what is the purpose of research papers

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

11.1 The Purpose of Research Writing

Learning objectives.

Identify reasons to research writing projects.
Outline the steps of the research writing process.

Why was the Great Wall of China built? What have scientists learned about the possibility of life on Mars? What roles did women play in the American Revolution? How does the human brain create, store, and retrieve memories? Who invented the game of football, and how has it changed over the years?

You may know the answers to these questions off the top of your head. If you are like most people, however, you find answers to tough questions like these by searching the Internet, visiting the library, or asking others for information. To put it simply, you perform research.

Whether you are a scientist, an artist, a paralegal, or a parent, you probably perform research in your everyday life. When your boss, your instructor, or a family member asks you a question that you do not know the answer to, you locate relevant information, analyze your findings, and share your results. Locating, analyzing, and sharing information are key steps in the research process, and in this chapter, you will learn more about each step. By developing your research writing skills, you will prepare yourself to answer any question no matter how challenging.

Reasons for Research

When you perform research, you are essentially trying to solve a mystery—you want to know how something works or why something happened. In other words, you want to answer a question that you (and other people) have about the world. This is one of the most basic reasons for performing research.

But the research process does not end when you have solved your mystery. Imagine what would happen if a detective collected enough evidence to solve a criminal case, but she never shared her solution with the authorities. Presenting what you have learned from research can be just as important as performing the research. Research results can be presented in a variety of ways, but one of the most popular—and effective—presentation forms is the research paper . A research paper presents an original thesis, or purpose statement, about a topic and develops that thesis with information gathered from a variety of sources.

If you are curious about the possibility of life on Mars, for example, you might choose to research the topic. What will you do, though, when your research is complete? You will need a way to put your thoughts together in a logical, coherent manner. You may want to use the facts you have learned to create a narrative or to support an argument. And you may want to show the results of your research to your friends, your teachers, or even the editors of magazines and journals. Writing a research paper is an ideal way to organize thoughts, craft narratives or make arguments based on research, and share your newfound knowledge with the world.

Write a paragraph about a time when you used research in your everyday life. Did you look for the cheapest way to travel from Houston to Denver? Did you search for a way to remove gum from the bottom of your shoe? In your paragraph, explain what you wanted to research, how you performed the research, and what you learned as a result.

Research Writing and the Academic Paper

No matter what field of study you are interested in, you will most likely be asked to write a research paper during your academic career. For example, a student in an art history course might write a research paper about an artist’s work. Similarly, a student in a psychology course might write a research paper about current findings in childhood development.

Having to write a research paper may feel intimidating at first. After all, researching and writing a long paper requires a lot of time, effort, and organization. However, writing a research paper can also be a great opportunity to explore a topic that is particularly interesting to you. The research process allows you to gain expertise on a topic of your choice, and the writing process helps you remember what you have learned and understand it on a deeper level.

Research Writing at Work

Knowing how to write a good research paper is a valuable skill that will serve you well throughout your career. Whether you are developing a new product, studying the best way to perform a procedure, or learning about challenges and opportunities in your field of employment, you will use research techniques to guide your exploration. You may even need to create a written report of your findings. And because effective communication is essential to any company, employers seek to hire people who can write clearly and professionally.

Writing at Work

Take a few minutes to think about each of the following careers. How might each of these professionals use researching and research writing skills on the job?

Medical laboratory technician
Small business owner
Information technology professional
Freelance magazine writer

A medical laboratory technician or information technology professional might do research to learn about the latest technological developments in either of these fields. A small business owner might conduct research to learn about the latest trends in his or her industry. A freelance magazine writer may need to research a given topic to write an informed, up-to-date article.

Think about the job of your dreams. How might you use research writing skills to perform that job? Create a list of ways in which strong researching, organizing, writing, and critical thinking skills could help you succeed at your dream job. How might these skills help you obtain that job?

Steps of the Research Writing Process

How does a research paper grow from a folder of brainstormed notes to a polished final draft? No two projects are identical, but most projects follow a series of six basic steps.

These are the steps in the research writing process:

Choose a topic.
Plan and schedule time to research and write.
Conduct research.
Organize research and ideas.
Draft your paper.
Revise and edit your paper.

Each of these steps will be discussed in more detail later in this chapter. For now, though, we will take a brief look at what each step involves.

Step 1: Choosing a Topic

As you may recall from Chapter 8 “The Writing Process: How Do I Begin?” , to narrow the focus of your topic, you may try freewriting exercises, such as brainstorming. You may also need to ask a specific research question —a broad, open-ended question that will guide your research—as well as propose a possible answer, or a working thesis . You may use your research question and your working thesis to create a research proposal . In a research proposal, you present your main research question, any related subquestions you plan to explore, and your working thesis.

Step 2: Planning and Scheduling

Before you start researching your topic, take time to plan your researching and writing schedule. Research projects can take days, weeks, or even months to complete. Creating a schedule is a good way to ensure that you do not end up being overwhelmed by all the work you have to do as the deadline approaches.

During this step of the process, it is also a good idea to plan the resources and organizational tools you will use to keep yourself on track throughout the project. Flowcharts, calendars, and checklists can all help you stick to your schedule. See Chapter 11 “Writing from Research: What Will I Learn?” , Section 11.2 “Steps in Developing a Research Proposal” for an example of a research schedule.

Step 3: Conducting Research

When going about your research, you will likely use a variety of sources—anything from books and periodicals to video presentations and in-person interviews.

Your sources will include both primary sources and secondary sources . Primary sources provide firsthand information or raw data. For example, surveys, in-person interviews, and historical documents are primary sources. Secondary sources, such as biographies, literary reviews, or magazine articles, include some analysis or interpretation of the information presented. As you conduct research, you will take detailed, careful notes about your discoveries. You will also evaluate the reliability of each source you find.

Step 4: Organizing Research and the Writer’s Ideas

When your research is complete, you will organize your findings and decide which sources to cite in your paper. You will also have an opportunity to evaluate the evidence you have collected and determine whether it supports your thesis, or the focus of your paper. You may decide to adjust your thesis or conduct additional research to ensure that your thesis is well supported.

Remember, your working thesis is not set in stone. You can and should change your working thesis throughout the research writing process if the evidence you find does not support your original thesis. Never try to force evidence to fit your argument. For example, your working thesis is “Mars cannot support life-forms.” Yet, a week into researching your topic, you find an article in the New York Times detailing new findings of bacteria under the Martian surface. Instead of trying to argue that bacteria are not life forms, you might instead alter your thesis to “Mars cannot support complex life-forms.”

Step 5: Drafting Your Paper

Now you are ready to combine your research findings with your critical analysis of the results in a rough draft. You will incorporate source materials into your paper and discuss each source thoughtfully in relation to your thesis or purpose statement.

When you cite your reference sources, it is important to pay close attention to standard conventions for citing sources in order to avoid plagiarism , or the practice of using someone else’s words without acknowledging the source. Later in this chapter, you will learn how to incorporate sources in your paper and avoid some of the most common pitfalls of attributing information.

Step 6: Revising and Editing Your Paper

In the final step of the research writing process, you will revise and polish your paper. You might reorganize your paper’s structure or revise for unity and cohesion, ensuring that each element in your paper flows into the next logically and naturally. You will also make sure that your paper uses an appropriate and consistent tone.

Once you feel confident in the strength of your writing, you will edit your paper for proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and formatting. When you complete this final step, you will have transformed a simple idea or question into a thoroughly researched and well-written paper you can be proud of!

Review the steps of the research writing process. Then answer the questions on your own sheet of paper.

In which steps of the research writing process are you allowed to change your thesis?
In step 2, which types of information should you include in your project schedule?
What might happen if you eliminated step 4 from the research writing process?

Key Takeaways

People undertake research projects throughout their academic and professional careers in order to answer specific questions, share their findings with others, increase their understanding of challenging topics, and strengthen their researching, writing, and analytical skills.
The research writing process generally comprises six steps: choosing a topic, scheduling and planning time for research and writing, conducting research, organizing research and ideas, drafting a paper, and revising and editing the paper.

Reference management. Clean and simple.

What is a research paper?

A research paper is a paper that makes an argument about a topic based on research and analysis.

Any paper requiring the writer to research a particular topic is a research paper. Unlike essays, which are often based largely on opinion and are written from the author's point of view, research papers are based in fact.

A research paper requires you to form an opinion on a topic, research and gain expert knowledge on that topic, and then back up your own opinions and assertions with facts found through your thorough research.

➡️ Read more about different types of research papers .

What is the difference between a research paper and a thesis?

A thesis is a large paper, or multi-chapter work, based on a topic relating to your field of study.

A thesis is a document students of higher education write to obtain an academic degree or qualification. Usually, it is longer than a research paper and takes multiple years to complete.

Generally associated with graduate/postgraduate studies, it is carried out under the supervision of a professor or other academic of the university.

A major difference between a research paper and a thesis is that:

a research paper presents certain facts that have already been researched and explained by others
a thesis starts with a certain scholarly question or statement, which then leads to further research and new findings

This means that a thesis requires the author to input original work and their own findings in a certain field, whereas the research paper can be completed with extensive research only.

➡️ Getting ready to start a research paper or thesis? Take a look at our guides on how to start a research paper or how to come up with a topic for your thesis .

Frequently Asked Questions about research papers

Take a look at this list of the top 21 Free Online Journal and Research Databases , such as ScienceOpen , Directory of Open Access Journals , ERIC , and many more.

Mason Porter, Professor at UCLA, explains in this forum post the main reasons to write a research paper:

To create new knowledge and disseminate it.
To teach science and how to write about it in an academic style.
Some practical benefits: prestige, establishing credentials, requirements for grants or to help one get a future grant proposal, and so on.

Generally, people involved in the academia. Research papers are mostly written by higher education students and professional researchers.

Yes, a research paper is the same as a scientific paper. Both papers have the same purpose and format.

A major difference between a research paper and a thesis is that the former presents certain facts that have already been researched and explained by others, whereas the latter starts with a certain scholarly question or statement, which then leads to further research and new findings.

Clerc Center | PK-12 & Outreach
KDES | PK-8th Grade School (D.C. Metro Area)
MSSD | 9th-12th Grade School (Nationwide)
Gallaudet University Regional Centers
Parent Advocacy App
K-12 ASL Content Standards
National Resources
Youth Programs
Academic Bowl
Battle Of The Books
National Literary Competition
Youth Debate Bowl
Bison Sports Camp
Discover College and Careers (DC²)
Financial Wizards
Immerse Into ASL
Alumni Relations
Alumni Association
Homecoming Weekend
Class Giving
Get Tickets / BisonPass
Sport Calendars
Cross Country
Swimming & Diving
Track & Field
Indoor Track & Field
Cheerleading
Winter Cheerleading
Human Resources
Plan a Visit
Request Info

Areas of Study
Accessible Human-Centered Computing
American Sign Language
Art and Media Design
Communication Studies
Data Science
Deaf Studies
Early Intervention Studies Graduate Programs
Educational Neuroscience
Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences
Information Technology
International Development
Interpretation and Translation
Linguistics
Mathematics
Philosophy and Religion
Physical Education & Recreation
Public Affairs
Public Health
Sexuality and Gender Studies
Social Work
Theatre and Dance
World Languages and Cultures
B.A. in American Sign Language
B.A. in Art and Media Design
B.A. in Biology
B.A. in Communication Studies
B.A. in Communication Studies for Online Degree Completion Program
B.A. in Deaf Studies
B.A. in Deaf Studies for Online Degree Completion Program
B.A. in Education with a Specialization in Early Childhood Education
B.A. in Education with a Specialization in Elementary Education
B.A. in English
B.A. in Government
B.A. in Government with a Specialization in Law
B.A. in History
B.A. in Interdisciplinary Spanish
B.A. in International Studies
B.A. in Interpretation
B.A. in Mathematics
B.A. in Philosophy
B.A. in Psychology
B.A. in Psychology for Online Degree Completion Program
B.A. in Social Work (BSW)
B.A. in Sociology
B.A. in Sociology with a concentration in Criminology
B.A. in Theatre Arts: Production/Performance
B.A. or B.S. in Education with a Specialization in Secondary Education: Science, English, Mathematics or Social Studies
B.S in Risk Management and Insurance
B.S. in Accounting
B.S. in Biology
B.S. in Business Administration
B.S. in Information Technology
B.S. in Mathematics
B.S. in Physical Education and Recreation
B.S. In Public Health
General Education
Honors Program
Peace Corps Prep program
Self-Directed Major
M.A. in Counseling: Clinical Mental Health Counseling
M.A. in Counseling: School Counseling
M.A. in Deaf Education
M.A. in Deaf Education Studies
M.A. in Deaf Studies: Cultural Studies
M.A. in Deaf Studies: Language and Human Rights
M.A. in Early Childhood Education and Deaf Education
M.A. in Early Intervention Studies
M.A. in Elementary Education and Deaf Education
M.A. in International Development
M.A. in Interpretation: Combined Interpreting Practice and Research
M.A. in Interpretation: Interpreting Research
M.A. in Linguistics
M.A. in Secondary Education and Deaf Education
M.A. in Sign Language Education
M.S. in Accessible Human-Centered Computing
M.S. in Speech-Language Pathology
Master of Social Work (MSW)
Au.D. in Audiology
Ed.D. in Transformational Leadership and Administration in Deaf Education
Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology
Ph.D. in Critical Studies in the Education of Deaf Learners
Ph.D. in Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences
Ph.D. in Linguistics
Ph.D. in Translation and Interpreting Studies
Ph.D. Program in Educational Neuroscience (PEN)
Individual Courses and Training
Certificates
Certificate in Sexuality and Gender Studies
Educating Deaf Students with Disabilities (online, post-bachelor’s)
American Sign Language and English Bilingual Early Childhood Deaf Education: Birth to 5 (online, post-bachelor’s)
Peer Mentor Training (low-residency/hybrid, post-bachelor’s)
Early Intervention Studies Graduate Certificate
Online Degree Programs
ODCP Minor in Communication Studies
ODCP Minor in Deaf Studies
ODCP Minor in Psychology
ODCP Minor in Writing
Online Degree Program General Education Curriculum
University Capstone Honors for Online Degree Completion Program

Quick Links

PK-12 & Outreach
NSO Schedule

The Process of Writing a Research Paper

202.448-7036

Planning the Research Paper

The goal of a research paper is to bring together different views, evidence, and facts about a topic from books, articles, and interviews, then interpret the information into your writing. It’s about a relationship between you, other writers, and your teacher/audience.

A research paper will show two things: what you know or learned about a certain topic, and what other people know about the same topic. Often you make a judgment, or just explain complex ideas to the reader. The length of the research paper depends on your teacher’s guidelines. It’s always a good idea to keep your teacher in mind while writing your paper because the teacher is your audience.

The Process There are three stages for doing a research paper. These stages are:

While most people start with prewriting, the three stages of the writing process overlap. Writing is not the kind of process where you have to finish step one before moving on to step two, and so on. Your job is to make your ideas as clear as possible for the reader, and that means you might have to go back and forth between the prewriting, writing and revising stages several times before submitting the paper.

» Prewriting Thinking about a topic

The first thing you should do when starting your research paper is to think of a topic. Try to pick a topic that interests you and your teacher — interesting topics are easier to write about than boring topics! Make sure that your topic is not too hard to research, and that there is enough material on the topic. Talk to as many people as possible about your topic, especially your teacher. You’ll be surprised at the ideas you’ll get from talking about your topic. Be sure to always discuss potential topics with your teacher.

Places you can find a topic: newspapers, magazines, television news, the World Wide Web, and even in the index of a textbook!

Narrowing down your topic

As you think about your topic and start reading, you should begin thinking about a possible thesis statement (a sentence or two explaining your opinion about the topic). One technique is to ask yourself one important question about your topic, and as you find your answer, the thesis can develop from that. Some other techniques you may use to narrow your topic are: jot lists; preliminary outlines; listing possible thesis statements; listing questions; and/or making a concept map. It also may be helpful to have a friend ask you questions about your topic.

For help on developing your thesis statement, see the English Center Guide to Developing a Thesis Statement .

Discovery/Reading about your topic

You need to find information that helps you support your thesis. There are different places you can find this information: books, articles, people (interviews), and the internet.

As you gather the information or ideas you need, you need to make sure that you take notes and write down where and who you got the information from. This is called “citing your sources.” If you write your paper using information from other writers and do not cite the sources, you are committing plagiarism . If you plagiarize, you can get an “F” on your paper, fail the course, or even get kicked out of school.

CITING SOURCES

There are three major different formats for citing sources. They are: the Modern Language Association (MLA) , the American Psychology Association (APA) , and the Chicago Turabian style . Always ask your teacher which format to use. For more information on these styles, see our other handouts!

ORGANIZING INFORMATION

After you’ve thought, read, and taken notes on your topic, you may want to revise your thesis because a good thesis will help you develop a plan for writing your paper. One way you can do this is to brainstorm — think about everything you know about your topic, and put it down on paper. Once you have it all written down, you can look it over and decide if you should change your thesis statement or not.

If you already developed a preliminary map or outline, now is the time to go back and revise it. If you haven’t developed a map or outline yet, now is the time to do it. The outline or concept map should help you organize how you want to present information to your readers. The clearer your outline or map, the easier it will be for you to write the paper. Be sure that each part of your outline supports your thesis. If it does not, you may want to change/revise your thesis statement again.

» Writing a research paper follows a standard compositional (essay) format. It has a title, introduction, body and conclusion. Some people like to start their research papers with a title and introduction, while others wait until they’ve already started the body of the paper before developing a title and introduction. See this link for more information about writing introductions and conclusions .

Some techniques that may help you with writing your paper are:

start by writing your thesis statement
use a free writing technique (What I mean is…)
follow your outline or map
pretend you are writing a letter to a friend, and tell them what you know about your topic
follow your topic notecards

If you’re having difficulties thinking of what to write about next, you can look back at your notes that you have from when you were brainstorming for your topic.

» Revising The last (but not least) step is revising. When you are revising, look over your paper and make changes in weak areas. The different areas to look for mistakes include: content– too much detail, or too little detail; organization/structure (which is the order in which you write information about your topic); grammar; punctuation; capitalization; word choice; and citations.

It probably is best if you focus on the “big picture” first. The “big picture” means the organization (paragraph order), and content (ideas and points) of the paper. It also might help to go through your paper paragraph by paragraph and see if the main idea of each paragraph relates to the thesis. Be sure to keep an eye out for any repeated information (one of the most common mistakes made by students is having two or more paragraphs with the same information). Often good writers combine several paragraphs into one so they do not repeat information.

Revision Guidelines

The audience understands your paper.
The sentences are clear and complete.
All paragraphs relate to the thesis.
Each paragraph explains its purpose clearly.
You do not repeat large blocks of information in two or more different paragraphs.
The information in your paper is accurate.
A friend or classmate has read through your paper and offered suggestions.

After you are satisfied with the content and structure of the paper, you then can focus on common errors like grammar, spelling, sentence structure, punctuation, capitalization, typos, and word choice.

Proofreading Guidelines

Subjects and verbs agree.
Verb tenses are consistent.
Pronouns agree with the subjects they substitute.
Word choices are clear.
Capitalization is correct.
Spelling is correct.
Punctuation is correct.
References are cited properly.

For more information on proofreading, see the English Center Punctuation and Grammar Review .

After writing the paper, it might help if you put it aside and do not look at it for a day or two. When you look at your paper again, you will see it with new eyes and notice mistakes you didn’t before. It’s a really good idea to ask someone else to read your paper before you submit it to your teacher. Good writers often get feedback and revise their paper several times before submitting it to the teacher.

Source: “Process of Writing a Research Paper,” by Ellen Beck and Rachel Mingo with contributions from Jules Nelson Hill and Vivion Smith, is based on the previous version by Dawn Taylor, Sharon Quintero, Robert Rich, Robert McDonald, and Katherine Eckhart.

202-448-7036

At a Glance

Quick Facts
University Leadership
History & Traditions
Accreditation
Consumer Information
Our 10-Year Vision: The Gallaudet Promise
Annual Report of Achievements (ARA)
The Signing Ecosystem
Not Your Average University

Our Community

Library & Archives
Technology Support
Interpreting Requests
Ombuds Support
Health and Wellness Programs
Profile & Web Edits

Visit Gallaudet

Explore Our Campus
Virtual Tour
Maps & Directions
Shuttle Bus Schedule
Kellogg Conference Hotel
Welcome Center
National Deaf Life Museum
Apple Guide Maps

Engage Today

Work at Gallaudet / Clerc Center
Social Media Channels
University Wide Events
Sponsorship Requests
Data Requests
Media Inquiries
Gallaudet Today Magazine
Giving at Gallaudet
Financial Aid
Registrar’s Office
Residence Life & Housing
Safety & Security
Undergraduate Admissions
Graduate Admissions
University Communications
Clerc Center

Gallaudet University, chartered in 1864, is a private university for deaf and hard of hearing students.

