspirants learn and practice essay writing techniques and patterns.

Introduction

• Globalization has transfigured Pakistan socially, politically, and economically into uncharted territory.
• Pakistan has procured a golden opportunity to unleash its true potential due to globalization.
• Globalization has put Pakistan’s sovereignty at stake due to the over-dominance of the world’s superpowers.

What is Globalization?

• Globalization deals with the interdependence of people, companies, and countries economically, socially, and politically on a global scale.

What are the Positive Impacts of Globalization?

Economic Merits

• Increasing  exports and Foreign direct investments
• Broadening access to goods and services
• Spreading technology and innovation

Political Merits

• Suppressing  authoritative governments
• Creating awareness among the public
• Tackling environmental hazards through international laws and policies

Socio-Cultural Merits

• Promoting desi music and art throughout the world
• Increasing education opportunities
• Lifting people out of poverty

What are the Negative Impacts of Globalization?

Economic Demerits

• Destructing local business
• Exacerbating the dependency of the state’s economy on foreign investment
• Increasing  inequality of income distribution

Political Demerits

• Empowering multinational companies at the Cost of national sovereignty
• Threatening national political norms of the country
• Exacerbating conflicts among the countries for dominance

Socio-Cultural Demerits

• Demolishing the multicultural beauty of Pakistan
• Westernizing the traditional and religious norms and values
• Declining patriotism and national values

Critical Analysis Conclusion

Globalization- the unhampered flow of products, technology, information, and jobs across national borders and cultures- has transformed the world’s economy, politics, society, and law, except in Pakistan. Although the country has been one of the founding members of the World Trade Organization (WTO), globalization has not been a choice but an obligation for it under the conditions imposed by international organizations, mainly IMF and World Bank. However, having been hailed with untapped natural and young human resources and its strategic location between energy sources and consumer nations of a population of three billion, Pakistan has procured a golden opportunity to unleash its true potential due to globalization. Free trade opportunities and technological advancements have helped the country grow economically and socially. For instance, the development of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor has enabled it to become an essential player in the geo-economic arena in South Asia. The national talent of art, music, and food has also brought international recognition in the contemporary globalized world.

On the other hand, Pakistan, being an underdeveloped country, has faced multiple challenges due to globalization, among which the threatened sovereignty is the deadliest. Since Pakistan has not made any economic or political policy without the constraints of international organizations and the superpowers it is indebted to, it is being exploited in the international market. The lack of infrastructure, inept leadership, deficient awareness of technology, and the shortage of education are also some hurdles that make the country far less competitive than other globally successful countries. Moreover, the unbridled Westernized culture- promoted vastly by media-is diminishes the essence of traditional and religious norms, taking the country’s norms from collectivism to individualism. The accelerated free movement of drug cartels and terrorists is another negative outcome of globalization in the country. Hence, globalization has made Pakistan a hybrid state, trying to balance liberalism and conservatism. It is high time some strategic changes should be made in the economic and foreign policies of the country so that the best progress could be brought about from globalization leaving behind the drawbacks. As it is aptly said by Mahbub ul Haq- a Pakistani economist, “Globalization is no longer an option; it is a fact. Pakistan must either learn to manage it far more skillfully or drown in the global cross currents.”

In literal meaning, globalization means the transformation of local or regional phenomena into global ones. Since it is a multidimensional process impacting every walk of life, its elucidation varies widely in the literature. For instance, in the economy, globalization is the process through which national economies- to a greater or a lesser extent- absorb into a single global economy. Likewise, cultural anthropologists define globalization as a global flow of information, commodities, images, etc., to flatten out the cultural differences between nations, individuals, and regions. Global warming is the inclination of national policy-making concerning international organizations on political grounds. According to John B. Larson, an American politician and businessman, “ Globalization is not a monolithic force but an evolving set of consequences – good, bad, and unintended. It is a new reality.”  So, it is not wrong to say that globalization is the most globalized term.