Accessibility
Cookie Consent Notice
Privacy Policy
File a Report

800 Florida Avenue NE, Washington, D.C. 20002

Summer 2024 Admissions Open Now. Sign up for upcoming live information sessions here (featuring former and current Admission Officers at Havard and UPenn).

How to Write a Research Paper

Mastering the Art of Research Paper Writing: A Comprehensive Guide

Undergrads often write research papers each semester, causing stress. Yet, it’s simpler than believing if you know how to write a research paper . Divide the task, get tips, a plan, and tools for an outstanding paper. Simplify research, writing, topic choice, and illustration use!

A research paper is an academic document that involves deep, independent research to offer analysis, interpretation, and argument. Unlike academic essays, research papers are lengthier and more detailed, aiming to evaluate your writing and scholarly research abilities. To write one, you must showcase expertise in your subject, interact with diverse sources, and provide a unique perspective to the discussion.

Research papers are a foundational element of contemporary science and the most efficient means of disseminating knowledge throughout a broad network. Nonetheless, individuals usually encounter research papers during their education; they are frequently employed in college courses to assess a student’s grasp of a specific field or their aptitude for research.

Given their significance, research papers adopt a research paper format – a formal, unadorned style that eliminates any subjective influence from the writing. Scientists present their discoveries straightforwardly, accompanied by relevant supporting proof, enabling other researchers to integrate the paper into their investigations.

This guide leads you through every steps to write a research paper , from grasping your task to refining your ultimate draft and will teach you how to write a research paper.

Understanding The Research Paper

A research paper is a meticulously structured document that showcases the outcomes of an inquiry, exploration, or scrutiny undertaken on a specific subject. It embodies a formal piece of academic prose that adds novel information, perspectives, or interpretations to a particular domain of study. Typically authored by scholars, researchers, scientists, or students as part of their academic or professional pursuits, these papers adhere to a well-defined format. This research paper format encompasses an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion.

The introduction provides context and outlines the study’s significance, while the literature review encapsulates existing research and situates the study within the broader academic discourse. The methodology section elucidates the research process, encompassing data collection and analysis techniques. Findings are presented in the results section, often complemented by graphical and statistical representations. Interpretation of findings, implications, and connection to existing knowledge transpire in the discussion section.

Ultimately, the conclusion encapsulates pivotal discoveries and their wider import.

Research papers wield immense significance in advancing knowledge across diverse disciplines, enabling researchers to disseminate findings, theories, and revelations to a broader audience. Before publication in academic journals or presentations at conferences, these papers undergo a stringent peer review process conducted by domain experts, ensuring their integrity, precision, and worth.

Academic and non-academic research papers diverge across several dimensions. Academic papers are crafted for scholarly circles to expand domain knowledge and theories. They maintain a formal, objective tone and heavily rely on peer-reviewed sources for credibility. In contrast, non-academic papers, employing a more flexible writing style, target a broader audience or specific practical goals. These papers might incorporate persuasive language, anecdotes, and various sources beyond academia. While academic papers rigorously adhere to structured formats and established citation styles, non-academic papers prioritize practicality, adapting their structure and citation methods to suit the intended readership.

The purpose of a research paper revolves around offering fresh insights, knowledge, or interpretations within a specific field. This formal document serves as a conduit for scholars, researchers, scientists, and students to communicate their investigative findings and actively contribute to the ongoing academic discourse.

Research Paper Writing Process – How To Write a Good Research Paper

Selecting a suitable research topic .

Your initial task is to thoroughly review the assignment and carefully absorb the writing prompt’s details. Pay particular attention to technical specifications like length, formatting prerequisites (such as single- vs. double-spacing, indentation, etc.), and the required citation style. Also, pay attention to specifics, including an abstract or a cover page.

Once you’ve a clear understanding of the assignment, the subsequent steps to write a research paper are aligned with the conventional writing process. However, remember that research papers have rules, adding some extra considerations to the process.

When given some assignment freedom, the crucial task of choosing a topic rests on you. Despite its apparent simplicity, this choice sets the foundation for your entire research paper, shaping its direction. The primary factor in picking a research paper topic is ensuring it has enough material to support it. Your chosen topic should provide ample data and complexity for a thorough discussion. However, it’s important to avoid overly broad subjects and focus on specific ones that cover all relevant information without gaps. Yet, approach topic selection more slowly; choosing something that genuinely interests you is still valuable. Aim for a topic that meets both criteria—delivering substantial content while maintaining engagement.

Conducting Thorough Research

Commence by delving into your research early to refine your topic and shape your thesis statement. Swift engagement with available research aids in dispelling misconceptions and unveils optimal paths and strategies to gather more material. Typically, research sources can be located either online or within libraries. When navigating online sources, exercise caution and opt for reputable outlets such as scientific journals or academic papers. Specific search engines, outlined below in the Tools and Resources section, exclusively enable exploring accredited sources and academic databases.

While pursuing information, it’s essential to differentiate between primary and secondary sources. Primary sources entail firsthand accounts, encompassing published articles or autobiographies, while secondary sources, such as critical reviews or secondary biographies, are more distanced. Skimming sources instead of reading each part proves more efficient during the research phase. If a source shows promise, set it aside for more in-depth reading later. Doing so prevents you from investing excessive time in sources that won’t contribute substantively to your work. You should present a literature review detailing your references and submit them for validation in certain instances.

Organizing And Structuring The Research Paper

According to the research paper format , an outline for a research paper is a catalogue of essential topics, arguments, and evidence you intend to incorporate. These elements are divided into sections with headings, offering a preliminary overview of the paper’s structure before commencing the writing process. Formulating a structural outline can significantly enhance writing efficiency, warranting an investment of time to establish one.

Start by generating a list encompassing crucial categories and subtopics—a preliminary outline. Reflect on the amassed information while gathering supporting evidence, pondering the most effective means of segregation and categorization.

Once a discussion list is compiled, deliberate on the optimal information presentation sequence and identify related subtopics that should be placed adjacent. Consider if any subtopic loses coherence when presented out of order. Adopting a chronological arrangement can be suitable if the information follows a straightforward trajectory.

Given the potential complexity of research papers, consider breaking down the outline into paragraphs. This aids in maintaining organization when dealing with copious information and provides better control over the paper’s progression. Rectifying structural issues during the outline phase is preferable to addressing them after writing.

Remember to incorporate supporting evidence within the outline. Since there’s likely a substantial amount to include, outlining helps prevent overlooking crucial elements.

Writing The Introduction

According to the research paper format , the introduction of a research paper must address three fundamental inquiries: What, why, and how? Upon completing the introduction, the reader should clearly understand the paper’s subject matter, its relevance, and the approach you’ll use to construct your arguments.

What? Offer precise details regarding the paper’s topic, provide context, and elucidate essential terminology or concepts.

Why? This constitutes the most crucial yet challenging aspect of the introduction. Endeavour to furnish concise responses to the subsequent queries: What novel information or insights do you present? Which significant matters does your essay assist in defining or resolving?

How? To provide the reader with a preview of the paper’s forthcoming content, the introduction should incorporate a “guide” outlining the upcoming discussions. This entails briefly outlining the paper’s principal components in chronological sequence.

Developing The Main Body

One of the primary challenges that many writers grapple with is effectively organizing the wealth of information they wish to present in their papers. This is precisely why an outline can be an invaluable tool. However, it’s essential to recognize that while an outline provides a roadmap, the writing process allows flexibility in determining the order in which information and arguments are introduced.

Maintaining cohesiveness throughout the paper involves anchoring your writing to the thesis statement and topic sentences. Here’s how to ensure a well-structured paper:

Alignment with Thesis Statement: Regularly assess whether your topic sentences correspond with the central thesis statement. This ensures that your arguments remain on track and directly contribute to the overarching message you intend to convey.
Consistency and Logical Flow: Review your topic sentences concerning one another. Do they follow a logical order that guides the reader through a coherent narrative? Ensuring a seamless flow from one topic to another helps maintain engagement and comprehension.
Supporting Sentence Alignment: Each sentence within a paragraph should align with the topic sentence of that paragraph. This alignment reinforces the central idea, preventing tangential or disjointed discussions.

Additionally, identify paragraphs that cover similar content. While some overlap might be inevitable, it’s essential to approach shared topics from different angles, offering fresh insights and perspectives. Creating these nuanced differences helps present a well-rounded exploration of the subject matter.

An often-overlooked aspect of effective organization is the art of crafting smooth transitions. Transitions between sentences, paragraphs, and larger sections are the glue that holds your paper together. They guide the reader through the progression of ideas, enhancing clarity and creating a seamless reading experience.

Ultimately, while the struggle to organize information is accurate, employing these strategies not only aids in addressing the challenge but also contributes to the overall quality and impact of your writing.

Crafting A Strong Conclusion

The purpose of the research paper’s conclusion is to guide your reader out of the realm of the paper’s argument, leaving them with a sense of closure.

Trace the paper’s trajectory, underscoring how all the elements converge to validate your thesis statement. Impart a sense of completion by ensuring the reader comprehends the resolution of the issues introduced in the paper’s introduction.

In addition, you can explore the broader implications of your argument, outline your paper’s contributions to future students studying the subject, and propose questions that your argument raises—ones that might not be addressed in the paper itself. However, it’s important to avoid:

Introducing new arguments or crucial information that wasn’t covered earlier.
Extending the conclusion unnecessarily.
Employing common phrases that signal the decision (e.g., “In conclusion”).

By adhering to these guidelines, your conclusion can serve as a fitting and impactful conclusion to your research paper, leaving a lasting impression on your readers.

Refining The Research Paper

Editing And Proofreading

Eliminate unnecessary verbiage and extraneous content. In tandem with the comprehensive structure of your paper, focus on individual words, ensuring your language is robust. Verify the utilization of active voice rather than passive voice, and confirm that your word selection is precise and tangible.

The passive voice, exemplified by phrases like “I opened the door,” tends to convey hesitation and verbosity. In contrast, the active voice, as in “I opened the door,” imparts strength and brevity.

Each word employed in your paper should serve a distinct purpose. Strive to eschew the inclusion of surplus words solely to occupy space or exhibit sophistication.

For instance, the statement “The author uses pathos to appeal to readers’ emotions” is superior to the alternative “The author utilizes pathos to appeal to the emotional core of those who read the passage.”

Engage in thorough proofreading to rectify spelling, grammatical, and formatting inconsistencies. Once you’ve refined the structure and content of your paper, address any typographical and grammatical inaccuracies. Taking a break from your paper before proofreading can offer a new perspective.

Enhance error detection by reading your essay aloud. This not only aids in identifying mistakes but also assists in evaluating the flow. If you encounter sections that seem awkward during this reading, consider making necessary adjustments to enhance the overall coherence.

Formatting And Referencing

Citations are pivotal in distinguishing research papers from informal nonfiction pieces like personal essays. They serve the dual purpose of substantiating your data and establishing a connection between your research paper and the broader scientific community. Given their significance, citations are subject to precise formatting regulations; however, the challenge lies in the existence of multiple sets of rules.

It’s crucial to consult the assignment’s instructions to determine the required formatting style. Generally, academic research papers adhere to either of two formatting styles for source citations:

MLA (Modern Language Association)
APA (American Psychological Association)

Moreover, aside from MLA and APA styles, occasional demands might call for adherence to CMOS (The Chicago Manual of Style), AMA (American Medical Association), and IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) formats.

Initially, citations might appear intricate due to their numerous regulations and specific details. However, once you become adept at them, citing sources accurately becomes almost second nature. It’s important to note that each formatting style provides detailed guidelines for citing various sources, including photographs, websites, speeches, and YouTube videos.

Tips For Writing An Effective Research Paper

By following these research paper writing tips , you’ll be well-equipped to create a well-structured, well-researched, and impactful research paper:

Select a Clear and Manageable Topic: Choose a topic that is specific and focused enough to be thoroughly explored within the scope of your paper.
Conduct In-Depth Research: Gather information from reputable sources such as academic journals, books, and credible websites. Take thorough notes to keep track of your sources.
Create a Strong Thesis Statement: Craft a clear and concise thesis statement that outlines the main argument or purpose of your paper.
Develop a Well-Structured Outline: Organize your ideas into a logical order by creating an outline that outlines the main sections and their supporting points.
Compose a Captivating Introduction: Hook the reader with an engaging introduction that provides background information and introduces the thesis statement.
Provide Clear and Relevant Evidence: Support your arguments with reliable and relevant evidence, such as statistics, examples, and expert opinions.
Maintain Consistent Tone and Style: Keep a consistent tone and writing style throughout the paper, adhering to the formatting guidelines of your chosen citation style.
Craft Coherent Paragraphs: Each paragraph should focus on a single idea or point, and transitions should smoothly guide the reader from one idea to the next.
Use Active Voice: Write in the active voice to make your writing more direct and engaging.
Revise and Edit Thoroughly: Proofread your paper for grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and sentence structure. Revise for clarity and coherence.
Seek Peer Feedback: Have a peer or instructor review your paper for feedback and suggestions.
Cite Sources Properly: Accurately cite all sources using the required citation style (e.g., MLA, APA) to avoid plagiarism and give credit to original authors.
Be Concise and Avoid Redundancy: Strive for clarity by eliminating unnecessary words and redundancies.
Conclude Effectively: Summarize your main points and restate your thesis in the conclusion. Provide a sense of closure without introducing new ideas.
Stay Organized: Keep track of your sources, notes, and drafts to ensure a structured and organized approach to the writing process.
Proofread with Fresh Eyes: Take a break before final proofreading to review your paper with a fresh perspective, helping you catch any overlooked errors.
Edit for Clarity: Ensure that your ideas are conveyed clearly and that your arguments are easy to follow.
Ask for Feedback: Don’t hesitate to ask for feedback from peers, instructors, or writing centers to improve your paper further.

In conclusion, we’ve explored the essential steps to write a research paper . From selecting a focused topic to mastering the intricacies of citations, we’ve navigated through the key elements of this process.

It’s vital to recognize that adhering to the research paper writing tips is not merely a suggestion, but a roadmap to success. Each stage contributes to the overall quality and impact of your paper. By meticulously following these steps, you ensure a robust foundation for your research, bolster your arguments, and present your findings with clarity and conviction.

As you embark on your own research paper journey, I urge you to put into practice the techniques and insights shared in this guide. Don’t shy away from investing time in organization, thorough research, and precise writing. Embrace the challenge, for it’s through this process that your ideas take shape and your voice is heard within the academic discourse.

Remember, every exceptional research paper begins with a single step. And with each step you take, your ability to articulate complex ideas and contribute to your field of study grows. So, go ahead – apply these tips, refine your skills, and witness your research papers evolve into compelling narratives that inspire, inform, and captivate.

In the grand tapestry of academia, your research paper becomes a thread of insight, woven into the larger narrative of human knowledge. By embracing the writing process and nurturing your unique perspective, you become an integral part of this ever-expanding tapestry.

Happy writing, and may your research papers shine brightly, leaving a lasting mark on both your readers and the world of scholarship.

Steps To Write A Great Research Paper

White Modern Breaking News Instagram Post (8)

CCIR Academy Featured by Nature, The World’s Most Prestigious Academic Publication

Our Exceptional Alumni: College Admission Results 2020-2023

High School Student Researcher Rushat Presented Research On Photometric Redshift Predictions At The Mit Urtc 2023

High School Student Researcher Sailahari’s Paper on Machine Learning Approach in Predicting Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) in E. coli Accepted at the MIT URTC 2023

High School Student Researcher Hyojin on Understanding Psychopathy through Structural and Functional MRI

High School Student Researcher Abigail On Quantifying Exam Stress Progressions Has Been Accepted At The 3rd Ieee International Conference On Bioinformatics And Bioengineering (bibe)

High School Student Researcher Abigail’s Paper on Quantifying Exam Stress Progressions Presented at the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) and Published in the IEEE Xplore Journal

Download Programme Prospectus

Programme structure
Research course catalogue
Professor biographies
Tuition and Scholarship

Start Your Application

Cambridge Future Scholar (Summer 24)

Admission is OPEN

Early Admissions Deadline: May 1

Regular Admissions Deadline: May 15

Rolling Admissions.

1-on-1 Research Mentorship Admission is open all year.

Writing Center
Current Students
Online Only Students
Faculty & Staff
Parents & Family
Alumni & Friends
Community & Business
Student Life
Video Introduction
Become a Writing Assistant
All Writers
Graduate Students
ELL Students
Campus and Community
Testimonials
Encouraging Writing Center Use
Incentives and Requirements
Open Educational Resources
How We Help
Get to Know Us
Conversation Partners Program
Workshop Series
Professors Talk Writing
Computer Lab
Starting a Writing Center
A Note to Instructors
Annotated Bibliography
Literature Review
Research Proposal
Argument Essay
Rhetorical Analysis

The Purpose of Research Writing

Learning Objectives
Identify reasons to research writing projects.
Outline the steps of the research writing process.

Reasons for Research

But the research process does not end when you have solved your mystery. Imagine what would happen if a detective collected enough evidence to solve a criminal case, but she never shared her solution with the authorities. Presenting what you have learned from research can be just as important as performing the research. Research results can be presented in a variety of ways, but one of the most popular—and effective—presentation forms is the research paper. A research paper presents an original thesis, or purpose statement, about a topic and develops that thesis with information gathered from a variety of sources.

Exercise 1
Write a paragraph about a time when you used research in your everyday life. Did you look for the cheapest way to travel from Houston to Denver? Did you search for a way to remove gum from the bottom of your shoe? In your paragraph, explain what you wanted to research, how you performed the research, and what you learned as a result.

Research Writing and the Academic Paper

Research Writing at Work

Writing at Work

Take a few minutes to think about each of the following careers. How might each of these professionals use researching and research writing skills on the job?

Medical laboratory technician
Small business owner
Information technology professional
Freelance magazine writer

Steps of the Research Writing Process

How does a research paper grow from a folder of brainstormed notes to a polished final draft? No two projects are identical, but most projects follow a series of six basic steps.

These are the steps in the research writing process:

Choose a topic.
Plan and schedule time to research and write.
Conduct research.
Organize research and ideas.
Draft your paper.
Revise and edit your paper.

Each of these steps will be discussed in more detail later in this chapter. For now, though, we will take a brief look at what each step involves.

Step 1: Choosing a Topic

To narrow the focus of your topic, you may try freewriting exercises, such as brainstorming. You may also need to ask a specific research question —a broad, open-ended question that will guide your research—as well as propose a possible answer, or a working thesis. You may use your research question and your working thesis to create a research proposal . In a research proposal, you present your main research question, any related subquestions you plan to explore, and your working thesis.

Step 2: Planning and Scheduling

Step 3: Conducting Research

When going about your research, you will likely use a variety of sources—anything from books and periodicals to video presentations and in-person interviews.

Step 4: Organizing Research and the Writer’s Ideas

Tip Remember, your working thesis is not set in stone. You can and should change your working thesis throughout the research writing process if the evidence you find does not support your original thesis. Never try to force evidence to fit your argument. For example, your working thesis is “Mars cannot support life-forms.” Yet, a week into researching your topic, you find an article in the New York Times detailing new findings of bacteria under the Martian surface. Instead of trying to argue that bacteria are not life forms, you might instead alter your thesis to “Mars cannot support complex life-forms.”

Step 5: Drafting Your Paper

Step 6: Revising and Editing Your Paper

Review the steps of the research writing process. Then answer the questions on your own sheet of paper.

In which steps of the research writing process are you allowed to change your thesis?
In step 2, which types of information should you include in your project schedule?
What might happen if you eliminated step 4 from the research writing process?

Key Takeaways

People undertake research projects throughout their academic and professional careers in order to answer specific questions, share their findings with others, increase their understanding of challenging topics, and strengthen their researching, writing, and analytical skills.

The research writing process generally comprises six steps: choosing a topic, scheduling and planning time for research and writing, conducting research, organizing research and ideas, drafting a paper, and revising and editing the paper.

This material comes from Writing for Success, by University of Minnesota, which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted. You are free to use, adapt, and/or share this material as long as you properly attribute. Please keep this information on materials you use, adapt, and/or share for attribution purposes.

Contact Info

Kennesaw Campus 1000 Chastain Road Kennesaw, GA 30144

Marietta Campus 1100 South Marietta Pkwy Marietta, GA 30060

Campus Maps

Phone 470-KSU-INFO (470-578-4636)

kennesaw.edu/info

Media Resources

Resources For

5.1: The Purpose of Research Writing

Last updated
Save as PDF
Page ID 28080

Lynne Bost, Barbara Hall, Michelle Kassorla, Karen McKinney-Holley, Kirk Swenson, and Rebecca Weaver (Managing Editor)

Lynne Bost, Barbara Hall, Michelle Kassorla, Karen McKinney-Holley, Kirk Swenson, and Rebecca Weaver (Managing Editor)
Georgia State University via Open Textbooks at Affordable Learning Georgia

The Purpose of Research Writing

Screen Shot 2019-11-27 at 10.10.04 AM.png

Who has written poetry about exile?
What roles did women play in the American Revolution?
Where do cicadas go during their off years?
Should big-time college athletes be paid?
When did bookmakers start using movable type?
Why was the Great Wall of China built?
How does the human brain create, store, and retrieve memories?

You may know the answers to these questions off the top of your head. If you are like most people, however, you find answers to tough questions like these by searching the Internet, visiting a library, or asking others for information. To put it simply, you perform research.

Whether or not you realize it, you probably already perform research in your everyday life.

When your boss, your instructor, or a family member asks you a question that you don’t know the answer to, you locate relevant information, analyze your findings, and share your results. Locating, analyzing, and sharing information are key steps in the research process. In this chapter, you will learn more about each step. By developing your research writing skills, you will prepare yourself to answer challenging questions.

Sometimes you perform research simply to satisfy your own curiosity. Once you find the answer to your research question, your search may be over, or it may lead to more in-depth research about that topic or about another topic.

Other times, you want to communicate what you have learned to your peers, your family, your teachers, or even the editors of magazines, newspapers, or journals. In your personal life, you might simply discuss the topic with your friends. In more formal situations, such as in business and school, you communicate your findings in writing or in a presentation.

There are differences between a report and research:

A report may simply relay the results of your research in an organized manner. In contrast, a research project presents a research question and answers that question through the sources which led you to that answer.

In a research paper, you use facts, interpretations, and opinions you encounter in your research to create a narrative and support an argument (an answer to your research question) about your topic.

A student in an art history course might write a research paper about an artist's work or an aesthetic movement. A student in a psychology course might present on findings about current research in childhood development.

No matter what field of study you pursue, you will most likely be asked to compose a research project in your college degree program and to apply the skills of research and writing in your career. For similar reasons as professionals, students do research to answer specific questions, to share their findings with others, to increase their understanding of challenging topics, and to strengthen their analytical skills.

Having to complete a research project may feel intimidating at first. After all, researching and composing a large project requires a lot of time, effort, and organization. However, its challenges have rewards. The research process allows you to gain expertise on a topic of your choice.

The writing process helps you to remember what you learned, to understand it on a deeper level, and to develop expertise. Thus writing a research paper can be a great opportunity to explore a question and topic that particularly interests you and to grow as a person.

Screen Shot 2019-11-27 at 10.11.55 AM.png

Exercise: Free Writing about Research

Screen Shot 2019-11-27 at 10.14.09 AM.png

Identify the job of your dreams.
Now, freewrite about ways in which strong researching, organizing, writing, and critical thinking skills could help you succeed at your dream job.
Finally, share some of your ideas with a partner or in class discussion. Are there more ways to apply research to that job than you had thought of initially?

Process Overview

Screen Shot 2019-11-27 at 10.16.17 AM.png

How does a research paper grow from a folder of notes to a polished final draft? No two projects are identical, and no two paths to completion are identical. That said, most research projects go through a set of stages, often repeating stages such a prewriting, drafting, writing from sources, and revising, in a recursive pattern.

Here is an example of what that pattern often looks like in a real-life research project, with the stages described in detail the infographic below:

The Recursive Process

Screen Shot 2019-11-27 at 10.17.14 AM.png

You probably noticed that the process started repeating and fell out of order, right? Well, that's research (and writing in general)! It's a messy, sometimes confusing, but almost always rewarding journey, and if you dive into the process with an open mind, you'll probably end up with some great and interesting results.

Defining a Topic

Depending on your specific professor's assignment directions, you may get to choose your topic completely, you may get to choose a topic within a frame, or you may get to choose a topic from a list provided by the professor.

To narrow the focus of your topic, brainstorm using prewriting techniques, as well as any guidance or texts given by your instructor. Once you're sure of your topic, formulate a specific research question (a broad, open-ended question) or set of questions that will guide your research. Your research will help you answer the question or answer another question that you realize is more interesting or useful.

Planning and Scheduling

Conducting Research: Determining and Gathering the Right Kinds of Research

When going about your research, you will likely use a variety of sources, anything from books and periodicals to video presentations and in-person interviews. However, you should pay close attention to instructions; instructors often specify what kinds of sources they require for research papers.

Many will instruct you to only use academic / scholarly (peer-reviewed) sources, as those are the sources most valued in academia. For some assignments, your sources might include primary, secondary, and tertiary sources.

Primary sources provide firsthand information or raw data. For example, surveys, in-person interviews, historical documents, works of art, and works of literature are primary sources.
Secondary sources -- such as biographies, literary reviews, or news articles--include some analysis or interpretation of the information presented.
Tertiary sources --such as dictionaries, sourcebooks, encyclopedias, and some textbooks--repackage, reorganize, abstract, or compile information. They are usually not referenced to a specific author.

As you conduct research, you should take detailed, careful notes about your discoveries. This is writing, and it's an important part of the process, even if it's just notes at this point. Remember: you understand what you're reading by engaging with the material. You need to read predatorily and take notes strategically. You should also evaluate the reliability of each source you find, especially sources that are not peer-reviewed. Just because it exists doesn't mean it's a good source.

Organizing Your Research and Ideas, Abstracting From Materials, Writing

As you're beginning to learn about your topic, you'll likely feel overwhelmed by all of the information. That's normal. Here is what will help: writing as you're researching. This doesn't have to be polished writing. What's important is that you write throughout the process, constantly cycling through the recursive process.

When your research is complete, you will therefore have more material than you need, and you'll then be able to organize your findings and decide which sources to cite in your paper. You will also have an opportunity to evaluate the evidence you have collected and determine whether it supports your thesis, or the focus of your paper.

You may decide to adjust your thesis or conduct additional research to ensure that your thesis is well supported. The steps of a research project often overlap and repeat. They are not sequential or separate from each other.

Drafting Your Project

Now you are ready to compile your research findings, your notes, and other research with your critical analysis of the results in a first rough draft. This will likely be a messy draft, and that's OK.

The idea at this stage is to start to draw all of your thoughts and new-found expertise into a somewhat cohesive whole. You can always revise later. Your goal in almost any research project is to find out the answer to your research question. You will incorporate source materials into your paper and discuss each source thoughtfully in relation to your thesis (the answer to that question) or purpose statement.

It is important to pay close attention to standard conventions for citing sources in order to avoid plagiarism, which is the practice of using someone else's words without acknowledging the source. Later in this chapter, you will learn how to incorporate sources in your project and avoid some of the most common pitfalls of attributing information.

Revising and Editing Your Project

If you commit to the process of drafting a little every day and drafting as you research, you'll find that the project will get less messy as you begin to understand how the new information you know helps you understand the topic and your questions about it.

You might reorganize your paper's structure or revise for unity and cohesion, ensuring that each element in your paper smoothly and logically flows into the next. You will also make sure that your paper uses an appropriate and consistent tone.

Once you feel confident in the strength of your writing, you will edit your paper for proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and formatting.

When you complete this final step, you will have transformed a simple idea or question into a thoroughly researched and well-written project of which you can be proud.

A Final Note

Writing a good research project takes time, thought, and effort. Although this assignment is challenging, it is manageable if you commit to the process: write to understand what you want to know (answer your research questions), write as you learn more (understand your research), and write to share what you know (share that expertise with your audience). This will help you develop a thoughtful, informative, well-supported research project.

Doing Research: A New Researcher’s Guide pp 1–15 Cite as

What Is Research, and Why Do People Do It?

James Hiebert 6 ,
Jinfa Cai 7 ,
Stephen Hwang 7 ,
Anne K Morris 6 &
Charles Hohensee 6
Open Access
First Online: 03 December 2022

15k Accesses

Part of the book series: Research in Mathematics Education ((RME))

Abstractspiepr Abs1

Every day people do research as they gather information to learn about something of interest. In the scientific world, however, research means something different than simply gathering information. Scientific research is characterized by its careful planning and observing, by its relentless efforts to understand and explain, and by its commitment to learn from everyone else seriously engaged in research. We call this kind of research scientific inquiry and define it as “formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses.” By “hypotheses” we do not mean the hypotheses you encounter in statistics courses. We mean predictions about what you expect to find and rationales for why you made these predictions. Throughout this and the remaining chapters we make clear that the process of scientific inquiry applies to all kinds of research studies and data, both qualitative and quantitative.

You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF

Part I. What Is Research?

Have you ever studied something carefully because you wanted to know more about it? Maybe you wanted to know more about your grandmother’s life when she was younger so you asked her to tell you stories from her childhood, or maybe you wanted to know more about a fertilizer you were about to use in your garden so you read the ingredients on the package and looked them up online. According to the dictionary definition, you were doing research.

Recall your high school assignments asking you to “research” a topic. The assignment likely included consulting a variety of sources that discussed the topic, perhaps including some “original” sources. Often, the teacher referred to your product as a “research paper.”

Were you conducting research when you interviewed your grandmother or wrote high school papers reviewing a particular topic? Our view is that you were engaged in part of the research process, but only a small part. In this book, we reserve the word “research” for what it means in the scientific world, that is, for scientific research or, more pointedly, for scientific inquiry .

Exercise 1.1

Before you read any further, write a definition of what you think scientific inquiry is. Keep it short—Two to three sentences. You will periodically update this definition as you read this chapter and the remainder of the book.

This book is about scientific inquiry—what it is and how to do it. For starters, scientific inquiry is a process, a particular way of finding out about something that involves a number of phases. Each phase of the process constitutes one aspect of scientific inquiry. You are doing scientific inquiry as you engage in each phase, but you have not done scientific inquiry until you complete the full process. Each phase is necessary but not sufficient.

In this chapter, we set the stage by defining scientific inquiry—describing what it is and what it is not—and by discussing what it is good for and why people do it. The remaining chapters build directly on the ideas presented in this chapter.

A first thing to know is that scientific inquiry is not all or nothing. “Scientificness” is a continuum. Inquiries can be more scientific or less scientific. What makes an inquiry more scientific? You might be surprised there is no universally agreed upon answer to this question. None of the descriptors we know of are sufficient by themselves to define scientific inquiry. But all of them give you a way of thinking about some aspects of the process of scientific inquiry. Each one gives you different insights.

An image of the book's description with the words like research, science, and inquiry and what the word research meant in the scientific world.

Exercise 1.2

As you read about each descriptor below, think about what would make an inquiry more or less scientific. If you think a descriptor is important, use it to revise your definition of scientific inquiry.

Creating an Image of Scientific Inquiry

We will present three descriptors of scientific inquiry. Each provides a different perspective and emphasizes a different aspect of scientific inquiry. We will draw on all three descriptors to compose our definition of scientific inquiry.

Descriptor 1. Experience Carefully Planned in Advance

Sir Ronald Fisher, often called the father of modern statistical design, once referred to research as “experience carefully planned in advance” (1935, p. 8). He said that humans are always learning from experience, from interacting with the world around them. Usually, this learning is haphazard rather than the result of a deliberate process carried out over an extended period of time. Research, Fisher said, was learning from experience, but experience carefully planned in advance.

This phrase can be fully appreciated by looking at each word. The fact that scientific inquiry is based on experience means that it is based on interacting with the world. These interactions could be thought of as the stuff of scientific inquiry. In addition, it is not just any experience that counts. The experience must be carefully planned . The interactions with the world must be conducted with an explicit, describable purpose, and steps must be taken to make the intended learning as likely as possible. This planning is an integral part of scientific inquiry; it is not just a preparation phase. It is one of the things that distinguishes scientific inquiry from many everyday learning experiences. Finally, these steps must be taken beforehand and the purpose of the inquiry must be articulated in advance of the experience. Clearly, scientific inquiry does not happen by accident, by just stumbling into something. Stumbling into something unexpected and interesting can happen while engaged in scientific inquiry, but learning does not depend on it and serendipity does not make the inquiry scientific.

Descriptor 2. Observing Something and Trying to Explain Why It Is the Way It Is

When we were writing this chapter and googled “scientific inquiry,” the first entry was: “Scientific inquiry refers to the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on the evidence derived from their work.” The emphasis is on studying, or observing, and then explaining . This descriptor takes the image of scientific inquiry beyond carefully planned experience and includes explaining what was experienced.

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, “explain” means “(a) to make known, (b) to make plain or understandable, (c) to give the reason or cause of, and (d) to show the logical development or relations of” (Merriam-Webster, n.d. ). We will use all these definitions. Taken together, they suggest that to explain an observation means to understand it by finding reasons (or causes) for why it is as it is. In this sense of scientific inquiry, the following are synonyms: explaining why, understanding why, and reasoning about causes and effects. Our image of scientific inquiry now includes planning, observing, and explaining why.

An image represents the observation required in the scientific inquiry including planning and explaining.

We need to add a final note about this descriptor. We have phrased it in a way that suggests “observing something” means you are observing something in real time—observing the way things are or the way things are changing. This is often true. But, observing could mean observing data that already have been collected, maybe by someone else making the original observations (e.g., secondary analysis of NAEP data or analysis of existing video recordings of classroom instruction). We will address secondary analyses more fully in Chap. 4 . For now, what is important is that the process requires explaining why the data look like they do.

We must note that for us, the term “data” is not limited to numerical or quantitative data such as test scores. Data can also take many nonquantitative forms, including written survey responses, interview transcripts, journal entries, video recordings of students, teachers, and classrooms, text messages, and so forth.

An image represents the data explanation as it is not limited and takes numerous non-quantitative forms including an interview, journal entries, etc.

Exercise 1.3

What are the implications of the statement that just “observing” is not enough to count as scientific inquiry? Does this mean that a detailed description of a phenomenon is not scientific inquiry?

Find sources that define research in education that differ with our position, that say description alone, without explanation, counts as scientific research. Identify the precise points where the opinions differ. What are the best arguments for each of the positions? Which do you prefer? Why?

Descriptor 3. Updating Everyone’s Thinking in Response to More and Better Information

This descriptor focuses on a third aspect of scientific inquiry: updating and advancing the field’s understanding of phenomena that are investigated. This descriptor foregrounds a powerful characteristic of scientific inquiry: the reliability (or trustworthiness) of what is learned and the ultimate inevitability of this learning to advance human understanding of phenomena. Humans might choose not to learn from scientific inquiry, but history suggests that scientific inquiry always has the potential to advance understanding and that, eventually, humans take advantage of these new understandings.

Before exploring these bold claims a bit further, note that this descriptor uses “information” in the same way the previous two descriptors used “experience” and “observations.” These are the stuff of scientific inquiry and we will use them often, sometimes interchangeably. Frequently, we will use the term “data” to stand for all these terms.

An overriding goal of scientific inquiry is for everyone to learn from what one scientist does. Much of this book is about the methods you need to use so others have faith in what you report and can learn the same things you learned. This aspect of scientific inquiry has many implications.

One implication is that scientific inquiry is not a private practice. It is a public practice available for others to see and learn from. Notice how different this is from everyday learning. When you happen to learn something from your everyday experience, often only you gain from the experience. The fact that research is a public practice means it is also a social one. It is best conducted by interacting with others along the way: soliciting feedback at each phase, taking opportunities to present work-in-progress, and benefitting from the advice of others.

A second implication is that you, as the researcher, must be committed to sharing what you are doing and what you are learning in an open and transparent way. This allows all phases of your work to be scrutinized and critiqued. This is what gives your work credibility. The reliability or trustworthiness of your findings depends on your colleagues recognizing that you have used all appropriate methods to maximize the chances that your claims are justified by the data.

A third implication of viewing scientific inquiry as a collective enterprise is the reverse of the second—you must be committed to receiving comments from others. You must treat your colleagues as fair and honest critics even though it might sometimes feel otherwise. You must appreciate their job, which is to remain skeptical while scrutinizing what you have done in considerable detail. To provide the best help to you, they must remain skeptical about your conclusions (when, for example, the data are difficult for them to interpret) until you offer a convincing logical argument based on the information you share. A rather harsh but good-to-remember statement of the role of your friendly critics was voiced by Karl Popper, a well-known twentieth century philosopher of science: “. . . if you are interested in the problem which I tried to solve by my tentative assertion, you may help me by criticizing it as severely as you can” (Popper, 1968, p. 27).

A final implication of this third descriptor is that, as someone engaged in scientific inquiry, you have no choice but to update your thinking when the data support a different conclusion. This applies to your own data as well as to those of others. When data clearly point to a specific claim, even one that is quite different than you expected, you must reconsider your position. If the outcome is replicated multiple times, you need to adjust your thinking accordingly. Scientific inquiry does not let you pick and choose which data to believe; it mandates that everyone update their thinking when the data warrant an update.

Doing Scientific Inquiry

We define scientific inquiry in an operational sense—what does it mean to do scientific inquiry? What kind of process would satisfy all three descriptors: carefully planning an experience in advance; observing and trying to explain what you see; and, contributing to updating everyone’s thinking about an important phenomenon?

We define scientific inquiry as formulating , testing , and revising hypotheses about phenomena of interest.

Of course, we are not the only ones who define it in this way. The definition for the scientific method posted by the editors of Britannica is: “a researcher develops a hypothesis, tests it through various means, and then modifies the hypothesis on the basis of the outcome of the tests and experiments” (Britannica, n.d. ).

An image represents the scientific inquiry definition given by the editors of Britannica and also defines the hypothesis on the basis of the experiments.

Notice how defining scientific inquiry this way satisfies each of the descriptors. “Carefully planning an experience in advance” is exactly what happens when formulating a hypothesis about a phenomenon of interest and thinking about how to test it. “ Observing a phenomenon” occurs when testing a hypothesis, and “ explaining ” what is found is required when revising a hypothesis based on the data. Finally, “updating everyone’s thinking” comes from comparing publicly the original with the revised hypothesis.

Doing scientific inquiry, as we have defined it, underscores the value of accumulating knowledge rather than generating random bits of knowledge. Formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses is an ongoing process, with each revised hypothesis begging for another test, whether by the same researcher or by new researchers. The editors of Britannica signaled this cyclic process by adding the following phrase to their definition of the scientific method: “The modified hypothesis is then retested, further modified, and tested again.” Scientific inquiry creates a process that encourages each study to build on the studies that have gone before. Through collective engagement in this process of building study on top of study, the scientific community works together to update its thinking.

Before exploring more fully the meaning of “formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses,” we need to acknowledge that this is not the only way researchers define research. Some researchers prefer a less formal definition, one that includes more serendipity, less planning, less explanation. You might have come across more open definitions such as “research is finding out about something.” We prefer the tighter hypothesis formulation, testing, and revision definition because we believe it provides a single, coherent map for conducting research that addresses many of the thorny problems educational researchers encounter. We believe it is the most useful orientation toward research and the most helpful to learn as a beginning researcher.

A final clarification of our definition is that it applies equally to qualitative and quantitative research. This is a familiar distinction in education that has generated much discussion. You might think our definition favors quantitative methods over qualitative methods because the language of hypothesis formulation and testing is often associated with quantitative methods. In fact, we do not favor one method over another. In Chap. 4 , we will illustrate how our definition fits research using a range of quantitative and qualitative methods.

Exercise 1.4

Look for ways to extend what the field knows in an area that has already received attention by other researchers. Specifically, you can search for a program of research carried out by more experienced researchers that has some revised hypotheses that remain untested. Identify a revised hypothesis that you might like to test.

Unpacking the Terms Formulating, Testing, and Revising Hypotheses

To get a full sense of the definition of scientific inquiry we will use throughout this book, it is helpful to spend a little time with each of the key terms.

We first want to make clear that we use the term “hypothesis” as it is defined in most dictionaries and as it used in many scientific fields rather than as it is usually defined in educational statistics courses. By “hypothesis,” we do not mean a null hypothesis that is accepted or rejected by statistical analysis. Rather, we use “hypothesis” in the sense conveyed by the following definitions: “An idea or explanation for something that is based on known facts but has not yet been proved” (Cambridge University Press, n.d. ), and “An unproved theory, proposition, or supposition, tentatively accepted to explain certain facts and to provide a basis for further investigation or argument” (Agnes & Guralnik, 2008 ).

We distinguish two parts to “hypotheses.” Hypotheses consist of predictions and rationales . Predictions are statements about what you expect to find when you inquire about something. Rationales are explanations for why you made the predictions you did, why you believe your predictions are correct. So, for us “formulating hypotheses” means making explicit predictions and developing rationales for the predictions.