Covering a wide range of distinct socio-politico-economic trends, globalization has greatly influenced Pakistan negatively and positively. To begin with the pros, it has revolutionized Pakistan’s economy the most. The free market economy has bolstered the size of the country’s market for exports and Foreign Direct Investment, which has aided development. Like many underdeveloped countries, Pakistan’s economy has remained highly regulated and protected for the first three decades of its establishment. However, constrained by the domestic economic situation, the pressure of international organizations, and the conditions of the world economy, Pakistan started liberalizing its economy in the 1980s. Hence, today Pakistan’s economy is more liberal than it was a few decades ago, with an increasing role of the private sector in economic development. The development of multiple foreign projects in the country- including the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and the increasing rate of immigration of Pakistani natives to other countries- is the overt manifestation of the country’s free-market economy, which has not only increased the real capital of the country but also contributed in its institutional developments. Another positive effect of globalization is greater and easier access to products at increasingly cheaper rates. Since liberalization allows multiple national and international companies to sell goods in the country, it has created a competitive environment for the survival and success of businesses. Hence, People have procured the most from free trade since they can buy goods at more affordable rates and, thus, a higher standard of living. Additionally, globalization has increased access to technology and innovation in Pakistan. Through the rapid spread of technology in the region, there is more room for competitive domestic industries to produce quality goods for the locals and export. Putting it briefly, globalization has brought miraculous advancements in the economic progress of Pakistan.

Moving Further, Globalization- through the quick availability of the internet and interstate communication- has turned the wave of the political culture of Pakistan. It has changed the state-centric views of politics and increased democratic cooperation. Although Pakistan has been a democratic country since its inception, the inept leadership, prevailed corruption, and unnecessary military interventions have made it more of an authoritative government, leaving democracy in the name. However, the globalized media approach has made the citizens aware of their rights and enabled them to revolt against authoritarian rulers. Hence, the rules and policies are now more transparent, and the leaders are more accountable for their performance. Along with national awareness, globalization has helped bring awareness to international issues, including environmental problems. The agreements are made through international non-governmental organizations. Being one of the biggest endorsers of environmental policies, Pakistan has helped a lot in managing climate problems. Recently, the country has made a record in the world’s most ambitious afforestation efforts through a Ten Billion Tree Tsunami spread Policy over Five years. As a result, it has gained an exemplary position for saving the environment worldwide, all thanks to globalization. In short, globalization is not the hope of the people yearning for their rights only, but it has also brought significant awareness in sorting out international problems through international collaborations. 

Besides, globalization has introduced the culture of Pakistan all over the world, creating a colourful image of the country internationally. The land, of pure-like every society- has its own rich and unique culture, traditions, norms, and way of life. Many deep-rooted desi traditions, cuisines, art, and music, run in the blood of Pakistani nationals. They have preserved their culture throughout history and manifested it worldwide through globalization. The Pakistani music genres of folk music, traditional Ghazals, and synchronized Qawwali and Western music by the world-renowned Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan are recognized beyond boundaries. Likewise, border-free travelling has opened the way for students to travel to other counties for higher and more competitive education in many of the world’s best universities. Since there becomes a great chance for people to learn, work, and earn equally without geographical boundaries, globalization-resultantly-has helped alleviate global poverty. Briefly, globalization has not only introduced the culture of Pakistan to the world but has also made education and job opportunities easily available for the state’s people.  

 “Globalization has changed us into a company that searches the world, not just to sell or to source, but to find intellectual capital – the world’s best talents and greatest ideas .” -Jack Welch, an American business executive