“Testing hypotheses” means making observations that allow you to assess in what ways your predictions were correct and in what ways they were incorrect. In education research, it is rarely useful to think of your predictions as either right or wrong. Because of the complexity of most issues you will investigate, most predictions will be right in some ways and wrong in others.

By studying the observations you make (data you collect) to test your hypotheses, you can revise your hypotheses to better align with the observations. This means revising your predictions plus revising your rationales to justify your adjusted predictions. Even though you might not run another test, formulating revised hypotheses is an essential part of conducting a research study. Comparing your original and revised hypotheses informs everyone of what you learned by conducting your study. In addition, a revised hypothesis sets the stage for you or someone else to extend your study and accumulate more knowledge of the phenomenon.

We should note that not everyone makes a clear distinction between predictions and rationales as two aspects of hypotheses. In fact, common, non-scientific uses of the word “hypothesis” may limit it to only a prediction or only an explanation (or rationale). We choose to explicitly include both prediction and rationale in our definition of hypothesis, not because we assert this should be the universal definition, but because we want to foreground the importance of both parts acting in concert. Using “hypothesis” to represent both prediction and rationale could hide the two aspects, but we make them explicit because they provide different kinds of information. It is usually easier to make predictions than develop rationales because predictions can be guesses, hunches, or gut feelings about which you have little confidence. Developing a compelling rationale requires careful thought plus reading what other researchers have found plus talking with your colleagues. Often, while you are developing your rationale you will find good reasons to change your predictions. Developing good rationales is the engine that drives scientific inquiry. Rationales are essentially descriptions of how much you know about the phenomenon you are studying. Throughout this guide, we will elaborate on how developing good rationales drives scientific inquiry. For now, we simply note that it can sharpen your predictions and help you to interpret your data as you test your hypotheses.

An image represents the rationale and the prediction for the scientific inquiry and different types of information provided by the terms.

Hypotheses in education research take a variety of forms or types. This is because there are a variety of phenomena that can be investigated. Investigating educational phenomena is sometimes best done using qualitative methods, sometimes using quantitative methods, and most often using mixed methods (e.g., Hay, 2016 ; Weis et al. 2019a ; Weisner, 2005 ). This means that, given our definition, hypotheses are equally applicable to qualitative and quantitative investigations.

Hypotheses take different forms when they are used to investigate different kinds of phenomena. Two very different activities in education could be labeled conducting experiments and descriptions. In an experiment, a hypothesis makes a prediction about anticipated changes, say the changes that occur when a treatment or intervention is applied. You might investigate how students’ thinking changes during a particular kind of instruction.

A second type of hypothesis, relevant for descriptive research, makes a prediction about what you will find when you investigate and describe the nature of a situation. The goal is to understand a situation as it exists rather than to understand a change from one situation to another. In this case, your prediction is what you expect to observe. Your rationale is the set of reasons for making this prediction; it is your current explanation for why the situation will look like it does.

You will probably read, if you have not already, that some researchers say you do not need a prediction to conduct a descriptive study. We will discuss this point of view in Chap. 2 . For now, we simply claim that scientific inquiry, as we have defined it, applies to all kinds of research studies. Descriptive studies, like others, not only benefit from formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses, but also need hypothesis formulating, testing, and revising.

One reason we define research as formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses is that if you think of research in this way you are less likely to go wrong. It is a useful guide for the entire process, as we will describe in detail in the chapters ahead. For example, as you build the rationale for your predictions, you are constructing the theoretical framework for your study (Chap. 3 ). As you work out the methods you will use to test your hypothesis, every decision you make will be based on asking, “Will this help me formulate or test or revise my hypothesis?” (Chap. 4 ). As you interpret the results of testing your predictions, you will compare them to what you predicted and examine the differences, focusing on how you must revise your hypotheses (Chap. 5 ). By anchoring the process to formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses, you will make smart decisions that yield a coherent and well-designed study.

Exercise 1.5

Compare the concept of formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses with the descriptions of scientific inquiry contained in Scientific Research in Education (NRC, 2002 ). How are they similar or different?

Exercise 1.6

Provide an example to illustrate and emphasize the differences between everyday learning/thinking and scientific inquiry.

Learning from Doing Scientific Inquiry

We noted earlier that a measure of what you have learned by conducting a research study is found in the differences between your original hypothesis and your revised hypothesis based on the data you collected to test your hypothesis. We will elaborate this statement in later chapters, but we preview our argument here.

Even before collecting data, scientific inquiry requires cycles of making a prediction, developing a rationale, refining your predictions, reading and studying more to strengthen your rationale, refining your predictions again, and so forth. And, even if you have run through several such cycles, you still will likely find that when you test your prediction you will be partly right and partly wrong. The results will support some parts of your predictions but not others, or the results will “kind of” support your predictions. A critical part of scientific inquiry is making sense of your results by interpreting them against your predictions. Carefully describing what aspects of your data supported your predictions, what aspects did not, and what data fell outside of any predictions is not an easy task, but you cannot learn from your study without doing this analysis.

An image represents the cycle of events that take place before making predictions, developing the rationale, and studying the prediction and rationale multiple times.

Analyzing the matches and mismatches between your predictions and your data allows you to formulate different rationales that would have accounted for more of the data. The best revised rationale is the one that accounts for the most data. Once you have revised your rationales, you can think about the predictions they best justify or explain. It is by comparing your original rationales to your new rationales that you can sort out what you learned from your study.

Suppose your study was an experiment. Maybe you were investigating the effects of a new instructional intervention on students’ learning. Your original rationale was your explanation for why the intervention would change the learning outcomes in a particular way. Your revised rationale explained why the changes that you observed occurred like they did and why your revised predictions are better. Maybe your original rationale focused on the potential of the activities if they were implemented in ideal ways and your revised rationale included the factors that are likely to affect how teachers implement them. By comparing the before and after rationales, you are describing what you learned—what you can explain now that you could not before. Another way of saying this is that you are describing how much more you understand now than before you conducted your study.

Revised predictions based on carefully planned and collected data usually exhibit some of the following features compared with the originals: more precision, more completeness, and broader scope. Revised rationales have more explanatory power and become more complete, more aligned with the new predictions, sharper, and overall more convincing.

Part II. Why Do Educators Do Research?

Doing scientific inquiry is a lot of work. Each phase of the process takes time, and you will often cycle back to improve earlier phases as you engage in later phases. Because of the significant effort required, you should make sure your study is worth it. So, from the beginning, you should think about the purpose of your study. Why do you want to do it? And, because research is a social practice, you should also think about whether the results of your study are likely to be important and significant to the education community.

If you are doing research in the way we have described—as scientific inquiry—then one purpose of your study is to understand , not just to describe or evaluate or report. As we noted earlier, when you formulate hypotheses, you are developing rationales that explain why things might be like they are. In our view, trying to understand and explain is what separates research from other kinds of activities, like evaluating or describing.

One reason understanding is so important is that it allows researchers to see how or why something works like it does. When you see how something works, you are better able to predict how it might work in other contexts, under other conditions. And, because conditions, or contextual factors, matter a lot in education, gaining insights into applying your findings to other contexts increases the contributions of your work and its importance to the broader education community.

Consequently, the purposes of research studies in education often include the more specific aim of identifying and understanding the conditions under which the phenomena being studied work like the observations suggest. A classic example of this kind of study in mathematics education was reported by William Brownell and Harold Moser in 1949 . They were trying to establish which method of subtracting whole numbers could be taught most effectively—the regrouping method or the equal additions method. However, they realized that effectiveness might depend on the conditions under which the methods were taught—“meaningfully” versus “mechanically.” So, they designed a study that crossed the two instructional approaches with the two different methods (regrouping and equal additions). Among other results, they found that these conditions did matter. The regrouping method was more effective under the meaningful condition than the mechanical condition, but the same was not true for the equal additions algorithm.

What do education researchers want to understand? In our view, the ultimate goal of education is to offer all students the best possible learning opportunities. So, we believe the ultimate purpose of scientific inquiry in education is to develop understanding that supports the improvement of learning opportunities for all students. We say “ultimate” because there are lots of issues that must be understood to improve learning opportunities for all students. Hypotheses about many aspects of education are connected, ultimately, to students’ learning. For example, formulating and testing a hypothesis that preservice teachers need to engage in particular kinds of activities in their coursework in order to teach particular topics well is, ultimately, connected to improving students’ learning opportunities. So is hypothesizing that school districts often devote relatively few resources to instructional leadership training or hypothesizing that positioning mathematics as a tool students can use to combat social injustice can help students see the relevance of mathematics to their lives.

We do not exclude the importance of research on educational issues more removed from improving students’ learning opportunities, but we do think the argument for their importance will be more difficult to make. If there is no way to imagine a connection between your hypothesis and improving learning opportunities for students, even a distant connection, we recommend you reconsider whether it is an important hypothesis within the education community.

Notice that we said the ultimate goal of education is to offer all students the best possible learning opportunities. For too long, educators have been satisfied with a goal of offering rich learning opportunities for lots of students, sometimes even for just the majority of students, but not necessarily for all students. Evaluations of success often are based on outcomes that show high averages. In other words, if many students have learned something, or even a smaller number have learned a lot, educators may have been satisfied. The problem is that there is usually a pattern in the groups of students who receive lower quality opportunities—students of color and students who live in poor areas, urban and rural. This is not acceptable. Consequently, we emphasize the premise that the purpose of education research is to offer rich learning opportunities to all students.

One way to make sure you will be able to convince others of the importance of your study is to consider investigating some aspect of teachers’ shared instructional problems. Historically, researchers in education have set their own research agendas, regardless of the problems teachers are facing in schools. It is increasingly recognized that teachers have had trouble applying to their own classrooms what researchers find. To address this problem, a researcher could partner with a teacher—better yet, a small group of teachers—and talk with them about instructional problems they all share. These discussions can create a rich pool of problems researchers can consider. If researchers pursued one of these problems (preferably alongside teachers), the connection to improving learning opportunities for all students could be direct and immediate. “Grounding a research question in instructional problems that are experienced across multiple teachers’ classrooms helps to ensure that the answer to the question will be of sufficient scope to be relevant and significant beyond the local context” (Cai et al., 2019b , p. 115).

As a beginning researcher, determining the relevance and importance of a research problem is especially challenging. We recommend talking with advisors, other experienced researchers, and peers to test the educational importance of possible research problems and topics of study. You will also learn much more about the issue of research importance when you read Chap. 5 .

Exercise 1.7

Identify a problem in education that is closely connected to improving learning opportunities and a problem that has a less close connection. For each problem, write a brief argument (like a logical sequence of if-then statements) that connects the problem to all students’ learning opportunities.

Part III. Conducting Research as a Practice of Failing Productively

Scientific inquiry involves formulating hypotheses about phenomena that are not fully understood—by you or anyone else. Even if you are able to inform your hypotheses with lots of knowledge that has already been accumulated, you are likely to find that your prediction is not entirely accurate. This is normal. Remember, scientific inquiry is a process of constantly updating your thinking. More and better information means revising your thinking, again, and again, and again. Because you never fully understand a complicated phenomenon and your hypotheses never produce completely accurate predictions, it is easy to believe you are somehow failing.

The trick is to fail upward, to fail to predict accurately in ways that inform your next hypothesis so you can make a better prediction. Some of the best-known researchers in education have been open and honest about the many times their predictions were wrong and, based on the results of their studies and those of others, they continuously updated their thinking and changed their hypotheses.

A striking example of publicly revising (actually reversing) hypotheses due to incorrect predictions is found in the work of Lee J. Cronbach, one of the most distinguished educational psychologists of the twentieth century. In 1955, Cronbach delivered his presidential address to the American Psychological Association. Titling it “Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology,” Cronbach proposed a rapprochement between two research approaches—correlational studies that focused on individual differences and experimental studies that focused on instructional treatments controlling for individual differences. (We will examine different research approaches in Chap. 4 ). If these approaches could be brought together, reasoned Cronbach ( 1957 ), researchers could find interactions between individual characteristics and treatments (aptitude-treatment interactions or ATIs), fitting the best treatments to different individuals.

In 1975, after years of research by many researchers looking for ATIs, Cronbach acknowledged the evidence for simple, useful ATIs had not been found. Even when trying to find interactions between a few variables that could provide instructional guidance, the analysis, said Cronbach, creates “a hall of mirrors that extends to infinity, tormenting even the boldest investigators and defeating even ambitious designs” (Cronbach, 1975 , p. 119).

As he was reflecting back on his work, Cronbach ( 1986 ) recommended moving away from documenting instructional effects through statistical inference (an approach he had championed for much of his career) and toward approaches that probe the reasons for these effects, approaches that provide a “full account of events in a time, place, and context” (Cronbach, 1986 , p. 104). This is a remarkable change in hypotheses, a change based on data and made fully transparent. Cronbach understood the value of failing productively.

Closer to home, in a less dramatic example, one of us began a line of scientific inquiry into how to prepare elementary preservice teachers to teach early algebra. Teaching early algebra meant engaging elementary students in early forms of algebraic reasoning. Such reasoning should help them transition from arithmetic to algebra. To begin this line of inquiry, a set of activities for preservice teachers were developed. Even though the activities were based on well-supported hypotheses, they largely failed to engage preservice teachers as predicted because of unanticipated challenges the preservice teachers faced. To capitalize on this failure, follow-up studies were conducted, first to better understand elementary preservice teachers’ challenges with preparing to teach early algebra, and then to better support preservice teachers in navigating these challenges. In this example, the initial failure was a necessary step in the researchers’ scientific inquiry and furthered the researchers’ understanding of this issue.

We present another example of failing productively in Chap. 2 . That example emerges from recounting the history of a well-known research program in mathematics education.

Making mistakes is an inherent part of doing scientific research. Conducting a study is rarely a smooth path from beginning to end. We recommend that you keep the following things in mind as you begin a career of conducting research in education.

First, do not get discouraged when you make mistakes; do not fall into the trap of feeling like you are not capable of doing research because you make too many errors.

Second, learn from your mistakes. Do not ignore your mistakes or treat them as errors that you simply need to forget and move past. Mistakes are rich sites for learning—in research just as in other fields of study.

Third, by reflecting on your mistakes, you can learn to make better mistakes, mistakes that inform you about a productive next step. You will not be able to eliminate your mistakes, but you can set a goal of making better and better mistakes.

Exercise 1.8

How does scientific inquiry differ from everyday learning in giving you the tools to fail upward? You may find helpful perspectives on this question in other resources on science and scientific inquiry (e.g., Failure: Why Science is So Successful by Firestein, 2015).

Exercise 1.9

Use what you have learned in this chapter to write a new definition of scientific inquiry. Compare this definition with the one you wrote before reading this chapter. If you are reading this book as part of a course, compare your definition with your colleagues’ definitions. Develop a consensus definition with everyone in the course.

Part IV. Preview of Chap. 2

Now that you have a good idea of what research is, at least of what we believe research is, the next step is to think about how to actually begin doing research. This means how to begin formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses. As for all phases of scientific inquiry, there are lots of things to think about. Because it is critical to start well, we devote Chap. 2 to getting started with formulating hypotheses.

Agnes, M., & Guralnik, D. B. (Eds.). (2008). Hypothesis. In Webster’s new world college dictionary (4th ed.). Wiley.

Google Scholar

Britannica. (n.d.). Scientific method. In Encyclopaedia Britannica . Retrieved July 15, 2022 from https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-method

Brownell, W. A., & Moser, H. E. (1949). Meaningful vs. mechanical learning: A study in grade III subtraction . Duke University Press..

Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., Cirillo, M., Kramer, S. L., & Hiebert, J. (2019b). Posing significant research questions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50 (2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.2.0114

Article Google Scholar

Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Hypothesis. In Cambridge dictionary . Retrieved July 15, 2022 from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/hypothesis

Cronbach, J. L. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12 , 671–684.

Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30 , 116–127.

Cronbach, L. J. (1986). Social inquiry by and for earthlings. In D. W. Fiske & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities (pp. 83–107). University of Chicago Press.

Hay, C. M. (Ed.). (2016). Methods that matter: Integrating mixed methods for more effective social science research . University of Chicago Press.

Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Explain. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary . Retrieved July 15, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/explain

National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education . National Academy Press.

Weis, L., Eisenhart, M., Duncan, G. J., Albro, E., Bueschel, A. C., Cobb, P., Eccles, J., Mendenhall, R., Moss, P., Penuel, W., Ream, R. K., Rumbaut, R. G., Sloane, F., Weisner, T. S., & Wilson, J. (2019a). Mixed methods for studies that address broad and enduring issues in education research. Teachers College Record, 121 , 100307.

Weisner, T. S. (Ed.). (2005). Discovering successful pathways in children’s development: Mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life . University of Chicago Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Education, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

James Hiebert, Anne K Morris & Charles Hohensee

Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

Jinfa Cai & Stephen Hwang

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Hiebert, J., Cai, J., Hwang, S., Morris, A.K., Hohensee, C. (2023). What Is Research, and Why Do People Do It?. In: Doing Research: A New Researcher’s Guide. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19078-0_1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19078-0_1

Published : 03 December 2022

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-19077-3

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-19078-0

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Find a journal
Track your research

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Genre and the Research Paper

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

This handout provides detailed information about how to write research papers including discussing research papers as a genre, choosing topics, and finding sources.

Research: What it is.

A research paper is the culmination and final product of an involved process of research, critical thinking, source evaluation, organization, and composition. It is, perhaps, helpful to think of the research paper as a living thing, which grows and changes as the student explores, interprets, and evaluates sources related to a specific topic. Primary and secondary sources are the heart of a research paper, and provide its nourishment; without the support of and interaction with these sources, the research paper would morph into a different genre of writing (e.g., an encyclopedic article). The research paper serves not only to further the field in which it is written, but also to provide the student with an exceptional opportunity to increase her knowledge in that field. It is also possible to identify a research paper by what it is not.

Research: What it is not.

A research paper is not simply an informed summary of a topic by means of primary and secondary sources. It is neither a book report nor an opinion piece nor an expository essay consisting solely of one's interpretation of a text nor an overview of a particular topic. Instead, it is a genre that requires one to spend time investigating and evaluating sources with the intent to offer interpretations of the texts, and not unconscious regurgitations of those sources. The goal of a research paper is not to inform the reader what others have to say about a topic, but to draw on what others have to say about a topic and engage the sources in order to thoughtfully offer a unique perspective on the issue at hand. This is accomplished through two major types of research papers.

Two major types of research papers.

Argumentative research paper:

The argumentative research paper consists of an introduction in which the writer clearly introduces the topic and informs his audience exactly which stance he intends to take; this stance is often identified as the thesis statement . An important goal of the argumentative research paper is persuasion, which means the topic chosen should be debatable or controversial. For example, it would be difficult for a student to successfully argue in favor of the following stance.

Perhaps 25 years ago this topic would have been debatable; however, today, it is assumed that smoking cigarettes is, indeed, harmful to one's health. A better thesis would be the following.

In this sentence, the writer is not challenging the current accepted stance that both firsthand and secondhand cigarette smoke is dangerous; rather, she is positing that the social acceptance of the latter over the former is indicative of a cultural double-standard of sorts. The student would support this thesis throughout her paper by means of both primary and secondary sources, with the intent to persuade her audience that her particular interpretation of the situation is viable.

Analytical research paper:

The analytical research paper often begins with the student asking a question (a.k.a. a research question) on which he has taken no stance. Such a paper is often an exercise in exploration and evaluation. For example, perhaps one is interested in the Old English poem Beowulf . He has read the poem intently and desires to offer a fresh reading of the poem to the academic community. His question may be as follows.

His research may lead him to the following conclusion.

Though his topic may be debatable and controversial, it is not the student's intent to persuade the audience that his ideas are right while those of others are wrong. Instead, his goal is to offer a critical interpretation of primary and secondary sources throughout the paper--sources that should, ultimately, buttress his particular analysis of the topic. The following is an example of what his thesis statement may look like once he has completed his research.

This statement does not negate the traditional readings of Beowulf ; instead, it offers a fresh and detailed reading of the poem that will be supported by the student's research.

It is typically not until the student has begun the writing process that his thesis statement begins to take solid form. In fact, the thesis statement in an analytical paper is often more fluid than the thesis in an argumentative paper. Such is one of the benefits of approaching the topic without a predetermined stance.

Buy Me a Coffee

Home » Purpose of Research – Objectives and Applications

Purpose of Research – Objectives and Applications

Table of Contents

Purpose of Research

Definition:

The purpose of research is to systematically investigate and gather information on a particular topic or issue, with the aim of answering questions, solving problems, or advancing knowledge.

The purpose of research can vary depending on the field of study, the research question, and the intended audience. In general, research can be used to:

Generate new knowledge and theories
Test existing theories or hypotheses
Identify trends or patterns
Gather information for decision-making
Evaluate the effectiveness of programs, policies, or interventions
Develop new technologies or products
Identify new opportunities or areas for further study.

Objectives of Research

The objectives of research may vary depending on the field of study and the specific research question being investigated. However, some common objectives of research include:

To explore and describe a phenomenon: Research can be conducted to describe and understand a phenomenon or situation in greater detail.
To test a hypothesis or theory : Research can be used to test a specific hypothesis or theory by collecting and analyzing data.
To identify patterns or trends: Research can be conducted to identify patterns or trends in data, which can provide insights into the behavior of a system or population.
To evaluate a program or intervention: Research can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of a program or intervention, such as a new drug or educational intervention.
To develop new knowledge or technology : Research can be conducted to develop new knowledge or technologies that can be applied to solve practical problems.
To inform policy decisions: Research can provide evidence to inform policy decisions and improve public policy.
To improve existing knowledge: Research can be conducted to improve existing knowledge and fill gaps in the current understanding of a topic.

Applications of Research

Research has a wide range of applications across various fields and industries. Here are some examples:

Medicine : Research is critical in developing new treatments and drugs for diseases. Researchers conduct clinical trials to test the safety and efficacy of new medications and therapies. They also study the underlying causes of diseases to find new ways to prevent or treat them.
Technology : Research is crucial in developing new technologies and improving existing ones. Researchers work to develop new software, hardware, and other technological innovations that can be used in various industries such as healthcare, manufacturing, and telecommunications.
Education : Research is essential in the field of education to develop new teaching methods and strategies. Researchers conduct studies to determine the effectiveness of various educational approaches and to identify factors that influence student learning.
Business : Research is critical in helping businesses make informed decisions. Market research can help businesses understand their target audience and identify trends in the market. Research can also help businesses improve their products and services.
Environmental Science : Research is crucial in the field of environmental science to understand the impact of human activities on the environment. Researchers conduct studies to identify ways to reduce pollution, protect natural resources, and mitigate the effects of climate change.

Goal of Research

The ultimate goal of research is to advance our understanding of the world and to contribute to the development of new theories, ideas, and technologies that can be used to improve our lives. Some more common Goals are follows:

Explore and discover new knowledge : Research can help uncover new information and insights that were previously unknown.
Test hypotheses and theories : Research can be used to test and validate theories and hypotheses, allowing researchers to refine and develop their ideas.
Solve practical problems: Research can be used to identify solutions to real-world problems and to inform policy and decision-making.
Improve understanding : Research can help improve our understanding of complex phenomena and systems, such as the human body, the natural world, and social systems.
Develop new technologies and innovations : Research can lead to the development of new technologies, products, and innovations that can improve our lives and society.
Contribute to the development of academic fields : Research can help advance academic fields by expanding our knowledge and understanding of important topics and areas of inquiry.

Importance of Research

The importance of research lies in its ability to generate new knowledge and insights, to test existing theories and ideas, and to solve practical problems.

Some of the key reasons why research is important are:

Advancing knowledge: Research is essential for advancing knowledge and understanding in various fields. It enables us to explore and discover new concepts, ideas, and phenomena that can contribute to scientific and technological progress.
Solving problems : Research can help identify and solve practical problems and challenges in various domains, such as health care, agriculture, engineering, and social policy.
Innovation : Research is a critical driver of innovation, as it enables the development of new products, services, and technologies that can improve people’s lives and contribute to economic growth.
Evidence-based decision-making : Research provides evidence and data that can inform decision-making in various fields, such as policy-making, business strategy, and healthcare.
Personal and professional development : Engaging in research can also contribute to personal and professional development, as it requires critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills.

When to use Research

Research should be used in situations where there is a need to gather new information, test existing theories, or solve problems. Some common scenarios where research is often used include:

Scientific inquiry : Research is essential for advancing scientific knowledge and understanding, and for exploring new concepts, theories, and phenomena.
Business and market analysis: Research is critical for businesses to gather data and insights about the market, customer preferences, and competition, to inform decision-making and strategy development.
Social policy and public administration: Research is often used in social policy and public administration to evaluate the effectiveness of programs and policies, and to identify areas where improvements are needed.
Healthcare: Research is essential in healthcare to develop new treatments, improve existing ones, and to understand the causes and mechanisms of diseases.
Education : Research is critical in education to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching methods and programs, and to develop new approaches to learning.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Process – Steps, Examples and Tips

Research Design – Types, Methods and Examples

Institutional Review Board – Application Sample...

Evaluating Research – Process, Examples and...

What (Exactly) Is A Research Proposal?

A simple explainer with examples + free template.

By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | June 2020 (Updated April 2023)

Whether you’re nearing the end of your degree and your dissertation is on the horizon, or you’re planning to apply for a PhD program, chances are you’ll need to craft a convincing research proposal . If you’re on this page, you’re probably unsure exactly what the research proposal is all about. Well, you’ve come to the right place.

Overview: Research Proposal Basics

What a research proposal is
What a research proposal needs to cover
How to structure your research proposal
Example /sample proposals
Proposal writing FAQs
Key takeaways & additional resources

What is a research proposal?

Simply put, a research proposal is a structured, formal document that explains what you plan to research (your research topic), why it’s worth researching (your justification), and how you plan to investigate it (your methodology).

The purpose of the research proposal (its job, so to speak) is to convince your research supervisor, committee or university that your research is suitable (for the requirements of the degree program) and manageable (given the time and resource constraints you will face).

The most important word here is “ convince ” – in other words, your research proposal needs to sell your research idea (to whoever is going to approve it). If it doesn’t convince them (of its suitability and manageability), you’ll need to revise and resubmit . This will cost you valuable time, which will either delay the start of your research or eat into its time allowance (which is bad news).

A research proposal is a formal document that explains what you plan to research , why it's worth researching and how you'll do it.

What goes into a research proposal?

A good dissertation or thesis proposal needs to cover the “ what “, “ why ” and” how ” of the proposed study. Let’s look at each of these attributes in a little more detail:

Your proposal needs to clearly articulate your research topic . This needs to be specific and unambiguous . Your research topic should make it clear exactly what you plan to research and in what context. Here’s an example of a well-articulated research topic:

An investigation into the factors which impact female Generation Y consumer’s likelihood to promote a specific makeup brand to their peers: a British context

As you can see, this topic is extremely clear. From this one line we can see exactly:

What’s being investigated – factors that make people promote or advocate for a brand of a specific makeup brand
Who it involves – female Gen-Y consumers
In what context – the United Kingdom

So, make sure that your research proposal provides a detailed explanation of your research topic . If possible, also briefly outline your research aims and objectives , and perhaps even your research questions (although in some cases you’ll only develop these at a later stage). Needless to say, don’t start writing your proposal until you have a clear topic in mind , or you’ll end up waffling and your research proposal will suffer as a result of this.

Need a helping hand?

As we touched on earlier, it’s not good enough to simply propose a research topic – you need to justify why your topic is original . In other words, what makes it unique ? What gap in the current literature does it fill? If it’s simply a rehash of the existing research, it’s probably not going to get approval – it needs to be fresh.

But, originality alone is not enough. Once you’ve ticked that box, you also need to justify why your proposed topic is important . In other words, what value will it add to the world if you achieve your research aims?

As an example, let’s look at the sample research topic we mentioned earlier (factors impacting brand advocacy). In this case, if the research could uncover relevant factors, these findings would be very useful to marketers in the cosmetics industry, and would, therefore, have commercial value . That is a clear justification for the research.

So, when you’re crafting your research proposal, remember that it’s not enough for a topic to simply be unique. It needs to be useful and value-creating – and you need to convey that value in your proposal. If you’re struggling to find a research topic that makes the cut, watch our video covering how to find a research topic .

Free Webinar: How To Write A Research Proposal

It’s all good and well to have a great topic that’s original and valuable, but you’re not going to convince anyone to approve it without discussing the practicalities – in other words:

How will you actually undertake your research (i.e., your methodology)?
Is your research methodology appropriate given your research aims?
Is your approach manageable given your constraints (time, money, etc.)?

While it’s generally not expected that you’ll have a fully fleshed-out methodology at the proposal stage, you’ll likely still need to provide a high-level overview of your research methodology . Here are some important questions you’ll need to address in your research proposal:

Will you take a qualitative , quantitative or mixed -method approach?
What sampling strategy will you adopt?
How will you collect your data (e.g., interviews, surveys, etc)?
How will you analyse your data (e.g., descriptive and inferential statistics , content analysis, discourse analysis, etc, .)?
What potential limitations will your methodology carry?

So, be sure to give some thought to the practicalities of your research and have at least a basic methodological plan before you start writing up your proposal. If this all sounds rather intimidating, the video below provides a good introduction to research methodology and the key choices you’ll need to make.

How To Structure A Research Proposal

Now that we’ve covered the key points that need to be addressed in a proposal, you may be wondering, “ But how is a research proposal structured? “.

While the exact structure and format required for a research proposal differs from university to university, there are four “essential ingredients” that commonly make up the structure of a research proposal:

A rich introduction and background to the proposed research
An initial literature review covering the existing research
An overview of the proposed research methodology
A discussion regarding the practicalities (project plans, timelines, etc.)

In the video below, we unpack each of these four sections, step by step.

Research Proposal Examples/Samples

In the video below, we provide a detailed walkthrough of two successful research proposals (Master’s and PhD-level), as well as our popular free proposal template.

Proposal Writing FAQs

How long should a research proposal be.

This varies tremendously, depending on the university, the field of study (e.g., social sciences vs natural sciences), and the level of the degree (e.g. undergraduate, Masters or PhD) – so it’s always best to check with your university what their specific requirements are before you start planning your proposal.

As a rough guide, a formal research proposal at Masters-level often ranges between 2000-3000 words, while a PhD-level proposal can be far more detailed, ranging from 5000-8000 words. In some cases, a rough outline of the topic is all that’s needed, while in other cases, universities expect a very detailed proposal that essentially forms the first three chapters of the dissertation or thesis.

The takeaway – be sure to check with your institution before you start writing.

How do I choose a topic for my research proposal?

Finding a good research topic is a process that involves multiple steps. We cover the topic ideation process in this video post.

How do I write a literature review for my proposal?

While you typically won’t need a comprehensive literature review at the proposal stage, you still need to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the key literature and are able to synthesise it. We explain the literature review process here.

How do I create a timeline and budget for my proposal?

We explain how to craft a project plan/timeline and budget in Research Proposal Bootcamp .

Which referencing format should I use in my research proposal?

The expectations and requirements regarding formatting and referencing vary from institution to institution. Therefore, you’ll need to check this information with your university.

What common proposal writing mistakes do I need to look out for?

We’ve create a video post about some of the most common mistakes students make when writing a proposal – you can access that here . If you’re short on time, here’s a quick summary:

The research topic is too broad (or just poorly articulated).
The research aims, objectives and questions don’t align.
The research topic is not well justified.
The study has a weak theoretical foundation.
The research design is not well articulated well enough.
Poor writing and sloppy presentation.
Poor project planning and risk management.
Not following the university’s specific criteria.

Key Takeaways & Additional Resources

As you write up your research proposal, remember the all-important core purpose: to convince . Your research proposal needs to sell your study in terms of suitability and viability. So, focus on crafting a convincing narrative to ensure a strong proposal.

At the same time, pay close attention to your university’s requirements. While we’ve covered the essentials here, every institution has its own set of expectations and it’s essential that you follow these to maximise your chances of approval.

By the way, we’ve got plenty more resources to help you fast-track your research proposal. Here are some of our most popular resources to get you started:

Proposal Writing 101 : A Introductory Webinar
Research Proposal Bootcamp : The Ultimate Online Course
Template : A basic template to help you craft your proposal

If you’re looking for 1-on-1 support with your research proposal, be sure to check out our private coaching service , where we hold your hand through the proposal development process (and the entire research journey), step by step.

Psst… there’s more!

This post is an extract from our bestselling Udemy Course, Research Proposal Bootcamp . If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this .

You Might Also Like:

51 Comments

I truly enjoyed this video, as it was eye-opening to what I have to do in the preparation of preparing a Research proposal.

I would be interested in getting some coaching.

I real appreciate on your elaboration on how to develop research proposal,the video explains each steps clearly.

Thank you for the video. It really assisted me and my niece. I am a PhD candidate and she is an undergraduate student. It is at times, very difficult to guide a family member but with this video, my job is done.

In view of the above, I welcome more coaching.

Wonderful guidelines, thanks

This is very helpful. Would love to continue even as I prepare for starting my masters next year.

Thanks for the work done, the text was helpful to me

Bundle of thanks to you for the research proposal guide it was really good and useful if it is possible please send me the sample of research proposal

You’re most welcome. We don’t have any research proposals that we can share (the students own the intellectual property), but you might find our research proposal template useful: https://gradcoach.com/research-proposal-template/

Cheruiyot Moses Kipyegon

Thanks alot. It was an eye opener that came timely enough before my imminent proposal defense. Thanks, again

thank you very much your lesson is very interested may God be with you

I am an undergraduate student (First Degree) preparing to write my project,this video and explanation had shed more light to me thanks for your efforts keep it up.

Very useful. I am grateful.

this is a very a good guidance on research proposal, for sure i have learnt something

Wonderful guidelines for writing a research proposal, I am a student of m.phil( education), this guideline is suitable for me. Thanks

You’re welcome 🙂

Thank you, this was so helpful.

A really great and insightful video. It opened my eyes as to how to write a research paper. I would like to receive more guidance for writing my research paper from your esteemed faculty.

Thank you, great insights

Thank you, great insights, thank you so much, feeling edified

Wow thank you, great insights, thanks a lot

Thank you. This is a great insight. I am a student preparing for a PhD program. I am requested to write my Research Proposal as part of what I am required to submit before my unconditional admission. I am grateful having listened to this video which will go a long way in helping me to actually choose a topic of interest and not just any topic as well as to narrow down the topic and be specific about it. I indeed need more of this especially as am trying to choose a topic suitable for a DBA am about embarking on. Thank you once more. The video is indeed helpful.

Have learnt a lot just at the right time. Thank you so much.

thank you very much ,because have learn a lot things concerning research proposal and be blessed u for your time that you providing to help us

Hi. For my MSc medical education research, please evaluate this topic for me: Training Needs Assessment of Faculty in Medical Training Institutions in Kericho and Bomet Counties

I have really learnt a lot based on research proposal and it’s formulation

Thank you. I learn much from the proposal since it is applied

Your effort is much appreciated – you have good articulation.

You have good articulation.

I do applaud your simplified method of explaining the subject matter, which indeed has broaden my understanding of the subject matter. Definitely this would enable me writing a sellable research proposal.

This really helping

Great! I liked your tutoring on how to find a research topic and how to write a research proposal. Precise and concise. Thank you very much. Will certainly share this with my students. Research made simple indeed.

Thank you very much. I an now assist my students effectively.

Thank you very much. I can now assist my students effectively.

I need any research proposal

Thank you for these videos. I will need chapter by chapter assistance in writing my MSc dissertation

Very helpfull

the videos are very good and straight forward

thanks so much for this wonderful presentations, i really enjoyed it to the fullest wish to learn more from you

Thank you very much. I learned a lot from your lecture.

I really enjoy the in-depth knowledge on research proposal you have given. me. You have indeed broaden my understanding and skills. Thank you

interesting session this has equipped me with knowledge as i head for exams in an hour’s time, am sure i get A++

This article was most informative and easy to understand. I now have a good idea of how to write my research proposal.

Thank you very much.

Wow, this literature is very resourceful and interesting to read. I enjoyed it and I intend reading it every now then.

Thank you for the clarity

Thank you. Very helpful.

Thank you very much for this essential piece. I need 1o1 coaching, unfortunately, your service is not available in my country. Anyways, a very important eye-opener. I really enjoyed it. A thumb up to Gradcoach

What is JAM? Please explain.

Thank you so much for these videos. They are extremely helpful! God bless!

very very wonderful…

thank you for the video but i need a written example

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Print Friendly

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

Knowledge Base

Methodology

Research Methods | Definitions, Types, Examples

Research methods are specific procedures for collecting and analyzing data. Developing your research methods is an integral part of your research design . When planning your methods, there are two key decisions you will make.

First, decide how you will collect data . Your methods depend on what type of data you need to answer your research question :

Qualitative vs. quantitative : Will your data take the form of words or numbers?
Primary vs. secondary : Will you collect original data yourself, or will you use data that has already been collected by someone else?
Descriptive vs. experimental : Will you take measurements of something as it is, or will you perform an experiment?

Second, decide how you will analyze the data .

For quantitative data, you can use statistical analysis methods to test relationships between variables.
For qualitative data, you can use methods such as thematic analysis to interpret patterns and meanings in the data.

Methods for collecting data, examples of data collection methods, methods for analyzing data, examples of data analysis methods, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about research methods.

Data is the information that you collect for the purposes of answering your research question . The type of data you need depends on the aims of your research.

Qualitative vs. quantitative data

Your choice of qualitative or quantitative data collection depends on the type of knowledge you want to develop.

For questions about ideas, experiences and meanings, or to study something that can’t be described numerically, collect qualitative data .

If you want to develop a more mechanistic understanding of a topic, or your research involves hypothesis testing , collect quantitative data .

You can also take a mixed methods approach , where you use both qualitative and quantitative research methods.

Primary vs. secondary research

Primary research is any original data that you collect yourself for the purposes of answering your research question (e.g. through surveys , observations and experiments ). Secondary research is data that has already been collected by other researchers (e.g. in a government census or previous scientific studies).

If you are exploring a novel research question, you’ll probably need to collect primary data . But if you want to synthesize existing knowledge, analyze historical trends, or identify patterns on a large scale, secondary data might be a better choice.

Descriptive vs. experimental data

In descriptive research , you collect data about your study subject without intervening. The validity of your research will depend on your sampling method .

In experimental research , you systematically intervene in a process and measure the outcome. The validity of your research will depend on your experimental design .

To conduct an experiment, you need to be able to vary your independent variable , precisely measure your dependent variable, and control for confounding variables . If it’s practically and ethically possible, this method is the best choice for answering questions about cause and effect.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Your data analysis methods will depend on the type of data you collect and how you prepare it for analysis.

Data can often be analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. For example, survey responses could be analyzed qualitatively by studying the meanings of responses or quantitatively by studying the frequencies of responses.

Qualitative analysis methods

Qualitative analysis is used to understand words, ideas, and experiences. You can use it to interpret data that was collected:

From open-ended surveys and interviews , literature reviews , case studies , ethnographies , and other sources that use text rather than numbers.
Using non-probability sampling methods .

Qualitative analysis tends to be quite flexible and relies on the researcher’s judgement, so you have to reflect carefully on your choices and assumptions and be careful to avoid research bias .

Quantitative analysis methods

Quantitative analysis uses numbers and statistics to understand frequencies, averages and correlations (in descriptive studies) or cause-and-effect relationships (in experiments).

You can use quantitative analysis to interpret data that was collected either:

During an experiment .
Using probability sampling methods .

Because the data is collected and analyzed in a statistically valid way, the results of quantitative analysis can be easily standardized and shared among researchers.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

Chi square test of independence
Statistical power
Descriptive statistics
Degrees of freedom
Pearson correlation
Null hypothesis
Double-blind study
Case-control study
Research ethics
Data collection
Hypothesis testing
Structured interviews

Research bias

Hawthorne effect
Unconscious bias
Recall bias
Halo effect
Self-serving bias
Information bias

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.

In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .

A sample is a subset of individuals from a larger population . Sampling means selecting the group that you will actually collect data from in your research. For example, if you are researching the opinions of students in your university, you could survey a sample of 100 students.

In statistics, sampling allows you to test a hypothesis about the characteristics of a population.

The research methods you use depend on the type of data you need to answer your research question .

If you want to measure something or test a hypothesis , use quantitative methods . If you want to explore ideas, thoughts and meanings, use qualitative methods .
If you want to analyze a large amount of readily-available data, use secondary data. If you want data specific to your purposes with control over how it is generated, collect primary data.
If you want to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables , use experimental methods. If you want to understand the characteristics of a research subject, use descriptive methods.

Methodology refers to the overarching strategy and rationale of your research project . It involves studying the methods used in your field and the theories or principles behind them, in order to develop an approach that matches your objectives.

Methods are the specific tools and procedures you use to collect and analyze data (for example, experiments, surveys , and statistical tests ).

In shorter scientific papers, where the aim is to report the findings of a specific study, you might simply describe what you did in a methods section .