Although globalization has multiple positive impacts, it is every benefit comes with a caveat. It has posed significant risks to developing countries, including Pakistan, by greatly benefiting Multinational corporations and prosperous governments. First, the threat of globalization leads to the domestic loss of business and jobs. In Pakistan, living depends on tech-based products imported from developed countries. Additionally, foreign-invested companies in the already low-employed country tend to provide international goods, thus, destroying the local business. Thus, the state’s economy depends on foreign direct investments, imports, or even debts with high-interest rates. According to the World Bank, the external debt of Pakistan has been raised to sixty-six million USD from 2002 until 2021. As a result, the country has been bound to make its economic and foreign policies under the obligations of the global economy regulating bodies like the World Bank and the International Monterey Fund. Additionally, globalization has been disastrous for the country’s working class. They are exploited to work at significantly lower wages in both the foreign-invested business within the country and as labour in other countries. Advancement in technology has further aggravated the risk of unemployment for workers. Hence, economic globalization has led to income inequality, making Pakistan more dependent on other powers. As it is aptly said by Winnie Byanyima, Executive Director of Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations- UNAIDS, “The widening gap between rich and poor is not just a natural phenomenon . It is a sign that much of what we have been doing, especially in terms of models of economic growth, has been wrong.” 

On political grounds, one of the most preponderant demerits of globalization is the threatened sovereignty of the state. National sovereignty is at stake due to unnecessary interventions of international organizations and multinational companies in state affairs. Pakistan is a highly affected victim of politically and economically stable international political alliances due to its significant economic and significant dependency on international organizations and world powers. As a result, the country’s leaders are made to feel that they lack decision-making ability and are persuaded to modify the structure of their government. Consequently, the stronger nations are trying to overrule the land of the pure by being directly or indirectly involved in its political independence as a state. For instance, America has been using the land of Pakistan for its vested interest in the Afghan war and, subsequently, in the war on terror. Hence, globalization has demolished the national political structure of the state and led to an erosion of its national sovereignty, thus, destroying its peace. 

Last but not least, globalization has badly impacted the socio-cultural diversity of Pakistan. It has hurt the state’s religious and ethical norms and demolished its multicultural beauty. For instance, the national dress of Pakistan is Shalwar Kameez. However, the Westernization of men’s and women’s dressing is degrading the country’s culture. Likewise, McDonaldization, fast-food culture, is widespread in the streets and shopping malls of the country despite its deep-rooted desi cuisine. Hence, the idea of flattened global culture has now become the imposition of Western values, beliefs, and norms on the rest of the world. Consequently, psychological problems like Xenocentrism- the belief that other cultures are superior to one’s own- and Ethnophaulism- the hatred belief for one’s nation- have drastically increased in the country. All thanks are due to globalization. Above all, it has diminished the importance of nationalism in the already shattered ethnicity of Pakistan. People from all provinces who are ready to kill their countrymen belonging to a sect and culture different from theirs are eager to adopt the Western culture. Hence, globalization creates an imbalance between patriotism and globalism. To put it briefly, globalization has badly ruined Pakistan’s cultural norms and values. 

Critically, globalization is a dichotomy with both comforts and harms. However, for Pakistan, the benefits accrued from globalization are nearly nothing. It has been a sour phenomenon for its youth looking for a job since the unemployment rate is continuously growing. Additionally, infrastructure and trade have not exhibited any significant performance after globalization. Poverty incidences are also reported to be increased. Above all, the prevalent Western culture has demolished the religious and cultural norms of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Hence, globalization is not a panacea for whole-lot-of problems that Pakistan faces. Nonetheless, Pakistan must educate and train its people on every ground to benefit from globalization.

In a nutshell, globalization has brought multiple transformations in Pakistan. Despite being a latecomer to be encompassed in the globalized world, the country, with its geographically important location at the crossroads separating South Asia from Central Asia and the Middle East, has gained a lot of political, social, and above all economic benefits from the globalized world. However, it could not actively participate in the growing world trade of goods and services, foreign investment, technological advancements, and skill supply. The serious concern is the underdevelopment of the country’s human resources and the low skill intensity of its labour force. Unless the quality and outreach of education, training, literacy, skills, and health status are significantly improved, the country will remain handicapped in maximizing the benefits of globalization. Therefore, the challenge to be successful in the shrivelled world is not beyond the reach of Pakistan; instead, it can be achieved easily with smart policy-making and determined collective effort.

CSS Solved Past Papers’ Essays

Articles might interest you.

The following are some of the most important articles for CSS and PMS aspirants. Click on any to start reading.