In a longer or more complex research project, such as a thesis or dissertation , you will probably include a methodology section , where you explain your approach to answering the research questions and cite relevant sources to support your choice of methods.

Is this article helpful?

Other students also liked, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples.

What Is a Research Design | Types, Guide & Examples
Data Collection | Definition, Methods & Examples

What is your plagiarism score?

Thesis and Purpose Statements

Use the guidelines below to learn the differences between thesis and purpose statements.

In the first stages of writing, thesis or purpose statements are usually rough or ill-formed and are useful primarily as planning tools.

A thesis statement or purpose statement will emerge as you think and write about a topic. The statement can be restricted or clarified and eventually worked into an introduction.

As you revise your paper, try to phrase your thesis or purpose statement in a precise way so that it matches the content and organization of your paper.

Thesis statements

A thesis statement is a sentence that makes an assertion about a topic and predicts how the topic will be developed. It does not simply announce a topic: it says something about the topic.

Good: X has made a significant impact on the teenage population due to its . . . Bad: In this paper, I will discuss X.

A thesis statement makes a promise to the reader about the scope, purpose, and direction of the paper. It summarizes the conclusions that the writer has reached about the topic.

A thesis statement is generally located near the end of the introduction. Sometimes in a long paper, the thesis will be expressed in several sentences or an entire paragraph.

A thesis statement is focused and specific enough to be proven within the boundaries of the paper. Key words (nouns and verbs) should be specific, accurate, and indicative of the range of research, thrust of the argument or analysis, and the organization of supporting information.

Purpose statements

A purpose statement announces the purpose, scope, and direction of the paper. It tells the reader what to expect in a paper and what the specific focus will be.

Common beginnings include:

“This paper examines . . .,” “The aim of this paper is to . . .,” and “The purpose of this essay is to . . .”

A purpose statement makes a promise to the reader about the development of the argument but does not preview the particular conclusions that the writer has drawn.

A purpose statement usually appears toward the end of the introduction. The purpose statement may be expressed in several sentences or even an entire paragraph.

A purpose statement is specific enough to satisfy the requirements of the assignment. Purpose statements are common in research papers in some academic disciplines, while in other disciplines they are considered too blunt or direct. If you are unsure about using a purpose statement, ask your instructor.

This paper will examine the ecological destruction of the Sahel preceding the drought and the causes of this disintegration of the land. The focus will be on the economic, political, and social relationships which brought about the environmental problems in the Sahel.

Sample purpose and thesis statements

The following example combines a purpose statement and a thesis statement (bold).

The goal of this paper is to examine the effects of Chile’s agrarian reform on the lives of rural peasants. The nature of the topic dictates the use of both a chronological and a comparative analysis of peasant lives at various points during the reform period. . . The Chilean reform example provides evidence that land distribution is an essential component of both the improvement of peasant conditions and the development of a democratic society. More extensive and enduring reforms would likely have allowed Chile the opportunity to further expand these horizons.

For more tips about writing thesis statements, take a look at our new handout on Developing a Thesis Statement.

Writing Process and Structure

This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related content panels.

Getting Started with Your Paper

Interpreting Writing Assignments from Your Courses

Generating Ideas for Your Paper

Creating an Argument

Thesis vs. Purpose Statements

Developing a Thesis Statement

Architecture of Arguments

Working with Sources

Quoting and Paraphrasing Sources

Using Literary Quotations

Citing Sources in Your Paper

Drafting Your Paper

Introductions

Paragraphing

Developing Strategic Transitions

Conclusions

Revising Your Paper

Peer Reviews

Reverse Outlines

Revising an Argumentative Paper

Revision Strategies for Longer Projects

Finishing Your Paper

Twelve Common Errors: An Editing Checklist

How to Proofread your Paper

Writing Collaboratively

Collaborative and Group Writing

SMU Libraries
Scholarship & Research
Teaching & Learning
Bridwell Library
Business Library
DeGolyer Library
Fondren Library
Hamon Arts Library
Underwood Law Library
Fort Burgwin Library
Exhibits & Digital Collections
SMU Scholar
Special Collections & Archives
Connect With Us
Research Guides by Subject
How Do I . . . ? Guides
Find Your Librarian
Writing Support

Types of Research Papers: Overview

A research paper is simply a piece of writing that uses outside sources. There are different types of research papers with varying purposes and expectations for sourcing.

While this guide explains those differences broadly, disciplines and assignments vary. Ask your professor for clarification on the purpose and types of appropriate research questions and sources.

Need More Help?

Related guides.

Literature Reviews
Annotated Bibliographies
Starting Your Research

Research and Writing Lab

Need last minute help but didn't book an appointment? Every week we offer online drop-in labs.

Tuesdays 3:00pm - 4:30pm via Zoom @ https://smu.zoom.us/j/92637892352 and in-person, Fondren Red 1st floor (near elevators)

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2024 1:00 PM
URL: https://guides.smu.edu/researchpapertypes

Research Objectives: The Compass of Your Study

Table of contents

1 Definition and Purpose of Setting Clear Research Objectives
2 How Research Objectives Fit into the Overall Research Framework
3 Types of Research Objectives
4 Aligning Objectives with Research Questions and Hypotheses
5 Role of Research Objectives in Various Research Phases
6.1 Key characteristics of well-defined research objectives
6.2 Step-by-Step Guide on How to Formulate Both General and Specific Research Objectives
6.3 How to Know When Your Objectives Need Refinement
7 Research Objectives Examples in Different Fields
8 Conclusion

Embarking on a research journey without clear objectives is like navigating the sea without a compass. This article delves into the essence of establishing precise research objectives, serving as the guiding star for your scholarly exploration.

We will unfold the layers of how the objective of study not only defines the scope of your research but also directs every phase of the research process, from formulating research questions to interpreting research findings. By bridging theory with practical examples, we aim to illuminate the path to crafting effective research objectives that are both ambitious and attainable. Let’s chart the course to a successful research voyage, exploring the significance, types, and formulation of research paper objectives.

Definition and Purpose of Setting Clear Research Objectives

Defining the research objectives includes which two tasks? Research objectives are clear and concise statements that outline what you aim to achieve through your study. They are the foundation for determining your research scope, guiding your data collection methods, and shaping your analysis. The purpose of research proposal and setting clear objectives in it is to ensure that your research efforts are focused and efficient, and to provide a roadmap that keeps your study aligned with its intended outcomes.

To define the research objective at the outset, researchers can avoid the pitfalls of scope creep, where the study’s focus gradually broadens beyond its initial boundaries, leading to wasted resources and time. Clear objectives facilitate communication with stakeholders, such as funding bodies, academic supervisors, and the broader academic community, by succinctly conveying the study’s goals and significance. Furthermore, they help in the formulation of precise research questions and hypotheses, making the research process more systematic and organized. Yet, it is not always easy. For this reason, PapersOwl is always ready to help. Lastly, clear research objectives enable the researcher to critically assess the study’s progress and outcomes against predefined benchmarks, ensuring the research stays on track and delivers meaningful results.

How Research Objectives Fit into the Overall Research Framework

Research objectives are integral to the research framework as the nexus between the research problem, questions, and hypotheses. They translate the broad goals of your study into actionable steps, ensuring every aspect of your research is purposefully aligned towards addressing the research problem. This alignment helps in structuring the research design and methodology, ensuring that each component of the study is geared towards answering the core questions derived from the objectives. Creating such a difficult piece may take a lot of time. If you need it to be accurate yet fast delivered, consider getting professional research paper writing help whenever the time comes. It also aids in the identification and justification of the research methods and tools used for data collection and analysis, aligning them with the objectives to enhance the validity and reliability of the findings.

Furthermore, by setting clear objectives, researchers can more effectively evaluate the impact and significance of their work in contributing to existing knowledge. Additionally, research objectives guide literature review, enabling researchers to focus their examination on relevant studies and theoretical frameworks that directly inform their research goals.

Types of Research Objectives

In the landscape of research, setting objectives is akin to laying down the tracks for a train’s journey, guiding it towards its destination. Constructing these tracks involves defining two main types of objectives: general and specific. Each serves a unique purpose in guiding the research towards its ultimate goals, with general objectives providing the broad vision and specific objectives outlining the concrete steps needed to fulfill that vision. Together, they form a cohesive blueprint that directs the focus of the study, ensuring that every effort contributes meaningfully to the overarching research aims.

General objectives articulate the overarching goals of your study. They are broad, setting the direction for your research without delving into specifics. These objectives capture what you wish to explore or contribute to existing knowledge.
Specific objectives break down the general objectives into measurable outcomes. They are precise, detailing the steps needed to achieve the broader goals of your study. They often correspond to different aspects of your research question , ensuring a comprehensive approach to your study.

To illustrate, consider a research project on the impact of digital marketing on consumer behavior. A general objective might be “to explore the influence of digital marketing on consumer purchasing decisions.” Specific objectives could include “to assess the effectiveness of social media advertising in enhancing brand awareness” and “to evaluate the impact of email marketing on customer loyalty.”

Aligning Objectives with Research Questions and Hypotheses

The harmony between what research objectives should be, questions, and hypotheses is critical. Objectives define what you aim to achieve; research questions specify what you seek to understand, and hypotheses predict the expected outcomes.

This alignment ensures a coherent and focused research endeavor. Achieving it necessitates a thoughtful consideration of how each component interrelates, ensuring that the objectives are not only ambitious but also directly answerable through the research questions and testable via the hypotheses. This interconnectedness facilitates a streamlined approach to the research process, enabling researchers to systematically address each aspect of their study in a logical sequence. Moreover, it enhances the clarity and precision of the research, making it easier for peers and stakeholders to grasp the study’s direction and potential contributions.

Role of Research Objectives in Various Research Phases

Throughout the research process, objectives guide your choices and strategies – from selecting the appropriate research design and methods to analyzing data and interpreting results. They are the criteria against which you measure the success of your study. In the initial stages, research objectives inform the selection of a topic, helping to narrow down a broad area of interest into a focused question that can be explored in depth. During the methodology phase, they dictate the type of data needed and the best methods for obtaining that data, ensuring that every step taken is purposeful and aligned with the study’s goals. As the research progresses, objectives provide a framework for analyzing the collected data, guiding the researcher in identifying patterns, drawing conclusions, and making informed decisions.

Crafting Effective Research Objectives

The effective objective of research is pivotal in laying the groundwork for a successful investigation. These objectives clarify the focus of your study and determine its direction and scope. Ensuring that your objectives are well-defined and aligned with the SMART criteria is crucial for setting a strong foundation for your research.

Key characteristics of well-defined research objectives

Well-defined research objectives are characterized by the SMART criteria – Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Specific objectives clearly define what you plan to achieve, eliminating any ambiguity. Measurable objectives allow you to track progress and assess the outcome. Achievable objectives are realistic, considering the research sources and time available. Relevant objectives align with the broader goals of your field or research question. Finally, Time-bound objectives have a clear timeline for completion, adding urgency and a schedule to your work.

Step-by-Step Guide on How to Formulate Both General and Specific Research Objectives

So lets get to the part, how to write research objectives properly?

Understand the issue or gap in existing knowledge your study aims to address.
Gain insights into how similar challenges have been approached to refine your objectives.
Articulate the broad goal of research based on your understanding of the problem.
Detail the specific aspects of your research, ensuring they are actionable and measurable.

How to Know When Your Objectives Need Refinement

Your objectives of research may require refinement if they lack clarity, feasibility, or alignment with the research problem. If you find yourself struggling to design experiments or methods that directly address your objectives, or if the objectives seem too broad or not directly related to your research question, it’s likely time for refinement. Additionally, objectives in research proposal that do not facilitate a clear measurement of success indicate a need for a more precise definition. Refinement involves ensuring that each objective is specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound, enhancing your research’s overall focus and impact.

Research Objectives Examples in Different Fields

The application of research objectives spans various academic disciplines, each with its unique focus and methodologies. To illustrate how the objectives of the study guide a research paper across different fields, here are some research objective examples:

In Health Sciences , a research aim may be to “determine the efficacy of a new vaccine in reducing the incidence of a specific disease among a target population within one year.” This objective is specific (efficacy of a new vaccine), measurable (reduction in disease incidence), achievable (with the right study design and sample size), relevant (to public health), and time-bound (within one year).
In Environmental Studies , the study objectives could be “to assess the impact of air pollution on urban biodiversity over a decade.” This reflects a commitment to understanding the long-term effects of human activities on urban ecosystems, emphasizing the need for sustainable urban planning.
In Economics , an example objective of a study might be “to analyze the relationship between fiscal policies and unemployment rates in developing countries over the past twenty years.” This seeks to explore macroeconomic trends and inform policymaking, highlighting the role of economic research study in societal development.

These examples of research objectives describe the versatility and significance of research objectives in guiding scholarly inquiry across different domains. By setting clear, well-defined objectives, researchers can ensure their studies are focused and impactful and contribute valuable knowledge to their respective fields.

Defining research studies objectives and problem statement is not just a preliminary step, but a continuous guiding force throughout the research journey. These goals of research illuminate the path forward and ensure that every stride taken is meaningful and aligned with the ultimate goals of the inquiry. Whether through the meticulous application of the SMART criteria or the strategic alignment with research questions and hypotheses, the rigor in crafting and refining these objectives underscores the integrity and relevance of the research. As scholars venture into the vast terrains of knowledge, the clarity, and precision of their objectives serve as beacons of light, steering their explorations toward discoveries that advance academic discourse and resonate with the broader societal needs.

Readers also enjoyed

WHY WAIT? PLACE AN ORDER RIGHT NOW!

Just fill out the form, press the button, and have no worries!

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.

Please enable JavaScript or use a Browser that supports JavaScript

Advanced Search
Browse by Analyte
Browse by Pre-analytical Factor
Search SOPs
SOP Compendiums
Suggest a New Paper
Submit an SOP
Curator Home
Back Office

Analysis of quality metrics in comprehensive cancer genomic profiling using a dual DNA-RNA panel.

Author(s): Watanabe K, Kohsaka S, Tatsuno K, Shinozaki-Ushiku A, Isago H, Kage H, Ushiku T, Aburatani H, Mano H, Oda K

Publication: Pract Lab Med , 2024, Vol. 39 , Page e00368

PubMed ID: 38404525 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

This paper compared two DNA integrity markers (Q-value and ddCq) and one RNA integrity metric (DV200) using DNA and RNA extracted from 585 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks that had been stored for <1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-5 y or approximately 5 years before extraction. The authors investigated the predictive performance of these metrics for four next-generation sequencing quality metrics. Potential effects associated with the hospital of collection/processing and cancer type on the DNA/RNA quality metrics evaluated were also examined.

Conclusion of Paper

The duration of FFPE block storage had a deleterious effect on DNA and RNA integrity, with a higher ratio of short to long real-time PCR products (ddCq), a lower ratio of PCR-amplified DNA to double-stranded DNA (Q-value), and a lower percentage of RNA fragments >200 bp (DV200) noted with progressive storage. While ddCq was weakly to modestly negatively correlated with the percentage on-target reads, and mean and target exon coverage, Q-value was weakly to modestly positively correlated with the percentage of on-target reads and coverage uniformity and DV200 were weakly positively correlated with coverage of housekeeping genes. A ddCq ≤5.36 was highly predictive of a mean depth >500 but less predictive of coverage uniformity or target exon coverage. A Q-value ≥0.928 was predictive of a mean depth >500, coverage uniformity ≥99%, and target exon coverage ≥99%. The predictive power of a DV200 >41 for coverage of housekeeping genes that was ≥70% was 92.1%. ddCq and Q-values displayed significant differences among hospitals even after correcting for tumor type, but DV200 was not affected by hospital. Q-values were lowest and DV200 highest in lung tumors.

Study Purpose

This study compared two DNA integrity markers (Q-value and ddCq) and one RNA integrity metric (DV200) using DNA and RNA extracted from 585 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks that had been stored for <1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-5 y or approximately 5 years before extraction. The authors investigated the predictive performance of these metrics for four next-generation sequencing quality metrics. Potential effects associated with the hospital of collection/processing and cancer type on the DNA/RNA quality metrics were also examined. A total of 585 tissues that included 114 lung, 90 bowel, 58 ovarian/fallopian tube, 51 uterus, 38 soft tissue, 31 cervix, and 203 specimens of types representing <5% of the total were collected (further details were not provided) and fixed in 10-20% neutral buffered formalin for 24-72 h before paraffin embedding. The specimens were contributed from multiple hospitals, with six hospitals providing >10 specimens. DNA (582 specimens) and RNA (572 specimens) were extracted using the GeneRead DNA FFPE Kit and the RNeasy FFPE Kit, respectively. Double stranded DNA was quantified by Qubit and amplifiable DNA was quantified using the TaqMan Copy Number Reference Assay Human RNase P. The Q value was then calculated as the percentage of dsDNA that was amplifiable. NA quantity was defined as the amount of double-stranded DNA when the Q-value was >1 and as the amount of amplifiable DNA when the Q-Value was ≥1. The ddCq value was calculated based on the ratio of two real-time PCR amplicons in the FFPE DNA QC Assay version 2 Kit. The percentage of RNA fragments >200 bp (DV200) was assessed using a 2200 TapeStation. DNA and the RNA libraries were prepared using a SureSelectXT Custom Kit and the SureSelect RNA Capture Kit, respectively, and sequenced on a Next-seq Instrument.

Summary of Findings:

The duration of FFPE block storage had a deleterious effect on DNA integrity, with significantly higher ddCq values and lower Q-values noted with progressive storage. ddCq values were higher in specimens stored for >1 year compared to those stored for approximately 1 year (P<0.001, all), stored >3 years compared to 1-2 years (P<0.001, both), or stored approximately 5 years compared to those stored 2-3 or 3-5 years (P<0.001, both). Q-values were lower in specimens that were stored for 5 years than 3-5 years (P<0.01), 2-3 years (P<0.001), 1-2 years (P<0.001), or approximately 1 year (P<0.001), or stored for 3-5 years compared to those stored 1-2 years (P<0.01) or approximately 1 year (P<0.01) but were not significantly different in specimens stored <3 years when compared to those stored for approximately 1 year. ddCq was negatively correlated with the percentage on-target reads (r=-0.47, P<0.001), mean depth (r=-0664, P<0.001), and target exon coverage (r=-0.362, P<0.001); Q-value was correlated with the percentage on-target reads (r=0.353, P<0.001) and coverage uniformity (r=0.411, P<0.001). In a generalized linear model, the percentage of on-target reads was associated with ddCq, but mean depth was associated with ddCq and Q-value. The predictive power of a ddCq ≤5.36 for a mean depth >500 was 91.6%, but the same cut-off was less predictive of coverage uniformity ≥99% (55.1%) or target exon coverage ≥99% (60.6%). The predictive power of a Q-value ≥0.928 for a mean depth >500, coverage uniformity ≥99%, and target exon coverage ≥99% was 79.9%, 81.5%, and 83.1% respectively. For specimens with a low ddCq (≤5.36) but unacceptable Q-values, the on-target read percentage and mean depth were still generally acceptable but uniformity and target exon coverage were <99%. ddCq and Q-values displayed significant differences among hospitals even after correcting for tumor type. Q-values were lowest in lung tumors.

Similarly, DNA and RNA integrity were adversely affected by block storage. The percentage of RNA fragments >200 nt (DV200) decreased progressively with FFPE block storage duration, with significantly lower DV200 values from specimens that were stored >2 years than those stored approximately 1 year (P<0.001 all) or those stored for 3-5 years or approximately 5 years compared to those stored approximately 1 year (P<0.01, both). DV200 was weakly positively correlated with the coverage of housekeeping genes (r=0.369, P<0.001). The predictive power of a DV200 >41 for a coverage of housekeeping genes ≥70% was 92.1%. DV200 was not significantly different among hospitals but was significantly higher in lung cancer specimens than in bowel or ovarian/fallopian cancer specimens.

Please enable JavaScript or use a Browser that supports JavaScript for more on this study.

Biospecimens

Tissue - Colorectal
Tissue - Lung
Tissue - Other
Tissue - Uterus
Tissue - Cervix
Tissue - Ovary

Preservative Types

Neoplastic - Carcinoma
Not specified
Neoplastic - Not specified

Pre-analytical Factors:

You recently viewed , news and announcements.

Most Popular SOPs in March 2024
New SOPs Available
Most Downloaded SOPs in January and February of 2024
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
National Institutes of Health
National Cancer Institute

Log in using your username and password

Search More Search for this keyword Advanced search
Latest content
Current issue
For authors
BMJ Journals More You are viewing from: Google Indexer

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5898-0900 Jo Taylor ,
Ruth Hall ,
Claire Heathcote ,
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0415-3536 Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt ,
Trilby Langton ,
Lorna Fraser
Department of Health Sciences , University of York , York , UK
Correspondence to Dr Jo Taylor, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; dohs-gender-research{at}york.ac.uk

Background Increasing numbers of children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence are being referred to specialist gender services and there are various published guidelines outlining approaches to clinical care.