Recent Posts

Top Categories

Cssprepforum, education company.

cssprepforum.com

Welcome to Cssprepforum, Pakistan’s largest learning management system (LMS) with millions of questions along with their logical explanations educating millions of learners, students, aspirants, teachers, professors, and parents preparing for a successful future. 

Founder:   Syed Kazim Ali Founded:  2020 Phone: +92-332-6105-842 +92-300-6322-446 Email:  [email protected] Students Served:  10 Million Daily Learners:  50,000 Offered Courses: Visit Courses  

More Courses

Basic English Grammar and Writing Course

Extensive English Essay & Precis Course for CSS and PMS

CSS English Essay and Precis Crash Course for 2023

Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox.

• CSS Solved Essays
• CSS Solved GSA
• CSS Solved PA
• CSS Solved Islamiat
• Current Affairs
• All Courses
• Writers Club
• All Authors
• All Members
• All Teachers
• Become an Author
• Who is Sir Syed Kazim Ali?
• Privacy Policy

CssPrepForum is Pakistan’s largest and greatest platform for CSS, PMS, FPSC, PPSC, SPSC, KPPSC, AJKPSC, BPSC, GBPSC, NTS, and other One Paper 100 Marks MCQs exams’ students. It has become Pakistan’s most trusted website among CSS, PMS students for their exams’ preparation because of its high-quality preparation material.

@ 2023 Cssprepforum. All RightsReserved.

Bernie Sanders’s foreign policy ‘revolution’ is a string of leftist clichés

The vermont senator looks at america’s global record and sees mostly failure and disgrace..

This week Foreign Affairs published a 2,800-word essay by Bernie Sanders, the US senator from Vermont whose campaigns for president in 2016 and 2020, though unsuccessful, attracted wide interest and support. Sanders calls himself a democratic socialist and his essay, titled “A Revolution in American Foreign Policy,” faithfully reflects the far-left worldview he has always embraced.

That worldview is easily summarized: Most of what is bad in world affairs can be blamed on the United States, and especially on American corporations and billionaires. Sanders sees US foreign policy as fundamentally “disastrous,” a word he uses repeatedly in his essay. “For many decades, there has been a ‘bipartisan consensus’ on foreign affairs,” Sanders writes in his opening paragraph. “Tragically, that consensus has almost always been wrong.”

Advertisement

The great 19th-century French statesman Talleyrand reportedly said about the Bourbon royal dynasty that they learned nothing and forgot nothing . The same can be said of the 82-year-old Sanders. He regards America’s global record since World War II as an almost unrelieved litany of failure. “It’s easy to see that the rhetoric and decisions of leaders in both major parties are frequently guided not by respect for democracy or human rights but militarism, groupthink, and the greed and power of corporate interests,” he declares.

From Sanders’s perspective, America went wrong with the Cold War. What President John F. Kennedy described as “a long twilight struggle” to defend liberty from a Soviet empire bent on global repression, the Vermont senator sees as America’s “shameful track record” of propping up anticommunist dictators, fighting unwinnable wars, and backing military coups in countries like Iran and Guatemala. In Southeast Asia, “the United States lost a war that never should have been fought,” he fumes, making no connection between the eventual departure of US forces and the horrors imposed by the Communist regimes that subsequently took control. In Eastern Europe, America’s victory in the Cold War opened the door to freedom, democracy, prosperity, and grateful alliance with the West. To that victory, the greatest US foreign policy success in the second half of the 20th century, Sanders doesn’t even allude.

He likewise pours out his scorn on the US policies that followed the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Reasonable people certainly found much to debate about the global war on terror and the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. It would be interesting to know how Sanders thinks the United States should have responded to the murderous threat posed by radical jihadists of Al Qaeda and the Taliban. But he doesn’t say. Should Saddam Hussein, one of the world’s cruelest dictators, have been left in power? He doesn’t say. What does Sanders recommend regarding Iran, which is ruled by a regime implacable in its pursuit of nuclear weapons, its sponsorship of regional terror networks, and its hatred of the United States? He doesn’t say.

Throughout his essay, Sanders is voluble on the subject of what American foreign policy makers have gotten wrong, yet almost wholly silent when it comes to explaining how they could have gotten it right.

He is no more illuminating on today’s international crises. He devotes a single boilerplate sentence to Russia’s savage war against Ukraine: “Like a majority of Americans, I believe it is in the vital interest of the United States and the international community to fight off Russian President Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine.” But after that throat-clearing, he focuses on the real villain — the “many defense contractors” that see the war in Ukraine “primarily as a way to line their own pockets.” Sanders rails at length about how much Raytheon charges for its Stinger missiles and the “record-breaking profits” earned by weapons manufacturers. Those profits clearly infuriate him far more than Putin’s slaughter.

He offers a similar bait-and-switch on China. “The United States can and should hold China accountable for its human rights violations,” Sanders writes. What follows, however, is not Sanders’s plan for promoting liberty in China but an extended denunciation of human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia. There is no question that the record of the Saudi regime is appalling. But Sanders’s lopsided outrage reflects a theme that runs throughout his essay: The governments he denounces most heatedly are those that ally themselves with the United States.

When all is said and done, the foreign policy “revolution” Sanders advocates is merely a tired recapitulation of leftist naysaying and eat-the-rich socialist clichés. He calls for unspecified “long-term efforts to build a world order based on international law,” for “ensur[ing] that all countries are held to the same standards on human rights,” and for “trade agreements that benefit workers ... not just multinational corporations.” Fine words, devoid of substance.

Over the years, Foreign Affairs has published articles of paradigm-shifting importance — George Kennan’s “ X Article ” in 1947, for example, or Samuel Huntington’s influential “ The Clash of Civilizations .” What Sanders has written will shift nothing. It is mere preaching to the choir, convincing only to those who already believe.

Jeff Jacoby can be reached at [email protected] . Follow him @jeff_jacoby . To subscribe to Arguable, his weekly newsletter, visit globe.com/arguable .

Globe Opinion

Industries Overview

Latest articles, gen zers fixate on wealth because of social media, but need banks’ help to know where they stand, meta, alphabet acquisitions on the decline as antitrust scrutiny ramps up, the digital ad industry’s overreliance on cookies could create a crisis, how marketers can prepare for ai’s impact on creative work, digital retailers want to use ai to get hyperpersonal in 2024, why beyond is bringing retail brands back from the dead, disney+ and hulu ctv ad inventory will be available via google and the trade desk, social shopping, gen z dualities, and creators on the big screen: 3 shoptalk takeaways, pets, membership perks, and smaller-format stores: three predictions for how walmart can continue to expand, shein and amazon are trying to stay one step ahead of the competition, about emarketer, guide to ad agencies and holding companies: what they are and how they support marketing and advertising.

Ad agencies pivot to meet tech innovation and changing customer expectations

Powerful data and analysis on nearly every digital topic

Want more research .

Sign up for the EMARKETER Daily Newsletter

Marketing and advertising agencies serve as vital partners for brands, offering not only expertise but also digital capabilities that allow their clients to execute campaigns without having to use in-house resources. 

Most agencies help their clients with core digital marketing tactics like SEO , social media, and real-time data analysis. They also help brands counter digital challenges commonly found in the advertising industry like ad blocking , a fragmented media landscape, and privacy concerns.

This guide explores the current landscape for advertising agencies and holding companies, the key players in the space, and the challenges agency-based marketers face.

• Want to learn more about ad agencies and other marketing trends? Sign up for the EMARKETER Daily newsletter.

What is an ad agency?

An advertising agency specializes in creating and executing advertising campaigns for clients. They develop strategies to reach target audiences effectively through various media channels, craft creative ads, and often provide a fresh perspective to enhance a company’s marketing efforts. Their areas of expertise include market research, media buying, and creative services, making ad agencies valuable partners for businesses looking to promote their products or services.

Types of ad agencies

The gamut of ad agency types ranges from full-service to highly niche. Here are some common business models.