Aim To examine the recommendations about the management of children and/or adolescents (age 0-18) experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence in published guidelines or clinical guidance. A separate paper examines the quality and development of guidelines.

Methods A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched to April 2022 and web-based searches and contact with international experts continued to December 2022, with results assessed independently by two reviewers. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool was used to examine guideline quality.

Results 23 guidelines/clinical guidance publications (1998–2022) were identified (4 international, 3 regional, 16 national). Guidelines describe a similar care pathway starting with psychosocial care for prepubertal children, puberty suppressants followed by hormones for eligible adolescents and surgical interventions as these adolescents enter adulthood. In general, there is consensus that adolescents should receive a multidisciplinary assessment, although clear guidance about the purpose or approach is lacking. There are differing recommendations about when and on what basis psychological and medical interventions should be offered. There is limited guidance about what psychological care should be provided, about the management of prepubertal children or those with a non-binary gender identity, nor about pathways between specialist gender services and other providers.

Conclusions Published guidance describes a similar care pathway; however, there is no current consensus about the purpose and process of assessment for children or adolescents with gender dysphoria/incongruence, or about when psychological or hormonal interventions should be offered and on what basis.

PROSPERO registration number CRD42021289659.

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable as no datasets were generated and/or analysed for this study.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ .

https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326500

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN

Increasing numbers of children and adolescents are being referred to specialist gender services.

Several clinical guidelines exist to support the clinical care of children and adolescents with gender dysphoria/incongruence and their families.

There are divergent clinical approaches to the management of these children/adolescents and a need to synthesise guideline recommendations to explore areas of consensus, disagreement or uncertainty.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

The clinical guidance identified describes a similar care pathway involving psychosocial care for prepubertal children followed by medical interventions for adolescents who meet certain criteria.

There is consensus that those requiring specialist gender care should receive a multidisciplinary assessment and be offered psychosocial support, although there is a lack of clarity about who should be involved in this and any differences for children and adolescents.

There are differing recommendations about when and on what basis psychological and hormone interventions should be offered, and limited guidance about prepubertal children or those with a non-binary gender identity.

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

Clinicians should consider the diverging recommendations about when and on what basis psychosocial or hormone interventions should be offered to children and adolescents when working with this population. Detailed guidance to support psychological care is needed.

Introduction

The prevalence of gender dysphoria/incongruence in children and adolescents is currently unknown due to limited population-level data. 1 2 However, the number of referrals to paediatric gender services internationally has increased over the last 10-15 years. 2 These children and adolescents require timely, appropriate and evidence-based care. Numerous guidelines exist to inform healthcare provision for this population. 3 4 However, there remains debate about the most appropriate assessment and care pathways. 5

Three systematic reviews have appraised clinical guidelines for transgender care. 3 4 6 They each focus on a subset: Dahlen et al 3 reviewed international guidelines, and Ziegler et al 4 6 focused on guidelines for use in primary care. This systematic review builds on these by appraising and synthesising all published clinical guidance that includes recommendations regarding the care of children/adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence. The review is reported in two papers. The first describes the review methods and examines guideline quality and development. 7 This second paper provides a synthesis of recommendations.

This review forms part of a linked series examining the epidemiology, care pathways, outcomes and experiences for children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021289659 8 ).

To synthesise recommendations, we identified common areas of clinical care for which recommendations are given and worked systematically through guidance to extract and summarise recommendations pertaining to each topic. This enabled us to map recommendations as well as identify areas of consensus, uncertainty or disagreement. The full methods for this review are reported in the first paper. 7

In total, 15 guidelines and 8 clinical guidance publications including at least one recommendation about the management of children/adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence were identified ( figure 1 ). The term guideline will be used in the synthesis.

Download figure
Open in new tab
Download powerpoint

Study flow diagram.

Guidelines were published from 1998 to 2022. Four guidelines are international, 9–12 three regional (Europe, 13 Asia and the Pacific, 14 the Caribbean 15 ) and others national (four US, 16–19 two Spain 20 21 and one from Australia, 22 23 Canada, 24 Denmark, 25 Finland, 26 Italy, 27 New Zealand, 28 29 Norway, 30 South Africa, 31 32 Sweden 33 and the UK 34 ).

Nine guidelines are about management of children and/or adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence. 11 19 20 22 24 26 27 33 34 One focuses on co-occurring autism spectrum condition (ASC) and gender dysphoria/incongruence. 12 Others cover broader populations ( online supplemental table 1 and figure 2 ).

Supplemental material

A timeline for the included guidelines by geographical region, country and target population. AACAP, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics; APA, American Psychological Association; ESSM, European Society for Sexual Medicine; HPP, Health Policy Project; PAHO, Pan American Health Organisation; RCHM, Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne; RCPsych, UK Royal College of Psychiatrists; SAHCS, South African HIV Clinicians Society; SAHM, Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine; SSEN, Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition; UCSF, University California, San Francisco; WPATH, World Professional Association for Transgender Health.

Guideline quality varies; the majority are of low to moderate quality. The development and recommendations of most guidelines were influenced by two international guidelines—version 7 of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) guideline published in 2012 35 (version 8 was published in 2022 9 ), and the 2009 36 and 2017 10 versions of the Endocrine Society guideline. Details about this and guideline quality are reported in the first paper.

Guideline synthesis

The following sections summarise recommendations for key areas of practice identified ( box 1 ). More guidelines focus on medical treatments than psychosocial care. The synthesis includes the latest version of guidelines and may not capture changes within guidelines over time.

Main practice areas in guidelines

Care models, principles and practices

Multidisciplinary team composition, roles, competencies and training

Psychosocial care

Information, education and advocacy

Social transition

Puberty suppressant hormones

Feminising/Masculinising hormones

Surgical interventions

Fertility care

Other interventions (eg, voice therapy, hair removal)

Sexual health and functioning

Physical health and lifestyle

Care models

Most guidelines recommend that a specialist multidisciplinary team of mental health professionals, endocrinologists and other professionals with expertise in gender and child development delivers assessment and care. Acknowledging different healthcare infrastructures, the WPATH guideline 9 and regional blueprints for Asia and the Pacific 14 and the Caribbean 15 recommend healthcare professionals involve relevant disciplines as an alternative to establishing multidisciplinary teams.

Six guidelines discuss the role of other services. The UK Royal College of Psychiatrist (RCPsych) guideline 34 recommends mental health services assess for gender dysphoria and co-occurring mental health difficulties. The University California, San Francisco guideline 16 states that paediatricians may provide care while recommending a role for mental health professionals. More recently, the Finnish, 26 Norwegian 30 and Swedish 33 guidelines recommend that local mental health services provide assessment and psychosocial interventions, and the Finnish guideline describes multiple different pathways between local mental health and specialist gender services. 26 The Australian guideline outlines the roles for different professionals who might be involved in the assessment and/or care of a child/adolescent, although there is a lack of clarity about the referral pathways between local and specialist gender services. This is the only guideline that discusses transition to adult gender services, and recommends support for this. 22

Most guidelines distinguish between care for prepubertal children and adolescents, recommending a phased approach. This begins with psychosocial support for children/adolescents and parents, followed by puberty suppressants and then hormones for adolescents, and surgical interventions in adulthood ( figure 3 ). Assessment and psychoeducation are suggested along the pathway. Two guidelines 27 33 explicitly adopt the Dutch model (the earliest paediatric treatment protocol 37 ), and most guidelines reflect this pathway. One of these, however, recommends that medical interventions occur under a research framework and modifies the original criteria for treatment. 33 Four guidelines propose an individualised approach to medical interventions, while still describing a phased approach. 16 22 28 31

The phased pathway of assessment and care described across the guidelines.

Care principles lack consensus and clarity about theoretical models or approaches. The following are referred to: informed consent model, a minority stress approach, a developmental approach and individualised or person-centred care. Sixteen guidelines use the term gender-affirming. Eight promote gender-affirming healthcare as a care principle, 9 11 16 18 19 22 28 31 defined as ‘healthcare that is respectful and affirming of a person’s unique sense of gender and provides support to identify and facilitate gender healthcare goals’. 28 The other eight use the term as a label for interventions like hormone treatments. 10 12–15 26 30 33

All guidelines recommend multidisciplinary assessment. Three types were identified: (1) comprehensive psychosocial assessment, (2) medical or ‘readiness’ assessment for adolescents seeking hormonal treatments and (3) diagnostic assessment for gender dysphoria/incongruence. Some guidelines integrate these, while others present them separately. In most guidelines, there is no distinct assessment section or recommendations. There is limited clarity about assessment purpose. Most cited reasons are to inform a care plan, or assess eligibility for hormone treatment. Although most guidelines describe different pathways for children and adolescents, only three provide separate guidance. 9 22 31 Five recent guidelines propose that prepubertal children only require assessment if gender-related psychosocial care is needed but provide limited detail about this. 9 22 26 28 30 Others propose all children be assessed. There is little consideration of how a psychosocial assessment might be different for children and adolescents.

Assessment domains

All guidelines recommend that discussion of gender development and identity forms part of assessment, however few provide detail. Several recommend assessing duration, severity, and persistence of gender dysphoria, and exploring different aspects including incongruence, distress, identity, expression, plans and future desires. Only four guidelines suggest formal measures to assess gender. 9 17 24 33 Three name specific measures, without a strong recommendation to use them ( online supplemental table S2 ). 17 24 33 In the eight guidelines referring to a diagnostic classification system, four recommend the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition 37 gender dysphoria classification, 17 24 27 33 three the International Classification of Diseases 38 gender incongruence 9 30 31 and four either. 10 21 22 34

Sixteen guidelines suggest what else should be assessed ( table 1 ). 9 10 13–15 17 18 22 24 25 27 28 30 31 33 34 Common domains include mental health, family functioning/support and psychosocial functioning. Less common domains include cognition/intellectual functioning, sexuality, sexual health, physical health and body image/satisfaction. The latter is discussed in seven guidelines 9 10 12 24 28 31 33 but only recommended for assessment in one. 24

View inline

Recommended assessment domains

Five guidelines recommend assessing for neurodevelopment conditions. The guideline by Strang et al recommends those with gender dysphoria/incongruence be screened for ASC and vice versa. 12 The Swedish guideline recommends screening for ASC and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. 33 The South African HIV Clinicians Society (SAHCS), 31 New Zealand 28 and WPATH 9 guidelines also recommend assessing for ASC. The guideline by Strang et al , 12 and Swedish 33 and WPATH 9 guidelines suggest children with ASC may require extended assessment. There is a lack of guidance about what support might be indicated if both are present.

Assessment process

Recommendations regarding assessment process are sparse. Several guidelines suggest using multiple methods 9 24 27 33 and gathering information from multiple sources. 9 10 12 24 27 31 33 Nine guidelines describe a process involving multiple sessions with children/adolescents and/or parents. 9 12 14 15 19 24 27 31 33 One guideline suggests joint and separate sessions. 15 Four guidelines discuss confidentiality, with emphasis on giving the child/adolescent a safe and confidential environment and discussing limits of confidentiality. 9 17 31 33 The WPATH guideline recommends considering factors affecting accurate reporting by child/adolescent or caregiver(s). 9 Three guidelines outline when parental involvement may not be appropriate. 9 31 33 Three other guidelines identify confidentiality as an overall principle of care. 22 24 28

Only the Swedish 33 and WPATH 9 guidelines contain detail on assessment process. Both recommend duration, structure and content be varied according to age, complexity and gender development. The Swedish guideline discusses benefits and risks of assessment, and recommends providing information about this. 33

Psychosocial care for children and adolescents

All but two guidelines 11 20 describe psychosocial care as a key care component. Less consensus exists about approach, and there is limited guidance. There is little consideration of any differences in provision for prepubertal children versus adolescents. Guidelines use varying different terms, including psychosocial care, psychological care or psychotherapy, which are not defined. Most guidelines describe multiple aims with limited agreement. These range from supporting exploration of gender experiences and identity; improving psychosocial functioning; treating co-occurring mental health difficulties; facilitating healthy psychosexual development; alleviating gender-related distress/dysphoria; assisting families to create a gender-affirming environment; preparing/supporting social or medical transition and support to manage stigma or discrimination.

Most guidelines describe a needs-based approach and five recent guidelines state not all children or adolescents will require psychosocial care. 9 22 28 30 31 All but one of these 30 promote a model of gender-affirming healthcare and indicate that those with ‘a stable gender identity’ and ‘supportive family and school environment’ may not require psychosocial care. This recommendation marks a departure from earlier guidelines which describe psychosocial care as the mainstay of treatment, and the recent Finnish 26 and Swedish 33 guidelines which describe it as first-line treatment for childhood gender dysphoria/incongruence.

In around half of the guidelines, assessment and psychosocial care are presented as overlapping. 12–15 21 22 25 27 31 33 34 Only the European Society for Sexual Medicine (ESSM) 13 and Swedish 33 guidelines recommend psychosocial support for gender exploration during the assessment process. Other guidelines emphasise the importance of gender exploration, although there is a lack of definition and consensus, particularly regarding adolescents. For example, the ESSM 13 and Swedish 33 recommendations do not distinguish between children and adolescents. In contrast, the Australian 22 and WPATH 9 guidelines identify gender exploration for children as potentially useful whereas recommendations for adolescents focus on psychosocial support for social and/or medical transition. Several other guidelines adopt this approach, citing evidence that gender development is more fluid in childhood, that most children will not experience gender dysphoria/incongruence into adolescence and uncertainty about which children will have persistent dysphoria/incongruence. 10 14 16 18 34

Most guidelines recommend co-occurring mental health difficulties are assessed and managed. 9 10 12–16 18 21 22 24–28 30 31 33 34 Only five consider how this might be integrated with psychological care for gender incongruence/dysphoria. The Finnish guideline recommends that local and specialist mental health services provide psychosocial support and any psychological care that is needed. 26 The early RCPsych guideline, 34 and the Swedish 33 and Danish 25 guidelines describe more of an integrated approach, although clarity and detail is lacking. The latter two recommend mental healthcare is provided outside the gender service if needed. The Australian guideline contains no explicit recommendation but describes different pathways depending on presentation. 22

Several guidelines acknowledge additional challenges in caring for looked after children. 9 11 16 22 24 31 The Australian guideline suggests providing advocacy for these children and support for carers. 22

Psychosocial support for parents

Seventeen guidelines discuss psychosocial support for parents. 9 13–19 21 22 24–26 28 30 31 33 While there is no consensus or clear purpose detailed, most highlight that children benefit from parental support in their gender development or care. There is no consensus about which interventions should be offered, and terms applied include counselling, supportive counselling, psychosocial support, support, education, psychoeducation, consultation and psychotherapy. Five guidelines recommend considering family therapy. 17–19 21 24 There is no consideration of how parental support may be different for those of prepubertal children versus adolescents.

Psychoeducation and advocacy

Most guidelines suggest providing education about gender development and identity to children/adolescents and families, although detailed guidance is lacking. 9 12–19 22 24 27 28 30 31 33 Several guidelines suggest peer support groups, 9 15 17 22 24 28 30 31 33 with a further two suggesting this for ‘people’ but not specifically children/adolescents. 14 18 Joint working, education and/or advocacy with schools and other services is recommended in 17 guidelines. 9 11 13–19 22 24 26 28 30 31 33 34

Eighteen guidelines discuss social transition. 9 10 12–19 21 22 24 28 30 31 33 34 Nearly all recommend providing information about benefits and risks of social transition, and psychosocial care for decision-making and during social transition, although detailed guidance is limited. Several guidelines recommend an educational and advocacy role with families, schools and other settings. Guidelines vary in whether recommendations refer to children and adolescents. For example, in the Australian, 22 South African 31 and WPATH 9 guidelines, recommendations are included in sections about children but not adolescents.

Two early guidelines 34 35 describe social transition decisions as ones requiring clinical judgement; others do not. The WPATH 9 and Swedish 33 guidelines discuss the limited evidence base regarding social transition, particularly for prepubertal children, and these and several others including the American Psychological Association 18 and SAHCS 31 guidelines recommend framing social transition in a way that ensures children/adolescents feel free to reconsider or reconceptualise their gender feelings as they develop.

Six guidelines discuss items such as binders or packers for adolescents. 9 22 24 28 31 33 A further four include recommendations for ‘people’, 14–16 30 which may apply to adolescents. Most recommend education about risks and benefits and if necessary safe use. The Swedish guideline 33 recommends health services provide items to facilitate transition for adolescents after full assessment. The Norwegian guideline recommends this for ‘people’, which may apply to adolescents. 30

Medical treatments

Medical treatments are not recommended for prepubertal children in any guideline.

For adolescents, most guidelines describe a phased approach starting with puberty suppression (specifically gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues) before feminising/masculinising hormones (oestrogen or testosterone). The Swedish guideline is unique in recommending that hormone treatments be provided under a research framework and in exceptional cases until this is established. 33 The Finnish guideline, which describes medical treatments for adolescents as experimental due to the limited evidence-base, also recommends a cautious approach and mandates that medical treatments are only provided in two centralised research clinics which should collect data about the outcomes of treatment. 26 Three recent guidelines 9 30 31 use gender incongruence as the clinical indication for treatment, 38 others use gender dysphoria. 39

Seven guidelines provide treatment protocols. 9 10 16 21 22 27 28 The Endocrine Society guideline 10 is the basis for others, resulting in similar recommendations regarding treatment contraindications, dosing, menstrual suppression and physical health risks and monitoring. Few guidelines address known treatment side effects and monitoring recommendations omit these.

Puberty suppression

Puberty suppressing treatments are discussed in all but one guideline. 34 Across guidelines there is ambiguity regarding treatment aims with various presented, including reducing gender-related distress/dysphoria, improving quality of life, allowing time for decision-making, supporting gender exploration or prolonging the diagnostic phase. Most guidelines emphasise full reversibility as a justification, while highlighting potential adverse effects on bone health, and uncertainty regarding cognitive development. Some guidelines discuss concerns about prolonged use, although few provide management suggestions. The Australian guideline 22 recommends vitamin D or early initiation of hormones as potential approaches.

Thirteen guidelines present eligibility criteria for puberty suppression. 9 10 13–15 20–22 24 25 27 28 33 Twelve recommend waiting until a child has achieved at least Tanner stage 2 of puberty, and the Swedish guideline recommends Tanner stage 3 to ensure adolescents experience more of puberty. This and the WPATH guideline discuss different options for treatment in early stage versus late-stage puberty. 9 33 Other common criteria are: presence of gender dysphoria (n=11) or incongruence (n=2), gender dysphoria has emerged or worsened at onset/progression of puberty (n=9), mental health difficulties are managed/unlikely to impact treatment (n=9), the adolescent has decision-making capacity (n=8), and parental consent (n=8). Several guidelines also require family/social support (n=6). Only two guidelines specify a minimum age (of 12 years). 20 33

Masculinising/Feminising hormones

All but one guideline 34 discusses hormones for adolescents and eight provide eligibility criteria. 9 10 21 22 25 27 28 33 Common criteria are: presence of gender dysphoria (n=7) or incongruence (n=1) with most requiring persistence over time, capacity to consent (n=8) and that mental health difficulties are managed/unlikely to affect treatment (n=6). Several require parental consent (n=5) and/or family/social support (n=4). Most guidelines reference age 16 years as the typical starting point, although only five specify this as the minimum age. 20 21 27 30 33 Two of these require the adolescent to have lived experience in their gender identity, one from Spain published in 2012 21 and the Swedish guideline published in 2022. 33 One guideline recommends puberty suppression before initiating hormones. 24

There are no recommendations about how to manage adolescents who, having started to medically transition wish to detransition (discontinue treatment and live as their birth-registered sex or retransition to an alternative gender 40 ), although the Swedish 33 and WPATH 9 guidelines recommend supporting these adolescents.

Surgical treatments

Fourteen guidelines include recommendations about surgery. Six do not recommend surgery for adolescents. 21 24 26–28 34 Six do not recommend genital surgery but support mastectomy. 10 16 22 25 30 33 Only the Swedish guideline 33 includes minimum age criterion 17 for mastectomy if carried out under a research framework. The two remaining guidelines (WPATH 9 and SAHCS 31 ), which also support surgery, include no restrictions for adolescents, although WPATH suggests phalloplasty be delayed until adulthood.

Nine guidelines offer no clear recommendations; three describe practice that includes chest surgery for adolescents, 14 15 19 three describe surgery as deferred until adulthood 12 17 20 and three contain no discussion. 11 13 18

Fertility and sexual healthcare

Eighteen guidelines recommend providing information regarding the impact of hormones and surgery on fertility, and fertility preservation options with consensus that this should precede treatment initiation. Four of these guidelines, 9 10 22 33 published post-2017, explicitly require this for hormone treatments. Fertility counselling and preservation recommendations are lacking.

Few guidelines include recommendations about sexual healthcare and primarily discuss pregnancy-prevention and sexually transmitted diseases. The ESSM guideline seeks to address this gap by recommending psychosexual education about the effects on body satisfaction and sexual function before any interventions. 13 This is also recommended in the Swedish 33 and WPATH 9 guidelines.

Management of children/adolescents with non-binary gender identities

Fourteen guidelines recommend care that views gender as a spectrum. 9 11–13 16 18 19 22 24 26 28 30 31 33 Three guidelines explicitly discuss provision for those who identify as non-binary. The Swedish 33 and Norwegian 30 guidelines do not recommend hormone treatments due to lack of evidence. The Swedish guideline recommends non-binary children/adolescents receive psychosocial care. 33 Recommendations in the WPATH guideline are included in a separate chapter about non-binary people, which may apply to adolescents. 9

This systematic review identified 23 clinical guidance publications (1998 to 2022), 9 focusing on management of children/adolescents with gender dysphoria/incongruence. 11 19 20 22 24 26 27 33 34 The review identified areas on which there is agreement and areas of divergence and uncertainty with limited guidance on how to implement recommendations. Overall, guidelines describe a care pathway similar to the original Dutch protocol that involves psychosocial care for prepubertal children followed by hormonal interventions for adolescents who meet specific criteria, provided by a specialist multidisciplinary team. 41 This approach continues to dominate clinical guidance despite lack of high-quality evidence regarding treatments, 42–50 or exploring alternative care models. 5

Although guidelines recommend similar treatments there are different recommendations about when hormone interventions should be offered and on what basis. The Dutch protocol required a diagnosis of gender dysphoria from early childhood that intensified during puberty as well as applying minimum age criterion for puberty suppressants and hormones. 37 Most subsequent guidance, influenced by WPATH version 7, 35 lacked minimum age criteria until the Swedish guideline re-introduced these. 33 The Swedish guideline additionally recommends adolescents are exposed to puberty until Tanner stage 3. The Swedish and Finnish guidelines require a diagnosis of gender dysphoria. In contrast, the South African, 31 Norwegian 30 and WPATH 9 guidelines specify gender incongruence as the treatment indication. The Finnish guideline, which views medical treatments for adolescents as experimental due to the limited evidence-base, recommends a cautious approach and the need for the centralised research clinics that provide these treatments to collect outcome data. The Swedish guideline recommends that these treatments are only provided under a research framework. This differs considerably to other guidance which identifies reversibility of puberty suppression as key justification for its use in practice, despite uncertainty about long-term effects. 45 48 51 A report by the Norwegian Healthcare Investigation Board 52 recommends a change in line with the cautious approach adopted by Sweden and Finland. 52

Detailed guidance regarding assessment is lacking with no consensus about the aim or clinical approach, nor the necessity for assessment in prepubertal children. Although most guidance recommends assessing gender, mental health, psychosocial and family functioning, other domains vary. Few guidelines recommend exploring sexual orientation or assessing body image, despite these being identified as important factors. 1 18 53 Few recommend specific assessment tools, and those suggested have not been developed and/or validated for this population. 54–56

Psychosocial care is recommended across guidelines, but detailed guidance is limited. Specifically lacking are recommendations regarding psychological care, how this overlaps with assessment, which children/adolescents receive it and how to manage co-occurring psychosocial concerns. There is a lack of clarity about how local mental health and gender services should work together. Such guidance may help reduce barriers to equitable and evidence-based care. However, limited research about psychosocial care for this population may prevent development of evidence-based guidance. 42–44

There is uncertainty regarding management of specific groups highlighted in the literature, for example, those with non-binary identities, or those presenting in mid-adolescence without a long-standing history of gender incongruence. 57 58 The Dutch protocol was not developed for these groups, 37 and they may have different outcomes and needs. There is consensus among international experts that adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence should be screened for ASC and those with co-occurring ASC may require extended assessment, 12 but detailed guidance is lacking. 12 59 Finally, there are no recommendations about the management of those who, having started to socially or medically transition, wish to desist, detransition or ‘re-transition’. 40

Strengths and limitations

Strengths include a published protocol, robust search strategies and comprehensive narrative synthesis. Including no date restrictions enabled us to map the development of guidance in this area of practice and consider how recommendations have changed. However, including older guidelines may have shaped the synthesis and review conclusions. Some guidelines not published in English may not have been identified. As searches were conducted to April 2022, this review does not include more recently published guidance; as this is a rapidly evolving area this is a limitation.

Conclusions

Published guidance recommends a care pathway for children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence for which there is limited evidence about benefits and risks, and long-term effects. Divergence of recommendations in recent guidelines suggest there is no current consensus about the purpose and process of assessment, or about when psychosocial care or hormonal interventions should be offered and on what basis.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication.

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Thompson L ,
Sarovic D ,
Wilson P , et al
Connolly D ,
Arif I , et al
Ziegler E ,
Charnish E ,
Carroll B , et al
Abbruzzese E ,
Levine SB ,
Carroll B ,
Hewitt CE ,
Taylor J , et al
Coleman E ,
Bouman WP , et al
Hembree WC ,
Cohen-Kettenis PT ,
Gooren L , et al
Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine
Strang JF ,
Meagher H ,
Kenworthy L , et al
T’Sjoen G ,
Arcelus J ,
De Vries ALC , et al
Health Policy Project, Asia Pacific Transgender Network, United Nations Development Programme
Pan American Health Organisation
John Snow Inc
World Professional Association for Transgender Health
University of California San Francisco Gender Affirming Health Program
Adelson SL , American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) Committee on Quality Issues (CQI)
American Psychological Association
Rafferty J , Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health , Committee on Adolescence , et al
Antonio EI ,
Asenjo Araque N ,
Hurtado Murillo F , et al
Moreno-Pérez O ,
Esteva De Antonio I , Grupo de Identidad y Diferenciación Sexual de la SEEN (GIDSEEN)
Telfer MM ,
Tollit MA ,
Pace CC , et al
de Vries AL ,
Delemarre-Van de Waal H
Danish Health Authority
Council for Choices in Healthcare in Finland
Fisher AD ,
Ristori J ,
Bandini E , et al
Oliphant J ,
Macdonald J , et al
Norwegian Directorate of Health
McLachlan C ,
Wattrus C , et al
The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare
The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Bockting W ,
Botzer M , et al
Cohen-Kettenis P ,
Delemarre-van de Waal HA , et al
de Vries ALC ,
Cohen-Kettenis PT
World Health Organisation
American Psychiatric Association
Durwood L ,
Horton R , et al
Lehmann K ,
Catelan RF ,
Lisboa C de M
Expósito-Campos P ,
Pérez-Fernández JI ,
Salaberria K
Ludvigsson JF ,
Adolfsson J ,
Höistad M , et al
Wilson LM ,
Sharma R , et al
Pasternack I ,
Söderström I ,
Saijonkari M , et al
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
Pellicane MJ ,
Anderson J ,
Williams K , et al
Norwegian Healthcare Investigation Board
Verveen A ,
Kreukels BP ,
de Graaf NM , et al
Nguyen TP ,
Lami F , et al
Bowman SJ ,
McAloon J , et al
McGuire JK ,
Catalpa JM , et al
Poulakis Z , et al
Abbruzzese E
Kallitsounaki A ,
Williams DM

Supplementary materials

Supplementary data.

This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Data supplement 1
Data supplement 2

Contributors LF and TL conceived the study. LF, TL, JT, RH, and CH contributed to the design of the review. JT, RH and CH conducted selection, extraction and synthesis. JT, CEH, RH, LF, and TL assisted with interpretation of synthesis. JT drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to and reviewed the manuscript before submission. CEH accepts full responsibility for the finished work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.

Funding This work was funded by NHS England to inform the Cass Review (Independent review of gender identity services for children and young people). The funder and Cass Review team had a role in commissioning the research programme but no role in the study conduct, interpretation or conclusion.

Competing interests None declared.

Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Linked Articles

Original research Clinical guidelines for children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria or incongruence: a systematic review of guideline quality (part 1) Jo Taylor Ruth Hall Claire Heathcote Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt Trilby Langton Lorna Fraser Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024; - Published Online First: 09 Apr 2024. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326499
Original research Care pathways of children and adolescents referred to specialist gender services: a systematic review Jo Taylor Ruth Hall Trilby Langton Lorna Fraser Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024; - Published Online First: 09 Apr 2024. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326760
Original research Psychosocial support interventions for children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria or incongruence: a systematic review Claire Heathcote Jo Taylor Ruth Hall Stuart William Jarvis Trilby Langton Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt Lorna Fraser Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024; - Published Online First: 09 Apr 2024. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326347
Original research Gender services for children and adolescents across the EU-15+ countries: an online survey Ruth Hall Jo Taylor Claire Heathcote Trilby Langton Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt Lorna Fraser Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024; - Published Online First: 09 Apr 2024. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326348
Original research Impact of social transition in relation to gender for children and adolescents: a systematic review Ruth Hall Jo Taylor Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt Claire Heathcote Stuart William Jarvis Trilby Langton Lorna Fraser Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024; - Published Online First: 09 Apr 2024. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326112
Original research Characteristics of children and adolescents referred to specialist gender services: a systematic review Jo Taylor Ruth Hall Trilby Langton Lorna Fraser Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024; - Published Online First: 09 Apr 2024. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326681
Original research Interventions to suppress puberty in adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria or incongruence: a systematic review Jo Taylor Alex Mitchell Ruth Hall Claire Heathcote Trilby Langton Lorna Fraser Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024; - Published Online First: 09 Apr 2024. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326669
Original research Masculinising and feminising hormone interventions for adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria or incongruence: a systematic review Jo Taylor Alex Mitchell Ruth Hall Trilby Langton Lorna Fraser Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024; - Published Online First: 09 Apr 2024. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326670
Editorial Holistic approach to gender questioning children and young people Camilla C Kingdon Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024; - Published Online First: 09 Apr 2024. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327100

Read the full text or download the PDF:

IMAGES

Introduction to Research and 10 Purposes of Research
PPT
Purpose of Writing a Research Paper
What is the purpose of writing a research paper
FREE 10+ Sample Purpose Statement Templates in PDF
Anatomy of a Scientific Research Paper

VIDEO

Difference between Research paper and a review. Which one is more important?
What is a Research
06th MARCH 2024 NIFTY50 OPTION BUY TRADING WITH LOGIC
GST Law And Practice Question Paper BCom 5th Semester #gstquestion
What is Research and It's Purpose?
Principles And Practice Of Auditing B.Com 5th semester Questions Paper 2024

COMMENTS

11.1 The Purpose of Research Writing
Research results can be presented in a variety of ways, but one of the most popular—and effective—presentation forms is the research paper. A research paper presents an original thesis, or purpose statement, about a topic and develops that thesis with information gathered from a variety of sources.
Research Paper
Definition: Research Paper is a written document that presents the author's original research, analysis, and interpretation of a specific topic or issue. It is typically based on Empirical Evidence, and may involve qualitative or quantitative research methods, or a combination of both. The purpose of a research paper is to contribute new ...
How to Write a Research Paper
Choose a research paper topic. Conduct preliminary research. Develop a thesis statement. Create a research paper outline. Write a first draft of the research paper. Write the introduction. Write a compelling body of text. Write the conclusion. The second draft.
14.1: The Purpose of Research Writing
Research results can be presented in a variety of ways, but one of the most popular— and effective—presentation forms is the research paper. A research paper presents an original thesis, or purpose statement, about a topic and develops that thesis with information gathered from a variety of sources.
What is a research paper?
Definition. A research paper is a paper that makes an argument about a topic based on research and analysis. Any paper requiring the writer to research a particular topic is a research paper. Unlike essays, which are often based largely on opinion and are written from the author's point of view, research papers are based in fact.
The Process of Writing a Research Paper
The Process There are three stages for doing a research paper. These stages are: Prewriting. Writing. Revising. While most people start with prewriting, the three stages of the writing process overlap. Writing is not the kind of process where you have to finish step one before moving on to step two, and so on.
Mastering the Art of Research Paper Writing: A Comprehensive Guide
The purpose of the research paper's conclusion is to guide your reader out of the realm of the paper's argument, leaving them with a sense of closure. Trace the paper's trajectory, underscoring how all the elements converge to validate your thesis statement. Impart a sense of completion by ensuring the reader comprehends the resolution of ...
Writing a Research Paper Introduction
Table of contents. Step 1: Introduce your topic. Step 2: Describe the background. Step 3: Establish your research problem. Step 4: Specify your objective (s) Step 5: Map out your paper. Research paper introduction examples. Frequently asked questions about the research paper introduction.
The Purpose of Research Writing
Research results can be presented in a variety of ways, but one of the most popular—and effective—presentation forms is the research paper. A research paper presents an original thesis, or purpose statement, about a topic and develops that thesis with information gathered from a variety of sources.
Writing a Research Paper
Upload your paper & get a free Expert Check. The pages in this section cover the following topic areas related to the process of writing a research paper: Genre - This section will provide an overview for understanding the difference between an analytical and argumentative research paper. Choosing a Topic - This section will guide the student ...
7.3: The Purpose of Research Writing
The research process allows you to gain expertise on a topic of your choice. The writing process helps you to remember what you learned and to understand it on a deeper level. Thus writing a research paper can be a great opportunity to explore a topic that particularly interests you and to grow as a person.
5.1: The Purpose of Research Writing
The research process allows you to gain expertise on a topic of your choice. The writing process helps you to remember what you learned, to understand it on a deeper level, and to develop expertise. Thus writing a research paper can be a great opportunity to explore a question and topic that particularly interests you and to grow as a person.
What Is Research, and Why Do People Do It?
Abstractspiepr Abs1. Every day people do research as they gather information to learn about something of interest. In the scientific world, however, research means something different than simply gathering information. Scientific research is characterized by its careful planning and observing, by its relentless efforts to understand and explain ...
Genre and the Research Paper
A research paper is the culmination and final product of an involved process of research, critical thinking, source evaluation, organization, and composition. It is, perhaps, helpful to think of the research paper as a living thing, which grows and changes as the student explores, interprets, and evaluates sources related to a specific topic.
Purpose of Research
The purpose of research can vary depending on the field of study, the research question, and the intended audience. In general, research can be used to: Generate new knowledge and theories. Test existing theories or hypotheses. Identify trends or patterns. Gather information for decision-making. Evaluate the effectiveness of programs, policies ...
What Is A Research Proposal? Examples + Template
The purpose of the research proposal (its job, so to speak) is to convince your research supervisor, committee or university that your research is suitable (for the requirements of the degree program) and manageable (given the time and resource constraints you will face). The most important word here is "convince" - in other words, your ...
Research Methods
Research methods are specific procedures for collecting and analyzing data. Developing your research methods is an integral part of your research design. When planning your methods, there are two key decisions you will make. First, decide how you will collect data. Your methods depend on what type of data you need to answer your research question:
Writing an Abstract for Your Research Paper
Definition and Purpose of Abstracts An abstract is a short summary of your (published or unpublished) research paper, usually about a paragraph (c. 6-7 sentences, 150-250 words) long. A well-written abstract serves multiple purposes: an abstract lets readers get the gist or essence of your paper or article quickly, in order to decide whether to….
Thesis and Purpose Statements
The purpose statement may be expressed in several sentences or even an entire paragraph. A purpose statement is specific enough to satisfy the requirements of the assignment. Purpose statements are common in research papers in some academic disciplines, while in other disciplines they are considered too blunt or direct.
Research Paper Purpose Statement Examples
A purpose statement clearly defines the objective of your qualitative or quantitative research. Learn how to create one through unique and real-world examples.
What is the Purpose of a Research Paper?
The True Purpose in Research Paper Writing. The truth is, you won't get past post-secondary education, unless you are able to complete this type of tasks. This is because research papers help your teachers and professors better understand your ability to find information, understand it and re-state the material in a comprehensible manner.
Overview
A research paper is simply a piece of writing that uses outside sources. There are different types of research papers with varying purposes and expectations for sourcing. ... Purpose: Research question: Use of sources: Academic argument essay: To argue for a single claim or thesis through evidence and analysis. Answers questions of how or why ...
Research Objectives: What They Are and How to Write Them
The purpose of research proposal and setting clear objectives in it is to ensure that your research efforts are focused and efficient, and to provide a roadmap that keeps your study aligned with its intended outcomes. ... consider getting professional research paper writing help whenever the time comes. It also aids in the identification and ...
What Is a Research Paper? (Writing Tips and Checklists)
Steps in Composing a Research Paper: Formats, Sources, and Citations. A lot of first-year students struggle to know where to begin when writing a research paper. The first tip is to break your project down into manageable chunks so that you can understand how to write a research paper step-by-step. Step 1: How to Compose a Research Paper Outline
What is the Purpose of Theory in International Relations?
This paper interrogates the core objective of theoretical discourse in International Relations. Through an expository lens, it examines the conventionally accepted threefold purpose of IR theory: descriptive-analytical, problem-solving, and critical.
Analysis of quality metrics in comprehensive cancer genomic profiling
Purpose of Paper This paper compared two DNA integrity markers (Q-value and ddCq) and one RNA integrity metric (DV200) using DNA and RNA extracted from 585 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks that had been stored for <1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-5 y or approximately 5 years before extraction.
Clinical guidelines for children and adolescents experiencing gender
Background Increasing numbers of children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence are being referred to specialist gender services and there are various published guidelines outlining approaches to clinical care. Aim To examine the recommendations about the management of children and/or adolescents (age 0-18) experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence in published guidelines ...

11.1 The Purpose of Research Writing

Reasons for Research

Research Writing and the Academic Paper

Research Writing at Work

Writing at Work

Steps of the Research Writing Process

Step 1: Choosing a Topic

Step 2: Planning and Scheduling

Step 3: Conducting Research

Step 4: Organizing Research and the Writer’s Ideas

Step 5: Drafting Your Paper

Step 6: Revising and Editing Your Paper

Key Takeaways

What is a research paper?

What is the difference between a research paper and a thesis?

Frequently Asked Questions about research papers

Related Articles

The Process of Writing a Research Paper

Planning the Research Paper

At a Glance

Our Community

Visit Gallaudet

Engage Today

How to Write a Research Paper

Understanding The Research Paper

Research Paper Writing Process – How To Write a Good Research Paper

Conducting Thorough Research

Organizing And Structuring The Research Paper

Writing The Introduction

Developing The Main Body

Crafting A Strong Conclusion

Refining The Research Paper

Tips For Writing An Effective Research Paper

Related Posts

Steps To Write A Great Research Paper

CCIR Academy Featured by Nature, The World’s Most Prestigious Academic Publication

Our Exceptional Alumni: College Admission Results 2020-2023

High School Student Researcher Sailahari’s Paper on Machine Learning Approach in Predicting Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) in E. coli Accepted at the MIT URTC 2023

High School Student Researcher Hyojin on Understanding Psychopathy through Structural and Functional MRI

High School Student Researcher Abigail’s Paper on Quantifying Exam Stress Progressions Presented at the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) and Published in the IEEE Xplore Journal

The Purpose of Research Writing

Reasons for Research

Research Writing and the Academic Paper

Research Writing at Work

Writing at Work

Steps of the Research Writing Process

Step 1: Choosing a Topic

Step 2: Planning and Scheduling

Step 3: Conducting Research

Step 4: Organizing Research and the Writer’s Ideas

Step 5: Drafting Your Paper

Step 6: Revising and Editing Your Paper

Key Takeaways

5.1: The Purpose of Research Writing

The Purpose of Research Writing

Exercise: Free Writing about Research

Process Overview

The Recursive Process

Defining a Topic

Planning and Scheduling

Conducting Research: Determining and Gathering the Right Kinds of Research

Organizing Your Research and Ideas, Abstracting From Materials, Writing

Drafting Your Project

Revising and Editing Your Project

A Final Note

What Is Research, and Why Do People Do It?

Abstractspiepr Abs1

Part I. What Is Research?

Exercise 1.1

Exercise 1.2

Creating an Image of Scientific Inquiry

Descriptor 1. Experience Carefully Planned in Advance

Descriptor 2. Observing Something and Trying to Explain Why It Is the Way It Is

Exercise 1.3

Descriptor 3. Updating Everyone’s Thinking in Response to More and Better Information

Doing Scientific Inquiry

Exercise 1.4

Unpacking the Terms Formulating, Testing, and Revising Hypotheses

Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.6