Full-service advertising agency

A full-service advertising agency offers a wide range of services, making it a suitable choice for businesses that are new to advertising or want flexibility across different channels. These agencies are essentially one-stop shops, handling campaign management, social media, TV and print ads, content creation, SEO, and radio commercials. They also help clients optimize their ad spend based on their target audience’s preferences.

Digital advertising agency

A digital advertising agency focuses on purely digital forms of advertising, including social media, SEO, content creation, web design and email. They excel in executing performance-based marketing campaigns, which involves paying service providers when specific goals or metrics are achieved, such as clicks, views, downloads, sales, or form-fills. This niche type of agency is focused on consistently monitoring campaign performance to inform real-time decisions and optimizations.

Traditional advertising agency

Traditional ad agencies are focused on media formats like TV, radio, and print. While traditional channels like TV still command significant budgets, they have lost some of their value in the digital age. 

That’s why many traditional agencies have expanded their services to include digital marketing, recognizing the importance of having an online presence and targeting. However, this transition has been uneven, and some may still struggle to keep pace with the rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Social media advertising agency

Social media advertising agencies specialize in growing a brand’s presence on social media platforms, offering services like brand strategy, content development, and paid social tactics. 

Recent changes, including Apple’s AppTrackingTransparency and Google’s cookie deprecation, have hindered social media platforms’ targeting effectiveness. Marketers must employ innovative strategies, like influencer marketing , to engage audiences. Consequently, agencies are actively exploring ways to adapt and ensure successful advertising campaigns and social media marketing in this evolving landscape.

Creative ad agency

A creative agency offers a range of services, including advertising, design, and technology, with a focus on the creative execution of campaigns. That includes services like design, copywriting, video production, and more.

Media-buying agency

Media-buying agencies help businesses strategically place ads across the right traditional and digital channels to maximize audience reach and improve campaign performance. They negotiate with media outlets to secure times and locations to reach the right people at the right time, making the most out of their client’s advertising budget.

What is an advertising holding company?

A holding company owns subsidiaries that offer various services, particularly in the advertising industry, like media buying and digital marketing. These subsidiaries can work independently or together, providing comprehensive solutions to clients. 

How ad holding companies are adapting to client demand  

A 2023 survey by the World Federation of Advertisers found that single established holding companies remain the dominant model, chosen by 47% of CEOs worldwide. These traditional holding companies are valued for their comprehensive services and ability to integrate various marketing disciplines.

That said, there’s growing interest in smaller, more agile agencies that specialize in technology. Clients want more flexibility (45%) and simpler services (37%), but they also expect agency services to become more centralized (53%), per World Federation of Advertisers. This means that holding companies are facing competition from specialized agencies that are adapting to what clients want.

Pros and cons of using an advertising holding company 

Using a holding company for advertising offers benefits like a broad range of services, cohesive strategies, and better rates due to their extensive buying power. However, drawbacks include potentially less personalized service and slower decision-making processes due to their size. Brands should consider these factors, alongside their campaign needs, to determine if a holding company’s comprehensive resources or a smaller agency’s tailored approach best suits their advertising objectives.

Top ad agencies and holding companies

The rapid digital transformation across various industries has led to a substantial increase in digital ad spend and a transformation of the advertising landscape. 

This shift toward digital platforms, including email marketing, social media, and programmatic ads , has given rise to a new generation of high-growth digital marketing agencies. Traditional advertising and creative agencies are also evolving to adapt to this digitally driven landscape. 

Here are the top global advertising agencies and marketing firms, ranked by 2022 revenues, per Zippia:

• WPP (London, UK), $17.9 billion: A global leader in advertising offering communications, technology, and commerce services. Known for its creative transformation strategies.
• Omnicom Group (New York, US), $14.3 billion: Specializes in digital marketing and serving clients globally. Recognized for innovative advertising strategies.
• Publicis Groupe (Paris, France), $13.5 billion: Focuses on digital media and the success of its Epsilon data business. Engages in user-level cross-domain tracking.
• The Interpublic Group of Companies (New York, US), $10.9 billion: Houses major networks like FCB and McCann Worldgroup, specializing in various marketing disciplines.
• Dentsu (Tokyo, Japan), $8.2 billion: A Japanese firm excelling in advertising and public relations. Utilizes advanced data modeling for advertising reach.
• Dentsu Aegis Network (London, UK), $7.3 billion: This multinational company has 10 divisions, including Merkle and Isobar. Offers communication strategy services through media planning and buying.
• Hakuhodo (Tokyo, Japan), $6.7 billion: Japan’s long-standing advertising agency, specializing in advertising, public relations, and marketing. Serves top clients like Yahoo, Nissan, and Tiffany & Co.
• Havas (Paris, France), $3.0 billion: A global advertising and public relations leader, offering services from direct marketing to corporate communications. Works with clients like Jack Daniel’s, Pernod Ricard, and IBM. 
• MDC Partners (New York, US), $1.3 billion: A US advertising and marketing holding company, offering services from media management to analytics. Uses a partnership model where MDC Partners acquires most of its partner agency’s ownership, but lets the founder keep a share.
• Publicis Sapient (Massachusetts, US), $1.3 billion: A leading global advertising firm founded in 1990. Specializes in digital marketing. 

What is the future outlook for ad agencies and holding companies?

While agencies and holding companies continue to hold powerful positions in the marketing and advertising industries, their outlook is mixed . Major firms like WPP and Omnicom Group are facing revenue drops, while Publicis Groupe is growing through data services.

One major challenge is the rise of automation and AI. Although US ad agency employment recently reached a record high, there’s a concern that automation could eliminate 33,000 jobs by 2030, with AI responsible for a significant portion of these losses, according to Forrester Research.

To adapt, 57% of agencies are currently operating at a local level, per 2023 data from the World Federation of Advertisers. But it’s important to note that while in-house marketing offers benefits like more control and transparency, it also has downsides. These include limitations in human resources, potential isolation from external expertise, and a narrower skill set.

As the advertising landscape evolves, businesses need to consider their options carefully, including implementing hybrid models, to navigate the changing industry effectively.

What role will generative AI play in ad agencies?

Ad agencies are divided in their response to generative AI , with some embracing it through partnerships and acquisitions while others remain cautious. 

Meta, Google, and TikTok are advancing their own AI ad creation tools, which could potentially transform the role of agencies and even replace them in some aspects of ad creation. 

That said, agencies are pivoting to remain relevant, including developing exclusive tech, becoming experts in managing AI campaigns, and finding unique draws that AI cannot replicate.

Generative AI is here to stay, as it is expected to yield $1.3 trillion in revenues by 2032, according to Bloomberg Intelligence, gaining prominence in areas like content generation and copywriting. Agencies will also focus on targeting and measurement, seeking a balance between leveraging AI’s capabilities, using human creativity, and preventing legal issues.

Want more marketing insights?

Sign up for EMARKETER Daily, our free newsletter.

By clicking “Sign Up”, you agree to receive emails from EMARKETER (e.g. FYIs, partner content, webinars, and other offers) and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . You can opt-out at any time.

Thank you for signing up for our newsletter!

Editor's Picks

Guide to Gen Z: What matters to this generation and what it means for marketers

Guide to Netflix for marketers and advertisers

Esports: What is it and how it benefits marketers

Industries →, advertising & marketing.

• Social Media
• Content Marketing
• Email Marketing
• Browse All →
• Value-Based Care
• Digital Therapeutics
• Online Pharmacy

Ecommerce & Retail

• Ecommerce Sales
• Retail Sales
• Social Commerce
• Connected Devices
• Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Financial Services

• Wealth Management

More Industries

• Real Estate
• Customer Experience
• Small Business (SMB)

Geographies

• Asia-Pacific
• Central & Eastern Europe
• Latin America
• Middle East & Africa
• North America
• Western Europe
• Data Partnerships

Media Services

• Advertising & Sponsorship Opportunities

Free Content

• Newsletters

Contact Us →

Worldwide hq.

One Liberty Plaza 9th Floor New York, NY 10006 1-800-405-0844

Sales Inquiries

1-800-405-0844 [email protected]